UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

Business vs. Individual cases in the 2010 term
DISPOSITION Reversed, 5-4 (Scalia) Affirmed, 6-2 (Scalia) Reversed, 9-0 (Sotomayor) Vacated and remanded, 8-0 (Breyer) Affirmed, 5-4 (Ginsburg) Affirmed, 9-0 (Roberts) Reversed, 9-0 (Ginsburg) Reversed, 6-3 (Kennedy) Reversed, 5-4 (Thomas) Vacated and remanded, 6-2 (Breyer) Affirmed, 9-0 (Sotomayor) Reversed, 5-4 (Thomas) Reversed, 5-3 (Thomas) Reversed, 9-0 (Kagan) Reversed, 8-0 (Scalia) Reversed, 8-0 (Scalia) Reversed, 5-4 (Scalia) Reversed, 8-0 (Breyer) TOTAL: 9 WINS, 9 LOSSES
Source: Mayer Brown

CASE NAME / SUBJECT MATTER AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion / Arbitration Bruesewitz v. Wyeth / Preemption Chase Bank USA v. McCoy / Rights of Credit-Card Holders CIGNA Corp. v. Amara / ERISA CSX Transportation v. McBride / Railroad Liability Erica P John Fund v. Halliburton / Securities Goodyear Luxembourg Tires v. Brown / Personal Jurisdiction J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro / Personal Jurisdiction Janus Capital Group v. First Derivative Traders / Securities Kasten v. Saint-Gobain / Employment Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano / Securities PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing / Preemption Schindler Elevator v. Kirk / False Claims Act Smith v. Bayer Corp. / Class Actions Staub v. Proctor Hospital / Employment Thompson v. North Am. Stainless / Employment Wal-Mart v. Dukes / Class Actions Williamson v. Mazda / Preemption

AGAINST OR IN FAVOR OF BUSINESS? In favor In favor In favor Against Against Against In favor In favor In favor Against Against In favor In favor Against Against Against In favor Against

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Business vs. Individual cases in the 2009 term
DISPOSITION Affirmed, 9-0 (Kennedy) Reversed and remanded, 5-3 (Roberts) Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded, 7-2 (Thomas) Vacated and remanded, 9-0 (Breyer) Vacated and remanded, 9-0 (Alito) Reversed and remanded, 6-3 (Sotomayor) Reversed and remanded, 9-0 (Scalia) Affirmed, 9-0 (Breyer) Affirmed, 9-0 (Sotomayor) Affirmed, 9-0 (Scalia) Reversed and remanded, 8-0 (Thomas) Reversed, 5-4 (Scalia) CASE NAME / SUBJECT MATTER Bilski v. Kappos / Patent Conkright v. Frommert / ERISA Granite Rock Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters / Labor Hertz Corp. v. Friend / Diversity Jurisdiction Jones v. Harris Associates L.P. / Securities Krupski v. Costa Conciere / Civil Procedure Lewis v. Chicago / Employment Merck & Co., Inc. v. Reynolds / Securities Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter / Attorney-Client Privilege Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. / Securities Reed Elsevier v. Muchnick / Copyright Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson / Employment Discrimination Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen General Committee of Adjustment, Central Region / Labor AGAINST OR IN FAVOR OF BUSINESS? In favor In favor Against In favor Against Against Against Against Against In favor In favor In favor

Affirmed, 9-0 (Ginsburg)

Against

TOTAL: 6 WINS, 7 LOSSES
Source: Mayer Brown

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.