178 views

Uploaded by Dhruvakumar Mallappa

- Solidworks Simulation Training Chapter 3
- VENTURIMETER
- Orifice
- Venturi Meter
- Calibration of Orifice Meter
- Water Purification Marketing Plan Final
- Lab 2-Venturi Meter
- Flow Through an Orifice
- Torsion Lab
- tidal-power-solutions-ocean-energy.pdf
- Venturimeter LAB Report
- Turbine
- Electricity use
- Tidal Energy
- Chapter3 Tidal Turbines
- Tidal Power TURBINE-Solid Works
- Tidal Power
- Wheel n Axle
- torsion
- SolidWorks Simulation Black Book

You are on page 1of 12

FITTINGS

-1-

ORIFICE CALIBRATION AND

FRICTION LOSSES IN PIPES AND FITTINGS

Objectives

2. To measure pressure drop across pipes and also across common pipe fittings.

pressure cell reading.

4. To determine and plot the orifice coefficient as a function of the Reynolds number and to

compare this plot to theory.

5. To compare the calculated friction losses in pipe fittings to those predicted in standard

chemical engineering references.

6. To utilize this data to estimate the energy loss for a proposed pipe system.

Theory

A flow meter is a device that produces a signal of some kind, the signal being a function of the

flow rate. Our understanding of the functional relationship is usually at least amenable to experimental

observation, so that a table or graph can be prepared from experimental observations of signal and flow

rate. From such information, we can presumably estimate flow rates from observations of the signal

produced by the meter.

If a calibration curve of the flow rate vs. signal (float height or differential pressure in this lab) is

determined, interpolation of this curve can be performed to determine a flow rate at a new signal level.

Errors associated with this approach can occur based on the interpolation technique incorporated or to the

data accuracy used to develop the calibration curve. These errors can be eliminated if an engineering

analysis of the system allows the functional relationship to be expressed as a mathematical relationship.

Furthermore, the precision can be estimated through the use of regression analysis.

For many types of flow meters, analysis can be conducted in terms of the mechanical energy

P g 2

∆ E + ∆ + ∆z + ∆ v + ∑ F = Qh - W s

ρ gc 2 α gc

For an orifice, the mechanical energy equation can be reduced through mathematical manipulation

to

-2-

-∆ P

2 g c

ρ

v1 = C o 2

A1 - 1

2

Ao

where, point 0 is at the orifice face and point 1 is taken in the bulk stream upstream of the orifice.

Experimental values for the friction losses (head loss) associated with pipes can be derived from

the mechanical energy equation. The head loss across the pipe length

∆P

hL =

ρ

(h L)is calculated using a reduced form of the mechanical energy balance equation.

The experimental Moody (or Darcy) and Fanning friction factors are calculated in the following

manner.

- ∆P d

ρ L

f D=

v2

2g

c

-3-

Fanning friction factor (f f ):

(- ∆P) g c d

f f=

2v2 L ρ

-4-

The predicted friction factors can be estimated by the equations below, once the flow regime and

16

Laminar Flow (Re < 2100) : f f=

Re

d/ε

+ 2.28 - 4.0 log 4.67 +1

1 d

Transition Flow : = 4.0 log

f ε Re f

f f

ε

= - 4.0 log

1 1.256

Turbulent Flow (Re > 3000) : +

f 3.7 d Re f

f f

fD = 4 f f

Then,

- ∆P g c L v2 L v2

hL = = fD =2 f

ρ g d 2g f

d g

The head loss (h L) can then be written in terms of the friction factor.

The length L may be a set length of straight pipe or may be an equivalent length of pipe that accounts for

valves, tees, elbows, etc.

Pipe fittings disturb the normal flow in a pipe and cause additional energy losses. In a short pipe

with many fittings, the friction loss from fittings could be greater than in the straight pipe. There are two

methods for estimating these losses.

The first is the equivalent length method. This technique uses data that gives the energy losses in

terms of a pipe length with an equivalent frictional loss. This data is usually presented in terms of Le/d.

Where d is the pipe diameter and Le is the equivalent length of pipe. This can be introduced into the above

equation by summing the equivalent length and the straight length of pipe.

The friction loss for fittings and valves is also sometimes expressed in terms of a “K factor”. The

K factor is defined as the additional number of velocity heads (v2/2gc) lost at a given Reynolds number due

to inclusion of the fitting. In this way, it is analogous to the Le/d method as seen in the above equation.

EQUIPMENT DIAGRAM

-5-

All pipe dimensions listed above are nominal values.

-6-

Moody (Darcy) Plot

Nomenclature

Co = Orifice coefficient

d = Diameter (ft)

E = Internal energy (lb f -ft/lb m)

ΣF = Sum of all frictional forces (lb f -ft/lb m)

fD = Darcy (or Moody) friction factor

ff = Fanning friction factor

g = Gravitational force constant (32.2 ft/s 2)

gc = Gravitational conversion factor (32.2 lb m-ft/lb f -s 2)

hL = Head loss (ft)

L = Length (ft)

m = Mass flow rate (lb m /s)

N = Pump speed (rpm)

P = Pressure from DP cell (inches of Hg)

-7-

Q = Volumetric flow rate or capacity (gal/min or gal/s)

Qh = Heat generated (lb f -ft/lb m)

Re = Reynolds number

v = Fluid velocity (ft/s)

W = Wattage (Watts)

Ws = Shaft work (ft-lb f /lb m)

z = Height (ft)

ε = Roughness coefficient (ft)

γ = Specific gravity

ρ = Density (lb m /gal)

-8-

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

Notes:

At present, the system is not attached to a water main, but to a pump and tank.

This means that valve V-1 does not exist but has been replaced by a valve V-A

which supplies another experiment. DO NOT OPEN V-A UNLESS

INSTRUCTED.

-Thanks, The Staff

Part I. Calibrate the primary flow meter (float rotameter) for water pumped to the pipe network

using the “bucket and stopwatch” method.

1. Close valves V-4, V-5, V-6, V-7, and V-8. Open valves V-3, V-9, and V-10.

2. Use V-2 to control the flow through the pipe system. Take at least three measurements to

obtain a calibration plot for the rotameter. DP cell DP-1 should be connected to an off

line (such as the ½ inch steel pipe.)

Part II Orifice

3. Make sure the differential pressure cell DP-1 is zeroed. If not, note the discrepancy and

continue. (Note, you must read it upside down.)

4. When measuring pressure drop, connect cell DP-1 tubing to the desired taps on each side

of the segment.

6. Connect the DP cell (DP-1) to the fittings on both sides of the orifice and open valve V-3.

7. Determine the differential pressure across the orifice at 7 flow rates (minimum) by

adjusting the water flow, using valve V-2.

8. If the pressure difference is to be observed for a straight pipe, (see below) open the

appropriate valve. All other valves should be closed except for those indicted in step 5,

and V-2 (your control valve)

9. When measuring the pressure drop across the fittings close off all of the pipes and have

only V-3 open.

10. Increase the water flow rate to the maximum level attainable on the pipe/fitting using

valve V-2 to adjust the flow rate and record the reading from DP-1.

11. After the maximum flow rate percentage is obtained, take at least 5 more readings from

the DP cell at different flow rate percentages.

-3/4 copper pipe

-1/2 Steel pipe

-1/2 Plastic pipe

-90 degree smooth bend

-90 degree fitted bend

-Gate valve

-180 degree bend

-9-

MINIMUM REPORT REQUIREMENTS

1. A calibration plot (flow rate vs. DP cell reading) should be generated for the orifice. Use

the regression analysis tool in Excel to estimate precision (95 % confidence level)

2. A plot of orifice coefficient (C o) vs. Reynolds number (Re) should be generated for the

orifice. On the same plot, graph a curve from the literature using the same diameter ratio.

The orifice diameter is 0.3125 inches, and the pipe ID is 0.5 inches.

3. A plot of log Q (volumetric flow rate) vs. log ∆P should be generated. Then discuss the

Re and Q ranges over which the orifice coefficient is useable for the laboratory orifice.

Also compare the estimated orifice coefficients with literature values.

4. A plot of Re vs. both the predicted and experimental f f (Fanning friction factor) for each

pipe/fitting.

5. A comparison of the above values obtained above (4) to literature values. Also discuss

effects of pipe/tube roughness and diameters on the Fanning friction factors.

6. Discuss whether the actual flow rate vs. rotameter reading is linear (an assumption made

in this lab).

-10-

SAMPLE DATA TABLES

ORIFICE ORIFICE

∆P % ∆P %

(inches Hg) Flow (inches Hg) Flow

∆P % ∆P %

(inches Hg) Flow (inches Hg) Flow

-11-

1/4" COPPER PIPE 3/8" COPPER PIPE

∆P % ∆P %

(inches Hg) Flow (inches Hg) Flow

∆P % ∆P %

(inches Hg) Flow (inches Hg) Flow

-12-

- Solidworks Simulation Training Chapter 3Uploaded byDavid Raj
- VENTURIMETERUploaded byKailash Raju
- OrificeUploaded byabhishekkandoi
- Venturi MeterUploaded byrafai1
- Calibration of Orifice MeterUploaded byMd. Hasib Al Mahbub
- Water Purification Marketing Plan FinalUploaded byAtif Jamil
- Lab 2-Venturi MeterUploaded byNorsilah CLah
- Flow Through an OrificeUploaded byVinay Shenoy
- Torsion LabUploaded byjeffreycychiu
- tidal-power-solutions-ocean-energy.pdfUploaded byAlexander Wijesooriya
- Venturimeter LAB ReportUploaded byJames Roy
- TurbineUploaded byKiran Ramdas
- Electricity useUploaded byNasim Mammadov
- Tidal EnergyUploaded bygearoid1990
- Chapter3 Tidal TurbinesUploaded byDavid Bartram
- Tidal Power TURBINE-Solid WorksUploaded byJab Sprtnz
- Tidal PowerUploaded byAbhishek Dhawan
- Wheel n AxleUploaded byCarey Fernandes
- torsionUploaded bysfilopou
- SolidWorks Simulation Black BookUploaded byAnonymous sAmJfcV
- 51791024 Tidal EnergyUploaded byshoshonko
- The Economics of Tidal EnergyUploaded byRicardo Giacomini
- CV Nasim (1)Uploaded byNasim Mammadov
- Fundamentals of Orifice Measurement TechWpaperUploaded byKiran Kulkarni
- Pelton Wheel TurbineUploaded bySiew Lyn
- Torsion Lab ReportUploaded byNerdy Ali
- UntitledUploaded bymarsjomm
- Report FinalUploaded by力捷
- Introduction to Finite Element Analysis Using SolidWorks by Randy H. ShihUploaded byhombre.muerto5959

- Critical Service Control Valve _ DRAGUploaded byamer_arauf
- Tiltrotor Download ReductionUploaded byt8e7w2ko
- CHEN 629 Syllabus - Fall 2014Uploaded byfrank
- Numerical Solution of the Compressible Laminar Boundary Layer Equations _ CuriosityFluidsUploaded byLuis Felipe Gutierrez Marcantoni
- Graphene Based Filteration MembranesUploaded byniharika pandey
- SRS Turbulence ModelsUploaded bySyed Qasim Zaheer
- Chapter_5Uploaded byephrem
- fmmUploaded byapi-279049687
- Diseño de La Bomba de Calor Version_c2Uploaded byPeter Gonzalez
- 1. DS's Lecture Flow of Fluids Through Fluidised BedsUploaded byPascanaSiahaan
- 9789-Article Text PDF-26598-2-10-20170619Uploaded bySrinivas Bobby
- Principal of Civil Engineering by LalUploaded bynankanvi
- 13886Uploaded byInsha Almira
- AEENotificationNoUploaded byMaheshSrikakulam
- Kempe Froehlich JFM AcceptedUploaded byolenbear
- Course Handout FDUploaded bySabik Nainar
- Experimental Investigation Into Convective Heat Transfer of Nano Fluids at the Entrance Region Under Laminar Flow ConditionsUploaded bysachinnigade
- Seepage_in_Soils_.pdfUploaded byfr3chill
- HR Calculation-Hotel.xlsUploaded bymunim87
- Tesi MineoUploaded bydon-donnola
- checksheetUploaded byAbdul Hakam Mohamed Yusof
- devilliers_2dmodelling_2007.pdfUploaded byJuan Carlos Rodriguez
- Piping Design Details & Steel ShapesUploaded bywilfred
- Kitchen Hood and Fire ProUploaded byEmmanuel Toreta
- Hydrodynamic Analysis of Flue Gas Flow Behavior Within a HRSGUploaded byDimitrios Pantazis
- Fluid Exam 2016Uploaded byhthaier4062
- Series and Parallel Operation of Centrifugal PumpsUploaded bydatonizam
- Chapter 4 ThermoUploaded byXin Ying
- review jurnal (1).docxUploaded byMaha D Nugroho
- fmhmUploaded bykranthi_chokkaakula