Case-1: CDR,SDDR,HOSR

Phenomena Description
Average CDR of a Backguna-1 was (3),and SDDR was( 0.20) HOSR was (93%) for a week After changing BCCH and TCH frequency at the date of 2 june after that ,SDDR decreases from (0.20) to (0.05) ,but not so much impact on CDR ,

But after changing the value of RACH Min.Access Level(dbm) at the date 12 june from -109 to -115 we got a huge improvement regarding CDR and traffic and HOSR. CDR decreases from (3) to (0.5) Traffic increases more than 100 Erl per day HOSR increases from 93% to 97%

Cause Analysis
2.1 Hardware failure(checked all alarm, TASR of all TRX) 2.2 Transmission problem(checked all transmission related alarms, like:E1/T1 related alarms )

6 No Coverage problem(insure by the swap night Drive test team) 2. But after changing the value of RACH Min.3 Version upgrade(checked the software version) 2. 2.14 Adjacent channel interference with dewanhat-1(BCCH:24) and Co TCH interference with lalkhanbazar-2(TCH:20).but not so much impact on CDR .15 We set BCCH :21 and TCH:2 for Backguna-1 to avoid those frequency interference at date 2 june.05) . 2.Access Level(dbm) at the date 12 june from -109 to -115 we got a huge improvement regarding CDR and traffic.20) to (0.Access Level(dbm) from -109 to -115 at the date 12 june Summary & Conclusion After changing BCCH and TCH frequency at the date of 2 june after that .5 Intra-network and inter-network interference (interference checked for the current frequency and give modifications). 2. 2.7 Antenna system have no problem 2.10 Swapping (no sector swap found .2. CDR decreases from (3) to (0. 2.5) Traffic increases more than 100 Erl per day HOSR increases from 93% to 97% .SDDR decreases from (0.16 Most of the drops are happened in Handover state.4 Parameter settings(all parameters are properly defined like planning) 2.8 uplink and downlink balance is ok 2.11 TRX Usibility(all the TRX properly getting traffic or not) 2.17 We set the value of RACH Min.12 HOSR(after checking HOSR with all neighbor we found that most of the failures are happened due to better cell) 2.13 Major Drops are happened in full rate and also this cells utilization is greater than 80%.ensure by the Drive test team) 2.

9 Major Drops are happened in half rate.7 Antenna system have no problem 2.5 for a week But after changing the value of TCH Traffic Busy Threshold(%) from 50 to 70 to increase full rate traffic at the date 12 june CDR decreases from (2.3 Version upgrade(checked the software version) 2.5) to (0. 2.6 No Coverage problem(insure by the swap night Drive test team) 2.2 Transmission problem(checked all transmission related alarms.5 Intra-network and inter-network interference (interference checked for the current frequency and give modifications).12 We set the value of TCH Traffic Busy Threshold(%) from 50 to 70 to increase full rate traffic at the date 12 june .8 uplink and downlink balance is ok 2.11 TCH utilization is less than 50% congestion is better than BM 2.10 Most of the traffic are in half rate.5) Cause Analysis 2. like:E1/T1 related alarms ) 2. 2. TASR of all TRX) 2. 2.4 Parameter settings(all parameters are properly defined like planning) 2.Case-2: CDR 1 Phenomena Description Average CDR of EPZ-1 was 2.1 Hardware failure(checked all alarm.

2.Summary & Conclusion Major Drops are happened in half rate and half rate trafiic also more. 2. but after neighbor relation changing its become (98%) Cause Analysis 2. the target cell to which the MS is handed over may not be the cell with the best signal quality. BQ HO margin(outgoing) 69 to 68 for College bazaar_N-3 to reduce HO command .5%). .5) to (0.6 Also add one bidirectional cell Khatunganj-2 .1 Handovers all basic parameter match with planning .5) Case-3: HOSR 1 Phenomena Description Average HOSR of Guptakhal-2 was (92. after changing the value of TCH Traffic Busy Threshold(%) from 50 to 70.5 we changes the parameter Co-BSC/MSC Adj yes to no. CDR decrease from (2.4 we changes the parameter PBGT HO Threshold(outgoing) 68 to 70. 2. 2.3 Drops are mainly happened due to coverage and bad quality & huge no.2 Major handover failures happened with external neighbor College bazar_N-3 . 2. of HO command was generated. because If this parameter is set to Yes.

2. 2.9 Major Drops are happened in half rate. but after changing the parameter Co-BSC/MSC Adj yes to no HOSR increases from 92. 2.6 No Coverage problem(insure by the swap night Drive test team) 2. Summary & Conclusion Major HO failures are happened due to bad quality .11 TCH utilization is less than 50% congestion is better than BM .8 uplink and downlink balance is ok 2.2 for a week But after changing the value of TCH Traffic Busy Threshold(%) from 50 to 80 to increase full rate traffic at the date 12 june CDR decreases from (10.2) to (2) 2 Cause Analysis 2. TASR of all TRX) 2.5 Intra-network and inter-network interference (interference checked for the current frequency and give modifications).5% to 98%. like:E1/T1 related alarms ) 2.4 Parameter settings(all parameters are properly defined like planning) 2.3 Version upgrade(checked the software version) 2.5% to 98%.2.2 Transmission problem(checked all transmission related alarms.7 Antenna system have no problem 2. Case-4: CDR 1 Phenomena Description Average CDR of Majir ghat-3 was 10.7 After that HOSR of Guptakhal -2 is increased from 92.1 Hardware failure(checked all alarm.10 Most of the traffic are in half rate.

after changing the value of TCH Traffic Busy Threshold(%) from 50 to 80. CDR decrease from (10.12 We set the value of TCH Traffic Busy Threshold(%) from 50 to 80 to increase full rate traffic at the date 12 june Summary & Conclusion Major Drops are happened in half rate and half rate trafiic also more.1) to (2) .2.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful