Response to Were All of America s Founding Fathers racists, pro-slavery, and hypocrites?

By Brother Amfri Umi-Uchechi © 6-29-2011

The original article appears at http://www.christiananswers.net/q-wall/wal-g003.html.
Abstain from all appearance of evil. It is sad that a so-called Christian organization is so disturbed by the sins of America s founding fathers that it would attempt to sanitize the ungodly practice of American chattel slavery and the participation of our founding fathers who knowingly and willingly practiced it. I can think of no greater national crime against humanity than a nation founded by a people who knowingly and willingly not just aided and abetted in the legalized murder, torture, rape, child molestation, medical experimentation, destruction of family, and the utter dehumanization of a race but profited from this process as well. These are not Christian acts. It is clear to me that the author is not one of African-American descent and has a desensitized view of the issue that is as alarming as it is disturbing. Instead of promoting the Christian view of truth, honesty, and integrity, this article seems to try to discount the horrors of slavery and the vestiges spawned by the horrific practice. But, this is why so many of us have left the Europeanized teaching of Christianity that seems to hold that It is okay to practice sin and evil if one has the power and means to do so, and furthermore profit from sin and evil if they have the power to immune themselves from the consequences of such sin and evil . I must reject this form of false-Christianity. It is simply dishonest. First, the title is intentionally too broad and this makes it deceptive. By saying all it allows the author to make a point that has no bearing on the real issue did American founding fathers engage in the systematic form of dehumanization and family destruction based on the aspect of race? All of the founding fathers did not engage in the practice of slavery, but a significant number did. Furthermore, at least 12 presidents actually owned slaves. So, the premise of the article is intentionally misleading. However, one nagging question remains, If the founding fathers were not racists, pro-slavery, or hypocrites then, why did they allow slavery and profit from it in the first place? Secondly, the 1973 book, Seven Who Shaped Our Destiny, Robert Morris identifies Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, John Jay, James Madison, & Alexander Hamilton as the key founding fathers. Of these, the following owned slaves: George Washington owned more than 200 slaves. In 1784, five years before he became president of the United States, George Washington, 52, was nearly toothless. So he hired a dentist to transplant nine teeth into his jaw--having extracted them from the mouths of his slaves. http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/040112/12slave.htm Thomas Jefferson owned more than 100 slaves. This is an excerpt from Thomas Jefferson s, Notes on the State of Virginia, it is at Yale University and reflects Jefferson s feelings about black people.
* The first difference [between whites and blacks] which strikes us is that of color. . . . The difference is fixed in nature, and is as real as if its seat and cause were better known to us. And is this difference of no importance? Is it not the foundation of a greater or less share of beauty in the two races? Are not the fine mixtures of red and white, the expressions of every passion by greater or less suffusions of color in the one, preferable to that eternal monotony, which reigns in the countenances, that immoveable veil of black which covers all the emotions of the other race? Add to these, flowing hair, a more elegant symmetry of form, their own judgment in favor of the whites, declared by their preference of them, as uniformly as is the preference of the orangutan for the black women over those of his own species. The circumstance of superior beauty, is thought worthy attention in the propagation of our horses, dogs, and other domestic animals; why not in that of man? . . . * They seem to require less sleep. A black, after hard labor through the day, will be induced by the slightest amusements to sit up till midnight, or later, though knowing he must be out with the first dawn of the morning. They are at least as brave, and more adventuresome. But this may perhaps proceed from a want of forethought, which prevents their seeing a danger till it be present. When present, they do not go through it with more coolness or steadiness than the whites. They are more ardent after their female: but love seems with them to be more an eager desire, than a tender delicate mixture of sentiment and sensation. Their griefs are transient.

Those numberless afflictions, which render it doubtful whether heaven has given life to us in mercy or in wrath, are less felt, and sooner forgotten with them. In general, their existence appears to participate more of sensation than reflection. . . . * Comparing them by their faculties of memory, reason, and imagination, it appears to me, that in memory they are equal to the whites; in reason much inferior, as I think one [black] could scarcely be found capable of tracing and comprehending the investigations of Euclid; and that in imagination they are dull, tasteless, and anomalous. It would be unfair to follow them to Africa for this investigation. We will consider them here, on the same stage with the whites, and where the facts are not apocryphal on which a judgment is to be formed. It will be right to make great allowances for the difference of condition, of education, of conversation, of the sphere in which they move. Many millions of them have been brought to, and born in America. Most of them indeed have been confined to tillage, to their own homes, and their own society: yet many have been so situated, that they might have availed themselves of the conversation of their masters; many have been brought up to the handicraft arts, and from that circumstance have always been associated with the whites. Some have been liberally educated, and all have lived in countries where the arts and sciences are cultivated to a considerable degree, and have had before their eyes samples of the best works from abroad. The Indians, with no advantages of this kind, will often carve figures on their pipes not destitute of design and merit. They will crayon out an animal, a plant, or a country, so as to prove the existence of a germ in their minds which only wants cultivation. They astonish you with strokes of the most sublime oratory; such as prove their reason and sentiment strong, their imagination glowing and elevated. But never yet could I find that a black had uttered a thought above the level of plain narration; never see even an elementary trait of painting or sculpture. In music they are more generally gifted than the whites with accurate ears for tune and time . . . . Whether they will be equal to the composition of a more extensive run of melody, or of complicated harmony, is yet to be proved. Misery is often the parent of the most affecting touches in poetry. Among the blacks is misery enough, God knows, but no poetry. * To our reproach it must be said, that though for a century and a half we have had under our eyes the races of black and of red men, they have never yet been viewed by us as subjects of natural history. I advance it therefore as a suspicion only, that the blacks, whether originally a distinct race, or made distinct by time and circumstances, are inferior to the whites in the endowments both of body and mind. It is not against experience to suppose, that different species of the same genus, or varieties of the same species, may possess different qualifications.

James Madison owned and sold slaves all his life even though, he called it [slavery] "the most oppressive dominion ever exercised by man over man." - http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2002/08/how-tounderstand-slavery-and-americas We know the following presidents owned slaves, and thus engaged knowingly and willingly in the brutal dehumanization and inherent crimes against humanity for which American chattel slavery became known. James Monroe owned 30-40 slaves. Andrew Jackson owned about 160 slaves. Martin Van Buren owned at least one slave. William Henry Harrison had several slaves. John Tyler had slaves. James K. Polk had 15 slaves. Zachary Taylor owned more than 100 slaves. Andrew Johnson owned 8 slaves. Ulysses S. Grant owned but freed his slaves. Had our founding fathers been so adamant against slavery, they would not have engaged in the practice. For a so-called Christian organization (your un-Christ like position fills me with doubt about your Christian claim) to engage in false dialogue reflects a deeply insensitive consciousness of the issue of race and slavery. Furthermore, your attempt to sanitize instead of face the sins of America s past is not consistent with the principles of Christianity Abstain from all appearance of evil.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful