PUBLIC CORRUPTION DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS 9TH CIRCUIT SUIT COOPER V [MONTANA CORPRA FICTA EMPLOYEES]

~JS 44 (Rev.

12/07)

CIVIL COVER SHEET

The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the .information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers asrequiredby hi.w!·-exQept as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, IS required for the use of the Clerk of Court forthe.purpose' of mmatmg the CIVIl docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) ",

I am Love Thomas Wright Cooper as a proper noun spelled here; any OTHER NAME capitalization is an attempted fraud, as I am not a company or en legis entity (b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff
(EXOBPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)

I.

(a)

PLAINTIFFS

DEFENDANTS

AS LISTED ON 1443 CLAIM ATTAC Ht:: 0 ~EIN
,; _ i

NiJJ'

/::J
..

County of Residence NOTE:

of First Listed Defendant (IN U.S:-PtAINTIFF

PARK
CASES ONLy)

-';';r

IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATioN OF THE LAND INVOLVED.

(c) Attorney's (Firm Name, A¢aress, and Telephone Number) SUI Juris, as myself Love Thomas wright Cooper 889 S. RAINBOW BLVD. iLAS VEGAS NV 89145
II. BASIS I OF JURISDICTION

Attorneys

(If Known)

(702) 608-1236
III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRIN (For Diversity Cases Only) PTF Citizen of This State 01 CIP DEF AL an "X" in One Box for Plaintiff and One Box for Defendant) PTF DEF Incorporated or Principal Place 04 04
of Business In This State

(Place an "X" in One Box Only)

PAR

TIES(Place

o

US. Government Plaintiff

o o

3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party)

o

1

~2

U.S. Government
Defendant

4

Diversity
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item Ill)

Citizen

of Another

State

o o

2

o o

2

Incorporated and Principal Place of Business In Another State
Foreign Nation

o o

5

0

5

3

6

0

6

IV

1)"·,":'

NATURE OF CONTRACT

SUIT

o o o o o o o o o o o o

:7"':

.,,:

{Place an "X" in One Box OnIV) "~,,V .;:fORTS

.--::_

..

-. .

FORFEITUREIPENAbTY'

,>BANKRUPTCY

,~:OTHER
0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 400 410 430 450 460 470

STATUTES

110 Insurance 120 Marine 130 Miller Act
140 Negotiable Instrument 150 Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcement of Judgment

151 Medicare Act 152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (ExcL Veterans) 153 Recovery of Overpayment
of Veteran's Benefits

PERSONAL INJURY en 310 Airplane en 315 Airplane Product Liability en 320 Assault, Libel & Slander o 330 Federal Employers' Liability C1 340 Marine

PERSONAL INJURY 0 362 Personal InjuryMed. Malpractice

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

0 0

365 Personal Injury . Product Liability
368 Asbestos Personal

610 Agriculture 620 Other Food & Drug 625 Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881
630 Liquor Laws

o o
I;'

-.

422 Appeal 28 USC 158 423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157

n

345 Marine 350 Motor

Product Vehicle

160 Stockholders' Suits 190 Other Contract 195 Contract Product Liability o 196 Franchise 11\-';': REALllROPERTY';+".", -

o en

Liability

o o o o o o

210 Land Condemnation

220 Foreclosure
230 Rent Lease & Ejectment

.355 Motor Vehicle Product Liability 360 Other Personal Injury CIVIL-RIGHTS [Jl 441Voting en 442 Employment o 443 Housing/

Injury Product Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY 0 370 Other Fraud 0 371 Truth in Lending 0 380 Other Personal Property Damage 0 385 Property Damage Product Liability

640 R.R. & Truck 650 Airline Regs. 660 Occupational SafetylHealth 690 Other ;, . LABOR 710 Fair Labor Standards Act 720 LaborlMgmt. Relations
730 Labor/Mgmt.Reporting & Disclosure Act 740 Railway Labor Act 790 Other Labor Litigation

'PROPERTY RIGHTS 0 820 Copyrights 0 830 Patent 0 840 Trademark

State Reapportionment Antitrust Banks and Banking Commerce Deportation Racketeer Influenced and

Corrupt Organizations 480 Consumer Credit

490 CablelSat TV
810 Selective Service

o o o o o o o

240 Torts to Land 245 TOlt Product Liability 290 All Other Real Property

_PRISONERP.ETI-TIONS 0 510 Motions to Vacate Sentence Habeas Corpus: Accommodations 0 530 General en 444 Welfare 0 535 Death Penalty [Jl 445 Arner. w/Disabilities . 0 540 Mandamus & Other Employment 0 550 Civil Rights o 446 Amer. wlDisabilities - 0 555 Prison Condition Other o 440 Other Civil Rights
.:;,,"

791 Emp!. Ret. Inc. Security Act ·lltiIMIGRATION·
462 Naturalization Alien Detainee

SOCIAL SECURITY 861 RIA (1395ff) 862 Black Luog (923) 863 DIWCIDIWW (405(g)) 864 ssm Title XVI 865 RSI (405(g)) FEDERAL TAX SllTS 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant) 871 IRS-Third Party 26 USC 7609

.'~ •

850 Securities/Commodities/ Exchange 0 875 Customer Challenge 12 USC 3410 0 890 Other Statutory Actions 0 891 Agricultural Acts 0 892 Economic Stabilization Act Matters 0 893 Environmental 0 894 Energy Allocation Act 0 895 Freedom ofInformation Act 0 900Appeal of Fee Determination
Under Equal Access of to Justice

Application )!!(

463 Habeas COlPllO. 465 Other Immigration
Actions

950 Constitutionality

State Statutes

V.

ORIGIN

01

Original
Proceeding

(Place ant'X" in One Box Only) igJ 2 Removed from 0 State Court

3

Remanded from Appellate Court

o

4

Reinstated Reopened

or

0

5

Transferred from another district statutes

o
unless

6 Multidistrict
Litigation diversity):

o

7 Judge from Magistrate
Jud ment

Appeal

to District

Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing VI. CAUSE OF ACTION

(Do not cite jurisdictional

1::'=:28~U""S""C~:1,""4;;;:;4",-3+,:-1,-"3,,,,4,,,-3-,-1 "'-8U"'-S"'-C""'-'-:1-"'66"'-1'-'+....!1-"'9:.1.:83~+c.=2""4.=.2+.w6""'5""4;J.;.+2=-+!..:4~4=-2 .:=U~S~C:.:..:1~4~4~1 +:!:..1l.=2""2-"'05~5-"'U-"'S::.:C",,!.:7-=2.!...71~. color of authorit

_

VII.

REQUESTED COMPLAINT:

IN
CASE-(S)

VIll.

RELATED IF

ANY

(See instructions):

JUDGE

WILLIAM

NELS SWANDAL

DOCKET

NUMBER

DC-10-25

RECEIPT #

--------

AM01JNT

-------------

APPLYING IFP

JUDGE

------~

MAG. JUDGE

---------

2: 11-ms-00056-NA
~---~lT------2 __/NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NINTH DISTRICT OF NEVADA 28 USC 1443 Civil rights cases STATE case removal by the defendant to the district court of the United States. I, Love Thomas Wright Cooper, and only as capitalized, am the ACCUSER: ,.) Any attempt to use my all Capital Name is Fraud on the Court, ') V. ) DEFENDANTS FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL CORPORA FICTA Employee(s); SHERIFF M. ALLEN LUTES®, SHERIFF'-} JAY BELL®, TONY STEFFINS®, BRIAN GREEN®, BLAKE BLA TTER®, STEVE VOSS®, JAMES SULAGES®, JOHN) DOE®, STEVEN C, BABCOCK®, BRYAN R WHITTAKER®, WILLIAM NELS SWANDAL®, BRIAN WHITTAKER®, ) PATRICK E DlJFFY®, D. ROBERTS®, JOANN BACHELLER®, MICHAEL COTTER®, LlC T. MACKAY & DIC H ) MCLEAN®, BRETT D. LINNEWEBER®, LINDA BUDESKI®, DENISE NELSON®, BRIAN SCHWEITZER®, JOHN ) BOHLINGER®, StEVE BULLOCK® KRISTINE THA TCHER®, GREG NOOSE®, JOANN LOEHR®, WAYNE C TERNES®, ) TANA MEUER(llJ, MICHAEL T. TOOLEY®, JIM SCHEIER®, BRANT LIGHT®, CHRIS D. TWEETEN®, JOE CHAPMAN®, ) JOHN STRANDELL®, ARL YN GREYDANUS®, JOE WODN1K®, JENNIFER VIETS®, ELEANOR COOPERlDER®, BRYAN ) COSTIGAN®, MARK LONG®, KATHLEEN CARRlCK®, SHANNAN PICCOLO®, SANDRA L GORDON®, KIM LA VENDER®, ) JUNE LITTLE®, NACOMA BARTON®, ORLINA HUNSAKER®, ANGIE HISER®, TERRY SARRAZIN®, SUE MARTIN®, M; ) ALLAN LUTES®, SCOTT HAMIL TON®, KEVIN J LARKIN®, DAVID R CARNES®, LINDA MCCULLOUGH®, JOHN ) VINCENT®, MONTANA DISTRICT COURT BILLINGS DIVISIONAL OFFICE®, UNITED STATES®, STATE OF MONTANA®, ) MONTANA STATE POLICE®, PARK COUNTY®, MONTANA SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT®, PARK COUNTY ) SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT®, MONTANA ATTORNEY GENERAL®, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE®, MOTOR VEHICLE ) DIVISION®, TITLE AND LICENSE BUREAU®, FIELD OPERATIONS BUREAU®, RECORDS AND DRIVER CONTROL ) BUREAU®, MONTANA HIGHWAY PATROL®, CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION NETWORK SERVICES SECTION®, ) CRIMINAL RECORDS AND IDENTIFICATION SERVICES SECTION®, MONTANA ALL THREAT INTELLIGENCE CENTER®, ) MONTANA BOARD OF CRIME CONTROL®, MONTANA SECRETARY OF STATE®, US. DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ) MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION®, JAMES F BATTIN FEDERAL BUlLDING®, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DETENTION ) FACILITY®, EMl:GRANT®, MAX BAUCUS®, JON TESTER®, DENNY REHBERG®, MONICA LINDEN®, MIKE MCGRATH®, ) JAMES C NELSON:ID, W. WILLIAM LEAPHART®, PATRICIA OBRIEN COTTER®, JIM RICE®, JOHN WARNER®, BRIAN ) MORRlS®, ED SiVlITH®, BOB RANEY® BRAD MOINAR®, KEN TOOLE®, GREG JERGESON®, DOUG MOOD®, TONY ) NA VE®, DEBYYHERNANDEZ®, CAROL MUESSIG®, SCOTT TWITO®, JIM RENO®, JOHN OSTLUND®, BILL KENNEDY®, ) MARTY PRYOR@, MIKE LINDER®, TOMAS W. HANEL®, BRENT BROOKS®, CHRISTINA VOLEK®, CARl MARTIN®, ) PEGGY DENNEY GAGHEN@, JIM RONQUILLO®, ANGELA CIMMINO®, DENIS PITMAN®, RICHARD MCF ADDEN®, ) VINCE RUEGANIER@, JAN! MCCALL®, ED ULLEDALEN®, RICHARD CLARK®, MARK ASTLE®, PATRICK WEBER®, ) SHANNON JOHNSON®, MACO®, NACO®, SENIOR JUDGE JACK SHANSTROM®, MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROLYN) OSTBY®, *1983; CAMDEN EASTERLING®, JODY HAUSEN®, CLAIRE JORGENSEN®, JASON "BIG J" HARRlS®, ) ROBERT BONACCOLTA®, DANIEL O'CONNELL®, VAL O'CONNELL®, - ADDING DEFENDANTS AS THEY BECOME ) KNOWN TO ME, ET AL ) ) ) )

3 4 5
6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15

16
17

18
19 20 21
22

CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: EXCLUDING ALL UNLAWFUL USURPATIONS: ARTICLE III SECTION 2, THE JUDICIAL POWER SHALL EXTEND TO ALL CASES, IN LAW AND EQUITY, ARISING UNDER THIS CONSTITUTION. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Remedy to be paid for deprivation of rights under color of federal law. The use of Federal law (codes), TITLE 21 CHAPTER 13 §§ 801-971 to illegally arrest and inflict cruel and unusual punishment, carries with it is a 15,000,000.00 penalty per color oflaw violation. Piracy 18 § 1661. Robbery ashore by FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL CORPORA FICTA Employee(s). ( Estate of Macias v. Ihde, 42 F. Supp.2d 957, 962 (N.D. Cal. 1999). TOTAL 140 defendants time violations totals 2.1 billion, reserving the right to add defendants as they become known. TRUE BILL for time spent falsely arrested: Seven x 1000 per minute x minutes held illegally is 639,360, which formula is upheld in a case in which the city was accused of failing to train its officers; Trezevant v. City of Tampa, 741 F.2d 336 (11thCir. 1984). This includes the pirated items that were taken upon the false arrest, which have neither been returned or given just compensation for: TRUE BILL is for number ofItems 6 x minutes held.

23 24 25

Grand Total for all violations of inflicting unlawful code, including 32% APR until May 24, 2011. Payable only 111 Gold & Silver, is 9.135108717 Billion. Final sum to be determined at time of settlement. FEDERAL, STATE & LOCAL CORPORA FlCTA Employee(s); hereby ordered to pay; Love Thomas Wright Cooper.
NOTICE OF 28 USC 1443 CIVIL RIGHTS CASES [S REMOVED BY THE DEFENDANT TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - 1-

1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9

Question of jurisdiction. Plaintiff claims federal jurisdiction pursuant to Article ill § 2 which extends the jurisdiction to cases arising under the U.S. Constitution. FRCP Rule 5.1. Constitutional Challenge to a Statute - Notice, Certification, and Intervention (d) No Forfeiture. A party's failure to file and serve the notice, or the court's failure to certify, does not forfeit a constitutional claim or defense that is otherwise timely asserted.
TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 89 > § 1443 Civil rights cases Any of the following cavil actions or criminal prosecutions, commenced in a State court may be removed by the defendant to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: (1) Against any person who is denied or cannot enforce in the courts of such State a right under any law providing for the equal civil rights of citizens of the United States, or of all persons within the jurisdiction thereof; (2) For any act under color of authority derived from any law providing for equal rights, or for refusing to do any act on the ground that it would be inconsistent with such law.

Opening argument: challenge 1.) FACT: No theft can be claimed on something that has a bill of private sale; the person who sold the item [truck] has committed fraud on the court to further a conspiracy against rights perpetrated by officers of the law. *see 1983. 2.) Montana is a bastion of individuals' rights. Our government should not interfere with a citizen's decision to use marijuana, a substance that has been proven less harmful than tobacco or alcohol, has never caused an overdose death, and moved Francis Young, the DEA's own administrative law judge, to declare it "one ofthe safest therapeutically active substances known to man". Therefore the charge of dangerous drugs for cannabis/ marijuana,

10 11 12

was only to further the conspiracy against rights perpetrated by the officers of the law. *see 1983. 3.) The war on drugs is illegal; there is no prohibition in the constitution that would forbid the use of "illegal drugs." This is evident by AMENDMENT XVIII and then the repeal by AMENDMENT XXI of the prohibition of

13
14 15 16

intoxicating liquors. Insurrection to the law, especially by those whose special duty to it is to the law, is an act of land piracy and vigilantism. Unconstitutional and color of law STATE "code" was used against me only to further the

conspiracy against rights under color of law, perpetrated by the officers of the law. *see 1983. 4.) Amendment II. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Anus, shall not be infi-inged. What part of "shall not be infringed" does this court not understand, where is the amendment to the constitution that says, if you've been convicted a "felon" does the second amendment suddenly change to say "shall be infringed if you're a felon?" Either each of the officers is insane or each of the officers is striking against the constitutional form of government in open court, and each has forfeited their oath ofo(fice and faithful performance bond by their high crimes and misdemeanors. 5.) In a case involving a person engaged in transporting property under contract for hire by truck on the highways, the Supreme Court of Montana revealed the nature of such activity in comparison to one using the roads for travel: "While a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, that right does not extend to the use of the highways, either in whole or in part, as a place of business for private gain." There was no commercial nexus that required a license, therefore the incorrect charge of driving was only to further the conspiracy against rights, perpetrated by the officers of the law. *see 1983. 6.) Article 1 Section. 10. No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or 24 25 Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws; There was no commerce involved therefore no commercial requirements; making commercial demands of me was only to further the conspiracy against rights perpetrated by the officers of the law under color oflaw. *see 1983.
NOTICE OF 28 USC 1443 CIVIL RIGHTS CASES [S REMOVED BY THE DEFENDANT TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES -2-

17 18 19
20 21 22 23

N W

N N

I-'
CD

I-' W

I-' N

o

I-'
CD

.1-'

o

00

[fJ (j) (j)

z
~
(j)

()

o

N

o· r(j)

S2

.g
(j) (j)

~
0.. C
V> (j)

o ...., o o
0..
(j) V>

~
()

;:;:
(j)

0..

i'0
{J1

i'0 W

i'0 N

o

i'0

m

f--'

f--'

o

m

i'0

"d

o "'
<:
(1)

s:
(1)

s

tv

W

1'0 N

co

f-'

f-'

f-'

W

1'0

o

f-'

co

w

1'0

1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8

15. Provide the strict proof that there is an amendment to the constitution allowing for the unlicensed practice of medicine in the state of Montana with properly state certified malpractice insurance by CORPORA FICTA EMPLOYEES; MAGISTRATE JUDGE LINDA BUDESKI®, JUDGE WILLIAM NELS SWANDAL®, TONY STEFFINS®, BRETT LINNEWEBER®, CAMDEN EASTERLING®, JODY HAUSEN®, CLAIRE JORGENSEN®, VAL O'CONNELL®, FBI

JASON "BIG J' HARRIS®, ROBERT BONACCOLTA®,

DANIEL O'CONNELL®,

MARK SEYLER®, DEA CHRIS RANDLE®, BRIAN®; ATF AGENT, SHERIFF M. ALLEN LUTES®, SHERIFF JAY BELL@, P.O. TONA WELLS@, DEPUTY BRIAN GREEN®, TROOPER JIM SULAGES® & DEPUTY BLAKE BLATTER®, while supposedly DEA policy, are each mentally and medically competent to make statements, assertions and actions which directly contravene previously established statements by the DEA's own administrative judge, Francis Young, who declared marijuana" one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man". 16. Provide strict proof that the lawful judge who signed the legal and lawful warrant for; Love Thomas Wright Cooper: a.)has not received and is not receiving any emoluments from any other place beside the United States Treasury, 9 10 11 of whose emoluments have never been diminished, b.)who has never taken any bribe(s) or never had a conflict of interest in adjudging the outcome of a case. 17. Provide strict proof that the lawful judge who signed the legal and lawful warrant for Love Thomas Cooper: a.) has a valid, sworn oath and maintains a valid faithful performance bond as registered with the Secretary of State of Montana as required by the Constitution of the united states of America, b.) has never held a hearing without ajury present, unless an impeachment for a public servant. 13 18. Provide strict proof that the lawful judge who signed the legal and lawful warrant for Love Thomas Cooper: a.) has never practiced law from the bench and b.) has never had an impeachment, c) has never impeached an inhabitant upon the land by use of a hearing in lieu of a jury trial. 19. Provide strict proof that if the court is relying on admiralty law that it is on international waters. 20. Provide strict proof that the jurisdiction of this court is constitutionally within the law, equity or common, in this case, and not unconstitutional in nature. 21. Provide strict proof that this court that is charging Love Thomas Wright Cooper is not an administrative court. 22. Prove strict proof that Love Thomas Wright Cooper has not been refused legal counsel of his choice. His counsel shall not be a member of the American Bar Association, per the highest court in this land, which ruled in Sperry v. State of Florida, ex reI. the Florida Bar (1963), and restated in Keller v. Wisconsin Ex ReI. State Bar of Wisconsin that I, Love Thomas Wright, have a right to rely on a legal advisor without having to patronize the bar for an administrative proceeding. 23. Provide strict proof that Love Thomas Wright Cooper had a jury of his peers, without undue influence by the court 22 23 24 25 or the judge or that perjury was not used to further a conspiracy against my rights by the CORPORA FICT A EMPLOYEES; MAGISTRATE JUDGE LINDA BUDESKI@, JUDGE WILLIAM NELS SWANDAL®, TONY STEFFINS@, BRETT LINNEWEBER@, CAMDEN EASTERLING®, JODY HAUSEN®, CLAIRE JORGENSEN®,

12

14 15 16
17

18 19
20

21

JASON "BIG J' HARRIS@, ROBERT BONACCOL TA@, DANIEL O'CONNELL@, VAL O'CONNELL@, FBI MARK SEYLER®, DEA CHRIS RANDLE@, BRIAN@; ATF AGENT, SHERIFF M. ALLEN LUTES®, SHERIFF

NOTICE OF 28 USC 1443 CIVIL RIGHTS CASES [S REMOVED BY THE DEFENDANT TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES -6-

N N

o

N

f-'

co

m

f-'

f-'

f-'

<Jl

W

o

f-'

m

<Jl

w

.1-'

1
2 3 4

SHERIFF JAY BELL, P.O. TONA WELLS®, DEPUTY GREEN®, TROOPER JIM SULAGES® & DEPUTY BLAKE BLATTER®, supervisors, heirs, agents, actors and assigns have each not violated each of their sworn oaths to fully protect each and every unalienable right of Love Thomas Wright Cooper in this case. US Constitution Article. II. Section. 4. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers ofthe United States. shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of. Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. All civil officers are impeachable for crimes committed against me. Anything over 5 days in jail is also removal from office. Amendment II. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep & bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Knowingly violating my rights, impeaching me as if I were a pnblic servant and pretending to have the right to violate my rights, is a criminal act.

5
6 7 8 9

10 11 12
13

TITLE 18> PART I > CHAPTER 13> § 241 Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, of because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured-They shall be fmed under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. It is not my duty to teach a public servant, or civil officer the law. All agents have all sworn to up hold the

14 15 16

constitution and ignorance of the law is no excuse for having violated the law. A civil officer's pervasive disregard in practice by those who as law officers owe special obedience to law, and having violated it, are criminals. Just because a public servant is just doing what they have been taught by using a deprivation of rights under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, is no excuse for wilful continued malfeasant criminal behavior.
TITLE 18> PART I > CHAPTER 31> § 645. Court officers generally Whoever, being a United States marshal, clerk, receiver, referee, trustee, or other officer of a United States court, or any deputy, assistant, or employee of any such officer, retains or converts to his own use or to the use of another or after demand by the party entitled thereto, unlawfully retains any money coming into his hands by virtue of his official relation, position or employment, is guilty of embezzlement and shall, where the offense is not otherwise punishable by enactment of Congress, be fined under this title or not more than double the value of the money so embezzled, whichever is greater, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; but if the amount embezzled does not exceed $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. It shall not be a defense that the accused person had any interest in such moneys or fund.

17 18
19 20 21 22
23 24

The civil officers in this case have retained and converted my personal property for their own use, by color of authority, and have no defense against this law suit in both their public and private capacity. All persons having the knowledge that there is a ring ofthieves operating, as an agent, or actor of the state, or county, or city, who does not as soon as possible make known this crime, becomes punishable as a principal.
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 2 Principals (a) Whoever commits an offense against ilie United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal. If you're covering for some crime that you know that was committed, you are punishable as a principal with no

25

immunity, and claiming immunity is admitting to having committed a crime, or knowing a crime was committed.
NOTICE OF 28 USC 1443 CIVIL RlGHTS CASES [S REMOVED BY THE DEFENDANT TO THE DISTRlCT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES -8-

W

N

N N

N

o

I-'
CO

I-'

W

I-' 1'0

I-' .1-'

o

I-'

co

w

1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9

of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States; (4) To recover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congress providing for the protection of civil rights, including the right to vote.

I have an unalienable right as "ANY PERSON" to bring a suit against and recover damages from ANY PERSON WHO FAILS to prevent the deprivation of my rights, including for enacting an illegal Attainder against me. President Vice President and all civil officers of the United States. shall be removed from office on im eachment for and conviction of. treason. bribeD'. or other high crimes and misdemeanors. ALL civil officers are subject to removal from office for acting criminal. Enacting a bill of attainder against me is taking bribes, kickbacks and is a high crime.
1.

Point. THE FEDERAL AGENTS, ACTORS or instrumentalities, such as CORPORA FICTA Employee(s); may not use a technical form of pleading to subjugate my right to redress of this injustice.

FRCP III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS> Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading e) Pleading to be Concise and Direct; Consistency Each averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct. No technical forms of pleading or motions are required. (f) Construction of Pleadings; All pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice.

10 11 12 13 14
1) 45 under office "does n.4.

2. Point. THE FEDERAL AGENTS, ACTORS or instrumentalities, such as CORPORA FICTA Employee(s); abuse of power is being called into account criminally for their official misconduct.
"There is no great danger that abuse of power will be fostered by this exemption from civil liability , for the prosecutor is at all times the wholesome restraint imposed by the risk of being called to account criminally for official misconduct * , or of being ousted from on that account * * 46 New Jersey statutes generally protect a public official for the performance of duties that statutory immunity not extend to conduct amounting to a crime or constituting actual malice, actual fraud or willful misconduct" Cashen, 334 A.2d at 13

3. Point. THE FEDERAL AGENTS, ACTORS or instrumentalities, such as CORPORA FICTA Employee(s); in their pervasive disregard to the law, must remember they: owe special duty to the law. No one is above the law, especially those who are viewed as the embodiment of the law. How can you become lawless, and expect others ito remain peacefully within the law, lawlessness begets lawlessness.
2) What is perhaps even more noteworthy is its pervasive disregard in practice by those who as law officers owe special obedience to law. What is true of the federal Act against wiretapping and its violations is widely true of related state legislation and its disobedience. See Westin, The Wire-Tapping Problem, 52 Col L. Rev. 165 GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. v. RAICH et al. The court relied heavily on United States v. Ihde, 514 U.S. 549, and United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, to hold that this separate class of purely local activities was beyond the reach of federal power.

15
16

17
18

4. Point. THE FEDERAL AGENTS, ACTORS or instrumentalities,

such as CORPORA FICTA Employee(s),

19
20 21 22 23 24

in an attempt to enforce federal law where no interstate commerce is involved, has enforced federal law, in a trick or scheme in which there is NO PROHIBITION, and directly strikes against the constitution and the

right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures.
In its order granting the Appellees' motion for summary judgment, the district court began its analysis by setting forth the elements of a § 1983 claim against an individual state actor as follows: Estate of Macias v. Ihde, 42 F. Supp.2d 957,962 (N.D. Cal 1999). The court also stated that, to establish municipal liability, a plaintiff must show that (1) [the plaintiff] possessed a constitutional right of which he/she was deprived; (2) the municipality had a policy or custom; (3) this policy or custom amounts to deliberate indifference to [the plaintiffs 1 constitutional right; and (4) the policy or custom caused the constitutional deprivation.

25

5. It is clear that the policy or custom caused the constitutional deprivation, that was not normally that of the municipality's written policy, but a complete indifference by those who owed special duty to their oath.
NOTICE OF 28 USC 1443 CIVIL RIGHTS CASES [S REMOVED BY THE DEFENDANT TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - 10 -

1 2 3 4 5
6 6.) 7 8 9

SIGNATURE PAGE 1.) 2.) 3.) 4.) My Name is, Love Thomas Wright Cooper Under the law, myself and my wife are one legal identity. My name is and spelling is only exactly as: Love Thomas Wright Cooper. I do in fact, do not use ANY other, nor do we allow ANY other form of our name, nor capitalization. My pleadings need not to be within the same standards as an attorney.

5.) Per Puckett v. Cox & Gideon v. Wainwright

CLER$$RULE 03-29-05 10:46:40 PGT·CTRULE 36 SUPREME COURT RULE 29 When a party is not represented by counsel, service shall be made on the party, personally, by mail, or by commercial carrier. Ordinarily, service on a party must be by a manner at least as expeditious as the manner used to file the document with the Court.

10 11 12

7.) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading ~) Pleading to be Concise and Direct; Consistency Each averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct. No technical forms of pleading or motions are required. 8.) Amendment V. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall ANY person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy oflife or limb, nor shall be compelled in ANY criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation. 9.) This must be heard before a grand jury unless for the impeachment of each of the officers. As of April 2006, the eleven states that have decriminalized certain marijuana use are Arizona, Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. Therefore the usurpation of my rights under federal codes is illegal. 10.) * A PRIVATE CITIZEN CAN BE HELD LIABLE UNDER § 1983 While a private citizen cannot ordinarily be held liable under § 1983 because that statute requires action under color of state law, if a private citizen conspires with a state actor, then the private citizen is subject to § 1983 liability. Brokaw v. Mercer County, 235 F.3d 1000 (7th Cir 2001) quoting Bowman v. City of Franklin, 980 F.2d 1104, 1107 (7th Cir. 1992) "To establish § 1983 liability through a conspiracy theory, a plaintiff must demonstrate that: (1) a state official and private individual( s) reached an understanding to deprive the plaintiff of his constitutional rights, and (2) those individual/s) were willful participants in joint activity with the State or its agents." Fries v. Helsper, 146 F.3d 452,457 (7th Cir. 1998) (internal quotation and citations omitted). 11.) Habeas corpus ad subjiciendum is an extraordinary remedy, attacking the legality of whether the custody is unlawful under the U.S. Constitution. The whole case is unconstitutional and there is no legal authority to hold me. 12.) As there is no immunity to the law by those who owe special duty to it, and once impeached are subject to the law as any other person, the bill for this, is due forthwith.

13
14 15 16 17

18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Article. IV. The Citizens of each State shall be entitled Citizens in the several States.

to all Privileges

and Immunities of

NOTICE OF 28 USC 1443 CIVIL RIGHTS CASES IS REMOVED BY THE DEFENDANT TO THE DISTRlCT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - 11-

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful