This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Comparison of Maternal Lineage and Biogeographic Analyses of Ancient and Modern Hungarian Populations
´ Gyongyver Tomory,1,2* Bernadett Csanyi,1 Erika Bogacsi-Szabo,1 Tibor Kalmar,1 Agnes Czibula,1 ¨ ´ ¨ ¨ ´ ´ ´ ´ Aranka Csosz,2 Katalin Priskin,1 Balazs Mende,2 Peter Lango,2 C. Stephen Downes,3 † ´ ´ ´ and Istvan Rasko1 ´ ´
Institute of Genetics, Biological Research Center of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 6726 Szeged, Hungary Archaeological Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1014 Budapest, Hungary 3 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT521SA, Northern Ireland KEY WORDS conqueror ancient DNA; mtDNA; Hungarians; Seklers; 10th–11th century bones; Hungarian genetic effect of populations who came into contact with ancient Hungarians during their migrations are seen. Strong differences appear when the ancient Hungarian samples are analyzed according to apparent social status, as judged by grave goods. Commoners show a predominance of mtDNA haplotypes and haplogroups (H, R, T), common in west Eurasia, while high-status individuals, presumably conquering Hungarians, show a more heterogeneous haplogroup distribution, with haplogroups (N1a, X) which are present at very low frequencies in modern worldwide populations and are absent in recent Hungarian and Sekler populations. Modern Hungarian-speaking populations seem to be speciﬁcally European. Our ﬁndings demonstrate that signiﬁcant genetic differences exist between the ancient and recent Hungarian-speaking populations, and no genetic continuity is seen. Am J Phys Anthropol 134:354–368, 2007. V 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
ABSTRACT The Hungarian language belongs to the Finno-Ugric branch of the Uralic family, but Hungarian speakers have been living in Central Europe for more than 1000 years, surrounded by speakers of unrelated Indo-European languages. In order to study the continuity in maternal lineage between ancient and modern Hungarian populations, polymorphisms in the HVSI and protein coding regions of mitochondrial DNA sequences of 27 ancient samples (10th–11th centuries), 101 modern Hungarian, and 76 modern Hungarianspeaking Sekler samples from Transylvania were analyzed. The data were compared with sequences derived from 57 European and Asian populations, including Finno-Ugric populations, and statistical analyses were performed to investigate their genetic relationships. Only 2 of 27 ancient Hungarian samples are unambiguously Asian: the rest belong to one of the western Eurasian haplogroups, but some Asian afﬁnities, and the
Hungarian is one of the few non-Indo-European languages in Europe, and the only one in Central Europe ´ (Redei, 1998). It belongs to the Finno-Ugric branch of the Uralic linguistic family, a diverse group of people ´ related by an ancient common linguistic heritage (Hajdu, 1976; Napolskikh, 1995). Of the approximately 25 million Finno-Ugrian speakers, three form separate nations: the Estonians and Finns on the Eastern Baltic Littoral, and the Hungarians (Magyars) in the Danubian plain. Hungarian is also widely spoken by Magyars in western ´ Romania, by Seklers (Szekelys) in Transylvania, and by ´ ´ Csangos east of the Carpathians. Other Finno-Ugric speakers include the Saamis (Lapps) in northern FinnoScandian and Kola Peninsulas, the Erzas, Moksas, Maris, Udmurts, and Komis in the northern woodland zone of European Russia and the Voguls and Ostyaks ´ around the river Ob in western Siberia (Vekony, 2002). Distantly related to the Finno-Ugrians are the various Samoyed peoples of Siberia, the Nenets, Enets, Nganassans, and Selkups (Chen et al., 1995). Hungarians entered central European history as seven major Magyar tribes that invaded the Danubian Basin from across the Carpathians in 895 AD (Regino, 1890). This was the last in a series of migrations (see Figure 1). At an earlier stage of their history they must have been far further east, for their closest linguistic afﬁnities are with the Voguls and Ostyaks of the forest steppes of western Siberia (Fodor, 1982). The Hungarians left the
C V 2007
forests and split off from them sometime in the Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age (around 500 BC); this separation marks the time from when we can speak of independent proto-Hungarian people, the only Finno-Ugric people to have become horse-riding steppe pastoralists ´ and nomads (Rona-Tas, 1999). Migrating westwards, they settled between the Urals and the Middle Volga region (Fodor, 1976) in a region lying at the Kama-Volga conﬂuence, still known to Europeans in the 13th century as Magna Hungaria, ‘‘Old Hungary’’ (Fodor, 1982). Around 700–750 AD the ancient Hungarians left Magna Hungaria and drifted southwards, settling in the steppe and forested steppe zone around the river Don, in a region they called Levedia. Here they were neighbors and allies of the Khazars, a Turkic-speaking people of
Grant sponsor: Hungarian National Research and Development Programs; Grant numbers: 5/088/2001, 5/038/2004. ´ ¨ ¨ ¨ *Correspondence to: Gyongyver Tomory, Archaeological Institute ´ of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1014 Budapest, Uri u. 49., Hungary. E-mail: email@example.com Received 19 May 2006; accepted 23 May 2007 DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20677 Published online 13 July 2007 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).
Lahermo et al. earlier migrants from the Eurasian steppes. The genetic relationships of speakers of the Uralic languages to the neighboring Indo-European-speaking populations are complex. 1994). 1989). The arrival and settlement of the Slavs has already begun under the Avars. and were discarded at this stage. according to the published protocol (Walsh et al. DNA was precipitated from 350-ll extract from bone powder and extraction buffer. 1991). In the early 850s the Hungarians. 1980). others. 1999. Huns. and Iranian-speaking Alans from whom the Caucasian Ossetes are descended ´ (Berta Rona-Tas. Around 830 they moved into the eastern Carpathian Mountains. Slavs. (2000) and alternatively when needed. two partially overlapping subregions were ampliﬁed with the primer pairs L16040 (50 -TCTGTTCTTTCATGGGGAAG-30 )/H16239 (50 -GTG 0 GCTTTGGAGTT-GCAGTT-3 ) (240bp. and others: it is probable on the eve of the Hungarian conquest the overwhelming majority of the indigenous population was Slavic. 2002). Standard isolation methods were used as described by Kalmar et al. Some suggest that the Seklers were one of the tribes of the original Hungarian conquest. The origin of the Hungarian-speaking Seklers. 2004). by Dacians.. 2000). Fig. nominally Jewish religion. Kasperaviciute et al. In 42 cases. American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10. Avars. In particular.. who settled at the eastern border. In cases of ancient samples. This migration took the Magyars into the great plain drained by the Danube and Tisza rivers. Romans. Fifteen of the 42 samples did not correspond to the criteria for authentication described below. The remaining 27 bone samples were submitted to genetic analysis. a region that corresponds roughly to present-day Hungary (Fodor. 2002.. respectively. which was formerly an autonomous principality under the Hungarian kingdom.. Kittles et al. Uzsok. 1998. Fig. Laitinen et al. 16020–16259) and L16201 (50 -AACCCCCTCCCCATGCTTA-30 )/H16400 (50 TGATTTCACGGAGGATGGTG-30 (239bp. and into the more fertile parts of Transylvania among the mountains. is still debated. The column was washed twice and DNA was eluted in a ﬁnal volume of 40 ll. during ´ the Middle Ages (Bona. 1996). 16182–16420). These regions had been settled for thousands of years before the Magyars’ arrival. Estimates of the fraction of the total population of the Carpathian Basin consisting of newly arrived Hungarians range from 10% to 50% (Cavalli-Sforza. 1890). from the 10th–11th century. by treatment with 350 ll 4M NH4-acetate and 700 ll 96% EtOH at 2708C for 10 min. and Dukla passes across the mountains (ReginoPertz. accompanied by the Kabars who had rebelled ´ against the Khazars (Balint. moved west¨ ward from Levedia to Etelkoz. Hair samples were collected from 101 maternally unrelated modern Hungarian individuals from all regions of Hungary. DNA isolation from the hair samples was performed by using Chelex. mtDNA analysis: HSVI region Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis was performed on the hypervariable region I (HVSI) of the mtDNA control region. 895 is the traditional date when seven major Magyar and Kabar hordes under King Arpad forced the Verecke. incubated overnight at 378C (Kalmar et al..BIOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSES OF HUNGARIAN POPULATIONS 355 (Lahermo et al. currently an isolated minority in Romanian Transylvania. Goths. that they migrated from Hungary later. ´ Savirs and Kabars (Kristo. between nucleotide positions 16024–16383. 1990).1002/ajpa . 2000). The migrations route of the ancient Hungarians. and from 76 maternally unrelated Sekler individuals living in Romanian Transylvania. Sarmatians. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sampling Seventy-nine bone samples from ancient remains from the age of the Hungarian conquest were included in the analysis.. Burial sites and bones were archeologically and anthropomorphologically well deﬁned before the analysis. In this modiﬁed method. in the Carpathian Basin. we have got PCR results with at least one of the primer pairs. and not entirely understood DNA isolation Ancient DNA (aDNA) was isolated from femoral bones. DNA derived from modern samples was ampliﬁed with the primer pair L16040/H16400. Samples were excavated in cemeteries from the 10th–11th centuries from different regions of Hungary (Table 1. whose steppe subjects and allies included the Turkic-speaking Onogur-Bulgars. another Turkish tribe. Previous analysis of modern Hungarian mitochondrial sequences indicated an essentially European maternal lineage (Lahermo et al. 1990. 1. and compare them to samples from modern Hungarians and Seklers. we have tested the hypothesis that no genetic continuity exists between ancient and modern Hungarian-speaking populations.. The contact between these people and the ancient Hungarians is reﬂected in both Hungarian language and culture. 2000). The mixture was transferred into DNeasy Mini spin column and centrifuged at 6000g for 1 min. 1996. the Dnieper-Dnester-Prut region. under pressure from the Petchenegs. some of whom perhaps lived to see the ´ Hungarian conquest (Bona. 2) and were provided by the Archaeological Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. a modiﬁed method incorporating the DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen) was used.. The aim of the present study was to analyze the mitochondrial lineages of human bone samples originating from archaeologically Hungarian graves.
The InsT/Aclone PCR Product Cloning Kit (Fermentas) was used for cloning of ancient DNA fragments. 2.tomb † ´ ´ Ormenykut 3/c tomb (12) † ´ ´ Ormenykut 8.tomb (15) Hungarian Lowland Hungarian Lowland Hungarian Lowland Hungarian Lowland Hungarian Lowland Hungarian Lowland North-eastern Hungary North-eastern Hungary North-eastern Hungary Hungarian Lowland Hungarian Lowland Hungarian Lowland Hungarian Lowland South-western Hungary South-western Hungary South-western Hungary South-western Hungary South-western Hungary South-western Hungary South-western Hungary South-western Hungary Hungarian Lowland Hungarian Lowland Hungarian Lowland South-western Hungary Hungarian Lowland North-western Hungary Estimated age (century) Middle 10th Middle 11th 10th Middle10th Early 11th Late 11th Late 10th 10th 10th Late10th Late10th Middle 10th Early 10th Late 10th Late 10th–early 11th Late 10th–early 11th Late 10th–early 11th 10–11th Middle 10th Middle 10th Middle 10th Late 10th Late 10th Late 10th 11th-12th Early 10th 11th Sex Male Male Female Male Female Female Female Male Nd Male Male Female Male Female Female Male Male Male Female Male Female Male Male Female Male Female Male ND: not determined. 200 lM each of dNTP (Fermentas).tomb ´ ¨ Mozs-Szarazdomb 60. 2001. tomb †lo ´ Aldebro-Mocsaros 25. The sequences were determined on an ABI Prism 310 sequencer (PE Applied Biosystem). and 30 ll of modern DNA respectively. tomb (8) ´ ´ ´ ´ ¨ Sarretudvar-Hızofold 5.tomb Fadd-Jegeshegy 74. tomb Fadd-Jegeshegy 62. 1..tomb ´ ¨ Mozs-Szarazdomb 2. 1999.5 U AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystem). Kivisild et al. Sequencing reactions were performed using the ABI Prism BigDyeTM Terminator v3. Ampliﬁcation conditions were: denaturation at 948C for 6 min. 1996. tomb (5) †lo ´ Szegvar-Oromdu † 593. Cloning of ancient samples Fig. and ﬁnal extension at 728C for 5 min. Polymorphic Sequencing Products of successful and contamination-free ampliﬁcations were puriﬁed and concentrated with a Montage American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10. 38 cycles of denaturation at 938C for 30 s. 12. mtDNA analysis: HVSII and coding regions In cases when haplogroup categorization was not possible on the basis of HVSI motifs alone.5 pmol of the same primer which had been used for the ampliﬁcation. tomb (6) † Besenyotelek-Szorhat 1. tomb ´ ´ ´ ´ ¨ Sarretudvar-Hızofold 213. 1993. and 8 ll Terminator Ready Reaction Mix were mixed in a ﬁnal volume of 20 ll sequencing reaction. extension at 728C for 40 s. tomb ´ ´ Zalavar-Kapolna 270.. analysis of the diagnostic polymorphic sites in the HVSII region and mtDNA coding region was also performed. Ten microliters of puriﬁed PCR product. Richards et al. 1998. tomb ´ ´ ´ ´ ¨ Sarretudvar-Hızofold 118.tomb (13) Harta-Freifelt 10.tomb Fadd-Jegeshegy 88. Ampliﬁcation reaction was checked on 8% native polyacrylamide gel and visualized after ethidium bromide staining with UV transilluminator (UVP). Macaulay et al.. tomb (9) ´ ´ ´ ´ ¨ Sarretudvar-Hızofold 9..tomb (2) ´ ¨ Oroshaza-Gorbics tanya 2. Finnila et al.tomb (10) Fadd-Jegeshegy 63.tomb (3) ´ ´ ´ Szabadkıgyos-Palliget 7.356 ¨ ¨ G..tomb (4) ´ Szegvar-Oromdu † 412. Numbers in brackets refer to cemeteries on the map in Fig. TABLE 1.1002/ajpa . TOMORY ET AL.tomb (14) ´ ´ ´ Lebeny-Kaszas 80. tomb † ´ ´ Ormenykut 12.. relative to the revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (rCRS) (Andrews et al. The standard ampliﬁcation reaction contained 4 ll of bone extract. annealing at 568C for 1 min. 2004).. DNA from six selected clones was sequenced in each cases with the universal M13 forward primer (50 -CGCCAG GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC-30 ). 13 PCR buffer and 3 mM MgCl2 in 40 ll total volume of reaction mixture. 25 pmol each of primers. 2.tomb Fadd-Jegeshegy 78. 1999). Quintana-Murci et al. Richards et al.. The origin.0 Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit. 1998. Location of cemeteries where bone samples were excavated and the homeland of the Seklers (Seklerland). 2001.tomb (11) ´ ¨ Mozs-Szarazdomb 41. 2002. 1999. mtDNA classiﬁcation mtDNA haplogroups were assigned to each sample by the use of published criteria (Torroni et al. Herrnstadt et al. 2000. according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. PCR Centrifuge Filter Device (Millipore) in a ﬁnal volume of 10 ll in cases of ancient DNA. tomb (7) † † ´ ´ ¨ Eger-Szepasszonyvolgy 4. age and sex of investigated bone samples Sample anc1 anc2 anc3 anc4 anc5 anc6 anc7 anc8 anc9 anc10 anc11 anc12 anc13 anc14 anc15 anc16 anc27 anc17 anc18 anc19 anc20 anc21 anc22 anc23 anc24 anc25 anc26 Origin ´ ´ Izsak-Balazspuszta (1) ´ Magyarhomorog 120..
Reaction was performed for 2 h at 378C. cell culture dishes. Substitution T?C A?G G?A C?T T?C G?A C?T T?C G?A A?G C?T T?C C?T Primers L28 50 -CAGGTCTATCACCCTATTAACCA-30 H132 50 -GGATGAGGCAGGAATCAAAG-30 L28 50 -CAGGTCTATCACCCTATTAACCA-30 H132 50 -GGATGAGGCAGGAATCAAAG-30 L4521 50 -TACCATCTTTGCAGGCACAC-30 H4660 50 -AAGGATTATGGATGCGGTTG-30 L6962 50 -TTTTCACCGTAGGTGGCCTG-30 H7126 50 -TGAAATGGATTTTGGCGTAGG-30 L10146 50 -TGACTACCACAACTCAACGGCT-30 H10288 50 -AGGTTAGTTGTTTGTAGGGCTC-30 H10220 50 -GCGTCCCTTTCTCCATAAAA-30 L10348 50 -GGCCAGACTTAGGGCTAGGA-30 L10292 50 -CCTTTTACCCCTACCATGAGCC-30 H10466 50 -TTTATGTAAATGAGGGGCATTTGG-30 L10767 50 -AACCTAAACCTACTCCAATGCTAAA-30 H10965 50 -GTGAGGGGTAGGAGTCAGGTAG-30 L11674 50 -CAGCCATTCTCATCCAAACC-30 H11852 50 -GGGGTAAGGCGAGGTTAGC-30 L12214 50 -CCCCTTATTTACCGAGAAAGC-30 H12398 50 -TTGTTAGGGTTAACGAGGGTGG-30 L12622 50 -CATCCCTGTAGCATTGTTCG-30 H12764 50 -AATTCCTACGCCCTCTCAGC-30 H14396 50 -CTCCATCGCTAACCCCACTA-30 L14527 50 -TTCTGAATTTTGGGGGAGGT-30 L14638 50 -ACCCCACAAACCCCATTACT-30 H14837 50 -AGGAGTGAGCCGAAGTTTCA-30 357 Detection of mutationa Sequencing 173ApaLI 24580NheI 17025AluI 110237HphI Sequencing Sequencing 210871MnlI Sequencing Sequencing Sequencing Sequencing 114766MseI a Sites are numbered from the ﬁrst nucleotid of the recognition sequence. 2000). Coding reg. Genetic distances were estimated between all populations as linearized Fst statistics by the use of ARLEQUIN version 2. Coding reg. Coding reg.26 (Meyer et al. 1999). Sites with lower mutation rates were given greater weight. Gamma distribution was a 5 0. appropriate precautions were taken in order to prevent possible contamination with modern DNA.0. The distribution of mtDNAs present in the ancient Hungarian population was assessed by searching for their associated control region motifs in the world-wide mtDNA database (NCBI. sites in the HVSII and mtDNA protein coding regions were ampliﬁed with speciﬁc primers and analyzed either by restriction enzyme cleavage or by sequencing. Coding reg. The published sources of these data are presented in Table 3.1002/ajpa . Comparisons were performed by the Blastn program (NCBI). containers) were cleaned with bleach and subsequently irradiated with 1. Reduced median network from the sequences of Hungarian-speaking populations was also constructed with the Network 4. PCR and Eppendorf tubes were sterilized before use by autoclaving. the primers used for ampliﬁcation and the type of detection Nucleotid position 72 73 4580 7028 10238 10310 10400 10873 11719 12308 12705 14410 14766 Location HVSII HVSII Coding reg. Coding reg. All solutions used were ﬁltered with 0. Coding reg. 1993). The haplogroup-associated polymorphic sites in the HVSII and coding regions. the primers used for ampliﬁcation and the restriction endonucleases used for detection of polymorphisms are reported in Table 2. American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10. Contamination precautions and authentication Database comparison and statistical analysis The sequences obtained were compared with previously published sequences of 7752 Eurasian individuals. sampled from 57 Eurasian populations.000 (Schneider et al. The Fst values were calculated by pairwise comparison using the Tamura–Nei model (Tamura and Nei. Throughout all manipulations Universal Fit Filter Tips (Corning Incorporated) were used for pipetting.. A plus (1) sign indicates the presence while minus (2) sign the absence of recognition site. 13 buffer and 3 U enzyme in 50 ll ﬁnal volume. pincers. drills. All workspaces (laminar ﬂow surfaces.. The ampliﬁcation reaction and conditions were the same as described previously for the HVSI sequences. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of the Hungarian-speaking populations was performed by the ARLEQUIN package. Table 3). The resulting matrix of interpopulation Fst values was summarized During each step of sample preparation. Coding reg. The haplogroup-associated polymorphic sites. The restriction enzyme cleavage reaction mix contained 25 ll PCR product from ancient DNA or 10 ll from modern DNA. tubes. Coding reg. The sizes of the resulted fragments were checked on 8% native polyacrylamide gel and visualized with an UV transilluminator after ethidium bromide staining.0 J/cm2 UV-C light for 60 min before use. PCR boxes) and appliances (pipettes. A 276 bp (np 16090–16365) long control-region of HVSI sequences from 204 Hungarian-speaking individuals together with the sequences of 7752 individuals was grouped into populations. face mask and laboratory coats).22 lm (Millipore) ﬁlter and subsequently (except for proteinase K) irradiated with UV-C light for 30 min.BIOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSES OF HUNGARIAN POPULATIONS TABLE 2. Coding reg. All steps of sample preparation (excavation and laboratory work) were carried out wearing the appropriate protective clothing (gloves.1 program. in two-dimensional scaling (MDS) performed by SPSS package version 5. Coding reg.
(1998). (NCBI Database) ´ ´ Bogacsi-Szabo et al. Sajantila et al. DNA extraction. (NCBI Database). (2000) Coble et al. Corte-Real et al. (1996). (2000). (1996) Pult et al. Baasner et al. (1995). Piercy et al. (2000) Richards et al.. (2000) Belyaeva et al. (2000) Richards et al. Richards et al. (2001) Villems et al. ampliﬁcation. Richards et al. (1995) Sajantila et al. Mogentale-Proﬁzi et al. (2004) Francalacci et al. (1999). Richards et al. TABLE 3. (2000). before extraction. post-PCR analysis) were carried out in separate rooms. Comas et al. (2000) Bertranpetit et al. Shimada et al. Dimo-Simonin et al. Richards et al. (NCBI Database) Di Rienzo and Wilson (1991). (NCBI Database) Metspalu et al. Bermisheva et al.ie/molpopgen/data. (1996). (2004) Kaessmann et al. (1996) Richards et al. Richards et al. (2000) Opdal et al. (2000) Sajantila et al. (1995) Harvey et al. (2001). (1997). Dubut et al. (NCBI Database) Sajantila et al. Comas et al. (1995) Yao et al. Gonzalez et al. All steps of work (bone powdering. (2000) Tajima et al. The surface of a 2 3 5 cm part of the bone diaphysis was removed with a sand disk American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10. (1998) Comas et al. (2000) Richards et al.gen. (2002) Kaessmann et al. Populations. (1994). (2000) Richards et al. (2000). (2004). Hofmann et al. Rousselet and Mangin (1998). McEvoy et al. (2003) Reidla et al.1002/ajpa . Sajantila et al. (1998). (1998) Comas et al. 2004). (1996). (1993) Sajantila et al. (2005) Richards et al. (2000) Helgason et al. (1998). (1998). (NCBI Database) Richards et al. (2000). (1996) Yao et al. (1995). (2002) Pult et al. (2002) Sajantila et al. (1995) Richards et al. (1995) Kolman et al. were washed with bleach and distilled water. (1994) Harvey et al. Malyarchuk and Derenko (2001). (1996). (1996). (2001).tcd. (2000) Calafell et al. TOMORY ET AL. (NCBI Database) Pult et al. (NCBI Database) Richards et al. Passarino et al. Richards et al. Bone surfaces. (2001).htm (McEvoy et al. (2004). (2001). Malyarchuk et al. (2000).358 ¨ ¨ G. CEPH Database Salas et al. (1996). Pfeiffer et al. (2001). (1998) Richards et al. number of samples of which mtDNA HVSI sequence was used for statistical analysis Populations Number of samples 84 42 191 99 48 156 51 13 163 141 180 60 11 83 38 242 149 236 37 230 379 135 168 582 43 185 116 300 248 83 82 43 49 15 53 14 20 101 106 629 20 197 117 473 15 92 379 114 56 88 128 32 224 69 28 98 17 7752 References Lebedeva et al. Cali et al. Richards et al. (1994) Richards et al. (NCBI Database) Harvey et al. (1999) Vernesi et al. (2000). Helgason et al. (1998) Voevoda et al. (1998) Malyarchuk and Derenko (2001) Adygei Albaniana Armeniana Austriana Azerbaijania Basquea Belarus BoscoGurin Bosnian Bulgariana Buryat Croatian Cumanian Czecha Danisha Englisha Estoniana European-Caucasian Evenki Finnish Frencha Galiciana Georgian Germana Greek Greek-Cretean Iraqia Irisha Italiana Kareliana Kazakh Kirghiz-Highland Kirghiz-Lowland Komi Kurdistaniana Mari Moksha Mongolian North-Ossetiana Norwegiana Oberwallis Ossetian Palestiniana Polisha Retoroman Romaniana Russiana Saami Serbian Slavonic-Russian Slovakian Swedisha Swissa Syriana Turkish Uighur Ukrainan Total a HVSI sequence data were retrieved from the web site www. (2000) Orekhov et al. Malyarchuk et al. (2002) Pult et al. Richards et al. Lutz et al. (2000) Parson et al. (1996). (NCBI Database) Calafell et al. (NCBI Database) Richards et al. (NCBI Database) Belledi et al. (2000) Richards et al. Tagliabracci et al. (2001) Sajantila et al. (NCBI Database) Markina et al. (1994) Kaldma et al. (1996).
American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10.. anc25) were cloned. Bone powder was produced by boring. two independent DNA extractions were carried out. anc22. Polymorphisms in ancient Hungarian samples Sample anc1* anc25* anc2 anc5 anc17 anc19 anc21* anc26 anc27 anc10 anc20 anc3* anc8* anc14 anc13* anc12* anc16 anc18 anc11 anc9* anc24 anc7* anc4* anc6 anc15 anc22* anc23* HVSI haplotypes (216000)a 140C 182C 183C 189C 217C 274A 294T 304C CRS CRS 304C 093C 366T CRS 311C 362C 311C 129A 148T 223T 223T 311C 147A 172C 183C 189C 223T 320T 355T 147A 172C 183C 189C 223T 248T 320T 355T CRS 311C 126C 182C 183C 189C 294T 296T 298C 051G 126C 147T 294T 296T 126C 148T 218T 294T 304C 126C 294T 304C 259A 311C 311C 343G 356C 223T 356C 114A 192T 256T 270T 294T 153A 298C 183C 189C 223T 278T 183C 189C 223T 278T HVSII and coding region haplotypesa 9bp del 273ApaLI 27025AluI 214766MseI 10310G 273ApaLI 27025AluI 214766MseI 273ApaLI 27025AluI 114766MseI 273ApaLI 27025AluI 214766MseI 273ApaLI 27025AluI 214766MseI 273ApaLI 27025AluI 214766MseI 273ApaLI 27025AluI 214766MseI 273ApaLI 214766MseI 17025AluI 110237HphI 12705T 10400T 110237HphI 10400C 110237HphI 110871MnlI 173ApaLI 27025AluI 11719A 12308A 114766MseI 173ApaLI 11719A 12308A 12705C 114766MseI 10400C 110871MnlI 273ApaLI 17025AluI 12308G 114766MseI 12308G 12308G 10400C 12308G 12705C 173ApaLI 12308G 72C 273ApaLI 14580NheI 17025AluI 214766MseI 110871MnlI 14470C 110871MnlI 14470C 359 Haplogroup B H H H H H H H HV I M N1a N1a R R T T T2 T2 U U3 U4 U4 U5a1 V X X a Sites are numbered according to revised CRS (Andrews et al.9%) was haplogroup H. at least two times each. excavated from the burial site at Harta-Freifelt. The most frequent (26. Haplogroups U and T were represented with 19. Both subregions of the analyzed mtDNA HVSI sequences were sequenced from both directions. Richards. anc12. in average 46%. The cleaned surface was irradiated with UV light at 1. the commonest European haplogroup. and collected into a sterile tube. Two sequences (anc1.9% each) and one each to HV. To prove the authenticity of ancient human DNA further. Haplotypes of all persons involved in processing the samples were determined and compared with the results obtained from the ancient bone samples. anc23. anc8. free of exogenous contamination.4% and 15. to assess the reproducibility and authenticity of results. aDNA from a fractional horse burial (only the horse skull and the ﬁrst two legs are buried with the human remains). Twenty-ﬁve different haplotypes were distinguished. In order to detect possible contamination by exogenous DNA.9% each). Each bone sample was powdered by at least two scientists. In each case. the ancient Hungarian frequency is lower than in modern Europe (40–60%.2% frequencies. buried with human sample anc25.0 J/cm2 for 30 min. The others were assigned to European-speciﬁc haplogroups. belonging to haplogroup X. and if both collaborators reproduced at least one partial sequence. and preV haplogroups (3. to 3–4-mm depth in order to eliminate possible surface contamination. The whole 360 bp sequence was assembled from the four independently produced part of the sequence. anc23). and at least two PCR ampliﬁcations were performed from each extract. This proves that it is possible to isolate aDNA with this method. which could be assigned to 15 different haplogroups. in order to prove that the results of the direct sequencing are correct and the ancient samples are free of contamination.BIOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSES OF HUNGARIAN POPULATIONS TABLE 4. However. 225 bp (15539–15763)) and human-speciﬁc primers (L16040/ H16239). respectively (Table 5). RESULTS Haplogroup identiﬁcation of ancient Hungarian samples Twenty-seven sequences derived from ancient Hungarian bones were analyzed for mtDNA polymorphisms. respectively. which was homologous with the previously published horse sequences. extraction and ampliﬁcation blanks (with no bone powder) were used as negative controls. I. All sequences could be assigned to deﬁnitive haplogroups. Sequences were considered authentic only if partial sequences were assembled unambiguously. anc20) belong to typical Asian haplogroups B (3. These polymorphisms in ancient sequences are shown in Table 4.1002/ajpa . Only the horse-speciﬁc primers resulted in ampliﬁcation product. * Sequences belonging to the classical conquerors. Two samples (anc22. Cloning Some of the ancient sequences (anc4. anc15.9%). Horse aDNA was ampliﬁed with both horse. 1999). 1998).9%) and M (3. Two samples were assigned to each of the N1a and R haplogroups (7. Only one of them was included in the subsequent statistical analysis to avoid the bias of inbred samples. was isolated with the same procedure as the human aDNA. those two individuals could be maternally related.(L15561 50 -CACCATACCCACCTGACATGCA-30 and H15741 50 -GCTGATTTCCCGCGGCTTGGTG-30 . anc6. posses the same haplotype and were derived from the same burial site.
360 ¨ ¨ G.0 1. ´ earrings (Mesterhazy.0 2. 1991).7 1.0 7.9 26. In addition in case of anc4 the sequence containing the 12705 position was determined after cloning. These samples † came mostly from the cemeteries of nuclear families ´ ´ (Revesz.1002/ajpa . Szoke.7 13.6 3. anc8. anc23.9 2. Only sporadic and inconsequential differences were found between cloned and direct sequences of ancient samples (Table 6). anc3 and anc8 show 16189C which is characteristic of the Central Asian American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10. anc22) respectively.7 36. and decorations. one of the six clones shows C in the np16223.9 7. This haplogroup is present in the Carpathian Basin from the Neolithic.3 1. 1962).1 6. The N haplogroup is of Near Eastern origin (Richards et al.7 1.0 2. 2000). The cloned sequences conﬁrmed the coexistence of these mutations in the same sample. and X.3 9.1 18.4 2. anc25) and four cases (anc4.9 7.0 1.2% (Haak et al. 16189.4 5. simpler. 1999). Among the classical Hungarian conquerors one sequence belongs to the typical Asian-speciﬁc haplogroup B (9. and nps 16183.. In case of fragments anc6.1%).3 1.2 6. These are bur† ial sites with many tombs. However. TABLE 5.0 1.9 3.7 100 3.6 3.8 7. braid ornaments.7 9. typically those of plebeians: who could be either Hungarian invaders or members of other populations who had been in the Carpathian Basin ´ before the Hungarian conquest (Mesterhazy. According to the direct sequencing sample anc4 displays 16223T.4 1.7 10.0 1.0 2. horse harness.6 7. this statement because of the small sample size must be considered with utmost cautions.. arrow-or spear-heads.7 18. the sequence of the 240 bp and the 239 bp long portion of the HVSI region was established in ﬁve (anc6.2% each) and one of haplogroups R. unambiguously typical of classical Hungarian conquerors—horse’s skull. and it also bears 12705C.9 Classical conquerors 9. T. Two sequences each are members of haplogroups H. respectively (9.7 18.0 4. 1962.0 1.0 1. The other 15 bone samples originated from commoners’ cemeteries. 1991). The frequency of N1a mtDNA lineage today is very low anywhere in the world. anc12.2 6.9 3. since 12705T also splits off the 16223C cluster (Macaulay et al.2 Commoners 39. 2005).9 2.4 3.6 7. respectively) could be deﬁned unambiguously from the sequences of the clones. anc12. N1a. The frequency of haplogroup H is rather low compared with the average in Europe. which raises the possibility of heteroplasmy at this position. mounted belts.0 4.1 6. Status comparison of the two groups of ancient samples The ancient samples originated from burial sites of the 10th–11th centuries. In case of fragments anc12 (239 bp) and anc23 (240 bp) obscurities in the directly sequenced samples (at nps 16294.6 Ancient Hungarian 3. anc15.1% each).7 6.7 7. 1997. The bone ﬁndings archaeologically could be divided into two major groups. U.7 1.7 6.9 33.2 9.0 4. However. and anc25 (240 bp fragments) all the six cloned sequences were identical to that obtained by direct sequencing (not shown).0 2. Comparing these two groups on the basis of haplogroup frequencies and haplotype identities signiﬁcant genetic differences were found (Table 4). Twelve of them were excavated from cemeteries with rich grave goods.0 2.6 7.9 3.9 3. These two mutations contradict to each other. at about 0.4 2.1 9. anc12. As the result of cloning.9 6.0 5.9 100 100 and to eliminate ambiguities obtained by direct sequencing. Balint. fewer. 16192.4 9.1 100 2.0 4. and U4 (18.7 2. 1996). 16296.7 2. and poorer ´ grave goods) (Szoke.6 3. with poor archaeological remains (no horse harness.7 6. However.. TOMORY ET AL. Haplogroup frequencies in Hungarian-speaking populations in percentages Haplogroups B C H HV I J J1 J1a J2 JT K M N1a R T T1 T2 T3 T4 U U3 U4 U5 U5a U5a1 U5a1a U5b1 preV V W X Total Recent Hungarian Sekler 2.9 1.9 100 2.
. . . . . . . . . . . . a Only variable sites are shown. . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Y T T T T T T C . . . . . . . . T . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dots mean the identical nucleotid with the CRS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T C C C C C C C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M C C C C C C T . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T T T T T T T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . Y T T T T T T C . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . T T T T T T T . . . . 1 6 0 3 5 1 6 0 3 9 1 6 0 4 8 1 6 0 4 9 G G G G . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . T T T T T T T A A A A A A A CRS anc4-direct anc4-clone1 anc4-clone2 anc4-clone3 anc4-clone4 anc4-clone5 anc4-clone6 anc8-direct anc8-clone1 anc8-clone2 anc8-clone3 anc8-clone4 anc8-clone5 anc8-clone6 anc12-direct anc12-clone1 anc12-clone2 anc12-clone3 anc12-clone4 anc12-clone5 anc12-clone6 anc15-direct anc15-clone1 anc15-clone2 anc15-clone3 anc15-clone4 anc15-clone5 anc15-clone6 anc22-direct anc22-clone1 anc22-clone2 anc22-clone3 anc22-clone4 anc22-clone5 anc22-clone6 anc23-direct anc23-clone1 anc23-clone2 anc23-clone3 anc23-clone4 anc23-clone5 anc23-clone6 . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . T C C C C C C C . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C T T C T T T T T T T T T T T . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . C . . . . . A . . . . . . R A A A A A A . . . . . . . . . . . . . T T T T T T T . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T T T T T T T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TABLE 6. . . . . . . Y C C C C C C C . . . . . . C . . . . . G A A 1 6 3 7 8 C . . . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sequences of cloned PCR fragments compared to the Cambridge Reference Sequence and the results of direct sequencinga 1 6 0 5 4 1 6 0 7 4 1 6 1 5 3 1 6 1 8 3 1 6 1 8 9 1 6 1 9 2 1 6 2 1 0 1 6 2 2 3 1 6 2 4 8 1 6 2 5 9 1 6 2 6 0 1 6 2 6 7 1 6 2 7 8 1 6 2 9 4 1 6 2 9 6 1 6 2 9 8 1 6 3 1 9 1 6 3 2 0 1 6 3 4 4 1 6 3 5 5 1 6 3 5 6 1 6 3 5 8 1 6 3 6 5 1 6 3 7 1 1 6 3 7 6 A . . Y C C C C C C A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
005) to populations from Central. compared to the other populations. and Mari. 4a. while one share the same HVSI but not RFLP haplotype with anc13 and anc27 sequences. So these haplotypes might have come through Asia to the Carpathian Basin. Among those samples who originated from commoners’ cemeteries. which are most common in Europe. On the basis of Fst values (Table 8) the ancient samples show the lowest genetic distance from some populations from the Levant (Syrian. Anc10. Slovakian. and Oberwallis populations. eight modern Hungarian and six Sekler samples. 1999. (Bandelt. Finnish. All of the recent Hungarian sequences are members of European type haplogroups. Slovakian. Haplogroup H is the most frequent in all populations. Russian. 2000). while Seklers have very low distances (Fst < 0.05) from Central Asian (Kazakh.65% and 36. including recent Hungarians and Seklers. Austrian.. Our data were compared with 7752 sequences from 57 populations from Europe. The two ancient populations were independently compared with the modern Hungarianspeaking populations (taking as one group) at variance level. Spanish. Serbian.9%) are similar to that in Europe among ancient samples and in particular among samples from the classical conquerors this value is rather low (26.05) from the recent Hungarian-speaking populations. the others belong to western Eurasian haplogroups. Haplotype variations among Hungarian-speaking populations under consideration were summarized by a reduced median network. Seven of the 15 sequences belong to the haplogroups H. and W haplogroups while the N1a and X haplogroups are missing among modern individuals analyzed in this study. Fst values were visualized by the use of multidimensional scaling (MDS) (Fig. Estonian. respectively). Three of the four sequences belonging to the European-speciﬁc T* haplogroups (Macaulay et al.005) to 25 populations.. When the samples of classical Hungarian conquerors and commoners were analyzed. see Fig. as do classical Hungarian conquerors from the commoners and recent Hungarian-speaking populations. Slovakian.. While there was a variance of 12. Croatian. while 23% of ancient haplotypes occur in recent Hungarian and 12% in Sekler populations. one (anc20) was assigned to the Asian-speciﬁc haplogroup M (Macaulay et al. K.65% between the classical conquerors and modern Hungarians. The T2 haplogroup is represented by two samples (13. English. Bosnian.. U3. while haplogroups HV.3%). Swedish. The ancient sequences lack the J. respectively. HV. TOMORY ET AL. the Middle East. The distance between the commoners and recent Hungarian and Sekler samples is insigniﬁcant. French. Azerbaijani. The Anc4 sample belonging to the U4 haplogroup has equivalent sequences in the Siberian Nenets. mostly from Eastern Europe and the Balkans. in case of the Hungarians. Statistical analysis AMOVA was performed with different grouping of the studied Hungarian-speaking populations (Table 7). Anc8 is identical with only one sequence originated from a Buryat tribe and is a one step neighbor (at np16183) of other Central Asian type sequences.38% of variance was observed. Greek). T. The Anc6 sequence belongs to the U5a1 haplogroup. Moksha). and also the Finno-Ugrian Komi. while samples from commoners’ cemeteries show very low distances (Fst < 0. French. 2004). Austrian. Bosnian. and West Siberia (Malyarchuk. Georgian. R. Ukrainian. 3).b). U5a1. and R. which approaches that in modern European populations. Central Asia (Turkish. All ancient samples show signiﬁcant distances (P < 0. which is characteristic of northeastern Europe (Pericic et al. Czech. which appears with high frequency in populations of the Volga. Ukrainian). This haplogroup occurs mainly in the southern but also in the eastern region of Europe (Richards. 1999) originate from commoners’ cemeteries. Swiss. branch. Ukrainian. It seems that American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10.26%) while comparing the two groups of ancient samples 12. 1998). Kirghiz. the CRS which is common in Europe (Richards et al. and Central Asia. Palestinian). Two sequences were assigned to the U4 haplogroup. and Estonian populations.31% within the groups. The modern Hungarian population shows very low genetic distances (Fst < 0. the variance between the commoners and modern Hungarians is negligible. anc25. When the two modern and the two ancient populations were grouped and related 1. apart from CRS sequences only one has an older equivalent in anc10 haplotype. and Europe (Oberwallis. 2000) was found in two ancient. the former group have a relatively low distance (Fst < 0.95% and 18. Moksha. and preV are represented by one sequence only (6. Among the recent Sekler sequences two are members of the Asian-speciﬁc haplogroup C. and Ossetian populations. but with some from Central and Western Europe.3%). Azerbaijani. This haplotype is shared between Finnish. apart from CRS sequences. Eastern. anc17. The frequency of haplogroup H is 33. Turk. Among the classical Hungarian conquerors the frequency of haplogroup U* was high (27. Norwegian.2%. Croatian. Serbian. and Western Europe (Czech. Richards et al. Swedish. Most of the populations studied are concentrated in a group composed of mainly European populations. Anc3 is at np16248 one step neighbor of Central Asian sequences. As far as the comparison with ancient samples is concerned. A group of Central Asian populations split off Comparison of ancient samples with two current Hungarian-speaking populations The sequences of ancient samples were compared with recent samples from 101 Hungarian and 76 Sekler individuals. Among the recent Sekler sequences. Considering the modern populations the percentage of variance between populations is very low (0. and Georgian sequences. Adygei. Syrian.3%.1002/ajpa . Polish. Swiss). The ancient Hungarian samples are not separated from the other sequences derived from modern Hungarians and Seklers. On the whole 13% of recent Hungarian and 9% of the Sekler haplotypes can be traced back to ancient haplotypes. shares haplotypes found in Korean. but while the percentage in modern Hungarian-speaking populations (39. only ﬁve of the modern haplotypes can be traced back to one of the older (anc11. Moksha) and also from Europe (Italian. I. a member of haplogroup I. 2005). Estonian. Mongolian)..001) from populations from Asia (Turkish. Ural region.75%). they appear in all branches together with the other sequences but mostly show individual haplotypes.362 ¨ ¨ G. anc27) haplotypes. 1999.62% variance was among the two groups and 2.
74 87. Uighur.000) (0. Comm: Commoners.26 0. AMOVA in samples of Hungarian-speaking populations Groupsa Modern (Hun vs.65 21. including the modern Hungarians and Seklers.0048) (0. Oberwallis populations.332) (0. Saamis. DISCUSSION According to our results. 3. North-Ossetian. Serbian.26 12.338) (0. Ancient Hun1Sek vs. but they are closest to populations from Central Asia.0137) (0. the ancient Hungarian population from the 10th–11th centuries was heterogeneous at the levels of mitochondrial haplogroup and haplotype.007) (0. This group further was mapped between a group of Central Asian (Mongolian. Class: Classical conquerors.229) (0. Kurdish.17 96. Syrian. Turkish. and Ossetian populations close to Western Eurasian populations. TABLE 7. American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10.165) (0.0048) (0. Sek: Sekler. Analyzing the samples of classical conquerors and commoners separately.91 (0.234) (0.26 (0. and it is close to the Azerbaijani. The amount of circles indicates the number of samples with the given haplotypes. Reduced median network of the haplotypes identiﬁed among ancient Hungarian and modern Hungarian-speaking populations.1002/ajpa . P values are given in parentheses.62 12. Comm) Hun1Sek vs.234) (0.34 (0. Class1Comm Hun1Sek vs.62 97. the commoners’ samples are mapped with Adygei. and the Finno-Ugric Komi populations. Evenkis. and European Caucasians are well separated from all studied populations.10 100.62 1.416) 2.655) Hun: Modern Hungarian. Kirghiz) and western Eurasian populations. unambiguously from them. Coding region and HVSII sites which deﬁne main branches of haplogroups are bold.000) (0. The group of the ancient Hungarian samples is mapped within a group that includes Palestinian. Comm a b Among groupsb Among populations within groups 0. Sek) Ancient (Class vs.326) (0.31 0.21 2. Class Hun1Sek vs. Ukrainian.BIOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSES OF HUNGARIAN POPULATIONS 363 Fig.06 87.172) Within populations 99. Kazakh. and to the mediaeval Cumanian population that migrated into Hungary in the 13th century. * Indicates the Cambridge Reference Sequence. The classical conquerors are well separated from all the populations under consideration.38 0.
while classical conquerors show a more heterogeneous haplogroup representation.02132 0.06349 0.00757 0.13045 0.07472 0.06651 0.07059 0.17773 0.01270 0.00932 0.00340 0.00129 0.00542 0.00662 20.01449 0. all but two (anc1.12206 0.01290 20.00146 20.00638 0.01070 20. we detect some Asian afﬁnities.00330 20.01323 0.00668 20.02460 0.06776 0.08971 0.00641 0.00630 0.16809 0.01266 0.02273 0.10703 0.01335 0.13606 20.00607 0. However.01535 0.07671 0.11208 0.00346 0.00813 0.11421 0.03038 0.00295 0.00013 0.22219 0.07693 0.00339 0.01407 0.00348 0.01102 0. and are absent in recent Hungarian American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10.01578 20.07655 0.01842 0.00392 0.01142 0.09060 0. Some could be classiﬁed to haplogroups (N1a.04968 0.02401 0.01211 20.00070 20.01191 20.14186 0.02032 0.05399 0.11356 0.00576 0.00315 20.01164 0.06400 0.04311 0.05535 20.00511 0.00332 0.00236 20.01690 0.00414 20.05762 0.00566 0.08103 0.00192 0.02410 0.00801 0.00876 0.10656 0.00676 0.06241 0.01856 0.07964 0.02076 0.01492 0.00771 20.00414 0.18765 0.00257 20.00126 20. Fst values calculated from mtDNA HVSI sequence data Populations Modern Hungarian 0.04771 0.00198 20.00422 0.13972 0.00463 0.10213 0.03060 0.00462 0.01050 0.00177 0.03682 0.02898 0.00629 0.00034 0. T) common in west Eurasia.06311 0.18442 0. The difference is more conspicu- ous when analyzed according to the burial status: Commoners show a clear dominance of haplotypes and haplogroups (H.00502 0.11704 0. anc20) ancient samples belong to potentially European haplogroups.06618 0.01377 20.12231 0.01587 0.02124 0. R.01767 Classical conquerors 0.04144 0.00515 0.00275 0.00060 0.00251 20.00520 0.13755 0. X) which frequencies are very low in recent worldwide populations.00274 0.11565 0.01162 0.01872 0.00347 20.01276 0.04136 0.06363 0. and the genetic effect of populations who came into contact with ancient Hungarians during their movement.13345 20.00262 20.00254 0.01081 0. Analyzing the haplotypes.00002 0.00704 0.01115 0.00376 0.10941 0.00967 20.06995 20.00794 0.00321 0.00611 0.03660 20.00202 0.07063 20.00462 0.08331 0.02521 0.00063 0.06779 0.00194 0.00850 0.03327 20.09912 0.01420 0.10787 Commoners 20.01858 0.02424 0.04939 20.13190 0.01184 0.01481 0.00378 0.00452 0.00124 20.03228 0.01358 0.01675 0.02771 0.10033 0.364 ¨ ¨ G.00107 0.00753 0.01573 20.14113 0.07162 0.09689 0.01798 0.00444 0.00361 0.07145 0.01840 0.00728 0.18491 0.02469 0.03129 20.01993 0.03161 0.03066 0.09332 0.00833 0.00344 0.02561 20.00322 0.16310 0.00684 0.00301 20.10602 0.00834 20.00000 Ancient Hungarian 0.02135 0.01558 20.03138 0.11010 0.01996 0.05304 0.07801 20.11508 0.10747 0.00339 0.01210 0. TABLE 8.04670 0.05911 0.02851 0.14129 20.01631 0.00942 0.04438 0.07064 0.02186 0.12111 0. TOMORY ET AL.13064 0.1002/ajpa .00785 20.10080 0.01138 0.01951 0.00352 0.02680 0.00651 0.00724 0.00486 0.25371 0.08389 0.24119 0.07410 0.01374 0.00644 20.01831 0.03695 20.00112 0.01129 0.02943 0.02540 0.00940 0.02876 20.01556 0.00382 0.00152 0.10033 Iraqi Syrian Palestinian Armenian Azerbaijani North-Ossetian Bulgarian Romanian Albanian Italian Glacial Basque Swiss Austrian Polish Russian Czech Danish Sweden Norwegian Estonian Karelian English German Irish Kurdistanian French Adygei Belarus BoscoGurin Bosnian Buryat Croatian European-Caucasian Evenki Finn Georgian Greek Greek-Cretan Kazakh Kirghiz-High Kirghiz-Low Komi Mari Moksha Mongolian Oberwallis Ossetian Retoroman Saami Serbian Slavonic-Russian Slovakian Turkish Uighur Ukrainian Cumanian Modern Hungarian Sekler Classicals Fifteen haplogroups and 25 haplotypes were distinguished among the 27 samples studied.11320 0.00032 0.01136 0.11083 20.02587 0.00000 Sekler 0.00419 0.01542 0.01533 0.00488 0.12108 0.01476 0.09576 0.02338 0.01146 0.11701 0.00698 20.00185 0.11408 0.16259 0.10251 0.00022 0.01513 0.01475 0.01096 0.01698 0.00974 0.00390 20.01116 0.05174 0.03570 0.00460 0.00612 0.06093 0.00462 0.01038 0.02065 0.01860 0.02858 0.20320 0.00919 0.
Ukrainians. Ady 5 Adygei. 2004). This level of analysis may very probably underestimate the proportion of Hungarian invaders whose maternal ancestry. Pol 5 Polish. Finn 5 Finnish. Ger 5 German. Gal 5 Galician. Hun 5 recent Hungarian. The explanation could be that the commoners’ cemeteries might contain the remains of pre-Hungarian populations. Classicals 5 classical Conqueror.1002/ajpa . The genetic effect of populations who lived in close contact with the Hungarians during their migration from the Ural region to the Carpathian Basin—Khazars. N-Oss 5 North-Ossetian. in accordance with the data of Lahermo et al. Petchenegs. Cro 5 Croatian. Mok 5 Moksha. was in the steppes. Swe 5 Swedish. Ancient 5 ancient Hungarians. Nor 5 Norwagian. Pal 5 Palestinian. It 5 Italian. Ob 5 Oberwallis. as well as in Hungarian language and culture. over the last few centuries. but recent analysis has shown that the mitochondrial characteristics of the Finno-Ugric populations of the Volga and Ural regions have signiﬁcant west Eurasian elements (Bermisheva et al. Gr 5 Greek. Statistical analysis shows the Asian genetic inﬂuence in the Hungarian conqueror population unambiguously. Kurd 5 Kurdistanian. Cum 5 ancient Cumanian. By contrast. Azer 5 Azerbaijani. Statistical analysis clearly reveals this difference. Eng 5 English. a: the localization of commoners and classical conquerors b: the localization of ancient Hungarian and modern Hungarian speaking populations. Russ 5 Russian. Bel 5 Belgian. Cre 5 Cretean. Oss 5 Ossetian. Reto 5 Retoroman. MDS plot of interpopulation Fst values.. However. Dan 5 Danish. Cze 5 Czech. Fr 5 French. (2000). Geo 5 Georgian. Comm 5 Commoners. Not only were they in contact there with Indo-European speakers such as the Alans. Arm 5 Armenian. Malyarchuk. Savirs. Rom 5 Romanian. Bos 5 Bosnian. 4. Genetic distances suggest a clear relationship with populations from Central Asia. in all directions. and Iranian-speaking Alans—seems to have left imprints in the ancient Hungarian gene pool. Au 5 Austrian. Turk 5 Turkish. Est 5 Estonian. and Sekler populations. and the Finno-Ugric Komis. Onogur-Bulgars. Sek 5 Sekler. Sy 5 Syrian. Sw 5 Swiss. which can be traced back for over American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10. Kaz 5 Kazakh. Bul 5 Bulgarian. Bel 5 Belarus. 2003). Population labels are as follows: Irq 5 Iraqi. Ukr 5 Ukrainan.BIOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSES OF HUNGARIAN POPULATIONS 365 Fig. Slo 5 Slovakian. the linguistic and cultural inheritance of modern Hungary. 2002. Ir 5 Irish.. Sl-Russ 5 SlavonicRussian. On a distance matrix tree they can be placed between Asian and European populations closest to Turks. recent Hungarian-speaking populations seem to be speciﬁcally European populations. over many millennia. The Magyar invasion of Europe was only one in a most complex series of population movement across the Eurasian steppe. Serb 5 Serbian. Kar 5 Karelian. as do even the Turkish-speaking populations of the Altai (Derenko et al.
Branching pattern in the evolutionary tree for human mitochondrial DNA. Am J Hum Genet 63:1824–1838. further large population movements have taken place in this area. Bermisheva M. NJ: Princeton University Press. From Asia to Europe: mitochondrial DNA sequence variability in Bulgarians and Turks. ´ Bona I. Turnbull DM. again. Le Roux MG. 1996. Brandt-Casadevall C. Chinnery PF. ¨ ´ ´ ´ ´ Bona I. In: Kopeczi B. Zeit der ungarisch-slawischen Zusammenlebens ¨ (895–1172). while in the Seklers the genetic effect of Eastern and Southern Europeans is more visible. MiscickaSliwka D. Forensic Sci Int 98:169–178. Khusnutdinova E. AF487590. Kalaydjieva L. AF487494. 2002. Maternal and paternal lineages in Albania and the genetic structure of Indo-European populations.118:137– 146. Taroni F. Bertranpetit J. Parsons TJ. Irwin JA. Hum Biol 67:595–612. Mitochondrial DNA of ancient Cumanians: culturally Asian steppe nomadic immigrants with substantially more western Eurasian mitochondrial DNA lineages. Calafell F. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:1597–1601. Germans. Dimo-Simonin N. Coble MD.nlm. AF487612–AF487614. Grange F. A history of the Alans in the West. Czech. Conterio F. 1995. Mateu E. Chen J. szazadban. The history and geography of human genes. Calafell F. AF487598– AF487600. it is probable that a relatively small number of Hungarian conquerors arrived in the Carpathian Basin. there is a dominating effect of Slav populations (Slovakian. Bertranpetit J. Int J Legal Med. O’Callaghan JE. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ´ ´ We would like to thank Maria Rado and Gabriella Lehocz for skilled technical assistance. further diluting the original Magyar contribution to the gene pool. Kakpakov VT. and DQ246265–DQ246352]. editor. Komi). There is little direct genetic relationship between the Hungarian conquerors and the recent Hungarian-speaking populations. Villems R. Comas D. Wilson AC.366 ¨ ¨ G. Pettener D. 2004. Czibula A. . AF487580. Peterson CT. Human mitochondrial DNA variation and the origin of Basques. Gene ﬂow from neighbors and migrations has affected the Hungarian gene pool: maternal lineages in the modern Hungarian gene pool bear the imprints of populations who have been living in the region for centuries. De Leo G. 2005.). Casalotti R. with inﬂuence from the Balkans and West Eurasia. ´ ´ Priskin K. Excofﬁer L. since during the centuries after the Hungarian conquest. Tolun A. Calafell F. Angelicheva D. 1973.ncbi. Zakharov IA. Kalmar T.html (for Hungarian sequences [accession numbers AF487583. Romans. Polymorphic sites in human mitochondrial DNA control region sequences: American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10. 1996. EF646857]). 1998. Mangin P. D’Anna R. Decorte R. Grzybowski T. Richards MB. [Diversity of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in ethnic populations of the Volga-Ural region of Russia]. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado. who show the lowest genetic distance to populations of Finno-Ugric origin (Moksha. Sala J. Int J Legal Med 114:229– 231. p 109–174. Hum Biol 77:639–662. Cali F. Adv Forensics Haemogenet 6:17–19. Baasner A. Die Archeology der Steppe. Tomory G. Buda´ ´ ¨ ´ pest: MTA Tortenettudomanyi Intezete. Facchini F. Cavalli-Sforza LL. Tagliavini J. Ann Hum Genet 59:63–81. Czarny J. Underhill PA. this mixture may have been less in the case of the Seklers. Clarimon J. ´ Balint C. Piazza A. Moral P. 2002. Single nucleotide polymorphisms over the entire mtDNA genome that increase the power of forensic testing in Caucasians. Nat Genet 23:147. 1989. Macaulay VA. Int J Legal Med 113:89–97.gov/Genbank/index. 2001. Corte-Real HB. AF487574–AF487576. ´ Berta A-Rona-Tas A. ´ ¨ ¨ Balint C. Dambueva IK. Genetic diversity in the Iberian Peninsula determined from mitochondrial sequence analysis. AF487586. 1995. Madea B. Horvath F. 2000. Belledi M. 2000. University of Minnesota Press. 1000 years. 1991. . 1994). mtDNA control region and RFLP data for Sicily and France. Eur J Hum Genet 7:480–486. Romano V. Princeton. Chiavetta V. Wien-Koln: Bohlau Verlag. Kurze Geschichte Sieben´ ´ burgens. Downes CS. Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA. Derenko MV. Bachrach BS. Avars. 1999. TOMORY ET AL. Poloni ES. Studia Archaeo¨ ´ ´ logica 11. modern Hungarians have 90% European and 10% Uralic genes. Csanyi B. Jahrhundert. Issad MS. Rasko I. AF487602. 1996. On the basis of the results of samples of commoners’ cemeteries and the recent Hungarian-speaking populations. Flugy A. 1998. Hariti G. for Sekler sequences [accession numbers AF487556–AF487559. Genetic analysis of single hair shafts by automated sequence analysis of the mitochondrial d-loop region. This is not surprising. Cambon-Thomsen A. Junge A. Perez-Lezaun A. † LITERATURE CITED Andrews RM. Ayala GF. Malyarchuk BA. Ann Hum Genet 60: 35–49. population data and maternal inheritance. The classical Hungarian conquerors and the modern populations differ at the levels both of haplogroups and haplotypes. Di Rienzo A. Bosch E. A magyarok es Europa a 9–10. Acta Orient Acad Scientiarum Hungaricae 55:43–67. Denisova GA. Worldwide analysis of genetic and linguistic relationships of human populations. Ann Hum Genet 67:391–411.. Ruhlen M. ´ ´ ´ ´ ´ ¨ ¨ Bogacsi-Szabo E. Croatian). Martinez-Arias R. According to Cavalli-Sforza. this may have been less in the Seklers. Bertranpetit J. Dorzhu CM. 1990. 2003. 2000. Lightowlers RN. AF487604. Trading genes along the silk road: mtDNA sequences and the origin of central Asian populations. Forensic evaluation of mtDNA in a population from south west Switzerland. Sykes BC. Mol Biol (Mosk) 36:990–1001. Dacians. http://www. This also is consistent with the Hungarian invaders being only a small fraction of the total population of the Carphatian Basin after the conquest (Cavalli-Sforza et al.nih. Howell N. Ann Hum Genet 60: 331–350. Tambets K. and DQ246353– DQ246411] and for ancient sequences [accession numbers DQ246412–DQ246437. Papiha S. Luiselli D. AF487561–AF487570. Ukrainian. Comas D. Letmanyi IH. who mixed with other populations had been living here earlier (Slavs. Sokal RR. In the recent Hungarians. Mikerezi I. Underhill P. Fiori G. This study shows that the linguistic isolation of Hungarian-speaking populations in the Carpathian Basin has not lead to signiﬁcant genetic isolation. Sudungarn im 10. 1994. AF487596. Just RS. A similar result was obtained when nuclear genetic markers were also studied.1002/ajpa . Kubacka I. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado. . does not correspond to much genetic continuity. Wozniak M. Old Turkic Loan Words in Hungarian. Diversity of mitochondrial DNA lineages in South Siberia. Mari. 1991. Schafer C. ELECTRONIC-DATABASE INFORMATION Accession numbers for data presented here are as follows: GenBank. Menozzi P. who have however acquired more afﬁnities with southern European populations.
Lahermo P. Parson W. FEBS Lett 445:197–201. Kucinskas V. Extensive linkage disequilibrium in small human populations in Eurasia. Brandt G. ´ ´ ´ ´ Mesterhazy K. Bezold R. Finnila S. Renfrew C. Pattern of nucleotide substitution and rate heterogeneity in the hypervariable regions I and II of human mtDNA. Eur J Hum Genet 12:293–300. In: ´ Hajdu P. Davis RE. Derenko MV. Izhevsk. Ancient DNA from the ﬁrst European farmers in 7500-year-old neolithic sites. Lahermo P. Linnoila M. mtDNA polymorphisms in ﬁve French groups: importance of regional sampling. Aholt S. 1996. Stevanovitch A. Beraud-Colomb E. 2001. Fahy E. Turnbull DM. Jaksch M. Usanga E. Hum Mol Genet 6:1835–1846. Herrnstadt C. Scheithauer R. The genetic relationship between the Finns and the Finnish Saami (Lapps): analysis of nuclear DNA and mtDNA. A honfoglalo magyarok tarsadalma es a ´ ´ ´ regeszet. Mitochondrial DNA sequence diversity in two groups of Italian Veneto speakers from Veneto. Bosnes V. Kivisild T. 1996. Dupuy BM. Rosa A. Sigurðardottir S. Helgason A. Ann Hum Genet 65:63–78. Goldman D. Malyarchuk BA. Borresen-Dale AL. p 30–6757. Mitochondrial DNA characterisation of European isolates: the Maragatos from Spain. Fodor I. ´ Kristo G. Burger J. Sistonen P. p 49–78. Mitochondrial DNA afﬁnities at the Atlantic fringe of Europe. 2004. Pradie MP. Lutz S. Hereditas 132:35–42. Kaessmann H. Paabo S. 2001. Long JC. 1998. Ancient cultures of the Uralian peoples. 2000. 1996. Richards M. Mogentale-Proﬁzi N. Am J Hum Genet 70:673–685. Bradley DG. Cavalleri GL. Aula P. Forster P. Alt KW. editor. ¨ Tanzer M. Nucleic Acids Res 28:E67. Weisser HJ. 1976. Aragon RA. Sistonen P. Flores C. Bramanti B. Int J Legal Med 111:124–132. Genetics 142:1321– 1334. 1997. Gronenborn D. Villems R. A honfoglalo magyarok targyi emlekei. editor. von Haeseler A. ´ Szombathely: Eletunk. Sistonen P. Savontaus ML. Sistonen P. The ancient Hungarians. Hickey E. Acta Paediatr 87:1039–1044. Am J Hum Genet 68:723–737. Miscicka-Sliwka D. Asian. Guida V. Parsons TJ. 2001. Am J Phys Anthropol 120:391–404. Gonzalez AM. 1976. 1999. Olefsky JM. Mitochondrial DNA variability in Poles and Russians. Int J Legal Med 111: 67–77. Underhill PA. Ghosh SS. Hofmann S. Am J Hum Genet 70:1152–1171. The Longue Duree of genetic ancestry: multiple genetic marker systems and Celtic origins on the Atlantic facade of Europe. Beraud-Colomb E. Fodor I. The main issues of Finno-Ugrian archaeology. Uralskogo Otolelinya RAN. Sajantila A. 2002. Levedia torzsszovetsegebol Szent Istvan alla´ ´ ¨ maig. Ivanov P. Elson JL. Beres J. Savontaus ML. Am J Hum Genet 58:1309–1322. The Hungarian conquest. Budapest: Corvina Press. ¨ Meyer S. Sykes B. 2005. Ancient cultures of the Uralian peoples. Am J Hum Genet 62:1171–1179. 1999. Larruga JM. Flores C. Ural and Western Siberia: Implication to the genetic history of the Uralic populations. Phylogenetic network for European mtDNA. Kittles RA. Parik J. p 13–18. Reduced-median-network analysis of complete mitochondrial DNA coding-region sequences for the major African. Maca-Meyer N. Mertens S. Poltoraus A. Lahermo P. Macaulay V. 1997. Dubut V. Laitinen V. Paprotta A. Peltonen L. editor. Rognum TO. ´ Hajdu P. Vege A. Orekhov V. Y-chromosomal diversity suggests that Baltic males share common Finno-Ugric-speaking forefathers. Am J Hum Genet 66: 999–1016. 1999. McEvoy B. Preston G. Sajantila A. Ethiopian mitochondrial DNA heritage: tracking gene ﬂow across and around the gate of tears. Budapest: Hungarian National Museum. 2004. Sequence diversity of the control region of mitochondrial DNA in Tuscany and its implications for the peopling of Europe. Gustafsson AC. Scozzari R. Matsumura S. 1995.BIOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSES OF HUNGARIAN POPULATIONS Dubut V. Kasperaviciute D. mtDNA and the islands of the North Atlantic: estimating the proportions of Norse and Gaelic ancestry. Y chromosomal polymorphisms reveal founding lineages in the Finns and the Saami. Uhlen M. Egeland T. 2002. ´ ´ ´ ´ † ´ ´ ¨ ¨ Kristo G. Marcsik A. Budapest: Corvina Press. Gonzalez AM. Dual origins of Finns revealed by Y chromosome haplotype variation. Zollner S. Am J Hum Genet 64:232– 249. Wiebe V. Holland MM. Flores C. Lundeberg J. de Knijff P. Maca-Meyer N. Beal MF. 367 Lahermo P. Chollet L. Anderson C. Am J Hum Genet 75:693–702. Pinto FM. 2004. A simple and efﬁcient method for PCR ampliﬁable DNA extraction from ancient bones. 1998. Laitinen V. ´ In: Hajdu P. Haak W. 2001. Malyarchuk BA. Am J Phys Anthropol 100:443–460. 2002. Szeged: JATE Press. Perola M. Stefansson K. Villems R. Stefansson K. Richards M. Goodacre S. Ann Hum Genet 68:438–452. Geberhiwot T. Am J Hum Genet 75:752–770. Reidla M. Cruciani F. Opdal SH. 2001. Weiss G. Genetics 152:1103–1110. Gilles A. Bonne-Tamir B. Rasko I. Brehm A. Ward R. American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10. ´ ´ Helgason A. Major genomic mitochondrial lineages delineate early human expansions. Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA variation in Lithuanians. Mogentale-Proﬁzi N. Mitochondrial DNA sequence diversity in Russians. Gonzalez AM. Poggi C. Perez JA. Forster P. Sambuughin N. Spadoni JL. Wozniak M. Eur J Hum Genet 7:447–458. ¨ ´ ´ ´ ´ Mesterhazy K. Murail P. Napolskikh VV. Francalacci P. Gulcher JR. Calafell F. 1998. Derenko MV. and European haplogroups. correlation with D loop variants and association with disease. Karcagi V. 2001. Bertranpetit J. Vega E. 2000. Ann Hum Genet 65:153– 166. Beres J. Gerbitz KD. Differentiation of the mitochondrial subhaplogroup U4 in populations of Eastern Europe. Eur J Hum Genet 9:708–716. 2003. Budapest: Corvina Press. Yankovsky N. Cabrera VM. Lin AA. p 11–46. Bermingham E. In: Fodor I. 2000. Diez F. Howell N. Lukka M. Eur J Hum Genet 10:521–529. Pollak S. Kolman CJ. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of Mongolian populations and implications for the origin of New World founders. Zhivotovsky LA. Heizmann J. 1982. Stoneking M. Am J Hum Genet 68:1475–1484. In search of a new homeland. Serre M. Science 310:1016–1018. Sykes B. Location and frequency of polymorphic positions in the mtDNA control region of individuals from Germany.1002/ajpa . Pennarun E. Cavalli-Sforza LL. Lehtonen MS. 1980. Linguistic background of genetic relationships. Ward R. 1999. Larruga JM. Czarny J. Spitsyn V. Savontaus ML. Increased number of substitutions in the D-loop of mitochondrial DNA in the sudden infant death syndrome. Uralic original home: history of studies. Mitochondrial DNA variability in Russians and Ukrainians: implication to the origin of the Eastern Slavs. 2004. Majamaa K. Virkkunen M. Brehm A. Torroni A. 1998. Budapest: Gondolat Konyvkiado. 1996. Bachrati CZ. Grzybowski T. 1996. Peltonen L. The emerging tree of West Eurasian mtDNAs: a synthesis of control-region sequences and RFLPs. 2002. Population genetics and disease susceptibility: characterization of central European haplogroups by mtDNA gene mutations. Different genetic components in the Norwegian population revealed by the analysis of mtDNA and Y chromosome polymorphisms. Stave AK. mtDNA polymorphism in the Hungarians: comparison to three other Finno-Ugric-speaking populations. Russ J Genetics 40:1281–1287. Chollet L. Kalmar T. Savontaus ML. Malyarchuk BA. Fodor I. BMC Genet 2:13. Bergen AW. 1996. 2004. Passarino G. mtDNA and the origin of the Icelanders: deciphering signals of recent population history. Hum Hered 53:68–78. Szombathely: Eletunk. The prehistory of the Hungarian people and the conquest. 2002. Hickey E. Population data for 101 Austrian Caucasian mitochondrial DNA dloop sequences: application of mtDNA sequence analysis to a forensic case. The early Hungarian in the 9th century. Cartault F. Cabrera VM. Metspalu E. p 768–795. Laan M. Aula P. Ann Hum Genet 66:261–283. Underhill PA.
1998. Villems R. Phylogeography of mitochondrial DNA in western Europe. 1994. Torroni A. I. Richards M. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler 375:837–840. Mitochondrial DNA sequences from Switzerland reveal striking homogeneity of European populations. PLoS Biol 3:e247. Mangin P. Janicijevic B.368 ¨ ¨ G. 2001. Juji T. Regeszeti Tanulmanyok 1. 1993. Expanding the forensic German mitochondrial DNA control region database: genetic diversity as a function of sample size and microgeography. ARLEQUIN version 2. Genetic evidence of an early exit of Homo sapiens from Africa through eastern Africa. Barbujani G. from human mtDNA. Savontaus ML. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:12035–12039. Hayami M. Vernesi C. Pinto F. Am J Hum Genet 62:1137–1152. Roessli D. Obinu D. Salem AH. Nei M. 1991. Guida V. Metzger DA. 2000. D’Urbano L. 1890. Benson N. Cruciani F. Cabrera VM. Steighner R. 1993. Sajantila A. Polymorphism of the mitochondrial DNA control region in Italians. Torroni A. Sykes B. Schneider S. Salas A. Carracedo A. In: Regino-Pertz GH editors. Budapest: Aka´ ´ demiai Kiado. Schaffner W. Savontaus ML. Tajima A. Rousselet F. 1998. Di Benedetto G. Am J Hum Genet 53:563–590. Sistonen P. A honfoglalo es kora Arpad-kori magyarsag † ´ ´ ´ ´ ´ ´ regeszeti emlekei. Sellitto D. Horai S. Francalacci P. Katti E. Monumenta Germaniae historica Scriptores verum Germanicarum in usum Scholarum Hannoverae-Lipsiae. 1998. 1999. Excoffer L. Lahermo P. Metspalu E. Caramelli D. Sullivan KM. Neel JV. Pfeiffer H. Kivisild T. Vullo CM. Bauer K. Rengo C. Pult I. Li ZY. Beckman L. Lareu MV. 1996. University of Geneva. Matsuo M. Huoponen K. 1991. Voltak-e nagycsaladi temetok a honfoglalo mag† ¨ ¨ ¨ yaroknak? Uber die Existenz der großfamiliaren Graberer´ felder bei den landnehmenden Ungarn. Sellitto D. Geneva. Paabo S. Paabo S. Hill E. p 131–133. Gill P. Larsen M. 1999. 1996. Norby S. Diversity of mtDNA lineages in Portugal: not a genetic edge of European variation. 2001. 1996. Bradley D. Martinez-Cabrera V. Cali F. Demaine A. Bertranpetit J. 2004. Ann Hum Genet 64:491–506. Higuchi R. Al Zaheri N. Lahermo P. Tambets K. Kurze. Santachiara-Benerecetti AS. Torroni A. Scozzari R. Barbujani G. Int J Legal Med 114:224–228. Piercy R. Bandelt HJ. Budapest: Balassi Kiado. Sajantila A. Cabell MF. Scozari R. Francalacci P. Sassaroli C. Comas D. Savontaus ML. Trejaut JA. Santachiara-Benerecetti AS. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Am J Hum Genet 66:262–278. Turchi C. Sellitto D. Romano V. Amorim A. Szeged: Mora Ferenc ´ ¨ ´ Muzeum Evkonyve. 2000. Morelli L. Int J Legal Med 112:291–298. 2000. Simoni L. Savontaus ML. Lee CL. ¨ Regino. mtDNA analysis reveals a major late Paleolithic population expansion from southwestern to northeastern Europe. Int J Legal Med 106:85–90. Torroni A. Papiha S. Issel-Tarver L. Calafell F. Santachiara-Benerecetti S. Macaulay V. 1995. Ostortenetunk kerdesei. Loo JH. Buscemi L. Tracing European founder lineages in the Near Eastern mtDNA pool. Macaulay VA. Georgiev O. Forster P. ´ Rona-Tas A. 1998. Traces of archaic mitochondrial lineages persist in Austronesian-speaking Formosan populations. Vona G. Asian afﬁnities and continental radiation of the four founding Native American mtDNAs. Karger B. Lukka M. Lin M. Reginos Abbatis Prumiensis chronicon. Koivumaki S. Oppenheim A. Al Zaheri N. p 615–638.10:512–526. 1962. Rickards O. Hsu CJ. Marin VT. Rychkov O. Bandelt HJ. TOMORY ET AL. A signal. Am J Hum Genet 67:1251–1276. Sykes B. 1993. WilkinsonHerbots H. Am J Hum Genet 69:844–852. Semino O. Di Rienzo A. Petrozzi M. ¨ ¨ ´ ´ ´ ´ ´ Redei K. Richards M. Ann Hum Genet 60:321–330. Triantaphyllidis C. Paleolithic and neolithic lineages in the European mitochondrial gene pool. Prata MJ. Belledi M. Tolk HV. Novelletto A. Simoni L. Pettener D. Hatina J. 2002. Paabo S. J Hum Genet 49:187–193. Villems R. Holland MM. Secchieri E. Moral P. Anttinen T. Magyar ostortenet-Magyar honfoglalas. Schurr TG. Bandelt HJ. Rychkov Y. Scozzari R. Forster P. Morris AA. Sykes BC. Moral P. F. Eur J Hum Genet 6:365–375. Huhne J. Switzerland: Genetics and Biometry Laboratory. Richards M. Vega E. Omoto K. Aula P. Wallace DC. Laitinen V. Kivisild T. 1996. ´ ´ Vekony G. Simanainen J. Corte-Real H. Nat Genet 23:437–441. Hungarians and Europe in the early middle ages. Stefanescu G. Coppa A. Forster P. Golge M. Genome Res 5:42–52. Rengo C. Bandelt HJ. 2005. Novelletto A. Gierig C. neck in the founding of the Finnish population. Buda† ¨ ´ ´ pest: Nap Kiado. Scozzari R. Tokunaga K. The application of mitochondrial DNA typing to the study of white Caucasian genetic identiﬁcation. Genetic characterization of the body attributed to the evangelist Luke. Tranebjaerg L. 2001. Wallace DC. GeddeDahl T. Genetic relationship between the Canary Islanders and their African and Spanish ancestors inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Thomas M. Bandelt HJ. Hickey E. Forster P. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms: a study of 50 French Caucasian individuals and application to forensic casework. Brown MD. Dimitrov D. Rychkov S. Classiﬁcation of European mtDNAs from an analysis of three European populations. Geographic patterns of mtDNA diversity in Europe. Savolainen P. Walsh PS.000: a software for population genetic data analysis. Bonne-Tamir B. Macaulay V. Brinkmann B. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. 1999. Smith DG. Sykes B. Tagliabracci A. Huoponen K. Bandelt HJ. Genetics 144:1835–1850. Genes and languages in Europe: an analysis of mitochondrial lineages. of postglacial recolonization in Europe. Genetic origins of the Ainu inferred from combined DNA analyses of maternal and paternal lineages. Torroni A. Int J Legal Med 111:292– 298. Parik J. Rolf B.1002/ajpa . Semino O. mtDNA analysis of the Galician population: a genetic edge of European variation. Biotechniques 10:506–513. Hickey E. ´ ´ ´ ´ ´ Szoke B. Budapest: CEU Press. Bertranpetit J. Pereira L. 1998. Rudan P. Rengo C. Papiha S. Hernandez M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13460–13463. Paternal and maternal DNA lineages reveal a bottle- American Journal of Physical Anthropology—DOI 10. Sajantila A. McElreavey K. Ann Hum Genet 62:241–260. Quintana-Murci L. Macaulay V. Demaine A. Mol Biol Evol. Am J Hum Genet 59:185–203. Passarino G. ´ ´ ´ ´ Revesz L. Gonzalez AM. Kivisild T. Malaspina P. Hedges R. Cruciani F. Marzuki S. Larruga JM. 2000. Di Rienzo A. Novelletto A. Tamura K. Richards MB. He CL.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.