Human Rights Alert

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750

Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

11-04-12 California Judge Peter Meeka Refuses to Disclose Financial Benefits to Him by Bank
of America, Accord Due Process
Bribing of state and US judges by Bank of America must be a serious concern.

Los Angeles, April 12 - In Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Plaintiff Susan Lomas is trying
to protect her rights through a Quiet Title action against alleged fraud by Bank of America and
others in foreclosure procedures. The case is opined as Fraud on the Court through collusion of
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, California Judge PETER MEEKA, Clerk of the Court
JOHN A CLARKE, and Attorney MARK ASDOURIAN, aimed to dispossess Lomas, while
denying her due process and access to an honest court.
In the latest episode in this case, Lomas appeared in court on Friday, April 8, 2011, with requests
for:
• Due process notice and service of minutes and access to court records.
• A statement on the record by Judge Meeka regarding financial benefits to him, if any, by
Bank of America. [i ]
In response, Lomas was subjected to what is opined as another instance of Fraud on the Court:
Lomas was told that her requests were denied, but no minutes at all were produced for the
proceeding (see copy of the minutes below). The records, which Lomas received from the Office
of the Clerk as “minutes” showed a date of “00/00/00”, with no evidence of a hearing by any
Judge of the Court and no evidence of any hearing or ruling at all.
Bribing of state and US judges by Bank of America must be a serious concern. Under similar
circumstances, the following judges responded in the same manner:
• US Judge Virginia Phillips;
• US Magistrate Carla Woehrle, and
• California Judge Terry Friedman.
A pattern of false and deliberately misleading court records is found in the case of Lomas v Bank
of America all along: [ii ]
• None of the minutes were certified by the Deputy Clerk of the Court;
z Page 2/2 April 12, 2011

• None of the minutes were noticed and served by the Court;

• Multiple proceedings were secretly listed in the minutes as "off of the record";
• No Initial Case Management Conference was ever held;
• Plaintiff has been repeatedly denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil
docket), where the true registration of the proceedings (or lack thereof) would be discerned;
• An invalid online "Case Summary" is published by the Court, which would lead a naive
reader to conclude that valid and effectual proceedings have been held and rulings have been
entered by the court.
• Attorney Mark Asdourian appears in the case for BofA, while refusing to provide certificate
of Attorney of Record. Attorney Asdourian has filed false and deliberately misleading
banking records as "Request for Judicial Notice", which was granted by Judge Peter Meeka.
• No declaration or any other record signed by Bank of America authorized person was ever
filed in the case.
Conduct of Bank of America in this case is inconsistent with the Bank of America Code of Ethics
and Outside Counsel Procedures, which prohibit appearances by unauthorized attorneys and
obstructionist conduct in litigation. [iii ]
The conduct of Judge Meeka and Clerk John A Clarke must also be deemed as violations of the
Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of Plaintiff Susan Lomas.
z Page 3/3 April 12, 2011

LINKS:
i
11-04-08 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379): Ex Parte Applications for Due Process and for a Statement by
California Judge Peter J Meeka Regarding Financial Benefits to Him by Bank of America
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52844251/H
ii
11-03-20 PRESS RELEASE Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Bank of America Continues Racketeering in
the Los Angeles Superior Court
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/51160102/H
11-03-20 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles online
“Case Summary” and Minutes
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/51157264/H
11-04-05 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles –
Fraud on the Court in a Quiet Title Action
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52336989/H
11-04-06 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) “Request[s] for Judicial Notice”- Additional Evidence of Fraud on
the Court in Foreclosure Procedure s
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52420585/H
11-04-07 Press Release: Lomas v BofA (KC059379) – Judge Meeka is Requested to Restore Due Process,
Declare Any Benefits from BofA
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52494342/H
11-03-31 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Request and Response for Certification of Authority as Attorney
of Record s
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52516705/H
iii
09-01-27 Bank of America Code of Ethics s
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/32173783/H
08-12-11 Bank of America - Outside Counsel Procedures
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/27932516/