Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=black.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Blackwell Publishing and American Anthropological Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to American Anthropologist.
http://www.jstor.org
EthnicRelationsin SoutheasternMexico1
BENJAMIN N. COLBY ANDPIERRE L. VAN DEN BERGHE
Harvard University
Religious orien- More pluralistic view of religion More dualistic view of religion
tations and universe. Belief in both and universe. Roman Ca-
Catholic and pagan dieties. tholicism of the Spanish
variant.
Little secularization. Wide adult Considerable secularization.
participationin religionthrough Specialization of religious
cargo and curing activities. functions in hands of profes-
sional-clergy.
Multiple soul concepts: a spirit- Single soul concept.
ual soul of 13 parts and two
types-of animal souls.
Need to maintain health and Belief in fore-ordained destiny,
complete possession of souls in changeable only through sup-
the face of an unpredictable plication of God and the
supernatural universe and an saints. Confession and sacra-
evil social environment. Bar- ments for restoring personal
gaining and exchanging with relationship to God.
the gods. Curing ceremonies
for restoring or keeping har-
mony with the supernatural
forces and maintaining the in-
tegrity of the soul.
Work and eco- Routine and manual labor val- Routine and manual labor
nomic orien- ued. avoided and devalued.
tations
Land valued as a source of sub- Land valued for ownership as a
sistence. Milpa-making most sign of status but agricul
worthy activity for men. tural work considered de-
basing.
Play and leisure censured. Play and leisure valued.
NOTES
l Among the many people who helped us at various stages of our study we should like to men-
tion G. W. Allport and E. Z. Vogt of Harvard University, J. de la Fuente, A. Villa Rojas and F.
Montes Sanchez of the Instituto Nacional Indigenista, L. Velasco Robles, P. Moscozo Pastrana,
J. Baroco, F. Blom, J. M. Duran Aldana and our many Zinacantan and San Cristobal informants
who were at all times most kind and helpful. This study is part of the Mexican Cultural Change
Project supported by the National Institute of Mental Health and directed by Professor E. Z.
Vogt. The present paper is mostly descriptive and qualitative. The quantitative results of our
questionnaire and interview studies are reported elsewhere (van den Berghe and Colby 1961).
2 Originally the word ladino was used to refer to the Indians who knew the language, i.e.,
Spanish. By extension, ladino came to be applied to all persons of Spanish culture as opposed to
790 A merican Anthropologist [63, 1961
the Indians.Ladinoalso meansliterally "cunning"or "crafty."The originof the term is thus
clearlycultural,not racial (Adams1956:18).
3 The 1950 Census lists 110,233 persons in the 15 Indian municipios, but this number, even
then,was probablyan under-estimate(VillaRojas 1959:4).
4 Thereis some objectiveeconomicbasis for placingthe Zinacantecoson top of the various
Indian groups.On the whole,Zinacantecosare better off than the other groups.Zinacantecos
often hire other Indians,principallyChamulas,to workfor them on theircornfields.Chamulas,
on the otherhand, seldom,if ever, hireZinacantecos.
6 Tumin emphasizesthis distinctionbetweenladinoand Indian culturesin Guatemala,and
speaksof the asymmetryof the two groups'valuesystems(Tumin1956:185,188).
6 In a semi-urbanhamlet on the outskirtsof San Cristobal,all Indianinhabitantsover 15
were commonlaborersor domesticservantsin ladino households(BonillaDominguez1953:6).
7 Foran analysisof differencesin Indianand Mexicanjusticein a ChiapasTzeltalcommunity
see Metzger(1960).
8 At the time of our visit the men's jail had 53 inmates, of whom 49 were Indians.The
women'sprisonhad 5 inmates,of whom3 wereIndians.No segregationexistedin the two jails.
Until recently,the San CristobalpolicearresteddrunkenIndiansand detainedthem for one or
moredays in jail so as to furnishthe town with a constantsupplyof street-sweepers.Even regu-
larcourtsdiscriminateagainstthe Indiansaccordingto AguirreBeltran(1953:108,110).
9 Recently,the municipalityof SanCristobalhireda ChamulaIndianas policeman.Weheard
two ladinosexpressastonishmentat his gettingsucha "good"job. On the otherhand, one Zina-
cantecoinformantimpliedthat beinga policemanfor the ladinoswouldbe beneathhis dignity.
x0However,up until recently,there were separateschoolsfor ladinosand Indiansin some
of the ruralmunicipioswhereboth ethnic groupswere being represented(VillaRojas 1959:3).
Recently,Indianyouths beingtrainedby INI for futureteachingof childrenin theirhomeareas
have enteredtwo of the previouslyall-ladinoschoolsin San Cristobal.
n Up until a few years ago, Indianswere debarredfrom the merry-go-round on the fiesta
grounds,but this is no longerthe case,due to the actionof INI.
12On this point we disagreewith Tuminwho states in his San Luis study that ritualkinship
between ladinos and Indians makes for more equalitarianrelationsbetween the two groups.
Tumin'sown descriptionof a baptismalfiestafor the ladinogodparentsof an Indianchildis clear
evidenceof inequalityin the relationship(Tumin1952:127,131-32). We are more in agreement
with Gillin'sinterpretationof interethniccompadrazgo(1951:61).
13In some areas more distant from San Cristobal,such as Oxchuc, Indians wear ladino
clothingat all times,thus clothingis not alwaysa distinguishingcharacteristic.
14Minorvariationsin the degreeof ladinoreceptivityto changingIndians exist in smaller
Chiapascommunities.For brief descriptionsof some of these see de la Fuente (ms.), and for a
detailedaccountof Indianchangein a Huistecancommunitysee Miller(1960).An excellentcom-
parativedescriptionof change in three Indian areas of Mexico, includingChiapas,appearsin
de la Fuente (1958).
16Of course,the high proportionof Indiansin Guatemalacan be consideredboth a causeand
an effectof the rigidityof the ethnicline.
16The paternalistic-competitive distinctionoverlaps,of course,with Redfield'sfolk-urban
continuumand TonniesGemeinschaft-Gesellschaft types. Examplesof paternalisticsituationsare
the ante-bellumSouthernUnited States, the plantationregimesof the West Indies,Latin Amer-
ica, and Brazil,and most colonialregimesin their early phase. The modem United States and
SouthAfricansituationsand anti-Semitismin muchof the WesternWorldare examplesof com-
petitivegrouprelations.
REFERENCES CITED
ADAMS,RICHARD
N.
1956 Encuestasobre la cultura de los ladinosen Guatemala.Guatemala,Editorialdel
Ministeriode Educaci6nPublica.
COLBYAND VAN DEN BERGHE] Ethnic Relations in Southeastern Mexico 791
AGUIRRE BELTRAN, GONZALO
1953 Formas de gobierno indigena. Mexico, Imprenta Universitaria.
ALLPORT, GORDON W.
1954 The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, Addison-Wesley.
BEALS,RALPHL.
1951 The history of acculturation in Mexico. In Homenaje a Alfonso Caso, Juan Comas
et al., eds. Mexico.
BONILLA DOMINGUEZ, CELIA
1953 El proceso de cambio cultural en medicina. Mexico, Instituto Nacional Indigenista.
DE LAFUENTE,JULIO
1958 Cambios de indumentaria en tres areas biculturales. Boletin del Instituto Nacional
Indigenista 1:3-21.
n.d. Relaciones etnicas en los altos de Chiapas. (mimeo).
FOSTER,GEORGE M.
1953 Compadrazgo in Spain and in Spanish America. Southwestern Journal of Anthro-
pology 9:1-28.
GJLLIN, JOHN
1947 Race relations without conflict: a Guatemalan town. American Journal of Sociology
53:337-43.
1951 The culture of security in San Carlos; a study of a Guatemalan community of
Indians and ladinos. Tulane University, Middle American Research Institute
Publication No. 16.
LA FARGE,OLIVER
1940 Maya ethnology: the sequence of cultures. In The Maya and their neighbors. New
York, D. Appleton-Century.
METZGER, Duane
1960 Conflict in Chulsanto, a village in Chiapas. The Alpha Kappa Deltan 30:35-48.
MILLER,FRANKC.
1960 The influence of decision-making on the process of change: the case of Yalcuc. The
Alpha Kappa Deltan 30:29-34.
MINTZ,SIDNEYand ERICR. WOLF
1950 An analysis of ritual co-parenthood (compadrazco). Southwestern Journal of
Anthropology 6: 341-68.
REDFIELD, ROBERT
1956 The relations between Indians and ladinos in Agua Escondida, Guatemala. America
Indigena 16:253-76.
SPICER,EDWARD H.
1954 Potam, a Yaqui village in Sonora. American Anthropological Association Memoir 77.
TAX, SOL
1942 Ethnic relations in Guatemala. America Indfgena 2:43-48.
THOMPSON, Donald E.
1954 Maya paganism and Christianity. Tulane University, Middle American Research
Institute Publication No. 19, Pt. 1.
TUMIN,MELVJNM.
1952 Caste in a peasant society. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
1956 Cultura, casta y clase en Guatemala: una nueva evaluaci6n. In Integraci6n social
en Guatemala. Guatemala, Seminario de Integraci6n Social Guatemalteca.
VANDENBERGHE,Pierre L.
1958 The dynamics of racial prejudice: an ideal-type dichotomy. Social Forces 37:138-
141.
1960a Distance mechanisms of stratification. Sociology and Social Research 44:155-64.
1960b Hypergamy, hypergenation, and miscegenation. Human Relations 13:83-91.
VANDENBERGHE,PIERREL. and BENJAMIN N. COLBY
1961 Ladino-Indian relations in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Social Forces, in press~
792 A merican Anthropologist [63, 1961]
VILLAROJAS,ALFONSO
1959 La zona Tzeltal-Tzotzil:su configuraci6nsocial y cultural.AccionIndigenista72.
VIVOESCOTO,JORGE A.
1959 Estudiode geograffaecon6micay demograficade Chiapas.Mexico,SociedadMex-
icana de Geograffay Estadfstica.
VOGT,EVONZ.
1959 Zinacantansettlementpatternsand ceremonialorganization.Unpublishedmanu-
script (Paperreadat annualmeetingof the AmericanAnthropological Association,
Mexico).
1960 AncientMaya conceptsin contemporaryZinacantanreligion.Unpublishedmanu-
script (Paper read at the VIth InternationalCongressof Anthropologicaland
EthnologicalSciences,Paris).
CHARLES
WAGLEY,
1949 The social and religiouslife of a Guatemalanvillage. AmericanAnthropological
AssociationMemoir71.
CHARLES
WISDOM,
1940 The ChortiIndiansof Guatemala.Chicago,Universityof ChicagoPress.