## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

3,405-430

**A constitutive model for partially saturated soils
**

E. E. ALONSO*,

A. GENS*

and A. JOSA*

The Paper presents a constitutive model for describing the stress-strain behaviour of partially saturated soils. The model is formulated within the framework of hardening plasticity using two iodependent sets of stress variables: the excess of total stress over air pressure and the suction. The mode1 is able to represent, in a consistent and unified manner, many of the fundamental features of the behaviour of partially saturated soils which had been treated separately by previously proposed models. On reaching saturation, the mode1 becomes a conventional critical state model. Because experimental evidence is still limited, the model has been kept as simple as possible in order to provide a basic framework from which extensions are possible. Tbe mode1 is intended for partially saturated soils which are slightly or moderately expansive. After formulating the model for isotropic and biaxial stress states, typical predictions are described and compared, in a qualitative way, with characteristic trends of the behaviour of partially saturated soils. Afterwards, the results of a number of suction-controlled laboratory tests on compacted kaolin and a sandy clay are used to evaluate the ability of the model to reproduce, quantitatively, observed behaviour. The agreement between observed and computed results is considered satisfactory and confirms the possibilities of reproducing the most important features of partially saturated soil behaviour using a simple general framework.

KEYWORDS: compaction; partial saturation; plasticity. NOTATION

coustitutive

relatioas;

L’article presente un modele constitutif pour d&crire le comportement contrainte/deformation des sols partiellement sat&s. Le modele est formule dans le cadre de la plasticite qui s’endurcit, en utilisant deux jeux independaots de variables de contrainte, c’est-a-dire I’excb de la contrainte totale sur la pression de l’air et la suction. Le modele peut rep&enter d’une facon logique et unitLee beaucoup des caractbristiques fondamentales du comportement des sols partiellement sat&s qui avaient &it trait&s separement dans des mod&s proposes pr&demment. Lorsque la saturation est atteinte le modele devient un modele conventionnel d’etat critique. Comme les don&es experimentales restent encore limit&s, le modele d’ete simplitii le plus que possible, afin de fournir un cadre de base a partir duquel des extensions sont possibles. Le modele convient a des sols partiellement saturb qui sont expansifs a un degre faible ou modire. Le modele est d’abord formule pour des etats de contrainte isotropes et triaxiaux. Puis l’article d&c& des predictions typiques et les compare de facon qualitative avec des tendances caracteristiques du comportement des sols partiellement saturb. Les r&dtats de quelques essais regis par la suction effectt& dans le laboratoire sur du kaolin compact et sur une argile sablonneuse sont utilises afin d’evaluer la capacite du modele de reproduire de facon quantitative le comportement observe. On considere que les r&udtats observes et calculb s’accordent bien et qu’ils confirment les possibilites de reproduire les caractbistiques les plus importames du comportement des sols partiellement sat&s par I’utilisation d’un cadre general tr&s simple. M

slope of critical state lines

a, b, c, d

G”

Ko

k

parameters of the state surface for specific volume void ratio shear modulus lateral stress coefficient parameter describing the increase in cohesion with suction

N(s) m, n

Discussion on this Paner closes 4 January 1991; for further details see p. ii. _ * Civil Engineering School, Technical University of Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. 405

specific volume at p = p’ parameters of the state surface for degree of saturation P excess of mean stress over air pressure (net mean stress) Pat atmospheric pressure stress PO preconsolidation stress for saturated PO* preconsolidation conditions PC reference stress 4 deviator& stress (= ur - a3) r parameter defining the maximum soil stiffness

ALONSO.

GENS AND JOSA

degree of saturation suction (= u, - a,) hardening parameter of the suction increase yield curve air pressure water pressure specific volume parameter controlling the rate of increase of soil stiffness with suction principal strains elastic principal strains plastic principal strains total, elastic and plastic deviatoric strains total, elastic and plastic volumetric strains elastic volumetric strain induced by changes in net mean stress plastic volumetric strain associated with the LC yield surface

null tests reported by Fredlund & Morgenstern (1977) which led to a formal proposition of any pair of stress fields among the following three stress states: (aij - ~~6,~); (aij - ~~6,~) and (u, - u,kiij as a suitable stress framework to describe stress-strain--strength behaviour of partially saturated soils. In these expressions, uij is the total stress, u, and u, the air and water pressure and aij the Kronecker delta. Under conditions of partial saturation the term u, - u, is a positive quantity and will be denoted as the suction term s. Adopting the suction and the excess of total stress over air pressure as the relevant stress variables, several aspects of the mechanical behaviour of partially saturated soils have been modelled in the past through constitutive relationships. Some of these models which cover partial aspects of the stress-strain behaviour are

(E,; + Ev;) elastic volumetric strain induced bv changes in suction plastic volumetric strain associated with the SI yield surface (%,e + %,P) saturated friction angle elastic stiffness parameter for changes in net mean stress elastic stiffness parameter for changes in suction stiffness parameter for changes in net mean stress for virgin states of the soil stiffness parameter for changes in suction for virgin states of the soil total principal stresses total stresses total mean stress (= (ai + e2 + a3)/3)

(4 The incremental

(4

(4

INTRODUCTION

The description of the stress-strain behaviour of partially saturated soils has been closely linked with efforts to isolate the relevant stress variables concerning soil behaviour. Difficulties in finding a single effective stress equation, illustrated in the works of Aitchison and Donald (1956), Bishop and Donald (1961), Bishop and Blight (1963) and Burland (1965), progressively led to the acceptance of two effective stress fields as a necessary framework to describe the observed features of partially saturated soil behaviour under paths involving the variation of total stress and pore water pressure deficiency (or suction). Important contributions to this topic were the early works of Bishop & Donald (1961), Coleman (1962) Matyas & Radhakrishna (1968) and the

stress-strain relations suggested by Coleman (1962) to relate changes in s and uij - u,Sij to the strain response of the soil. This is essentially an incremental elastic type of formulation and it was also proposed by Fredlund (1979) who recognized the nonlinear character of the moduli involved in the incremental relations. The description of volumetric behaviour by means of state surfaces in a three-dimensional [e, (a - us), s] space. These surfaces are able to describe the transitions from swelling to collapse behaviour when the total stress increases. They were formally introduced by Matyas & Radhakrishna (1968). Based on experimental results, Fredlund (1979) and Lloret & Alonso (1980, 1985) proposed mathematical expressions for these surfaces, for a class of imposed stress paths. An extension of the Mohr-Coulomb failure criteria to include partial saturation, through a new angle of friction relating changes in shear strength to changes in suction (Fredlund, Morgenstern & Widger, 1978). The original linear expression has been recently questioned in view of increasing experimental evidence (Escario & Saez, 1986, 1987; Fredlund, Rahardjo & Gan, 1987).

These valuable efforts are, however, unable to provide an integrated scheme for a stress-strain characterization of partially saturated soils. In addition, some basic features of partially saturated soil behaviour such as its strong stress path dependence are poorly represented by the existing models. In devising the model, simplicity was considered a desirable feature. Nevertheless, fundamental tendencies of observed behaviour of partially saturated soils are believed to be rep-

as the confining stress is increased. shear strength tests reported by Fredlund et al. Changes in suction may induce irreversible volumetric deformations. The oedometric results of samples tested at different moisture conditions can also be interpreted as an increase in the apparent preconsolidation stress as suction increases (Dudley. Gulhati and Satija (1981). A qualitative description of this model and its relationship with observed behaviour is given in Alonso. The model described in this Paper is intended for partially saturated soils which are slightly or moderately expansive such as partially saturated sands. Barden et al. potentially collapsible microstructures subjected to a suction reduction from a relatively high initial value have been reported to experience first an expansion and then a compressive strain (Escario & Saez. The main features of this behaviour are summarized in the following paragraphs. however. 1970. Cox. 1968. Yudhbir. Maswoswe. to a lesser extent. 1982. Results compiled by Yudhbir (1982) for different residual soils show that the confining stress leading to the maximum collapse varies widely for different initial conditions. Delgado & Ruiz (1984) (testing compacted samples of expansive clay). The volumetric response of partially saturated soils depends not only on the initial and final stress and suction values but on the particular path followed from the initial to the final state. For a certain range of the confining stress (which varies from soil to soil) the amount of collapse increases with the intensity of the confining stress (Blight. However. silts. sandy clays and clays of low plasticity. However.CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 407 resented by the model. Gens & Hight (1987). offers room for improvement when more experimental evidence becomes available. 1982). FEATURES SATURATED OF BEHAVIOUR OF PARTIALLY SOIL Some patterns of the behaviour of non-plastic and moderately expansive partially saturated soils have been established in the past three decades through experimental work involving mainly oedometer testing (with or without suction control) and. Suction controlled experiments have revealed. Among many others. (1978).. It is also thought that some features of the behaviour of expansive clays are suitably represented by the proposed model as well. Jennings & Knight. significant departures from this result are obtained when the stress path involves an increase in suction and an increase in external load. (1987) for a moderately plastic kaolin. 1975. Josa. Lloret & Gens. 1976). a reduction in suction (wetting) for a given confining stress may induce an irrecoverable volumetric compression (collapse). that a reversal in volumetric behaviour may also occur during the wetting process. 1987). approximately. Lloret & Alonso. 1969. clayey sands. Gens & Hight (1987). 1973. a comprehensive description of this type of soil will probably require significant modifications of the model described below. Dudley. This behaviour may be investigated by subjecting samples of soil to drying-wetting cycles. Similar qualitative results for compacted samples of a low plasticity residual clay have been reported by Booth (1975). 1975. which uses well established concepts of the theory of hardening plasticity and reduces to a critical state model when the soil reaches full saturation. triaxial and direct shear testing. If the natural depositional processes or the compaction method induce an open structure in the soil. results of this type may be found in Maswoswe (1985) (testing a statically compacted sandy clay) and Justo. 1969. once wetted. Erol & El Ruwaih. 1987) that paths which involve loading steps and non-increasing suction are essentially path independent. The state surfaces described by some of the authors listed above are only meaningful if stress-path independence is guaranteed. For a limited range of confining stress and applied suction. the collapsed sample follows. 1982. testing a sandy clay). 1985. the stress-strain path of an initially saturated sample in compression (Erol & El Ruwaih. Finally. The model. Alonso. In both cases plastic volumetric strains were measured as a consequence of a drying process. Any partially saturated soil included in the types mentioned (and even active clays) may either expand or collapse on wetting if the confining stress is sufftciently low (expansion) or high (collapse). It has been often reported (Matyas & Radhakrishna. Suction contributes to stiffening the soil against external loading. 1970). Japp & How (1971) for a kaolinite and a natural low activity clay and by Josa et al.. This is a well proved result when compacted samples either dry or wet of optimum are loaded in compression (Rico & De1 Castillo. Additional details are given in Alonso. 1965. Madedor & Sides. 1978. testing a natural loess. In fact. Josa et al. Tests of this type have been reported by Yong. Ho and Fredlund (1982) and Fredlund & Rahardjo (1985) may be interpreted in the sense that an increase in suction results in an increase in effective cohesion while maintaining constant . the amount of collapse may reach a maximum followed by decreasing values. However. Barden. Booth. 1985.

GENS AND JOSA the (saturated) friction angle d. 2(a) the response to isotropic loading of two samples subjected to different suctions: s = 0 (saturated case) and a larger suction s. This comparison will also allow a more detailed presentation of some features of the behaviour of partially saturated soils which have only been outlined in the summary above. 2(a)). Consider an isotropic test in which a soil suction sample at a given (subsequently maintained) is subjected to p-load increments along virgin states. The increase in strength cannot continue indefinitely with applied suction. 1.. Fig. a comparison between predicted and measured response for some suction controlled tests will be made. In this way the developed framework will be hopefully well rooted in commonly observed experimental behaviour.* P In these equations the stiffness parameter 1(s) depends on suction in accordance with observations reported in the previous section. The saturated preconsolidation stress is labelled p. A dependence of N(s) on s will be maintained for the sake of generality. Consider in Fig. In full correspondence with the behaviour of saturated soils the specific volume. However. s) stress plane (Fig. which extend the suction ranges used in previously published results. s) space using as background information the behaviour of saturated soils (which impose a limiting condition to partially saturated soils) and observed features of isotropic and oedometer testing under controlled suction. (1987). Proposed variation of specific volume with net mean stress and suction along virgin and unloadin* reloading paths . A schematic representation of Equations (1) and (2) is given in Fig. will be given by 0 = N(s) . Stress path testing may later be used to check the overall behaviour of the model and its ability to reproduce measured stress-strain response of the soil. and the saturated value po* can now be obtained by relating the specific volumes at points 1 and 3 through a virtual path which involves an initial unloading. a constant value has been adopted to ensure that the elastic part of the model is conservative.. initially at point 1 (p. Departures from this pattern have been reported by Escario and Saez (1986) and Delage.408 ALONSO. it is convenient in this case to present a formal derivation of the yield function to underline ‘ab initio’ the relationship of yield states with observed volumetric behaviour of partially saturated soils and to incorporate the well established features of isotropic or oedometer compression of saturated soils. The purpose of this section is to derive a yield locus in the (p. On unloading and reloading (at constant s) the soil is supposed to behave elastically: dv= -. from p. The conceptual bases for the model and the basic formulation are given in the next sections. u = 1 + e.* (point 3 in Fig. p.u. to po*. Examples of the response of the model to some imposed stress and strain conditions are then presented. Suraj de Silva & De Lame (1987). 1. s) follows the path l-2-3 (Figs 2(a) FORMULATION STRESS STATES OF MODEL FOR ISOTROPIC Stress states inducing yield A suitable stress space to describe isotropic states is (p. Some recent results reported by Escario and Saez (1987) and Fredlund et al. as a mathematical relationship that involves constitutive parameters. over air pressure and s is the suction. 1 and 3. a relationship between the generic yield stress. at constant stress (p. at constant suction. from s to zero. It may simply be proposed.1(s) In $ where pc is a reference stress state for which u = N(s). If both points. indicate a non-linear increase of strength with suction and a tendency towards a maximum at some given (high) suction. (point 1). The second sample will yield at a larger isotropic stress p.*). It is not strictly necessary to derive a yield function in the way described below. 2(b)). The sample. and a subsequent reduction in suction. Finally. Most of this experimental evidence has been used to develop a model which could offer a unified approach to some fundamental features of the behaviour of partially saturated soils. belong to the same yield curve in a (p. s) where p = em . Although some dependence of K on s is also likely. (net mean stress) is the excess of mean stress 6. on the basis of observed yield behaviour.

3 (4) which provides a relationship between p. Relatioasbip between preconsolidation stresses pO nod po*: (a) compression carves for saturated and uasatorated soil.(s + P.L(s) In F + K In G + ic. Equation (3) becomes s + Pat N(s) .(0) PO P 1 Collapse s=o P: (b) Fig. Taking into account Equations (l). K. In P. (b) stress path and yield carve in (p. = vj identity may be estab- (3) pa.has been added to s to avoid infinite values as s approaches zero. + Au. takes place which is given by a logarithmic expression similar to Equation (2) dv= ds -K. s) stress plane and 2(b)). K.p’) and some soil parameters (N(s). Under these circumstances a reversible swelling Au. (2) and (4).I(O) In 5 (5) where the different quantities are indicated in Fig. 2(a). 2. n(s). The following lished v1 + Au. The suction unloading (wetting) from 2 to 3 occurs in the elastic domain.CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 409 (4 ‘\I J.t PO = N(O) .). A convenient choice of pc and N(s) to simplify Equation . and s as a function of some reference stress values (PO*.

the final specific volume for the (generic) stress state (p. A path of this kind is shown in Fig. Most of the reported state surfaces have been obtained through stress paths which involve reductions in suction from an initial value and a subsequent increment in net mean (or vertical) stress p. The tests considered involved different soil types (low plasticity clays. An LC yield curve through points 1 and 3 has been sketched in Fig. Surface fitting analysis was performed in order to find the most appropriate analytical expression for the analysed data. = p’). may be used to support some of the model assumptions. GENS AND JOSA s + Pat P. as given by Equation (4). Only the elastic component. Identifying Equations (8) and (9) suggests that V(P”. observed in wetting paths. SJ + Av(p”) ’ = a + c In s . This expression may be compared with the following empirical equation which was found by Lloret & Alonso (1985) to fit well experimental results v=a+bln$+clns+dln4lns P = a + c In s + (b + d In s) In !PC where a. is predicted by the alternative equation n(s) = d(O)[(l . It an unlimited increase in predicts. not only the apparent increase in preconsolidation stress associated with increasing but also the collapse phenomena suction.~~~~~__~~~~~~ t PC P P This Equation defines the set of yield p. is maintained. b. In - ALONSO. c and d are constants.W (9) (10) which supports the logarithmic variation of v with suction adopted in Equation (6). values for each associated suction (it can be considered therefore as a family of yield curves in a (p. 3. changes in s do not result in plastic deformations. In this case.1 (6) St__--------_ In other words. as discussed at length later. p’ is the net mean stress at which one may reach the saturated virgin state. 2(a)) A~(p”)l. si) + Au(p”) ’ + l(s) In s (8) si where the p-loading was supposed to take place along virgin states. Existing information on the volumetric behaviour of partially saturated soils. stiffness for increasing s and this is a limitation for wide ranges of suction changes.r) exp (-Bs) + r] (12) where r is a constant related to the maximum stiffness of the soil (for an infinite suction). An asymptotic maximum stiffness. Note that when po* = pc the LC yield curve becomes a straight line (p. s) may be written : Fig. silty clay and clayey sand) and suction values ranging from zero to 100 kPa in most of the cases.410 (5) is to assume (Fig. however. If Equation (6) is introduced into Equation (5). starting at a partially saturated condition.N(s) = K. through a wetting path which involves only (elastic) swelling. In addition Equation (9) provides an expression describing the increase in soil stiffness with suction: a(s) = b + d In s (11) This expression may adequately predict an increase in soil stiffness with suction if d < 0. r = l(s + co)/l(O). In order to isolate a single yield curve it is necessary to specify the preconsolidation net mean stress for saturated conditions (po*) which may be viewed as the hardening parameter in Equation (7). 3. s) stress plane ufp.~ = N(0) . the yield curves (7) will be named LC yield curves (after loading-collapse). s) space). as revealed by suction controlled tests. Wetting and loading stress path in (p. This Equation plays a central role in the model developed and explains. For this reason. the following relationship is obtained @) = (&_qo)-Kl/wKl ~. 2(b). The results of a number of isotropic and oedometer tests of this type were compiled by Lloret & Alonso (1985) and reported in terms of state surfaces (the void ratio was expressed as a function of net vertical or net confining stress and suction). For this particular path. which is probably closer to real behaviour. and B is a parameter which . = s) v(p’.

This yield locus is named SI (after suction increase). As a preliminary and simple choice. As reviewed in a previous section. 6).45 0.2 and K = 0.. Shapes of the LC yield of the parameters PO*. Fig. for selected values of used parameters pO*. Loadingcollapse yield curves (LC) aad suction increase (SI) . when q(s) is given by Equation (12). 5.1 MPa. 4. 4 are pf = 0. Different expressions may be used for the (virgin) coeffkient of compressibility when more experimental evidence becomes available. LC and SI yield loci enclose an elastic region in the (p. s) plane (Fig. for virgin states ds dv= -$+p.50 0. It is proposed that whenever the soil reaches a maximum previously attained value of the suction so. 6.40 0.65 L / Fig.) Fig. before more experimental evidence becomes available. Equation (12) has been adopted in the remainder of this Paper given its superior predicting capabilities as compared with Equation (11). r and j?.60 0. an increase in suction may also induce irrecoverable strains.55 0.16 _p: = 0. Both. Definition of yield suction ss b = 12.r and /I k &&rent values Fig. n(O) = 0. Adopting a linear dependence between v and In (s + p. 4 illustrates the shape of the LC yield curves.CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 411 controls the rate of increase of soil stiffness with suction. irreversible strains will begin to develop.4 MPa p. one may write.5 MPa-’ 0. 5). = Elastic region 0.02. both in the elasto-plastic and elastic range. the following yield condition s = s0 = constant (13) 020 0.2 MPa is adopted. Other parameters in drawing Fig. s0 has the meaning of the maximum past suction ever experienced by the soil and bounds the transition from the elastic state to the virgin range when suction is increased (Fig.J.

it is simple to show that the plastic volumetric deformation (18) is also given by dE p _ 40) V K dpo* PO* vp --- Similarly. however.Ed)). In parallel with the saturated condition. that both sets of plastic deformations have similar effects. an increase in suction within the elastic region will result in the volumetric strain (Equations (4) or (14)) ds de YS KS e=-p v (s + P. the saturated model adopted as a limit condition is a version of the modified Cam-clay model which gives an adequate qualitative description of saturated soil behaviour. Other choices are. a simple way to couple both yield curves results if their position is controlled by the total plastic volumetric deformation. and K. basically.( = . The strain state is defined by E. therefore.. Then. some experimental evidence (Josa et al. q = (al . This type of hardening implies an independent motion of both yield curves in the (p. GENS AND JOSA (15) which is. As discussed previously this may be a suitable approach for a limited range of stress changes. However. Hardening laws According to Equation (2).. If the increase in cohesion follows a linear relationship with suction.) (22) Irreversible deformations control the position of the LC and SI yield surfaces through Equations (19) and (22). possible.) and. Equation (4). = the folwill be 3 ~ dso 1. has to be incorporated to include the effect of shear stresses. as a first approximation. for simplicity. Accordingly. Ks MODEL FOR TRIAXIAL STRESS STATES and. The unsaturated formulation presented here could be coupled to more complex saturated models.P = dso (%I + P. maintaining the slope M of the CSL for saturated conditions. s) stress space. if the yield locus s = s. a critical state line (CSL) for non-zero suction will represent the increased strength induced by suction. It could be argued. the plastic component metric strain will be given by of volu- (18) Taking into account Equation (7) for the LC yield locus. on the net mean stress may be suspected but. given that the main aim of the model is the reproduction of the general behaviour of unsaturated soil. 20 and its A third stress parameter. from Equations (19) and (22) the proposed hardening laws are as follows dp VP dpo* -= * PO -=. In this manner. However. an increase of p in the elastic region will induce a compressive (positive value) volumetric deformation given by de e= VP dv __=__ V K associated discussion in a later section).. ds. In accordance with the aim of simplicity... and EJ= $(E~ . value which lies on the loading-collapse (LC) yield curve (Fig.412 For drying and wetting reversals ds ALONSO. In order to define the ellipse it is also necessary to specify the failure states. they will be taken as constants. However.. the total volumetric deformation may be computed from Equation (1) so + Pat deVP 1. As a first hypothesis. some dependence of 1.uJ.7). the effect of suction will be represented by an increase in cohesion.) (21) da. it is proposed that the yield curve for a sample at constant suction s will be described by an ellipse which will exhibit an isotropic preconsolidation stress given by the previously defined p. the selected saturated model is adequate for the purpose. is reached....dso A(o)‘V K devP (23) Once the net mean stress p reaches the yield value p.P = da. the different treatment given so far to the plastic deformations induced by suction or stress changes have only a formal meaning which has been useful to derive the appropriate relationships. 1987) suggests a definite coupling between them (see also Fig. lJ Ks v (so+ P. shear strain. achieving thus a better representation of some aspects of soil behaviour. However. the ellipses will inter- . For consistency.P.si + ~EJ. the model must predict saturated behaviour when the value of suction reduces to zero. lowing total and plastic deformations induced (Equation 13) &.P + ds. volumetric strain.

Given the relationship between K. values (K.(s) axis of the to p&) and where u is chosen in such a way that the flow rule predicts zero lateral strain for stress states corresponding to Jaky’s (1948) K. s) stress space .pP 2qa M2(2P + Ps .PO) f Pi Fig.4M 4* . the vector of plastic strain increment induced by suction increase will be (dsysP.sin C$ = (6 . 1982) resulting in the following equation de. PO P s f SI : I It is also proposed that the yield locus SI extends into the region q > 0 by means of a plane parallel to the q axis. In fact. A threedimensional view of the yield surfaces in the (p. the expression for the associated flow rule is modified by introducing a parameter Q (Ohmaki.M2(P + PJPO . 1982a) that conventional criticalstate models often overestimate K. where dsVsP is given by Equation (22). so that the Equation (13) is maintained in the (p.de.CONSTITUTIVE 9 MODEL FOR PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 413 its equation CSL (S) will be given by (26) I’ /’ &. q. = 1 . 8.= -ks (25) k is a constant. The components of the plastic strain associated with this yield surface will be given by (de Vpp. 9 t s t Fig.2M)/(6 + M)). Regarding the direction of plastic strain increments. 7. q. s) space. associated with the yield surface (26). PO P q. For the second yield surface (Equation (13)). To avoid this shortcoming. 0). The expressions for these strain components can be derived by the application of standard procedures of strain hardening plasticity. values. g. Tke-dimenGonaI view of the yield surfaces in (p.P. and M the new flow rule does not introduce any additional constitutive parameter.P) = 0 . s) space sect the p axis at a point for which p= where --p. The major ellipse will span the segment -P. q.P). it is known (Gens & Potts. Yield surfaces in (p. a non-associated flow rule in the planes s = constant is suggested. s) space is given in Fig.P= de.

r. compressibility coefficient for changes in suction within the elastic region. 1988). . GENS AND JOSA : (b) (b) TO failure t Fig. (a) Initial state: initial stresses (pi. compressibility coefficient for the saturated state along virgin loading. Suitable stress paths to determine the model parameters Fig.’ . compressibility coeflicient for increments of suction across virgin states. K. (4 Parameters da.e = ($G) dq An ordered summary of the mathematical expressions defining the model are presented in Appendix 1.d&a’) strains. K. Parameters directly associated with changes in suction and the SI yield curve: A. si). elastic by changes in q will be computed a shear modulus G (28) variables (strain hardening parameters) defining the initial position of the yield surfaces (POi** sOi). comelastic coefficient along pressibility (unloading-reloading) stress paths.414 ALONSO. qi. PARAMETERS OF THE MODEL DETERMINATION AND THEIR (4 The application of the model requires information on the following stress states and parameters. reference stress. 10.. A controls the rate of increase in stiffness (virgin states) with suction. Extension to the three-dimensional principal stress space can be easily formulated (Gens & Potts. 9. 1(O). Suggested teats to determine model parameters The induced through ds.= = $(ds.. initial specific volume ue and initial reference stress directly associated with the LC yield curve (isotropic stress): pc. establishes the minimum value of the compressibility coefficient (virgin states) for high values of suction.

.

15 I 0.9 1.20 MPa and s. Case 2. Response of model to decreasing suction (wetting) at increasing net mean stressp: (a) stress paths. quoted before.5 0. sr = 0 and pF = 0. (b) specific volume-net mean stress relationships stress. The initial position of the yield curves is given by pO* = 0. Also.7 (a) 0.55 1 0. Experimental results which favour this uniqueness have been reported by Jennings and Burland (1962) and Blight (1965) for collapsing sands.3 MPa. 3) which always involve a nonincreasing suction and a common final stress point. GENS AND JOSA 0. are represented. 11(b)).1 RI 1 B D I A II c I- I I I 1 * 0. The final volumetric deformation is the same under the three stress paths. take the LC yield curve to a final common position LC. inducing either expansion (A + C + E -+ F) or collapse (A -+ B+ D + F).&i I p: MPa (b) 1 0. follow a unique path for saturated conditions (path DF after wetting 2 follows the saturated compression curve BDF).25 I O. effect of alternate application ofload and suction changes A first example is illustrated in Fig.. a larger collapse takes place (segment EF in Fig. once the wetting is completed.6 MPa. to formulate the volumetric behaviour of partially satu- . the compression curves.65 Fig.15 MPa). Beginning at the initial stress point A (So = 0. The different combinations of p-loading and suction reduction.3 0. = 0.416 ALONSO.45 1 I 0. These types of loading and suction change sequences lead to volume changes which are stress path independent and they have been used by some authors. three alternative loading stress paths (1.1 160 0. 11.2 MPa. pa = 0.. 12(a). by Erol and El-Ruwaih (1982) testing loess and by Maswoswe (1985) in the case of a low plasticity sandy clay. 2.

CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 417 I F P + 0.25 I I I I I 1 0. 2. pF = 0. pA = 0. 13). without any further change of the position of the LC curve. Experimental results that involved stress paths qualitatively similar to the paths indicated in Fig.2 MPa. stress paths which involve drying steps (Fig. 12. Under path 3. and then experiences an elastic decrease in volume when suction is increased from B to F.55 0. 12(a) were also reported by Barden et al. the suction applied from A to E induces some compression of the sample and an increase in stiffness against the subsequent increase of confining stress.6 MPa. however. Sample 1.45 0.65 Fig. displaces the yield LC curve to the position LC.35 p:MPa (b) 0. The same initial preconsolidation state of the sample (s. (1969) (group 2 tests) for low-plasticity clay. 3) start now at a common stress point A (So = 0. 13(b) .15 MPa) and are loaded and dried in three different sequences towards the final point F (sF = 0. Three samples (1.3 MPa. The stress path EF displaces the LC yield curve to the final position LC.15 0. It will experience the smallest volumetric deformation as Fig. po* = 0. at a reference poF* < pas* = 0. = 0. (b) specific volume-net mean stress relationships rated soils in terms of state surfaces. loaded under saturated conditions. Consider. Response of model to increments of oet mean stress p and decreasing suction (wetting): (a) stress paths. The pattern of model predictions agrees well with measured results. This sample experiences the largest volumetric deformation of the three.6 MPa).2 MPa) as before is adopted in this case.

418 ALONSO.65 Fig. I 0. Case 3. ! 0. to the position LC.45 p: MPa @J ! 0.15 .. 14. GENS AND JOSA 1. Experimental indication of this type of behaviour may .55 . the sample experiences a larger preconsolidation stress than the sample subjected to path AB (Fig. 14(a). The initial yield curves are characterized by pO* = 0. The paths which involve drying before subsequent p-loading are therefore stress path dependent. On subsequent p-loading.601 ! 0. Response of model to increments of net mean stress p and increasing suction (drying): (a) stress paths. a p-loading path AB at a constant suction (a* = OMPa) is compared with a similar loading (DE) preceded in this latter case by a drying-wetting cycle (ACD) in which a maximum suction of 0.. path DE.2 MPa and sa = 0. Matyas & Radhakrishna (1968) testing a low plasticity sandy clay and Josa et al.3 MPa is applied. In Fig. (1987) testing kaolin. The drying-wetting cycle induces a net compaction of the sample and the irreversible path of this deformation moves LC. 13.s In the preceding two cases the SI yield curve did not play any role in the model predictions since the applied suctions were smaller than s. (b) specific volume-net mean stress relationships indicates. (1969) testing low plasticity clay.35 1 0. shown in Fig.025 MPa.25 I 1 0. 14(b)). coupling of the SI and LC yield curve. This conclusion was also reached in the experimental work reported by Barden et al.

shear tests for diflerent suctions Three shear tests maintaining a constant net mean stress pa = 0. The initial positions of the yield curves LC and SI are plotted in Fig. (b) specific volume-net mean stress relationship be found in the experimental (1987). Effect of initial increase of suction: (a) stress paths. .15 MPa.e. 15.. In the case analysed the suction was first increased at constant net mean stress (path AB).35 p:MPa (b) 0.15 MPa. a deviatoric stress was applied (CD) and the suction was finally reduced until failure was achieved (DE).CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 419 c 2.65 Fig. 14. Case 5. The shear stressshear strain relationships computed in the three cases are plotted in Fig. failure under decreasing suction A stress path to illustrate the possibility of failure of a stressed partially saturated soil due to suction reduction is indicated in Fig.70 1 1 1.30 MPa) are indicated in Fig. This type of failure is probably significant in slopes located in partially saturated soils (i. then the net mean stress was increased at constant suction (BC).45 0.55 0. 15(b).15 0.25 0.00 1 1 1. = 0. slopes in residual soils in tropical regions) subjected to wetting due to infiltration from rainfalls (Brand.4 MPa) are shown in Fig. work of Josa et al. Results of this kind have been reported by Delage et al. 15(a).20 MPa. s. for three different suctions (si = 0.60)-T~ 0. These curves show an increase in strength with suction. 1981). Case 4. (1987) testing silt in a suction controlled triaxial cell. sJ = 0. 16.10 MPa. s2 = 0. The initial yield curves LC and SI (pO* = 0.

0.3 MPa). 16(b). GENS AND JOSA MPa 0. Josa.32 O-40 Fig.15 MPa. 1987. 1988) and only a brief summary is given here.15 0. linked to the system. Pore and confining pressures as well as vertical load were applied by means of mercury pots whose position was controlled by stepper motors.. COMPARISON OF MODEL PREDICTIONS WITH EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS Tests on partially saturated compacted kaolin reported by Josa (1988) Details of the tests performed on partially saturated compacted kaolin are given elsewhere (Josa et al. A computer. . 15.420 ALONSO. A stress-path triaxial cell was suitably modified to induce suction states in the pore water. controlled the predefined stress and suction path . Load and deformation measurements were made inside the testing chamber. (b) shear stress-shear strain relationships suctions: (a) 16(a) (pO* = 0.2 p: MPa J I . Failure takes place at a final suction sr = 0.16 0 24 0. I I O-06 I 8 . .033 MPa. s. This was achieved by applying a constant air pressure in the upper porous stone and a variable water pressure in the lower stone.. = 0. Response of model to shear tests at diierent stress paths. The effect of final wetting (DE) in terms of change in shear strain is plotted in Fig.

4 MPa-’ and r = 0.06 0. provided the C E6 0. Once consolidated.06) from the final horizontal sections of the curves which relate to samples loaded beyond their preconsolidation pressure.06 0. (b) suctiobshear strain relationship 150 - through the necessary feedback of measured performance.09) = 0. 17. Response of model to test in which failure is induced by decreasing suction (wetting): (a) stress paths.875. In order to obtain I. % particles < 2. Samples were compacted by kneading and then allowed to consolidate to an initial stress state given by p = 0. A moderate percentage of illite was also found in X-ray diffraction tests. s = 0. (b) variation of soil compressibility . Main mineral components were quartz and kaolinite. an average value K = 0.915 and S. = 0.04 L I 0.06 m 4 ii 0. see Equation loo- 2 > - 50 - 00 0 0..14.30 Fig.30 t q: MPa t Pa (4 c 020 D (12)) can be obtained by means of isotropic compression tests at different constant suctions. l(O.~: 4%.26.30 Fig.00 0.20 0.9%. 16.01 MPa and q = 0.16 0. Universal Classification: ML).045 MPa. 200 ASTM: 95%. n(O.12 m s ij 7 A 0.06 0. In Fig.32 0. Also. The soil used in the tests was a commercially available kaolin moderately plastic (w._ = 38.20 p MPa (b) 0.09.7%. = 0. was measured under unloading paths.40 0 0 0. r and p through Equation (12). The parameters controlling the variation of soil stiffness with suction (n(O). and K.00 0. tests involving the application of suction cycles at a constant net mean stress p.10 0. Tests of this kind are shown in Fig.16 0.04 0. % parwp = 26. computed through Equation (17) was plotted in terms of p. It was found n(O) = 0. Three 4s) values were obtained (1(OG4) = 0. They allow the determination of the three unknowns n(O).02 0.24 0.06) = 0. Isotropic compression tests of partially saturnted compacted kaolin: (a) stress paths. are ideally suited. From this state the subsequent application of a desired stress path was carried out. uniformity coeflicient: 2. 17(a). I and /I.015..075. p = 16. ticles < No.10 (a) 0. 17(b) the variation of n(s).CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 421 1 0. they reached e.

~~(0. s: MPa (b) . p. 4.07 MPa. O-06 El5 0. . (b) experimentnl results fits the results with a standard deviation of 6.30 range of stresses applied (s = 0 to 0.245. The stress paths selected and the measured shear stress-strain relationships are given in Figs 22(a) and (b) respectively (these tests will be used subsequently to compare with model predictions). the following values can perhaps be identified from Fig.821~ + 1.10 0.60 Test 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I P: MPa 0.065 MPa.84- l. Within the BNP 0. In our case.097 MPa and p = 0.137 0.10 0..40- 1 0. It shows a quasi-elastic response of the soil beyond the first suction increase.. Several shear strength tests were performed at different values of p and s (Fig.20 p: MPa (a) 0. This plane provides the constants M = 0.0097 0..MO 0 0 . 17. Although it is difficult to pinpoint exactly the position of the yield point.055 MPa and pc = 0443 MPa. GENS AND JOSA suction decrease path does not intersect the LC yield locus. A test of this kind is represented in Fig.II. Several tests of this kind provided the following average parameter values: 1.3 MPa was obtained. 19. 0. 0. As a consequence of the flow rule assumed. These values have been used to compute p.142 0. A least squares error prediction procedure leads to p. = 0. / 0.0160 0~0000 0.08 11 12 13 0. Effect of cycles of applied suction on changes in specific volume of isotropically confined partially saturated compacted kaolin: (a) stress paths.04 - Fig.. . no plastic shear strains occur at the start of the test.095 m % L. at a constant net mean stress. The initial position of the yield surface is governed by the reference stress variables p.010 0.06) = 0.05 and K.30 q. = (049) = 0. In .422 ALONSO. as suggested by the model proposed. 0.10 Fig..SOl 1 0 . this information is provided by the tests reported in Fig. po* may be obtained if there is information concerning the yield stress under increasing p.06 .0142 0. 19).* and pc through Equation (7). measured: 0. 0.20 0.095 0.50 0.40 MPa 0.016 0.* = 0.085 MPa.01.JOGt) = 0.0950 0.091 0.04 .10 0. = 0.06 . This may be achieved if the suction is first increased and then decreased..022s (29) 1. so the initial part of the stressstrain curves can be used to determine the elastic shear modulus G..260 0.097 0.142 0.821 and k = 1. Comparison between measured qr values and predicted shear strength assuming critical state plane in the (P.s) srce A . 17(b): p.8% (Fig. 18. The shear modulus G was obtained in drained tests involving the application of a deviatoric stress q at different values of net mean stress and suction.340 s: I MPa 0.* and se.137 to 0. A value of 3. A relatively sudden change in l/n(s) with p provides an estimation of p.50 m 2 0. 18.I.02 / / 0. 19).59 MPa) the plane q = Mp + Mks = 0.

. 20 shows an apparent increase in s. A second example. :l=# 0 0. a good correspondence is obtained.04 0. In test Ell. could be interpreted in a similar way (test El in Fig.__. 20.20 / . 21 shows a reasonably good prediction.30 . The measured volumetric deformations of the two samples (in terms of u) and the model predictions using the parameters given in Table 1 are plotted in Fig. A summary of model parameters and initial and reference conditions is given in Table 1. 22(b).741 . when the sample has undergone a previous increase in net mean stress p (path AC).CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS E6 423 addition.03 MPa.06___. It was found so = 0. Comparison between measured and predicted results for partially saturated compacted kaolin under isotropic stress changes: (a) stress paths. is given in Fig.02 01 1 i---r I/ 0 A C I 1 I. A second test (E3) represented in Fig. 21. thus maintaining a constant net mean stress p. tests in which suction was increased. In these two tests the samples are subchanges in net mean jected to ever increasing c 0.02 G 0 A .10 . Fig.94 A 1 A ------ Excx?rimental Model B D 1. (b) Variation of soil compressibility with applied suction .08 1 ( 0.32 1 I 0.01 0.40 . 22. Tests on partially saturated compacted sandy clay reported by Maswoswe (1985) Maswoswe (1985) reports several suction controlled oedometer and triaxial tests of low plasticity sandy clay (Lower Cromer till) having the 0. 21.20 p: MPa (a) 0.09 Fig. (b) variation of specific volume with net mean stress D I I I I stress and suction along different paths. Tests on partially saturated compacted kaolin involving increase in suction: (a) stress paths.04 E5 L 0. 0. 0.82- m 5 0. 21..08 - 4 1. equal to the initial value.30 1. Test El8 involves the application of 4 maintaining dp = 0. The results of two tests-test El8 (path CZ) and test El1 (path JZkare compared with model predictions. 0.! h r 0. 0. involving the application of deviatoric stresses.24 . .10 0.16 p: MPa (b) .86 - 0. The stress paths followed by two tests (E5 and E6) in the plane 4 = 0 are represented in Fig. In general terms. 0. This result suggests a coupling between the yield loci LC and SI as proposed in the model. The comparison between measured and predicted shear stressshear strain relationships is given in Fig. ( 0.07 0. da. = 0. ) 0.0 p: MPa (a) Fig.05 s: MPa (b) 0. In both tests the samples reached failure.03 0.06 - / El E3 1.78- ij 0. 20).08 I / 0.

O 990.0 52 g 2 8 a ZH3 1x3 131 LO.yq!ssalduro3 99.0 13-I 516.o P.1 PZ.0 sso.0 t?dK :% “dm : *Od SJa~amamd ssaqs ajoaaaja~ - z 860.0 9z.1 L sOO.0 100.0 PI.0 520.Lm .0 .0 sOO.0 SL.0 z10.0 oz LLOO.0 0 zo.0 9900.0 zo.T 2 z.0 ZW3 q@uaqs Jeaaqs snlnpour Ieaqs saSueq3 uoyns Iapun b.I s10.0 Et-O.0 r-edYV 1s’ @P (ok sa%wqa ssalls ueazu lapun Lvyq!ssa~dmo3 l ZW3 *.1 0 IO.0 fO.0 sm.8..2 so.0 1x3 n e&q :b l3dm :S Ed&AJ:d anus PPP1 IO.91 EdPl :J .0 E.0 sz.0 oz 110-O s90.0 VO.

Shear tests on partially saturated compacted kaolin: (a) stress paths. Stress path followed by sample of sandy clay (Lower Cromer till) tested by Maswoswe (1985) (test SK3) 0.2. The results of a particularly relevant test in which a sample was first subjected to an increase in vertical stress under constant water content and subsequently wetted under constant vertical stress were selected for comparison with the model developed. = 0. Other model parameters could not be obtained directly from Maswoswe’s results.03)/2) and ((aI + od2 . The stress path followed by the sample is shown in Fig. s). 23 in a plane (ol . Samples were statically compacted. the loading test under constant water content are diflicult to interpret as the saturation of the sample increases with the load and therefore ‘pure’ compression behaviour and collapse phenomena may coexist in the sample along the same stress path. The test to be modelled (test SK3. the parameters of the proposed model.12 O-16 0.: MPa 0. Accordingly. the collapsing properties of the soil tested are relatively important and therefore a low value for r(r = 0. 24(a and b). For instance. clay content: 17% . 1982.CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS Constant 425 watercontent q: MPa 0. The tests performed by Maswoswe (1985) are not well suited to determine.71. 23.25) was adopted. However. (b) comparison of measured and predicted shear stress-&ear strain relationships following characteristics: wL = 25%. 22. M = 1. Gens & Potts.20 (b) Fig. Measured behav- iour of the sample in terms of variation of void ratio with vertical stress and in terms of the stress path followed by the soil in the planes ((ol + 03)/2 . An important aim of the research work reported by Maswoswe (1985) was to determine the stress path followed by the soil during collapse conditions lateral oedometric under (no deformation). some basic parameters of saturated compacted Lower Cromer till have been reported by independent studies (Gens.20 u. Fortunately. (a.. In particular. . The following values were taken from this work: I(O) = 0.2 MPa for a suction close to .. They have been selected for the purposes of the present comparison as they appear to fit well the behaviour of the soil saturated after compaction.3 t 0 0. and k = 0.40 Fig. in a direct way. 24(a)) indicated an apparent preconsolidation net mean stress p. the increase in stiffness with suction is relatively marked and this is reflected in the selected values /3 = 20 MPa-‘.u. percentage of sand > 50% . dry of optimum.u. u.)/2) are plotted in Fig. clay activity = 0. Fig. K = 0.u.04 0.06 0. On the other hand.066.0077. the radial deformation of the samples in the triaxial tests was constantly monitored and the stress state was modified to ensure zero lateral deformation. 1982b).a..8. the observed trends of behaviour have been used to obtain approximate values for the unknown parameters.00 0. wp = 12%. >(01 .

)/2 . show a satisfactory agreement with the measured results. Although the chosen parameters are consistent with the experimental evidence.02 MPa). It is unclear to what extent could this expression.38 MPa-‘. Again due to the significant collapsing characteristics of the tested soil.. conditions. Gens (1982) proposed a variation of G with the maximum previous effective preconsolidation stress p.* = 0. 1987). be used for a partially saturated soil. 24.2 MPa) value of po’ intermediate and po*( = 0. In general S. Maswoswe’s results for test SK3 can be approximated with the values n = 5. . alternatively. for instance. The first part of the test represented in Figs 23 and 24 involves the application of vertical stress at constant water content.012 MPa for the reference stress.. Thinking in terms of the proposed model.3 n (U> + n. interpreted through Equation (7) provide a value pf = 0. for saturated specimens.2 1 0.02 MPa. depends markedly on s whereas the influence of applied stress is small (Alonso.” F .’ Y. 24.1 Vertical stress B: MPa (a) 1 .. This probably indicates that the preceding expression for G in terms of po’ will probably overestimate where m and n are constants.“.1 0 0.‘. = 1 . in Lloret and Alonso (1985). This type of test cannot be reproduced with the proposed model unless a relationship between water content (or. the value of K. degree of saturation S.4 I t B -------- Expenmental Model c 0.4 Fig. the following relationship S. valid for saturated conditions. Gens & Hight. Therefore K.426 ALONSO. G = 7 MPa.o 0.)/2 . values derived from the computed deformations of the sample should match the values given by Equation (30). was selected equal to 0X)01. may be found if the expression for G is computed for a between po( = 0. A summary of the model parameters discussed here and the initial stress conditions of the test analysed is given in Table 1. value after collapse corresponds to K. plotted in Fig.A’ C’ .6 : ‘a 2 P -0 ) 0.’ . it is recognized that other sets of parameter values might lead to similar model predictions.22 MPa. Oedometer tests on saturated samples prepared in the same way and with the same initial conditions showed preconsolidation stresses significantly lower. GENS AND JOSA Y 0.01 t 0. the wetter the soil (i. It is also believed that secondary plastic strains take place within the elastic region bounded by the LC and SI yield loci and this will tend to underestimate the shear modulus which better fits the experimental results.) and the stress state (p. given an apparent preconsolidation stress p.e.I 0. (b) stress paths in the triaxial plane the shear modulus if po’ is substituted by p. More than the success in predicting accurately a particular test in this case should be stressed the capability of the model to reproduce the basic features of a relatively complicated stress path such as the loading and collapse under K. In his experimental work on saturated compacted Lower Cromer till. Accordingly.M tanh (ns) (30) s = 0. will probably be very small.4. q.. s) is established. it is difficult to isolate recoverable volumetric strains along the wetting paths.2 Model Experimental -_3$> (4 A’ . A simple way to model this relationship is to use the concept of state surface as described. ---0 (q + rr. Using the parameters and the initial and reference stress values indicated in Table 1 the computed model predictions. m = 064.4p. G = 93. the lower the suction). Results reported by Maswoswe (1985) (Teat SK3) and model predictions: (a) variation of void ratio with vertical stress. has been used. . given the type of soil and the rigid open structure likely to develop in the process of static compaction dry of optimum. Lloret and Alonso (1985) found that this expression fitted well published experimental results for soils with degrees of saturation over 0. around p. The value of G used in the present analysis of Maswoswe’s results.2 0. The model correctly predicts that the K.uw I g 0. Suction was not controlled and its variation is a response of the sample to the boundary conditions. the smaller its specific volume. It is thought that. The loading process at constant water content could now be modelled in an iterative way by imposing that the S. These results. which provides a good fit for the experimental results.

645 and t+. reproduces the irreversible response of the soil against stress and suction reversals.15 - m % 0. Two alternative isotropic stress paths. 25.02 MPa. as well as rcs.06 Lx - 2. . The variation of specific volume is plotted in Fig.05 0.10 p: MPa (a) I I ) 0. jl. ( A Fig. j? = 20 MPa-‘.00.627 and D = 2. All of these parameters and the initial and reference stress states have been summarized in Table 1. two tests corresponding to the stress paths shown in Fig. These two tests are particularly interesting since they reveal most of the patterns of behaviour of partially saturated soil. In order to derive the model parameters. the soil should have a low compressibility. Tests OIIcompacted kaolin reported by Karube (1986): (a) stress paths.05 MPa) and they reached S.CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 427 Tests on partially saturated compacted kaolin reported by Karube (1986) The results of several tests on partially saturated compacted kaolin in a triaxial cell were reported by Karube (1986). 2. Among the different results reported. 25(a). = 0.20 - B c 0. 25(b). is directly related to the wetting path under low confining stress (B to A) and it was found IC.114. pc. starting and ending at the same stress point were followed by Karube (1986). = 2. are relevant. They were subsequently consolidated under the initial stress state (p = 0.. r = 0. The values d(0) = 0.* = 0. clay fraction: 22%. the ability of the model to reproduce the main features of the measured behaviour.07 MPa. It accounts for the stiffness changes of the soil induced by suction changes. and se.10 Lj 0.20 --o-- Expertmental Model vious sections of this Paper. Given the relatively low water content used in compaction. maximum size of particles: 0. Using the reported results it was found A. It was estimated: K = 0. Model predictions using these values are plotted in Fig. . D ..01 MPa were first selected and the remaining parameters mentioned were subsequently determined from the measured results along the stress path steps indicated. In the drying paths A to B and D to C both I. 25(b). = 0.00 1 0. The value of K.75 and p. discussed in pre- 1 0. 25(a) have been selected for comparison with the model developed. The quantitative agreement is in this case satisfactory. again. s = 0.04mm.011. . provides the conditions for collapsibility and links the amount of collapse to the . The following basic properties of the soil are provided in this reference: wL = 37%. The value of K is directly related to the behaviour observed in the path steps C to B and D to A which involve unloading of the net mean stress.025 and se = 0.(O). the results reported by Karube have been used in the following way. A .065 and p” = 0. The behaviour in the steps B to C and A to D is controlled by the parameters J.098. IP = 28%. (b) comparison between experimental and computed results CONCLUDING REMARKS A review of the main characteristics of the behaviour of partially saturated soils has shown that existing models cover only limited aspects of the stress-strain response of these soils.05 A D 0. Even more important is. B . = 0. The samples used in the tests were compacted at a water content 6% dry of optimum and they had S.04 MPa. = 0+X)5. c (b) .15 0. shown in Fig. Using as effective stress fields two independent stress variables-the excess of total stress over air pressure and the water pressure deficiency (or suction)--an elastoplastic hardening model has been developed and is described in the Paper. r and pO* as well as K.

loading-collapse and SI.K/J. {Ml . so) = s . been indicated. .u.XPo .)/3 . The examples analysed demonstrate that the model is capable of making accurate predictions.r) exp f*(s. but is unable to approximate the behaviour of highly expansive soils.’ has been assumed to be zero). These additional five constants account for phenomena typically associated with the behaviour of partially saturated soils such as decrease in stiffness and strength with suction decrease. Some aspects not specifically included in the model are the irreversible nature of expansion in swelling clays. however. Different constitutive models for saturated conditions can be coupled to the unsaturated formulation presented in this Paper.Ko)/(l + 2Ko) Equations dl= = (2/3)Wc1 .P) = 0 (31) (> PO PC (33) i(s) = A(O)[( 1 . .po)l associated with yield (36) (37) (38) (39) In Equation (39) bl is a constant which can be derived by requiring that the direction of plastic strain increment for zero lateral deformation. As described in the Paper p stresses for suction p. Extension and further elaboration of the proposed model may be envisaged to improve the description of partially saturated soil behaviour.sSP= plnq where ?lp= 1 nq = C2MW2p + P.. = ks PO -= PC (32) * I4O)-Kl/[~(sl-Kl + P. It is therefore intended for use with partially saturated soils of moderate to low plasticity. the decrease in collapse potential when the confining stress becomes larger than a critical or threshold value and the non-linear character of the strength envelope. s = u. The plastic strain increments can be obtained following standard procedures of the theory of hardening plasticity.) = 3(1 . conditions: (4/P + P. that before such extensions are made more experience should be gained with the model in its simplest forms. For isotropic stress conditions the model is characterized by two yield curves (LC.3. It is believed. Yield surfaces Two yield surfaces have been defined (in terms of the following stress variables: p = (aI + 2a. The behaviour of saturated soils is a particular case of the model developed which is reached when suction becomes zero.. de v p=plnp d.u. The comparison made between the results of several suction controlled tests on low plasticity kaolin and a sandy clay and model predictions is encouraging.sc = 0 (-Bs) + i-1 (34) (35) s the model provides a simple representation of swelling. 4 = 61 . . and po* are preconsolidation and for saturated conditions respectively. s> PO*) = q2 .(O)]} (42) M(. five more than the critical state model.a. (3941) provide . collapse and (moderate) expansion of the soil when wetted. An additional parameter is required when the stress path implies suction increases beyond the maximum past suction value. More significant perhaps is the possibility of reproducing relevant features of partially saturated soil behaviour in a unified context. 5 VP (where for simplicity de. These curves become yield surfaces when a third axis (accounting for shear stress) is introduced to model triaxial stress states. is found for stress states satisfying K. For applications that involve stress paths which imply monotonic wetting of the soil (which may be the case of embankment dam construction and subsequent water impounding) the model is characterized by nine constants. Suitable testing procedures for obtaining the model parameters have ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors express their gratitude for the support received from the CAICYT (Comision Asesora de Investigation Cientifica y Tecnica) through research projects 2673183 and PB860379. suction-increase) whose hardening laws are controlled by the total plastic volumetric deformation. and granular soils. For simplicity. is (dsVPP daSP).(& y). clayey sands and silts.428 ALONSO. APPENDIX 1.t0(o)il (41) (6). GENS AND JOSA stiffness changes of the soil induced by changes in suction.): fAP> 4. such as sandy clays.mP where p. a critical state model has been used as the reference model for saturated soil. MATHEMATICAL MODEL FORMULATION OF CONSTITUTIVE An ordered summary of the proposed model is presented here. Flow rules The plastic strain increment surfacef.

Booth. Expansive Soils. G. Some aspects of the mechanical behaviour of partially saturated soils. (1979). 9th European Conf. (1982). 49-54. W. Sydney: Butterworths. Shear strength of soils under high suction values. 3. G. V.* and so. Theoretical context for understanding unsaturated residual soil behaviour. V. 9th European Co& Soil Mech. Int.. R. Sot. pp. Engrs 103. (1970).CONSTITUTIVE For the yield surface f. Fdn Engng. H. Appropriate concepts and technology for unsaturated soils. In Moisture equilibria and moisture changes in soils beneath covered areas. Geom&h. 295 306. Am. Coleman. 33-51. pp. Durban. A theoretical model for describing the behaviour of soils not obeying Rendulic’s principle. D. 16. G. Ist Int. Numer. Morgenstem.. Elastic strains The volumetric strain are given by &. Sot. Gens. Lateritic and Saprolitic Soils. Civ. & Blight. Madedor. J. (1987).. & Potts. & Satija. (1961). G. Engrs 95. 1. & Potts. Fredlund. Delage. A. D. B. Escario. Correspondence to Gkotechnique 12. Gens. (1978). Volime’ change characteristics of unsaturated clays. A. (1975). L. GCotechnique 36. They depend on the total plastic volumetric strain increment dsvP as follows ” A(O)p= dso (so + P. G. J. Bishop.-N. Fdn Engng. (1981). Proc. Un nouvel appareil triaxial pour les sols nonsaturts. A. D. & Donald. D. The shear strength of unsaturated soils. through (43) plastic con- Hardening laws The evolution of the yield surfaces is controlled by the hardening parameters p. (1985). M. Erol. A. Civ. The experimental study of partly saturated soils in the triaxial apparatus. Can. & Widger. Cox. 24-32. 3. Fdn Engng. No. & Donald. M. Proc. Rahardjo. D. B. No. J. R. A. 13. Sydney: Butterworths. Written discussion. 373-376. Christchurch. Proc. pp. 6th Regional Con& for Africa on Soil Mech. Brasilia.” K (44) - ” ds. F. 3. Some thoughts on rain-induced slope failures. G. Fdn Engng. Gbotechnique 13. R. & SBez. D. Soil Mech. 121-139. 9th European Conf. Suraj de Silva. Gulhati. Zurich. J. & Potts. 0. Critical state models in computational geomechanics. London University. 0. Engng Div. G R. Dublin. Y. D. B. N. Numer. 4. Bishop. 3rd Int. Soil Mech. GT5. N. Dudley. K. Burland. Fredlund. (1965). Blight. E. Can. Shear strength of partially saturated soils. Geotech. D. No. No. SM3. W. SMl. Some preliminary studies of unsaturated soils. Brand.. Mod. 3.e = (1/3G) dq REFERENCES Aitchison. The factors influencing collapse settlement in compacted soils. Dublin. (1981). Barden. Soil Mech. (1982). Haifa. A. in Tropical. (1956). Civ. 1157. J. Fdn Engng. Fdn Engng 1. I. (1965). H. ConJ: Soil Mech. 1st Int.. R. PhD thesis. & El-Ruwaih. M. A. 3. Gens. & Sbz. Fdn Engng. Gens. (1986). P. M.. Conf Expansive Soils. & Morgenstern. Proc. 10th Int. Soil Mech. Geomech. 1. 453456. Ho. G. 1st Int. Fdn Engng. 57-63. Mod. Sot.348-350. S. Conf. Review of collapsing soils. & Gan. Stress-strain and strength characteristics of a low plasticity clay. Con& Soil Mech. D. Gens. & SBez. pp. J. 1. 1. I. Conf. (1977). 443448. Proc. London: ICE. K. E. Stress state variables for unsaturated soils. Stockholm. Geotech. Measurement of the properties of swelling and collapsing soils under controlled suction. (1963). 4th Cong. Engrs %. 10th Int.. (1973). S. J. J. vector is (ds. 3.. 0) where MODEL FOR PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 429 the associated plastic strain dsvsP = /I 2 Both ~“1 and p’z can be obtained sistency conditions.3 (46) (47) ds. 13-21. Soil Mech. . . (1982).) ds. Increase in . Fredlund. (b) Effective stresses in unsaturated soils. 196200. pp. (1969). Fredlund.. J. G. G. 259-269. H. W. 6th Int. Some aspects of effective stress in saturated and partly saturated soils. The shear strength of partly saturated soils. E.447-446. & Sides.’ (45) 1. Collapse behaviour of desert loess. D. m-612. V. 25-28. E.S = and shear elastic components of If dp Ifi . A study of effective stress for volume change. (1987). (1982a). General report. Symp. (1987). IAEG 1. ClayJills.ds + 0 P ” (s + P. Geotech. & Rahardjo. No. Am. J. Proc. E. 15. 312323. I. B. A. Proc.K. Volume change of compacted clay fill. 313-321. 178-197. Proc. Escario. W. Fdn Engng. & High& D. 5th. Proc. S. D. 79-86. Proc. Stockholm. A. 177-197. pp. Proc. (1982b). 192-199. G. Dublin. Escario. J.. Alonso. Engineering Computations 8. 925-947. Application of critical state soil models to the predictibn of the behaviour of a normally consolidated low plasticity clay. Fdn Engng. & Fredlund. J. (1987). & De Laure. Zealand Conf Soil Mech. (1978). D. Proc. (1988). 27&278. 1087-l 146. Proc. Session 5. 2nd At&r. Conf: on Geomech. Zurich. R. New Delhi. Nonlinearity of strength envelope for unsaturated soils.p. Proc. Symp. Fredlund. D. D. Special problem soils. Am. P. A. Stress strain relations for partly saturated soil. In Moisture equilibria and moisture changes beneath covered areas. (1962). A..

E.. Con& Soil Mech. and Fdn Engng 1. Proc. (1986). Alonso. 1. 1. PhD thesis. J. A guide to construction on or with materials exhibiting additional settlement due to ‘collapse’ of grain structure. D. Barcelona. Symp. Consolidation of unsaturated soil including swelling and collapse behaviour. & Gens. B. J. Collapsing behaviour of residual soils. 2. Matyas. A. normally consolidated cohesive soil. & How. Mod. .. (1968). (1976). J. Jennings. Proc. GCotechnique 12. Stress path for a compacted soil during collapse due to wetting. San Francisco. 1st Int. G. No. Honolulu. H. S. 103-107. GENS AND JOSA strength due to suction for two Hong Kong soils.44%477. HongKong. 2. Conf: Expansive Soils. Delgado. S. E. 4th Asian Reg. No.43248. 2. (1962). E. (1985). 1. L. L. Lloret.. 4. La ingenieria de suelos en las vias terrestres. New concept of effective stress in unsaturated soil and its proving tests. The influence of stress-path in the collapse-swelling of soils at the laboratory. 12: 183-187. (1987). Fdn Engng. Conf: Soil Mech. Josa. (1982): Stress-strain behaviour of anisotropically. on Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock. E.91>930. Proc. (1980). Conf: Engng and Construction in Tropical and Residual Soils. Un modelo eslastoplirstico para suelos no de saturados. A. 6th Regional Con& for Africa on Soil Mech. A. A. Adelaide. (1948). Gtotechniaue 18. Proc. No. Karube.539-552. (1975). Shear strength of partially saturated clays. Co@. (1971).. Dublin. 2. 9th European Conz Soil Mech. Yudhbir. J. 4. E. 263-295. Jennings. Justo. & Ruiz. Josa. J. Rico. Tesis Doctoral. 67-71. E. Yang.430 ALONSO.. Ohmaki. Maswoswe. 5th Int. Stress-strain behaviour of partially saturated soils. London. Imperial College. A. 2nd Int. State surfaces for partially saturated soils. E. Jaky. ST 977. ASTM Symp. Durban.9%105. Pressure in silos. E. E. H. Zurich. & Radhakrishna.557-562. Limitations to the use of effective stresses in partly saturated soils. Japp. Geomech. Volume change characteristics of partially saturated soils. N. A. Proc. & Burland. Fdn Engng. J. Soil Mech. 7th Southeast Asian Geotech. 11th Int. Lloret. (1988). GCotechnique 30. Proc. 125144. & Alonso. Proc. Mbxico. Universitat PoWcnica Catalunya. A. Num. 561-564. Bangkok. & Alonso. Limusa. & Knight. Fdn Engng. (1984). A. R. D. & De1 Castillo. Lloret. R. Fdn Engng. 25& 269. (1985). Conf. (1982). J. Proc. Proc. K.

- ARMA-2012-559
- 08 Plasticity 06 Strain Hardening
- 061001_1
- shaft part 1
- 00_jwolf_full_thesis
- H26.pdf
- Geomechanics Notes
- (ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8-5(300)
- Final
- Thermo-Mechanical Treatment Effects on Stress Relaxation and Hydrogen Embrittlement of Cold Drawn Eutectoid Steels
- TheoryPlast_03
- 05062.pdf
- Triaxial Stress Analysis
- 2005k Gebreselassie, Kempfert - Calibration of Soil Parameters
- Embankment
- Ada 370635
- Lab 2
- 1920 metalsinaircraft00hanbrich
- ce591intro_F10
- 2276-1
- 60b7d5286485a403b5
- Design of Concrete Structures 15th Edition Darwin Solution Manual
- Main Press Plate-SimulationXpress Study-1
- Bala-Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Anisotropic Yield Criteria for Warm Deep Drawing of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy
- The Local Buckling Strength of Partially Stiffened Type 3CR12 Sta
- HTHP Bundles
- ff
- Geo Mechanics Module Users Guide
- Structures 2 Notes
- Stability of a circular tunnel in cohesive-frictional soil subjected to surcharge loading.pdf

- tmpAFE1.tmp
- Finite Element Modeling of Push-Out Test for Embossed Steel Plate Connector
- As 1391-2007 Metallic Materials - Tensile Testing at Ambient Temperature
- tmp943A.tmp
- As 3880-1991 Bin Flow Properties of Coal
- As 3519-2005 Timber - Machine Proof Grading
- New Product Development approach for design and FEA analysis of Skid Plates - A Case study
- Experimental Evaluation of Optimum Performance Parameters for Burnishing of Spur Gear
- tmpE858.tmp
- State-of-the-art review of FRP strengthened RC slabs
- Design & Development of Horizontal Hydraulic Embossing Machine
- tmpCE04.tmp
- Performance Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of EN41B using Gas Nitriding Process

- 3. Cantidades de obra Rev 0 27-05-15.xls
- Capitulo34.pdf
- Plan de Estudios
- 3-1aspectosgeneralesimpuestoalvaloragregadoiva-130514145204-phpapp02.pdf
- 2paso1
- 7467_constitucion_de_sas.docx
- Decreto_2201_30_de_Diciembre_2016.pdf
- 35B. Autoretencion por CREE.xlsx
- 6.4.1 BMP Pervious Pavement with Infiltration Bed.pdf
- Geology for civil engineers.pdf
- Valoración Leonisa Modelo Básico 1
- tecnologia-Sika-Grout.pdf
- Anexo 1 Resolucion 7935-09-EspecificacionTecnica1010
- 580860anagomezcartascomerciales-140814154358-phpapp02
- 35A. Que es Cree
- Texto Tesina Máster Agustín Cuadrado Cabello
- Quantifying Sensitivity of Local Site Response Models to Statistical
- Design and Management Strategies for Mine Pavements
- Auriol and Picard 2011 a Theory of BOT Contracts
- Simposio Pav Manizales- Jorge Alvarez
- Liquefaction Resistance of Soils
- Herramienta de Software Para Inventario
- Calidad Paul
- RA6-014MEDIDADERESISTIVIDAD_V3
- 10 Cambio Climatico
- Espectros de Diseño
- Analisis de Licuacion Ver3
- Norma Técnica ESSA
- RA8_015ultima
- Importancia DelAjuste y Adecuada Configuracion Del HDM-4

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading