CACHE Modules on Energy in the Curriculum Fuel Cells Module 4 (Final Draft): Generation of Electricity Using Recovered Hydrogen

Module Author: David Allen Author Affiliation: University of Texas at Austin Module Secondary Author: Valarie Thomas Author Affiliation: University of Michigan Course: Mass and Energy Balances Text Reference: Section 4.7 of Felder and Rousseau, 2nd ed. (Combustion Reactions) Concepts: Energy (balance) required to generate electricity using hydrogen as a fuel supplement in a fuel cell is compared to that required when using the combustion heat energy of natural gas in a power plant. In addition, efficiencies of these 2 differing methods at generating electricity are compared. Background/Introduction A number of chemical manufacturing reactions produce hydrogen as a co-product. For example, in a chloro-alkali facility, sodium hydroxide and molecular chlorine are produced from salt water along with hydrogen as a co-product:
electrolysis

2NaCl + 2H2O
pyrolysis

Cl2 + 2NaOH + H2

In ethylene production from ethane, hydrogen is also a co-product. CH3-CH3 CH2=CH2 + H2

At some of these facilities, excess hydrogen not used in other chemical manufacturing processes is used as a fuel supplement. Customarily hydrogen is utilized as a fuel supplement by converting the heat energy released from its combustion into electricity. Alternatively, hydrogen can be used as a fuel supplement by feeding it to a fuel cell, an energy conversion device that electrochemically generates electricity. A fuel cell consists of an anode and cathode, separated by an electrolyte. Hydrogen is fed to the anode and oxygen to the cathode. A diagram showing the operation of a typical polymer-electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell is shown below:

1
(revised by Valarie Thomas, U of MI) 6/13/2011

S. oxygen that has been catalytically reduced reacts with protons from the electrolyte and electrons from the external circuit to form the reaction products water and heat. completely convert the chemical energy of hydrogen into electricity. (U. Example Problem The overall reaction occurring in the fuel cell is: H2 + 0.energy. http://www.65 * 104 Coulombs of charge (Faraday’s constant).gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/fuelcells/) The overall reaction in the fuel cell produces water and heat. Department of Energy.Figure 1. For this problem.5 O2  H2O The maximum amount of electrical energy that can be generated by a fuel cell can be determined from the ion (proton) flow. A coulomb/sec is an ampere (1 amp of current). hydrogen is catalytically dissociated into protons and electrons.eere. In the cathode. A comparison of how effective the two different methods are at utilizing hydrogen as a fuel supplement can be made by calculating the overall energy efficiencies of processes. the flow of protons through the electrolyte and electrons in an external circuit. efficiency is defined as the ratio of electrical energy actually obtained to the energy input. the conversion of hydrogen’s chemical energy into mechanical work is limited by the laws of thermodynamics. The electrons leave the anode via an external circuit and re-enters the fuel cell via the cathode. in principle. 2 (revised by Valarie Thomas. a fuel cell can. In contrast. U of MI) 6/13/2011 . For combustion. Every mole of molecular hydrogen (H 2) fed to a fuel cell has the potential to generate two moles of electrons at the anode. In the anode. Every mole of electrons carries 9. PEM fuel cell.

) The ideal current generated from 10.6 mol/sec) * (2 electrons/mole)* 9. d. then the power is 320 * 106 A*V (320 MW).6 mol/sec The current carried by that number of moles of hydrogen is determined by multiplying the molar flow by Faraday’s constant accounting for the fact that every mole of molecular hydrogen generates 2 electrons: (5 x 103/3.) If the fuel cell operates at 50% efficiency. what heat would have been provided (in BTU/hr)? Assume the heat of combustion is 61.) If the 10.000 kg of hydrogen fed to a PEM fuel cell in an hour is calculated by first converting the mass flow to molar flow per second: (10.) Calculate the net energy used producing electrical power with the fuel cell as opposed to combusted natural gas at a power plant (energy content of the natural gas that would be used at the power plant – heat of combustion that would have been liberated if hydrogen had been combusted at a power plant).000 kg/hr) * (1000g/kg) *(1 mole/2g) * (1 hr/3600 sec) = 5 x 103/3.2 V. c.65 x 108)/ 3.) If the fuel cell operates at 50% efficiency. b.6 coulomb/sec (A= amp) = 270 MA If the power is the product of the current and voltage (I*V) and the current is generated at 1.000 kilogram/hr.) Assume that the fuel cell generates electricity at a voltage of 1.5*320 MW) of power would be provided. b.000 kilograms/hr of hydrogen were fed to the fuel cell? c.) If the same amount of electricity in part b) had been generated by a power plant burning natural gas (with an efficiency of 35% in converting the heat of combustion of the natural gas into electricity). 160 MW (0.) To yield 160 MW of electrical energy (the same as that from the fuel cell) from a thermoelectric conversion process converting the heat of combustion of natural gas to electricity at 35% efficiency. the energy input would have been: 3 (revised by Valarie Thomas. how much natural gas would have been used (in kg/hr and in BTU/hr)? Assume that the heating value of natural gas is 1000 BTU/scf.2 V. Solution to Example Problem a. a.000 kg/hr of hydrogen had been used as a combustion fuel.65 * 104 Coulombs/mole = (9. how much power could be generated if 10. U of MI) 6/13/2011 .The power generated by 1 amp of current depends on the voltage (V) at which the current is generated (P=I*V).000 BTU/lb. Calculate the ideal electrical power (in MW) that would be generated by the fuel cell if fed hydrogen at a rate of 10. e.

1570 x 106 BTU/hr of heat energy would be needed from the combustion of natural gas. Thus.000kg/hr of recovered hydrogen would have been combusted to generate 1340 x 106 BTU/hr of heat energy.3 L/ft3 * 1 mole/22. e. And.35 x (total thermal power available) or 460 MW total thermal power was available.57 * 106 scf natural gas * 28.160 MW= 0. an energy savings. the 10.016 kg/mole = 32000 kg/hr of natural gas would be used to generate the same electrical power as the fuel cell d.000 BTU/lb = 1340*106 BTU/hr heat of combustion would be liberated per hr if that mass flowrate of molecular hydrogen was combusted.4 L * . Converting to BTU/hr: 460 MW * (3.) The energy balance of producing electrical energy changes when a fuel cell is used.) If the heat of combustion of hydrogen is assumed to be 61. This total thermal power must be converted to the equivalent heat of combustion in order to determine the amount of natural gas required for the 160 MW electrical energy yield.000 BTU/lb then the heat generated from the combustion of the molecular hydrogen mass flowrate of 10.2 lb/kg * 61. using a fuel cell to produce electricity from hydrogen by-product gas in a chloro-alkali or ethylene manufacturing facility increases the efficiency of generating electrical power by 15%. 4 (revised by Valarie Thomas. using the ideal gas law: 1. the use of the fuel cell to electrochemically oxidize hydrogen rather than combust natural gas to generate electrical power causes a net energy change of (1570 x 106 BTU/hr of avoided thermal energy from natural gas use – 1340 x 106 BTU/hr of thermal energy that is fed to the fuel cell rather than combusted) = 230 x 106 BTU/hr. (230* 106 BTU/hr)/ (1570 x 106 BTU/hr). Thus.000 kg/hr would be: 10. Normally to produce the electrical energy generated by the fuel cell.57 * 106 scf/hr natural gas Converting this to a mass flow rate.415 BTU/hr per watt) = 1570 *106 BTU/hr of heat of combustion required from natural gas to generate the same electrical power as the fuel cell This will require the following volume of natural gas: 1570 *106 BTU/hr * 1000 BTU/scf of natural gas = 1. U of MI) 6/13/2011 .000 kg/hr * 2.

however now assume that the natural gas power plant is 40% efficient.Problem Statement 1. With these assumptions. Carbon dioxide is a known greenhouse gas. 3. and some facilities are attempting to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide. what is the improvement in energy efficiency due to using the fuel cell? Assume that the power plant is 40% efficient. If the fuel cell efficiency is 80%. What percentage change in carbon dioxide emissions results from the scenario described in the sample problem? 5 (revised by Valarie Thomas.) – e. does using the fuel cell increase overall energy efficiency? 2. In a subsequent module in this series on fuel cells (Module 7) you will calculate that the thermodynamic limit to fuel cell efficiency is approximately 80% for some types of fuel cells. Repeat parts a. U of MI) 6/13/2011 .) above.

energy.dow.com/commitments/studies/fuelcell/press.dow.htm Fuel cell trailer at the Dow Freeport facility From: http://www. This partnership is described in the attached press release. which can also be found at the Dow web site: http://www.com/dow_news/corporate/2003/20030507c. in partnership with General Motors Corporation is demonstrating the use of hydrogen fuel cells in generating electricity from by-product hydrogen in chemical manufacturing operations.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/fuelcells/ Information on the use of fuel cells to generate electricity from chemical by-products: Dow Chemical Company.eere. U of MI) 6/13/2011 .Description of the Module: Resources: Basic background information on fuel cells is available at a Department of Energy web site: http://www.htm?filepath=&fromPage=BasicSearch 6 (revised by Valarie Thomas.

Fuel cell trailer at the Dow Freeport facility From: http://www.htm?filepath=&fromPage=BasicSearch Notes to Instructor: The time required to read the problem and perform the problem should be under 1 hour.com/commitments/studies/fuelcell/press. determining whether the 50% efficiency used in the problem is an appropriate value. 7 (revised by Valarie Thomas. If the students are also required to visit the web sites and learn the basics of fuel cells prior to completing the problem. 2 hours would be required. The students will discover that higher efficiencies may be possible. or by having the students perform Module 7 in this series.dow. The problem could be expanded by asking students to research fuel cell efficiencies. U of MI) 6/13/2011 . particularly if waste heat is recovered from the fuel cell.

U of MI) 6/13/2011 .8 (revised by Valarie Thomas.

U of MI) 6/13/2011 .9 (revised by Valarie Thomas.