This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Signed 20 November 1989 Location New York Effective 2 September 1990 Condition 20 ratifications Signatories 140 Parties 194 Depositary UN Secretary-General Languages Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (commonly abbreviated as the CRC, CROC, or UNCRC) is a human rights treaty setting out the civil, political, economic, social, health and cultural rights of children. The Convention generally defines a child as any human being under the age of eighteen, unless an earlier age of majority is recognized by a country's law. Nations that ratify this convention are bound to it by international law. Compliance is monitored by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child which is composed of members from countries around the world. Once a year, the Committee submits a report to the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly, which also hears a statement from the CRC Chair, and the Assembly adopts a Resolution on the Rights of the Child. Governments of countries that have ratified the Convention are required to report to, and appear before, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child periodically to be examined on their progress with regards to the advancement of the implementation of the Convention and the status of child rights in their country. Their reports and the committee's written views and concerns are available on the committee's website. The United Nations General Assembly adopted the Convention and opened it for signature on 20 November 1989 (the 30th anniversary of its Declaration of the Rights of the Child). It came into force on 2 September 1990, after it was ratified by the required number of nations. As of November 2009, 194 countries have ratified it, including every member of the United Nations except Somalia and the United States of America. Somalia's cabinet ministers have announced plans to ratify the treaty.  Two optional protocols were adopted on 25 May 2000. The First Optional Protocol restricts the involvement of children in military conflicts, and the Second Optional Protocol prohibits the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. Both protocols have been ratified by more than 140 states
It requires that states act in the best interests of the child. accepted.  Australia Australia is member of the convention since 1990. at the very least. which claims to be responsible only to the children of the world (and which therefore ultimately is responsible to no-one)". to be protected from abuse or exploitation. This approach is different from the common law approach found in many countries that had previously treated children as possessions or chattels. Article 19 of the Convention states that State Parties must "take all appropriate legislative. and to have their privacy protected. and it requires that their lives not be subject to excessive interference. 193 countries have ratified. The Convention acknowledges that every child has certain basic rights. or acceded to it (some with stated reservations or interpretations) including every member of the United Nations except Somalia and the United States. The Convention obliges states to allow parents to exercise their parental responsibilities. . social and educational measures to protect the child from all forms of physical or mental violence". In many jurisdictions. and to have a relationship with both parents. including the right to life.  States party and signatories As of November 2009. a creative approach within the existing laws. his or her own name and identity. including Australia. or. The Convention also obliges signatory states to provide separate legal representation for a child in any judicial dispute concerning their care and asks that the child's viewpoint be heard in such cases. administrative. An article in the Australian National Observer in 1999 described it as having "frightening potential for the ultimate destruction of Western family values" and the Committee on the Rights of the Child as "an unelected body. Canada and the United Kingdom.Contents The Convention deals with the child-specific needs and rights. Somalia has announced that it would shortly do so. ownership of which was sometimes argued over in family disputes. The Convention also acknowledges that children have the right to express their opinions and to have those opinions heard and acted upon when appropriate. even if they are separated. properly implementing the Convention requires an overhaul of child custody and guardianship laws. to be raised by his or her parents within a family or cultural grouping. The European Court of Human Rights has made reference to the Convention when interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights. The Convention forbids capital punishment for children. but it makes no reference to corporal punishment. In its General Comment 8 (2000) the Committee on the Rights of the Child stated that there was an "obligation of all States parties to move quickly to prohibit and eliminate all corporal punishment and all other cruel or degrading forms of punishment of children". and the Committee's interpretation on this point has been explicitly rejected by several States Party to the Convention.
thereby increasing demand for child laborers. Current estimates as to the number of child laborers in the country range from the government's conservative estimate of 12 million children under 13 years of age to the much higher estimates of children's rights activists. In 2006. there is no outright ban on child labor. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration). In response to criticisms expressed in the 1998 review by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in Geneva. the Irish government established the office of Ombudsman for Children and drew up a national children's strategy. 2006 or Sec. children's rights are often underrepresented. Canada's laws were either largely or entirely in conformity with the treaty. the Irish government undertook to amend the constitution to make a more explicit commitment to children's rights. especially when laws to protect women & children (such as Domestic Violence Act. on 21 September 1992. Little is being done to address the problem since the economy is booming and the nuclear family is spreading. Canada Canada has ratified the Convention. .498A of Indian Penal Code) are abused or misused by women. As a result. even when there is a Court order to the effect. which hover around 60 million. international human rights organisations and foreign governments routinely denounce executions of Iranian child offenders as a violation of the treaty. and the practice is generally permitted in most industries except those deemed "hazardous". without reservation. not available or enforced in practice. and as domestic servants.  Ireland The Republic of Ireland signed the Convention on the Rights of the Child on 21 October 1992 and ratified it. Under the auspices of the Unicef financed Udisha initiative the Government of India is specifying the outline of a means of change and improvement in child care. Youth criminal laws in Canada underwent major changes resulting in the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) which went into effect on 1 April 2003. There are severe restrictions on children in India on their rights to have a relationship with both parents. Prior to ratifying the treaty. Although a law in October 2006 banned child labor in hotels. when they are separated/ divorced. The mother is provided custody by default with the child's access to the Father. following concerns expressed by the committee that the wording of the Irish Constitution does not allow the State to intervene in cases of abuse other than in very exceptional cases. there continues to be high demand for children as hired help in the home. The Act specifically references Canada's different commitments under the Convention.  Iran Although the Islamic Republic of Iran is a state party to the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The convention was influential in the following administrative Law decision of Baker v.  India In India. restaurants.
 New Zealand New Zealand ratified the Convention 6 April 1993 with reservations concerning the right to distinguish between persons according to the nature of their authority to be in New Zealand.. was rejected by the UK Government. arguing that this would imply that the country's adherence was 'at least partly window-dressing'. and the negative impact of poverty on children's rights. below the age of 18". and the lack of opportunities for children and young people to express views. the Court of Appeal dismissed the suggestion that the Minister for Immigration and his department were at liberty to ignore the convention. The committee said it was "deeply alarmed" over the discretionary power judges hold to treat juveniles as adults: In its 2004 report the Saudi Arabia government had stated that it "never imposes capital punishment on persons. with several declarations and reservations. The 2002 report's criticism of the legal defence of 'reasonable chastisement' of children by parents. strongly condemned the government for its practice of imposing the death penalty on juveniles. which removed the defence of "reasonable force" for the purpose of correction. The Minister for Children. calling it "a serious violation of the fundamental rights". In September 2008 the UK government decided to give up its reservations and agree to the Convention in these respects. The 2002 report of the Committee expressed similar concerns. and made its first report to the Committee on the Rights of the Child in January 1995. the Committee was criticised by the Family Education Trust for "adopting radical interpretations of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in its pursuit of an agenda". the need for legislative action on economic exploitation . The Committee on the Rights of the Child. the majority said they would not support a ban. In May 2007. with a reservation 'with respect to all such articles as are in conflict with the provisions of Islamic law' and considers it to be a valid source of domestic law. In its third and final vote parliament votes 113 to eight in favour of the legislation. In 1994.  Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia ratified the Convention in 1996. Concerns raised by the Committee included the growth in child poverty and inequality. and the provisions for the separation of juvenile offenders from adult offenders. New Zealand passed the Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Act 2007. Young People and Families commented that while fewer parents are using smacking as a form of discipline. unequal treatment of asylum seekers. which the Committee described as 'a serious violation of the dignity of the child'. which reviewed Saudi Arabia's treatment of children under the Convention in January 2005. The Joint Committee's report recommended that "the time has . the use of custody for young offenders.. the low age of criminal responsibility. In evidence to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights.which it argued was adequately protected by existing law. the extent of violence towards children.  United Kingdom The United Kingdom ratified the Convention on 16 December 1991. including the welfare of children in custody. regardless of the person's actual age at the time of the crime or at the time of the scheduled execution. The government delegation later acknowledged that a judge could impose the death penalty whenever he decided that the convicted person had reached his or her majority.
 It has been claimed that opposition to the Convention stems primarily from political and religious conservatives. the Heritage Foundation sees it as threatening national control over domestic policy. the Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children. as of October 2010. The US has signed and ratified both the optional protocols to the Convention. The first." The UK Government responded that "the use of physical punishment is a matter for individual parents to decide". and calls on governments to do everything feasible to ensure that members of their armed forces who are under eighteen years of age do not take part in hostilities. Constitution's Supremacy Clause in Article VI. in addition to allowing minors to have abortions without the knowledge or consent of parents. A third optional protocol. Child Prostitution and Child Pornography.  Optional protocols Two optional protocols were adopted by the UN General Assembly on 25 May 2000. 139 states are party to the protocol and another 24 states have signed but not yet ratified it. This protocol entered into force on 12 July 2002. 142 states are party to the protocol and another 25 states have signed but not yet ratified it. as of 2010 . who claim that it would automatically override almost all domestic laws on children and families because of the U. The second. Along with Somalia. such as the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA). President Barack Obama has described the failure to ratify the Convention as 'embarrassing' and has promised to review this.  United States Main article: US ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child The United States government played an active role in the drafting of the Convention and signed it on 16 February 1995. which argues that the CRC threatens homeschooling. and that it undermines parental rights by granting State officials the power to micromanage families and review all parental decisions to verify that they are truly in the "best interests" of the child. which would allow children and/or their representatives to file individual complaints for violation of the rights of children. requires governments to ensure that children under the age of eighteen are not recruited compulsorily into their armed forces. Other groups also oppose it.come for the Government to act upon the recommendations of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child concerning the corporal punishment of children and the incompatibility of the defence of reasonable chastisement with its obligations under the Convention.org. and parental rights groups such as ParentalRights. requires states to prohibit the sale of children. the United States is one of only two countries in the world which have not ratified the Convention. but has not ratified it. the Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict. when the best interests standard is highly subjective. It entered into force on 18 January 2002. For example. as of November 2010. child prostitution and child pornography.S. is being elaborated.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.