WSDC 2011: THE DRAW

ROUND ONE
‘ THIS HOUSE WOULD OFFER DICTATORS IMMUNITY IN RETURN FOR LEAVING POWER ’ PROPOSITION AUSTRALIA N AMIBIA WALES N EPAL P ERU S LOVAKIA Q ATAR B ERMUDA C ANADA BARBADOS R EPUBLIC OF KOREA ROMANIA versus OPPOSITION I NDONESIA UAE G ERMANY S COTLAND T URKEY I RELAND S ERBIA N EW Z EALAND E STONIA C HINA K UWAIT S RI L ANKA

ROUND ONE (cont. . . )
‘ THIS HOUSE WOULD OFFER DICTATORS IMMUNITY IN RETURN FOR LEAVING POWER ’ PROPOSITION N ETHERLANDS T HAILAND M EXICO BANGLADESH E NGLAND P OLAND G REECE C HILE I SRAEL S WEDEN P HILIPPINES A RGENTINA versus OPPOSITION N IGERIA PAKISTAN C ROATIA S OUTH A FRICA U NITED S TATES I NDIA C ZECH R EPUBLIC H ONG KONG L ITHUANIA S LOVENIA JAPAN S INGAPORE

ROUND TWO
IMPROMPTU

PROPOSITION S OUTH A FRICA C ROATIA PAKISTAN N IGERIA S RI L ANKA K UWAIT C HINA E STONIA S INGAPORE JAPAN S LOVENIA L ITHUANIA

versus

OPPOSITION M EXICO BANGLADESH N ETHERLANDS T HAILAND R EPUBLIC OF KOREA ROMANIA C ANADA BARBADOS P HILIPPINES A RGENTINA I SRAEL S WEDEN

ROUND TWO (cont. . . )
IMPROMPTU

PROPOSITION H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC I NDIA U NITED S TATES N EW Z EALAND S ERBIA I RELAND T URKEY S COTLAND G ERMANY UAE I NDONESIA

versus

OPPOSITION G REECE C HILE E NGLAND P OLAND Q ATAR B ERMUDA P ERU S LOVAKIA WALES N EPAL AUSTRALIA N AMIBIA

ROUND THREE
‘ THIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT UNIVERSAL PRIMARY EDUCATION IS A MISALLOCATION OF RESOURCES FOR THE DEVELOPING WORLD ’ PROPOSITION S INGAPORE JAPAN S LOVENIA L ITHUANIA H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC I NDIA U NITED S TATES N EW Z EALAND S ERBIA I RELAND T URKEY versus OPPOSITION N ETHERLANDS T HAILAND M EXICO BANGLADESH C ANADA BARBADOS R EPUBLIC OF KOREA ROMANIA S RI L ANKA K UWAIT C HINA E STONIA

ROUND THREE (cont. . . )
‘ THIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT UNIVERSAL PRIMARY EDUCATION IS A MISALLOCATION OF RESOURCES FOR THE DEVELOPING WORLD ’ PROPOSITION S COTLAND G ERMANY UAE I NDONESIA E NGLAND P OLAND G REECE C HILE I SRAEL S WEDEN P HILIPPINES A RGENTINA versus OPPOSITION S OUTH A FRICA C ROATIA PAKISTAN N IGERIA P ERU S LOVAKIA Q ATAR B ERMUDA AUSTRALIA N AMIBIA WALES N EPAL

ROUND FOUR
IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION S OUTH A FRICA C ROATIA PAKISTAN N IGERIA S RI L ANKA K UWAIT C HINA E STONIA AUSTRALIA N AMIBIA WALES N EPAL

versus

OPPOSITION G ERMANY S COTLAND I NDONESIA UAE S ERBIA N EW Z EALAND T URKEY I RELAND S WEDEN I SRAEL A RGENTINA P HILIPPINES

ROUND FOUR (cont. . . )
IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION P ERU S LOVAKIA Q ATAR B ERMUDA C ANADA BARBADOS R EPUBLIC OF KOREA ROMANIA N ETHERLANDS T HAILAND M EXICO BANGLADESH

versus

OPPOSITION P OLAND E NGLAND C HILE G REECE C ZECH R EPUBLIC H ONG KONG U NITED S TATES I NDIA JAPAN S INGAPORE L ITHUANIA S LOVENIA

ROUND FIVE
‘ THIS HOUSE WOULD LEGALISE THE SALE OF HUMAN ORGANS ’ PROPOSITION S OUTH A FRICA C ROATIA PAKISTAN N IGERIA S RI L ANKA K UWAIT C HINA E STONIA AUSTRALIA N AMIBIA WALES N EPAL versus OPPOSITION S LOVENIA L ITHUANIA S INGAPORE JAPAN I NDIA U NITED S TATES H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC R EPUBLIC OF KOREA ROMANIA C ANADA BARBADOS

ROUND FIVE (cont. . . )
‘ THIS HOUSE WOULD LEGALISE THE SALE OF HUMAN ORGANS ’ PROPOSITION P ERU S LOVAKIA Q ATAR B ERMUDA N EW Z EALAND S ERBIA I RELAND T URKEY S COTLAND G ERMANY UAE I NDONESIA versus OPPOSITION M EXICO BANGLADESH N ETHERLANDS T HAILAND G REECE C HILE E NGLAND P OLAND P HILIPPINES A RGENTINA I SRAEL S WEDEN

ROUND SIX
IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION S INGAPORE JAPAN S LOVENIA L ITHUANIA H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC I NDIA U NITED S TATES C ANADA BARBADOS R EPUBLIC OF KOREA ROMANIA

versus

OPPOSITION N IGERIA PAKISTAN C ROATIA S OUTH A FRICA E STONIA C HINA K UWAIT S RI L ANKA N EPAL WALES N AMIBIA AUSTRALIA

ROUND SIX (cont. . . )
IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION N ETHERLANDS T HAILAND M EXICO BANGLADESH E NGLAND P OLAND G REECE C HILE I SRAEL S WEDEN P HILIPPINES A RGENTINA

versus

OPPOSITION B ERMUDA Q ATAR S LOVAKIA P ERU T URKEY I RELAND S ERBIA N EW Z EALAND I NDONESIA UAE G ERMANY S COTLAND

ROUND SEVEN
‘ THIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT WOMEN CAN ONLY ACHIEVE EQUALITY UNDER A SECULAR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT ’ PROPOSITION S OUTH A FRICA C ROATIA PAKISTAN N IGERIA S RI L ANKA K UWAIT C HINA E STONIA S INGAPORE JAPAN S LOVENIA L ITHUANIA versus OPPOSITION N AMIBIA AUSTRALIA N EPAL WALES S LOVAKIA P ERU B ERMUDA Q ATAR S ERBIA N EW Z EALAND T URKEY I RELAND

ROUND SEVEN (cont. . . )
‘ THIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT WOMEN CAN ONLY ACHIEVE EQUALITY UNDER A SECULAR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT ’ PROPOSITION H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC I NDIA U NITED S TATES C ANADA BARBADOS R EPUBLIC OF KOREA ROMANIA N ETHERLANDS T HAILAND M EXICO BANGLADESH versus OPPOSITION G ERMANY S COTLAND I NDONESIA UAE P OLAND E NGLAND C HILE G REECE S WEDEN I SRAEL A RGENTINA P HILIPPINES

ROUND EIGHT
IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION AUSTRALIA N AMIBIA WALES N EPAL P ERU S LOVAKIA Q ATAR B ERMUDA N EW Z EALAND S ERBIA I RELAND T URKEY

versus

OPPOSITION S OUTH A FRICA C ROATIA PAKISTAN N IGERIA S RI L ANKA K UWAIT C HINA E STONIA S INGAPORE JAPAN S LOVENIA L ITHUANIA

ROUND EIGHT (cont. . . )
IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION S COTLAND G ERMANY UAE I NDONESIA E NGLAND P OLAND G REECE C HILE I SRAEL S WEDEN P HILIPPINES A RGENTINA

versus

OPPOSITION H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC I NDIA U NITED S TATES C ANADA BARBADOS R EPUBLIC OF KOREA ROMANIA N ETHERLANDS T HAILAND M EXICO BANGLADESH

Beth James, Andrew Marshall and Simon Quinn, June 2011

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful