Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NLR-TP-98264
NLR-TP-98264
This investigation has been carried out under a contract awarded by the Netherlands
Agency for Aerospace Programmes, contract number 01310N.
The Netherlands Agency for Aerospace Programmes has granted NLR permission to
publish this report.
Contents
ABSTRACT 5
INTRODUCTION 5
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION 6
SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION 6
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE 6
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 7
RESULTS FROM EARLIER INVESTIGATIONS 8
Specimen description 8
Experimental procedure 8
Experimental results 8
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 14
REFERENCES 14
6 Tables
17 Figures
generation
either: ofthegeneric
increase Testinandthe Verification
cumulative Equipment incomingenergy
acoustic emission units. Verification
was Contr
quite of attitudethroughout
gradual
ol Computer control modes
(TVE) with re-usable hardware and software
the loading process upto the point of final failure. for and AOCSreal-time behaviour is done in the early period of
MACS bus
testing of Attitude and Orbit Control Subsystems integration using a combination of real and simulated
The photographs taken during testing and post-mortem inspection of the specimens showed that
(AOCS) of spacecraft [Ref. 1]. units.
delaminations were formed in the adhesive layer on the Sensorright hand side of the specimen Actuator and Protocol
Data
Le
vel
Electronics Electronics
Thebetween
TVE hadthe to be+45°
usableandfrom 0°thelayers on the
early stage left hand
of the Theside test of the described
concept specimen. in Figure
this paper5 isshows based on a a
delamination
AOCS developmentbetweenup to thethe +45° and
integration 0° AOCS
of the layers on the leftclosed
static handloop sidetest of afacility
specimen. (no realSubstantial
motion). The
Sensor
in growth
the spacecraft
of the environment
delamination i.e. open
wasloop seentests
in with test configuration
some instances. is shown in figureActuator
Head On the left hand side a jump of the
2. The dynamics
a delamination
single unit uptototheclosed loop tests with any and environment
adjacent interface between the 0° and -45° layers was observed. simulation is responsible for theUser Level
Data
combination of real and simulated AOCS units should computation of stimuli for the sensor units and
The results obtained for specimens with skin S4 were Electrical
Physical very similar MACS unitto those MACS obtained
Electrical forthe(Engineer
units)
ing
be supported. processing
Stimuli ofStimulimonitorSimulation
data from Monitoringthe actuator
Monitoring units.
specimens containing skin S2, albeit at considerably The higher stimulated loads. sensorsThe non-linearity will deliver priorsensor
to
Gr
A delamination
prototype TVEwas wasabsent
built forfor these
ESA/ESTECspecimens. to measurements to the AOCS ACCUnit Sim via the MACS attitude
ulation
The delamination
demonstrate the new approachlocations were thehardware
with re-usable same as found control fordatabus.
specimens Dynamics and vironment
En the
In the containing
ACC Sim
ureceived
lationskin S2. data The will be
andformation
software [Ref. 2]. This prototype has recently fed Test Equipment
into the attitude control laws, which results in
of a delamination in specimen S4F3 is shown in figure 6.
been developed into a fullblown AOCS test
The results for the specimens containing skin system commanding S5 were of the actuator units.
again quite similar to those The response of the
able to meet the requirements for both subsystem and Fig. 2 Test
actuator unitsconfigur
is ation
measured with a monitoring deviceFig. 3 Architecture o
obtained for the specimens containing the skin S3. For this specimens the only viable method
system level testing of the AOCS of the XMM and and routed back to the corresponding dynamics and
to determine
INTEGRAL the delamination onset load was visual
satellites. inspection,
environment model. since In the
this onset
way the ofloopdelamination
is closed.
was not evident on the load-deflection curve.
Delamination
2. TEST CONCEPT was observed between the +45° and The-45° MACS layers on thehasleft
interface to hand side of the to
be programmable
Figure
(9 pages in total)
1 gives a schematic overview of a generic reflect any combination of real and simulated units. If
specimen.
AOCS for spacecraft. The diagram reflects the cyclic real sensor and/or actuator units are not available they
-8-
NLR-TP-98264
ABSTRACT 2. Tensor Skin Concept nature of the AOCS. A complete AOCS, together 3 with
Specimen description dynamics and environment can be considered as a
The National Aerospace Laboratory NLR in the loop which is actively closed by the Attitude Control
3. Experimental Results 4
NetherlandsThehas specimens
developed aused
new ingeneration of Test
reference 2 consistedComputer (ACC). stiffener bonded onto a skin
of a blade-type
and Verification Equipment (TVE) for testing of
laminate. Orbit
Attitude and 4.
The stiffener flange was not tapered. The specimen width was equal to 50 mm. The
Control Subsystems of spacecraft.
overall Simulations
dimensions of the specimens weretestthe same as given in figure 1.target attitude 7
Based on a prototype TVE developed for ESA,
equipment The experimental
has been developed programme
for Matra Marconiencompassed 4 differentmeasurements skin lay-ups, commands
CONTR
OL
three different
stiffener
Space lay-ups
for AOCS and for
subsystem each
and stiffener
system level lay-up
testing one
5. Recently performed Tests and Future Developments or two variants with either a thicker stiffener
9
of blade,
the XMM and INTEGRAL scientific satellites.
which was obtained by adding a centre laminate to the blade, or a wider stiffener flange.
SENSORS ACTUATORS
The laminates were made using Fibredux 6376/T400H prepreg, with a nominal thickness of
This paper 6. Conclusions
describes the test concept and the 9
0.181 mm. The adhesive used to bond the stiffener to the skin was FM 300K.
architecture of the XMM test system with its main
The skin
features, the and stiffener
incremental identification
development and of all specimens is givenattitude
delivery, in table IV.
DYNAMICS
torques magnetic
Info on: fields9
References
and experiences obtained during development and use Earth disturbances
of the system. The described work has also been Sun
Stars ENVIR
ONMENT Syst
performed under ESA
Experimental contract.
procedure Magnetic field
1. INTRODUCTION
The 4 Tables
same test set-up as shown in figure 2 wasFig.used 1 Generic attitude contr
to load theolspecimens
system
in four-point Sy
Based on experiences with the production and use of
bending. 8The
Figures
test were performed under displacement control with a constant loading rate of B
various test systems for the ISO, SAX, SOHO and Int
1 mm/min.
other satellites, Specimens
the Nationalwere also tested
Aerospace under lateral
Laboratory In tension, in which
the integration thephase
and test load the is applied to the
AOCS subsystem
Physical Le
vel
NLRskininlaminate only. The
the Netherlands has tests were performed
developed a new under displacement
is gradually control with
built up Attitude
depending on thea constant
schedule ofData
generation
loadingofrate generic
of 1Test and Verification
mm/min. Equipment
During the incoming
tests, the applied units.
load andVerification
theContr
cross ofhead
ol Computerattitude control modes
displacement
(TVE) with re-usable hardware and software for
were monitored. Photographs were taken during the testing. and real-time
AOCS behaviour is done in the early period of
MACS bus
testing of Attitude and Orbit Control Subsystems integration using a combination of real and simulated
(AOCS) of spacecraft [Ref. 1]. units. Protocol Le
vel
Sensor Actuator Data
Electronics Electronics
TheExperimental
TVE had to beresults
usable from the early stage of the The test concept described in this paper is based on a
AOCS development up to the integration of the AOCS static closed loop test facility (no real motion). The
Sensor
in the spacecraft environment i.e. open loop tests
All specimens loaded in four-point bending with testshowed
configurationa similar is shown in figure
failure Actuator
2. The dynamics
behaviour. At a
Head
a certain
single unit up to closed loop tests with any and environment simulation
load level a crack initiated in the fillet of the bond layer. After a further load increase, is responsible for theUser Level
Data
combination of real and simulated AOCS units should computation of stimuli for the sensor units and the
Electrical The (Engineer ing
a delamination formed either in the bond layer or inPhysical the firstElectrical
layer of MACSthe
unit skin MACS laminate.
units)
be supported. processing
Stimuli ofStimulimonitorSimulation
data from the actuator
Monitoring Monitoring units.
bending moments at delamination initiation for allThe specimensstimulated are givensensorsin table will V.deliver sensor Gr
A prototypeTheTVEfailure
wasbehaviour
built for of the specimens
ESA/ESTEC to loaded in lateral to
measurements tension
the AOCS(one
ACC specimen
via
Unit Sim
ulation the MACS for each attitude
configuration)
demonstrate the newwas quitewith
approach similar to that
re-usable of the specimens
hardware control databus.loaded Dynamics
in and
In the vironment
En the
four-point
ACC Sim
ureceived
lationbending. data The will be
andloads
software [Ref. 2]. This prototype has recently fedTest Equipment
into the attitude control laws, which results in
at delamination initiation for all specimens are given in table VI.
been developed into a fullblown AOCS test system commanding of the actuator units. The response of the
able to meet the requirements for both subsystem and Fig. 2 Test
actuator conf
units igur
is ation
measured with a monitoring deviceFig. 3 Architecture o
system level testing of the AOCS of the XMM and and routed back to the corresponding dynamics and
EVALUATION
INTEGRAL satellites. OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS environment model. In this way the loop is closed.
OBSERVATIONS
2. TEST CONCEPT AND INTERPRETATION OFThe EXPERIMENTAL
MACS interface has RESULTS
to be programmable to
(9 pages in total)
Figure 1 gives a schematic overview of a generic reflect any combination of real and simulated units. If
AOCS for The
spacecraft. The diagram
delamination reflects
onset the cyclic
moments real sensor tested
for the specimens and/or in
actuator units areprogramme
the current not availableas
they
given in table III are shown in figure 7. The delamination onset moments for the specimens
-9-
NLR-TP-98264
Evaluation
Space for AOCS of
subsystem the
and tests
systemon specimens
level testing with
5. Recently performed Tests and Future Developments various skin laminates rendered a failure
9
of envelope
the XMM and INTEGRAL scientific satellites.
in the 22-γ12 plane. As an example, ellipses are used to fit to the current data sets:
SENSORS ACTUATORS
S1, satellites,
other S2, S3 and the S4. The ratio
National is approximately
Aerospace Laboratory equal to integration
In the 0.4. The and ratiotestofphase22 and γ12 for
the AOCS skin
subsystem
Physical Le
vel
NLRS5 is
in approximately
the Netherlandsequal has to 0.25. a new
developed is gradually built up Attitude
depending on the schedule ofData
generation of generic
The criterion Test and
brings Verification
together Equipment
the results incoming
for specimens units.
with theVerification
thinner of laminate
S2
Control Computerattitude control
and modes
the
(TVE) with re-usable hardware and software for and real-time
AOCS
results for specimens with the thicker S3, S4 and S5 laminates. The plotted behaviour is done in the early
strains period
for of
MACS bus
testing of Attitude and Orbit Control Subsystems integration using a combination of real and simulated
specimens with skin S1 pertain to the maximum loads during the tests, which were not
(AOCS) of spacecraft [Ref. 1]. units. Protocol Le
vel
sufficient to cause delamination. Clearly, the results obtained Sensor for skin S1 are not in line with Data
Actuator
Electronics Electronics
Thethe
TVEproposed
had to becriterion.
usable from the early stage of the The test concept described in this paper is based on a
The failure
AOCS development up to envelope for ofthe
the integration the specimens
AOCS tested
static closedin four-point
loop test facility bending (no in realthe earlierThe
motion).
Sensor
in programme
the spacecraft is
environment i.e. open loop tests with
given in figure 12. The failure strains Head test configuration
used to compose the criterion for dynamics
is shown in figure Actuator
2. The these
fand environment simulation is responsible for theUser Level
a experimental
single unit upresults
to closedwere 0.35 for 22 and 2 for γ 12 which are quite similar to the values used Data
loop tests f
with any
combination of real and simulated AOCS units should
in figure 13. It should be kept in mind that the computation flanges of stimuli
Physical of Electrical
the specimens for theMACS
MACS unit withsensor Electrical
whichunits and the(Engineering
these units)
be supported. processing
Stimuli ofStimulimonitorSimulation
data from the actuator
Monitoring Monitoring units.
experimental results were obtained, were not tapered. The stimulated sensors will deliver sensor Gr
A As can be TVE
prototype seen, was
the ratio
built offor 22 and γ12 is similar
ESA/ESTEC to for skin laminates
measurements to the 1a ACC
AOCS and 2a, the
via
Unit Sim
ulation andMACS for 1b attitude
and
2b respectively.
demonstrate The signwith
the new approach of re-usable
the shearhardware
angle, whichcontrol databus. Dynamics
was negative the and
Insince vironment
En top
the
ACC theSimulayer
lation
received haddata a -45°
will be
andorientation,
software [Ref. 2]. This prototype has recently fedT est Equipment
into the attitude control laws, which results in
was changed to bring all results into the first quadrant.
been developed into a fullblown AOCS test system
For the results in figure 12 the criterion appears to beFig. commanding
applicable: of the actuator units. The response of
the results for specimens with Fig. 3 Architecture o the
able to meet the requirements for both subsystem and actuator 2 Test conf
units igur
is ation
measured with a monitoring device
thicker and thinner skin laminates, skin laminates 2a and 2b, and skin laminates 1a and 1b
system level testing of the AOCS of the XMM and and routed back to the corresponding dynamics and
respectively,
INTEGRAL satellites. are equally well described; also, the environment model. In this way laminates
results for very different the loop is closed. can be
described by the proposed criterion.
It should
2. TEST be noted that the skin laminate 1b from the
CONCEPT Theearlier
MACSprogramme interface has is identical
to be programmableto the skin to
Figure
(9 pages
1 gives
in total)overview of a generic
laminate S1a inschematic
the current programme. The same reflectapplies
any combination
for skinoflaminates real and simulated 2b andunits. S3 If
AOCS for spacecraft. The diagram reflects the cyclic
respectively. From the fact that the criterion appears to properly describe the behaviour ofthey
real sensor and/or actuator units are not available
specimens containing skin laminates 1b, whereas it appears to be less appropriate for specimens
-11-
NLR-TP-98264
Electronics Electronics
Thesubstantial.
TVE had to The calculated
be usable from themoment
early stageforofspecimens
the with
The test skin
concept laminate
described S5incorresponded
this paper is based quite
on a
welldevelopment
AOCS with the experimental results.
up to the integration of the AOCS static closed loop test facility (no real motion). The
Sensor
in the spacecraft
Fromenvironment i.e. openofloop
the comparison thetests with
calculated testthe
and configuration is shown in figureActuator
Head experimental results form the earlier
2. The dynamics
a experimental
single unit upprogramme
to closed (Fig.
loop 15),
tests itwith any and environment simulation
can be concluded that these results are generally described is responsible for theUser Level
Data
combination of real and simulated AOCS units should computation of stimuli for the sensor units
quite well. The extreme values mostly pertain to specimens Physical with a stiffener
Electrical MACS unit which MACS hadElectricala thickerthe(Engineer
and
units)
ing
be supported. processing
Stimuli ofStimulimonitorSimulation
data from the actuator
Monitoring Monitoring units.
stiffener web or had an enlarged stiffener flange,The especiallystimulated as farsensors
as the specimens
will deliverwithsensor a
Gr
A thicker
prototypeskinTVE werewasconcerned.
built for ESA/ESTEC to measurements to the AOCS ACC Unit Simvia the MACS attitude
ulation
demonstrate the new approach with re-usable hardware control databus. Dynamics
In the and vironment
En the
ACC Sim
ureceived
lation data will be
and software [Ref. 2]. This prototype has recently Test Equipment
fed into the attitude control laws, which results in
been developed into a fullblown
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTSAOCSFROMtest system commanding of the actuator units. The response of the
THE LITERATURE
able to meet the requirements for both subsystem and Fig. 2 Test
actuator conf
units igur
is ation
measured with a monitoring deviceFig. 3 Architecture o
system level testing of the AOCS of the XMM and and routed back to the corresponding dynamics and
INTEGRALThe applicability of the criterion was also environment
satellites. evaluated for model. experimental
In this way the results
loop isgiven
closed.in
references 4 and 5.
In reference 4 results are given for a 24-ply
2. TEST CONCEPT The MACS skin interface
with a hasquasi-isotropic lay-up. to
to be programmable
Figure
(9 pages
1 gives were
in total)
a schematic
Specimens similaroverview of a genericused inreflect
to the specimens any combination
the current of real and
experimental simulated units.
programme. The If
AOCS for spacecraft. The diagram reflects the cyclic
specimen width was equal to 25 mm. Specimens were manufactured from the prepreg materialthey
real sensor and/or actuator units are not available
IM6/3501-6. They contained either square ended (specimen code B) or tapered flanges
-12-
NLR-TP-98264
The
Space for AOCS specimens
subsystem with
and a
systemsquare
level ended
testing
5. Recently performed Tests and Future Developments flange were unadvertently manufactured with
9 a
of slightly
the XMMdifferent
and INTEGRAL scientific satellites.
lay-up. The difference in lay-up is taken into account in the determination of
SENSORS ACTUATORS
the strains. The sign of the shear angle was changed to bring all results into the first quadrant.
This paper 6. Conclusions
describes the test concept and the 9
In figure 16 the calculated strains at failure
architecture of the XMM test system with its main 22
and γ12 are given. The most salient observation
is the the
features, considerably
incremental lower strains and
development at failure
delivery,for these specimensattitude in comparison
DYNAMICS to the strains
torques magnetic at
Info on: fields
andfailure givenobtained
experiences in figures
References 11 development
during to 13: the strainsand use are less Ear than
th
50 percent of the strains given
disturbances
9there.
of As
the can be seen,
system. The the ratio of
described work22has andalsoγ12 been
is quite different
Sun for the skin laminate combined with
Stars
performed under ESA contract.
the square ended flanges and the skin laminate combined with the ENVIR
Magnetic field
ONMENT
tapered flanges. As a result Syst
of the low mechanical strain levels, the relative influence of the curing strains is larger.
1. INTRODUCTION 4 Tables
For the tapered specimens the strains at failure are similar Fig. 1 Generic attitude contr
for all threeol loading system
conditions. For Sy
Based on experiences with the production and use of
the square 8 Figures
ended specimens the strains at failure obtained using the three-point bending tests B
various test systems for the ISO, SAX, SOHO and Int
are satellites,
other somewhatthelower thanAerospace
National those obtained using the Infour-point
Laboratory the integration bending and testtest.phase Thethe variation
AOCS subsystem in the
NLRresults
in for
the specimens
Netherlandswith has square endeda flanges
developed new is considerably
is gradually built lessup than for
depending
Attitude
the specimens
on the schedulewith ofPhysical
Data
Level
generation
taperedofflanges.
generic Test
From andtheVerification Equipment here incoming
results presented it can beunits. concluded Verification
Controthat ofthe
l Computer attitude
influencecontrolofmodes a
(TVE) with re-usable hardware and software for andAOCS
transverse load on the delamination onset was absent for specimens with a tapered real-time behaviour is done in the early
flange period
and of
MACS bus
testing of Attitude and Orbit Control Subsystems integration using a combination of real and simulated
relatively small for specimens with a square ended flange.
(AOCS) of spacecraft [Ref. 1]. units. Protocol Le
vel
Since there is only one point per configuration, it is not possible to accurately construct
Sensor Actuator failure Data
Electronics Electronics
Theenvelopes.
TVE had toFrom the available
be usable from the early results
stageitofappears
the likely
The test thatconcept
the applicable
described in failure
this paper strains would
is based on a
be less
AOCS for square
development up toended than foroftapered
the integration the AOCS specimens. staticThe closedfactloop that testthe facility
flange (no tapering appearsThe
real motion).
Sensor
in to
the influence
spacecraft environment i.e. open onset
the delamination loop tests with whereas
moment test configuration
Headthe flangeis lay-up shown in figureActuator
appears 2.toThe have dynamics
no
a significant
single unit influence,
up to closed loop tests with
would merit further research. any and environment simulation is responsible for theUser Level
Data
combination of real and simulated AOCS units should computation of stimuli for theMACS sensor Electrical
units and the(Engineering
In reference 5, results are given of four-point bending
Physical tests.MAFive
Electrical CS unit different specimen units)
be supported. processing
Stimuli ofStimulimonitorSimulation
data from Monitoringthe actuator
Monitoring units.
configurations were tested: four different skin laminates (A,C,D,F), and
The stimulated sensors one skin will laminatedeliver with sensor Gr
A two different
prototype TVEflange lay-ups
was built for (A, B). All flanges
ESA/ESTEC to were tapered with
measurements to theaAOCS 20°
ACC Unittaper.
Simvia the
ulation TheMACS specimen attitude
width was
demonstrate the 25
newmm. approach with re-usable hardware control databus. Dynamics In the andACC vironment
En the Sim
ureceived
lation data will be
andThesoftware [Ref. 2]. This prototype has recently fedT est Equipment
into the attitude control laws, which results
delamination was reported to have occurred in the flange for all configurations but in
been developed into a fullblown AOCS test
configuration D. Therefore the proposed criterionFig. can system commanding notof the
be considered valid, for of
actuator units. The response allthe
able to meet the requirements for both subsystem and actuator 2 Test
unitsconfigur
is ation
measured with a monitoring deviceFig. 3 Architecture o
configurations but configuration D. For those configurations, the strains at failure, which are
system level testing of the AOCS of the XMM and and routed back to the corresponding dynamics and
shown insatellites.
INTEGRAL figure 17, should be viewed as lying inside the proposed
environment model.failure In this envelope.
way the loop The strains
is closed.
at failure were calculated using the same material data as used for the results of reference 4.
Comparing
2. TEST CONCEPT the rest for configurations A and B, the Theinfluence
MACS of the flange
interface has to laminate lay-up on to
be programmable
Figure
(9 pages in total)overview of a generic
1 gives a schematic
the delamination onset moment is again found toreflect any combination
be negligible, also for of real and simulatedinunits.
delamination the If
AOCS for spacecraft. The diagram reflects the cyclic
flange. The failure strain in the outermost 45° layer for configuration C is much smaller, sincethey
real sensor and/or actuator units are not available
this layer was the second layer from the flange interface while the layer adjacent to the flange
-13-
NLR-TP-98264
Agency
Space for
for AOCS Aerospace
subsystem Programmes,
and system level contract
testing number
5. Recently performed Tests and Future Developments 01310 N. 9
of the XMM and INTEGRAL scientific satellites.
The contributions to the programme of a student from Imperial College, ms. S. Handley,
SENSORS ACTUATORS
and her supervisor K. Stevens, are gratefully acknowledged.
This paper 6. Conclusions
describes the test concept and the 9
architecture of the XMM test system with its main
DYNAMICS
features, the incremental development and delivery, attitude torques magnetic
Info on: fields
andREFERENCES References
experiences obtained during development and use Earth disturbances
9
of the system. The described work has also been Sun
Stars ENVIRONMENT Syst
performed
1. under ESA contract.
P. Arendsen, H.G.S.J. Thuis, J.F.M. Wiggenraad Magnetic field
Optimization of composite stiffended panels with postbuckling constraints, National
1. INTRODUCTION4 Tables Fig. 1 Generic attitude contr ol system
Aerospace
Based on experiences
Laboratory
with the
Technical
production and
Publication
use of
NLR TP 94083 U, published in the Proc. Sy
50 8thFigures
Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Washington, DC,1994 B
various test systems for the ISO, SAX, SOHO and Int
2. satellites,
other H.G.S.J. Thuis, J.F.M.
the National Aerospace Wiggenraad
Laboratory In the integration and test phase the AOCS subsystem
Physical Le
vel
NLR in the Investigation
Netherlands ofhas thedeveloped
bond strengtha new of a isdiscrete
gradually skin-stiffener
built up Attitude
depending interface,
on the National
schedule ofData
generation Aerospace
of generic Test and Verification
Laboratory Equipment
Technical incoming
Publication NLR TP units.92183Verification
L,ol1992
Contr of attitude control modes
Computer
(TVE)
3. with re-usable
H.G.S.J. Thuis hardware and software for and real-time
AOCS behaviour is done in the early period of
MACS bus
testing of Attitude and Orbit Control Subsystems integration using a combination of real and simulated
Onvestigation
(AOCS) of spacecraft [Ref. 1].
into the strength of bonded joints
units.
between composite stiffeneres and skins
- continuation of the investigation described inSensor NLR TP 92183 L -, NationalActuator Aerospace Protocol Data
Le
vel
Electronics Electronics
The TVE had Laboratory
to be usableContract
from theReport NLR
early stage of CR
the 93279
TheCtest (inconcept
Dutch),described 1993 in this paper is based on a
4. development
AOCS P.J. Minguet,
up to theT.K. O'Brien
integration of the AOCS static closed loop test facility (no real motion). The
Sensor
in the spacecraft environment
“Analysis of test i.e. open loop tests
methods for with test configuration
characterizing is shown in figureActuator
Head skin/stringer debonding failures in
2. The dynamics
a single unit up to closed loop tests with any and environment
reinforced composite panels”, Composite materials: testing and design (Twelfth volume), simulation is responsible for theUser Level
Data
combination of real and simulated AOCS units should computation
Physical
of
Electrical
stimuli for
MASociety
CS unit
the MACS
sensor units and the
Electrical and (Engineer ing
ASTM
be supported.
STP 1274, R.B. Deo and C.R. Saff, Eds.,
processing
Stimuli
American
ofStimulimonitorSimulation
data from
for Testing
the actuator
Monitoring Monitoring units. units)
Materials, 1994 The stimulated sensors will deliver sensor Gr
A 5. P.J.TVE
prototype Minguet,
was built T.K.forO'Brien
ESA/ESTEC to measurements to the AOCS ACC via the MACS attitude
Unit Sim
ulation
demonstrate“Analysis of composite
the new approach skin/stringer
with re-usable hardware bondcontrolfailure usingDynamics
databus. Inathe and
strain
ACCvironment
En the Sim
energy ureceived
lation
release data rate
will be
and software [Ref. 2]. This prototype has recently fed Test Equipment
into the attitude control laws, which results in
approach”, Proceedings of ICCM-10, Whistler, B.C., 1995
been
6. developed into a fullblown AOCS test
Laminate Analysis Program, User Guide, Anaglyphsystem commanding of
Ltd, the actuator
London 1996 units. The response of the
able to meet the requirements for both subsystem and Fig. 2 Test conf iguration
actuator units is measured with a monitoring device Fig. 3 Architectur
eo
system level testing of the AOCS of the XMM and and routed back to the corresponding dynamics and
INTEGRAL satellites. environment model. In this way the loop is closed.
PER CONFIGURATION
1. INTRODUCTION4 Tables Fig. 1 Generic attitude contr
ol system
Sy
Based on experiences with the
8 Figures S1 production and S2use of S3 S4 S5 B
various test systems for the ISO, SAX, SOHO and Int
F1 the National3 Aerospace Laboratory
other satellites, 3 In the3 integration and test
3 phase the AOCS subsystem
Physical Le
vel
NLR in the Netherlands has developed a new is gradually built up Attitude
depending on the schedule ofData
generation F2
of generic Test and3 Verification Equipment
3 3 units. Verification
incoming 3ol Computer
Contr of attitude control modes
(TVE) with re-usable hardware and software for andAOCS
real-time behaviour is done in the early period of
testing of F3 3 Control Subsystems
3 3 3 MACS bus
Attitude and Orbit integration using a combination of real and simulated
(AOCS) of spacecraft [Ref. 1]. units. Protocol Le
vel
F4 Sensor 3
Actuator Data
Electronics Electronics
The TVE had to be usable from the early stage of the The test concept described in this paper is based on a
AOCS development up to the integration of the AOCS static closed loop test facility (no real motion). The
Sensor
in the spacecraft environment i.e. open loop tests with test configuration
Head
is shown in figureActuator 2. The dynamics
a single unit up to closed loop tests with any and environment simulation is responsible for theUser Level
Data
combination of real and simulated AOCS units should computation
Physical
of stimuli
Electrical
for theMACS
MACS unit
sensor Electrical
units and the(Engineering
be supported. processing
Stimuli ofStimulimonitorSimulation
data from the actuator
Monitoring units)
Monitoring units.
The stimulated sensors will deliver sensor Gr
A prototype TVE was built for ESA/ESTEC to measurements to the AOCS ACC via the MACS attitude
Unit Sim
ulation
demonstrate the new approach with re-usable hardware control databus. Dynamics In the and
ACCvironment
En the Sim
ureceived
lation data will be
and software [Ref. 2]. This prototype has recently Test Equipment
fed into the attitude control laws, which results in
been developed into a fullblown AOCS test system commanding of the actuator units. The response of the
able to meet the requirements for both subsystem and Fig. 2 Test
actuator conf
units igur
is ation
measured with a monitoring deviceFig. 3 Architecture o
system level testing of the AOCS of the XMM and and routed back to the corresponding dynamics and
INTEGRAL satellites. environment model. In this way the loop is closed.
Skin laminates
1. INTRODUCTION 4 Tables Fig. 1 Generic attitude contr
ol system
Sy
BasedCode
on experiences with the production and use of
8Laminate
Figures lay-up B
various test systems for the ISO, SAX, SOHO and Int
other 1asatellites, the 45,
[-45, National Aerospace
-45, 45, -45, 45,Laboratory In the integration and test phase the AOCS subsystem
45, -45, 45, -45] Physical Le
vel
NLR in the Netherlands has developed a new is gradually built up Attitude
depending on the schedule ofData
1b of generic
generation [-45, 0,Test
45,and
0, Verification
-45, 45, 0,Equipment
-45, 0, -45] incoming units. Verification of attitude control modes
Control Computer
(TVE) with re-usable hardware and software for andAOCS
real-time behaviour is done in the early period of
MACS bus
testing 2aof Attitude
[-45, 45,
and -45,
Orbit45,Control
-45, 45, -45, 45, -45, 45]s
Subsystems integration using a combination of real and simulated
(AOCS) of spacecraft [Ref. 1]. units. Protocol Le
vel
2b [45, 0, -45, 0, 45, 0, -45, 0, 45, 0, 0, -45, 0,Sensor
-45, 0, 45, 0, -45, 0, 45] Actuator Data
Electronics Electronics
The TVE had to be usable from the early stage of the The test concept described in this paper is based on a
AOCS development up to the integration of theStiffener
AOCS laminates
static closed loop test facility (no real motion). The
Sensor
in the spacecraft environment i.e. open loop tests with test configuration
Head
is shown in figureActuator 2. The dynamics
Codeunit up to closed loopLaminate
a single tests withlay-up
any and environment simulation Core laminate is responsible Flange for theUser Level
lay-up width Data
combination of real and simulated AOCS units should computation
Physical
of stimuli
Electrical
for
MACS unit
the MACS
sensor units
Electrical
and the(Engineering
be supported. processing
Stimuli ofStimulimonitorSimulation
data from [mm] units.units)
the actuator
Monitoring Monitoring
The stimulated sensors will deliver sensor Gr
1a
A prototype [0,
TVE45,was
0, -45,
built 0,for
90,ESA/ESTEC
0, -45, 0, 45,
to 0] measurements to the - AOCS
ACC via the MACS
Unit Sim
ulation 44 attitude
demonstrate the new approach with re-usable hardware control databus. Dynamics In the and
ACCvironment
En the Sim
ureceived
lation data will be
1b [0, 45, 0, -45, 0, 90, 0, -45, 0,
and software [Ref. 2]. This prototype has recently 45, 0] Test Equipment [0 ]
fed into the attitude 5control laws, which 44.9results in
been developed into a fullblown AOCS test system commanding of the actuator units. The response of the
able to1c [0,requirements
meet the 45, 0, -45, for
0, both
90, 0, -45, 0, and
subsystem 45, 0] actuator
Fig. 2 Test conf
units igur
is ation [0,-45,0,45,0]
measured with a smonitoring 45.81 deviceFig. 3 Architecture o
system level testing of the AOCS of the XMM and and routed back to the corresponding dynamics and
2a [0, 0, 45, 0, -45, 0, 90, 0, -45, 0, 45, 0, environment
INTEGRAL satellites.
0] -
model. In this way the loop is closed.
50
2b [0, 0, 45, 0, -45, 0, 90, 0, -45, 0, 45, 0, 0] [0,-45,0,45,0] 51.81
2. TEST CONCEPT The MACS interface has to be s programmable to
Figure 3a
(9 pages
1 gives[0,a 45,
in total)
schematic
-45, 45,overview
0, -45, of
0, a90,generic
0,-45, 0, reflect
45, -45,any45,combination
0] - of real and simulated44 units. If
AOCS for spacecraft. The diagram reflects the cyclic real sensor and/or actuator units are not available they
3b [0, 45, -45, 45, 0, -45, 0, 90, 0,-45, 0, 45, -45, 45, 0] - 56
-17-
NLR-TP-98264
250 mm
50 mm
50 mm
45°
C659-01N
0° 0°
Figure 1 Specimen dimensions and reference coordinate frame for lay-up definition.
114 mm
P/2 P/2
C659-01N
160 mm
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-19-
NLR-TP-98264
Figure 3 Experimental set-up for four point bending tests in current programme.
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-20-
NLR-TP-98264
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-21-
NLR-TP-98264
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-22-
NLR-TP-98264
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-23-
NLR-TP-98264
700
600
Failure moment [Nmm/mm]
500
400
300
200
100
C659-07N
0
S1F1 S1F2 S1F3 S2F1 S2F2 S2F3 S3F1 S3F2 S3F3 S4F1 S4F2 S4F3 S5F4
skin 1 skin 2 skin 3 skin 4 skin 5
(10 plies) (10 plies) (20 plies) (20 plies) (18 plies)
Specimen code
Figure 7 Delamination onset moments for the specimens in the current experimental programme
as given in table III (for skin laminate S1 maximum applied moments are given
which were insufficient to cause delamination).
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-24-
NLR-TP-98264
600
500
Failure moment [Nmm/mm]
400
300
200
100
C659-08N
0
1a1a 1a1b 1a2a 1a2b 1b1a 1b1b 1b2a 1b2b 2a1a 2a1c 2a3a 2a3b 2b1a 2b1c 2b3a 2b3b
skin 1a (10 plies) skin 1b (10 plies) skin 2a (20 plies) skin 2b (20 plies)
Specimen code
Figure 8 Delamination onset moments for the specimens tested in four-point bending in the
earlier programme as given in table V.
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-25-
NLR-TP-98264
700
600
Failure moment [Nmm/mm]
500
400
300
200
100
C659-09N
0
1a1a 1a1b 1a2a 1a2b 1b1a 1b1b 1b2a 1b2b 2a1a 2a1c 2a3a 2a3b 2b1a 2b1c 2b3a 2b3b
Specimen code
Figure 9 Delamination onset loads for the specimens tested in lateral tension in the earlier
programme as given in table VI.
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-26-
NLR-TP-98264
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-27-
NLR-TP-98264
1,5
γ12
[%] 1
S1
S2F1
S2F2
S2F3
S3F1
0,5 S3F2
S1F3
S4F1
S4F2
S4F3
C659-11N
S5F4
0
0 0,2 0,4 0,6
ε22 [%]
Figure 11 Failure envelope for the specimens tested in the current programme (results for skin
laminate S1 pertain to the maximum applied moments which were insufficient to
cause delamination).
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-28-
NLR-TP-98264
2.5
1a1a
1.5 1a1b
1a2a
γ12 1a2b
[%] 1b1a
1b1b
1 1b2a
1b2b
2a1a
2a1c
2a3a
0.5 2a3b
2b1a
2b1c
2b3a
C659-12N
0 2b3b
Figure 12 Failure envelope for the specimens tested in four-point bending in the earlier
programme [Ref. 2].
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-29-
NLR-TP-98264
1.5
1
1a1a
1a1b
1a2a
γ12
1a2b
[%]
1b1a
1b1b
1b2a
1b2b
0.5
2a1a
2a1c
2a3a
2a3b
2b1a
2b1c
2b3a
C659-13N
2b3b
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
ε22 [%]
Figure 13 Failure envelope for the specimens tested in lateral tension in the earlier programme
[Ref. 2].
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-30-
NLR-TP-98264
700
600
Calculated delamination onset moment [Nm/m]
500
400
S1
300 S2F1
S2F2
S2F3
S3F1
200
S3F2
S1F3
S4F1
100 S4F2
S4F3
C659-14N
S5F4
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Experimental delamination onset moment [Nm/m]
Figure 14 Comparison of the experimentally determined delamination onset moments for the
specimens tested in the current programme and calculated delamination onset
moments using ε22f = 0.5 and ε12f = 1.75 (experimental results for skin laminate
S1 pertain to the maximum applied moments which were insufficient to cause
delamination).
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-31-
NLR-TP-98264
600
Calculated delamination onset moment [Nm/m]
400 1a1a
1a1b
1a2a
1a2b
1b1a
1b1b
1b2a
1b2b
200 2a1a
2a1c
2a3a
2a3b
2b1a
2b1c
2b3a
C659-15N
2b3b
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Experimental delamination onset moment [Nm/m]
Figure 15 Comparison of the experimentally determined delamination onset moments for the
specimens tested in four-point bending in the earlier programme and calculated
delamination onset moments using ε22f = 0.35 and γ12f = 2.0
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-32-
NLR-TP-98264
0.6
0.4
γ12
[%]
0.2
B: 3-point (3 in)
B: 3-point (4 in)
B: 4-point
T: 3-point (3 in)
T: 3-point (4 in)
C659-16N
T: 4-point
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
ε22 [%]
Figure 16 Calculated strains at failure for the specimens tested in three-point bending and
four-point bending [Ref. 4].
FOKKER RESTRICTED
FOKKER RESTRICTED
-33-
NLR-TP-98264
2
AB
F
1.5
γ12
[%]
1 C D
0.5
C659-17N
0
Figure 17 Calculated strains at failure for the specimens tested in four-point bending [Ref. 5].
FOKKER RESTRICTED