142 views

Uploaded by helramly

save

- MATE BÁSICA- SESIÓN 3
- Comandos Derivadas e Integrales
- 122
- a
- Activated Sludge
- silent reading personal reaction
- FOR 2010
- 23170833 Absceso y Quiste Hepatico
- Obat Tumor Usus Besar de Nature Herbal Terbaru
- Evidencia Blog 10
- Sistema Internacional de Unidades
- Algebra.pdf
- Estrategias de Lectura.pdf
- 1
- ch 43 Voiceover
- Sistemas Expertos Deterministicos BASADOS en REGLAS
- Tugas SA 140815 A4
- DERECHO_PENAL._MATERIALES_PARA_SU_DOCENCIA_Y_APRENDIZAJE.pdf
- NBR 7211 - 2009 - Agregados Para Concreto Especificação
- Joseph LeDoux - O cérebro emocional.pdf
- Subiect Admitere 2018 Iulie Informatica UBB
- DPES_U1_A1_JOVG
- renta de sonido para fiestas df
- Designing Pre Engineered Structure
- exploracic3b3n-logopedia.pdf
- Case Book version 1 120907b (8).pdf
- REPASO DE FUNCIONES INORGÁNICAS.pdf
- townsendd 04 beyond the basic prductivity tools lesson
- dfydyfidyfidyfidfyid
- Review Jurnal Flavonoid
- Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future
- Dispatches from Pluto: Lost and Found in the Mississippi Delta
- The Innovators: How a Group of Hackers, Geniuses, and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution
- Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
- Yes Please
- The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New America
- This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate
- Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius
- A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius: A Memoir Based on a True Story
- The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer
- The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power
- John Adams
- Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America
- The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century
- Rise of ISIS: A Threat We Can't Ignore
- The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy Answers
- Smart People Should Build Things: How to Restore Our Culture of Achievement, Build a Path for Entrepreneurs, and Create New Jobs in America
- Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
- The New Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
- How To Win Friends and Influence People
- Steve Jobs
- Angela's Ashes: A Memoir
- Bad Feminist: Essays
- You Too Can Have a Body Like Mine: A Novel
- The Incarnations: A Novel
- The Light Between Oceans: A Novel
- Leaving Berlin: A Novel
- The Silver Linings Playbook: A Novel
- The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)
- Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close: A Novel
- A Man Called Ove: A Novel
- The Master
- Bel Canto
- We Are Not Ourselves: A Novel
- The First Bad Man: A Novel
- The Rosie Project: A Novel
- The Blazing World: A Novel
- The Flamethrowers: A Novel
- Brooklyn: A Novel
- Life of Pi
- The Love Affairs of Nathaniel P.: A Novel
- The Bonfire of the Vanities: A Novel
- Lovers at the Chameleon Club, Paris 1932: A Novel
- The Perks of Being a Wallflower
- A Prayer for Owen Meany: A Novel
- The Cider House Rules
- Wolf Hall: A Novel
- The Art of Racing in the Rain: A Novel
- The Wallcreeper
- Interpreter of Maladies
- The Kitchen House: A Novel
- Beautiful Ruins: A Novel
- Good in Bed

You are on page 1of 8

**5ième CONGRÈS CONJOINT SCG/AIH-CNN 5TH JOINT CGS/IAH-CNC CONFERENCE
**

Probabilistic Stability Analysis of an Embankment on Soft Clay

H. El-Ramly, AMEC Earth and Environmental, Edmonton, AB, Canada

N.R. Morgenstern, and D.M. Cruden, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of

Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

ABSTRACT

A probabilistic slope analysis methodology based on Monte Carlo simulation using Microsoft Excel and @Risk software is

applied to study the performance of the Muar trial embankment in Malaysia. The study demonstrates the techniques used

in quantifying the various sources of uncertainty associated with the undrained shear strengths of clay foundations, and

estimating the probability of unsatisfactory performance. The relationships between embankment height, factor of safety

and probability of unsatisfactory performance at different stages during construction are examined. Sensitivity analyses

show that the uncertainties in Bjerrum’s vane correction factor and the contribution of embankment fill strength to stability

have significant impacts on the reliability of the factor of safety.

RÉSUMÉ

La performance d’un remblais d’essai à Muar, en Malaisie, est évaluée avec une méthode d’analyse probabiliste qui

incorpore la simulation Monte Carlo comme base, et utilise les logiciels Microsoft Excel et @Risk. L’article démontre les

techniques suivis pour quantifier les sources d’incertitudes reliées à l’estimation de résistance au cisaillement des

matériaux de fondations et à l’estimation de la probabilité d’obtenir une performance insatisfaisante. La relation entre

hauteur de remblais, facteur de sécurité et probabilité de performance insatisfaisante durant différents niveaux de

construction est examinée. Des analyses de sensibilité démontrent que la fiabilité du facteur de sécurité est fortement

affecter par certain incertitudes telles que ; le facteur de correction scissométrique de Bjerrum et par la contribution à la

résistance du matériel de remblais.

1. INTRODUCTION

Despite decades of accumulated experience, the ability of

the geotechnical profession to make reliable forecasts of

slope failures remains poor. As an example, in 1989 the

Malaysian Highway Authority built a full-scale trial

embankment in the valley of the Muar River to optimize

the design of a highway embankment on soft marine clay.

A detailed soil investigation program was conducted, and

extensive amounts of data were collected. Prior to

construction, thirty geotechnical consultants were invited

to predict the performance of the trial embankment,

including its height at failure. Brand and Premchitt (1989)

and Poulos et al. (1990) provided a discussion of the

predictions and the results of the field trial. The

embankment failed when the thickness of the placed fill

reached 5.4m. At the time of failure the average

settlement of the embankment was about 0.7 m, and the

height of the embankment above average ground was

4.7 m. Figure 1 is a histogram of predictions of

embankment height at failure. A significant scatter in the

predictions is evident, even though all participants had the

same site characterization data.

The difficulties in predicting field performances in

geotechnical engineering are attributed to the substantial

uncertainties that dominate the profession. Probabilistic

techniques offer an attractive framework for quantifying

and incorporating uncertainty in slope analysis and

design.

The stability of the Muar embankment is analysed using

the probabilistic methodology by El-Ramly et al. (2002a),

and the conventional approach based on the factor of

safety. The relationships between embankment height at

various stages during construction and the probability of

unsatisfactory performance (or failure probabilities) and

factor of safety are examined. The study is one of a series

of case histories (El-Ramly et al., 2002a; 2002b; 2003a)

illustrating the value of probabilistic techniques, and

providing guidelines for acceptable probabilities of

unsatisfactory performance.

Embankment Height (m)

F

r

e

q

u

e

n

c

y

12

10

4.7

0

0

Embankment Failed

6

Figure 1 Histogram of predictions of embankment height

above ground at failure (modified from Kay,

1993).

Session 3F

Page 14

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

0 10 20 30 40 50

Horizontal Distance (m)

E

l

e

v

a

t

i

o

n

(

60

m

)

Deterministic critical

slip surface

Hassan and Wolff

(1999) surface

Embankment

Very Soft

Silty Clay

Soft Silty Clay

Weathered Clay Crust

2

.0

:

1

2

.

0

:

1

Figure 2 Geometry and stratigraphy of the Muar embankment at failure

2. STRATIGRAPHY AND SOIL CHARACTERISTICS

The Muar Trial embankment had a base area of about

55 m x 90 m and side slopes of 2h:1v; a cross-section of

the embankment is shown in Figure 2. It was constructed

on a crust of weathered clay, about 2.0m thick, underlain

by very soft to soft clays. Two clay layers of different

properties were identified. Immediately below the

weathered crust, 6.0 m of highly plastic, very soft clay

were encountered followed by 9.5 m of soft clay of lower

plasticity and slightly higher strength. The clay sequence

was underlain by 0.7 m of peat on top of dense clayey

sand. Figure 3 shows soil stratigraphy and Table 1

summarizes the physical and mechanical characteristics

of clay layers. Detailed descriptions of the geology and

soil conditions are given in the report prepared by the

Asian Institute of Technology (AIT, 1989) and the

summary paper by Brand and Premchitt (1989).

The undrained shear strengths of subsurface soils were

assessed through 9 field vane soundings. Figure 3 shows

the variation of the undrained shear strength with depth.

The strength of the desiccated crust is much higher than

that of the underlying very soft clay, and decreases from

about 50 kPa at surface to 8 kPa at 2 m depth. The

strengths of the underlying clay layers increase almost

linearly with depth from about 6.5 kPa at 2 m below

surface to 34 kPa at 17 m depth.

3. SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY

Construction of the embankment took 100 days and,

hence, undrained conditions prevailed at failure. The

stability of the embankment is governed by the undrained

shear strength of foundation soils, and the shear strength

of embankment fill. Uncertainties in shear strength

parameters are attributed to the inherent spatial variability

of the soil layers, and systematic sources of uncertainty

including biases in empirical factors used in deducing

strength values and statistical uncertainties due to limited

amounts of data available. In the following sections,

uncertainties in input parameters whose impacts on the

stability of the embankment could be significant are

quantified.

-17.5

-15.0

-12.5

-10.0

-7.5

-5.0

-2.5

0.0

2.5

0 20 40

Undrained Shear Strength; S (kPa)

u

Clay Crust

Very Soft

Silty Clay

Soft Silty

Clay

60

Dense Clayey Sand

t

C

= -1.77*Elev. + 7.21

t

Cr

= 15.73*Elev. + 2.79

E

l

e

v

a

t

i

o

n

(

m

)

t

C

c

C

Figure 3 Profile of field vane shear strength

Session 3F

Page 15

Table 1. Summary of soil properties of clay layers

Soil Layer LL

(%)

PL

(%)

LI

(%)

e ¸

b

(kN/m

3

)

Clay Crust 90 30 0.6 1.85 15.5

Very Soft Silty

Clay

80 27 1.5 2.60 14.0

Soft Silty Clay 55 23 1.4 1.65 16.0

LL, liquid limit; PL, plastic limit; LI, liquidity, index; e, void

ratio; ¸

b

, bulk unit weight.

3.1 Very Soft and Soft Clay Layers

Figure 3 shows hardly any distinction between the

undrained shear strengths of the very soft and the soft

clay layers in terms of trend and scatter of measurements.

Hence, the data of the two layers are combined and the

undrained shear strengths are treated as one population.

It should be noted that this approximation does not reflect

the geology on site as indicated by the different physical

properties of the two layers (Table 1). It is only a

modelling approach to simplify the statistical treatment of

the data. The validity of this simplification is examined in

the following paragraphs. For illustration purposes, all

parameters pertaining to the subject clay layers are

identified with a “

C

“ subscript.

The undrained shear strength of the clays is considered a

random variable and modelled using Equation 1,

) c + u = u =

C C C M - u C C - u

t S S ( [1]

where S

u-C

is the undrained shear strength at location i, u

C

is Bjerrum’s vane correction factor (Bjerrum, 1972), and

S

u-M

is the measured vane strength at the same location.

The measured vane strength is divided into a trend

component, t

C

, dependent on location, and a residual

component, c

C

, that characterizes the spatial variation of

strength over and above the trend value, as shown in

Figure 3.

Using the method of least squares, a linear trend is fitted

to the vane data (Figure 3). The mean values of the slope,

E[a

1-C

], and intercept, E[a

o-C

], of the trend line are

-1.77 kPa/m and 7.21 kPa, respectively. Since E[a

1-C

] and

E[a

o-C

] are estimated based on a limited amount of data,

they are also uncertain. Assuming a

1-C

and a

o-C

are

normally distributed random variables, statistical theory

(Neter et al. 1990) allows estimating the variances o

2

[a

1-C

]

and o

2

[a

o-C

] as follows;

| |

¯ ÷

=

2

2

C - 1

2

]) E[ (

ı

] [ ı

z z

S

i

M - u

a [2]

| |

)

`

¹

¹

´

¦

¯ ÷

+ =

2

2

2

C - o

2

]) E[ (

] E[

n

1

ı ] [ ı

z z

z

S

i

M - u

a [3]

where E[-] and o

2

[-] are the mean and variance,

respectively, z

i

is the depth, and n is the number of vane

measurements. The estimates a

1-C

and a

o-C

, are usually

correlated. The correlation coefficient p(a

1-C

, a

o-C

) is given

by;

] ı[ ] ı[

] [ ı ] E[

) , ȡ(

1 o

1

2

C - 1 C - o

a a

a

a a

z

÷ = [4]

where o[-] is the standard deviation. Using Equations 2

through 4, the standard deviations o[a

1-C

] and o[a

o-C

] are

0.07 kPa/m and 0.63 kPa, respectively, and the

correlation coefficient p(a

1-C

, a

o-C

) is 0.86.

The trend component is removed from all vane

measurements to estimate the statistical population of the

residual component c

C

. The residual component has a

constant mean of zero and a standard deviation, o[c

C

], of

2.45 kPa. Figure 4 shows the histogram of c

C

. It exhibits a

single peak indicating that vane shear strengths of the two

clay layers are consistent in a statistical sense.

E[ ] = 0.00 kPa

[ ] = 2.45 kPa

n = 61

c

c

C

C

o

Figure 4 Histogram of residual component of undrained

shear strength of clay layers; c

C

Based on a review of several embankment and cut slope

failures, Bjerrum (1972, 1973) recommended applying an

empirical correction factor, u, to vane measurements

Session 3F

Page 16

(Equation 1) depending on the plasticity index. Figure 5

shows Bjerrum’s database, as well as additional cases

compiled by Aas et al. (1986). The scatter of the data

around Bjerrum’s recommended relationship is

substantial. Hence, the uncertainty surrounding the vane

correction factor is significant and should be addressed in

any probabilistic assessment.

Figure 5 indicates a relatively uniform scatter of data

points around Bjerrum’s mean curve, irrespective of the

plasticity index. So, the vane correction factor can be

considered a random variable with a mean equal to

Bjerrum’s recommended curve and a constant standard

deviation deduced from the scatter of data around the

mean curve. Assuming u to be normally distributed, the

standard deviation o[u] is 0.15. Based on the plasticity

indices of the subject clay layers, the mean value of

Bjerrum’s vane correction factor, E[u

C

], is estimated to be

0.80.

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

0 50 100 150

Plasticity Index (%)

Bjerrum, 1972 & 1973

Compiled by Aas et al., 1986

V

a

n

e

C

o

r

r

e

c

t

i

o

n

F

a

c

t

o

r

;

u

Bjerrum, 1972

Figure 5 Bjerrum’s vane correction factor

3.2 Clay Crust

Published studies (e.g. Lefebvre et al., 1987) suggested

that the field vane overestimates the operational shear

strength of overconsolidated clay crusts due to the

presence of pre-existing fissures. Ferkh and Fell (1994)

recommended the use of a reduced strength for the crust.

Preliminary slope stability analyses of the Muar

embankment using an upper strength threshold of 14 kPa

for the weathered crust showed minimal impact, less than

4 percent, on the factor of safety. Hence, no threshold is

applied to the measured vane strength of the clay crust.

A similar approach to that in Section 3.1 is used to

quantify the uncertainties in the undrained shear strength

of the clay crust. For clarity, all parameters pertaining to

the clay crust are denoted with a “

Cr

” subscript. A linear

trend is fitted to the vane data as shown in Figure 3. The

mean values of the slope and intercept, E[a

1-Cr

] and

E[a

o-Cr

], are 15.73 kPa/m and 2.79 kPa, respectively.

Assuming normal distributions, the standard deviations,

o[a

1-Cr

] and o[a

o-Cr

], are 2.49 kPa/m and 3.62 kPa. The

correlation coefficient p(a

1-Cr

, a

o-Cr

) is -0.92. Removing

trend values from vane measurements, the mean and

standard deviation of the residual component, c

Cr

, are

zero and 4.55 kPa. Figure 6 shows the histogram of the

residual component. The uncertainty in Bjerrum’s vane

correction factor is represented by a normal probability

distribution with a mean of 0.75 (Figure 5) and a standard

deviation of 0.15.

E[ ] = 0.00 kPa

[ ] = 4.55 kPa

n = 11

c

c

Cr

Cr

o

Figure 6 Histogram of residual component of undrained

shear strength of clay crust; c

Cr

3.3 Embankment Fill Material

The embankment was constructed using compacted

clayey sand to sandy clay fill. As part of the site

investigation program, three unconsolidated undrained

triaxial tests were performed on samples of fill material.

The tests yielded undrained shear strength envelopes with

cohesion intercepts ranging between 64 and 19 kPa, and

corresponding friction angles ranging between 12 and 26

degrees. An approximate estimate of fill strength is

obtained by averaging shear strengths corresponding to a

confining stress equivalent to mid height of the

embankment from failure envelopes of three triaxial tests.

It is estimated to be 60 kPa.

The uncertainty in the operational shear strength of

embankment fill is attributed to two factors. First, the

procedure used above to estimate the average shear

strength is approximate, particularly since the initial

stresses within the embankment are not geostatic and

depend largely on the compaction energy. Second, the

strains experienced by the compacted fill, due to the

Session 3F

Page 17

distortion of the underlying soft clay, exceeds the strain

levels at peak strength. Hence, the operational shear

strength of the fill at failure is an unknown value between

the peak and residual strengths. In the stability analyses

in the following sections, the average shear strength of

embankment fill along the slip surface is considered a

random variable and modelled using a normal probability

distribution with a mean equal to 60 kPa. The standard

deviation is assigned, judgementally, a value of 12 kPa; a

coefficient of variation of 0.2.

4. PROBABILISTIC SLOPE ANALYSIS

4.1 Probabilistic Methodology and Input Variables

The stability of the Muar embankment at failure is

analysed using the probabilistic methodology developed

by El-Ramly et al. (2002a). Only brief descriptions of the

methodology are provided here and the reader is referred

to the original paper for more details.

The probabilistic methodology is spreadsheet-based and

makes use of the Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, 1997) and

@Risk (Palisade, 1996) software. The embankment

geometry, stratigraphy, soil properties, critical slip

surface(s), and selected method of slope analysis are

modelled in an Excel spreadsheet. The Bishop method of

slices (Bishop, 1955) is used in the spreadsheet. Three

input parameters are considered random variables; the

shear strength of the embankment fill, and the undrained

shear strengths of the clay crust and the underlying soft

clays. Using @Risk functions, each of these input

parameters is assigned appropriate probability

distributions. To account for the various sources of

uncertainty addressed in Section 3, each parameter is

represented by a number of variables. The uncertainties

due to the spatial variability of clay layers are represented

by the observed probability distribution functions of the

residual components, whose histograms are shown in

Figures 4 and 6. The biases in Bjerrum’s vane correction

factors and the statistical uncertainties in regression

coefficients of the linear trends of the undrained shear

strengths are represented by normal probability

distributions with the means and standard deviations

estimated in Section 3. The correlations between slopes

and intercepts of trend lines are established in the

spreadsheet using @Risk tools. Table 2 summarizes the

statistical parameters of all input variables.

4.2 Autocorrelation Distance and Spatial Variability

To account for the spatial variability of undrained shear

strengths along the slip surface, an estimate of the

autocorrelation of in-situ soils is required. In the absence

of adequate data to conduct a site specific assessment,

empirical estimates of horizontal and vertical

autocorrelations distances are made based on typical

values in the literature (El-Ramly et al., 2003). A range of

30-40 m is postulated as a possible range for the

horizontal autocorrelation distance and 1-3 m as a

possible range for the vertical autocorrelation distance. To

simplify the analysis of spatial variability, an equivalent

isotropic autocorrelation distance, rather than different

horizontal and vertical distances, is adopted. Using the

approximate procedure proposed by El-Ramly (2001) and

the typical ranges above, the equivalent isotropic

autocorrelation distance, r

o

, of the marine clays in the

foundation is in the range of 5-15 m. The probabilistic

analyses in the following sections are based on an

intermediate value of 10 m. The sensitivity of the outputs

to the autocorrelation distance is investigated in a latter

section.

The spatial variability of the residual components of

undrained shear strengths along the slip surface is

modelled using one-dimensional, stationary random fields

(Vanmarcke, 1983). At any given location along the slip

Table 2. Statistical parameters of input variables

Input variable Soil spatial variability Systematic uncertainty

E[--] o[--] PDF E[--] o[--] PDF

Embankment fill; S

u-Fill

(kPa) 60.0 12.0 N. -- -- --

Trend

a

1-Cr

(kPa/m)

-- -- -- 15.73 2.49 N.

a

o-Cr

(kPa)

-- -- -- 2.79 3.62 N.

Residuals; c

Cr

(kPa)

0.00 4.55 Exper.

(Figure 6)

-- -- --

Weathered clay

Crust

Bjerrum factor; u

Cr

-- -- -- 0.75 0.15 N.

Trend

a

1-C

(kPa/m)

-- -- -- -1.77 0.07 N.

a

o-C

(kPa)

-- -- -- 7.21 0.63 N.

Residuals; c

C

(kPa)

0.00 2.45 Exper.

(Figure 4)

-- -- --

Very soft/soft

clay layers

Bjerrum factor; u

C

-- -- -- 0.80 0.15 N.

Note: E[-], mean; o[-], standard deviation; PDF, probability density function; a

1

and a

o

, slope and

intercept of linear trends of undrained shear strengths; c, residual component; Exper., experimental

probability distribution; N, normal probability distribution.

Session 3F

Page 18

surface, the residual component c

C

, for example, is a

random variable, spatially correlated with the residual

components at adjacent locations. Instead of modelling

the point-to-point variation of the residual component, the

variability of its local averages over local domains within

the random field is considered (Vanmarcke, 1983). The

portion of the slip surface within each soil layer is divided

in the spreadsheet (using principles of analytical

geometry) into segments of lengths l

i

. The statistical

characteristics of local averages of c

C

include the

reduction in variance due to spatial averaging and the

correlation coefficients between averages over adjacent

segments of the slip surface. By taking segment lengths

l

i

equal to or less than the scale of fluctuation, o, the

variances of local averages approach the point variance

and the correlation coefficients between most of the local

averages approach zero (Vanmarcke, 1977 and; 1983).

Assuming the spatial structure of the residual

components follows an exponential autocovariance

function, the scale of fluctuation, o, is equal to twice the

autocorrelation distance; approximately 20 m.

4.3 Critical Slip Surface

Two candidate critical slip surfaces are considered; the

deterministic critical slip surface based on mean values

of input parameters, and the surface corresponding to

the minimum reliability index based on the Hassan and

Wolff (1999) algorithm (Figure 2). Preliminary Monte

Carlo simulations indicated that the probability of

unsatisfactory performance associated with the former is

higher than that of the latter. Hence, the deterministic

critical slip surface is considered the critical surface for

probabilistic slope stability analyses.

4.4 Monte Carlo Simulation

Having completed the spreadsheet, Monte Carlo

simulation is performed with @Risk drawing at random a

value for each input variable from its defined probability

distribution. In sampling the input probability distributions,

the correlations between variables are maintained. The

sampled input values are used to solve the spreadsheet

and calculate the corresponding factor of safety. The

process is repeated sufficient times to estimate the

statistical distribution of the factor of safety. Using 10,000

iterations, the mean and standard deviation of the factor

of safety are estimated to be 1.11 and 0.15, respectively.

The probability of unsatisfactory performance P

u

(probability of factor of safety less than one) is estimated

to be 23.8x10

-2

. Figure 7 shows the histogram of the

factor of safety. Since the simulation process is based on

random sampling of input variables, the calculated

probability of unsatisfactory performance is also a

variable. Based on the results of 25 simulations (using

different seed values), the mean probability of

unsatisfactory performance is 24.1x10

-2

. The reliability

index, another probabilistic safety indicator, is given by

þ={E[FS]-1}/o[FS], where E[FS] and o[FS] are the mean

and standard deviation of the factor of safety. It is

computed to be 0.72.

1.0

P

u

Seed = 31069

E[FS] = 1.11

[FS] = 0.15

P = 23.8x10

o

u

-2

Figure 7 Histogram of factor of safety at failure

(embankment height above ground = 4.7 m)

4.5 Calibration of Probability Figures

Providing a link between current slope design practice

and probabilistic slope stability analyses is essential in

explaining the meanings of the computed probabilities of

unsatisfactory performance and, hence, reduce the

hesitation of practitioners to use such techniques in

practice. The stability of the Muar embankment is

analyzed probabilistically and deterministically at various

stages during construction (i.e. different embankment

heights). Four embankment heights are considered; 2.5,

3.3, 3.5 and 4.0 m. The probabilistic analyses are

conducted following the same approach described

previously. Figure 8 shows the variation of the probability

of unsatisfactory performance and factor of safety with

embankment height. The plot indicates little increase in

the probability of unsatisfactory performance up to a

height of about 3.3 m followed by a sharp increase in

probability value as the embankment height exceeds

3.5m.

Based on the observed field performance of the Muar

embankment and typical factors of safety used in

practice, a 3.3 m high embankment (a deterministic

factor of safety of 1.42) would have been anticipated to

perform adequately in a conventional slope assessment.

Probabilistic slope stability analysis of this embankment

indicates a mean factor of safety of 1.42 with a 0.20

standard deviation. The probability of unsatisfactory

performance is 1.38x10

-2

, and the reliability index is 2.07.

For comparison, the probability of unsatisfactory

performance and the reliability index of the failed

embankment (4.7 m in height) are 24.1x10

-2

and 0.72,

respectively.

Session 3F

Page 19

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

2 3 4 5

Embankment Height Above Ground; H (m)

P

r

o

b

a

b

i

l

i

t

y

o

f

U

n

s

a

t

i

s

f

a

c

t

o

r

y

P

e

r

f

o

r

m

a

n

c

e

;

P

u

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2.0

F

a

c

t

o

r

o

f

S

a

f

e

t

y

;

F

S

Acceptable

Design (H=3.3m)

Embankment

Failed (H=4.7m)

FS

P

u

Figure 8 Variation of the probability of unsatisfactory

performance and the factor of safety with

embankment height.

4.6 Impact of Autocorrelation Distance

The sensitivity of the estimated probability of

unsatisfactory performance of the 3.3 m high

embankment to the value of the autocorrelation distance,

r

o

, is investigated by repeating the probabilistic analysis

using different autocorrelation distances. Five

autocorrelation distances within the postulated range of

5 to 15 m (Section 4.2) are considered. The probabilities

of unsatisfactory performance range between 1.1x10

-2

for

r

o

=5 m, and 1.7x10

-2

for r

o

=15 m. From a practical

perspective, the probability of unsatisfactory performance

of the Muar embankment does not seem to be sensitive

to the autocorrelation distance of the marine clay

foundation. Addressing the stability of a tailings dyke on

a marine clay shale foundation, El-Ramly et al. (2003)

noted a similar conclusion.

4.7 Sensitivity Analysis

Using @Risk software, a sensitivity analysis is

undertaken to assess the relative contributions of input

variables to the uncertainty in the factor of safety.

Spearman rank correlation coefficient is used as the

analysis tool. It measures the strength of linear

correlations between input variables and the factor of

safety. Its numeric value ranges between 1 and –1. A

value of 1 indicates a perfect positive correlation, a value

of –1 indicates a perfect negative correlation, and zero

indicates no correlation. Figure 9 shows Spearman rank

correlation coefficients for all input variables.

The plot indicates that the impact of the uncertainty in

Bjerrum’s vane correction factor on the reliability of the

computed factor of safety is significant, and comparable

to that of the spatial variability of the undrained shear

strength. In other words, the use of Bjerrum’s factor has

introduced an additional element of uncertainty that is as

significant as the inherent spatial variability of the

undrained shear strength. This highlights the drawbacks

of using empirical factors and correlations without proper

understanding of their limitations and, more importantly,

their reliability. The plot also shows that the uncertainty in

the contribution of fill strength to stability has a large

impact on the reliability of the factor of safety; a

longstanding issue still facing practitioners in the design

of embankments on soft soils.

In conventional slope design practice, deterministic

estimates of the above two quantities, namely; the

reduction (if any) in the measured vane strength and the

contribution of fill strength to stability, ought to be made.

These estimates are largely subjective and depend on

the designer’s judgement and experience, which

explains, at least in part, the significant scatter in the

predictions of embankment height at failure in Figure 1.

a

o-C

c

C

- Segment 1

S

u-Fill

u

C

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

I

n

p

u

t

V

a

r

i

a

b

l

e

Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient

u

Cr

c

C

- Segment 2

a

1-C

c

Cr

- Segment 2

a

1-Cr

a

o-Cr

c

Cr

- Segment 1

NOTE: “ - Segment 1” is the local

average of over the length of a

segment of the critical slip surface

c

c

C

C

Figure 9 Spearman rank correlation coefficients

between input variables and factor of safety

As expected, the uncertainty in the strength of the

weathered clay crust has a small impact on the reliability

of the computed factor of safety. Because of the

relatively large number of field vane measurements, the

statistical uncertainty in the mean trend of the undrained

shear strength of the soft clays also has a minimal

impact on the analysis.

Session 3F

Page 20

5. CONCLUDING REMARKS

In a similar study, El-Ramly et al. (2002b) conducted a

probabilistic slope analysis of the Lodalen slide. Based

on a back analysis of the failure, they redesigned the cut

slope (hypothetically) to a flatter inclination deemed

stable and undertook a probabilistic assessment of its

stability. In another study, El-Ramly et al. (2003)

presented a probabilistic analysis of a tailings dyke on a

pre-sheared clay-shale foundation. The dyke

performance was monitored during and after construction

and is deemed adequate. Table 3 summarizes the

results of the two case studies together with the results

of the Muar embankment at an intermediate height,

3.3 m, deemed stable.

Table 3. Safety indices of three case histories

Soil Layer E[FS] o[FS] P

u þ

Lodalen Slope 1.33 0.07 ~ 0.00 4.85

Tailings Dyke 1.31 0.14 0.16x10

-2

2.31

Muar Embankment 1.42 0.20 1.38x10

-2

2.07

The results in Table 3 indicate two important

observations. First, the probabilities of unsatisfactory

performance of adequate slopes appear to be much

higher than some of the recommendations reported in

the literature. For example, the US Corps of Engineers

(1995) recommended a probability of unsatisfactory

performance of 3x10

-5

or a minimum reliability index of

4.0 as design targets for a “Good” performance level.

Second, the factor of safety of the Muar embankment is

higher than those of the two other cases, yet its

probability of unsatisfactory performance is substantially

higher. This inconsistency is attributed to the significant

uncertainties in the analysis of the Muar embankment,

including Bjerrum’s vane correction factor and

embankment strength. Neither of these issues would be

addressed in conventional slope stability analyses based

on the deterministic factor of safety.

REFERENCES

Aas, G., Lacasse, S., Lunne, T., and Hoeg, K. 1986. Use

of in situ tests for foundation design on clay. In Use of in

Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, Proceedings of

In Situ’86. Geotechnical Special Publication No. 6,

ASCE, Blacksburg, USA, June 23-25, pp 1-30.

AIT, 1989. Laboratory test data on soil samples from the

Muar flats test embankment. Asian Institute of

Technology. Research Report – Phase II

Bishop, A.W. 1955. The use of the slip circle in the

stability analysis of slopes. Geotechnique, 5(1): 7-17.

Bjerrum, L. 1972. Embankments on soft ground.

Proceedings of ASCE Specialty Conference on

Performance of Earth and Earth-Supported Structures.

Purdue University, Lafayette, USA, June 11-14. Volume

2. pp 1-54.

Bjerrum, L. 1973. Problems of soil mechanics and

construction on soft clays. Proceedings of 8th

International Conference on Soil Mechanics and

Foundation Engineering. Moscow. Volume 3. pp 111-

159.

Brand, E.W., and Premchitt, J. 1989. Comparison of the

predicted and observed performance of the Muar test

embankment. Proceedings of the Symposium on Trial

Embankments on Malaysian Marine Clays. Kuala

Lumpur, Malaysia, November. Volume 3.

El-Ramly, H. 2001. Probabilistic analyses of landslide

hazards and risks: Bridging theory and practice. Ph.D.

thesis, University of Alberta, Canada.

El-Ramly, H., Morgenstern, N.R., and Cruden, D. 2002a.

Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice.

Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39: 665-683.

El-Ramly, H., Morgenstern, N.R., and Cruden, D. 2002b.

Probabilistic Stability Analysis of Lodalen Slide.

Proceedings, 55th Canadian Geotechnical Conference,

Niagara Falls, Canada, October 20-23. Canadian

Geotechnical Society, pp 1053-1060.

El-Ramly, H., Morgenstern, N.R., and Cruden, D. 2003.

Probabilistic stability analysis of a tailings dyke on

presheared clay-shale. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,

40: 192-208.

Ferkh, Z., and Fell, R. 1994. Design of embankments on

soft clay. Proceedings of 13th International Conference

on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, New

Delhi, India, January 5-10. Volume 2. pp 733-738.

Hassan, A., and Wolff, T. 1999. Search algorithm for

minimum reliability index of earth slopes. Journal of

Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,

ASCE, 125(4): 301-308.

Kay, J.N. 1993. Probabilistic design of foundations and

earth structures. In Probabilistic Methods in Geotechnical

Engineering, Li & Lo (eds.). Balkema, Rotterdam. pp

49-62.

Lefebvre, G., Pare, J.J., and Dascal, O. 1987. Undrained

shear strength in the surficial weathered crust. Canadian

Geotechnical Journal, 24: 23-24.

Microsoft, 1997. Microsoft Excel 97. Microsoft

Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA.

Palisade Corporation, 1996. @Risk: risk analysis and

simulation add-in for Microsoft Excel or Lotus 1-2-3.

Palisade Corporation, Newfield, NY, USA.

Poulos, H.G., Lee, Y.C., and Small, J.C. 1990. Predicted

and observed behaviour of a test embankment on

Malaysian soft clays. Research Report No. R620,

University of Sydney.

Vanmarcke, E.H. 1977. Probabilistic modeling of soil

profiles. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering

Division, ASCE, 103(11): 1227-1246.

US Army Corps of Engineers 1995. Introduction to

Probability and Reliability Methods for Use in

Geotechnical Engineering. Engineering Technical Letter

No. 1110-2-547, Washington DC.

Vanmarcke, E.H. 1983. Random fields: analysis and

synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Session 3F

Page 21

hence. It was constructed on a crust of weathered clay. Figure 3 shows the variation of the undrained shear strength with depth.0 tC -12.73*Elev.0 1 2. Two clay layers of different properties were identified. including biases in empirical factors used in deducing strength values and statistical uncertainties due to limited amounts of data available. a cross-section of the embankment is shown in Figure 2. SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY -15.0m thick.5 Clay Crust 0. undrained conditions prevailed at failure. + 2.0 Dense Clayey Sand -17.0 m of highly plastic. and the shear strength of embankment fill. uncertainties in input parameters whose impacts on the stability of the embankment could be significant are quantified.21 -7. 1989) and the summary paper by Brand and Premchitt (1989). In the following sections. Su (kPa) Figure 3 Profile of field vane shear strength Construction of the embankment took 100 days and. and decreases from about 50 kPa at surface to 8 kPa at 2 m depth.5 0 20 40 60 Undrained Shear Strength. Elevation (m) The Muar Trial embankment had a base area of about 55 m x 90 m and side slopes of 2h:1v.0 tC = -1.77*Elev. Figure 3 shows soil stratigraphy and Table 1 summarizes the physical and mechanical characteristics of clay layers. and systematic sources of uncertainty Session 3F Page 15 . 6.5 kPa at 2 m below surface to 34 kPa at 17 m depth. The strengths of the underlying clay layers increase almost linearly with depth from about 6. Detailed descriptions of the geology and soil conditions are given in the report prepared by the Asian Institute of Technology (AIT. underlain by very soft to soft clays.79 -2.5 Soft Silty Clay C 3.0 tCr = 15. + 7.7 m of peat on top of dense clayey sand.15 10 Elevation (m) : 2. STRATIGRAPHY AND SOIL CHARACTERISTICS The undrained shear strengths of subsurface soils were assessed through 9 field vane soundings. The stability of the embankment is governed by the undrained shear strength of foundation soils. very soft clay were encountered followed by 9. 2. The strength of the desiccated crust is much higher than that of the underlying very soft clay.5 Very Soft Silty Clay -5.5 m of soft clay of lower plasticity and slightly higher strength.0 Deterministic critical slip surface Hassan and Wolff (1999) surface 5 Embankment :1 Weathered Clay Crust 0 Very Soft Silty Clay -5 Soft Silty Clay -10 0 10 20 30 Horizontal Distance (m) Figure 2 Geometry and stratigraphy of the Muar embankment at failure 40 50 60 2. Immediately below the weathered crust. The clay sequence was underlain by 0. about 2. Uncertainties in shear strength parameters are attributed to the inherent spatial variability of the soil layers.5 -10.

Using Equations 2 through 4.45 kPa n = 61 where Su-C is the undrained shear strength at location i. 3. bulk unit weight. of the trend line are -1. S u -C C S u-M C (t C C [1] E[ C] = 0. It is only a modelling approach to simplify the statistical treatment of the data.00 kPa [ C] = 2. statistical theory 2 (Neter et al.63 kPa. a1-C ) E[ z ] 2 [ a1 ] [ a o ] [ a1 ] [4] where [-] is the standard deviation. respectively. plastic limit. and Su-M is the measured vane strength at the same location. The trend component is removed from all vane measurements to estimate the statistical population of the residual component C.4 e 1. Bjerrum (1972. The correlation coefficient (a1-C. ( a o-C .45 kPa. The mean values of the slope. Figure 3 shows hardly any distinction between the undrained shear strengths of the very soft and the soft clay layers in terms of trend and scatter of measurements. b. a linear trend is fitted to the vane data (Figure 3). The residual component has a constant mean of zero and a standard deviation. Since E[a1-C] and E[ao-C] are estimated based on a limited amount of data. as shown in Figure 3. PL. all parameters pertaining to the subject clay layers are identified with a “C“ subscript. C. ao-C) is 0.M 1 n E[ z ] 2 2 b (kN/m ) 15. 2 2 Figure 4 Histogram of residual component of undrained shear strength of clay layers. 1973) recommended applying an empirical correction factor. C Based on a review of several embankment and cut slope failures. ao-C) is given by. to vane measurements [ a1-C ] Su . C is Bjerrum’s vane correction factor (Bjerrum. 1972). of 2. It should be noted that this approximation does not reflect the geology on site as indicated by the different physical properties of the two layers (Table 1).60 1. e. the data of the two layers are combined and the undrained shear strengths are treated as one population. liquidity. tC.6 1. The measured vane strength is divided into a trend component.0 3 ( z i E[ z ]) [3] LL.5 14. and the correlation coefficient (a1-C. index. and intercept. void ratio. LI. The estimates a1-C and ao-C. E[ao-C].07 kPa/m and 0. Summary of soil properties of clay layers 2 Soil Layer LL (%) Clay Crust 90 Very Soft Silty 80 Clay Soft Silty Clay 55 PL (%) 30 27 23 LI (%) 0.M E[ z ]) 2 (zi [2] Session 3F Page 16 .21 kPa.0 16. The validity of this simplification is examined in the following paragraphs. 1990) allows estimating the variances [a1-C] 2 and [ao-C] as follows. the standard deviations [a1-C] and [ao-C] are 0. respectively. respectively. are usually correlated.77 kPa/m and 7. The undrained shear strength of the clays is considered a random variable and modelled using Equation 1. . [ C].85 2.5 1.Table 1.1 Very Soft and Soft Clay Layers where E[-] and 2[-] are the mean and variance. E[a1-C]. that characterizes the spatial variation of strength over and above the trend value. and n is the number of vane measurements. Using the method of least squares. dependent on location. Assuming a1-C and ao-C are normally distributed random variables. For illustration purposes. liquid limit.65 [ a o-C ] 2 Su . they are also uncertain. and a residual component. zi is the depth. Hence.86. It exhibits a single peak indicating that vane shear strengths of the two clay layers are consistent in a statistical sense. Figure 4 shows the histogram of C.

62 kPa. the mean and standard deviation of the residual component. The tests yielded undrained shear strength envelopes with cohesion intercepts ranging between 64 and 19 kPa.15. The scatter of the data around Bjerrum’s recommended relationship is substantial. E[ Cr] = 0. Preliminary slope stability analyses of the Muar embankment using an upper strength threshold of 14 kPa for the weathered crust showed minimal impact. An approximate estimate of fill strength is obtained by averaging shear strengths corresponding to a confining stress equivalent to mid height of the embankment from failure envelopes of three triaxial tests. the strains experienced by the compacted fill. It is estimated to be 60 kPa. The Session 3F Page 17 . are 15. are zero and 4. 1987) suggested that the field vane overestimates the operational shear strength of overconsolidated clay crusts due to the presence of pre-existing fissures.55 kPa. are 2. irrespective of the plasticity index.2 Bjerrum. on the factor of safety. Assuming to be normally distributed. the procedure used above to estimate the average shear strength is approximate.1 is used to quantify the uncertainties in the undrained shear strength of the clay crust. As part of the site investigation program.73 kPa/m and 2. Based on the plasticity indices of the subject clay layers. A similar approach to that in Section 3. E[ C].6 Bjerrum. all parameters pertaining to the clay crust are denoted with a “Cr” subscript.75 (Figure 5) and a standard deviation of 0.79 kPa. Figure 5 indicates a relatively uniform scatter of data points around Bjerrum’s mean curve. the mean value of Bjerrum’s vane correction factor. Cr. Figure 5 shows Bjerrum’s database. less than 4 percent. Cr 3. [a1-Cr] and [ao-Cr]. 1. no threshold is applied to the measured vane strength of the clay crust.. The uncertainty in the operational shear strength of embankment fill is attributed to two factors.2 Clay Crust Published studies (e. Lefebvre et al.49 kPa/m and 3.15. respectively.92. the vane correction factor can be considered a random variable with a mean equal to Bjerrum’s recommended curve and a constant standard deviation deduced from the scatter of data around the mean curve. and corresponding friction angles ranging between 12 and 26 degrees. the standard deviations. due to the 3. the uncertainty surrounding the vane correction factor is significant and should be addressed in any probabilistic assessment. Figure 6 shows the histogram of the residual component. Assuming normal distributions. E[a1-Cr] and E[ao-Cr].8 0.(Equation 1) depending on the plasticity index.g.55 kPa n = 11 1. three unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests were performed on samples of fill material.80. So. A linear trend is fitted to the vane data as shown in Figure 3. the standard deviation [ ] is 0.4 0 50 100 150 Plasticity Index (%) Figure 6 Histogram of residual component of undrained shear strength of clay crust. The correlation coefficient (a1-Cr. Ferkh and Fell (1994) recommended the use of a reduced strength for the crust. 1972 0. ao-Cr) is -0. Hence. For clarity. mean values of the slope and intercept.3 Embankment Fill Material Figure 5 Bjerrum’s vane correction factor The embankment was constructed using compacted clayey sand to sandy clay fill. 1986 Vane Correction Factor. particularly since the initial stresses within the embankment are not geostatic and depend largely on the compaction energy. First. is estimated to be 0. (1986). Removing trend values from vane measurements.00 kPa [ Cr] = 4. Hence. The uncertainty in Bjerrum’s vane correction factor is represented by a normal probability distribution with a mean of 0.. as well as additional cases compiled by Aas et al. Second. 1972 & 1973 Compiled by Aas et al.

each parameter is represented by a number of variables. the operational shear strength of the fill at failure is an unknown value between the peak and residual strengths. mean. exceeds the strain levels at peak strength. -N.49 3. Hence. experimental probability distribution. . standard deviation.55 ---2. stationary random fields (Vanmarcke. The standard deviation is assigned. and selected method of slope analysis are modelled in an Excel spreadsheet. 4.2..distortion of the underlying soft clay. Very soft/soft clay layers Trend a1-C (kPa/m) ao-C (kPa) C Residuals. --Exper. rather than different horizontal and vertical distances. each of these input parameters is assigned appropriate probability distributions. ro. A range of 30-40 m is postulated as a possible range for the horizontal autocorrelation distance and 1-3 m as a possible range for the vertical autocorrelation distance. Exper. The sensitivity of the outputs to the autocorrelation distance is investigated in a latter section. residual components. whose histograms are shown in Figures 4 and 6. 2003). the equivalent isotropic autocorrelation distance. The biases in Bjerrum’s vane correction factors and the statistical uncertainties in regression coefficients of the linear trends of the undrained shear strengths are represented by normal probability distributions with the means and standard deviations estimated in Section 3. Session 3F Page 18 . the shear strength of the embankment fill.07 0. 1996) software. probability density function. a1 and ao. The Bishop method of slices (Bishop. of the marine clays in the foundation is in the range of 5-15 m. PDF.62 -0.80 -2. an estimate of the autocorrelation of in-situ soils is required. To account for the various sources of uncertainty addressed in Section 3. N. Using @Risk functions. (Figure 6) ---Exper. Table 2 summarizes the statistical parameters of all input variables. The spatial variability of the residual components of undrained shear strengths along the slip surface is modelled using one-dimensional. In the absence of adequate data to conduct a site specific assessment.0 12. Su-Fill (kPa) Weathered clay Crust Trend Soil spatial variability E[--] PDF [--] 60.15 -N. slope and intercept of linear trends of undrained shear strengths. N.21 -0. empirical estimates of horizontal and vertical autocorrelations distances are made based on typical values in the literature (El-Ramly et al. The correlations between slopes and intercepts of trend lines are established in the spreadsheet using @Risk tools. a coefficient of variation of 0. The uncertainties due to the spatial variability of clay layers are represented by the observed probability distribution functions of the Table 2.0 --4. Only brief descriptions of the methodology are provided here and the reader is referred to the original paper for more details. 4. is adopted.79 -0. Using the approximate procedure proposed by El-Ramly (2001) and the typical ranges above. Note: E[-]. At any given location along the slip The stability of the Muar embankment at failure is analysed using the probabilistic methodology developed by El-Ramly et al. In the stability analyses in the following sections. Three input parameters are considered random variables. (kPa) C Bjerrum factor. -N. an equivalent isotropic autocorrelation distance. The probabilistic analyses in the following sections are based on an intermediate value of 10 m. a1-Cr (kPa/m) --ao-Cr (kPa) Cr Residuals.. soil properties. Statistical parameters of input variables Input variable Embankment fill.75 -1.63 -0. (Figure 4) -Systematic uncertainty E[--] PDF [--] -15.15 0.2 Autocorrelation Distance and Spatial Variability 4. 1955) is used in the spreadsheet.00 ---0.73 2. the average shear strength of embankment fill along the slip surface is considered a random variable and modelled using a normal probability distribution with a mean equal to 60 kPa. 1997) and @Risk (Palisade. stratigraphy. The embankment geometry.1 PROBABILISTIC SLOPE ANALYSIS Probabilistic Methodology and Input Variables To account for the spatial variability of undrained shear strengths along the slip surface. N. residual component.00 -- Bjerrum factor. judgementally. normal probability distribution. critical slip surface(s). a value of 12 kPa. The probabilistic methodology is spreadsheet-based and makes use of the Microsoft Excel (Microsoft.45 -N. (2002a).77 7. N. [-]. (kPa) Cr 0. 1983). and the undrained shear strengths of the clay crust and the underlying soft clays. To simplify the analysis of spatial variability.

the variances of local averages approach the point variance and the correlation coefficients between most of the local averages approach zero (Vanmarcke. a 3. . the scale of fluctuation.11 [FS] = 0. Based on the observed field performance of the Muar embankment and typical factors of safety used in practice. the deterministic critical slip surface is considered the critical surface for probabilistic slope stability analyses.5m. the mean probability of unsatisfactory performance is 24.72.e.1x10-2. the deterministic critical slip surface based on mean values of input parameters. The statistical characteristics of local averages of C include the reduction in variance due to spatial averaging and the correlation coefficients between averages over adjacent segments of the slip surface.72. The plot indicates little increase in the probability of unsatisfactory performance up to a height of about 3.4 Monte Carlo Simulation 4.38x10-2.15 -2 Pu = 23. 1983). and the surface corresponding to the minimum reliability index based on the Hassan and Wolff (1999) algorithm (Figure 2). The probabilistic analyses are conducted following the same approach described previously.5 and 4.20 standard deviation. the mean and standard deviation of the factor of safety are estimated to be 1.0 Figure 7 Histogram of factor of safety at failure (embankment height above ground = 4. In sampling the input probability distributions.5. 4. the calculated probability of unsatisfactory performance is also a variable. respectively. for example. The stability of the Muar embankment is analyzed probabilistically and deterministically at various stages during construction (i. By taking segment lengths li equal to or less than the scale of fluctuation. respectively. The portion of the slip surface within each soil layer is divided in the spreadsheet (using principles of analytical geometry) into segments of lengths li. .3 Critical Slip Surface Seed = 31069 E[FS] = 1. It is computed to be 0. 2. the probability of unsatisfactory performance and the reliability index of the failed embankment (4. 1983). the correlations between variables are maintained.3 m followed by a sharp increase in probability value as the embankment height exceeds 3. Monte Carlo simulation is performed with @Risk drawing at random a value for each input variable from its defined probability distribution. and the reliability index is 2. Using 10. Probabilistic slope stability analysis of this embankment indicates a mean factor of safety of 1.7 m in height) are 24.3 m high embankment (a deterministic factor of safety of 1. Providing a link between current slope design practice and probabilistic slope stability analyses is essential in explaining the meanings of the computed probabilities of unsatisfactory performance and.8x10 Pu 1. reduce the hesitation of practitioners to use such techniques in practice. spatially correlated with the residual components at adjacent locations. where E[FS] and [FS] are the mean and standard deviation of the factor of safety. 4. For comparison. the variability of its local averages over local domains within the random field is considered (Vanmarcke.8x10-2.42) would have been anticipated to perform adequately in a conventional slope assessment. different embankment heights). Preliminary Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the probability of unsatisfactory performance associated with the former is higher than that of the latter.15. 3.000 iterations. Figure 7 shows the histogram of the factor of safety.3.11 and 0.7 m) Two candidate critical slip surfaces are considered. The probability of unsatisfactory performance is 1. 1977 and. hence. Assuming the spatial structure of the residual components follows an exponential autocovariance function. Four embankment heights are considered.5 Calibration of Probability Figures Having completed the spreadsheet. the residual component C.1x10-2 and 0. Hence. 3. The sampled input values are used to solve the spreadsheet and calculate the corresponding factor of safety. The probability of unsatisfactory performance Pu (probability of factor of safety less than one) is estimated to be 23. is equal to twice the autocorrelation distance.0 m. Instead of modelling the point-to-point variation of the residual component. is a random variable. The process is repeated sufficient times to estimate the statistical distribution of the factor of safety.42 with a 0. Session 3F Page 19 . is given by ={E[FS]-1}/ [FS]. The reliability index. approximately 20 m. Based on the results of 25 simulations (using different seed values). another probabilistic safety indicator.surface.07. Since the simulation process is based on random sampling of input variables. Figure 8 shows the variation of the probability of unsatisfactory performance and factor of safety with embankment height.

In conventional slope design practice.Segment 1 The sensitivity of the estimated probability of unsatisfactory performance of the 3.1x10-2 for ro=5 m. the probability of unsatisfactory performance of the Muar embankment does not seem to be sensitive to the autocorrelation distance of the marine clay foundation.2 FS 2. It measures the strength of linear correlations between input variables and the factor of safety. is investigated by repeating the probabilistic analysis using different autocorrelation distances. Session 3F Page 20 . Pu Acceptable Design (H=3. In other words. and comparable to that of the spatial variability of the undrained shear strength. The plot indicates that the impact of the uncertainty in Bjerrum’s vane correction factor on the reliability of the computed factor of safety is significant. and zero indicates no correlation.Segment 2 Input Variable Cr ao-C Cr .Segment 2 Cr a1-C a1-Cr ao-Cr 0.0.2 NOTE: “ C . the use of Bjerrum’s factor has introduced an additional element of uncertainty that is as significant as the inherent spatial variability of the 0.3 m high embankment to the value of the autocorrelation distance. which explains. Figure 8 Variation of the probability of unsatisfactory performance and the factor of safety with embankment height. at least in part. Five autocorrelation distances within the postulated range of 5 to 15 m (Section 4. the reduction (if any) in the measured vane strength and the contribution of fill strength to stability. (2003) noted a similar conclusion. The probabilities of unsatisfactory performance range between 1. Its numeric value ranges between 1 and –1.Segment 1” is the local average of C over the length of a segment of the critical slip surface Using @Risk software. Spearman rank correlation coefficient is used as the analysis tool. These estimates are largely subjective and depend on the designer’s judgement and experience. and 1.8 Embankment Failed (H=4. El-Ramly et al. FS C Su-Fill 4.3 Probability of Unsatisfactory Performance.7 Sensitivity Analysis . Factor of Safety. more importantly. 4. ought to be made.2 0. ro.0 0. their reliability.8 Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient Figure 9 Spearman rank correlation coefficients between input variables and factor of safety As expected.4 0. Because of the relatively large number of field vane measurements. This highlights the drawbacks of using empirical factors and correlations without proper understanding of their limitations and.7x10-2 for ro=15 m. a sensitivity analysis is undertaken to assess the relative contributions of input variables to the uncertainty in the factor of safety.3m) 0.1 Pu 0 2 3 4 5 0. Figure 9 shows Spearman rank correlation coefficients for all input variables. the statistical uncertainty in the mean trend of the undrained shear strength of the soft clays also has a minimal impact on the analysis.2) are considered. Addressing the stability of a tailings dyke on a marine clay shale foundation. a longstanding issue still facing practitioners in the design of embankments on soft soils. the significant scatter in the predictions of embankment height at failure in Figure 1.4 Embankment Height Above Ground.Segment 1 .0 1.6 1. deterministic estimates of the above two quantities.7m) 0. a value of –1 indicates a perfect negative correlation.6 Impact of Autocorrelation Distance C C . From a practical perspective. A value of 1 indicates a perfect positive correlation.6 0. H (m) undrained shear strength. the uncertainty in the strength of the weathered clay crust has a small impact on the reliability of the computed factor of safety. namely. The plot also shows that the uncertainty in the contribution of fill strength to stability has a large impact on the reliability of the factor of safety.

Cambridge. (2003) presented a probabilistic analysis of a tailings dyke on a pre-sheared clay-shale foundation.C. 1990.H. 1996. June 23-25. NY.G. J. Volume 2.38x10 4. N. Based on a back analysis of the failure. N. Laboratory test data on soil samples from the Muar flats test embankment. Malaysia. Session 3F Page 21 . 5(1): 7-17. E. Probabilistic design of foundations and earth structures. In Probabilistic Methods in Geotechnical Engineering. D. REFERENCES Aas. and Cruden. Geotechnical Special Publication No. H. El-Ramly et al. Embankments on soft ground. Lacasse. Y... Palisade Corporation. Moscow. University of Sydney. H. Undrained shear strength in the surficial weathered crust.14 0. Proceedings of ASCE Specialty Conference on Performance of Earth and Earth-Supported Structures. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. El-Ramly. First. Bjerrum. El-Ramly et al. 1972. J. Morgenstern. and Fell.. USA. Canadian Geotechnical Society.31 2. Vanmarcke. 24: 23-24. Morgenstern. Newfield. G.. Probabilistic Stability Analysis of Lodalen Slide. 40: 192-208. Lee. Proceedings of the Symposium on Trial Embankments on Malaysian Marine Clays.. USA. and Cruden. (2002b) conducted a probabilistic slope analysis of the Lodalen slide. Corporation. 2003. 1987. D.R. Redmond.. In Use of in Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering. USA. Massachusetts. Problems of soil mechanics and construction on soft clays. Palisade Corporation. Research Report No. USA. and Dascal. 2001.. June 11-14. Morgenstern. the probabilities of unsatisfactory performance of adequate slopes appear to be much higher than some of the recommendations reported in the literature. Brand. 1993. 1977. Table 3 summarizes the results of the two case studies together with the results of the Muar embankment at an intermediate height. 1983. ASCE. Ferkh. 1989. and Cruden. Proceedings. Research Report – Phase II Bishop.). pp 49-62. University of Alberta. 1989. The dyke performance was monitored during and after construction and is deemed adequate. E. Proceedings of In Situ’86. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division. Comparison of the predicted and observed performance of the Muar test embankment. Volume 3. ASCE. Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. D. T. Canada. thesis. the US Corps of Engineers (1995) recommended a probability of unsatisfactory performance of 3x10-5 or a minimum reliability index of 4. A.R.. USA.D.0 as design targets for a “Good” performance level. Rotterdam. Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles. Niagara Falls. Poulos. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. Search algorithm for minimum reliability index of earth slopes. H. R620. 1110-2-547. Volume 3. El-Ramly. Asian Institute of Technology. MIT Press. Z. S. Blacksburg. 6. the factor of safety of the Muar embankment is higher than those of the two other cases. H. AIT. G.00 -2 0. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. O. Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice. Random fields: analysis and synthesis.07 0.85 2..16x10 -2 1. Purdue University. 1986. In another study. January 5-10. Li & Lo (eds.31 1. Probabilistic stability analysis of a tailings dyke on presheared clay-shale. deemed stable. This inconsistency is attributed to the significant uncertainties in the analysis of the Muar embankment. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. CONCLUDING REMARKS In a similar study. yet its probability of unsatisfactory performance is substantially higher. Lafayette.20 Pu 0. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. Bjerrum. 103(11): 1227-1246.. The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of slopes. Kuala Lumpur. A. US Army Corps of Engineers 1995. India. H. Kay. pp 1-54. 1997.33 1. @Risk: risk analysis and simulation add-in for Microsoft Excel or Lotus 1-2-3. Canada. Engineering Technical Letter No. and Hoeg. they redesigned the cut slope (hypothetically) to a flatter inclination deemed stable and undertook a probabilistic assessment of its stability.N.. including Bjerrum’s vane correction factor and embankment strength.42 [FS] 0. Balkema.H. Washington. and Premchitt. Design of embankments on soft clay. Predicted and observed behaviour of a test embankment on Malaysian soft clays. K. El-Ramly. Second. Safety indices of three case histories Soil Layer Lodalen Slope Tailings Dyke Muar Embankment E[FS] 1.R. Microsoft. Microsoft Excel 97.. ASCE. 3. El-Ramly. E. Use of in situ tests for foundation design on clay. L. Washington DC. 1973. pp 733-738. and Wolff. November.J. Geotechnique.. and Small. J.3 m. Neither of these issues would be addressed in conventional slope stability analyses based on the deterministic factor of safety.... 2002a. pp 1-30. New Delhi. 1955. 125(4): 301-308. Microsoft Table 3. R. J. 55th Canadian Geotechnical Conference. Pare. pp 1053-1060. N. 39: 665-683.W. Lefebvre. Lunne.5. October 20-23. L. Vanmarcke. 1994. 2002b. Probabilistic analyses of landslide hazards and risks: Bridging theory and practice. T. Hassan. Introduction to Probability and Reliability Methods for Use in Geotechnical Engineering. 1999. Volume 2.W. pp 111159.07 The results in Table 3 indicate two important observations. For example. Ph.C.

- Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic FutureAshlee Vance
- Dispatches from Pluto: Lost and Found in the Mississippi DeltaRichard Grant
- The Innovators: How a Group of Hackers, Geniuses, and Geeks Created the Digital RevolutionWalter Isaacson
- Sapiens: A Brief History of HumankindYuval Noah Harari
- Yes PleaseAmy Poehler
- The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New AmericaGeorge Packer
- This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The ClimateNaomi Klein
- Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic GeniusSylvia Nasar
- A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius: A Memoir Based on a True StoryDave Eggers
- The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of CancerSiddhartha Mukherjee
- The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & PowerDaniel Yergin
- John AdamsDavid McCullough
- Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New AmericaGilbert King
- The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first CenturyThomas L. Friedman
- Rise of ISIS: A Threat We Can't IgnoreJay Sekulow
- The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy AnswersBen Horowitz
- Smart People Should Build Things: How to Restore Our Culture of Achievement, Build a Path for Entrepreneurs, and Create New Jobs in AmericaAndrew Yang
- Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham LincolnDoris Kearns Goodwin
- The New Confessions of an Economic Hit ManJohn Perkins
- How To Win Friends and Influence PeopleDale Carnegie
- Steve JobsWalter Isaacson
- Angela's Ashes: A MemoirFrank McCourt
- Bad Feminist: EssaysRoxane Gay

- You Too Can Have a Body Like Mine: A NovelAlexandra Kleeman
- The Incarnations: A NovelSusan Barker
- The Light Between Oceans: A NovelM.L. Stedman
- Leaving Berlin: A NovelJoseph Kanon
- The Silver Linings Playbook: A NovelMatthew Quick
- The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)Viet Thanh Nguyen
- Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close: A NovelJonathan Safran Foer
- A Man Called Ove: A NovelFredrik Backman
- The MasterColm Toibin
- Bel CantoAnn Patchett
- We Are Not Ourselves: A NovelMatthew Thomas
- The First Bad Man: A NovelMiranda July
- The Rosie Project: A NovelGraeme Simsion
- The Blazing World: A NovelSiri Hustvedt
- The Flamethrowers: A NovelRachel Kushner
- Brooklyn: A NovelColm Toibin
- Life of PiYann Martel
- The Love Affairs of Nathaniel P.: A NovelAdelle Waldman
- The Bonfire of the Vanities: A NovelTom Wolfe
- Lovers at the Chameleon Club, Paris 1932: A NovelFrancine Prose
- The Perks of Being a WallflowerStephen Chbosky
- A Prayer for Owen Meany: A NovelJohn Irving
- The Cider House RulesJohn Irving
- Wolf Hall: A NovelHilary Mantel
- The Art of Racing in the Rain: A NovelGarth Stein
- The WallcreeperNell Zink
- Interpreter of MaladiesJhumpa Lahiri
- The Kitchen House: A NovelKathleen Grissom
- Beautiful Ruins: A NovelJess Walter
- Good in BedJennifer Weiner