Integrated Analysis of Hybrid Systems for Rural Electrification in Developing Countries

Timur Gül

Supervisor and Examiner Assoc. Professor Jan-Erik Gustafsson Division of Land and Water and Water Resources Engineering Royal Institute of Technology

Supervisor in Germany Dr. Dirk Aßmann Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment, Energy

Reviewer Michael Bartlett Department of Energy Processes Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm 2004

TRITA-LWR Master Thesis ISSN 1651-064X LWR-EX-04-26



Around 2 billion people world-wide do not have access to electricity services, of which the main share in rural areas in developing countries. Due to the fact that rural electricity supply has been regarded as essential for economic development during the Earth Summit on Sustainable Development in 2002, it is nowadays a main focus in international development cooperation. Renewable energy resources are a favourable alternative for rural energy supply. In order to handle their fluctuating nature, however, hybrid systems can be applied. These systems use different energy generators in combination, by this maintaining a stable energy supply in times of shortages of one the energy resources. Main hope attributed to these systems is their good potential for economic development. This paper discusses the application of hybrid systems for rural electrification in developing countries by integrating ecological, socio-economic and economic aspects. It is concluded that hybrid systems are suitable to achieve both ecological and socio-economic objectives, since hybrid systems are an environmental sound technology with high quality electricity supply, by this offering a good potential for economic development. However, it is recommended to apply hybrid systems only in areas with economic development already taking place in order to fully exploit the possibilities of the system. Moreover, key success factors for the application of hybrid systems are discussed. It is found that from a technical point of view, appropriate maintenance structures are the main aspect to be considered, requiring the establishment of maintenance centres. It is therefore recommendable to apply hybrid systems in areas with a significant number of villages, which are to be electrified with these systems, in order to improve financial sustainability of these maintenance centres. The appropriate distribution model is seen as being important as well; it is thought that the sale of hybrid systems via credit, leasing or cash is the most likely approach. In order to do so, however, financial support and capacity building of local dealers is inalienable.

Table of Contents


Table of Contents
Abstract ........................................................................................................................I Table of Contents....................................................................................................... II List of Figures ........................................................................................................... IV List of Tables.............................................................................................................. V Acronyms .................................................................................................................. VI 1 1.1 1.2 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Objective ........................................................................................................... 2 Methodology...................................................................................................... 2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply ........................................................... 4

2.1 Decentralised Electrification .............................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Diesel Generating Sets ....................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Renewable Energy Technologies ....................................................................... 5 2.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 2.3 3 Hybrid System Technology................................................................................ 6 Relevance .......................................................................................................... 6 Hybrid Systems in Developing Countries........................................................... 7 Other Hybrid Systems........................................................................................ 9 Technical Aspects ............................................................................................ 11 Grid-based Electrification ................................................................................ 14 Analysis of Impacts ........................................................................................ 16

3.1 Scope of the Analysis....................................................................................... 16 3.1.1 Scenario Definitions......................................................................................... 16 3.1.2 Modelling Assumptions ................................................................................... 18 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 The Concept of Indicators of Sustainability...................................................... 18 Developing an Indicator Set for Energy Technologies...................................... 19 Analysis of Sustainability ................................................................................ 21 Ecological Dimension ...................................................................................... 21 Socio-Economic Dimension............................................................................. 27 Economic Dimension....................................................................................... 33

3.5 Results and Discussion..................................................................................... 42 3.5.1 Results ............................................................................................................. 42 3.5.2 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 45

...............................................................1 Ecology....................................................... 86 C................................................... 75 B............................................................................................3 Electricity Generating Costs from Different Sources .............................................................1 Investment Costs.....................2 Socio-Economic Issues.....2 4............................................................. 87 C................................................................................................ 47 4.............2 System Design ................................................................3 5 5...2 5.......................... 101 D..... 104 D............. 75 B......1 Baseline .............................................................................................. 70 Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations ......................................................................................................5 5..2 Modelling Results .................................. 63 Political Factors ............. 49 Project Description ....1 Calculation of Electricity Demand.............................................................................................................................2.........................................Table of Contents III 4 Project Examples ....................2 Electricity Generating Costs.......... 47 4..................................... 60 Technical Aspects ....2................................................................ 86 C............. 49 Baseline ........................ 57 Capacity Building .............................................................................1 Hybrid Systems in Indonesia...1 4...................................................................... 52 Key success factors..................................................1 5............................................................................................. 66 Annex A: Electricity Demand and System Design..........................2 4...................................................................3 Economic Issues....................... 105 D..................................2..........3 5.......1......1 Scenario Definitions ................................................................... 47 4........................ 79 Annex C: Analysis of Impacts ..................................6 6 Hybrid Systems in Inner Mongolia.......................................4 5................................................. 62 Assessment of Electricity Demand and Potential for Renewable Energies..................................................................................2 Project Description .............. 64 Summary and Conclusions .............................1..... 53 Organisation ....... 68 A... 49 Aspects of System Dissemination ..... 113 .............................. 93 Annex D: Cost Analysis ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 110 Terms of Reference ................................. 47 4.................................................................................................................................................................. 53 Financing .................... 68 A..........................................................

............................. 29 Figure 3...........4 Comparative Assessment of Air Pollutants Emissions ........19 Comparative Assessment of Supply Security........11 Comparative Assessment of Potential for Economic Development ............1 GEMIS Results: GHG Emissions ........ 84 Figure B.....................................................................9 Comparative Assessment of Supply Equity .....3 GEMIS Results: Emissions of Air Pollutants......12 Comparative Assessment of Employment Effects...............................18 Comparative Assessment Regional Self-Supply and Import Independence 40 Figure 3..........6 Cumulative Energy Demand According to Resources................. 28 Figure 3.......................................... 31 Figure 3.................................22 Results Socio-Economic Assessment .......... 85 Figure D.....1 Specific Investment for Wind Power Plants and Diesel Gensets ............5 GEMIS Results: Cumulative Energy Demand of Primary Energy ....................... 85 Figure B...........................15 Electricity Generating Costs in Comparison ............. 44 Figure 3......................................................... 41 Figure 3..................1 GEMIS Results: Greenhouse Gas Emissions ... 44 Figure 5..... 25 Figure 3.7 Comparative Assessment of Noise Pollution .......................1 Principle Circuit of Hybrid Systems .. 22 Figure 3..........................21 Results Ecology Assessment ..2 Comparative Assessment of GHG Emissions ............................................. 33 Figure 3.................................................. 108 Figure D................................... 81 Figure B..................List of Figures IV List of Figures Figure 2...... 104 Figure D............................. 39 Figure 3...........................................13 Comparative Assessment of Impacts on Health . 83 Figure B... 43 Figure 3............... 24 Figure 3.................................................................................. 25 Figure 3. 108 ......... 37 Figure 3... 60 Figure B.................. 30 Figure 3................4 Illustration of Electricity Generating Costs for Wind/Diesel ..... 103 Figure D...................................10 Comparative Assessment of Participation and Empowerment.....17 Comparative Assessment of Maintenance Requirements ....6 Comparative Assessment of Resource Consumption .......4 Selected Air Pollutants ......16 Comparative Assessment of Electricity Generating Costs...5 Cumulative Energy Demand (Primary Energy)...........................................................20 Comparative Assessment of Future Potential.......2 Specific Investment for Hybrid Systems of Different Capacities...............3 Illustration of Electricity Generating Costs for PV/Diesel.......................23 Results Economic Assessment .........................2 GEMIS Results: Methane Emissions .. 26 Figure 3................................. 23 Figure 3............................................................. 32 Figure 3............. 36 Figure 3............................ 38 Figure 3........................1 Hybrid Village Systems: Distribution Steps .................. 8 Figure 3........... 42 Figure 3................8 Comparative Assessment of Cultural Compatibility and Acceptance ............. 23 Figure 3... 80 Figure B..................................................................14 Comparative Assessment of Investment Costs......3 GEMIS Results: Air Pollutants ...............

...............3: Hybrid Systems at Different Diesel Prices ......................................... 16 Table 3.............. 106 Table D................................................1 Standard Household Characteristics... 38 Table 4.........2: Electricity Generating Costs for Diesel Gensets ........................ 102 Table D....................2 Investment Costs for Small-Scale Wind Power Plants...........9 Electricity Generating Costs of Hybrid Systems in Inner Mongolia ..3 Performance Assessment Scheme.......... 68 Table A............................. 69 Table A.....3 Investment Costs for Diesel Gensets..................3 Cumulative Energy Demand (Primary Energy) .................................... 19 Table 3....................................1: Initial Investment Costs for Diesel Gensets....... 106 Table D......... 68 Table A........... 20 Table 3.. 101 Table D............10 5 kW Hybrid Systems at Different Diesel Prices .......................................... 111 Table D.................4 Main Assumptions for the Cost Analysis .6 Investment Costs of Different Scenarios for Rural Electrification ............................... 102 Table D................................................................................. 109 Table D.......2 Rich Household Characteristics ...2 Criteria and Indicators for the Assessment of Energy Technologies ..... 80 Table B................... 36 Table 3.....List of Tables V List of Tables Table 3.......................... 35 Table 3............................................... 34 Table 3.... 112 .............................1 Main Assumptions for the Cost Analysis .3 Peak and Base Loads for Different Village Sizes ........................ 105 Table D........4 Main Modelling Assumptions..................................................................... 84 Table C......... 71 Table B.........................................8 Investment and Operating Costs of Different Household Systems...........................................................7 Electricity Generating Costs PV/Wind...... 70 Table A.. 82 Table B....... 93 Table C................................................................................................... 95 Table C.............................................................5 Specific Investment Costs of Hybrid Systems.....5 Electricity Generating Costs of PV/Diesel Systems [€/kWh]...............................................................................1 Scenarios and Technologies for Rural Electrification................................................1 Amount of Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................. 96 Table D............... Inner Mongolia......................5 Share of Technologies for Electricity Generation................................6 Electricity Generating Costs of Wind/Diesel Systems [€/kWh] .2 Air Pollutants................... 49 Table A.7 Electricity Generating Costs for Different Scenarios................. 111 Table D....4 Range of Investment Costs for Hybrid Systems ................1 Hybrid Systems in Inner Mongolia ........................

e.e. produces i. different solar energy systems SMA Regelsysteme GmbH.Acronyms VI Acronyms AC CED CSD DC EMS GEF GHG GTZ KfW OECD PV Schueco SMA SHS WHO Alternating Current Cumulative Energy Demand Commission on Sustainable Development Direct Current Energy Management System Global Environmental Facility Greenhouse Gas Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Photovoltaic Schueco International KG. inverters Solar Home System World Health Organisation . produces i.

2002. This lack of access to electricity mainly applies to rural areas in developing countries. with the increase being mainly based on fossil fuels. is likely to increase.4 billion people or 18 % of the world’s population without electricity supply (IEA. without on the other hand increasing reliance on fossil fuels. Without states taking heavy financial initiatives. the combating population growth by shifting relative benefits and costs of fertility towards lower rates of birth. however.1 Introduction 1 1 Introduction Recent research on the development of the world’s energy state and the future development scenarios show alarming developments: 1. Renewable energies use environmentally sound technologies: their consumption does not result in the depletion of resources. will account for more than 60 % of this increase (IEA. The outstanding key role in economic development. 3. 1996a). Global consumption of primary energy resources. i. the situation in 2030 will remain more or less unchanged with 1. 2. is the instable energy provision due to the fluctuating nature of the resources. Today. The challenge. which had been attributed to energy services in the past. Main hope is here attributed to the application of renewable energies as wind. especially in Asia. their improved access to modern energy services has been regarded as essential for sustainable development during the Earth Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg. major ones being economic and social goals. 2002). Social benefits related to improved energy services include poverty alleviation by changing energy use patterns in favour of non-traditional fuels. productivity increases or improved economic opportunities. The effect of increasing global CO2-emissions will be the consequence. but additional measures are required as well. 2002). which is a major occupation of women in developing countries. however. time that could be used for education or employment instead. 2002). 2002).e. Higher availability of jobs. Developing countries. This is mainly due to the goals that are associated with the development of energy infrastructure. are the effect that can be expected from better energy services. A pos- . and the creation of new opportunities for women by reducing the time for the collection of wood for cooking and heating (WEHAB Working Group. In response to the lack of electricity supply in developing countries. Around 2 billion people world-wide do not have access to modern energy services. and their application strengthens the security of energy supply by using local resources. could not live up to experiences. which are especially suited for decentralised electricity generation. by catalysing the creation of small enterprises or livelihood activities in evening hours (WEHAB Working Group. and progress being made over the last 25 years has applied mainly to urban areas (The World Bank. however. thus. the compatibility to climate is better than for currently used options. A major problem related to the application of renewable energies in decentralised systems. energy services are indeed seen as a major driving force to economic development. solar and hydro power. Recent approaches meet this challenge with a focus on decentralised systems for the electrification of rural areas. is to improve access to modern energy services.

chapter 6 gives a summary and an outlook to the perspective of hybrid systems in developing countries. site visits could not be held and. therefore. Special attention is paid to hybrid systems. Finally. Firstly. which are of importance for any decentralised rural electrification project and especially for hybrid systems.1 Introduction 2 sibility to solve this problem is to backup the renewable energy generator with another power generator in a so-called hybrid system. The sustainability of hybrid systems is assessed relative to the other potential decentralised electrification scenarios: diesel generator-based mini-grids. several are currently under implementation. . a literature research was performed first. an indicator system on the three dimensions of sustainability – ecology. the question whether and to which extent these systems satisfy the expectations on rural electrification projects with regard to sustainable development. The objective in investigating key success factors is to maintain the sustainability of a project for rural electrification with hybrid systems. while chapter 5 then outlines the key success factors for the application of hybrid systems. as well as with experts from Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW) on July. which have already been applied in developing countries. the information here is limited to the findings of the literature review and the interviews. 2003. and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) on August. 2003. Moreover. This approach. The different options for rural electrification are then investigated and compared with regard to these indicators.1 Objective The objective of this paper is to analyse and assess the sustainability of the application of hybrid systems for rural electrification in developing countries. 1. Several factors have been limiting to this work. Solar Home Systems and biogas plants for electricity generation. For the assessment of sustainability in Chapter 3. where hybrid systems were applied. 28th. is just now stepwise gaining importance. capacity building and others. 2003. although being known for quite some years already. Another objective here is to find key success factors for the application of hybrid systems. the extension of the conventional grid is considered as well. In this paper. Chapter 4 then describes experiences with projects in Indonesia and Inner Mongolia. Due to the absence of respective surveys. this analysis is performed in comparative terms on the basis of an indicator set developed here. 1. 14th. has not been investigated yet and shall be matter of this paper. A number of projects applying hybrid systems for electricity generation have already been carried out. which needs to be ensured by setting the right framework. The findings of this research were then discussed with project developers at the fair Intersolar in Freiburg/Germany on June. socio-economic and economic issues . 7th. organisation. while the potential of other such possibilities is briefly discussed as well. These key success factors are related to aspects of financing. However.2 Methodology To pursue the above objectives. the different systems for energy provision being important for the comparative assessment of sustainability are presented first. accepting that sustainability is an ongoing dynamic developed.

the findings of this analysis are always to be seen as strongly generalised and their applicability must be proven anew in each case. . What proves to be right in one country can be completely wrong for another country. the analysis of hybrid systems in developing countries in general can come only to rather vague results.1 Introduction 3 Moreover. Therefore.

by supplying single consumers and load groups. W.1 Decentralised Electrification In highly fragmented areas or at certain distances from the grid.2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply 4 2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply This chapter gives an overview on potential solutions for rural energy supply. 3. Those of importance for this paper are described more detailed firstly in the following.. locally. Raptis. which is due to the fact that they work very inefficiently when running just at fractions of their rated capacity. including technical aspects to be considered and main applications.e. due to repair or maintenance.1. Different technological options are in practice. 2. power supply in developing countries for rural areas takes place in three different ways (Kleinkauf.. F. Moreover. single diesel gensets can be applied for electrification. In cases security of supply is not of major importance. In a next step. which are in operation in developing countries nowadays. by expansion of interconnected grids. most commonly diesel generating sets and renewable energies. i. This problem can be met by using a group of diesel gensets. centrally. With diesel gensets. being adapted to the needs of the consumers. 2. The voltage of the generator is often adjusted to be higher than the required 220 Volt for the household because of high losses within the local distribution lines (Baur. Finally. Diesel gensets have problems with short durability. J. 2000). the different hybrid systems. Generally. potential other hybrid solutions will be discussed against the background of applying them in developing countries. The objective is to provide a technical background for the evaluation of these options in the following chapters. the options of importance for this work are discussed more in detail. Typically. 2000). the electric current is produced within the village itself. this chapter will also briefly discuss the centralised approach of the extension of the conventional grid to rural areas. the decentralised approaches of regional mini-grid systems or local supply of single consumers can become competitive due to lower investments and maintenance costs compared to large scale electrification by expanding interconnected grids. decentrally. with the other gensets providing backup (ESMAP. the effi- . by erecting or extending stand-alone regional mini-grids.1 Diesel Generating Sets Small diesel-power generating sets (diesel gensets) have been the traditional way to address the problem of the lack of electricity. They provide a simple solution for rural electrification and can be designed for different capacities. The approaches of local and decentralised electrification are obviously closely connected and can be met by similar technologies. 2. will be presented. 1996/1997): 1. accepting that no electricity can be supplied in times the genset is out of commission..

Moreover. the transportation of diesel fuel can result in severe environmental damage. 2001). The application of inverters to provide alternating current (AC) at a voltage of 220 Volt is possible. Diesel gensets are typically just operated for around 4 hours in the evenings. is more a problem related to infrastructure. F. and biogas for local mini-grids or single consumers. 1996). but increases overall system costs.000 gallons of industrial fuel and diesel and putting the sensitive ecosystems of the islands to high risks. 2000). spilling out 145.2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply 5 ciency of operation is between 25-35% (Turcotte. the tanker Jessica ran aground close to San Cristobal.e. which is used for loading the battery. Biogas Biogas systems utilise micro-organisms for the conversion of biomass (i. The electricity current is provided in direct current (DC).1. L. and very often old motors from cars are used for the purpose of electrification. they convert the insolation into electric current. the capacity can technically be expanded easily and.. A. Schaeffer. hydropower and larger-scale photovoltaics. The battery supplies electricity to the consumer during evening hours and in case of insolation shortages due to unfavourable weather conditions. the battery offers the possibility to meet peak load demand for short periods of time. excrements from animal husbandry) for the production of biogas under anaerobic conditions2.. On a local level. S. J. . D. Pneumaticos. social as well as economic goals associated with rural electrification.1 Both are presented in the following.. Many. The systems work at voltages of 12 or 24 100-Wp photovoltaic array and a leadacid battery with charge controller supplying energy for individual household appliances (Cabraal. 2 Anaerobic conditions: in absence of oxygen. Moreover. islands) from higher developed regions so that the regular supply with diesel fuel becomes a logistical problem and an important financial burden even in countries. frequent start-up and shut-down procedures decrease their lifetime as well. where fuel is heavily subsidised. A common 50 Wp can supply lighting and a TV/radio for several hours per day (Preiser..e. Cosgrove-Davies. which requires high cross-sectional wiring in order to avoid high losses (Baur.2 Renewable Energy Technologies The use of renewable energy technologies is a very promising approach towards meeting environmental. which can be used in gas burners or motors 1 More potential renewable technologies include stand-alone wind turbines. 2. wind farms. The photovoltaic modules are usually installed on rooftops. Sheriff. In 2001.. however. as experienced for example at the Galapagos Islands. areas are far away or isolated (i.. thus. K. One of the basic problems for the application of diesel generating systems in developing countries. M. be adapted to individual needs. especially rural. The originating gas consists of 55 to 70% from Methane (CH4). Solar Home Systems Solar Home Systems (SHS) typically include a 20. 2001).. two technologies are of high importance: Solar Home Systems (SHS) for supply of single consumers. Moreover.

This can be avoided by the use of hybrid systems. this has so far been limited to pilot projects in industrialised countries. Wind Generator and Diesel Genset. 1995). The presentation of these other potential options is left for section 2. the system components. Although other renewable energy resources than solar and wind can in principle be used in hybrid systems as well. 1999a). Main component of a biogas plant is the digestion tank (fermenter). 2. resulting in intermittent delivery of power and causing problems if supply continuity is required.1 Relevance One of the main problems of solar as well as wind energy is the fluctuation of energy supply. M.2 Hybrid System Technology Hybrid systems are another approach towards decentralised electrification. biogas lamps.. 2. 1 m3 biogas is necessary (GTZ. 1999a). . but complementary energy supply systems at the same place. So far.3.e. three different types of hybrid systems have been applied in developing countries. solar cells and wind power plants” (Weber. Hybrid systems can technically be designed for almost any purpose at any capacity. incubators and refrigerators working on biogas (GTZ. acidification and methane formation. A system using complementary energy supply technologies has the advantage of being able to supply energy even at times when one part of the hybrid system is unavailable. basically by combining the technologies presented above. A hybrid system can be defined as “a combination of different. They can be designed as stand-alone mini-grids or in smaller scale as household systems.2. In developing countries these other technology options have not yet gained importance. general technical aspects and potential applications. including Photovoltaic Generator and Diesel Generating Set (Diesel Genset). where the organic substrate is decomposed in the three steps hydrolysis. R. i. This section wants to discuss available technology options. Main applications for rural electrification in developing countries include independent electric power supply for 3 To generate 1 kWh of electricity.. 2000) or for gas cookers/stoves. Photovoltaic and Wind Generators.2.2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply 6 for the production of electric current3 (Kaltschmitt. radiant heaters. Biogas systems are widely used in India and China for the supply of single consumers or local mini-grids.

wind and diesel generators in a hybrid system (Roth. which might not be satisfied by the renewable system alone. maintaining a stable energy supply during short periods of time (Blanco. . the renewable part of the system satisfies the energy demand.). the battery serves to meet peak demands. Maintaining high availability with renewable energies alone usually requires big renewable energy generators. 4 Personal Comment given by Mr. in cases of low sunlight or low wind. on June 28th. TV/radio. 5 Storage systems in hybrid systems in developing countries are usually battery aggregates maintaining a stable output over a time frame of one or more days.2. J. A future option might be the hydrogen fuel cell. i. Germany. All these components and the problems related to their application are further described in section 2. The appliances (lighting. A primary source of energy.2. Energiebau Solarstromsysteme GmbH. plugs. Installation material (safety boxes. controlling the battery not to be overloaded. Georg Weingarten. . 2003. A secondary source of energy for supply in case of shortages.e.5 4. Moreover. Hybrid systems are applied in areas where permanent and reliable availability of electricity supply is an important issue. at Intersolar-Fair. 6. etc. Figure 2. using the energy surplus to load the battery. 2. A charge controller..e. Rotating masses can be used for shorter time frames (seconds).Missions.or long-term storage.Farmhouses. . The batteries act as “buffers”. At favourable weather conditions. A charge controller regulates the state of load of the battery. .Desalination Systems.4.1 shows a principle overview of how to combine PV. 5. . Residential Buildings.Hotels.). Usually. 2003).1. A storage system to guarantee a stable output during short times of shortages. a renewable energy resource.2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply 7 - Villages.Irrigation systems. a DC/AC inverter needs to be installed additionally.Radio Relay Transmitters.. 2003).4 2. The complementary resource produces the required energy at times of imminent deep discharge of the battery. Hospitals. combustion aggregates need to be used for medium. Freiburg. i. W. . Schools. cables.e. .2 Hybrid Systems in Developing Countries A common hybrid system for the application in developing countries generally consists of the following main components: 1. 3. at the same time loading the battery. a diesel genset. which can be avoided with hybrid systems. etc. i.

5 m/s already (Sauer. they can be applied in regions where average wind speed is around 3. at Intersolar-Fair.. The CO2 emissions decrease correspondingly. 2003. built up in the same way as are PV/Diesel systems. The solar generator can provide about 100% of the electricity during summertime.2 Wind/Diesel Wind/Diesel combinations are.2.2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply 8 Solar Generator Charge Control G Wind Generator Charge Control Battery Inverter Mini-Grid / Appliances G Diesel Generator Charge Control Figure 2. et al. Freiburg. while in winter this figure is less. Energiebau Solarstromsysteme GmbH. Georg Weingarten. in climatic regions like Germany a PV/Diesel hybrid system is designed to provide around 50% of the electricity from photovoltaic during winter. on June 28th. Germany.. Georg Weingarten. H.. If wind 6 Personal Comment given by Mr. . Naturally.2. Freiburg..1. G.1 PV/Diesel Combining Photovoltaic arrays and a diesel genset provides a rather simple solution and is feasible for regions with good solar resources. 2000). Experiences show annual fuel savings of more than 80% compared to stand-alone mini-grids on diesel genset basis. As can be seen in Figure 2. 7 Personal Comment given by Mr. R. since PV modules provide direct current.2. 2003). Typically. at Intersolar-Fair. on June 28th. the observed fuel saving varies over the year. Compared to the common solution for rural off-grid electrification using diesel gensets alone. A project at Montague Island even reached an 87% decrease in fuel consumption (Corkish. 2003. in principal. Germany. R.1 Principle Circuit of Hybrid Systems 2.7 2. Lowe.2. the rest being supplied with the diesel genset. From a perspective of financial competitiveness. the hybrid solution using photovoltaic offers great potential in saving fuel. D.. Bopp. Energiebau Solarstromsysteme GmbH. PV/Diesel hybrid systems require a DC/AC-inverter if appliances need alternating current.6 depending on the regional conditions and the design of the system. Puls.

it must be doubted whether this effect of further reduction of diesel use can trade off the higher investment and operation costs. This is obviously due to the fact that PV/Wind/Diesel hybrid systems involve a higher share of renewable energy resources. 2. the situation is different for PV/Wind systems. Thus. for a hikers’ inn in the Black Forest of Germany (Kaltschmitt. situated close to the Baltic Sea in Northeastern Germany.3 PV/Wind and PV/Wind/Diesel In some regions the exploitation of both wind and solar resources can become favourable. In regions. For the application in developing countries. During short periods of time with low winds. however. M. however preparing the energy management for further expansion using biogas in a decentralised cogeneration plant.2. The main components of the system include a 250 kWp solar generator and a 300 kW wind turbine with 3 inverted rectifiers connected in parallel (Neuhäusser. The objective was to provide 80% of the necessary energy. if weather conditions are favourable. being replaced by the diesel generating set when low winds occur over longer periods of time. being able to feed up to 30% of surplus energy under good performing conditions into the public grid. This kind of hybrid system has been implemented e. A PV/Wind hybrid system is able to provide energy all time of the day. i. being highly reliable and resulting in a further reduction of diesel compared to other hybrid systems.2. combining any renewable resource with others is conceivable. .3. Here.e. using the renewable energy resources photovoltaic. which is not suitable for some non-household applications. Of utmost importance is here that wind and solar energy supply complement each other so that energy provision is possible over the whole year. G. 1996).2. combinations in hybrid systems are worth discussing. While for the other hybrid systems applying diesel gensets. 2. the battery maintains a stable system. Generally. at coastal or mountain areas with high degree of solar radiation. i.2. The PV/Wind/Diesel hybrid system has proven successful in Germany. wind and biogas for energy provision. Wiese. 2. where two different resources complement each other.g. 2003). However. a PV/Wind hybrid system might ideally be supported by an additional diesel generating set for times of extremely unfavourable weather conditions. the system was implemented using just wind energy and photovoltaic arrays.. breakdowns in energy supply are possible.3 Other Hybrid Systems The hybrid systems implemented in developing countries so far do not reflect the whole range of potential solutions.. In the first stage. hospital electrification. accurate assessment of the resources is essential for the decision on the appropriate system design. the wind turbine is in charge of the provision of energy. the objective in designing the system is to maximise the exploitation of the renewable energy resource. depending on the availability of resources..e.2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply 9 speed is sufficient.1 Biogas Hybrid Systems PV/Wind/Biogas ASE GmbH as the performing organisation has created an autonomous hybrid power supply systems for the purification plant of Körkwitz. A.

2. not be obtained. For constant electricity generation. the two resources wind and hydropower tend to complement each other to some extent (Iowa. or some kinds of fuel cells can be used to generate electricity in addition to the wind turbine. 2. during late summer. During the research for this work it was found out that these kind of systems are currently tested in developing countries in South Asia (ITDG. so that the feasibility of Wind/Large Hydropower systems needs to be assessed for each case individually. Modelling simulations proved that the availability of wind energy is upgraded by applying biogas systems additionally (Surkow. A reasonable statement on the applicability therefore cannot be given here. which is produced in an anaerobic digester. microhydropower is more feasible. Generally it is thought that biogas plants instead of diesel gensets as backup for wind or PV systems offer an environmental benign approach towards rural electrification. Combining three different types of renewable energy systems certainly involves investment costs too high for this purpose. However. Instead of the diesel genset. 2002a).3. here engine generator sets.2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply 10 Information on the performance of the installed system and about the further expansion with biogas could not be obtained within the framework of this work. when river flows are low. Micro-hydroelectric generators are turbines that are able to op- . both resources might become low. wind resources are better at high elevations. it is unlikely that these resources are combined in a project in developing countries. the adaptation of this hybrid system for rural electrification in developing countries seems unlikely especially from a financial perspective. Moreover. for some locations the situation might be different. R. another energy resource would therefore be necessary. 2003). Especially in winter. conventional gases as propane can be used instead.. Wind/Biogas The concept of a Wind/Biogas system is to some degree similar to Wind/Diesel hybrid systems. since this opportunity does not seem economically attractive. Wind/Micro-Hydro and PV/Micro-Hydro While hybrid systems with large-scale hydropower generators seem unattractive.2 Hydropower Hybrid Systems Wind/Large Hydropower On a seasonal basis. 1999). If the production of biogas is at times not sufficient. small gas turbines. A key role can be assigned to the size of the systems’ gas storage tank and its operating management. more detailed information could. additional secondary energy needed from conventional fuels (propane or diesel) accounts for 7-11% of the total amount of electricity. while hydro generators on rivers are usually at lower levels. However. however. The engine is fuelled by biogas. and the combination of both is then disadvantageous. wind has the potential to take over electricity supply. Depending on the management strategy and the scenario used for the type of consumers. Since the combination of wind and hydropower offers just limited advantages. so that the potential should be more closely investigated. This is due to the fact that the participating companies have been declared insolvent since implementation and the new operator of the systems could not be identified. However.

are briefly summarised below. This approach. 2. Vegetable oil can be made available by peanut plants. Problems and other general technical aspects. Here.5 °C above a temperature of 20 °C (Wuppertal Institute. being suitable for small rivers (Iowa. but also common for the use of the single elements. 2. A careful assessment of water resources is therefore essential. a gasification system might be applied as well. gas turbines or fuel cells. as was further outlined in section 2. and another 1% for every 5.2. Where rivers have inconsistent flow characteristics (dry in summer.1. 2002). however.4 Technical Aspects This section gives an overview on different technical aspects related to the application of hybrid systems in developing countries. 2002c). The decrease in efficiency is 1% for every 100 m above sea level. and the accordingly missing infrastructure for maintenance of renewable energy technologies. rapeseed or sunflowers.1 General Aspects General problems occurring with the elements of hybrid systems are not only specific for hybrid systems.2. These plants are often locally available and CO2 neutral.. since here start-up and shut-down procedures are less frequent. A holistic approach to create this kind of infrastructure and to make the use of renewable energy technologies in developing countries sustainable is imperative for energy planners and development aid organisations. diesel generating sets are rather sensitive to climatic and geographic conditions. 2002b). The diesel generating set The non-continuous use of diesel generating sets always results in a reduction of lifetime due to the frequent start-up and shut-down procedures. with figures from 1. producer gas is made from biomass in a fluidised bed gasifier and used to fuel internal combustion engines. 2002). especially those specific to the adaptation in developing countries. Lack of infrastructure for renewable energies One of the key disadvantages of renewable energies is the fact that they apply new and not yet widespread technologies. being mostly produced in the industrialised countries.1. Instead of conventional diesel gensets. is still matter of research and currently more applicable for industrial purposes (Iowa. makes their adaptation in developing countries a rather difficult task. In comparison to the application of diesel gensets alone. Although the production of vegetable oil requires an additional initial investment. generators using vegetable oil for operation offer a potential solution. including general technical aspects and problems of the system’s components as well as technical management aspects. F. Moreover. to mention but a few. . motor generating sets have a wide range of operating hours. this can be traded off with later cost reduction due to fuel savings. To improve the situation of diesel dependence.000 – 80.000 hours for generators with capacities less than 30 kW (Kininger.2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply 11 erate under low elevation head or low volumetric flow rate conditions. In comparison to other technical devices. frozen in winter). strongly depending on the way of operation. a hybrid system applying wind or PV support can be attractive.4. This. the application in hybrid systems is advantageous in this respect.

High temperatures result in an increase of corrosion velocity of the battery’s electrodes. This is due to the fact that an accurately working charge controller increases performance and lifetime of the battery bank. 2003. 1998): 1. Deep discharge to less than 50% of the capacity. resulting in the need for suitable operation and management system. it also influences the overall performance costs of the system. Most controllers additionally regulate the current to the load in order to protect the battery from discharge. thus reducing the battery’s lifetime significantly. The charge controller. 1999a). Germany. daily control both of battery acid level and voltage are fundamental. Energiebau Solarstromsysteme GmbH. where the nominal value is given by the manufacturer. Freiburg. though being one of the least costly components in renewable energy systems. Furthermore. On the other hand. .2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply 12 The Storage System The storage device of hybrid systems. Regulation of the current from the renewable energy generator in order to protect the battery from being overcharged. which guarantees that the battery is neither over-charged nor discharged too deeply. In order to guarantee this. at Intersolar-Fair. 8 Personal Comment given by Mr. 2. Therefore. a battery installation should be designed based on the 80% of the nominal battery capacity (IEA. both high and low temperatures should be avoided as far as possible (IEA. The performance of a battery bank is controlled with the help of a charge controller. Effect of temperature: The nominal capacity is usually given at a battery temperature of 20°C. The use of storage systems in hybrid power plants has a twofold effect: on the one hand. resulting in lower overall costs. overcharge and a low electrolyte level should be avoided. The optimal performance of this component highly influences not only the system’s performance. The more optimal the performance of the battery bank.8 - - The Charge Controller The charge controller in renewable energy systems has two fundamental functions (IEA. 1999a). the application of a charge controller is essential. the storage of power is meant to bypass short times of power shortages. on June 28th. The following major aspects need to be considered when designing a battery bank for hybrid systems: Capacity Design: When designing a battery bank installation. in most cases lead-acid batteries. is of high importance for the system’s reliability and highly influences the system’s maintenance costs (IEA. Low temperatures slow down the chemical reactions inside the battery. the longer the battery’s lifetime. the battery offers support in times of peak demands. is a very sensitive and crucial part of the system. Georg Weingarten. Thus. thus significantly reducing the utilisable capacity. which cannot be met by the renewable energy source alone. The end of life of a battery is reached when capacity has declined to 80% of the nominal value. it is important to note that a battery’s capacity decreases over lifetime. too. 1998).

exceeds a certain threshold. making the charge control simpler. S. i. in addition to the former. batteries are also usually the first component suffering from abuse (Turcotte. 1998). Battery banks in hybrid systems are generally relatively smaller and cycled more than. many charge controllers cannot be properly adjusted. This increases the importance of regular equalisation and makes the cycle life the main factor determining the battery lifetime. sometimes it is even left to the user to switch on the genset (IEA. The fact that power is available on demand in diesel genset supported hybrid systems eliminates many of the vagaries associated with the fluctuating nature of renewable energy resources. For the aspect of charge control. the diesel genset runs at full loading. Freiburg. 2003. 2001).000 cycles. A typical cycle life of hybrid systems’ battery banks consists of 2. This dispatch strategy is commonly quite simple: it can be determined by a low voltage point of the battery and a voltage point at which the battery is fully charged. in hybrid systems relying on renewable energy technologies for power supply alone (i. and not only that battery specifications are not always available. the loading at which to operate. 9 Personal Comment given by Mr. or to start the genset when the net load. . Pneumaticos. is also to minimise costs for diesel fuel and maintenance (IEA. the control of charge and discharge basically works as it does in systems with just one renewable energy resource. deciding when to turn it on. Other dispatch strategies are to turn on the genset only when the load is reasonably large and to run it at a loading to supply just enough power in order to keep the batteries from being discharged. The situation. Especially if the diesel genset is oversized. D. PV/Wind hybrid systems). on June 28th.2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply 13 For hybrid systems. Since the genset is switched on in times the renewable energy resource cannot meet the demand. Concerning the diesel genset itself. Germany. the objective of system control.. There. one needs to distinguish two different scenarios: firstly. During this time..000 – 3. 1998). meaning the load current minus the current available from the renewable energy generators. is different for hybrid systems using diesel gensets as a backup.e. charge currents can be rather high. the main objective of applying charge control is to maximise the battery’s lifetime.. using the power which is not required by the load to charge the battery bank (IEA. the charge controller is giving the dispatch strategy. Sheriff. Georg Weingarten. which is often difficult. without increasing the overall costs significantly. Since hybrid systems are typically designed for higher loads than pure renewable systems. 9 2.e. there are four major differences for diesel genset supported hybrid systems compared to “simple” systems with renewable energy technologies alone (IEA. at Intersolar-Fair. 3. Energiebau Solarstromsysteme GmbH.. however. Main problems related to batteries and the charge controller in hybrid systems include temperature control. This gives potential for more costly controllers with higher functionality. 1998). 4. in pure photovoltaic systems. charge controllers are relatively less costly for the overall system. 1998): 1. and when to switch the genset off. F.

2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply


Inverters In cases where the power supplied by the renewable energy generator is given in DC, a DC/AC-inverter needs to be installed additionally. This is due to the fact that most appliances needing AC current are less costly than those requiring DC current. There are different inverter models available, which are not to be discussed within this work. All of these models, however, need to meet the following requirements (Kaltschmitt, M., 2001/2002): optimal adjustment to the renewable energy generator proper energetic inversion to DC current compliance with the principles of netparallel operation

Inverters for hybrid systems are nowadays still considered as problematic and are in need for further development (Turcotte, D.; Sheriff, F.; Pneumaticos, S., 2001). Common problems related to their application in hybrid systems include faults during transition and difficulties in starting the generators. Moreover, available models often loose their parameters when being reset, and some faults additionally require manual reset (Turcotte, D.; Sheriff, F.; Pneumaticos, S., 2001). Modern inverter technologies available on the market not only provide the normal functions of an inverter, but additionally integrate the charge control. These appliances allow with their integrated system management an automatic control of the energy sources, the charging state of the battery and the power demand of the loads. Energy Management Systems Energy Management Systems (EMS) are a modern possibility to improve supply security of hybrid or other systems applying renewable energy resources. It serves the function of the charge controller in a more flexible way, while at the same time serving additional functions. An EMS anticipates expected loads and prioritises them, co-ordinates the application of the different generators and optimises the exploitation of the renewable energy resource, and decreases the maintenance requirements by optimising the operation of the batteries (Benz, J., 2003).


Grid-based Electrification

Finally, the centralised approach of extending the conventional grid to rural areas is the last option to be described here. Grid-based electricity is delivered to consumers at three different levels (Baur, J., 2000): 1. The electric current produced in conventional central power plants is transported via high-voltage transmission lines at a voltage of 60 – 200 kilovolt over long distances; 2. On a regional level, the electric current is distributed to the villages via mean-voltage grid, normally at a voltage of 10 - 22 kilovolt. 3. Inside the village, the electric current is transformed to the voltage level of 110 – 220/230 volt of the households.

2 Technologies for Rural Energy Supply


Compared to European standards, the conventional grid in developing countries lacks redundancy. This leads to lower costs on the one hand, but to less reliability on the other hand as well. Grid-based electrification is often highly favoured by rural population despite the problems with reliable electricity supply. However, the extension of the conventional grid is often not feasible from an economic point of view. Factors to be considered include10 distance of the village from the grid, number of households to be connected to the grid within the village, and household density in the villages, meaning the distances between the different houses.

Moreover, the fact that many developing countries are heavily dependent on fossil fuels makes grid-based rural electrification unattractive not only from an economic, but also from an environmental perspective.


For further reading see: (Cabraal, A.; Cosgrove-Davies, M.; Schaeffer, L., 1996) and (Baur, J., 2000).

3 Analysis of Impacts



Analysis of Impacts

Although several projects with hybrid systems for rural electrification have been carried out already, surveys investigating these systems are so far very limited. In fact, no socioeconomic survey discussing the adaptation of hybrid systems in developing countries has been conducted to date. This problem led to the idea of discussing the application of hybrid systems in developing countries not in absolute terms, but rather to compare their sustainability relative to other likely scenarios of rural electrification, which will be defined in the following section. This chapter, thus, aims to analyse the impacts of rural electrification in developing countries with hybrid systems relative to the different technology options presented above. In doing so, it is tried to find out to which degree hybrid system likely provide a sustainable option for rural electrification. The assessment of hybrid systems compared to the different other scenarios is accomplished with a set of indicators, which is developed in 3.2 and 3.3, making possible a comparison on the three dimensions of sustainability: ecological, socio-economic and economic issues.


Scope of the Analysis

For the assessment, the fictitious case of electrification of a remote village in a rural area in a developing country is discussed. It is assumed that this village is electrified with different scenarios of rural electrification, and their impacts on the three dimensions of sustainability are analysed relative to each other. Table 3.1 gives and overview on the chosen scenarios. Table 3.1 Scenarios and Technologies for Rural Electrification
No. Scenario Technologies PV-Diesel 1 Decentralised Rural Electrification with Hybrid Systems Wind-Diesel PV-Wind 2 3 4 Decentralised Rural Electrification with Diesel Gensets Decentralised Rural Electrification with Renewable Energies Centralised Rural Electrification by Grid Extension Diesel Gensets SHS Biogas Country dependent

3.1.1 Scenario Definitions This section outlines the underlying assumptions for the different scenarios for rural electrification, as they will be used for the assessment in the following. Scenario 1: Hybrid Systems The analysis of the different hybrid systems is here restricted to those which have been applied already in developing countries, namely the combinations PV/Diesel, Wind/Diesel and PV/Wind. The reason to leave out potential other technologies, as they were presented in

3 Analysis of Impacts 17 chapter 2. two typical options are investigated here in comparison to hybrid systems: SHS and biogas systems. accepting that the comparison with a hybrid village system is to some extent not accurate. since it is seen as inappropriate for being discussed here. . The different scenarios are all discussed as real application scenarios. it is thought that the comparison with SHS will be supportive to identify the circumstances under which the application of hybrid systems is reasonable with regard to sustainability. It is assumed that the households of the considered village are electrified each with a SHS. Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets The comparison of hybrid systems with diesel gensets is based on the assumption that the considered rural village is for this scenario supplied by a diesel-based mini-grid. Since SHS are not used for productive purposes. Scenario 3: Renewable Energies For electrification of rural villages with renewable energies. is that this kind of assessment would be based on too many assumptions and therefore be too speculative. However. operated by a private operator and being implemented privately. if necessary.2. but usually for household electrification only. not under the guidance of development cooperation organisations. for the assessment of hybrid systems it is seen as important to include grid extension as well in order to accurately determine the quality of hybrid system electrification. Biogas systems are investigated as village systems for electrification of the considered remote village. the electrification of non-electrified areas has been regarded as essential to economic and social development during the Earth Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg. This is due to two reasons: on the one hand. it is supposed that natural and other conditions for the realisation of the considered technical alternatives are given. it is here often referred to experiences of two projects on rural electrification with hybrid systems. and will be presented as examples in detail in chapter 4. These projects took place in Inner Mongolia and Indonesia. It is obvious that in practical cases.3. only a more limited number of the technical options will be available. The hybrid systems discussed here are designed for 24-hours electrification of a remote rural village. which means that ideal conditions are not assumed. meaning that a generator is applied for producing electricity. However. this is accounted for here. Scenario 4: Grid Extension The extension of the conventional grid to remote rural areas is in most cases unlikely due to usually large distances of rural villages to the grid and the corresponding considerable investment necessary for the extension. For the assessment of hybrid systems. SHS are accounted here because they are applied widely nowadays. The scenario “Rural area without electrification” is not included in the analysis. the comparison of non-electrified areas with the electrification by different technologies seems to be inadequate in technical terms anyway. Where appropriate. the relevant combinations of hybrid systems are discussed as a whole. which more detailed information could be obtained for. It is rather a debate on principles but a question of analytical discussion. 2002. However. they are discussed each for themselves. on the other hand.

For the task of evaluating the sustainability of different energy technology concepts. 3. For the design of the hybrid systems to electrify a village in Trapani. Most commonly. The need for such an indicator system.2 Modelling Assumptions For the assessment of parts of the ecological and economic dimension. the annual peak demand of the village was determined according to different possible village sizes. and 1:2 in the case of PV/Wind systems. The assessment of ecological issues is performed for a village with 170 households with a calculated annual peak electricity consumption of 48. The calculation of investment and electricity generating costs for the assessment of economic sustainability is then performed for different village sizes for the same location. creating a transparent and simplified system to provide information on the degree of sustainability both to decision-makers and the interested public.2 The Concept of Indicators of Sustainability Measuring the degree of sustainability obviously is a difficult task. A system trying to describe and to quantify the degree of sustainability is the concept of indicators for sustainable development. The annual consumption results from a calculated specific consumption per household and an additional 40% excess consumption for productive purposes.126 kWh/a.11 Although this location is not situated in a developing country. The hybrid systems are then designed accordingly to meet this demand with the ratio 4:1 in the cases of PV/Diesel and Wind/Diesel systems. Source: Meteosat. leaving much space for discussion and interpretation. This electricity demand is then met with the different scenarios for rural electrification in order to comparatively assess hybrid systems. no approved indicator system has been developed yet. Indicators are used to give a comprehensive view on sustainability. indicator sets have been developed and used to provide information on the state of sustainability of production processes or societies as a whole. Trapani/Italy was chosen as an example with moderately suited weather conditions. . the comparison with weather data from several other locations revealed that this location makes a generalised statement possible by offering average conditions. 3. the details of the calculations can be found in Annex A. The main assumptions are presented in the following. summarising complex information and. thus. Especially.1. how- 11 Global radiation: 1. the latter concept of indicators for societies as a whole has gained importance by understanding the global dimension of sustainability. A number of indicator sets have been developed.664 kWh/m2/a.3 Analysis of Impacts 18 Parts of the ecological and economic analysis in the following could not be performed in general terms and required an accurate modelling of the considered remote village and the installed hybrid systems. of which some of the most known on an international level have been set up by the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

In a next step. They do.3 0. W. This led to the following set of indicators: Table 3.. 12 On the one hand. T. D.2 Criteria and Indicators for the Assessment of Energy Technologies Dimension Criteria Climate Protection Ecology Resource Protection Noise Reduction Indicator Greenhouse Gas Emissions per kWh Emissions of Air Pollutants per kWh Consumption of Unlasting Resources Noise Pollution Cultural Compatibility and Acceptance SocioEconomic Issues Overall SocioEconomic Matters Degree of Supply Equity Potential for Participation and Empowerment Potential for Economic Development Individual SocioEconomic Interests Low Costs and Tariffs Economic Issues Maintenance Economic Independence Future Potential Employment Effects Impacts on Health Investment Costs per W Electricity Generating Costs per kWh Maintenance Requirements Degree of Import Dependence and Regional Self-Supply Supply Security Degree of know-how Improvement Weighting 0..05 12 Compare for example: (Aßmann. a set of indicators measuring these criteria was developed.3 0... 2003) or (Nill.2 0.4 0. Friedrich.3 0. evaluating their current state of sustainability relative to each other.1 0. the results being obtained by such an indicator set can provide a data base for the evaluation of the sustainability of a society as a whole. In a first step. R. is apparent and has been highlighted in a number of studies already.. Marheineke. socio-economic and economic issues – needed to be broken down to a set of criteria describing these issues.1 0. A. and also offering a comprehensive view on the their weak points from a perspective of sustainability.3 0. however. provide the basis for the indicator set being developed within this work. it allows a “relative” comparison of different technologies.1 0..1 0. 3. Krewitt. with the indicators weighted relative to their importance for the respective dimension according to the author’s opinion.1 0.1 0. On the other hand. 2000).3 Analysis of Impacts 19 ever.25 0.2 0.3 Developing an Indicator Set for Energy Technologies Available indicator sets for measuring the sustainability of energy technologies have been found to be inappropriate within the framework of this work since they are commonly adapted to the conditions of industrialised rather than to those in developing countries and they include too many indicators. the three dimensions of sustainability – ecological. Voß.1 0. . M.

and the assessment of these kinds of general benefits of rural electrification has been matter of a lot of research work during the last years. 2002).13 However. moreover. aiming to analyse the three dimensions of sustainability as comprehensive as possible. investment costs.. . This set of indicators tries to give a holistic picture.. the indicator of electricity generating costs is seen as being of highest importance because these costs are to be covered by the customers directly. For the socio-economic dimension. D. gender issues are not taken into account although this issue might be important in individual cases. a detailed determination of differences can only be discussed on concrete case studies. the indicators are then summarised for each dimension individually according to their respective weight for the dimension. weighted high as well. thus. 2002) and (Barnes. The comparative assessment of hybrid systems with the other scenarios of rural electrification with regard to the different indicators is done with the following assessment scheme: Table 3. A. For the economic dimension.3 Analysis of Impacts 20 The discussion of the relevance of the different indicators to the three dimensions of sustainability is left to the sections below. meanwhile. emphasis is given to climate and resource protection due to their high importance for environmental sustainability. A. is of key importance for the reliable performance of the electricity supply system and. - In order to come to a conclusion on the performance of hybrid systems on the three dimensions of sustainability. where each indicator is presented and analysed for different energy technology options. for example donor organisations.3 Performance Assessment Scheme 2 Comparatively very good performance 1 0 -1 Comparatively poor performance -2 Comparatively very poor performance Average performComparatively good ance or no statement performance possible 13 As examples: (Barkat. et al. the criteria of low costs and tariffs as well as maintenance are seen as most important criteria because of their high influence on the success of electrification projects. Maintenance. The extent to which technologies meet this objective should be weighted accordingly. As an example. The weighting of the indicators is explained as follows: For the ecological dimension. The discussion of sustainability in this chapter does not account for benefits or problems related to electrification in general. Among these criteria. while this work needs to stay on a more generalised level. The constricted number of indicators allows to give significant statements on the chosen criteria by being investigated intensively. can be covered by other means. the indicators for economic development and employment effects are emphasised in the weighting due to the fact that economic development is one of the major objectives of rural electrification.. DomDom.

and South Africa) are chosen as representatives. but during their whole life cycle including i.oeko. SO2-Equivalents aggregate different air pollutants like SO2. transport. CO2Equivalents aggregate the different greenhouse gas emissions as CO2. All of these emissions occur not only during operation of energy supply systems.4.3 Analysis of Impacts 21 It must be emphasised at this point that this assessment scheme only gives information on the relative sustainability of the different scenarios compared to each other.4 Analysis of Sustainability This section analyses hybrid systems on the three dimensions of sustainability with the help of the indicators set up above. this electricity demand was met with the different technology scenarios. . CH4 or N2O14 due to their contribution to the greenhouse effect over a time frame of 100 years. shall be shown as a relative comparison rather than as in absolute figures. CO = carbon monoxide. since it is not a detailed life cycle assessment. this section presents only the assessment for hybrid systems in detail. only the results are presented here. CH4 = methane. production. NOx = nitrogen oxide. They can be assessed with the help of GEMIS (Global Emission Model for Integrated Systems). a free download software provided by the German Öko-Institut.4. The details of the modelling assumptions and a detailed discussion of the results can be found in Annex B. Annex C. and Emissions of Air Pollutants per kWh. Air pollutants are emitted in combustion processes as well. Greenhouse Gas Emissions per kWh. gives chapter for a justification of the results. N2O = nitrous oxide (laughing gas). For the relative comparison with the other scenarios. operation.e. China.16 The results of this analysis. recycling.1. 3. For a better reading. The emission of air pollutants is here measured in SO2-Equivalents per kWh. Ecological Dimension 3. however. All of these gases are emitted as products of combustion processes. and compares them relative to the other options for rural electrification. 14 15 CO2 = carbon dioxide. three country examples (Brazil. dust or CO15 due to their acidification potential. For the modelling in GEMIS. 16 Available at: http://www. are closely linked to the occurrence of acid rain and have severe impacts on human health. Conclusions on an absolute degree of sustainability cannot be drawn from this. SO2 = sulphur oxide. NOx. the main results are presented here.1 Climate Protection The degree of climate sustainability is here determined with two different indicators. then. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are here measured in CO2-Equivalents per kWh. For the extension of the conventional grid.

Purely renewable hybrid systems as PV/Wind are here performing even better than dieselbased systems. South Africa and China.2 summarises the results of the analysis of GHG emissions on the basis of the comparative assessment scheme.000 10. Figure 3. PV/Wind systems result in lower greenhouse gas emissions than all other scenarios except SHS.3 Analysis of Impacts 22 3.000 30. however.000 20. their performance is therefore worse. which similar greenhouse gas emissions can be attributed to. 60.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions per kWh Scenario Comparison Figure 3.000 Greenhouse Gases [kg CO2-Equivalents] 50.1. . diesel-based hybrid systems are advantageous.1.000 40.000 0 PV/ Wind/ PV/ Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South China Diesel Diesel Wind Af rica Figure 3. The scenario of grid extension is described with the chosen countries Brazil. The GHG emissions resulting from diesel-based hybrid systems are higher due to the application of the diesel genset.1 GEMIS Results: Greenhouse Gas Emissions The comparison of GHG emissions per kWh shows that especially PV/Wind hybrid systems are highly preferential.1 shows the modelling results of GHG emissions attributable to the different scenarios for meeting the electricity demand of the chosen village.4. It shows that hybrid systems can be assessed as being supportive for the objective of decreasing GHG emissions compared to conventional energy systems. Compared to conventional energy systems. In comparison to purely renewable energy systems.

PV/Wind systems are advantageous in any case.2 Comparative Assessment of GHG Emissions 3. while they emit less air pollutants compared to the grids of China and South Africa. Diesel-based mini-grids result in the highest amount of air pollutants due to NOx emissions in the combustion process. the amount of air pollutants is considerable in the case of biogas. the application of diesel-based hybrid systems is associated with more emissions of air pollutants compared to the grid of Brazil. The comparison with the conventional grid clearly shows a high dependence on the respective energy sources used in such grids. The other hybrid systems suffer in their performance mainly from the emission of NOx in the combustion process of the diesel generator.3 GEMIS Results: Emissions of Air Pollutants While SHS almost do not result in any emission of air pollutants due to the absence of a combustion process. . They are therefore strongly disadvantageous in this respect.4.2 Emissions of Air Pollutants per kWh Scenario Comparison The comparison of emissions of air pollutants again shows a preference for the PV/Wind system. These emissions result mainly from sulphur bound in the substrate.1.3 Analysis of Impacts 23 2 1 0 PV/ Diesel -1 -2 Wind/ Diesel PV/ Wind Diesel SHS Biogas Grid Extension Figure 3.1. China and South Africa rely mainly on coal with the associated high SO2-emissions from sulphur bound in the coal. Thus. 800 Air Pollutants [kg SO2-Equivalents] 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 PV/ Wind/ PV/ Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South China Diesel Diesel Wind Africa Figure 3. While Brazil applies mainly hydroelectric power and therefore hardly has significant emissions of air pollutants.

2 Resource Protection The degree of resource protection is here measured with the help of the indicator “Consumption of unlasting Resources”. GEMIS is used as well. Scenario Comparison The comparison of CED with GEMIS shows expected results: fossil fuelled scenarios involve a higher amount of non-renewable energy for the production of energy. both during operation and for the construction of the power plant. because most developing countries apply a significant share of fossil resources for electricity generation. A comparatively good performance can be attributed to PV/Diesel. GEMIS investigates the cumulative energy demand (CED) in kWh. 2 1 0 PV/ Diesel -1 -2 Wind/ Diesel PV/ Wind Diesel SHS Biogas Grid Extension Figure 3. which is a measure for the whole effort on energy resources (primary energy) caused by the provision of products or services. the availability of unlasting renewable energy resources as for example firewood is to be ensured as well.4.3 Analysis of Impacts 24 For the comparative assessment. Wind/Diesel and biogas systems. For the assessment. 17 Source: GEMIS. The reason to investigate the CED rather than just the consumption of non-renewable resources is that the depletion of all resources is crucial for the environmental performance of energy systems.17 It is therefore a measure to describe the extent to which renewable and non-renewable energy resources are consumed in order to provide electricity. .1. This shows the assessment with GEMIS in Figure 3.4 Comparative Assessment of Air Pollutants Emissions 3. PV/Wind systems and SHS are evaluated to perform comparatively best.5. The conventional grid is concluded to perform worst with regard to the emission of air pollutants.

3 Analysis of Impacts


250.000 200.000 CED [kWh] 150.000 100.000 50.000 0 PV/ Wind/ PV/ Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South China Diesel Diesel Wind Africa Non-renew able Renew able Others

Figure 3.5 GEMIS Results: Cumulative Energy Demand of Primary Energy Thus, here again PV/Wind systems are to be distinguished from diesel-based hybrid systems. PV/Wind systems involve a similar CED as do biogas systems and slightly more than SHS, while diesel-based systems here come out worse. While in comparison to diesel gensets, all hybrid systems perform better with regard to CED, the situation is different concerning the conventional grid. Since the CED as well strongly depends from the energy mix of the respective countries, it is here decided to give preference just to PV/Wind systems and rank diesel-based hybrid systems similar to the conventional grid. Figure 3.6 summarises the results of the assessment of this indicator on the basis of the assessment scheme.
2 1 0 PV/ Diesel -1 -2 Wind/ Diesel PV/ Wind Diesel SHS Biogas Grid Extension

Figure 3.6 Comparative Assessment of Resource Consumption Noise Reduction Noise reduction is here measured with the help of the indicator „Noise Pollution”. Noise is a ubiquitous environmental problem, being more than just disturbing. A stringent interpretation of the term “health” as given by the World Health Organisation (WHO) allows to call noise a health problem (WHO, 1948). The effects of noise on health reach from aural detriment or deterioration to extra-aural health problems or the perturbation of well-being (Helfer, M., 1998/1999).

3 Analysis of Impacts


Although the absolute figure of noise pollution measured in decibel is of importance to measure the effect on human health, it is here abandoned to do so. This is due to the fact that on the one hand reliable data could not be obtained; on the other hand mitigation measures on severe noise pollution are available and applied in developing countries as well.18 Thus, this section is based on own assessment of the author, leaving out noise being generated during construction phase, as this applies to all scenarios. Assessment of Hybrid Systems PV modules do not create noise during operation. For the case of a PV/Diesel system, thus, the diesel genset is the only part generating noise during operation and through start-up and shut-down procedures. The noise originated by the diesel genset, however, can well be cushioned by building a capsule, i.e. a powerhouse, which is taken into consideration for the assessment here. Wind turbines create an additional buzzing noise by their rotating wings. This effect can be recognised as being disturbing. Moreover, the power distribution lines of the mini-grid further contribute with a buzzing noise as well. Scenario Comparison The comparison of the impacts of the different technologies shows a disadvantage of windbased hybrid systems, being due to the noise generated by the wind turbines.
2 1 0 PV/ Diesel -1 -2 Wind/ Diesel PV/ Wind Diesel SHS Biogas Grid Extension

Figure 3.7 Comparative Assessment of Noise Pollution For PV/Diesel hybrid systems, the assessment here is less negative. Still, the application of the diesel genset is disadvantageous in comparison to SHS. For the comparison with diesel gensets, hybrid systems are all seen as advantageous, because cushioning measures are usually not applied for diesel gensets in developing countries. The comparatively good performance of the extension of the conventional grid on this indicator results from the fact that electricity generation does not take place in the village itself, by this not being disturbing to its inhabitants.


Personal Comment given by Georg Kraft, German Bank for Reconstruction (KfW), on July 7th, 2003 in Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

3 Analysis of Impacts


3.4.2 Socio-Economic Dimension Overall Socio-Economic Matters The discussion of overall social matters, reflecting overall interests and needs for sustainable social development, is based on a number of different indicators: Cultural Compatibility and Acceptance, Degree of Supply Equity, Degree of Participation and Empowerment, and Potential for Economic Development. Cultural Compatibility and Acceptance Cultural Compatibility and Acceptance can be seen as key factors for project developers in developing countries. The history of development aid projects has many examples of projects, which failed due to a lack of cultural compatibility and the corresponding lack of acceptance. This indicator, thus, tries to investigate whether major cultural obstacles exist and whether this or other factors can lead to problems with regard to acceptance. It is obvious that an assessment of cultural compatibility and acceptance in global terms can just be rather vague. Especially cultural compatibility varies strongly not only between countries, but even within different regions. However, it is tried here to assess the cultural compatibility of hybrid systems by extracting experiences obtained within projects and by referring to studies addressing this issue. For this purpose, detailed information only on two projects in Inner Mongolia and Indonesia could be reviewed, because other detailed project reports could not be obtained. Assessment of Hybrid Systems The final reports of projects applying hybrid systems for rural electrification in Inner Mongolia (GTZ, 2003) and Indonesia (Preiser, K. et al., 2000) do not indicate that cultural reservations must be anticipated. Neither is there any evidence that rural electrification through solar or wind energy would reveal any potential cultural obstacles.19 However, although cultural compatibility is likely not to be problematic, problems with the acceptance of the application of hybrid system can always arise from poor system performance.20 Commonly, rural population is familiar with good-quality energy services through information given by relatives or friends who live in grid-electrified urban areas. A system promising electrification on a 24-hours basis, but not working reliably, can soon lead to dissatisfaction. Moreover, it can be expected that in areas where renewable energies have not been applied yet, hybrid systems will be met with scepticism and caution by rural population.


Personal Comment given by Jörg Baur, GTZ, in Eschborn/Germany on August 14th, 2003. 20 In Subang/Indonesia, for example, it was observed that consumers were dissatisfied due to technical failures or temporary breakdowns of a PV/Diesel hybrid systems. Thus, a connection to the grid was stated to be preferential by the consumers (Preiser, K., et al., 2000).

and both need to be taken into account here: Access to electricity services can be hampered by existing structures of political power.2 Degree of Supply Equity Supply equity basically refers to two different aspects. faces severe cultural obstacles due to religious or social Figure 3. however. thus.21 In the assessment. 2000). 14th. 3. supply equity is not a matter of course in decentralised systems and should not be overestimated.2. widely independent from national political matters. This section is. Moreover. Assessment of Hybrid Systems By being a decentralised system. Low total costs make electricity affordable to people of almost any income class. et al. The assessment of cultural compatibility shows that conventional technologies as grid extension and diesel gensets are likely to result in less cultural obstacles or problems of acceptance since these technologies are wellknown to rural population. priority is given to the matter of equal access to electricity.. From a financial perspective. in Eschborn/Germany on August. it is assumed that the use of renewable energy technologies is a rather unknown approach for most people in rural areas.8 Comparative Assessment of Cultural taboos associated with dealing with Compatibility and Acceptance excrements.. However.1. hybrid systems are relatively expensive regarding both investment and operation costs.3 Analysis of Impacts 28 Scenario Comparison The comparison as being presented in Annex C. Without taking external costs into account. . but also on own estimations by the author as well as on conversations with project co-ordinators of the GTZ.22 This restricts the application of hybrid systems for the electrification of rural villages to areas with some economic and financial potential. 21 22 With Jörg Baur and Roman Ritter.2 is based on the assumption that all systems are working well. The way of implementation and existing structures of political power in the village itself can be obstacles for supply equity as well. K. Surveys and project descriptions dealing with electrification in developing countries have been analysed. based not only on literature. Low total costs are used as an additional criterion for the comparative assessment.4. The Indonesian project proofs that population of a hybrid-powered village does not feel discriminated with energy distribution compared to other customers (Preiser. but just very limited information could be obtained. hybrid systems offer the possibility to supply energy equally to everybody within the village. 2003. 2 1 0 -1 -2 Hybrid Systems Diesel Genset SHS Biogas Grid Extension Biogas.

The fact that hybrid systems are applied at a certain limited capacity.1. and therefore by their nature less able to guarantee longterm equal access to electricity. Another aspect to be considered is empowerment: increased understanding and participation of the interested public in a development context provides the opportunity of increasing empowerment.9 Comparative Assessment of Supply Equity 3. which improves understanding and empowerment.3 Potential for Participation and Empowerment This section aims to discuss whether hybrid systems are likely to contribute to capacity building on matters of energy. The provision of fossil resources as well as the conventional grid are often subject to political changes and interference. Electricity is also produced within the village itself. but provide electricity the whole day. For a future sustainable energy system it is essential not only to provide energy in a clean and inexpensive way. Scenario Comparison The comparison shows a great potential for hybrid systems on capacity building for energy issues. SHS come off better concerning supply equity. hybrid systems are likely to improve people’s understanding in matters of energy provision. Not only that the installed capacity is limited and does not allow unlimited consumption of electricity. however. since especially in Indonesia the capacity installed was too low to meet the demand. Assessment of Hybrid Systems The experiences made in the projects in Indonesia and in Inner Mongolia do not create a consistent picture of the ability of hybrid systems to improve knowledge on energy saving measures. which is not very surprising since the decentralised nature and the avoiding of fossil resources are major advantages of renewable energies. Biogas plants come off better than hybrid systems due to the lower total costs associated with their application. come to the conclusion that people are willing and able to learn about the system. and by which people can learn about issues of electricity production. Since hybrid systems are discussed here for the application on community level. Both project reports. . 2 1 0 -1 -2 Hybrid Systems Diesel Genset SHS Biogas Grid Extension Among the renewable energies. but also to make customers aware of the fact that energy is limited and saving of energy therefore important.2. as do decentralised electricity generation in general. preference is given to household units. However.3 Analysis of Impacts 29 Scenario Comparison The analysis of supply equity shows a preference to decentralised systems in general and especially to those applying renewable energies. Both projects did apply certain consumption restrictions to the consumers. and that people were also willing to adapt to the restrictions that were set. Figure 3. is a good mixture for capacity building and empowerment.4.

the demand is likely to increase. 2 1 0 -1 Hybrid Systems Diesel Genset SHS Biogas Grid Extension Biogas plants. they can supply electricity on a 24 hours basis.. the assessment would be different.. the conclusion can be drawn that they offer a good potential for economic development.3 Analysis of Impacts 30 People need to understand the limited nature of energy in order to properly exploit the installed capacity of hybrid systems and in order to give every user in the community the same possibility to use electricity. 3. the stability and flexibility of the system. have greater -2 potential compared to the hybrid systems investigated here. If an adequate capacity is installed. . K.10 Comparative Assessment of Participament. 2000). However. Under quality aspects of electricity provision.1. a significant share of annual income could be attributed to electricity in Bangladesh (Barkat.Figure 3.2. the projects in Indonesia and Inner Mongolia did apply certain restrictions on the use of electricity.. which was not expected especially in Indonesia. moreover. Complementary measures need to be taken in order to ensure economic development. 2002). A. because once electricity is available. Both projects experienced that the installed capacity of the systems soon was unable to meet the demand since people employed more and more electric appliances. As a result.1. for example. and experiences made particularly in connection with SHS. for example.3. These examples. which can be installed at and technically easily extended to comparatively high capacities.2.. For hybrid systems applying tion and Empowerment biogas plants as backup.5. This is due to the fact that energy services are commonly seen as essential for economic development: lighting. because they require a high degree of user involve. Experiences made in Bangladesh. show that electrification results in a higher number of people being employed.4. 2002). electrification allows handicraft enterprises to apply more power tools and to increase their productivity. allows shop owners or handicraft enterprises to extend their commercial activities to the evenings. but not as only necessary measure.. and people in general have more time for enhanced commercial activities during the day if they have lighting for doing their household chores in the evenings. electrification should be seen as essential for economic development. Assessment of Hybrid Systems As already mentioned in section 3. proof the necessity of careful demand forecasts as will be discussed in chapter 5.4. but are matter of the implementation process and cannot be considered for a comparative assessment. in Indonesia some customers even evaluated the quality higher than that of the conventional public grid (Preiser. the good quality of the produced electricity as well as the possibility to install high capacities make hybrid systems very favourable. they are normally meeting the needs. even among household without access to electricity (Barkat. et al.. For hybrid systems.4 Potential for Economic Development The indicator “Potential for Economic Development” certainly is of major importance for the assessment of the sustainability of energy technologies. however. A. et al. et al.

23 Employment effects can result from enhanced economic activities as a result of lighting on the one hand..2. continuity of electricity supply or commonly installed capacities. et al. service and maintenance of renewable energy systems will occur as was already experienced with SHS (Nieuwenhout. It can generally be expected that employment opportunities in production. renewable energy technologies as wind energy are relatively more labour intensive (Scheelhasse.J. J. J.. A.. Socio-economic surveys on rural electrification in general reveal that employment effects are likely to occur and can directly be attributed to electrification.2 Individual Social Interests The criterion individual social interests will be discussed with the two indicators Employment Effects. no studies at all were found investigating employment effects of hybrid systems explicitly.. F.. K.D.2.4. 2000).4.1 Employment Effects In order to create a sustainable energy system in developing countries.11 Comparative Assessment of Potential practically no limitations to commer. Only fragmentary information could be obtained on employment effects attributable to the application of different energy technologies in developing countries in general. because these other systems are problematic with regard to issues as reliability. Assessment of Hybrid Systems Compared to conventional power plant technologies.2. and Impacts on Health. For this issue it was therefore tried to draw conclusions from surveys investigating the effects on employment of renewable energies in Germany. Demand-side-management to optimise appliances and con- 23 (Barkat. . 1999). Fenhann. 2002). Case studies in Africa expect that the decentralised nature of manufacturing of technologies as solar energy is likely to result in wide-spread employment opportunities (Painuly. 3. 2 1 0 -1 -2 Hybrid Systems Diesel Genset SHS Biogas Grid Extension Just the conventional grid by offering Figure 3..for Economic Development cial activities on rural village level has higher potential for economic development.. 2002) reveals that access to electricity results in a higher number of people employed even among non-electrified households in the village. sales. the effects of different technology options on employment are important.3 Analysis of Impacts 31 Scenario Comparison Hybrid systems show a good advantage on economic development in comparison to other decentralised rural electrification options. but are also likely to occur due to manufacturing and maintenance processes related to the application of the energy technology in the village. Haker. 3. et al. The expansion of renewable energy technologies in Germany has shown that the provision of energy services gains importance. J.

3. Scenario Comparison The comparison of hybrid systems 2 with other electrification scenarios shows a good potential for hybrid sys1 tems. Assessment of Hybrid Systems Hybrid systems emit corrosive gases during operation of the diesel genset. Another aspect concerning human health refers to experiences with rural electrification. which makes them favourable compared to options as SHS.12 Comparative Assessment of Employment. too. This. For the extension of the conventional grid. which reveal that rural health clinics could improve their medical services due to electrification. Due to this usually incomplete combustion process. J. Haker. fume and particles. Systems Genset Extension which makes them favourable com-2 pared to conventional options as diesel gensets. This is mainly due to the fact 0 that renewable energies are relatively Hybrid Diesel SHS Biogas Grid -1 labour intensive on the one hand. X-ray and sonography equipment can be used for better diagnosis of illnesses. K. by this creating more employment opportunities than in the case of hybrid systems. is taken into consideration here.. refrigerators can be used to store vaccines.Figure 3.3 Analysis of Impacts 32 sumption is likely to have significant employment effects (Scheelhasse. There are no emissions during operation resulting from the use of the renewable energy technologies. burn biomass for cooking.2. Moreover. their higher potential on economic development and therefore employment opportunities than for hybrid systems is attenuated by lower potential for employment attributable to production or maintenance of the energy system. by this creating employment ment Effects opportunities. On the other hand they have good potential for economic develop. Critical corrosive gases emitted by diesel gensets are NOx. Biogas systems.2 Impacts on Health The relevance of this indicator derives from the experience that people in areas. thus directly affecting human health (GTZ. 2003). cannot be quantified here.2.. The example of Inner Mongolia shows that hybrid systems indeed provide the possibility to improve the situation for rural health clinics reliably on a 24 hours basis. Other sources of soot and fumes are candles and kerosene lamps. which are not electrified. . corrosive gases are generated with negative impacts on human health. 1999). however. are seen as preferential compared to hybrid systems with regard to the fact that many system components of biogas plants can be produced inside the respective countries.4. To which extent this observation might apply to developing countries as well. The electrification of rural health clinics is a main application for hybrid systems of smaller capacities.

but also for commercial activities.3. they are seen as advan0 tageous compared to diesel gensets Hybrid Diesel SHS Biogas Grid and SHS.4. potential customers are likely to decide for a cheaper option. For the assessment of costs and tariffs. Electricity generating costs per kWh. the extension of the conventional grid brings out similar health effects as do hybrid systems.4. The following basic assumptions were made: . While biogas is seen as -1 Systems Genset Extension preferable due to further effects on -2 overall cleanliness.1 Low Costs and Tariffs The question of low costs and tariffs mainly depends on three different aspects: Investment costs per W. Figure 3. hardly result in 1 exhaust fumes. a cost analysis for hybrid systems was performed based on cost data obtained by project developers and system providers and for the location of Trapani/Italy. Willingness-to-pay on the one hand. but also affordability of electricity services on the other hand are essential matters of investigation in the planning process of these projects. moreover. Low electricity generating costs per kWh allow customers to apply more technical devices.3 Economic Dimension 3.3 Analysis of Impacts 33 Scenario Comparison Due to the fact that hybrid systems can 2 well provide electricity to rural health clinics. not accounting for the fact that electricity generating costs in the end might be lower. Low costs and tariffs in general are key factors for the successful realisation and sustainable operation of electrification projects. and. Investment costs must be seen as a major hurdle for the implementation of electrification projects. not only for lighting purposes.13 Comparative Assessment of Impacts on Health 3. If first investment is too high and requires substantial financial expenditure.

Support: 2000 € Operating Costs Manpower.3 additionally gives an overview on cost estimations made by other organisations in order to make the picture as comprehensive as possible.. 4.1068 × Source Schueco24   P  25  [€/kW] kW  P   [€/kW] kW  For Plants ≥ 10 kW: Costs = 2016. Tower): For Plants ≤ 10kW: Costs = 4309 × exp − 0. GTZ. Assembly and Commissioning: 15% of total investment Transport: 1000 € Local grid. during a telephone interview on August. 18th.007 × Diesel Genset: Costs = 345. H. 2003. accordingly.4 Main Assumptions for the Cost Analysis Type of Costs Costs/Details Specific Investment PV Modules: 400 €/kWp Specific Investment Wind Power Plants (incl. 22nd. Maintenance and Repair: Annually 4% of total investment Interest Rate: 6% Miscellaneous Lifetime system components: PV modules 20 years. Inverter and Charge Controller 10 years Cost data SMA KfW27 Schueco28 Own estimations GTZ 29 Own assumption For PV and Wind: (Sauer.1 to 1 € per litre. 28 Personal Comment Mr.7 × exp − 0. G. 18th. 18th. The electricity generating costs were calculated with the annuity method for diesel fuel prices of 0. 2003. Wind generator 12 years. Bopp. Koerner during a telephone interview on August.63 × exp − 0. 2003). D. the batteries are designed for a storage capacity of 2 days Inverter and Charge Controller “Sunny Island”. former KfW staff member. Koerner during a telephone interview on August. Cables. . Annex D. in Eschborn/Germany on August 14th. Puls. 27 Personal Recommendation Mr. 2003. Geis.0394 ×   Own calculation based on available cost data (see Annex D) Investment   P   [€/kW] kW  Schueco 26 Battery bank: 333 €/kWh for a 12V.3 Analysis of Impacts 34 Table 3. 2003. 500Ah battery. others: own estimation The cost analysis was performed for different village sizes of 30 to 300 households and. Koerner during a telephone interview on August.. 26 Personal Comment Mr. The details of the calculation can be found in Annex D. 2003. Internal Wiring: 6000 € Cabinets. Battery 5 years. different system capacities. 24 Personal Comment Mr. Diesel genset 10 years.. 29 Personal Recommendation Jörg Baur. 25 P = Installed capacity.5kW: 5000 € Planning.

Therefore.00 6.05 – 10. Since these costs are based on data from German manufacturers. This implies that PV/Wind systems are likely to be cost-competitive with the other hybrid systems only where weather conditions are favourable enough to guarantee electricity supply with smaller battery banks. 3.1 Investment Costs per W Assessment of Hybrid Systems Assessing the initial investment necessary for hybrid systems is a difficult task since it depends strongly on the chosen system configuration. Scenario Comparison Table 3. but should rather be seen as indicative. cost data was collected from various other institutions. which are presented in more detail in Annex D. By this it is tried to find out at which level of the different cost ranges hybrid systems are positioned. they need to be taken with caution. moreover. Table 3. charge controllers. the quality of the components and the specific characteristics of the location.21 €/W for PV/Wind household systems.6 gives an overview on typical investment costs for the other scenarios of rural electrification.5 indicate that the size of the battery highly influences the specific investment costs.03 to 4.1.03 to 3. inverters or other devices may significantly reduce investment costs.3 Analysis of Impacts 35 For the comparison with the other electrification scenarios.3.5 €/W for Wind/Diesel village systems and 2. the following results were obtained for the specific investment costs per W for villages with 30 to 300 households. more suitable locations with regard to weather conditions strongly influence the system design and can therefore decrease investment costs.44 9. 3.18 For PV/Wind systems.30 to 4.86 – 9.20 8. the influence of the battery capacity on investment costs was investigated by varying the storage capacity. Locally produced batteries. This is proven by a number of examples collected from other organisations.67 – 12. the here obtained investment costs for hybrid systems cannot be generalised for all cases.4. .3. The results in Table 3.5 Specific Investment Costs of Hybrid Systems System PV/Diesel Systems Wind/Diesel Systems PV/Wind Systems at 2 days battery capacity PV/Wind Systems at 1 day battery capacity Share in Electricity Generation 4:1 4:1 1:2 1:2 Range of Investment Costs [€/W] 8. These investment costs vary between 3.8 €/W for PV/Diesel village systems. In the investment costs analysis.23 – 9.

The quantity depends on the distance of the village to the grid. 2003) The comparison of this data with those for hybrid systems calculated here reveals the following aspects: Diesel gensets are likely to be least costly among the decentralised solutions. F. Cosgrove-Davies. The comparison of hybrid systems with biogas systems shows that biogas is likely to be less costly as well. diesel gensets and biogas systems . by this reducing investment costs strongly since specific investment for PV modules does not decrease with higher installed capacities. the number of households to be connected. 2 1 0 -1 -2 Hybrid Systems Diesel Genset SHS Biogas Grid Extension - - This leads to a comparative assessment as shown in Figure 3.5 €/W 7 – 26 US$/Wp 2. the investment for hybrid systems might become similar.hybrid power plants require the highest specific investment and are therefore disadvantageous.. 2000). CosgroveDavies.. hybrid systems require less specific investment due to the fact that the renewable part of the systems is not designed to meet the full electricity demand.14. A..3 Analysis of Impacts 36 Table 3. Schaeffer.3 – 2. however. A. 2002) (Cabraal. M. Schaeffer.. the construction of power distribution lines account for 80 to 90% of the overall investment. The comparison shows that among the decentralised solutions for rural village supply – hybrid systems. meanwhile. For the case of a remote village.. The investment cost calculations for hybrid systems from other sources. requires high financial input for remote rural areas. Source (Kininger. and can be up to 20.6 Investment Costs of Different Scenarios for Rural Electrification System Diesel Genset SHS Biogas Grid Extension Range of Investment Costs 0.000 US$ per kilometre (ESMAP.5 – 4 €/W Depending on the location. 1996) (ATB. and the density of households in the village (Cabraal. M. investment costs for grid extension can therefore be evaluated as higher than for hybrid systems.14 Comparative Assessment of Investment Costs . According to the World Bank. Grid extension. and are therefore evaluated as comparatively very good here. and: Baur. 2000b).. 1996... J. show that for other locations and circumstances. L. Compared to the use of PV alone as SHS. L. Figure 3.

06 €/kWh lower for all village sizes at a fuel price of 0. The effect of decreasing diesel fuel prices is only moderate.15 Electricity Generating Costs in Comparison The analysis of electricity generating costs lead to the following main observations: The electricity generating costs of all systems decrease with higher capacities.3 Analysis of Impacts 37 3. both for PV/Diesel and Wind/Diesel systems.1 €/l Diesel Wind/Diesel: 1 €/l Diesel PV/Diesel: 0.2 Electricity Generating Costs per kWh Assessment of Hybrid Systems The cost analysis of hybrid systems was performed for different village sizes as well as different fuel prices in order to determine their influence on electricity generating costs. Therefore. and the chosen system configuration strongly influences the electricity generating costs.50 1. The decrease in electricity generating costs for PV/Diesel systems is lower than for the other systems due to the fact that investment for PV modules does not decrease with higher capacities.1 €/l compared to 1 €/l. The results can be found in Figure 3. but also in the possibility to design the battery bank smaller.1 €/l Diesel PV/Diesel: 1 €/l Diesel 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 175 225 275 Electricity Generating Costs [€/kWh] 1.3.80 PV/Wind.60 1. This is proven by comparing the data calculated here with those of other institutions.3. the absolute numbers for electricity generating costs must be taken with caution. does not only result in higher electricity output of the PV modules. higher loads/larger villages give preference to Wind/Diesel systems if wind potential is sufficient. i. - - Again.e.10 1. Especially in the case of household systems. Battery 1 Day Wind/Diesel: 0..30 1.90 Number of Households Figure 3.70 1.40 1. which can be found in Annex D. Battery 2 Days PV/Wind.00 0.1.20 1. Higher annual global radiation. They might vary strongly according to actual site conditions.4.15. so that the data here shall just be seen as indicative. the electricity generating costs are only 0. The electricity generating costs of PV/Wind systems as well strongly depend on the battery size and the weather conditions. 1. the costs can be significantly lower. which is mainly due to the fact that factors as the construc- . In fact. which is mainly due to the decline in investment costs for wind and diesel generators.

. If compared to Generating Costs hybrid household system. this observation must not be taken for granted and can differ strongly from case to case. 2000a) (BMZ.16 Comparative Assessment of Electricity here is anyway critical. 2 The comparison with the conventional grid shows a disadvantage of hybrid systems as well.. SHS proHybrid Diesel SHS Biogas Grid duce electricity at lower costs than -1 Systems Genset Extension hybrid village systems due to lower -2 operational costs.3. Once the conventional grid is extended to a rural village.7. For decentralised electrification. et al. the resulting electricity generating costs are likely to be lower. Still. For PV/Diesel hybrid systems. and since diesel fuel is often heavily subsidised in develop1 ing countries. the comparison with hybrid village systems Figure 3. D. the situation can be completely different.15 – 0. the Fraunhofer-Institute states that electricity generating costs are likely not to become lower than 1. they are evaluated as 0 comparatively good here.3.. shows a clear disadvantage of hybrid village systems among the decentralised solutions.20 – 0. 1999) (Wuppertal Institute.4.000 kWh at an interest rate of 6% (Sauer.3 Analysis of Impacts 38 tion of a local mini-grid or maintenance and repair must not be accounted. the scattered nature of these systems is generally problematic with regard to maintenance.2 Maintenance Requirements The indicator “Maintenance Requirements” discusses requirements on maintenance structures.7 Electricity Generating Costs for Different Scenarios System Diesel Genset SHS Biogas Systems Grid Extension Specific Electricity Generating Costs 0.03 Euro/kWh for village systems with annual consumption of less than 15. 3. Table 3. since this is left to the buyer of the systems.20 €/kWh Country dependent Source (ESMAP. However. Scenario Comparison The comparison with other potential systems for rural electrification. 2002) The comparison shows that biogas systems are the least costly option among the decentralised systems from a point of view of electricity generating costs. because grid extension offers the least costly option for electricity generation if a medium voltage line passes the respective village nearby. which can be found in Annex C. Diesel gensets strongly depend on the diesel fuel price. The main results are presented in Table 3.60 US$/kWh 1 US$/kWh 0. 1999).

14th. Technicians need to be educated. the assessment as presented in Figure 3. because biogas systems require regular attendance and maintenance. F. More details can be found in section 5. in hybrid systems. D. on August.3 Analysis of Impacts 39 Assessment of Hybrid Systems Maintenance requirements for hybrid systems must be evaluated as being comparatively high. adequate supply of spare parts is essential. 3. S. With focus on matters of energy. 2003.3. GTZ. None of the systems is therefore assessed as comparatively very good with regard to maintenance here. etc.. the question to be discussed here is whether a technology is able to decrease dependency of developing countries on the one hand. Just biogas systems are here seen to be even more problematic. This shows that maintenance structures are very complex in the case of hybrid systems. By investigating the degree of supply security. Experiences show that regular annual inspection and maintenance can reduce average fault rates of three failures per year to one failure every two years (Turcotte. 2001). batteries and charge controllers. and Supply Security. Pneumaticos. Special attention needs to be paid to the maintenance of the key components.17 reflects that maintenance is problematic for rural electrification in general.3 Economic Independence 2 1 0 -1 -2 Hybrid Systems Diesel Genset SHS Biogas Grid Extension Figure 3. Generally. in Eschborn/Germany.1.. and whether the creation of economic surplus remains within the country on the other hand. If this is not ensured. Project developers state this issue to be of major importance and very crucial from a technical point of view30: whole maintenance centres need to be erected close to the villages. Scenario Comparison The comparison of maintenance requirements with other scenarios shows that hybrid systems due to their complexity require higher attention on maintenance issues than do other systems for rural electrification. and problems with charge controller and batteries make these systems comparatively problematic with regard to maintenance.17 Comparative Assessment of Maintenance Requirements The criterion of economic independence is measured with the two indicators Degree of Import Dependence and Regional Self-Supply. which is an important economic factor since commercial activities require reliable 30 Personal Comment given by Jörg Baur. Economic dependence on industrialised countries is one of the major problems of developing countries. two important aspects of electrification are investigated in detail: on the one hand supply security refers to likeliness of system breakdowns. than system breakdowns of several days can be the result. Sheriff.4. maintenance centres need to be erected. To make customers aware of the need for maintenance of these small components is one of the key issues to be addressed in the implementation process of hybrid electrification projects.. .

1999b). K. etc.e. i. show that developing countries very well had the ability to produce at least parts of hybrid systems. Scenario Comparison In comparison to the other scenarios. wiring.3 Analysis of Impacts 40 electricity output. On the other hand the importance of supply security refers to the question whether a technology has the ability to supply electricity the whole day. -2 however.3.4. On the other hand experiences also show that quality of important system parts as batteries is likely to be low (Preiser. can be preferred to hybrid systems. The latter question has been discussed for many years already. however. except diesel is produced in the country itself. Improvements in this respect and the development of markets for renewable technologies can be expected only over longer periods of time and often need external support. the need for diesel fuel makes regions applying this technology dependent on fuel imports. shows that a market for renewable energies can emerge as well (GTZ.. R. It was argued that necessary production facilities and experts are likely not to be available in developing countries for many years. 1990). Systems like biogas plants are neither dependent on new tech. and therefore are significantly preferential to hybrid systems. 31 See for example: (Hemmers. where renewable energies have been strongly promoted.Supply and Import Independence sources. On the one hand.. batteries.3. The fear is that dependency on oil imports from industrialised countries might be replaced by a dependency on imports of modern technologies for the use of non-depleting resources as solar energy. 2003). Pure renewable energies. two different aspects need to be discussed..1 Degree of Import Dependence and Regional Self-Supply Assessment of Hybrid Systems With regard to import dependence and regional self-supply. On the other hand. 2 two major groups can be distinguished: electrification scenarios de1 pendent on fossil resources are less 0 preferential from the point of view of Hybrid Diesel SHS Biogas Grid -1 Systems regional self-supply and import indeGenset Extension pendence. 31 Experiences lately.Figure 3. the question whether the other components of a hybrid system can be produced in the respective countries is of major importance for sustainability in terms of maintenance as well as further dissemination of this technology. charge controllers. (IEA.18 Comparative Assessment Regional Selfnologies nor reliant on fossil re. et al. 2000). . 3. The example of Inner Mongolia.

19 Comparative Assessment of Supply Se.4 Future Potential The criterion of future potential is discussed with the indicator “Degree of know-how Improvement”. More-1 Systems Genset Extension over. Assessment of Hybrid Systems . a hybrid system is still able to supply a limited amount of energy with the other components. the likelicurity hood of complete system breakdowns is comparatively low. As an example.3. For this reason... Firstly. modern and sustainable approaches for rural electrification can be promoted. et al. tribute is given to the fact that fossil resources are limited and that for future development a decrease of dependence on such resources is desirable. K. Scenario Comparison Compared with other methods.ture technologies.2 Supply Security Assessment of Hybrid Systems Renewable energy generators as PV arrays and wind generators have a lifetime of up to 20 years and are nowadays very reliable. The assessment here therefore reflects supply security as a main strength of hybrid systems. hybrid systems offer a high degree of supply security.. but Hybrid Diesel SHS Biogas Grid are backed up by another one. This observation is mainly 1 due to the fact that hybrid systems do 0 not rely on one generator alone. By this. 2000). et al. hybrid systems apply renewable -2 energy technologies as photovoltaic and wind. This and the fact that hybrid systems can be applied for 24-hours electrification shows that hybrid systems generally have a relatively high degree of supply security.3. capacity building and sustainable energy development. 2 3. this section tries to identify the potential of the respective technologies by evaluating their degree of modernity and their ability to improve the people’s knowledge on energy issues.4. which cannot be influenced by project developers. With the help of demonstration projects and well-functioning rural electrification projects. The experience of Indonesia shows as well that if projections are not carried out closely. The relevance of future potential and know-how improvement is to be seen within the context of technology transfer. leading to breakdowns and therefore decreasing supply security severely (Preiser. Moreover.4. Naturally.3 Analysis of Impacts 41 3.3. the system is likely not to cover demand increase at a certain stage anymore.. both nowadays being maFigure 3. careful projection of demand development is essential in order to enable supply security. The experiences with hybrid systems in Inner Mongolia and Indonesia therefore did not show major breakdowns due to system component failures. K. Anyhow. system breakdowns can occur by incidents. 2000). a PV/Diesel hybrid system in Indonesia was not working due to lightning strike (Preiser. if systems breakdowns due to failures of one of the electricity generation components occur.

the comparison of the future potential clearly results in a preference for the solutions based on renewable energy resources. to which hybrid systems are likely to be a sustainable option for rural electrification. since these are modern and new technologies not demanding fossil resources either. Especially compared to conventional electrification solutions.5 Results and Discussion The result of the assessment of the indicators is now aggregated according to the weight.1. Moreover. as was the objective in the beginning. the relatively low energy consumption for the production of hybrid systems as well contributes to a good overall result on environmental sustainability compared to diesel gensets and grid extension. which certainly offer less potential for know-how improve. The three dimensions ecological. 2 1 0 Hybrid Diesel SHS Biogas Grid -1 Systems Genset Extension Diesel gensets and extension of the -2 conventional grids on the other hand are options. A high degree of potential for know-how improvement and capacity building can therefore be attributed to such technologies. 3. which are based on approaches being followed in the industrialised countries as well and involve lower dependence on fossil resources.1 Results 3.5.3 Analysis of Impacts 42 Hybrid systems apply modern and new technologies for rural electrification. it is tried to come to a conclusion on the degree.1 Ecological Dimension The analysis of the ecological dimension shows good potential for hybrid systems. . 3. tential Thus.20 Comparative Assessment of Future Poments. Scenario Comparison For SHS and Biogas. socio-economic and economic sustainability are still discussed individually. which was attributed to the individual indicators in Table 3. hybrid systems indeed have the potential to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants.2 on page 19.5. With this. the future potential can be seen as equally high.Figure 3.

since leakages in diesel tanks and the associated ground pollution are a major problem especially in dieselbased mini-grids. . if the choice is to be made between hybrid systems and other renewable energies as SHS and biogas. especially of those applying diesel gensets for backup. PV/Wind systems are the only systems being able to compete under ecological aspects and to provide an equal environmentally sound solution. The comparison here is therefore fictitious. the aggregated impacts on environment investigated here are worse for diesel-based hybrid systems. The question whether hybrid systems are more environmentally Figure 3. which needs to be assured in order to make the systems environmentally benign. village electrification also for productive purposes in the case of hybrid systems). Therefore. The comparison of hybrid systems with the extension of the conventional grid does not provide a -2 PV/ Diesel Wind/ PV/ Wind Diesel SHS Biogas Grid consistent picture at first Diesel Extension glance. however. Nevertheless.21 Results Ecology Assessment benign than the conventional grid strongly depends on the energy mix of the respective countries. since hybrid systems are especially meant to replace them in rural electrification. Moreover. For the real application of hybrid systems.3 Analysis of Impacts 43 2 1 0 This observation is not very surprising with regard to diesel gensets. because they serve different purposes (basic household electrification in the case of SHS.32 The assessment of environmental sustainability was here restricted to matters of air and noise pollution. reveals a worse performance of hybrid systems. and can become problematic for diesel-based hybrid systems as well. These aspects include mainly battery recycling. -1 The comparison of hybrid systems with purely renewable energy technologies as SHS and biogas. the choice between SHS and hybrid systems will not need to be made. other environmentally important aspects would be of importance as well and would need to be examined as well. 32 Note: In practical terms. Due to the fact that purely renewable systems do not consume fossil resources during operation. aspects of diesel storage need to be taken into account. the commonly high dependence of developing countries on fossil fuels allows assessing the environmental performance of hybrid systems as better.

2 Socio-Economic Dimension The assessment of the socio2 economic effects of hybrid systems reveals a good preference 1 for hybrid systems compared to other decentralised solutions. But high investment costs.5. Hybrid systems by providing high quality and reliable electrification and with the quality of electric current being comparable to the conventional grid are likely to be the best among the here investigated methods for decentralised electrification.1. indeed.1. The analysis here reveals that hybrid systems can be ranked similarly to SHS. These problems are. however. then this applies to hybrid systems as well. Regarding other matters of social sustainability as supply equity and capacity building/empowerment.5. 1 Hybrid systems have advantages with regard to supply security 0 compared to other decentralised options. which have been facing many problems with regard to financial issues as investment and maintenance. hybrid systems have problems in 2 competing with other decentralised systems for rural electrification. assesses SHS as problematic from this point of view. they do. severe and Figure 3. the decentralised option hybrid system is certainly favourable. 0 which is mainly due to the high potential of hybrid systems for -1 economic development and for the creation of employment op-2 portunities. . If one. therefore. -1 high electricity generating costs and the problem of high require-2 ments on maintenance are main Hybrid Diesel SHS Biogas Grid problems associated with the apSystems Genset Extension plication of hybrid systems. The slight comparative disadvantage of hybrid systems to grid-based electrification mainly results from the high preference rural population is likely to give to grid extension and from the high potential for economic development attributed to grid-based electrification here.22 Results Socio-Economic Assessment hopes connected to rural electrification.23 Results Economic Assessment are in the relative assessment here not reflected accurately in absolute terms.3 Economic Dimension From an economic perspective.3 Analysis of Impacts 44 3. however. These indicators have Hybrid Diesel SHS Biogas Grid Systems Gensets Extension been weighted comparatively high in the assessment scheme since the furtherance of economic development is one of the main Figure 3. 3. result in the demand for high involvement of donor organisations.

then. 1. What. Hybrid systems are applicable for remote rural areas. This assessment is. Hybrid systems certainly have the potential of furtherance of economic development. and the extension of the conventional grid to these areas will in practical cases not be an option for their electrification due to the high investment involved. decentralised systems for electrification are advantageous compared to grid extension with regard to the regional creation of value and to independence and supply security. the analysis shows that especially the question of financial competitiveness with other decentralised options for rural electrification is a major problem. From an economic perspective. is crucial. two different possibilities are distinguished. and the question whether positive impacts of hybrid systems on ecological and socio-economic issues trade-off this problem. In a way. and under which circumstances should they be implemented? For the answer to these questions. does make sense at all. Firstly. it is thought here that hybrid systems on village level should just be applied in areas where this potential. cannot fully exploit the system. however. and the resulting intermittent supply of energy was accepted (GTZ. Nevertheless. the question is whether the application of hybrid systems. the question whether or not to apply hybrid systems depends on the respective local circumstances. for the electrification of individuals. but at least a basis of economic de- . the assessment of these impacts was done in relatively general terms and is therefore strongly related to the underlying assumptions and their subjective evaluation. It was shown that hybrid systems indeed can be a method for sustainable rural electrification with regard to ecological and socio-economic issues. this main advantage also provides the ground on which to decide whether or not to apply hybrid systems. thus.3 Analysis of Impacts 45 The comparison also revealed that hybrid systems are disadvantageous from an economic perspective to grid extension. to be taken with caution. From a personal point of view.2 Discussion The analysis of impacts of hybrid systems reveals that the initially raised question. applies to hybrid systems. the question of ecological and socio-economic impacts will always need to be investigated individually. is the niche for hybrid systems. in other terms. both on a household scale as well as in the here investigated village mini-grids. as well. But if this is the case. to which degree hybrid systems are likely to provide a sustainable option for rural electrification.5. For the real application of hybrid systems. It is rather inappropriate to apply hybrid systems in rural areas. cannot simply be answered with yes or no. 3. which do not have the demand for reliable and continuous electricity supply and. The discussion of advantages and disadvantages here has revealed that probably the most important advantage compared to other systems is that hybrid systems offer a good potential for economic development. However. 2003). is at all given. meaning the demand for electrification for productive purposes. This. In Inner Mongolia it was experienced that the diesel genset was in some cases not operated in order to decrease expenditure on diesel fuel. being relatively expensive and sophisticated at the same time. is the answer on the initially raised question whether hybrid systems are a sustainable solution for rural electrification? What.

the advantage of high quality electrification exactly adapted to the consumer demand applies and makes hybrid systems very favourable and certainly trades off the relatively high investment costs. smaller and less sophisticated solutions as biogas.3 might provide a framework for such an assessment. However. The extension of such small-scale renewable solutions to hybrid systems by applying additional diesel or other generators might then be a possibility to support the next step of development by providing 24-hours electrification.3 Analysis of Impacts 46 velopment already taking place should be given in order to apply and fully exploit hybrid systems. hotels. telecommunication devices. desalination systems. the sustainability of hybrid systems and other options will need to be investigated prior to the implementation process every time again individually. For a respective project with the objective of sustainable rural electrification. then the application of hybrid systems might be ideally seen as the second step of development. Hybrid systems are here assessed to be more suitable for supporting development of areas. SHS or stand-alone wind turbines seem to offer a better suited method. therefore. Secondly. For this purpose. etc. this assessment is not to be taken for granted for any situation. If one considers economic development as a stepwise process. . For supporting the first step. 2. are seen as less suitable for poverty alleviation for the poorest as are other systems. small-scale hybrid systems are well applicable to the electrification of single consumers as rural health clinics. which are already developing by other means and where other conditions are favourable to allow a positive prognosis of further development. It is based on a subjective and generalised assessment of the impacts of hybrid systems and therefore not universally applicable. The indicator set developed here and presented in section 3. taking account of the specific conditions and circumstances. Hybrid systems.

first pilot projects installed 85 SHS and 15 PV street lighting already in 1989 in Sukatani. people were satisfied with the hybrid systems. and since then there is no 24-hours electricity supply. a market for SHS has developed over recent years. but also with regard to PV hybrid systems.1 Baseline Indonesia consists of around 17.2 Project Description Within the project described in (Preiser.4 Project Examples 47 4 Project Examples This section presents the experiences made in two projects on rural electrification with hybrid systems in Indonesia and Inner Mongolia.1.2. Indonesia has long standing experiences with PV. The project team felt that just protection elements were damaged. They are based on literature review. drivers. et al.1. 4. which aims to electrify one million households with PV within 10 years. the village used just the diesel genset for electrification.1 Hybrid Systems in Indonesia 4. The inhabitants of the village reported the breakdown of the system two months before the on-site visit. Despite the problems. are connected in parallel to supply electricity to a village of approximately 50 inhabitants. a wind power plant and a diesel genset. two existing plants were visited by the project planners. 4. Since breakdown of the system. the operational experiences with PV systems were reviewed.. Therefore. Systems of choice are not only SHS. By this.. hygiene and fuel. but no reaction resulted from that. a test and certification laboratory for PV is to be erected in Jakarta. the results on hybrid systems are summarised here. The following information were obtained at the on-site visit: Lightning stroke has damaged the plant. 4. In order to overcome this situation. both consisting of a PV generator. PV/Diesel Hybrid System close to Subang - 4.1.1 PV/Wind/Diesel Hybrid System at Nusa Penida Island Two plants.1. but also a number of PV-based hybrid systems. which according to their opinion provided ideal electricity supply for their remote village. . K. with special focus on SHS. which is switched on during evening hours and works smoothly.500 islands with approximately 23 million households not being connected to the conventional grid. The village has an elementary school and some shopping facilities for food. Inhabitants are usually farmers. or work in nearby urban areas. the Indonesian government has created the so-called 50 MW PV-programme in 1997.2. For this purpose.2 This system was erected in 1997 and is designed to provide electricity to three settlements with altogether 350 families. so that this could easily be repaired by a technician. 2000).

all system components except the battery bank were showing good overall test result. a 40 kW Diesel Genset. in turn. 33 It was assumed that due to the low income of inhabitants. The battery bank was after the three years of operation down to a capacity of 60% and therefore close to replacement. while during daytime. being secured by fuses. . for which they had to pay a connection fee of 20.000 or 30. The system was designed for a electricity consumption of 150 kWh/d. just those. 33 Quoted Exchange Rate: 1 US $ = 2. while the latter led to massive frustration among consumers. a Battery Bank of 1. which need to be connected to the grid permanently. The whole situation led to strikes and civil commotion. the consumption rose to 238 kWh/d. The organisation committee. The system applies two different load limitations. all settlements obtain electricity service. where light is simply not switched off. and only the local technician remained in position. people began to apply more electrical devices than they were supposed to.200 Ah and a 20 kW bi-directional Inverter. which was created in the village before and which was in charge of the hybrid system. Already in the year 2000. During night-time. The organisation committee changed several times. the behaviour in using lights was similar to that in urban areas. village inhabitants are not supplied with electricity for 24 hours anymore. When asked. People had experienced the limitations of the system and did adapt to the system’s needs by i. could not be used anymore. Some adapters and cables of the PV-modules were also abraded and needed to be replaced. tried to cope with increased level of demand by extending the operational hours of the diesel genset and by temporarily disconnecting parts of the village from the system. only one of the three settlements can use electricity. In a new arrangement. Test of system components proved that the system was still in good shape.e. On the other hand. the system could soon not meet the demand anymore. The first led to increased electricity generating costs. shows that maybe not all characteristics of electricity supply and energy saving had been understood. This.000 Indonesian Rupees. Since the fuses did not function. ironing during daytime. respectively.4 Project Examples 48 The hybrid system consists of a 7 kWp PV Generator. they proved good understanding about the characteristics of the system and felt that the allocation of electricity was fair. proved that this assumption was wrong. The saved money of six million Rupees disappeared during these changes. The operation of the system. which where experienced by system failures. However. which is due to the system’s constant operation with high loads.500 Indonesian Rupees. Soon after connection. this was not a problem. Consumers could be connected to either 100W or 200W. because those devices. the installed capacity was likely to be sufficient to satisfy consumers’ needs. however. because the provided amount of energy was not sufficient and the temporary disconnection was not acceptable. exceeding the assumed level by 88 kWh/d. People were obviously dissatisfied with the system’s performance. project organisation was felt to be not transparent and people would have wished to be more involved in the project during implementation. But when other consumers began to follow this behaviour.

in some villages the availability .1 Hybrid Systems in Inner Mongolia Applied Systems PV/Diesel Systems Wind/Diesel Systems Wind/Diesel Systems Different Hybrid Systems Place Inner Mongolia Inner Mongolia China Sea Remote Repeater Stations Battery Bank 300 W Wind-Generator PV/Wind Systems Household Systems 100 W PV-Generator Battery Bank Hybrid Village Systems Application System Configuration Wind. Main focus was the transfer of technical knowledge. Table 4. Table 4.2. 2003). Prolonged power cuts due to low availability of renewable resources were accepted.2 Hybrid Systems in Inner Mongolia 4. proximity to the parent company of HDNTC. for the demonstration projects. Huhhot.4 Project Examples 49 4.or PV-Generator up to 10 kW Diesel Genset. different hybrid systems were installed for village electrification.1 Baseline China and Inner Mongolia have been supporting the adaptation of renewable energies for rural electrification very strongly over recent years. Through the executing company Hua De New Technology Company (HDNTC).1 gives an overview. a distance of more than 50 km from the conventional grid. Hybrid Village Systems 4.2 Project Description This project was implemented to locally produce and use wind and solar energy systems to solve problems with the availability of energy in rural areas. and therefore it was in many villages avoided to run the diesel genset to save the additional costs for fuel.2. the actual and projected demand for electricity.1 System Design The hybrid systems for village electrification were designed and meant for 24-hours supply. experiences showed that this assumption was wrong. 8-24 kW Criteria for the selection of projects sites were the quality of wind and solar resources. It was assumed that the village governments/the operator were willing and able to pay for the additional diesel. as many project examples on SHS. It was observed that guiding principle for the operators was to minimise costs. wind farms or other prove. 4. and the purchasing power of the respective county. However.2. and was reviewed in 2000 (GTZ. repeater stations and as household systems.2. The project presented here was taking place from 1990 till the end of 1999.

progressive tariffs depending on the consumption or seasonal adjustment of tariffs to the operation costs would be helpful instead in order to reduce peak load demands. This shows clearly that the willingness to pay for the convenience of 24-hours electrification was not given. However. the tariffs were found not to cover the full costs of the systems. no differentiation is made according to the amount of power consumed or to the point of time of consumption. In the beginning. Households use typical appliances as irons. downtimes of one or two months may occur. Here. In cases of major breakdowns and need for spare parts from Germany. financial and operational management were separated in many villages for better control of revenues. HDNTC can be contacted via telephone and gives advises in cases of technical problems. Due to high investment costs for the systems. Operation and Maintenance of the Systems There was no agreed management system on the plants with the villages. found to be sufficiently transparent and known by everybody concerned. The operator or the village government are responsible for maintenance of the systems and all expenditures on it.4 Renminbi/kWh34 and was set by the village government after a test phase of one or two months. too. Later. according to the affordability by the users and the objective of operational cost recovery. which is in the range of 1. it was mostly the operator being responsible for the collection of the electricity fees. The chosen operators were then trained by HDNTC with a Mobile Training Bus and an additional on-the-job-training during and after installation. Subsidies between 60 to 80% of the initial investment were necessary. More appropriate after-sales service is difficult. but only the costs of operation. the households were connected to an electricity meter to pay the consumption-based tariff. however.51 €. which was strongly accounted to the high acceptance of the system.000 Renminbi per household. with all consequential costs. since many villages are situated at far distances from the company. and 34 Quoted Exchange Rate (5/2000): 4 Renminbi = 1 DM = 0. in most cases the villages decided to choose the actual operator of their previously used diesel genset to operate the hybrid system. Development of Electricity Demand The development of electricity consumption showed the expected effects. The tariff system was.4 Project Examples 50 of electricity supply was reduced to 4 hours/day. Costs and Tariffs The village centres applied one fixed tariff. Electricity is mainly used for lighting. This approach is pragmatic and very user-oriented. it seems that it was not understood that this intermittent mode of operation increased the risk of reduced technical lifetime of the battery bank. However.8 – 2. The electricity fee was experienced to be paid regularly by the consumers. the village governments and the households contributed with connection fees in the range of 350-1. The main problem was that a transparent and comparable bookkeeping was not introduced. but problematic due to the fixed tariff. however. With the installation of the hybrid systems. radios and TV. To account this. . leaving the total management performance much to individual perceptions and attitudes of the operator.

Hospitals use X-ray equipment or sonographs. constant problem occurring was the balance of energy demand in the households: in some cases people wanted to use more appliances than the systems were designed for. An overview on cost details can be found in Annex D. dealers were engaged as mediators for HDNTC. many electrical appliances can be used by the customers.2. In other regions. But once these bulbs were broken. The experiences showed that most people were willing to adapt to these regulation. For the sale of the systems. . cost data and service time experienced indicate that PV/Wind systems are the most cost-effective option for decentralised household electricity supply from a point of view of electricity generating costs. Operation and Maintenance As in the case of village systems. by optimisation of supply or through control of demand by adapting regulations on consumption behaviour.2. because families in Inner Mongolia are usually herdsmen and come rarely to urban areas. Moreover. In smaller villages as Yingen (200 inhabitants). however. disappointing. Because of this. 4. they were rarely replaced due to the high purchase costs. the same capacity as above still met the electricity demand at the time of project review.2 Hybrid Household Systems System Purchase and Costs Compared to other household systems. which was technically easily feasible. This training needed to be very comprehensive. which makes the sale a risk for HDNTC being the creditor. However. Experiences here where. on the other hand. local banks installed electrical warning systems. found to be very conscious on matters of energy saving by using energy saving bulbs in the beginning. Most household systems were paid by instalments. PV/Wind hybrid household systems in Inner Mongolia require high initial investment and can therefore only be afforded by higher income households.4 Project Examples 51 working equipment as drilling machines. electric water pumps are used for irrigation purposes. the demand was tried to be controlled by an increase of tariffs. Nevertheless. and boarding schools apply washing machines. experiences in Inner Mongolia were good in this regard. Households were. because a contract on maintenance was not concluded between HDNTC and the system owners. Problems with the installed capacity were experienced in villages with a rather high number of inhabitants as Wuliji (600 inhabitants). Development of Electricity Demand Due to the relatively high installed capacity of the hybrid systems. the users were trained with the Mobile Training Bus of HDNTC. Families caused almost a quarter of system breakdowns due to lack of knowledge of the system and neglecting attitudes towards maintenance. The installed 10 kW Wind/Diesel system reached its capacity limit within two years.3 Electricity Generating Costs from Different Sources. However. this capacity problem was partly also met by extension of the system. which obviously stroke poor families more. Sometimes. some families stayed without electricity after system breakdowns between two and five months. This problem was met in Wuliji by extension of the system.

however. the project review states scepticism due to high initial investment costs and considered subsidies to remain essential for their dissemination. the users were less satisfied. direct economic benefits could also not be attributed to the application of PV/Wind household systems.2. and service provision to other families is not possible due to far distances between scattered households in Inner Mongolia. 4. financing schemes need to be supportive. the circumstances with regard to i. . The owners of household systems manage them by themselves and expand them according to their need and purchasing power. especially compared to diesel gensets and their high costs for operation. Compared to SHS. however. The experiences show that the village supply systems are a persuasive demonstration for a decentralised RE supply system not only for village inhabitants. mainly due to the fact that the wind generator in the PV/Wind system has shown to be a bit temperamental. further dissemination without subsidisation and just by market mechanisms alone are stated to be feasible in the project review.3 Aspects of System Dissemination The dissemination of hybrid systems by market mechanisms alone is the ultimate goal for the sustainability of the project presented here.e. SHS have a higher degree of acceptance. for the village systems.4 Project Examples 52 Miscellaneous Aspects As is usually the case with SHS. Of course. however. China and Inner Mongolia provide relatively good conditions in this respect. The users apparently tolerated downtimes for repairs without being negatively influenced on their opinion on the systems. but also for scattered households who feel motivated to buy a household system. The installed capacity is simply to low for income generating activities. However. found to be high. The acceptance of the system was. For PV/Wind household systems. because a market for renewable energy devices already exists.

5.e. which can be sup- . the provision of working capital is to be ensured. Moreover.5 Key success factors 53 5 Key success factors Sustainability describes a dynamic process. Leasing is an option of lower risk for the dealers since it is considerably less complicated to retrieve the equipment in case the consumers neglect their duty to pay the monthly leasing rates. financing. for the adaptation of leasing. Sustainability needs also to be ensured by implementing the system in a way that guarantees a sustainable self-contained operation after project implementation. important aspects of organisation. With the approach of selling equipment directly to individuals. The systems can be purchased either on cash or credit basis. on the other hand there is the sale of electricity service approach. Neither will individual poor households be able to purchase hybrid home system on cash basis. Ideally. These models are presented in the following. the key success factors in approaching a sustainable electrification project with hybrid systems shall be discussed in this section. Direct Equipment Sales: The approach of direct equipment sales commonly refers to sale of complete systems rather than components. Dominican Republic). and therefore it is not enough to ensure whether hybrid systems are likely to be a sustainable option for rural electrification. ownership. To achieve this. For hybrid systems the approach of direct equipment sales is adequate if an appropriate credit or leasing system is set up. and this is likely to remain so in the future due to the fact that credit is rarely available in rural areas and is just provided to consumers with secure occupations. but which has not yet gained major importance due to the same reason of insufficient working capital on the side of the dealers as in case of credit based purchase (ESMAP. For this. equipment dealers usually lack financial background to offer credit to local consumers. Another option for equipment sales is leasing. and capacity building will be discussed on the basis of a literature review. as is in the case of SHS. The approach of direct equipment sales therefore demands to make funds available to dealers in order to give them the possibility to provide credit to rural population or to create a leasing model. although it involves less investment than hybrid systems for an individual consumer. which has been successfully implemented in some countries (i. thus. 2001): on the one hand there is the equipment-sale approach. nor can poor communities commonly afford hybrid systems for electrification of villages. operation and maintenance. demand assessment and management.1 Organisation Decision on the distribution model The World Bank distinguishes two major distribution or sales models to be applied in developing countries (ESMAP. Predominating option is cash sales. funding of the dealers shall be provided by local banks. and direct equipment sale has proven to be difficult already in the case of SHS. 2001). the responsibility for maintenance and repair is transferred to the purchaser. Investment costs are simply too high for hybrid systems.

Criterion for decision is either - the least grant necessary for a predetermined number of connections. Problematic for the adaptation of this approach is the fact that in remote areas electricity service companies are rarely existent. As an option or in addition. however. The alternative is then to build capacity among small local companies through business advisory services and business development. the isolation of these rural areas makes them highly unattractive for substantial private participation at any level of subsidy (Tomkins. although being probably even more financially sustainable. In an ideal model. R. is the fact that in many countries electricity service provision is restricted to only national utility. depending on the actual local situation. however. both local and foreign companies are bidding for the right to provide the electricity service exclusively. focus rather on supporting private providers of electricity supply and to support them with subsidies in order to ease access to electricity for poor population. The question for hybrid systems is which of these models to favour. credits can also be made available to consumers by such banks. In fact. Basic problem of all projects applying renewable energies is the fact that knowledge and therefore necessary infrastructure is rarely existent in rural areas. questions of ownership and responsibility. The decision will therefore always be an individual one. or the maximum number of concessions possible with a given grant (Tomkins. but also demands high involvement by donor organisations. however. It is assumed that this approach is likely to open up and strengthen markets for decentralised electrification and therefore result in an increase of equipment sales (ESMAP. 2001). the electricity service company may receive a subsidy per user. 2003). The Global Environmental Facility (GEF) recommends to task managers of single electrification projects to experiment with both approaches individually in order to then decide for the most appropriate one (GEF. i. In order to make electricity affordable to even the poorest among the rural population.). are very important for the mini-grid in several respects: Firstly. Recent approaches. Sale of Electricity Service: This approach is called “Dispersed Area Concession Model” by the World Bank and gives an electricity service company exclusive right to provide electricity service to a certain area by concession. This approach. is not only comparatively time-consuming. 2001).. Users are provided electricity after paying a certain connection fee and through paying a monthly cost-based tariff. The winning company then constructs the energy provision system including distribution lines. Identification of Responsibility For the electrification of a rural village.5 Key success factors 54 ported by international organisations as the World Bank. responsibility for the power plant is important with regard to theft and vandalism.e. R. therefore requiring new political regulations (ESMAP. the operational structure for the mini-grids to be established. 2000). General problem in the approach to provide electricity services through private companies or businessman. Common experiences in developing countries especially with SHS show that if .

be avoided to press from outside village inhabitants to form such organisations.5 Key success factors 55 the question of responsibility is not solved. the organisational structure must be set up very carefully. since training requirements are high and complex and need high involvement especially with regard to maintenance. but also with other renewable energy technologies as SHS. is rather difficult in the case of hybrid systems. The appropriate solutions will vary strongly between countries and even among different villages in the same region. Moreover. which one to prefer in the case of hybrid systems. take care of operation and maintenance. and knowledge about maintenance is usually very limited. meaning a co-operative or a user group. Therefore. It should. D. the second approach of creating co-operatives or user groups. Implementing sustainable maintenance structures Experiences not only with hybrid systems. Failure rates of these components can be reduced from three every year to one every two years if just inspection and maintenance are carried out carefully (Turcotte. Thirdly. require regular maintenance. In general. Moreover. Sheriff. and he will by his own interest prevent the plant from theft and vandalism. The decision on the appropriate organisational model is difficult. The other possibility is some form of village ownership. Pneumaticos. even slight problems with the system can become major issues and lead to complete breakdown of electricity supply. depending on the specific local conditions. Secondly. F. and ensure the payment of bills. 2000a): Either the hybrid power plant and the corresponding mini-grid are installed by a private entrepreneur. and a general recommendation.. Then all responsibility is left to him. Without appropriate maintenance structures. battery bank and charge controller. however. - The World Bank distinguishes two different scenarios (ESMAP. Important issues to be addressed with regard to sustainable maintenance structures include the following: Identification and Training of Technicians for System Operation and Maintenance: The identification of technicians within the rural community is a crucial and important task in setting up a maintenance structure. prove the importance of sustainable maintenance structures. This approach is very common in developing countries and has a strong advantage by committing the village’s population to the project.. a clear knowledge on responsibility is essential for operation and maintenance of the system. because it is strongly matter of their trust among each other and of their ability to work together whether such an approach will be successful. cannot be given here. especially the crucial parts of a hybrid system. If private entrepreneurs are chosen for the . Applying renewable energies for rural electrification is a new and innovative approach. especially with regard to leadership in order to avoid failures and severe problems. S. one has to take into account that this organisational solution brings with it higher risks for the local community. Not even costly and well-designed systems with high quality components can reliably provide electricity without regular and proper maintenance.. 2001). then theft and vandalism can become severe problems and compromise the whole success of the electrification project. Clear assignment of responsibility helps a lot to avoid problems in this regard. clear responsibility for the financial management of a plant is necessary in order to ensure the payment of bills from the customers.

This remoteness can become a problem for hybrid systems. Establishment of Regional Maintenance Centres: System operators should optimally have contact persons with higher technical expertise (ESMAP. Moreover. having been educated at school recently. Schaeffer. Otherwise. and people with highest capability as well as respect among other village inhabitants can be chosen in the end. For this. . if outside organisations take over responsibility for guiding the implementation process.. has shown to be problematic.. then others can take over seamlessly. 2000b). 2000a). the main objective is not to have high staff turnover on this position. which cannot be solved by the operator individually. 2000a). This. By this. and the implementing organisation needs to monitor success after project implementation. since maintenance centres in nearby urban areas are not available and therefore need to be erected. Hybrid systems are commonly implemented for electrification of remote areas. For hybrid systems. Maintenance centres can serve this function of guidance and technical knowledge backup. the World Bank recommends not to decide for one or two system operators in the very beginning of the project implementation process. in case the chosen operator is at times not available in the future due to i. the approach of assigning the responsibility for the system to elder persons has proved to be recommendable.e. these centres should be financially self-sufficient and not need financial assistance.. too (ESMAP. M. then the choice of the technicians is of course to be left to them. the question of maintenance centres is difficult. Ideally.5 Key success factors 56 provision of electricity. illness. When deciding for a system operator. Cosgrove-Davies. 1996). A rule of thumb from the application of SHS in the Dominican Republic is that systems should not be further away than 50 km from a service centre (Cabraal. People need to be involved in the whole implementation process for a deeper understanding of the power plant. but to involve as many interested people as possible (ESMAP. A. These people then can be asked in case technical problems occur. which are ideally situated in the vicinity of the centre. as for example in a project at Galapagos Islands. Training of system operators is a long-term process and cannot be performed with in a couple of days. a pool of potential later technical experts can be created. however. can only be achieved if these centres serve a substantial number of villages. 2000a). just having graduated and looking for work. which have the necessary potential for economic development and are in need of such a system. Young people tend to be more open to changes and are more likely to move away to urban areas after a while (ESMAP. L. Also the engagement of young people as system operators. For the application of hybrid systems it therefore seems to be essential to choose areas with a considerable number of potential communities. Not only has the potentially higher degree of respect and acceptance of elder people within rural communities played a role here.

It is to be found out how much the potential consumers are willing to invest to get access to and to pay for the provision of electricity services in order to determine the investment and operation costs. As a rule of thumb. if applied costs for operation. warrants the higher financial burden for the consumer. 2001). . disposable batteries for radios and rechargeable car-batteries and the costs for their recharging. Prior to the decision. But whether people can actually afford electrification is a different question of equal importance and cannot be answered by simple investigation of willingness-topay. Operational costs should be covered by consumers themselves from the beginning. the World Bank estimates that about 15 percent of the disposable income is usually spent on all such energy services (ESMAP. maintenance and overhauling costs for equipment replacement Finding the most appropriate way for covering these costs is a difficult matter. Investigating both willingness. the effects of this fact on affordability are to be taken into account. failed. but also the operational costs often used to be covered to a large extent by subsidies. This approach. which option for rural electrification is to be chosen. 2000a: Annex 5. however. Based on the objective to provide electricity to even the poorest among the poor. 2000a): capital costs for the implementation of the mini-grid project fuel costs for the diesel genset. pure investigation of consumer’s willingness-to-pay has been found to be shortsighted. Common approaches usually investigate the current expenditure of rural households on kerosene. Costs for hybrid systems can be broken down to the following aspects (ESMAP. willing to pay for it. In areas where steady income is not guaranteed. it needs to be found out whether the demand for 24-hours electrification as can be provided by hybrid systems is given and whether the economic potential. which are likely to be covered by consumers themselves. Correct pricing of electricity – setting up a sustainable tariff structure Correct pricing of electricity is probably the most important success factor to be described here. It is obvious that rural population is likely to be interested in electrification and. Investigating the consumer’s willingness-to-pay is commonly done on the basis of questionnaires. Otherwise it was experienced that consumers op- 35 Examples can be found at the World Bank (ESMAP.and ability-to-pay is of major importance especially in the case of hybrid systems. as is described in section 5. which involve rather high investment and electricity generating costs. candles.and Ability-to-pay for the electricity service of rural population Investigating the consumer’s willingness-to-pay is one of the key issues to be determined prior to any electrification project.2 Financing Willingness.4).35 However.5. which these systems certainly offer.5 Key success factors 57 5. thus. Affordability of electrical appliances and electricity services is difficult to determine and closely linked to energy demand assessment. not only the implementation or connection costs.

however. need to be paid off. W. Moreover. With fee-for-service. billing and money collecting. with diesel gensets the purchase of diesel fuel can be reduced or stopped. KfW staff member. . However. Different approaches exist. R. the use of power during offpeak times is encouraged additionally. however. This tariff allows appropriate charging according to the real individual consumption by applying an energy meter. whether money is available at that time or not. thus awarding energy-saving consumer behaviour through lower energy bills. Energy-based tariffs: The approach of applying energy-based tariffs is probably the most equitable one. a more constant flow of operational income can be expected. 36 Personal Comment given by Mr.L. and therefore it might come out that wealthier households consume that much that minigrids with limited capacity are overloaded. which needs to be applied to any decentralised rural electrification project. energy meters require considerable additional investment and are therefore not suitable in small-sized mini-grids with small numbers of consumers. Common for all tariff structures. and each of them can be applied successfully depending on the specific circumstances. The latter subsidy on connection costs is proposed just to be partial by the World Bank (Tomkins. Setting up a sustainable tariff structure cannot be done by following a single and proven formula for success.. 2000a) is presented in the following. et al. the emphasis on poverty alleviation by subsidising can restrict sustainable market expansion. discourage investment. is one rule. 2003). Dubois. Moreover. This approach uses magnetic cards or tokens. 1998). and hamper business development as was experienced in China (Wallace.. less welleducated consumers might have difficulties in understanding the meter and how to read it. In order to avoid problems associated with meter reading. which can be bought by the consumers and with which the consumer purchases the possibility to consume a certain amount of electricity. For electrification projects applying renewable energies. 7th. Finally. which makes it an additional test of user’s demand and preferences concerning electrification. conventional energy meters do not limit consumption. in order not to undermine the other users’ paying morality. 2003. 2000a) and KfW36 both strongly recommend: those who do not pay their monthly bills should be consequently disconnected from electricity supply. on July. It is therefore widely agreed nowadays that grants and subsidies should only be given on implementation costs. and a contribution to connection costs for households can be justified as well. fee-for-service is as well very costly with regard to equipment and support service. Renewable energy devices. the option of energy-based tariffs is applied in cases where there is a reasonable number of potential consumers and where ability and willingness to pay allow the application of this rather sophisticated tariff system.5 Key success factors 58 posed to later tariff increases to fully cover operational costs themselves. If time-of-day meters are applied. this method is of special interest because it attenuates a disadvantage of these technologies compared to diesel gensets-based electrification: if consumers temporarily do not have money to afford electricity. An overview about potential solutions as described by the World Bank in (ESMAP.. However. In summary. which often led to financial difficulties and even to failures of electrification projects. a new approach applies prepayment meters and is usually called “Fee-for-service”. resulting in unexpected high bills. as World Bank (ESMAP.

while the second approach of power-based tariffs is likely to be better applicable in mini-grids with a concise number of consumers and well-established social structures. furthermore. this approach generally restricts availability of electricity to consumers and. power consumption can be limited electrically by regulating the current into the home. However. an oral or written agreement with the consumer limits his consumption to a predetermined level according to his appliances. reliability and accuracy of electrical load limiters is often poor. This approach obviously depends much on the honesty of the consumers and is disadvantageous in this respect since it does not apply control mechanisms. 2000). in Eschborn/Germany on August 14th. In comparison to energy-based tariffs the power-based tariff is easier to understand for consumers and requires less effort for payment collection. Generally. . while power-based tariffs can be applied to other users.. Moreover. which he is not allowed to exceed and for which he monthly pays a constant amount of money. To avoid this problem. reliable load limiters are mostly less expensive than reliable energy meters. electrification projects will most likely apply a mixture of both tariffs. GTZ. organisation and financing. Source: Own illustration. but on the maximum amount of power likely to be consumed. overloading of the system can be avoided and every user gets the same possibility of access to electricity services. it can be stated that the first approach of energy-based tariffs is well applicable in mini-grids of a substantial size with a considerable number of consumers. Moreover. In practice.38 37 38 Personal Comment Jörg Baur. K. et al. In the most simple variation.1 gives an overview about the key issues addressed so far being important with regard to distribution. Energy-based tariffs using energy meters are applied for well-income consumers and businesses as restaurants. Roman Ritter. leaves more potential to fraud by bypassing the limiter. 2003.37 Figure 5. as was experienced for example in Indonesia (Preiser..5 Key success factors 59 Power-based tariffs: This tariff-scheme is not based on metering of actual electricity consumption. However.

In order to exploit the full potential a hybrid system offers. Education on Demand-side management Hybrid systems are installed at certain capacities and are therefore limited. thus subsidies necessary. . Aspects as the education of technicians are part of capacity building. education on demand-side management is advisable. Other important aspects on capacity building are to be discussed in the following.1 Hybrid Village Systems: Distribution Steps 5. but have already been outlined above. thus needing subsidies. the potential profit is too low for involvement. Most likely approach. Figure 5. For other private providers.3 Capacity Building Capacity Building is a major aspect for the success of any project implemented in developing countries. demands high donor involvement Public power utility is usually not interested much in decentralised rural electrification due to high costs.5 Key success factors 60 Rural Electrification with Hybrid Village Systems Sales Model Distribution Model Cash Credit Leasing Existing Utility Service Model Communitybased Provider Open-Market Provider System Owner Buyer Buyer Dealer Energy Service Company (ESCo) Operator Private Entrepreneur Village Co-operative ESCo Maintenance Operator Local Technician ESCo Energy-based Tariff Power-based Tariff Tariff Energy Meters Agreement Fee-for-Service Load Limiters Applicable for Large Mini-grids Small Mini-grids Evaluation Unlikely due to low profits.

The issue of safety should be addressed because for many areas electricity is a new commodity. 2000a). but also for larger systems in case of village electrification. Education on Business Planning If the potential of hybrid systems is to be fully exploited. This policy is best to be established in a written manner. project examples are an important aspect for the dissemination of knowledge on hybrid systems. and can be included in an agreement. ironing. If markets for hybrid systems are to be developed. when for example lights are switched on everywhere in the village. Population in rural areas in developing countries are commonly sceptic towards unknown approaches in the first place. the installed capacity of a hybrid system may soon be insufficient to meet the demand. this question is of major importance. Common for the use of electricity in developing countries is the occurrence of a relatively high peak demand during evening hours. Two major possibilities are worth mentioning. then awareness rising is essential. This is especially important in order not to raise unreasonable expectations.5 Key success factors 61 Demand-side management in the first place refers to consumption habits. i. during daytime. then rural population should not be left alone with the system. through bypassing energy meters or current limiters. These include especially financial obligations: the understanding of the need to pay for receiving electricity is not to be taken for granted. If other appliances are used at the same time. The example of Inner Mongo- . Education of Consumers on Obligations and Behaviour Another aspect in educating consumers deals with the obligations related to the connection to an electricity supply system. Additionally. i. and electrical lines and appliances should be handled with caution (ESMAP. Hybrid systems strongly need accompanying with regard to economic development by teaching about important aspects of business founding. etc. a policy encouraging the payment of bills by disconnecting non-paying consumers from electricity supply needs to be established. and prefer to be convinced by being informed about the possibilities and the functioning of hybrid systems visually. the limitation of their electricity supply system can lead to consumer’s dissatisfaction and frustration. Especially in the case of household systems. Consumers must be aware that theft of power. will not be tolerated. which do not necessarily have to take place in the evening. Awareness Rising as a Means of Market Development The issue of awareness rising refers to making public hybrid systems as an option for rural electrification. 2000a).e. which cannot be obtained by electrification alone. Demand-side management also refers to the use of energy-saving appliances such as energy saving bulbs. which is to be signed by the consumers. A successful project for rural electrification with hybrid systems should prepare the ground for economic development.e. and therefore helps to better exploit the potential of a hybrid system. If consumers are not aware of it. This reduces electricity consumption considerably. Firstly. This has to be explained to consumers in order to make the project a financial success. an example can be found at the World Bank (ESMAP. and to guide them in using it correctly by performing activities. This agreement describes explicitly all obligations for the potential consumers. It is therefore important to make consumers aware of the limitations of the system. as setting up business plans. Other issues to be addressed in consumer education include theft of power and safety.

F. However. the dissemination of hybrid systems can be promoted. but are due to rather frequent failures of components’ integration. project examples should not be seen as the end of dissemination activities. Key success factors from a technical point of view are the following: The design of hybrid systems should always seek to maximise utilisation of local resources in order to keep the use diesel fuel low.2.. on August 14th. The same phenomenon applies to hybrid systems for village electrification: if the neighbour village owns one and feels satisfied. S. The trained staff can then multiply the obtained information by teaching the interested public about the possibilities of hybrid systems. pilot projects indeed can contribute to the sale of the technology.. since these systems are rather sophisticated.39 - 39 Personal Comment given by Jörg Baur. This fact increases the importance of pilot projects for awareness rising. . it can be stated that for awareness rising in developing countries the word-ofmouth propaganda is the most effective way. too. 1999).. 2001). 2003). F. E. since it increases system costs especially in the case of photovoltaic-based systems remarkably (Turcotte. proves this (GTZ.5 Key success factors 62 lia.. which can be addressed by these organisations.4 Technical Aspects Main technical aspects of hybrid systems have already been discussed in chapter 2. especially with regard to maintenance requirements.4. Pneumaticos. If someone owns a hybrid household system and feels satisfied with it. For hybrid systems. Pneumaticos. GTZ. the other villages are likely to get interested as well. multiplier organisations can play an important role.. Most technical problems observed with hybrid system are not result of failures of single components itself.. et al. For the purpose of developing markets. 2003. 5. D. S. oversizing of the renewable energy generator is not an option. Experts see the point of reliability as a major hurdle for the adaptation of hybrid systems in developing countries. However. the regional administration or others. By informing and training the staff of multiplier organisations as local non-governmental organisations (NGOs). include (ESMAP. Key requirement from a technical point of view is simplicity and reliability (Turcotte. Sheriff. Sheriff. 2001): o assessment of electricity demand prior to the project o provision of credit guarantees or cash sales for group lending o independent operation of the hybrid system o financing Generally. where project examples in rural administrative villages contributed to the dissemination of especially household systems. Secondly. this issue is a major challenge. 2001). he will tell this to his friends and neighbours and make them aware of the possibility to use hybrid systems for electrification. Local institutions or NGOs can play an even greater role than just capacity building... in Eschborn/Germany. Other aspects. they are rather a tool. D. But real market development can just take place through replication (Richards.

then the growth in demand during the whole lifetime has to be accounted. which expects grid-based electrification in medium-term perspective. 2000a): If the system is to be installed in a region. for appropriate comparison certain restrictions apply for the surveyed area: The surveyed area should have a similar type of electricity service. 5. already-electrified regions with similar characteristics (ESMAP. the potential of hybrid systems to economic development is comparatively high. meaning 24-hour power supply in the case of hybrid systems. then this period has to be accounted for growth projections. Therefore. 2000a). two different aspects are of major importance: Demand Assessment and Projections The assessments of current demand for electricity as well as projections of future growth in demand are essential. However. Similar tariffs are applied in the surveyed regions as are planned for the new project. but also of potential future growth is of major importance for hybrid systems.4.5 Key success factors 63 For information on key technical issues to be considered when erecting mini-grids in developing countries in general. which describes major technical aspects in detail (ESMAP. not only the actual demand for electricity.1. making adequate load projections is frequently a very difficult task. As the project examples in chapter 4 prove.4. and the corresponding financial burden in terms of the monthly bills for electricity supply cannot be overviewed by them. - . as the World Bank describes (ESMAP. the electricity demand is likely to increase substantially. The knowledge of so far non-electrified households on their real demand for electricity is very limited.5 Assessment of Electricity Demand and Potential for Renewable Energies In order to guarantee optimal sizing of hybrid systems and the application of the most suitable hybrid combinations. The relevance results from the fact that over sizing of the hybrid system inherently increases the overall system costs. it is here referred to the Mini-Grid Design Manual published by the World Bank. and may soon lead to dissatisfaction of consumers if future growth is not accurately forecasted in advance. The approach of simply asking households for their potential electricity demand is not sufficient. which is likely not to be connected to conventional grid during the lifetime of the system. 2000a). the World Bank proposes to assess electricity demand by surveying adjoining. while underestimation of load demand is likely to entail frustration on poor system performance due to excessive consumption. the optimal system performance is closely linked to an accurate demand assessment. 2000a). However.2. For this reason. By doing so. The assessment of not only actual demand for electricity. which is lower than the system’s lifetime. Demand in the surveyed region is not kept down by applying consumption restrictions due to limited installed capacity. If the system is to be installed in a region. As described in chapter 3. For a hybrid system. but also the history of load growth can be determined and taken into consideration. two different situations need to be distinguished (ESMAP.

accurate assessment of these resources is important. competitive. subsidies on diesel fuel or kerosene need to be lowered or fully eliminated in order to decrease competitive disadvantages of renewable energy technologies. 2001). which require converse occurrence of insolation and wind power in order to produce electricity on a 24-hours basis. which need to be eliminated in order to make the option of renewable energy. Investigation of the Potential for Hybrid Systems for Electrification In order to assess the potential for hybrid systems for electrification of a certain area. D. the potential of wind power and/or the extent of insolation need to be investigated prior to project implementation. legalisation of rural energy markets In many countries legislation does not allow for private operators to provide electricity services. G. This then needs to be changed in a way that allows private operators to supply electricity to regions without electricity. i.5 Key success factors 64 An important role in assessing energy demand plays the population itself: involvement of rural population. This is essential for choosing the appropriate system design and to quantify the share of the renewable energy resource for electricity generation. ideally through policy statements and direct support of respective initiatives. The World Bank states that no project on electrification has ever succeeded without the backing of political will (ESMAP. can do much to obtain information on demand and future growth (Barnes. and therefore it is tried here to state the main political framework conditions for decentralised hybrid system projects. 1998). 2001): Defining the Role of the Government The central and local governments need to be involved from the very beginning and to demonstrate commitment to decentralised electrification. Sector reforms may be necessary. Especially in the case of PV/Wind hybrid systems. Establishing electricity laws.e. Project developers report from the example of Morocco that the promise to extend the conventional grid to non-electrified areas had the ef- . Elimination of Tax and Duty Barriers The introduction of renewable energy technologies in many countries faces obstacles from unfair import duties.6 Political Factors The political framework is a major issue for decentralised electrification as well. A general problem in developing countries concerning the role of government results from unrealistic promises during election campaigns. and supporting institutions might need to be established.. a rural electrification committee. Moreover. value-added taxes or other taxes. Foley. and with it hybrid systems. Three key issues can be identified (ESMAP. since this is traditionally the exclusive right of national or regional utility. 5..

and general characteristics of electrification.40 People rather remain without electrification for some more years than to be electrified with other systems. Sheriff.. Main issues to be addressed include environmental concerns for fossil fuel powered sources. i. on June. F. Fraunhofer ISE – Club für ländliche Elektrifizierung. and ongoing advances in technology (Turcotte. growing demand for electricity in developing countries. 40 Personal Comment given by Dirk-Uwe Sauer. at Intersolar Fair in Freiburg/Germany.5 Key success factors 65 fect that decentralised solutions were not accepted among rural population. and grid connection is preferred strongly. Decentralised electrification is often seen as a second class electrification. S.e.. with hybrid systems. For the project developers it is therefore important when addressing the governments to intensively inform them about the benefits of rural electrification with decentralised systems.. 28th. 2001). Pneumaticos. . 2003. D. because they fear then to be ignored when the grid connection becomes possible.

and to identify key success factors to improve the sustainability of a hybrid rural electrification project. thus. are questions of financing and maintenance. The assessment revealed that from a point of view of environmental and socio-economic sustainability. The main problem for the application of renewable energies in rural electricity supply. thus. rural electrification is a problematic issue. address the challenge of rural electrification with decentralised energy supply systems applying renewable energies. was and is the intermittent supply of power due to the fluctuating nature of the resources.. main advantages include reliable and continuous energy supply and. Main strengths of hybrid systems from an environmental perspective include low emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants compared to conventional methods for rural electrification. however. This problem is recently met with the application of hybrid systems.e. and is integral part especially for furtherance of economic progress. Modern approaches. Common practice to meet the problem of rural electrification in developing countries is the use of diesel gensets. however. As is the case always for the application of renewable energies as PV and wind in developing countries. use locally available resources and offer a high potential with regard to local independence compared to grid extension and diesel gensets. which has lead to customer dissatisfaction in many cases. since diesel gensets usually cannot evolve the full potential of electrification for rural development. hybrid systems are likely to be more beneficial than are other technologies. did not result in a clear yes concerning their application. from a socio-economic perspective. therefore.6 Summary and Conclusions 66 6 Summary and Conclusions Rural electrification is commonly seen as essential part for the development of rural areas in developing countries. which hybrid . i. on the one hand by unrealistically high expectations on side of the population. a good potential for economic development. but also from a socio-economic and economic perspective. socio-economic and economic issues. Despite these numerous advantages. Objective of this work. since they are less dependent on external interference. and can as well be undesirable from a point of view of environmental sustainability. on the other hand due to problems with reliability of the systems. It was argued that in order to fully exploit the potential. The assessment of sustainability of hybrid systems. This approach. however. therefore. and that expectations associated to decentralised rural electrification are likely to be met. these issues are major hurdles and require attention during the planning of hybrid system projects and high donor involvement through subsidies and the development of maintenance structures. Renewable energies are an environmental benign solution for rural electrification. The assessment was performed in comparative terms relative to other solutions for rural electricity supply by using an indicator set developed within this work. In many cases renewable energies have failed to meet the expectations of rural population. was to generally assess the sustainability of hybrid systems for rural electrification with regard to environmental. the application of renewable energies for rural electrification has not yet been the success story it was expected to be. renewable energies. however. is as well unfavourable not only from an environmental. Problematic. and have several additional benefits related to their use. However. The extension of the conventional grid is often economically not feasible for remote rural areas.

a certain economic development should already be taking place in the area to be electrified. Main issues to be addressed include organisational issues with decision on appropriate distribution models and the implementation of sustainable maintenance schemes. or the implementation of an appropriate tariff system.6 Summary and Conclusions 67 systems certainly can offer especially with regard to economic development. which make them comparable to the conventional grid especially with regard to the quality of electricity supply. Moreover. should and cannot be seen as the ultimate solution for rural electrification in developing countries. however. Although the assessment here was performed in rather global terms and although therefore in individual cases the assessment might be a different one. since economic benefits not just depend on the availability of energy. capacity building as an essential condition to create the appropriate framework for economic development and for correct use of the hybrid systems. the results allow the statement that hybrid systems can be a sustainable option. and they might then ideally be chosen for those villages in the region. Hybrid systems. and political framework conditions and several technical aspects. Hybrid systems are here assessed to be a promising approach for decentralised rural electrification. and the potential to meet the demand with renewable energies for an appropriate system design. This paper has also identified key factors to successfully apply hybrid systems in developing countries. hybrid systems require a holistic approach towards electrification. certain framework conditions need to be established. meanwhile being more environmentally benign. but also on other conditions favouring economic development. the indicator set developed here might provide a framework for the assessment whether environmental and socio-economic surpluses attributable to hybrid systems justify the high investment and the necessary effort in setting up maintenance structures. They might therefore be applied within the context of whole electrification programmes for remote rural areas as an integral part of a set of different methods. for which the preconditions and circumstances allow to expect the full evolvement of the system’s potential. . Despite their advantages. the assessment of electricity demand now and projected to the future.and ability-to-pay for electricity service. issues of financing as the investigation of willingness. For an analysis of respective projects.

with village sizes from 30 to 300 households. It is assumed here that (fictitious) 10% of all households in the village are rich.00 1168..02 2.12 0.41 The figures adopted here are mainly based on data from (Baur.) and public consumption (public lighting.9 Table A. while 90% are standard households.1 Standard Household Characteristics Equipment Energy Saving Lamp TV (b/w) Radio Total Number Capacity [W] 4 1 1 10 20 10 70 Daily Hours of Operation [h/d] 3 6 2 Daily Electricity Consumption [kWh/d] 0.02 0. Erich Geis. .2 Rich Household Characteristics Equipment Number Capacity [W] Daily Hours of Operation [h/d] 3 6 2 8 Daily Electricity Consumption [kWh/d] 0. the base load of the villages is calculated. This is accounted by adding 40% excess consumption on the consumption of the individual households.12 0.Annex A: Electricity Demand and System Design 68 Annex A: Electricity Demand and System Design A. etc. Additional electricity consumption results from commercial (shops. etc. 22nd. It is assumed that energy saving lighting is applied within the electrification project. since the diesel 41 Personal Recommendation Mr. The base load is of major importance for the design of the diesel genset in a hybrid system. during a telephone interview on August. Table A. two different types of households with different consumption behaviour are distinguished: standard households and rich households.60 0. the peak load for different village sizes are calculated. Moreover. 2000).1 Calculation of Electricity Demand For the calculation.26 Annual Electricity Consumption [kWh/a] 43. 2003.70 219.8 7.40 3. J.3 94. health care. schools. handicraft businesses. former KfW staff member.).30 876.00 Energy Saving Lamp TV (Colour) Radio Refrigerator Total 6 1 1 1 10 100 10 300 470 In a next step.00 7.18 0.8 43.20 Annual Electricity Consumption [kWh/a] 65.

1 31.0 3.6 18401. the load caused by the adaptation of refrigerators is defined as the base load.0 225.0 75.0 99.5 63.7 77.8 18.6 85.3 27.8 73.5 225.0 90.5 10.5 90.0 4.2 14.0 140.2 39633.0 65.0 153.0 49541.8 42.0 58. during a telephone interview on August 20th.0 85.4 40.0 76.2 14154.0 80.0 7.0 60. 2003.0 48126.3 36802.3 11323.0 31.9 Peak Load Annual [kWh/a] 8492.0 150.9 28309.0 17.3 Peak and Base Loads for Different Village Sizes Number of Households Daily [kWh/d] 23.0 48.9 69.6 116.0 35.5 180.0 Annual [kWh/a] 2628 3066 3504 3942 4380 4818 5256 5694 6132 6570 7008 7446 7884 8322 8760 9636 10512 11388 12264 13140 14016 14892 15330 17520 19710 21900 Standard Rich Total 27. Table A.8 24.0 5.0 117.6 36.0 42 Personal Comment Mr.8 31.4 31140.0 25478.8 12.2 8.0 144.5 81.0 200.0 85.5 20. Table A.7 15570.5 6.5 36.5 4.0 12.1 22647.8 108.4 21.0 11.5 193.0 17.5 56618.0 49.0 130.5 9.1 100.8 63696.0 54.0 14.0 160.0 202.8 9908.0 170.0 30.0 15.0 120.0 22.3 33971.6 10.8 12739. Institut für Solare Energieversorgungstechnik (ISET).4 15.0 3.1 174.3 93.5 8.5 45.0 40.0 70.5 72.0 100.0 19.2 70773.0 157.0 6.5 Base Load (Refrigerators) Daily [kWh/d] 7.0 8.0 175.42 To simplify matters.0 60.5 5.Annex A: Electricity Demand and System Design 69 genset should normally be designed to satisfy the base demand.2 42464.0 16.5 24063.0 126.3 124.4 54.0 40.0 50.9 135.1 131.0 65.0 9.0 34.0 250.9 38.0 108.2 16985.4 9.5 54.2 62.0 67.7 155.0 135.2 33.5 25.3 shows the results for different village sizes. Strauß.7 46.2 20.0 13.6 21232.0 26.6 16.3 58.4 28.1 19816.5 7.0 45.0 95.0 13.5 26893.5 50.8 42.0 55.0 110. .0 38.1 45295.6 22.

F. Italy. good site Equals 6 h/d Own assumption. Hemmerle. For the system design. Sheriff.3 232.0 275. for a comparative assessment.9 84928. (FHG ISE.4 Main Modelling Assumptions PV Modules Annual Global Radiation: 1. 2002) Own assumption.2 kWh/m2/d Temperature Correction In Summer: 0..190 h/a Efficiency: 0. Berger. However.9 Norm Radiation = 1. R. 2003. (Homer.5 270. 2002).2 kWh/m2/d In December: 2. ISET44 Personal Recommendation given by Claudia Hemmerle. Pneumaticos. F. typically between 0.2 Base Load (Refrigerators) Daily [kWh/d] 66.. 2003)). 2003)) or HOMER (Evaluation of design options. 2003. C.. 43 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sonnenenergie Average Site in Trapani.25 – 0.. Berger. D. . Strauss. It is obvious that the design of the systems here is therefore rather rough and that real application of hybrid systems would require accurate system design with the help of optimisation models as for example TALCO (Technical and Least Cost Optimisation.0 27.0 Annual [kWh/a] 24090.5 30. F..Annex A: Electricity Demand and System Design 70 Number of Households Daily Peak Load Annual [kWh/a] 77850. R. Hemmerle. 2001) Personal Recommendation Mr.664 kWh/m /a Radiation on a surface with 10° incline In June: 7.2 System Design The design of hybrid systems here is based on personal comments by project developers and literature review (Haselhuhn.0 A.0 Standard Rich Total [kWh/d] 213. 44 During a telephone interview on August 20th.0 300.. it seems sufficient.000 W/m2 Diesel Genset Annual operating time in Mini-Grid: 2.. C. the following basic assumptions are made: Table A.85 In Winter: 0.7 247. Source Meteosat 2 Remarks/Source 43 During a telephone interview on August 21st.35 (Turcotte.0 26280..000 h/a Miscellaneous Energy losses due to inverter and battery: 24% (Haselhuhn.0 72. S.3 Designed to meet the base load Wind Generator Annual Full Load Hours: 2..

1/3 PV Own assumption Common design for cost optimisation Based on these assumptions. 2003.5 Share of Technologies for Electricity Generation PV/Diesel Hybrid Systems Share: 80 % PV.Annex A: Electricity Demand and System Design 71 For the different hybrid systems. the following share on electricity generation was attributed to the different generators: Table A. 45 demand in winter Energiebau GmbH Wind/Diesel Hybrid Systems Share: 80 % Wind. . 20% Diesel Genset Remarks/Source Common design for cost optimisation PV generator is designed to meet 50% of the electricity Personal Recommendation Mr. 20% Diesel Genset PV/Wind Hybrid Systems Share: 2/3 Wind. the calculations lead to the following system designs for the different village sizes. 45 Given at Intersolar Fair in Freiburg/Germany on June 28th. Georg Weingarten.

8 2.8 18.4 66.8 12456.9 4.6 18118.5 10380.9 15853.7 33.5 3.1 6.1 11323.6% Wind [kWh/a] 5661.9 12.4 2.6 4246.3%PV [kWh/a] 2830.1 13588.6 6.9 6605.8 12267.5 4.0 Wind Capacity at 2000 h/a [kW] 3.0 19250.4 Wind Capacity at 2000 h/a [kW] 4.9 6133.7 6605.9 3302.7 15098.5 5.7 9.0 10191.9 15853.8 9436.1 System Design PV/Diesel 80% PV [kWh/a] 6794.4 11.6 21.4 8.5 7549.4 7549.0 10.6 9059.1 13588.4 8.3 16042.3 3.5 7077.6 3.3 9.2 8492.3 20.4 11323.5 14720.4 13211.1 2.1 5661.3 5.9 9.6 12.2 8.5 16.0 7.2 8021.3 16985.6 .2 15.0 3.8 12456.7 3.9 14.7 9.9 10.3 11.6 9059.5 7.3 7926.0 System Design PV/Wind PV Capacity [kW] 2.2 6.7 7.1 8.2 5.3 4.6 6.6 3.9 4.4 PV Capacity [kW] 7.8 7.2 5190.4 11323.3 16985.7 4.2 11.3 7926.8 5.0 19.7 10.2 4.0 19250.0 10191.9 System Design Wind/Diesel 80% Wind [kWh/a] 6794.0 5.1 14154.5 14720.8 5.0 6.Annex A: Electricity Demand and System Design 72 Total Number of Households 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Diesel Capacity [kW] 1.2 6.8 3774.6 18118.4 4718.0 3.

4 13.9 Wind Capacity at 2000 h/a [kW] 11.6% Wind [kWh/a] 16985.Annex A: Electricity Demand and System Design 73 Total Number of Households 90 95 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 175 200 Diesel Capacity [kW] 5.4 14.3 27177.8 15.0 38500.8 39633.8 18872.4 13211.4 17.5 24534.7 14.8 31706.3 36236.1 22647.5 33971.1 28309.5 System Design Wind/Diesel 80% Wind [kWh/a] 20382.4 20.2 13.2 45295.0 13.2 14.3 23.2 11.1 22647.5 10380.5 25.1 51.9 14.3%PV [kWh/a] 8492.8 26422.1 17.8 21515.3 16042.8 21515.0 9.6 10.3 18872.9 33.8 28.5 36.7 32084.2 24.4 5.9 16.9 System Design PV/Wind PV Capacity [kW] 7.8 12.2 45295.1 21.7 6.4 30196.3 27177.9 19.0 33027.5 12.6 37745.8 .9 22.9 16.4 18.1 38.0 29441.8 25.8 45.3 36236.6 10.2 17.5 24912.0 16513.9 20760.8 8964.8 8.0 6.7 15098.0 PV Capacity [kW] 23.7 24.9 21.3 26.8 33.0 29441.8 12267.7 41.0 System Design PV/Diesel 80% PV [kWh/a] 20382.8 8.6 9436.3 12.3 30.4 9.2 10.2 22647.4 66.6 7.0 38500.1 29.8 39633.5 33971.6 17929.2 43.6 19.5 24912.7 9.2 7.3 8.0 Wind Capacity at 2000 h/a [kW] 13.4 11.8 31706.1 14154.1 11323.

Annex A: Electricity Demand and System Design 74 Total Number of Households 225 250 275 300 Diesel Capacity [kW] 13.9 77.9 26.6 21.1 47182.9 31.0 16.0 34.0 System Design PV/Diesel 80% PV [kWh/a] 50956.6 PV Capacity [kW] 58.7 67942.5 37.9 56618.3 System Design Wind/Diesel 80% Wind [kWh/a] 50956.7 23.1 37.5 15.3%PV [kWh/a] 21232.7 33.8 62280.8 62280.3 51900.3 28309.1 23591.4 70.0 64.2 41.2 .8 Wind Capacity at 2000 h/a [kW] 27.4 System Design PV/Wind PV Capacity [kW] 19.0 44.6 Wind Capacity at 2000 h/a [kW] 33.5 18.7 67942.1 66.6 56618.6% Wind [kWh/a] 42464.2 25950.9 56618.

Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations


Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations
B.1 Scenario Definitions
For the comparison of the different electrification scenarios, the main requirement for adequate comparison is that in all scenarios the same amount of electricity is provided. Here, a village with 170 households is chosen, with peak electricity consumption of 48,126 kWh/a, which is to be produced by the different scenarios. SHS, however, are seen as an exception here. SHS are just used for household electrification, and since real application is to be investigated, this is accounted for here. It is assumed that every household is supplied with a 50 Wp SHS-module each, generating 80 kWh/a at the given global irradiation, efficiency and energy density. For the assessment of the impacts of conventional grid-based electrification on ecology, three commonly used developing/transition countries are chosen: Brazil for its high share of hydro power plants on electricity supply; China for its high share coal power plants on electricity supply; and South Africa as an African representative and with comparatively high share of nuclear power.

The different electricity supply systems are chosen from the database of GEMIS. An overview on system designs and main assumptions is given in the following.
Scenario 1: Hybrid systems
PV Module PV/Diesel monocrystalline PVmodule, system with aluminium-frame incl. Elevation after DIN small-scale dieselmotor for decentral electricity production, no emission control (base case) 20 9,625.2 10.2 30 1,460 10 Own assumption Source: GEMIS; for the diesel generator, no emission control is applied as worst case scenario Wind Generator Diesel Remarks/Source


Electricity Production [%] Electricity Production [kWh/a] Installed Capacity [kW] Efficiency [%] Annual Operating Hours [h/a] Lifetime [a]

80 38,500.8 43.8 10 1,664 20

Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations
PV Module PV/Wind monocrystalline PVsmall-scale single module, system mit wind turbine, for good aluminium-frame incl. sites Elevation after DIN 33.3 16,042 14.8 10 1,664 20 66.7 32,084 21.1 100 2,000 12 Own estimation Wind Generator Diesel



Source: GEMIS

Electricity Production [%] Electricity Production [kWh/a] Installed Capacity [kW] Efficiency [%] Annual Operating Hours [h/a] Lifetime [a] Wind/Diesel


small-scale dieselmoSmall-scale single tor for decentral elecwind turbine, for good tricity production, no emission control sites (base case) 80 38,500.8 25.3 100 2,000 12 20 9,625.2 10.2 30 1,460 10

Source: GEMIS; for the diesel generator, no emission control is applied as worst case scenario

Electricity Production [%] Electricity Production [kWh/a] Installed Capacity [kW] Efficiency [%] Annual Operating Hours [h/a] Lifetime [a]

Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations


Scenario 2: Diesel Mini-Grid
Diesel Mini-Grid


small-scale dieselmotor for decentral electricity Source: GEMIS; no emission control as is production, no emission control (base case) common in developing countries

Electricity Production [kWh/a] Installed Capacity [kWp] Efficiency [%] Annual Operating Hours [h/a] Lifetime [a] 48,126

22 30 2,190 6 Own assumption

Scenario 3: Renewable Energy
Solar Home system Remarks/Source Biogas Plant Remarks/Source Small generator for biogas from decentral Source: GEMIS; fermentation for elecCatalytic Converter tricity generation in added; Converter developing countries, meets World Bank with three-way cataEmission and Imlytic-converter for remission Standards duction of NOx/CO/NMVOC 35,058.3 170 Buildings, each one SHS


Complete 50 Wp Solar Home System, incl. battery & CFL bulbs, with 100% firm power due to battery storage

Source: GEMIS

Electricity Production [kWh/a] Installed Capacity [kWp] Efficiency [%] Annual Operating Hours [h/a] Lifetime [a]


8.5 10 1,600 20

10 27.74 4,813 10

Own estimation Source: GEMIS

Own estimation

800.5 0.1 577.7 4. injected gas turbine = STIG 8.000 30 2.117. electric filter.dam + reservoir water reactor LWR) in China.5 1.000 50 .98 3.removal.Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations 78 Hydroelectric Power Plant Scenario 4: Grid-Extension Coal Power Plant Brazil In Brazil: bagasse.000 30 950 33 6.000 50 2. includes asNOx.2 50 100 6.plant (pressurisedbine for developing water reactor. 80. PWR) sized power plant with Large scale river countries.8 10 38.000 20 250 100 4.1 Electricity Production [%] Electricity Production [kWh/a] Installed Capacity [MW] Efficiency [%] Annual Operating Hours [h/a] Lifetime [a] 38.250 33 6.4 82. no SO2.994.3 4. of 5 g/MWh-el.1 here neglected 600 38 6.2 1.597.506 15 Description Nuclear power plant Coal-fired steamhydro-electric power (pressurised lightturbine power plant in plant . Large hard coal power Generic nuclear power Here dealt with as biomass: mediumplant with steam tur.213.5 300 38 5. in China China.6 Nuclear Power Plant Others Description Electricity Production [%] Electricity Production [kWh/a] Installed Capacity [MW] Efficiency [%] Annual Operating Hours [h/a] Lifetime [a] China 3.or in developing counintegrated biomass power plant Brazil tries.2 18. no cool. but gasification of wood.000 20 39.5 8.sumed nuclear waste simple-cycle steaming tower.903.

1 0. PWR with 2x 920 no SO2.000 25 920 33 7.4 here neglected 500 38 5. cooling tower assumed nuclear waste with wet recooling.5 5. With GEMIS. . the amount of greenhouse gas emissions.1 44. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The following table shows the amount of greenhouse gas emissions attributable to the different electrification scenarios. of 5 g/MWh-el.9 529. bine in South Africa.561 50 B.reMW-netto.2 Modelling Results The following section gives an overview and interpretation on the results of the GEMIS calculation for a village of 170 household. South Africa.200 25 360 100 3.or NOx. includes moval.5 1.8 2.646. CO2-Equivalents aggregate the different greenhouse gas emissions due to their contribution to the greenhouse effect. air pollutants and the cumulative energy demand (CED) were calculated.997. supplied with energy due to the different scenarios. Nuclear Power Plant Hydroelectric Power Plant Others 79 Description Electricity Production [%] Electricity Production [kWh/a] Installed Capacity [MW] Efficiency [%] Annual Operating Hours [h/a] Lifetime [a] 93.Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations Coal Power Plant South Africa Nuclear power plant Large hard coal power Koeberg close to Cape plant with steam turTown.

52 553.74E-07 These figures are illustrated by the following graphs.707.23 234.Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations 80 Table B.7% of hydropower for electricity generation. For Brazil.000 20.000 30.677.50 0.02 8.35 Perfluormethane Perfluorethane [kg] [kg] 2.1 GEMIS Results: GHG Emissions The comparison of the different scenarios clearly shows that hybrid systems result in relatively few GHG emissions.000 40. the result .36 46.73 11.27 3.969.340.69 N2O [kg] 0.95 CH4 [kg] 27. The comparison with diesel genset shows the expected result: the application of hybrid systems result in less GHG emissions due to the fact that the diesel generator accounts for just 80% of the electricity production.63 2.43 13. The comparison with renewable energy technologies shows a likewise expected result: diesel based hybrid systems result in more GHG emissions than do SHS and biogas plants due to the application of the diesel generator.83E-07 4.80 4.10 1.04 6.31 1.40E-07 1.710.879.51 10.568.24 2. The comparison of hybrid systems with grid-based electrification shows expected results for South Africa and China.000 Greenhouse Gases [kg CO2-Equivalents] 50.98E-06 8.44E-07 1.16 12.1 Amount of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Option [kg] PV/ Diesel Wind/ Diesel PV/ Wind Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South Africa China CO2Equivalents [kg] 18.75 54.32 0.27 42.165.31 2.503.43 40.93 3.63 CO2 [kg] 17.945.43 17.38E-06 6.80E-03 4.65E-03 7.201.637.11E-02 5.000 10.593.00 3. which applies 82.05E-08 1.50 0. 60.09 1. so that their GHG emissions are equal to those attributable to SHS and biogas.73E-07 7.071.46E-06 3.38 0.422.52E-07 1.533.37 34.56 29. PV/Wind hybrid systems do not apply fossil resources during operation. which can be explained with the high share of coal in electricity production.53 54.47E-07 8.16E-06 2.887.53E-06 1.57 166.38 56.815.000 0 PV/ Wind/ PV/ Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South China Diesel Diesel Wind Af rica Figure B.11E-03 5.35E-06 6.

have a comparatively high greenhouse potential and therefore significantly contribute to the aggregated CO2Equivalents. Secondly. .Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations 81 seems surprising in the first instance. SO2-Equivalents aggregate the different air pollutants due to their acidification potential. the diesel generator applied in the model here does not apply emission reduction measures as catalytic converters.2. although from their total amount fewer than CO2 emissions. 600 Methance Emissions [kg] 500 400 300 200 100 0 PV/ Wind/ PV/ Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South China Diesel Diesel Wind Africa Figure B. the Brazilian grid results in similar GHG emissions as do PV/Diesel systems. This has two main reasons: Firstly. the application of hydroelectric power plants results in a high degree of CH4 emissions as shows figure B.2 GEMIS Results: Methane Emissions CH4 emissions. Air Pollutants The following tables show the amount of air pollutants attributable to the different electrification scenarios.

75E-09 6.55E-05 1.22 -6.74 0.04E-04 3.08 0.41 NMVOC [kg] 3.03 3.67 47.02E-05 1.89E-05 South Africa 8.42E-05 6.04E-05 5.17E-04 3.94E-10 1.51E-08 1.00 155.33E-06 2.66E-07 These figures are illustrated with the following graphs.31E-04 2.00 0.47E-05 4.18E-05 1.07 1.48E-06 -1.69 25.13 35.73E-06 5.04E-07 7.12 5.42E-10 1.24E-08 Option PV/ Diesel NH3 [kg] As [kg] Cd [kg] Cr [kg] Hg [kg] Ni [kg] Pb [kg] PCDD/F [kg] 1.00E-06 2.22 246.01 0.62E-08 1.74E-05 6.17E-12 8.19E-09 4.30E-06 1.85 0.06 186.54 161.66 0.44E-09 4.97E-05 2.03E-04 4.33 1.05E-06 1.12 0.15E-09 -4.64E-10 2.2 Air Pollutants Option PV/ Diesel Wind/ Diesel PV/ Wind Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South Africa China 9.57E-04 China 5.66 18.43E-05 1.53 116.17 1.02 0.25 HF [kg] 0.76E-06 6.22 0.65E-08 2.69E-05 9.08 0.91 0.40 0.86E-06 1.35E-06 2.89E-06 4.01 0.92E-08 6.08 0.53E-05 8.49E-10 2.26E-07 -1.07E-06 1.67E-05 1.51 13.97E-05 1.85 297.46E-05 1.12E-05 1.20 77.86 215.46E-10 1.47 0.04E-05 1.78 27.18E-05 3.62 390.40 H2 S [kg] -1.36 197.13E-08 1.89E-05 4.71 NOx [kg] 169.86 4. .61 4.48 43.37 2.76E-04 1.95 HCl [kg] 0.04 772.61 134.50 0.16E-05 4.79E-04 8.23E-05 1.45 52.39E-04 6.35E-05 2.56 14.30 222.01 21.22 32.11E-06 2.06 156.88 3.97 4.06 168.73 SO2 [kg] 53.14 3.56E-05 5.28E-03 Wind/ Diesel 3.89E-05 6.Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations 82 Table B.24E-08 1.83 799.56E-05 4.77E-10 1.38E-08 -1.18E-07 3.79 395.15 0.29 16.03 Dust [kg] 44.87E-11 SO2Equivalent [kg] 172.04 40.88 12.97E-04 8.10 1.24E-04 1.21E-06 3.01 2.33E-05 9.91E-06 2.10E-06 3.76 6.27E-05 4.32E-06 5.87E-06 1.49E-06 3.03 CO [kg] 51.52E-04 PV/ Wind Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil 5.71 1.

the amount of air pollutants in a country like Brazil. reveals similar or less air pollutants from hybrid systems. especially PV/Wind systems. dust and CO. again the expected result is obtained. Due to fewer operational time of the diesel generator in hybrid systems. the higher the share of coal in electricity production and the worse the flue gas cleaning in these countries. while the conventional grid emits mainly SO2 from coal combustion. For a better overview on the amount of the main air pollutants SO2. the amount of air pollutants is significantly Figure B. In comparison with grid-based electrification. the following figure is meant to provide an overview. It illustrates that main pollutants in diesel systems are NOx. the better the comparative performance of hybrid system. . applying a high share of hydroelectric power. The comparison with biogas systems. the total amount is similar. For PV/Wind systems.3 GEMIS Results: Air Pollutants lower than for diesel mini-grids. Compared to diesel gensets. is lower. The comparison with SHS shows that diesel-based hybrid systems result in higher emissions of air pollutants. The high amount of air pollutants in the biogas system here results mainly from SO2 from sulphur in the fuel. NOx.Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations 83 800 Air Pollutants [kg SO2-Equivalents] 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 PV/ Wind/ PV/ Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South China Diesel Diesel Wind Af rica The comparison of the different scenarios shows that hybrid systems are likely to result in few emissions of air pollutants. however. However.

3 82.4 123.975.3 39.4 Selected Air Pollutants Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) The Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) in kWh is a measure for the whole effort on energy resources (primary energy) for the provision of products or services.4 45.3 209.681.369.861.6 537.1 180.1 10.6 48.537.46 It is therefore a measure to describe the extent to which renewable and non-renewable energy resources are consumed in order to provide electricity.015.040.9 19.012.600.1 Renewable Resources [kWh] 39.053.3 Cumulative Energy Demand (Primary Energy) Option Total CED [kWh] 103. 46 Source: GEMIS . Table B.078.717.2 1.032.747.085.6 68.3 0.705. The following table shows the results of the GEMIS calculations.0 58.6 8.4 54.4 350.602.645.3 59.0 60.7 64.0 12.4 Non-Renewable Resources [kWh] 62.6 958.3 PV/Diesel Wind/Diesel PV/Wind Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South Africa China These figures are illustrated with the following graphs.742.454.2 14.370.0 118.945.2 129.273.1 109. both during operation and for the construction of the power plant.8 13.3 56.6 129.799.0 Others [kWh] 2.0 38.159.Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations 800 Selected Air Pollutants [kg] 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 PV/ Wind/ Diesel Diesel PV/ Wind Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South Africa China SO2 NOx Dust CO 84 Figure B.2 43.0 210.353.

6 as well. this disadvantage might well be due to the fact that larger systems of higher installed capacity are applied to provide more energy than with SHS.000 50. This is to the higher energy demand for higher installed capacity in PV/Wind hybrid systems. hybrid systems applying diesel generators are disadvantageous.000 plication of hybrid systems is advanta100.000 geous compared to 50. As is proved by figure B.6 Cumulative Energy Demand According to Resources .6 as well.000 the diesel mini-grid and to the conven0 tional grid in counPV/ Wind/ PV/ Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South China tries with a high Diesel Diesel Wind Africa share of coal in electricity generaFigure B.5 Cumulative Energy Demand (Primary Energy) tion. In comparison to Biogas and the conventional grid of Brazil with a high share of hydropower. For the case of PV/Wind hybrid systems. being most important for this assessment here. is higher in these hybrid systems due to the use of the diesel generator. This idea is supported by figure B.000 100.000 total cumulative energy demand 200. hybrid systems are all disadvantageous. but also a significantly higher degree of non-renewable energy consumption.000 150. which shows not only a higher degree of renewable energy consumption by PV/Wind systems than with SHS.000 CED [kWh] 200. Just PV/Wind systems are able to compete with biogas and the grid of Brazil.Annex B: GEMIS Scenario Calculations 85 The investigation of 250. the consumption of non-renewable resources. In comparison to SHS.000 0 PV/ Wind/ PV/ Diesel SHS Biogas Brazil South China Diesel Diesel Wind Africa Non-renew able Renew able Others CED [kWh] Figure B.000 shows that the ap150. 250.

are necessary in order to provide the same amount of electricity as with hybrid systems. Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid The generation of electricity in centralised power plants does not result in noise in the remote villages. resulting in a comparatively good assessment. affecting more villages than the discussed single remote one. Since the load is not constant during these hours. but also due to start-up and shut-down procedures. by this resulting in a comparatively good assessment. usually for the duration of several hours. Due to the fact that power transport to remote villages takes place over large distances with high and medium voltage lines. Therefore. for the single remote village discussed here the impact on noise pollution is estimated to be low due to the fact that electricity generation does not take place in the village itself. However. For power distribution lines the same considerations apply as above. but in reality this is not often the case and. the noise is distributed over these large distances as well. power distribution lines of the mini-grid further contribute to noise generation. However. Cushioning the noise of a diesel genset alone can as well be done by building a powerhouse. The impact on noise pollution is therefore estimated to be negligible. which as well can be cushioned. Due to this reason the impact of diesel gensets on noise pollution is evaluated to be comparatively very poor.1 Ecology Indicator: Noise Pollution Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets Diesel genset-based mini-grids are commonly operating the generator during evening hours. which frequently occur. Moreover. This clearly shows that this effect is not negligible. cannot be taken in consideration for the assessment here.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 86 Annex C: Analysis of Impacts C. with longer operation time than in diesel-based hybrid systems. the generator produces noise not only through operation. Biogas plants for electrification create noise through the operation of the biogas-generator. Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies The PV modules of SHS do not generate noise during operation and do not apply power distribution lines. larger gensets producing more noise. which could create noise. thus. power distribution lines cause significant noise pollution by generating a constantly buzzing noise. the impact on noise pollution created by biogas-systems is estimated to be low. Just as for hybrid systems. resulting in a comparatively very good evaluation. .

open to solutions for this. The GTZ reports obstacles arising from religious and/or social taboos (GTZ. biogas systems are estimated to be in many cases significantly less compatible to cultural issues than hybrid systems. can give to rural population. but also to the hard and tiring work connected to filling the tank of a generator. because they have relatives or friends in cities. a preference towards these technologies can sometimes even be observed. Thus.. Experiences show that only the advertisement of SHS as pre-electrification before being connected to the grid brings the necessary acceptance among rural population (Sauer. 2000). if functioning well. people are likely to have a high degree of confidence towards this technology. which. All in all. so that hybrid systems are likely to face less cultural obstacles than do SHS. Furthermore. thus. the feeling of being electrified in second class manner. diesel gensets are still likely to face hardly any cultural obstacles or problems with acceptance than hybrid systems due to their high degree of publicity. Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies For SHS. The fact that energy provision is very limited and does not satisfy all needs and expectations. no major obstacles resulting from cultural incompatibilities have been reported yet. Furthermore. the use of the produced gas for the preparation of food and the use of the slurry as fertiliser is sometimes hindered on cultural grounds. 1999a). 2000). it is also reported that people are often dissatisfied with the unreliable and intermittent energy provision with diesel gensets (Prokahausli Sangsad Ltd.. This is not only due to the high operational costs for diesel gensets. Especially the work connected to running a biogas system can be prohibited as well. who is well aware of possibilities of grid-based electrification.2 Socio-Economic Issues Indicator: Cultural Compatibility and Acceptance Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets Diesel gensets are one of the most common and well-known ways to address the problem of electrification of remote areas. In an overall result.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 87 C. H. As a result. However. is not seen as guaranteed in dealing with human and animal excrements. can supply electricity for 24 hours. This effect is likely to be stronger than in hybrid systems. Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid The extension of the conventional grid is usually the option being preferred the most by rural population. in regions where renewable energies like photovoltaic and wind have already been applied. However. Biogas systems have been found to be the system probably facing most cultural obstacles. Religious taboos are experienced to arise for example from the fact that cleanliness. resulting in a comparatively very good performance. Since word-of-mouth . and are. which is valued very high in some religions. SHS are assessed to perform comparatively poor with regard to cultural compatibility and acceptance. Most people in rural areas are familiar of the possibilities and benefits of gridbased electrification. but probably to a higher degree since SHS is a new technology being unknown to population. SHS suffer from the same problem of acceptance due to intermittent supply as do diesel gensets. therefore performing comparatively very poor. especially in winter (GTZ. 2003).

and electrification with diesel gensets has then usually not been implemented in an elaborated way. however. Fraunhofer ISE – Club for Rural Electrification. Cosgrove-Davies.and middle-income rural families (Cabraal. Nevertheless.47 For this reason. at Intersolar fair. L. the GTZ notes the possibility of a further accentuation of existing differences in income and property holdings (GTZ. Meanwhile. the same problem might apply as for hybrid systems that matters of political power or 47 Personal Comment given by Dirk-Uwe Sauer. the application of hybrid systems (and any other technology) has the potential to do so and to take account of matters of supply equity. either free of charge or at least cheaply. this effect does not apply. M. SHS are independent from fuel and are not likely to become matter of political power demonstrations since they belong to the consumers themselves. 1996). Project developers even describe experiences where rural population refused to be electrified with renewable energy technologies because of their fear that the conventional grid is then likely not to be extended to their region.. However. However. SHS can be assessed to be more beneficial towards supply equity. preferred to remain for a couple of years without electrification in order to preserve the chances for grid extension. 1999b). In this respect. June 28th. the extension of the conventional grid to remote villages is considered as “real electrification” and will most likely be welcomed by rural population. Schaeffer. SHS are significantly advantageous compared to hybrid systems and other decentralised electrification measures: because SHS provide electricity to individual households. that investment costs for SHS are comparatively high. A. It is.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 88 propaganda is a common cultural habit in developing countries. Once constructed. so that it is decided here to assess hybrid systems and diesel gensets as equally with regard to supply equity.. diesel gensets are relatively expensive with regard to total costs. From a financial perspective. Indicator: Degree of Supply Equity Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets Diesel-based mini-grids often do already exist in developing countries. thus. attenuates this effect. The World Bank states that investment costs are in the order of magnitude of a year’s income for low. 2003 . they can be considered as completely independent from power structures even within rural communities. since costs for hybrid systems are high as well. For a biogas plant on community level. and poor farmers are likely to be coerced to deliver their manure to the landlord or more prosperous farmers. Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies SHS offer a solution for electrification being largely independent from existing power structures. the degree of cultural compatibility and acceptance of grid extension is assessed to be comparatively very good. hybrid systems are even more expensive. Biogas systems generally seem to offer a good possibility for independent and fair power supply. nevertheless. being independent from fossil resources.. Comparatively high investments make this technology more affordable to well-situated families. The fact. however.

. Indicator: Potential for Participation and Empowerment Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets Diesel gensets. and that people adapt energy consumption to seasonal patterns with regard to insolation (Hammamami. Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid It is a well-known fact that the conventional grid can become a matter of political power on a national level. This does not result in the same effect on capacity building or social empowerment than with hybrid systems. to some degree have the same problem as diesel gensets: if insolation (or diesel in the case of diesel gensets) is there. resulting in a comparatively poor performance of grid extension in this respect. A. a general statement cannot be given. SHS. This effect. where electricity is simply not available during the day. . resulting in a comparatively very good assessment. 1999). F. but also needs to directly participate in the production of energy and the fertiliser. it is decided here to assess hybrid systems as preferential to grid extension with regard to supply equity. Still. The consumer should not only be directly involved in the planning processes. Njaimi.. Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies Experiences with PV systems in general and SHS in particular show that the link between energy consumption and insolation is usually understood (Nieuwenhout.. where people are to understand the limited nature of energy in order to make electricity available to everybody to the same extent. The question whether or not to extend the conventional grid to certain rural areas is often a matter of political influence and preference as well. N. then no electricity can be used. electricity is available. biogas plants are seen as preferential with regard to supply equity compared to hybrid systems. which make decentralised rural electrification highly advantageous with regard to supply equity. However.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 89 mismanagement of the electrification committee can result in unequal supply.D. et al. Since grid extension to remote rural areas requires enormous investment. Many developing countries have experienced demonstrations of political power on the issue of energy. the effect on capacity building of SHS is here evaluated to be lower. 2000). which cannot be run all day. Biogas systems involve a lot of work to be done by the consumer himself. Ounalli. Therefore. applies to hybrid systems as well.J. however. by this offer potential for understanding of the limited nature of energy.. M. From a financial perspective. the potential for capacity building and increasing empowerment is higher for hybrid systems due to the fact that consumers in hybrid systems need to adapt to certain regulations. which is obviously due to natural limitations and fluctuations of renewable energy resources. but to a lesser degree since back-up with a diesel genset weakens the effect. This shows the great potential this technology offers towards capacity building and empowerment. This is not the case with diesel gensets.. and therefore the effect on capacity building is here evaluated to be higher than for hybrid systems.. et al. and the responsibility for this is left to the individual consumer. due to lower costs for biogas systems. but only during some hours in the evening. if not.

When discussing the economic development potential. Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies The potential for economic development of SHS has been matter of intensive research.. D. However. Schaeffer... 2000): lighting provides the possibility of extended commercial activities in the evening. average increases of yields between 6 to 10%. An important constraint on the potential for economic development is the fact that diesel gensets are less suitable to be operated the whole day. have been reported (GTZ.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 90 Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid The extension of the conventional grid is not likely to improve understanding about the limited availability of electricity. 2000b). The potential of SHS for economic development is therefore rated to be considerably lower than for hybrid systems. diesel gensets are comparable to grid connection. Energy is not generated on site to improve people’s understanding. et al. The potential for economic development of biogas systems depends on the size of the system and is therefore a matter of the pre-investment planning process. The commonly installed capacities are not sufficient to be used for productive purposes by installing electrical machines. L. and energy supply is open to any kind of use with limitation just through pricing. et al. .. which was mentioned as potential for income generation. G. 1996).. but there was just little evidence found for the potential of SHS to generate income (Nieuwenhout. SHS services are limited. 1999b). M. Indicator: Potential for Economic Development Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets From a technical point of view. 2000). Experiences show that rural population reverts to existing diesel gensets in the village for productive purposes or to the use of petroleum for further lighting (Preiser. in some cases up to 20%. offering a high degree of flexibility for the villages with effectively no technical constraints to be made on the use of appliances (ESMAP. one should not ignore the fact of improved yields attributable to biogas systems. a biofertiliser. SHS were found to be a tourist attraction in Nepal. A. An extension of an existing system can be done by erecting new tanks and biogas generators if enough substrate is available and financial feasibility is given. The effect is therefore evaluated to be significantly lower than for hybrid systems. and the costs for expanding capacity are considerably high (Cabraal. resulting in the assessment of a comparatively very poor potential for participation and empowerment. The following aspects are mentioned (Campen. Due to the latter fact.J. Best. resulting in a comparatively very poor potential of SHS for economic development. K. since operation costs are high.D. As a result of the use of the by-product.. Guidi. F.. 2000).. Cosgrove-Davies.. B. the potential for economic development with diesel gensets is estimated to be lower than with hybrid systems.

L. which are likely to experience a substantial load-growth after electrification. employment effects by enhanced commercial activities during the evenings are likely to occur through SHS. Direct effects on employment related to operation and maintenance of diesel gensets can be evaluated to be low. the extension of the conventional grid normally offers a maximum degree of flexibility to accommodate increasing demand without supply constraints. it is expected here that SHS are likely to result in lower employment effects than hybrid systems. as outlined above. sales. Anyhow. however.. Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies As with diesel gensets.J. and related maintenance work is carried out – if at all . This effect. .. As for all energy technologies. Generally. to sell their goods ( the operator or family members.D. the impact of diesel gensets on overall employment is valued to be lower than with hybrid systems. the potential for economic development given by the conventional grid can be considered to be higher than for hybrid systems. while hybrid systems depend on the unlimited resources wind and/or sun. the potential for economic development through biogas systems seems lower than with hybrid systems. M. Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid For villages.. F. service and maintenance of PV systems. Since SHS systems just provide potential for lighting. who are the major competitor of SHS for lighting. especially of those activities taking place in evenings since this is the time when diesel-based mini-grids likely operate. are likely to result in further employment effects as well. Indicator: Employment Effects Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets The use of diesel gensets for electrification is likely to result in lower employment effects as in the case of hybrid systems. Production. A. 1996). However. the application of diesel gensets is not very labour intensive. the effect of enhanced economic activities is likely to occur. 2000). 1999b). since it is limited by the availability of the substrate. already the construction phase is likely to encourage local manufacturing of building materials and accessories. For this reason. 2003). Schaeffer. In China it was experienced that every district applying biogas erected its own enterprises for the production of the individual parts of the biogas plant (GTZ. Biogas systems provide potential for employment both in a long-term and short-term perspective. The main restriction given is quite often the ability of the customers to pay for the energy service. is reduced by the fact that the application of SHS is likely to have negative influence on the possibility of kerosene dealers. it should not be overseen that for grid connection a minimum threshold level of electricity demand as well as certain load densities are essential in order to achieve economies of scale (Cabraal.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 91 However... et al. Since building material for biogas plants is less sophisticated than for example for photovoltaic modules. These activities are mostly carried out by family members of the operator and are often neglected (GTZ. but not for electrification of machines for handicraft businesses. Cosgrove-Davies.

Thus. the likelihood to create job opportunities is here estimated to be higher than for hybrid systems. For this reason the positive impact on human health is here considered to be lower than with hybrid systems. However. Electrification of rural health clinics with SHS is unlikely. In comparison to hybrid systems. The positive effect on human health is thus higher than with hybrid systems. The fermentation process inside the tank significantly reduces the initial pathogenic capacity of the animal and human excrements. Besides the potential general impacts of electrification on human health. diesel gensets generally can be applied as well. and both are evaluated to have a comparatively good effect on employment opportunities. the impact on improved human health is lower than with hybrid systems. further employment effects for operation and maintenance of the plants can be expected. and since household chores can be dealt with in the evenings due to lighting. For the electrification of health clinics. This leads to the estimation that no preference is made towards one of these scenarios. 1999b). 1999b). which can be attributed to electrification. families have more time during the day to follow commercial activities as farming or animal husbandry. biogas systems have a special positive side effect by improving sanitary conditions for the plant owners or even the villages. direct employment effects are likely not to occur. Due to the fact that biogas systems are less sophisticated and that experiences proof immediate effects on employment due to their application. Commercial activities using electricity can take place at any time of the day. The extension of the conventional grid hardly gives rise to job opportunities related to production. the fact that grid-based electrification offers higher potential for commercial activities than hybrid systems is lowered by the lack of job opportunities related to the energy provision itself. handicraft enterprises get the opportunity to use as many appliances as they need and can finance. Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid The extension of the conventional grid is certainly the possibility offering the highest potential to create all such employment opportunities. but do not produce electricity in the same reliable and constant manner as do hybrid systems. and biogas slurry does not attract important causes for contagious diseases as flies and other insects (GTZ. since skilled craftsmen are needed as permanent staff for the plant (GTZ. Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies During operation of SHS. no corrosive gases are emitted. This positive effect can be reduced if kerosene lamps and candles are applied additionally in case lighting is not sufficient. sales or maintenance of energy generating technologies. Indicator: Impacts on Health Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets For the use of diesel gensets the same argument concerning corrosive gases applies as outlined for the hybrid systems. SHS are usually not designed to support appliances like refrigerators or even X-ray equipment. .Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 92 When applying biogas systems on a community level.

.33 US$/W 50 Bulitai (Inner Mongolia) (GTZ.29 €/W 5 (Wuppertal Institute. CO or SO2 are emitted. 1998) any (Kininger. Since flue gas cleaning in these power plants is usually not elaborated well.5 €/W 0. B. Shen. the main problems of diesel gensets are rather the high operation costs and the overall low lifetime.. W. 2002) 1.5 Inner Mongolia (Byrne.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 93 Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid The extension of the conventional grid to remote areas does not result in emissions from the electricity generating process in the village itself. J. F.10 – 1. 2003) Bangladesh (Prokahausli Sangsad Ltd. 2000) Second hand generators of private service providers 0. Thus.e. high amounts of i. Table C. This positive assessment. This does not take place close to the remote villages and therefore does not result in immediate health problems.3 Economic Issues Indicator: Investment Costs per kW Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets Diesel gensets commonly require low initial investment.3 – 2..45 – 0. some data could be collected and is presented in Table C.1: Initial Investment Costs for Diesel Gensets System Investment costs Capacity [kW] Location/Source Remarks 0. Wallace.20 US$/W 5 – 20 Diesel 2.. Moreover. However. it is decided here not to give a preference to grid extension or hybrid systems with regard to the impacts on human health and both are considered to have a comparatively good potential to improve human health situation.. CO2. But after-effects as acid rain have severe impacts on human health. the conventional grid is undoubtedly able to support electricity demand from rural health clinics.1. is worsened in countries where for example the share of coal for electricity generation is high. C. however. 2002) .57 US$/W 0.

if 48 P = Installed Capacity in kW . 1996). A. are estimated to be 50 – 75 US$ per m3 capacity in (GTZ. can be constructed with a high share of user’s involvement. the World Bank estimated in 1996 that prices for SHS are typically in the range of 7 – 26 US$/Wp (Cabraal. M. 2000).. the initial investment for diesel gensets is therefore significantly lower. Due to their simplicity..000 US$ per kilometre (ESMAP. and often higher energy losses (Cabraal. resulting in the assessment of comparatively very poor performance with regard to investment costs. A. For the evaluation. F.D. et al. the extension of the conventional grid is just economically feasible. the initial investment is as well significantly higher than for diesel gensets..48 Compared to the figures for hybrid systems. M.. Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid As in all of the above cases. 1999b). lower capacity utilisation rates. meaning for example 0. could not be supported. 1996). Cosgrove-Davies. L. Biogas plants usually require high investment as well. Problems associated with grid extension in rural areas are lower load densities in rural areas. For PV/Wind systems... with 250 – 400 €/ m3 for the digester. 2003) gives 2. Therefore.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 94 The cost analysis here revealed specific investment costs for diesel gensets of P   345. Total costs of biogas plants. Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies The initial investment costs for SHS vary significantly from country to country. An appraisal in (ATB. biogas plants.5 – 4 €/W as a reference point for specific investment costs.J. 1999b). the construction of power distribution lines account for 80 to 90% of the overall investment. however. L. According to the World Bank. investment cost for biogas plants can be evaluated to be lower than for hybrid systems. which is not surprising with regard to the fact that PV/Diesel and Wind/Diesel systems apply diesel gensets as well. 2000b). but are generally comparatively high: depending on the size of the module and the frame conditions of the respective countries. Schaeffer. The same study furthermore concluded that the prevailing view that costs for PV hardware are likely to decrease. costs for extension of the conventional grid vary widely not only among. Schaeffer.16 €/W for a 20 kW diesel genset. with the main share of the costs needed for the digester. Additional costs result from the application of the biogas generator.63 × exp − 0.28 €/W in the case of a 5 kW kW   genset or 0.. but also within countries. Cosgrove-Davies. and can be up to 20.0394 ×  [€/kW]. Observed price reductions are stated to be related to decreases in taxes and duties rather than to a decrease of hardware costs. resulting in a comparatively good assessment of investment costs. including all installations but not including land.. it can be stated that SHS can require significantly higher investments per Watt than hybrid systems. Therefore. A recent Dutch study concluded that prices are typically in the range of 10 – 22 US$/Wp (Nieuwenhout. and costs vary strongly between different plant types and sizes. A reduction of up to 15% for labour wages can be achieved (GTZ.

J. the experiences with diesel genset are presented in Table C. a considerable number of households is to be connected to the grid. hybrid systems can be evaluated to be less costly than grid extension.3.. with a median cost of about US$ 520 per connection. For the case of a remote village. consumption per individual consumer. 2000b): size of the generator. The World Bank estimates that costs for electricity generation with such systems typically range from US $0. Table C.56 US$/kWh 0.2. J. the connection cost to the grid is of major importance. Shen. 2002). 2001). and: Baur. and is shown in Table C. Indicator: Electricity Generating Costs Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets The costs for electricity generation with mini-grids based on diesel gensets vary depending mainly on the following factors (ESMAP. number of consumers. A. The operational costs for diesel gensets are usually considerably high. 1998) Source A direct comparison of hybrid systems with diesel gensets. Wallace. 49 Levelized costs based on field analysis of battery’s lifetime.2: Electricity Generating Costs for Diesel Gensets Diesel Genset (non-continuous service) 0.16-1...76-0...60 per kWh (ESMAP. 2000). L.20 to US$ 0. and a review of the World Bank in 1990 showed that these costs typically range from US$ 230-US$ 1. B. Schaeffer. should be performed on the basis of the same capacity installed and with the same electricity output.. W. This was done by Wuppertal Institute in (Wuppertal Institute. M.800 per connection. Cosgrove-Davies. 1996. For the case of Inner Mongolia.27 US$/kWh49 Diesel Genset (continuous service) (GTZ.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 95 - the village is situated close to the next medium-voltage line of the conventional grid. and the efficiency of operation. and the distance between single households in the village is low (household density) (Cabraal. From a perspective of the local consumer. which is still lower than for hybrid systems. 2000b). 2003) (Byrne. however. Main determinant for the resulting connection cost is the average number of consumers per kilometre of line (ESMAP..80 US$/kWh 1. .

. For the application of biogas systems. J. these costs are high and make the application of SHS difficult for electrification of the poorest.70 €/kWh Electricity Generating Costs at Diesel Price of 1.450 23. the cost analysis of electricity generating costs reveals that SHS is likely to result in lower costs than hybrid village systems. Nevertheless... et al. F. In any case.. J. W.D. B. these hybrid systems can compete. W. thus lowering overall system costs.J.D. Experiences in Inner Mongolia reveal costs of 0.59 €/kWh Comparing these figures for hybrid systems and diesel gensets. Experiences of GTZ show that biogas programmes are usually less costly than similar strategies accounting both for energy and the production or use of fertilisers and being based on fossil resources (GTZ. delivering around 0.45 €/kWh 1.. Shen. ratio 4:1 Wind/Diesel. For a common 50 Wp SHS.67 –0.73 US$/kWh (Byrne.37 US$/kWh (Byrne.3: Hybrid Systems at Different Diesel Prices Capacity: 5 kW Electricity Output: 2190 kWh/a Diesel Genset PV/Diesel. 2000). the electricity generating costs are approximately 1 US$/kWh (BMZ. auxiliary energy sources as diesel gensets might be applied and generate additional costs (Nieuwenhout.5 € 1.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 96 Table C. F. 1999a). 1998). 1998). 2000).. costs do not decrease with more households applying SHS.3 shows the high dependency on the fuel price. The comparison in Table C. diesel-based hybrid systems are likely not to be competitive. Wallace. In countries where fuel is subsidised. in the evaluation preference is given to diesel gensets due the data of the World Bank. a general statement cannot be given for PV/Diesel and Wind/Diesel hybrid systems. Wallace. 1999). PV/Wind household systems were experienced to be as low as 0. making the construction of mini-grids more attractive for villages with several households demanding electrification.75 € 1. if no subsidies are provided by the respective countries. in the case of hybrid household systems. this situation might be considerably different as the above example of Inner Mongolia proves..825 22. 1999b). data based on experiences could not be obtained.84 €/kWh 1.25 kWh of electricity on a sunny day. An appraisal of the Wuppertal Institute results in electricity generating costs of 0.20 . photovoltaic systems are likely to become the least cost option (Nieuwenhout.. ratio 4:1 Investment costs in € 11..51 €/kWh 1. However.15 – 0. Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies In case smaller loads are required. Generally. et al. Here.J. Shen. Whether additional costs occur is matter of further use of appliances: since SHS have limited capacity and extension is comparatively expensive. B.740 Electricity Generating Costs at Diesel Price of 0. especially if 24-hours electrification is required. the aspect of costs for electricity generation cannot be seen independent from the fact that the production of bio-fertiliser and a correspondent observed increase of yields generates income (GTZ.. However. However.

L. Even though the technology itself has been known for years. 1996). not every PV user owns the required auxiliary means as for example a ladder for cleaning the PV array. Schaeffer. Cosgrove-Davies. Service centres are needed as well. A common occurrence is that a doubling of consumption per household over a time frame of ten years leads in many places to a decline of costs per kWh of about 40% (ESMAP. Technicians are needed. L. has not to be taken for granted since costs for biogas plants vary strongly.. L. As a conclusion it is decided here to value the performance of biogas systems with regard to electricity prices significantly better than for hybrid systems. M. A.J. spare parts are difficult to purchase due to the remoteness of the villages (ESMAP.. then costs and tariffs can be relatively low. 1996). as the World Bank describes.. A.D.. et al. Still. Nevertheless. 2002). 2000b). Indicator: Maintenance Requirements Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets The application of diesel gensets in remotely located mini-grids has been facing long-standing maintenance problems. the additional requirement for the maintenance of the renewable energy generator and the other components as batteries and charge controllers give preference to the diesel genset.. 2001). from a perspective of maintenance the application of hybrid systems seems to be less favourable than diesel gensets.. operators often lack knowledge about these systems. a rule of thumb from the Dominican Republic states that systems should not be installed more than 50 km away from the next service centre (Cabraal. F. et al. Cosgrove-Davies. grid extension offers the least costly option for electricity generation in cases where a medium voltage line serving a number of centres with larger loads passes the respective community nearby (ESMAP.. 2000a).. Although the back-up diesel generator in hybrid systems is likely to be strained less than in the case of a diesel genset-based mini-grid. If this is the case. which is available on rural markets (Prokahausli Sangsad Ltd. and they can even further decline with increasing consumption. Schaeffer.. A problematic experience with the education of technicians was observed in Indonesia in applying SHS: technicians who were educated within the context of the project left the villages . 2000).. 2000). M... However. Schaeffer. A. electricity generating costs are here valued to be significantly lower for grid extension than for hybrid systems. Cosgrove-Davies.. M. but a single technician can serve maintenance needs for a large number of customers (Cabraal. According to the World Bank. This. Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies SHS can partly be maintained by users themselves. A. Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid A general statement on electricity generating costs from the conventional grid cannot be given since costs vary strongly between different countries and grid characteristics.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 97 Euro/kWh for biogas plants (Wuppertal Institute.. again. just few households can carry out this maintenance by themselves over a long period of time (Cabraal. resulting in considerable effort for cleaning (Nieuwenhout. Experiences also show severe problems with poor quality contaminated fuel. 2002). 1996). especially simple maintenance functions as cleaning of the PV arrays can be carried out individually. In case of system breakdowns. Moreover. as the example of Bangladesh proofs (Barkat.

Diesel gensets are also heavily dependent on the import of fuel. very often it is just old motors from cars. but requires help from experts even in developed countries. the result of decreasing gas production is observed with significant time lag. etc.51 and therefore hybrid systems are evaluated to be less problematic from a point of view of maintenance. It is therefore likely that due to the remoteness of the here considered villages. where fuel consumption is reduced to roughly 20% of the figures for diesel-based mini-grids. especially in African countries. 50 51 Personal Comment given by Jörg Baur. Regular charging with substrate is essential. Therefore. GTZ. the comparative assessment results in a preference for grid extension.50 For this reason.. 2003. resulting in comparatively very poor performance of biogas plants with regard to maintenance. which are taken for electrification. resulting in longer periods of shortages. making the performance of diesel gensets comparatively poor with regard to this indicator. Biogas systems require regular attendance and maintenance. et al. Moreover. Indicator: Degree of Import Dependence and Regional Self-Supply Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets Diesel gensets can usually be only produced in larger countries as China. GTZ. but taking into account the current non-existence. which can be a problem especially in tropic countries where climate dictates agricultural activities. the cause of problems related to the micro-organisms inside the tank cannot be identified by users themselves. Maintenance usually cannot be carried out by the customers themselves or local technicians. Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid System breakdowns and shortages in power supply are likely to occur due to often unreliable conventional grids in developing countries. local technicians need to be trained and maintenance centres need to be erected. the relatively higher complexity of hybrid systems compared to SHS makes the application of SHS advantageous from the point of view of maintenance. Personal Comment given by Jörg Baur. Although the problem of batteries and charge controllers applies to SHS as well. the conventional grid is assessed to perform comparatively good with regard to maintenance. Maintenance of the conventional grid is to be carried out by a central public or private utility.. maintenance will be carried out slowly. 1999a). 2000). but in case it is forgotten. 2003. . in Eschborn/Germany on August 14th. Assuming that markets for renewable energy technologies are likely to develop. This lead to a lack of maintenance and undermined the whole effort for setting up a maintenance structure. K.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 98 and searched for better paid jobs in cities (Preiser. in Eschborn/Germany on August 14th. experts from GTZ have experienced maintenance as a major issue with biogas plants. a return to normal levels takes up to 10 days (GTZ. This dependency is of course much higher than for hybrid systems. which usually have a pool of experts or technicians for this purpose. the result is then a slight preference for hybrid systems. India. Thus. If once the production of biogas is reduced. Because in the case of decentralised electrification with hybrid systems.

Indicator: Supply Security Scenario 2: Diesel Gensets Electricity provision with diesel-based mini-grids is limited. the lifetime of a conventional diesel genset is about 4 years and can become as low as 1. Schaeffer. the gensets usually operate 4-12 hours in the evenings (Cabraal. M. Thus. Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid On a country level. the result of this assessment is the same due to the fact that markets both for PV and for wind generators need to be developed before local production becomes reasonable. M. Countries as Brazil. Although diesel gensets offer a proven and reliable technology for rural electrification. resulting in a comparatively very good assessment of biogas plants with regard to this indicator. local production of needed materials and components and respective markets can rather easily be developed. For the case of PV/Wind systems.. A.. resulting in a comparatively good performance of SHS with regard to this indicator. diesel gensets provide limited energy supply .. A. Schaeffer. The degree of import independence is here evaluated to be lower than for hybrid systems. Furthermore... 1999a). This is due to the fact that the degree of regional self-supply is higher for decentralised electrification solutions than with the conventional grid. the degree of import dependency is difficult to assess for developing countries in general. the World Bank in 1996 stated high transaction costs in purchase and servicing for SHS due to limited market structures (Cabraal. the experience shows that due to the uncomplex nature of the systems. which are dependent on fuel imports to a large extent. 1996). generating a high share of its electricity with hydropower. L.. Biogas systems provide a comparatively high potential for independence in electricity generation. Cosgrove-Davies. obviously are less dependent on energy import than the major part of the developing countries. 2000).5 years (Prokahausli Sangsad Ltd. Therefore preference is given to SHS with regard to import dependency since hybrid systems applying diesel gensets normally still rely on diesel imports. since it was experienced and is assumed here that markets for PV are likely to develop. The degree of import independence and regional self-supply is therefore rated to be significantly higher with biogas systems compared to hybrid systems. this is not taken in consideration. L.. the comparative assessment reveals a poor performance of grid extension with regard to this indicator. Cosgrove-Davies. ingredients for the operation of the plants are locally available.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 99 Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies SHS offer to a large extent the possibility of independence from the import of fossil resources as oil or coal. 1996). the degree of supply security is here estimated to be lower than with hybrid due to the following aspects: as already described. Firstly. The additional effect of the production of bio-fertiliser can even lower the need for import of mineral fertilisers. This effect was evaluated to be in the range of 30-35% by Indian experts (GTZ. For the application of SHS in developing countries. However.

However. the reactivation can take several days and needs the involvement of experts in case problems with the tank occur. SHS are seen as average with regard to supply security. 2000).. It can generally be stated that biogas plants nowadays are a mature technology (Biogas. However.D. maintenance or repair is likely to take a long time. as was mentioned in the context of maintenance requirements already. in cases of system breakdowns no back-up with other energy sources can stabilise electricity generation if no diesel genset is available. On the other hand. This certainly reduces the otherwise significant advantage of hybrid systems compared to grid extension concerning supply security and results in an evaluation of just better performance.J. For biogas plants no information on the reliability of the systems could be obtained. 2000b). .D. However. et al. 2000b). F. being average in the comparative assessment here. implying that in case of breakdowns.. Information concerning reliability of SHS is very limited and does not give a consistent picture. diesel gensets are valued as average with regard to supply security. et al. While some projects report all SHS systems as being operative. The same study also reveals that larger SHS systems are working more reliable since deep discharge of batteries occurs less frequently in larger systems (Nieuwenhout. the problem of biogas plants.J. reductions and fluctuations in voltage can become so severe that the use of appliances is connected with the risk of damages for the customer (ESMAP.Annex C: Analysis of Impacts 100 - in case of breakdowns. no electricity can be generated at all For the comparative assessment here. The reason for this is on the one hand non-continuous energy provision. 1999a). F. it has to be considered that markets and maintenance structures for renewable energy have not yet emerged in most developing countries. a recent survey estimates that roughly three-quarters of the SHS systems operate relatively well (Nieuwenhout. For the comparative assessment here. Scenario 4: Extension of the Conventional Grid From the extension of the conventional grid one can usually expect a reliable full-time coverage of electricity demand. Scenario 3: Renewable Energy Technologies Security supply with SHS is certainly to be estimated as lower than with hybrid systems. It is therefore assessed that biogas systems offer a lower degree of security on energy supply. and with system breakdowns without electricity supply during longer periods of unfavourable weather conditions. others report 100% failures. On the other hand. lies in the fact that once the system is down. with breakdowns in generating equipment or distribution systems and leading to intermittent availability of electricity (ESMAP. Moreover. limiting electricity provision to just several hours during the day. being average in the comparative assessment here.. no alternative energy source is available in case of shortages of fuel. in many regions in developing countries the quality of grid supply is rather low. 2000)..

7 × exp − 0.. 57 Personal Comment given by Jörg Baur.000 € Planning. Table D. G. Inverter and Charge Controller 10 years 52 Personal Comment given by Mr.. Puls.5kW: 5. 2003. 22nd. 54 Personal Comment given by Mr. Bopp. in Eschborn/Germany. Battery 5 years.000 € Operating Costs Manpower. Diesel Genset 10 years. others: own assumption Interest Rate: 6% Miscellaneous Lifetime system components: PV modules 20 years. Körner during a telephone interview on August 18th. 2003). Tower) For Plants ≤ 10kW: Costs = 4309 × exp − 0.1 Main Assumptions for the Cost Analysis Type of Costs PV Modules 400 €/kWp Wind Power Plants (incl.000 € Cabinet. 500Ah battery. Maintenance and Repair: Annually 4% of total investment Cost data SMA KfW55 Schueco56 Own estimation GTZ57 Own assumption For PV and Wind: (Sauer. Körner during a telephone interview on August 18th. 2003. Körner during a telephone interview on August 18th.007 × Diesel Genset: Costs = 345. Internal Wiring: 6. 2003.63 × exp − 0. former KfW staff member. 2003.0394 ×   Own calculation based on available cost data Investment   P   in [€/kW] kW  Schüco 54 Battery bank: 333 €/kWh for a 12V. the following basic assumptions were made. Support: 2. 56 Personal Comment given by Mr. Geis. H.Annex D: Cost Analysis 101 Annex D: Cost Analysis For the cost analysis. on August 14th. D. GTZ.000 € Local grid. during a telephonme interview on August.. the batteries are designed for a storage capacity of 2 days Inverter and Charge Controller “Sunny Island”. 4. . Assembly and Commissioning: 15% of total investment Transport: 1. 2003. 55 Personal Recommendation given by Mr.1068 × Costs/Details Source Schüco52   P  53  in [€/kW] kW  P   in [€/kW] kW  For Plants ≥ 10 kW: Costs = 2016. Wind generator 12 years. Cables. 53 P = Installed capacity in kW.

0 17.599.970.51 1.725.17 (Heyde. Table D. 2003)60 58 Personal Comment given by Mr. 1st.509.17 1.6 0.069.44 78.742.762.600.80 6.68 4.0 3.39 Specific Investment Costs [€/kW] 349.954.84 1.80 29. .38 Source (Diesel.999. Twele during a telephone interview on September.0 3.970.680.0 80.9 Total Investment Costs [€] 629.751.75 1.981.24 10.802.0 10. Twele during a telephone interview on September.94 297.499.022.5 2.0 30.980.00 89.0 60.Annex D: Cost Analysis 102 The investment costs for wind power plants and diesel gensets are based on the costs for different plants from various manufacturers.0 20.199. 2003) Remarks Source INCLIN 600 AC 752 turbo MAJA 1000 INCLIN 1500 neo GRT 2000 INCLIN 3000 neo INCLIN 6000 neo Inventus 6 GRT 8000 AIRMAXX-10 Novatec ML10Eco Vergnet GEV10/20 Fuhrländer FL30 Vergnet GEV15/60 Lagerwej LW18 6. 2003.60 Including 19 m tower Inventus Windpower GmbH Including 11 m tower (Heyde.165.40 17.40 3.0 10.68 1.8 1.40 2.294.00 1.20 3.310.3 Investment Costs for Diesel Gensets Diesel Generator Mitsubishi MGE-1800 ROU Mitsubishi MGE-2900 ROU Capacity [kW] 1.00 60.324. 2003. 1st.373.0 8.67 5.00 9.998.68 2.97 3.80 6.08 19. 59 Personal Comment given by Mr.0 6.40 2.90 862.117.420.471.60 5.490.00 2.48 3.8 2.08 1.381. The details are shown in the following tables.0 1. 2003) Including 11 m tower Bundesverband 58 Windenergie Including 18m tower Including 27m tower Including 30m tower Including 40m tower Bundesverband 59 Windenergie Table D.2 Investment Costs for Small-Scale Wind Power Plants Name Capacity Total Investment Specific Investment Costs [€] Costs [€/kW] [kW] 0.

00 100.09 224.51 1.00 300.63 × exp − 0.00 0 5 10 15 P   Costs = 2016.51 Specific Investment Costs [€/kW] 310.000 4.2 6.693.20 2.000 1.000 2.91 1. 2003). 2003)61 The decline in specific investment cost per kW is reflected in the following graphs.500 1.00 0.1068 ×  in [€/kW] kW   Specific Investm ent for Diesel Gensets Specific Investment [€/kW] 400.000 500 0 0 50 100 Installed Capacity [kW] P   Costs = 4309 × exp − 0.13 275.90114 € (September 8th.1 Specific Investment for Wind Power Plants and Diesel Gensets 60 61 Calculated Exchange Rate: 1 US$ = 0.116.90114 € (September 8th. Calculated Exchange Rate: 1 US$ = 0.00 200.46 Source (Diesel.242. Specific Investm ent for Plants <=10kW Specific Investment [€kW] 6.431.000 1.000 3.67 1.Annex D: Cost Analysis 103 Diesel Generator Yamaha EF4000DE Yamaha YG4000D Yamaha EF5200DE Yamaha EF6600DE Yamaha EF12000DE Capacity [kW] 4 4 5.7 × exp − 0.657.6 12 Total Investment Costs [€] 1.67 279.500 2.000 0 0 5 10 15 Installed Capacity [kW] Specific Investm ent for Plants =>10kW Specific Investment [€/kW] 2.37 251.000 5. . 2003).0394 × kW    in [€/kW]  Figure D.007 ×  in [€/kW] kW   Installed Capacity [kW] P  Costs = 345.

400 8. it was distinguished between plants of smaller capacity ≤ 10 kW and plants of higher capacity ≥ 10 kW in order to improve the accuracy of regression.000 6. PV/Diesel 9.600 8.000 7.Annex D: Cost Analysis 104 While the regression is rather fair in the case of diesel gensets with a regression coefficient of R2 = 0.000 10.000 8.000 8. this is not the case for wind power plants.1 × exp − 0.200 8.000 12.6659 in the case of smaller plants and R2 = 0. Regression coefficients of R2 = 0.000 0 20 40 60 80 Installed Capacity [kW] PV/Wind at 2 Days Battery 14. still being relatively poor. With this data.5 × exp − 0. the analysis of investment and electricity generating costs was performed.000 0 50 100 150 11.000 6.000 6.800 8. this leads to the following range of investment costs.000 0 20 40 60 80 Installed Capacity [kW] Investment Costs [€/kW] P  P    Costs = 8241.000 9.0027 ×  in [€/kW] kW  kW    Figure D.000 0 20 40 60 80 Wind/Diesel Investment Costs [€/kW] Investment Costs [€/kW] Installed Capacity [kW] Installed Capacity [kW] P  P    Costs = 8880.000 8.000 9.8422.0034 × kW  kW    PV/Wind at 1 Day Battery 10. Here.000 10.7163 for bigger plants were obtained.400 9. Investment Costs [€/kW] .200 9.0009 ×  in [€/kW]  in [€/kW] Costs = 9564.000 8. D.0037 ×  in [€/kW] Costs = 11061 × exp − 0.1 Investment Costs The analysis investment costs revealed the following results.2 Specific Investment for Hybrid Systems of Different Capacities For the different village sizes as presented in Annex A.7 × exp − 0.000 7.

repair and diesel fuel. For the different systems and varying diesel fuel prices.2 Electricity Generating Costs The electricity generating costs per kWh were calculated with the help of the annuity method. the following formula was used to calculate the annuity of the investment costs of single components: a = C0 × (1 + i )n − 1 i × (1 + i ) n With a i = Annuity = Interest Rate = 6% C0 = Capital Value n = Component Lifetime The total annuity of investment is then the sum of the single annuities. the following results were obtained: .00 9.Annex D: Cost Analysis 105 Table D. By adding the annuities of operation costs for manpower. Division of the annual costs by the annual electricity production leads to the specific electricity generating costs per kWh.86 D.18 Investment Costs at 300 Households [€/W] 8.20 10. maintenance.4 Range of Investment Costs for Hybrid Systems System PV/Diesel Systems Wind/Diesel Systems PV/Wind Systems at 2 days battery capacity PV/Wind Systems at 1 day battery capacity Investment Costs at 30 Households [€/W] 9.44 12.05 9.23 8. With the help of the underlying assumptions as presented on page 101.67 6. the total annual costs can be calculated.

55 1.47 1.54 1.48 1.53 1.45 1.4 1.46 1.47 1 1.43 1.47 1.43 1.50 1.69 1.52 1.52 1.51 1.50 1.42 1.48 1.43 1.49 1.44 1.47 1.48 1.45 1.45 1.5 1.46 1.51 1.50 1.47 1.52 1.46 1.73 1.1 1.53 1.51 1.51 1.45 1.51 1.48 1.49 1.44 1.47 1.48 1.49 1.52 1.45 0.50 1.42 0.50 1.67 1.44 0.50 1.71 1.52 1.53 1.68 1.45 1.55 1.49 1.53 1.49 1.47 1.50 1.44 1.51 1.64 0.44 1.52 1.48 1.47 1.47 1.48 1.47 1.47 1.64 1.55 1.45 1.47 1.72 1.45 1.47 1.46 1.49 1.52 1.6 1.46 0.44 1.48 1.45 1.70 1.43 1.44 1.52 1.48 1.53 1.45 1.46 1.51 1.46 1.51 1.49 1.44 1.46 1.44 1.7 1.8 1.51 1.49 1.53 1.48 1.66 1.49 1.51 1.45 1.45 1.49 1.53 1.46 1.49 1.45 1.44 1.50 1.9 1.46 1.48 1.51 1.45 1.51 1.Annex D: Cost Analysis 106 Table D.52 1.43 1.45 1.43 1.49 1.50 1.48 1.50 1.45 1.46 1.54 1.44 1.47 1.58 1.49 1.46 1.49 1.46 1.50 1.48 1.49 1.48 1.47 1.49 1.47 1.49 1.5 1.42 1.48 1.54 1.6 1.66 1.47 1.45 1.50 1.50 1.45 1.49 1.45 1.51 1.47 1.63 0.52 1.46 1.48 1.46 1.47 1.47 1.47 1.8 1.46 1.56 1.48 1.49 1.47 0.45 1.45 1.3 1.52 1.68 1.44 1.53 1.43 0.47 1.48 1.53 1.71 1.43 1.46 1.48 1.48 1.49 1.48 Table D.60 0.44 1.48 1.47 1.49 1.65 .45 1.3 1.56 1.51 1.48 1.68 1.57 1.51 1.7 1.50 1.49 1.49 1.44 1.46 1.47 1.51 1.45 1.48 1.48 1.4 1.42 1.50 1.46 1.50 1.50 1.48 1.50 1.46 1.48 1.44 1.46 1.9 1.45 1.54 1.51 1.47 1.45 1.48 1.50 1.47 1.43 1.2 1.65 1.47 1.55 1.63 0.46 1.48 1.45 0.49 1.67 1.49 1.5 Electricity Generating Costs of PV/Diesel Systems [€/kWh] Number of Households 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 175 200 225 250 275 300 Diesel Fuel Price [€/l] 0.47 1.49 1.61 0.56 1.52 1.47 1.44 1.55 1.43 1.62 0.48 1.48 1.46 1.70 1.43 1.61 0.51 1.52 1.53 1.44 1.47 1.53 1.48 1.43 0.49 1.47 1.43 1.49 1.50 1.47 1.50 1.44 1.46 1.46 1.42 1.47 1.73 1.47 1.2 1.65 1 1.50 1.43 1.49 1.1 1.6 Electricity Generating Costs of Wind/Diesel Systems [€/kWh] Number of Households 30 35 40 Diesel Fuel Price [€/l] 0.70 1.53 1.69 1.69 1.59 0.46 1.49 1.49 1.48 1.50 1.52 1.54 1.48 1.44 1.45 1.51 1.47 1.54 1.43 1.47 1.46 1.46 1.

48 1.40 1.49 1.52 1.56 1.46 1.48 1.49 1.44 1.54 1.52 1.46 These figures can be illustrated with the graphs on the following page.52 1.48 1.55 1.44 1.50 1.49 1.47 1.48 1.47 1.45 1.49 1.49 1.50 1.47 1.50 1.59 1.44 0.51 1.53 1.61 1.51 1.41 1.48 1.52 1.49 1.57 1.51 1.50 1.49 1.47 1.45 1.46 1.48 1.50 1.46 1.44 1.44 1.56 1.49 1.51 1.53 1.57 1.4 1.58 1.51 1.Annex D: Cost Analysis 107 Number of Households 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 175 200 225 250 275 300 Diesel Fuel Price [€/l] 0.43 1.44 1.44 1.55 1.47 1.54 1.46 1.3 1.52 1.50 1.48 1.6 1.56 1.52 1.45 1.44 1.48 1.50 1.46 1.45 1 1.48 1.49 1.54 1.55 1.48 1.50 1.50 1.42 1.51 1.47 1.41 0.47 1.50 1.50 1.43 1.55 1.52 1.43 1.45 1.45 1.7 1.45 1.52 1.43 1.47 1.47 1.42 1.58 1.48 1.46 1.41 1.41 1.51 1.50 1.46 1.43 1.48 1.53 1.9 1.45 1.60 1.52 1.51 1.53 1.59 1.53 1.50 1.60 1.50 1.51 1.44 0.48 1.46 1.46 1.54 1.46 1.54 1.55 1.40 0.48 1.46 1.51 1.47 1.49 1.62 1.48 1.52 1.51 1.44 1.51 1.48 1.53 1.44 1.1 1.8 1.57 1.59 1.48 1.49 1.54 1.48 1.47 1.53 1.43 1.50 1.53 1.42 1.47 1.51 1.47 1.45 1.44 1.49 1.45 1.43 1.46 1.56 1.51 1.52 1.53 1.59 1.53 1.42 1.46 1.48 1.52 1.50 1.48 1.50 1.50 1.47 1.53 1.51 1.42 1.55 1.46 1.41 1.57 1.51 1.53 1.45 1.49 1.49 1.45 1.47 1.52 1.43 0.46 1.56 1.54 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.61 1.46 1.44 1.53 1.47 1.53 1.63 1.45 1.49 1.2 1.49 1. .47 1.61 1.51 1.49 1.53 1.42 0.51 1.58 1.54 1.46 1.48 1.50 1.51 1.49 1.43 1.52 1.51 1.56 1.47 1.40 0.56 1.44 1.54 1.52 1.50 1.53 1.49 1.49 1.42 0.48 1.45 1.45 1.51 1.49 1.5 1.46 1.48 1.50 1.

40 1.40 1.Annex D: Cost Analysis 1.50-1.45 108 Figure D. where it is calculated that electricity generating costs are .3 Illustration of Electricity Generating Costs for PV/Diesel 1.40-1.50 1.60 Electricity Costs [€/kWh] 1. The buckling in the curve progression is a result of the different equations used for small and big wind generators.50 1.55 1.45-1.1 300 1 Diesel Price [€/l] 1. This effect is stronger in the case of Wind/Diesel systems.20 30 45 60 110 140 170 225 Num ber of Households 75 90 0.60 1. 1999).70 1..70 1.4 Illustration of Electricity Generating Costs for Wind/Diesel The cost analysis of hybrid systems here reveals that electricity generating costs are decreasing with higher loads and lower diesel fuel prices.55 1.55-1. which they are likely not to fall below.80 1.35 1.40-1. This observation is supported by the investigations of the Fraunhofer Institute in (Sauer. meanwhile.50 Figure D.45 1.60-1. et al.80 Electricity Costs [€/kWh] 1.60 1. seem to reach a threshold value at all diesel fuel prices. This is due to the fact that the decline in investment costs of diesel gensets at certain installed capacities does not trade off the high investment for the PV modules anymore.30 1.50-1.30 30 45 60 110 140 170 225 Num ber of Households 75 90 0.1 300 1 Diesel Costs [€/l] 1. where costs decline over the whole area of investigation due to the decrease in specific investment costs for wind power plants with higher capacities. D. PV/Diesel systems.50 1..60 1.70-1.

52 1 Day 1.58 1.03 1.63 1.58 1.04 1.09 1.53 1.57 1.53 1.52 1.76 1.56 1.54 1.56 1.22 1.Annex D: Cost Analysis 109 likely not to become lower than 1.02 1.56 1.00 1.07 1.01 1.62 1.7 Electricity Generating Costs PV/Wind Number of Households 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 175 200 225 250 275 300 PV/Wind Systems with Battery Capacity for 2 Days 1.12 1.01 1.03 1.98 .99 0.58 1. the following results were obtained with regard to electricity generating costs per kWh: Table D.00 1. For PV/Wind systems.54 1.98 0.57 1.66 1.10 1.05 1.69 1.54 1.00 0.64 1.54 1.03 Euro/kWh for systems with lower annual consumption of 15.04 1.99 0.56 1.03 1.73 1.000 kWh and at an interest rate of 6%.15 1.58 1.59 1.98 0.55 1.01 1.18 1.55 1.02 1.01 1.03 1.

the circumstances are just moderately suited for fully renewable coverage of electricity demand. 1..000 full load hours for wind generators. Fraunhofer Institut für Solare Energiesysteme ISE in (Sauer. Result 50 kWh/d 9.76 Euro kWh. Assumptions o Electricity Consumption: o Solar Coverage Rate: o Diesel Fuel Price: o Interest Rate: o Labour Costs: 2. 2002) PV/Diesel hybrid system for Sevilla/Spain with costs on planning.. Assumptions o Electricity Consumption: o Capacity PV Modules: o Capacity Diesel Genset: o Battery Bank: o Inverter: o Energy Management System applied o Global radiation in Sevilla/Spain: o Diesel Costs: o Interest rate: o Labour Costs: 2. These costs increase for remote regions. D.30 Euro/l 6% 350 Euro/d . 1..34 Euro/kWh.0 % 37. Result o Electricity generating costs of 1. F.000 kWh/a 77% 0. transport and construction for Kassel/Germany. 1999) PV/Diesel hybrid system for Mexico City.5 Euro/h Electricity generating costs of 0.6 kWh 1.6 kW 96.00 Euro/l 5.664 kWh/m2/a and under the assumption of 2.752 kWh/m2/a 1.9 kWp 6. 11.0 kWh 6.Annex D: Cost Analysis 110 The analysis of PV/Wind systems shows the high dependency of electricity generating costs from the size of the battery bank. D. For the chosen location of Trapani/Italy with annual global radiation of 1.3 Electricity Generating Costs from Different Sources Institut für Solare Energieversorgungstechnik (ISET) in (Kininger. et al.

Annex D: Cost Analysis 111 National Renewable Energy Laboratory(NREL)/University of Delaware in (Byrne.8 Investment and Operating Costs of Different Household Systems. Result 1. Wallace.37 US$/kWh . Results Table D. Costs are related to the size of the system. in (GTZ.82 US$/l 12% Levelised costs based on field analysis of battery’s lifetime. Shen. Electricity Generating Costs: 0. 1. W. B. 1998) PV/Wind Household hybrid systems for Inner Mongolia.720 Operating costs/year [RMB/a] 100 119 119 Table D..43 US$/kWh – 0..75 US$/kWh PV/Wind Household System 0. with large hybrid systems being less expensive. China. PV/Wind hybrid systems (300 W Wind. J. 100 W PV) for household electrification.087 11.72 US$/kWh.85 US$/kWh Wind/Diesel Village System 0. Gesellschaft für technische Zusammenarbeit GTZ. Assumptions o Global radiation: o Wind Energy Density: o Capacity Wind: o Capacity PV: o Diesel Fuel Price: o Interest Rate: 2..837 6.150 kWh/m2/a 150 W/m2 300 W 100 W 0. 2003) Application of PV/Diesel and Wind/Diesel hybrid systems for village electrification. Inner Mongolia System specification PV-Battery-Inverter System (100 W) Wind-Battery-Inverter System (300 W) Wind-PV-Battery-Inverter System (300 + 100 W) Investment costs [RMB] 6.9 Electricity Generating Costs of Hybrid Systems in Inner Mongolia PV/Diesel Village System 1.

51 €/kWh 1.10 5 kW Hybrid Systems at Different Diesel Prices Capacity: 5 kW Electricity Output: 2. 2002) Table D. ratio 80:20 Wind/Diesel.70 €/kWh Electricity Generating Costs at Diesel Price of 1.59 €/kWh .450 23.75 € 1.740 Electricity Generating Costs at Diesel Price of 0.825 22. ratio 80:20 Investment costs in € 11.190 kWh/a Diesel Genset PV/Diesel.Annex D: Cost Analysis 112 Wuppertal Institute in (Wuppertal Institute.5 € 1.84 €/kWh 1.45 €/kWh 1.

de/german/fields/field3/mb1/materialien/Energiemanagement%20f%F Cr%20autonome%20Photovoltaik-Systeme.ise.. A. 1996: Best Practices for Photovoltaic Household Electrification Programs – Lessons from Experiences in Selected Countries. Campen.. W. Barnes. seen: August 23rd. 2003: Energiemanagement für autonome Photovoltaik-Systeme. 2002: Rural Electrification and Development in the Philippines: Measuring the Social and Economic Benefits. Strukturen und Technologien für ein zukunftsfähiges Energiesystem. The World Bank. 2003.Terms of Reference 113 Terms of Reference Aßmann. in: http://www. A. B. G. 2000. Schaeffer.C. seen: August 3rd. Washington... UNDP. M.undp. th 16 European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference. J.. seen: th September 15 . IER-Forschungsbericht Band 69. 2000. in: http://www. B. 2003. D. October 2002. Leibniz – Institut für Agrartechnik Bornim e..pdf. Byrne. 1998: The Economics of Sustainable Energy for Rural Development – A Study of Renewable Energy in Rural China. L.fhg. DomDom. . D. in: http://wbln0018. 1-5 May 1998.. J. Corkish.26(1)... 2003. seen: June 6th. 2003: Energy as an Instrument for Socio-Economic Development. Shen. May 2002. A. August 1996. German Federal Ministry for Economic Co-operation and Development (BMZ). Energy Policy. Barnes. Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung. G. Cosgrove-Davies.. R.... Barkat. 2003: Akteure. D. 2003.45-54. 2000: The Potential and Impact of Solar Photovoltaic Systems for Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development. Guidi. BMZ. Human Development Research Centre. Frankfurt/Germany. in: http://www. 2002: Economic and Social Impact Evaluation Study of the Rural Electrification Program in Bangladesh.. 2000: Montague Island Photovoltaic/Diesel Hybrid System. Cabraal... Best. Draft.. ATB.. et al.. 1999: Materials No. D. J. J.worldbank..V. et al..100: Renewable Energy for Sustainable Development and Climate Protection.html.worldbank. Dhaka/Bangladesh. Glasgow/UK.nsf/0/8525690b0065f5d18525 68a3005d4a23?OpenDocument. 1999. in: www. Baur. Peter Lang Verlag. World Bank Technical Paper Number 324. Stuttgart/Germany. 2000. R. 2003.atb-potsdam. 2000: Verfahren zur Bestimmung optimaler Versorgungsstrukturen für die Elektrifizierung ländlicher Gebiete in Entwicklungsländern. 1998: Rural Electrification in the Developing World: Lessons from Successful Programms./USA. pp. Berlin/Germany. Foley.. D. Lowe. Blanco.htm. Benz. 2003: Wirtschaftlichkeit von Biogasanlagen.pdf.

Ounalli. approach and practical experience. Fraunhofer Gesellschaft Solare Energiesysteme. Washington. sign%20& 1998/1999. 1999: Solar rural electrification in Tunisia. R.pdf. 2002: Photovoltaische Anlagen – Leitfaden für Elektriker. D./USA. Braunschweig/Germany.. Eschborn/Germany. in: http://www. Washington. in: www. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit GTZ. I: Biogas Basics.pdf. Monitoring and Evaluation Paper 2. seen: September 8th.gtz. Hemmers. Vol. published by DGS – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sonnenenergie. Berger. The World Bank. Hammamami. Berlin/Germany. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit GTZ.ise. August 2000. F.worldbank. 1998/1999: Strassenverkehrslärm.heyde-windtechnik. A.. Eschborn/Germany. not yet published.pdf FHG ISE. D. volume 1 and 2. Landesverband Berlin Brandenburg e. M. Architekten und Bauherren.552-558 Heyde.. et al.III: Biogas Costs and Benefits. Washington. . October 1990. Hemmerle.C. October 2001. Fachplaner. September 2000.D. 2003.. ESMAP Technical Paper 009./USA. in: http://www5. 1999. in: http://www. Southwest Supply. in: Geographische Rundschau.Terms of Reference 114 Diesel. 2003: Design und Optimierung im Detail. in: http://wwwwds. 2000: The GEF Solar PV Portfolio: Emerging Experiences and Lessons. 2003. 2003: Final Report of the Sino-German project „Use of Wind and Solar Energy in Inner Mongolia and Selected Islands of the People’s Republic of China“. 2. 2000b: Photovoltaic Applications in Rural Areas of the Developing World. 2003. 2003: Diesel Generator Superstore generator. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit GTZ. The World Bank. 1999. D.. Eschborn/ 2003: Heyde Windtechnik. GEF. in: www. Njaimi. seen: September 5th.pdf ESMAP.a-diesel- ESMAP. R.C./USA. in: http://www5. USA. Dachdecker. ESMAP Technical Paper No. 2001: Best Practice Manual: Promoting Decentralized Electrification Investment. C. 2000a: Mini-Grid Design Manual. Vol. Washington. Stuttgart University. 305412326/Rendered/PDF/multi_page. Global Environmental Facility GEF.C.gtz. M. Lecture Handout Stuttgart/Germany..V. pp. Haselhuhn. 1999b: Biogas Digest. seen: September The World Bank. 007. ESMAP. 1999a: Biogas Digest.pdf GTZ..C.. GTZ. November 2000. 2002 Helfer. 1990: Einsatz regenerativer Energien zur Infrastrukturverbesserung in Entwicklungsländern.. 1999.fhg..

Paris/France. M.ecn. 2000: Regenerative Energieträger zur Stromerzeugung II. Iowa Department of Natural Resources/USA. Report IEA PVPS T305:1998.. 1996/1997: Electrification with Renewable Energies – Hybrid Plant Technology for Decentralised.htm. 1998. 2003. Iowa Department of Natural Resources/USA. 0329833. 3. August 20th. Themen 96/97. A. seen: August 25th. Wirtschaftlichkeit. Lecture Handout Stuttgart University. September 2000. seen: August 25th. Paris/France.und Hybridsysteme. IEA PVPS Task III. OECD/ International Energy Agency. 2000: Monitoring and Evaluation of Solar Home Systems – Experiences with applications of solar PV for households in developing countries. Nieuwenhout. Iowa. 2003. Kaltschmitt. Kleinkauf. 2003. Springer Verlag. M.Terms of Reference 115 Homer. IEA.. http://www. et al. 2002: World Energy Outlook 2002. Grid-Compatible Power Supply. Raptis. Wedel/Germany. seen: August 25th. 1999b: Stand-alone PV Systems in Developing Countries. Lecture Handout Stuttgart University. 2002a: Wind Hybrid Electricity Applications... 1998: Recommended Practices for Charge Controllers. in: Forschungsverbund Sonnenenergie. F. Neuhäusser. August 1999. 1996: Schlussbericht Demonstrationsvorhaben zur objektorientierten hybriden Stromversorgung des Klärwerkes Körkwitz/Riebnitz-Damgarten mit DVgestütztem Energiemanagement . 2002. Report IEAPVPS 3-06:1999. ITDG. IEA. . OECD/ International Energy Agency.Teilprojekt PV/Biogas. OECD/ International Energy Agency.. 2003: Analysis of small and renewable energy power system options. 2002b: Wind Hybrid Electricity Applications.ia. in: ftp://ftp. Iowa Department of Natural Resources/USA. March 2002. F. 2003: Erneuerbare Energien: Systemtechnik. Stuttgart/ W. Paris/France..htm. seen: September 23rd. 1999a: Lead-Acid Battery Guide for Stand-Alone Photovoltaic Systems. Berlin/Germany.. IEA. 2001/2002: Regenerative Energieträger zur Stromerzeugung I. Intermediate Technology Development Group.ia. Kassel/Germany. 2003. OECD/ International Energy Agency.J.D. 2002: Ermittlung der allgemeinen Investitions. Abschlußbericht FuE Vorhaben Nr. Kaltschmitt. in: http://analysis. Kaltschmitt.und Hybridsystemtechnik. www.state. in: Modulare PV.und Betriebskostenstrukturen für modulare PV.. G.. M. 2001/2002.ia.nrel. 2002c: Wind Hybrid Electricity Applications.state.htm. Auflage.. 2003: South Asia Programmes – Energy. January 1996. Umweltaspekte.itdg. BMBF-Förderkennzeichen 032 9170 A. Institut für Solare Energieversorgungstechnik (ISET). Kininger. Paris/France. Iowa.pdf. Stuttgart/Germany 2000.state. F. IEA. http://www. 2003. 2003.

1999: Mehr Arbeitsplätze durch ökologisches Wirtschaften? Eine Untersuchung für Deutschland.ise. Puls. D. 2003: Optimierungswerkzeug für Auslegung und Betriebsführung – Kostenrechnung und Batteriemodell inklusive. in: http://www.. Marheineke. Zwischenbericht anlässlich des Statusseminars des BWPLUS am 1.. .pdf Scheelhasse. Painuly. W. 2000: Evaluation. K.. Preiser. J. in http://www.fhg. Karlsruhe/Germany..pdf. in: http://www. T. Fraunhofer Gesellschaft.Terms of Reference 116 Nill. 1999: Photovoltaics in Mexico: A Model for Increasing the Use of Renewable Energy Systems. 2000: Grundlagen zur Beurteilung der Nachhaltigkeit von Energiesystemen in Baden-Württemberg. Preiser.. J. die Schweiz und Österreich. 2003: Netzferne Stromversorgung mit Photovoltaik.. prepared for the World Sauer. 1999.. G. edp-Entwicklungspolitik 21/2000. Fraunhofer-Institut für Solare Energiesysteme ISE. 2001. Volume 13: An Annual Review of Research and Development.epd. et al. K. UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment. Science Park Gelsenkirchen. 2000: Ein überschätzter Hoffnungsträger.V. September 3rd. February 5th/6th... Denmark.sandia. 2003.. K. W. Sauer. June 2000. Riso National %FCr%20Auslegung%20und%20Betriebsfuehrung. März 2000 im Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe. 2003... Gelsenkirchen/Germany. H. in: Renewable Energies for the South – New Support for Clean Energy Investment in Developing Countries. in: http://www. Prokaushali Sangsad Ltd. Colorado/USA. H. Erprobung und Weiterentwicklung von PV-Systemen in Indonesien. Haker. Voß. Final Report. January 2000. M.. Richards. Preprint of a chapter that appeared in Advances in Solar Energy. R... Summary of Country Studies. D. Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen aus dem Institut für Meteorologie der Universität Leipzig und dem Institut für Troposphärenforschung e. published by the American Solar Energy Society (ASES). Abschlußbericht zum Forschungsvorhaben Nr. Munich/Germany. 1999: Optimierung der Leistungsverfügbarkeit von Windenergie durch ihre Integration in Wind-Biogas-Hybridanlagen. 2000: Feasibility Study for a Solar Home Systems Project within the Context of Alternative Options for Rural Electrification.fhg. 2002.. Freiburg/Germany. R.. Roth. April 1999. 039722 des vom BMBF geförderten Vorhabens...ise. A. 1999: Inselanlagen – Was kosten sie?. Bopp. J. Fenhann... Leipzig. Surkow. 2001: Photovoltaic Hybrid Systems – Energy Supply for Villages. Krewitt. Leipzig/Germany 1999. Survey of Prognos Institute on behalf of Greenpeace. Friedrich. et al. und 2. et al.. E. in: Fachseminar Netzferne Stromversorgung mit Photovoltaik.. 2000. 2003. Programm Lebensgrundlage Umwelt und ihre Sicherung (BWPLUS). 2002: Implementation of Renewable Energy Technologies – Opportunities and Barriers.

Terms of Reference 117 The World 1996b: Best Practices for Photovoltaic Household Electrification Programs – Lessons from Experiences in Selected Countries. Report no: 2001-116 (TR)411HYBRND. Geneva/Switzerland. 2003: Extending rural electrification: A survey of innovative schemes.nrel. Natural Resources Canada.. 1948. 2003. Tomkins. 1998. 2...L.– 2. R. in: http://www. Energie GmbH. Ergebnisse der einzeltechnologischen Analysen.worldbank.. Sheriff.. D. Nutzungstechniken. November 2001. The World Bank. Turcotte. S. The World Bank. Wallace. Wuppertal/Germany. 1995. Tsd. August 2002. Wuppertal Institute. Vienna/Austria. 1995: Erneuerbare Energie: Energieformen.pdf Weber. 1996a: Rural Energy and Development – Improving Energy Supplies for Two Billion People. Presented at the 2nd World Conference and Exhibition on Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion. Washington. Johannesburg. 1948: Constitutions of World Health Organisation. July World Health Organisation. et al. 2002. 1996./USA. 2001: PV Horizon: Workshop on Photovoltaic Hybrid Systems – Summary and Conclusions of the Workshop. in: http://rru. South Africa. 2002: A Framework for Action on Energy. D. deren Auswirkungen auf die Wirtschaftsstruktur und Ableitung technologiepolitischer Handlungsempfehlungen. R. D. WEHAB Working Group. World Summit on Sustainable Development. – Vaduz: Olynthus-Verlags-Anstalt. Pneumaticos. Varennes/Canada. 1998: The Use of Photovoltaics for Rural Electrification in Northwestern China... . 1996. August 2002.C. 34. 2002: Der Beitrag regenerativer Energien und rationeller Energienutzung zur wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung in Nordrhein-Westfalen – Analyse und Bewertung von Zukunftstechnologien. bis 53.pdf. Umwelteinflüsse.C. July 6th-10th. Umwelt. F. The World Bank. Washington. Bd./USA. Webers Taschenlexikon. Endbericht Band II. Wuppertal Institut für Klima. W. CANMET Energy Diversification Research Laboratory. WHO.Aufl.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful