Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FACEBOOK
ENGAGEMENT
REPORT
A Snapshot Of The Asia Travel
Industry’s Market Leaders
Table of Contents
Execu&ve
Summary
2
Preliminary Ma4ers 3
Principal Conclusions
The most significant conclusions:
• The last 12 months have provided huge growth in Facebook usage and Fan Base for the large
brands.
• Very few brands are taking advantage of the full interactive potential of the Facebook platform.
• AirAsia media engagement by Asian Travel Brands. The selection process for
this year’s report began by looking at 35 Asian travel brands active
• Air New Zealand on Facebook. Based upon the data collected, the list was narrowed
to a final set of 20 that we believe accurately represents the Top 20
• Anantara most active Asian travel brands on Facebook. The list of the final
• Cathay Pacific
• Dusit Thani Who’s Included?
• HPL Hotels In terms of selection criteria, all the brands are based in Asia, though
many have properties elsewhere in the world. The selection critera is
• Jetstar broad enough to cover groups that control or manage multiple
• Karma Resorts brands, for example, HPL Hotels, an umbrella group that includes
various branded properties.
• Korean Air
Our definition of “Asia” includes Australia, New Zealand, Korea and
• Malaysia Airlines Japan, but does not include India. The focus is on English language
pages.2
• Mandarin Oriental
• Pan Pacific Hotels
& Resorts Representativeness
• Qantas Despite our best efforts, the data set suffers from several limitations:
• Tiger Airways • Japan - As Facebook is not the dominant social network in Japan,
Japanese firms may be under-represented. Additionally, local brands
• Tune Hotels who engage primarily in Japanese, not English, were not included.
• Wotif • Korea - Korean firms are also likely to be under-represented for the
same reasons we state regarding Japan, above.
1 A complete list of all the brands in this report, with URLs to their primary Facebook Fan Page, can be found at the end of
this paper.
2 Where a brand maintains multiple Fan Pages in multiple languages we have included in the count the non-English Pages.
Among the properties listed last year that were not included this year:
Of that group, many are smaller firms, or companies with only one property. The smaller firms, though more
agile in developing their Facebook presence, were not able to keep pace with the larger brands in the long run.3
• Asiana
3 It’s worth noting that two previous participants were excluded for reasons not related to their engagement levels: Zuji is
owned by US-based Travelocity and therefore not eligible for inclusion, and Bangkok Airways ceased operations since the
last report. Additionally, note that last year’s report identified 25 market leaders, where this year we have narrowed to
selection set to only 20.
• 50% of the group achieved more than 500% growth in their Facebook Fan base since our last report in
April of 2010.
• Four of our top 20 -- Cathay Pacific, Dusit Thani, Jetstar and Wotif -- managed growth in excess of
1,000%!
• In terms of fan count, the leader last year and this year remains the same: AirAsia. Last year, AirAsia
was the only company in the group with more than 100,000 fans. This year, AirAsia is the only
company to break the landmark 1,000,000 fans barrier, exhibiting a growth rate of 682%.
• Malaysia Airlines came in second both this year and last, with 355,073
fans -- a growth rate of 537%.
50% of our
• While many of the leading firms turned in impressive growth figures, the brands saw their
laggard in the group was Six Senses, who’s fan base grew by on 72%
fan base grow
over last year.
more than
500%
• The second slowest growth rate came from Qantas, which still turned in
a very respectable 233% rate of growth.
4This number is largely influenced by the engagement strategy employed by the brand; those brands allowing individual
properties to maintain their own Fan Pages have considerably larger numbers than those brands that centralize their social
media efforts.
AirAsia 1,322,243
Malaysia Airlines 355,073
Cathay Pacific 204,920
HPL Hotels 185,629
Air New Zealand 166,703
Shangri-La 142,291
Tiger Airways 85,466
Jetstar 83,790
Mandarin Oriental 82,821
Wotif 56,511
Qantas 46,839
Thai Airlines 40,875
Karma Resorts 30,932
Asiana 30,835
Dusit Thani 29,630
Tune Hotels 28,159
Korean Air 21,806
Six Senses 17,860
Pan Pacific 9,948
Anantara 8,591
As you can see in the chart above, when it comes to fans, airline brands dominate the group. Four of our top
five brands are airlines. Going a bit further, six of the top eight are from the airline sector. Given the airlines’
exposure to large numbers of clients, the dominance of the airline brands is probably no surprise.
The leading accommodation brand, HPL Hotels, draws it’s strength almost exclusively from the popularity of it’s
flagship Hard Rock Hotels operations in the region. Both the Penang and the Bali branches of the Hard Rock
have Fan Pages with over 75,000 fans each. The second place accommodations firm, Shangri-La 5 , maintains
a large number of Fan Pages, but the real strength in fan numbers resides in the group’s primary Facebook Fan
Page, which boasts more than 100,000 fans.
At the bottom end of this metric, the laggards are Pan Pacific and Anantara. If we look at the numbers in
terms of the average fans per Fan Page (as opposed to looking at total fans, shown above), Pan Pacific
actually finishes behind Anantara; Anantara averages 1,227 fans per Page, where Pan Pacific comes in at
less than half that amount, averaging 552 fans per Fan Page.6
6 Taking this one step further, if we look at the statistics in terms of average number of fans per Fan Page, Six Senses also
finishes behind Anantara, with an average of 638 fans per Fan Page.
As a general rule, the accommodations brands in our survey maintained significantly higher numbers of Fan
Pages. Of the six brands maintaining the fewest Fan Pages, five are from the airlines category. There are,
however exceptions: three of our airline brands, Air New Zealand, AirAsia and Cathay Pacfic, maintain more
than 10 Fan Pages each.
Our research shows that the large number of accommodation brand Pages are the result of the creation of
individual Pages for the various hotel/resort/spa/restaurant properties under the brand umbrella. For the airlines,
in contrast, multiple Pages typically result from the creation of different Pages aimed at different geographic
markets.
The total number of Fan Pages maintained by our group was 221. That total also shows significant growth over
the numbers for 2010.
The default Facebook Fan Page offers a stock set of tabs. The default set can include7:
• Info
• Photos
• Discussions
• Notes
• Events
• Video
• Reviews
• Links
Photos 98%
Discussions 57%
Notes 50%
Events 47%
Video 33%
Links 20%
Polls/Questions 14%
Reviews 12%
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Of the default tab options, only the Info tab is required and cannot be deleted or hidden. We found the Photos
tab to be nearly ubiquitous, with 98% of the pages employing the tab in some fashion; thereafter, however, we
saw a great deal of diversity. The Discussions and Notes tabs were the only other tabs to be employed by at
7 The exact contents of the default set depends on when the Page was created, as Facebook has made changes to this
functionality over time.
The custom tabs we saw were used for a variety of purposes. The most common Less than
usage was simply to display text or promotional graphics. Many sites employed
“Welcome” pages, that is, custom tabs built to greet visitors on arrival to the Page.
50%
While the Welcome page technique appeared frequently, surprisingly few of the of Pages
Fan Pages went further to employ the “reveal” feature, which is used to encourage surveyed employ
visitors to “like” the Page. custom tabs.
8Sadly, though, the Discussions tab was empty as often as not! The tab is published by default, indicating to us that some
companies were unaware that the tab could be removed or hidden if unused.
Twitter 6%
YouTube 5%
RSS 2%
Flickr 1%
FourSquare 1%
1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%
Despite their sophistication in other areas of Facebook usage, brands still seem to be treating their social media
channels as silos, as opposed to promoting engagement across channels. In this area at the very least, it seems
many companies are missing clear opportunities for richer engagement with their fans.
Contests 8%
Bookings 8%
Games 1%
1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%
While there are a number of Fan Pages that employ content pages containing promotional information, the use
of Facebook purely for display advertising fails to take full advantage of the rich media and interactive
possibilities of the Facebook platform. The Facebook Only Specials category, indicated in the chart above,
typically took the form of content pages that employ the reveal functionality; a simple mechanism, but effective
for this limited purpose.
• Of those Pages employing Contests or Games, the most common application provider was Wildfire10 ,
though several Pages appear to be using proprietary gaming platforms.
• For those Fan Pages providing a Bookings and Reservations functionality, there does not yet appear to
be a dominant provider.
• Airfares and other more specialized bookings appear to rely on proprietary systems.13
9In most cases our Top 20 maintained multiple Twitter profiles. Five of our brands have more than 10 Twitter profiles. At the
extreme top end of the scale, Mandarin Oriental has 19.
10 http://www.wildfiregames.com
11 http://www.fastbooking.com
12 http://www.opentable.com
13 The source of a number of the bookings systems was not reliably discernible from the code on the Page.
AirAsia http://www.facebook.com/AirAsia
Anantara http://www.facebook.com/anantara
Asiana http://www.facebook.com/asianaairlines.korea
Jetstar http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jetstar-Asia/31975232581
Qantas http://www.facebook.com/Qantas
Shangri-La http://www.facebook.com/shangrilaintl
Wotif http://www.facebook.com/wotif
* HPL Hotels does not maintain a Fan Page for their parent company; rather, their Fan Pages relate to the
individual brands under their umbrella.
We have a highly detailed Social Media case-study report coming out this June which will focus on Global
trends and best-practices from the most innovative and successful social media brands in travel. For more info
please email gina@eyefortravel.com
Contact
Details
EyeforTravel Ltd Web: www.eyefortravel.com
7-9 Fashion Street Twitter: www.twitter.com/eyefortravel
London
LinkedIn: Asia Travel Executives
E1 6PX
eMail: marco@eyefortravel.com
United Kingdom
This report references data and conclusions published in April 2010 in the Asia Travel
Engagement Report. That Report can be downloaded free of charge from the
water&stone website by visiting: http://www.waterandstone.com/book/white-papers
Contact
Details
23a Jalan Raya Semer Web: www.waterandstone.com
Kerobokan, Kuta Facebook: www.facebook.com/waterandstone
Bali, Indonesia Twitter: www.twitter.com/waterandstone
80361 eMail: contactus@waterandstone.com
T 62 361 739 969