You are on page 1of 8


ILR is Government of Indias proposal to link 37 rivers through 30 links, dozens of large dams and thousands of miles of canals, making it the largest water project in the world. It aims to transfer water from watersurplus to water-deficit areas and thus proposes to provide a permanent solution to the paradox of floods and drought. Of the 30 links proposed, 14 are in the Himalayan and 16 in the Peninsular component. Claimed Benefits Besides the vision of grandeur and the solution to floods and droughts, the project has certain specific stated claims 8:
q q q q q q q


Interlinking of Rivers (ILR) has assumed tremendous importance in our country, with the President of India, the Prime minister, the Supreme Court and several officials promoting it as the single panacea not only to recurring problems of drought and floods but also to all water problems. The proposed Water grid is also the biggest project in scope, funds and impact in Indian history. Increasing water scarcity and crises in our villages and cities are making us more and more desperate to see some magic happen, at least through this project. Many politicians have even made river linking, a campaign issue during the recent elections.

Irrigation of 34 million hectares of land Potable water for rural & urban areas and industrial water-supply 34,000 MW power generation through hydroelectric generators. Inland navigation through the network of rivers. Ecological upgradation and increased tree farming Sizeable employment generation National integration Completion of feasibility studies by 2005; 8 links completed Detailed Project Reports (DPRs) by 2006 Completion of Project 2016; 2 to start this year 1972- Ganga Cauvery link proposed by Union minister Dr. K.L. Rao. 1974- Garland Canal proposal by Captain Dinshaw J Dastur, a pilot. Both plans rejected due to technical infeasibility and huge costs. 1980- Ministry of Water Resources frames the National Perspective Plan (NPP) envisaging inter-basin transfer. 1982- The National Water Development Agency (NWDA) set up to carry out pre-feasibility studies. These form the basis of the ILR plan. 1999 A national commission (NCIWRDP) set up to review NWDA reports concluded that it saw no imperative necessity for massive water transfers in the peninsular component and that the Himalayan Component would require more detailed study. Aug 15, 2002- President Abdul Kalam mentions the need for riverlinking in his Independence-day speech, based on which senior advocate Ranjit Kumar filed a PIL in Supreme Court. Oct 2002- Supreme Court recommends that the government formulate a plan to link the major Indian rivers by the year 2012. Dec 2002- Govt. appointed a Task Force (TF) on Interlinking of rivers (ILR) led by Mr. Suresh Prabhu. The deadline was revised to 2016.

Important deadlines
q q q

We, the members of Rivers for Life, an independent research action group working on water issues in India present, in this booklet, several important questions and larger issues that the civil society has raised regarding the ILR. These are usually pushed under the carpet by the proponents and common citizens end up with limited and one-sided information. Whether we intuitively support the project or not, we need to critically examine the project from the following angles and discuss it: Is the plan based on a sound understanding of river systems? Will the plan achieve what it claims it will? Has the planning process allowed for sufficient scrutiny from all concerned, and assessment of all available options? What will be the actual cost? What are its implications for the public? What are the lessons to be learnt from similar attempts worldwide? Are there sensible, viable and sustainable ways of handling our water problems?

How, when and by whom- A short history of ILR

We hope this booklet will raise these larger issues and many such in the context of ILR and generate sufficient interest and discussion.
Table of contents 1. Interlinking of rivers an overview.1 2. Shrouded in secrecy?.3 3. The ILR Price Tag...4 4. Questioning the answers -Permanent drought proofing and flood mitigation?..5 - More irrigation, doubling of food production from 220-450 MT?...6 -We (will) have the power!..7 -When will we learn from others?..7 -Lot of jobs- ILR and employment.9 -We will become one happy nation- ILR and national integration10 5. Sense and sensibility for water management..11 6. What should all of us ask for?...14 2

Can we see the detailed reports of the ILR please?
The reports are highly technical and will not be of interest to the public at large -Suresh Prabhu, June 30, 2003


Financial Costs Initial estimated cost was Rs 560,000 crores just for infrastructure not including rehabilitation, environmental costs, so on. The Task Force members have admitted it could exceed Rs. 1,000,000 crore. What do these huge numbers mean? Rs. 560,000 crores is: - 250% of the Indias entire tax revenues in 2002 - 1/4th of Indias annual GDP. - More than twice the entire irrigation budget of India since 1950. The implications on the economy are mind-boggling. (see below) Rehabilitation costs It is estimated that ILR would submerge 8000 sq. kms of land affecting thousands of villages and towns.7 Millions of people will be displaced from the most needy sections precisely those that should benefit from government projects. At the least, the resettlement costs should factor in at the outset. Around 33 million have been displaced in India during the last 50 years1 and most have not been rehabilitated, ending up destitute. 50,000 Ha of forests to be submerged just by the peninsular links.8 River systems will be altered catastrophically creating new droughts and deserts, destruction of fisheries, seawater ingress. Intensive irrigation in unsuitable soils will lead to water logging and salinity as in the Indira Gandhi Irrigation Canal. Highly polluted rivers will spread toxicity to other rivers.

What is alarming is the lack of any detailed information and reports available to the public though there is plenty of marketing and emotional rallying by its proponents. Though ideally, a proposal (as the TF claims it still is) has to be thoroughly evaluated by independent experts at every level before even thinking of implementation, the SC and the Task Force are talking about deadlines for completion! A mega project of this kind needs an extensive inter disciplinary debate at all levels and that requires detailed information. A cross section of independent groups and experts from various disciplines have been demanding for the reports ever since the ILR was announced. Till today, the reports have not been released. Shouldnt the reports prepared by competent experts, engineers and institutions be evaluated and discussed by other experts in the country also? A grand plan Out of the blue ? Have other options and approaches been assessed thoroughly before announcing this project as the only panacea for all water problems? Have funds been allocated in the Ninth or Tenth 5-year plans for this project? Has there been a parliamentary discussion? Were all the states consulted? The PMs address to National Water Resources Council (April 2002) doesnt even mention ILR. Instead he said our catchword should be: catch the catchment Its a powerful idea whose time has come, stressing on community water bodies and rainwater harvesting. The Tenth 5year Plan (2002-07) doesnt mention ILR, let alone allocating finances. The issue has been approached by starting with the proposition that rivers have to be linked and that river linking is the best option. Therefore, TF has been ordered to examine not its soundness or viability, but the modalities of its implementation. After giving the directive to link rivers, the States were asked to get back to the Supreme Court on the issue. However, it received consent only from Tamil Nadu (since it is the only state that is a recipient and not a donor) and concluded that, since no other State or Union Territory has filed any affidavit...The presumption therefore clearly is that they do not oppose the plea. This issue has not even been discussed in the Parliament considering that it involves so many parties and States.

Environmental costs

A MILLION CRORES What It Means for India Completion of existing irrigation projects alone requires Rs.80,000 crores with many languishing due to lack of funds. Renovation of tanks, watershed development and rainwater harvesting compete for the same shrinking pie. A massive allocation for ILR simply means creating a black hole that sucks away all resources. Heavy borrowing will be inevitable, sinking the country into a debt trap. The interest alone could be Rs.30,000 crores per year. The Task Force is already talking of contracts to foreign companies. This is a clear path to private ownership of our water resources. The experience with Shivnath river in Chattisgarh points the way.7 A boon to the corrupt? The project is a mouth-watering prospect for politicians and contractors even a 10% graft from the project costs would leave the country short by Rs.100,000 crores


Got the logic right? ILR is based on the understanding that an enormous amount of water of our rivers flows waste into the sea and this should be prevented and equalized by diverting water from water-surplus to water-deficit areas. Does this assumption hold water? How much is surplus? Do the claimed benefits based on this logic make sense?

low demand projection and 23% higher than the high-demand projection of the National Commission.7 Damn the drought prone Comparing the two maps below shows that almost all the links and their command areas are in the lower river basins and the coastal belts (which are already irrigated or have abundant water resources), while most of the drought-prone uplands are not even covered. In the fig. (left), the areas in orange denote drought areas. The ILR neglects many drought-prone areas of West A.P, North Karnataka, Maharashtra, M.P., Kutch, Saurashtra.

1. Permanent drought proofing and flood mitigation This drought-flood phenomenon is a recurring feature. The need of the hour is to have a water mission would be networking of our rivers. - Abdul Kalam, Aug 15, 2002 q Two sides of the same region Does water surplus=flood prone and water deficit=drought prone? Cherrapunji which receives the highest average annual rainfall in the world suffers from severe water shortage in the non-monsoon months. In Orissa, 12 out of 30 districts are declared flood hit every monsoon and drought-hit every summer. Why do droughts and floods occur side by side?

Flood relief and false security After 50 years of dam building, floodprone areas in India have increased from 25 to 40 million hectares 4. Some dams, in fact, aggravate flooding due to sudden releases, siltation and breaching of embankments. For instance, floods in the Mahanadi delta are reported to be 3 times more frequent than before the Hirakud dam was built2. In 1978, 65,000 people were rendered homeless because of sudden discharges from the Bhakra Nangal. Flood control-Power Generation-Water for Irrigation- All at once? In practice it is not possible to achieve all, because satisfying one purpose defeats the requirement of the other. Power generation requires that the reservoir level be maintained high. But, diversion for irrigation will bring down the water level in the reservoir. Flood control requires the reservoir to be empty during the monsoon months to deal with an anticipated surplus. And if there's no surplus, you're left with an empty dam. And this, defeats the purpose of irrigation, which is to store the monsoon water. But ILR stated claims for the three are calculated for the same water quantity. How much water does India need? The National Commission projected that India would need 973 to 1180 billion cubic meters (BCM) of water in 2050, depending on the projects being high or low. But according to the Task Force, India would need 1447 BCM! How the figure was arrived at is not explained. This is 49% higher than the

2. More Irrigation, Doubling of food production from 220 to 450 MT


Food for rats? An estimated 200 million Indians are underfed while our godowns overflow with a buffer stock of 62 metric tons of food grain (FCI). Our government is exporting food grains at Rs. 5.45/ kg while our own fellow Indians below the poverty line pay Rs.6.4/kg to buy their food grain in fair price shops3 This shows that food distribution and not production is the primary problem. The Myth of more irrigation = more food grain Contrary to popular belief, less than 40% of irrigation in India is through dams and canals, over 60% being irrigated by wells, tanks and traditional water structures! Moreover, only 12-13% of increased food grain production post 1950s is due to large dams! 2 So, increasing irrigated area does not mean either more food grain or increased nutrition. More irrigation or better irrigation? Indian irrigation is only 20-35% efficient at its best. This means that most of the water in canals is lost mainly due to evaporation and seepage. Even a 10% increase in irrigation efficiency could lead to an additional irrigation potential of

14 M Ha (mid-term review of the Ninth Plan). That is more than 1/3rd of the projected claims of ILR! Though we have the worlds largest irrigation network and second largest arable area, Chinas per capita food grain production is 13% more than India.


Point 1:There are no permanent flood-prone or drought-prone areas. Point 2: Floods and drought are not always only natural disasters. To understand this lets looks at a flow of a river. A river has a natural low and high flow cycle. The low flow maintains the ground water level which in turn maintains the river flow and sustains aquatic life. The common observance of rivers drying up is an indication that the factors that maintain the minimum flow of the river have not been taken care of. What we are even less aware of is the role that floods, which form apart of the high flow play. In the peak flow, sediments get deposited in the river plains thus giving us fertile agricultural lands. The wetlands, pools and groundwater in the entire floodplain also get recharged.

Irrigation and irreversible damages The most serious problem due to excessive irrigation is waterlogging and the resulting increase in soil salinity, which is irreversible and causes permanent damage. Water gets logged in lands due to poor drainage and/or excessive water input in lands not suited to intensive irrigation. Approximately 2,46,000 hectares of land has been waterlogged and salinised due to the canal project in Rajasthan. ICAR estimates that land rendered unproductive due to water logging and salinity in India is well over 23 million hectares.

3. We (will) have the power! Claim: 35,000MW power projection

Before we look at power generation, it is necessary to under stand what inter-river basin transfer is all about. The terms watershed and river basin need explanation here. In the figure, you see several small streams joining a main river/stream in the middle. The entire area that you see in the figure is the watershed of that particular river. Water might fall anywhere in the watershed, but it will finally contribute to replenish this river or stream that exits the watershed at its lowest point. The boundary of a watershed is necessarily elevated (called a ridge) and water flows through gravity along the slopes of the ridge and empties into the stream. A river basin is essentially the river and its watershed area together. As in the figure, two streams that seem physically close to reach other empty into different rivers because of the ridge separating the two river basins. Every inter-basin transfer must necessarily involve carrying of water across the natural barrier between basins by lifting, or by tunneling through, or by a long circuitous routing around the mountains, if such a possibility exists.1 How a project of this kind will be a net generator of upwards of 30,000MW of electric power is not clear. Linked to this is the claim that the links will be largely gravity links, with a few modest lifts. If 30,000 MW is the net generation, what will be the gross generation and in which projects will it be generated? 7 - Ramaswamy Iyer, Former Secretary, Min. of Water Resources

The Flood-Drought mystery

Extensive deforestation that leads to topsoil erosion all of which ends up in the river as silt and raises the height of the riverbed. This causes water to spill over and cause floods. Since most of the water merely runs off instead of percolating and replenishing the water table, there could be water shortage during lean months in the same area, thus leading to drought. Channelisation of natural flow of water due to dams, bunds and flood-proof embankments results in the river not being able to burst its bank and deposit its silt in the flood plain and instead adds up in the reservoir. 11 of Indias reservoirs with capacities greater that 1 cubic kilometer are filling with sediment faster than expected.2 That explains why floods become far more intense and dangerous soon after appearing to be in control after the building of the dam or embankment. Floods during the natural peak flow of the cycle.

Given this understanding of floods how should we manage them?

The key is to allow some land to flood so that others can stay dry. Regeneration of the watershed and regular cleaning up of river and banks of obstacles that obstruct the free flow, regulations to discourage new flood plain development and encroachment and improved flood warning systems are some ways of managing floods and being sensitive to the river too.

When will we learn from others?

Schemes of inter-basin water transfer have been successfully completed and are operational the world over. In none of these cases have geographical changes occurred as alleged. -Radha Singh, Director, NWDA

A River becomes a trickle- The Case of the Colorado, USA The delta of the Colorado river basin has shrunk to 5% of its historic size thanks to intensive river diversions that have spelt a death knell to the people, flora and fauna of the region. Since 1960, the river has reached the sea only during rare flood years, more usually ending just south of the US border in a few stagnant pools of pesticide and saltlaced agricultural runoff. Due to intensive irrigation in desert lands, waters have become extremely saline. A $256 million desalination plant was set up at Yuma, Arizona to desalinate the water in 1992. It was shut down in 1993 after floods destroyed drains and brought in saline water. The Bureau of Reclamations salinity control program had cost tax-payers $660 million by 1993. An $8 billion plan has been passed in California to revive some of its rivers. 2 Many more cases: Irtysh-Karaganda (Satpaevs) Canal The South-eastern Anatolia Project (GAP), Turkey The Three Gorges and The North- South Transfer project The Spanish National Hydrological plan, Spains
5. We will become one happy nation: ILR and national integration

Large scale river diversions that have been attempted in other countries, have proved to be ecologically disastrous and the benefits short-lived. These countries today spend billions of dollars in decommissioning dams and reversing damages. Also the population and dynamics of every region is very different. Because of this, many times even the logic of when they can do it, why cant we doesnt work because even imagining the consequences of such ventures in a country like ours, is too scary! Drying up of the Aral Sea, Soviet Union 7
What was the fourth biggest inland sea is now mostly desert. What appears to be snow on the seabed is really salt. The winds blow this as far as the Himalayas.

The Aral sea started drying up when almost 92% of the waters of the Amu Darya and Syr Darya that feed into the sea were diverted for irrigation, industrial and water supply. The disastrous consequences of this 1960s venture are: o The area of the lake has been reduced to almost half and its volume has reduced by 75%! More than 20,000 square kilometer of salty sea floor is exposed. o The commercial fishery that produced 40,000 tons of fishery has almost been eliminated. o The land and water that remains is heavily polluted by pesticides and has led to extreme health problems like cancers, kidney and liver problems. The economic damage is between $1.25-$2.5 billion a year just for human health, tourism and agriculture.
4. Lot of jobs ILR and employment There could be 10 million new jobs- Suresh Prabhu, The Statesman

Inter and Intra-State conflicts The NWDAs assessment that Mahanadi and the Godavari are water surplus is not shared by the Orissa and A.P State governments. The Cauvery dispute between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka on the sharing of its waters continues even today. Kerala, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Assam, Punjab, Chattisgarh, Goa have opposed the plan so far. Gujarat, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Orissa and Maharashtra have expressed conditional support- agreeing to the recipient links and opposing the donor links. Many parts within a State (for eg. Rayalseema and Telengana in A.P and Kalahandi in Orissa ) face droughts every year and may not agree to water being diverted to other states while they languish in misery. International conflicts The diversion of the Ganga and Brahmaputra waters have raised severe objections from our neighbouring countries which share these waters- Bangladesh, Nepal, etc. Many experts in Bangladesh claim that the ILR flouts the India-Bangladesh Treaty of 1996 on the sharing of Ganga waters. Almost two dozen dams on the Brahmaputra in the Northeast are already in advanced stage of construction and planning.1 This would leave little water for diversion to other parts of India.

This seems a strange justification. Any large-scale construction activity is bound to generate some employment, even if the construction itself is completely pointless. The mere fact that an activity will involve the employment of people cannot warrant the undertaking of that activity. Given the magnitude of the project and the accelerated time frame, it seems likely that advanced, sophisticated technologies will be used; and these are unlikely to be labourintensive. 7 -Ramaswamy Iyer, Ex- Secretary, Min. of Water Resources


The issue is not how much water you have- It is how you learn to use, store and relate to that water. These are the central questions that surround water management. In other words, the culture of dealing with water is far more important than any issue of technology. And it's only when we have the right kind of culture, that we'll find that we have enough water for all our industrial, household, urban and rural needs -Anil Agarwal, Center for Science and Environment

Catching the rain where it falls India receives some of the highest average rainfall among all nations. It is common sense that the most efficient way to begin managing our water is by conserving the rainwater in the local area. Only when this does not meet the needs, additional water transfer from outside is required. Over many decades, we have reversed this simple logic by promoting longdistance water as the primary solution and neglecting rain harvesting. Dying Wisdom, a report brought out by CSE documents how people living in different climates and terrains, with different water availabilities and crop patterns managed their water resources. Their simplicity belies the extent of their efficiency. In the dry, drought-prone areas, these techniques have worked wonders here are some glimpses:

Since the 1950s, India has been the second-biggest dam-building nation in the world, constructing more than 3500 large dams. About 85% of Indias irrigation budget has gone into such projects. Today, with so many dams and canals, we still grope with drinking water problems, droughts and untold miseries, both in the villages and the cities. Still, the ILR envisions even more gigantic-scale projects as the one-stop solution!
PIECES OF THE PUZZLE: The water puzzle is very complex and there are

many pieces to the solution. Our view is that depending on the needs and the region, the pieces come together in different ways and we need to make wise choices so that the solutions are sustainable over the long term and do not themselves lead to more problems. The bright news is that, in the past two decades, there has been tremendous growth of sustainable solutions to water problems. They have been recognized nationally and internationally some of them are almost magical! and many of them combine centuries-old successful practices with modern approach. Here are some key pieces of the puzzle. Eri, cheruvu, kere, kohli, talai, samand A Tank by any other name What comes to your mind when you think of a tank? A water body of a few hundred square yards, or one that is a sq. km. large and irrigates several hundred hectares? The fact is that tanks exist in all sizes small and big, but more significant is the number of them 1.5 million across A.P., Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala, M.P., Maharashtra, West Bengal. Tanks were the mainstay of irrigation across many states in India before the British policies caused great damage. Unfortunately, after independence, the governments continued the neglect and allocated meager resources to develop new tanks and maintain existing ones. Investment required to create irrigation for 1 ha by tanks is Rs.20,000 compared to Rs.50,000 for big dams, and >Rs.100,000 for ILR. In A.P., 1.1 million ha (40% of all irrigated land) was served by tanks in 1955. Instead of being expanded, this area has now shrunk by 25%. 1/3 of irrigated land in Tamil Nadu is watered by eris. Less than 10% of irrigation budget has been spent on tanks! Many experts feel that tank renovation is the real priority in South India.
Rajendra Singh Water-man from Alwar

Sense and Sensibility and Success! Ralegaon Siddhi, Maharashtra (Avg annual rainfall < 300 mm): Irrigation increased from 80 to 1200 acre; 3 crops every year worth Rs. 60 lakhs. Alwar, Rajasthan (Rainfall<450 mm): Arvari, a river that was dry half the year, became perennial. During drought in the rest of Rajasthan, water was available for drinking and irrigation even after 3 years of no rains. Raj Samadhiyala, Rajkot District, Gujarat (Rainfall < 600mm): Water table increased from a depth of 250 mts to 15 mts even with a failure of rains. Avg. income per hectare up from Rs.4,600 in 1985 to Rs.31,000 in 2002! Gandhigram, Kachchh, Gujarat (Rainfall< 340 mm): During 2001, although the village received only 165 mm, the check-dam reservoirs were full. In 2002, Gandhigram topped in groundnut production in Mandvi district. How do we catch rain? Building checkdams that prevent run-off of streams and rivulets, digging farm-ponds, percolation tanks, johads, which store rainwater and increase the ground-water level, and many such methods. Power to People and their Priorities Significantly, these structures are typically built and maintained by the village communities using local technology, material and manpower. So they are not at the mercy of whether or not one big dam on, say Cauvery, will release water.

This is an important theme in water management being recognized everywhere including government programs - empower people to take charge of their resources so that they have the flexibility to decide and formulate their own water policies according to needs and crises. In many of these success stories, the user groups have been able to plan based on their drinking water requirements, which crops consume more water, separating water need for food security and for commercial crops. Small is Big? A common response to the rainwater harvesting approach is, These are small-scale local solutions. How about the large-scale water issues? It is a myth that these work only on a small-scale and are slow compared to the huge projects. Watershed development is proven technology! Such initiatives can be planned over an entire district as successfully demonstrated in Jhabua district in M.P. The governments Watershed Development mission worked in 374 villages from 1994-98, irrigated area doubled to 1115 hectares, over 20 lakh trees were regenerated, fodder availability increased by 5-6 times and distress migration reduced. The estimated cost of treating the land was only Rs.3000 per hectare. Planning for the River Basin Ridge-to-River? In fact, our planning can extend to an even larger scale, looking at the river basin or sub-basin as the unit. When we build big dams, the focus is on the lower reaches of the basin, and the water is never taken to the upper reaches, which are drier and have more needy people. By looking at the entire basin and beginning in the hills to conserve water, the basin can be developed more efficiently and equitably. Independent studies are already being done e.g. a plan for the 155 km long Swarnamukhi river in A.P. that dries up in summer, proposed by T.Hanumanta Rao (ref: Let the Waters Flow by Neeti Samakhya). Participatory planning at the basin and sub-basin level is the cutting edge of river management, so to speak! It was adopted as the national policy by South Africa, which is at a similar stage of development as India. Why then hasnt the government take up a comprehensive assessment of rainwater harvesting potential for even a single basin or sub basin in the country? 7 Why dont we have a Task Force take it up on a war footing? The Changing Culture of Agriculture Farmers have in the recent years gone for cropping patterns and crops that require intensive irrigation and inputs. To address the water problem, the focus should change to productivity/unit water rather than

maximizing yield/hectare using any amount of water. e.g. After the Mettur dam, farmers in the Cauvery delta started growing two crops of paddy. But when paddy is sown in June, the SW monsoon in Karnataka is in full swing and it is dry in TN. So theres intense competition between states for the water. By October, when TN gets the NE monsoon, the crop is almost ready for harvest, so the monsoon water is simply wasted. And the 2 nd crop needs irrigation water again! Making sensible choices These form some of the key elements, along with roof-top rainwater harvesting in cities, afforestation to reduce floods, etc. It is possible that some long-distance transfer is needed, especially for huge metropolis like Chennai and Delhi. However, the need is for making choices that are sustainable, benefit the most needy, and dont damage the rivers.


The Interlinking Rivers plan should not be projected as an inevitable national priority. Instead, it should be considered a plan that is open to debate and scrutiny with public participation at all levels. All reports on ILR, including the pre-feasibility and feasibility studies should be made fully public with immediate effect. Detailed options assessment has to be done before choosing a path. Each individual link should be critically examined, including public hearings, instead of being considered fait accompli. More resources to be allocated for studies and implementation of time-proven sustainable approaches for managing water resources Prior informed consent to be obtained from all affected people before embarking work on any of the links. An undertaking from the Government that no part of any river will be privatized. Agricultural policies should be really oriented towards food security and increasing sustainable production by most needy.
References: 1. The Ecologist Asia Vol. 11, Jan-Mar 2003 2. Silenced Rivers- The Ecology and politics of large dams, Patrick McCully 3. The Feel-good Factory, P. Sainath, 2004. 4. B.B.Vohra, quoting National Commission on Floods. Land and Water: Towards a Policy for Life-Support Systems, INTACH Environmental Series 5. Archives of 6. Rivers for Life, Sandra Postel and Brian Richter, 2003 7. Essays from River linking- A Millennium folly? Edited by Medha Patkar 8. ILR Task force website 9. CSEs Rainwater Harvesting website: 14


From Enrons Dabhol project to Americas Iraq war, we have seen what happens when crucial information is hidden from the public while momentous decisions are made. Stating lofty goals and big claims of benefits is a common strategy to gain public support, while avoiding public scrutiny of the details. When the real details do come out, much of the damage is already done. Do we sense the same pattern in the Interlinking Rivers plan of megaprojections and little information? As alert citizens, this is time to ensure we are not being taken for a ride it is a matter of putting more than of our GDP into a single program and drastically altering our river systems. This booklet is an attempt to examine the process and the claims, and square them with the facts on the ground. The non-availability of prefeasibility and feasibility reports has made the job tougher, but we have gathered information from multiple sources, verifying authenticity. Feedback and discussion is most welcome. It is in everybodys interest to solve our water problems - it is too crucial to be left to the manipulations of politicians. Water is everybodys business.

Booklet compiled by Rivers for Life- an independent research action group comprising of engineers, concerned citizens and other professionals which works on water issues in India with members based in the U.S and India. For more info contact: Website (active soon):

DID YOU KNOW? More than 3/5th of irrigated area in India receives water from wells and tanks. About 2/3rds of 18 million hectares of irrigated area in the United States is watered from wells or small on-farm ponds and reservoirs. Only 30-40% of the worlds 270 million hectares of irrigated land gets its water from dams. At most, dams contribute to just 12-16% of the worlds food grain production. Only 12-13% of increased food production post 1950s in India was due to large dams! The World Commission on Dams (WCD) estimates worldwide dam induced displacement at a staggering 40-80 million! More than 2.5 lakh hectares of land has been permanently damaged by waterlogging and salinity after the Rajasthan canal project. Sugar growers in Maharashtra , occupy only 1/10th of State's irrigated land, but use half of its irrigated water.