JERSEY CITY:
FROM A SKATE PARK TO THE WORLD:
A CULTURAL CORRIDOR THROUGH DOWNTOWN AND JOURNAL SQUARE
Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Jersey City has an unparalleled opportunity for developing park space and cultural amenities in a two-mile corridor running from the Powerhouse Arts District in the East, along the Sixth Street Embankment to the Palisades, then along the East face the Bergen Hill to the Bergen Tunnel, and west through the Erie Cut-Bergen Arches to JFK Boulevard. What is unique about this strategy is that it builds on both abandoned railroad properties and on Jersey Citys status as a center for graffiti art of the highest caliber. By capitalizing on its graffiti heritage, Jersey City can attract tourists from around the world and establish itself as an international center of cutting-edge art. This development strategy includes three park-garden areas: 1) Sixth Street Embankment, 2) Bergen Hill Walk, and 3) Erie Cut. At full development the Erie Cut would have a series of small gardens in various national styles Indian, Chinese, Spanish, etc. and a conservatory linking the bottom of the cut to the street-level surface (Route 139). There would also be two modest museum complexes: 1) a graffiti museum at 12th and Monmouth, and 2) a railroad museum nearby at the Bergen Tunnel. These complexes would include restaurants and shops. A thumbnail calculation indicates that these developments could bring new tourist revenue to the city in the amount $36 to $90 million (or more) annually. Other benefits include increased property values along the corridor and new businesses.
ADDENDUM: 2013
When I originally prepared this report late in 2007 I did so mostly out of a desire to put the pieces together. I knew that if this plan were realized, the world would respond; that is, I constructed the plan to match the needs of the larger world. But, given the realities of Jersey City political and civil life, I did not think there was much chance that it would be taken seriously in Jersey City. I did however show it to a number of people, many of them life-long residences of Jersey City, and these people liked it, while at the same time feeling, as I did, that there was little chance of Jersey City undertaking such a set of projects. A couple of years ago I placed the report online, at Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/doc/58300722/Jersey-City-From-a-Skate-Park-to-the-World It has been read by almost 1000 people to date. Of course, I have no idea who these people are. But I have reason to believe that many of them live in Jersey City. On August 1, 2011 I placed a link to that report on JCList, where it has generated mixed response, as one would expect: http://tinyurl.com/n7oo7a9 Things have now changed, for the better. While the skate park that was being planned late in 2007 never materialized, the City now intends to build a skate park in the new Berry Lane Park. More importantly, I now give the project a 15 percent chance of completion. That 15% is just a number; theres nothing rigorous about it. Thats not high, but its better than it had late in 2007. I see that three developments that make the project more likely: 1) Steve Fulop was elected mayor, 2) the High Line is being constructed in Manhattan, and 3) Mana Contemporary has opened in
Page 2
Jersey City. I figure each of those factors independently accounts for 5% of the proposals increased likelihood. In the first place, the election of Steve Fulop and his team to head city government indicates that things are changing in Jersey City. Fulops victory signals a major shift in the electorate. A LOT of people had to change their minds to make that take place. In the second place, New York Citys High Line is now recognized as a success. It didnt exist when I sketched this plan. If Chicagos Millennium Park is the first important new urban space built in the United States in this new millennium, then the High Line is the second important space. This proposal is similar to the High Line in many respects, but quite different, and unique to Jersey City, in other respects. The world has thus validated one aspect of my proposal. Finally, Mana Contemporary has arrived on the scene. Mana Contemporary is a multi-purpose arts complex located in the Journal Square area of Jersey City. It has mounted major exhibitions of the caliber of art that will draw people to Jersey City from New York City and ultimately from out of town. As explained in a recent New York Times article http://tinyurl.com/kzkppdf Mana Contemporary is drawing people to Jersey City who ordinarily would not visit here, though not yet in significant numbers. The founders believe that Mana Contemporary will be so successful that they plan to build a hotel at the site. That hotel will be only five or six blocks from the location Id slated for a hotel in this plan. That will, of course, increase property values in the Journal Square area and draw-in new businesses. It will make the proposals in this report more plausible. At the same time, the proposed cultural corridor will draw more people to the city and funnel them directly to Mana Contemporary, thereby increasing the number of visitors and thus the value of their investment.
Page 3
Jersey City though Ive provided an appendix that lists links to my online writing about Jersey Citys graffiti. For the moment I want to proceed on the assumption that graffiti is globally significant and will become more so in the future. Given that, Jersey City has an important role to play in this development, one that will foster development in a way that enhances quality of life. I view these proposals as an elaboration of the recommendation made by the Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy for the adaptive reuse of the Bergen Arches and Erie Cut as open space, connecting with the Sixth Street Embankment as a connector for the East Coast Greenway. In addition, I propose that we permit graffiti painting in the Arches and under the thruway behind Enos Jones park, where it already exists, and that we consider developing both a graffiti museum and a modest railroad museum, along with other enhancements and amenities. Though I have made no attempt to estimate the costs of these various projects, my sense is that the full development would be comparable the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, at roughly $230 million, and Millennium Park in Chicago, roughly $475 million, both of which have proven well-worth the municipal investment. Both of those projects, however, were all-or-none ventures. Once the decision had been made to proceed, it became necessary to go all the way. The concept I outline in this document is quite different. It consists of a suite of loosely linked projects of varying scope and expense. One can pick and choose which to implement, and the implementation order is relatively flexible. It is thus a strategy that readily allows for growth and adjustment over the course of a decade or more. ***** Ive organized this document as follows: First I review skate park that Councilman Fulop had proposed in 2007. Thats what got me thinking about larger issues. After that I have a satellite map (courtesy of Google Earth) of the potential development sites. I then outline possible lines of development in order from the East to the West. Finally I offer some observations about economic returns and I conclude with a suggestion for a grand opening celebration in 2020.
Page 5
I note that Ceaze (upper right) has painted all over the country and in Japan. Possible site of proposed park:
Page 6
The triceratops is roughly 7 feet high and 18 feet wide. It was painted by Japan Joe, who also has a piece at the old chocolate factory and two pieces under the bridges beyond the western end of the Erie Cut. Photographs, old skate park: http://flickr.com/photos/stc4blues/sets/72157601065037735/ Proposed site for new park:
http://flickr.com/photos/stc4blues/sets/72157603272569024/
Page 7
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Sixth Street embankment. Proposed skate park: 7th & Newark Bergen Hill Walk Railroad Museum, Restaurant Graffiti Museum & studios Erie Cut Bergen Arches, plus 139 at the surface Meadowlands Gateway
A straight-line path from the eastern end of the embankment to the Bergen Hill, then North to the Erie Cut, and then West through the cut is about two miles long.
Page 8
Page 9
The stanchions supporting the 12th and 14th Street viaducts are richly painted in graffiti starting parallel to 9th street and continuing through to the Bergen Tunnel. Graffiti painting should be made legal at these sites. The major issue concerns the active CSX (was Conrail) line through this area. The line needs to be fenced off in a way that is effective, but does not impede access to the grounds and to the graffiti at the base of the supporting stanchions of the thruway viaducts. Photographs, Bergen Hill Walk:
http://flickr.com/photos/stc4blues/sets/72157603280812542/
significant FIRST, one that would reverberate internationally through the world-wide graffiti community, related areas of design, and through the art world in general.
(As a side note, I observe that the Liberty Science Center has an interactive graffiti exhibit in which people can write digital graffiti on digital walls.)
The abandoned industrial building at 12th and Monmouth would be an appropriate site for a graffiti museum. Though Ive not been inside the building, I have been told that there is some excellent graffiti on its walls. Much of the tagging on the outside is new. Thus it is historically appropriate that this building be used as a graffiti museum. The museum should team-up with Susan Farrell, a graffiti expert who has developed the oldest and most extensive graffiti site on the web. Together they could work with Google to develop strategies for visually searching online images, not only to identify graffiti, but specific kinds of graffiti. Thus the museum could become home to the most sophisticated online archive of graffiti world-wide. The location is readily accessible by car and area behind the building could be used for parking. It is less than a mile from the Newport-Pavonia PATH station. I do not know whether or not the building has a basement, but it appears to have four floors above ground. The building's exterior footprint measures roughly 177 ft. by 127 ft. That means each floor is over 20,000 sq. ft. for a total of well over 80,000 sq. ft. on four floors. Perhaps half the building should be used for the graffiti museum and the other half for appropriate rent generating purposes, such as artist studios, recording studios, video and film studios, etc. Alternatively, the museum might want to share the building with the Dia Foundation, which specializes in large-scale contemporary art, the kind of work that is difficult to display because it is so large. Their major location is in a renovated Nabisco factory in Westchester County in the town of Beacon, New York. They recently abandoned plans to create gallery space in Manhattan near the High Line, leaving them without permanent display space in New York City. They might well consider locating in Jersey City in the context of the kind of programs proposed in this document. Photographs, building at 12th and Monmouth:
http://flickr.com/photos/stc4blues/sets/72157603244723176/
Page 11
Beyond this, I note that one railroad track remains in the cut. This could be removed or be left in place to be used as a planter for flowers, grasses, herbs, and small bushes. The most basic level of development makes the cut more accessible, but little more. This requires creating access at the two ends of the cut and at one or more points between. Roughly half way through the cut, at Central and Hoboken, one finds the abandoned building of Cortes & Co., which manufactured sausages. A wedge-shaped segment of the building extends over the cut. This is a logical place to situate some kind of vertical access into the cut. It would also be an appropriate location for a small restaurant and-or small shops. There is also ground level parking at this location. A more elaborate level of development takes its cue from the fact that Jersey City is increasingly a city of immigrants, many from the Middle and Far East. I propose that modest plots
Page 12
throughout the cut be used to create gardens in the styles of various nations contributing citizens to Jersey City. The gardens could be designed in conjunction with experts from the contributing nations, which might also contribute funds for the initial design and creation of the gardens. While the City would ultimately be responsible for the gardens, it should explore the possibility of having them maintained by garden clubs, thus creating direct citizen participation in the care of this park. There is, however, a conspicuous problem with this suggestion: many people emigrate to Jersey City from tropical and semi-tropical climates. Many characteristic plant species native to those climates would not survive in the cut. This problem could be addressed by enclosing part of the cut to create a climate-controlled conservatory. For example, the segment (roughly) between Summit Ave. and Bevan Ave. could be enclosed, with the enclosure to include one or both of the short tunnels at the ends of this segment. The enclosed section would be a bit less than the size of an American football field. Such a conservatory enclosure would, of course, be a structure at the ground level, above the floor of the cut, and thus contribute directly to the development of the Journal Square neighborhood and to the adjacent area of the Heights. The center of this structure would be roughly 740 feet north of Five Corners. While this conservatory might be a relatively expensive project, both to construct and to maintain, it is also an opportunity for Jersey City to construct a unique building of international distinction think of, for example, the glass pyramid that I. M. Pei designed as the new entrance to the Louvre, in Paris. However, the decision and consequent financial commitment to construct the conservatory need not be made at the beginning. It can easily be delayed while other aspects of this strategy have time to prove-out in practice. Finally, I note that while these development projects would take place below ground level, they would have significant impact at the surface-level. The cut parallels Route 139, which currently is a conduit. It moves traffic east and west across the Palisades and traffic moves across it going north or south. There are no destinations along 139 that draw people to them. That will change once access points are established so that people can enter and exit the cut along 139. The conservatory would itself be a major destination and would draw vehicle and pedestrian traffic to the western half of the cut. This suggests, in turn, that an opportunity might well emerge for a private developer to build a hotel or hotel-condominium complex at the western end of the cut near Kennedy Boulevard. It could be built at the edge the cut with access directly down into the cut. With the Journal Square PATH station less than a mile away, such a complex would contribute to the revitalization of that area. About Peis pyramid:
http://www.greatbuildings.com/buildings/Pyramide_du_Louvre.html
route to somewhere else. The southern edge of 139 borders directly on the cut, through there are significant bridging structures across the cut. Specifically, there is an area 500 feet wide roughly between Oakland and Central; this area is currently a parking lot (which, presumably, serves the courthouse and related buildings a few blocks away). The northern edge of the cut borders on the Heights and contains housing, small businesses, and abandoned buildings. It is not at all obvious how this area would be affected by the development of the cut; but it would certainly be affected. Zoning should be adopted to protect the areas immediately bordering on the cut from the creation of structures that would destroy the ambience down in the cut. Beyond this, I note only that development in this area should complement the international flavor of the gardens in the cut. Given the presence of significant immigrant populations living in this area (e.g. Little India), this should not be difficult to achieve. Finally, I suggest that a program of colorful banners and planters along 139 would brighten-up the area, lending it a festive air, and yet cost relatively little. Photographs, 139 survey:
http://flickr.com/photos/stc4blues/sets/72157603253508080/
MEADOWLANDS GATEWAY
Finally, we need to think about possible lines of development for the land just beyond the western end of the Erie Cut, north of St. Peters Cemetery and south of North American Plywood. I have only one specific suggestion, but I simply want to note that, in the context of these other projects, that land will become valuable. We should begin thinking about how to develop it appropriately. My specific suggestion is but one example of what could be done at this site. This area could be used as an outdoor sculpture garden, perhaps by Dia Foundation (see the discussion of the graffiti museum on page 11), or perhaps by another foundation or museum. I am intrigued by the possibility of commissioning someone like Richard Serra or Maya Lin to create a large work here that is designed to accept graffiti. Such a collaboration, could it be arranged, would be stunning and would itself attract visitors to Jersey City and further establish the citys reputation as a center for cutting-edge art. Photographs of the gateway:
http://flickr.com/photos/stc4blues/sets/72157603280660058/
Maya Lin:
http://www.earlywomenmasters.net/lin/index.html
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
In addition to the quality of life benefits these projects would afford the citizens of Jersey City, the net effect of them would be to transform Jersey City into a premier international tourist destination. While it is difficult to estimate the income from such tourism, it is instructive to consider two comparison cases: the Guggenheim museum in Bilbao, and Millennium Park in
Page 14
Chicago. Both of these developments have been very successful. As I indicated in the introduction, the former cost $230 million and the latter, $470 million. The Guggenheim museum transformed a small industrial city, with a population of 350,000, into a major international tourist destination. It has generated an average of 779,028 new overnight stays per year since the museum opened and earns almost $40 million a year for the Basque treasury. Chicagos Millennium Park has increased property values, attracted new businesses, attracted retirees (to its accessible and mostly free programming), and has attracted new tourists and Chicago was already a premier tourist destination. The park attracted 2 million people within the first six months after it opened, with the average international visitor spending $300 per day and over-night domestic visitors spending $150 per day. These two cases are quite different from one another, yet both are clear examples of the economic benefit of well-planned cultural venues. Jersey City is different from either of those cases. It is similar in population to Bilbao, but its close proximity to New York puts it in a very large population center with a strong tourist business. Further, the suite of programs Ive outlined is unlike either the museum in Bilbao or the 24-acre park in Chicago, but, with two museums and three park-garden spaces, combines elements of both. Thus it is difficult to generalize from those cases to that of Jersey City. Further, we need to take into account the graffiti effect. Graffiti is an international phenomenon, especially among the young, but not exclusively so. A destination that legitimizes graffiti in the ways outlined here would thus have tremendous appeal to an international population, one that will grow in the future. Jersey City thus has a unique one-time opportunity to capitalize on an unrecognized cultural asset and establish itself as an international destination. With these factors in mind, I have prepared a crude estimate of potential tourist revenues. Using the Chicago figures of $300 per day for international overnight stays and $150 for domestic stays, I have added a third figure of $50 per day for day visitors. I have then calculated gross annual revenues assuming, respectively, 50, 100, 200, and 500 visitors per day in each category (for a total of 150, 300, 600, and 1500 visitors per day). Note that even 1500 visitors per day is only 500,000+ per year, which is less than the number of people who visit Guggenheim Bilbao. The table below shows the resulting tourism revenue:
50/day international overnight domestic overnight day trip TOTAL Annual Gross Revenue $300 $150 $50 $5,400,000 $2,700,000 $900,000 $9,000,000 100/day $10,800,000 $5,400,000 $1,800,000 $18,000,000 200/day $21,600,000 $10,800,000 $3,600,000 $36,000,000 500/day $54,000,000 $27,000,000 $9,000,000 $90,000,000
Crude as it is, this estimate doesnt take account of increases in real estate values, nor new businesses attracted; thus it does not even begin to represent the potential economic benefits of these projects. Beatriz Plaza, The Bilbao Effect, Museum News, September/October 2007, 13-15, 68.
http://www.scholars-on-bilbao.info/fichas/MUSEUM_NEWS_The_Bilbao_Effect.pdf
Edward K. Uhlir, The Millennium Park Effect: Creating a Cultural Venue with an Economic Impact, Economic Development Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, Spring 2005.
http://www.economyleague.org/files/File/Millennium.pdf
offended by the inclusion of graffiti in these projects. The reason for emphasizing graffiti is that, as I have indicated before, there is a large international group of people who like graffiti. Some of them paint graffiti, many of them buy graffiti books, but almost all of them wear shoes and clothes that have been influenced by graffiti style, buy CDs with graffiti style art on the covers, use graffiti-embellished sports equipment, and so forth. Graffiti is here to stay. Further, incorporating graffiti into these projects, Jersey City has an opportunity to attract donations and sponsorship from music companies, apparel companies, sporting goods manufacturers, and others. While the City must certainly be prudent and circumspect about such sponsorship, the opportunities are there and should be carefully explored. Finally, the new skate park gives the City an opportunity to test the graffiti effect early in the development process by hosting an international graffiti jam, perhaps as early as the Fall 2008. If it fails, it fails, but little or nothing has been lost. If it succeeds, then Jersey City will be on the threshold of international acclaim.
The photos in the following set have been linked to an online map which thus outlines the geographical extent of the graffiti Ive been photographing:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/stc4blues/sets/72157601345772564/
Here are the photos of the Hoboken Ave. skate park that is in the process of being demolished:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/stc4blues/sets/72157601065037735/
One of the locations proposed for a new skate park is beneath the thruway behind Brunswick at roughly 8th street. There is a lot of graffiti under the thruway just north of that site:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/stc4blues/sets/72157594380714804/
I have also written a three-part article about this graffiti. The first part is a general introduction, including some very brief historical comments: Graffs in the Hood 1: The Story:
http://www.thevalve.org/go/valve/article/graffs_in_the_hood_1_the_story/
The second article analyzes a few pieces, considers whether or not graffiti is art, and assesses its general importance:
Page 17
Graffs in the Hood 2: Analysis: http://www.thevalve.org/go/valve/article/graffs_in_the_hood_2_analysis/ The third article is a guide to my online graffiti photos. At the end I have a brief guide to general material about graffiti, including online sites: Graffs in the Hood 3: Guide to Photos, Sites, and Links
http://www.thevalve.org/go/valve/article/graffs_in_the_hood_3_guide_to_photos_sites_and_links/
Page 18