238 views

Uploaded by jamjam34

- Gantry Girder
- nonlinear analysis of shear dominant prestressed concrete beams using ansys
- Detailing of Reinforcement in Concrete Structures 28 Aug 2012
- Computation for Floor Joists
- Special Assignment mekanik pepejal
- Temp Loading
- Shear Connection
- COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE INTEGRAL AND THE SIMPLY SUPPORTED BRIDGE
- T-Psc Beam Design
- Design of Rcc T Beam
- dalle beton armé.pptx
- bfm-3A978-1-4899-7134-0-2F1
- MSI10 Plastic Analysis
- Sample of Detailed Structural Analysis Computation of Beams MIDAS
- Amos_2012_Question Paper.pdf
- 1031_Slice Forces and Moments in Solids
- Sample Problems in Pre-Stressed Concrete.pdf
- 3 Restrained Beams - 2012
- 13-05 Strength of Materials (MN & in)
- 18 Indeterminate Beam

You are on page 1of 5

(http://www.lubanren.com/weblog/)

TIPS

2D Solid PLANE42 3D Solid SOLID45 SOLID185 SOLID95/186 SOLID92/187 3D Shell SHELL63 SHELL181 SHELL93

www.ansys.belcan.com

by Paul Dufour

Picking an element type from the large library of elements in ANSYS can be an intimidating thing for a beginner. Out of the almost 200 available which one should I select? Why are there so many? Are there 181 kinds of shell elements? This article will address this issue for a structural analysis. The table below shows the most commonly used element types for stress analysis. Element Order Linear PLANE182 PLANE82/183 Quadratic PLANE2 Element Naming Conventions: Elements are organized into groups of similar characteristics. These group names make up the first part of the element name (PLANE, SOLID, SHELL,etc). The second part of the element name is a number that is more or less (but not exactly) chronological. As elements have been created over the past 30 years the element numbers have simply been incremented. The earliest and simplest elements have the lowest numbers (LINK1, BEAM3, etc), the more recently developed ones have higher numbers. The 18x, 20x, and 22x series of elements (SHELL181, SOLID187, etc) are the newest and most modern in the ANSYS element library. Some FEA codes (NASTRAN comes to mind) have just a handful of elements that do everything. There are several reasons why there are such a large number of elements in ANSYS. First, there was a conscious plan from the beginnings of the program that, for example, if you want to do a thermal analysis, there is no reason to use an element with structural degrees of freedom. That just requires an element to carry a bunch of baggage around that it is not using. While ANSYS does have coupled field elements that can do both, generally speaking if you want to do a thermal analysis you use an element with a temperature degree of freedom only, and structural elements do not drag around an unused temperature degree of freedom. This was done in the name of computational efficiency. Secondly, old elements are rarely deleted out of the program library for the sake of compatibility with older models. When a new and improved BEAM4 element was created, BEAM4 was not revised but left alone, and the BEAM44 was introduced. So the library keeps getting larger as new and more capable elements are formulated. The last reason is that ANSYS is a huge program with integrated capabilities in many physics fields. So there are elements for fluids, electromagnetics, electric field, acoustics, and explicit dynamics analyses as well. BEAM188 BEAM189 Line Elements BEAM3/44

sN

(http://www.lubanren.com/weblog/)

Element Order: Element order refers to the interpolation of an elements nodal results to the interior of the element. This determines how results can vary across an element, and is important if you have high gradients of strain. A beam or plate in bending is a good example of this phenomenon, where the strain is changing sign over a potentially very small distance. Element order can be linear or quadratic. Linear elements do not have midside nodes. In general the strain can only vary linearly from one node to another. This is complicated in ANSYS with many linear elements having so called extra shapes or being fully integrated. This makes the elements behave more like a quadratic element, but not completely so. Naturally a linear element is computationally faster than a quadratic element. Quadratic elements have midside nodes. The shape function for strains varies in some nonlinear fashion between the corner nodes. Whereas linear elements are flat on both the sides and in-plane, a quadratic element can follow a curvature in both directions and is more accurate for a given number of nodes in the model. For example, in a tube with a hole, the curvature is maintained around the edges of the hole as well as on the curved edge of the panel; it is not a faceted representation as illustrated below.

For in-plane bending type problems, quadratic elements are much better than linear elements. Even several linear elements with extra shapes or full integration turned on are not as good one quadratic element.

sN

(http://www.lubanren.com/weblog/)

Linear elements are more sensitive to non-perfect element shapes (i.e., have more error). A linear element is probably better in a mapped mesh than a free mesh. For out-of-plane, plate type bending, there isnt much difference between linear and quadratic elements. Linear bricks give good results due to the extra shapes (full integration) if the elements are regularly shaped. If the volume has a shape complex enough to make skewed elements, mesh it with 20 node bricks or tetrahedral elements. An important side note herelinear triangles and tets give poor results since they are actually constant-strain elements (one value of strain calculated for the whole element. No gradient at all. These elements are no longer even available in ANSYS except as degenerate elements.). As a general rule of thumb, one quadratic element containing three nodes should be more accurate than two linear elements having a total of three nodes across the same dimension. In nonlinear analysis, a finer mesh of linear elements is computationally more efficient, robust, stable and more accurate than a coarser quadratic mesh with a comparable number of nodes.

Make very simple models and experiment! Lame advice, I knowbut it will never fail you! 2D Solid Elements: How can a 2D element be a solid? Thats a question most new ANSYS users ask. There are two reasons in ANSYS-speak. First, they are considered solid because they are not a shell or a beam element. Shells and beams are structural abstractions that will be discussed in the following sections. Secondly, they are solids because they fully represent a solid chunky part by modeling a cross section of that part. There are three main kinds of 2D solid elements:

Plane Strain: In a plane strain analysis we are modeling something that is so long that there is no strain in the thickness direction. A cross section of a long beam or a dam holding back water would be examples of this kind of behavior. Stresses in the thickness direction are significant. Axisymmetric: In this type of analysis we are modeling a cross section of a structure that is fully defined by rotating the cross section around a central axis. A pressure vessel or bottle would be examples of this kind of structure. The thickness direction here represents the circumferential (hoop) direction and those out-of-plane stresses are very significant (picture a tank under pressure). Plane Stress: This is not really a solid element per say but still falls into this category (since it doesnt really fit anywhere else). A plane stress analysis is a 2D model of a thin sheet with a small thickness and inplane loading. You would get the same results with a shell model with in-plane loads only and the out-ofplane displacement constrained.

All 2D solid elements can be any one of these three types by changing the element key options.

sN

(http://www.lubanren.com/weblog/)

PLANE42: Basic 2D solid element. PLANE82: 8 noded version of PLANE42. Also has a triangular option. PLANE182: Similar to PLANE42 except has capability for simulating deformations of nearly incompressible elastoplastic materials, and fully incompressible hyperelastic materials. PLANE183: 8 noded version of PLANE182.

3D Solid Elements: These types of elements have their geometry fully defined by the element nodes. They are elements used to mesh volumes in ANSYS. These volumes could be created in the ANSYS preprocessor or imported from a CAD system. Hexahedral elements (bricks) can be used to mesh regularly shaped rectangular type volumes, while tetrahedral elements (tets) can be used to mesh any volume. Even linear bricks (if they are not distorted much) can model a thin plate in out-of-plane bending with one element through the thickness since they all by default have the extra shapes turned on.

SOLID45: Basic linear brick. SOLID95: 20 noded version of SOLID45. It can tolerate irregular shapes without as much loss of accuracy. Well suited to model curved boundaries. These elements can also be tetrahedral and can automatically transition between hexahedral and tetrahedral using pyramids. SOLID185: Newer version of SOLID45. Also has mixed formulation capability for simulating deformations of nearly incompressible elastoplastic materials, and fully incompressible hyperelastic materials. SOLID186: Newer version of SOLID95. Also has mixed formulation capability for simulating deformations of nearly incompressible elastoplastic materials, and fully incompressible hyperelastic materials. SOLID92: Tetrahedral only element (10 noded quadratic). SOLID187: Newer version of SOLID92. Similarly to other 18x elements also has mixed formulation capability for simulating deformations of nearly incompressible elastoplastic materials, and fully incompressible hyperelastic materials.

sN

(http://www.lubanren.com/weblog/)

3D Shell Elements: A shell element is a surface type element. It is really a 2D element that is called 3D because it is not restricted to the XY plane like a 2D solid element; it can be located anywhere in three-dimensional space and it can deform out-of-plane. Shell elements are engineering abstractions because a geometric surface has no physical thickness. An ANSYS real constant is used to assign a thickness to a shell element. Shell elements are also called plate elements, and are used to model panel type structures where the thickness is small compared to the other dimensions of the part. They can carry in-plane loads (also called membrane loads) and also out-of-plane bending moments and twisting.

SHELL63: This is an older but still very widely used shell element. It can analyze large deflections but not plasticity. SHELL93: Quadratic version of SHELL63. In addition it can analyze plasticity. SHELL181: Newest linear shell element. Has plasticity and can also be used to model laminated composites and sandwich panels. Note: There is no eight noded 18x series shell element.

Line Elements: Line elements are a further engineering abstraction from shells; they are physically idealized as a simple line, which represents a long slender structure that can carry axial, bending, shear and twisting forces. Real constants define the cross sectional properties of the beam element.

BEAM3: Simple 2D beam element. Must be created in XY plane. BEAM4: Beam element that can be modeled in 3D space. Has large deflection. BEAM44: Tapered beam element. Can use the beam tool to define a section and have real constants automatically calculated. BEAM188: Timoshenko beam that includes shear deformation. Can handle plasticity and can define a section with the beam tool. Can have a built-up cross section with more than one material. By default this is a true linear element. You need a lot of them to give the same results as one BEAM3/4/44/189. In release 8.0 turn on KEYOPT(3) = 2 to give an internal quadratic shape function to eliminate this problem. Can display stresses on the actual beam shape like it was solid. BEAM189: Three noded quadratic version of BEAM188. This is pretty much the ultimate beam element that can do everything well. Conclusion:

ANSYS has many elements in its library, but its fast to narrow them down to just a few for your structural analysis once you select an analysis approach. Try to stick with the 18x/20x series of elements when possible because they incorporate the latest technology.

- Gantry GirderUploaded byVishnu Samy
- nonlinear analysis of shear dominant prestressed concrete beams using ansysUploaded byMaryam Sh
- Detailing of Reinforcement in Concrete Structures 28 Aug 2012Uploaded byAfzal Kareem
- Computation for Floor JoistsUploaded byTalen Marzan-Lelis
- Special Assignment mekanik pepejalUploaded byIsmail Ibrahim
- Temp LoadingUploaded byprasagnihotri
- Shear ConnectionUploaded byHanuman Sharma
- COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE INTEGRAL AND THE SIMPLY SUPPORTED BRIDGEUploaded byAshaari Cha-e
- T-Psc Beam DesignUploaded byVardaan Anand Singh
- Design of Rcc T BeamUploaded byAnonymous dxsNnL6S8h
- dalle beton armé.pptxUploaded bySoukaina Cherradi
- bfm-3A978-1-4899-7134-0-2F1Uploaded byAdel Adel
- MSI10 Plastic AnalysisUploaded byAtiqah Juhari
- Sample of Detailed Structural Analysis Computation of Beams MIDASUploaded byRj Mendiola
- Amos_2012_Question Paper.pdfUploaded byprk74
- 1031_Slice Forces and Moments in SolidsUploaded byTamara Knox
- Sample Problems in Pre-Stressed Concrete.pdfUploaded byRafael Santiago
- 3 Restrained Beams - 2012Uploaded byMelinda Gordon
- 13-05 Strength of Materials (MN & in)Uploaded byAnahira Lice
- 18 Indeterminate BeamUploaded byamgad13
- Group4_ProblemSet1Uploaded byMatthew Carandang
- Robustness ExerciseUploaded byalexrodriguezabc
- Part3 Ch-3 One Way and Continuous BeamsUploaded byjust me
- 14.2042015Assignment12SolutionUploaded byReno Rindyantono
- NBR6118EUROCOD-ConstruindoUploaded byKléver Gonçalves
- fix dimensi 2.pdfUploaded byDian
- CE132P - Det IndetUploaded byJanssen Alejo
- CE UG S3 IT2 - 13CE302 21-9-2015 (1)Uploaded byrameshbabu_1979
- Civil Lect 5 - 2015Uploaded byAbdelhay Mohamed Hassan
- Civil_Lect_5_-_2015Uploaded byahmed ramadan

- 3D FEA of Shot Peening Process for Simulation and Research on Shot Peenig Process ParametersUploaded byzebra00
- 11-7677 Wp Depg FinalUploaded byStefano Ramsingh
- CRE Assignment - 1Uploaded byRishikesh
- Question 6 Pt3 2017Uploaded bynoraini
- CAT I - EMMU 7241 - Machine Tool Vibrations and Cutting Dynamics-Marking Scheme.docxUploaded byCharles Ondieki
- Thesis ProjectUploaded byRahul Mahajan
- Heat-Radiation-From-FlaresUploaded byAman Goel
- CBD_Effect of PhUploaded bySagar Anwar
- Ductile to Brittle TransitionUploaded byTushar Saini
- Devlin Complete ConceptsUploaded bysgadde321
- 20101209120114 b e Mba Mechanical Engineering 3rd to 6th Semester 2010 2011Uploaded bycoolrathee
- Gas -Liquid Mixing Impeller of New GenerationUploaded byscranderi
- Metals AbbreviationsUploaded byAnonymous TjdHCu
- Goldstein_31_32_7Uploaded byDijana Tolić
- 9701_s02_qp_1.pdfUploaded byMazlin
- Perrins Purification ShortUploaded byGaveUpOnTV
- art 2.pdfUploaded byJairArmandoGomezPerez
- MOS CapacitorUploaded bydebashis1987
- Dispersible Tablet FormulationUploaded bygoutam5
- Developing an Efficacious Diclofenac Diethylamine Transdermal Formulation.pdfUploaded bymariohuang
- 321 Hartie Creponata Weidmann 4Uploaded byhiren_mistry55
- Novel Polyether Polyols for Automotive SeatingUploaded byA Mahmood
- Chemical students presentation.docxUploaded byManpreetSaran
- STUDY OF NOISE GENERATED BY SINGLE CYLINDER TWO STROKE PETROL ENGINE (SONAL ZAKHMI).pdfUploaded bynksiavash
- Oil Immersed Transformer MaintenanceUploaded byNovancy
- Mass transfer project 1.pdfUploaded bywasie kebire
- A Study on Use of Waste Material in High Strength ConcreteUploaded byIJRASETPublications
- ASIGN_1_(DE-12-ME-014)Uploaded byNITESH JHA
- Chemistry - Unit2Uploaded bySonal Perera
- Vibrating Plate 2D Viscous Flow 53Uploaded byAteeq Ur Rehman