Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
The 1991 Local Government Code, which initiated the decentralization process in
community needs, has always been referred to as radical and revolutionary. It now
serves as an example for other countries on how local governments have accepted,
However, after nearly two decades of local autonomy, it has become imperative to
know and describe the progress, initiatives, and innovations of local governments 19
Objective
Review of Literature
and choose their own government. As a political principle, the idea of self-
which early expression was given by the French and American revolutions
(Duignan, n.d.).
government to local level. This transfer of powers to local level makes this
major
or the discretion to plan, decide and manage from central to local levels;
administrative or sectorial.
The Congress shall enact a local government code which shall provide for a
initiative, and referendum, allocate among the different local government units
functions and duties of local officials, and all other matters relating to the
organization and operation of the local units. The President shall exercise
component cities and municipalities, and cities and municipalities with respect
to component barangays, shall ensure that the acts of their component units
are within the scope of their prescribed powers and functions (The 1987
the latter fail or neglect to fulfill them, the former may take such action or step
other hand, means the power of an officer to alter or modify or nullify or set
aside what a subordinate officer has done in the performance of his duties
and to substitute the judgment of the former for that of the latter.
For instance, officers in control lay down the rules in the performance or
accomplishment of an act. If these rules are not followed, they may, in their
such authority. Supervising officials merely see to it that the rules are
followed, but they themselves do not lay down such rules, nor do they have
the discretion to modify or replace them. If the rules are not observed, they
may order the work done or redone, but only to conform to such rules. They
may not prescribe their own manner of execution of the act. They have no
discretion on this matter except to see to it that the rules are followed.
Under our present system of government, executive power is vested in the
President. The members of the Cabinet and other executive officials are
merely alter egos. As such, they are subject to the power of control of the
President, at whose will and behest they can be removed from office; or their
powers emanate from the electorate, to whom they are directly accountable.
only, not control, so long as their acts are exercised within the sphere of their
legitimate powers. By the same token, the President may not withhold or alter
any authority or power given them by the Constitution and the law (Team,
n.d.).
Every local government unit created or recognized under the Local Code
more directly responsive and effective at the local levels. Through the
devolution of powers, our local governments will be able to chart their own
destinies and make their lasting imprint in the arena of public service
(Moisiu, 2014).
All things which are not outside the commerce of men may be the object of
is outside the commerce of men is inexistent and void from the beginning
The Civil Code, or any other law, does not contain a definition of the
phrase “outside the commerce of men”. The phrase does not refer to
provision in the Civil Code (Article 1348). Neither does it refer to “services
which are not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order or public
policy,” as these are also covered by a separate provision in the Civil Code
(Article 1347, third paragraph). What we have are illustrative cases to shed
the commerce of man, and may not be the subject of lease or other
the State; (3) is not subject to attachment and execution; and (4) cannot
by the State such as forest or timber land or mineral land, is outside the
commerce of man. It cannot be titled and any title which may be issued is
Local Government Code of 1991 providing local governments with the enabling
localized service delivery, citizens are more satisfied with local governments than
Social Weather Stations reflect that citizens are in fact more satisfied with local
governments than with national government. The specific local government services
citizens are most satisfied with are: maintaining of the public market, implementing
References