Objective: To reframe our thoughts about groups “them” or “us”, seeing all human beings
as members of one family, while still celebrating the beauty of diversity.
The Set up: Moderate
The Plan:
Hook: Competition vs. Collaboration (30 mins)
o Give teams a task to complete, not telling them that they can collaborate (we are conditioned
to compete).
o Think about our natural reaction to which groups are “us” vs. which groups are “them”.
Book: Reaching Across Lines (15 mins)
o Explore several examples of when society said “they” but Jesus said “us”.
Look: Examples of Solidarity (30 mins)
o In small groups, explore examples using articles/videos: NZ Prime Minister wearing headscarf, NZ Maori
doing Haka to honor victims; more broadly: Preemptive Love Coalition (“Love across enemy lines”), Campaign to
reunify families (“There is no such thing as other people’s children”).
o Watch a video of the boxes we try to put people into, and our shared human experiences
Took: Reframing (15 mins)
o Thinking about the “boxes” we put people in at school, etc. and how we can look for ways to
say “us”
The Supplies:
A Copy of lesson
Markers
Straws
Tape
Scissors
Paper Plate
Paper Cup
Blank sheets of paper
Print outs of Scripture Pages
Print outs of articles OR 3-5 tablets/leader cell phones set with correct links loaded
AV Equipment
The Preparation:
Set up bins of supplies (unequal) for each team in the first activity
Cue up videos
Print out and copy everything
Supplies to distribute (unequally or so that no group has exactly what they need):
Straws, markers, tape, paper, scissors, paper plate, paper cup
LEADER TIP: Notice you didn’t say they were competing or that they couldn’t collaborate. Chances are, because of societal
conditioning, they will view this as a competition, not an opportunity for collaboration. If they ask questions, just repeat the
instructions “Your task is to build a tower with the items given to you…the tower must be 5 ft tall and able to withstand a
light breeze.”
LEADER TIP: How they answer this question will depend on how they define “us” and “them”. And that really is the point of
the whole activity: to re-examine that definition. Ultimately, this lesson will try to define “us” as the whole human family,
drawing the circle wider. It’s likely they can say “us” for any categories represented in their youth group, but they might
argue that they could say “us” for those they can find something in common with, even if someone from that group isn’t
represented in your youth group. For example, if there are no Muslims or Presbyterians in your group, they could still find a
reason to say “us” if they found a commonality with that group, and defined those in that category as “religious.” The point
is for them to re-think the lines. There’s not a right or wrong answer, but we just want to explore our natural/societally
conditioned response, and then evaluate and think through that, because in doing so, we might arrive at a different answer.
LEADER TIP: LGBTQIA+ categories have intentionally been left off of this list, so as not to single out someone in your youth
group who might not WANT to be singled out. But you know you’re group, and whether that would be appropriate to
discuss, keeping in mind the lesson has only allotted 10 mins for this discussion.
Transitional Statement:
There are lots of ways that society works like a competition, and to survive in a competitive society,
sometimes we feel like we have to compete. We see those outside our “group” as a threat who might take
what we’re working for. We see those inside our group as allies, perhaps, but sometimes that doesn’t last if
we start competing for the same thing.
But what if we reframed how we thought about things? What if we trained ourselves to have a mentality of
abundance/collaboration, that there’s enough for everyone, instead of a mentality of scarcity/competition
(that there’s only a set amount, and it might run out without my getting some)? What if we realized that “we
ALL do better when we ALL do better”?
What if we started seeing those we think of as “outside” our group as one of us, and treating them
accordingly? That would revolutionize things. Jesus did that. When society said “them”, Jesus said “us”. And
it was revolutionary!
Put youth into groups (could be the same as their teams for the Opening Activity)
Pass out the Scripture Stories (see pages at the end of the lesson)
Have each group read the story and answer the questions. Give them about 10 mins.
Ask each group to share: “How did Jesus reach across the lines in your story?” (5 mins)
Transitional Statement:
The society in Jesus’ day tried to group people into “us” and “them”. Those they saw as “less than” or
“sinners” or “other” or “outsiders” they cast out. They treated them as though they were from a different
group, were in a different category, and they often worked hard to maintain “the lines”.
Today’s society often does the same thing. The mindset of “us vs them” and competition wreaks havoc on the
world. Just take a look at the New Zealand mosque shootings, and what motivated them…It was an “us vs.
them” mentality taken to the extreme (that refugees who just want to keep their families safe from war and
death would be taking things from the New Zealanders who “deserved” them).
But Jesus showed us another way to think about things. Jesus joined the groups that were “them”…He
showed that He thought of “those people” as “My people”. If society said “them”, Jesus pretty much always
cut through that line, drew the circle wider, and said “us” and treated people accordingly. Jesus showed us
that we are all part of the human family, and instead of competing, this means collaborating. And yes, it
means sacrifice, but that we should be able to willingly sacrifice whatever extra we have so that others can be
free and safe and whole. That’s a different mindset than competition, and it’s a different mindset than “us” or
“them”.
The Prime Minister of New Zealand (not sure if she’s a Christian) shared Jesus’ ideas about how it’s not a
competition, it’s a collaboration. https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2019/mar/15/jacinda-ardern-
condemns-christchurch-mosque-shootings-video (show video through 0:39 seconds…where she says “they are
us”)
In the wake of the shooting of Muslims in New Zealand, she famously said “They are Us”.
Let’s take a look at some other examples of what happens when people reframe their mentality from “Us vs
Them” to “They are Us”…..
LEADER TIP: A point for group discussion…The article about the NZ women wearing Headscarves contains a
critique of the practice, which mostly has caused praise and appreciation from the Muslim community, but has
some critical comments from others in the Muslim community as well. Often, we don’t always know how to
perfectly show solidarity while respecting diversity, but this doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try. Sometimes we try
and fail and learn as we go. Part of the process of building bridges with those who are different than we are is
admitting that trying with good intentions still falls short sometimes, but we don’t give up, we just do better next
time.
o Preemptive Love Coalition is a group whose motto is “Love Across Enemy Lines” and “Love
Anyway.” Among other things, they provide relief on the frontlines of war-torn areas across
Syria and Iraq, so they are in the most dangerous places, caring for fleeing refugees.
Read more about their work: https://preemptivelove.org/our-work/
“They Are Us” by Sally Ulrey
for the Diocese of Atlanta
6
Transitional Statement:
These are some great examples of the best of humanity, when we remember that it’s not “them or us”, it’s
just “us”. It doesn’t mean we’re all the same, or we have to assimilate into one culture and be the same thing.
There’s beauty in the diversity God has given humanity. But it does mean that we have to reframe our
thinking. We first think “us” and not “them,” and look for the things we share in our common humanity.
Let’s look at an example of how the society tries to put us into categories. And let’s also look at how we can
cross those lines and realize we have something in common, that we have shared HUMAN experiences…
Transitional Statement
Reframing our mindset and building bridges with those we think of as “outside our group” takes practice,
though. And we need to practice wherever we are….
Instruct the young people to think about the groups/categories in their schools and communities, and
some of the people that are most different than they are.
Challenge them to find one person they don’t know well in a class or somewhere, and strike up a
conversation with that person, trying to find something in common.
Challenge them to look for the things they have in common with each person they interact with (not
denying the differences, but looking for shared experience and common humanity: they’re both step-
siblings, they’ve experienced a death in the family, they have moved far away, they’ve gotten a
piercing, they’ve taken care of a younger sibling, they’ve been in the hospital before, they’re a hockey
fan, etc.)
Ask them to keep a list of the things they have found out that they’ve had in common with the humans
around them to share at a later time
Additionally, brainstorm ways they can show love and solidarity with human beings in crisis beyond
their local communities. Examples:
o Learn more about or support the work of Episcopal Relief and Development, Episcopal
Migration Ministries, Preemptive Love Coalition, and/or Together Rising.
o They could also visit a local mosque (follow these guidelines: https://preemptivelove.org/blog/a-non-muslims-
guide-to-visiting-a-mosque/)
o They could find out about refugee/migration support in their local communities
o They could visit worshipping communities in the Episcopal Church that are different than they
are used to, such as: The Church of the Common Ground, or visiting an Episcopal Hispanic
congregation.
Close in prayer. You might want to use the Prayer of St. Francis of Assissi on BCP pg 833.
Discussion Questions:
What lines did society make, but Jesus reached across?
How did Jesus break down the lines and show the woman love and inclusion? (see vs. 10, vs 22-23)
What was the reaction to breaking down those barriers?
Discussion Questions:
What lines did society make, but Jesus reached across?
What were the disciples’ reaction to the woman?
What do you think Jesus was doing by saying he was only sent to Israel? (this first response to her seems
to be upholding those lines…what do you think that was about?)
How did Jesus break down the lines and show the woman love and inclusion?
What was the result to breaking down those barriers?
19 Jesus entered Jericho and was passing through. 2 A man was there by the name of Zacchaeus; he was a chief
tax collector and was wealthy.3 He wanted to see who Jesus was, but because he was short he could not see over
the crowd. 4 So he ran ahead and climbed a sycamore-figtree to see him, since Jesus was coming that way.
5
When Jesus reached the spot, he looked up and said to him, “Zacchaeus, come down immediately. I must stay
at your house today.”6 So he came down at once and welcomed him gladly.
7
All the people saw this and began to mutter, “He has gone to be the guest of a sinner.”
8
But Zacchaeus stood up and said to the Lord, “Look, Lord! Here and now I give half of my possessions to the
poor, and if I have cheated anybody out of anything, I will pay back four times the amount.”
9 10
Jesus said to him, “Today salvation has come to this house, because this man, too, is a son of Abraham. For
the Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost.”
Discussion Questions:
What lines did society make, but Jesus reached across?
What were people’s reaction to Jesus reaching across the lines?
How did Jesus break down the lines and show the “sinner” love and inclusion?
What was the result to breaking down those barriers?
Discussion Questions:
What lines did society make, but Jesus reached across?
What were people’s reaction to Jesus reaching across the lines?
How did Jesus break down the lines and show the woman love and inclusion?
What was the result to breaking down those barriers?