1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

HORNBECK OFFSHORE SERVICES, L.L.C.,

* * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * KENNETH L. SALAZAR, ET AL, * * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

APPEARANCES:

For the Plaintiff:

of T

he F

MOTION TO INTERVENE, BEFORE THE HONORABLE JOSEPH C. WILKINSON, JR., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ds

For the Defendant:

ien

Fr

For the Intervenor, Dr. Orly Taitz:

og Bo w. co m
Civil Action No. 10-1663 Section “F”(2)

New Orleans, Louisiana May 11, 2011

Jones Walker By: CARL D. ROSENBLUM, ESQ. Place St. Charles 201 St. Charles Avenue Suite 5100 New Orleans, Louisiana 70170

U.S. Attorney’s Office By: PETER M. MANSFIELD, ESQ. Hale Boggs Federal Building 500 Poydras Street, Room 210 New Orleans, Louisiana 70130

By: DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ. 29839 Santa Margarita Parkway Suite 100 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

2 APPEARANCES (Cont’d.):

Court Audio Operator:

Transcriptionist:

Proceedings recorded by electronic sound recording, transcript produced by transcription service.

Fr

ien

ds

of T

he F

og Bo w. co m
Cindy Usner

Sherryl Robinson c/o U.S. District Court 500 Poydras Street, Room C151 New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 (504) 589-7721

3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

(Call to Order of the Court) THE COURT: Good morning.

(All Counsel respond, “Good morning, Your Honor.”) THE COURT:

case that I’m going to call is Hornbeck v. Salazar, and the reason I’m calling it is because my staff tells me that

Dr. Taitz who is the proposed Intervenor has appeared and come all the way in from California.

oral argument scheduled, Dr. Taitz --

of T

California, I had my staff call the local lawyers for the other parties, let them know you were here, and tell them that I intended to let you have your say. MS. TAITZ: THE COURT: I greatly appreciate it, Your Honor. In the future though, I have to tell you

Fr

ien

ds

that you need to study the local rules and comply with them. MS. TAITZ: THE COURT: Yes, sir. I also -We’ll do this

he F
DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: Taitz? MS. TAITZ: THE COURT:

Step up anybody who is here for this.

og Bo w. co m
P R O C E E D I N G S (Wednesday, May 11, 2011) Be seated, please. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Since you came all the way from

Let’s see ladies and gentlemen, the first

So, despite the fact that there was no

4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 first. Make your appearances.

And I also just received, a few minutes ago, your Motion for Leave to file a reply memo, which I intend to sign. But in perfect candor, I haven’t read it yet. DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: All right.

I’m not going to rule on the motion orally, as I ordinarily might, and then I’m going to read it when I finish. MS. TAITZ: THE COURT: later, okay? Thank you, Your Honor.

of T

appearances for the record.

proposed Intervenor. THE COURT: All right. Good morning Your Honor, Carl

ds ien
Salazar.

Rosenblum on behalf of the Plaintiffs. THE COURT: Good morning. Good morning Your Honor, Peter

Fr

Mansfield with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, here on behalf of Defendants, all the Federal Defendants, including Secretary

he F
MS. TAITZ: THE COURT: Okay. MS. TAITZ: MR. ROSENBLUM: MR. MANSFIELD:

For the Intervenor, we have the proposed Intervenor. I’m Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire, and I am the

og Bo w. co m

So, I’m going to let you have your say.

And then I’ll issue a written ruling

So, why don’t you formally make your

5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT:

MR. MANSFIELD: THE COURT: DR. TAITZ:

And I have enlarged exhibits.

exhibits so you would be able to see them.

Motion to Intervene because what I have found out that the Hornbeck case is much more than a case of moratorium on deep water drilling.

What I’ve found out that this is a case where the administration, the federal government, have been impeding -(Cell phone ringing in courtroom.) I greatly apologize. I’m sorry.

of T

(Pause.)

turn them off.

he F
THE COURT: DR. TAITZ:

UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER:

ien

ds

oil and drill -- gas and oil industry in the Gulf of Mexico, which caused significant loss of jobs and significant damage to the economy of the region. I have seen similar actions in other regions of the

Fr

United States and specifically in the State of California, where I reside, where I am a taxpayer that were similar, I would say attacks, on the economy of the region. I am an

og Bo w. co m
All right, thank you. Thank you, Your Honor. All right, Dr. Taitz, proceed. Thank you, Your Honor.

I have enlarged I have filed this

If any of you have cell phones, please

Isn’t that a local rule?

-- have been impeding the efforts of the

6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Appeals. attorney who developed an expertise on the issue of Constitutional eligibility.

matter for the last nearly three years in a number of legal actions, and just a week ago I had a hearing in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on a similar issue. And what I have found is that -THE COURT:

pending, not just one?

papers was you had one in the Central District of California. DR. TAITZ: It’s in the Ninth Circuit Court of

of T

cases raising this issue, the President’s citizenship and other cases around the country? DR. TAITZ: Eligibility. I have, well, one case in

ien

ds

California which is currently at the level of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: to show Your Honor. THE COURT: All right. Okay, all right. Go ahead.

Fr

he F
THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: Right. THE COURT:

og Bo w. co m
I was granted an oral hearing -Uh-huh.

I have been prosecuting this

So Dr. Taitz, you have other cases My understanding from reading your

-- which was conducted on May the 2nd. Okay, but my point is that you have other

And what I was able to find, and I wanted

8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Circuit? THE COURT:

oral argument in the Ninth Circuit last week? DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: Yes, yes.

THE COURT:

before or after he posted his birth certificate on the Internet?

DR. TAITZ: THE COURT:

from experts, because it was just released, and I wasn’t able

of T

to get any affidavits from experts yet. THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: All right. Go ahead.

dealt with a decision by the district judge that was made earlier, and so I could only talk about the issues that were relevant to prior decision. And what I have found, this is actually -THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: What did the district judge do? Well, it’s really interesting.

Fr

ien

ds

Originally, the district judge stated that this case -THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: Just tell me in one word. Well, originally he said that it’s going

he F

DR. TAITZ:

og Bo w. co m
They were -What, last week? They were on May the 2nd, yes. Did you present all of this? It was right after, however --

Did I understand you to say that you had

Was that

Did you present all of this to the Ninth

I didn’t -- I did not have any affidavits

Additionally, the Ninth Circuit hearing

9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 thing off. to be heard on the merits.

his defense attorneys as his clerk and he changed his mind and he said that he no longer has jurisdiction, and he dismissed the case.

THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: THE COURT:

(Cell phone ringing in courtroom.) DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: What?

(Cell phone ringing in courtroom.)

jurisdiction and that’s why I feel that it’s so important for this case to be heard. I believe that this is the most

important case we have today, and most important case in the history of this nation, because we have -THE COURT: This is a federal court, just like that

ien

ds
one.

of T

Fr

finds there is no jurisdiction, that I won’t have any jurisdiction either? DR. TAITZ: Well, actually the Ninth Circuit dealt

he F
DR. TAITZ: DR. TAITZ: DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: Yes.

og Bo w. co m
Okay. So, he dismissed the case? He dismissed the case as to -For lack of jurisdiction? Is that my phone? Yes, I thought I did.

And then Mr. Obama placed one of

Dr. Taitz, you have got to turn that

She dismissed the case for lack of

Don’t you think that if the Ninth Circuit

10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 with a slightly different case, and they were stating that there were no damages.

This case is proceeding and in this case the Plaintiffs do have damages.

now, so that there is jurisdiction and that’s why this case is so unique, because damages are here and I am here to show why those Plaintiffs have those damages, because we have an

individual who is occupying the position of the President and Commander in Chief using a forged birth certificate according to two experts and I have provided their affidavits.

he F

He is using an invalid Social Security Number.

og Bo w. co m
All right. And if I can just show --

The case is in discovery right

He is

using invalid Selective Service certificate.

He is providing

fraudulent information in regards to his educational records,

policies have affected the Plaintiffs and have affected many other industries around the nation, and that’s why it is so important to get to the root of this problem and once and for all get all of the evidence and for the nation to see all of the evidence, and to decide on the issue of eligibility and decide if the orders, and in this case moratorium orders to withhold permits for drilling like in this case, if any policies involving persecutions of Civil Rights attorneys like me, if any of those were valid. THE COURT: DR. TAITZ:

Fr

ien

ds

of T

and his whereabouts in the past.

And we have seen that his

11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 up. THE COURT: more minutes though.

DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: THE COURT:

DR. TAITZ:

Your Honor, and it’s obvious, and this shows complete

disrespect to this whole nation and system of justice.

og Bo w. co m
Yes, you can. Yes. Sure, I understand. Yes. And what I wanted to show

I’m going to give you two

I have a courtroom full of people.

And I have three other matters to take

This is

just to show what Mr. Obama has provided to the nation, claiming to be a true and correct copy of his birth certificate. This is a true and correct copy of a birth

Mr. Obama.

be on white paper. time.

of T

certificate of a woman who was born just a few hours after

ien

ds

You can see defined orders -- borders.

he F

And you can see that a true and correct copy had to You can see how it’s turning yellow with What Mr. Obama

provided is on paper, green safety paper that was not used in 1961. There are no borders, it’s just a computer composite

where bits and pieces of different images and different birth certificates were put together to create this image. unbelievable. To me, I believe that there has to be an emergency hearing on this, in that we have an individual sitting in the It’s

Fr

12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 White House using a forged birth certificate, and based on this forged birth certificate, he is occupying the highest position in the land, affecting so many industries, so many parties. You can see also the numbers. This woman, her birth

certificate was signed in the same office. same hospital.

It was signed on the 11th, August 11th, and you

can see the number ends on 637.

Obama claims that the number that was assigned to him is 641, and his was signed on August the 8th, and again, and you can see in the affidavit, this is completely impossible. It’s out of order.

he F

here that the birth certificates in those years were typewritten; they had to be justified to the left. Here, it’s

is using, here is a statement from yet another expert showing that when it was created, when you open it in Adobe Illustrator, you can see the grammatical layers. You can see

ds

how it was actually created, where they took bits and pieces of different birth certificates. You can see part of the

Fr

ien

signature of Stanley Ann Dunham and they might have used a birth certificate from -- for his sister, Maya Soetoro, and just added -- at that time his mother was signing documents as Stanley Ann D. Soetoro. It looks like Soetoro was removed and

they added Dunham Obama, and that’s how they came with Stanley

of T

completely wrong.

And in the last one you can see that what Mr. Obama

og Bo w. co m
This is clearly a forgery.

She was born in the

You can see

13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 to make? Ann Dunham Obama.

Your Honor, this is, I feel that this is an assault on the system of justice in this country to allow somebody with forged documents, with forged and invalid identification documents to continue in the position of the President and without any discovery on the part of any judge or any court. THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: All right.

Mr. Mansfield, do you have any response that you want

arguments are contained in our memorandum in opposition that

of T

the proposed intervention doesn’t satisfy Rule 24(b). THE COURT: All right, sir. That’s all the response that I need

to make.

ds
already.

ien

he F
MR. MANSFIELD: MR. MANSFIELD: THE COURT: MR. MANSFIELD: THE COURT: MR. ROSENBLUM:

anything that you want to say? Only this, Your Honor. I appreciate

Fr

the Court calling us and letting us know that we were going to have a hearing.

og Bo w. co m
Thank you, Your Honor. Dr. Taitz, you’re welcome. Thank you, Your Honor. Let’s see.

Only to say, Your Honor, that our

I have seen it and I have reviewed it

Mr. Rosenblum, is there

14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT:

local rule that requires it. Right, Dr. Taitz? DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: THE COURT:

MR. ROSENBLUM:

not file anything as the Court is aware, Judge.

I would point out is to correct a statement by Dr. Taitz.

sought monetary damages, Judge.

he F
THE COURT: MR. ROSENBLUM: THE COURT: MR. ROSENBLUM: THE COURT:

As Your Honor knows, the Hornbeck case has never We believe that any ability to

get monetary damages, we’d have to go to the Federal Court of

injunction.

been a lot of water under the bridge since that time. So, the suggestion that we’re seeking damages is

ds

simply not correct in this case. Do you think -Now, we do have the contempt motion,

ien

Judge, on the attorney’s fees that you’re looking at. I have it. That’s the only thing that I would

Fr

like to say. Do you think water under the bridge is

of T

Claims.

This case was asking for a permanent and preliminary We got the preliminary injunction and there has

og Bo w. co m
I wasn’t aware. Okay. I’m sorry. All right.

I’m sure Dr. Taitz wasn’t aware of the

On behalf of the Plaintiffs, we did The only thing

15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 it? Judge. the right analogy or simile to use at the moment? MR. ROSENBLUM:

Your Honor, to Judge Feldman in this case, there has been a lot of water under the bridge. we haven’t seen -I’m not so sure at this point since

THE COURT:

though, before the water started rising. MR. ROSENBLUM:

THE COURT:

for a couple of weeks, but it’s coming, Judge. THE COURT: Okay.

sensitivity.

of T

he F
MR. ROSENBLUM: MR. ROSENBLUM: THE COURT: MR. ROSENBLUM: THE COURT:

ds

haven’t read your reply yet.

Fr

ien

until I read everything that people have submitted.

to sign the order permitting you to leave the file with us right now. DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: Thank you, Judge. Have you served these two gentlemen with

og Bo w. co m
I have indicated previously, I see. So, I understand the Court’s All right. Thank you, Judge. All right.

I think you said that in the winter

Actually, I think it was last summer,

But in any event, we haven’t had rain

Okay, thank you very much.

Now Dr. Taitz, as I said, I

I don’t like ruling on things I’m going

16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DR. TAITZ:

that it’s going to be on Pacer shortly, also. THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: DR. TAITZ: THE COURT: All right. Thank you.

this last submission.

MR. ROSENBLUM: MR. MANSFIELD: THE COURT:

he F
* *

Fr

ien

ds

of T

og Bo w. co m
Thank you very much. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you. * * * (Hearing is Concluded)

I served a bunch of them, and I guess

The matter is deferred until I can read

17

I certify that the foregoing is a correct transcript from the electronic sound recording of the proceeding in the above-entitled matter.

of T

he F
S/Sherryl P. Robinson Sherryl P. Robinson _6/6/11_ Date

Fr

ien

ds

og Bo w. co m
C E R T I F I C A T E

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful