ISOLATOR COMMENTS

1. Break up of 356kg static terminal load during Mechanical Endurance Type test is asked. 2. Make to be specified for all equipment, specially for motor in DRG No. . 3. Separate designation for Earth Switch operation handle. 4. Send Hardcopy in A1/A2 size of all drawings for approval. 5. Change designation for NC/NO & include it in the Legends. 6. Reversal of common phase(Y & B) for master and follower side. 7. Local/Remote Switch Design to be clear. 8. Master/Individual mode designation to be made clear. 9. Clearly indicate on the drawing Y-pole as master drive and R & B as follower drive. 10. Auxiliary switch make and type should be same in type test report & in drawing. 11. Send drawings for H.V. test for offered equipment. 12. Stopper to be indicated in General Arrangement drawing of follower and master drive.

Comments on DPR of ARUN-III HEP(4X225 MW) Comments on drawings
Switchyard Layout Drawing (Drg. no. ARUN-3/WAP-E-09):A. General: 1. 27m Bay width indicated in the drawing needs to be reviewed to optimize the space requirement of Switchyard. 2. Selection criteria for (Centre break/Double Break) isolator based on techno-economic feasibility. 3. Symbols for isolator with earth-switch on one side/two side is not correctly indicated in the drawing and also not matching with legend. 4. Symbol for Pantograph type isolator may be incorporated in the legend given in the drawings. 5. Equipments numbering to be provided in the drawing. 6. Correlation of SLD and Switchyard drawings to be insured. 7. Section D-D to be provided for reactor bay. B. Incoming Bay: y Isolator at point of entry in this bay needs to be reviewed in line with SLD (Drg. no. ARUN-3/WAP-E-08). y Incoming Bay no. needs to be specified in the drawing. C. Reactor Bay: y Please clarify that whether CT-R1 is bushing type or an independent CT. y LA to be located near to reactor bushing. y Earth Switch located near to LA has not been indicated in this drawing. y CT located between LA & isolator is not appearing in SLD (Drg. no. ARUN-3/WAP-E-08 ) & needs to be reviewed. D. Bus-Coupler Bay: y Earth switches are not indicated in the drawing & may be corrected & shown suitably.

Switchyard Section Drawing (ARUN-3/WAP-E-10):A. Incoming Bay: y CT shown between incoming isolator & bypass isolator is not provided in the SLD (Drg. no. ARUN-3/WAP-E-08) & needs a review. B. Outgoing Bay: y LA shown in SLD (Drg. No. ARUN-3/WAP-E-08 ) between bypass isolator & CT-20 is not appearing in this drawing. The requirement of LA at this location needs a review as commented in the observations for SLD. C. Reactor Bay: Section view of reactor bay is missing & needs to be incorporated in this drawing.

Comments on DPR of Dhaulasidh HEP(2X33 MW) Comments on drawings
Power House 132kV Switchyard Area Layout (Drg. no. 1254-EM-03):A. General: 1. Only 2 nos. of Bus-selector isolator has been used for 4 nos. of Bays (Incoming & Outgoing). It needs to be reviewed and corrected. 2. Bay width for Bay having lines from UNIT-1, Bay from where 132kV outgoing feeder is emanating and Bus coupler bay has been chosen 16000mm spacing and not 12800mm. It needs to be reviewed to minimize the overall reduction in the switchyard area. Further the bay width of 12800mm to be reviewed according to CBIP guidelines for substation design. 3. Minimum clearances table to be provided clearing indicating phasephase clearance, phase-earth clearance, sectional clearance, ground clearance and plinth level for 132kV substation. 4. Equipment to equipment spacing is to be provided in the drawing. 5. System parameters, like Nominal Voltage, Highest System voltage, Lightning Impulse Withstand voltage etc. 6. Isolator with Earth switches are not indicated in the drawing & may be corrected & shown suitably. 7. Equipments/Structure numbering to incorporated in the drawings. B. Incoming Bays(from Unit-1 & Unit-2): 1. Symbols for CT and CB to be corrected in R-Phase of lines coming from Unit-2. C. Outgoing Bays(to 132kV Line feeders 1 & 2): 1. CVT should be in all 3-phases of both feeders. 2. Wave Trap has not been indicated in feeders. It should be shown in the feeders in line with SLD (Drg. No. 1254-EM-01 ). 3. Symbols for CT and CB to be corrected in R-Phase of 132kV feeder-2. 4. Position of isolator & CT in both feeders is not in line with SLD (Drg. No. 1254-EM-01). It should be corrected.

5. Insulator string has not been shown in both feeder at beams located at a distance of 27.4m and 40.2m from the fence in the Incoming Bay side.

D. Bus-Coupler Bay: 1. CT under the gantry beam is not clear. E. Bus-Bar: 1. Insulator strings at the gantry beams common for both feeder 1 & 2 (Outgoing or Incoming) should be clearly drawn.

Power House Switchyard Area Sections (Drg. no. 1254-EM-04):A. General: 1. All general comments for Switchyard Layout (Drg. no. 1254EM-03) should be considered for this drawing also. 2. Since this drawing is sectional representation of switchyard layout (Drg. no. 1254-EM-03), it should have a complete match. 3. This drawing need not have a legend. Although legend given has no correlation with this drawing. B. Section-1 1. Insulators used (Suspension or Tension) in switchyard layout (Drg. no. 1254-EM-03) same should be reflected in the section view. 2. Symbol for insulator at STR, supporting lines from generator -transformer side is to be corrected. 3. Connection to CT in the generator-transformer side is not in line with switchyard layout (Drg. no. 1254-EM-03).

4. Connection support for CB in this drawing has been provided by suspension insulator while in switchyard layout (Drg. no. 1254-EM-03) it has been shown for a tension type insulator. It should same in both. 5. Symbol for insulator used in between GANTRY supporting 132kV Bus -II is to be corrected. 6. Wave Traps to be shown in the sections as commented before. 7. Connections for 132kV line feeder are not clear in this drawing. 8. Bus selector isolator symbol should be identical. 9. Phase to phase spacing in both 132kV Bus -I and Bus-II should be same in the drawing. 10. Clearance between phase and neutral (both generator-transformer side and 132kV line feeder side) should be same.

C. Section-2 1. There is no live connection to the phases between gantries (One located at a distance of 14.6m and other at 27.4m). It should be connected and properly shown in the drawing. 2. It should be reviewed for the need of post insulator support for wires emanating from isolators. 3. Connections to 132kV BUS-I Should be made through the use of suspension type insulator.

Comments on Write up DC Supply System 1. AH Rating of proposed 220V battery & 48V DC battery bank has not been indicated & needs to be sized optimally. Supporting calculation for DC battery system needs to be submitted. 2. It may be reviewed to opt for two sets of 220V DC battery bank inside the power house and two sets of 220V DC battery bank for switchyard. For other voltage requirement suitable DC/DC converters can be used for both locations. For Dam site also suitable arrangement for DC power needs to be proposed in DPR. 14.8 400kV Switchyard

1. The write up given under this clause include the double bus bar arrangement, however, the scheme proposed in the drawing indicate double bus bar with by-pass isolator arrangement. This needs to be verified & corrected. 2. The basis for selection criteria for switching scheme considering technoeconomic benefit may also be provided for Arun -III project.

S.No. Comments on Wind Load calculation 1. a. As specified in Technical specification wind load calculation has to be carried out for design wind pressure 195Kgf/m2. b. Design wind speed for above said comes out to be 56.45 m/s. (Refer IS-802, Part-I, page-4). Unit Wind load on Aluminum Conductor: Formula to be used Wf= C.C d .Kz. Gf.Vd2 .I.(Di + 2ri) (Refer IEEE-605-1998 , page-14) After Calculation it has to be multiplied by total length of conductor used both side of the isolator divided by two. Unit Wind load on Contact Arm: Formula to be used Wf= C.C d .Kz. Gf.Vd2 .I.(Di + 2ri) (Refer IEEE-605-1998 , page-14) After Calculation it has to be multiplied by length of contact arm. Wind Force on Insulator: Formula Used is correct. (Refer IEEE-605-1998 , page-27). Value of constant C to be used is 2.132 X 10 -4 . 5. Value of Constants C = 2.132 X 10 -4 Cd = 1 Kz = 1 Gf = 0.85(Exposure Type C) I = 1.15 (Refer IEEE-605-1998 , page-14,15)

2

3.

4.

Comments on DPR of Jakhol Sankari HEP (2X25.5 MW) Comments on drawings
Layout Plan of 220kV Pot Head Yard (Drg. no. 06208-H-20340-X01):General: a. The arrangement provided in Pot Head Yard for spare cable bus bar needs to be reviewed viz-a-viz provision made of such type if any at GIS end. Preliminary it is understood that for any fault in cable, the time for restoration shall also depend upon replacement of cable at GIS end. b. Bay width of 18000mm needs to be reviewed to minimize the overall space requirment according to CBIP guidelines for substation design.

PLAN: a. The purpose for control room in Pot Head Yard area needs to be specified. b. The plan view of spare cable bus bar indicated here does not match with that of indicated in section at C-C. c. String Insulator shown towards spare cable bus bar is not in line with the section at B-B. d. The maximum fault level of 31.5kA for 1 sec needs to be verified in system study and also reviewed in line with data given for Naitwar Mori HEP. Section at A-A: a. The purpose of providing hatched area below NSL (Natural Surface Level) is not clear. You are requested to indicate clearly what this hatched area meant for & its purpose. Section at B-B: a. In the drawing the connections with transmission line have been indicated at the peak rather than gantry beam. This needs to be corrected.

b. Elevation level of various benches to be indicated. Section at C-C: a. An additional PotHead has been used here. It should be made clear that what similar arrangement has been made in the GIS .

DC Battery System
1. Supporting documents for selecting the AH rating of DC battery needs to be submitted. It is to be mentioned that for a s imilar DC power requirements 600AH battery rating has been selected for Naitwar Mori HEP. 2. Lead Acid type DC battery has been selected. Criteria for selection of the same needs to be submitted. 3. Provision for DC to DC converter (220V to 48V/24V) needs to be provided in the DC Distribution Board. 4. Suitably rated DC system comprising of DC batteries, battery charger, DCDB etc. shall be provided at the barrage site to meet the DC requirement of various systems installed at the barrage viz. communication, data transmission, indication and control etc. 5.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful