You are on page 1of 5

Prevalence and characteristics of asymptomatic tears of the rotator cuff

AN ULTRASONOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL STUDY

S. Moosmayer, H.-J. Smith, R. Tariq, A. Larmo
From Martina Hansen’s Hospital, Baerum Postterminal, Norway

We undertook clinical and ultrasonographic examination of the shoulders of 420 asymptomatic volunteers aged between 50 and 79 years. MRI was performed in selected cases. Full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff were detected in 32 subjects (7.6%). The prevalence increased with age as follows: 50 to 59 years, 2.1%; 60 to 69 years, 5.7%; and 70 to 79 years, 15%. The mean size of the tear was less than 3 cm and tear localisation was limited to the supraspinatus tendon in most cases (78%). The strength of flexion was reduced significantly in the group with tears (p = 0.01). Asymptomatic tears of the rotator cuff should be regarded as part of the normal ageing process in the elderly but may be less common than hitherto believed.

S. Moosmayer, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Martina Hansen’s Hospital, P B 23, 1306 Baerum Postterminal, Norway. H.-J. Smith, MD, PhD, Professor Department of Radiology Rikshospitalet University Hospital. 0027 Oslo, Norway. R. Tariq, MD, Radiologist A. Larmo, MD, Radiologist Capio Diagnostics, Middelthunsgate 23, 0368 Oslo, Norway. Correspondence should be sent to Dr S. Moosmayer; e-mail: st.moos@online.no ©2009 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B2. 21069 $2.00 J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:196-200. Received 27 March 2008; Accepted after revision 15 September 2008

Tears of the rotator cuff are a well-known cause of chronic pain and dysfunction in the shoulder, but it has been shown that some tears are, and possibly remain, asymptomatic. Studies on cadavers1-4 and, more recently, using MRI5-9 or ultrasonography10-13 have tried to assess the prevalence of asymptomatic tears in the general population. In the cadaver studies, however, clinical details were not available and tears which were symptomatic were included. Those based on MRI have been on small series in younger age groups, and most lacked correlation with the clinical findings. Ultrasonography allows examination of large groups and is reported to be reliable in the detection of full-thickness tears.14-24 However, such studies are uncommon and present varying results for prevalence, the influence of age and the clinical findings. There have been few data on the characteristics of asymptomatic rotator-cuff tears, such as their size, location, involvement of the biceps tendon and bursal or glenohumeral effusion. Such information may give better understanding of the factors which are important in the development of symptoms. Our aim in this clinical and ultrasonographic study was to assess, prospectively, the prevalence and characteristics of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff in asymptomatic subjects aged between 50 and 79 years, and to relate these findings to clinical examination.

Patients and Methods The study had ethical approval. Between September 2005 and January 2008, we performed

clinical and ultrasonographic examination of the shoulders of 420 subjects with asymptomatic shoulders in the age groups 50 to 59, 60 to 69 and 70 to 79 years. Each group consisted of 140 individuals and all gave informed consent. They had earlier been treated at our hospital for conditions unrelated to the shoulder such as meniscal tears, hallux valgus, hammer toe, Morton’s neuroma and carpal tunnel syndrome. They were included on the basis of a written statement, which confirmed the absence of acute or earlier pain and subjective dysfunction in one (120 subjects) or both shoulders (300 subjects), along with a score of at least 90 points in the self report section of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons form (ASES).25 The choice of 90 points was based on age-related baseline values from studies of individuals with no history of shoulder symptoms.26-28 Clinical examination was performed by one examiner (SM) and consisted of measurement of the active range of movement (ROM) for abduction, flexion and external rotation with a goniometer, and of internal rotation by noting the highest anatomical landmark reached by the subject’s thumb, such as the gluteal region, sacrum, vertebral spine L5, L3 or T12 and the interscapular region. Strength was assessed using a handheld spring balance with the elbow extended with the subject sitting on a swivel stool with the shoulder in 90° of abduction and then in 90° of flexion. The ‘break-test method’29 was used in which the subject resisted the examiner’s downward force until it overcame the subject’s isometric contraction. The mean of two
196

VOL. 91-B, No. 2, FEBRUARY 2009

5 to 18. His ability to detect full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff in symptomatic shoulders had been shown to have a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97%. 2800/40 ms. by chance. Two were excluded. A full-thickness tear was diagnosed as a discontinuity or gap in the tendon or increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images.34 Assessment of the biceps tendon was performed on anterior transverse and longitudinal views. adjusted for gender and between tear/no-tear and gender on shoulder strength. but had ultrasonographic appearances which were described as diagnostic for partial-thickness tears.-J. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for prevalence was derived from the binominal distribution. but found only a partial-thickness tear in two. 4) axial proton density-weighted turbo spin echo with fat saturation (TR/TE.6). 2) oblique sagittal T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TR/TE. In this group. 192 × 256). All images were interpreted by one of two musculoskeletal radiologists (RT. hypoor anechoic discontinuity and contour concavity at the superior border of the tendon of the rotator cuff in two planes. The relationship between the size of the tear and strength was investigated using the Pearson productmoment correlation coefficient. This association was highly significant (chisquared test. Such criteria included focal heterogenous tendon hypoechogenicity. A. matrix 230 × 256).3 to 10. Measurement of the range of movement (ROM) and ASES points were expressed as mean values for subjects with and without tears of the rotator cuff. was examined first was used for all further analysis. the shoulder which. The possibility for a false-negative ultrasonographic result was assessed in a subgroup of 81 individuals considered to be at risk for overlooked full-thickness tears by ultrasonography.0 and one number of excitations were obtained as follows: 1) oblique sagittal T1weighted spin echo (TR/TE. In order to control for false-positive findings. 513/13 ms. MRI confirmed the ultrasonographic finding of a full-thickness tear in 28 subjects. SMITH. field of view of 17. R. 2930/74 ms. It was also carried out on 81 subjects who did not fulfil our criteria for full-thickness tears. One-way ANCOVA with age and gender as covariates was performed to test the effect of tear/no-tear on shoulder strength. matrix. 2500/13 to 81.33 The particular tendon involved was observed on anterior (subscapularis) and lateral transverse views (supra. Tears extending posteriorly for less than 1.23. using the biceps tendon as a landmark. THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY . A dislocation was diagnosed when the tendon was seen anterior or medial to the lesser tuberosity. 45 with a partial-thickness tear and 34 with no tear.5 cm were recorded as involving supra.19 Real-time ultrasonography was performed according to a standard protocol. LARMO consecutive measurements was used for analysis and a form listing the findings was completed immediately afterwards.36 Statistical analysis. Results Ultrasonographic screening detected asymptomatic fullthickness tears of the rotator cuff in 32 subjects (7. 3) oblique coronal.30-32 In subjects with bilateral tears only one shoulder was used for analysis of tear characteristics.and infraspinatus and those located anterior to the biceps tendon as tears of subscapularis. In those with bilateral findings. Partialthickness tears were not included because of the lack of reliable diagnostic criteria for their detection. p < 0.197 S. MRI detected two patients with a full-thickness tear.23 The amount of any subacromial-subdeltoid bursal effusion and effusion of the biceps tendon sheath was assessed on anterior transverse views and graded subjectively as normal (distension < 1 mm). and 5) oblique coronal dual echo turbo spin echo (TR/TE. Five sequences. Those extending for more than 1. extending from the articular to the bursal surface.37 A chisquared test for trend was used to assess the association between the prevalence of a tear and the age group. The distance between the margins of the tear on the lateral transverse view or between the margin of the tear and the greater tuberosity on the lateral longitudinal view was determined. The prevalence of tears was calculated per subject. adjusted for age was tested by a twoway analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). matrix 205 × 256). slightly increased (1 mm to 2 mm) or clearly increased (> 2 mm). matrix 218 × 256).35.5 to 11. Germany) equipped with a linear-array transducer of 8.5 T scanner (Siemens Medical Systems). 95% CI 5.19 using a Sonoline Antares scanner (Siemens Medical Systems. The prevalence increased with age (Table I). all with a slice thickness of 3. MRI of subjects with ultrasonographic evidence of a tear was carried out in 30 of 32 subjects. A tear was diagnosed if the tendon could not be identified in the intertubercular sulcus or elsewhere in front of the humerus.31 Since ultrasonographic distinction between partial and small fullthickness tears is difficult16 we considered this group to be at risk for overlooked full-thickness tears and MRI was therefore performed as a control for false-negative ultrasonographic findings using a 1. TARIQ. MOOSMAYER. one because of claustrophobia and the other because of the presence of a pacemaker. Diagnostic criteria for fullthickness tears included absence of the rotator cuff. incomplete hypoechoic clefts and pitting or irregularity of the bony surface of the greater tuberosity. The measurement of the maximum size of the tear was made on lateral transverse and longitudinal views.30. Interaction between tear/no-tear and age on shoulder strength.and infraspinatus). H.6%.5 cm from the intra-articular portion of the biceps tendon were recorded as tears of supraspinatus. MRI was performed on subjects with an ultrasonographically detected full-thickness tear. Bilateral ultrasonographic examination was then performed by the same examiner who had previously carried out 2000 such examinations of the shoulder.0005). AL).5 MHz. blinded as to the clinical and ultrasonographic findings.5 mm to 4 mm. Erlangen.

A slightly increased effusion was found in nine and six and a clearly increased effusion in two and 11 subjects.4 to 6.0) 15.0 (9.01† * levels 1 to 6. medium (1 cm to 3 cm) in 18.1 (0. A tear of the long head of the biceps was diagnosed in the three cases in which subscapularis was affected. . Clinical findings and mean American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) scores in the 420 subjects No tear Number of subjects Mean range of movement (°) Abduction Flexion External rotation Internal rotation* ASES score (SD) Mean force of abduction (kg) Mean force of flexion (kg) 388 Full-thickness 32 p-value 179 179 65 5.7) 7.8) in the anteroposterior plane and 13.0) * 95% CI. The size was classified as small (< 1 cm) in 12 subjects.33 -0.2) 7.PREVALENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF ASYMPTOMATIC TEARS OF THE ROTATOR CUFF 198 Table I.7 98 (3.6%) and 15 (47%) subjects. 17 of which were on the dominant side.16† 0.5 to 11.0) 6. For the 32 asymptomatic tears. In one case a complete tear of the supraspinatus.5 (3. Four tears extended less than 5 mm into the infraspinatus. interscapular region (6) † adjusted for age and gender Table III.9 mm (SD 8. Unilateral asymptomatic tears were discovered ultrasonographically in 21 subjects.2 99 (2.5) in the mediolateral plane. 2. Bilateral asymptomatic tears were found in 11.1) 0. Testing for interaction between tear/no-tear and age on shoulder strength (adjusted for gender) and between tear/no-tear group and gender on shoulder strength (adjusted for age) by two-way ANCOVA was negative.41* Strength in flexion -0.33 -0.1 mm (SD 9.5 to 22. Pearson correlations for measures between the size of the tear and shoulder strength for 32 asymptomatic tears Strength in abduction Anteroposterior Mediolateral * p < 0. VOL. vertebral body L5. respectively. Prevalence (%.7 (2.42* There was no difference of clinical relevance between the tear and no-tear groups in respect of the ROM and ASES points (Table II).3 (2. A moderate negative strength of relationship was found for the association of the size with shoulder strength (Table III). respectively. 95% confidence interval Table II. sacral region (2). 95% CI*) of asymptomatic tears of the rotator cuff related to age Gender Group I II III Number of Age (yrs) subjects M 50 to 59 60 to 69 70 to 79 140 140 140 71 71 64 F 69 69 76 Number of tears M 2 3 13 F 1 5 8 Total Prevalence (%) (95% CI) 3 8 21 2. 91-B. The subacromial-subdeltoid bursa and biceps tendon sheath were assessed ultrasonographically as normal in 21 (65.6 (3. one into subscapularis and one in both. Testing of the effect of tear/no-tear on shoulder strength with age and gender as covariates by one-way ANCOVA showed statistical significance for flexion strength only (Table II). The tears were localised to the supraspinatus tendon in 25 subjects (78%). infraspinatus and subscapularis tendons was found.05 (two-tailed) -0. The relationship between the size of tear in the mediolateral or anteroposterior planes on one side and abduction or flexion strength on the other side was assessed by analysis of correlation.5) 6. Strength testing showed reduced mean values for abduction and flexion strength in those with fullthickness tears. gluteal region (1). the mean tear size by ultrasonography was 12.6) 175 177 67 4.5 (2.1) 5. All the subjects were right-handed. FEBRUARY 2009 large (3 cm to 5 cm) in one and massive (> 5 cm) in one. No. L3 and T12 (3 to 5).

H. only one tear was analysed.13 and MRIbased studies.9 year.jbjs. therapeutic decisions must be made on the basis of clinical examination and not on imaging findings alone. The ultrasonographic12 or MRI7. the clinical results from measuring the ROM and the ASES score showed no clinically significant differences between torn and intact cuffs. the prevalence of asymptomatic tears in cadaver studies should be higher than the true prevalence. We cannot assume that the shoulders which we studied will remain asymptomatic but only that the finding of a torn rotator cuff did not relate to previous or current symptoms. in all 13 of the series of Schibany et al11 and in 92 of 96 of that of Tempelhof et al. We therefore believe that our study group represented the general population without shoulder problems. When considering the younger mean age between these and cadaver studies. as was also found by Schibany et al.5 of maximum 25 points. However.10.9. as in 25 of 32 tears in our study.9 When comparing these results with ours. The tear size was small to moderate (< 3 cm) in 30 of 32 cases in our study. R. and in 80 of 96 cases in that of Tempelhof et al. the theoretical expectation of a slightly lower prevalence in vivo was realised. Schibany et al11 found significant differences between torn and intact cuffs for the Constant power score (15.10. MOOSMAYER. the discrepancy was even greater. Also. MRI in all subjects with negative ultrasonographic findings might have supported the reliability of our results but was considered to be too costly and time-consuming.5 to 11. Asymptomatic tears of the rotator cuff were found less frequently in our study than in most comparable reports. LARMO Discussion The prevalence of asymptomatic tears of the rotator cuff in our study was lower than that in most comparable reports. is not yet understood. and possibly remain asymptomatic. Ultrasonography and MRI can only perform a static evaluation of an evolving condition.12 Involvement of the subscapularis and biceps tendon was not described in any of the earlier studies but was present in three of our cases. Our group may have differed from the general population since all the subjects had been treated at our hospital.5 MHz compared with 7. and surgical exploration may have given a different result.2 vs 11.-J. We alone attempted to verify positive and negative ultrasonographic results by MRI and good agreement between the techniques supported the reliability of our findings.13 difficult to explain.org. MRI of those subjects who were defined ultrasonographically to be at risk of overlooked tears seemed to be an acceptable compromise. The reason as to why these tears are.12. In our study. SMITH.3 vs 89.10. In a review of several cadaver studies. in cases of bilateral asymptomatic tears.5 MHz) gave better image resolution. In agreement with our inclusion criteria. but it was present in 11 of 32 of our cases and in all 14 in the study of Needell et al.12 They did not find any effusion in the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa.13 In agreement with the study of Schibany et al11 and the results of MRI-based studies. Our differences for strength between the groups were considerable but reached statistical significance for strength of flexion only.5 of maximum 100 points) and the Constant ROM score (37.12. A lower prevalence has been given by the results of cadaver studies which have the advantage of a high diagnostic validity but the disadvantage of the likelihood that some tears are symptomatic.3 vs 37. This makes the higher values from other studies9.11 characteristics of asymptomatic tears are generally agreed. Porcellini is available with the electronic version of this article on our website at www. but this is not practicable in asymptomatic subjects.3%. Tempelhof et al12 found increasing loss of strength with the size of tear of the affected compared with the non-affected side.5-9 we found that asymptomatic tears were very uncommon in subjects younger than 60 years but increased in prevalence with age. Reilly et al38 found that the prevalence of asymptomatic full-thickness tears was 12. Supplementary material A further opinion by Dr G. Neither ultrasonography nor MRI is currently used as the optimum standard for the evaluation of the rotator cuff in research protocols. The low number of subjects older than 60 years in the other studies9. The calculation of prevalence and analysis of tear characteristics should be performed on the basis of independent observations.13 may have lessened the validity of their findings. A higher prevalence has been reported in other ultrasonographic10. In the majority of our cases the tear was less than 3 cm in size and localisation was limited to the supraspinatus. We were unaware of any evidence which might link those conditions with the rotator cuff. Our use of a higher frequency transducer (8.8 of maximum 40 points) between the two groups. both shoulders must be considered and this had implications for our study design. and since the right and left shoulders are interdependent.199 S. the following differences in study design should be noted.12. A. p < 0. THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY . Therefore.s the prevalence was 10. In studies analysing the prevalence of conditions of the rotator cuff. they had only one or very few attendances.01) indicating that asymptomatic tears caused measurable changes in shoulder strength. Several limitations in our study design warrant discussion. Therefore.7 In 17 of our 32 cases and in all 14 of Needell et al7 an effusion was seen in the biceps sheath.uk No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. with a comparable mean age of 69.9. the prevalence was calculated by subject rather than by shoulder.11 who reported a slight reduction in the Constant-Murley score (84. and were treated for minor orthopaedic conditions remote from the shoulder.7%. Asymptomatic tears are typically limited to the supraspinatus tendon. In our two oldest age groups. TARIQ.

Eur Radiol 2002. Bunker T. double-contrast arthrography. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Sonography of the rotator cuff in painful shoulders performed without knowledge of clinical information: results from 58 sonographic examinations with surgical correlation. Anatomical considerations relative to rupture of the supraspinatus tendon. Moosmayer S. Aust NZ J Surg 1997. Brinker MR.10:410-15. Tears of the humeral rotator cuff: a radiological and pathological necropsy survey. Windley J. 25.158:1281-7. Am J Sports Med 1995.31:387-94. Thomas M. Seligson D. van Holsbeck M. et al. Walker JA 2nd. acromial morphology.46-B:314-28. Semin Ultrasound 2000. Dowdy PA. Rotator-cuff changes in asymptomatic adults: the effect of age. Stefani P. Barrack RL. et al. Petersen SA. Wurnig C. Yamaguchi K. SozaRex F.51:263-8. Al-Shawi A. Exact binomial and Poisson confidence intervals.12:23-6. Murphy BJ. 35. Giuffre BM. Miniaci A.11:463-9. Murley AH. 18. Zlatkin MB. Farin PU.160:103-7. Teefey SA. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function.html (date last accessed 12 November 2008). magnetic resonance imaging. 26. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992. et al. An examination of bias in shoulder scoring instruments among healthy collegiate and recreational athletes. Tempelhof S. et al. No. Findings at ultrasound. and computed tomography arthrography with surgical correlation. Nakagawa Y. Zlatkin MB. MR imaging of the shoulder: appearance of the supraspinatus tendon in asymptomatic volunteers. 33.67:630-3. Navas-Acién A. J Clin Ultrasound 207. Governu S. 22. et al. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008. Cotton RE. Popham GJ. Iannotti JP.77-B:296-8. Reilly P. Jahnke AH. Distinction between supraspinatus. and rotator cuff tear pathology diagnosed by ultrasound in asymptomatic patients. FEBRUARY 2009 . Iannotti JP.12:622-7. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the rotator cuff tendons in the asymptomatic shoulder.21:164-91. 2. Kolowich PA. Sallay PI. Rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic individuals: a clinical and ultrasonographic screening study. 20. 5. Ho C. Lee S-M. Seil R. Radiology 1995. Diagnostic ultrasound of the shoulder: a method for experts only?: results from an orthopaedic surgeon with relative inexperience compared to operative findings. Emery RJ. Clin Orthop 1987. van Holsbeck MT. Skinner HA. Macleod I. Bade R. MRI of the shoulder: degenerative changes and rotator cuff tears. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: a comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994. Kai-Nan A. Golt RG. Esterhai JL. Gerharter J.141:160-70 (in German). Radke S. Masuhara K. Hughes JS.82-A:498-504. 14.35:20-6. Anatomical observations on senile changes in the shoulder. MR imaging of the rotator cuff: peritendinous and bone abnormalities in an asymptomatic population. Rubin DA. Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. et al. Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.197:443-6. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000. Ozaki J. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004. Kaukanen E. 32. Middleton WD. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1964. Hasan SA. Keenan J.90-B:889-92. Schaffler M.2:211-21. J Bone Joint Surg 1937. 12. hand dominance and gender. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears: comparison of ultrasonographic. Milgrom C. 37. Orthopäde 2001. 4. Kainberger F. Reed L. 17. Burresi F. 28. Willits KR. Vigni F.3:347-52. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2003. Busse M. 6. The measurement of normative American shoulder and elbow surgeons scores. 19. Zlatkin MB. 11. 21. specificity. 9. et al. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1995.30:159-62. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006. Sonnabend DH. Wiener SN.87A:1305-11. Dieball O. Murphy BJ. et al. et al. Tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder associated with pathological changes of the acromion: a study in cadavera. Jaroma H. Sher JS. Ultrasonographic and magnetic resonance images of rotator cuff lesions compared with arthroscopy or open surgery findings. infraspinatus and subcapularis tendon tears with ultrasound in 332 surgically confirmed cases. Sher JS. Rideout DF. Kenn W.PREVALENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF ASYMPTOMATIC TEARS OF THE ROTATOR CUFF 200 References 1. Diagnostic capabilities of shoulder ultrasonography in the detection of complete and partial rotator cuff tears. 8. 23.8:296-9. Teefey SA. J Bone Joint Surg 1935. Vellet AD. Sonography of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003. Uribe JW. Clin Imaging 1992.23:142-5. Middleton WD. 38. J South Orthop Assoc 2003. Martin-Hervás C.org/confint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001. Ultrasonography of the shoulder. 36. 3. Needell SD. Zehetgruber H. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993. US depiction of partial-thickness tear of the rotator cuff.30:484-91 (in German). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999. and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. Chandnani V. 30. et al.12:1211-17. The detection of full thickness rotator cuff tears using ultrasound. UCLA. Cuomo JS. Romero J.70-A:1224-30. 34. Dead men and radiologists don’t lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence. Smith HJ. Posada A. Gilbert S. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996. 24.214:160-4. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995.86-A:708-16.76:503-8.88:116-21. Dhanju J.17:953-60. Correlation of age.19:137-51. Steinbach LS. 91-B.77A:10-15. Am J Orthop 2001. Smith HJ.166:863-7. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1991. 29. Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder: sensitivity. No authors listed. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005. Moosmayer S. Acta Orthop 2005. ASES scores and SF-36 health survey. MR findings in asymptomatic shoulders: a blind analysis using symptomatic shoulders as controls. Ferrari FS. Middleton WD. Bouffard JA. Richards RR. Schibany N. Keyes EL. Macfarlane R.73-A:17-29. Seitz WH. Fujimoto S. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002. Eur J Radiol 2004. 10. Rupp S. et al. Buss DD. http://statpages. Uribe JW. Lee D. 13. 7. Sonography of the shoulder in patients with tears of the rotator cuff: accuracy and value for selecting surgical options. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002. 27. Lang T. Teefey SA. Neumann CH. Gohlke F. Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. Ciccone J. O’Connor DP. Worland RL. Zehetgruber H. Tamai S. and predictive value.16:25-30. Invest Radiol 1996. 31. The clinical role of shoulder ultrasound. Orozco CG. Roberts CS. 15. Eyler WR. Bigliani LU. 2.28:711-17. 16. Constant CR. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 1998. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988. Supraspintaus tendon tears: comparison of US and MR arthrography with surgical correlation. VOL. Heir S. Normal values of the shoulder strength in dependency on age and gender: comparison with the constant.