## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

SECOND ORDER

RATIONAL DIFFERENCE

EQUATIONS

With Open Problems and Conjectures

CHAPMAN & HALL/CRC

DYNAMICS of

SECOND ORDER

RATIONAL DIFFERENCE

EQUATIONS

M. R. S. Kulenovi´c

G. Ladas

Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C.

With Open Problems and Conjectures

This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material

is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable

efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and the publisher cannot

assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequences of their use.

Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic

or mechanical, including photocopying, microﬁlming, and recording, or by any information storage or

retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.

The consent of CRC Press LLC does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for

creating new works, or for resale. Speciﬁc permission must be obtained in writing from CRC Press LLC

for such copying.

Direct all inquiries to CRC Press LLC, 2000 N.W. Corporate Blvd., Boca Raton, Florida 33431.

Trademark Notice:

Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are

used only for identiﬁcation and explanation, without intent to infringe.

Visit the CRC Press Web site at www.crcpress.com

© 2002 by Chapman & Hall/CRC

No claim to original U.S. Government works

International Standard Book Number 1-58488-275-1

Library of Congress Card Number 20010370

Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0

Printed on acid-free paper

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Kulenovi´ c, M.R.S. (Mustafa R.S.)

Dynamics of second order rational difference equations : with

open problems and conjectures / M.R.S. Kulenovi´ c, G. Ladas.

p. cm.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN 1-58488-275-1

1. Difference equations—Numerical solutions. I. Ladas, G.E.

II. Title.

QA431 .K84 2001

515

′

.625—dc21 20010370

disclaimer Page 1 Monday, June 18, 2001 9:53 AM

Contents

Preface ix

Acknowledgements xi

Introduction and Classiﬁcation of Equation Types 1

1 Preliminary Results 5

1.1 Deﬁnitions of Stability and Linearized Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . 5

1.2 The Stable Manifold Theorem in the Plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

1.3 Global Asymptotic Stability of the Zero Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . 9

1.4 Global Attractivity of the Positive Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

1.5 Limiting Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

1.6 The Riccati Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

1.7 Semicycle Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

2 Local Stability, Semicycles, Periodicity, and Invariant Intervals 29

2.1 Equilibrium Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

2.2 Stability of the Zero Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

2.3 Local Stability of the Positive Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

2.4 When is Every Solution Periodic with the Same Period? . . . . . . . . . 33

2.5 Existence of Prime Period-Two Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

2.6 Local Asymptotic Stability of a Two Cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

2.7 Convergence to Period-Two Solutions When

C = 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

2.8 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

2.9 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

3 (1, 1)-Type Equations 47

3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

3.2 The Case α = γ = A = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

3.3 The Case α = β = A = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

Bx

n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

3.4 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

v

vi Contents

4 (1, 2)-Type Equations 53

4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

4.2 The Case β = γ = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α

A+Bx

n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

4.3 The Case β = γ = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

4.4 The Case α = γ = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

A+Cx

n−1

- Pielou’s Equation . . . . . . 57

4.5 The Case α = γ = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

4.6 The Case α = β = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59

4.7 The Case α = β = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60

4.7.1 The Case p < 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61

4.7.2 The Case p = 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

4.7.3 The Case p > 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

4.8 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

5 (2, 1)-Type Equations 69

5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

5.2 The Case γ = A = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

Cx

n−1

- Lyness’ Equation . . . . . . . 70

5.3 The Case β = A = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

Bx

n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

5.4 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

6 (2, 2)-Type Equations 77

6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

6.2 The Case γ = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Bx

n

- Riccati Equation . . . . . . . . . . 78

6.3 The Case γ = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

6.4 The Case γ = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

6.4.1 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

6.4.2 Semicycle Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84

6.4.3 Global Stability and Boundedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87

6.5 The Case β = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89

6.5.1 Semicycle Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90

6.5.2 The Case q < 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90

6.5.3 The Case q > 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91

6.6 The Case β = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92

6.6.1 Existence and Local Stability of Period-Two Cycles . . . . . . . . 93

6.6.2 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96

6.6.3 Semicycle Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97

6.6.4 Global Behavior of Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100

6.7 The Case α = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101

6.7.1 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102

6.7.2 Semicycle Analysis of Solutions When q ≤ 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

6.7.3 Semicycle Analysis and Global Attractivity When q = 1 . . . . . . 105

6.7.4 Global Attractivity When q < 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107

Contents vii

6.7.5 Long-term Behavior of Solutions When q > 1 . . . . . . . . . . . 107

6.8 The Case α = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109

6.8.1 Invariant Intervals and Semicycle Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110

6.8.2 Global Stability of the Positive Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . 112

6.9 The Case α = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113

6.9.1 Existence of a Two Cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114

6.9.2 Semicycle Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

6.9.3 Global Stability Analysis When p < q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

6.9.4 Global Stability Analysis When p > q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

6.10 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

7 (1, 3)-Type Equations 131

7.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131

7.2 The Case β = γ = 0 : x

n+1

=

α

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131

7.3 The Case α = γ = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

7.4 The Case α = β = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133

7.5 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134

8 (3, 1)-Type Equations 137

8.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137

8.2 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138

9 (2, 3)-Type Equations 141

9.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141

9.2 The Case γ = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141

9.2.1 Boundedness of Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142

9.2.2 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143

9.2.3 Semicycle Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144

9.2.4 Global Asymptotic Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147

9.3 The Case β = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149

9.3.1 Existence and Local Stability of Period-Two Cycles . . . . . . . . 150

9.3.2 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154

9.3.3 Convergence of Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156

9.3.4 Global Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157

9.3.5 Semicycle Analysis When pr = q +

q

2

r

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157

9.4 The Case α = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158

9.4.1 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160

9.4.2 Convergence of Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162

9.5 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163

viii Contents

10 (3, 2)-Type Equations 167

10.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167

10.2 The Case C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167

10.2.1 Proof of Part (b) of Theorem 10.2.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169

10.2.2 Proof of Part (c) of Theorem 10.2.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172

10.3 The Case B = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172

10.3.1 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173

10.3.2 Global Stability When p ≥ r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173

10.3.3 Convergence of Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174

10.4 The Case A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175

10.4.1 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177

10.4.2 Convergence of Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179

10.5 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180

11 The (3, 3)-Type Equation x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

183

11.1 Linearized Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183

11.2 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184

11.3 Convergence Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189

11.3.1 Global Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191

11.4 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192

A Global Attractivity for Higher Order Equations 201

Bibliography 211

Index 217

Preface

In this monograph, we present the known results and derive several new ones on the

boundedness, the global stability, and the periodicity of solutions of all rational diﬀerence

equations of the form

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

+ γx

n−1

A +Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (1)

where the parameters α, β, γ, A, B, C and the initial conditions x

−1

and x

0

are nonneg-

ative real numbers.

We believe that the results about Eq(1) are of paramount importance in their own

right and furthermore we believe that these results oﬀer prototypes towards the devel-

opment of the basic theory of the global behavior of solutions of nonlinear diﬀerence

equations of order greater than one. The techniques and results which we develop in

this monograph to understand the dynamics of Eq(1) are also extremely useful in ana-

lyzing the equations in the mathematical models of various biological systems and other

applications.

It is an amazing fact that Eq(1) contains, as special cases, a large number of equations

whose dynamics have not been thoroughly understood yet and remain a great challenge

for further investigation. To this end we pose several Open Problems and Conjec-

tures which we believe will stimulate further interest towards a complete understanding

of the dynamics of Eq(1) and its functional generalizations.

Chapter 1 contains some basic deﬁnitions and some general results which are used

throughout the book. In this sense, this is a self-contained monograph and the main

prerequisite that the reader needs to understand the material presented here and to be

able to attack the open problems and conjectures is a good foundation in analysis. In an

appendix, at the end of this monograph, we present some global attractivity results for

higher order diﬀerence equations which may be useful for extensions and generalizations.

In Chapter 2 we present some general results about periodic solutions and invariant

intervals of Eq(1). In particular we present necessary and suﬃcient conditions for Eq(1)

to have period-two solutions and we also present a table of invariant intervals.

In Chapters 3 to 11 we present the known results and derive several new ones on the

various types of equations which comprise Eq(1).

Every chapter in this monograph contains several open problems and conjectures

related to the particular equation which is investigated and its generalizations.

ix

Acknowledgements

This monograph is the outgrowth of lecture notes and seminars which were given at the

University of Rhode Island during the last ﬁve years. We are thankful to Professors R.

D. Driver, E. A. Grove, J. Hoag, W. Kosmala, L. F. Martins, O. Merino, S. Schultz,

and W. S. Sizer and to our graduate students A. M. Amleh, W. Briden, E. Camouzis,

C. A. Clark, K. Cunningham, R. C. DeVault, H. El-Metwally, J. Feuer, C. Gibbons, E.

Janowski, C. Kent, L. McGrath, M. Predescu, N. Prokup, M. Radin, I. W. Rodrigues,

C. T. Teixeira, S. Valicenti, and K. P. Wilkinson for their enthusiastic participation and

useful suggestions which helped to improve the exposition.

xi

To

Senada and Theodora

Introduction and Classiﬁcation of

Equation Types

In this monograph, we present the known results and derive several new ones on the

boundedness, the global stability, and the periodicity of solutions of all rational diﬀerence

equations of the form

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

+ γx

n−1

A + Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (1)

where the parameters α, β, γ, A, B, C are nonnegative real numbers and the initial con-

ditions x

−1

and x

0

are arbitrary nonnegative real numbers such that

A + Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

> 0 for all n ≥ 0.

We believe that the results about Eq(1) are of paramount importance in their own

right and furthermore we believe that these results oﬀer prototypes towards the devel-

opment of the basic theory of the global behavior of solutions of nonlinear diﬀerence

equations of order greater than one. The techniques and results which we develop in

this monograph to understand the dynamics of Eq(1) are also extremely useful in ana-

lyzing the equations in the mathematical models of various biological systems and other

applications.

It is an amazing fact that Eq(1) contains as special cases, a large number of equa-

tions whose dynamics have not been thoroughly established yet. To this end we pose

several Open Problems and Conjectures which we believe will stimulate further

interest towards a complete understanding of the dynamics of Eq(1) and its functional

generalizations.

Eq(1) includes among others the following well known classes of equations:

1. The Riccati diﬀerence equation when

γ = C = 0.

This equation is studied in many textbooks on diﬀerence equations, such as [1], [21],

[41], [42], etc. See Section 1.6 where, in addition to the basic description of the solutions

1

2 Introduction and Classiﬁcation

of the Riccati equation, we introduce the forbidden set of the equation. This is the

set F of all initial conditions x

0

∈ R through which the equation

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

A + Bx

n

(2)

is not well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. Hence the solution {x

n

} of Eq(2) exists for all n ≥ 0,

if and only if x

0

/ ∈ F.

The problem of existence of solutions for diﬀerence equations is of paramount

importance but so far has been systematically neglected. See [13], [18], [32], [69], and

Section 1.6 for some results in this regard.

Throughout this monograph we pose several open problems related to the existence

of solutions of some simple equations with the hope that their investigation may throw

some light into this very diﬃcult problem.

An example of such a problem is the following:

Open Problem Find all initial points (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ R×R through which the equa-

tion

x

n+1

= −1 +

x

n−1

x

n

is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. See [13].

2. Pielou’s discrete delay logistic model when

α = γ = B = 0.

See ([42], p. 75), [55], [66], [67], and Section 4.4.

We believe that the techniques which we develop in this monograph to understand

the dynamics of Eq(1) will also be of paramount importance in analyzing the equations

in the mathematical models of various biological systems and other applications. For

example, it is interesting to note the similarities of the dynamics of the population model

x

n+1

= α + βx

n−1

e

−x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . .

and the rational equation

x

n+1

=

α + αx

n

+ βx

n−1

1 + x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

See [24] and Sections 2.7 and 10.2.

3. Lyness’ equation when

γ = A = B = 0.

See [42], [44], [49], [57], and Section 5.2. This is a fascinating equation with many

interesting extensions and generalizations. A characteristic feature of this equation is

that it possesses an invariant which can be used to understand the character of its

Introduction and Classiﬁcation 3

solutions. Without the use of this invariant we are still unable to show, for example,

that every positive solution of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

α + x

n

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

where α ∈ (0, ∞), is bounded.

It is an amazing fact that Eq(1) contains, as special cases, a large number of equations

whose dynamics have not been thoroughly established yet.

For convenience we classify all the special cases of Eq(1) as follows.

Let k and l be positive integers from the set {1, 2, 3}. We will say that a special case

of Eq(1) is of (k, l)-type if the equation is of the form of Eq(1) with k positive parameters

in the numerator and l positive parameters in the denominator.

For example the following equations

x

n+1

=

x

n

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

γ + x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

x

n+1

=

βx

n

+ γx

n−1

A + Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

are of types (1, 1), (2, 2), (2, 1), and (2, 3) respectively.

In this sense, Eq(1) contains 49 equations as follows:

9 equations of type (1, 1)

9 equations of type (1, 2)

9 equations of type (2, 1)

9 equations of type (2, 2)

3 equations of type (1, 3)

3 equations of type (3, 1)

3 equations of type (2, 3)

3 equations of type (3, 2)

1 equation of type (3, 3).

Of these 49 equations, 21 are either trivial, or linear, or of the Riccati type. The

remaining 28 are quite interesting nonlinear diﬀerence equations. Some of them have

been recently investigated and have led to the development of some general theory about

diﬀerence equations. See [7], [15], [28], [29], [42], [43], [45] and [52]-[54]. However to this

day, many special cases of Eq(1) are not thoroughly understood yet and remain a great

challenge for further investigation.

Our goal in this monograph is to familiarize readers with the recent techniques and

results related to Eq(1) and its extensions, and to bring to their attention several Open

Research Problems and Conjectures related to this equation and its functional

generalization.

Chapter 1

Preliminary Results

In this chapter we state some known results and prove some new ones about diﬀerence

equations which will be useful in our investigation of Eq(1).

The reader may just glance at the results in this chapter and return for the details

when they are needed in the sequel. See also [1], [4], [16], [21], [22], [33], [34], [41], [63],

and [68].

1.1 Deﬁnitions of Stability and Linearized Stability

Analysis

Let I be some interval of real numbers and let

f : I ×I →I

be a continuously diﬀerentiable function.

Then for every set of initial conditions x

0

, x

−1

∈ I, the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

), n = 0, 1, . . . (1.1)

has a unique solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

A point x ∈ I is called an equilibrium point of Eq(1.1) if

x = f(x, x);

that is,

x

n

= x for n ≥ 0

is a solution of Eq(1.1), or equivalently, x is a ﬁxed point of f.

Deﬁnition 1.1.1 Let x be an equilibrium point of Eq(1.1).

5

6 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

(i) The equilibrium x of Eq(1.1) is called locally stable if for every ε > 0, there

exists δ > 0 such that for all x

0

, x

−1

∈ I with |x

0

−x| +|x

−1

−x| < δ,

we have

|x

n

−x| < ε for all n ≥ −1.

(ii) The equilibrium x of Eq(1.1) is called locally asymptotically stable if it is

locally stable, and if there exists γ > 0 such that for all x

0

, x

−1

∈ I with |x

0

−x| +

|x

−1

−x| < γ,

we have

lim

n→∞

x

n

= x.

(iii) The equilibrium x of Eq(1.1) is called a global attractor if for every x

0

, x

−1

∈ I

we have

lim

n→∞

x

n

= x.

(iv) The equilibrium x of Eq(1.1) is called globally asymptotically stable if it is

locally stable and a global attractor.

(v) The equilibrium x of Eq(1.1) is called unstable if it is not stable.

(vi) The equilibrium x of Eq(1.1) is called a source, or a repeller, if there exists r > 0

such that for all x

0

, x

−1

∈ I with 0 < |x

0

−x| +|x

−1

−x| < r, there exists N ≥ 1

such that

|x

N

−x| ≥ r.

Clearly a source is an unstable equilibrium.

Let

p =

∂f

∂u

(x, x) and q =

∂f

∂v

(x, x)

denote the partial derivatives of f(u, v) evaluated at the equilibrium x of Eq(1.1).

Then the equation

y

n+1

= py

n

+ qy

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (1.2)

is called the linearized equation associated with Eq(1.1) about the equilibrium point x.

Theorem 1.1.1 (Linearized Stability)

(a) If both roots of the quadratic equation

λ

2

−pλ −q = 0 (1.3)

lie in the open unit disk |λ| < 1, then the equilibrium x of Eq(1.1) is locally

asymptotically stable.

1.2. The Stable Manifold Theorem in the Plane 7

(b) If at least one of the roots of Eq(1.3) has absolute value greater than one, then the

equilibrium x of Eq(1.1) is unstable.

(c) A necessary and suﬃcient condition for both roots of Eq(1.3) to lie in the open

unit disk |λ| < 1, is

|p| < 1 −q < 2. (1.4)

In this case the locally asymptotically stable equilibrium x is also called a sink.

(d) A necessary and suﬃcient condition for both roots of Eq(1.3) to have absolute value

greater than one is

|q| > 1 and |p| < |1 −q| .

In this case x is a repeller.

(e) A necessary and suﬃcient condition for one root of Eq(1.3) to have absolute value

greater than one and for the other to have absolute value less than one is

p

2

+ 4q > 0 and |p| > |1 −q| .

In this case the unstable equilibrium x is called a saddle point.

(f ) A necessary and suﬃcient condition for a root of Eq(1.3) to have absolute value

equal to one is

|p| = |1 −q|

or

q = −1 and |p| ≤ 2.

In this case the equilibrium x is called a nonhyperbolic point.

Deﬁnition 1.1.2 (a) A solution {x

n

} of Eq(1.1) is said to be periodic with period p

if

x

n+p

= x

n

for all n ≥ −1. (1.5)

(b) A solution {x

n

} of Eq(1.1) is said to be periodic with prime period p, or a

p-cycle if it is periodic with period p and p is the least positive integer for which

(1.5) holds.

1.2 The Stable Manifold Theorem in the Plane

Let T be a diﬀeomorphism in I × I, i.e., one-to-one, smooth mapping, with smooth

inverse.

Assume that p ∈ I ×I is a saddle ﬁxed point of T, i.e., T(p) = p and the Jacobian

J

T

(p) has one eigenvalue s with |s| < 1 and one eigenvalue u with |u| > 1.

8 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

Let v

s

be an eigenvector corresponding to s and let v

u

be an eigenvector correspond-

ing to u.

Let S be the stable manifold of p, i.e., the set of initial points whose forward orbits

(under iteration by T)

p, T(p), T

2

(p), . . .

converge to p.

Let U be the unstable manifold of p, i.e., the set of initial points whose backward

orbits (under iteration by the inverse of T)

p, T

−1

(p), T

−2

(p), . . .

converge to p. Then, both S and U are one dimensional manifolds (curves) that contain

p. Furthermore, the vectors v

s

and v

u

are tangent to S and U at p, respectively.

The map T for Eq(1.1) is found as follows:

Set

u

n

= x

n−1

and v

n

= x

n

for n ≥ 0.

Then

u

n+1

= x

n

and v

n+1

= f(v

n

, u

n

) for n ≥ 0

and so

T

u

v

=

v

f(v, u)

.

Therefore the eigenvalues of the Jacobian J

T

x

x

**at the equilibrium point x of Eq(1.1)
**

are the roots of Eq(1.3).

In this monograph, the way we will make use of the Stable Manifold Theorem in our

investigation of the rational diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

+ γx

n−1

A + Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (1.6)

is as follows:

Under certain conditions the positive equilibrium of Eq(1.6) will be a saddle point

and under the same conditions Eq(1.6) will have a two cycle

. . . φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . (1.7)

which is locally asymptotically stable. Under these conditions, the two cycle (1.7) cannot

be a global attractor of all non-equilibrium solutions. See, for example, Sections 6.6 and

6.9.

1.3. Global Asymptotic Stability of the Zero Equilibrium 9

1.3 Global Asymptotic Stability of the Zero Equi-

librium

When zero is an equilibrium point of the Eq(1.6), which we are investigating in this

monograph (with β > 0), then the following theorem will be employed to establish

conditions for its global asymptotic stability. Amazingly the same theorem is a powerful

tool for establishing the global asymptotic stability of the zero equilibrium of several

biological models. See, for example, [31] and [48].

Theorem 1.3.1 ([31]. See also [48], and [70]) Consider the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

= f

0

(x

n

, x

n−1

)x

n

+ f

1

(x

n

, x

n−1

)x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (1.8)

with nonnegative initial conditions and

f

0

, f

1

∈ C[[0, ∞) ×[0, ∞), [0, 1)].

Assume that the following hypotheses hold:

(i) f

0

and f

1

are non-increasing in each of their arguments;

(ii) f

0

(x, x) > 0 for all x ≥ 0;

(iii) f

0

(x, y) + f

1

(x, y) < 1 for all x, y ∈ (0, ∞).

Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(1.8) is globally asymptotically stable.

1.4 Global Attractivity of the Positive Equilibrium

Unfortunately when it comes to establishing the global attractivity of the positive equi-

librium of the Eq(1.6) which we are investigating in this monograph, there are not

enough results in the literature to cover all various cases. We strongly believe that the

investigation of the various special cases of our equation has already played and will

continue to play an important role in the development of the stability theory of general

diﬀerence equations of orders greater than one.

The ﬁrst theorem, which has also been very useful in applications to mathematical

biology, see [31] and [48], was really motivated by a problem in [35].

Theorem 1.4.1 ([31]. See also [35], [48], and ([42], p. 53). Let I ⊆ [0, ∞) be some

interval and assume that f ∈ C[I ×I, (0, ∞)] satisﬁes the following conditions:

(i) f(x, y) is non-decreasing in each of its arguments;

(ii) Eq(1.1) has a unique positive equilibrium point x ∈ I and the function f(x, x)

satisﬁes the negative feedback condition:

(x −x)(f(x, x) −x) < 0 for every x ∈ I −{x}.

Then every positive solution of Eq(1.1) with initial conditions in I converges to x.

10 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

The following theorem was inspired by the results in [55] that deal with the global

asymptotic stability of Pielou’s equation (see Section 4.4), which is a special case of

the equation that we are investigating in this monograph.

Theorem 1.4.2 ([42], p. 27) Assume

(i) f ∈ C[(0, ∞) ×(0, ∞), (0, ∞)];

(ii) f(x, y) is nonincreasing in x and decreasing in y;

(iii) xf(x, x) is increasing in x;

(iv) The equation

x

n+1

= x

n

f(x

n

, x

n−1

), n = 0, 1, . . . (1.9)

has a unique positive equilibrium x.

Then x is globally asymptotically stable.

Theorem 1.4.3 ([27]) Assume

(i) f ∈ C[[0, ∞) ×[0, ∞), (0, ∞)];

(ii) f(x, y) is nonincreasing in each argument;

(iii) xf(x, y) is nondecreasing in x;

(iv) f(x, y) < f(y, x) ⇐⇒x > y;

(v) The equation

x

n+1

= x

n−1

f(x

n−1

, x

n

), n = 0, 1, . . . (1.10)

has a unique positive equilibrium x.

Then x is a global attractor of all positive solutions of Eq(1.10).

The next result is known as the stability trichotomy result:

Theorem 1.4.4 ([46]) Assume

f ∈ C

1

[[0, ∞) ×[0, ∞), [0, ∞)]

is such that

x

∂f

∂x

+ y

∂f

∂y

< f(x, y) for all x, y ∈ (0, ∞). (1.11)

Then Eq(1.1) has stability trichotomy, that is exactly one of the following three cases

holds for all solutions of Eq(1.1):

(i) lim

n→∞

x

n

= ∞ for all (x

−1

, x

0

) = (0, 0) .

(ii) lim

n→∞

x

n

= 0 for all initial points and 0 is the only equilibrium point of Eq(1.1).

(iii) lim

n→∞

x

n

= x ∈ (0, ∞) for all (x

−1

, x

0

) = (0, 0) and x is the only positive equi-

librium of Eq(1.1).

1.4. Global Attractivity of the Positive Equilibrium 11

Very often the best strategy for obtaining global attractivity results for Eq(1.1) is

to work in the regions where the function f(x, y) is monotonic in its arguments. In this

regard there are four possible scenarios depending on whether f(x, y) is nondecreasing

in both arguments, or nonincreasing in both arguments, or nonincreasing in one and

nondecreasing in the other.

The next two theorems are slight modiﬁcations of results which were obtained in [54]

and were developed while we were working on a special case of the equation that we are

investigating in this monograph. (See Section 6.9.) The ﬁrst theorem deals with the case

where the function f(x, y) is non-decreasing in x and non-increasing in y and the second

theorem deals with the case where the function f(x, y) is non-increasing in x and non-

decreasing in y. Theorems 1.4.8 and 1.4.7 below are new and deal with the remaining

two cases relative to the monotonic character of f(x, y). See Sections 6.4 and 6.8 where

these theorems are utilized. See also the Appendix, at the end of this monograph, which

describes the extension of these results to higher order diﬀerence equations.

Theorem 1.4.5 ([54]) Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b] ×[a, b] →[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y) is non-decreasing in x ∈ [a, b] for each y ∈ [a, b], and f(x, y) is non-

increasing in y ∈ [a, b] for each x ∈ [a, b];

(b) If (m, M) ∈ [a, b] ×[a, b] is a solution of the system

f(m, M) = m and f(M, m) = M,

then m = M.

Then Eq(1.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(1.1) con-

verges to x.

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f(M

i−1

, m

i−1

) and m

i

= f(m

i−1

, M

i−1

).

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0,

m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . ≤ M

i

≤ . . . ≤ M

1

≤ M

0

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 2i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

12 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

Then

M ≥ limsup

i→∞

x

i

≥ liminf

i→∞

x

i

≥ m (1.12)

and by the continuity of f,

m = f(m, M) and M = f(M, m).

Therefore in view of (b),

m = M

from which the result follows. 2

Theorem 1.4.6 ([54]) Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b] ×[a, b] →[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y) is non-increasing in x ∈ [a, b] for each y ∈ [a, b], and f(x, y) is non-

decreasing in y ∈ [a, b] for each x ∈ [a, b];

(b) The diﬀerence equation Eq(1.1) has no solutions of prime period two in [a, b].

Then Eq(1.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(1.1) converges

to x.

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f(m

i−1

, M

i−1

) and m

i

= f(M

i−1

, m

i−1

).

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0,

m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . ≤ M

i

≤ . . . ≤ M

1

≤ M

0

,

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 2i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

Then clearly (1.12) holds and by the continuity of f,

m = f(M, m) and M = f(m, M).

In view of (b),

m = M

from which the result follows. 2

1.4. Global Attractivity of the Positive Equilibrium 13

Theorem 1.4.7 Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b] ×[a, b] →[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y) is non-increasing in each of its arguments;

(b) If (m, M) ∈ [a, b] ×[a, b] is a solution of the system

f(m, m) = M and f(M, M) = m,

then m = M.

Then Eq(1.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(1.1) con-

verges to x.

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f(m

i−1

, m

i−1

) and m

i

= f(M

i−1

, M

i−1

).

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0,

m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . ≤ M

i

≤ . . . ≤ M

1

≤ M

0

,

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 2i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

Then clearly (1.12) holds and by the continuity of f,

m = f(M, M) and M = f(m, m).

In view of (b),

m = M = x

from which the result follows. 2

Theorem 1.4.8 Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b] ×[a, b] →[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y) is non-decreasing in each of its arguments;

(b) The equation

f(x, x) = x,

has a unique positive solution.

Then Eq(1.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(1.1) con-

verges to x.

14 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f(M

i−1

, M

i−1

) and m

i

= f(m

i−1

, m

i−1

).

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0,

m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . ≤ M

i

≤ . . . ≤ M

1

≤ M

0

,

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 2i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

Then clearly the inequality (1.12) is satisﬁed and by the continuity of f,

m = f(m, m) and M = f(M, M).

In view of (b),

m = M = x,

from which the result follows. 2

1.5 Limiting Solutions

The concept of limiting solutions was introduced by Karakostas [37] (see also [40]) and

is a useful tool in establishing that under certain conditions a solution of a diﬀerence

equation which is bounded from above and from below has a limit.

In this section we ﬁrst give a self-contained version of limiting solutions the way we

will use them in this monograph.

Let J be some interval of real numbers, f ∈ C[J ×J, J], and let k ≥ 1 be a positive

integer. Assume that {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

is a solution of Eq(1.1) such that

A ≤ x

n

≤ B for all n ≥ −1,

where A, B ∈ J. Let L be a limit point of the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

(For example L is the

limit superior S or the limit inferior I of the solution). Now with the above hypotheses,

we will show that there exists a solution {L

n

}

∞

n=−k

of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

), n ≥ −k + 1, . . . (1.13)

1.5. Limiting Solutions 15

such that

L

0

= L

and for every N ≥ −k, the term L

N

is a limit point of the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

The solution {L

n

}

∞

n=−k

is called a limiting solution of Eq(1.13) associated with the

solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(1.1).

Karakostas takes k = ∞and calls the solution {L

n

}

∞

n=−∞

a full limiting sequence

of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

), (1.14)

associated with the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(1.1). (See Theorem 1.5.2 below.)

We now proceed to show the existence of a limiting solution {L

n

}

∞

n=−k

.

Clearly there exists a subsequence {x

n

i

}

∞

i=1

of {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

such that

lim

i→∞

x

n

i

= L.

Next the subsequence {x

n

i

−1

}

∞

i=1

of {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

also lies in interval [A, B] and so it has a

further subsequence {x

n

i

j

}

∞

j=1

which converges to some limit which we call L

−1

. There-

fore,

lim

i→∞

x

n

i

j

= L and lim

i→∞

x

n

i

j

−1

= L

−1

.

Continuing in this way and by considering further and further subsequences we obtain

numbers L

−2

, L

−3

, . . . , L

−k

and a subsequence {x

n

j

}

∞

n=−1

such that

lim

j→∞

x

n

j

= L

lim

j→∞

x

n

j

−1

= L

−1

. . .

lim

j→∞

x

n

j

−k

= L

−k

.

Let {

n

}

∞

n=−k

be the solution of Eq(1.13) with

−k

= L

−k

and

−k+1

= L

−k+1

.

Then clearly,

−k+2

= f(

−k+1

,

−k

) = f(L

−k+1

, L

−k

)

= lim

j→∞

f(x

n

j

−k+1

, x

n

j

−k

) = lim

j→∞

x

n

j

−k+2

= L

−k+2

.

It follows by induction that the sequence

L

−k

, L

−k+1

, . . . , L

−1

, L

0

= L =

0

, L

1

=

1

, . . .

satisﬁes Eq(1.13) and every term of this sequence is a limit point of the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

The following result, which is a consequence of the above discussion, is stated in the

way we will use it in this monograph:

16 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

Theorem 1.5.1 Let J be some interval of real numbers, f ∈ C[J ×J, J], and let k ≥ 1

be a positive integer. Suppose that {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

is a bounded solution of Eq(1.1) with limit

inferior I and limit superior S, with I, S ∈ J. Then Eq(1.13) has two solutions {I

n

}

∞

n=−k

and {S

n

}

∞

n=−k

with the following properties:

I

0

= I, S

0

= S

and

I

n

, S

n

∈ [I, S] for n ≥ −k.

We now state the complete version of full limiting sequences, as developed by Karakostas.

Theorem 1.5.2 ([37]) Let J be some interval of real numbers, f ∈ C[J

ν+1

, J], and let

{x

n

}

∞

n=−ν

be a bounded solution of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

, . . . , x

n−ν

), n = 0, 1, . . . (1.15)

with

I = liminf

n→∞

x

n

, S = limsup

n→∞

x

n

and with I, S ∈ J.

Let Z denote the set of all integers {. . . , −1, 0, 1, . . .}. Then there exist two solutions

{I

n

}

∞

n=−∞

and {S

n

}

∞

n=−∞

of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

, . . . , x

n−ν

) (1.16)

which satisfy the equation for all n ∈ Z, with

I

0

= I, S

0

= S, I

n

, S

n

∈ [I, S] for all n ∈ Z

and such that for every N ∈ Z, I

N

and S

N

are limit points of {x

n

}

∞

n=−ν

.

Furthermore for every m ≤ −ν, there exist two subsequences {x

r

n

} and {x

l

n

} of the

solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−ν

such that the following are true:

lim

n→∞

x

r

n

+N

= I

N

and lim

n→∞

x

l

n

+N

= S

N

for every N ≥ m.

The solutions {I

n

}

∞

n=−∞

and {S

n

}

∞

n=−∞

of the diﬀerence equation (1.16) are called

full limiting solutions of Eq(1.16) associated with the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−k

of Eq(1.15).

See [23] and [25] for an application of Theorem 1.5.2 to diﬀerence equations of the form

x

n+1

=

k

i=0

A

i

x

n−i

, n = 0, 1, . . .

which by the change of variables x

n

=

1

y

n

reduce to rational diﬀerence equations of the

form

y

n+1

=

1

k

i=0

A

i

y

n−i

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

1.6. The Riccati Equation 17

1.6 The Riccati Equation

A diﬀerence equation of the form

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

A + Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (1.17)

where the parameters α, β, A, B and the initial condition x

0

are real numbers is called a

Riccati diﬀerence equation.

To avoid degenerate cases, we will assume that

B = 0 and αB −βA = 0. (1.18)

Indeed when B = 0, Eq(1.17) is a linear equation and when αB − βA = 0, Eq(1.17)

reduces to

x

n+1

=

βA

B

+ βx

n

A + Bx

n

=

β

B

for all n ≥ 0.

The set of initial conditions x

0

∈ R through which the denominator A+Bx

n

in Eq(1.17)

will become zero for some value of n ≥ 0 is called the forbidden set F of Eq(1.17).

One of our goals in this section is to determine the forbidden set F of Eq(1.17). It

should be mentioned here that there is practically nothing known about the forbidden

set of Eq(1) (when the parameters α, β, γ, A, B, C and the initial conditions x

−1

, x

0

are

all real numbers) other than the material presented here, which is extracted from [32].

(See also [13] and [69].)

The other goal we have is to describe in detail the long- and short-term behavior of

solutions of Eq(1.17) when x

0

/ ∈ F.

The ﬁrst result in this section addresses a very special case of Eq(1.17) regarding

period-two solutions. The proof is straightforward and will be omitted.

Theorem 1.6.1 Assume that (1.18) holds and that Eq(1.17) possesses a prime period-

two solution. Then

β + A = 0. (1.19)

Furthermore when (1.19) holds every solution of Eq(1.17) with

x

0

=

β

B

(1.20)

is periodic with period two.

In the sequel, in addition to (1.18), we will assume that

β + A = 0. (1.21)

18 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

Now observe that the change of variable

x

n

=

β + A

B

w

n

−

A

B

for n ≥ 0 (1.22)

transforms Eq(1.17) into the diﬀerence equation

w

n+1

= 1 −

R

w

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (1.23)

where

R =

βA −αB

(β + A)

2

is a nonzero real number, called the Riccati number of Eq(1.17).

It is interesting to note that the four parameters of Eq(1.17) have been reduced to

the single parameter R of Eq(1.23). If we set

y = g(w) = 1 −

R

w

then we note that the two asymptotes

x = −

A

B

and y =

β

B

of the function

y = f(x) =

α + βx

A + Bx

have now been reduced to the two asymptotes

w = 0 and y = 1

of the function

y = 1 −

R

w

.

Also note that the signum of R is equal to the signum of the derivative

f

(x) =

βA −αB

(A + Bx)

2

.

For the remainder of this section we focus on Eq(1.23) and present its forbidden set F

and the character of its solutions. Similar results can be obtained for Eq(1.17) through

the change of variables (1.22).

From Eq(1.23) it follows that when

R <

1

4

1.6. The Riccati Equation 19

Eq(1.23) has the two equilibrium points w

−

and w

+

with

w

−

=

1 −

√

1 −4R

2

<

1 +

√

1 −4R

2

= w

+

and

|w

−

| < w

+

.

Also

w

−

< 0 if R < 0

and

w

−

> 0 if R ∈ (0,

1

4

).

When

R =

1

4

,

Eq(1.23) has exactly one equilibrium point namely,

w =

1

2

.

Finally, when

R >

1

4

,

Eq(1.23) has no equilibrium points.

Now observe that the change of variables

w

n

=

y

n+1

y

n

for n = 0, 1, . . .

with

y

0

= 1 and y

1

= w

0

reduces Eq(1.23) to the second order linear diﬀerence equation

y

n+2

−y

n+1

+ Ry

n

= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . (1.24)

which can be solved explicitly.

The forbidden set of Eq(1.23) is clearly the set of points where the sequence {y

n

}

∞

n=0

vanishes.

The next two theorems deal with the cases R <

1

4

and R =

1

4

, respectively, where

the characteristic roots of Eq(1.24) are real numbers. Note that in these two cases the

characteristic roots of Eq(1.24) are the equilibrium points of Eq(1.23).

20 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

Theorem 1.6.2 Assume

R <

1

4

.

Then

w

−

=

1 −

√

1 −4R

2

and w

+

=

1 +

√

1 −4R

2

are the only equilibrium points of Eq(1.23).

The forbidden set F of Eq(1.23) is the sequence of points

f

n

=

w

n−1

+

−w

n−1

−

w

n

+

−w

n

−

w

+

w

−

for n = 1, 2, . . . . (1.25)

When w

0

/ ∈ F, the solution of Eq(1.23) is given by

w

n

=

(w

0

−w

−

)w

n+1

+

−(w

+

−w

0

)w

n+1

−

(w

0

−w

−

)w

n

+

−(w

+

−w

0

)w

n

−

, n = 1, 2, . . . . (1.26)

It is now clear from Theorem 1.6.2 that

lim

n→∞

f

n

= w

−

,

and

f

n

< w

−

if R > 0

while

(f

n

−w

−

)(f

n+1

−w

−

) < 0 if R < 0.

The equilibrium w

+

is a global attractor as long as

w

0

/ ∈ F ∪ {w

−

}

and the equilibrium w

−

is a repeller.

Theorem 1.6.3 Assume

R =

1

4

.

Then

w =

1

2

is the only equilibrium point of Eq(1.23).

The forbidden set F of Eq(1.23) is the sequence of points

f

n

=

n −1

2n

for n = 1, 2, . . . , (1.27)

1.6. The Riccati Equation 21

which converges to the equilibrium from the left.

When w

0

/ ∈ F, the solution of Eq(1.23) is given by

w

n

=

1 + (2w

0

−1)(n + 1)

2 + 2(2w

0

−1)n

for n = 0, 1, . . . . (1.28)

From Theorem 1.6.3 it follows that the equilibrium w =

1

2

of Eq(1.23) is a global

attractor for all solutions with w

0

/ ∈ F but is locally unstable, more precisely, it is a sink

from the right and a source from the left.

Finally consider the case

R >

1

4

.

The characteristic roots of Eq(1.24) in this case are

λ

±

=

1

2

±i

√

4R −1

2

with

|λ

±

| =

√

R.

Let

φ ∈ (0,

π

2

)

be such that

cos φ =

1

2

√

R

and sin φ =

√

4R −1

2

√

R

.

Then

y

n

= R

n

2

(C

1

cos(nφ) + C

2

sin(nφ)), n = 0, 1, . . .

with

C

1

= y

0

= 1

and

√

R(C

1

cos φ + C

2

sin φ) = y

1

= w

0

.

It follows that

C

1

= 1 and C

2

=

2w

0

−1

√

4R −1

.

Hence

w

n

=

√

R

√

4R −1 cos(n + 1)φ + (2w

0

−1) sin(n + 1)φ

√

4R −1 cos(nφ) + (2w

0

−1) sin(nφ)

, n = 0, 1, . . . (1.29)

22 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

as long as the denominator is diﬀerent from zero, that is,

w

0

=

1

2

−

√

4R −1

2

cot(nφ) for n = 1, 2, . . . .

The following theorem summarizes the above discussion.

Theorem 1.6.4 Assume that

R >

1

4

and let φ ∈ (0,

π

2

) be such that

cos φ =

1

2

√

R

and sin φ =

√

4R −1

2

√

R

.

Then the forbidden set F of Eq(1.23) is the sequence of points

f

n

=

1

2

−

√

4R −1

2

cot(nφ) for n = 1, 2, . . . . (1.30)

When w

0

/ ∈ F, the solution of Eq(1.23) is given by (1.29).

Clearly when R >

1

4

the character of the solution {w

n

} and the forbidden set F

depends on whether or not the number φ ∈ (0,

π

2

) is a rational multiple of π.

Let θ ∈ (−

π

2

,

π

2

) be such that

cos θ =

√

4R −1

r

and sin θ =

2x

0

−1

r

where

r =

(4R −1)

2

+ (2x

0

−1)

2

.

Then we obtain,

w

n

=

√

R

cos(nφ + φ −θ)

cos(nφ −θ)

=

√

R

cos(nφ −θ) cos φ −sin(nφ −θ) sin φ

cos(nφ −θ)

=

√

R(cos φ −sin φtan(nφ −θ))

and so

w

n

=

1

2

−

√

4R −1

2

tan(nφ −θ), n = 0, 1, . . . (1.31)

from which the character of the solutions of Eq(1.23), when R >

1

4

, can now be easily

revealed.

For example, assume φ is a rational multiple of π, that is,

φ =

k

N

π ∈ (0,

π

2

) (1.32)

1.6. The Riccati Equation 23

for some

k, N ∈ {1, 2, . . .} with 2k < N.

Then

w

N

=

1

2

−

√

4R −1

2

tan(kπ −θ) =

1

2

−

√

4R −1

2

tan(−θ) = w

0

and so every solution of Eq(1.23) is periodic with period N.

Equivalently assume that

A =

1

4 cos

2

φ

with φ =

k

N

π

where

k, N ∈ {1, 2, . . .} and 2k < N,

then every solution of Eq(1.23) is periodic with period N.

The following theorem summarizes the above discussion.

Theorem 1.6.5 Assume that

φ =

k

p

π ∈ (0,

π

2

)

where k and p are positive comprimes and suppose that

cos φ =

1

2

√

R

and sin φ =

√

4R −1

2

√

R

,

or equivalently

4Rcos

2

(

k

p

π) = 1.

Then every solution of Eq(1.23) with

w

0

=

sin(n

k

p

π) −

√

4R −1 cos(n

k

p

π)

2 sin(n

k

p

π)

for n = 1, 2, . . . , p −1

is periodic with period p.

When the number φ in Theorem 1.6.5 is not a rational multiple of π, then the

following result is true:

Theorem 1.6.6 Assume that the number φ in Theorem 1.6.5 is not a rational multiple

of π. Then the following statements are true:

(i) No solution of Eq(1.23) is periodic.

(ii) The set of limit points of a solution of Eq(1.23) with w

0

/ ∈ F is dense in R.

24 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

Proof. Statement (i) is true because,

w

k

= w

l

if and only if

tan(kφ −θ) = tan(lφ −θ)

if and only if for some integer N

kφ −θ −(lφ −θ) = Nπ

if and only if

(k −l)φ = Nπ

that is,

φ is a rational multiple of π.

The proof of statement (ii) is a consequence of the form of the solution of Eq(1.23) and

the fact that when φ is not a rational multiple of π, then the values

(nφ −θ)(mod π) for n = 0, 1, . . .

are dense in the interval (−

π

2

,

π

2

). 2

1.7 Semicycle Analysis

We strongly believe that a semicycle analysis of the solutions of a scalar diﬀerence equa-

tion is a powerful tool for a detailed understanding of the entire character of solutions

and often leads to straightforward proofs of their long term behavior.

In this section, we present some results about the semicycle character of solutions of

some general diﬀerence equations of the form

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

), n = 0, 1, . . . (1.33)

under appropriate hypotheses on the function f.

First we give the deﬁnitions for the positive and negative semicycle of a solution of

Eq(1.33) relative to an equilibrium point x.

A positive semicycle of a solution {x

n

} of Eq(1.1) consists of a “string” of terms

{x

l

, x

l+1

, . . . , x

m

}, all greater than or equal to the equilibrium x, with l ≥ −1 and m ≤ ∞

and such that

either l = −1, or l > −1 and x

l−1

< x

and

either m = ∞, or m < ∞ and x

m+1

< x.

1.7. Semicycle Analysis 25

A negative semicycle of a solution {x

n

} of Eq(1.33) consists of a “string” of terms

{x

l

, x

l+1

, . . . , x

m

}, all less than the equilibrium x, with l ≥ −1 and m ≤ ∞ and such

that

either l = −1, or l > −1 and x

l−1

≥ x

and

either m = ∞, or m < ∞ and x

m+1

≥ x.

Deﬁnition 1.7.1 (Oscillation)

(a) A sequence {x

n

} is said to oscillate about zero or simply to oscillate if the terms

x

n

are neither eventually all positive nor eventually all negative. Otherwise the

sequence is called nonoscillatory. A sequence {x

n

} is called strictly oscillatory

if for every n

0

≥ 0, there exist n

1

, n

2

≥ n

0

such that x

n

1

x

n

2

< 0.

(b) A sequence {x

n

} is said to oscillate about x if the sequence x

n

− x oscillates.

The sequence {x

n

} is called strictly oscillatory about x if the sequence x

n

−x

is strictly oscillatory.

The ﬁrst result was established in [28] while we were working on a special case of the

equation we are investigating in this monograph. (See Section 6.5.)

Theorem 1.7.1 ([28]) Assume that f ∈ C[(0, ∞) ×(0, ∞), (0, ∞)] is such that:

f(x, y) is decreasing in x for each ﬁxed y, and f(x, y) is increasing in y for each ﬁxed

x.

Let x be a positive equilibrium of Eq(1.33). Then except possibly for the ﬁrst semi-

cycle, every solution of Eq(1.33) has semicycles of length one.

Proof. Let {x

n

} be a solution of Eq(1.33) with at least two semicycles. Then there

exists N ≥ 0 such that either

x

N−1

< x ≤ x

N

or

x

N−1

≥ x > x

N

.

We will assume that

x

N−1

< x ≤ x

N

.

All other cases are similar and will be omitted. Then by using the monotonic character

of f(x, y) we have

x

N+1

= f(x

N

, x

N−1

) < f(x, x) = x

and

x

N+2

= f(x

N+1

, x

N

) > f(x, x) = x.

Thus

x

N+1

< x < x

N+2

26 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

and the proof follows by induction. 2

The next result applies when the function f is decreasing in both arguments.

Theorem 1.7.2 Assume that f ∈ C[(0, ∞)×(0, ∞), (0, ∞)] and that f(x, y) is decreas-

ing in both arguments.

Let x be a positive equilibrium of Eq(1.33). Then every oscillatory solution of

Eq(1.33) has semicycles of length at most two.

Proof. Assume that {x

n

} is an oscillatory solution with two consecutive terms x

N−1

and x

N

in a positive semicycle

x

N−1

≥ x and x

N

≥ x

with at least one of the inequalities being strict. The proof in the case of negative

semicycle is similar and is omitted. Then by using the decreasing character of f we

obtain:

x

N+1

= f(x

N

, x

N−1

) < f(x, x) = x

which completes the proof. 2

The next result applies when the function f is increasing in both arguments.

Theorem 1.7.3 Assume that f ∈ C[(0, ∞)×(0, ∞), (0, ∞)] and that f(x, y) is increas-

ing in both arguments.

Let x be a positive equilibrium of Eq(1.33). Then except possibly for the ﬁrst semi-

cycle, every oscillatory solution of Eq(1.33) has semicycles of length one.

Proof. Assume that {x

n

} is an oscillatory solution with two consecutive terms x

N−1

and x

N

in a positive semicycle

x

N−1

≥ x and x

N

≥ x,

with at least one of the inequalities being strict. The proof in the case of negative

semicycle is similar and is omitted. Then by using the increasing character of f we

obtain:

x

N+1

= f(x

N

, x

N−1

) > f(x, x) = x

which shows that the next term x

N+1

also belongs to the positive semicycle. It follows by

induction that all future terms of this solution belong to this positive semicycle, which

is a contradiction. 2

The next result applies when the function f(x, y) is increasing in x and decreasing

in y.

1.7. Semicycle Analysis 27

Theorem 1.7.4 Assume that f ∈ C[(0, ∞) ×(0, ∞), (0, ∞)] is such that:

f(x, y) is increasing in x for each ﬁxed y, and f(x, y) is decreasing in y for each ﬁxed

x.

Let x be a positive equilibrium of Eq(1.33).

Then, except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle, every oscillatory solution of Eq(1.33)

has semicycles of length at least two.

Furthermore, if we assume that

f(u, u) = x for every u (1.34)

and

f(x, y) < x for every x > y > x (1.35)

then {x

n

} oscillates about the equilibrium x with semicycles of length two or three, except

possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle which may have length one. The extreme in each semicycle

occurs in the ﬁrst term if the semicycle has two terms, and in the second term if the

semicycle has three terms.

Proof. Assume that {x

n

} is an oscillatory solution with two consecutive terms x

N−1

and x

N

such that

x

N−1

< x ≤ x

N

.

Then by using the increasing character of f we obtain

x

N+1

= f(x

N

, x

N−1

) > f(x, x) = x

which shows that the next term x

N+1

also belongs to the positive semicycle. The proof

in the case

x

N−1

≥ x > x

N

,

is similar and is omitted.

Now also assume that {x

n

} is an oscillatory solution with two consecutive terms

x

N−1

and x

N

such that

x

N−1

> x

N

≥ x and x

N−2

< x.

Then by using the increasing character of f and Condition (1.34) we obtain

x

N+1

= f(x

N

, x

N−1

) < f(x

N

, x

N

) = x

which shows that the positive semicycle has length two. If

x

N

> x

N−1

> x

then by using the increasing character of f and Condition (1.34) we obtain:

x

N+1

= f(x

N

, x

N−1

) > f(x

N

, x

N

) = x

28 Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

and by using Condition (1.35) we ﬁnd

x

N+1

= f(x

N

, x

N−1

) < x

N

and the proof is complete.

2

Condition (1.34) is not enough to guarantee the above result. If, instead of Condition

(1.35), we assume

f(x, y) > x for every x > y > x. (1.36)

then Eq(1.33) has monotonic solutions.

Theorem 1.7.5 Assume that f ∈ C[(0, ∞) ×(0, ∞), (0, ∞)] is such that:

f(x, y) is increasing in x for each ﬁxed y, and f(x, y) is decreasing in y for each ﬁxed

x.

Let x be a positive equilibrium of Eq(1.33). Assume that f satisﬁes Conditions (1.34)

and (1.36).

Then if x

0

> x

−1

> x, the corresponding solution is increasing.

If, on the other hand, f satisﬁes Condition (1.34), and

f(x, y) < x for every x < y < x (1.37)

then if x

0

< x

−1

< x, the corresponding solution is decreasing.

Proof. First, assume that Condition (1.36) is satisﬁed and that x

0

> x

−1

> x. Then

by the monotonic character of f and (1.34), we obtain

x

1

= f(x

0

, x

−1

) > f(x

−1

, x

−1

) = x.

In view of Condition (1.36) we get

x

1

= f(x

0

, x

−1

) > x

0

.

and the proof follows by induction.

The proof of the remaining case is similar and will be omitted. 2

Chapter 2

Local Stability, Semicycles,

Periodicity, and Invariant Intervals

2.1 Equilibrium Points

Here we investigate the equilibrium points of the general equation

x

n+1

=

α +βx

n

+γx

n−1

A +Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (2.1)

where

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ [0, ∞) with α +β + γ, B +C ∈ (0, ∞) (2.2)

and where the initial conditions x

−1

and x

0

are arbitrary nonnegative real numbers such

that the right hand side of Eq(2.1) is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0.

In view of the above restriction on the initial conditions of Eq(2.1), the equilibrium

points of Eq(2.1) are the nonnegative solutions of the equation

x =

α + (β +γ)x

A + (B +C)x

(2.3)

or equivalently

(B +C)x

2

−(β + γ −A)x −α = 0. (2.4)

Zero is an equilibrium point of Eq(2.1) if and only if

α = 0 and A > 0. (2.5)

When (2.5) holds, in addition to the zero equilibrium , Eq(2.1) has a positive equilibrium

if and only if

β +γ > A.

29

30 Chapter 2. Local Stability, Semicycles, Periodicity, and Invariant Intervals

In fact in this case the positive equilibrium of Eq(2.1) is unique and is given by

x =

β +γ −A

B +C

. (2.6)

When

α = 0 and A = 0

the only equilibrium point of Eq(2.1) is positive and is given by

x =

β +γ

B +C

. (2.7)

Note that in view of Condition (2.2), when α = 0, the quantity β +γ is positive.

Finally when

α > 0

the only equilibrium point of Eq(2.1) is the positive solution

x =

β +γ −A +

(β + γ −A)

2

+ 4α(B + C)

2(B +C)

(2.8)

of the quadratic equation (2.4).

If we had allowed negative initial conditions then the negative solution of Eq(2.4)

would also be an equilibrium worth investigating. The problem of investigating Eq(2.1)

when the initial conditions and the coeﬃcients of the equation are real numbers is of

great mathematical importance and, except for our presentation in Section 1.6 about

the Riccati equation

x

n+1

=

α +βx

n

A +Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . ,

there is very little known. (See [13], [18], [32], and [69] for some results in this regard.)

In summary, it is interesting to observe that when Eq(2.1) has a positive equilibrium

x, then x is unique, it satisﬁes Eqs(2.3) and (2.4), and it is given by (2.8). This ob-

servation simpliﬁes the investigation of the local stability of the positive equilibrium of

Eq(2.1).

2.2 Stability of the Zero Equilibrium

Here we investigate the stability of the zero equilibrium of Eq(2.1).

Set

f(u, v) =

α +βu + γv

A +Bu + Cv

and observe that

f

u

(u, v) =

(βA −αB) + (βC −γB)v

(A +Bu +Cv)

2

(2.9)

2.2. Stability of the Zero Equilibrium 31

and

f

v

(u, v) =

(γA −αC) −(βC −γB)u

(A +Bu +Cv)

2

. (2.10)

If x denotes an equilibrium point of Eq(2.1), then the linearized equation associated

with Eq(2.1) about the equilibrium point x is

z

n+1

−pz

n

−qz

n−1

= 0

where

p = f

u

(x, x) and q = f

v

(x, x).

The local stability character of x is now described by the linearized stability Theorem

1.1.1.

For the zero equilibrium of Eq(2.1) we have

p =

β

A

and q =

γ

A

and so the linearized equation associated with Eq(2.1) about the zero equilibrium point

is

z

n+1

−

β

A

z

n

−

γ

A

z

n−1

= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . .

For the stability of the zero equilibrium of Eq(2.1), in addition to the local stability The-

orem 1.1.1, we have the luxury of the global stability Theorem 1.3.1. As a consequence

of these two theorems we obtain the following global result:

Theorem 2.2.1 Assume that A > 0. Then the zero equilibrium point of the equation

x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A +Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

is globally asymptotically stable when

β + γ ≤ A

and is unstable when

β +γ > A.

Furthermore the zero equilibrium point is

a sink when A > β +γ

a saddle point when A < β +γ < A + 2β

a repeller when β +γ > A + 2β.

32 Chapter 2. Local Stability, Semicycles, Periodicity, and Invariant Intervals

2.3 Local Stability of the Positive Equilibrium

As we mentioned in Section 2.1, Eq(2.1) has a positive equilibrium when either

α = 0 and β +γ > A

or

α > 0.

In these cases the positive equilibrium x is unique, it satisﬁes Eqs(2.3) and (2.4), and it

is given by (2.8). By using the identity

(B +C)x

2

= (β + γ −A)x +α,

we see that

p = f

u

(x, x) =

(βA −αB) + (βC −γB)x

(A + (B +C)x)

2

=

(βA −αB) + (βC −γB)x

A

2

+ α(B +C) + (B +C)(A +β + γ)x

and

q = f

v

(x, x) =

(γA −αC) −(βC −γB)x

(A + (B +C)x)

2

=

(γA −αC) −(βC −γB)x

A

2

+α(B +C) + (B +C)(A +β +γ)x

.

Hence the conditions for the local asymptotic stability of x are (see Theorem 1.1.1) the

following:

|p| < 1 −q (2.11)

and

q > −1. (2.12)

Inequalities (2.11) and (2.12) are equivalent to the following three inequalities:

¸

A +β + γ + 2

βC −γB

B + C

¸

x > −α −

A

2

+ (βA −αB) −(γA −αC)

B +C

(2.13)

(A +β +γ)x > −α −

A

2

−(βA −αB) −(γA −αC)

B + C

(2.14)

¸

A +β + γ −

βC −γB

B +C

¸

x > −α −

A

2

+ (γA −αC)

B +C

. (2.15)

Out of these inequalities we will obtain explicit stability conditions by using the following

procedure:

First we observe that Inequalities (2.13)-(2.15), are equivalent to some inequalities

of the form

x > ρ

2.4. When is Every Solution Periodic with the Same Period? 33

and/or

x < σ

for some ρ, σ ∈ [0, ∞).

Now if we set

F(u) = (B +C)u

2

−(β +γ −A)u −α,

it is clear that

F(x) = 0

and that

x > ρ if and only if F(ρ) < 0

while

x < σ if and only if F(σ) > 0.

2.4 When is Every Solution Periodic with the Same

Period?

The following four special examples of Eq(2.1)

x

n+1

=

1

x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (2.16)

x

n+1

=

1

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (2.17)

x

n+1

=

1 +x

n

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (2.18)

x

n+1

=

x

n

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (2.19)

are remarkable in the sense that all positive solutions of each of these four nontrivial

equations are periodic with periods 2, 4, 5, and 6 respectively.

The following result characterizes all possible special cases of equations of the form

of Eq(2.1) with the property that every solution of the equation is periodic with the

same period. (See also [75], [73], and [74].)

Theorem 2.4.1 Let p ≥ 2 be a positive integer and assume that every positive solution

of Eq(2.1) is periodic with period p. Then the following statements are true:

(i) Assume C > 0. Then A = B = γ = 0.

(ii) Assume C = 0. Then γ(α +β) = 0.

34 Chapter 2. Local Stability, Semicycles, Periodicity, and Invariant Intervals

Proof. Consider the solution with

x

−1

= 1 and x

0

∈ (0, ∞).

Then clearly

x

0

= x

p

and x

p−1

= x

−1

= 1

and so from Eq(2.1)

x

p

=

α +β + γx

p−2

A + B +Cx

p−2

= x

0

.

Hence

(A +B)x

0

+ (Cx

0

−γ)x

p−2

= α +β. (2.20)

(i) Assume that C > 0. Then we claim that

A = B = 0. (2.21)

Otherwise A +B > 0 and by choosing

x

0

> max

α +β

A +B

,

γ

C

¸

we see that (2.20) is impossible. Hence (2.21) holds. In addition to (2.21) we now

claim that also

γ = 0. (2.22)

Otherwise γ > 0 and by choosing

x

0

< min

α +β

A +B

,

γ

C

¸

we see that (2.20) is impossible. Thus (2.22) holds .

(ii) Assume C = 0 and, for the sake of contradiction, assume that

γ(α +β) > 0.

Then by choosing x

0

suﬃciently small, we see that (2.20) is impossible.

The proof is complete. 2

Corollary 2.4.1 Let p ∈ {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}. Assume that every positive solution of Eq(2.1)

is periodic with period p. Then up to a change of variables of the form

x

n

= λy

n

Eq(2.1) reduces to one of the equations (2.16)-(2.19) .

2.5. Existence of Prime Period-Two Solutions 35

2.5 Existence of Prime Period-Two Solutions

In this section we give necessary and suﬃcient conditions for Eq(2.1) to have a prime

period-two solution and we exhibit all prime period-two solutions of the equation. (See

[50].)

Furthermore we are interested in conditions under which every solution of Eq(2.1)

converges to a period-two solution in a nontrivial way according to the following con-

vention.

Convention Throughout this book when we say that “every solution of a certain

diﬀerence equation converges to a periodic solution with period p” we mean that every

solution converges to a, not necessarily prime, solution with period p and furthermore

the set of solutions of the equation with prime period p is nonempty.

Assume that

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

is a prime period-two solution of Eq(2.1). Then

φ =

α +βψ +γφ

A +Bψ + Cφ

and

ψ =

α + βφ +γψ

A +Bφ +Cψ

from which we ﬁnd that

C(φ +ψ) = γ −β −A (2.23)

and when

C > 0 (2.24)

we also ﬁnd that

(B −C)φψ =

αC +β(γ −β −A)

C

. (2.25)

One can show that when

C = 0 and B > 0 (2.26)

Eq(2.1) has a prime period-two solution if and only if

γ = β + A. (2.27)

Furthermore when (2.26) and (2.27) hold

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

is a prime period-two solution of Eq(2.1) if and only if

α + β(φ +ψ) = Bφψ with φ, ψ ∈ [0, ∞) and φ = ψ

36 Chapter 2. Local Stability, Semicycles, Periodicity, and Invariant Intervals

or equivalently

φ >

β

B

, φ =

β +

√

β

2

+ αB

B

, and ψ =

α + βφ

−β +Bφ

. (2.28)

Next assume that (2.24) holds and that Eq(2.1) possesses a prime period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . .

Then it follows from (2.23) and (2.25) that one of the following three conditions must

be satisﬁed:

B = C, α = β = 0, and φψ = 0; (2.29)

γ > β + A and B = C, α = β = 0, and φψ ≥ 0; (2.30)

B > C, α + β > 0, and φψ > 0. (2.31)

When (2.29) holds, the two cycle is

. . . , 0,

γ −A

C

, 0,

γ −A

C

, . . . .

When (2.30) holds, the two cycle is

. . . , φ,

γ −A

C

−φ, φ,

γ −A

C

−φ, . . . with 0 ≤ φ <

γ −A

C

.

Finally when (2.31) holds, the values φ and ψ of the two cycle are given by the two roots

of the quadratic equation

t

2

−

γ −β −A

C

t +

αC +β(γ −β −A)

C(B −C)

= 0

and we should also require that the discriminant of this quadratic equation be positive.

That is,

α <

(γ −β −A)[B(γ −β −A) −C(γ + 3β −A)]

4C

2

. (2.32)

2.6 Local Asymptotic Stability of a Two Cycle

Let

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

be a two cycle of the diﬀerence equation (2.1).

Set

u

n

= x

n−1

and v

n

= x

n

for n = 0, 1, . . .

2.6. Local Asymptotic Stability of a Two Cycle 37

and write Eq(2.1) in the equivalent form:

u

n+1

= v

n

v

n+1

=

α+βv

n

+γu

n

A+Bv

n

+Cu

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

Let T be the function on [0, ∞) ×[0, ∞) deﬁned by:

T

u

v

=

v

βv+γu+α

Bv+Cu+A

.

Then

φ

ψ

**is a ﬁxed point of T
**

2

, the second iterate of T. Furthermore

T

2

u

v

=

g(u, v)

h(u, v)

where

g(u, v) =

α +βv + γu

A + Bv +Cu

and h(u, v) =

α +β

α+βv+γu

A+Bv+Cu

+γv

A +B

α+βv+γu

A+Bv+Cu

+ Cv

.

The two cycle is locally asymptotically stable if the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix

J

T

2, evaluated at

φ

ψ

**lie inside the unit disk.
**

By deﬁnition

J

T

2

φ

ψ

=

¸

¸

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ)

∂g

∂v

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂u

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ)

¸

.

By computing the partial derivatives of g and h and by using the fact that

φ =

α +βψ + γφ

A +Bψ +Cφ

and ψ =

α +βφ + γψ

A + Bφ +Cψ

we ﬁnd the following identities:

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ) =

(γA −αC) + (γB −βC)ψ

(A +Bψ +Cφ)

2

,

∂g

∂v

(φ, ψ) =

(βA −αB) −(γB −βC)φ

(A +Bψ +Cφ)

2

,

∂h

∂u

(φ, ψ) =

[(βA −αB) −(γB −βC)ψ][(γA −αC) + (γB −βC)ψ]

(A +Bφ +Cψ)

2

(A + Bψ +Cφ)

2

,

38 Chapter 2. Local Stability, Semicycles, Periodicity, and Invariant Intervals

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ) =

[(βA −αB) −(γB −βC)ψ][(βA −αB) −(γB −βC)φ]

(A + Bφ +Cψ)

2

(A +Bψ + Cφ)

2

+

(γA −αC) + (γB −βC)φ

(A +Bφ + Cψ)

2

.

Set

S =

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ) +

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ)

and

D =

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ) −

∂g

∂v

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂u

(φ, ψ).

Then it follows from Theorem 1.1.1 (c) that both eigenvalues of J

T

2

φ

ψ

**lie inside the
**

unit disk |λ| < 1, if and only if

|S| < 1 +D and D < 1.

See Sections 6.6, 6.9, and 7.4 for some applications.

Deﬁnition 2.6.1 (Basin of Attraction of a Two Cycle)

Let

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

be a two cycle of Eq(2.1). The basin of attraction of this two cycle is the set B of all

initial conditions (x

−1

, x

0

) through which the solution of Eq(2.1) converges to the two

cycle.

2.7 Convergence to Period-Two Solutions When

C = 0

In this section we consider the equation

x

n+1

=

α +βx

n

+γx

n−1

A +Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (2.33)

where

α, β, γ, A, B ∈ [0, ∞) with α + β +γ, A +B ∈ (0, ∞)

and nonnegative initial conditions and obtain a signum invariant for its solutions which

will be used in the sequel (See Sections 4.7, 6.5, 6.7, and 10.2) to obtain conditions on

α, β, γ, A and B so that every solution of Eq(2.33) converges to a period-two solution.

That is, every solution converges to a (not necessarily prime) period-two solution and

2.7. Convergence to Period-Two Solutions When C = 0 39

there exist prime period-two solutions. (See also Section 10.2 where we present the

complete character of solutions of Eq(2.33).)

Now before we see that when B > 0 every solution of Eq(2.33) converges to a period-

two solution if and only if (2.27) holds, we need the following result, the proof of which

follows by straightforward computations.

Lemma 2.7.1 Assume that (2.27) holds, and let {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(2.33).

Set

J

n

= α +β(x

n−1

+x

n

) −Bx

n−1

x

n

for n ≥ 0. (2.34)

Then the following statements are true:

(a)

J

n+1

=

β +A

A +Bx

n

J

n

for n ≥ 0.

In particular, the sign of the quantity J

n

is constant along each solution.

(b)

x

n+1

−x

n−1

=

J

n

A +Bx

n

for n ≥ 0.

In particular, one and only one of the following three statements is true for each solution

of Eq(2.33):

(i)

x

n+1

−x

n−1

= 0 for all n ≥ 0;

(ii)

x

n+1

−x

n−1

< 0 for all n ≥ 0;

(iii)

x

n+1

−x

n−1

> 0 for all n ≥ 0.

Clearly (i) holds, if and only if, (β + A)J

0

= 0. In this case, the solution {x

n

} is

periodic with period-two.

Statement (ii) holds if and only if J

0

< 0 and β+A > 0. In this case the subsequences

{x

2n

}

∞

n=0

and {x

2n−1

}

∞

n=0

of the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=0

are both decreasing to ﬁnite limits and

so in this case the solution converges to a period-two solution.

Finally (iii) holds, if and only if J

0

> 0 and β +A > 0. In this case the subsequences

{x

2n

}

∞

n=0

and {x

2n−1

}

∞

n=0

of the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=0

are both increasing and so if we can

show that they are bounded, the solution would converge to a period-two solution.

Now observe that

x

n+1

−x

n−1

=

β +A

A +Bx

n

(x

n

−x

n−2

) for n ≥ 1

40 Chapter 2. Local Stability, Semicycles, Periodicity, and Invariant Intervals

and so

x

n+1

−x

n−1

= (x

1

−x

−1

)

n

¸

k=1

β +A

A + Bx

k

. (2.35)

We will now employ (2.35) to show that the subsequences of even and odd terms of

the solution are bounded. We will give the details for the subsequence of even terms.

The proof for the subsequence of odd terms is similar and will be omitted. To this end

assume, for the sake of contradiction, that the subsequence of even terms increases to

∞. Then there exists N ≥ 0 such that

ρ =

A +β

A + Bx

2N+1

A +β

A +Bx

2N

< 1.

Clearly for all n > N,

A +β

A +Bx

2n+1

A + β

A +Bx

2n

<

A + β

A +Bx

2N+1

A +β

A +Bx

2N

= ρ.

Set

K = |x

2N

−x

2N−2

|.

Then

|x

2N+2

−x

2N

| =

A + β

A +Bx

2N+1

A +β

A +Bx

2N

|x

2N

−x

2N−2

| < Kρ

|x

2N+4

−x

2N+2

| =

A + β

A + Bx

2N+3

A + β

A + Bx

2N+2

|x

2N+2

−x

2N

| < Kρ

2

and by induction

|x

2N+2m

−x

2N+2(m−1)

| < Kρ

m

for m = 1, 2, . . . .

But then

x

2N+2m

≤ |x

2N+2m

−x

2N+2m−2

| +. . . +|x

2N+2

−x

2N

| +x

2N

≤ K

m

¸

i=1

ρ

i

+x

2N

<

Kρ

1 −ρ

+x

2N

which contradicts the hypothesis that the subsequence of even terms is unbounded.

In summary we have established the following result.

Theorem 2.7.1 Assume B > 0. Then the following statements hold:

(a) Eq(2.33) has a prime period-two solution if and only if (2.27) holds.

(b) When (2.27) holds all prime period-two solutions

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

of Eq(2.33) are given by (2.28).

(c) When (2.27) holds every solution of Eq(2.33) converges to a period-two solution.

2.8. Invariant Intervals 41

2.8 Invariant Intervals

An invariant interval for Eq(2.1) is an interval I with the property that if two con-

secutive terms of the solution fall in I then all the subsequent terms of the solution also

belong to I. In other words I is an invariant interval for the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

), n = 0, 1, . . . (2.36)

if x

N−1

, x

N

∈ I for some N ≥ 0, then x

n

∈ I for every n > N.

Invariant intervals for Eq(2.36) are determined from the intervals where the function

f(x, y) is monotonic in its arguments.

For Eq(2.1) the partial derivatives are given by (2.9) and (2.10) and are

f

x

(x, y) =

L +My

(A +Bx + Cy)

2

and f

y

(x, y) =

N −Mx

(A +Bx + Cy)

2

,

where

L = βA −αB, M = βC −γB, and N = γA −αC.

The following table gives the signs of f

x

and f

y

in all possible nondegenerate cases.

Case L M N Signs of derivatives f

x

and f

y

1 + + +

f

x

> 0

f

y

> 0 if x <

N

M

; f

y

< 0 if x >

N

M

2 + + 0 f

x

> 0 and f

y

< 0

3 + + − f

x

> 0 and f

y

< 0

4 + 0 + f

x

> 0 and f

y

> 0

5 + 0 0 f

x

> 0 and f

y

= 0

6 + − +

f

x

> 0 if y < −

L

M

; f

x

< 0 if y > −

L

M

f

y

> 0

7 0 + 0 f

x

> 0 and f

y

< 0

8 0 + − f

x

> 0 and f

y

< 0

9 0 − + f

x

< 0 and f

y

> 0

10 0 − 0 f

x

< 0 and f

y

> 0

11 − + −

f

x

> 0 if y > −

L

M

; f

x

< 0 if y < −

L

M

f

y

< 0

12 − 0 0 f

x

< 0 and f

y

= 0

13 − 0 − f

x

< 0 and f

y

< 0

14 − − + f

x

< 0 and f

y

> 0

15 − − 0 f

x

< 0 and f

y

> 0

16 − − −

f

x

< 0

f

y

> 0 if x >

N

M

; f

y

< 0 if x <

N

M

Using this table, we obtain the following table of invariant intervals for Eq(2.1).

42 Chapter 2. Local Stability, Semicycles, Periodicity, and Invariant Intervals

Case Invariant intervals

1

[0,

N

M

] if

αM+(β+γ)N

AM+(B+C)N

<

N

M

[

N

M

,

(β−A)M−CN+

√

((β−A)M−NC)

2

+4BM(αM+γN)

2BM

] if

αM+(β+γ)N

AM+(B+C)N

>

N

M

and B > 0

[

N

M

,

αM+γN

(A−β)M+CN

] if B = 0 and (A−β)M +CN > 0

2

[0,

β−A+

√

(β−A)

2

+4Bα

2B

] if B > 0

[0,

α

A−β

] if B = 0, α > 0 and A > β

3

[0,

β−A+

√

(β−A)

2

+4Bα

2B

] if B > 0

[0,

α

A−β

] if B = 0, α > 0 and A > β

4 [0,

β+γ−A+

√

(β+γ−A)

2

+4α(B+C)

2(B+C)

] if B +C > 0

5

[

α

A

,

β−A+

√

(β−A)

2

+4αB

2B

] if B > 0

[

α

A

,

α

A−β

] if B = 0 and A > β

6

[0, −

L

M

] if

αM−(β+γ)L

AM−(B+C)L

< −

L

M

[−

L

M

,

(A−γ)M−BL+

√

((A−γ)M−BL)

2

+4CM(αM−βL)

−2CM

] if C = 0 and

βMK+αM−γL

BMK+AM−CL

> −

L

M

[−

L

M

,

βL−αM

(γ−A)M+BL

] if C = 0, (γ −A)M +BL > 0 and −(βM +BL)K ≥ αM +AL

7

[

γ

C

,

β

B

] if B > 0

[

γ

C

,

γ

2

C(γ−β)

] if B = 0 and β < γ

8

[0,

β

B

] if B = 0

[

γ

C

,

αC+γ

2

γ−βC

] if B = 0 and γ > βC

9

[0,

γ

C

] if C > 0

[k, K] if C = 0 where k and K satisfy α +βk + (γ −A)K ≤ BkK ≤ α +βK −Ak

10

[

β

B

,

γ

C

] if C > 0

[

β

B

,

β

2

B(β−γ)

] if C = 0 and β > γ

11

[

αM−L(β+γ)

AM−L(B+C)

, −

L

M

] if

αM−L(β+γ)

AM−L(B+C)

< −

L

M

[−

L

M

,

(β−A)M+LC+

√

((β−A)M+LC)

2

+4BM(αM−γL)

2BM

] if

αM−βL+γMK

AM−BL+CMK

> −

L

M

12

[

α(A+β)

A

2

+Bα

,

α

A

] if A > 0

[

β

B

,

β

B

+

α

β

] if A = 0 and β > 0

13

[0,

α

A

] if A > 0

[k, K] if A = 0 where k and K satisfy

α+(β+γ)k

B+C

≤ kK ≤

α+(β+γ)K

B+C

14

[0,

γ

C

] if C > 0

[k, K] if C = 0 where k and K satisfy α +βk + (γ −A)K ≤ BkK ≤ α +βK −Ak

15

[0,

γ

C

] if C > 0

[

β

B

,

αB+β

2

B(β−γ)

] if A = 0 and β > γ

16

[

αM+(β+γ)N

AM+(B+C)N

,

N

M

] if

αM+(β+γ)N

AM+(B+C)N

<

N

M

[

N

M

,

(γ−A)M−BN+

√

((γ−A)M−BN)

2

+4BM(αM+βN)

2CM

] if

αM+βK+γNM

AM+BK+CNM

>

N

M

2.9. Open Problems and Conjectures 43

2.9 Open Problems and Conjectures

What is it that makes all solutions of a nonlinear diﬀerence equation periodic with the

same period?

For a linear equation, every solution is periodic with period p ≥ 2, if and only if

every root of the characteristic equation is a pth root of unity.

Open Problem 2.9.1 Assume that f ∈ C

1

[(0, ∞) × (0, ∞), (0, ∞)] is such that every

positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

), n = 0, 1, . . . (2.37)

is periodic with period p ≥ 2.

Is it true that the linearized equation about a positive equilibrium point of Eq(2.37)

has the property that every one of its solutions is also periodic with the same period p?

What is it that makes every positive solution of a diﬀerence equation converge to a

periodic solution with period p ≥ 2 ?

Open Problem 2.9.2 Let f ∈ C

1

[[0, ∞) × [0, ∞), [0, ∞)] and let p ≥ 2 be an integer.

Find necessary and suﬃcient conditions so that every nonnegative solution of the diﬀer-

ence equation (2.37) converges to a periodic solution with period p. In particular address

the case p = 2.

Open Problem 2.9.3 Let p ≥ 2 be an integer and assume that every positive solution

of Eq(2.1) with

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ [0, ∞)

converges to a solution with period p . Is it true that

p ∈ {2, 4, 5, 6}?

Open Problem 2.9.4 It is known (see Sections 2.7, 4.7, 6.5, and 6.7) that every pos-

itive solution of each of the following three equations

x

n+1

= 1 +

x

n−1

x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (2.38)

x

n+1

=

1 +x

n−1

1 + x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (2.39)

x

n+1

=

x

n

+ 2x

n−1

1 + x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (2.40)

44 Chapter 2. Local Stability, Semicycles, Periodicity, and Invariant Intervals

converges to a solution with (not necessarily prime) period-two:

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . . (2.41)

In each case, determine φ and ψ in terms of the initial conditions x

−1

and x

0

.

Conversely, if (2.41) is a period-two solution of Eq(2.38) or Eq(2.39) or Eq(2.40), de-

termine all initial conditions (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ (0, ∞)×(0, ∞) for which the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

converges to the period-two solution (2.41).

Conjecture 2.9.1 Assume

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞).

Show that every positive solution of Eq(2.1) is bounded.

Open Problem 2.9.5 Assume

α, β, γ, A, B ∈ (0, ∞) and γ > β +A.

Determine the set of initial conditions x

−1

and x

0

for which the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

of

Eq(2.33) is bounded.

(See Sections 2.7, 4.7, 6.5, 6.7, and 10.2.)

Conjecture 2.9.2 Assume

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞)

and that Eq(2.1) has no period-two solution. Show that the positive equilibrium is globally

asymptotically stable.

Conjecture 2.9.3 Assume

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞)

and that Eq(2.1) has a positive prime period-two solution. Show that the positive equi-

librium of Eq(2.1) is a saddle point.

2.9. Open Problems and Conjectures 45

Open Problem 2.9.6 Assume

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ [0, ∞).

Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions in terms of the coeﬃcients so that every

positive solution of Eq(2.1) is bounded.

Conjecture 2.9.4 Assume that

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ [0, ∞).

Show that Eq(2.1) cannot have a positive prime two cycle which attracts all positive

non-equilibrium solutions.

Open Problem 2.9.7 Assume f ∈ C[(0, ∞), (0, ∞)]. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient

conditions on f for every solution of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

f(x

n

)

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

to be bounded.

(See Section 5.2).

Open Problem 2.9.8 Assume f ∈ C[(0, ∞), (0, ∞)]. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient

conditions on f for every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

= 1 +

f(x

n−1

)

x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . .

to converge to a period-two solution.

(See Section 4.7).

Open Problem 2.9.9 Extend Theorem 2.7.1 to third order diﬀerence equations

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

+ γx

n−1

+δx

n−2

A +Bx

n−1

+ Dx

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . .

with nonnegative parameters and nonnegative initial conditions such that

γ = β +δ +A.

What additional conditions should the parameters satisfy?

46 Chapter 2. Local Stability, Semicycles, Periodicity, and Invariant Intervals

Open Problem 2.9.10 Extend the linearized stability Theorem 1.1.1 to third order dif-

ference equations

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

, x

n−2

), n = 0, 1, . . . . (2.42)

For the equation

λ

3

+aλ

2

+ bλ +c = 0

one can see that all roots lie inside the unit disk |λ| < 1 if and only if

|a +c| < 1 +b

|a −3c| < 3 −b

b +c

2

< 1 +ac

.

But how about necessary and suﬃcient conditions for the equilibrium of Eq(2.42) to

be a repeller, or a saddle point, or nonhyperbolic?

Extend these results to fourth order diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

, x

n−2

, x

n−3

), n = 0, 1, . . . .

Chapter 3

(1, 1)-Type Equations

3.1 Introduction

Eq(1) contains the following nine equations of the (1, 1)-type:

x

n+1

=

α

A

, n = 0, 1, . . . (3.1)

x

n+1

=

α

Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (3.2)

x

n+1

=

α

Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (3.3)

x

n+1

=

βx

n

A

, n = 0, 1, . . . (3.4)

x

n+1

=

β

B

, n = 0, 1, . . . (3.5)

x

n+1

=

βx

n

Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (3.6)

47

48 Chapter 3. (1, 1)-Type Equations

x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

A

, n = 0, 1, . . . (3.7)

x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (3.8)

and

x

n+1

=

γ

C

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (3.9)

Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these

equations are positive, the initial conditions are nonnegative, and the denominators are

always positive.

Of these nine equations, Eqs(3.1), (3.5), and (3.9) are trivial. Eqs (3.4) and (3.7)

are linear diﬀerence equation. Every solution of Eq(3.2) is periodic with period two and

every solution of Eq(3.4) is periodic with period four. The remaining two equations,

namely, Eqs(3.6) and (3.8), are treated in the next two sections.

3.2 The Case α = γ = A = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

Cx

n−1

This is the (1, 1)-type Eq(3.6) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

β

C

y

n

reduces to the equation

y

n+1

=

y

n

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (3.10)

It is easy to see that every positive solution of Eq(3.10) is periodic with period six.

Indeed the solution with initial conditions y

−1

and y

0

is the six-cycle:

y

−1

, y

0

,

y

0

y

−1

,

1

y

−1

,

1

y

0

,

y

−1

y

0

, . . . .

It is interesting to note that except for the equilibrium solution y = 1, every other

solution of Eq(3.10) has prime period six.

3.3. The Case α = β = A = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

Bx

n

49

3.3 The Case α = β = A = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

Bx

n

This is the (1, 1)-type Eq(3.8) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

γ

B

e

y

n

reduces to the linear equation

y

n+1

+ y

n

−y

n−1

= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . . (3.11)

The general solution of Eq(3.11) is

y

n

= C

1

−1 +

√

5

2

n

+ C

2

−1 −

√

5

2

n

, n = 0, 1, . . .

from which the behavior of solutions is easily derived.

3.4 Open Problems and Conjectures

Of the nine equations in this chapter we would like to single out the two nonlinear

equations, (3.2) and (3.6), which possess the property that every positive nontrivial

solution of each of these two equations is periodic with the same prime period, namely

two and six, respectively. Eq(3.3) also has the property that every nontrivial positive

solution is periodic with prime period four but this equation is really a variant of Eq(3.2).

Also every solution of Eq(3.7) is periodic with period two but this is a linear equation.

Eq(3.2) is of the form

x

n+1

= f(x

n

), n = 0, 1, . . . (3.12)

where

f ∈ C[(0, ∞), (0, ∞)], (3.13)

while Eq(3.6) is of the form

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

), n = 0, 1, . . . (3.14)

where

f ∈ C[(0, ∞) ×(0, ∞), (0, ∞)]. (3.15)

What is it that makes every solution of a nonlinear diﬀerence equation periodic with the

same period? We believe this is a question of paramount importance and so we pose the

following open problems.

50 Chapter 3. (1, 1)-Type Equations

Open Problem 3.4.1 Let k ≥ 2 be a positive integer and assume that (3.13) holds.

Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f so that every positive solution of Eq(3.12)

is periodic with period k.

Open Problem 3.4.2 Let k ≥ 2 be a positive integer and assume that (3.15) holds.

Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f so that every positive solution of Eq(3.14)

is periodic with period k. In particular address the cases

k = 4, 5, 6.

Open Problem 3.4.3 Let k be a positive integer and assume that

α, β, γ ∈ (−∞, ∞).

Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on α, β, γ so that every solution of the equa-

tion

x

n+1

= α|x

n

| + βx

n−1

+ γ, n = 0, 1, . . .

with real initial conditions is periodic with period k. In particular address the cases:

k = 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.

(See [10], [17], and [59].)

Conjecture 3.4.1 Let f ∈ C

1

[[0, ∞), [0, ∞)] be such that every positive nontrivial so-

lution of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

f(x

n

)

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (3.16)

is periodic with prime period six. Show that

f(x) = x.

Conjecture 3.4.2 Let f ∈ C

1

[[0, ∞), [0, ∞)] be such that every positive nontrivial so-

lution of the diﬀerence equation (3.16) is periodic with prime period ﬁve. Show that

f(x) = 1 + x.

3.4. Open Problems and Conjectures 51

Open Problem 3.4.4 Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f ∈ C[[0, ∞), [0, ∞)]

such that every positive nontrivial solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

f(x

n

)

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (3.17)

is periodic with prime period three.

Open Problem 3.4.5 Let {p

n

}

∞

n=0

be a sequence of nonzero real numbers. In each of

the following cases investigate the asymptotic behavior of all positive solutions of the

diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

p

n

x

n

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (3.18)

(i) {p

n

}

∞

n=0

converges to a ﬁnite limit;

(ii) {p

n

}

∞

n=0

converges to ±∞;

(iii) {p

n

}

∞

n=0

is periodic with prime period k ≥ 2.

Chapter 4

(1, 2)-Type Equations

4.1 Introduction

Eq(1) contains the following nine equations of the (1, 2)-type:

x

n+1

=

α

A + Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.1)

x

n+1

=

α

A + Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.2)

x

n+1

=

α

Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.3)

x

n+1

=

βx

n

A + Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.4)

x

n+1

=

βx

n

A + Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.5)

x

n+1

=

βx

n

Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.6)

53

54 Chapter 4. (1, 2)-Type Equations

x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

A + Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.7)

x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

A + Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.8)

and

x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (4.9)

Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these

equations are positive, the initial conditions are nonnegative, and the denominators are

always positive.

Two of these equations, namely Eqs(4.1) and (4.4) are Riccati-type diﬀerence equa-

tions. (See Section 1.6 in the Preliminary Results). Also Eqs(4.2) and (4.8) are essen-

tially Riccati equations. Indeed if {x

n

} is a solution of Eq(4.2), then the subsequences

{x

2n−1

} and {x

2n

} satisfy the Riccati equation of the form of Eq(4.1). Similarly, if {x

n

}

is a solution of Eq(4.8), then the subsequences {x

2n−1

} and {x

2n

} satisfy the Riccati

equation

y

n+1

=

γy

n

A + Cy

n

n = 0, 1, . . . .

It is also interesting to note that the change of variables

x

n

=

1

y

n

reduces the Riccati equation (4.4) to the linear equation

y

n+1

=

A

β

y

n

+

B

β

, n = 0, 1, . . .

from which the global behavior of solutions is easily derived.

In view of the above, Eqs(4.2), (4.4), and (4.8) will not be discussed any further in

this chapter.

4.2 The Case β = γ = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α

A+Bx

n

This is the (1, 2)-type Eq(4.1) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

A

B

y

n

4.3. The Case β = γ = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

55

reduces to the Riccati equation

y

n+1

=

p

1 + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.10)

where

p =

αB

A

2

.

The Riccati number associated with this equation (see Section 1.6) is

R = −p < 0

and so the following result is a consequence of Theorem 1.6.2.

Theorem 4.2.1 The positive equilibrium

y =

−1 +

√

1 + 4p

2

of Eq(4.10) is globally asymptotically stable.

4.3 The Case β = γ = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (1, 2)-type Eq(4.3) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

√

α

y

n

(4.11)

is transformed to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

B

y

n

+

C

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (4.12)

Eq(4.12) was investigated in [65]. (See also [12].)

We will ﬁrst show that every solution of Eq(4.12) is bounded and then we will use

the method of “limiting solutions” to show that every solution of Eq(4.12) converges to

its equilibrium

√

B + C.

Theorem 4.3.1 Every solution of Eq(4.12) is bounded and persists.

Proof. It is easy to see that if a solution of Eq(4.12) is bounded from above then it is

also bounded from below and vice-versa. So if the theorem is false there should exist a

solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

which is neither bounded from above nor from below. That is,

limsup

n→∞

y

n

= ∞ and liminf

n→∞

y

n

= 0.

56 Chapter 4. (1, 2)-Type Equations

Then clearly we can ﬁnd indices i and j with 1 ≤ i < j such that

y

i

> y

n

> y

j

for all n ∈ {−1, . . . , j −1}.

Hence

y

j

=

B

y

j−1

+

C

y

j−2

>

B + C

y

i

and

y

i

=

B

y

i−1

+

C

y

i−2

≤

B + C

y

j

.

That is ,

B + C < y

i

y

j

≤ B + C

which is impossible. 2

Theorem 4.3.2 The equilibrium y =

√

B + C of Eq(4.12) is globally asymptotically

stable.

Proof. The linearized equation of Eq(4.12) about the equilibrium y =

√

B + C is

z

n+1

= −

B

B + C

z

n

−

C

B + C

z

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (4.13)

and by Theorem 1.1.1, y is locally asymptotically stable for all positive values of B and

C.

It remains to be shown that y is a global attractor of all solutions of Eq(4.12). To

this end, let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(4.12). Then by Theorem 4.3.1 , {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

is

bounded and persists. Therefore there exist positive numbers m and M such that

m ≤ y

n

≤ M for n ≥ −1.

Let

I = liminf

n→∞

y

n

and S = limsup

n→∞

y

n

.

We will show that

I = S.

By the theory of limiting solutions (see Section 1.5) there exist two solutions {I

n

}

∞

n=−3

and {S

n

}

∞

n=−3

of the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

B

y

n

+

C

y

n−1

, n = −3, −2, . . .

with the following properties:

I

0

= I, S

0

= S

4.4. The Case α = γ = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

A+Cx

n−1

- Pielou’s Equation 57

and

I

n

, S

n

∈ [I, S] for n ≥ −3.

Then

S =

B

S

−1

+

C

S

−2

≤

B + C

I

and

I =

B

I

−1

+

C

I

−2

≥

B + C

S

.

Hence

B + C = SI.

Thus

B

S

−1

+

C

S

−2

= S =

B + C

I

=

B

I

+

C

I

from which it follows that

S

−1

= S

−2

= I. (4.14)

Therefore

B

S

+

C

S

= I = S

−1

=

B

S

−2

+

C

S

−3

from which it follows that

S = S

−2

. (4.15)

From (4.14) and (4.15) we conclude that

S = I

and the proof is complete. 2

4.4 The Case α = γ = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

A+Cx

n−1

- Pielou’s

Equation

This is the (1, 2)-type Eq(4.5) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

A

C

y

n

,

reduces to Pielou’s diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

py

n

1 + y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.16)

where

p =

β

A

.

58 Chapter 4. (1, 2)-Type Equations

This equation was proposed by Pielou in her books ([66], p.22) and ([67], p.79) as a

discrete analogue of the delay logistic equation

dN

dt

= rN(t)

1 −

N(t −τ)

P

, t ≥ 0

which is a prototype of modelling the dynamics of single-species.

Eq(4.16) was investigated in [55]. (See also ([42], p.75).)

When

p ≤ 1,

it follows from Eq(4.16) that every positive solution converges to 0.

Furthermore, 0 is locally asymptotically stable when p ≤ 1 and unstable when p > 1.

So the interesting case for Eq(4.16) is when

p > 1. (4.17)

In this case the zero equilibrium of Eq(4.16) is unstable and Eq(4.16) possesses the

unique positive equilibrium

y = p −1,

which is locally asymptotically stable.

In fact by employing Theorem 1.4.2, it follows that when (4.17) holds, x is globally

asymptotically stable.

We summarize the above discussion in the following theorem.

Theorem 4.4.1 (a) Assume

p ≤ 1.

Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(4.16) is globally asymptotically stable.

(b) Assume y

0

∈ (0, ∞) and

p > 1.

Then the positive equilibrium y = p −1 of Eq(4.16) is globally asymptotically stable.

4.5 The Case α = γ = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (1, 2)-type Eq(4.6) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

β

B + Cy

n

,

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

p + y

n

p + y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.18)

4.6. The Case α = β = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

59

where

p =

B

C

.

Eq(4.18) was investigated in ([42] Corollary 3.4.1 (e), p. 73) where it was shown that

its equilibrium one is globally asymptotically stable .

4.6 The Case α = β = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

This is the (1, 2)-type Eq(4.7) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

γ

B

y

n

,

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

y

n−1

p + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.19)

where

p =

A

γ

∈ (0, ∞).

Eq(4.19) was investigated in [28].

The following local result is a straightforward application of the linearized stability

Theorem 1.1.1.

Lemma 4.6.1 (a) Assume

p > 1.

Then 0 is the only equilibrium point of Eq(4.19) and it is locally asymptotically stable.

(b) Assume

p < 1.

Then 0 and y = 1 − p are the only equilibrium points of Eq(4.19) and they are both

unstable. In fact, 0 is a repeller and y = 1 −p is a saddle point equilibrium.

The oscillatory character of the solutions of Eq(4.19) is a consequence of Theorem

1.7.1. That is, except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle, every solution of Eq(4.19) has

semicycles of length one.

It follows directly from Eq(4.19) (see also Section 2.5) that

y

n+1

<

1

p

y

n−1

for n ≥ 0

and so when

p > 1

60 Chapter 4. (1, 2)-Type Equations

the zero equilibrium of Eq(4.19) is globally asymptotically stable. On the other hand

when

p = 1,

y

n+1

< y

n−1

for n ≥ 0

and so every positive solution of Eq(4.19) converges to a period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . .

Furthermore we can see that

φψ = 0

but whether there exists solutions with

φ = ψ = 0

remains an open question.

Finally when

p < 1

by invoking the stable manifold theory one can see that there exist nonoscillatory solu-

tions which converge monotonically to the positive equilibrium 1−p. It follows from the

identity

y

n+1

−y

n−1

=

(1 −p) −y

n

p + y

n

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

that every oscillatory solution is such that the subsequences of even and odd terms

converge monotonically one to ∞ and the other to 0.

4.7 The Case α = β = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (1, 2)-type Eq(4.9) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

γ

By

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

= p +

y

n−1

y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.20)

where

p =

C

B

∈ (0, ∞).

This equation was investigated in [7] where it was shown that the following statements

are true:

4.7. The Case α = β = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

61

(i) p ≥ 1 is a necessary and suﬃcient condition for every solution of Eq(4.20) to be

bounded;

(ii) When p = 1, every solution of Eq(4.20) converges to a period-two solution;

(iii) When p > 1, the equilibrium y = p + 1 of Eq(4.20) is globally asymptotically

stable.

We now proceed to establish the above results.

Clearly the only equilibrium point of Eq(4.20) is y = p + 1.

The linearized equation of Eq(4.20) about the equilibrium point y = p + 1 is

z

n+1

+

1

p + 1

z

n

−

1

p + 1

z

n−1

= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . . (4.21)

As a simple consequence of the linearized stability Theorem 1.1.1 we obtain the following

result:

Theorem 4.7.1 The equilibrium point y = p + 1 of Eq(4.20) is locally asymptotically

stable when p > 1 and is an unstable saddle point when p < 1.

The next result about semicycles is an immediate consequence of some straightfor-

ward arguments and Theorem 1.7.1.

Theorem 4.7.2 (a) Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(4.20) which consists of at least

two semicycles. Then {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

is oscillatory. Moreover, with the possible excep-

tion of the ﬁrst semicycle, every semicycle has length one.

(b) Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(4.20) which consists of a single semicycle. Then

{y

n

}

∞

n=−1

converges monotonically to y = p + 1.

4.7.1 The Case p < 1

Here we show that there exist solutions of Eq(4.20) which are unbounded. In fact the

following result is true.

Theorem 4.7.3 Let p < 1, and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(4.20) such that 0 <

y

−1

≤ 1 and y

0

≥

1

1−p

. Then the following statements are true:

1. lim

n→∞

y

2n

= ∞.

2. lim

n→∞

y

2n+1

= p.

Proof. Note that

1

1−p

> p + 1, and so y

0

> p + 1. It suﬃces to show that

y

1

∈ (p, 1] and y

2

≥ p + y

0

and use induction to complete the proof.

62 Chapter 4. (1, 2)-Type Equations

Indeed y

1

= p +

y

1

y

0

> p. Also,

y

1

= p +

y

−1

y

0

≤ p +

1

y

0

≤ 1,

and so y

1

∈ (p, 1]. Hence y

2

= p +

y

0

y

1

≥ p + y

0

. 2

4.7.2 The Case p = 1

The following result follows from Lemma 2.7.1 and some straightforward arguments. See

also Section 2.5.

Theorem 4.7.4 Let p = 1, and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(4.20). Then the

following statements are true.

(a) Suppose {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

consists of a single semicycle. Then {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

converges mono-

tonically to y = 2.

(b) Suppose {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

consists of at least two semicycles. Then {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

converges to

a prime period-two solution of Eq(4.20).

(c) Every solution of Eq(4.20) converges to a period-two solution if and only if p = 1.

4.7.3 The Case p > 1

Here we show that the equilibrium point y = p+1 of Eq(4.20) is globally asymptotically

stable. The following result will be useful.

Lemma 4.7.1 Let p > 1, and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(4.20). Then

p +

p −1

p

≤ liminf

n→∞

y

n

≤ limsup

n→∞

y

n

≤

p

2

p −1

.

Proof. It follows from Theorem 4.7.2 that we may assume that every semicycle of

{y

n

}

∞

n=−1

has length one, that p < y

n

for all n ≥ −1, and that p < y

0

< p + 1 < y

−1

.

We shall ﬁrst show that limsup

n→∞

y

n

≤

p

2

p−1

. Note that for n ≥ 0,

y

2n+1

< p +

y

2n−1

p

.

So as every solution of the diﬀerence equation

y

m+1

= p +

1

p

y

m

, m = 0, 1, . . .

4.7. The Case α = β = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

63

converges to

p

2

p−1

, it follows that limsup

n→∞

y

n

≤

p

2

p−1

.

We shall next show that p +

p−1

p

≤ liminf

n→∞

y

n

. Let > 0. There clearly exists

N ≥ 0 such that for all n ≥ N,

y

2n−1

<

p

2

+

p −1

.

Let n ≥ N. Then

y

2n

= p +

y

2n−2

y

2n−1

> p + p

p −1

p

2

+

=

p

3

+ p + p(p −1)

p

2

+

.

So as is arbitrary, we have

liminf

n→∞

y

n

≥

p

3

+ p(p −1)

p

2

= p +

p −1

p

.

2

We are now ready for the following result.

Theorem 4.7.5 Let p > 1. Then the equilibrium y = p + 1 is globally asymptotically

stable.

Proof. We know by Theorem 4.7.1 that y = p + 1 is a locally asymptotically stable

equilibrium point of Eq(4.20). So let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(4.20). It suﬃces to

show that

lim

n→∞

y

n

= p + 1.

For x, y ∈ (0, ∞), set

f(x, y) = p +

y

x

.

Then f ∈ C[(0, ∞) ×(0, ∞), (0, ∞)] , f is decreasing in x ∈ (0, ∞) for each y ∈ (0, ∞),

and f is increasing in y ∈ (0, ∞) for each x ∈ (0, ∞). Recall that by Theorem 4.7.4,

there exist no solutions of Eq(4.20) with prime period two. Let > 0, and set

a = p and b =

p

2

+

p −1

.

Note that

f

p

2

+

p −1

, p

= p + p

p −1

p

2

+

> p

and

f

p,

p

2

+

p −1

=

p

3

+ p

p

2

−p

=

p

2

+

p −1

.

Hence

p < f(x, y) <

p

2

+

p −1

for all x, y ∈

p,

p

2

+

p −1

.

64 Chapter 4. (1, 2)-Type Equations

Finally note that by Lemma 4.7.1,

p < p +

p −1

p

≤ liminf

n→∞

y

n

≤ limsup

n→∞

y

n

≤

p

2

p −1

<

p

2

+

p −1

and so by Theorem 1.4.6,

lim

n→∞

y

n

= p + 1.

2

4.8 Open Problems and Conjectures

Conjecture 4.8.1 Consider the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

A

x

n−k

+

B

x

n−l

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.22)

where

A, B ∈ (0, ∞) and k, l ∈ {0, 1, . . .} with k < l.

and where the initial conditions x

−l

, . . . , x

0

are arbitrary positive real numbers.

Show that every solution of Eq(4.22) converges, either to the equilibrium or to a

periodic solution with period p ≥ 2 and that what happens and the exact value of p are

uniquely determined from the characteristic roots of the linearized equation

λ

l+1

+

A

A + B

λ

l−k

+

B

A + B

= 0.

(See [19], [23], [25], [60], and [61].)

Open Problem 4.8.1 Let

. . . , φ

1

, φ

2

, . . . , φ

p

, . . .

be a given prime period p solution of Eq(4.22). Determine the set of all positive initial

conditions x

−l

, . . . , x

0

such that {x

n

}

∞

n=−l

converges to this periodic solution.

Open Problem 4.8.2 (see [18]) Assume that A, B ∈ (0, ∞).

(a) Find all initial conditions y

−1

, y

0

with

y

−1

y

0

< 0

for which the equation

y

n+1

=

A

y

n

+

B

y

n−1

, (4.23)

is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0.

(b) Assume that the initial conditions y

−1

, y

0

are such that y

−1

y

0

< 0 and such that

Eq(4.23) is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. Investigate the global behavior of the solution

{y

n

}. Is it bounded? Does lim

n→∞

y

n

exist? When does {y

n

} converge to a two cycle?

4.8. Open Problems and Conjectures 65

Conjecture 4.8.2 Assume that p = 1. Show that Eq(4.19) has a solution which con-

verges to zero.

Open Problem 4.8.3 Assume that p < 1. Determine the set of initial conditions

y

−1

, y

0

∈ (0, ∞)

for which the solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(4.19) is bounded.

Open Problem 4.8.4 Determine the set G of all initial conditions (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ R × R

through which the equation

y

n+1

=

y

n−1

1 + y

n

is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0 and, for these initial points, investigate the global character

of {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

Conjecture 4.8.3 Show that Eq(4.20) possesses a solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

which remains

above the equilibrium for all n ≥ −1.

Open Problem 4.8.5 (a) Assume p ∈ (0, ∞). Determine all initial conditions y

−1

, y

0

∈

R such that the equation (4.20) is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0.

(b) Let y

−1

, y

0

∈ R be such that Eq(4.20) is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. For such an

initial point, investigate the boundedness, the asymptotic behavior, and the periodic

nature of the solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(4.20).

(c) Discuss (a) and (b) when p < 0.

Open Problem 4.8.6 (See [13]) Find the set G of all initial points (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ R ×R

through which the equation

x

n+1

= −1 +

x

n−1

x

n

(4.24)

is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0.

Conjecture 4.8.4 Assume that (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ R × R is such that the equation (4.24) is

well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0 and bounded. Show that {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

is a three cycle.

66 Chapter 4. (1, 2)-Type Equations

Open Problem 4.8.7 Let f ∈ C[(0, ∞), (0, ∞)]. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient con-

ditions on f for every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

f(x

n

)

x

n

+ x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

to be bounded.

Open Problem 4.8.8 Let a, a

i

∈ (0, ∞) for i = 0, . . . , k. Investigate the global asymp-

totic stability of the equilibrium points of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

x

n

a + a

0

x

n

+ . . . + a

k

x

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . .

with positive initial conditions.

Conjecture 4.8.5 (See [27]) Assume r ∈ (0, ∞). Show that every positive solution of

the population model

J

n+1

= J

n−1

e

r−(J

n

+J

n−1

)

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-two solution.

Conjecture 4.8.6 (Pielou’s Discrete Logistic Model; see [55], [66], and [67].) As-

sume

α ∈ (1, ∞) and k ∈ {0, 1, . . .}.

Show that the positive equilibrium of Pielou’s discrete logistic model

x

n+1

=

αx

n

1 + x

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . .

with positive initial conditions is globally asymptotically stable if and only if

α −1

α

< 2 cos

kπ

2k + 1

.

Open Problem 4.8.9 (See [5]) For which initial values x

−1

, x

0

∈ (0, ∞) does the se-

quence deﬁned by

x

n+1

= 1 +

x

n−1

x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to two?

4.8. Open Problems and Conjectures 67

(See also Section 4.7)

Open Problem 4.8.10 (See [31]) Consider the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

= y

n−1

e

−y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.25)

with nonnegative initial conditions.

One can easily see that every solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(4.25) converges to a period-two

solution

. . . , , 0, , 0, . . . .

More precisely, each of the subsequences {y

2n

}

∞

n=0

and {y

2n+1

}

∞

n=−1

is decreasing and

[ lim

n→∞

y

2n

][ lim

n→∞

y

2n+1

] = 0.

(a) Find all initial points y

−1

, y

0

∈ [0, ∞) through which the solutions of Eq(4.25)

converge to zero. In other words, ﬁnd the basin of attraction of the equilibrium of

Eq(4.25).

(b) Determine the limits of the subsequences of even and odd terms of every solution

of Eq(4.25), in terms of the initial conditions y

−1

and y

0

of the solution.

Open Problem 4.8.11 Assume p ∈ (0, 1).

(a) Find the set B of all initial conditions y

−1

, y

0

∈ (0, ∞) such that the solutions

{y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(4.20) are bounded.

(b) Let y

−1

, y

0

∈ B. Investigate the asymptotic behavior of {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

Open Problem 4.8.12 Let {p

n

}

∞

n=0

be a convergent sequence of nonnegative real num-

bers with a ﬁnite limit,

p = lim

n→∞

p

n

.

Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of

each of the following diﬀerence equations:

y

n+1

=

p

n

y

n

+

1

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.26)

y

n+1

=

p

n

y

n

1 + y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.27)

68 Chapter 4. (1, 2)-Type Equations

y

n+1

=

p

n

+ y

n

p

n

+ y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.28)

y

n+1

=

y

n−1

p

n

+ y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (4.29)

y

n+1

= p

n

+

y

n−1

y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (4.30)

Open Problem 4.8.13 Let {p

n

}

∞

n=0

be a periodic sequence of nonnegative real numbers

with period k ≥ 2. Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of each of

Eqs(4.26) - (4.30).

Open Problem 4.8.14 For each of the following diﬀerence equations determine the

“good” set G ⊂ R × R of all initial conditions (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ R × R through which the

equation is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. Then for every (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ G, investigate the long

term behavior of the solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

:

y

n+1

=

y

n

1 −y

n−1

, (4.31)

y

n+1

=

1 + y

n

1 −y

n−1

, (4.32)

y

n+1

=

y

n−1

1 −y

n

, (4.33)

y

n+1

= −1 +

y

n−1

y

n

. (4.34)

For those equations from the above list for which you were successful, extend your result

by introducing arbitrary real parameters in the equation.

Chapter 5

(2, 1)-Type Equations

5.1 Introduction

Eq(1) contains the following nine equations of the (2, 1)-type:

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

A

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.1)

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.2)

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.3)

x

n+1

=

α + γx

n−1

A

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.4)

x

n+1

=

α + γx

n−1

Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.5)

x

n+1

=

α + γx

n−1

Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.6)

69

70 Chapter 5. (2, 1)-Type Equations

x

n+1

=

βx

n

+ γx

n−1

A

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.7)

x

n+1

=

βx

n

+ γx

n−1

Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.8)

and

x

n+1

=

βx

n

+ γx

n−1

Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (5.9)

Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these

equations are positive, the initial conditions are nonnegative, and the denominators are

always positive.

Of these nine equations, Eqs(5.1), (5.4) and (5.7) are linear. Eq(5.2) is a Riccati

equation and Eq(5.6) is essentially like Eq(5.2).

The change of variables

x

n

=

γ

B

y

n

,

reduces Eq(5.8) to Eq(4.20) with p =

β

γ

, which was investigated in Section 4.7.

Finally the change of variables

x

n

=

γ

C

+

β

C

y

n

,

reduces Eq(5.9) to Eq(4.18) with p =

γ

β

, which was investigated in Section 4.5.

Therefore there remain Eqs(5.3) and (5.5), which will be investigated in the next two

sections.

5.2 The Case γ = A = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

Cx

n−1

- Lyness’

Equation

This is the (2, 1)-type Eq(5.3) which by the change of variables reduces to the equation

y

n+1

=

p + y

n

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.10)

5.2. The Case γ = A = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

Cx

n−1

- Lyness’ Equation 71

where

p =

αC

β

2

.

The special case of Eq(5.10) where

p = 1

was discovered by Lyness in 1942 while he was working on a problem in Number Theory.

(See ([42], p. 131) for the history of the problem.) In this special case, the equation

becomes

y

n+1

=

1 + y

n

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.11)

every solution of which is periodic with period ﬁve. Indeed the solution of Eq(5.11) with

initial conditions y

−1

and y

0

is the ﬁve-cycle:

y

−1

, y

0

,

1 + y

0

y

−1

,

1 + y

−1

+ y

0

y

−1

y

0

,

1 + y

−1

y

0

, . . . .

Eq(5.10) possesses the invariant

I

n

= (p + y

n−1

+ y

n

)

1 +

1

y

n−1

1 +

1

y

n

= constant (5.12)

from which it follows that every solution of Eq(5.10) is bounded from above and from

below by positive constants.

It was shown in [30] that no nontrivial solution of Eq(5.10) has a limit.

It was also shown in [44] by using KAM theory that the positive equilibrium y of

Eq(5.10) is stable but not asymptotically stable. This result was also established in [49]

by using a Lyapunov function.

Concerning the semicycles of solutions of Eq(5.10) the following result was established

in [43]:

Theorem 5.2.1 Assume that p > 0. Then the following statements about the positive

solutions of Eq(5.10) are true:

(a) The absolute extreme in a semicycle occurs in the ﬁrst or in the second term.

(b) Every nontrivial semicycle, after the ﬁrst one, contains at least two and at most

three terms.

There is substantial literature on Lyness’ Equation. See [11], [42], [43], [57]-[59], [71],

and [72] and the references cited therein.

72 Chapter 5. (2, 1)-Type Equations

5.3 The Case β = A = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

Bx

n

This is the (2, 1)-type Eq(5.5) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

γ

B

y

n

reduces to the equation

y

n+1

=

p + y

n−1

y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.13)

where

p =

αB

γ

2

.

Eq(5.13) was investigated in [28].

By the linearized stability Theorem 1.1.1 one can see that the unique equilibrium

point

y =

1 +

√

1 + 4p

2

of Eq(5.13) is a saddle point.

By Theorem 1.7.1 one can see that except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle, every

oscillatory solution of Eq(5.13) has semicycles of length one.

Concerning the nonoscillatory solutions of Eq(5.13) one can easily see that every

nonoscillatory solution of Eq(5.13) converges monotonically to the equilibrium y.

The global character of solutions of Eq(5.13) is a consequence of the identity

y

n+1

−y

n−1

=

y

n−1

−y

n−2

y

n

for n ≥ 1.

From this it follows that a solution of Eq(5.13) either approaches the positive equilibrium

y monotonically or it oscillates about y with semicycles of length one in such a way that

{y

2n

} and {y

2n+1

} converge monotonically one to zero and other to ∞.

5.4 Open Problems and Conjectures

By using the invariant (5.12), one can easily see that every solution of Lyness’ Eq(5.10)

is bounded from above and from below by positive numbers. To this day we have not

found a proof for the boundedness of solutions of Eq(5.10) without using essentially the

invariant.

Open Problem 5.4.1 Show that every solution of Lyness’ Eq(5.10) is bounded without

using the invariant (5.12).

5.4. Open Problems and Conjectures 73

Open Problem 5.4.2 Assume that f ∈ C[(0, ∞), (0, ∞)]. Obtain necessary and suﬃ-

cient conditions in terms of f so that every positive solution of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

f(x

n

)

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.14)

is bounded.

What is it that makes Lyness’ equation possess an invariant? What type of diﬀerence

equations possess an invariant? Along these lines, we oﬀer the following open problems

and conjectures.

Open Problem 5.4.3 Assume that f ∈ C[(0, ∞), (0, ∞)]. Obtain necessary and suﬃ-

cient conditions in terms of f so that the diﬀerence equation (5.14) possesses a (non-

trivial) invariant.

Conjecture 5.4.1 Assume that f ∈ C[(0, ∞), (0, ∞)] and that the diﬀerence equation

(5.14) possesses a unique positive equilibrium point x and a nontrivial invariant. Show

that the linearized equation of Eq(5.14) about x does not have both eigenvalues in |λ| < 1

and does not have both eigenvalues in |λ| > 1.

When we allow the initial conditions to be real numbers the equation

y

n+1

=

p + y

n

y

n−1

(5.15)

may not even be well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. To illustrate, we oﬀer the following open

problems and conjectures.

Open Problem 5.4.4 (See [26].) Assume p ∈ (−∞, ∞). Determine the set G of all

initial conditions y

−1

, y

0

∈ (−∞, ∞) through which Eq(5.15) is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0.

Conjecture 5.4.2 Let G be the set of initial conditions deﬁned in the Open problem

5.4.4. Show that the subset of G through which the solutions of Eq(5.15) are unbounded

is a set of measure zero.

74 Chapter 5. (2, 1)-Type Equations

Conjecture 5.4.3 Assume p ∈ (−∞, ∞). Show that the set of points (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈

(−∞, ∞) × (−∞, ∞) through which Eq(5.15) is not well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0, is a

set of points without interior.

Open Problem 5.4.5 Determine all positive integers k with the property that every

positive solution of the equation

y

n+1

=

1 + . . . + y

n−k

y

n−k−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

is periodic.

Conjecture 5.4.4 Show that every positive solution of the equation

y

n+1

=

y

n

y

n−1

+

y

n−4

y

n−3

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-six solution.

Conjecture 5.4.5 (See [20]) Show that every positive solution of the equation

y

n+1

=

1

y

n

y

n−1

+

1

y

n−3

y

n−4

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-three solution.

Conjecture 5.4.6 Show that the equation

y

n+1

=

1 + y

n−1

y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . .

has a nontrivial positive solution which decreases monotonically to the equilibrium of the

equation.

Open Problem 5.4.6 Find the set G of all initial points (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ R × R through

which the equation

y

n+1

=

1 + y

n−1

y

n

is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. Determine the periodic character and the asymptotic

behavior of all solutions with (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ G.

5.4. Open Problems and Conjectures 75

Conjecture 5.4.7 (May’s Host Parasitoid Model; see [59]) Assume α > 1. Show

that every positive solution of May’s Host Parasitoid Model

x

n+1

=

αx

2

n

(1 + x

n

)x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

is bounded.

Conjecture 5.4.8 (The Gingerbreadman Map; see [59]) Let A ∈ (0, ∞). Show that

every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

max{x

2

n

, A}

x

n

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.16)

is bounded.

Note that the change of variables

x

n

=

A

1+y

n

2

if A > 1

e

y

n

2

if A = 1

A

−1+y

n

2

if A < 1

reduces Eq(5.16) to

y

n+1

= |y

n

| −y

n−1

+ δ, n = 0, 1, . . . (5.17)

where

δ =

1 if A < 1

0 if A = 1

−1 if A > 1.

When δ = 1, Eq(5.17) is called the Gingerbreadman Map and was investigated

by Devaney [17].

Chapter 6

(2, 2)-Type Equations

6.1 Introduction

Eq(1) contains the following nine equations of the (2, 2)-type:

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

A + Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.1)

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

A + Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.2)

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.3)

x

n+1

=

α + γx

n−1

A + Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.4)

x

n+1

=

α + γx

n−1

A + Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.5)

x

n+1

=

α + γx

n−1

Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.6)

77

78 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

x

n+1

=

βx

n

+ γx

n−1

A + Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.7)

x

n+1

=

βx

n

+ γx

n−1

A + Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.8)

x

n+1

=

βx

n

+ γx

n−1

Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (6.9)

Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these

equations are positive, the initial conditions are nonnegative, and the denominators are

always positive.

Eq(6.5) is essentially similar to Eq(6.1). In fact if {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

is a positive solution of

Eq(6.5) then {x

2n

}

∞

n=0

and {x

2n−1

}

∞

n=0

are both solutions of the Riccati equations

z

n+1

=

α + γz

n

A + Cz

n

, n = 0, 1, . . .

with

z

n

= x

2n

for n ≥ 0

and

z

n+1

=

α + γz

n

A + Cz

n

, n = −1, 0, . . .

with

z

n

= x

2n+1

for n ≥ −1,

respectively.

Therefore we will omit any further discussion of Eq(6.5).

6.2 The Case γ = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Bx

n

- Riccati

Equation

This is the (2, 2)-type Eq(6.1) which is in fact a Riccati equation. See Section 1.6.

To avoid a degenerate situation we will assume that

αB −βA = 0.

6.3. The Case γ = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Cx

n−1

79

The Riccati number associated with this equation is

R =

βA −αB

(β + A)

2

and clearly

R <

1

4

.

Now the following result is a consequence of Theorem 1.6.2:

Theorem 6.2.1 The positive equilibrium of Eq(6.1) is globally asymptotically stable.

6.3 The Case γ = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Cx

n−1

This is the (2, 2)-type Eq(6.2) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

A

C

y

n

reduces to the equation

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n

1 + y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.10)

where

p =

αC

A

2

and q =

β

A

.

(Eq(6.10) was investigated in [42] and [43]. See also [36].)

Eq(6.10) has the unique positive equilibrium y given by

y =

q −1 +

(q −1)

2

+ 4p

2

.

By applying the linearized stability Theorem 1.1.1 we obtain the following result.

Lemma 6.3.1 The equilibrium y of Eq(6.10) is locally asymptotically stable for all val-

ues of the parameters p and q.

Eq(6.10) is a very simple looking equation for which it has long been conjectured

that its equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable. To this day, the conjecture has

not been proven or refuted.

The main results known about Eq(6.10) are the following:

Theorem 6.3.1 Every solution of Eq(6.10) is bounded from above and from below by

positive constants.

80 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Proof. Let {y

n

} be a solution of Eq(6.10). Clearly, if the solution is bounded from

above by a constant M, then

y

n+1

≥

p

1 + M

and so it is also bounded from below. Now assume for the sake of contradiction that the

solution is not bounded from above. Then there exists a subsequence {y

1+n

k

}

∞

k=0

such

that

lim

k→∞

n

k

= ∞, lim

k→∞

y

1+n

k

= ∞, and y

1+n

k

= max{y

n

: n ≤ n

k

} for k ≥ 0.

From (6.10) we see that

y

n+1

< qy

n

+ p for n ≥ 0

and so

lim

k→∞

y

n

k

= lim

k→∞

y

n

k

−1

= ∞.

Hence, for suﬃciently large k,

0 ≤ y

1+n

k

−y

n

k

=

p + [(q −1) −y

n

k

−1

]y

n

k

1 + y

n

k

−1

< 0

which is a contradiction and the proof is complete. 2

The oscillatory character of solutions for Eq(6.10) is described by the following result:

Theorem 6.3.2 Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a nontrivial solution of Eq(6.10). Then the following

statements are true:

(i) Every semicycle, except perhaps for the ﬁrst one, has at least two terms.

(ii) The extreme in each semicycle occurs at either the ﬁrst term or the second. Fur-

thermore after the ﬁrst, the remaining terms in a positive semicycle are strictly

decreasing and in a negative semicycle are strictly increasing.

(iii) In any two consecutive semicycles, their extrema cannot be consecutive terms.

(iv) Assume

q ≤ p.

Then, except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle, every semicycle contains two or three

terms. Furthermore, in every semicycle, there is at most one term which follows

the extreme.

Proof. We present the proofs for positive semicycles only. The proofs for negative

semicycles are similar and will be omitted.

6.3. The Case γ = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Cx

n−1

81

(i) Assume that for some N ≥ 0,

y

N−1

< y and y

N

≥ y.

Then

y

N+1

=

p + qy

N

1 + y

N−1

>

p + qy

1 + y

= y.

(ii) Assume that for some N ≥ 0, the ﬁrst two terms in a positive semicycle are y

N

and y

N+1

. Then

y

N

≥ y, y

N+1

> y

and

y

N+2

y

N+1

=

1

y

N+1

p + qy

N+1

1 + y

N

=

p

y

N+1

+ q

1 + y

N

<

p

y

+ q

1 + y

= 1.

(iii) We consider the case where a negative semicycle is followed by a positive one. The

opposite case is similar and will be omitted. So assume that for some N ≥ 0 the

last two terms in a negative semicycle are y

N−1

and y

N

with

y

N−1

≥ y

N

.

Then

y

N+1

=

p + qy

N

1 + y

N−1

<

p + qy

N+1

1 + y

N

= y

N+2

.

(iv) Assume that for some N ≥ 0, the terms y

N

, y

N+1

, and y

N+2

are all in a positive

semicycle. Then

y

N+3

=

p + qy

N+2

1 + y

N+1

<

p + qy

N+1

1 + y

N+1

<

p + qy

1 + y

= y.

2

Theorem 6.3.3 The positive equilibrium of Eq(6.10) is globally asymptotically stable if

one of the following two conditions holds:

(i)

q < 1;

(ii)

q ≥ 1

and

either p ≤ q or q < p ≤ 2(q + 1).

82 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Proof.

(i) In view of Lemma 6.3.1, it remains to show that every solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(6.10)

tends to y as n →∞. To this end, let

i = liminf

n→∞

y

n

and s = limsup

n→∞

y

n

which by Theorem 6.3.1 exist and are positive numbers. Then Eq(6.10) yields

i ≥

p + qi

1 + s

and s ≤

p + qs

1 + i

.

Hence

p + (q −1)i ≤ is ≤ p + (q −1)s

and so because q < 1,

i ≥ s

from which the result follows.

(ii) The proof when

p < q

follows by applying Theorem 1.4.2. This result was ﬁrst established in [43].

For the proof when

1 ≤ q ≤ p ≤ 2(q + 1)

see ([42], Theorem 3.4.3 (f), p. 71).

2

6.4 The Case γ = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (2, 2)-type Eq(6.3) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

β

B

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

y

n

+ p

y

n

+ qy

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.11)

where

p =

αB

β

2

and q =

C

B

.

Eq(6.11) was investigated in [15].

The following result is a consequence of the linearized stability Theorem 1.1.1.

6.4. The Case γ = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

83

Theorem 6.4.1 The unique positive equilibrium point

y =

1 +

1 + 4p(q + 1)

2(q + 1)

of Eq(6.11) is locally asymptotically stable for all values of the parameters p and q.

6.4.1 Invariant Intervals

The following result establishes that the interval I with end points 1 and

p

q

is an invari-

ant interval for Eq(6.11) in the sense that if, for some k ≥ 0, two consecutive values

y

k−1

and y

k

of a solution lie in I, then y

m

∈ I for all m > k.

Lemma 6.4.1 Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(6.11). Then the following statements

are true:

(a) Assume p < q and suppose that for some k ≥ 0,

y

k−1

, y

k

∈

¸

p

q

, 1

¸

.

Then

y

n

∈

¸

p

q

, 1

¸

for all n > k.

(b) Assume p > q and suppose that for some k ≥ 0,

y

k−1

, y

k

∈

¸

1,

p

q

¸

.

Then

y

n

∈

¸

1,

p

q

¸

for all n > k.

Proof.

(a) The basic ingredient behind the proof is the fact that when u, v ∈ [

p

q

, ∞), the

function

f(u, v) =

u + p

u + qv

is increasing in u and decreasing in v. Indeed,

y

k+1

=

y

k

+ p

y

k

+ qy

k−1

≤

y

k

+ p

y

k

+ q

p

q

= 1,

y

k+1

=

y

k

+ p

y

k

+ qy

k−1

≥

p

q

+ p

p

q

+ q

>

p

q

and the proof follows by induction.

(b) The proof is similar and will be omitted. 2

84 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

6.4.2 Semicycle Analysis

Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(6.11). Then observe that the following identities are

true:

y

n+1

−1 = q

p

q

−y

n−1

y

n

+ qy

n−1

for n ≥ 0, (6.12)

y

n+1

−

p

q

=

(q −p) + pq(1 −y

n−1

)

q(y

n

+ qy

n−1

)

for n ≥ 0, (6.13)

and

y

n

−y

n+4

=

(y

n

−1)[qy

n

y

n+3

+ y

n+1

y

n+3

] + qy

n+1

(y

n

−

p

q

)

q(p + y

n+1

) + y

n+3

(y

n+1

+ qy

n

)

for n ≥ 0. (6.14)

First we will analyze the semicycles of the solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

under the assumption

that

p > q. (6.15)

The following result is a direct consequence of (6.12)-(6.15):

Lemma 6.4.2 Assume that (6.15) holds and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(6.11).

Then the following statements are true:

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

<

p

q

, then y

N+1

> 1;

(ii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

=

p

q

, then y

N+1

= 1;

(iii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

>

p

q

, then y

N+1

< 1;

(iv) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

≥ 1, then y

N+1

<

p

q

;

(v) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

≤ 1, then y

N+1

> 1;

(vi) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≥

p

q

, then y

N+4

< y

N

;

(vii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≤ 1, then y

N+4

> y

N

;

(viii) If for some N ≥ 0, 1 ≤ y

N−1

≤

p

q

, then 1 ≤ y

N+1

≤

p

q

;

(ix) If for some N ≥ 0, 1 ≤ y

N−1

, y

N

≤

p

q

, then y

n

∈ [1,

p

q

] for n ≥ N. That is [1,

p

q

] is

an invariant interval for Eq(6.11);

(x)

1 < y <

p

q

.

6.4. The Case γ = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

85

The next result, which is a consequence of Theorem 1.7.2, states that when (6.15)

holds, every nontrivial and oscillatory solution of Eq(6.11), which lies in the interval

[1,

p

q

], oscillates about the equilibrium y with semicycles of length one or two.

Theorem 6.4.2 Assume that Eq(6.11) holds. Then every nontrivial and oscillatory

solution of Eq(6.11) which lies in the interval [1,

p

q

], oscillates about y with semicycles

of length one or two.

Next we will analyze the semicycles of the solutions {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

under the assumption

that

q = p. (6.16)

In this case, Eq(6.11) reduces to

y

n+1

=

y

n

+ p

y

n

+ py

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.17)

with the unique equilibrium point

y = 1.

Also identities (6.12)-(6.14) reduce to

y

n+1

−1 = p

1 −y

n−1

y

n

+ py

n−1

for n ≥ 0 (6.18)

and

y

n

−y

n+4

= (y

n

−1)

py

n+1

+ py

n

y

n+3

+ y

n+1

y

n+3

p(p + y

n+1

) + y

n+3

(y

n+1

+ py

n

)

for n ≥ 0. (6.19)

and so the following results follow immediately:

Lemma 6.4.3 Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(6.17). Then the following statements

are true:

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

< 1, then y

N+1

> 1;

(ii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

= 1, then y

N+1

= 1;

(iii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

> 1, then y

N+1

< 1;

(iv) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

< 1, then y

N

< y

N+4

< 1;

(v) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

> 1, then y

N

> y

N+4

> 1.

Corollary 6.4.1 Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a nontrivial solution of Eq(6.17). Then {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

oscillates about the equilibrium 1 and, except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle, the following

are true:

86 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

(i) If y

−1

= 1 or y

0

= 1, then the positive semicycle has length three and the negative

semicycle has length one.

(ii) If (1 −y

−1

)(1 −y

0

) = 0, then every semicycle has length two.

Finally we will analyze the semicycles of the solutions {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

under the assumption

that

p < q. (6.20)

The following result is a direct consequence of (6.12)-(6.14) and (6.20).

Lemma 6.4.4 Assume that (6.20) holds and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(6.11).

Then the following statements are true:

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

<

p

q

, then y

N+1

> 1;

(ii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

=

p

q

, then y

N+1

= 1;

(iii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

>

p

q

, then y

N+1

< 1;

(iv) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

≤ 1, then y

N+1

>

p

q

;

(v) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N−1

≤

p

q

, then y

N+1

>

p

q

;

(vi) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≥ 1, then y

N+4

< y

N

;

(vii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≤

p

q

, then y

N+4

> y

N

;

(viii) If for some N ≥ 0,

p

q

≤ y

N−1

≤ 1, then

p

q

≤ y

N+1

≤ 1;

(ix) If for some N ≥ 0,

p

q

≤ y

N−1

, y

N

≤ 1, then y

n

∈ [

p

q

, 1] for n ≥ N. That is, [

p

q

, 1] is

an invariant interval for Eq(6.11);

(x)

p

q

< y < 1.

The next result, which is a consequence of Theorem 1.7.4, states that when (6.20)

holds, every nontrivial and oscillatory solution of Eq(6.11) which lies in the interval

[

p

q

, 1], after the ﬁrst semicycle, oscillates with semicycles of length at least two.

Theorem 6.4.3 Assume that (6.20) holds. Then every nontrivial and oscillatory solu-

tion of Eq(6.11) which lies in the interval [

p

q

, 1], after the ﬁrst semicycle, oscillates with

semicycles of length at least two.

6.4. The Case γ = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

87

How do solutions which do not eventually lie in the invariant interval behave?

First assume that

p > q

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution which does not eventually lie in the interval I = [1,

p

q

].

Then one can see that the solution oscillates relative to the interval [1,

p

q

], essentially in

one of the following two ways:

(i) Two consecutive terms in (

p

q

, ∞) are followed by two consecutive terms in (0, 1),

are followed by two consecutive terms in (

p

q

, ∞), and so on. The solution never visits

the interval (1,

p

q

).

(ii) There exists exactly one term in (

p

q

, ∞), which is followed by exactly one term in

(1,

p

q

), which is followed by exactly one term in (0, 1), which is followed by exactly one

term in (1,

p

q

), which is followed by exactly one term in (

p

q

, ∞), and so on. The solution

visits consecutively the intervals

. . . ,

p

q

, ∞

,

1,

p

q

, (0, 1),

1,

p

q

,

p

q

, ∞

, . . .

in this order with one term per interval.

The situation is essentially the same relative to the interval [

p

q

, 1] when

p < q.

6.4.3 Global Stability and Boundedness

Our goal in this section is to establish the following result:

Theorem 6.4.4 (a) The equilibrium y of Eq(6.11) is globally asymptotically stable

when

q ≤ 1 + 4p. (6.21)

(b) Assume that

q > 1 + 4p.

Then every solution of Eq(6.11) lies eventually in the interval

p

q

, 1

.

Proof.

(a) We have already shown that the equilibrium y is locally asymptotically stable so

it remains to be shown that y is a global attractor of every solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of

Eq(6.11).

Case 1 Assume p = q. It follows from (6.19) that each of the four subsequences

{y

4n+i

}

∞

n=0

for i = 1, 2, 3, 4

88 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

is either identically equal to one or else it is strictly monotonically convergent. Set

L

i

= lim

n→∞

y

4n+i

for i = 1, 2, 3, 4.

Thus clearly

. . . , L

1

, L

2

, L

3

, L

4

, . . . (6.22)

is a periodic solution of Eq(6.11) with period four. By applying (6.19) to the

solution (6.22) we see that

L

i

= 1 for i = 1, 2, 3, 4

and so

lim

n→∞

y

n

= 1.

Case 2 Assume p = q. First, we assume that p > q.

Recall from Lemma 6.4.2 that [1,

p

q

] is an invariant interval. In this interval the

function

f(u, v) =

u + p

u + qv

is decreasing in both variables and so it follows by applying Theorem 1.4.7 that

every solution of Eq(6.11) with two consecutive values in [1,

p

q

] converges to y. By

using an argument similar to that in the case p = q, we can see that if a solution is

not eventually in [1,

p

q

], it converges to a periodic solution with period-four which

is not the equilibrium. By applying (6.14) to this period four solution we obtain a

contradiction and so every solution of Eq(6.11) must lie eventually in [1,

p

q

].

Hence for every solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(6.11)

lim

n→∞

y

n

= y

and the proof is complete.

Now, assume that p < q.

As in Case 2 we can see that every solution of Eq(6.11) must eventually lie in the

interval [

p

q

, 1]. In this interval the function

f(u, v) =

u + p

u + qv

is increasing in u and decreasing in v. Under the assumption that q ≤ 1 + 4p,

Theorem 1.4.5 applies and so every solution of Eq(6.11) converges to y.

(b) The proof follows from the discussion in part (a).

2

6.5. The Case β = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

89

6.5 The Case β = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

This is the (2, 2)-type Eq(6.4) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

A

B

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n−1

1 + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.23)

where

p =

αB

A

2

and q =

γ

A

.

(Eq(6.23) was investigated in [28].)

The only equilibrium point of Eq(6.23) is

y =

q −1 +

(q −1)

2

+ 4p

2

and by applying the linearized stability Theorem 1.1.1 we obtain the following result:

Theorem 6.5.1 The equilibrium y of Eq(6.23) is locally asymptotically stable when

q < 1,

and is an unstable saddle point when

q > 1.

Concerning prime period-two solutions, the following result is a consequence of the

results in Section 2.7.

Theorem 6.5.2 (a) Eq(6.23) has a prime period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . (6.24)

if and only if

q = 1. (6.25)

(b) Assume (6.25) holds. Then the values φ and ψ of all prime period-two solutions

(6.24) are given by

{φ, ψ ∈ (0, ∞) : φψ = p}.

(c) Assume that (6.25) holds. Then every solution of Eq(6.23) converges to a period

two solution.

90 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

6.5.1 Semicycle Analysis

Our results on the semicycles of solutions for Eq(6.23) are as follows:

Theorem 6.5.3 Let {y

n

} be a nontrivial solution of Eq(6.23) and let y denote the

unique positive equilibrium of Eq(6.23). Then the following statements are true:

(a) After the ﬁrst semicycle, an oscillatory solution {y

n

} of Eq(6.23) oscillates about

the equilibrium y with semicycles of length one.

(b) Assume p ≥ q. Then every nonoscillatory solution of Eq(6.23) converges mono-

tonically to the equilibrium y.

Proof. (a) This follows immediately from Theorem 1.7.1

(b) Let {y

n

} be a nonoscillatory solution of Eq(6.23). We will assume that there exists

a positive integer K such that y

n−1

≥ y for every n ≥ K. The case where y

n−1

< y for

n ≥ K is similar and will be omitted. It is suﬃcient to show that {y

n

} is a decreasing

sequence for n ≥ K. So assume for the sake of contradiction that for some n

0

≥ K,

y

n

0

> y

n

0

−1

.

Clearly, the condition p ≥ q implies that the function

f(x) =

p + qx

1 + x

is decreasing. Then

y

n

0

+1

=

p + qy

n

0

−1

1 + y

n

0

= f(y

n

0

, y

n

0

−1

) < f(y

n

0

, y

n

0

) < f(y, y) = y,

which is impossible. 2

6.5.2 The Case q < 1

The main result in this section is the following:

Theorem 6.5.4 Assume that

q < 1.

Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(6.23) is globally asymptotically stable.

Proof. Clearly

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n−1

1 + y

n

< p + qy

n−1

, n ≥ 0. (6.26)

Set

M =

p

1 −q

+ ,

6.5. The Case β = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

91

where is some positive number.

From Eq(6.26) and Eq(6.23), it now follows that every solution of Eq(6.23) lies

eventually in the interval [0, M].

Set

f(x, y) =

p + qy

1 + x

, a = 0, and b =

p

1 −q

+ .

Then clearly,

a ≤ f(x, y) ≤ b,

for all (x, y) ∈ [a, b] ×[a, b]. By applying Theorem 1.4.6 it follows that y is a global at-

tractor of all solutions of Eq(6.23). The local stability of y was established in Theorem

6.5.1. The proof is complete. 2

6.5.3 The Case q > 1

In this case we will show that there exist solutions that have two subsequences, one of

which is monotonically approaching 0 and the other is monotonically approaching ∞.

In fact this is true for every solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

whose initial conditions are such that the

following inequalities are true:

y

−1

< q −1 and y

0

> q −1 +

p

q −1

.

To this end observe that

y

1

=

p + qy

−1

1 + y

0

<

p + q(q −1)

1 + y

0

< q −1

and

y

2

=

p + qy

0

1 + y

1

>

p + qy

0

q

= y

0

+

p

q

and by induction,

y

2n−1

< q −1 and y

2n

> y

0

+ n

p

q

for n ≥ 1.

Hence

lim

n→∞

y

2n

= ∞

and

lim

n→∞

y

2n+1

= lim

n→∞

p + qy

2n−1

1 + y

2n

= 0

and the proof is complete.

92 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

6.6 The Case β = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (2, 2)-type Eq(6.6) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

γ

C

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

p + y

n−1

qy

n

+ y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.27)

where

p =

αC

γ

2

and q =

B

C

.

(Eq(6.27) was investigated in [45].)

Eq(6.27) has the unique positive equilibrium

y =

1 +

1 + 4p(1 + q)

2(1 + q)

.

The linearized equation associated with Eq(6.27) about y is

z

n+1

+

q

1 + q

z

n

−

qy −p

(y + p)(1 + q)

z

n−1

= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . . (6.28)

By employing Theorem 1.1.1 we see that y is locally asymptotically stable when

(q −1)y < 2p (6.29)

and unstable (a saddle point) when

(q −1)y > 2p. (6.30)

Clearly the equilibrium y is the positive solution of the quadratic equation

(1 + q)y

2

−y −p = 0.

If we now set

F(u) = (1 + q)u

2

−u −p,

it is easy to see that (6.29) is satisﬁed if and only if either

q ≤ 1

or

q > 1 and F

2p

q −1

> 0.

6.6. The Case β = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

93

Similarly (6.30) is satisﬁed if and only if

q > 1 and F

2p

q −1

< 0.

The following result is now a consequence of the above discussion and some simple

calculations:

Theorem 6.6.1 The equilibrium y of Eq(6.27) is locally asymptotically stable when

q < 1 + 4p (6.31)

and unstable, and more precisely a saddle point equilibrium, when

q > 1 + 4p. (6.32)

6.6.1 Existence and Local Stability of Period-Two Cycles

Let

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

be a period-two cycle of Eq(6.27). Then

φ =

p + φ

qψ + φ

and ψ =

p + ψ

qφ + ψ

.

It now follows after some calculations that the following result is true:

Theorem 6.6.2 Eq(6.27) has a prime period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

if and only if

q > 1 + 4p.

Furthermore when (6.32) holds, the period-two solution is “unique” and the values of φ

and ψ are the positive roots of the quadratic equation

t

2

−t +

p

q −1

= 0.

94 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

To investigate the local stability of the two cycle

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

we set

u

n

= y

n−1

and v

n

= y

n

, for n = 0, 1, . . .

and write Eq(6.27) in the equivalent form:

u

n+1

= v

n

v

n+1

=

p+u

n

qv

n

+u

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

Let T be the function on (0, ∞) ×(0, ∞) deﬁned by:

T

u

v

=

v

p+u

qv+u

.

Then

φ

ψ

**is a ﬁxed point of T
**

2

, the second iterate of T. By a simple calculation we ﬁnd that

T

2

u

v

=

g(u, v)

h(u, v)

where

g(u, v) =

p + u

qv + u

and h(u, v) =

p + v

qg(u, v) + v

.

Clearly the two cycle is locally asymptotically stable when the eigenvalues of the

Jacobian matrix J

T

2, evaluated at

φ

ψ

**lie inside the unit disk.
**

We have

J

T

2

φ

ψ

=

¸

¸

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ)

∂g

∂v

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂u

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ)

¸

where,

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ) =

qψ −p

(qψ + φ)

2

,

∂g

∂v

(φ, ψ) = −

(p + φ)q

(qψ + φ)

2

,

6.6. The Case β = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

95

∂h

∂u

(φ, ψ) = −

q(p + ψ)(qψ −p)

(qφ + ψ)

2

(qψ + φ)

2

,

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ) =

q

2

(p + φ)(p + ψ)

(qφ + ψ)

2

(qψ + φ)

2

+

qφ −p

(qφ + ψ)

2

.

Set

S =

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ) +

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ)

and

D =

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ) −

∂g

∂v

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂u

(φ, ψ).

Then it follows from Theorem 1.1.1 that both eigenvalues of J

T

2

φ

ψ

**lie inside the
**

unit disk |λ| < 1, if and only if

|S| < 1 +D < 2. (6.33)

Inequality (6.33) is equivalent to the following three inequalities:

S < 1 +D (6.34)

−1 −D < S (6.35)

D < 1. (6.36)

First we will establish Inequality (6.34).

To this end observe that (6.34) is equivalent to

(qψ −p)(qφ + ψ)

2

+ (qφ −p)(qψ + φ)

2

+ q

2

(p + ψ)(p + φ) −(qψ −p)(qφ −p)

< (qψ + φ)

2

(qφ + ψ)

2

which is true if and only if

p

q −1

(q

3

+ 2q

2

−4qp + 2q

2

p + 2p −3q) + q −p + q

2

p

2

+ qp −p

2

< (qψ + φ)

2

(qφ + ψ)

2

which is true if and only if

−q

3

p + 7q

2

p −8qp

2

+ 4q

2

p

2

+ 4p

2

−7qp + 2q

2

−q + p −q

3

< 0

which is true if and only if

−(p + 1)(q −1)(q −

p

p + 1

)[q −(1 + 4p)] < 0

which is true because q > 1 + 4p.

96 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Next we will establish Inequality (6.35). Observe that (6.35) is equivalent to

−(qψ + φ)

2

(qφ + ψ)

2

< (qψ −p)(qφ + ψ)

2

+ (qφ −p)

2

(qψ + φ)

2

+ q

2

(p + ψ)(p + φ) + (qψ −p)(qφ −p)

which is true if and only if

−(qψ + φ)

2

(qφ + ψ)

2

<

p

q −1

(q

3

+ 4q

2

−4qp + 2q

2

p + 2p −3q) −p + q

2

p

2

which is true if and only if

q

2

+ 2pq + 2p

2

q

2

−p

2

+ qp

2

−q

3

−3q

3

p −2q

3

p

2

−p < 0

which is true if and only if

p

2

(−2q

3

+ 2q

2

+ q −1) + p(−3q

3

+ 2q −1) −q

3

+ q

2

< 0

which is true because q > 1.

Finally, we establish Inequality (6.36). Observe that (6.36) is true if and only if

(qψ −p)(qφ −p) < (qψ + φ)

2

(qφ + ψ)

2

which is true if and only if

p

q −1

[q

2

−(q −1)(q −p)] < (pq −p + q)

2

which is true if and only if

q(pq −p + q)(pq −2p + q −1) > 0

which is true because q > 1 + 4p.

6.6.2 Invariant Intervals

Here we show that the interval I with end points one and

p

q

is an invariant interval for

Eq(6.27). More precisely we show that the values of any solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(6.27)

either remain forever outside the interval I or the solution is eventually trapped into I.

Theorem 6.6.3 Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(6.27). Then the following statements

are true.

(a) Assume that p ≤ q and that for some N ≥ 0,

p

q

≤ y

N

≤ 1.

Then

p

q

≤ y

n

≤ 1 for all n ≥ N.

6.6. The Case β = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

97

(b) Assume that p ≥ q and that for some N ≥ 0,

1 ≤ y

N

≤

p

q

.

Then

1 ≤ y

n

≤

p

q

for all n ≥ N.

Proof.

(a) Indeed we have

y

N+1

=

p + y

N−1

qy

N

+ y

N−1

≤

p + y

N−1

p + y

N−1

= 1

and

y

N+1

=

p + y

N−1

qy

N

+ y

N−1

=

p + y

N−1

q

p

(py

N

+

p

q

y

N−1

)

≥

p

q

p + y

N−1

p + y

N−1

=

p

q

and the proof follows by induction.

(b) Clearly,

y

N+1

=

p + y

N−1

qy

N

+ y

N−1

≥

p + y

N−1

p + y

N−1

= 1

and

y

N+1

=

p + y

N−1

qy

N

+ y

N−1

=

p

q

p + y

N−1

py

N

+

p

q

y

N−1

≤

p

q

p + y

N−1

p + y

N−1

=

p

q

and the proof follows by induction.

2

6.6.3 Semicycle Analysis

Here we present a thorough semicycle analysis of the solutions of Eq(6.27) relative to

the equilibrium y and relative to the end points of the invariant interval of Eq(6.27).

Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(6.27). Then observe that the following identities

are true:

y

n+1

−1 = q

p

q

−y

n

qy

n

+ y

n−1

for n ≥ 0, (6.37)

y

n+1

−

p

q

=

qy

n−1

(1 −

p

q

) + pq(1 −y

n

)

q(qy

n

+ y

n−1

)

for n ≥ 0, (6.38)

y

n

−y

n+2

=

qy

n−1

(y

n

−

p

q

) + (y

n

−1)(y

n−1

y

n

+ qy

2

n

)

q(p + y

n−1

) + y

n

(qy

n

+ y

n−1

)

for n ≥ 0. (6.39)

98 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

When

p = q

that is for the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

p + y

n−1

py

n

+ y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.40)

the above identities reduce to the following:

y

n+1

−1 = p

1 −y

n

py

n

+ y

n−1

for n ≥ 0 (6.41)

and

y

n

−y

n+2

= (y

n

−1)

py

n−1

+ y

n−1

y

n

+ py

2

n

p(p + y

n−1

) + y

n

(py

n

+ y

n−1

)

for n ≥ 0. (6.42)

The following three lemmas are now direct consequences of (6.37)-(6.42).

Lemma 6.6.1 Assume that

p > q

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(6.27). Then the following statements are true:

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

<

p

q

, then y

N+1

> 1;

(ii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

=

p

q

, then y

N+1

= 1;

(iii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

>

p

q

, then y

N+1

< 1;

(iv) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≥ 1, then y

N+1

<

p

q

;

(v) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≥

p

q

, then y

N+2

< y

N

;

(vi) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≤ 1, then y

N+2

> y

N

;

(vii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≤

p

q

, then y

n

∈ [1,

p

q

] for n ≥ N. In particular [1,

p

q

] is an

invariant interval for Eq(6.27);

(viii)

1 < y <

p

q

.

Lemma 6.6.2 Assume that

p = q

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(6.27). Then the following statements are true:

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

< 1, then y

N+1

> 1;

6.6. The Case β = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

99

(ii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

= 1, then y

N+1

= 1;

(iii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

> 1, then y

N+1

< 1;

(iv) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

< 1, then y

N

< y

N+2

< 1;

(v) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

> 1, then y

N

> y

N+2

> 1.

Lemma 6.6.3 Assume that

p < q

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(6.27). Then the following statements are true:

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

<

p

q

, then y

N+1

> 1;

(ii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

=

p

q

, then y

N+1

= 1;

(iii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

>

p

q

, then y

N+1

< 1;

(iv) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≤ 1, then y

N+1

>

p

q

;

(v) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≤

p

q

, then y

N+1

≥ 1;

(vi) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≥ 1, then y

N+2

< y

N

;

(vii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≤

p

q

, then y

N+2

> y

N

;

(viii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≤ 1, then y

n

∈ [

p

q

, 1] for n ≥ N. In particular [

p

q

, 1] is an

invariant interval for Eq(6.27);

(ix)

p

q

< y < 1.

Note that the function

f(u, v) =

p + v

qu + v

is always decreasing in u but in v it is decreasing when u <

p

q

and increasing when u >

p

q

.

The following result is now a consequence of Theorems 1.7.1 and 1.7.2 and Lemmas

6.6.1-6.6.3:

100 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Theorem 6.6.4 Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(6.27). Let I be the closed interval

with end points 1 and

p

q

and let J and K be the intervals which are disjoint from I and

such that

I ∪ J ∪ K = (0, ∞).

Then either all the even terms of the solution lie in J and all odd terms lie in K, or

vice-versa, or for some N ≥ 0,

y

n

∈ I for n ≥ N. (6.43)

When (6.43) holds, except for the length of the ﬁrst semicycle of the solution, if

p < q

the length is one, while if

p > q

the length is at most two.

6.6.4 Global Behavior of Solutions

Recall that Eq(6.27) has a unique equilibrium y which is locally stable when (6.31) holds.

When (6.32) holds, and only then, Eq(6.27) has a “unique” prime period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . (6.44)

with

φ + ψ = 1 and φψ =

p

q −1

. (6.45)

Also recall that a solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(6.27) either eventually enters the interval I

with end points 1 and

p

q

and remains there, or stays forever outside I.

Now when

q ≤ 1 + 4p

there are no period-two solutions and so the solutions must eventually enter and remain

in I and, in view of Theorems 1.4.6 and 1.4.7, must converge to y.

On the other hand when (6.32) holds, any solution which remains forever outside the

interval I = [

p

q

, 1] must converge to the two cycle (6.44)-(6.45). But this two cycle lies

inside the interval I. Hence, when (6.32) holds, every solution of Eq(6.27) eventually

enters and remains in the interval I.

The character of these solutions remains an open question.

The above observations are summarized in the following theorem:

Theorem 6.6.5 (a) Assume

q ≤ 1 + 4p. (6.46)

Then the equilibrium y of Eq(6.27) is global attractor.

6.7. The Case α = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

101

(b) Assume

q > 1 + 4p.

Then every solution of Eq(6.27) eventually enters and remains in the interval [

p

q

, 1].

6.7 The Case α = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

This is the (2, 2)-type equation Eq(6.7) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

A

B

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.47)

where

p =

β

A

and q =

γ

A

.

(Eq(6.47) was investigated in [52].)

The equilibrium points of Eq(6.47) are the solutions of the equation

y =

py + qy

1 + y

.

So y = 0 is always an equilibrium point, and when

p + q > 1,

y = p + q −1 is the only positive equilibrium point of Eq(6.47).

The following result follows from Theorem 1.3.1 and the linearized stability Theorem

1.1.1:

Theorem 6.7.1 (a) Assume

p + q ≤ 1.

Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(6.47) is globally asymptotically stable.

(b) Assume

p + q > 1.

Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(6.47) is unstable. More precisely it is a saddle

point when

1 −p < q < 1 + p

and a repeller when

q > 1 + p.

102 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

(c) Assume

1 −p < q < 1 + p.

Then the positive equilibrium y = p + q − 1 of Eq(6.47) is locally asymptotically

stable.

(d) Assume

q > 1 + p.

Then the positive equilibrium y = p+q −1 of Eq(6.47) is an unstable saddle point.

Concerning prime period-two solutions it follows from Sections 2.5 that the following

result is true:

Theorem 6.7.2 Eq(6.47) has a prime period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

if and only if

q = 1 + p. (6.48)

Furthermore when (6.48) holds, the values of φ and ψ of all prime period-two solutions

are given by:

{φ, ψ ∈ (p, ∞) : ψ =

pφ

φ −p

= 2p}.

6.7.1 Invariant Intervals

The main result here is the following theorem about Eq(6.47) with q = 1. The case

q = 1 (6.49)

is treated in Section 6.7.3.

Theorem 6.7.3 (a) Assume that

q < 1. (6.50)

Then every solution of Eq(6.47) eventually enters the interval (0,

p

q

]. Furthermore,

(0,

p

q

] is an invariant interval for Eq(6.47). That is, every solution of Eq(6.47)

with initial conditions in (0,

p

q

], remains in this interval.

(b) Assume that

q > 1. (6.51)

Then every solution of Eq(6.47) eventually enters the interval [

p

q

, ∞). Further-

more, [

p

q

, ∞) is an invariant interval for Eq(6.47).

6.7. The Case α = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

103

The proof of the above theorem is an elementary consequence of the following lemma,

whose proof is straightforward and will be omitted.

Lemma 6.7.1 (a) Assume that (6.50) holds. Then for any k, m ∈ N,

y

k

≤

p

q

=⇒y

k+2

≤ p <

p

q

and

y

k+2

≥

p

q

m

=⇒y

k

>

p

q

m+1

> p.

(b) Assume that (6.51) holds. Then for any k, m ∈ N,

y

k

≥

p

q

=⇒y

k+2

≥ p >

p

q

and

y

k+2

≤

p

q

m

=⇒y

k

>

p

q

m+1

> p.

6.7.2 Semicycle Analysis of Solutions When q ≤ 1

Here we discuss the behavior of the semicycles of solutions of Eq(6.47) when

p + q > 1 and q ≤ 1.

Hereafter, y refers to the positive equilibrium p + q −1 of Eq(6.47).

Let f : [0, ∞) ×[0, ∞) →[0, ∞) denote the function

f(x, y) =

px + qy

1 + x

.

Then f satisﬁes the negative feedback condition; that is,

(x −x)(f(x, x) −x) < 0 for x ∈ (0, ∞) −{x}.

Consider the function g : [0, ∞) →[0, ∞) deﬁned by

g(x) =

(p + q)x

1 + x

.

Observe that g(y) = y and that g increases on [0, ∞).

Theorem 6.7.4 Suppose

p + q > 1 and q ≤ 1.

Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a positive solution of Eq(6.47). Then the following statements are true

for every n ≥ 0:

104 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

(a) If y ≤ y

n−1

, y

n

, then y ≤ y

n+1

≤ max{y

n−1

, y

n

}.

(b) If y

n−1

, y

n

≤ y, then min{y

n−1

, y

n

} ≤ y

n+1

< y.

(c) If y

n−1

< y ≤ y

n

, then y

n−1

< y

n+1

< y

n

.

(d) If y

n

< y ≤ y

n−1

, then y

n

< y

n+1

< y

n−1

.

(e) If y < y

k

<

y

2−q

, for every k ≥ −1, then {y

n

} decreases to the equilibrium y.

Proof.

(a) Suppose y ≤ y

n−1

, y

n

. Then

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n

≤

(p + q) max{y

n−1

, y

n

}

1 + y

= max{y

n−1

, y

n

}.

Since the function

px + qx

1 + x

,

is increasing for y <

p

q

, which is equivalent to q ≤ 1, we obtain

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n

≥

py

n

+ qy

1 + y

n

≥ g(y) = y.

Observe that all inequalities are strict if we assume that y

n−1

> y or y

n

> y.

(b) Suppose y

n−1

, y

n

≤ y. Then in view of the previous case

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n

≤

py

n

+ qy

1 + y

n

< g(y) = y

and

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n

≥

(p + q) min{y

n−1

, y

n

}

1 + y

= min{y

n−1

, y

n

}.

Observe that all inequalities are strict if we assume that y

n−1

< y or y

n

< y.

(c) Suppose y

n−1

< y ≤ y

n

. Then

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n

<

(p + q)y

n

1 + y

n

=

(1 + y)y

n

1 + y

n

< y

n

.

Since q ≤ 1 and y

n−1

< y,

p −qy

n−1

> p −qy = (1 −q)(p + q) ≥ 0.

Thus

px+qy

n−1

1+x

increases in x and so

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n

>

py

n−1

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n−1

= g(y

n−1

) > y

n−1

.

The last inequality follows from the negative feedback property.

6.7. The Case α = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

105

(d) Suppose y

n

< y ≤ y

n−1

. Then

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n

>

py

n

+ qy

n

1 + y

n

= g(y

n

) > y

n

by the negative feedback property.

To see that y

n+1

< y

n−1

, we must consider two cases:

Case 1. Suppose p −qy

n−1

≥ 0. Then

px+qy

n−1

1+x

increases in x and so

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n

≤

py

n−1

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n−1

< y

n−1

.

The last inequality follows from the negative feedback property.

Case 2. Suppose p −qy

n−1

< 0. Then

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n

<

qy

n−1

(y

n

+ 1)

1 + y

n

≤ y

n−1

.

(e) Observe that

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ qy

n−1

1 + y

n

> y = p + q −1

and so

y

n−1

≥ qy

n−1

> y + (q −1)y

n

> y

n

from which the result follows.

2

6.7.3 Semicycle Analysis and Global Attractivity When q = 1

Here we discuss the behavior of the solutions of Eq(6.47) when

q = 1.

Here the positive equilibrium of Eq(6.47) is

y = p.

Theorem 6.7.5 Suppose that q = 1 and let y

−1

+ y

0

> 0. Then the equilibrium y of

Eq(6.47) is globally asymptotically stable. More precisely the following statements are

true.

(a) Assume y

−1

≥ p and y

0

≥ p. Then y

n

≥ p for all n > 0 and

lim

n→∞

y

n

= p. (6.52)

(b) Assume y

−1

≤ p and y

0

≤ p. Then y

n

≤ p for all n > 0 and (6.52) holds.

(c) Assume either y

−1

< p < y

0

or y

−1

> p > y

0

. Then {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

oscillates about the

equilibrium p with semicycles of length one and (6.52) holds.

106 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Proof. (a) The case where y

−1

= y

0

= p is trivial. We will assume that y

−1

≥ p and

y

0

> p. The case y

−1

> p and y

0

≥ p is similar and will be omitted. Then

y

1

=

py

0

+ y

−1

1 + y

0

≥

py

0

+ p

1 + y

0

= p,

and

y

2

=

py

1

+ y

0

1 + y

1

>

py

1

+ p

1 + y

1

= p.

It follows by induction that y

n

≥ p for all n > 0. Furthermore, y

−1

≥ p implies that

py

0

+ y

−1

≤ y

−1

y

0

+ y

−1

and so

y

1

=

py

0

+ y

−1

1 + y

0

≤

y

−1

y

0

+ y

−1

1 + y

0

= y

−1

.

Similarly, we can show that y

2

< y

0

and by induction

y

−1

≥ y

1

≥ y

3

≥ . . . ≥ p

and

y

0

> y

2

> y

4

> . . . > p.

Thus, there exist m ≥ p and M ≥ p such that

lim

k→∞

y

2k+1

= m and lim

k→∞

y

2k

= M.

As Eq(6.47) has no period-two solutions when q = 1, it follows that m = M = p and

the proof of part (a) is complete.

It is interesting to note that

y

−1

= p ⇒y

2k+1

= p for k ≥ 0 and y

0

= p ⇒y

2k

= p for k ≥ 0.

(b) The proof of (b) is similar to the proof of (a) and will be omitted.

(c) Assume y

−1

< p < y

0

. The proof when y

0

< p < y

−1

is similar and will be

omitted.

y

1

=

py

0

+ y

−1

1 + y

0

<

py

0

+ p

1 + y

0

= p,

and

y

2

=

py

1

+ y

0

1 + y

1

>

py

1

+ p

1 + y

1

= p.

It follows by induction that the solution oscillates about p with semicycles of length one.

Next, we claim that the subsequence {y

2k+1

}

∞

k=−1

is increasing, and so convergent. In

fact, since y

−1

+ py

0

> y

−1

+ y

−1

y

0

then

y

1

=

py

0

+ y

−1

1 + y

0

> y

−1

6.7. The Case α = C = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

107

and the claim follows by induction. In a similar way we can show that the subsequence

{y

2k

}

∞

k=0

is decreasing, and so convergent. Thus, there exist m ≤ p and M ≥ p such

that

lim

k→∞

y

2k+1

= m and lim

k→∞

y

2k

= M

and as in (a), m = M. 2

6.7.4 Global Attractivity When q < 1

Here we consider the case where

1 −p < q < 1,

and we show that the equilibrium point y = p + q −1 of Eq(6.47) is global attractor of

all positive solutions of Eq(6.47).

Theorem 6.7.6 Assume

1 −p < q < 1.

Then every positive solution of Eq(6.47) converges to the positive equilibrium y.

Proof. Observe that the consistency condition y ≤

p

q

is equivalent to the condition

q ≤ 1. By Theorem 6.7.3 (a) we may assume that the initial conditions y

−1

and y

0

lie

in the interval I = (0,

p

q

]. Now clearly the function

f(x, y) =

px + qy

1 + x

satisﬁes the hypotheses of Theorem 1.4.5 in the interval I from which the result follows.

2

6.7.5 Long-term Behavior of Solutions When q > 1

Here we discuss the behavior of the solutions of Eq(6.47) when

q > 1

which is equivalent to

y >

p

q

.

In this case, every positive solution of Eq(6.47) lies eventually in the interval [p, ∞).

Concerning the long-term behavior of solutions of Eq(6.47) we may assume, without

loss of generality, that

y

−1

, y

0

∈ [p, ∞).

108 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Then the change of variable

y

n

= u

n

+ p,

transforms Eq(6.47) to the equation

u

n+1

=

p(q −1) + qu

n−1

1 + p + u

n

(6.53)

where u

n

≥ 0 for n ≥ 0.

The character of solutions of Eq(6.53) was investigated in Section 6.5. By apply-

ing the results of Section 6.5 to Eq(6.53), we obtain the following theorems about the

solutions of Eq(6.47) when q > 1:

Theorem 6.7.7 After the ﬁrst semicycle, an oscillatory solution of Eq(6.47) oscillates

about the positive equilibrium y with semicycles of length one.

Theorem 6.7.8 (a) Assume

q = 1 + p.

Then every solution of Eq(6.47) converges to a period-two solution.

(b) Assume

1 < q < 1 + p.

Then every positive solution of Eq(6.47) converges to the positive equilibrium of

Eq(6.47).

(c) Assume

q > 1 + p.

Then Eq(6.47) has unbounded solutions.

6.8. The Case α = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Cx

n−1

109

6.8 The Case α = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Cx

n−1

This is the (2, 2)-type Eq(6.8) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

γ

C

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ y

n−1

q + y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.54)

where

p =

β

γ

and q =

A

γ

.

(Eq(6.54) was investigated in [53].)

The equilibrium points of Eq(6.54) are the solutions of the equation

y =

py + y

q + y

.

So y = 0 is always an equilibrium point of Eq(6.54) and when

p + 1 > q,

Eq(6.54) also possesses the unique positive equilibrium y = p + 1 −q.

The following result follows from Theorems 1.1.1 and 1.3.1.

Theorem 6.8.1 (a) Assume

p + 1 ≤ q.

Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(6.54) is globally asymptotically stable.

(b) Assume

p + 1 > q. (6.55)

Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(6.54) is unstable and the positive equilibrium

y = p + 1 − q of Eq(6.54) is locally asymptotically stable. Furthermore the zero

equilibrium is a saddle point when

1 −p < q < 1 + p

and a repeller when

q < 1 −p.

In the remainder of this section we will investigate the character of the positive

equilibrium of Eq(6.54) and so we will assume without further mention that (6.55) holds.

Our goal is to show that when (6.55) holds and y

−1

+ y

0

> 0, the positive equilibrium

y = p + 1 −q of Eq(6.54) is globally asymptotically stable.

110 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

6.8.1 Invariant Intervals and Semicycle Analysis

Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a positive solution of Eq(6.54). Then the following identities are easily

established:

y

n+1

−1 = p

y

n

−

q

p

q + y

n−1

for n ≥ 0, (6.56)

y

n+1

−

q

p

=

p

2

[y

n

−

q

p

2

] + (p −q)y

n−1

p(q + y

n−1

)

for n ≥ 0, (6.57)

and

y

n+1

−y

n

=

(p −q)y

n

+ (1 −y

n

)y

n−1

q + y

n−1

for n ≥ 0. (6.58)

Note that the positive equilibrium

y = p + 1 −q

of Eq(6.54) is such that:

y is

< 1 if p < q < p + 1

= 1 if p = q

> 1 if p > q.

When

p = q

that is for the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ y

n−1

p + y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.59)

the identities (6.56)-(6.58) reduce to the following:

y

n+1

−1 = (y

n

−1)

p

p + y

n−1

for n ≥ 0 (6.60)

and

y

n+1

−y

n

= (1 −y

n

)

y

n−1

p + y

n−1

for n ≥ 0. (6.61)

The following three lemmas are now direct consequences of the above identities.

Lemma 6.8.1 Assume that

p < q (6.62)

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a positive solution of Eq(6.54). Then the following statements are

true:

6.8. The Case α = B = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Cx

n−1

111

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

<

q

p

, then y

N+1

< 1;

(ii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

=

q

p

, then y

N+1

= 1;

(iii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

>

q

p

, then y

N+1

> 1;

(iv) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

>

q

p

2

, then y

N+1

<

q

p

;

(v) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≤ 1, then y

N+1

< 1;

(vi) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≥ 1, then y

N+1

< y

N

.

Lemma 6.8.2 Assume that

p = q (6.63)

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a positive solution of Eq(6.54). Then the following statements are

true:

(i) If y

0

< 1, then for n ≥ 0, y

n

< 1 and the solution is strictly increasing;

(ii) If y

0

= 1, then y

n

= 1 for n ≥ 0;

(iii) If y

0

> 1, then for n ≥ 0, y

n

> 1 and the solution is strictly decreasing.

Lemma 6.8.3 Assume that

p > q (6.64)

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a positive solution of Eq(6.54). Then the following statements are

true:

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

<

q

p

, then y

N+1

< 1;

(ii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

=

q

p

, then y

N+1

= 1;

(iii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

>

q

p

, then y

N+1

> 1;

(iv) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

>

q

p

2

, then y

N+1

>

q

p

;

(v) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≤ 1, then y

N+1

> y

N

;

(vi) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

≥ 1, then y

N+1

>

q

p

and y

N+2

> 1.

112 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

6.8.2 Global Stability of the Positive Equilibrium

When (6.62) holds, it follows from Lemma 6.8.1 that if a solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

is such that

y

n

≥ 1 for all n ≥ 0

then the solution decreases and its limit lies in the interval [1, ∞). This is impossible

because y < 1. Hence, by Lemma 6.8.1, every positive solution of Eq(6.54) eventually

enters and remains in the interval (0, 1). Now in the interval (0, 1) the function

f(u, v) =

pu + v

q + v

is increasing in both arguments and by Theorem 1.4.8, y is a global attractor.

When (6.63) holds, it follows from Lemma 6.8.2 that every solution of Eq(6.54)

converges to the equilibrium y = 1.

Next, assume that (6.64) holds. Here it is clear from Lemma 6.8.3 that every solu-

tion of Eq(6.54) eventually enters and remains in the interval (1, ∞). Without loss of

generality we will assume that

y

n

> 1 for n ≥ −1.

Set

y

n

= 1 + (q + 1)u

n

for n ≥ −1.

Then we can see that {u

n

}

∞

n=−1

satisﬁes the diﬀerence equation

u

n+1

=

p−q

(q+1)

2

+

p

q+1

u

n

1 + u

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.65)

with positive parameters and positive initial conditions. This (2, 2)-type equation was

investigated in Section 6.3 where we established in Theorem 6.3.3 that every solution

converges to its positive equilibrium

u =

p −q

q + 1

.

From the above observations and in view of Theorem 6.8.1 we have the following

result:

Theorem 6.8.2 Assume that p + 1 > q and that y

−1

+ y

0

> 0. Then the positive

equilibrium y = p + 1 −q of Eq(6.54) is globally asymptotically stable.

6.9. The Case α = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

113

6.9 The Case α = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (2, 2)-type Eq(6.9) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

γ

C

y

n

reduces to the equation

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ y

n−1

qy

n

+ y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.66)

where

p =

β

γ

and q =

B

C

.

To avoid a degenerate situation we will also assume that

p = q.

(Eq(6.66) was investigated in [54].)

The only equilibrium point of Eq(6.66) is

y =

p + 1

q + 1

and the linearized equation of Eq(6.66) about y is

z

n+1

−

p −q

(p + 1)(q + 1)

z

n

+

p −q

(p + 1)(q + 1)

z

n−1

= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . .

By applying the linearized stability Theorem 1.1.1 we obtain the following result:

Theorem 6.9.1 (a) Assume that

p > q.

Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(6.66) is locally asymptotically stable.

(b) Assume that

p < q.

Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(6.66) is locally asymptotically stable when

q < pq + 1 + 3p (6.67)

and is unstable (and more precisely a saddle point equilibrium) when

q > pq + 1 + 3p. (6.68)

114 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

6.9.1 Existence of a Two Cycle

It follows from Section 2.5 that when p > q, Eq(6.66) has no prime period-two solutions.

On the other hand when

p < q

and

q > pq + 1 + 3p,

Eq(6.66) possesses a unique prime period-two solution:

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . (6.69)

where the values of φ and ψ are the (positive and distinct) solutions of the quadratic

equation

t

2

−(1 −p)t +

p(1 −p)

q −1

= 0. (6.70)

In order to investigate the stability nature of this prime period-two solution, we set

u

n

= y

n−1

and v

n

= y

n

for n = 0, 1, . . .

and write Eq(6.66) in the equivalent form:

u

n+1

= v

n

v

n+1

=

pv

n

+u

n

qv

n

+u

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

Let T be the function on (0, ∞) ×(0, ∞) deﬁned by:

T

u

v

=

v

pv+u

qv+u

.

Then

φ

ψ

**is a ﬁxed point of T
**

2

, the second iterate of T. One can see that

T

2

u

v

=

g(u, v)

h(u, v)

where

g(u, v) =

pv + u

qv + u

and h(u, v) =

p

pv+u

qv+u

+ v

q

pv+u

qv+u

+ v

.

The prime period-two solution (6.69) is asymptotically stable if the eigenvalues of the

Jacobian matrix J

T

2, evaluated at

φ

ψ

**lie inside the unit disk. One can see that
**

J

T

2

φ

ψ

=

¸

¸

¸

−

(p−q)ψ

(qψ+φ)

2

(p−q)φ

(qψ+φ)

2

−

(p−q)

2

ψ

2

(qψ+φ)

2

(qφ+ψ)

2

(p−q)φ

(qφ+ψ)

2

(p−q)ψ

(qψ+φ)

2

−1

¸

.

6.9. The Case α = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

115

Set

P =

p −q

(qψ + φ)

2

and Q =

p −q

(qφ + ψ)

2

.

Then

J

T

2

φ

ψ

=

−Pψ Pφ

−PQψ

2

PQφψ −Qφ

**and its characteristic equation is
**

λ

2

+ (Pψ + Qφ −PQφψ)λ + PQφψ = 0.

By applying Theorem 1.1.1 (c), it follows that both eigenvalues of

J

T

2

φ

ψ

**lie inside the unit disk if and only if
**

|Pψ + Qφ −PQφψ| < 1 + PQφψ < 2

or equivalently if and only if the following three inequalities hold:

Pψ + Qφ + 1 > 0 (6.71)

Pψ + Qφ < 1 + 2PQφψ (6.72)

and

PQφψ < 1. (6.73)

Observe that

φ > 0, ψ > 0, P < 0 and Q < 0

and so Inequality (6.72) is always true.

Next we will establish Inequality (6.71). We will use the fact that

φ + ψ = 1 −p, φψ =

p(1 −p)

q −1

φ =

pψ + φ

qψ + φ

and ψ =

pφ + ψ

qφ + ψ

.

Inequality (6.71) is equivalent to

(p −q)ψ

(qψ + φ)

2

+

(p −q)φ

(qφ + ψ)

2

+ 1 > 0

which is true if and only if

(q −p)[(qφ + ψ)

2

ψ + (qψ + φ)

2

φ] < (qψ + φ)

2

(qφ + ψ)

2

116 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

if and only if

(q −p)[(qφ + ψ)(pφ + ψ) + (qψ + φ)(pψ + φ)] < [(qφ + ψ)(qψ + φ)]

2

. (6.74)

Now observe that the lefthand side of (6.74) is

I = (q −p)[(qp + 1)(φ

2

+ ψ

2

) + 2(p + q)φψ]

= (q −p)[(qp + 1)(φ + ψ)

2

−2φψ(qp + 1 −p −q)]

= (q −p)[(qp + 1)(1 −p)

2

−2

p(1 −p)

q −1

(p −1)(q −1)]

= (q −p)(1 −p)

2

(qp + 1 + 2p).

The righthand side of (6.74) is

II = [(qψ + φ)(qφ + ψ)]

2

= [(q

2

+ 1)ψφ + q(φ

2

+ ψ

2

)]

2

= [q(φ + ψ)

2

+ (q −1)

2

φψ]

2

= [q(1 −p)

2

+ (q −1)p(1 −p)]

2

= (1 −p)

2

(q −p)

2

.

Hence, Inequality (6.71) is true if and only if (6.68) holds.

Finally, Inequality (6.73) is equivalent to

(p −q)

2

φψ < (qψ + φ)

2

(qφ + ψ)

2

which is true if and only if

(q −p)

φψ < (qψ + φ)(qφ + ψ)

if and only if

(q −p)

φψ < (q

2

+ 1)φψ + q(φ

2

+ ψ

2

)

if and only if

(q −p)

φψ < (q

2

+ 1)φψ + q[(φ + ψ)

2

−2φψ]

if and only if

(q −p)

φψ < (q −1)

2

φψ + q(φ + ψ)

2

if and only if

(q −p)

φψ < (q −1)

2

p(1 −p)

q −1

+ q(1 −p)

2

if and only if

(q −p)

φψ < (1 −p)(q −p)

6.9. The Case α = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

117

if and only if

p(1 −p)

q −1

< (1 −p)

2

if and only if q > pq + 1 which is clearly true.

In summary, the following result is true about the local stability of the prime period-

two solution (6.69) of Eq(6.66):

Theorem 6.9.2 Assume that Condition (6.68) holds. Then Eq(6.66) posseses the prime

period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

where φ and ψ are the two positive and distinct roots of the quadratic Eq(6.70). Fur-

thermore this prime period-two solution is locally asymptotically stable.

6.9.2 Semicycle Analysis

In this section, we present a semicycle analysis of the solutions of Eq(6.66).

Theorem 6.9.3 Let {y

n

} be a nontrivial solution of Eq(6.66). Then the following state-

ments are true:

(a) Assume p > q. Then {y

n

} oscillates about the equilibrium y with semicycles of

length two or three, except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle which may have length one.

The extreme in each semicycle occurs in the ﬁrst term if the semicycle has two terms

and in the second term if the semicycle has three terms.

(b) Assume p < q. Then either {y

n

} oscillates about the equilibrium y with semicycles

of length one, after the ﬁrst semicycle, or {y

n

} converges monotonically to y.

Proof. (a) The proof follows from Theorem 1.7.4 by observing that the condition p > q

implies that the function

f(x, y) =

px + y

qx + y

is increasing in x and decreasing in y. This function also satisﬁes Condition (1.35).

(b) The proof follows from Theorem 1.7.1 by observing that when p < q, the function

f(x, y) is increasing in y and decreasing in x. 2

6.9.3 Global Stability Analysis When p < q

The main result in this section is the following

Theorem 6.9.4 Assume that

p < q

and (6.67) holds. Then the positive equilibrium y of Eq(6.66) is globally asymptotically

stable.

118 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Proof. Set

f(x, y) =

px + y

qx + y

,

and note that f(x, y) is decreasing in x for each ﬁxed y, and increasing in y for each

ﬁxed x. Also clearly,

p

q

≤ f(x, y) ≤ 1 for all x, y > 0.

Finally in view of (6.67), Eq(6.66) has no prime period-two solution. Now the conclusion

of Theorem 6.9.4 follows as a consequence of Theorem 1.4.6 and the fact that y is locally

asymptotically stable. 2

The method employed in the proof of Theorem 1.4.6 can also be used to establish

that certain solutions of Eq(6.66) converge to the two cycle (6.69) when instead of (6.67),

(6.68) holds.

Theorem 6.9.5 Assume that (6.68) holds. Let φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . ., with φ < ψ, denote the

two cycle of Eq(6.66). Assume that for some solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(6.66) and for

some index N ≥ −1,

y

N

≥ ψ and y

N+1

≤ φ. (6.75)

Then this solution converges to the two cycle φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . ..

Proof. Assume that (6.75) holds. Set

f(x, y) =

px + y

qx + y

.

Then clearly,

y

N+2

= f(y

N+1

, y

N

) ≥ f(φ, ψ) = ψ,

y

N+3

= f(y

N+2

, y

N+1

) ≤ f(ψ, φ) = φ

and in general

y

N+2k

≥ ψ and y

N+2k+1

≤ φ for k = 0, 1, . . . .

Now as in the proof of Theorem 1.4.6

limsup

n→∞

y

n

= ψ and liminf

n→∞

y

n

= φ

from which we conclude that

lim

k→∞

y

N+2k

= ψ and lim

k→∞

y

N+2k+1

= φ.

2

Next we want to ﬁnd more cases where the conclusion of the last theorem holds. We

consider ﬁrst the case where eventually consecutive terms y

i

, y

i+1

lie between m and M.

6.9. The Case α = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

119

Lemma 6.9.1 Suppose that for some i ≥ 0,

m ≤ y

i

, y

i+1

≤ M.

Then y

k

∈ [m, M] for every k > i.

Proof. Using the monotonic character of the function f we have

m = f(M, m) ≤ f(y

i+1

, y

i

) = y

i+2

≤ f(m, M) = M,

and the result follows by induction. 2

If we never get two successive terms in the interval [m, M] and if we never get two

successive terms outside of the interval [m, M] (that is, for every i, either y

i

> M and

y

i+1

< m or y

i

< m and y

i+1

> M), then we have one of the following four cases:

(A) y

2n

> M and M ≥ y

2n+1

> m for every n;

(B) y

2n+1

> M and M ≥ y

2n

> m for every n;

(C) y

2n

< m and m ≤ y

2n+1

< M for every n;

(D) y

2n+1

< m and m ≤ y

2n

< M for every n.

Lemma 6.9.2 In all cases (A)-(D) the corresponding solution {y

n

} converges to the

two cycle

. . . φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . .

Proof. Since the proofs are similar for all cases we will give the details in case (A). By

our earlier observation we have that M ≥ limsup

i→∞

y

i

, and so

M ≥ limsup

n→∞

y

2n

≥ liminf

n→∞

y

2n

≥ M.

Hence lim

n→∞

y

2n

= M. From Eq(6.66) we have

y

2n+1

=

y

2n

−y

2n

y

2n+2

qy

2n+2

−p

.

and so

lim

n→∞

y

2n+1

=

M −M

2

qM −p

.

On the other hand by solving the equation

M = f(m, M) =

pm + M

qm + M

for m we ﬁnd

m =

M −M

2

qM −p

.

Thus, lim

n→∞

y

2n+1

= m and the proof is complete. 2

Since the case in which the solution lies outside of the interval [m, M] is answered by

Theorem 6.9.5, we are left with the case in which the solution lies eventually in [m, M].

120 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Lemma 6.9.3 Suppose M ≥ y

i+2

≥ y

i

≥ y ≥ y

i+1

≥ y

i+3

≥ m and not both y

i+2

and

y

i+3

are equal to y. Then {y

n

} converges to the two cycle

. . . φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . .

Proof. Here we have

y

i+4

= f(y

i+3

, y

i+2

) ≥ f(y

i+1

, y

i

) = y

i+2

and

y

i+5

= f(y

i+4

, y

i+3

) ≤ f(y

i+2

, y

i+1

) = y

i+3

.

Induction on i then establishes the monotonicity of the two sequences. Thus, the se-

quence {y

i+2k

} is non decreasing and bounded above by M, and the sequence {y

i+2k+1

}

is a non increasing sequence and bounded below by m. Therefore, both subsequences

converge and their limits form a two cycle. In view of the uniqueness of the two cycle

and the fact that at least one of y

i

, y

i+1

is diﬀerent from y, the proof is complete.The

case M ≥ y

i+3

≥ y

i+1

≥ y ≥ y

i

≥ y

i+2

≥ m is handled in a similar way. 2

Using a similar technique one can prove that if

M ≥ y

i

≥ y

i+2

≥ y ≥ y

i+3

≥ y

i+1

≥ m

or

M ≥ y

i+1

≥ y

i+3

≥ y ≥ y

i+2

≥ y

i

≥ m

we would get convergence to y , but this situation cannot occur, as the following results

show. Let us consider the ﬁrst case. The second case can be handled in a similar way.

In this case we need to know more about the condition y

i+2

= f(y

i+1

, y

i

) ≤ y

i

, so we are

led to the general equation

f(x, y) = y. (6.76)

It makes sense to consider this equation only for y ∈ (

p

q

, 1), in which case Eq(6.76) has a

unique positive solution for x, which of course depends on y. We denote this value by y

.

Thus f(y

, y) = y. The correspondence between y and y

**has the following properties:
**

Lemma 6.9.4 (1) f(x, y) > y if and only if x < y

.

(2) x > y if and only if x

< y

.

(3) For y < y < M, f(y, y

) < y

and y > y

, and for m < y < y, f(y, y

) > y

and y

> y.

Proof.

6.9. The Case α = A = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

121

(1) Since f is decreasing in the ﬁrst variable and f(y

, y) = y, x < y

**if and only if
**

f(x, y) > f(y

, y) = y.

(2) Solving f(y

, y) = y for y

gives

y

= g(y) =

y −y

2

qy −p

.

Computing the derivative of g we get

g

(y) = −

p −2y + qy

2

(p −qy)

2

.

The discriminant of the numerator is 4p

2

− 4pq = 4p(p − q) < 0, so the roots of

the numerator are not real. For y ∈ (

p

q

, 1), g

(y) < 0, so y

**is decreasing function
**

of y.

(3) Eliminating y

from the equations y = f(y

, y) and y

= f(y, y

) we get

x −x

2

qx −p

=

px +

x−x

2

qx−p

qx +

x−x

2

qx−p

.

Simplifying this equation we get a fourth degree polynomial equation with roots

0, y, m, M. Thus each of these roots is simple and so f(y, y

)−y

changes sign as y

passes each of these values. Clearly as y approaches

p

q

y

approaches ∞. However

p

q

< f(y, y

) < 1. Thus for y < m, f(y, y

) < y

. Hence

m < y < y ⇒f(y, y

) > y

,

y < y < M ⇒f(y, y

) < y

,

M < y <⇒f(y, y

) > y

.

By (1) then, for m < y < y, y < y

, and for y < y < M, y > y

.

2

Now we will use this result to prove the following:

Lemma 6.9.5 Assume that for some i,

M ≥ y

i

≥ y

i+2

≥ y ≥ y

i+1

≥ m.

Then y

i+3

≤ y

i+1

with equality only in the case of a two cycle.

122 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Proof. To show y

i+3

= f(y

i+2

, y

i+1

) ≤ y

i+1

, we must show y

i+2

≥ y

i+1

.

Since y

i+2

= f(y

i+1

, y

i

) ≤ y

i

, we have y

i+1

≥ y

i

. Thus by (2) of the previous lemma

y

i

≥ y

i+1

, and by (3) y

i

≥ y

i

. Thus y

i

≥ y

i+1

. Since f is increasing in the second

argument and y

i

≥ y

i+1

we get

y

i+2

= f(y

i+1

, y

i

) ≥ f(y

i+1

, y

i+1

).

By (3) of the previous lemma, since m ≤ y

i+1

≤ y, f(y

i+1

, y

i+1

) ≥ y

i+1

. Thus y

i+2

≥ y

i+1

,

as required. To get equality we must have y

i+1

= y

i

or equivalently y

i+2

= y

i

, as well as

y

i+3

= y

i+1

. Thus equality occurs only in the case of a two cycle. 2

The case

m ≤ y

i

≤ y

i+2

≤ y ≤ y

i+1

≤ M

is similar.

We also obtain the following lemma:

Lemma 6.9.6 Unless {y

n

} is a period-two solution, there is no i such that either

M ≥ y

i

≥ y

i+2

≥ . . . ≥ y ≥ y

i+1

≥ y

i+3

≥ . . . ≥ m,

or

M ≥ . . . ≥ y

i+2

≥ y

i

≥ y ≥ . . . ≥ y

i+3

≥ y

i+1

≥ . . . ≥ m.

Proof. We will consider the ﬁrst case; the second case is similar. Since {y

i+2k+1

} is a

bounded monotonic sequence it has a limit c. The value c will be one value in a two

cycle, so either c = y or c = m. If c = y, then y

i+2n+1

= y for all n, and solving for y

i+2n

we see y

i+2n

= y also. But then y

i

= y

i+1

= y, and our solution is a two cycle.. If c = m,

solving for lim

n→∞

y

i+2n

gives lim

n→∞

y

i+2n

= M. This can only happen if y

i+2n

= M

for all n, in which case y

i+2n+1

= m for all n, which also gives a two cycle. 2

The above sequence of lemmas leads to the following result:

Theorem 6.9.6 Assume that

p < q,

and that Eq(6.66) possesses the two-cycle solution (6.69). Then every oscillatory solution

of Eq(6.66) converges to this two cycle.

Remark. Since some of the oscillatory solutions of Eq(6.66) are generated by initial

values {y

−1

, y

0

} that are on opposite sides of the equilibrium y, it follows by Theorem

6.9.6 that all such pairs belong to the stable manifold of the two cycle.

6.10. Open Problems and Conjectures 123

6.9.4 Global Stability Analysis When p > q

Here we have the following result:

Theorem 6.9.7 Assume that

p > q

and

p ≤ pq + 1 + 3q. (6.77)

Then the positive equilibrium y of Eq(6.66) is globally asymptotically stable.

Proof. We will employ Theorem 1.4.5. To this end, set

f(x, y) =

px + y

qx + y

,

and observe that when p > q, the function f(x, y) is increasing in x for each ﬁxed y, and

is decreasing in y for each ﬁxed x. Also

1 ≤ f(x, y) ≤

p

q

for all x, y > 0.

Finally observe that when (6.77) holds, the only solution of the system

M =

pM + m

qM + m

, m =

pm + M

qm + M

,

is

m = M.

Now the result is a consequence of Theorem 1.4.5. 2

6.10 Open Problems and Conjectures

Open Problem 6.10.1 (See [64]) Assume that

a, b, c, d ∈ R.

(a) Investigate the forbidden set F of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

ax

n

+ bx

n−1

cx

n

+ dx

n−1

x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

(b) For every point (x

−1

, x

0

) / ∈ F, investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic

nature of the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

124 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

(See Section 1.6.)

Open Problem 6.10.2 Assume that

α

n

, β

n

, A

n

, B

n

∈ R for n = 0, 1, . . .

are convergent sequences of real numbers with ﬁnite limits. Investigate the forbidden set

and the asymptotic character of solutions of the nonautonomous Riccati equation

x

n+1

=

α

n

+ β

n

x

n

A

n

+ B

n

x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

(See Section 1.6 for the autonomous case.)

Conjecture 6.10.1 Assume

p, q ∈ (0, ∞).

Show that every positive solution of Eq(6.10) has a ﬁnite limit.

(Note that by Theorem 6.3.3, we need only to conﬁrm this conjecture for p > 2(q +1)

and q ≥ 1. See also [36].)

Conjecture 6.10.2 Assume that

p, q ∈ (0, ∞).

Show that every positive solution of Eq(6.11) has a ﬁnite limit.

(Note that by Theorem 6.4.4, this conjecture has been conﬁrmed for q ≤ 1 + 4p.)

Conjecture 6.10.3 Assume p ∈ (0, ∞). Show that the equation

y

n+1

=

p + y

n−1

1 + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . .

has a positive and monotonically decreasing solution.

(Note that by Theorem 6.5.2, every positive solution converges to a, not necessarily

prime, period-two solution.)

6.10. Open Problems and Conjectures 125

Conjecture 6.10.4 Assume that

p, q ∈ (0, ∞).

Show that every positive solution of Eq(6.27) either converges to a ﬁnite limit or to a

two cycle.

(See Section 6.6.)

Open Problem 6.10.3 Assume that

p, q ∈ (0, ∞)

and

q > 1 + 4p.

Find the basin of attraction of the period-two solution of Eq(6.27).

Open Problem 6.10.4 Assume that

p, q ∈ (0, ∞)

and

q > pq + 1 + 3p.

Find the basin of attraction of the period-two solution of Eq(6.66).

Conjecture 6.10.5 Assume

p > q.

Show that every positive solution of Eq(6.66) has a ﬁnite limit.

(Note that by Theorem 6.9.7, this conjecture has been conﬁrmed for p ≤ pq +1+3q.)

Open Problem 6.10.5 Find the set of all initial conditions (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ R×R through

which the solution of the equation

y

n+1

=

y

n

+ y

n−1

1 + y

n

is well deﬁned and converges to 1, as n →∞.

126 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Open Problem 6.10.6 Find the set of all initial conditions (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ R×R through

which the solution of the equation

y

n+1

=

y

n

+ y

n−1

1 + y

n−1

is well deﬁned and converges to 1, as n →∞.

Open Problem 6.10.7 For each of the following diﬀerence equations determine the

“good” set G ⊂ R×R of initial conditions (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ R×R through which the equation

is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0.Then for every (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ G, investigate the long-term

behavior of the solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

:

y

n+1

=

1 −y

n

1 −y

n−1

(6.78)

y

n+1

=

y

n

−1

y

n

−y

n−1

(6.79)

y

n+1

=

1 −y

n−1

1 −y

n

(6.80)

y

n+1

=

1 −y

n−1

y

n

−y

n−1

(6.81)

y

n+1

=

y

n

−y

n−1

y

n

−1

(6.82)

y

n+1

=

y

n

−y

n−1

1 −y

n−1

(6.83)

y

n+1

=

y

n

+ y

n−1

y

n

−y

n−1

. (6.84)

For those equations from the above list for which you were successful, extend your

result by introducing arbitrary real parameters in the equation.

Open Problem 6.10.8 Assume

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞).

Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of solutions of the diﬀerence

equation

x

n+1

=

αx

n

+ βx

n−1

+ γx

n−2

Ax

n

+ Bx

n−1

+ Cx

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

Extend and generalize.

6.10. Open Problems and Conjectures 127

Open Problem 6.10.9 Assume that {p

n

}

∞

n=0

and {q

n

}

∞

n=0

are convergent sequences of

nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits,

p = lim

n→∞

p

n

and q = lim

n→∞

q

n

.

Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of

each of the following eight diﬀerence equations:

y

n+1

=

p

n

+ y

n

q

n

+ y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.85)

y

n+1

=

p

n

+ q

n

y

n

1 + y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.86)

y

n+1

=

y

n

+ p

n

y

n

+ q

n

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.87)

y

n+1

=

p

n

+ q

n

y

n−1

1 + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.88)

y

n+1

=

p

n

+ y

n−1

q

n

y

n

+ y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.89)

y

n+1

=

p

n

y

n

+ q

n

y

n−1

1 + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.90)

y

n+1

=

p

n

y

n

+ y

n−1

q

n

+ y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.91)

y

n+1

=

p

n

y

n

+ y

n−1

q

n

y

n

+ y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (6.92)

Open Problem 6.10.10 Assume that {p

n

}

∞

n=0

and {q

n

}

∞

n=0

are period-two sequences

of nonnegative real numbers. Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of

Eqs(6.85)-(6.92). Extend and generalize.

Open Problem 6.10.11 Assume q ∈ (1, ∞).

(a) Find the set B of all initial conditions (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ (0, ∞) × (0, ∞) such that the

solutions {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(6.23) are bounded.

(b) Let (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ B. Investigate the asymptotic behavior of {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

128 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Open Problem 6.10.12 Assume q ∈ (1, ∞).

(a) Find the set B of all initial conditions (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ (0, ∞) × (0, ∞) such that the

solutions {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(6.47) are bounded.

(b) Let (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ B. Investigate the asymptotic behavior of {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

Open Problem 6.10.13 (A Plant-Herbivore System; See [9], [3], and [2]) Assume

α ∈ (1, ∞), β ∈ (0, ∞), and γ ∈ (0, 1) with α + β > 1 +

β

γ

.

Obtain conditions for the global asymptotic stability of the positive equilibrium of the

system

x

n+1

=

αx

n

βx

n

+e

y

n

y

n+1

= γ(x

n

+ 1)y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (6.93)

Conjecture 6.10.6 Assume x

0

, y

0

∈ (0, ∞) and that

α ∈ (2, 3), β = 1 and γ =

1

2

.

Show that the positive equilibrium of System (6.93) is globally asymptotically stable.

Open Problem 6.10.14 (Discrete Epidemic Models; See [14].) Let A ∈ (0, ∞).

(a) Determine the set G of initial conditions (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ (0, ∞) ×(0, ∞) through which

the solutions {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

= (1 −x

n

−x

n−1

)(1 −e

−Ax

n

), n = 0, 1, . . . (6.94)

are nonnegative.

(b) Let (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ G. Investigate the boundedness character, the periodic nature, and

the asymptotic behavior of the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(6.94).

(c) Extend and generalize.

6.10. Open Problems and Conjectures 129

Open Problem 6.10.15 (The Flour Beetle Model; See [48]). Assume

a ∈ (0, 1), b ∈ (0, ∞), and c

1

, c

2

∈ [0, ∞) with c

1

+ c

2

> 0.

Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions for the global asymptotic stability of the Flour

Beetle Model:

x

n+1

= ax

n

+ bx

n−2

e

−c

1

x

n

−c

2

x

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . .

with positive initial conditions.

Open Problem 6.10.16 (A Population Model) Assume

α ∈ (0, 1) and β ∈ (1, ∞).

Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of the system

x

n+1

= αx

n

e

−y

n

+ β

y

n+1

= αx

n

(1 −e

−y

n

)

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

which may be viewed as a population model.

Open Problem 6.10.17 Assume that

p, q ∈ [0, ∞) and k ∈ {2, 3, . . .}.

Investigate the global behavior of all positive solutions of each of the following diﬀerence

equations:

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n

1 + y

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.95)

y

n+1

=

y

n

+ p

y

n

+ qy

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.96)

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n−k

1 + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.97)

y

n+1

=

p + y

n−k

qy

n

+ y

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.98)

y

n+1

=

y

n

+ py

n−k

y

n

+ q

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.99)

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ y

n−k

q + y

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . . (6.100)

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ y

n−k

qy

n

+ y

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (6.101)

130 Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

Open Problem 6.10.18 Obtain a general result for an equation of the form

y

n+1

= f(y

n

, y

n−1

), n = 0, 1, . . .

which extends and uniﬁes the global asymptotic stability results for Eqs(6.11) and (6.27).

Open Problem 6.10.19 Assume that every positive solution of an equation of the form

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

), n = 0, 1, . . . (6.102)

converges to a period-two solution. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f so

that every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

= f(x

n−2

, x

n−1

), n = 0, 1, . . . (6.103)

also converges to a period-two solution.

Extend and generalize.

Open Problem 6.10.20 Assume that Eq(6.102) has a two cycle which is locally asymp-

totically stable. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f so that the same two

cycle is a locally asymptotically stable solution of Eq(6.103).

Chapter 7

(1, 3)-Type Equations

7.1 Introduction

Eq(1) contains the following three equations of the (1, 3)-type:

x

n+1

=

α

A +Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (7.1)

x

n+1

=

βx

n

A +Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (7.2)

and

x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

A +Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (7.3)

Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all the parameters in the above

(1, 3)-type equations are positive and that the initial conditions are nonnegative.

7.2 The Case β = γ = 0 : x

n+1

=

α

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (1, 3)-type Eq.(7.1) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

α

A

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

1

1 +py

n

+qy

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (7.4)

where

p =

αB

A

2

and q =

αC

A

2

.

131

132 Chapter 7. (1, 3)-Type Equations

One can easily see that the positive equilibrium of Eq(7.4) is locally asymptotically stable

for all values of the parameters and that Eq(7.4) has no prime period two solutions.

The following result is now a straightforward consequence of either the stability

trichotomy Theorem 1.4.4, or Theorem 1.4.7 in the interval [0, 1].

Theorem 7.2.1 The positive equilibrium of Eq(7.4) is globally asymptotically stable.

7.3 The Case α = γ = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (1, 3)-type Eq(7.2) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

A

C

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

y

n

1 +py

n

+qy

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (7.5)

where

p =

β

A

and q =

B

C

.

Eq(7.5) always has zero as an equilibrium point and when

p > 1

it also has the unique positive equilibrium point

y =

p −1

q + 1

.

The following result is a straightforward consequence of Theorem 1.3.1.

Theorem 7.3.1 Assume

p ≤ 1.

Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(7.5) is globally asymptotically stable.

The following result is a straightforward consequence of Theorem 1.4.2. It also follows

by applying Theorem 1.4.5 in the interval [0,

p

q

].

Theorem 7.3.2 Assume that y

−1

, y

0

∈ (0, ∞) and

p > 1.

Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(7.5) is globally asymptotically stable.

7.4. The Case α = β = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

133

7.4 The Case α = β = 0 : x

n+1

=

γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (1, 3)-type Eq(7.3) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

γ

C

y

n

reduces to the equation

y

n+1

=

y

n−1

p +qy

n

+y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (7.6)

where

p =

A

γ

and q =

B

C

.

Eq(7.6) always has the zero equilibrium and when

p < 1

it also has the unique positive equilibrium

y =

1 −p

1 +q

.

The subsequent result is a straightforward application of Theorems 1.1.1 and 1.3.1.

Theorem 7.4.1 (a) The zero equilibrium of Eq(7.6) is globally asymptotically stable

when

p ≥ 1

and is unstable (a repeller) when

p < 1.

(b) Assume that p < 1. Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(7.6) is locally asymptot-

ically stable when

q < 1

and is unstable (a saddle point) when

q > 1.

Concerning prime period-two solutions one can see that Eq(7.6) has a prime period-

two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

if and only if

p < 1.

134 Chapter 7. (1, 3)-Type Equations

Furthermore when

p < 1 and q = 1

the only prime period-two solution is

. . . , 0, 1 −p, 0, 1 −p, . . . .

On the other hand, when

p < 1 and q = 1

all prime period-two solutions of Eq(7.6) are given by

. . . , φ, 1 −p −φ, φ, 1 −p −φ, . . .

with

0 ≤ φ ≤ 1 −p and φ =

1 −p

2

.

Theorem 7.4.2 Assume that

p < 1 and q > 1. (7.7)

Then the period-two solution

. . . , 0, 1 −p, 0, 1 −p, . . . (7.8)

of Eq(7.6) is locally asymptotically stable.

Proof. It follows from Section 2.6 that here

J

T

2

0

1 −p

=

1

p+q(1−p)

0

−

q(1−p)

p+q(1−p)

p

and in view of (7.7) both eigenvalues of J

T

2

0

1 −p

**lie in the disk |λ| < 1. Therefore
**

the prime period-two solution (7.8) is locally asymptotically stable. 2

7.5 Open Problems and Conjectures

Conjecture 7.5.1 Assume

p, q ∈ (0, 1).

Show that every positive solution of Eq(7.6) has a ﬁnite limit.

7.5. Open Problems and Conjectures 135

Conjecture 7.5.2 Assume

p < 1 and q ≥ 1.

Show that every positive solution of Eq(7.6) converges to a, not necessarily prime, period-

two solution.

Open Problem 7.5.1 Assume

p ∈ (0, 1) and q ∈ (1, ∞).

Find the basin of attraction of the two cycle

. . . , 0, 1 −p, 0, 1 −p, . . .

of Eq(7.6).

Open Problem 7.5.2 Investigate the asymptotic character and the periodic nature of

all positive solutions of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

x

n−2

1 +px

n

+qx

n−1

+x

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . .

where

p, q ∈ [0, ∞).

Extend and generalize.

Open Problem 7.5.3 For each of the equations given below, ﬁnd the set G of all points

(x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ R ×R through which the equation is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0:

x

n+1

=

1

1 +x

n

+x

n−1

(7.9)

x

n+1

=

x

n

1 +x

n

+x

n−1

(7.10)

x

n+1

=

x

n−1

1 +x

n

+x

n−1

. (7.11)

Now for each of the equations (7.9)-(7.11), let (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ G be an initial point

through which the corresponding equation is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0, and investigate

the long term-behavior of the solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

136 Chapter 7. (1, 3)-Type Equations

Open Problem 7.5.4 Assume that {p

n

}

∞

n=0

and {q

n

}

∞

n=0

are convergent sequences of

nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits,

p = lim

n→∞

p

n

and q = lim

n→∞

q

n

.

Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of

each of the following three diﬀerence equations:

y

n+1

=

1

1 +p

n

y

n

+q

n

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (7.12)

y

n+1

=

y

n

1 +p

n

y

n

+q

n

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (7.13)

y

n+1

=

y

n−1

p

n

+q

n

y

n

+y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (7.14)

Open Problem 7.5.5 Assume that {p

n

}

∞

n=0

and {q

n

}

∞

n=0

are period-two sequences of

nonnegative real numbers. Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of

Eqs(7.12)-(7.14). Extend and generalize.

Chapter 8

(3, 1)-Type Equations

8.1 Introduction

Eq(1) contains the following three equations of the (1, 3)-type:

x

n+1

=

α +βx

n

+γx

n−1

A

, n = 0, 1, . . . (8.1)

x

n+1

=

α +βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (8.2)

and

x

n+1

=

α +βx

n

+γx

n−1

Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (8.3)

Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these

equations are positive, the initial conditions are nonnegative, and the denominators are

always positive.

Eq(8.1) is a linear diﬀerence equation and can be solved explicitly.

Eq(8.2) by the change of the variables

x

n

= y

n

+

β

B

,

is reduced to a (2, 2)-type equation of the form of Eq(6.4) (see Section 6.5), namely,

y

n+1

=

(α +

βγ

B

) +γy

n−1

β +By

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

Eq(8.3) by the change of the variables

x

n

= y

n

+

γ

C

,

137

138 Chapter 8. (3, 1)-Type Equations

is reduced to a (2, 2)-type equation of the form of Eq(6.2) (see Section 6.3) namely,

y

n+1

=

(α +

βγ

C

) +βy

n

γ +Cy

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

Hence there is nothing else remaining to do about these equations other than to pose

some Open Problems and Conjectures.

8.2 Open Problems and Conjectures

Open Problem 8.2.1 Assume γ > β. Determine the set of initial conditions (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈

(0, ∞) ×(0, ∞) through which the solutions of Eq(8.2) are bounded.

Open Problem 8.2.2 (a) Assume γ = β and let

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . (8.4)

be a period-two solution of Eq(8.2). Determine the basin of attraction of (8.4).

(b) Let {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a positive solution of Eq(8.2) which converges to (8.4). Determine

the values of φ and ψ in terms of the initial conditions x

−1

and x

0

.

Conjecture 8.2.1 Show that every positive solution of Eq(8.3) converges to the positive

equilibrium of the equation.

Open Problem 8.2.3 Determine the set G of all initial points (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ R × R

through which the equation

x

n+1

=

1 +x

n

+x

n−1

x

n

is well deﬁned for all n and for these initial points determine the long-term behavior of

the solutions {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

Open Problem 8.2.4 Determine the set G of all initial points (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ R × R

through which the equation

x

n+1

=

1 +x

n

+x

n−1

x

n−1

is well deﬁned for all n and for these initial points determine the long-term behavior of

the solutions {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

8.2. Open Problems and Conjectures 139

Open Problem 8.2.5 Assume that {p

n

}

∞

n=0

and {q

n

}

∞

n=0

are convergent sequences of

nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits,

p = lim

n→∞

p

n

and q = lim

n→∞

q

n

.

Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of

each of the following two diﬀerence equations:

y

n+1

=

p

n

+x

n

+x

n−1

q

n

x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (8.5)

y

n+1

=

p

n

+x

n

+x

n−1

q

n

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (8.6)

Open Problem 8.2.6 Assume that {p

n

}

∞

n=0

and {q

n

}

∞

n=0

are period-two sequences of

nonnegative real numbers. Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of

Eqs(8.5) and (8.6). Extend and generalize.

Chapter 9

(2, 3)-Type Equations

9.1 Introduction

Eq(1) contains the following three equations of the (2, 3)-type:

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

A + Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (9.1)

x

n+1

=

α + γx

n−1

A + Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (9.2)

and

x

n+1

=

βx

n

+ γx

n−1

A + Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (9.3)

Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all the parameters in the above

(2, 3)-type equations are positive and the initial conditions are nonnegative.

9.2 The Case γ = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (2, 3)-type Eq(9.1) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

A

B

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n

1 + y

n

+ ry

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (9.4)

where

p =

αB

A

2

, q =

β

A

, and r =

C

B

.

141

142 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

(Eq(9.4) was investigated in [51].)

Here we make some simple observations about linearized stability, invariant intervals,

and the convergence of solutions in certain regions of initial conditions.

Eq(9.4) has a unique equilibrium y which is positive and is given by

y =

q −1 +

(q −1)

2

+ 4p(r + 1)

2(r + 1)

.

By employing the linearized stability Theorem 1.1.1, we obtain the following result:

Theorem 9.2.1 The equilibrium y of Eq(9.4) is locally asymptotically stable for all

values of the parameters p, q and r.

9.2.1 Boundedness of Solutions

We will prove that all solutions of Eq(9.4) are bounded.

Theorem 9.2.2 Every solution of Eq(9.4) is bounded from above and from below by

positive constants.

Proof. Let {y

n

} be a solution of Eq(9.4). Clearly, if the solution is bounded from above

by a constant M, then

y

n+1

≥

p

1 + (1 + r)M

and so it is also bounded from below. Now assume for the sake of contradiction that the

solution is not bounded from above. Then there exists a subsequence {y

1+n

k

}

∞

k=0

such

that

lim

k→∞

n

k

= ∞, lim

k→∞

y

1+n

k

= ∞, and y

1+n

k

= max{y

n

: n ≤ n

k

} for k ≥ 0.

From (9.4) we see that

y

n+1

< qy

n

+ p for n ≥ 0

and so

lim

k→∞

y

n

k

= lim

k→∞

y

n

k

−1

= ∞.

Hence for suﬃciently large k,

0 < y

1+n

k

−y

n

k

=

p + [(q −1) −y

n

k

−ry

n

k

−1

]y

n

k

1 + y

n

k

+ ry

n

k

−1

< 0

which is a contradiction and the proof is complete. 2

The above proof has an advantage that extends to several equations of the form

of Eq(9.1) with nonnegative parameters. The boundedness of solutions of the special

9.2. The Case γ = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

143

equation (9.4) with positive parameters immediately follows from the observation that

if

M = max{1, p, q}

then

y

n+1

≤

M + My

n

1 + y

n

= M for n ≥ 0.

9.2.2 Invariant Intervals

The following result, which can be established by direct calculation, gives a list of in-

variant intervals for Eq(9.4). Recall that I is an invariant interval, if whenever,

y

N

, y

N+1

∈ I for some integer N ≥ 0,

then

y

n

∈ I for n ≥ N.

Lemma 9.2.1 Eq(9.4) possesses the following invariant intervals:

(a)

0,

q −1 +

(q −1)

2

+ 4p

2

¸

¸

, when p ≤ q;

(b)

¸

p −q

qr

, q

¸

, when q < p < q(rq + 1);

(c)

¸

q,

p −q

qr

¸

, when p > q(rq + 1).

Proof.

(a) Set

g(x) =

p + qx

1 + x

and b =

q −1 +

(q −1)

2

+ 4p

2

and observe that g is an increasing function and g(b) ≤ b. Using Eq(9.4) we see

that when y

k−1

, y

k

∈ [0, b], then

y

k+1

=

p + qy

k

1 + y

k

+ ry

k−1

≤

p + qy

k

1 + y

k

= g(y

k

) ≤ g(b) ≤ b.

The proof follows by induction.

144 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

(b) It is clear that the function

f(x, y) =

p + qx

1 + x + ry

is increasing in x for y >

p−q

qr

. Using Eq(9.4) we see that when y

k−1

, y

k

∈

p−q

qr

, q

,

then

y

k+1

=

p + qy

k

1 + y

k

+ ry

k−1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≤ f

q,

p −q

qr

= q.

Also by using the condition p < q(rq + 1) we obtain

y

k+1

=

p + qy

k

1 + y

k

+ ry

k−1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≥ f

p −q

qr

, q

=

q(pr + p −q)

(rq)

2

+ rq + p −q

>

p −q

qr

.

The proof follows by the induction.

(c) It is clear that the function

f(x, y) =

p + qx

1 + x + ry

is decreasing in x for y <

p−q

qr

. Using Eq(9.4) we see that when y

k−1

, y

k

∈

q,

p−q

qr

,

then

y

k+1

=

p + qy

k

1 + y

k

+ ry

k−1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≥ f

p −q

qr

,

p −q

qr

= q.

Also by using the condition p > q(rq + 1) we obtain

y

k+1

=

p + qy

k

1 + y

k

+ ry

k−1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≤ f(q, q) =

p + q

2

1 + (r + 1)q

<

p −q

qr

.

The proof follows by induction.

2

9.2.3 Semicycle Analysis

Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(9.4). Then the following identitites are true for n ≥ 0:

y

n+1

−q =

qr(

p−q

qr

−y

n−1

)

1 + y

n

+ ry

n−1

, (9.5)

y

n+1

−

p −q

qr

=

qr

q −

p−q

qr

y

n

+ qr

y

n−1

−

p−q

qr

+ pr(q −y

n−1

)

qr(1 + y

n

+ ry

n−1

)

, (9.6)

y

n

−y

n+4

=

9.2. The Case γ = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

145

qr

y

n

−

p−q

qr

y

n+1

+ (y

n

−q)(y

n+1

y

n+3

+ y

n+3

+ y

n+1

+ ry

n

y

n+3

) + y

n

+ ry

2

n

−p

(1 + y

n+3

)(1 + y

n+1

+ ry

n

) + r(p + qy

n+1

)

,

(9.7)

y

n+1

−y =

(y −q)(y −y

n

) + yr(y −y

n−1

)

1 + y

n

+ ry

n−1

. (9.8)

The proofs of the following two lemmas are straightforward consequences of the Identities

(9.5)- (9.8) and will be omitted.

Lemma 9.2.2 Assume

p > q(qr + 1)

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(9.4). Then the following statements are true:

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

>

p−q

qr

, then y

N+2

< q;

(ii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

=

p−q

qr

, then y

N+2

= q;

(iii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

<

p−q

qr

, then y

N+2

> q;

(iv) If for some N ≥ 0, q < y

N

<

p−q

qr

, then q < y

N+2

<

p−q

qr

;

(v) If for some N ≥ 0, y ≥ y

N−1

and y ≥ y

N

, then y

N+1

≥ y;

(vi) If for some N ≥ 0, y < y

N−1

and y < y

N

, then y

N+1

< y;

(vii) q < y <

p−q

qr

.

Lemma 9.2.3 Assume

q < p < q(qr + 1)

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(9.4). Then the following statements are true:

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

<

p−q

qr

, then y

N+2

> q;

(ii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

=

p−q

qr

, then y

N+2

= q;

(iii) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

>

p−q

qr

, then y

N+2

< q;

(iv) If for some N ≥ 0, y

N

>

p−q

qr

and y

N

< q then q > y

N+2

>

p−q

qr

;

(v)

p−q

qr

< y < q.

146 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

Lemma 9.2.4 Assume

p = q(qr + 1)

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(9.4). Then

y

n+1

−q =

qr

1 + y

n

+ ry

n−1

(q −y

n−1

). (9.9)

Furthermore when qr < 1, then

lim

n→∞

y

n

= y. (9.10)

Proof. Identity (9.9) follows by straightforward computation. The limit (9.10) is a

consequence of the fact that in this case qr ∈ (0, ∞) and Eq(9.4) has no period-two

solution. 2

Here we present a semicycle analysis of the solutions of Eq(9.4) when p = q(1 +rq).

In this case Eq(9.4) becomes

y

n+1

=

q + rq

2

+ qy

n

1 + y

n

+ ry

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

and the only equilibrium point is y = q.

Theorem 9.2.3 Suppose that p = q + rq

2

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a nontrivial solution of

Eq(9.4). Then this solution is oscillatory and the sum of the lengths of two consecutive

semicycles, excluding the ﬁrst, is equal to four. More precisely, the following statements

are true for all k ≥ 0:

(i)

y

−1

> q and y

0

≤ q =⇒y

4k−1

> q, y

4k

≤ 1, y

4k+1

< q, and y

4k+2

≥ q;

(ii)

y

−1

< q and y

0

≥ q =⇒y

4k−1

< q, y

4k

≥ 1, y

4k+1

> q, and y

4k+2

≤ q;

(iii)

y

−1

> q and y

0

≥ q =⇒y

4k−1

> q, y

4k

≥ 1, y

4k+1

< q, and y

4k+2

≤ q;

(iv)

y

−1

< q and y

0

≤ q =⇒y

4k−1

< q, y

4k

≤ 1, y

4k+1

> q, and y

4k+2

≥ q.

Proof. The proof follows from identity (9.5). 2

9.2. The Case γ = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

147

9.2.4 Global Asymptotic Stability

The following lemma establishes that when p = q(qr + 1), every solution of Eq(9.4)

is eventually trapped into one of the three invariant intervals of Eq(9.4) described in

Lemma 9.2.1. More precisely, the following is true:

Lemma 9.2.5 Let I denote the interval which is deﬁned as follows:

I =

[0,

q−1+

√

(q−1)

2

+4p

2

] if p ≤ q;

[

p−q

qr

, q] if q < p < q(qr + 1);

[q,

p−q

qr

] if p > q(qr + 1).

Then every solution of Eq(9.4) lies eventually in I.

Proof. Let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a solution of Eq(9.4). First assume that

p ≤ q.

Then clearly, y ∈ I. Set

b =

q −1 +

(q −1)

2

+ 4p

2

and observe that

y

n+1

−b =

(q −p)(y

n

−b) −r(p + qb)y

n−1

(1 + y

n

+ ry

n−1

)(1 + b)

, n ≥ 0.

Hence, if for some N, y

N

≤ b, then y

N+1

< b. Now assume for the sake of contradiction

that

y

n

> b for n > 0.

Then y

n

> y for n ≥ 0 and so

lim

n→∞

y

n

= y ∈ I

which is a contradiction.

Next assume that

q < p < q(qr + 1)

and, for the sake of contradiction, also assume that the solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

is not even-

tually in the interval I. Then by Lemma 9.2.3, there exists N > 0 such that one of the

following three cases holds:

(i) y

N

> q, y

N+1

> q, and y

N+2

<

p−q

qr

;

(ii) y

N

> q, y

N+1

<

p−q

qr

, and y

N+2

<

p−q

qr

;

148 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

(iii) y

N

> q,

p−q

qr

≤ y

N+1

≤ q, and y

N+2

<

p−q

qr

.

Also observe that

if y

N

≥ q, then y

N

+ ry

2

N

−p > 0

and

if y

N

≤

p−q

qr

, then y

N

+ ry

2

N

−p < 0.

The desired contradiction is now obtained by using the Identity (9.7) from which it

follows that for j ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3}, each subsequence {y

n+4k+j

}

∞

k=0

with all its terms outside

the interval I converges monotonically and enters in the interval I.

The proof when

p > q(qr + 1)

is similar and will be omitted. 2

By using the monotonic character of the function

f(x, y) =

p + qx

1 + x + ry

in each of the intervals in Lemma 9.2.1, together with the appropriate convergence

Theorems 1.4.7 and 1.4.5, we can obtain some global asymptotic stability results for the

solutions of Eq(9.4). For example, the following results are true for Eq(9.4):

Theorem 9.2.4 (a) Assume that either

p ≥ q + q

2

r,

or

p <

q

1 + r

.

Then the equilibrium y of Eq(9.4) is globally asymptotically stable.

(b) Assume that either

p ≤ q

or

q < p < q + q

2

r

and that one of the following conditions is also satisﬁed:

(i) q ≤ 1;

(ii) r ≤ 1;

(iii) r > 1 and (q −1)

2

(r −1) ≤ 4p.

Then the equilibrium y of Eq(9.4) is globally asymptotically stable.

Proof.

9.3. The Case β = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

149

(a) The proof follows from Lemmas 9.2.1 and 9.2.4 and Theorems 1.4.7 and 1.4.2.

(b) In view of Lemma 9.2.1 we see that when y

−1

, y

0

∈

¸

0,

q−1+

√

(q−1)

2

+4p

2

, then y

n

∈

¸

0,

q−1+

√

(q−1)

2

+4p

2

**for all n ≥ 0. It is easy to check that y ∈
**

¸

0,

q−1+

√

(q−1)

2

+4p

2

**and that in the interval
**

¸

0,

q−1+

√

(q−1)

2

+4p

2

**, the function f increases in x and
**

decreases in y.

We will employ Theorem 1.4.5 and so it remains to be shown that if

m = f(m, M) and M = f(M, m)

then M = m. This system has the form

m =

p + qm

1 + m + rM

and M =

p + qM

1 + M + rm

.

Hence (M −m)(1 −q + M + m) = 0. Now if m + M = q −1, then M = m. For

instance, this is the case if Condition (i) is satisﬁed. If m + M = q − 1 then m

and M satisfy the equation

(r −1)m

2

+ (r −1)(1 −q)m + p = 0.

Clearly now if Condition (ii) or (iii) is satisﬁed, m = M from which the result

follows.

The proof when q < p < q + q

2

r holds follows from Lemma 9.2.1 and Theorem

1.4.5.

2

9.3 The Case β = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (2, 3)-type Eq(9.2) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

A

B

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n−1

1 + y

n

+ ry

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (9.11)

where

p =

αB

A

2

, q =

γ

A

, and r =

C

B

.

150 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

This equation has not been investigated yet. Here we make some simple observations

about linearized stability, invariant intervals, and the convergence of solutions in certain

regions of initial conditions.

Eq(9.11) has a unique equilibrium y which is positive and is given by

y =

q −1 +

(q −1)

2

+ 4p(r + 1)

2(r + 1)

.

By employing the linearized stability Theorem 1.1.1 we obtain the following result.

Theorem 9.3.1 (a) The equilibrium y of Eq(9.11) is locally asymptotically stable when

either

q ≤ 1

or

q > 1 and (r −1)(q −1)

2

+ 4pr

2

> 0.

(b) The equilibrium y of Eq(9.11) is unstable, and more precisely a saddle point,

when

q > 1 and (r −1)(q −1)

2

+ 4pr

2

< 0. (9.12)

9.3.1 Existence and Local Stability of Period-Two Cycles

Let

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

be a period-two cycle of Eq(9.11). Then

φ =

p + qφ

1 + ψ + rφ

and ψ =

p + qψ

1 + φ + rψ

.

It now follows after some calculation that the following result is true.

Lemma 9.3.1 Eq(9.11) has a prime period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

if and only if (9.12) holds.

Furthermore when (9.12) holds, the period-two solution is “unique” and the values

of φ and ψ are the positive roots of the quadratic equation

t

2

−

q −1

r

t +

p

1 −r

= 0.

9.3. The Case β = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

151

To investigate the local stability of the two cycle

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

we set

u

n

= y

n−1

and v

n

= y

n

, for n = 0, 1, . . .

and write Eq(9.11) in the equivalent form:

u

n+1

= v

n

v

n+1

=

p+qu

n

1+v

n

+ru

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

Let T be the function on (0, ∞) ×(0, ∞) deﬁned by:

T

u

v

=

v

p+qu

1+v+ru

.

Then

φ

ψ

**is a ﬁxed point of T
**

2

, the second iterate of T. By a simple calculation we ﬁnd that

T

2

u

v

=

g(u, v)

h(u, v)

where

g(u, v) =

p + qu

1 + v + ru

and h(u, v) =

p + qv

1 + g(u, v) + rv

.

Clearly the two cycle is locally asymptotically stable when the eigenvalues of the

Jacobian matrix J

T

2, evaluated at

φ

ψ

**, lie inside the unit disk.
**

We have

J

T

2

φ

ψ

=

¸

¸

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ)

∂g

∂v

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂u

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ)

¸

,

where

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ) =

q −pr + qψ

(1 + ψ + rφ)

2

,

∂g

∂v

(φ, ψ) =

−p −qφ

(1 + ψ + rφ)

2

,

152 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

∂h

∂u

(φ, ψ) =

(p + qψ)(pr −q −qψ)

(1 + ψ + rφ)

2

(1 + φ + rψ)

2

,

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ) =

(p + qψ)(p + qφ)

(1 + ψ + rφ)

2

(1 + φ + rψ)

2

+

q −pr + qφ

(1 + φ + rψ)

2

.

Set

S =

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ) +

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ)

and

D =

∂g

∂u

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂v

(φ, ψ) −

∂g

∂v

(φ, ψ)

∂h

∂u

(φ, ψ).

Then it follows from Theorem 1.1.1 that both eigenvalues of J

T

2

φ

ψ

**lie inside the
**

unit disk |λ| < 1, if and only if

|S| < 1 +D < 2. (9.13)

Inequality (9.13) is equivalent to the following three inequalities:

D < 1 (9.14)

S < 1 +D (9.15)

−1 −D < S. (9.16)

First we will establish Inequality (9.14). This inequality is equivalent to

(q −pr + qφ) (q −pr + qψ) −(1 + ψ + rφ)

2

(1 + φ + rψ)

2

< 0.

Observe that,

(q −pr + qφ) (q −pr + qψ) = (q −pr)

2

+ q(q −pr)(φ + ψ) + q

2

φψ =

=

−2q

2

r + q

2

r

2

+ 3qpr

2

−2qpr

3

−p

2

r

3

+ p

2

r

4

−q

3

+ rq

3

+ q

2

−pr

2

q

2

−qpr

r (−1 + r)

and that

(1 + ψ + rφ)

2

(1 + φ + rψ)

2

=

1 + φ + rψ + ψ + ψφ + rψ

2

+ rφ + φ

2

r + r

2

φψ

2

=

−pr

2

+ qr + pr −q + q

2

r

2

.

Thus

9.3. The Case β = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

153

(q −pr + qφ) (q −pr + qψ) −(1 + ψ + rφ)

2

(1 + φ + rψ)

2

=

−pr

3

q

2

+ 2q

2

r −q

2

r

2

−q

2

+ 3p

2

r

3

−2p

2

r

4

−3rq

3

+ 3qpr

3

−5qpr

2

r

2

(1 −r)

+

2qpr + 4pr

2

q

2

+ 2q

3

+ q

4

r −p

2

r

2

−2prq

2

−q

4

+ r

2

q

3

r

2

(1 −r)

=

(2r

2

p −rp + q −q

2

−qr + q

2

r) (−r

2

p + rp −q + q

2

+ qr)

r

2

(1 −r)

.

Note that

−r

2

p + rp −q + q

2

+ qr = rp(1 −r) + q(q −1) + qr > 0.

Also by using Condition (9.12) we see that

(r −1)(q −1)

2

+ 4pr

2

= q

2

r −2qr + r −q

2

+ 2q −1 + 4r

2

p < 0

and so

2r

2

p −rp + q −q

2

−qr + q

2

r < 2r

2

p −rp + q −qr + 2qr −r −2q + 1 −4r

2

p

= −2r

2

p −rp −q + qr −r + 1 = −2r

2

p −rp + (r −1) (q −1) < 0

from which the result follows.

Next we turn to Inequality (9.15). This inequality is equivalent to

(q −pr + qψ)(1 + φ + rψ)

2

+ (p + qψ)(p + qφ) + (q −pr + qφ)(1 + ψ + rφ)

2

−(q −pr + qφ) (q −pr + qψ) −(1 + ψ + rφ)

2

(1 + φ + rψ)

2

< 0.

After some lengthy calculation one can see that this inequality is a consequence of

Condition (9.12).

Finally Inequality (9.16) is equivalent to

(q −pr + qψ)(1 + φ + rψ)

2

+ (p + qψ)(p + qφ) + (q −pr + qφ)(1 + ψ + rφ)

2

+(q −pr + qφ) (q −pr + qψ) + (1 + ψ + rφ)

2

(1 + φ + rψ)

2

> 0.

After some lengthy calculation one can see that this inequality is also a consequence

of Condition (9.12).

In summary, we have established the following result:

154 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

Theorem 9.3.2 Eq(9.11) has a unique prime period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

if and only if (9.12) holds.

Furthermore when (9.12) holds, this period-two solution is locally asymptotically sta-

ble.

9.3.2 Invariant Intervals

The following result, which can be established by direct calculation, gives a list of in-

variant intervals for Eq(9.11).

Lemma 9.3.2 Eq(9.11) possesses the following invariant intervals:

(a)

0,

q −1 +

(q −1)

2

+ 4pr

2r

¸

¸

when pr ≤ q;

(b)

¸

pr −q

q

,

q

r

¸

when 1 < q < pr < q +

q

2

r

−

q

r

;

(c)

¸

q

r

,

pr −q

q

¸

when pr ≥ q +

q

2

r

.

Proof.

(a) Set

g(x) =

p + qx

1 + rx

and b =

q −1 +

(q −1)

2

+ 4pr

2r

and observe that g is an increasing function and g(b) ≤ b. Using Eq(9.11) we see

that when y

k−1

, y

k

∈ [0, b], then

y

k+1

=

p + qy

k−1

1 + y

k

+ qy

k−1

≤

p + qy

k−1

1 + ry

k−1

= g(y

k−1

) ≤ g(b) ≤ b.

The proof follows by induction.

9.3. The Case β = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

155

(b) It is clear that the function

f(x, y) =

p + qy

1 + x + ry

is increasing in y for x >

pr−q

q

. Using Eq(9.11) we see that when y

k−1

, y

k

∈

pr−q

q

,

q

r

,

then

y

k+1

=

p + qy

k−1

1 + y

k

+ ry

k−1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≥ f

q

r

,

pr −q

q

≥

pr −q

q

.

Now by using the monotonic character of the function f(x, y) and the condition

q < pr < q +

q

2

r

we obtain

y

k+1

=

p + qy

k−1

1 + y

k

+ ry

k−1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≤ f

pr −q

q

,

q

r

=

q

r

.

The proof follows by induction.

(c) It is clear that the function

f(x, y) =

p + qy

1 + x + ry

is decreasing in y for x <

pr−q

q

. Using Eq(9.11) we see that when y

k−1

, y

k

∈

q

r

,

pr−q

q

, then

y

k+1

=

p + qy

k−1

1 + y

k

+ qy

k−1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≥ f

pr −q

q

,

pr −q

q

=

q

r

.

By using the fact that f(x, y) is decreasing in both arguments and the condition

pr > q +

q

r

2

we obtain

y

k+1

=

p + qy

k−1

1 + y

k

+ qy

k−1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≤ f

q

r

,

q

r

=

pr + q

2

r + (r + 1)q

<

pr −q

q

.

The proof follows by induction.

2

156 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

9.3.3 Convergence of Solutions

By using the monotonic character of the function

f(x, y) =

p + qy

1 + x + ry

in each of the intervals in Lemma 9.3.2, together with the appropriate convergence

theorem (from among Theorems 1.4.5-1.4.8) we can obtain some convergence results for

the solutions with initial conditions in the invariant intervals. For example, the following

results are true for Eq(9.11):

Theorem 9.3.3 Assume that

pr ≤ q

and that one of the following conditions is also satisﬁed:

(i) q ≤ 1;

(ii) r ≥ 1;

(iii) r < 1 and (r −1)(q −1)

2

+ 4pr

2

≥ 0.

Then every solution of Eq(9.11) with initial conditions in the invariant interval

0,

q −1 +

(q −1)

2

+ 4pr

2r

¸

¸

converges to the equilibrium y.

Proof. In view of Lemma 9.3.2 we see that when y

−1

, y

0

∈

¸

0,

q−1+

√

(q−1)

2

+4pr

2r

, then

y

n

∈

¸

0,

q−1+

√

(q−1)

2

+4pr

2r

**for all n ≥ 0. It is easy to check that y ∈
**

¸

0,

q−1+

√

(q−1)

2

+4pr

2r

**and that in the interval
**

¸

0,

q−1+

√

(q−1)

2

+4pr

2r

**the function f decreases in x and increases
**

in y. The result now follows by employing Theorem 1.4.6.

2

Theorem 9.3.4 (a) Assume that 1 < q < pr < q+

q

2

r

−

q

r

and that one of the following

conditions is also satisﬁed:

(i) r ≥ 1;

(ii) r < 1 and (r −1)(q −1)

2

+ 4pr

2

≥ 0.

9.3. The Case β = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

157

Then every solution of Eq(9.11) with initial conditions in the invariant interval

¸

pr −q

q

,

q

r

¸

converges to the equilibrium y.

(b) Assume that pr > q +

q

2

r

. Then every solution of Eq(9.11) with initial conditions

in the invariant interval

¸

q

r

,

pr −q

q

¸

converges to the equilibrium y.

Proof.

(a) In view of Lemma 9.3.2 we conclude that y

n

∈

pr−q

q

,

q

r

**for all n ≥ 0. It is easy to
**

check that y ∈

pr−q

q

,

q

r

**and that the function f(x, y) decreases in x and increases
**

in y. The result now follows by employing Theorem 1.4.6.

(b) In view of Lemma 9.3.2 we conclude that y

n

∈

q

r

,

pr−q

q

**for all n ≥ 0. It is easy to
**

check that y ∈

q

r

,

pr−q

q

and that in the interval

q

r

,

pr−q

q

**the function f decreases
**

in both x and in y. The result now follows by employing Theorem 1.4.7.

2

9.3.4 Global Stability

By applying Theorem 1.4.3 to Eq(9.11), we obtain the following global asymptotic sta-

bility result.

Theorem 9.3.5 Assume

r ≥ 1 and pr ≤ q.

Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(9.11) is globally asymptotically stable.

9.3.5 Semicycle Analysis When pr = q +

q

2

r

Here we present a semicycle analysis of the solutions of Eq(9.11) when pr = q +

q

2

r

. In

this case Eq(9.11) becomes

y

n+1

=

qr + q

2

+ qr

2

y

n−1

r

2

+ r

2

y

n

+ r

3

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

and the only positive equilibrium is y =

q

r

.

158 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

Theorem 9.3.6 Suppose that pr = q +

q

2

r

and let {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

be a nontrivial solution of

Eq(9.11). Then after the ﬁrst semicycle, the solution oscillates about the equilibrium y

with semicycles of length one.

Proof. The proof follows from the relation

y

n+1

−

q

r

= (

q

r

−y

n

)

qr

2

r

3

(1 + y

n

+ ry

n−1

)

.

2

9.4 The Case α = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (2, 3)-type Eq(9.3) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

γ

C

y

n

,

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ y

n−1

r + qy

n

+ y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (9.17)

where

p =

β

γ

, q =

B

C

, and r =

A

γ

.

This equation has not been investigated yet. Here we make some simple observations

about linearized stability, invariant intervals, and the convergence of solutions in certain

regions of initial conditions.

The equilibrium points of Eq(9.17) are the nonnegative solutions of the equation

y =

(p + 1)y

r + (1 + q)y

.

Hence zero is always an equilibrium point and when

p + 1 > r, (9.18)

Eq(9.17) also possesses the unique positive equilibrium

y =

p + 1 −r

q + 1

.

The following theorem is a consequence of Theorem 1.1.1 and Theorem 1.3.1.

9.4. The Case α = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

159

Theorem 9.4.1 (a) Assume that

p + 1 ≤ r.

Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(9.17) is globally asymptotically stable.

(b) Assume that

p + 1 > r.

Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(9.17) is unstable. Furthermore the zero equilibrium

is a saddle point when

1 −p < r < 1 + p

and a repeller when

r < 1 −p.

The linearized equation associated with Eq(9.17) about its positive equilibrium y is

z

n+1

−

p −q + qr

(p + 1)(q + 1)

z

n

−

q −p + r

(p + 1)(q + 1)

z

n−1

= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . .

The following result is a consequence of Theorem 1.1.1.

Theorem 9.4.2 Assume that (9.18) holds. Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(9.17)

is locally asymptotically stable when

q + r < 3p + 1 + qr + pq, (9.19)

and unstable (a saddle point) when

q + r > 3p + 1 + qr + pq. (9.20)

Concerning prime period-two solutions for Eq(9.17), it follows from Section 2.5 that the

following result is true.

Theorem 9.4.3 Eq(9.17) has a prime period-two solution

. . . φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

if and only if (9.20) holds. Furthermore when (9.20) holds there is a unique period-two

solution and the values of φ and ψ are the positive roots of the quadratic equation

t

2

−(1 −p −r)t +

p(1 −p −r)

q −1

= 0.

160 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

9.4.1 Invariant Intervals

The following result, which can be established by direct calculation, gives a list of in-

variant intervals for Eq(9.17).

Lemma 9.4.1 Eq(9.17) possesses the following invariant intervals:

(a)

¸

0,

p + q −r

q + 1

¸

when p = q

2

and q

2

+ q > r

and

[0, K] when p = q

2

and q

2

+ q ≤ r,

where K > 0 is an arbitrary number;

(b)

¸

0,

qr

p −q

2

¸

when q

2

< p ≤ q

2

+ r and p + q > r,

[0, K] when q

2

< p ≤ q

2

+ r and p + q ≤ r,

where K > 0 is an arbitrary number

and

¸

qr

p −q

2

, K

1

¸

when p > q

2

+ r

where

K

1

=

(q −r)(p −q

2

) −qr +

((r −q)(p −q

2

) + qr)

2

+ 4q

3

r(p −q

2

)

2q(p −q

2

)

;

(c)

¸

0,

pr

q

2

−p

¸

when q

2

−qr ≤ p < q

2

and p + q > r,

[0, K] when q

2

−qr ≤ p < q

2

and p + q ≤ r,

where K > 0 is an arbitrary number

and

¸

pr

q

2

−p

, K

2

¸

when q

2

> p + qr,

where

K

2

=

(q −r)(q

2

−p) +

((q −r)(q

2

−p))

2

+ 4p

3

qr

2

2pqr

.

9.4. The Case α = 0 : x

n+1

=

βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

161

Proof.

(a) It is easy to see that when p = q

2

the function

f(x, y) =

px + qy

r + qx + y

is increasing in both arguments. Therefore for any K > 0,

0 ≤ f(x, y) ≤ f(K, K).

Now observe that the inequality f(K, K) ≤ K is equivalent to q

2

+q−r ≤ (q+1)K.

When q

2

+q ≤ r, this inequality is satisﬁed for any K > 0, while when q

2

+q > r

the inequality is true when

K ≥

p + q −r

q + 1

.

(b) It is clear that the function f(x, y) is increasing in both arguments for x <

qr

p−q

2

,

and it is increasing in x and decreasing in y for x ≥

qr

p−q

2

.

First assume that q

2

< p ≤ q

2

+ r .

Hence for y

k−1

, y

k

∈

0,

qr

p−q

2

we obtain

y

k+1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≤ f(K, K) = (p + q)K

1

r + (q + 1)K

≤ K,

where we set K =

qr

p−q

2

. The last inequality is always satisﬁed when p +q ≤ r and

when p + q > r, it is satisﬁed under the condition r + q

2

> p.

Second assume that p > q

2

+ r.

Then for y

k−1

, y

k

∈

qr

p−q

2

, K

1

**we can see that
**

f

qr

p −q

2

, K

1

≤ y

k+1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≤ f(K

1

,

qr

p −q

2

) ≤ K

1

.

(c) It is clear that the function f(x, y) is increasing in both arguments for y <

pr

q

2

−p

,

and it is increasing in y and decreasing in x for y ≥

pr

q

2

−p

.

First assume that q

2

−qr ≤ p < q

2

.

Then one can see that for y

k−1

, y

k

∈

0,

pr

q

2

−p

we obtain

y

k+1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≤ f(K, K) = (p + q)K

1

r + (q + 1)K

≤ K,

with K =

pr

q

2

−p

.

Second assume that p < q

2

−qr. Then for y

k−1

, y

k

∈

pr

q

2

−p

, K

2

**one can see that
**

f

pr

q

2

−p

, K

2

≤ y

k+1

= f(y

k

, y

k−1

) ≤ f

K

2

,

pr

q

2

−p

≤ K

2

.

2

162 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

9.4.2 Convergence of Solutions

By using the monotonic character of the function

f(x, y) =

px + qy

r + qx + y

in each of the intervals in Lemma 9.4.1, together with the appropriate convergence

theorem (from among Theorems 1.4.5-1.4.8), we can obtain some convergence results

for the solutions with initial conditions in the invariant intervals. For example, the

following results are true for Eq(9.17):

Theorem 9.4.4 (a) Assume that p = q

2

and q

2

+ q > r. Then every solution of

Eq(9.17) with initial conditions in the invariant interval

¸

0,

q

2

+ q −r

q + 1

¸

converges to the equilibrium y.

Assume that p = q

2

and q

2

+ q ≤ r. Then every solution of Eq(9.17) with initial

conditions in the interval [0, K], for any K > 0, converges to the equilibrium y.

(b) Assume that q

2

+r ≥ p > q

2

and p +q > r. Then every solution of Eq(9.17) with

initial conditions in the invariant interval

¸

0,

qr

p −q

2

¸

converges to the equilibrium y.

Assume that q

2

+r ≥ p > q

2

and p +q ≤ r. Then every solution of Eq(9.17) with

initial conditions in the interval [0, K], for any K > 0, converges to the equilibrium

y.

(c) Assume that q

2

−qr ≥ p < q

2

and p +q > r. Then every solution of Eq(9.17) with

initial conditions in the invariant interval

¸

0,

pr

q

2

−p

¸

converges to the equilibrium y.

Assume that q

2

−qr ≤ p < q

2

and p +q ≤ r. Then every solution of Eq(9.17) with

initial conditions in the interval [0, K], for any K > 0, converges to the equilibrium

y.

Proof. The proof is an immediate consequence of Lemma 9.4.1 and Theorem 1.4.8.

2

9.5. Open Problems and Conjectures 163

Theorem 9.4.5 Assume that

p > q

2

+ r

and that one of the following conditions is also satisﬁed:

(i) p ≤ q + r;

(ii) q ≥ 1;

(iii) q < 1 and p ≤

3q

2

+q−qr+r

1−q

.

Then every solution of Eq(9.11) with initial conditions in the invariant interval

qr

p−q

2

, K

1

**converges to the equilibrium y.
**

Proof. The proof is a consequence of Lemma 9.4.1 and Theorem 1.4.5.

2

Theorem 9.4.6 Assume that q

2

> p + qr and that Condition (9.20) is not satis-

ﬁed. Then every solution of Eq(9.11) with initial conditions in the invariant interval

qr

p−q

2

, K

2

**converges to the equilibrium y.
**

Proof. The proof is an immediate consequence of Lemma 9.4.1 and Theorem 1.4.6.

2

9.5 Open Problems and Conjectures

Conjecture 9.5.1 Assume

α, β, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞).

Show that every positive solution of Eq(9.1) has a ﬁnite limit.

Conjecture 9.5.2 Assume

α, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞).

Show that every positive solution of Eq(9.2) is bounded.

Conjecture 9.5.3 Assume

β, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞).

Show that every positive solution of Eq(9.3) is bounded.

164 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

Conjecture 9.5.4 Assume

α, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞)

and suppose that Eq(9.2) has no prime period-two solutions. Show that the positive

equilibrium of Eq(9.2) is globally asymptotically stable.

Conjecture 9.5.5 Assume that x

−1

, x

0

∈ [0, ∞) with x

−1

+ x

0

> 0 and that

β, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞).

Suppose that Eq(9.3) has no prime period-two solutions. Show that the positive equilib-

rium of Eq(9.3) is globally asymptotically stable.

Open Problem 9.5.1 Determine the set G of all initial points (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ R × R

through which the equation

x

n+1

=

x

n

+ x

n−1

1 + x

n

+ x

n−1

is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0, and for these initial points investigate the long-term behavior

of the solutions {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

. Extend and generalize.

Open Problem 9.5.2 Determine the set G of all initial points (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ R × R

through which the equation

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n

1 + x

n

+ x

n−1

is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0, and for these initial points investigate the long-term behavior

of the solutions {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

. Extend and generalize.

Open Problem 9.5.3 Determine the set G of all initial points (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ R × R

through which the equation

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n−1

1 + x

n

+ x

n−1

is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0, and for these initial points investigate the long-term behavior

of the solutions {x

n

}

∞

n=−1

. Extend and generalize.

9.5. Open Problems and Conjectures 165

Open Problem 9.5.4 Assume that {p

n

}

∞

n=0

, {q

n

}

∞

n=0

, and {r

n

}

∞

n=0

are convergent se-

quences of nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits,

p = lim

n→∞

p

n

, q = lim

n→∞

q

n

, and r = lim

n→∞

r

n

.

Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of

each of the following three diﬀerence equations:

y

n+1

=

p

n

+ q

n

y

n

1 + y

n

+ r

n

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (9.21)

y

n+1

=

p

n

+ q

n

y

n−1

1 + y

n

+ r

n

y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (9.22)

y

n+1

=

p

n

y

n

+ y

n−1

r

n

+ q

n

y

n

+ y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (9.23)

Open Problem 9.5.5 Assume that {p

n

}

∞

n=0

, {q

n

}

∞

n=0

, and {r

n

}

∞

n=0

are period-two se-

quences of nonnegative real numbers. Investigate the global character of all positive

solutions of Eqs(9.21)-(9.23). Extend and generalize.

Open Problem 9.5.6 Assume that (9.12) holds. Investigate the basin of attraction of

the two cycle

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

of Eq(9.11).

Open Problem 9.5.7 Assume that (9.20) holds. Investigate the basin of attraction of

the two cycle

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

of Eq(9.17).

Conjecture 9.5.6 Assume that (9.20) holds. Show that the period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

of Eq(9.17) is locally asymptotically stable.

166 Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

Open Problem 9.5.8 Assume that

p, q, r ∈ [0, ∞) and k ∈ {2, 3, . . .}.

Investigate the global behavior of all positive solutions of each of the following diﬀerence

equations:

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n

1 + y

n

+ ry

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . . (9.24)

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n−k

1 + y

n

+ ry

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . . (9.25)

y

n+1

=

py

n

+ y

n−k

r + qy

n

+ y

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (9.26)

Chapter 10

(3, 2)-Type Equations

10.1 Introduction

Eq(1) contains the following three equations of the (3, 2)-type:

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

+ γx

n−1

A + Bx

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (10.1)

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

+ γx

n−1

A + Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (10.2)

and

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

+ γx

n−1

Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (10.3)

Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these

equations are positive, the initial conditions are nonnegative, and the denominators are

always positive.

10.2 The Case C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

This is the (3, 2)-type Eq(10.1) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

A

B

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n

+ ry

n−1

1 + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (10.4)

where

p =

αB

A

2

, q =

β

A

, and r =

γ

A

.

167

168 Chapter 10. (3, 2)-Type Equations

(Eq(10.4) was investigated in [29].)

The linearized equation of Eq(10.4) about its unique equilibrium

y =

q + r −1 +

(q + r −1)

2

+ 4p

2

is

z

n+1

−

q −p −ry

(1 + y)

2

z

n

−

r

1 + y

z

n−1

= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . .

By applying the linearized stability Theorem 1.1.1 we see that y is locally asymptot-

ically stable when

r < 1 + q

and is an unstable (saddle point) equilibrium when

r > 1 + q.

When

r = q + 1

Eq(10.4) possesses prime period-two solutions. See Sections 2.5 and 2.7. The main

result in this section is that the solutions of Eq(10.4) exhibit the following trichotomy

character.

Theorem 10.2.1 (a) Assume that

r = q + 1. (10.5)

Then every solution of Eq(10.4) converges to a period-two solution.

(b) Assume that

r < q + 1. (10.6)

Then the equilibrium of Eq(10.4) is globally asymptotically stable.

(c) Assume that

r > q + 1. (10.7)

Then Eq(10.4) possesses unbounded solutions.

The proof of part (a) of Theorem 10.2.1 was given, for a more general equation, in

Section 2.7. The proofs of parts (b) and (c) of Theorem 10.2.1 are given in Sections

10.2.1 and 10.2.2 below.

10.2. The Case C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

169

10.2.1 Proof of Part (b) of Theorem 10.2.1

Here we assume that Eq(10.6) holds and we prove that the equilibrium of Eq(10.4) is

globally asymptotically stable. We know already that when Eq(10.6) holds the equilib-

rium is locally asymptotically stable so it remains to be shown that every solution of

Eq(10.4) is attracted to the equilibrium.

Observe that

y

n+1

= q +

(p −q) + ry

n−1

1 + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . .

and so when

p ≥ q (10.8)

we have

y

n

≥ q for n ≥ 1.

Therefore the change of variables

y

n

= q + z

n

transforms Eq(10.4) to the diﬀerence equation

z

n+1

=

(p + rq −q) + rz

n−1

(1 + q) + z

n

, n = 1, . . . (10.9)

which is of the form of the (2, 2)-type Eq(6.23) which was investigated in Section 6.5

and therefore the proof is complete when (10.8) holds.

So in the remaining part of the proof we assume that

p < q.

Now observe that the solutions of Eq(10.4) satisfy the following identity

y

n+1

−q =

r

1 + y

n

y

n−1

−

q −p

r

for n ≥ 0. (10.10)

Note that when

q =

q −p

r

that is when

p + qr −q = 0 (10.11)

the Identity (10.10) reduces to

y

n+1

−q =

r

1 + y

n

(y

n

−q) for n ≥ 0. (10.12)

Also in this case

0 < r = 1 −

p

q

< 1

170 Chapter 10. (3, 2)-Type Equations

and the equilibrium of Eq(10.4) is equal to q.

It follows from (10.12) that

|y

n+1

−q| < r|y

n+1

−q|

and so

lim

n→∞

y

n

= q

which completes the proof when (10.11) holds.

Still to be considered are cases where

p + qr −q > 0 (10.13)

and

p + qr −q < 0. (10.14)

First assume that (10.13) holds. To complete the proof in this case it is suﬃcient to

show that eventually

y

n

≥ q (10.15)

and then use the known result for Eq(10.9). To this end, note that now

q −p

r

< q

and employ (10.10). If (10.15) is not eventually true then either

y

2n

<

q −p

r

for n ≥ 0 (10.16)

or

y

2n−1

<

q −p

r

for n ≥ 0. (10.17)

This is because when

y

N−1

>

q −p

r

for some N ≥ 0,

then it follows from (10.10) that

y

N+1+2K

> q for all K ≥ 0.

We will assume that (10.16) holds. The case where (10.17) holds is similar and will be

omitted. Then we can see from (10.10) that

y

2n+2

−q =

r

1 + y

n+1

y

2n

−

q −p

r

> r

y

2n

−

q −p

r

and so

y

2n+2

> ry

2n

+ p for n ≥ 0. (10.18)

10.2. The Case C = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

171

This is impossible when r ≥ 1, because by (10.16) the solution is bounded. On the other

hand, when r < 1, it follows from (10.16) and (10.18) that

q −p

r

> y

2n+2

> r

n+1

y

0

+ r

n

p + . . . + rp + p

and so

q −p

r

≥

p

1 −r

which contradicts (10.13) and completes the proof when (10.13) holds.

Next assume that (10.14) holds. Now we claim that every solution of Eq(10.4) lies

eventually in the interval

0,

q−p

r

**. Once we establish this result, the proof that the
**

equilibrium is a global attractor of all solutions would be a consequence of Theorem

1.4.8 and the fact that in this case the function

f(x, y) =

p + qx + ry

1 + x

is increasing in both arguments. To this end assume for the sake of contradiction that

the solution is not eventually in the interval

0,

q−p

r

**. Then one can see from (10.10) and
**

the fact that now

q <

q −p

r

,

that either

y

2n

>

q −p

r

for n ≥ 0 (10.19)

or

y

2n−1

>

q −p

r

for n ≥ 0. (10.20)

We will assume that (10.19) holds. The case where (10.20) holds is similar and will be

omitted. Then from (10.10) we see that

y

2n+2

−q =

r

1 + y

2n+1

y

2n

−

q −p

r

< r

y

2n

−

q −p

r

and so

y

2n+2

< ry

2n

+ p for n ≥ 0.

Note that in this case r < 1 and so

q −p

r

< y

2n+2

< r

n+1

y

0

+ r

n

p + . . . + rp + p

which implies that

q −p

r

≤

p

1 −r

.

This contradicts (10.14) and completes the proof of part (b) of Theorem 10.2.1.

172 Chapter 10. (3, 2)-Type Equations

10.2.2 Proof of Part (c) of Theorem 10.2.1

Here we assume that (10.7) holds and show that Eq(10.4) possesses unbounded solutions.

To this end observe that

y

n+1

= q +

p + r(y

n−1

−

q

r

)

1 + y

n

for n ≥ 0

and so when (10.7) holds the interval [q, ∞) is invariant. That is when

y

−1

, y

0

∈ [q, ∞),

then

y

n

≥ q for n ≥ 0.

Now the change of variables

y

n

= q + z

n

transforms Eq(10.4) to Eq(10.9) and the conclusion of part (c) follows from Section 6.5

for appropriate initial conditions y

−1

and y

0

. More speciﬁcally the solutions of Eq(10.4)

with initial conditions such that

q ≤ y

−1

< r −1 and y

0

> r

−1

+

p + q(r −1)

r −1 −q

have the property that the subsequences of even terms converge to ∞ while the subse-

quences of odd terms converge to q.

It should be mentioned that when (10.7) holds, the equilibrium of Eq(10.4) is a

saddle point and so by the stable manifold theorem, in addition to unbounded solu-

tions, Eq(10.4) possesses bounded solutions which in fact converge to the equilibrium of

Eq(10.4).

10.3 The Case B = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Cx

n−1

This is the (3, 2)-type Eq(10.2) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

A

C

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n

+ ry

n−1

1 + y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (10.21)

where

p =

αC

A

2

, q =

β

A

, and r =

γ

A

.

10.3. The Case B = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Cx

n−1

173

This equation has not been investigated yet. Here we make some simple observations

about linearized stability, invariant intervals, and convergence of solutions in certain

regions of initial conditions.

The linearized equation of Eq(10.21) about its positive equilibrium

y =

q + r −1 +

(q + r −1)

2

+ 4p

2

is

z

n+1

−

q

1 + y

z

n

+

p −r + qy

(1 + y)

2

z

n

= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . .

By applying Theorem 1.1.1 we see that y is locally asymptotically stable for all values

of the parameters p, q, and r.

10.3.1 Invariant Intervals

The following result, which can be established by direct calculation, gives a list of in-

variant intervals for Eq(10.21).

Recall that I is an invariant interval, if whenever,

y

N

, y

N+1

∈ I for some integer N ≥ 0,

then

y

n

∈ I for n ≥ N.

Lemma 10.3.1 Eq(10.21) possesses the following invariant intervals:

(a)

¸

0,

p

1 −q

¸

when q < 1 and p ≥ r;

(b)

¸

0,

r −p

q

¸

when q < 1 and p ≥ r(1 −q).

10.3.2 Global Stability When p ≥ r

Here we discuss the behavior of the solutions of Eq(10.21) when p ≥ r.

Observe that

y

n+1

= r +

(p −r) + qy

n

1 + y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

and so when

p ≥ r

174 Chapter 10. (3, 2)-Type Equations

y

n

≥ r for n ≥ 1.

Therefore the change of variables

y

n

= r + z

n

transforms Eq(10.21) to the diﬀerence equation

z

n+1

=

p + qr −r + qz

n

(1 + r) + z

n−1

, n = 1, 2, . . .

which is of the form of the (2, 2)-type Eq(6.2) which was investigated in Section 6.3.

The following result is now a consequence of the above observations and the results

in Section 6.3.

Theorem 10.3.1 Assume

p ≥ r.

Then the following statements are true.

(a) Every positive solution of Eq(10.21) is bounded.

(b) The positive equilibrium of Eq(10.21) is globally asymptotically stable if one of

the following conditions holds:

(i) q < 1;

(ii)

q ≥ 1

and

either p + qr −r ≤ q or q < p + qr −r ≤ 2(q + 1).

10.3.3 Convergence of Solutions

Here we discuss the behavior of the solutions of Eq(10.21) when p < r.

Theorem 10.3.2 (a) Assume that

q < 1 and r ≥

p

1 −q

.

Then every solution of Eq(10.21) with initial conditions in the invariant interval

¸

0,

r −p

q

¸

converges to the equilibrium y.

10.4. The Case A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

175

(b) Suppose that either

0 ≤ q −1 < r and p < r

or

q < 1 and p < r <

p

1 −q

.

Set

K =

pq + r

2

−pr

q + r −p −q

2

.

Then every solution of Eq(10.21) with initial conditions in the invariant interval

¸

r −p

q

, K

¸

converges to the equilibrium y.

Proof.

(a) In view of Lemma 10.3.1 we see that when y

−1

, y

0

∈

0,

r−p

q

, then y

n

∈

0,

r−p

q

for all n ≥ 0. It is easy to check that y ∈

0,

r−p

q

and that in the interval

0,

r−p

q

**the function f(x, y) increases in both x and y. The result is now a consequence of
**

Theorem 1.4.8.

(b) In view of Lemma 10.3.1 we see that when y

−1

, y

0

∈

r−p

q

, K

, then y

n

∈

r−p

q

, K

for all n ≥ 0. It is easy to check that y ∈

r−p

q

, K

and that in the interval

r−p

q

, K

**the function f(x, y) increases in x and decreases in y. The result is now
**

a consequence of Theorem 1.4.5.

2

10.4 The Case A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

This is the (3, 2)-type Eq(10.3) which by the change of variables

x

n

=

γ

C

y

n

reduces to the diﬀerence equation

y

n+1

=

r + py

n

+ y

n−1

qy

n

+ y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (10.22)

where

p =

β

γ

, q =

B

C

, and r =

αC

γ

2

.

176 Chapter 10. (3, 2)-Type Equations

This equation has not been investigated yet. Here we make some simple observations

about linearized stability, invariant intervals, and the convergence of solutions in certain

regions of initial conditions.

The linearized equation of Eq(10.22) about its positive equilibrium

y =

(1 + p) +

(1 + p)

2

+ 4r(1 + q)

2(1 + q)

is

z

n+1

−

(p −q)y −qr

(q + 1)(r + (p + 1)y)

z

n

+

(p −q)y + r

(q + 1)(r + (p + 1)y)

z

n−1

= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . .

By applying Theorem 1.1.1 we see that y is locally asymptotically stable when either

q ≤ pq + 1 + 3p (10.23)

or

q > pq + 1 + 3p and F

2r

q −pq −1 −3p

> 0

where

F(u) = (q + 1)u

2

−(p + 1)u −r.

The second condition reduces to

q > pq + 1 + 3p. (10.24)

It is interesting to note that the above condition for the local asymptotic stability of y

requires the assumption that r > 0. When r = 0, as in Section 6.9, the inequality in

(10.23) is strict and Condition (10.24) is void.

Concerning prime period-two solution, it follows from Section 2.5 that a period-two

solution exists if and only if

p < 1, q > 1 and 4r < (1 −p)(q −pq −3p −1). (10.25)

Furthermore in this case the prime period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

is unique and the values φ and ψ are the positive roots of the quadratic equation

t

2

−(1 −p)t +

r + p(1 −p)

q −1

= 0.

10.4. The Case A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

177

10.4.1 Invariant Intervals

Here we present some results about invariant intervals for Eq(10.21). We consider the

cases where p = q, p > q, and p < q.

Lemma 10.4.1 Eq(10.21) possesses the following invariant intervals:

(a)

[a, b] when p = q and

a and b are positive numbers such that

r + (p + 1)a ≤ (q + 1)ab ≤ r + (p + 1)b. (10.26)

(b)

¸

p

q

,

qr

p −q

¸

when p > q and

p

2

−pq

q

2

< r;

¸

qr

p −q

,

p

q

¸

when p > q and

p

2

−pq

q

2

> r.

(c)

¸

1,

r

q −p

¸

when p < q < p + r;

¸

r

q −p

, 1

¸

when q > p + r.

Proof.

(a) It is easy to see that when p = q the function

f(x, y) =

r + px + y

qx + y

is decreasing in both arguments. Hence

a ≤

r + (p + 1)b

(q + 1)b

= f(b, b) ≤ f(x, y) ≤ f(a, a) =

r + (p + 1)a

(q + 1)a

≤ b.

(b) Clearly the function f(x, y) is decreasing in both arguments when y <

qr

p−q

, and it

is increasing in x and decreasing in y for y ≥

qr

p−q

.

First assume that p > q and

p

2

−pq

q

2

< r.

178 Chapter 10. (3, 2)-Type Equations

Then for x, y ∈

p

q

,

qr

p−q

we obtain

p

q

= f

qr

p −q

,

qr

p −q

≤ f(x, y) ≤ f

p

q

,

p

q

=

qr + p(p + 1)

p(q + 1)

≤

qr

p −q

.

The inequalities

qr + p(p + 1)

p(q + 1)

≤

qr

p −q

and

p

q

<

qr

p −q

are equivalent to the inequality

p

2

−pq

q

2

< r.

Next assume that p > q and

p

2

−pq

q

2

> r.

For x, y ∈

qr

p−q

,

p

q

, we obtain

(qr + p)(p −q) + pq

2

r

q

3

r + p(p −q)

= f

qr

p −q

,

p

q

≤ f(x, y) ≤ f

p

q

,

qr

p −q

=

p

q

.

The inequalities

(qr + p)(p −q) + pq

2

r

q

3

r + p(p −q)

≥

qr

p −q

and

p

q

>

qr

p −q

follow from the inequality

p

2

−pq

q

2

> r.

(c) It is clear that the function f(x, y) is decreasing in both arguments for x <

r

q−p

,

and it is increasing in y and decreasing in x for x ≥

r

q−p

.

First, assume that p < q < p + r.

Using the decreasing character of f, we obtain

1 = f

r

q −p

,

r

q −p

≤ f(x, y) ≤ f(1, 1) =

r + p + 1

q + 1

≤

r

q −p

,

The inequalities

1 <

r

q −p

and

r + p + 1

q + 1

<

r

q −p

are equivalent to the inequality q < p + r.

Next assume that q > p + r.

Using the decreasing character of f in x and the increasing character of f in y, we

obtain

(p + r)(q −p) + r

q(q −p) + r

= f

1,

r

q −p

≤ f(x, y) ≤ f

r

p −q

, 1

= 1.

10.4. The Case A = 0 : x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

179

The inequalities

(p + r)(q −p) + r

q(q −p) + r

≥

r

q −p

and

r

q −p

< 1

follow from the inequality q > p + r.

2

10.4.2 Convergence of Solutions

Here we obtain some convergence results for Eq(10.22).

Theorem 10.4.1 (a) Assume that p = q. Then every solution of Eq(10.22) with

initial conditions in the invariant interval [a, b], where 0 < a < b satisfy (10.26)

converges to the equilibrium y.

(b) Assume that p > q and r >

p

2

−pq

q

2

. Then every solution of Eq(10.22) with initial

conditions in the invariant interval

p

q

,

qr

p−q

**converges to the equilibrium y.
**

(c) Assume that p < q < p+r. Then every solution of Eq(10.22) with initial conditions

in the invariant interval

1,

r

q−p

**converges to the equilibrium y.
**

Proof. The proof is an immediate consequence of Lemma 10.4.1 and Theorem 1.4.7.

2

Theorem 10.4.2 Assume that p > q, r <

p

2

−pq

q

2

, and that either

p ≤ 1

or

p > 1 and (q −1)[(p −1)

2

(q −1) −4q(1 −p −qr)] ≤ 0.

Then every solution of Eq(10.22) with initial conditions in the invariant interval

qr

p−q

,

p

q

**converges to the equilibrium y.
**

Proof. The proof is an immediate consequence of Lemma 10.4.1 and Theorem 1.4.5.

2

Theorem 10.4.3 Assume that p < q, p +r < q, and that Condition (10.25) is not sat-

isﬁed. Then every solution of Eq(10.22) with initial conditions in the invariant interval

r

q−p

, 1

**converges to the equilibrium y.
**

Proof. The proof is an immediate consequence of Lemma 10.4.1 and Theorem 1.4.6.

2

180 Chapter 10. (3, 2)-Type Equations

10.5 Open Problems and Conjectures

Open Problem 10.5.1 We know that every solution {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(10.4) converges

to a not necessarily prime period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . (10.27)

if and only if

r = 1 + q.

(a) Determine the set of initial conditions y

−1

and y

0

for which φ = ψ.

(b) Assume (10.27) is a prime period-two solution of Eq(10.4). Determine the set of

initial conditions y

−1

and y

0

for which {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

converges to (10.27).

Open Problem 10.5.2 Assume

r > q + 1.

(a) Find the set B of all initial conditions (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ (0, ∞) × (0, ∞) such that the

solutions {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

of Eq(10.4) are bounded.

(b) Let (y

−1

, y

0

) ∈ B. Investigate the asymptotic behavior of {y

n

}

∞

n=−1

.

Conjecture 10.5.1 Every positive solution of Eq(10.21) converges to the positive equi-

librium of the equation.

Open Problem 10.5.3 For each of the equations listed below, determine the set G of

all initial conditions (x

−1

, x

0

) ∈ R×R through which the equation is well deﬁned for all

n ≥ 0, and for these initial points investigate the long-term behavior of the corresponding

solution:

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n

+ x

n−1

1 + x

n

(10.28)

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n

+ x

n−1

1 + x

n−1

(10.29)

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n

+ x

n−1

x

n

+ x

n−1

. (10.30)

Extend and generalize.

10.5. Open Problems and Conjectures 181

Conjecture 10.5.2 Assume that

p, q, r ∈ (0, ∞).

Then the following statements are true for Eq(10.22)

(a) Local stability of the positive equilibrium implies global stability.

(b) When Eq(10.22) has no prime period-two solutions the equilibrium y is globally

asymptotically stable.

(c) When Eq(10.22) possesses a period-two solution, the equilibrium y is a saddle

point.

(d) The period-two solution of Eq(10.22), when it exists, is locally asymptotically sta-

ble, but not globally.

Open Problem 10.5.4 Assume that {p

n

}

∞

n=0

, {q

n

}

∞

n=0

, and {r

n

}

∞

n=0

are convergent se-

quences of nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits,

p = lim

n→∞

p

n

, q = lim

n→∞

q

n

, and r = lim

n→∞

r

n

.

Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of

each of the following three diﬀerence equations:

y

n+1

=

p

n

+ q

n

y

n

+ r

n

y

n−1

1 + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (10.31)

y

n+1

=

p

n

+ q

n

y

n

+ r

n

y

n−1

1 + y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (10.32)

y

n+1

=

r

n

+ p

n

y

n

+ y

n−1

q

n

y

n

+ y

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (10.33)

Open Problem 10.5.5 Assume that {p

n

}

∞

n=0

, {q

n

}

∞

n=0

, and {r

n

}

∞

n=0

are period-two se-

quences of nonnegative real numbers. Investigate the global character of all positive

solutions of Eqs(10.31)-(10.33). Extend and generalize.

182 Chapter 10. (3, 2)-Type Equations

Open Problem 10.5.6 Assume that

p, q, r ∈ [0, ∞) and k ∈ {2, 3, . . .}.

Investigate the global behavior of all positive solutions of each of the following diﬀerence

equations:

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n

+ ry

n−k

1 + y

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (10.34)

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n

+ ry

n−k

1 + y

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . . (10.35)

y

n+1

=

p + qy

n

+ ry

n−1

qy

n

+ y

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (10.36)

Chapter 11

The (3, 3)-Type Equation

x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

In this chapter we discuss the (3, 3)-type equation

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

+ γx

n−1

A + Bx

n

+ Cx

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (11.1)

Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all coeﬃcients of this equation are

now assumed to be positive and the initial conditions nonnegative.

This equation has not been investigated yet. Here we make some simple observations

about linearized stability, invariant intervals, and the convergence of solutions in certain

regions of initial conditions.

11.1 Linearized Stability Analysis

Eq(11.1) has a unique equilibrium which is the positive solution of the quadratic equation

(B + C)x

2

−(β + γ −A)x −α = 0.

That is,

x =

β + γ −A +

(A −β −γ)

2

+ 4α(B + C)

2(B + C)

.

The linearized equation about x is (see Section 2.3)

z

n+1

−

(βA −Bα) + (βC −Bγ)x

A

2

+ α(B + C) + (B + C)(A + β + γ)x

z

n

−

(γA −Cα) −(βC −γB)x

A

2

+ α(B + C) + (B + C)(A + β + γ)x

z

n−1

= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . . (11.2)

183

184 Chapter 11. The (3, 3)-Type Equation x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

The equilibrium x is locally asymptotically stable if Conditions (2.13), (2.14), and (2.15)

are satisﬁed.

Eq(11.1) has a prime period-two solution

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

if, see Section 2.5, Conditions (2.31) and (2.32) are satisﬁed; that is,

γ > β+A, B > C, and α <

(γ −β −A)[B(γ −β −A) −C(γ + 3β −A)]

4C

2

. (11.3)

Furthermore, when (11.3), holds the values of φ and ψ are the positive roots of the

quadratic equation

t

2

+

γ −β −A

C

t +

αC + β(γ −β −A)

C(B −C)

= 0. (11.4)

The local asymptotic stability of the two cycle

. . . , φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . .

is discussed in Section 2.6.

11.2 Invariant Intervals

Here we obtain several invariant intervals for Eq(11.1). These intervals are derived by

analyzing the intervals where the function

f(x, y) =

α + βx + γy

A + Bx + Cy

is increasing or decreasing in x and y.

If we set

L = βA −αB, M = βC −γB, and N = γA −αC

then clearly

f

x

=

L + My

(A + Bx + Cy)

2

and f

y

=

N −My

(A + Bx + Cy)

2

.

Recall that an interval I is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) if whenever,

y

N

, y

N+1

∈ I for some integer N ≥ 0,

then

y

n

∈ I for n ≥ N.

Once we have an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) then we may be able to obtain a con-

vergence result for the solutions of Eq(11.1) by testing whether the hypotheses of one of

the four Theorems 1.4.5-1.4.8 are satisﬁed.

11.2. Invariant Intervals 185

Lemma 11.2.1 (i) Assume that

γ

C

=

β

B

>

α

A

.

Then

α

A

,

β

B

**is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the function
**

f(x, y) is increasing in both variables.

(ii) Assume that

β

B

>

γ

C

>

α

A

and

γ

C

≤

N

M

.

Then

α

A

,

γ

C

**is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the function
**

f(x, y) is increasing in both variables.

(iii) Assume that

γ

C

>

β

B

>

α

A

and

β + γ

B + C

≤

αB −βA

βC −γB

.

Then

α

A

,

β+γ

B+C

**is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the func-
**

tion f(x, y) is increasing in both variables.

(iv) Assume that

γ

C

=

β

B

<

α

A

.

Then

β

B

,

α

A

**is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the function
**

f(x, y) is decreasing in both variables.

(v) Assume that

γA −αC

βC −γB

≥

α

A

>

β

B

>

γ

C

.

Then

0,

γA−αC

βC−γB

**is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the func-
**

tion f(x, y) is decreasing in both variables.

(vi) Assume that

β

B

<

γ

C

<

α

A

<

γA −αC

βC −γB

.

Then

0,

α

A

**is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the function
**

f(x, y) is decreasing in both variables.

(vii) Assume that

α

A

=

β

B

>

γ

C

.

Then

0,

α

A

**is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the function
**

f(x, y) is increasing in x and decreasing in y.

186 Chapter 11. The (3, 3)-Type Equation x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

(viii) Assume that

β

B

>

α

A

≥

γ

C

.

Then

0,

β

B

**is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the function
**

f(x, y) is increasing in x and decreasing in y.

(ix) Assume that

α

A

=

β

B

<

γ

C

.

Then

0,

γ

C

**is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the function
**

f(x, y) is increasing in y and decreasing in x.

(x) Assume that

β

B

<

α

A

≤

γ

C

.

Then

0,

γ

C

**is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the function
**

f(x, y) is increasing in y and decreasing in x.

Proof.

(i) The condition

γ

C

=

β

B

>

α

A

is equivalent to M = 0 and L > 0, which in turn imply

that N > 0. Thus, in this case the function f is increasing in both variables for

all values of x and y and

α

A

= f(0, 0) ≤ f(x, y) ≤ f(

β

B

,

β

B

) ≤

β + γ

B + C

=

β

B

.

Here we used the fact that under the condition

γ

C

=

β

B

>

α

A

the function f(u, u) is increasing and consequently

f(u, u) ≤

β + γ

B + C

=

β

B

.

(ii) The condition

β

B

>

γ

C

>

α

A

is equivalent to M > 0, L > 0, and N > 0. Thus, in

this case the function f is increasing in x, for every x. In addition, this function

is increasing in y for x <

N

M

. Thus, assuming

γ

C

≤

N

M

we obtain

α

A

= f(0, 0) ≤ f(x, y) ≤ f(

N

M

,

N

M

) =

γ

C

,

for all x, y ∈

α

A

,

γ

C

.

11.2. Invariant Intervals 187

(iii) The condition

γ

C

>

β

B

>

α

A

is equivalent to M < 0 and L > 0, which in turn imply

that N > 0. Thus, in this case the function f is increasing in y, for every y. In

addition, this function is increasing in x for y < −

L

M

. Thus assuming

β+γ

B+C

≤ −

L

M

,

we obtain,

α

A

= f(0, 0) ≤ f(x, y) ≤ f

β + γ

B + C

,

β + γ

B + C

≤

β + γ

B + C

,

for all x, y ∈

α

A

,

β+γ

B+C

.

(iv) The condition

γ

C

=

β

B

<

α

A

is equivalent to M = 0 and L < 0, which in turn imply

that N < 0. Thus, in this case the function f is decreasing in both variables for

all values of x and y and

β

B

≤ f

α

A

,

α

A

≤ f(x, y) ≤ f(0, 0) =

α

A

.

Here we used the fact that under the condition

γ

C

=

β

B

<

α

A

the function f(u, u) is decreasing and consequently

f(u, u) ≥

β + γ

B + C

=

β

B

.

(v) The condition

α

A

>

β

B

>

γ

C

is equivalent to M > 0 and L < 0, which imply that

N < 0. Thus, in this case the function f is decreasing in y, for every y. In addition,

this function is decreasing in x for y < −

L

M

. Thus assuming

α

A

≤ −

L

M

, we obtain

0 ≤ f(x, y) ≤ f(0, 0) =

α

A

≤ −

L

M

,

for all x, y ∈

0, −

L

M

.

(vi) The condition

α

A

>

γ

C

>

β

B

is equivalent to M < 0, L < 0, and N < 0. Thus, in

this case the function f is decreasing in x, for every x. In addition, this function

is decreasing in y for x <

N

M

. Thus assuming

α

A

≤

N

M

, we obtain

0 ≤ f(x, y) ≤ f(0, 0) =

α

A

,

for all x, y ∈

0,

α

A

.

188 Chapter 11. The (3, 3)-Type Equation x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

(vii) The condition

α

A

=

β

B

>

γ

C

is equivalent to M > 0 and L = 0, which in turn imply

that N < 0. Thus, in this case the function f is increasing in x and decreasing in

y for all values of x and y. Using this we obtain,

0 ≤ f(x, y) ≤ f

α

A

, 0

=

α

A

,

for all x, y ∈

0,

α

A

.

(viii) The condition

β

B

>

α

A

>

γ

C

is equivalent to M > 0, L > 0, and N < 0. Thus, in

this case the function f is increasing in x and decreasing in y for all values of x

and y. Using this we obtain,

0 ≤ f(x, y) < f

β

B

, 0

=

β

B

,

for all x, y ∈

0,

β

B

.

(ix) The condition

α

A

=

β

B

<

γ

C

is equivalent to M < 0 and L = 0, which in turn imply

that N > 0. Thus, in this case the function f is decreasing in x and increasing in

y for all values of x and y. Using this we obtain,

0 ≤ f(x, y) ≤ f

0,

γ

C

=

γ

C

,

for all x, y ∈

0,

γ

C

.

(x) The condition

β

B

<

α

A

≤

γ

C

is equivalent to M < 0, L < 0, and N ≥ 0. Thus, in

this case the function f is increasing in x and decreasing in y for all values of x

and y. Using this we obtain,

0 ≤ f(x, y) < f

0,

γ

C

≤

γ

C

,

for all x, y ∈

0,

γ

C

**. Here we use the fact that the function f(0, v) is increasing in
**

v when N > 0 and so

f(0, v) ≤

γ

C

= lim

v→∞

f(0, v),

for all v.

2

The next table summarizes more complicated invariant intervals with the signs of

the partial derivatives f

x

and f

y

.

11.3. Convergence Results 189

Case Invariant intervals Signs of derivatives

1

[0,

N

M

] if

αM+(β+γ)N

AM+(B+C)N

<

N

M

[

N

M

, K

1

] if

αM+(β+γ)N

AM+(B+C)N

>

N

M

f

x

> 0

f

y

> 0 if x <

N

M

; f

y

< 0 if x >

N

M

2

[0,

β−A+

√

(β−A)

2

+4Bα

2B

]

f

x

> 0

f

y

< 0

3

[0,

β+γ−A+

√

(β+γ−A)

2

+4α(B+C)

2(B+C)

]

f

x

> 0

f

y

> 0

4

[0, −

L

M

] if

αM−(β+γ)L

AM−(B+C)L

< −

L

M

[−

L

M

, K

2

] if

βMK+αM−γL

BMK+AM−CL

> −

L

M

f

x

> 0 if y < −

L

M

; f

x

< 0 if y > −

L

M

f

y

> 0

5 [0,

β

B

]

f

x

> 0

f

y

< 0

6 [0,

γ

C

]

f

x

< 0

f

y

> 0

7

[

αM−L(β+γ)

AM−L(B+C)

, −

L

M

] if

αM−L(β+γ)

AM−L(B+C)

< −

L

M

[−

L

M

, K

3

] if

αM−βL+γMK

AM−BL+CMK

> −

L

M

f

x

> 0 if y > −

L

M

; f

x

< 0 if y < −

L

M

f

y

< 0

8 [0,

α

A

]

f

x

< 0

f

y

< 0

9

[

αM+(β+γ)N

AM+(B+C)N

,

N

M

] if

αM+(β+γ)N

AM+(B+C)N

<

N

M

[

N

M

, K

4

] if

αM+βK+γNM

AM+BK+CNM

>

N

M

f

x

< 0

f

y

> 0 if x >

N

M

; f

y

< 0 if x <

N

M

where

K

1

=

(β −A)M −CN +

((β −A)M −NC)

2

+ 4BM(αM + γN)

2BM

,

K

2

=

(A −γ)M −BL +

((A −γ)M −BL)

2

+ 4CM(αM −βL)

−2CM

,

K

3

=

(β −A)M + LC +

((β −A)M + LC)

2

+ 4BM(αM −γL)

2BM

,

K

4

=

(γ −A)M −BN +

((γ −A)M −BN)

2

+ 4BM(αM + βN)

2CM

.

11.3 Convergence Results

The following result is a consequence of Lemma 11.2.1 and Theorems 1.4.5-1.4.8.

Theorem 11.3.1 Let {x

n

} be a solution of Eq(11.1). Then in each of the following

cases

lim

n→∞

x

n

= x.

190 Chapter 11. The (3, 3)-Type Equation x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

(i)

γ

C

=

β

B

>

α

A

and x

−1

, x

0

∈

¸

α

A

,

β

B

¸

;

(ii)

β

B

>

γ

C

>

α

A

,

γ

C

≤

γA −αC

βC −γB

, and x

−1

, x

0

∈

¸

α

A

,

γ

C

;

(iii)

γ

C

>

β

B

>

α

A

,

β + γ

B + C

≤

αB −βA

βC −γB

, and x

−1

, x

0

∈

¸

α

A

,

β + γ

B + C

¸

;

(iv)

γ

C

=

β

B

<

α

A

and x

−1

, x

0

∈

¸

β

B

,

α

A

¸

;

(v)

γA −αC

βC −γB

≥

α

A

>

β

B

>

γ

C

and x

−1

, x

0

∈

¸

0,

γA −αC

βC −γB

¸

;

(vi)

β

B

<

γ

C

<

α

A

<

γA −αC

βC −γB

and x

−1

, x

0

∈

¸

0,

α

A

;

(vii) At least one of the following three conditions is not satisﬁed and x

−1

, x

0

∈

0,

α

A

:

β > γ + A,

B < C,

and

(C −B)[(C −B)(β −γ −A)

2

−4B(αB + γ(β −γ −A))] > 0,

or

α

A

=

β

B

>

γ

C

;

(viii) At least one of the following three conditions is not satisﬁed and x

−1

, x

0

∈

0,

β

B

:

β > γ + A,

B < C,

and

(C −B)[(C −B)(β −γ −A)

2

−4B(αB + γ(β −γ −A))] > 0,

or

β

B

>

α

A

≥

γ

C

;

11.3. Convergence Results 191

(ix) Condition (11.3) is not satisﬁed,

α

A

=

β

B

<

γ

C

and x

−1

, x

0

∈

¸

0,

γ

C

;

(x) Condition (11.3) is not satisﬁed,

β

B

<

α

A

≤

γ

C

and x

−1

, x

0

∈

¸

0,

γ

C

.

Proof. The proofs of statements (i-iii) follow by applying Lemma 11.2.1 (i-iii) and

Theorem 1.4.8.

The proofs of statements (iv-vi) follow by applying Lemma 11.2.1 (iv-vi) and Theo-

rem 1.4.7.

The proofs of statements (vii) and (viii) follow by applying Lemma 11.2.1 (vii) and

(viii) respectively, Theorem 1.4.5, and by observing that the only solution of the system

of equations

m = f(m, M), M = f(M, m);

that is,

m =

α + βm + γM

A + Bm + CM

, M =

α + βM + γm

A + BM + Cm

is m = M.

The proofs of statements (ix) and (x) follow by applying Lemma 11.2.1 (ix) and (x)

respectively, Theorem 1.4.6, and by observing that Eq(11.1) does not possess a prime

period-two solution.

2

11.3.1 Global Stability

Theorem 1.4.2 and linearized stability imply the following global stability result:

Theorem 11.3.2 Assume that

γ

C

< min

β

B

,

α

A

¸

.

Then the equilibrium x of Eq(11.1) is globally asymptotically stable.

By applying Theorem 1.4.3 to Eq(11.1) we obtain the following global asymptotic

result.

192 Chapter 11. The (3, 3)-Type Equation x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

Theorem 11.3.3 Assume that

B ≤ C, γB > βC, αB > βA, and γA > αC.

Then the equilibrium x of Eq(11.1) is globally asymptotically stable.

The following global stability result is a consequence of linearized stability and the

Trichotomy Theorem 1.4.4.

Theorem 11.3.4 (a) Assume that

αC ≥ γA, βA ≥ αB, and 3γB ≥ βC ≥ γB.

Then the equilibrium x of Eq(11.1) is globally asymptotically stable.

(b) Assume that

αB ≥ βA, γA ≥ αC, and 3βC ≥ γB ≥ βC.

Then the equilibrium x of Eq(11.1) is globally asymptotically stable.

11.4 Open Problems and Conjectures

Conjecture 11.4.1 Assume

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞).

Show that every positive solution of Eq(11.1) is bounded.

Conjecture 11.4.2 Assume

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞)

and that Eq(11.1) has no positive prime period-two solution. Show that every positive

solution of Eq(11.1) converges to the positive equilibrium.

Conjecture 11.4.3 Assume

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞)

and that Eq(11.1) has a positive prime period-two solution. Show that the positive equi-

librium of Eq(11.1) is a saddle point and the period-two solution is locally asymptotically

stable.

11.4. Open Problems and Conjectures 193

Conjecture 11.4.4 Assume

α, β, γ, A, B, C ∈ (0, ∞).

Show that Eq(11.1) cannot have a prime period-k solution for any k ≥ 3.

Open Problem 11.4.1 Assume {α

n

}

∞

n=0

, {β

n

}

∞

n=0

, {γ

n

}

∞

n=0

, {A

n

}

∞

n=0

, {B

n

}

∞

n=0

, {C

n

}

∞

n=0

are convergent sequences of nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits. Investigate the

asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of the diﬀerence

equation

x

n+1

=

α

n

+ β

n

x

n

+ γ

n

x

n−1

A

n

+ B

n

x

n

+ C

n

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (11.5)

Open Problem 11.4.2 Assume that the parameters in Eq(11.5) are period-two se-

quences of positive real numbers. Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic

nature of all positive solutions of Eq(11.5).

Open Problem 11.4.3 Assume that

a, A, a

i

, A

i

∈ [0, ∞) for i = 0, 1, . . . , k. (11.6)

Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions so that every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

a + a

0

x

n

+ . . . + a

k

x

n−k

A + A

0

x

n

+ . . . + A

k

x

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . . . (11.7)

has a ﬁnite limit.

Open Problem 11.4.4 Assume that (11.6) holds. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient con-

ditions so that every positive solution of Eq(11.7) converges to a period-two solution.

Open Problem 11.4.5 Assume that (11.6) holds. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient con-

ditions so that every positive solution of Eq(11.7) is periodic with period-k, k ≥ 2. In

particular, investigate the cases where 2 ≤ k ≤ 8.

194 Chapter 11. The (3, 3)-Type Equation x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

Open Problem 11.4.6 Let

α, β, γ, δ ∈ [0, ∞) with γ + δ > 0.

Investigate the boundedness character, the periodic nature, and the asymptotic behavior

of all positive solutions of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

αx

n

+ βx

n−1

x

n−2

γx

n

x

n−1

+ δx

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

(See [8] and [61].)

Conjecture 11.4.5 Let k ≥ 2 be a positive integer. Show that every positive solution

of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

x

n

+ . . . + x

n−k

+ x

n−k−1

x

n−k−2

x

n

x

n−1

+ x

n−2

+ . . . + x

n−k−2

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to 1. Extend and generalize.

(See [8], [47], and [60].)

Conjecture 11.4.6 Let

a

ij

∈ (0, ∞) for i, j ∈ {1, 2, 3}.

Show that every positive solution of the system

x

n+1

=

a

11

x

n

+

a

12

y

n

+

a

13

z

n

y

n+1

=

a

21

x

n

+

a

22

y

n

+

a

23

z

n

z

n+1

=

a

31

x

n

+

a

32

y

n

+

a

33

z

n

, n = 0, 1, . . . (11.8)

converges to a period-two solution. Extend to equations with real parameters.

(See [32] for the two dimensional case.)

Conjecture 11.4.7 Assume that

p, q ∈ [0, ∞).

11.4. Open Problems and Conjectures 195

(a) Show that every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

px

n−1

+ x

n−2

q + x

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-two solution if and only if

p = 1 + q.

(b) Show that when

p < 1 + q

every positive solution has a ﬁnite limit.

(c) Show that when

p > 1 + q

the equation possesses positive unbounded solutions.

(See [62].)

Conjecture 11.4.8 Assume that

p ∈ (0, ∞).

(a) Show that every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

x

n−1

x

n−1

+ px

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-two solution if

p ≥ 1.

(b) Show that when

p < 1

the positive equilibrium x =

1

1+p

is globally asymptotically stable.

Conjecture 11.4.9 Assume that

p, q ∈ [0, ∞).

196 Chapter 11. The (3, 3)-Type Equation x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

(a) Show that every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

x

n−1

+ p

x

n−2

+ q

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-two solution if and only if

q = 1.

(b) Show that when

q > 1

the positive equilibrium of the equation is globally asymptotically stable.

(c) Show that when

q < 1

the equation possesses positive unbounded solutions.

(See [62].)

Conjecture 11.4.10 Show that every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

x

n

+ x

n−2

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-four solution.

(See [62].)

Conjecture 11.4.11 Show that the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

p + x

n−2

x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . .

has the following trichotomy character:

(i) When p > 1 every positive solution converges to the positive equilibrium.

(ii) When p = 1 every positive solution converges to a period-ﬁve solution.

(iii) When p < 1 there exist positive unbounded solutions.

(See [62].)

11.4. Open Problems and Conjectures 197

Conjecture 11.4.12 Show that every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n

x

n−1

+ x

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-six solution of the form

. . . , φ, ψ,

ψ

φ

,

1

φ

,

1

ψ

,

φ

ψ

, . . .

where

φ, ψ ∈ (0, ∞).

(See [62].)

Open Problem 11.4.7 Consider the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

α + βx

n

+ γx

n−1

+ δx

n−2

A + Bx

n

+ Dx

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . . (11.9)

with nonnegative parameters and nonnegative initial conditions such that B+D > 0 and

A + Bx

n

+ Dx

n−2

> 0 for n ≥ 0.

Then one can show that Eq(11.9) has prime period-two solutions if and only if

γ = β + δ + A. (11.10)

(a) In addition to (11.10), what other conditions are needed so that every positive

solution of Eq(11.9) converges to a period-two solution?

(b) Assume

γ < β + δ + A.

What other conditions are needed so that every positive solution of Eq(11.9) con-

verges to the positive equilibrium?

(c) Assume

γ > β + δ + A.

What other conditions are needed so that Eq(11.9) possesses unbounded solutions?

(See [6].)

198 Chapter 11. The (3, 3)-Type Equation x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

Conjecture 11.4.13 Show that every positive solution of each of the two equations

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n−1

+ x

n−2

x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . .

and

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n−1

+ x

n−2

x

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-two solution.

(See [6].)

Conjecture 11.4.14 Show that every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n−1

1 + x

n

+ x

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-two solution.

(See [6].)

Conjecture 11.4.15 Show that every positive solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

x

n−2

x

n−1

+ x

n−2

+ x

n−3

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-three solution.

Conjecture 11.4.16 Consider the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

p + qx

n

+ rx

n−2

x

n−1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

where

p ∈ [0, ∞) and q, r ∈ (0, ∞).

(a) Show that when

q = r

every positive solution converges to a period-four solution.

(b) Show that when

q > r

every positive solution converges to the positive equilibrium.

11.4. Open Problems and Conjectures 199

(c) Show that when

q < r

the equation possesses positive unbounded solutions.

(See [62].)

Open Problem 11.4.8 Determine whether every positive solution of each of the fol-

lowing equations converges to a periodic solution of the corresponding equation:

(a)

x

n+1

=

x

n−2

+ x

n−3

x

n

, n = 0, 1, . . .

(b)

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n−3

1 + x

n

+ x

n−3

, n = 0, 1, . . .

(c)

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n

+ x

n−3

x

n−2

, n = 0, 1, . . .

(d)

x

n+1

=

x

n−1

x

n

+ x

n−2

+ x

n−3

, n = 0, 1, . . . .

Open Problem 11.4.9 Assume that k is a positive integer and that

A, B

0

, B

1

, . . . B

k

∈ [0, ∞) with

k

¸

i=0

B

i

> 0.

Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on the parameters A and B

0

, B

1

, . . . B

k

so

that every positive solution of the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

=

x

n−k

A + B

0

x

n

+ . . . + B

k

x

n−k

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a period-(k + 1) solution of this equation.

(See [6].)

200 Chapter 11. The (3, 3)-Type Equation x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

Open Problem 11.4.10 Assume that k is a positive integer. Then we can easily see

that every nonnegative solution of the equation

x

n+1

=

x

n−k

1 + x

n

+ . . . + x

n−k+1

, n = 0, 1, . . . (11.11)

converges to a period-(k + 1) solution of the form

. . . , 0, 0, ..., 0

. .. .

k−terms

, φ, . . . (11.12)

with φ ≥ 0.

(a) Does Eq(11.11) possess a positive solution which converges to zero?

(b) Determine, in terms of the nonnegative initial conditions x

−k

, . . . , x

0

, the value of

φ in (11.12) which corresponds to the nonnegative solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−k

of Eq(11.11).

(c) Determine the set of all nonnegative initial conditions x

−k

, . . . , x

0

for which the

corresponding solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−k

of Eq(11.11) converges to a period-(k+1) solution

of the form (11.12) with a given φ ≥ 0 ?

(See [6].)

Conjecture 11.4.17 Let k be a positive integer. Show that every positive solution of

x

n+1

=

1 + x

n

+ x

n−k

x

n−k+1

, n = 0, 1, . . .

converges to a periodic solution of period 2k.

Appendix A

Global Attractivity for Higher

Order Equations

In this appendix we present some global attractivity results for higher order diﬀerence

equations which are analogous to Theorems 1.4.5-1.4.8. We state the results for third

order equations from which higher order extensions will become clear.

Let I be some interval of real numbers and let

f : I ×I ×I →I

be a continuously diﬀerentiable function.

Then for every set of initial conditions x

0

, x

−1

, x

−2

∈ I, the diﬀerence equation

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

, x

n−2

), n = 0, 1, . . . (A.1)

has a unique solution {x

n

}

∞

n=−2

.

As we have seen in previous chapters, very often a good strategy for obtaining global

attractivity results for Eq(A.1) is to work in the regions where the function f(x, y, z) is

monotonic in its arguments. In this regard there are eight possible scenarios depending

on whether f(x, y, z) is non decreasing in all three arguments, or non increasing in two

arguments and non decreasing in the third, or non increasing in one and non decreasing

in the other two, or non decreasing in all three.

Theorem A.0.1 Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b]

3

→[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y, z) is non-decreasing in each of its arguments;

(b) The equation

f(x, x, x) = x,

has a unique solution in the interval [a, b].

Then Eq(A.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(A.1)

converges to x.

201

202 Appendix

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f(M

i−1

, M

i−1

, M

i−1

) and m

i

= f(m

i−1

, m

i−1

, m

i−1

).

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0,

m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . ≤ M

i

≤ . . . ≤ M

1

≤ M

0

,

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 3i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

Then

M ≥ limsup

i→∞

x

i

≥ liminf

i→∞

x

i

≥ m (A.2)

and by the continuity of f,

m = f(m, m, m) and M = f(M, M, M).

In view of (b),

m = M = x,

from which the result follows. 2

Theorem A.0.2 Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b]

3

→[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y, z) is non-decreasing in x and y ∈ [a, b] for each z ∈ [a, b], and is non-

increasing in z ∈ [a, b] for each x and y ∈ [a, b];

(b) If (m, M) ∈ [a, b] ×[a, b] is a solution of the system

m = f(m, m, M) and M = f(M, M, m)

then

m = M.

Then Eq(A.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(A.1) converges

to x.

Appendix 203

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for each i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f(M

i−1

, M

i−1

, m

i−1

)

and

m

i

= f(m

i−1

, m

i−1

, M

i−1

).

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0

a = m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . M

i

≤ . . . M

1

≤ M

0

= b.

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 3i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

Then (A.2) holds and by the continuity of f,

m = f(m, m, M) and M = f(M, M, m).

Therefore in view of (b)

m = M

from which the result follows. 2

Theorem A.0.3 Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b]

3

→[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y, z) is non-decreasing in x and z in [a, b] for each z ∈ [a, b], and is non-

increasing in y ∈ [a, b] for each x and z in [a, b];

(b) If (m, M) ∈ [a, b] ×[a, b] is a solution of the system

M = f(M, m, M) and m = f(m, M, m)

then

m = M.

Then Eq(A.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(A.1) converges

to x.

204 Appendix

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for each i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f (M

i−1

, m

i−1

, M

i−1

)

and

m

i

= f (m

i−1

, M

i−1

, m

i−1

) .

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0

a = m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . M

i

≤ . . . M

1

≤ M

0

= b.

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 3i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

Then (A.2) holds and by the continuity of f,

m = f (m, m, M) and M = f (M, M, m) .

Therefore in view of (b)

m = M

from which the results follows. 2

Theorem A.0.4 Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b]

3

→[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y, z) is non-increasing in x for each y and z ∈ [a, b] and is non-decreasing

in y and z for each x, y ∈ [a, b];

(b) If (m, M) ∈ [a, b] ×[a, b] is a solution of the system

M = f(m, M, M) and m = f(M, m, m)

then

m = M.

Then Eq(A.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(A.1) converges

to x.

Appendix 205

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for each i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f(m

i−1

, M

i−1

, M

i−1

)

and

m

i

= f(M

i−1

, m

i−1

, m

i−1

).

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0

m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . M

i

≤ . . . M

1

≤ M

0

= b

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 3i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

Then (A.2) holds and by the continuity of f,

M = f(m, M, M) and m = f(M, m, m).

Therefore in view of (b)

m = M

from which the results follows. 2

Theorem A.0.5 Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b]

3

→[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y, z) is non-decreasing in x for each y and z ∈ [a, b] and is non-increasing

in y and z for each x ∈ [a, b];

(b) If (m, M) ∈ [a, b] ×[a, b] is a solution of the system

M = f(M, m, m) and m = f(m, M, M)

then

m = M.

Then Eq(A.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(A.1) converges

to x.

206 Appendix

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for each i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f(M

i−1

, m

i−1

, m

i−1

)

and

m

i

= f(m

i−1

, M

i−1

, M

i−1

).

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0

m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . M

i

≤ . . . M

1

≤ M

0

= b

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 3i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

Then (A.2) holds and by the continuity of f,

M = f(M, m, m) and m = f(m, M, M).

Therefore in view of (b)

m = M

from which the results follows. 2

Theorem A.0.6 Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b]

3

→[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y, z) is non-decreasing in y for each x and z ∈ [a, b] and is non-increasing

in x and z for each y ∈ [a, b];

(b) If (m, M) ∈ [a, b] ×[a, b] is a solution of the system

M = f(m, M, m) and m = f(M, m, M)

then

m = M.

Then Eq(A.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(A.1) converges

to x.

Appendix 207

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for each i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f(m

i−1

, M

i−1

, m

i−1

)

and

m

i

= f(M

i−1

, m

i−1

, M

i−1

).

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0

m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . M

i

≤ . . . M

1

≤ M

0

= b

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 3i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

Then (A.2) holds and by the continuity of f,

M = f(m, M, m) and m = f(M, m, M).

Therefore in view of (b)

m = M

from which the results follows. 2

Theorem A.0.7 Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b]

3

→[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y, z) is non-decreasing in z for each x and y in [a, b] and is non-increasing

in x and y for each z ∈ [a, b];

(b) If (m, M) ∈ [a, b] ×[a, b] is a solution of the system

M = f(m, m, M) and m = f(M, M, m)

then

m = M.

Then Eq(A.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(A.1) converges

to x.

208 Appendix

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for each i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f(m

i−1

, m

i−1

, M

i−1

)

and

m

i

= f(M

i−1

, M

i−1

, m

i−1

).

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0

m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . M

i

≤ . . . M

1

≤ M

0

= b

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 3i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

Then (A.2) holds and by the continuity of f,

M = f(m, m, M) and m = f(M, M, m).

Therefore in view of (b)

m = M

from which the results follows. 2

Theorem A.0.8 Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b]

3

→[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(x, y, z) is non-increasing in all three variables x, y, z in [a, b];

(b) If (m, M) ∈ [a, b] ×[a, b] is a solution of the system

M = f(m, m, m) and m = f(M, M, M)

then

m = M.

Then Eq(A.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(A.1) converges

to x.

Appendix 209

Proof. Set

m

0

= a and M

0

= b

and for each i = 1, 2, . . . set

M

i

= f(m

i−1

, m

i−1

, m

i−1

)

and

m

i

= f(M

i−1

, M

i−1

, M

i−1

).

Now observe that for each i ≥ 0

m

0

≤ m

1

≤ . . . ≤ m

i

≤ . . . M

i

≤ . . . M

1

≤ M

0

= b

and

m

i

≤ x

k

≤ M

i

for k ≥ 3i + 1.

Set

m = lim

i→∞

m

i

and M = lim

i→∞

M

i

.

Then (A.2) holds and by the continuity of f,

M = f(m, m, m) and m = f(M, M, M).

Therefore in view of (b)

m = M

from which the results follows. 2

The above theorems can be easily extended to the general diﬀerence equation of order

p

x

n+1

= f(x

n

, x

n−1

, . . . , x

n−p+1

), n = 0, 1, . . . (A.3)

where

f : I

p

→I

is a continuous function. In this case, there are 2

p

possibilities for the function f to

be non decreasing in some arguments and non increasing in the remaining arguments.

This gives 2

p

results of the type found in Theorems A.0.1-A.0.8. Let us formulate one

of these results.

Theorem A.0.9 Let [a, b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that

f : [a, b]

p

→[a, b]

is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a) f(u

1

, u

2

, . . . , u

p

) is non decreasing in the second and the third variables u

2

and

u

3

and is non increasing in all other variables.

210 Appendix

(b) If (m, M) ∈ [a, b] ×[a, b] is a solution of the system

M = f(m, M, M, m, . . . , m) and m = f(M, m, m, M, . . . , M)

then

m = M.

Then Eq(A.3) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a, b] and every solution of Eq(A.3) converges

to x.

Bibliography

[1] R. Agarwal, Diﬀerence Equations and Inequalities. Theory, Methods and Applica-

tions, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1992.

[2] L. S. Allen, M. K. Hannigan, and M. J. Strauss, Mathematical analysis of a model

for a plant-herbivore system, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 55 (1993), 847-864.

[3] L. S. Allen, M. J. Strauss, M. J. Thorvilson, and W. N. Lipe, A Preliminary math-

ematical model of the Apple Twig Borer (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Grapes on

the Texas High Plains Ecological Modelling 58 (1991), 369-382.

[4] K.T. Alligood, T. Sauer and J.A. Yorke , CHAOS An Introduction to Dynamical

Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo, 1997.

[5] American Mathemathical Monthly, Problem 10670, 106(1999), 967-968.

[6] A. M. Amleh and G. Ladas, Convergence to periodic solutions, J. Diﬀer. Equations

Appl. 7(2001), (to appear).

[7] A. M. Amleh, D. A. Georgiou, E. A. Grove, and G. Ladas, On the recursive sequence

x

n+1

= α +

x

n−1

x

n

, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 233(1999), 790-798.

[8] A. M. Amleh, N. Kruse, and G. Ladas, On a class of diﬀerence equations with

strong negative feedback, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 5(6)(1999), 497-515.

[9] A. M. Amleh, G. Ladas, and J. T. Hoag, Boundedness of solutions of a plant-

herbivore system, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Diﬀerence

Equations and Applications, September 1-5, 1977, Taipei, Taiwan, Gordon and

Breach Science Publishers, 1999, 1-5.

[10] R. Abu-Saris, On the periodicity of the diﬀerence equation x

n+1

= α|x

n

| + βx

n−1

,

J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 5(1)(1999), 57-69.

[11] E. Barbeau, B. Gelbard, and S. Tanny, Periodicities of solutions of the generalized

Lyness recursion, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 1(3)(1995), 291-306.

[12] B. Beckermann and J. Wimp, Some dynamically trivial mappings with applications

to the improvement of simple iteration, Comput. Math. Appl. 24(1998), 89-97.

211

212 BIBLIOGRAPHY

[13] E. Camouzis, R. DeVault, and G. Ladas, On the recursive sequence x

n+1

= −1 +

x

n−1

x

n

, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 7(2001), (to appear).

[14] K. L. Cooke, D. F. Calef, and E. V. Level, Stability or chaos in discrete epidemic

models, Nonlinear Systems and Applications, V. Lakshmikantham, editor, 73-93,

Academic Press, New York, 1977.

[15] K. Cunningham, M. R. S. Kulenovi´c, G. Ladas, and S. Valicenti, On the recursive

Sequence x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

, Proceedings of WCNA2000, Catania, Italy, July 19-26,

2000, Nonlin. Anal. TMA,(to appear).

[16] R. Devaney, A First Course in Chaotic Dynamical Systems: Theory and Experi-

ment, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1992.

[17] R. Devaney, A Piecewise linear model for the zones of instability of an area-

preserving map, Physica D 10(1984), 387-393.

[18] R. DeVault, L. Galminas, E. J. Janowski and G. Ladas, On the recursive sequence

x

n+1

=

A

x

n

+

B

x

n−1

, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 6(1)(2000), 121-125.

[19] R. DeVault, G. Ladas, and S. W. Schultz, On the Recursive Sequence x

n+1

=

A

x

n

+

1

x

n−2

, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 126 (1998), 3257-3261.

[20] R. DeVault, G. Ladas, and S. W. Schultz, On the recursive sequence x

n+1

=

A

x

n

x

n−1

+

1

x

n−3

x

n−4

, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 6(4)(2000), 481-483.

[21] S. Elaydi, An Introduction to Diﬀerence Equations, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New

York, 1999.

[22] S. Elaydi, Discrete Chaos, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000.

[23] H. El-Metwally, E. A. Grove, and G. Ladas, A global convergence result with ap-

plications to periodic solutions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 245 (2000), 161-170.

[24] H. El-Metwally, E. A. Grove, G. Ladas, R. Levins, and M. Radin, On the diﬀerence

equation x

n+1

= α + βx

n−1

e

−x

n

, Proceedings of WCNA2000, Catania, Italy, July

19-26, 2000, (to appear).

[25] H. El-Metwally, E. A. Grove, G. Ladas, and H. D. Voulov, On the global attractivity

and the periodic character of some diﬀerence equations, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl.

7(2001), (to appear).

[26] J. Feuer, E. J. Janowski, and G. Ladas, Lyness-type equations in the third quadrant,

Nonlinear Anal. 30(1997), 1183-1189.

[27] J. E. Franke, J. T. Hoag, and G. Ladas, Global attractivity and convergence to a

two-cycle in a diﬀerence equation, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 5(2)(1999), 203-209.

BIBLIOGRAPHY 213

[28] C. H. Gibbons, M. R. S. Kulenovi´c, and G. Ladas, On the recursive sequence

x

n+1

=

α+βx

n−1

γ+x

n

, Math. Sci. Res. Hot-Line, 4(2)(2000), 1-11.

[29] C. H. Gibbons, M. R. S. Kulenovi´c, G. Ladas, and H. D. Voulov, On the trichotomy

character of x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+x

n

, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 7(2001) (to appear).

[30] E. A. Grove, E. J. Janowski, C. M. Kent, and G. Ladas, On the rational recursive

sequence x

n+1

= (αx

n

+β)/((γx

n

+C)x

n−1

), Comm. Appl. Nonlinear Anal. 1(1994),

61-72.

[31] E. A. Grove, C. M. Kent, R. Levins, G. Ladas, and S. Valicenti, Global stability

in some population models , Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference

on Diﬀerence Equations and Applications, August 27-31, 1998, Poznan, Poland,

Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 2000, 149-176.

[32] E. A. Grove, G. Ladas, L.C. McGrath, and C. T. Teixeira, Existence and behavior

of solutions of a rational system, Comm. Appl. Nonlinear Anal. 8(2001), 1-25.

[33] J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and

Bifurcations of Vector Fields, Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg,

Tokyo, 1983.

[34] J. Hale and H. Kocak, Dynamics and Bifurcations, Springer-Verlag, New York,

Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo, 1991.

[35] M. L. J. Hautus and T.S. Bolis, Solution to Problem E2721, Amer. Math. Monthly,

86(1979), 865-866.

[36] J. H. Jaroma , On the global asymptotic stability of x

n+1

=

a+bx

n

A+x

n−1

, Proceedings of

the First International Conference on Diﬀerence Equations and Applications, May

25-28, 1994, San Antonio, Texas, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1995,

281-294.

[37] G. Karakostas, A discrete semi-ﬂow in the space of sequences and study of con-

vergence of sequences deﬁned by diﬀerence equations, M. E. Greek Math. Society,

(1989), 66-74.

[38] G. Karakostas, Convergence of a diﬀerence equation via the full limiting sequences

method, Diﬀerential Equations Dynam. Systems 1(1993), 289-294.

[39] G. Karakostas, Asymptotic 2-periodic diﬀerence equations with diagonally self-

invertible responses, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 6(3)(2000), 329-335.

[40] G. Karakostas, Ch. G. Philos, and Y. G. Sﬁcas, The dynamics of some discrete

population models, Nonlinear Anal. 17(1991), 1069-1084.

214 BIBLIOGRAPHY

[41] W. G. Kelley and A. C. Peterson, Diﬀerence Equations, Academic Press, New York,

1991.

[42] V. L. Kocic and G. Ladas, Global Behavior of Nonlinear Diﬀerence Equations of

Higher Order with Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland,

1993.

[43] V. L. Kocic, G. Ladas, and I. W. Rodrigues, On the rational recursive sequences,

J. Math. Anal. Appl. 173 (1993), 127-157.

[44] V. L. Kocic, G. Ladas, G. Tzanetopoulos, and E. Thomas, On the stability of Ly-

ness’ equation, Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems 1(1995),

245-254.

[45] W. A. Kosmala, M. R. S. Kulenovi´c, G. Ladas, and C. T. Teixeira, On the recursive

sequence y

n+1

=

p+y

n−1

qy

n

+y

n−1

, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 251(2000), 571-586.

[46] U. Krause, Stability trichotomy, path stability, and relative stability for positive

nonlinear diﬀerence equations of higher order, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 1(4)

(1995), 323-346.

[47] N. Kruse and T. Nesemann, Global asymptotic stability for discrete dynamical

systems, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 235 (1999), 151-158.

[48] Y. K. Kuang and J. M. Cushing, Global stability in a nonlinear diﬀerence-delay

equation model of ﬂour beetle population growth, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl.

2(1)(1996), 31-37.

[49] M. R. S. Kulenovi´c, Invariants and related Liapunov functions for diﬀerence equa-

tions, Appl. Math. Lett. 13 (7)(2000), 1-8.

[50] M. R. S. Kulenovi´c and G. Ladas, Open problems and conjectures: On period two

solutions of x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 6(5) (2000), 641-646.

[51] M. R. S. Kulenovi´c, G. Ladas, L. F. Martins, and I. W. Rodrigues, On the dynamics

of x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

facts and conjectures, Comput. Math. Appl., (to appear).

[52] M. R. S. Kulenovi´c, G. Ladas, and N. R. Prokup, On the recursive sequence x

n+1

=

αx

n

+βx

n−1

1+x

n

, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 6(5) (2000), 563-576.

[53] M. R. S. Kulenovi´c, G. Ladas, and N. R. Prokup, On a rational diﬀerence equation,

Comput. Math. Appl. 41(2001), 671-678.

[54] M. R. S. Kulenovi´c, G. Ladas, and W. S. Sizer, On the recursive sequence x

n+1

=

αx

n

+βx

n−1

γx

n

+Cx

n−1

, Math. Sci. Res. Hot-Line 2(1998), no.5, 1-16.

BIBLIOGRAPHY 215

[55] S. Kuruklis and G. Ladas, Oscillation and global attractivity in a discrete delay

logistic model, Quart. Appl. Math. 50 (1992), 227-233.

[56] G. Ladas, Invariants for generalized Lyness equations, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl.

1(2)(1995), 209-214.

[57] G. Ladas, Open problems and conjectures, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 1(1)(1995),

95-97.

[58] G. Ladas, Open problems and conjectures, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 1(3)(1995),

317-321.

[59] G. Ladas, Open Problems and Conjectures, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 1(4)(1995),

413-419.

[60] G. Ladas, On the recursive sequence x

n+1

=

k

i=0

A

i

x

n−2i

, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl.

4(3)(1998), 311-313.

[61] G. Ladas, Open problems and conjectures, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 4(5)(1998),

497-499.

[62] G. Ladas, Open problems and conjectures, J. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 7(2001), (to

appear).

[63] M. Martelli, Introduction to Discrete Dynamical Systems and Chaos, John Wiley &

Sons, New York, 1999.

[64] Mathemathics Magazine, Problem 1572, 73(2000), 160-161.

[65] Ch. G. Philos, I. K. Purnaras, and Y. G. Sﬁcas, Global attractivity in a nonlinear

diﬀerence equation, Appl. Math. Comput. 62(1994), 249-258.

[66] E. C. Pielou, An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology, John Wiley & Sons, New

York, 1965.

[67] E. C. Pielou, Population and Community Ecology, Gordon and Breach, New York,

1974.

[68] C. Robinson, Stability, Symbolic Dynamics, and Chaos, CRC Press, Boca Raton,

FL, 1995.

[69] H. Sedaghat, Existence of solutions of certain singular diﬀerence equations, J. Dif-

fer. Equations Appl. 6(5)(2000), 535-561.

[70] H. Sedaghat, Geometric stability conditions for higher order diﬀerence equations,

J. Math. Anal. Appl. 224(1998), 255-272.

216 BIBLIOGRAPHY

[71] W. S. Sizer, Some periodic solutions of the Lyness equation , Proceedings of the

Fifth International Conference on Diﬀerence Equations and Applications, January

3-7, 2000, Temuco, Chile, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 2001, (to appear).

[72] E. C. Zeeman, Geometric unfolding of a diﬀerence equation,

http://www.math.utsa.edu/ecz/gu.html

[73] Y. Zheng, Existence of nonperiodic solutions of the Lyness equation x

n+1

=

α+x

n

x

n−1

,

J. Math. Anal. Appl. 209(1997), 94-102.

[74] Y. Zheng, On periodic cycles of the Lyness equation, Diﬀerential Equations Dynam.

Systems 6(1998), 319-324.

[75] Y. Zheng, Periodic solutions with the same period of the recursion x

n+1

=

α+βx

n

+γx

n−1

A+Bx

n

+Cx

n−1

, Diﬀerential Equations Dynam. Systems 5(1997), 51-58.

Index

basin of attraction of a two cycle, 38

classiﬁcation of equation types, 3

convergence to period-two solutions, 38

Discrete Epidemic Models, 128

equilibrium point, 5, 29

existence of prime period-two solution,

35

existence of solutions, 2

ﬁxed point, 5

Flour Beetle Model, 129

forbidden set, 2, 17

full limiting sequence, 15

full limiting solution, 16

gingerbreadman map, 75

global asymptotic stability of the zero

equilibrium, 9, 31

global attractivity of the positive equi-

librium, 9–14

global attractor, 6

globally asymptotically stable, 6

invariant, 71

invariant interval, 41–42, 184–189

limiting solution, 15

linearized stability analysis, 5, 183

linearized stability theorem, 6

local asymptotic stability of a two cycle,

36

local stability of the positive equilibrium

, 32

local stability of the zero equilibrium, 30

locally asymptotically stable, 6

locally stable, 6

Lyness’ equation, 2, 70

May’s host parasitoid model, 75

negative feedback condition, 9

negative semicycle, 25

nonoscillatory, 25

open problems and conjectures, 43–46,

49–51, 64–68, 72–75, 123–130, 134–

136, 138–139, 163–166, 180–182,

192–200

oscillate about x, 25

oscillate about zero, 25

periodic solution, 7

periodic solutions with the same period,

33

Pielou’s discrete delay logistic model, 2,

66

Pielou’s equation, 57

Plant-herbivore system, 128

population model, 66, 129

positive equilibrium, 9

positive semicycle, 24

prime period p solution, 7

repeller, 6, 7

Riccati diﬀerence equation, 1, 17, 78

Riccati number, 18

saddle point, 7

semicycle analysis, 24–28

signum invariant, 38

sink, 7

217

218 INDEX

source, 6

stability of equilibrium, 5

stability trichotomy, 10

stable manifold, 8

stable manifold theorem in the plane, 7

strictly oscillatory, 25

table of invariant intervals, 42, 189

trichotomy character, 168

type of equation

(1, 1)-type, 47–48

(1, 2)-type, 53–54

(1, 3)-type, 131

(2, 1)-type, 69–70

(2, 2)-type, 77–78

(2, 3)-type, 141

(3, 1)-type, 137

(3, 2)-type, 167

(3, 3)-type, 183

unstable equilibrium, 6

unstable manifold, 8

**DYNAMICS of SECOND ORDER RATIONAL DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS
**

With Open Problems and Conjectures

**DYNAMICS of SECOND ORDER RATIONAL DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS
**

With Open Problems and Conjectures

M. R. S. Kulenovi´ c G. Ladas

**CHAPMAN & HALL/CRC
**

Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C.

M.W. Corporate Blvd. Reprinted material is quoted with permission. including photocopying. ISBN 1-58488-275-1 1.S.com © 2002 by Chapman & Hall/CRC No claim to original U.. Visit the CRC Press Web site at www. for creating new works. Ladas. Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means. G. 2000 N. G. I. Florida 33431. Boca Raton. Kulenovi´ . Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information.E. microﬁlming.) c Dynamics of second order rational difference equations : with open problems and conjectures / M. Direct all inquiries to CRC Press LLC. and sources are indicated.Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kulenovi´. for promotion. and are used only for identiﬁcation and explanation. The consent of CRC Press LLC does not extend to copying for general distribution. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks. c p.S.S. or for resale. Includes bibliographical references and index. Government works International Standard Book Number 1-58488-275-1 Library of Congress Card Number 20010370 Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 Printed on acid-free paper .crcpress. A wide variety of references are listed.S. and recording. without intent to infringe.625—dc21 20010370 This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. without prior permission in writing from the publisher. Title. Speciﬁc permission must be obtained in writing from CRC Press LLC for such copying. electronic or mechanical. Difference equations—Numerical solutions. cm.R. (Mustafa R.R. QA431 . II. but the author and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequences of their use.K84 2001 515′. Ladas. or by any information storage or retrieval system.

. . . . . . . . . 2. . .3 The Case α = β = A = C = 0 : xn+1 = γxn−1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Local Asymptotic Stability of a Two Cycle . . . . . 2. . Semicycles. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 The Riccati Equation . . . . . . . . 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix xi 1 5 5 7 9 9 14 17 24 29 29 30 32 33 35 36 38 41 43 47 47 48 49 49 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. βxn 3. . . . . .1 Deﬁnitions of Stability and Linearized Stability Analysis 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Equilibrium Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . v . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . .4 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 (1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1)-Type Equations 3. . . . . 2. . 2. . . 1.7 Semicycle Analysis . 2. . . . . .2 Stability of the Zero Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . .2 The Case α = γ = A = B = 0 : xn+1 = Cxn−1 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Limiting Solutions . . . . . . .2 The Stable Manifold Theorem in the Plane . . 1.7 Convergence to Period-Two Solutions When C=0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Periodicity. . . .Contents Preface Acknowledgements Introduction and Classiﬁcation of Equation Types 1 Preliminary Results 1. 2. . . . . . . . . . . and Invariant Intervals 2. . . . . .4 Global Attractivity of the Positive Equilibrium .3 Global Asymptotic Stability of the Zero Equilibrium . . . . . 1. . . . .3 Local Stability of the Positive Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. .4 When is Every Solution Periodic with the Same Period? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Local Stability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . Bxn 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Existence of Prime Period-Two Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6. . . . . . . . . 6. . . . 6. . . .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 The Case γ = C = 0 : xn+1 = A+Bxn . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 α 4.7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Semicycle Analysis . . . .3 Global Stability and Boundedness . . . . . . . . . . . .1 The Case p < 1 . . . 82 83 84 87 89 90 90 91 92 93 96 97 100 101 102 103 105 107 . . 57 58 59 60 61 62 62 64 69 69 70 72 72 . 2)-Type Equations 53 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 The Case α = β = A = 0 : xn+1 = 4. . . . . . . . .4 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . .Riccati Equation . . . . . 4. . . . n +γx 6. . . . . .4. .7. . 78 n α+βxn 6. .3 The Case β = γ = A = 0 : xn+1 = Bxn +Cxn−1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. . .6 The Case β = A = 0 : xn+1 = Bxn +Cxn−1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . α+γxn−1 6. . . . . . . . . . A+Bxn 6. . . . .7. .8 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . . .2 The Case p = 1 . . .6 The Case α = β = C = 0 : xn+1 = 4. . . . .5 The Case β = C = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 . . . .7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. A+Bxn γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 Pielou’s Equation .3 Semicycle Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Semicycle Analysis and Global Attractivity When q = 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . n 6. 55 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . .3 The Case p > 1 .2 The Case γ = A = B = 0 : xn+1 = α+βxn . . . . . . . . . . . . .7. . . . 6. . 6.7. . .4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5. . . . . . . .6. . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 6. . . . . . . 6 (2. . . . . .Lyness’ Equation Cxn−1 n−1 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Global Attractivity When q < 1 . . . . . . . . . .vi Contents 4 (1. . . . .5 The Case α = γ = A = 0 : xn+1 = 4. . . . . Bx 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. . . . 5 (2. . . .1 Invariant Intervals .2 The Case β = γ = C = 0 : xn+1 = A+Bxn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1)-Type Equations 5.1 Existence and Local Stability of Period-Two Cycles . .4. . . . . . .5. . . . . . . . . . . .3 The Case q > 1 .3 The Case β = A = C = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. . . . . . .6. 6. .7 The Case α = C = 0 : xn+1 = βxA+Bxn−1 . . . . . . . . . . .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Case γ = A = 0 : xn+1 = Bxα+βxn n +Cxn−1 6. . . . . . . . . . . 53 α 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. .2 Semicycle Analysis of Solutions When q ≤ 1 . . . . . . .7. . . .4 Global Behavior of Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . .4. . βxn A+Cxn−1 βxn Bxn +Cxn−1 γxn−1 . 77 α+βx 6. . . 6. .4 The Case α = γ = B = 0 : xn+1 = 4. . . . . . . . . . . .3 The Case γ = B = 0 : xn+1 = A+Cxn−1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. . . 6. . . 6. . . . . .1 Semicycle Analysis . . .6. . . 2)-Type Equations 77 6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 The Case q < 1 . . . . . . . . . . . .

. .2 The Case γ = 0 : xn+1 = A+Bxn +Cxn−1 . . βxn 9. . . . . . . . . α+γxn−1 9. . . . . .5 Open Problems and Conjectures . .3. . .4. . . 132 n +Cx γx 7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Convergence of Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.1 Existence and Local Stability of Period-Two Cycles 9. . . . . . . . . 6. . . . . . . . . vii 107 109 110 112 113 114 117 117 123 123 7 (1. . . . . . . . . .4 Global Stability Analysis When p > q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 9. . . . . . . .2 Semicycle Analysis . . . . .1 Introduction . . . . . . . .3. . . . . . . . . . . .3 The Case α = γ = 0 : xn+1 = A+Bxβxn n−1 . . .2 Convergence of Solutions . . 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2. . . 131 +Cx 7. . .4 Global Asymptotic Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3. . . . 9. . . . . . . 3)-Type Equations 131 7. . . . . . . . . .8. . . 6. . . .9. . . . 9. . . . . . 3)-Type Equations 9. . . . . . . . . . . 1)-Type Equations 137 8. . . . . . . .5 Semicycle Analysis When pr = q + qr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8. . . . . . . 141 141 141 142 143 144 147 149 150 154 156 157 157 158 160 162 163 . . . . . . . . 9. . . . . . . .1 Invariant Intervals . . . .2. . . . . . . . 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 9 (2. 9. . . . . 6. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Invariant Intervals . . . .1 Existence of a Two Cycle . . . . . . 6. . . . . . .3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . βxn +γx 6. . . 137 8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9. 134 8 (3. . .1 Invariant Intervals and Semicycle Analysis . . . . . . . . .2 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . .Contents 6. . . . . . . .2 Global Stability of the Positive Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9. . . . n +Cxn−1 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Semicycle Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . α+βxn 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. . . . . . . . . . .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Open Problems and Conjectures .3. . . . . . 131 7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . . . . .1 Introduction .4 Global Stability .1 Boundedness of Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 The Case β = 0 : xn+1 = A+Bxn +Cxn−1 . . . . . . . . . 9. . . 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Long-term Behavior of Solutions When q > 1 6. . . . . . .2 The Case β = γ = 0 : xn+1 = A+Bxnα n−1 . . . . . . . . .8 The Case α = B = 0 : xn+1 = βxn +γxn−1 . . . . . . . .4. . . . . . . . .4 The Case α = 0 : xn+1 = A+Bx+γxn−1 .9. . . . . . A+Cxn−1 6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 +Cx 7. n−1 6.2. . . .2 Invariant Intervals . . . .3 Global Stability Analysis When p < q . . . . .4 The Case α = β = 0 : xn+1 = A+Bxnn−1 n−1 . .7. . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 The Case α = A = 0 : xn+1 = Bxn +Cxn−1 . .

. . 10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11. . . .1 Invariant Intervals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3. . . . . . . . .2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Invariant Intervals . . . .4 The Case A = 0 : xn+1 = α+βx+Cxn−1 . . . α+βx (3. . .1 11. . . . .viii 10 (3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 11. . A Global Attractivity for Higher Order Equations Bibliography Index . . . . .2 The Case C = 0 : xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3. . . . . . . . . . .5 Open Problems and Conjectures . . . . . .3 Convergence of Solutions . . . . . Bxn 10. . .2 Proof of Part (c) of Theorem 10. . . . . . . . . .4. . . . . . . . . . . A+Cxn−1 10. . . . . . .1 Introduction . . . . . . n +γxn−1 10. . . . . . . . .2. . . . . . . A+Bxn 10. . . . . .1 10. . . .1 Global Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 10. . . . . . .4. .3 Contents 167 167 167 169 172 172 173 173 174 175 177 179 180 183 183 184 189 191 192 201 211 217 . . . . . . . . . . . 11 The 11. . . . . . . . Convergence Results . .3 The Case B = 0 : xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 . . . 10. . . . . . . .2.4 Open Problems and Conjectures . .3. . . . . . . .2 Global Stability When p ≥ r . .3. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Convergence of Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2)-Type Equations 10. . . . . . . . . 10. . . . . . . 11. . . . . . 10. . . . . . . . . 3)-Type Equation xn+1 = A+Bxn +γxn−1 n +Cxn−1 Linearized Stability Analysis . . . 10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Invariant Intervals . . . .1 Proof of Part (b) of Theorem 10.

We believe that the results about Eq(1) are of paramount importance in their own right and furthermore we believe that these results oﬀer prototypes towards the development of the basic theory of the global behavior of solutions of nonlinear diﬀerence equations of order greater than one. . 1. Every chapter in this monograph contains several open problems and conjectures related to the particular equation which is investigated and its generalizations. . we present some global attractivity results for higher order diﬀerence equations which may be useful for extensions and generalizations. β. It is an amazing fact that Eq(1) contains. A. A + Bxn + Cxn−1 n = 0. In Chapter 2 we present some general results about periodic solutions and invariant intervals of Eq(1). C and the initial conditions x−1 and x0 are nonnegative real numbers. γ.Preface In this monograph. ix . and the periodicity of solutions of all rational diﬀerence equations of the form xn+1 = α + βxn + γxn−1 . (1) where the parameters α. a large number of equations whose dynamics have not been thoroughly understood yet and remain a great challenge for further investigation. The techniques and results which we develop in this monograph to understand the dynamics of Eq(1) are also extremely useful in analyzing the equations in the mathematical models of various biological systems and other applications. In this sense. at the end of this monograph. as special cases. the global stability. Chapter 1 contains some basic deﬁnitions and some general results which are used throughout the book. To this end we pose several Open Problems and Conjectures which we believe will stimulate further interest towards a complete understanding of the dynamics of Eq(1) and its functional generalizations. In an appendix. this is a self-contained monograph and the main prerequisite that the reader needs to understand the material presented here and to be able to attack the open problems and conjectures is a good foundation in analysis. In particular we present necessary and suﬃcient conditions for Eq(1) to have period-two solutions and we also present a table of invariant intervals. B. . we present the known results and derive several new ones on the boundedness. In Chapters 3 to 11 we present the known results and derive several new ones on the various types of equations which comprise Eq(1).

.

Sizer and to our graduate students A. M. Amleh. J. Kosmala. Valicenti. C. M. T. E. Janowski. W. K. C. O. Wilkinson for their enthusiastic participation and useful suggestions which helped to improve the exposition. and W. Merino. C. Radin. Gibbons. Briden. Driver. Martins. and K. D. C. S. E. xi . We are thankful to Professors R. S. Predescu. El-Metwally. S. Rodrigues. Hoag. E. J. Feuer. Cunningham. Prokup. M. W. L. Camouzis. P. F. DeVault. Grove. Schultz. Teixeira. W. H. Kent. Clark. C. R.Acknowledgements This monograph is the outgrowth of lecture notes and seminars which were given at the University of Rhode Island during the last ﬁve years. A. A. McGrath. L. N. I.

.

To Senada and Theodora .

.

It is an amazing fact that Eq(1) contains as special cases. [41]. etc.6 where. . the global stability. The Riccati diﬀerence equation when γ = C = 0. This equation is studied in many textbooks on diﬀerence equations. . β. in addition to the basic description of the solutions 1 . and the periodicity of solutions of all rational diﬀerence equations of the form xn+1 = α + βxn + γxn−1 . . A. such as [1]. γ. [42]. we present the known results and derive several new ones on the boundedness. (1) where the parameters α. 1. B. Eq(1) includes among others the following well known classes of equations: 1. See Section 1. To this end we pose several Open Problems and Conjectures which we believe will stimulate further interest towards a complete understanding of the dynamics of Eq(1) and its functional generalizations. C are nonnegative real numbers and the initial conditions x−1 and x0 are arbitrary nonnegative real numbers such that A + Bxn + Cxn−1 > 0 for all n ≥ 0. a large number of equations whose dynamics have not been thoroughly established yet. The techniques and results which we develop in this monograph to understand the dynamics of Eq(1) are also extremely useful in analyzing the equations in the mathematical models of various biological systems and other applications. A + Bxn + Cxn−1 n = 0. [21].Introduction and Classiﬁcation of Equation Types In this monograph. We believe that the results about Eq(1) are of paramount importance in their own right and furthermore we believe that these results oﬀer prototypes towards the development of the basic theory of the global behavior of solutions of nonlinear diﬀerence equations of order greater than one.

and Section 1.4. We believe that the techniques which we develop in this monograph to understand the dynamics of Eq(1) will also be of paramount importance in analyzing the equations in the mathematical models of various biological systems and other applications. . [49]. 1.2 Introduction and Classiﬁcation of the Riccati equation. . See [42]. 1 + xn n = 0. . 2. . Hence the solution {xn } of Eq(2) exists for all n ≥ 0. . p. 75). [55]. we introduce the forbidden set of the equation. and Section 4. [32]. See [13]. Throughout this monograph we pose several open problems related to the existence of solutions of some simple equations with the hope that their investigation may throw some light into this very diﬃcult problem.2. / if and only if x0 ∈ F. This is the set F of all initial conditions x0 ∈ R through which the equation xn+1 = α + βxn A + Bxn (2) is not well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. [18]. [57]. and the rational equation xn+1 = α + αxn + βxn−1 . 1. Pielou’s discrete delay logistic model when α = γ = B = 0. [44]. For example. [66].2. n = 0. it is interesting to note the similarities of the dynamics of the population model xn+1 = α + βxn−1 e−xn .6 for some results in this regard. The problem of existence of solutions for diﬀerence equations is of paramount importance but so far has been systematically neglected.7 and 10. See [24] and Sections 2. [67]. An example of such a problem is the following: Open Problem Find all initial points (x−1 . x0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation xn−1 xn+1 = −1 + xn is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. . and Section 5. See [13]. [69]. . 3. This is a fascinating equation with many interesting extensions and generalizations. Lyness’ equation when γ = A = B = 0. A characteristic feature of this equation is that it possesses an invariant which can be used to understand the character of its . See ([42].

21 are either trivial. Eq(1) contains 49 equations as follows: 9 equations of type (1.Introduction and Classiﬁcation 3 solutions. It is an amazing fact that Eq(1) contains. is bounded. . . 1). n = 0. for example. 1. n = 0. [45] and [52]-[54]. However to this day. 1) 9 equations of type (1. xn+1 = xn−1 α + βxn xn+1 = . 2) 9 equations of type (2. as special cases. See [7]. . . [15]. (2. 1) 3 equations of type (2. . [28]. that every positive solution of the diﬀerence equation α + xn . . 3). . or linear. 3) respectively. Without the use of this invariant we are still unable to show. xn+1 = A + Bxn + Cxn−1 are of types (1. 1. 1). 1. Our goal in this monograph is to familiarize readers with the recent techniques and results related to Eq(1) and its extensions. n = 0. Let k and l be positive integers from the set {1. l)-type if the equation is of the form of Eq(1) with k positive parameters in the numerator and l positive parameters in the denominator. We will say that a special case of Eq(1) is of (k. The remaining 28 are quite interesting nonlinear diﬀerence equations. . [43]. Of these 49 equations. 2). . 2) 3 equations of type (1. 2) 1 equation of type (3. 1. . . or of the Riccati type. n = 0. For example the following equations xn . . In this sense. For convenience we classify all the special cases of Eq(1) as follows. . 1. a large number of equations whose dynamics have not been thoroughly established yet. many special cases of Eq(1) are not thoroughly understood yet and remain a great challenge for further investigation. [42]. n = 0. xn+1 = xn−1 where α ∈ (0. 3) 3 equations of type (3. (2. and to bring to their attention several Open Research Problems and Conjectures related to this equation and its functional generalization. Some of them have been recently investigated and have led to the development of some general theory about diﬀerence equations. 1) 9 equations of type (2. 3) 3 equations of type (3. γ + xn−1 1 + xn . [29]. . . . 3}. and (2. xn+1 = xn−1 βxn + γxn−1 . ∞). 2.

.

.1). [41]. the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = f (xn .1 Deﬁnitions of Stability and Linearized Stability Analysis f :I ×I →I Let I be some interval of real numbers and let be a continuously diﬀerentiable function. x−1 ∈ I. [16]. x).Chapter 1 Preliminary Results In this chapter we state some known results and prove some new ones about diﬀerence equations which will be useful in our investigation of Eq(1). or equivalently. 5 . n = 0. . 1. [63].1) has a unique solution {xn }∞ . Deﬁnition 1. [34]. [4].1 Let x be an equilibrium point of Eq(1. x is a ﬁxed point of f . See also [1].1). Then for every set of initial conditions x0 . [33].1) if x = f (x. and [68]. xn = x for n ≥ 0 is a solution of Eq(1. xn−1 ). [21]. (1. [22]. . that is. The reader may just glance at the results in this chapter and return for the details when they are needed in the sequel. n=−1 A point x ∈ I is called an equilibrium point of Eq(1. 1.1.

n→∞ (iv) The equilibrium x of Eq(1. we have |xn − x| < ε for all n ≥ −1.1) is called unstable if it is not stable. and if there exists γ > 0 such that for all x0 .1 (Linearized Stability) (a) If both roots of the quadratic equation λ2 − pλ − q = 0 (1. 1. or a repeller. Clearly a source is an unstable equilibrium. x−1 ∈ I with 0 < |x0 − x| + |x−1 − x| < r.1.1) is called a global attractor if for every x0 . x) ∂u ∂v denote the partial derivatives of f (u. .1). x−1 ∈ I with |x0 − x| + |x−1 − x| < δ.1) about the equilibrium point x. Theorem 1. x−1 ∈ I we have lim xn = x. (v) The equilibrium x of Eq(1. v) evaluated at the equilibrium x of Eq(1.1) is called globally asymptotically stable if it is locally stable and a global attractor. x) and q = (x.1) is locally asymptotically stable. (1. (ii) The equilibrium x of Eq(1. (vi) The equilibrium x of Eq(1.2) p= is called the linearized equation associated with Eq(1. x−1 ∈ I with |x0 − x| + |x−1 − x| < γ. Then the equation yn+1 = pyn + qyn−1 . if there exists r > 0 such that for all x0 . then the equilibrium x of Eq(1. . n = 0. there exists N ≥ 1 such that |xN − x| ≥ r.1) is called locally asymptotically stable if it is locally stable.1) is called a source. we have n→∞ lim xn = x.3) Let lie in the open unit disk |λ| < 1. . ∂f ∂f (x.1) is called locally stable if for every ε > 0. (iii) The equilibrium x of Eq(1.6 Chapter 1. there exists δ > 0 such that for all x0 . Preliminary Results (i) The equilibrium x of Eq(1. .

1.2. The Stable Manifold Theorem in the Plane

7

(b) If at least one of the roots of Eq(1.3) has absolute value greater than one, then the equilibrium x of Eq(1.1) is unstable. (c) A necessary and suﬃcient condition for both roots of Eq(1.3) to lie in the open unit disk |λ| < 1, is |p| < 1 − q < 2. (1.4) In this case the locally asymptotically stable equilibrium x is also called a sink. (d) A necessary and suﬃcient condition for both roots of Eq(1.3) to have absolute value greater than one is |q| > 1 and |p| < |1 − q| . In this case x is a repeller. (e) A necessary and suﬃcient condition for one root of Eq(1.3) to have absolute value greater than one and for the other to have absolute value less than one is p2 + 4q > 0 and |p| > |1 − q| .

In this case the unstable equilibrium x is called a saddle point. (f ) A necessary and suﬃcient condition for a root of Eq(1.3) to have absolute value equal to one is |p| = |1 − q| or q = −1 and |p| ≤ 2. In this case the equilibrium x is called a nonhyperbolic point. Deﬁnition 1.1.2 if (a) A solution {xn } of Eq(1.1) is said to be periodic with period p xn+p = xn for all n ≥ −1. (1.5)

(b) A solution {xn } of Eq(1.1) is said to be periodic with prime period p, or a p-cycle if it is periodic with period p and p is the least positive integer for which (1.5) holds.

1.2

The Stable Manifold Theorem in the Plane

Let T be a diﬀeomorphism in I × I, i.e., one-to-one, smooth mapping, with smooth inverse. Assume that p ∈ I × I is a saddle ﬁxed point of T, i.e., T(p) = p and the Jacobian JT (p) has one eigenvalue s with |s| < 1 and one eigenvalue u with |u| > 1.

8

Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

Let vs be an eigenvector corresponding to s and let vu be an eigenvector corresponding to u. Let S be the stable manifold of p, i.e., the set of initial points whose forward orbits (under iteration by T) p, T(p), T2 (p), . . . converge to p. Let U be the unstable manifold of p, i.e., the set of initial points whose backward orbits (under iteration by the inverse of T) p, T−1 (p), T−2 (p), . . . converge to p. Then, both S and U are one dimensional manifolds (curves) that contain p. Furthermore, the vectors vs and vu are tangent to S and U at p, respectively. The map T for Eq(1.1) is found as follows: Set un = xn−1 and vn = xn Then un+1 = xn and so T u v = v f (v, u) x x . and vn+1 = f (vn , un ) for n ≥ 0

for n ≥ 0.

Therefore the eigenvalues of the Jacobian JT

at the equilibrium point x of Eq(1.1)

are the roots of Eq(1.3). In this monograph, the way we will make use of the Stable Manifold Theorem in our investigation of the rational diﬀerence equation xn+1 = α + βxn + γxn−1 , A + Bxn + Cxn−1 n = 0, 1, . . . (1.6)

is as follows: Under certain conditions the positive equilibrium of Eq(1.6) will be a saddle point and under the same conditions Eq(1.6) will have a two cycle . . . φ, ψ, φ, ψ, . . . (1.7)

which is locally asymptotically stable. Under these conditions, the two cycle (1.7) cannot be a global attractor of all non-equilibrium solutions. See, for example, Sections 6.6 and 6.9.

1.3. Global Asymptotic Stability of the Zero Equilibrium

9

1.3

Global Asymptotic Stability of the Zero Equilibrium

When zero is an equilibrium point of the Eq(1.6), which we are investigating in this monograph (with β > 0), then the following theorem will be employed to establish conditions for its global asymptotic stability. Amazingly the same theorem is a powerful tool for establishing the global asymptotic stability of the zero equilibrium of several biological models. See, for example, [31] and [48]. Theorem 1.3.1 ([31]. See also [48], and [70]) Consider the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = f0 (xn , xn−1 )xn + f1 (xn , xn−1 )xn−1 , with nonnegative initial conditions and f0 , f1 ∈ C[[0, ∞) × [0, ∞), [0, 1)]. Assume that the following hypotheses hold: (i) f0 and f1 are non-increasing in each of their arguments; (ii) f0 (x, x) > 0 for all x ≥ 0; (iii) f0 (x, y) + f1 (x, y) < 1 for all x, y ∈ (0, ∞). Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(1.8) is globally asymptotically stable. n = 0, 1, . . . (1.8)

1.4

Global Attractivity of the Positive Equilibrium

Unfortunately when it comes to establishing the global attractivity of the positive equilibrium of the Eq(1.6) which we are investigating in this monograph, there are not enough results in the literature to cover all various cases. We strongly believe that the investigation of the various special cases of our equation has already played and will continue to play an important role in the development of the stability theory of general diﬀerence equations of orders greater than one. The ﬁrst theorem, which has also been very useful in applications to mathematical biology, see [31] and [48], was really motivated by a problem in [35]. Theorem 1.4.1 ([31]. See also [35], [48], and ([42], p. 53). Let I ⊆ [0, ∞) be some interval and assume that f ∈ C[I × I, (0, ∞)] satisﬁes the following conditions: (i) f (x, y) is non-decreasing in each of its arguments; (ii) Eq(1.1) has a unique positive equilibrium point x ∈ I and the function f (x, x) satisﬁes the negative feedback condition: (x − x)(f (x, x) − x) < 0 for every x ∈ I − {x}.

Then every positive solution of Eq(1.1) with initial conditions in I converges to x.

10

Chapter 1. Preliminary Results

The following theorem was inspired by the results in [55] that deal with the global asymptotic stability of Pielou’s equation (see Section 4.4), which is a special case of the equation that we are investigating in this monograph. Theorem 1.4.2 ([42], p. 27) Assume (i) f ∈ C[(0, ∞) × (0, ∞), (0, ∞)]; (ii) f (x, y) is nonincreasing in x and decreasing in y; (iii) xf (x, x) is increasing in x; (iv) The equation xn+1 = xn f (xn , xn−1 ), n = 0, 1, . . . has a unique positive equilibrium x. Then x is globally asymptotically stable. Theorem 1.4.3 ([27]) Assume (i) f ∈ C[[0, ∞) × [0, ∞), (0, ∞)]; (ii) f (x, y) is nonincreasing in each argument; (iii) xf (x, y) is nondecreasing in x; (iv) f (x, y) < f (y, x) ⇐⇒ x > y; (v) The equation xn+1 = xn−1 f (xn−1 , xn ), n = 0, 1, . . . (1.10)

(1.9)

has a unique positive equilibrium x. Then x is a global attractor of all positive solutions of Eq(1.10). The next result is known as the stability trichotomy result: Theorem 1.4.4 ([46]) Assume f ∈ C 1 [[0, ∞) × [0, ∞), [0, ∞)] is such that x ∂f ∂f +y < f (x, y) for all x, y ∈ (0, ∞). ∂x ∂y (1.11)

Then Eq(1.1) has stability trichotomy, that is exactly one of the following three cases holds for all solutions of Eq(1.1): (i) limn→∞ xn = ∞ for all (x−1 , x0 ) = (0, 0) . (ii) limn→∞ xn = 0 for all initial points and 0 is the only equilibrium point of Eq(1.1). (iii) limn→∞ xn = x ∈ (0, ∞) for all (x−1 , x0 ) = (0, 0) and x is the only positive equilibrium of Eq(1.1).

Mi−1 ).8 and 1. b] for each y ∈ [a.4. In this regard there are four possible scenarios depending on whether f (x. . or nonincreasing in both arguments. y) is non-increasing in x and nondecreasing in y. b] × [a. . . ≤ mi ≤ .9. .4. y) is non-decreasing in x ∈ [a.4.1) is to work in the regions where the function f (x. The next two theorems are slight modiﬁcations of results which were obtained in [54] and were developed while we were working on a special case of the equation that we are investigating in this monograph. b] for each x ∈ [a. y) is nondecreasing in both arguments. ≤ M1 ≤ M0 and Set mi ≤ xk ≤ Mi m = lim mi i→∞ for k ≥ 2i + 1.5 ([54]) Let [a. y) is non-decreasing in x and non-increasing in y and the second theorem deals with the case where the function f (x. Then Eq(1.7 below are new and deal with the remaining two cases relative to the monotonic character of f (x. . b] → [a. Theorems 1. y) is monotonic in its arguments. at the end of this monograph. Proof.4. m) = M. b] is a solution of the system f (m. then m = M . ≤ Mi ≤ . b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a. Set m0 = a and M0 = b and for i = 1. 2. mi−1 ) and mi = f (mi−1 .1) converges to x.1. set Mi = f (Mi−1 .1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a. y) is nonincreasing in y ∈ [a. . y). (See Section 6. or nonincreasing in one and nondecreasing in the other.8 where these theorems are utilized. b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x. b]. (b) If (m. b] and every solution of Eq(1. and f (x. . i→∞ and M = lim Mi . m0 ≤ m1 ≤ . b] × [a. which describes the extension of these results to higher order diﬀerence equations. . Now observe that for each i ≥ 0. Theorem 1. M ) = m and f (M. b]. Global Attractivity of the Positive Equilibrium 11 Very often the best strategy for obtaining global attractivity results for Eq(1. See also the Appendix. . M ) ∈ [a. See Sections 6.) The ﬁrst theorem deals with the case where the function f (x.4 and 6. .

b]. b]. b] × [a. and Set mi ≤ xk ≤ Mi m = lim mi i→∞ for k ≥ 2i + 1. m = f (M. m=M from which the result follows. Therefore in view of (b). ≤ M1 ≤ M0 .12) and by the continuity of f .6 ([54]) Let [a. m). b] for each y ∈ [a. y) is nondecreasing in y ∈ [a. ≤ mi ≤ . b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a. Set m0 = a and M0 = b and for i = 1. Preliminary Results M ≥ lim sup xi ≥ lim inf xi ≥ m i→∞ i→∞ (1. . M ) and M = f (M. mi−1 ).12 Then Chapter 1. Proof. 2 . . b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x. b] → [a. M ). m0 ≤ m1 ≤ . . (b) The diﬀerence equation Eq(1. and f (x. 2 Theorem 1. m=M from which the result follows. set Mi = f (mi−1 . Then clearly (1. m) and M = f (m. y) is non-increasing in x ∈ [a. .1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a. b].1) converges to x. b] and every solution of Eq(1. 2. m = f (m. .12) holds and by the continuity of f . .4. b] for each x ∈ [a. Now observe that for each i ≥ 0. .1) has no solutions of prime period two in [a. . In view of (b). Mi−1 ) and mi = f (Mi−1 . ≤ Mi ≤ . Then Eq(1. . i→∞ and M = lim Mi .

(b) If (m. m). 2. b] is a solution of the system f (m. b] → [a. Now observe that for each i ≥ 0. Set m0 = a and M0 = b and for i = 1. and Set mi ≤ xk ≤ Mi m = lim mi i→∞ for k ≥ 2i + 1. b] and every solution of Eq(1.7 Let [a. Then clearly (1.4. b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a. mi−1 ) and mi = f (Mi−1 . M ) and M = f (m. M ) ∈ [a. i→∞ and M = lim Mi .4. b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x. M ) = m. . x) = x.1) converges to x. In view of (b). y) is non-decreasing in each of its arguments. b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a. Then Eq(1.8 Let [a. ≤ M1 ≤ M0 . m=M =x from which the result follows. Mi−1 ). .12) holds and by the continuity of f . b] and every solution of Eq(1. .1) converges to x.1. Global Attractivity of the Positive Equilibrium Theorem 1. . Proof. b] → [a. 2 Theorem 1. b] × [a. set Mi = f (mi−1 . m0 ≤ m1 ≤ . m) = M and f (M. y) is non-increasing in each of its arguments. ≤ mi ≤ . .4.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a. . . Then Eq(1. has a unique positive solution. . . b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a. b] × [a. m = f (M. (b) The equation f (x. . ≤ Mi ≤ . b] × [a. 13 then m = M .

∞ we will show that there exists a solution {Ln }n=−k of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = f (xn . In view of (b). xn−1 ). 2. Now observe that for each i ≥ 0. m = M = x. . . m0 ≤ m1 ≤ . mi−1 ). Let L be a limit point of the solution {xn }∞ n=−1 (For example L is the limit superior S or the limit inferior I of the solution).13) . Then clearly the inequality (1. ≤ M1 ≤ M0 .5 Limiting Solutions The concept of limiting solutions was introduced by Karakostas [37] (see also [40]) and is a useful tool in establishing that under certain conditions a solution of a diﬀerence equation which is bounded from above and from below has a limit. M ). n ≥ −k + 1. . m = f (m. Assume that {xn }∞ n=−1 is a solution of Eq(1. 2 1. Set Chapter 1.12) is satisﬁed and by the continuity of f . In this section we ﬁrst give a self-contained version of limiting solutions the way we will use them in this monograph. from which the result follows. (1. . . Let J be some interval of real numbers. J].14 Proof. Mi−1 ) and mi = f (mi−1 . and mi ≤ xk ≤ Mi Set m = lim mi i→∞ for k ≥ 2i + 1. Now with the above hypotheses. ≤ Mi ≤ . . i→∞ and M = lim Mi . . . . Preliminary Results m0 = a and M0 = b and for i = 1. and let k ≥ 1 be a positive integer.1) such that A ≤ xn ≤ B for all n ≥ −1. . set Mi = f (Mi−1 . . f ∈ C[J × J. B ∈ J. ≤ mi ≤ . where A. . m) and M = f (M.

−k Let { n }∞ n=−k be the solution of Eq(1. which is a consequence of the above discussion. L1 = 1. Limiting Solutions such that L0 = L 15 and for every N ≥ −k.. B] and so it has a ∞ further subsequence {xnij }j=1 which converges to some limit which we call L−1 .1). . ∞ Next the subsequence {xni −1 }i=1 of {xn }∞ n=−1 also lies in interval [A. (See Theorem 1.1. . (1.13) and every term of this sequence is a limit point of the solution {xn }∞ . . . . L−k and a subsequence {xnj }n=−1 such that j→∞ lim xnj = L j→∞ lim xnj −1 = L−1 . is stated in the way we will use it in this monograph: . L−k+1 . −k ) = f (L−k+1 . Therefore.13) associated with the The solution {Ln }∞ n=−k solution {xn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(1. n=−1 is called a limiting solution of Eq(1. L−k ) j→∞ = lim f (xnj −k+1 .) ∞ We now proceed to show the existence of a limiting solution {Ln }n=−k .1). .5. . xnj −k ) = lim xnj −k+2 = L−k+2 . L−3 . the term LN is a limit point of the solution {xn }∞ . lim xnij = L and lim xnij −1 = L−1 . . . . Clearly there exists a subsequence {xni }∞ of {xn }∞ i=1 n=−1 such that i→∞ lim xni = L.13) with Then clearly.. . −k+2 j→∞ = L−k and −k+1 = L−k+1 . L0 = L = 0 .5. j→∞ lim xnj −k = L−k . xn−1 ).14) associated with the solution {xn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(1. It follows by induction that the sequence L−k .2 below. L−1 . i→∞ i→∞ Continuing in this way and by considering further and further subsequences we obtain ∞ numbers L−2 . = f( −k+1 . n=−1 The following result. Karakostas takes k = ∞ and calls the solution {Ln }∞ n=−∞ a full limiting sequence of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = f (xn . satisﬁes Eq(1.

1) with limit inferior I and limit superior S. . . n=−ν Furthermore for every m ≤ −ν. J].}.2 to diﬀerence equations of the form xn+1 = Ai . i=0 xn−i k n = 0. yn+1 = k i=0 Ai yn−i . . Sn ∈ [I. 0. Theorem 1. f ∈ C[J ν+1 . with I = lim inf xn . . xn−1 . xn−ν ). . Suppose that {xn }∞ n=−1 is a bounded solution of Eq(1.1 Let J be some interval of real numbers. . 1. there exist two subsequences {xrn } and {xln } of the solution {xn }∞ n=−ν such that the following are true: n→∞ (1. as developed by Karakostas. 1. Sn ∈ [I. . Then Eq(1. See [23] and [25] for an application of Theorem 1. .13) has two solutions {In }∞ n=−k with the following properties: and {Sn }∞ n=−k I0 = I. f ∈ C[J × J.5. . . S0 = S. J]. ∞ The solutions {In }∞ n=−∞ and {Sn }n=−∞ of the diﬀerence equation (1. n = 0. n→∞ S = lim sup xn n→∞ n = 0. and let {xn }∞ n=−ν be a bounded solution of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = f (xn . 1. (1. Preliminary Results Theorem 1. . 1. S ∈ J.5. Let Z denote the set of all integers {. with I. S] for all n ∈ Z and such that for every N ∈ Z. . . and In .5. In . .2 ([37]) Let J be some interval of real numbers.16) associated with the solution {xn }∞ n=−k of Eq(1. IN and SN are limit points of {xn }∞ .16 Chapter 1. . which by the change of variables xn = y1 reduce to rational diﬀerence equations of the n form 1 . and let k ≥ 1 be a positive integer. . S0 = S We now state the complete version of full limiting sequences. S] for n ≥ −k. S ∈ J. . . Then there exist two solutions ∞ {In }∞ n=−∞ and {Sn }n=−∞ of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = f (xn .16) lim xrn +N = IN and n→∞ lim xln +N = SN for every N ≥ m. with I0 = I. xn−1 .15) and with I. xn−ν ) which satisfy the equation for all n ∈ Z. . . −1.15). . .16) are called full limiting solutions of Eq(1. . .

x0 are all real numbers) other than the material presented here.6. Furthermore when (1.) The other goal we have is to describe in detail the long. B. 1. (1.17).17) with x0 = is periodic with period two.17) reduces to βA + βxn β xn+1 = B = for all n ≥ 0. γ. we will assume that B = 0 and αB − βA = 0. The proof is straightforward and will be omitted.21) β B (1.19) β + A = 0. (1. It should be mentioned here that there is practically nothing known about the forbidden set of Eq(1) (when the parameters α.1 Assume that (1. Eq(1.18).1.17) when x0 ∈ F.18) holds and that Eq(1. B and the initial condition x0 are real numbers is called a Riccati diﬀerence equation.20) .17) where the parameters α. A.17) is a linear equation and when αB − βA = 0.6.17) possesses a prime periodtwo solution.19) holds every solution of Eq(1. The Riccati Equation 17 1. . (1. β. . A. A + Bxn B The set of initial conditions x0 ∈ R through which the denominator A+Bxn in Eq(1. .18) Indeed when B = 0. A + Bxn A diﬀerence equation of the form xn+1 = n = 0. which is extracted from [32]. In the sequel.6 The Riccati Equation α + βxn . Theorem 1.and short-term behavior of / solutions of Eq(1. Then (1. in addition to (1. Eq(1. (See also [13] and [69]. C and the initial conditions x−1 . To avoid degenerate cases. The ﬁrst result in this section addresses a very special case of Eq(1. β.17). we will assume that β + A = 0. One of our goals in this section is to determine the forbidden set F of Eq(1.17) regarding period-two solutions.17) will become zero for some value of n ≥ 0 is called the forbidden set F of Eq(1.

(1.18 Now observe that the change of variable xn = β+A A wn − B B Chapter 1. It is interesting to note that the four parameters of Eq(1.17).17) have been reduced to the single parameter R of Eq(1.22). .23).22) transforms Eq(1. . If we set y = g(w) = 1 − then we note that the two asymptotes x=− of the function A B and y = β B R w α + βx A + Bx have now been reduced to the two asymptotes y = f (x) = w = 0 and y = 1 R .17) into the diﬀerence equation wn+1 = 1 − where R= R . . Preliminary Results for n ≥ 0 (1.17) through the change of variables (1.23) βA − αB (β + A)2 is a nonzero real number. w Also note that the signum of R is equal to the signum of the derivative y =1− f (x) = βA − αB . (A + Bx)2 of the function For the remainder of this section we focus on Eq(1.23) it follows that when R< 1 4 .23) and present its forbidden set F and the character of its solutions. called the Riccati number of Eq(1. Similar results can be obtained for Eq(1. From Eq(1. 1. wn n = 0.

respectively. 1. where 4 the characteristic roots of Eq(1. 1.23) has the two equilibrium points w− and w+ with w− = and |w− | < w+ . Note that in these two cases the characteristic roots of Eq(1. The forbidden set of Eq(1. 1 The next two theorems deal with the cases R < 1 and R = 4 . 4 1 R= .23) is clearly the set of points where the sequence {yn }∞ n=0 vanishes. . ). 4 1− √ √ 1 − 4R 1 + 1 − 4R < = w+ 2 2 19 When Eq(1. (1. Now observe that the change of variables wn = with y0 = 1 and y1 = w0 reduces Eq(1. .1. . The Riccati Equation Eq(1. .23) has exactly one equilibrium point namely.23). 4 Eq(1. . when 1 R> .6.23) has no equilibrium points. .24) are real numbers. n = 0.24) are the equilibrium points of Eq(1.23) to the second order linear diﬀerence equation yn+2 − yn+1 + Ryn = 0. Also w− < 0 if R < 0 and 1 w− > 0 if R ∈ (0. 2 Finally. . 1 w= . which can be solved explicitly.24) yn+1 yn for n = 0.

The equilibrium w+ is a global attractor as long as w0 ∈ F ∪ {w− } / and the equilibrium w− is a repeller. The forbidden set F of Eq(1.23) is given by / n+1 n+1 (w0 − w− )w+ − (w+ − w0 )w− . . .26) It is now clear from Theorem 1. (1. 4 1 2 is the only equilibrium point of Eq(1.6. 2.23) is the sequence of points fn = n−1 2n for n = 1. . . . wn = n n (w0 − w− )w+ − (w+ − w0 )w− n = 1.6.23) is the sequence of points fn = n−1 n−1 w+ − w− w+ w− n n w+ − w− for n = 1.2 that n→∞ lim fn = w− . (1. 2.6. .20 Theorem 1. (1. if R > 0 and fn < w− while (fn − w− )(fn+1 − w− ) < 0 if R < 0. . . Preliminary Results √ √ 1 − 4R 1 + 1 − 4R w− = and w+ = 2 2 are the only equilibrium points of Eq(1.23). .25) When w0 ∈ F.2 Assume Then 1 R< . the solution of Eq(1.27) . The forbidden set F of Eq(1.3 Assume Then w= 1 R= . . 4 1− Chapter 1.23). Theorem 1. 2. . .

R 4R − 1 cos(nφ) + (2w0 − 1) sin(nφ) .28) From Theorem 1. 4 The characteristic roots of Eq(1. ) 2 and √ 4R − 1 √ sin φ = .29) n Finally consider the case √ R. more precisely. (1. . (1. .3 it follows that the equilibrium w = 1 of Eq(1. . π φ ∈ (0. 1. . The Riccati Equation 21 which converges to the equilibrium from the left. the solution of Eq(1.1. Hence wn = √ √ 4R − 1 cos(n + 1)φ + (2w0 − 1) sin(n + 1)φ √ . . . 2w0 − 1 C1 = 1 and C2 = √ . it is a sink from the right and a source from the left. When w0 ∈ F. 1. 2 R n = 0.24) in this case are √ 4R − 1 1 λ± = ± i 2 2 with |λ± | = Let be such that 1 cos φ = √ 2 R Then with C1 = y0 = 1 and It follows that √ R(C1 cos φ + C2 sin φ) = y1 = w0 .6.6. yn = R 2 (C1 cos(nφ) + C2 sin(nφ)). . 1 R> . 4R − 1 n = 0.23) is a global 2 / attractor for all solutions with w0 ∈ F but is locally unstable. . 1. .23) is given by / wn = 1 + (2w0 − 1)(n + 1) 2 + 2(2w0 − 1)n for n = 0. .

. . 2 n = 0. . . For example.29).23) is the sequence of points √ 1 4R − 1 fn = − cot(nφ) for n = 1. can now be easily 4 revealed. π ) is a rational multiple of π. π ) be such that 2 1 cos φ = √ 2 R and 1 4 √ 4R − 1 √ sin φ = .30) 1 Clearly when R > 4 the character of the solution {wn } and the forbidden set F depends on whether or not the number φ ∈ (0. assume φ is a rational multiple of π. . 2. ) N 2 (1. Theorem 1. 2. (1. when R > 1 . π ) be such that 2 2 √ 4R − 1 2x0 − 1 and sin θ = cos θ = r r where r= Then we obtain.4 Assume that R> and let φ ∈ (0. wn = (4R − 1)2 + (2x0 − 1)2 . and so √ cos(nφ + φ − θ) √ cos(nφ − θ) cos φ − sin(nφ − θ) sin φ R = R cos(nφ − θ) cos(nφ − θ) √ = R (cos φ − sin φ tan(nφ − θ)) 1 wn = − 2 √ 4R − 1 tan(nφ − θ). . .31) from which the character of the solutions of Eq(1. 1. . . Preliminary Results as long as the denominator is diﬀerent from zero. / (1. that is. .23).32) . 2 Let θ ∈ (− π .22 Chapter 1. 2 2 When w0 ∈ F. w0 = − 2 2 The following theorem summarizes the above discussion. the solution of Eq(1. that is.23) is given by (1. φ= π k π ∈ (0. 2 R Then the forbidden set F of Eq(1.6. . √ 4R − 1 1 cot(nφ) for n = 1.

23) with √ sin(n k π) − 4R − 1 cos(n k π) p p w0 = k 2 sin(n p π) is periodic with period p. 2. The following theorem summarizes the above discussion. Equivalently assume that A= where k. . . .1. then every solution of Eq(1. N ∈ {1.} and 2k < N. (ii) The set of limit points of a solution of Eq(1. .23) is periodic with period N . Theorem 1.5 is not a rational multiple of π. p − 1 . . N ∈ {1. / for n = 1. then the following result is true: Theorem 1.6. . . ) p 2 1 4 cos2 φ with φ = k π N Then where k and p are positive comprimes and suppose that √ 4R − 1 1 √ cos φ = √ and sin φ = . p Then every solution of Eq(1. √ √ 1 1 4R − 1 4R − 1 wN = − tan(kπ − θ) = − tan(−θ) = w0 2 2 2 2 and so every solution of Eq(1. 2. . The Riccati Equation 23 for some k.} with 2k < N.6. .5 is not a rational multiple of π.23) with w0 ∈ F is dense in R.23) is periodic with period N . 2.6.6 Assume that the number φ in Theorem 1. When the number φ in Theorem 1.6.23) is periodic. 2 R 2 R or equivalently k 4R cos2 ( π) = 1.5 Assume that φ= k π π ∈ (0.6. . Then the following statements are true: (i) No solution of Eq(1.

. 2 2 2 1. The proof of statement (ii) is a consequence of the form of the solution of Eq(1. wk = wl if and only if Chapter 1. . n = 0. or l > −1 and xl−1 < x and either m = ∞. 1. xl+1 .7 Semicycle Analysis We strongly believe that a semicycle analysis of the solutions of a scalar diﬀerence equation is a powerful tool for a detailed understanding of the entire character of solutions and often leads to straightforward proofs of their long term behavior. . . . In this section. .23) and the fact that when φ is not a rational multiple of π. or m < ∞ and xm+1 < x. 1. are dense in the interval (− π . A positive semicycle of a solution {xn } of Eq(1. π ).33) under appropriate hypotheses on the function f . . we present some results about the semicycle character of solutions of some general diﬀerence equations of the form xn+1 = f (xn . First we give the deﬁnitions for the positive and negative semicycle of a solution of Eq(1.33) relative to an equilibrium point x. with l ≥ −1 and m ≤ ∞ and such that either l = −1. φ is a rational multiple of π. . (1. xn−1 ).24 Proof. all greater than or equal to the equilibrium x. xm }. . Statement (i) is true because. then the values (nφ − θ)(mod π) for n = 0. .1) consists of a “string” of terms {xl . . Preliminary Results tan(kφ − θ) = tan(lφ − θ) if and only if for some integer N kφ − θ − (lφ − θ) = N π if and only if (k − l)φ = N π that is.

33) consists of a “string” of terms {xl . n2 ≥ n0 such that xn1 xn2 < 0.33).1 (Oscillation) (a) A sequence {xn } is said to oscillate about zero or simply to oscillate if the terms xn are neither eventually all positive nor eventually all negative. x) = x. Then by using the monotonic character of f (x. (0. ∞) × (0. Proof. . xN −1 ) < f (x.) Theorem 1. y) we have xN +1 = f (xN . (b) A sequence {xn } is said to oscillate about x if the sequence xn − x oscillates. ∞)] is such that: f (x.7.7.33) has semicycles of length one. every solution of Eq(1.7. Semicycle Analysis 25 A negative semicycle of a solution {xn } of Eq(1.1. y) is increasing in y for each ﬁxed x. . Then except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle. Then there exists N ≥ 0 such that either xN −1 < x ≤ xN or xN −1 ≥ x > xN . Otherwise the sequence is called nonoscillatory. (See Section 6. all less than the equilibrium x. ∞). there exist n1 . or l > −1 and xl−1 ≥ x and either m = ∞. xm }. xl+1 . We will assume that xN −1 < x ≤ xN . Let {xn } be a solution of Eq(1. The ﬁrst result was established in [28] while we were working on a special case of the equation we are investigating in this monograph. with l ≥ −1 and m ≤ ∞ and such that either l = −1. Let x be a positive equilibrium of Eq(1. x) = x and xN +2 = f (xN +1 . and f (x.5. y) is decreasing in x for each ﬁxed y. . A sequence {xn } is called strictly oscillatory if for every n0 ≥ 0.33) with at least two semicycles. . xN ) > f (x. . Thus xN +1 < x < xN +2 or m < ∞ and xm+1 ≥ x.1 ([28]) Assume that f ∈ C[(0. All other cases are similar and will be omitted. The sequence {xn } is called strictly oscillatory about x if the sequence xn − x is strictly oscillatory. Deﬁnition 1.

33) has semicycles of length at most two. which is a contradiction. (0. ∞).7. The proof in the case of negative semicycle is similar and is omitted. every oscillatory solution of Eq(1.7. xN −1 ) < f (x. Then by using the decreasing character of f we obtain: xN +1 = f (xN . x) = x which shows that the next term xN +1 also belongs to the positive semicycle. y) is decreasing in both arguments. Chapter 1.3 Assume that f ∈ C[(0. Then every oscillatory solution of Eq(1. Theorem 1.33) has semicycles of length one.26 and the proof follows by induction. ∞). ∞) × (0. y) is increasing in both arguments. x) = x which completes the proof. ∞)] and that f (x. xN −1 ) > f (x.33). Preliminary Results 2 The next result applies when the function f is decreasing in both arguments. The proof in the case of negative semicycle is similar and is omitted. The next result applies when the function f is increasing in both arguments. with at least one of the inequalities being strict. 2 The next result applies when the function f (x. y) is increasing in x and decreasing in y. Assume that {xn } is an oscillatory solution with two consecutive terms xN −1 and xN in a positive semicycle xN −1 ≥ x and xN ≥ x. Proof. Assume that {xn } is an oscillatory solution with two consecutive terms xN −1 and xN in a positive semicycle xN −1 ≥ x and xN ≥ x with at least one of the inequalities being strict. ∞)] and that f (x. Theorem 1. Proof. ∞) × (0. 2 . Then except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle. It follows by induction that all future terms of this solution belong to this positive semicycle.2 Assume that f ∈ C[(0. Then by using the increasing character of f we obtain: xN +1 = f (xN . Let x be a positive equilibrium of Eq(1. (0. Let x be a positive equilibrium of Eq(1.33).

Furthermore. y) is increasing in x for each ﬁxed y. except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle which may have length one. Assume that {xn } is an oscillatory solution with two consecutive terms xN −1 and xN such that xN −1 < x ≤ xN .34) we obtain xN +1 = f (xN .33) has semicycles of length at least two.33).7. Then by using the increasing character of f and Condition (1.4 Assume that f ∈ C[(0. xN ) = x which shows that the positive semicycle has length two. The proof in the case xN −1 ≥ x > xN . Then by using the increasing character of f we obtain xN +1 = f (xN . except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle. If xN > xN −1 > x then by using the increasing character of f and Condition (1. The extreme in each semicycle occurs in the ﬁrst term if the semicycle has two terms.35) then {xn } oscillates about the equilibrium x with semicycles of length two or three. y) is decreasing in y for each ﬁxed x. is similar and is omitted. and in the second term if the semicycle has three terms. xN ) = x (1. Let x be a positive equilibrium of Eq(1. every oscillatory solution of Eq(1. xN −1 ) < f (xN . and f (x.34) we obtain: xN +1 = f (xN . if we assume that f (u. (0. ∞)] is such that: f (x.34) . xN −1 ) > f (x. Semicycle Analysis 27 Theorem 1. Proof.1. ∞) × (0. xN −1 ) > f (xN . y) < x for every x > y > x (1. x) = x which shows that the next term xN +1 also belongs to the positive semicycle. Then. Now also assume that {xn } is an oscillatory solution with two consecutive terms xN −1 and xN such that xN −1 > xN ≥ x and xN −2 < x. ∞). u) = x for every u and f (x.7.

Assume that f satisﬁes Conditions (1. and f (x. we assume (1. Preliminary Results xN +1 = f (xN .35). y) > x for every x > y > x. and the proof follows by induction.37) . y) is increasing in x for each ﬁxed y.28 and by using Condition (1.34) is not enough to guarantee the above result. (0.34). y) < x for every x < y < x then if x0 < x−1 < x. f satisﬁes Condition (1. Then if x0 > x−1 > x. If.36) we get x1 = f (x0 . 2 (1. If. ∞). First. ∞)] is such that: f (x.36) is satisﬁed and that x0 > x−1 > x.5 Assume that f ∈ C[(0. xN −1 ) < xN and the proof is complete. Theorem 1.35) we ﬁnd Chapter 1.33) has monotonic solutions. the corresponding solution is increasing.7.36).34). Let x be a positive equilibrium of Eq(1. x−1 ) > f (x−1 . x−1 ) = x. Proof. Then by the monotonic character of f and (1.36) f (x. In view of Condition (1. the corresponding solution is decreasing. then Eq(1. on the other hand. x−1 ) > x0 .33). y) is decreasing in y for each ﬁxed x. ∞) × (0. and f (x. The proof of the remaining case is similar and will be omitted. we obtain x1 = f (x0 .34) and (1. assume that Condition (1. 2 Condition (1. instead of Condition (1.

(2. the equilibrium points of Eq(2.3) n = 0. A + Bxn + Cxn−1 Here we investigate the equilibrium points of the general equation xn+1 = where α. B. ∞) (2.5) holds.1) When (2.4) α + (β + γ)x A + (B + C)x (2. Semicycles. ∞) with α + β + γ.1) are the nonnegative solutions of the equation x= or equivalently (B + C)x2 − (β + γ − A)x − α = 0.1) if and only if α = 0 and A > 0. (2.2) and where the initial conditions x−1 and x0 are arbitrary nonnegative real numbers such that the right hand side of Eq(2. Zero is an equilibrium point of Eq(2. Eq(2. 29 . C ∈ [0.1 Equilibrium Points α + βxn + γxn−1 . A.5) (2.1) is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. B + C ∈ (0. β. in addition to the zero equilibrium . . .Chapter 2 Local Stability. In view of the above restriction on the initial conditions of Eq(2. . and Invariant Intervals 2.1). γ.1) has a positive equilibrium if and only if β + γ > A. Periodicity. 1.

. it is interesting to observe that when Eq(2. and [69] for some results in this regard. Periodicity. v) = A + Bu + Cv and observe that (βA − αB) + (βC − γB)v fu (u. except for our presentation in Section 1. it satisﬁes Eqs(2.2).2 Stability of the Zero Equilibrium Here we investigate the stability of the zero equilibrium of Eq(2. Finally when α>0 the only equilibrium point of Eq(2.1).) In summary. . This observation simpliﬁes the investigation of the local stability of the positive equilibrium of Eq(2.3) and (2.4) would also be an equilibrium worth investigating. . Set α + βu + γv f (u.30 Chapter 2. A + Bxn there is very little known. B+C (2.1) is unique and is given by x= When α = 0 and A = 0 the only equilibrium point of Eq(2. The problem of investigating Eq(2. . when α = 0. [32]. (See [13]. the quantity β + γ is positive.8) of the quadratic equation (2. Semicycles.6 about the Riccati equation α + βxn xn+1 = . B+C (2.9) .1). 2. Local Stability.4).1) is positive and is given by x= β+γ .8).1) when the initial conditions and the coeﬃcients of the equation are real numbers is of great mathematical importance and.1) is the positive solution x= β+γ−A+ (β + γ − A)2 + 4α(B + C) 2(B + C) (2.4). then x is unique.7) β+γ−A . and it is given by (2. n = 0. and Invariant Intervals In fact in this case the positive equilibrium of Eq(2.1) has a positive equilibrium x. 1.6) Note that in view of Condition (2. [18]. v) = (A + Bu + Cv)2 (2. If we had allowed negative initial conditions then the negative solution of Eq(2.

1. Furthermore the zero equilibrium point is a sink when a saddle point when a repeller when A>β+γ A < β + γ < A + 2β β + γ > A + 2β. x). (A + Bu + Cv)2 31 (2. The local stability character of x is now described by the linearized stability Theorem 1. n = 0. . . 1. Stability of the Zero Equilibrium and fv (u.2.1.2. . Then the zero equilibrium point of the equation xn+1 = βxn + γxn−1 .1) about the equilibrium point x is zn+1 − pzn − qzn−1 = 0 where p = fu (x. . .2. in addition to the local stability Theorem 1. 1. we have the luxury of the global stability Theorem 1.1). x) and q = fv (x.1.1) about the zero equilibrium point is β γ zn+1 − zn − zn−1 = 0. A A For the stability of the zero equilibrium of Eq(2. For the zero equilibrium of Eq(2. As a consequence of these two theorems we obtain the following global result: Theorem 2.1 Assume that A > 0. v) = (γA − αC) − (βC − γB)u . A + Bxn + Cxn−1 n = 0.3. is globally asymptotically stable when β+γ ≤A and is unstable when β + γ > A. .1).10) If x denotes an equilibrium point of Eq(2.1. . .1.1) we have p= β A and q = γ A and so the linearized equation associated with Eq(2. then the linearized equation associated with Eq(2.

4).11) and q > −1.1) has a positive equilibrium when either or α > 0.12) are equivalent to the following three inequalities: A+β+γ+2 βC − γB A2 + (βA − αB) − (γA − αC) x > −α − B+C B+C A2 − (βA − αB) − (γA − αC) B+C (2.13) (2. Periodicity. A+β+γ− B+C B+C Out of these inequalities we will obtain explicit stability conditions by using the following procedure: First we observe that Inequalities (2.15). In these cases the positive equilibrium x is unique. and Invariant Intervals 2.11) and (2. are equivalent to some inequalities of the form x>ρ .1. Local Stability. 2 (A + (B + C)x) A + α(B + C) + (B + C)(A + β + γ)x (βA − αB) + (βC − γB)x (βA − αB) + (βC − γB)x = 2 2 (A + (B + C)x) A + α(B + C) + (B + C)(A + β + γ)x Hence the conditions for the local asymptotic stability of x are (see Theorem 1.12) (A + β + γ)x > −α − (2.13)-(2. it satisﬁes Eqs(2.15) A2 + (γA − αC) βC − γB x > −α − . By using the identity (B + C)x2 = (β + γ − A)x + α.32 Chapter 2. Eq(2.1. x) = and q = fv (x.3) and (2. Inequalities (2.8). we see that p = fu (x.1) the following: |p| < 1 − q (2.14) (2. x) = (γA − αC) − (βC − γB)x (γA − αC) − (βC − γB)x = 2 . and it is given by (2. Semicycles.3 Local Stability of the Positive Equilibrium α = 0 and β + γ > A As we mentioned in Section 2.

and 6 respectively. .1 Let p ≥ 2 be a positive integer and assume that every positive solution of Eq(2. .4.2. . . 1. xn 1 xn−1 . n = 0. The following result characterizes all possible special cases of equations of the form of Eq(2. Now if we set F (u) = (B + C)u2 − (β + γ − A)u − α. [73]. . (See also [75]. The following four special examples of Eq(2.4.17) (2. and [74]. .) Theorem 2.1) with the property that every solution of the equation is periodic with the same period. ∞). it is clear that F (x) = 0 and that x > ρ if and only if F (ρ) < 0 while x<σ if and only if F (σ) > 0. When is Every Solution Periodic with the Same Period? and/or x<σ for some ρ.16) (2.18) (2. n = 0. (ii) Assume C = 0. σ ∈ [0. . 33 2. .1) is periodic with period p. . . 1. 5. . 1. 1.4 When is Every Solution Periodic with the Same Period? 1 . (2.19) 1 + xn .1) xn+1 = xn+1 = xn+1 = xn+1 n = 0. 4. Then A = B = γ = 0. Then the following statements are true: (i) Assume C > 0. . = xn−1 are remarkable in the sense that all positive solutions of each of these four nontrivial equations are periodic with periods 2. n = 0. . Then γ(α + β) = 0. xn−1 xn .

(ii) Assume C = 0 and. 6}. (i) Assume that C > 0.20) is impossible.1) reduces to one of the equations (2.20) α + β + γxp−2 = x0 . Then up to a change of variables of the form xn = λyn Eq(2. for the sake of contradiction. Thus (2. Then we claim that A = B = 0.19) . 3. Periodicity. assume that γ(α + β) > 0. Local Stability. (2. and Invariant Intervals Proof.20) is impossible. The proof is complete. Semicycles. A+B C we see that (2. A + B + Cxp−2 and xp−1 = x−1 = 1 we see that (2.22) holds .16)-(2. ∞). In addition to (2. 2 Corollary 2. Otherwise A + B > 0 and by choosing x0 > max α+β γ .1) is periodic with period p. Then clearly x0 = xp and so from Eq(2. .20) is impossible.4. 4.21) we now claim that also γ = 0. A+B C (2.21) (2.21) holds. 5.34 Chapter 2. Then by choosing x0 suﬃciently small. Hence (2.22) Otherwise γ > 0 and by choosing x0 < min α+β γ . we see that (2. Assume that every positive solution of Eq(2. Consider the solution with x−1 = 1 and x0 ∈ (0.1) xp = Hence (A + B)x0 + (Cx0 − γ)xp−2 = α + β.1 Let p ∈ {2.

27) (2. ψ. is a prime period-two solution of Eq(2.5 Existence of Prime Period-Two Solutions In this section we give necessary and suﬃcient conditions for Eq(2. . . Convention Throughout this book when we say that “every solution of a certain diﬀerence equation converges to a periodic solution with period p” we mean that every solution converges to a.) Furthermore we are interested in conditions under which every solution of Eq(2. .1) converges to a period-two solution in a nontrivial way according to the following convention. Assume that .1) to have a prime period-two solution and we exhibit all prime period-two solutions of the equation. ψ. (See [50]. . ψ ∈ [0.1) if and only if α + β(φ + ψ) = Bφψ with φ.27) hold .26) αC + β(γ − β − A) . is a prime period-two solution of Eq(2. . Then φ= and ψ= from which we ﬁnd that C(φ + ψ) = γ − β − A and when C>0 we also ﬁnd that (B − C)φψ = One can show that when C = 0 and B > 0 Eq(2. . Existence of Prime Period-Two Solutions 35 2.23) α + βψ + γφ A + Bψ + Cφ α + βφ + γψ A + Bφ + Cψ . C (2.5. φ. . not necessarily prime.24) (2. . Furthermore when (2.26) and (2. . ∞) and φ = ψ (2. .1).25) (2.2. . ψ. ψ. φ. solution with period p and furthermore the set of solutions of the equation with prime period p is nonempty.1) has a prime period-two solution if and only if γ = β + A. φ. . φ.

and φψ ≥ 0.28) Next assume that (2.. . . B > C. . .31) γ > β + A and When (2. the two cycle is .31) holds. . and Invariant Intervals or equivalently β φ> . α + β > 0. . φ. γ−A γ−A − φ. φ. 1. the values φ and ψ of the two cycle are given by the two roots of the quadratic equation t2 − γ−β−A αC + β(γ − β − A) t+ =0 C C(B − C) and we should also require that the discriminant of this quadratic equation be positive. . φ. 0.1) possesses a prime period-two solution . C C with 0 ≤ φ < γ−A . C C Finally when (2. Set un = xn−1 and vn = xn for n = 0. B and ψ = α + βφ . and φψ > 0. (2. −β + Bφ (2.6 Let Local Asymptotic Stability of a Two Cycle . B = C. . φ.30) (2.30) holds.23) and (2. . . Then it follows from (2. Semicycles. . . be a two cycle of the diﬀerence equation (2. . That is. the two cycle is . . . (γ − β − A)[B(γ − β − A) − C(γ + 3β − A)] α< . α = β = 0. ψ. . α = β = 0. ψ. 0. and φψ = 0. . φ.24) holds and that Eq(2. . .25) that one of the following three conditions must be satisﬁed: B = C. Periodicity. . ..29) (2. ..29) holds. . ψ. . ψ.36 Chapter 2. . B φ= β+ √ β 2 + αB . C γ−A γ−A . Local Stability.1). φ. (2.32) 4C 2 2. When (2. − φ. . . .

. v) = u v = g(u. ψ) ∂v (φ. ∞) deﬁned by: T Then u v = v βv+γu+α Bv+Cu+A 37 . Furthermore T2 where g(u.1) in the equivalent form: un+1 = vn α+βv vn+1 = A+Bvn +γun . evaluated at ψ By deﬁnition ∂g ∂g (φ. ψ) = . . v) α+βv+γu α + β A+Bv+Cu + γv α+βv+γu A + B A+Bv+Cu + Cv . φ ψ is a ﬁxed point of T 2 . n = 0. ∂u (A + Bψ + Cφ)2 ∂g (βA − αB) − (γB − βC)φ (φ. . ψ ∂h ∂h (φ. ψ) ∂u we ﬁnd the following identities: (γA − αC) + (γB − βC)ψ ∂g (φ. ∂u (A + Bφ + Cψ)2 (A + Bψ + Cφ)2 . n +Cun Let T be the function on [0. ψ) = . v) h(u. 1. ∂v (A + Bψ + Cφ)2 [(βA − αB) − (γB − βC)ψ][(γA − αC) + (γB − βC)ψ] ∂h (φ. Local Asymptotic Stability of a Two Cycle and write Eq(2.6. the second iterate of T . ψ) ∂v (φ. By computing the partial derivatives of g and h and by using the fact that φ= α + βψ + γφ A + Bψ + Cφ and ψ = α + βφ + γψ A + Bφ + Cψ The two cycle is locally asymptotically stable if the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix φ lie inside the unit disk. ∞) × [0.2. ψ) = . ψ) ∂u φ = JT 2 . . v) = α + βv + γu A + Bv + Cu and h(u. JT 2 .

.4 for some applications. The basin of attraction of this two cycle is the set B of all initial conditions (x−1 . 2. if and only if |S| < 1 + D and D < 1. (2. . B ∈ [0. See Sections 6. β.38 Chapter 2.33) .1) converges to the two cycle. ψ) + (φ. .5. be a two cycle of Eq(2. every solution converges to a (not necessarily prime) period-two solution and n = 0. ψ. A + Bxn In this section we consider the equation xn+1 = where α. γ.7. ∞) and nonnegative initial conditions and obtain a signum invariant for its solutions which will be used in the sequel (See Sections 4. .7 Convergence to Period-Two Solutions When C=0 α + βxn + γxn−1 . φ. A + B ∈ (0. Local Stability. A. β. 6.6. and Invariant Intervals [(βA − αB) − (γB − βC)ψ][(βA − αB) − (γB − βC)φ] ∂h (φ. γ.33) converges to a period-two solution. .1 (c) that both eigenvalues of JT 2 unit disk |λ| < 1.6.1 (Basin of Attraction of a Two Cycle) Let .1. 6. 6.9. That is.2) to obtain conditions on α. ψ). A and B so that every solution of Eq(2.1).7. ψ) = ∂v (A + Bφ + Cψ)2 (A + Bψ + Cφ)2 (γA − αC) + (γB − βC)φ . ψ) (φ. + (A + Bφ + Cψ)2 Set S= and D= ∂h ∂g (φ. φ. ∞) with α + β + γ. ψ) ∂u ∂v ∂h ∂g ∂h ∂g (φ. and 7. ψ. . . . Semicycles. ∂u ∂v ∂v ∂u φ ψ lie inside the Then it follows from Theorem 1. x0 ) through which the solution of Eq(2. 1. ψ) (φ. Periodicity. . Deﬁnition 2. and 10. ψ) − (φ.

Then the following statements are true: (a) β+A Jn for n ≥ 0. we need the following result. and let {xn }n=−1 be a solution of Eq(2. Clearly (i) holds. A + Bxn In particular. Jn+1 = (b) xn+1 − xn−1 = Jn A + Bxn for n ≥ 0. In this case the subsequences ∞ {x2n }∞ and {x2n−1 }∞ of the solution {xn }n=0 are both increasing and so if we can n=0 n=0 show that they are bounded. one and only one of the following three statements is true for each solution of Eq(2.27) holds. (β + A)J0 = 0. if and only if. the solution would converge to a period-two solution.33). Statement (ii) holds if and only if J0 < 0 and β +A > 0.) Now before we see that when B > 0 every solution of Eq(2.27) holds. (See also Section 10.7. Set (2.33) converges to a periodtwo solution if and only if (2.2. the solution {xn } is periodic with period-two. (ii) xn+1 − xn−1 < 0 for all n ≥ 0. Finally (iii) holds.1 Assume that (2. ∞ Lemma 2. In particular.2 where we present the complete character of solutions of Eq(2. In this case. In this case the subsequences {x2n }∞ and {x2n−1 }∞ of the solution {xn }∞ are both decreasing to ﬁnite limits and n=0 n=0 n=0 so in this case the solution converges to a period-two solution. if and only if J0 > 0 and β + A > 0.33): (i) xn+1 − xn−1 = 0 for all n ≥ 0. the proof of which follows by straightforward computations. Now observe that xn+1 − xn−1 = β+A (xn − xn−2 ) for n ≥ 1 A + Bxn .7. Convergence to Period-Two Solutions When C=0 39 there exist prime period-two solutions. (iii) xn+1 − xn−1 > 0 for all n ≥ 0.33).34) Jn = α + β(xn−1 + xn ) − Bxn−1 xn for n ≥ 0. the sign of the quantity Jn is constant along each solution.

≤K ρi + x2N < i=1 which contradicts the hypothesis that the subsequence of even terms is unbounded.27) holds every solution of Eq(2. Kρ + x2N 1−ρ . . A + Bx2n+1 A + Bx2n A + Bx2N +1 A + Bx2N Set Then K = |x2N − x2N −2 |.1 Assume B > 0. φ.33) are given by (2. The proof for the subsequence of odd terms is similar and will be omitted.27) holds all prime period-two solutions . . A + Bx2N +1 A + Bx2N A+β A+β |x2N − x2N −2 | < Kρ A + Bx2N +1 A + Bx2N A+β A+β |x2N +2 − x2N | < Kρ2 |x2N +4 − x2N +2 | = A + Bx2N +3 A + Bx2N +2 and by induction |x2N +2m − x2N +2(m−1) | < Kρm But then x2N +2m ≤ |x2N +2m − x2N +2m−2 | + . .7.33) has a prime period-two solution if and only if (2.28). (c) When (2. 2.27) holds. .33) converges to a period-two solution.35) We will now employ (2.35) to show that the subsequences of even and odd terms of the solution are bounded. that the subsequence of even terms increases to ∞. . (b) When (2. . of Eq(2. Local Stability. . . Periodicity. Theorem 2. Then there exists N ≥ 0 such that ρ= Clearly for all n > N . A+β A+β A+β A+β < = ρ. ψ. . In summary we have established the following result. . and Invariant Intervals n xn+1 − xn−1 = (x1 − x−1 ) β+A . + |x2N +2 − x2N | + x2N m for m = 1. Semicycles. . for the sake of contradiction. We will give the details for the subsequence of even terms. To this end assume. φ. Then the following statements hold: (a) Eq(2. |x2N +2 − x2N | = A+β A+β < 1.40 and so Chapter 2. A + Bxk k=1 (2. . ψ.

1.2.1). Invariant intervals for Eq(2. xn−1 ).8 Invariant Intervals An invariant interval for Eq(2. .9) and (2.10) and are fx (x. (A + Bx + Cy)2 − + − − − − − − Using this table. (2.36) if xN −1 . y) is monotonic in its arguments. In other words I is an invariant interval for the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = f (xn . . and N = γA − αC.8. For Eq(2. . fx < 0 if y > − M fy > 0 fx > 0 and fy < 0 fx > 0 and fy < 0 fx < 0 and fy > 0 fx < 0 and fy > 0 L L fx > 0 if y > − M .1) is an interval I with the property that if two consecutive terms of the solution fall in I then all the subsequent terms of the solution also belong to I. y) = where L = βA − αB. fx < 0 if y < − M fy < 0 fx < 0 and fy = 0 fx < 0 and fy < 0 fx < 0 and fy > 0 fx < 0 and fy > 0 fx < 0 N N fy > 0 if x > M . then xn ∈ I for every n > N . fy < 0 if x > M fx > 0 and fy < 0 fx > 0 and fy < 0 fx > 0 and fy > 0 fx > 0 and fy = 0 L L fx > 0 if y < − M . Signs of derivatives fx and fy fx > 0 N N fy > 0 if x < M .1) the partial derivatives are given by (2. n = 0. fy < 0 if x < M L + My (A + Bx + Cy)2 and fy (x. xN ∈ I for some N ≥ 0. . Invariant Intervals 41 2. The following table gives the signs of fx and fy in all possible nondegenerate cases. Case L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 + + + + + + 0 0 0 0 M + + + 0 0 − + + − − 0 0 − − N + 0 − + 0 + 0 − + 0 − 0 − + 0 − M = βC − γB. y) = N − Mx . we obtain the following table of invariant intervals for Eq(2.36) are determined from the intervals where the function f (x.

M ] if AM +(B+C)N < M √ 2 N (γ−A)M −BN + ((γ−A)M −BN ) +4BM (αM +βN ) [M . A−β ] if B = 0 and A > β L [0. A ] if A > 0 [k. A−β ] if B = 0. α > 0 and A > β √ β−A+ (β−A)2 +4Bα [0. K] if C = 0 where k and K satisfy α + βk + (γ − A)K ≤ BkK ≤ α + βK − Ak γ [0. ] if B + C > 0 √ 2(B+C) 2 +4αB α β−A+ (β−A) [A. C ] if C > 0 [k. Semicycles. B(β−γ) ] if C = 0 and β > γ αM −L(β+γ) αM −L(β+γ) L L [ AM −L(B+C) . ] if AM −BL+CMK > − M 2BM K α [ α(A+β) . A ] if A > 0 A2 +Bα β β [ B . (A−β)M +CN ] if B = 0 and (A − β)M + CN > 0 √ β−A+ (β−A)2 +4Bα [0. ] if 2CM αM +βK+γN M AM +BK+CN M > N M . B ] if B > 0 γ γ2 [ C . and Invariant Intervals Case 1 2 3 4 5 Invariant intervals αM +(β+γ)N N N [0. ] if B > 0 2B α [0. M ] if AM +(B+C)N < M √ 2 αM +(β+γ)N N (β−A)M −CN + ((β−A)M −N C) +4BM (αM +γN ) [M . C ] if C > 0 β β2 [ B . Local Stability. B(β−γ) ] if A = 0 and β > γ αM +(β+γ)N N αM +(β+γ)N N [ AM +(B+C)N . α > 0 and A > β √ β+γ−A+ (β+γ−A)2 +4α(B+C) [0. C(γ−β) ] if B = 0 and β < γ βM K+αM L if C = 0 and BM K+AM −γL > − M −CL and −(βM + BL)K ≥ αM + AL β [0. B + α ] if A = 0 and β > 0 β α [0. αC+γ ] if B = 0 and γ > βC γ−βC γ [0. ] if AM +(B+C)N > 2BM αM +γN N [ M . ] if B > 0 2B α α [ A .42 Chapter 2. − M ] if AM −L(B+C) < − M √ 2 αM −βL+γM L (β−A)M +LC+ ((β−A)M +LC) +4BM (αM −γL) L [− M . (γ − A)M + BL > 0 N M and B > 0 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 γ β [ C . K] if C = 0 where k and K satisfy α + βk + (γ − A)K ≤ BkK ≤ α + βK − Ak β γ [ B . C ] if C > 0 β αB+β 2 [ B . A−β ] if B = 0. C ] if C > 0 [k. − M ] if L [− M . B ] if B = 0 2 γ [ C . Periodicity. K] if A = 0 where k and K satisfy α+(β+γ)k ≤ kK ≤ α+(β+γ)K B+C B+C γ [0. L [− M . ] if B > 0 2B α [0. αM −(β+γ)L L AM −(B+C)L < − M √ (A−γ)M −BL+ ((A−γ)M −BL)2 +4CM (αM −βL) ] −2CM βL−αM (γ−A)M +BL ] if C = 0.

3 Let p ≥ 2 be an integer and assume that every positive solution of Eq(2.1 Assume that f ∈ C 1 [(0.7) that every positive solution of each of the following three equations xn+1 = 1 + xn+1 = xn+1 xn−1 . . 1. .2. ∞). (2. n = 0. ∞).7. xn n = 0. 6}? Open Problem 2. xn−1 ). Open Problem 2. . . 4.9 Open Problems and Conjectures What is it that makes all solutions of a nonlinear diﬀerence equation periodic with the same period? For a linear equation.39) (2. .38) (2.40) 1 + xn−1 . n = 0. A.9. ∞) × [0. B.9.37) has the property that every one of its solutions is also periodic with the same period p? What is it that makes every positive solution of a diﬀerence equation converge to a periodic solution with period p ≥ 2 ? Open Problem 2.37) converges to a periodic solution with period p. Open Problems and Conjectures 43 2. In particular address the case p = 2. (2. C ∈ [0. if and only if every root of the characteristic equation is a pth root of unity. 4. . β.37) is periodic with period p ≥ 2. 1. . = 1 + xn .5. 5. Find necessary and suﬃcient conditions so that every nonnegative solution of the diﬀerence equation (2. 6.7.9. Is it true that the linearized equation about a positive equilibrium point of Eq(2. Is it true that p ∈ {2. every solution is periodic with period p ≥ 2. Open Problem 2. . . 1 + xn xn + 2xn−1 . [0. . (0. and 6.9. ∞) × (0. .1) with α. n = 0. γ. . ∞) converges to a solution with period p .2 Let f ∈ C 1 [[0. 1.9. 1. ∞)] is such that every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = f (xn .4 It is known (see Sections 2. ∞)] and let p ≥ 2 be an integer.

if (2. Show that the positive equilibrium of Eq(2.1) is bounded. .9.3 Assume α. ∞) and γ > β + A.7.41) is a period-two solution of Eq(2. and 10. . Local Stability.44 Chapter 2. ψ.5 Assume α. C ∈ (0. C ∈ (0. φ.9. ∞) and that Eq(2. (2. 4. γ. B.41) In each case. . determine all initial conditions (x−1 . β.40).1) is a saddle point.38) or Eq(2. ψ. φ. .5. Periodicity. Determine the set of initial conditions x−1 and x0 for which the solution {xn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(2.) Conjecture 2. A. and Invariant Intervals converges to a solution with (not necessarily prime) period-two: . γ. Semicycles.1 Assume α. γ.41).7.7. Conjecture 2. C ∈ (0. x0 ) ∈ (0. 6. A. Conjecture 2.39) or Eq(2. . B ∈ (0. β. (See Sections 2.1) has no period-two solution. A. B. Open Problem 2. ∞). β. ∞) for which the solution {xn }∞ n=−1 converges to the period-two solution (2. Show that the positive equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable. Conversely. .2. ∞) and that Eq(2.1) has a positive prime period-two solution.9. ∞) × (0. .33) is bounded. γ. Show that every positive solution of Eq(2. β. 6. determine φ and ψ in terms of the initial conditions x−1 and x0 . B. A.2 Assume α.9. .

with nonnegative parameters and nonnegative initial conditions such that γ = β + δ + A. ∞).6 Assume α. Open Problem 2. ∞)]. 1.9.2). xn−1 n = 0. xn n = 0.8 Assume f ∈ C[(0.9 Extend Theorem 2. Conjecture 2. B. ∞). A. .7. 45 Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions in terms of the coeﬃcients so that every positive solution of Eq(2. C ∈ [0. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f for every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = 1 + to converge to a period-two solution. β. β. . f (xn ) . Show that Eq(2. γ. B.9. Open Problems and Conjectures Open Problem 2. What additional conditions should the parameters satisfy? .1 to third order diﬀerence equations xn+1 = α + βxn + γxn−1 + δxn−2 .9.9. (See Section 5.7 Assume f ∈ C[(0. A + Bxn−1 + Dxn−2 n = 0. .9. . f (xn−1 ) . . A. C ∈ [0.9. (0. . Open Problem 2. . γ.7).1) cannot have a positive prime two cycle which attracts all positive non-equilibrium solutions. 1. Open Problem 2. (See Section 4. . ∞).4 Assume that α.2. . (0. ∞)].1) is bounded. ∞). Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f for every solution of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = to be bounded. 1.

. But how about necessary and suﬃcient conditions for the equilibrium of Eq(2. . .10 Extend the linearized stability Theorem 1. xn−2 ). . xn−1 . or a saddle point. Semicycles. xn−1 .9. Periodicity. xn−2 . . (2. . xn−3 ).1 to third order difference equations xn+1 = f (xn . Local Stability. . 1. n = 0. or nonhyperbolic? Extend these results to fourth order diﬀerence equation xn+1 = f (xn . .46 Chapter 2. . and Invariant Intervals Open Problem 2.42) to be a repeller.1. n = 0. 1.42) For the equation λ3 + aλ2 + bλ + c = 0 one can see that all roots lie inside the unit disk |λ| < 1 if and only if |a + c| < 1 + b |a − 3c| < 3 − b b + c2 < 1 + ac .

4) xn+1 = β . Cxn−1 47 n = 0. 1.5) xn+1 = βxn . . .Chapter 3 (1.3) xn+1 = βxn . . (3. Cxn−1 n = 0. . . 1. . . . . . B n = 0. . 1)-Type Equations 3. . 1. (3.6) . . 1)-type: xn+1 = n = 0. A n = 0. 1. A Eq(1) contains the following nine equations of the (1. (3. .2) xn+1 = α . 1. . . . .1) xn+1 = α . (3.1 Introduction α . (3. (3. 1. Bxn n = 0.

.7) are linear diﬀerence equation.9) Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these equations are positive. (3.. y−1 y−1 y0 y0 It is interesting to note that except for the equilibrium solution y = 1.1).48 Chapter 3.. The remaining two equations. Bxn n = 0. every other solution of Eq(3.. (3. . . (3.9) are trivial. . y0 .2 The Case α = γ = A = B = 0 : xn+1 = β yn C βxn Cxn−1 This is the (1. . y0 1 1 y−1 . 1)-Type Equations xn+1 = γxn−1 . C n = 0.6) and (3. 1)-type Eq(3. . . are treated in the next two sections. A n = 0. yn−1 n = 0.7) xn+1 = and γxn−1 .4) is periodic with period four. . Of these nine equations. . . Eqs (3. Eqs(3.8). 3. Every solution of Eq(3. . 1.2) is periodic with period two and every solution of Eq(3. . namely. . Eqs(3. 1. (1. . . . . . (3.10) has prime period six.10) is periodic with period six. and the denominators are always positive. and (3. Indeed the solution with initial conditions y−1 and y0 is the six-cycle: y−1 .5). the initial conditions are nonnegative. (3. 1.8) xn+1 = γ . .6) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the equation yn+1 = yn . 1.4) and (3.10) It is easy to see that every positive solution of Eq(3.

3) also has the property that every nontrivial positive solution is periodic with prime period four but this equation is really a variant of Eq(3. (3. while Eq(3. n = 0. (0. . 1. The Case α = β = A = C = 0 : xn+1 = γxn−1 Bxn 49 γxn−1 Bxn 3.15) What is it that makes every solution of a nonlinear diﬀerence equation periodic with the same period? We believe this is a question of paramount importance and so we pose the following open problems. Eq(3. (3.14) (3. .6). respectively. namely two and six. The general solution of Eq(3. where f ∈ C[(0. ∞)]. ∞). . 1. (0.3. .12) . which possess the property that every positive nontrivial solution of each of these two equations is periodic with the same prime period. 1. n = 0.13) n = 0. (3. 3.8) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the linear equation yn+1 + yn − yn−1 = 0. ∞). . .7) is periodic with period two but this is a linear equation.2) is of the form xn+1 = f (xn ).2). from which the behavior of solutions is easily derived.6) is of the form xn+1 = f (xn . ∞)]. . xn−1 ).3 The Case α = β = A = C = 0 : xn+1 = γ yn e B This is the (1. Also every solution of Eq(3. . 1. . (3.11) is yn = C1 −1 + 2 √ 5 n n = 0.2) and (3.4 Open Problems and Conjectures Of the nine equations in this chapter we would like to single out the two nonlinear equations. . . (3. 1)-type Eq(3. where f ∈ C[(0. .11) + C2 −1 − 2 √ 5 n .3. Eq(3. ∞) × (0. .

1 Let k ≥ 2 be a positive integer and assume that (3. 9.4. 5. [17]. γ so that every solution of the equation xn+1 = α |xn | + βxn−1 + γ. 6. n = 0. 1)-Type Equations Open Problem 3. . Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f so that every positive solution of Eq(3. [0. xn−1 n = 0. ∞).15) holds. 7. Open Problem 3. ∞).) Conjecture 3. β.14) is periodic with period k.1 Let f ∈ C 1 [[0.2 Let k ≥ 2 be a positive integer and assume that (3. (1.4.4.16) is periodic with prime period ﬁve. γ ∈ (−∞.50 Chapter 3.3 Let k be a positive integer and assume that α. .12) is periodic with period k. .13) holds. In particular address the cases: (See [10]. ∞)] be such that every positive nontrivial solution of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = f (xn ) . Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on α. . and [59]. 1. In particular address the cases k = 4. [0.16) is periodic with prime period six. (3. ∞)] be such that every positive nontrivial solution of the diﬀerence equation (3. with real initial conditions is periodic with period k. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f so that every positive solution of Eq(3. Open Problem 3. k = 5. β. 1. . ∞). .4. 8.4. Conjecture 3. 6. .2 Let f ∈ C 1 [[0. Show that f (x) = 1 + x. Show that f (x) = x.

(3. f (xn ) .4.4. . n = 0. 1. n=0 . .4.5 Let {pn }∞ be a sequence of nonzero real numbers.3. n=0 (iii) {pn }∞ is periodic with prime period k ≥ 2. xn−1 n = 0. . . In each of n=0 the following cases investigate the asymptotic behavior of all positive solutions of the diﬀerence equation pn x n xn+1 = . ∞)] such that every positive nontrivial solution of the equation xn+1 = is periodic with prime period three. .4 Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f ∈ C[[0. [0. .18) xn−1 ∞ (i) {pn }n=0 converges to a ﬁnite limit. . Open Problems and Conjectures 51 Open Problem 3.17) Open Problem 3. (3. (ii) {pn }∞ converges to ±∞. ∞). 1.

.

. (4. .4) xn+1 = βxn . 1. . 1. Bxn + Cxn−1 n = 0. A + Bxn Eq(1) contains the following nine equations of the (1. 2)-type: xn+1 = n = 0. 1. . . A + Cxn−1 n = 0. Bxn + Cxn−1 53 n = 0.1) xn+1 = α . .3) xn+1 = βxn .1 Introduction α . . . 1.Chapter 4 (1. . (4.2) xn+1 = α .6) . (4. (4. A + Cxn−1 n = 0. 1. . (4. . . . . 1. 2)-Type Equations 4. . (4. A + Bxn n = 0. . .5) xn+1 = βxn . .

A + Bxn n = 0. . namely Eqs(4. (4. Two of these equations.8) will not be discussed any further in this chapter. .4).8) γxn−1 . . then the subsequences {x2n−1 } and {x2n } satisfy the Riccati equation of the form of Eq(4. (See Section 1. 2)-type Eq(4. 1. from which the global behavior of solutions is easily derived. . Similarly. 2)-Type Equations xn+1 = γxn−1 .1) and (4. the initial conditions are nonnegative. .4) are Riccati-type diﬀerence equations. Also Eqs(4.1).6 in the Preliminary Results). . 1. and the denominators are always positive. .2) and (4. Indeed if {xn } is a solution of Eq(4.7) xn+1 = and xn+1 = γxn−1 . then the subsequences {x2n−1 } and {x2n } satisfy the Riccati equation γyn n = 0. 1.4) to the linear equation yn+1 = A B yn + . yn+1 = A + Cyn It is also interesting to note that the change of variables xn = 1 yn reduces the Riccati equation (4. and (4. .2 The Case β = γ = C = 0 : xn+1 = A yn B α A+Bxn This is the (1.9) Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these equations are positive. Eqs(4. A + Cxn−1 n = 0. Bxn + Cxn−1 n = 0. (4. if {xn } is a solution of Eq(4. (4. . 4. . . 1.54 Chapter 4.2). .1) which by the change of variables xn = . . . .8).8) are essentially Riccati equations. (1. . (4. β β n = 0. In view of the above. 1. .2).

A2 The Riccati number associated with this equation (see Section 1.12) is bounded and persists.12) was investigated in [65]. yn yn−1 n = 0.2. . . 1 + yn p= n = 0. That is. (4. 2)-type Eq(4.2. So if the theorem is false there should exist a ∞ solution {yn }n=−1 which is neither bounded from above nor from below.10) αB .12) is bounded and then we will use the method of “limiting solutions” to show that every solution of Eq(4. 4. . .3. .12) converges to √ its equilibrium B + C. It is easy to see that if a solution of Eq(4.12) is bounded from above then it is also bounded from below and vice-versa. . Theorem 4.12) Eq(4. Proof.10) is globally asymptotically stable. (See also [12].3 The Case β = γ = A = 0 : xn+1 = α Bxn +Cxn−1 This is the (1. Theorem 4.) We will ﬁrst show that every solution of Eq(4.1 The positive equilibrium y= −1 + √ 2 1 + 4p of Eq(4. . n→∞ .3) which by the change of variables √ α xn = yn is transformed to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = C B + .4.1 Every solution of Eq(4.3.6) is R = −p < 0 and so the following result is a consequence of Theorem 1. The Case β = γ = A = 0 : xn+1 = reduces to the Riccati equation yn+1 = where α Bxn +Cxn−1 55 p . lim sup yn = ∞ and n→∞ lim inf yn = 0.6. 1. 1. (4.11) (4.

(1.3. n→∞ for n ≥ −1. The linearized equation of Eq(4. Then by Theorem 4. 2 √ B + C of Eq(4. 2)-Type Equations Then clearly we can ﬁnd indices i and j with 1 ≤ i < j such that yi > yn > yj Hence yj = and yi = That is .56 Chapter 4. .1. B+C B+C n = 0. To ∞ this end. By the theory of limiting solutions (see Section 1.1 . . . and by Theorem 1. B + C < yi yj ≤ B + C which is impossible. .12) is globally asymptotically √ B + C is (4. . −2.12). B C B+C + > yj−1 yj−2 yi C B+C B + ≤ .12) about the equilibrium y = zn+1 = − B C zn − zn−1 . j − 1}. Therefore there exist positive numbers m and M such that m ≤ yn ≤ M Let I = lim inf yn n→∞ We will show that I = S. . .1. y is locally asymptotically stable for all positive values of B and C. . and S = lim sup yn . yn yn−1 n = −3. . 1. Theorem 4. let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(4.2 The equilibrium y = stable. yi−1 yi−2 yj Proof. {yn }n=−1 is bounded and persists. . .5) there exist two solutions {In }∞ n=−3 and {Sn }∞ n=−3 of the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = with the following properties: I0 = I. . It remains to be shown that y is a global attractor of all solutions of Eq(4.13) for all n ∈ {−1.3.12). S0 = S B C + .

2)-type Eq(4.14) and (4.4 The Case α = γ = B = 0 : xn+1 = Equation A yn . From (4.Pielou’s This is the (1.16) . and I= Hence Thus B C B+C B C + =S= = + S−1 S−2 I I I from which it follows that S−1 = S−2 = I.15) we conclude that S=I and the proof is complete.15) 2 4. Therefore B C B C + = I = S−1 = + S S S−2 S−3 S = S−2 . . C βxn A+Cxn−1 . I−1 I−2 S B + C = SI.5) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to Pielou’s diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= pyn . Sn ∈ [I. 1.4. A n = 0. S= B C B+C + ≤ S−1 S−2 I C B+C B + ≥ . (4.14) from which it follows that (4. . (4.4. 1 + yn−1 β .Pielou’s Equation 57 In . The Case α = γ = B = 0 : xn+1 = and Then βxn A+Cxn−1 . . S] for n ≥ −3.

16) that every positive solution converges to 0. 1. 0 is locally asymptotically stable when p ≤ 1 and unstable when p > 1.79) as a discrete analogue of the delay logistic equation dN N (t − τ ) = rN (t) 1 − . .17) In this case the zero equilibrium of Eq(4.16) is when p > 1.16) is globally asymptotically stable.4.2.18) . Eq(4. In fact by employing Theorem 1.75). p.6) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = p + yn . it follows from Eq(4. B + Cyn βxn Bxn +Cxn−1 This is the (1. (See also ([42]. So the interesting case for Eq(4. Furthermore. Theorem 4. p + yn−1 n = 0.17) holds. which is locally asymptotically stable.16) was investigated in [55]. Then the positive equilibrium y = p − 1 of Eq(4. (4.) When p ≤ 1. p.1 (a) Assume p ≤ 1.16) possesses the unique positive equilibrium y = p − 1. t≥0 dt P which is a prototype of modelling the dynamics of single-species.16) is unstable and Eq(4. We summarize the above discussion in the following theorem. (1. 2)-type Eq(4. (b) Assume y0 ∈ (0.4.58 Chapter 4. x is globally asymptotically stable.5 The Case α = γ = A = 0 : xn+1 = β .16) is globally asymptotically stable. ∞) and p > 1. 4. Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(4. p. . (4. it follows that when (4. .22) and ([67]. 2)-Type Equations This equation was proposed by Pielou in her books ([66].

p + yn n = 0. except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle. every solution of Eq(4.1. ∞). In fact. Then 0 and y = 1 − p are the only equilibrium points of Eq(4.4. Then 0 is the only equilibrium point of Eq(4.1.19) and it is locally asymptotically stable. The following local result is a straightforward application of the linearized stability Theorem 1. . Lemma 4.6 The Case α = β = C = 0 : xn+1 = γ yn . 73) where it was shown that its equilibrium one is globally asymptotically stable . 0 is a repeller and y = 1 − p is a saddle point equilibrium. The oscillatory character of the solutions of Eq(4. (b) Assume p < 1.19) (see also Section 2.1 (e).19) was investigated in [28]. B γxn−1 A+Bxn This is the (1.7) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= yn−1 .19) A ∈ (0. .19) is a consequence of Theorem 1. That is.4.1 (a) Assume p > 1.1. The Case α = β = C = 0 : xn+1 = where γxn−1 A+Bxn 59 B .18) was investigated in ([42] Corollary 3. It follows directly from Eq(4. 1.6.19) and they are both unstable. 2)-type Eq(4.19) has semicycles of length one. . γ Eq(4. (4.7.5) that 1 yn+1 < yn−1 p and so when p>1 for n ≥ 0 . C Eq(4. p= 4. p.6.

. 2)-type Eq(4. 1.19) is globally asymptotically stable. Furthermore we can see that φψ = 0 but whether there exists solutions with φ=ψ=0 remains an open question. It follows from the identity (1 − p) − yn yn−1 . 4. . 1. ψ.60 Chapter 4. . ∞). . (4. yn+1 − yn−1 = p + yn that every oscillatory solution is such that the subsequences of even and odd terms converge monotonically one to ∞ and the other to 0. B This equation was investigated in [7] where it was shown that the following statements are true: p= .19) converges to a period-two solution . . . . (1. n = 0. . Finally when p<1 by invoking the stable manifold theory one can see that there exist nonoscillatory solutions which converge monotonically to the positive equilibrium 1 − p. φ.9) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = p + where yn−1 .7 The Case α = β = A = 0 : xn+1 = γ Byn γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 This is the (1. . . yn n = 0. φ.20) C ∈ (0. 2)-Type Equations the zero equilibrium of Eq(4. yn+1 < yn−1 for n ≥ 0 and so every positive solution of Eq(4. . ψ. . . On the other hand when p = 1.

21) As a simple consequence of the linearized stability Theorem 1. every solution of Eq(4. The linearized equation of Eq(4. ∞ (b) Let {yn }n=−1 be a solution of Eq(4.20) such that 0 < 1 y−1 ≤ 1 and y0 ≥ 1−p .20) to be bounded.2 (a) Let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(4. (iii) When p > 1.7.7. and so y0 > p + 1. n→∞ y2n+1 = p. n→∞ lim 2. Note that 1 1−p > p + 1. the equilibrium y = p + 1 of Eq(4. In fact the following result is true.20) which consists of a single semicycle. The next result about semicycles is an immediate consequence of some straightforward arguments and Theorem 1.7. and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(4. It suﬃces to show that y1 ∈ (p.20) is locally asymptotically stable when p > 1 and is an unstable saddle point when p < 1. with the possible exception of the ﬁrst semicycle. 1] and y2 ≥ p + y0 and use induction to complete the proof. . 1.1 The equilibrium point y = p + 1 of Eq(4. Theorem 4. 4. lim y2n = ∞. . The Case α = β = A = 0 : xn+1 = γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 61 (i) p ≥ 1 is a necessary and suﬃcient condition for every solution of Eq(4. Then the following statements are true: 1.7.4. (ii) When p = 1. . .1 The Case p < 1 Here we show that there exist solutions of Eq(4. We now proceed to establish the above results. every semicycle has length one.1.7. (4. Proof.20) which consists of at least two semicycles.1. Then {yn }∞ n=−1 converges monotonically to y = p + 1.20) converges to a period-two solution.20) is globally asymptotically stable. Moreover.7. Clearly the only equilibrium point of Eq(4.3 Let p < 1. Theorem 4.20) which are unbounded.1 we obtain the following result: Theorem 4. .20) is y = p + 1.20) about the equilibrium point y = p + 1 is zn+1 + 1 1 zn − zn−1 = 0. Then {yn }∞ n=−1 is oscillatory. p+1 p+1 n = 0.

y1 = p + y−1 1 ≤p+ ≤ 1. Then p+ p2 p−1 ≤ lim inf yn ≤ lim sup yn ≤ .4 Let p = 1.7. n→∞ p p−1 n→∞ Proof.7.7. p2 We shall ﬁrst show that lim supn→∞ yn ≤ p−1 .2 The Case p = 1 The following result follows from Lemma 2.1 Let p > 1. Then the following statements are true.20). y2n+1 < p + So as every solution of the diﬀerence equation 1 ym+1 = p + ym .20).5. ∞ (a) Suppose {yn }n=−1 consists of a single semicycle. p m = 0. Note that for n ≥ 0. Then {yn }∞ n=−1 converges monotonically to y = 2. 4.7.2 that we may assume that every semicycle of {yn }∞ n=−1 has length one. 1]. 2)-Type Equations > p. and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(4. ∞ (b) Suppose {yn }∞ n=−1 consists of at least two semicycles. Also. . that p < yn for all n ≥ −1. The following result will be useful. and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(4.7.20). y0 y0 2 and so y1 ∈ (p. y2n−1 . p . and that p < y0 < p + 1 < y−1 . It follows from Theorem 4. (c) Every solution of Eq(4. Then {yn }n=−1 converges to a prime period-two solution of Eq(4. Theorem 4.62 Indeed y1 = p + y1 y0 Chapter 4.20) converges to a period-two solution if and only if p = 1. 1. Hence y2 = p + y0 y1 ≥ p + y0 .20) is globally asymptotically stable. (1. Lemma 4. See also Section 2.3 The Case p > 1 Here we show that the equilibrium point y = p + 1 of Eq(4. .7. 4.1 and some straightforward arguments. .

Let p N ≥ 0 such that for all n ≥ N .7.4. Hence p < f (x. it follows that lim supn→∞ yn ≤ p−1 . we have p−1 p3 + p(p − 1) =p+ . Proof. ∞). .20) with prime period two. So let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(4. (0. set p−1 p2 + >p . y ∈ p. y2n−1 p + p2 + is arbitrary. x Then f ∈ C[(0. there exist no solutions of Eq(4. ∞). Then > 0. and f is increasing in y ∈ (0. ∞).p = p + p 2 p−1 p + p2 + p−1 p2 + p−1 = p2 + p3 + p = . Let > 0.5 Let p > 1. Then the equilibrium y = p + 1 is globally asymptotically stable. We know by Theorem 4. Recall that by Theorem 4. y) = p + . ∞)] . We shall next show that p + p−1 ≤ lim inf n→∞ yn . n→∞ y f (x. p2 + y2n−1 < . lim inf yn ≥ 2 n→∞ p p 2 We are now ready for the following result.7.1 that y = p + 1 is a locally asymptotically stable equilibrium point of Eq(4. ∞) × (0. ∞). y) < for all x. p−1 f p. p2 − p p−1 p2 + .20).7. ∞) for each y ∈ (0. There clearly exists y2n = p + So as p−1 p3 + p + p(p − 1) y2n−2 >p+p 2 = .7. p−1 Let n ≥ N .20). and set a = p and b = Note that f and p2 + . f is decreasing in x ∈ (0. Theorem 4. The Case α = β = A = 0 : xn+1 = 2 γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 2 63 p p converges to p−1 . y ∈ (0.4. It suﬃces to show that lim yn = p + 1. p−1 For x. ∞) for each x ∈ (0.

. y0 are such that y−1 y0 < 0 and such that Eq(4. 2 4. . (b) Assume that the initial conditions y−1 . [25]. . x0 such that {xn }∞ converges to this periodic solution. [60]. . Determine the set of all positive initial conditions x−l .23) is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0.6. and [61]. . (a) Find all initial conditions y−1 . p<p+ Chapter 4. . . B ∈ (0.1 Let . φ1 . A+B A+B A. [23]. . 1.22) converges. . n=−l Open Problem 4.8. xn−l n = 0. .22) Conjecture 4.64 Finally note that by Lemma 4.8. Show that every solution of Eq(4. .1 Consider the diﬀerence equation where and where the initial conditions x−l . .4. 2)-Type Equations and so by Theorem 1.} with k < l. y0 with y−1 y0 < 0 for which the equation yn+1 = B A . (4. . . l ∈ {0. . .2 (see [18]) Assume that A. φp . ∞). φ2 . p−1 p2 + p2 ≤ lim inf yn ≤ lim sup yn ≤ < n→∞ p p−1 p−1 n→∞ n→∞ lim yn = p + 1. .1.23) A B λl−k + = 0. Investigate the global behavior of the solution {yn }. . 1. .7. . B ∈ (0. . is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. either to the equilibrium or to a periodic solution with period p ≥ 2 and that what happens and the exact value of p are uniquely determined from the characteristic roots of the linearized equation λl+1 + (See [19]. . ∞) and k. (1. Is it bounded? Does limn→∞ yn exist? When does {yn } converge to a two cycle? . be a given prime period p solution of Eq(4.) Open Problem 4. .22). x0 are arbitrary positive real numbers.8 Open Problems and Conjectures xn+1 = A xn−k + B .8. + yn yn−1 (4. .

8. x0 ) ∈ R × R is such that the equation (4. Determine the set of initial conditions y−1 . Open Problem 4. For such an initial point. for these initial points.3 Show that Eq(4. Open Problems and Conjectures 65 Conjecture 4.20) is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0.8. y0 ∈ R be such that Eq(4.5 (a) Assume p ∈ (0. .8. the asymptotic behavior.8. Show that {xn }∞ n=−1 is a three cycle.6 (See [13]) Find the set G of all initial points (x−1 .4 Assume that (x−1 .20) possesses a solution {yn }∞ n=−1 which remains above the equilibrium for all n ≥ −1. and the periodic ∞ nature of the solution {yn }n=−1 of Eq(4.24) xn is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. Open Problem 4. ∞) ∞ for which the solution {yn }n=−1 of Eq(4. investigate the boundedness. Conjecture 4. Determine all initial conditions y−1 . (b) Let y−1 . Show that Eq(4. Open Problem 4.8. x0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation xn−1 xn+1 = −1 + (4.19) is bounded.20).3 Assume that p < 1. y0 ∈ R such that the equation (4. Conjecture 4.4. ∞).2 Assume that p = 1.20) is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. (c) Discuss (a) and (b) when p < 0.19) has a solution which converges to zero.24) is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0 and bounded.8.8.4 Determine the set G of all initial conditions (y−1 . Open Problem 4.8. y0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation yn−1 yn+1 = 1 + yn is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0 and. y0 ∈ (0. investigate the global character ∞ of {yn }n=−1 .

. .) Assume α ∈ (1. n = 0.}. ∞)].8. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f for every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = to be bounded. 1 + xn−k n = 0. .8. . . k. Investigate the global asymptotic stability of the equilibrium points of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = xn . and [67]. (0. x0 ∈ (0. ∞) does the sequence deﬁned by xn−1 . . . 1. Show that the positive equilibrium of Pielou’s discrete logistic model xn+1 = αxn . ai ∈ (0.8. < 2 cos α 2k + 1 Open Problem 4. (1. . . . ∞). ∞) and k ∈ {0. . with positive initial conditions. f (xn ) . 1. 1. 1. . [66]. ∞) for i = 0. . xn + xn−1 n = 0. a + a0 xn + . . . 2)-Type Equations Open Problem 4. .7 Let f ∈ C[(0. see [55]. xn+1 = 1 + xn converges to two? .8.6 (Pielou’s Discrete Logistic Model.66 Chapter 4. Conjecture 4.8 Let a. .5 (See [27]) Assume r ∈ (0. ∞). Conjecture 4. . . . with positive initial conditions is globally asymptotically stable if and only if kπ α−1 . 1. . Show that every positive solution of the population model Jn+1 = Jn−1 er−(Jn +Jn−1 ) .8. 1. Open Problem 4. . converges to a period-two solution. n = 0. . . + ak xn−k n = 0.9 (See [5]) For which initial values x−1 .

25) converges to a period-two solution . . 67 (4. y0 ∈ [0. (a) Find the set B of all initial conditions y−1 . . . (b) Determine the limits of the subsequences of even and odd terms of every solution of Eq(4. 0. ∞ More precisely. 1). Open Problems and Conjectures (See also Section 4. 1.4.20) are bounded. 1.25) with nonnegative initial conditions. in terms of the initial conditions y−1 and y0 of the solution. y0 ∈ B.11 Assume p ∈ (0. . n = 0. . . . (4.25) converge to zero. Investigate the asymptotic behavior of {yn }n=−1 . 1. Open Problem 4. .8.27) . n = 0.7) Open Problem 4. . ∞) such that the solutions {yn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(4. . Open Problem 4. . 1 + yn−1 n = 0. yn yn−1 pn yn . 0. . .25). each of the subsequences {y2n }∞ and {y2n+1 }n=−1 is decreasing and n=0 lim [n→∞ y2n ][n→∞ y2n+1 ] = 0. . lim p = n→∞ pn .12 Let {pn }∞ be a convergent sequence of nonnegative real numn=0 bers with a ﬁnite limit.10 (See [31]) Consider the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = yn−1 e−yn . .8. . ∞ (b) Let y−1 . lim (a) Find all initial points y−1 . ∞ One can easily see that every solution {yn }n=−1 of Eq(4. Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of each of the following diﬀerence equations: yn+1 = yn+1 = 1 pn + .26) (4. y0 ∈ (0.25).8. In other words. ﬁnd the basin of attraction of the equilibrium of Eq(4.8. ∞) through which the solutions of Eq(4. . .

. . yn For those equations from the above list for which you were successful. 1 − yn−1 1 + yn . . Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of each of Eqs(4. 1 − yn (4.14 For each of the following diﬀerence equations determine the “good” set G ⊂ R × R of all initial conditions (y−1 .33) (4.29) (4. . n = 0.31) yn+1 = (4. . Then for every (y−1 .32) (4. 1. . n = 0. investigate the long term behavior of the solution {yn }∞ n=−1 : yn+1 = yn . . Open Problem 4. extend your result by introducing arbitrary real parameters in the equation. (4. 2)-Type Equations yn+1 = n = 0.30) yn+1 = yn+1 = pn + Open Problem 4. . 1. 1. .68 pn + yn .(4.13 Let {pn }∞ be a periodic sequence of nonnegative real numbers n=0 with period k ≥ 2. yn Chapter 4. (1.8.26) . pn + yn yn−1 . . pn + yn−1 yn−1 .30). y0 ) ∈ G.34) yn+1 = yn+1 = −1 + yn−1 .28) (4. . y0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. 1 − yn−1 yn−1 .8.

. . Bxn n = 0. . . Bxn n = 0.6) . . . (5. .Chapter 5 (2. . . . (5. . 1. . (5. 1. .3) xn+1 = α + γxn−1 .5) xn+1 = α + γxn−1 . A n = 0. (5. . 1. 1. 1. 1)-Type Equations 5. 1)-type: xn+1 = n = 0.2) xn+1 = α + βxn . (5. . 1. .1 Introduction α + βxn . Cxn−1 n = 0.1) xn+1 = α + βxn .4) xn+1 = α + γxn−1 . A Eq(1) contains the following nine equations of the (2. . (5. . Cxn−1 69 n = 0.

which was investigated in Section 4. the initial conditions are nonnegative.8) to Eq(4. 1. 1. 5.Lyness’ This is the (2.8) βxn + γxn−1 .9) to Eq(4. 1)-Type Equations xn+1 = βxn + γxn−1 .4) and (5. 1. Eqs(5.7) xn+1 = and xn+1 = βxn + γxn−1 . Bxn n = 0. (5. . which was investigated in Section 4.7. Therefore there remain Eqs(5.1). .18) with p = β .7) are linear. (5.10) . . . (5.3) which by the change of variables reduces to the equation yn+1 = n = 0. . (5.2). . .5). (5.2 The Case γ = A = B = 0 : xn+1 = Equation p + yn .5. .9) Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these equations are positive. Cxn−1 n = 0. . .20) with p = β . 1)-type Eq(5. Of these nine equations.6) is essentially like Eq(5. which will be investigated in the next two sections. γ Finally the change of variables xn = γ β + yn . yn−1 α+βxn Cxn−1 . B reduces Eq(5. (2. . C C γ reduces Eq(5. 1. .3) and (5.2) is a Riccati equation and Eq(5. and the denominators are always positive. Eq(5. A n = 0.70 Chapter 5. The change of variables γ xn = yn . .

. (See ([42]. β2 p=1 was discovered by Lyness in 1942 while he was working on a problem in Number Theory. contains at least two and at most three terms. .Lyness’ Equation 71 p= The special case of Eq(5.1 Assume that p > 0.5.12) from which it follows that every solution of Eq(5. 1.. . (b) Every nontrivial semicycle. after the ﬁrst one. .) In this special case.2. It was also shown in [44] by using KAM theory that the positive equilibrium y of Eq(5. 1 + y0 1 + y−1 + y0 1 + y−1 . [57]-[59]. .10) has a limit. and [72] and the references cited therein. Then the following statements about the positive solutions of Eq(5. [71]. the equation becomes 1 + yn yn+1 = . This result was also established in [49] by using a Lyapunov function. It was shown in [30] that no nontrivial solution of Eq(5. [43].. [42].2.10) where αC .10) is bounded from above and from below by positive constants. Indeed the solution of Eq(5.. .10) are true: (a) The absolute extreme in a semicycle occurs in the ﬁrst or in the second term. The Case γ = A = B = 0 : xn+1 = where α+βxn Cxn−1 . n = 0.10) possesses the invariant In = (p + yn−1 + yn ) 1 + 1 yn−1 1+ 1 yn = constant (5. Concerning the semicycles of solutions of Eq(5.11) yn−1 every solution of which is periodic with period ﬁve. See [11].11) with initial conditions y−1 and y0 is the ﬁve-cycle: y−1 . There is substantial literature on Lyness’ Equation. 131) for the history of the problem.10) is stable but not asymptotically stable. p. . y−1 y−1 y0 y0 Eq(5. y0 .10) the following result was established in [43]: Theorem 5. (5.

. α+γxn−1 Bxn This is the (2.13) either approaches the positive equilibrium y monotonically or it oscillates about y with semicycles of length one in such a way that {y2n } and {y2n+1 } converge monotonically one to zero and other to ∞. Concerning the nonoscillatory solutions of Eq(5.13) αB . .1. 5. 1. By Theorem 1.13) is a saddle point. The global character of solutions of Eq(5.3 The Case β = A = C = 0 : xn+1 = γ yn B n = 0.10) is bounded from above and from below by positive numbers. From this it follows that a solution of Eq(5.12). 1)-Type Equations 5.13) is a consequence of the identity yn+1 − yn−1 = yn−1 − yn−2 yn for n ≥ 1.1 one can see that the unique equilibrium point √ 1 + 1 + 4p y= 2 of Eq(5.72 Chapter 5.12). By the linearized stability Theorem 1. one can easily see that every solution of Lyness’ Eq(5.10) without using essentially the invariant. .13) was investigated in [28].13) converges monotonically to the equilibrium y.4 Open Problems and Conjectures By using the invariant (5.1 one can see that except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle.10) is bounded without using the invariant (5.13) has semicycles of length one. 1)-type Eq(5. . γ2 Eq(5. To this day we have not found a proof for the boundedness of solutions of Eq(5. (2. Open Problem 5.5) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the equation yn+1 = where p= p + yn−1 . every oscillatory solution of Eq(5.13) one can easily see that every nonoscillatory solution of Eq(5.1 Show that every solution of Lyness’ Eq(5.7.4. yn (5.

14) possesses a (nontrivial) invariant.4. y0 ∈ (−∞. (0.2 Let G be the set of initial conditions deﬁned in the Open problem 5. . ∞). Conjecture 5. ∞). Show that the subset of G through which the solutions of Eq(5.4.4.4.5. Open Problems and Conjectures 73 Open Problem 5. When we allow the initial conditions to be real numbers the equation yn+1 = p + yn yn−1 (5. xn−1 n = 0.14) about x does not have both eigenvalues in |λ| < 1 and does not have both eigenvalues in |λ| > 1.2 Assume that f ∈ C[(0. ∞)] and that the diﬀerence equation (5. Open Problem 5. ∞). we oﬀer the following open problems and conjectures. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions in terms of f so that the diﬀerence equation (5. Determine the set G of all initial conditions y−1 . ∞)].) Assume p ∈ (−∞. .4. (0.4.4. Show that the linearized equation of Eq(5. f (xn ) . (0.15) is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. we oﬀer the following open problems and conjectures.1 Assume that f ∈ C[(0. ∞) through which Eq(5. ∞)]. ∞). .14) Open Problem 5. Conjecture 5.15) may not even be well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. 1.4 (See [26]. To illustrate. .3 Assume that f ∈ C[(0. (5.15) are unbounded is a set of measure zero. What is it that makes Lyness’ equation possess an invariant? What type of diﬀerence equations possess an invariant? Along these lines. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions in terms of f so that every positive solution of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = is bounded.4.14) possesses a unique positive equilibrium point x and a nontrivial invariant.

. 1.3 Assume p ∈ (−∞.5 Determine all positive integers k with the property that every positive solution of the equation yn+1 = is periodic.4 Show that every positive solution of the equation yn+1 = converges to a period-six solution. yn−1 yn−3 n = 0. Conjecture 5. Conjecture 5. is a set of points without interior. y0 ) ∈ (−∞.4. 1. . .4.15) is not well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. Conjecture 5.4. converges to a period-three solution. . ∞) × (−∞. yn n = 0.4. (2. . . y0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation 1 + yn−1 yn+1 = yn is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. 1)-Type Equations Conjecture 5.4. . . yn yn−4 + . y0 ) ∈ G.6 Find the set G of all initial points (y−1 . 1 + . + yn yn−1 yn−3 yn−4 n = 0. . 1.4. . . + yn−k . Open Problem 5. . . Determine the periodic character and the asymptotic behavior of all solutions with (y−1 . yn−k−1 n = 0. has a nontrivial positive solution which decreases monotonically to the equilibrium of the equation.6 Show that the equation yn+1 = 1 + yn−1 .74 Chapter 5. . ∞). . Show that the set of points (y−1 .5 (See [20]) Show that every positive solution of the equation yn+1 = 1 1 . ∞) through which Eq(5. 1. Open Problem 5.

(1 + xn )xn−1 n = 0. . see [59]) Assume α > 1. Show that every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = is bounded. 1.4. Show that every positive solution of May’s Host Parasitoid Model xn+1 = is bounded.8 (The Gingerbreadman Map. . . . . . 1. see [59]) Let A ∈ (0.16) A A 1+yn 2 reduces Eq(5.17) is called the Gingerbreadman Map and was investigated by Devaney [17].16) to where xn = −1+yn 2 if A > 1 if A = 1 if A < 1 n = 0. (5. xn xn−1 n = 0.17) yn+1 = |yn | − yn−1 + δ. 1. . Eq(5. . 2 αxn .5. 1 if A < 1 if A = 1 δ= 0 −1 if A > 1. Open Problems and Conjectures 75 Conjecture 5. Conjecture 5. ∞). When δ = 1. (5. Note that the change of variables n e y2 max{x2 .4. A} n . .4. .7 (May’s Host Parasitoid Model.

.

A + Cxn−1 n = 0. A + Bxn n = 0. 2)-type: xn+1 = n = 0. 1. .5) xn+1 = α + γxn−1 . Bxn + Cxn−1 n = 0.4) xn+1 = α + γxn−1 . . . . . . 1. 2)-Type Equations 6. A + Cxn−1 n = 0. 1. . . . 1. Bxn + Cxn−1 77 n = 0. . (6.2) xn+1 = α + βxn . 1.3) xn+1 = α + γxn−1 .Chapter 6 (2. . .6) .1 Introduction α + βxn . . .1) xn+1 = α + βxn . . . A + Bxn Eq(1) contains the following nine equations of the (2. (6. (6. . 1. (6. (6. (6. .

7) xn+1 = βxn + γxn−1 . See Section 1.6. Eq(6. A + Cxn−1 n = 0. Therefore we will omit any further discussion of Eq(6. . 2)-type Eq(6.5) then {x2n }n=0 and {x2n−1 }n=0 are both solutions of the Riccati equations zn+1 = with zn = x2n and zn+1 = with zn = x2n+1 respectively. 1. . (6. . . Bxn + Cxn−1 n = 0. for n ≥ −1. (6. .1) which is in fact a Riccati equation. To avoid a degenerate situation we will assume that αB − βA = 0. A + Czn for n ≥ 0 n = −1. (2. (6. 6. In fact if {xn }∞ n=−1 is a positive solution of ∞ ∞ Eq(6. . 2)-Type Equations xn+1 = βxn + γxn−1 . .5) is essentially similar to Eq(6.78 Chapter 6.1). 1. . . α + γzn . 1. . . the initial conditions are nonnegative. 1. . .9) Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these equations are positive. .2 The Case γ = C = 0 : Equation xn+1 = α+βxn A+Bxn . and the denominators are always positive. α + γzn . .Riccati This is the (2. A + Bxn n = 0. A + Czn n = 0.8) xn+1 = βxn + γxn−1 .5). 0. . .

2) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the equation yn+1 = where p + qyn . 4 Now the following result is a consequence of Theorem 1. the conjecture has not been proven or refuted. (6. To this day. By applying the linearized stability Theorem 1.1 we obtain the following result. The Case γ = B = 0 : xn+1 = α+βxn A+Cxn−1 79 The Riccati number associated with this equation is R= and clearly βA − αB (β + A)2 1 R< . See also [36].3. Lemma 6. .6.3 The Case γ = B = 0 : xn+1 = A yn C α+βxn A+Cxn−1 This is the (2.6. 6.3.3.) Eq(6. .2.10) has the unique positive equilibrium y given by p= y= q−1+ (q − 1)2 + 4p 2 . 1 + yn−1 n = 0. . 2)-type Eq(6. The main results known about Eq(6.10) is bounded from above and from below by positive constants.10) αC β and q = . 1. 2 A A (Eq(6.2: Theorem 6.1) is globally asymptotically stable.10) is a very simple looking equation for which it has long been conjectured that its equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable. Eq(6.1 The positive equilibrium of Eq(6.10) was investigated in [42] and [43]. .1 The equilibrium y of Eq(6.10) is locally asymptotically stable for all values of the parameters p and q.1.1 Every solution of Eq(6.10) are the following: Theorem 6.

Clearly. Furthermore after the ﬁrst. .10) we see that yn+1 < qyn + p for n ≥ 0 and so k→∞ lim ynk = lim ynk −1 = ∞. k→∞ lim y1+nk = ∞.2 Let {yn }n=−1 be a nontrivial solution of Eq(6. Proof. k→∞ Hence. then p yn+1 ≥ 1+M and so it is also bounded from below. Then there exists a subsequence {y1+nk }∞ such k=0 that k→∞ lim nk = ∞. 0 ≤ y1+nk − ynk = p + [(q − 1) − ynk −1 ]ynk <0 1 + ynk −1 2 which is a contradiction and the proof is complete. except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle. (iv) Assume q ≤ p. except perhaps for the ﬁrst one. and y1+nk = max{yn : n ≤ nk } for k ≥ 0.10). Furthermore. From (6. there is at most one term which follows the extreme. every semicycle contains two or three terms. Then. (iii) In any two consecutive semicycles. Now assume for the sake of contradiction that the solution is not bounded from above. the remaining terms in a positive semicycle are strictly decreasing and in a negative semicycle are strictly increasing.10) is described by the following result: ∞ Theorem 6.3. Then the following statements are true: (i) Every semicycle. has at least two terms. if the solution is bounded from above by a constant M .80 Chapter 6.10). 2)-Type Equations Proof. The proofs for negative semicycles are similar and will be omitted. Let {yn } be a solution of Eq(6. The oscillatory character of solutions for Eq(6. their extrema cannot be consecutive terms. (ii) The extreme in each semicycle occurs at either the ﬁrst term or the second. We present the proofs for positive semicycles only. in every semicycle. for suﬃciently large k. (2.

So assume that for some N ≥ 0 the last two terms in a negative semicycle are yN −1 and yN with yN −1 ≥ yN . p + qyN p + qy = y. (ii) q≥1 and either p ≤ q or q < p ≤ 2(q + 1).3. the ﬁrst two terms in a positive semicycle are yN and yN +1 . Then yN ≥ y. Then yN +1 = p + qyN p + qyN +1 < = yN +2 . < < 1 + yN +1 1 + yN +1 1+y 2 Theorem 6. α+βxn A+Cxn−1 81 yN −1 < y Then yN +1 = and yN ≥ y. The Case γ = B = 0 : xn+1 = (i) Assume that for some N ≥ 0. 1 + yN −1 1 + yN (iv) Assume that for some N ≥ 0. Then yN +3 = p + qyN +2 p + qyN +1 p + qy = y. the terms yN .3. yN +1 . The opposite case is similar and will be omitted. > 1 + yN −1 1+y (ii) Assume that for some N ≥ 0.10) is globally asymptotically stable if one of the following two conditions holds: (i) q < 1.3 The positive equilibrium of Eq(6. . yN +1 > y and p p +q +q yN +2 1 p + qyN +1 yN +1 = = < y = 1. and yN +2 are all in a positive semicycle. yN +1 yN +1 1 + yN 1 + yN 1+y (iii) We consider the case where a negative semicycle is followed by a positive one.6.

4. Chapter 6.3) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= yn + p . yn + qyn−1 αB β2 n = 0. . 1 ≤ q ≤ p ≤ 2(q + 1) 2 6.2.1.10) yields i≥ Hence and so because q < 1.1. 1+i from which the result follows. The following result is a consequence of the linearized stability Theorem 1. C . it remains to show that every solution {yn }∞ of Eq(6.82 Proof. Then Eq(6. This result was ﬁrst established in [43]. .1 exist and are positive numbers. . Theorem 3. For the proof when see ([42]. To this end.11) and q = Eq(6.10) n=−1 tends to y as n → ∞. 71).4. 2)-type Eq(6.3 (f). (ii) The proof when p<q follows by applying Theorem 1.11) was investigated in [15]. B (6. 2)-Type Equations (i) In view of Lemma 6. let i = lim inf yn n→∞ and s = lim sup yn n→∞ which by Theorem 6. p. p + (q − 1)i ≤ is ≤ p + (q − 1)s i≥s p + qi 1+s and s ≤ p + qs .3.1. (2.4 The Case γ = A = 0 : xn+1 = β yn B α+βxn Bxn +Cxn−1 This is the (2. . 1.3.

p q p . Then the following statements are true: (a) Assume p < q and suppose that for some k ≥ 0. Proof.1 Invariant Intervals The following result establishes that the interval I with end points 1 and p is an invariq ant interval for Eq(6.1 The unique positive equilibrium point y= 1+ 1 + 4p(q + 1) 2(q + 1) of Eq(6. yk−1 . q for all n > k. yk−1 . ∞). (b) The proof is similar and will be omitted.1 Let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(6. v) = u + qv is increasing in u and decreasing in v.4.11) is locally asymptotically stable for all values of the parameters p and q. yk + p yk + p yk+1 = ≤ = 1.1 . Indeed.1 q p . Then yn ∈ 1. yk ∈ Then yn ∈ p . 6. for some k ≥ 0. The Case γ = A = 0 : xn+1 = α+βxn Bxn +Cxn−1 83 Theorem 6. (b) Assume p > q and suppose that for some k ≥ 0.11) in the sense that if. (a) The basic ingredient behind the proof is the fact that when u. q for all n > k.4.11).4. the q function u+p f (u. yk ∈ 1. . yk + qyk−1 yk + q p q yk+1 yk + p = ≥ yk + qyk−1 p q p q +p +q > p q 2 and the proof follows by induction. Lemma 6. then ym ∈ I for all m > k.6. two consecutive values yk−1 and yk of a solution lie in I. v ∈ [ p .4.

84

Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

6.4.2

Semicycle Analysis

∞ Let {yn }n=−1 be a solution of Eq(6.11). Then observe that the following identities are true: p − yn−1 (6.12) yn+1 − 1 = q q for n ≥ 0, yn + qyn−1

yn+1 − and yn − yn+4 =

p (q − p) + pq(1 − yn−1 ) = q q(yn + qyn−1 )

for n ≥ 0,

(6.13)

(yn − 1)[qyn yn+3 + yn+1 yn+3 ] + qyn+1 (yn − p ) q q(p + yn+1 ) + yn+3 (yn+1 + qyn )

for n ≥ 0.

(6.14)

First we will analyze the semicycles of the solution {yn }∞ n=−1 under the assumption that p > q. (6.15) The following result is a direct consequence of (6.12)-(6.15):

∞ Lemma 6.4.2 Assume that (6.15) holds and let {yn }n=−1 be a solution of Eq(6.11). Then the following statements are true:

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 < p , then yN +1 > 1; q (ii) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 = p , then yN +1 = 1; q (iii) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 > p , then yN +1 < 1; q (iv) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 ≥ 1, then yN +1 < p ; q (v) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 ≤ 1, then yN +1 > 1; (vi) If for some N ≥ 0, yN ≥ p , then yN +4 < yN ; q (vii) If for some N ≥ 0, yN ≤ 1, then yN +4 > yN ; (viii) If for some N ≥ 0, 1 ≤ yN −1 ≤ p , then 1 ≤ yN +1 ≤ p ; q q (ix) If for some N ≥ 0, 1 ≤ yN −1 , yN ≤ p , then yn ∈ [1, p ] for n ≥ N . That is [1, p ] is q q q an invariant interval for Eq(6.11); (x) p 1<y< . q

6.4. The Case γ = A = 0 : xn+1 =

α+βxn Bxn +Cxn−1

85

The next result, which is a consequence of Theorem 1.7.2, states that when (6.15) holds, every nontrivial and oscillatory solution of Eq(6.11), which lies in the interval [1, p ], oscillates about the equilibrium y with semicycles of length one or two. q Theorem 6.4.2 Assume that Eq(6.11) holds. Then every nontrivial and oscillatory solution of Eq(6.11) which lies in the interval [1, p ], oscillates about y with semicycles q of length one or two.

∞ Next we will analyze the semicycles of the solutions {yn }n=−1 under the assumption that q = p. (6.16)

In this case, Eq(6.11) reduces to yn+1 = with the unique equilibrium point y = 1. Also identities (6.12)-(6.14) reduce to yn+1 − 1 = p and yn − yn+4 = (yn − 1) pyn+1 + pyn yn+3 + yn+1 yn+3 p(p + yn+1 ) + yn+3 (yn+1 + pyn ) for n ≥ 0. (6.19) 1 − yn−1 yn + pyn−1 for n ≥ 0 (6.18) yn + p , yn + pyn−1 n = 0, 1, . . . (6.17)

**and so the following results follow immediately:
**

∞ Lemma 6.4.3 Let {yn }n=−1 be a solution of Eq(6.17). Then the following statements are true:

(i) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 < 1, then yN +1 > 1; (ii) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 = 1, then yN +1 = 1; (iii) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 > 1, then yN +1 < 1; (iv) If for some N ≥ 0, yN < 1, then yN < yN +4 < 1; (v) If for some N ≥ 0, yN > 1, then yN > yN +4 > 1.

∞ Corollary 6.4.1 Let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a nontrivial solution of Eq(6.17). Then {yn }n=−1 oscillates about the equilibrium 1 and, except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle, the following are true:

86

Chapter 6. (2, 2)-Type Equations

(i) If y−1 = 1 or y0 = 1, then the positive semicycle has length three and the negative semicycle has length one. (ii) If (1 − y−1 )(1 − y0 ) = 0, then every semicycle has length two. Finally we will analyze the semicycles of the solutions {yn }∞ under the assumption n=−1 that p < q. (6.20) The following result is a direct consequence of (6.12)-(6.14) and (6.20). Lemma 6.4.4 Assume that (6.20) holds and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(6.11). Then the following statements are true: (i) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 < p , then yN +1 > 1; q (ii) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 = p , then yN +1 = 1; q (iii) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 > p , then yN +1 < 1; q (iv) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 ≤ 1, then yN +1 > p ; q (v) If for some N ≥ 0, yN −1 ≤ p , then yN +1 > p ; q q (vi) If for some N ≥ 0, yN ≥ 1, then yN +4 < yN ; (vii) If for some N ≥ 0, yN ≤ p , then yN +4 > yN ; q (viii) If for some N ≥ 0,

p q p q

≤ yN −1 ≤ 1, then

≤ yN +1 ≤ 1;

(ix) If for some N ≥ 0, p ≤ yN −1 , yN ≤ 1, then yn ∈ [ p , 1] for n ≥ N . That is, [ p , 1] is q q q an invariant interval for Eq(6.11); (x) p < y < 1. q

The next result, which is a consequence of Theorem 1.7.4, states that when (6.20) holds, every nontrivial and oscillatory solution of Eq(6.11) which lies in the interval [ p , 1], after the ﬁrst semicycle, oscillates with semicycles of length at least two. q Theorem 6.4.3 Assume that (6.20) holds. Then every nontrivial and oscillatory solution of Eq(6.11) which lies in the interval [ p , 1], after the ﬁrst semicycle, oscillates with q semicycles of length at least two.

6.4. The Case γ = A = 0 : xn+1 =

α+βxn Bxn +Cxn−1

87

How do solutions which do not eventually lie in the invariant interval behave? First assume that p>q

∞ and let {yn }n=−1 be a solution which does not eventually lie in the interval I = [1, p ]. q Then one can see that the solution oscillates relative to the interval [1, p ], essentially in q one of the following two ways: (i) Two consecutive terms in ( p , ∞) are followed by two consecutive terms in (0, 1), q are followed by two consecutive terms in ( p , ∞), and so on. The solution never visits q the interval (1, p ). q (ii) There exists exactly one term in ( p , ∞), which is followed by exactly one term in q (1, p ), which is followed by exactly one term in (0, 1), which is followed by exactly one q term in (1, p ), which is followed by exactly one term in ( p , ∞), and so on. The solution q q visits consecutively the intervals

...,

p p p p , ∞ , 1, ,∞ ,... , (0, 1), 1, , q q q q

in this order with one term per interval. The situation is essentially the same relative to the interval [ p , 1] when q p < q.

6.4.3

Global Stability and Boundedness

Our goal in this section is to establish the following result: Theorem 6.4.4 when (b) Assume that q > 1 + 4p. Then every solution of Eq(6.11) lies eventually in the interval Proof. (a) We have already shown that the equilibrium y is locally asymptotically stable so it remains to be shown that y is a global attractor of every solution {yn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(6.11). Case 1 Assume p = q. It follows from (6.19) that each of the four subsequences {y4n+i }∞ n=0 for i = 1, 2, 3, 4

p ,1 q

(a) The equilibrium y of Eq(6.11) is globally asymptotically stable q ≤ 1 + 4p. (6.21)

.

22) we see that Li = 1 for i = 1. . As in Case 2 we can see that every solution of Eq(6. First. L1 . 2)-Type Equations is either identically equal to one or else it is strictly monotonically convergent. 4.2 that [1. By applying (6. v) = u+p u + qv is increasing in u and decreasing in v.11) with two consecutive values in [1.11) must eventually lie in the interval [ p . 2.4. Now. Recall from Lemma 6. In this interval the q function u+p f (u. 3. L4 .19) to the solution (6. (2. . .5 applies and so every solution of Eq(6. L3 .11) converges to y. p ] is an invariant interval.4. v) = u + qv is decreasing in both variables and so it follows by applying Theorem 1. . we can see that if a solution is not eventually in [1. p ].7 that every solution of Eq(6. By applying (6.88 Chapter 6. Set Li = n→∞ y4n+i lim Thus clearly .11) n→∞ lim yn = y and the proof is complete. (6. Theorem 1. Under the assumption that q ≤ 1 + 4p. 2 . q Hence for every solution {yn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(6. 4 and so n→∞ for i = 1. assume that p < q. In this interval the function q f (u. lim yn = 1.11) with period four.22) is a periodic solution of Eq(6. p ] converges to y. it converges to a periodic solution with period-four which q is not the equilibrium. L2 . By q using an argument similar to that in the case p = q. (b) The proof follows from the discussion in part (a). . p ]. . 1]. 3. Case 2 Assume p = q. we assume that p > q. 2.14) to this period four solution we obtain a contradiction and so every solution of Eq(6.4.11) must lie eventually in [1.

Then the values φ and ψ of all prime period-two solutions (6. .23) is locally asymptotically stable when q < 1. ∞) : φψ = p}. .25) (b) Assume (6.1. ψ ∈ (0. the following result is a consequence of the results in Section 2.5. Then every solution of Eq(6. if and only if q = 1. . .24) .6. 1.23) has a prime period-two solution . φ. (6.5.23) is y= q−1+ (q − 1)2 + 4p 2 and by applying the linearized stability Theorem 1. Theorem 6.24) are given by {φ.1 The equilibrium y of Eq(6.25) holds.5.23) converges to a period two solution. .1 we obtain the following result: Theorem 6. (c) Assume that (6. and is an unstable saddle point when q > 1.23) and q = (Eq(6. γ . Concerning prime period-two solutions.4) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= p + qyn−1 .25) holds.2 (a) Eq(6.5 The Case β = C = 0 : xn+1 = A yn B This is the (2. ψ. ψ. A (6. (6. The Case β = C = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 A+Bxn 89 α+γxn−1 A+Bxn 6. . . φ. .) The only equilibrium point of Eq(6. 1 + yn αB A2 n = 0. . 2)-type Eq(6.7.23) was investigated in [28].

90 Chapter 6. (2. It is suﬃcient to show that {yn } is a decreasing sequence for n ≥ K. The case where yn−1 < y for n ≥ K is similar and will be omitted.4 Assume that q < 1. Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(6. Proof. So assume for the sake of contradiction that for some n0 ≥ K.23). yn0 ) < f (y. Then yn0 +1 = which is impossible. Clearly. the condition p ≥ q implies that the function f (x) = is decreasing. yn0 −1 ) < f (yn0 . y) = y. 2)-Type Equations 6. p + qyn0 −1 = f (yn0 .23) oscillates about the equilibrium y with semicycles of length one. an oscillatory solution {yn } of Eq(6. (6.23) are as follows: Theorem 6.5.3 Let {yn } be a nontrivial solution of Eq(6. 1 + yn p + . (b) Assume p ≥ q.23) is globally asymptotically stable.5.23) and let y denote the unique positive equilibrium of Eq(6. Proof.1 Semicycle Analysis Our results on the semicycles of solutions for Eq(6.2 The Case q < 1 The main result in this section is the following: Theorem 6. 1−q n ≥ 0.23).7. Then every nonoscillatory solution of Eq(6. Clearly yn+1 = Set M= p + qyn−1 < p + qyn−1 .1 (b) Let {yn } be a nonoscillatory solution of Eq(6. Then the following statements are true: (a) After the ﬁrst semicycle. We will assume that there exists a positive integer K such that yn−1 ≥ y for every n ≥ K. 1 + yn0 2 p + qx 1+x 6. yn0 > yn0 −1 . (a) This follows immediately from Theorem 1.5.26) .5.23) converges monotonically to the equilibrium y.

1+x 1−q Then clearly.3 The Case q > 1 In this case we will show that there exist solutions that have two subsequences. The local stability of y was established in Theorem 6.6. By applying Theorem 1.5.23). M ]. The Case β = C = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 A+Bxn 91 where is some positive number.5.6 it follows that y is a global attractor of all solutions of Eq(6.5. a = 0. .1. lim y2n = ∞ p + qy2n−1 =0 1 + y2n and lim y2n+1 = lim n→∞ n→∞ and the proof is complete. y) ≤ b. y2n−1 < q − 1 and y2n > y0 + n Hence n→∞ p . y) = . one of which is monotonically approaching 0 and the other is monotonically approaching ∞. The proof is complete. and b = + . a ≤ f (x.4. From Eq(6.26) and Eq(6. it now follows that every solution of Eq(6. b] × [a. b]. y) ∈ [a.23) lies eventually in the interval [0. for all (x.23). 2 6. q−1 p + q(q − 1) p + qy−1 < <q−1 1 + y0 1 + y0 p + qy0 p + qy0 p > = y0 + 1 + y1 q q p q for n ≥ 1. Set p + qy p f (x. In fact this is true for every solution {yn }∞ n=−1 whose initial conditions are such that the following inequalities are true: y−1 < q − 1 and y0 > q − 1 + To this end observe that y1 = and y2 = and by induction.

. qyn + yn−1 αC γ2 n = 0. C (6.27) was investigated in [45].28) By employing Theorem 1. . F (u) = (1 + q)u2 − u − p. .30) (6.1 we see that y is locally asymptotically stable when (q − 1)y < 2p and unstable (a saddle point) when (q − 1)y > 2p. Clearly the equilibrium y is the positive solution of the quadratic equation (1 + q)y 2 − y − p = 0. B .27) about y is zn+1 + q qy − p zn − zn−1 = 0.27) has the unique positive equilibrium y= 1+ 1 + 4p(1 + q) 2(1 + q) . . . If we now set it is easy to see that (6.29) .29) is satisﬁed if and only if either q≤1 or q > 1 and F 2p q−1 > 0. . 2)-type Eq(6. .27) and q = (Eq(6.6 The Case β = A = 0 : xn+1 = γ yn C α+γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 This is the (2.1.) Eq(6.92 Chapter 6. The linearized equation associated with Eq(6. 1.6) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= p + yn−1 . 2)-Type Equations 6. 1. 1+q (y + p)(1 + q) n = 0. (6. (2. (6.

ψ. q−1 . . Then φ= p+φ qψ + φ and ψ = p+ψ . φ.6.27) has a prime period-two solution . qφ + ψ It now follows after some calculations that the following result is true: Theorem 6.6. .27) is locally asymptotically stable when q < 1 + 4p and unstable. φ. when q > 1 + 4p.31) 6.6. . The Case β = A = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 93 Similarly (6. .27). .6. Furthermore when (6. ψ.32) (6. (6. if and only if q > 1 + 4p.32) holds.1 Let Existence and Local Stability of Period-Two Cycles . and more precisely a saddle point equilibrium. ψ. .2 Eq(6. . ψ. . . The following result is now a consequence of the above discussion and some simple calculations: Theorem 6.30) is satisﬁed if and only if q > 1 and F 2p q−1 < 0. the period-two solution is “unique” and the values of φ and ψ are the positive roots of the quadratic equation t2 − t + p = 0.1 The equilibrium y of Eq(6. be a period-two cycle of Eq(6. φ. . . . φ.6.

qg(u. ψ) ∂h (φ. v) = p+u qv + u u v = g(u. . By a simple calculation we ﬁnd that T2 where g(u.27) in the equivalent form: un+1 = vn vn+1 = p+un qvn +un . ψ) = . ψ) ∂u ∂v where.94 To investigate the local stability of the two cycle . . . Let T be the function on (0. 1. ∞) × (0. ∂v (qψ + φ)2 . Chapter 6. φ. v) = Clearly the two cycle is locally asymptotically stable when the eigenvalues of the φ lie inside the unit disk. the second iterate of T . we set un = yn−1 and vn = yn . v) p+v . v) + v and h(u. φ. . and write Eq(6. ∂u (qψ + φ)2 ∂g (p + φ)q (φ. Jacobian matrix JT 2 . ∂g qψ − p (φ. . . (2. evaluated at ψ We have ∂g ∂g (φ. . 1. ∞) deﬁned by: T Then u v = v p+u qv+u . . 2)-Type Equations for n = 0. . . . ψ) ∂v (φ. ψ. n = 0. ψ. . ψ) ∂u φ JT 2 = ψ ∂h (φ. ψ) = − . v) h(u. φ ψ is a ﬁxed point of T 2 . .

34) (6. The Case β = A = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 95 q(p + ψ)(qψ − p) ∂h (φ.36) (qψ − p)(qφ + ψ)2 + (qφ − p)(qψ + φ)2 + q 2 (p + ψ)(p + φ) − (qψ − p)(qφ − p) < (qψ + φ)2 (qφ + ψ)2 which is true if and only if p (q 3 + 2q 2 − 4qp + 2q 2 p + 2p − 3q) + q − p + q 2 p2 + qp − p2 < (qψ + φ)2 (qφ + ψ)2 q−1 which is true if and only if −q 3 p + 7q 2 p − 8qp2 + 4q 2 p2 + 4p2 − 7qp + 2q 2 − q + p − q 3 < 0 which is true if and only if −(p + 1)(q − 1)(q − which is true because q > 1 + 4p.34) is equivalent to (6.6. if and only if |S| < 1 + D < 2. ψ) = − . p )[q − (1 + 4p)] < 0 p+1 . ψ) − (φ.1 that both eigenvalues of JT 2 unit disk |λ| < 1. ψ) = .34). First we will establish Inequality (6. ∂u (qφ + ψ)2 (qψ + φ)2 ∂h q 2 (p + φ)(p + ψ) qφ − p (φ. ψ) (φ.35) (6. ψ) ∂u ∂v ∂g ∂h ∂h ∂g (φ. + 2 (qψ + φ)2 ∂v (qφ + ψ) (qφ + ψ)2 Set S= and D= ∂h ∂g (φ. ψ) + (φ.33) is equivalent to the following three inequalities: S <1+D −1 − D < S D < 1. Inequality (6. To this end observe that (6. ψ) (φ. ∂u ∂v ∂v ∂u φ ψ lie inside the Then it follows from Theorem 1.33) (6.6. ψ).1.

36) is true if and only if (qψ − p)(qφ − p) < (qψ + φ)2 (qφ + ψ)2 which is true if and only if p [q 2 − (q − 1)(q − p)] < (pq − p + q)2 q−1 which is true if and only if q(pq − p + q)(pq − 2p + q − 1) > 0 which is true because q > 1 + 4p.35). we establish Inequality (6.3 Let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(6. Observe that (6. Theorem 6. More precisely we show that the values of any solution {yn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(6.27).96 Chapter 6.2 Invariant Intervals Here we show that the interval I with end points one and p is an invariant interval for q Eq(6. (2. (a) Assume that p ≤ q and that for some N ≥ 0. 2)-Type Equations Next we will establish Inequality (6. p ≤ yN ≤ 1. Observe that (6.27) either remain forever outside the interval I or the solution is eventually trapped into I.36). Then the following statements are true. q . Finally. q Then p ≤ yn ≤ 1 for all n ≥ N.27).6.35) is equivalent to −(qψ + φ)2 (qφ + ψ)2 which is true if and only if < (qψ − p)(qφ + ψ)2 + (qφ − p)2 (qψ + φ)2 + q 2 (p + ψ)(p + φ) + (qψ − p)(qφ − p) −(qψ + φ)2 (qφ + ψ)2 < p (q 3 + 4q 2 − 4qp + 2q 2 p + 2p − 3q) − p + q 2 p2 q−1 which is true if and only if q 2 + 2pq + 2p2 q 2 − p2 + qp2 − q 3 − 3q 3 p − 2q 3 p2 − p < 0 which is true if and only if p2 (−2q 3 + 2q 2 + q − 1) + p(−3q 3 + 2q − 1) − q 3 + q 2 < 0 which is true because q > 1.6. 6.

The Case β = A = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 97 (b) Assume that p ≥ q and that for some N ≥ 0.27). Then observe that the following identities are true: p − yn for n ≥ 0. 6. q Then 1 ≤ yn ≤ Proof.27). (b) Clearly.39) 2 qyn−1 (yn − p ) + (yn − 1)(yn−1 yn + qyn ) q .3 Semicycle Analysis Here we present a thorough semicycle analysis of the solutions of Eq(6. yN +1 = and yN +1 = p + yN −1 p + yN −1 =1 ≥ qyN + yN −1 p + yN −1 p q p + yN −1 ≤ pyN + p yN −1 q p q p p + yN −1 = p + yN −1 q 2 p + yN −1 = qyN + yN −1 and the proof follows by induction. p 1 ≤ yN ≤ .6.37) yn+1 − 1 = q q qyn + yn−1 qyn−1 (1 − p ) + pq(1 − yn ) p q yn+1 − = q q(qyn + yn−1 ) yn − yn+2 = q(p + yn−1 ) + yn (qyn + yn−1 ) for n ≥ 0. Let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(6. (a) Indeed we have yN +1 = and yN +1 = p + yN −1 p + yN −1 ≤ =1 qyN + yN −1 p + yN −1 p q p + yN −1 p = p + yN −1 q p q for all n ≥ N. (6.27) relative to the equilibrium y and relative to the end points of the invariant interval of Eq(6. p + yN −1 p + yN −1 ≥ = q qyN + yN −1 (pyN + p yN −1 ) p q and the proof follows by induction.6.6. for n ≥ 0. (6.38) (6.

40) the above identities reduce to the following: yn+1 − 1 = p and yn − yn+2 = (yn − 1) 1 − yn pyn + yn−1 for n ≥ 0 for n ≥ 0. then yN +2 < yN . 2)-Type Equations n = 0.2 Assume that p=q ∞ and let {yn }n=−1 be a solution of Eq(6. . Lemma 6. yN > p . q (v) If for some N ≥ 0. q Lemma 6. q (iv) If for some N ≥ 0. Then the following statements are true: (i) If for some N ≥ 0.27). pyn + yn−1 Chapter 6.42) The following three lemmas are now direct consequences of (6.27). yN ≤ 1. p ] is an q q q invariant interval for Eq(6. yN < 1.6. yN ≥ 1.6. .1 Assume that p>q and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(6. . yN = p . (2. then yN +1 < p . . yN < p . then yN +1 > 1. (6. yN ≥ p . In particular [1. yN ≤ p . (6. then yN +1 = 1. q (vi) If for some N ≥ 0. then yN +1 > 1.41) 2 pyn−1 + yn−1 yn + pyn p(p + yn−1 ) + yn (pyn + yn−1 ) (6. then yN +1 < 1.42). q (ii) If for some N ≥ 0. q (iii) If for some N ≥ 0.37)-(6.27). 1. then yN +2 > yN . (viii) p 1<y< . (vii) If for some N ≥ 0. then yn ∈ [1. Then the following statements are true: (i) If for some N ≥ 0. p ] for n ≥ N .98 When p=q that is for the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = p + yn−1 .

q (vi) If for some N ≥ 0. then yN +1 > p . (vii) If for some N ≥ 0.1-6.7. then yN +2 > yN .3 Assume that p<q ∞ and let {yn }n=−1 be a solution of Eq(6. yN = 1. yN ≤ 1. yN < p . 1] for n ≥ N .2 and Lemmas 6. yN = p .6. then yN > yN +2 > 1. then yN +1 = 1. yN ≥ 1.3: .7. then yN +1 > 1. (iii) If for some N ≥ 0. q (iv) If for some N ≥ 0. yN ≤ p .27). In particular [ p .6. then yn ∈ [ p .6. then yN +1 < 1.6. q (ii) If for some N ≥ 0. yN ≤ 1. then yN +1 ≥ 1. (iv) If for some N ≥ 0. yN ≤ p . Then the following statements are true: (i) If for some N ≥ 0. yN > p . Lemma 6. (v) If for some N ≥ 0. q (iii) If for some N ≥ 0. (ix) p < y < 1. then yN +1 < 1. yN < 1. then yN < yN +2 < 1. q q The following result is now a consequence of Theorems 1. then yN +1 = 1. q (v) If for some N ≥ 0. q Note that the function f (u.27).1 and 1. q (viii) If for some N ≥ 0. The Case β = A = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 99 (ii) If for some N ≥ 0. then yN +2 < yN . 1] is an q q invariant interval for Eq(6. v) = p+v qu + v is always decreasing in u but in v it is decreasing when u < p and increasing when u > p . yN > 1.6. yN > 1.

φ. . with φ + ψ = 1 and φψ = p .27) eventually enters and remains in the interval I.44)-(6. in view of Theorems 1. φ. any solution which remains forever outside the interval I = [ p . every solution of Eq(6. Let I be the closed interval p with end points 1 and q and let J and K be the intervals which are disjoint from I and such that I ∪ J ∪ K = (0.6.6. The above observations are summarized in the following theorem: Theorem 6. When (6. and only then.5 (a) Assume q ≤ 1 + 4p. must converge to y.27) either eventually enters the interval I with end points 1 and p and remains there.27) has a “unique” prime period-two solution . . or vice-versa. or stays forever outside I.100 Chapter 6. ψ. When (6. 2)-Type Equations Then either all the even terms of the solution lie in J and all odd terms lie in K.27). . ∞).6.6 and 1.7. Hence. .4 Let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(6. (6. when (6. 1] must converge to the two cycle (6. q Now when q ≤ 1 + 4p Then the equilibrium y of Eq(6.32) holds. if Theorem 6. . The character of these solutions remains an open question. (2. or for some N ≥ 0.43) 6. .44) (6.27) has a unique equilibrium y which is locally stable when (6.32) holds.32) holds. q−1 (6.45) there are no period-two solutions and so the solutions must eventually enter and remain in I and.43) holds.4 Global Behavior of Solutions Recall that Eq(6. On the other hand when (6. But this two cycle lies q inside the interval I. Eq(6.4. .31) holds. yn ∈ I for n ≥ N.27) is global attractor. while if p>q the length is at most two. p<q the length is one. ψ.45). (6.4.46) Also recall that a solution {yn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(6. except for the length of the ﬁrst semicycle of the solution.

1: Theorem 6.47) was investigated in [52]. The following result follows from Theorem 1.6. More precisely it is a saddle point when 1−p<q <1+p and a repeller when q > 1 + p.27) eventually enters and remains in the interval [ p . . .47) is unstable.47) β γ and q = . 1 + yn n = 0. Then every solution of Eq(6.7.7 The Case α = C = 0 : xn+1 = A yn B βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn This is the (2. The Case α = C = 0 : xn+1 = (b) Assume βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn 101 q > 1 + 4p. y = p + q − 1 is the only positive equilibrium point of Eq(6. and when p + q > 1. Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(6.7) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where pyn + qyn−1 . . q 6.7.1.3.1 and the linearized stability Theorem 1. 1. (6. A A (Eq(6. 1+y So y = 0 is always an equilibrium point. Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(6.1 (a) Assume p + q ≤ 1.) The equilibrium points of Eq(6.47).47) is globally asymptotically stable. . (b) Assume p + q > 1.47) are the solutions of the equation p= y= py + qy . 1]. 2)-type equation Eq(6.

50) Then every solution of Eq(6. φ−p 6.49) The main result here is the following theorem about Eq(6.7. (6. if and only if q = 1 + p.47) eventually enters the interval (0. Furthermore. .47) is an unstable saddle point. Then the positive equilibrium y = p + q − 1 of Eq(6. ψ ∈ (p.47) eventually enters the interval [ p . p ]. . [ p .47) q with initial conditions in (0. (d) Assume q > 1 + p. q (0.47) with q = 1. φ. remains in this interval.47). q (b) Assume that q > 1. q .2 Eq(6.7. (2. Theorem 6. every solution of Eq(6.3 (a) Assume that q < 1. Furtherq more.1 Invariant Intervals q=1 (6.47).48) holds. (6.47) is locally asymptotically stable.47) has a prime period-two solution .51) Then every solution of Eq(6. ψ.48) Furthermore when (6. The case is treated in Section 6. ∞) : ψ = = 2p}. . . φ.102 (c) Assume Chapter 6. 2)-Type Equations 1 − p < q < 1 + p. .7.3. . Then the positive equilibrium y = p + q − 1 of Eq(6. ψ. ∞) is an invariant interval for Eq(6.5 that the following result is true: Theorem 6.7. That is. Concerning prime period-two solutions it follows from Sections 2. p ]. (6. p ] is an invariant interval for Eq(6. ∞). the values of φ and ψ of all prime period-two solutions are given by: pφ {φ.

Let f : [0.47). qm q 6. ∞) → [0. Then for any k. that is. ∞) − {x}. x) − x) < 0 for x ∈ (0. ∞) → [0. ∞) denote the function f (x. 1+x Observe that g(y) = y and that g increases on [0. Consider the function g : [0.1 (a) Assume that (6.4 Suppose Let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a positive solution of Eq(6.7. m ∈ N. whose proof is straightforward and will be omitted. ∞) × [0. Hereafter. y) = px + qy . y refers to the positive equilibrium p + q − 1 of Eq(6. Theorem 6.47) when p + q > 1 and q ≤ 1. The Case α = C = 0 : xn+1 = βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn 103 The proof of the above theorem is an elementary consequence of the following lemma.51) holds. Then for any k. ∞) deﬁned by g(x) = (p + q)x .50) holds. .2 Here we discuss the behavior of the semicycles of solutions of Eq(6.47). Lemma 6.7.7. ∞). (x − x)(f (x. m q q (b) Assume that (6. Then the following statements are true for every n ≥ 0: p + q > 1 and q ≤ 1. yk ≤ and yk+2 ≥ p p =⇒ yk+2 ≤ p < q q p p =⇒ yk > m+1 > p. yk ≥ and yk+2 ≤ p p =⇒ yk+2 ≥ p > q q p p =⇒ yk > m+1 > p. m ∈ N. 1+x Semicycle Analysis of Solutions When q ≤ 1 Then f satisﬁes the negative feedback condition.7.6.

yn ≤ y. yn }. we obtain q yn+1 = pyn + qyn−1 pyn + qy ≥ ≥ g(y) = y. Then yn+1 = y . yn }. (b) Suppose yn−1 . (b) If yn−1 . 1 + yn 1 + yn−1 yn+1 = The last inequality follows from the negative feedback property.104 (a) If y ≤ yn−1 . (a) Suppose y ≤ yn−1 . 2)-Type Equations then then then then y ≤ yn+1 ≤ max{yn−1 . (d) If yn < y ≤ yn−1 . (c) If yn−1 < y ≤ yn . yn } pyn + qyn−1 ≤ = max{yn−1 . 1 + yn 1 + yn 1 + yn Since q ≤ 1 and yn−1 < y. yn . then {yn } decreases to the equilibrium y. (2. min{yn−1 . Thus px+qyn−1 1+x p − qyn−1 > p − qy = (1 − q)(p + q) ≥ 0. 2−q Chapter 6. 1 + yn 1+y Observe that all inequalities are strict if we assume that yn−1 < y or yn < y. yn . (e) If y < yk < Proof. (p + q) max{yn−1 . 1+x is increasing for y < p . for every k ≥ −1. 1 + yn 1+y px + qx . yn+1 = (c) Suppose yn−1 < y ≤ yn . yn } pyn + qyn−1 ≥ = min{yn−1 . 1 + yn 1 + yn Since the function Observe that all inequalities are strict if we assume that yn−1 > y or yn > y. . Then in view of the previous case yn+1 = and pyn + qy pyn + qyn−1 ≤ < g(y) = y 1 + yn 1 + yn (p + q) min{yn−1 . Then yn+1 = pyn + qyn−1 (p + q)yn (1 + y)yn < = < yn . which is equivalent to q ≤ 1. increases in x and so pyn + qyn−1 pyn−1 + qyn−1 > = g(yn−1 ) > yn−1 . yn ≤ y. yn−1 < yn+1 < yn . yn }. yn } ≤ yn+1 < y. yn < yn+1 < yn−1 .

Then yn ≤ p for all n > 0 and (6.47) is y = p.6. (a) Assume y−1 ≥ p and y0 ≥ p. Then yn ≥ p for all n > 0 and n→∞ lim yn = p. Theorem 6.52) holds. we must consider two cases: Case 1. (6. Then px+qyn−1 increases in x and so 1+x yn+1 = pyn−1 + qyn−1 pyn + qyn−1 ≤ < yn−1 . Suppose p − qyn−1 < 0. More precisely the following statements are true.5 Suppose that q = 1 and let y−1 + y0 > 0. 1 + yn 1 + yn pyn + qyn−1 >y =p+q−1 1 + yn 6. Then the equilibrium y of Eq(6.52) holds. (c) Assume either y−1 < p < y0 or y−1 > p > y0 . Then yn+1 = βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn 105 pyn + qyn pyn + qyn−1 > = g(yn ) > yn 1 + yn 1 + yn by the negative feedback property. To see that yn+1 < yn−1 .3 Semicycle Analysis and Global Attractivity When q = 1 q = 1. Here we discuss the behavior of the solutions of Eq(6. yn−1 ≥ qyn−1 > y + (q − 1)yn > yn 2 pyn + qyn−1 qyn−1 (yn + 1) < ≤ yn−1 .47) is globally asymptotically stable. . Suppose p − qyn−1 ≥ 0. Then yn+1 = (e) Observe that yn+1 = and so from which the result follows. The Case α = C = 0 : xn+1 = (d) Suppose yn < y ≤ yn−1 .47) when Here the positive equilibrium of Eq(6.7. 1 + yn 1 + yn−1 The last inequality follows from the negative feedback property. Case 2. Then {yn }∞ n=−1 oscillates about the equilibrium p with semicycles of length one and (6.7.7.52) (b) Assume y−1 ≤ p and y0 ≤ p.

y2 = 1 + y1 1 + y1 It follows by induction that the solution oscillates about p with semicycles of length one. we can show that y2 < y0 and by induction y1 = y−1 ≥ y1 ≥ y3 ≥ . we claim that the subsequence {y2k+1 }∞ k=−1 is increasing. We will assume that y−1 ≥ p and y0 > p. 2)-Type Equations Proof. Next. In fact. and so convergent. > p. The proof when y0 < p < y−1 is similar and will be omitted. 1 + y0 1 + y0 Similarly. (b) The proof of (b) is similar to the proof of (a) and will be omitted. 1 + y0 1 + y0 and py1 + p py1 + y0 > = p. Furthermore. . there exist m ≥ p and M ≥ p such that k→∞ lim y2k+1 = m and k→∞ lim y2k = M. (2. . ≥ p and y0 > y2 > y4 > . py0 + y−1 py0 + p y1 = < = p. Then y1 = and py0 + p py0 + y−1 ≥ = p. . y−1 ≥ p implies that y2 = py0 + y−1 ≤ y−1 y0 + y−1 and so y−1 y0 + y−1 py0 + y−1 ≤ = y−1 . The case y−1 > p and y0 ≥ p is similar and will be omitted.47) has no period-two solutions when q = 1. 1 + y1 1 + y1 It follows by induction that yn ≥ p for all n > 0. It is interesting to note that y−1 = p ⇒ y2k+1 = p for k ≥ 0 and y0 = p ⇒ y2k = p for k ≥ 0. (c) Assume y−1 < p < y0 . . As Eq(6. 1 + y0 1 + y0 py1 + y0 py1 + p > = p. (a) The case where y−1 = y0 = p is trivial. since y−1 + py0 > y−1 + y−1 y0 then y1 = py0 + y−1 > y−1 1 + y0 . it follows that m = M = p and the proof of part (a) is complete.106 Chapter 6. Thus.

6 Assume 1 − p < q < 1. Concerning the long-term behavior of solutions of Eq(6. and so convergent. The Case α = C = 0 : xn+1 = βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn 107 and the claim follows by induction. y) = px + qy 1+x satisﬁes the hypotheses of Theorem 1. without loss of generality. .7.5 Long-term Behavior of Solutions When q > 1 q>1 Here we discuss the behavior of the solutions of Eq(6. Here we consider the case where and we show that the equilibrium point y = p + q − 1 of Eq(6. Theorem 6. 2 6. there exist m ≤ p and M ≥ p such k=0 that lim y2k+1 = m and lim y2k = M k→∞ k→∞ and as in (a).4. ∞). Observe that the consistency condition y ≤ p is equivalent to the condition q q ≤ 1.6.47) we may assume. Thus.7.7. q In this case.47) converges to the positive equilibrium y. Now clearly the function q f (x. ∞).7.4 Global Attractivity When q < 1 1 − p < q < 1. 2 6. m = M . that y−1 . y0 ∈ [p.47) is global attractor of all positive solutions of Eq(6.47) when which is equivalent to p y> . By Theorem 6.3 (a) we may assume that the initial conditions y−1 and y0 lie in the interval I = (0. Then every positive solution of Eq(6.47). p ]. In a similar way we can show that the subsequence {y2k }∞ is decreasing.5 in the interval I from which the result follows. Proof. every positive solution of Eq(6.47) lies eventually in the interval [p.7.

47). . an oscillatory solution of Eq(6.53) where un ≥ 0 for n ≥ 0. Then Eq(6.47) oscillates about the positive equilibrium y with semicycles of length one.7. (c) Assume q > 1 + p. Theorem 6. we obtain the following theorems about the solutions of Eq(6.108 Then the change of variable yn = un + p.47) has unbounded solutions.47) converges to the positive equilibrium of Eq(6. By applying the results of Section 6.47) converges to a period-two solution. Then every solution of Eq(6. The character of solutions of Eq(6. (2.47) to the equation un+1 = Chapter 6.53).53) was investigated in Section 6. (b) Assume 1 < q < 1 + p.5.7.5 to Eq(6. transforms Eq(6.47) when q > 1: Theorem 6.7 After the ﬁrst semicycle.8 (a) Assume q = 1 + p. 2)-Type Equations p(q − 1) + qun−1 1 + p + un (6. Then every positive solution of Eq(6.

1.8) which by the change of variables reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= pyn + yn−1 .54) is locally asymptotically stable.54) is globally asymptotically stable. 1.1 (a) Assume p + 1 ≤ q. Furthermore the zero equilibrium is a saddle point when 1−p<q <1+p and a repeller when q < 1 − p.1 and 1. . Theorem 6.6. Eq(6.54) and when p + 1 > q.54) and so we will assume without further mention that (6.8 The Case α = B = 0 : xn+1 = xn = γ yn C This is the (2.8.8. .1. 2)-type Eq(6.55) Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(6. (6.55) holds and y−1 + y0 > 0. . q + yn−1 β γ n = 0.54) is globally asymptotically stable. The Case α = B = 0 : xn+1 = βxn +γxn−1 A+Cxn−1 109 βxn +γxn−1 A+Cxn−1 6. A . the positive equilibrium y = p + 1 − q of Eq(6.55) holds. (b) Assume p + 1 > q. .54) and q = (Eq(6. The following result follows from Theorems 1. In the remainder of this section we will investigate the character of the positive equilibrium of Eq(6.54) was investigated in [53]. Our goal is to show that when (6.) The equilibrium points of Eq(6.3. Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(6.54) also possesses the unique positive equilibrium y = p + 1 − q. q+y So y = 0 is always an equilibrium point of Eq(6. γ (6.54) is unstable and the positive equilibrium y = p + 1 − q of Eq(6.54) are the solutions of the equation y= py + y .

p + yn−1 n = 0.1 Invariant Intervals and Semicycle Analysis Let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a positive solution of Eq(6.56)-(6.58) Note that the positive equilibrium y =p+1−q of Eq(6.59) the identities (6.62) and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a positive solution of Eq(6. (6.8. When p=q that is for the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = pyn + yn−1 .56) q + yn−1 q p2 [yn − p ] + (p − q)yn−1 q yn+1 − = p p(q + yn−1 ) 2 for n ≥ 0.61) The following three lemmas are now direct consequences of the above identities. . .1 Assume that p<q (6.60) (6. . for n ≥ 0.58) reduce to the following: yn+1 − 1 = (yn − 1) and yn+1 − yn = (1 − yn ) p p + yn−1 yn−1 p + yn−1 for n ≥ 0 for n ≥ 0. (6.8. (6. Then the following statements are true: . (2. 1. Lemma 6. Then the following identities are easily established: q yn − p yn+1 − 1 = p for n ≥ 0.54) is such that: < 1 if p < q < p + 1 y is = 1 if p = q > 1 if p > q.110 Chapter 6.54). (6.57) and yn+1 − yn = (p − q)yn + (1 − yn )yn−1 q + yn−1 (6.54). 2)-Type Equations 6.

(vi) If for some N ≥ 0. yn < 1 and the solution is strictly increasing. then yN +1 < 1. The Case α = B = 0 : xn+1 = βxn +γxn−1 A+Cxn−1 111 q (i) If for some N ≥ 0. (ii) If y0 = 1. then yN +1 > yN .54). yN > p . q (iii) If for some N ≥ 0. yN > q 2 . yN ≥ 1. then yN +1 > q p and yN +2 > 1.8. yn > 1 and the solution is strictly decreasing. Lemma 6. (v) If for some N ≥ 0. (iv) If for some N ≥ 0. yN < p . then for n ≥ 0.54). q (iii) If for some N ≥ 0. p q then yN +1 < p . then yN +1 < 1.2 Assume that p=q (6. then yN +1 < yN . (v) If for some N ≥ 0. then yN +1 > 1.3 Assume that p>q (6. then yN +1 = 1. Lemma 6. yN = p . (iv) If for some N ≥ 0. .64) and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a positive solution of Eq(6. (iii) If y0 > 1. p q then yN +1 > p . Then the following statements are true: q (i) If for some N ≥ 0. then yN +1 = 1. Then the following statements are true: (i) If y0 < 1. yN = p . then yn = 1 for n ≥ 0. then for n ≥ 0.8. then yN +1 < 1. q (ii) If for some N ≥ 0. yN < p . q (ii) If for some N ≥ 0. yN ≥ 1. yN ≤ 1. yN > q 2 . yN ≤ 1. yN > p . (vi) If for some N ≥ 0.8.63) and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a positive solution of Eq(6. then yN +1 > 1.6.

(6. .63) holds. 1).3 where we established in Theorem 6.8. When (6.2 Assume that p + 1 > q and that y−1 + y0 > 0. This is impossible because y < 1. q+1 From the above observations and in view of Theorem 6. every positive solution of Eq(6.1. Next. .8.8.3 that every solution converges to its positive equilibrium u= p−q . (2. . y is a global attractor. n = 0. Now in the interval (0.8. Then we can see that {un }∞ n=−1 satisﬁes the diﬀerence equation un+1 = p−q (q+1)2 + p u q+1 n 1 + un−1 . ∞). Then the positive equilibrium y = p + 1 − q of Eq(6.2 Global Stability of the Positive Equilibrium When (6. Without loss of generality we will assume that yn > 1 for n ≥ −1.1 that if a solution {yn }∞ n=−1 is such that yn ≥ 1 for all n ≥ 0 then the solution decreases and its limit lies in the interval [1. .1 we have the following result: Theorem 6. Set yn = 1 + (q + 1)un for n ≥ −1.64) holds. 2)-Type Equations 6.54) converges to the equilibrium y = 1.2 that every solution of Eq(6.4. 1.112 Chapter 6. it follows from Lemma 6. by Lemma 6. 1) the function f (u.8. This (2.65) with positive parameters and positive initial conditions. Here it is clear from Lemma 6.8.54) eventually enters and remains in the interval (0.62) holds. ∞).54) is globally asymptotically stable. assume that (6. 2)-type equation was investigated in Section 6. Hence.54) eventually enters and remains in the interval (1. v) = pu + v q+v is increasing in both arguments and by Theorem 1.8.3.3 that every solution of Eq(6.8. it follows from Lemma 6.

1. . (b) Assume that p < q.68) (6.67) .66) is y= p+1 q+1 and the linearized equation of Eq(6. 1.9) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the equation yn+1 = where pyn + yn−1 . Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(6.6.1 we obtain the following result: Theorem 6. qyn + yn−1 n = 0. 2)-type Eq(6. (6.9. .66) about y is zn+1 − p−q p−q zn + zn−1 = 0. (6. .66) B β and q = .9. .) The only equilibrium point of Eq(6.1. γ C To avoid a degenerate situation we will also assume that p= p = q. .66) was investigated in [54]. (Eq(6.66) is locally asymptotically stable when q < pq + 1 + 3p and is unstable (and more precisely a saddle point equilibrium) when q > pq + 1 + 3p.9 The Case α = A = 0 : xn+1 = γ yn C This is the (2.66) is locally asymptotically stable. The Case α = A = 0 : xn+1 = βxn +γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 113 βxn +γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 6. By applying the linearized stability Theorem 1.1 (a) Assume that p > q. . Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(6. (p + 1)(q + 1) (p + 1)(q + 1) n = 0. .

114 Chapter 6. n = 0. Eq(6.70) t2 − (1 − p)t + = 0. 2)-Type Equations 6. v) p pv+u + v qv+u q pv+u + v qv+u v pv+u qv+u . v) = = . the second iterate of T . ψ. is a ﬁxed point of T 2 .5 that when p > q.69) is asymptotically stable if the eigenvalues of the φ Jacobian matrix JT 2 . φ. One can see that ψ JT 2 φ ψ = (p−q)ψ − (qψ+φ)2 (p−q) ψ − (qψ+φ)2 (qφ+ψ)2 2 2 (p−q)φ (qψ+φ)2 (p−q)φ (qφ+ψ)2 (p−q)ψ (qψ+φ)2 −1 . . . qv Let T be the function on (0. (6. . The prime period-two solution (6. q−1 In order to investigate the stability nature of this prime period-two solution. evaluated at lie inside the unit disk. . v) = qv + u and h(u. On the other hand when p<q and q > pq + 1 + 3p. φ.9. ψ.66) has no prime period-two solutions. we set un = yn−1 and vn = yn for n = 0. .1 Existence of a Two Cycle It follows from Section 2. . One can see that T2 where pv + u g(u. 1. and write Eq(6. . ∞) × (0. Eq(6.66) possesses a unique prime period-two solution: . . . . ∞) deﬁned by: T Then u v = φ ψ u v g(u. (2. .69) where the values of φ and ψ are the (positive and distinct) solutions of the quadratic equation p(1 − p) (6. 1. . . .66) in the equivalent form: un+1 = vn n +un vn+1 = pvn +un . v) h(u.

71) (6. The Case α = A = 0 : xn+1 = Set P = Then JT 2 βxn +γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 115 p−q . Observe that φ > 0.73) (6. φ= pψ + φ qψ + φ φψ = p(1 − p) q−1 pφ + ψ . (qφ + ψ)2 p−q (qψ + φ)2 φ ψ = and Q = and its characteristic equation is Pφ −P ψ −P Qψ 2 P Qφψ − Qφ λ2 + (P ψ + Qφ − P Qφψ)λ + P Qφψ = 0. By applying Theorem 1.72) is always true. ψ > 0.1.1 (c). We will use the fact that φ + ψ = 1 − p.72) φ ψ and ψ = Inequality (6.71) is equivalent to (p − q)φ (p − q)ψ + +1>0 (qψ + φ)2 (qφ + ψ)2 which is true if and only if (q − p)[(qφ + ψ)2 ψ + (qψ + φ)2 φ] < (qψ + φ)2 (qφ + ψ)2 . Next we will establish Inequality (6.71). P < 0 and Q < 0 and so Inequality (6. it follows that both eigenvalues of JT 2 lie inside the unit disk if and only if |P ψ + Qφ − P Qφψ| < 1 + P Qφψ < 2 or equivalently if and only if the following three inequalities hold: P ψ + Qφ + 1 > 0 P ψ + Qφ < 1 + 2P Qφψ and P Qφψ < 1.6.9. qφ + ψ (6.

(2. Inequality (6.71) is true if and only if (6. Inequality (6.74) = (q − p)(1 − p)2 (qp + 1 + 2p). Finally.74) is I = (q − p)[(qp + 1)(φ2 + ψ 2 ) + 2(p + q)φψ] = (q − p)[(qp + 1)(φ + ψ)2 − 2φψ(qp + 1 − p − q)] = (q − p)[(qp + 1)(1 − p)2 − 2 The righthand side of (6.73) is equivalent to (p − q)2 φψ < (qψ + φ)2 (qφ + ψ)2 which is true if and only if (q − p) φψ < (qψ + φ)(qφ + ψ) if and only if if and only if if and only if if and only if (q − p) φψ < (q 2 + 1)φψ + q(φ2 + ψ 2 ) (q − p) φψ < (q 2 + 1)φψ + q[(φ + ψ)2 − 2φψ] (q − p) φψ < (q − 1)2 φψ + q(φ + ψ)2 (q − p) φψ < (q − 1)2 if and only if p(1 − p) + q(1 − p)2 q−1 = (1 − p)2 (q − p)2 .74) is p(1 − p) (p − 1)(q − 1)] q−1 (6. = [q(φ + ψ)2 + (q − 1)2 φψ]2 (q − p) φψ < (1 − p)(q − p) . 2)-Type Equations (q − p)[(qφ + ψ)(pφ + ψ) + (qψ + φ)(pψ + φ)] < [(qφ + ψ)(qψ + φ)]2 . II = [(qψ + φ)(qφ + ψ)]2 = [(q 2 + 1)ψφ + q(φ2 + ψ 2 )]2 = [q(1 − p)2 + (q − 1)p(1 − p)]2 Hence. Now observe that the lefthand side of (6.116 if and only if Chapter 6.68) holds.

6. (b) The proof follows from Theorem 1.9. we present a semicycle analysis of the solutions of Eq(6. or {yn } converges monotonically to y. 6.9. The extreme in each semicycle occurs in the ﬁrst term if the semicycle has two terms and in the second term if the semicycle has three terms. This function also satisﬁes Condition (1. Then either {yn } oscillates about the equilibrium y with semicycles of length one. ψ.3 Global Stability Analysis When p < q The main result in this section is the following Theorem 6. (a) The proof follows from Theorem 1.66) is globally asymptotically stable. Theorem 6.66). y) is increasing in y and decreasing in x.66) posseses the prime period-two solution . Then the positive equilibrium y of Eq(6. Proof. . the function 2 f (x. The Case α = A = 0 : xn+1 = if and only if βxn +γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 117 p(1 − p) < (1 − p)2 q−1 if and only if q > pq + 1 which is clearly true.9. .3 Let {yn } be a nontrivial solution of Eq(6.9.7.68) holds. . φ. .66): Theorem 6.4 Assume that p<q and (6. after the ﬁrst semicycle. φ.2 Assume that Condition (6.67) holds.66). except possibly for the ﬁrst semicycle which may have length one.9.9.6. Then {yn } oscillates about the equilibrium y with semicycles of length two or three.2 Semicycle Analysis In this section. Then Eq(6.7. .1 by observing that when p < q. where φ and ψ are the two positive and distinct roots of the quadratic Eq(6.69) of Eq(6. (b) Assume p < q. ψ. . Then the following statements are true: (a) Assume p > q.35). y) = qx + y is increasing in x and decreasing in y. Furthermore this prime period-two solution is locally asymptotically stable.4 by observing that the condition p > q implies that the function px + y f (x.70). In summary. . the following result is true about the local stability of the prime periodtwo solution (6.

Theorem 6.4. Set f (x. y > 0. with φ < ψ. y) = Then clearly. yN +1 ) ≤ f (ψ.67). . Eq(6. φ) = φ and in general yN +2k ≥ ψ and yN +2k+1 ≤ φ for k = 0.66) converge to the two cycle (6.69) when instead of (6. yN +2 = f (yN +1 .4.6 lim sup yn = ψ n→∞ px + y .9. ψ. Set f (x. and increasing in y for each ﬁxed x. (6. and lim inf yn = φ n→∞ Now as in the proof of Theorem 1. Assume that for some solution {yn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(6..6 and the fact that y is locally asymptotically stable.67). . . .9. . yN ) ≥ f (φ.75) holds. (2. .68) holds. 2)-Type Equations and note that f (x. p ≤ f (x. q Finally in view of (6. ψ. (6.66) has no prime period-two solution.66). We consider ﬁrst the case where eventually consecutive terms yi .68) holds.5 Assume that (6. y) = px + y . Let φ. denote the two cycle of Eq(6. 2 Next we want to ﬁnd more cases where the conclusion of the last theorem holds. Proof. qx + y Chapter 6..66) and for some index N ≥ −1.4 follows as a consequence of Theorem 1. ψ. .75) yN ≥ ψ and yN +1 ≤ φ.118 Proof. y) is decreasing in x for each ﬁxed y. . y) ≤ 1 for all x. .4. . φ. 2 The method employed in the proof of Theorem 1. Assume that (6. 1. φ. ψ) = ψ. yi+1 lie between m and M . Then this solution converges to the two cycle φ. qx + y from which we conclude that limk→∞ yN +2k = ψ and limk→∞ yN +2k+1 = φ. Also clearly. .6 can also be used to establish that certain solutions of Eq(6. yN +3 = f (yN +2 . ψ. Now the conclusion of Theorem 6.

ψ. M ) = M. The Case α = A = 0 : xn+1 = βxn +γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 119 Lemma 6.9. Proof. yi ) = yi+2 ≤ f (m. M ] is answered by Theorem 6. then we have one of the following four cases: (A) y2n > M and M ≥ y2n+1 > m for every n. By our earlier observation we have that M ≥ lim supi→∞ yi . M ) = pm + M qm + M for m we ﬁnd Thus. Since the proofs are similar for all cases we will give the details in case (A). Proof. we are left with the case in which the solution lies eventually in [m. From Eq(6. and the result follows by induction. m= 2 Since the case in which the solution lies outside of the interval [m.1 Suppose that for some i ≥ 0. either yi > M and yi+1 < m or yi < m and yi+1 > M ). yi+1 ≤ M. M ] (that is. and so M ≥ lim supn→∞ y2n ≥ lim inf n→∞ y2n ≥ M. n→∞ qM − p On the other hand by solving the equation M = f (m. (B) y2n+1 > M and M ≥ y2n > m for every n. . Lemma 6. limn→∞ y2n+1 M − M2 .9.9. Then yk ∈ [m. . m) ≤ f (yi+1 . qy2n+2 − p M − M2 lim y2n+1 = .6.2 In all cases (A)-(D) the corresponding solution {yn } converges to the two cycle . . . . m ≤ yi .66) we have y2n+1 = and so y2n − y2n y2n+2 . (C) y2n < m and m ≤ y2n+1 < M for every n. M ]. qM − p = m and the proof is complete.9. M ] for every k > i.5. Using the monotonic character of the function f we have m = f (M. . φ. φ. Hence limn→∞ y2n = M . . (D) y2n+1 < m and m ≤ y2n < M for every n. 2 If we never get two successive terms in the interval [m. for every i. M ] and if we never get two successive terms outside of the interval [m. ψ.

φ. (2. In this case we need to know more about the condition yi+2 = f (yi+1 .The case M ≥ yi+3 ≥ yi+1 ≥ y ≥ yi ≥ yi+2 ≥ m is handled in a similar way.4 (1) f (x. so we are led to the general equation f (x. and for m < y < y. yi+1 ) = yi+3 . Let us consider the ﬁrst case. but this situation cannot occur. 2)-Type Equations Lemma 6. which of course depends on y. both subsequences converge and their limits form a two cycle. y ) > y and y > y. Here we have yi+4 = f (yi+3 . yi+1 is diﬀerent from y. . f (y. as the following results show. yi ) = yi+2 and yi+5 = f (yi+4 . Proof. .3 Suppose M ≥ yi+2 ≥ yi ≥ y ≥ yi+1 ≥ yi+3 ≥ m and not both yi+2 and yi+3 are equal to y. φ. . . yi+3 ) ≤ f (yi+2 . y) > y if and only if x < y . in which case Eq(6. 2 Using a similar technique one can prove that if M ≥ yi ≥ yi+2 ≥ y ≥ yi+3 ≥ yi+1 ≥ m or M ≥ yi+1 ≥ yi+3 ≥ y ≥ yi+2 ≥ yi ≥ m we would get convergence to y . yi ) ≤ yi . y ) < y and y > y . f (y. The second case can be handled in a similar way. ψ. ψ. (6. Thus. Therefore. yi+2 ) ≥ f (yi+1 .120 Chapter 6. y) = y. y) = y.76) It makes sense to consider this equation only for y ∈ ( p . . Induction on i then establishes the monotonicity of the two sequences.76) has a q unique positive solution for x. the proof is complete. (3) For y < y < M. Then {yn } converges to the two cycle . Proof. the sequence {yi+2k } is non decreasing and bounded above by M .9. . We denote this value by y .9. and the sequence {yi+2k+1 } is a non increasing sequence and bounded below by m. (2) x > y if and only if x < y . 1). Thus f (y . . In view of the uniqueness of the two cycle and the fact that at least one of yi . The correspondence between y and y has the following properties: Lemma 6.

(3) Eliminating y from the equations y = f (y . For y ∈ ( p . x < y if and only if f (x. 2 Now we will use this result to prove the following: Lemma 6. f (y. g (y) < 0. y) and y = f (y. Thus each of these roots is simple and so f (y. y < y . Simplifying this equation we get a fourth degree polynomial equation with roots 0. qy − p The discriminant of the numerator is 4p2 − 4pq = 4p(p − q) < 0. However q p < f (y. y ) > y . M < y <⇒ f (y. (p − qy)2 y − y2 . and for y < y < M. Thus for y < m. M ≥ yi ≥ yi+2 ≥ y ≥ yi+1 ≥ m. By (1) then.9. y) = y for y gives y = g(y) = Computing the derivative of g we get g (y) = − p − 2y + qy 2 . y. for m < y < y. M . y ) we get px + x − x2 = qx − p qx + x−x2 qx−p x−x2 qx−p . y ) < y . so the roots of the numerator are not real. Hence q m < y < y ⇒ f (y. y ) − y changes sign as y passes each of these values.6. y < y < M ⇒ f (y. m. Then yi+3 ≤ yi+1 with equality only in the case of a two cycle. The Case α = A = 0 : xn+1 = βxn +γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 121 (1) Since f is decreasing in the ﬁrst variable and f (y . y) > f (y . y ) < 1.9. y>y . Clearly as y approaches p y approaches ∞. y) = y. y) = y. so y is decreasing function q of y.5 Assume that for some i. . y ) > y . y ) < y . 1). (2) Solving f (y .

or M ≥ . solving for limn→∞ yi+2n gives limn→∞ yi+2n = M .. But then yi = yi+1 = y.9. . Thus yi+2 ≥ yi+1 . If c = m. The value c will be one value in a two cycle. the second case is similar. as required. (2. 2)-Type Equations Proof. To show yi+3 = f (yi+2 . Thus equality occurs only in the case of a two cycle. in which case yi+2n+1 = m for all n. Thus yi ≥ yi+1 . yi+1 ) ≥ yi+1 . . then yi+2n+1 = y for all n. . ≥ m. We will consider the ﬁrst case. By (3) of the previous lemma. and by (3) yi ≥ yi . yi+1 ) ≤ yi+1 .9.9. f (yi+1 . . . . . so either c = y or c = m. Since {yi+2k+1 } is a bounded monotonic sequence it has a limit c. Remark.122 Chapter 6. which also gives a two cycle. Thus by (2) of the previous lemma yi ≥ yi+1 . y0 } that are on opposite sides of the equilibrium y. we must show yi+2 ≥ yi+1 . Since some of the oscillatory solutions of Eq(6. ≥ y ≥ yi+1 ≥ yi+3 ≥ .6 Assume that p < q. The case m ≤ yi ≤ yi+2 ≤ y ≤ yi+1 ≤ M is similar. and solving for yi+2n we see yi+2n = y also.6 that all such pairs belong to the stable manifold of the two cycle. yi ) ≥ f (yi+1 . Since f is increasing in the second argument and yi ≥ yi+1 we get yi+2 = f (yi+1 . ≥ yi+2 ≥ yi ≥ y ≥ . we have yi+1 ≥ yi . yi+1 ). Then every oscillatory solution of Eq(6. . as well as 2 yi+3 = yi+1 . Since yi+2 = f (yi+1 . since m ≤ yi+1 ≤ y.66) converges to this two cycle. This can only happen if yi+2n = M 2 for all n. it follows by Theorem 6. . If c = y.66) are generated by initial values {y−1 . We also obtain the following lemma: Lemma 6. Proof.69). ≥ yi+3 ≥ yi+1 ≥ . yi ) ≤ yi . . . The above sequence of lemmas leads to the following result: Theorem 6. there is no i such that either M ≥ yi ≥ yi+2 ≥ . ≥ m. and that Eq(6. and our solution is a two cycle.66) possesses the two-cycle solution (6. To get equality we must have yi+1 = yi or equivalently yi+2 = yi .6 Unless {yn } is a period-two solution.

qm + M 6. and is decreasing in y for each ﬁxed x. x0 ) ∈ F. .66) is globally asymptotically stable. . qM + m m= pm + M . 2 pM + m . set f (x. c. y > 0. To this end.9. qx + y (6. investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic ∞ nature of the solution {xn }n=−1 .5. b. y) = px + y .10. Also 1 ≤ f (x. 1. / (b) For every point (x−1 . Proof.4. y) ≤ p q for all x. Then the positive equilibrium y of Eq(6.4 Global Stability Analysis When p > q Here we have the following result: Theorem 6.10.6.7 Assume that p>q and p ≤ pq + 1 + 3q. Open Problem 6. the only solution of the system M= is m = M. Now the result is a consequence of Theorem 1.5.77) holds. . We will employ Theorem 1.77) and observe that when p > q.1 (See [64]) Assume that (a) Investigate the forbidden set F of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = axn + bxn−1 xn . . d ∈ R.10 Open Problems and Conjectures a. the function f (x. y) is increasing in x for each ﬁxed y. . Open Problems and Conjectures 123 6. cxn + dxn−1 n = 0.4. Finally observe that when (6.9.

3 Assume p ∈ (0. Show that every positive solution of Eq(6. (Note that by Theorem 6. βn . 2)-Type Equations Open Problem 6.) Chapter 6. . .4. ∞). (Note that by Theorem 6. has a positive and monotonically decreasing solution. Show that the equation yn+1 = p + yn−1 . 1. .6. q ∈ (0. every positive solution converges to a. Show that every positive solution of Eq(6.2.) . 1. ∞).) Conjecture 6.) Conjecture 6. .10. See also [36]. this conjecture has been conﬁrmed for q ≤ 1 + 4p. . period-two solution. .11) has a ﬁnite limit. Investigate the forbidden set and the asymptotic character of solutions of the nonautonomous Riccati equation xn+1 = αn + βn xn . An + Bn xn n = 0. not necessarily prime. are convergent sequences of real numbers with ﬁnite limits.10. ∞).5. 1 + yn n = 0. Bn ∈ R for n = 0. (2.10.1 Assume p. we need only to conﬁrm this conjecture for p > 2(q +1) and q ≥ 1. An . (Note that by Theorem 6. .124 (See Section 1.3.2 Assume that αn .3.2 Assume that p.6 for the autonomous case.4.) Conjecture 6. 1. (See Section 1.10. . . . q ∈ (0.10) has a ﬁnite limit.

6.3 Assume that p. Open Problem 6. as n → ∞.5 Find the set of all initial conditions (y−1 . Open Problems and Conjectures Conjecture 6. q ∈ (0. Find the basin of attraction of the period-two solution of Eq(6. ∞) and q > pq + 1 + 3p.10. 125 Show that every positive solution of Eq(6.9.4 Assume that p.27).6. q ∈ (0.10. (See Section 6.27) either converges to a ﬁnite limit or to a two cycle. Conjecture 6. ∞) and q > 1 + 4p.) Open Problem 6. q ∈ (0.66). .) Open Problem 6. (Note that by Theorem 6. Find the basin of attraction of the period-two solution of Eq(6.10.5 Assume p > q. ∞).66) has a ﬁnite limit. this conjecture has been conﬁrmed for p ≤ pq + 1 + 3q. y0 ) ∈ R × R through which the solution of the equation yn+1 = yn + yn−1 1 + yn is well deﬁned and converges to 1.10.4 Assume that p.10. Show that every positive solution of Eq(6.10.7.

.8 Assume α.10. γ. β.81) (6. y0 ) ∈ G. B.6 Find the set of all initial conditions (y−1 . extend your result by introducing arbitrary real parameters in the equation. . Open Problem 6. Open Problem 6. n = 0. Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of solutions of the diﬀerence equation αxn + βxn−1 + γxn−2 .10.84) yn − yn−1 For those equations from the above list for which you were successful.10. .126 Chapter 6. .Then for every (y−1 . as n → ∞. . xn+1 = Axn + Bxn−1 + Cxn−2 Extend and generalize. A.7 For each of the following diﬀerence equations determine the “good” set G ⊂ R × R of initial conditions (y−1 .80) (6. 2)-Type Equations Open Problem 6.78) (6. investigate the long-term behavior of the solution {yn }∞ : n=−1 yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = 1 − yn 1 − yn−1 yn − 1 yn − yn−1 1 − yn−1 1 − yn (6. (2. ∞).79) (6. y0 ) ∈ R × R through which the solution of the equation yn+1 = yn + yn−1 1 + yn−1 is well deﬁned and converges to 1. C ∈ (0. 1.82) (6.83) yn − yn−1 yn − 1 yn − yn−1 1 − yn−1 1 − yn−1 yn − yn−1 yn + yn−1 . y0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. (6.

10. n = 0. . qn + yn n = 0. n = 0. p = n→∞ pn lim lim and q = n→∞ qn . . qn + yn−1 pn yn + yn−1 .85) (6. . Investigate the asymptotic behavior of {yn }∞ .92) pn + qn yn . .9 Assume that {pn }n=0 and {qn }∞ are convergent sequences of n=0 nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits. y0 ) ∈ B. Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of Eqs(6.23) are bounded. . 1. Open Problem 6. ∞). . 1. n = 0. n = 0. .89) (6. . .88) (6. (6. y0 ) ∈ (0. . 1.87) (6. 1. (a) Find the set B of all initial conditions (y−1 . ∞) × (0. . Open Problems and Conjectures 127 ∞ Open Problem 6.92). . n=−1 . n = 0. 1. . . . . qn yn + yn−1 pn yn + qn yn−1 . 1. n = 0. . Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of each of the following eight diﬀerence equations: yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = pn + yn . .6. qn yn + yn−1 yn+1 = yn+1 = Open Problem 6. 1 + yn pn + yn−1 .10.10 Assume that {pn }∞ and {qn }∞ are period-two sequences n=0 n=0 of nonnegative real numbers. 1. 1 + yn−1 yn + pn . Extend and generalize. ∞) such that the solutions {yn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(6. . . (b) Let (y−1 .90) (6. . 1 + yn pn yn + yn−1 . yn + qn yn−1 pn + qn yn−1 . 1.86) (6. n = 0.85)-(6. . .91) (6. .10. .11 Assume q ∈ (1.10.

β ∈ (0. 1. (a) Determine the set G of initial conditions (y−1 . (2. .93) is globally asymptotically stable. . 1) with α + β > 1 + β . . Open Problem 6. ∞) and that α ∈ (2.14 (Discrete Epidemic Models. ∞). . γ Obtain conditions for the global asymptotic stability of the positive equilibrium of the system xn+1 = αxn βxn +eyn yn+1 = γ(xn + 1)yn . n = 0.10.12 Assume q ∈ (1.47) are bounded. n = 0. the periodic nature. ∞).10. Investigate the asymptotic behavior of {yn }n=−1 . See [14].) Let A ∈ (0. are nonnegative.94) . . (b) Let (x−1 . (6. 2)-Type Equations (a) Find the set B of all initial conditions (y−1 .128 Open Problem 6. 1. Chapter 6. ∞) such that the solutions {yn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(6. (c) Extend and generalize. x0 ) ∈ G. y0 ) ∈ B. y0 ) ∈ (0. [3]. Investigate the boundedness character. ∞ (b) Let (y−1 .13 (A Plant-Herbivore System. . ∞). and [2]) Assume α ∈ (1. y0 ∈ (0. (6. See [9].6 Assume x0 . ∞). and γ ∈ (0. 1 β = 1 and γ = . . ∞) through which the solutions {xn }∞ n=−1 of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = (1 − xn − xn−1 )(1 − e−Axn ). 3).93) Conjecture 6.10. Open Problem 6.10. y0 ) ∈ (0. 2 Show that the positive equilibrium of System (6. ∞) × (0.94). ∞) × (0. and the asymptotic behavior of the solution {xn }∞ n=−1 of Eq(6.

10. c2 ∈ [0. .10. ∞) and k ∈ {2. . . n = 0. n = 0. q + yn−k pyn + yn−k . .99) (6. 1). . ∞) with c1 + c2 > 0. ∞). q ∈ [0. . with positive initial conditions.17 Assume that p. See [48]).6.10. n = 0. n = 0. . 1) and xn+1 = αxn e−yn + β yn+1 = αxn (1 − e −yn β ∈ (1. yn + qyn−k p + qyn−k . Investigate the global behavior of all positive solutions of each of the following diﬀerence equations: p + qyn yn+1 = . n = 0. . ) which may be viewed as a population model. . . 1. .96) (6.95) 1 + yn−k yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = yn + p . yn + q pyn + yn−k .10. . . n = 0. 3. . . Open Problem 6. .101) . (6.98) (6. 129 Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions for the global asymptotic stability of the Flour Beetle Model: xn+1 = axn + bxn−2 e−c1 xn −c2 xn−2 . 1. . . . qyn + yn−k n = 0. .16 (A Population Model) Assume α ∈ (0. (6. . ∞). . . 1. n = 0. . qyn + yn−k yn + pyn−k . . . 1. and c1 . .}.97) (6. . . .100) (6. Open Problems and Conjectures Open Problem 6. 1. . . 1.15 (The Flour Beetle Model. 1. b ∈ (0. n = 0. Assume a ∈ (0. Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of the system . Open Problem 6. 1. 1. 1 + yn p + yn−k .

. . 1.102) converges to a period-two solution. which extends and uniﬁes the global asymptotic stability results for Eqs(6.10. . n = 0.103) Open Problem 6. xn−1 ). . . . yn−1 ). n = 0. 1. (2. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f so that every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = f (xn−2 .11) and (6. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on f so that the same two cycle is a locally asymptotically stable solution of Eq(6.130 Chapter 6.20 Assume that Eq(6. n = 0. xn−1 ). also converges to a period-two solution.10.18 Obtain a general result for an equation of the form yn+1 = f (yn .102) has a two cycle which is locally asymptotically stable.27). (6. 2)-Type Equations Open Problem 6.103). Open Problem 6. .19 Assume that every positive solution of an equation of the form xn+1 = f (xn . . Extend and generalize. . (6. 1. .10.

3)-type equations are positive and that the initial conditions are nonnegative. 1. A + Bxn + Cxn−1 βxn . 1. (7.3) α .1) (7. n = 0. 1. .1) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= 1 .Chapter 7 (1. A2 . 1. . . . .1 Introduction xn+1 = xn+1 = and xn+1 = γxn−1 . 1 + pyn + qyn−1 αB A2 and q = 131 n = 0.2 The Case β = γ = 0 : xn+1 = α yn A α A+Bxn +Cxn−1 This is the (1. . . . . .2) Eq(1) contains the following three equations of the (1. (7. . . 7. (7. 3)-type Eq. 3)-Type Equations 7.(7. A + Bxn + Cxn−1 n = 0. . A + Bxn + Cxn−1 n = 0. 3)-type: Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all the parameters in the above (1.4) αC .

or Theorem 1. .3. 1]. 3)-Type Equations One can easily see that the positive equilibrium of Eq(7. It also follows by applying Theorem 1. . 3)-type Eq(7. 1. A C Eq(7.4) is locally asymptotically stable for all values of the parameters and that Eq(7. q+1 The following result is a straightforward consequence of Theorem 1.5) β B and q = .4) has no prime period two solutions.5) is globally asymptotically stable.5) always has zero as an equilibrium point and when p>1 it also has the unique positive equilibrium point y= p−1 .132 Chapter 7. The following result is a straightforward consequence of Theorem 1.2.7 in the interval [0. . The following result is now a straightforward consequence of either the stability trichotomy Theorem 1. (7. Theorem 7. q Theorem 7.4. Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(7. 1 + pyn + qyn−1 p= n = 0.4. ∞) and p > 1.3 The Case α = γ = 0 : xn+1 = A yn C βxn A+Bxn +Cxn−1 This is the (1.1 Assume p ≤ 1.4) is globally asymptotically stable.2. . Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(7.2) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where yn . p ]. Theorem 7.4. (1.1 The positive equilibrium of Eq(7.4.1. y0 ∈ (0.5 in the interval [0. 7.5) is globally asymptotically stable.4.2 Assume that y−1 .3.3.

.1 and 1. B . The Case α = β = 0 : xn+1 = γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 133 γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 7.6) has a prime periodtwo solution . 3)-type Eq(7.1 (a) The zero equilibrium of Eq(7.6) is locally asymptotically stable when q<1 and is unstable (a saddle point) when q > 1.3. . . .6) is globally asymptotically stable when p≥1 and is unstable (a repeller) when p < 1.4. C (7.4.3) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the equation yn+1 = where p= yn−1 . (b) Assume that p < 1. . if and only if p < 1. p + qyn + yn−1 A γ n = 0. φ. 1.4 The Case α = β = 0 : xn+1 = γ yn C This is the (1. . . ψ. . Theorem 7.6) always has the zero equilibrium and when p<1 it also has the unique positive equilibrium y= 1−p . . ψ.6) and q = Eq(7. φ. Concerning prime period-two solutions one can see that Eq(7. . 1+q The subsequent result is a straightforward application of Theorems 1. Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(7.7.1.1.

2 and in view of (7. when p < 1 and q = 1 all prime period-two solutions of Eq(7. On the other hand. . with 0 ≤ φ ≤ 1 − p and φ = Theorem 7. .8) 0 p 0 lie in the disk |λ| < 1. .7) (7. 1 − p. Therefore 1−p the prime period-two solution (7.6 that here JT 2 0 1−p = 1 p+q(1−p) q(1−p) − p+q(1−p) 1−p .134 Furthermore when Chapter 7. . 0. . .6) is locally asymptotically stable. (7.2 Assume that p<1 Then the period-two solution .8) is locally asymptotically stable. (1.7) both eigenvalues of JT 2 7. 0. . . 0. .1 Assume Show that every positive solution of Eq(7. φ. . 1 − p − φ. It follows from Section 2. 1 − p − φ.4. . .6) are given by . 1). 0. 1 − p. . .5. 3)-Type Equations p < 1 and q = 1 the only prime period-two solution is . Proof. . . . . q ∈ (0. Conjecture 7.5 Open Problems and Conjectures p. of Eq(7. . 1 − p.6) has a ﬁnite limit. φ. 1 − p. 2 and q > 1. .

. 0. 1) and q ∈ (1. 0.9) (7.11). Open Problem 7.5. x0 ) ∈ G be an initial point through which the corresponding equation is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. . Open Problems and Conjectures Conjecture 7. 1 − p. Open Problem 7.9)-(7.2 Investigate the asymptotic character and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = where p.3 For each of the equations given below.11) Now for each of the equations (7. . ﬁnd the set G of all points (x−1 . Find the basin of attraction of the two cycle .6). . . ∞). periodtwo solution. 1 + xn + xn−1 (7.5. Extend and generalize. xn−2 .10) (7.1 Assume p ∈ (0.7.5. . 135 Show that every positive solution of Eq(7. x0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0: xn+1 = xn+1 = xn+1 = 1 1 + xn + xn−1 xn 1 + xn + xn−1 xn−1 . 1. . 1 − p. .5. not necessarily prime. . 1 + pxn + qxn−1 + xn−2 n = 0. and investigate ∞ the long term-behavior of the solution {xn }n=−1 . let (x−1 . q ∈ [0.5.2 Assume p < 1 and q ≥ 1. . ∞). of Eq(7. Open Problem 7.6) converges to a.

. 3)-Type Equations Open Problem 7. 1 + pn yn + qn yn−1 yn . .13) (7.14) Open Problem 7. pn + qn yn + yn−1 n = 0. 1.14).136 Chapter 7. . 1 + pn yn + qn yn−1 yn−1 . . . n = 0.5 Assume that {pn }∞ and {qn }∞ are period-two sequences of n=0 n=0 nonnegative real numbers.5.5. (7. (1. lim Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of each of the following three diﬀerence equations: yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = 1 .4 Assume that {pn }∞ and {qn }∞ are convergent sequences of n=0 n=0 nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits. . p = lim pn n→∞ and q = n→∞ qn . 1. . . n = 0. . . Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of Eqs(7. 1. .12) (7.12)-(7. Extend and generalize.

yn+1 = (α + βγ ) + γyn−1 B . .1 Introduction α + βxn + γxn−1 . . 1. .Chapter 8 (3. 1.2) by the change of the variables xn = yn + β . 3)-type: xn+1 = xn+1 = and xn+1 = α + βxn + γxn−1 . Cxn−1 n = 0.3) by the change of the variables xn = yn + 137 γ . Eq(8. . Eq(8. (8. namely. n = 0. Bxn Eq(1) contains the following three equations of the (1. (8.5). . and the denominators are always positive. C . .3) n = 0. 2)-type equation of the form of Eq(6.1) (8. . . . .4) (see Section 6. 1. B is reduced to a (2. 1. . 1)-Type Equations 8. . A α + βxn + γxn−1 .2) Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these equations are positive. β + Byn n = 0. Eq(8. . the initial conditions are nonnegative.1) is a linear diﬀerence equation and can be solved explicitly. .

8.2).4) be a period-two solution of Eq(8.2 (a) Assume γ = β and let .2.2) which converges to (8. . x0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation 1 + xn + xn−1 xn+1 = xn−1 is well deﬁned for all n and for these initial points determine the long-term behavior of the solutions {xn }∞ . x0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation 1 + xn + xn−1 xn+1 = xn is well deﬁned for all n and for these initial points determine the long-term behavior of the solutions {xn }∞ . Determine the values of φ and ψ in terms of the initial conditions x−1 and x0 . Conjecture 8. . . . .3) converges to the positive equilibrium of the equation. n=−1 Open Problem 8. Open Problem 8. Open Problem 8.1 Assume γ > β. ∞) × (0. x0 ) ∈ (0. (3.2) are bounded.4). φ. = γ + Cyn−1 n = 0. . ∞) through which the solutions of Eq(8.4 Determine the set G of all initial points (x−1 .4). 1. yn+1 (α + βγ ) + βyn C .2 Open Problems and Conjectures Open Problem 8. φ. (b) Let {xn }∞ n=−1 be a positive solution of Eq(8.2.2. . ψ. n=−1 .1 Show that every positive solution of Eq(8.2. ψ. Determine the set of initial conditions (x−1 . 1)-Type Equations is reduced to a (2.3) namely. Hence there is nothing else remaining to do about these equations other than to pose some Open Problems and Conjectures. . (8. .2. 2)-type equation of the form of Eq(6. Determine the basin of attraction of (8. .2) (see Section 6.138 Chapter 8.3 Determine the set G of all initial points (x−1 .

8.2. Open Problems and Conjectures

139

Open Problem 8.2.5 Assume that {pn }∞ and {qn }∞ are convergent sequences of n=0 n=0 nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits, lim p = n→∞ pn and q = n→∞ qn . lim

Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of each of the following two diﬀerence equations: yn+1 = yn+1 = pn + xn + xn−1 , q n xn pn + xn + xn−1 , qn xn−1 n = 0, 1, . . . (8.5)

n = 0, 1, . . . .

(8.6)

∞ ∞ Open Problem 8.2.6 Assume that {pn }n=0 and {qn }n=0 are period-two sequences of nonnegative real numbers. Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of Eqs(8.5) and (8.6). Extend and generalize.

**Chapter 9 (2, 3)-Type Equations
**

9.1 Introduction

α + βxn , A + Bxn + Cxn−1 α + γxn−1 , A + Bxn + Cxn−1 βxn + γxn−1 , A + Bxn + Cxn−1

Eq(1) contains the following three equations of the (2, 3)-type: xn+1 = xn+1 = and xn+1 = n = 0, 1, . . . . (9.3) n = 0, 1, . . . n = 0, 1, . . . (9.1) (9.2)

Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all the parameters in the above (2, 3)-type equations are positive and the initial conditions are nonnegative.

9.2

The Case γ = 0 : xn+1 =

α+βxn A+Bxn +Cxn−1

This is the (2, 3)-type Eq(9.1) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= p + qyn , 1 + yn + ryn−1 q= β , A n = 0, 1, . . . C . B (9.4) A yn B

αB , A2

and r =

141

142

Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

(Eq(9.4) was investigated in [51].) Here we make some simple observations about linearized stability, invariant intervals, and the convergence of solutions in certain regions of initial conditions. Eq(9.4) has a unique equilibrium y which is positive and is given by y= q−1+ (q − 1)2 + 4p(r + 1) 2(r + 1) .

By employing the linearized stability Theorem 1.1.1, we obtain the following result: Theorem 9.2.1 The equilibrium y of Eq(9.4) is locally asymptotically stable for all values of the parameters p, q and r.

9.2.1

Boundedness of Solutions

We will prove that all solutions of Eq(9.4) are bounded. Theorem 9.2.2 Every solution of Eq(9.4) is bounded from above and from below by positive constants. Proof. Let {yn } be a solution of Eq(9.4). Clearly, if the solution is bounded from above by a constant M , then p yn+1 ≥ 1 + (1 + r)M and so it is also bounded from below. Now assume for the sake of contradiction that the solution is not bounded from above. Then there exists a subsequence {y1+nk }∞ such k=0 that

k→∞

lim nk = ∞,

k→∞

lim y1+nk = ∞,

and y1+nk = max{yn : n ≤ nk } for k ≥ 0.

**From (9.4) we see that yn+1 < qyn + p for n ≥ 0 and so
**

k→∞

**lim ynk = lim ynk −1 = ∞.
**

k→∞

Hence for suﬃciently large k, 0 < y1+nk − ynk = p + [(q − 1) − ynk − rynk −1 ]ynk <0 1 + ynk + rynk −1 2

which is a contradiction and the proof is complete.

The above proof has an advantage that extends to several equations of the form of Eq(9.1) with nonnegative parameters. The boundedness of solutions of the special

9.2. The Case γ = 0 : xn+1 =

α+βxn A+Bxn +Cxn−1

143

equation (9.4) with positive parameters immediately follows from the observation that if M = max{1, p, q} then yn+1 ≤ M + M yn =M 1 + yn f or n ≥ 0.

9.2.2

Invariant Intervals

The following result, which can be established by direct calculation, gives a list of invariant intervals for Eq(9.4). Recall that I is an invariant interval, if whenever, yN , yN +1 ∈ I then yn ∈ I (a) for n ≥ N. Lemma 9.2.1 Eq(9.4) possesses the following invariant intervals:

for some integer N ≥ 0,

0,

q−1+

(q − 1)2 + 4p 2

,

when p ≤ q;

(b) p−q ,q , qr (c) q, p−q , qr when p > q(rq + 1). when q < p < q(rq + 1);

Proof. (a) Set q − 1 + (q − 1)2 + 4p p + qx and b = 1+x 2 and observe that g is an increasing function and g(b) ≤ b. Using Eq(9.4) we see that when yk−1 , yk ∈ [0, b], then g(x) = yk+1 = p + qyk p + qyk ≤ = g(yk ) ≤ g(b) ≤ b. 1 + yk + ryk−1 1 + yk

The proof follows by induction.

144 (b) It is clear that the function f (x, y) =

Chapter 9. (2, 3)-Type Equations

p + qx 1 + x + ry

p−q ,q qr

is increasing in x for y > p−q . Using Eq(9.4) we see that when yk−1 , yk ∈ qr then p + qyk p−q = f (yk , yk−1 ) ≤ f q, = q. yk+1 = 1 + yk + ryk−1 qr Also by using the condition p < q(rq + 1) we obtain yk+1 = p + qyk = f (yk , yk−1 ) ≥ f 1 + yk + ryk−1

,

p−q q(pr + p − q) p−q > ,q = . 2 + rq + p − q qr (rq) qr

The proof follows by the induction. (c) It is clear that the function f (x, y) = p + qx 1 + x + ry

is decreasing in x for y < p−q . Using Eq(9.4) we see that when yk−1 , yk ∈ q, p−q , qr qr then p + qyk p−q p−q yk+1 = = q. , = f (yk , yk−1 ) ≥ f 1 + yk + ryk−1 qr qr Also by using the condition p > q(rq + 1) we obtain yk+1 = p + qyk p−q p + q2 < . = f (yk , yk−1 ) ≤ f (q, q) = 1 + yk + ryk−1 1 + (r + 1)q qr

The proof follows by induction. 2

9.2.3

Semicycle Analysis

qr( p−q − yn−1 ) qr 1 + yn + ryn−1

**Let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(9.4). Then the following identitites are true for n ≥ 0: yn+1 − q = qr q − p−q yn+1 − = qr
**

p−q qr

, + pr(q − yn−1 )

(9.5)

qr(1 + yn + ryn−1 ) yn − yn+4 =

yn + qr yn−1 −

p−q qr

,

(9.6)

9.2. The Case γ = 0 : xn+1 = qr yn −

p−q qr

α+βxn A+Bxn +Cxn−1

145

2 yn+1 + (yn − q)(yn+1 yn+3 + yn+3 + yn+1 + ryn yn+3 ) + yn + ryn − p

(1 + yn+3 )(1 + yn+1 + ryn ) + r(p + qyn+1 )

,

(9.7) yn+1 − y = (y − q)(y − yn ) + yr(y − yn−1 ) . 1 + yn + ryn−1 (9.8)

The proofs of the following two lemmas are straightforward consequences of the Identities (9.5)- (9.8) and will be omitted. Lemma 9.2.2 Assume p > q(qr + 1) and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(9.4). Then the following statements are true: (i) If for some N ≥ 0, (ii) If for some N ≥ 0, (iii) If for some N ≥ 0, (iv) If for some N ≥ 0, (v) If for some N ≥ 0, (vi) If for some N ≥ 0, (vii) q < y <

p−q . qr

yN > yN = yN <

p−q , qr p−q , qr p−q , qr

**then then then
**

p−q , qr

yN +2 < q; yN +2 = q; yN +2 > q; q < yN +2 <

p−q ; qr

q < yN <

then

y ≥ yN −1 and y ≥ yN , then y < yN −1 and y < yN , then

yN +1 ≥ y; yN +1 < y;

Lemma 9.2.3 Assume q < p < q(qr + 1) and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(9.4). Then the following statements are true: (i) If for some N ≥ 0, (ii) If for some N ≥ 0, (iii) If for some N ≥ 0, (iv) If for some N ≥ 0, (v)

p−q qr

yN < yN = yN > yN >

p−q , qr p−q , qr p−q , qr p−q qr

then then then

yN +2 > q; yN +2 = q; yN +2 < q; then q > yN +2 >

p−q ; qr

and yN < q

< y < q.

(9.10) Proof. y4k+1 > q. y4k ≤ 1. 3)-Type Equations qr (q − yn−1 ). y4k ≥ 1. (iv) y−1 < q and y0 ≤ q =⇒ y4k−1 < q. 1 + yn + ryn−1 lim yn = y. y4k+1 < q. and the only equilibrium point is y = q. the following statements are true for all k ≥ 0: (i) y−1 > q and y0 ≤ q =⇒ y4k−1 > q. 1 + yn + ryn−1 n = 0.4). . is equal to four.2.2. then n→∞ Chapter 9.5). and y4k+2 ≥ q.9) (9. and y4k+2 ≤ q. Proof.4). (2. . excluding the ﬁrst. 2 .3 Suppose that p = q + rq 2 and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a nontrivial solution of Eq(9.4 Assume p = q(qr + 1) and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a solution of Eq(9. y4k+1 > q. ∞) and Eq(9. The limit (9. Then this solution is oscillatory and the sum of the lengths of two consecutive semicycles. Theorem 9. y4k ≥ 1. and y4k+2 ≥ q.146 Lemma 9. In this case Eq(9. y4k ≤ 1. 1.4) becomes yn+1 = q + rq 2 + qyn . Identity (9. (iii) y−1 > q and y0 ≥ q =⇒ y4k−1 > q. (ii) y−1 < q and y0 ≥ q =⇒ y4k−1 < q. and y4k+2 ≤ q.10) is a consequence of the fact that in this case qr ∈ (0.4) has no period-two solution. y4k+1 < q. The proof follows from identity (9.9) follows by straightforward computation. 2 Here we present a semicycle analysis of the solutions of Eq(9. More precisely. .4) when p = q(1 + rq). Then yn+1 − q = Furthermore when qr < 1.

Then clearly. More precisely.5 Let I denote the interval which is deﬁned as follows: √ 2 [0. q−1+ (q − 1)2 + 4p 2 Hence. p > q(qr + 1).4) lies eventually in I.4). if for some N . Let {yn }n=−1 be a solution of Eq(9. for the sake of contradiction.2.4) described in Lemma 9. Then every solution of Eq(9. q] qr [q. Then by Lemma 9. 2 I= [ p−q . Set b= and observe that yn+1 − b = (q − p)(yn − b) − r(p + qb)yn−1 . yN +1 < p−q .2.2. p−q ] qr if if q < p < q(qr + 1). (1 + yn + ryn−1 )(1 + b) n ≥ 0. Now assume for the sake of contradiction that yn > b for n > 0. every solution of Eq(9. yN +1 > q. First assume that p ≤ q.4) is eventually trapped into one of the three invariant intervals of Eq(9. yN ≤ b. ∞ Proof.2. The Case γ = 0 : xn+1 = α+βxn A+Bxn +Cxn−1 147 9. qr and yN +2 < .4 Global Asymptotic Stability The following lemma establishes that when p = q(qr + 1). the following is true: Lemma 9. there exists N > 0 such that one of the following three cases holds: (i) yN > q.3. y ∈ I. then yN +1 < b. Next assume that q < p < q(qr + 1) and. also assume that the solution {yn }∞ n=−1 is not eventually in the interval I.2. qr n→∞ lim yn = y ∈ I and yN +2 < p−q . (ii) yN > q.1.9. Then yn > y for n ≥ 0 and so which is a contradiction. q−1+ (q−1) +4p ] if p ≤ q. qr p−q .

each subsequence {yn+4k+j }∞ with all its terms outside k=0 the interval I converges monotonically and enters in the interval I.4). For example.2. qr The desired contradiction is now obtained by using the Identity (9. or q . together with the appropriate convergence Theorems 1. 2. the following results are true for Eq(9.5. 1+r Then the equilibrium y of Eq(9. and yN +2 < p−q . 1.4) is globally asymptotically stable. p< p≤q or q < p < q + q2r and that one of the following conditions is also satisﬁed: (i) q ≤ 1.4 (a) Assume that either p ≥ q + q 2 r. we can obtain some global asymptotic stability results for the solutions of Eq(9.148 (iii) yN > q. Proof. (b) Assume that either (iii) r > 1 (ii) r ≤ 1.4. qr Also observe that 2 if yN ≥ q.7 and 1.4.1. By using the monotonic character of the function f (x.2.7) from which it follows that for j ∈ {0. 3}. (2.4) is globally asymptotically stable. . and (q − 1)2 (r − 1) ≤ 4p. Then the equilibrium y of Eq(9. p−q qr Chapter 9.4): Theorem 9. then yN + ryN − p > 0 and 2 if yN ≤ p−q . 3)-Type Equations ≤ yN +1 ≤ q. The proof when p > q(qr + 1) is similar and will be omitted. then yN + ryN − p < 0. y) = p + qx 1 + x + ry 2 in each of the intervals in Lemma 9.

Clearly now if Condition (ii) or (iii) is satisﬁed. A2 and r = . We will employ Theorem 1.4. For instance. this is the case if Condition (i) is satisﬁed. 2 2 √ 2 +4p q−1+ (q−1) .4. This system has the form m= p + qm 1 + m + rM and M = p + qM .3 The Case β = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 This is the (2. 1 + M + rm Hence (M − m)(1 − q + M + m) = 0.4. A n = 0. 0. The Case β = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 149 (a) The proof follows from Lemmas 9. m) then M = m.2.5 and so it remains to be shown that if m = f (m. 2 decreases in y. . 1.4. √ q−1+ (q−1)2 +4p (b) In view of Lemma 9. .3.2.4 and Theorems 1. C . then M = m. . Now if m + M = q − 1. 2 9.11) A yn B αB .5. y0 ∈ 0.2.1 we see that when y−1 . It is easy to check that y ∈ 0. M ) and M = f (M. then yn ∈ 2 √ √ q−1+ (q−1)2 +4p q−1+ (q−1)2 +4p for all n ≥ 0.2.1 and 9. m = M from which the result follows. 1 + yn + ryn−1 q= γ .1 and Theorem 1. . If m + M = q − 1 then m and M satisfy the equation (r − 1)m2 + (r − 1)(1 − q)m + p = 0. B (9.2.9. the function f increases in x and and that in the interval 0. The proof when q < p < q + q 2 r holds follows from Lemma 9. 3)-type Eq(9.7 and 1.2) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= p + qyn−1 .

. Theorem 9. Eq(9. if and only if (9. Lemma 9. ψ. invariant intervals. . φ.1 Eq(9. .1 Let Existence and Local Stability of Period-Two Cycles . φ. Then φ= p + qφ 1 + ψ + rφ and ψ = p + qψ . 3)-Type Equations This equation has not been investigated yet.12) holds. (b) The equilibrium y of Eq(9. and the convergence of solutions in certain regions of initial conditions. Here we make some simple observations about linearized stability.11) has a unique equilibrium y which is positive and is given by y= q−1+ (q − 1)2 + 4p(r + 1) 2(r + 1) . Furthermore when (9. . and more precisely a saddle point.11) is unstable. . ψ. . ψ.150 Chapter 9.3. φ. . be a period-two cycle of Eq(9.12) holds. .11).1. . .3. 1 + φ + rψ It now follows after some calculation that the following result is true.3.1 (a) The equilibrium y of Eq(9. ψ. (9.12) 9. when q > 1 and (r − 1)(q − 1)2 + 4pr2 < 0. By employing the linearized stability Theorem 1.11) has a prime period-two solution . φ. .1 we obtain the following result. the period-two solution is “unique” and the values of φ and ψ are the positive roots of the quadratic equation t2 − p q−1 = 0. (2. . t+ r 1−r .11) is locally asymptotically stable when either q≤1 or q > 1 and (r − 1)(q − 1)2 + 4pr2 > 0.

Jacobian matrix JT 2 . By a simple calculation we ﬁnd that T2 where g(u. ∞) × (0. n = 0. . the second iterate of T . . . v) + rv and h(u. v) = p + qu 1 + v + ru u v = g(u. v) = Clearly the two cycle is locally asymptotically stable when the eigenvalues of the φ . . we set un = yn−1 and vn = yn . φ. 1.3. evaluated at ψ We have ∂g ∂g (φ. . 1. ψ) = . ψ) = ∂u (1 + ψ + rφ)2 ∂g −p − qφ (φ. . . ψ) ∂u φ = JT 2 . 1 + g(u. The Case β = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 151 To investigate the local stability of the two cycle . v) h(u. and write Eq(9. ψ ∂h ∂h (φ. . . ψ) ∂u where ∂g q − pr + qψ . φ. φ ψ is a ﬁxed point of T 2 . . ψ. ψ) ∂v (φ. ∂v (1 + ψ + rφ)2 . Let T be the function on (0. ∞) deﬁned by: T Then u v = v p+qu 1+v+ru . . v) p + qv . .11) in the equivalent form: un+1 = vn vn+1 = p+qun 1+vn +run . ψ) ∂v (φ. lie inside the unit disk. ψ. .9. for n = 0. (φ.

(9.13) (9. ψ) = .152 Chapter 9. 3)-Type Equations ∂h (p + qψ)(pr − q − qψ) (φ.13) is equivalent to the following three inequalities: D<1 S <1+D −1 − D < S. Inequality (9. if and only if |S| < 1 + D < 2.16) First we will establish Inequality (9. ψ) (φ. ψ) + (φ.14). Thus . 2 (1 + φ + rψ)2 ∂v (1 + ψ + rφ) (1 + φ + rψ)2 Set S= and D= ∂h ∂g (φ. ψ). Observe that. ψ) − (φ. ψ) ∂u ∂v ∂h ∂g ∂h ∂g (φ. ∂u (1 + ψ + rφ)2 (1 + φ + rψ)2 ∂h (p + qψ)(p + qφ) q − pr + qφ (φ.15) (9. ∂u ∂v ∂v ∂u φ ψ lie inside the Then it follows from Theorem 1.1 that both eigenvalues of JT 2 unit disk |λ| < 1. (2. ψ) (φ. This inequality is equivalent to (q − pr + qφ) (q − pr + qψ) − (1 + ψ + rφ)2 (1 + φ + rψ)2 < 0.1.14) (9. ψ) = + . (q − pr + qφ) (q − pr + qψ) = (q − pr)2 + q(q − pr)(φ + ψ) + q 2 φψ = = −2q 2 r + q 2 r2 + 3qpr2 − 2qpr3 − p2 r3 + p2 r4 − q 3 + rq 3 + q 2 − pr2 q 2 − qpr r (−1 + r) (1 + ψ + rφ)2 (1 + φ + rψ)2 = 1 + φ + rψ + ψ + ψφ + rψ 2 + rφ + φ2 r + r2 φψ = −pr2 + qr + pr − q + q 2 r 2 2 and that .

The Case β = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 153 (q − pr + qφ) (q − pr + qψ) − (1 + ψ + rφ)2 (1 + φ + rψ)2 = −pr3 q 2 + 2q 2 r − q 2 r2 − q 2 + 3p2 r3 − 2p2 r4 − 3rq 3 + 3qpr3 − 5qpr2 r2 (1 − r) + 2qpr + 4pr2 q 2 + 2q 3 + q 4 r − p2 r2 − 2prq 2 − q 4 + r2 q 3 r2 (1 − r) Note that (2r2 p − rp + q − q 2 − qr + q 2 r) (−r2 p + rp − q + q 2 + qr) = . After some lengthy calculation one can see that this inequality is a consequence of Condition (9.3. This inequality is equivalent to (q − pr + qψ)(1 + φ + rψ)2 + (p + qψ)(p + qφ) + (q − pr + qφ)(1 + ψ + rφ)2 − (q − pr + qφ) (q − pr + qψ) − (1 + ψ + rφ)2 (1 + φ + rψ)2 < 0. we have established the following result: . Also by using Condition (9.12) we see that (r − 1)(q − 1)2 + 4pr2 = q 2 r − 2qr + r − q 2 + 2q − 1 + 4r2 p < 0 and so 2r2 p − rp + q − q 2 − qr + q 2 r < 2r2 p − rp + q − qr + 2qr − r − 2q + 1 − 4r2 p = −2r2 p − rp − q + qr − r + 1 = −2r2 p − rp + (r − 1) (q − 1) < 0 from which the result follows.15).12). After some lengthy calculation one can see that this inequality is also a consequence of Condition (9.16) is equivalent to (q − pr + qψ)(1 + φ + rψ)2 + (p + qψ)(p + qφ) + (q − pr + qφ)(1 + ψ + rφ)2 + (q − pr + qφ) (q − pr + qψ) + (1 + ψ + rφ)2 (1 + φ + rψ)2 > 0. In summary. r2 (1 − r) −r2 p + rp − q + q 2 + qr = rp(1 − r) + q(q − 1) + qr > 0. Finally Inequality (9.9.12). Next we turn to Inequality (9.

gives a list of invariant intervals for Eq(9. (a) Set g(x) = p + qx 1 + rx and b = q−1+ (q − 1)2 + 4pr 2r and observe that g is an increasing function and g(b) ≤ b. q−1+ (q − 1)2 + 4pr 2r when pr ≤ q. . then yk+1 = p + qyk−1 p + qyk−1 ≤ = g(yk−1 ) ≤ g(b) ≤ b. φ. if and only if (9. r q when pr ≥ q + q2 . .11) has a unique prime period-two solution . this period-two solution is locally asymptotically stable. .11) possesses the following invariant intervals: (a) 0. b].3. ψ.2 Invariant Intervals The following result. (b) pr − q q .2 Eq(9. 1 + yk + qyk−1 1 + ryk−1 The proof follows by induction. Furthermore when (9. . q r (c) q pr − q .3. .2 Eq(9. Using Eq(9. .3. . yk ∈ [0. 9. 3)-Type Equations Theorem 9.154 Chapter 9. Lemma 9. r when 1 < q < pr < q + q2 q − .11).12) holds. φ. r r Proof. ψ. (2.11) we see that when yk−1 . which can be established by direct calculation.12) holds.

q r q = . yk−1 ) ≥ f 1 + yk + qyk−1 pr − q pr − q . The Case β = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 155 (b) It is clear that the function f (x. r By using the fact that f (x.11) we see that when yk−1 . y) and the condition 2 q < pr < q + qr we obtain yk+1 = p + qyk−1 = f (yk . Now by using the monotonic character of the function f (x.3. r The proof follows by induction. q q q = .11) we see that when yk−1 . yk ∈ q then q pr − q p + qyk−1 pr − q = f (yk . 1 + yk + qyk−1 r r = pr + q 2 pr − q . y) is decreasing in both arguments and the condition pr > q + rq2 we obtain yk+1 = q q p + qyk−1 = f (yk . y) = p + qy 1 + x + ry pr−q q . y) = is decreasing in y for x < q pr−q .r q is increasing in y for x > pr−q . yk−1 ) ≤ f 1 + yk + ryk−1 pr − q q . 2 . Using Eq(9. . (c) It is clear that the function f (x. q p + qy 1 + x + ry .9. < r + (r + 1)q q The proof follows by induction. q r pr−q . ≥ yk+1 = 1 + yk + ryk−1 r q q . yk−1 ) ≥ f . then yk+1 = Using Eq(9. yk ∈ p + qyk−1 = f (yk . yk−1 ) ≤ f .

then Proof. 3)-Type Equations 9. In view of Lemma 9.3.11): Theorem 9. q−1+ (q − 1)2 + 4pr 2r converges to the equilibrium y.3 Convergence of Solutions p + qy 1 + x + ry By using the monotonic character of the function f (x. . for all n ≥ 0.4.4.8) we can obtain some convergence results for the solutions with initial conditions in the invariant intervals.3. the following results are true for Eq(9. together with the appropriate convergence theorem (from among Theorems 1. (iii) r < 1 and (r − 1)(q − 1)2 + 4pr2 ≥ 0.2 we see that when y−1 . the function f decreases in x and increases 2r in y. For example.3. It is easy to check that y ∈ 0. . The result now follows by employing Theorem 1. y) = in each of the intervals in Lemma 9.6. (ii) r ≥ 1.4.3.11) with initial conditions in the invariant interval 0.4 (a) Assume that 1 < q < pr < q+ qr − q and that one of the following r conditions is also satisﬁed: (i) r ≥ 1. 2r √ √ q−1+ (q−1)2 +4pr q−1+ (q−1)2 +4pr yn ∈ 0. 2 Theorem 9.5-1. 2 q−1+ √ (q−1)2 +4pr (ii) r < 1 and (r − 1)(q − 1)2 + 4pr2 ≥ 0.3 Assume that pr ≤ q and that one of the following conditions is also satisﬁed: (i) q ≤ 1. 2r 2r √ q−1+ (q−1)2 +4pr and that in the interval 0.156 Chapter 9.2. (2.3. y0 ∈ 0. Then every solution of Eq(9.

r2 + r2 yn + r3 yn−1 n = 0.2 we conclude that yn ∈ pr−q q . Theorem 9.4. r .3. r 9.4 Global Stability By applying Theorem 1. The Case β = 0 : xn+1 = α+γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 157 Then every solution of Eq(9.3 to Eq(9. q r interval q .6.5 Semicycle Analysis When pr = q + Here we present a semicycle analysis of the solutions of Eq(9. y) decreases in x and increases in y.11).2 we conclude that yn ∈ for all n ≥ 0. q2 r q2 .11) with initial conditions in the invariant interval pr − q q . . 2 q pr−q .4.3. It is easy to (b) In view of Lemma 9. r q converges to the equilibrium y. In and the only positive equilibrium is y = q .r q 2 check that y ∈ and that the function f (x. The result now follows by employing Theorem 1. . (a) In view of Lemma 9. we obtain the following global asymptotic stability result. the function f decreases check that y ∈ q . It is easy to 9. Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(9. pr−q and that in the r q in both x and in y. Proof. The result now follows by employing Theorem 1. pr−q r q for all n ≥ 0.11) when pr = q + this case Eq(9.11) becomes yn+1 = qr + q 2 + qr2 yn−1 .4.r q pr−q q . .3.11) is globally asymptotically stable. q r converges to the equilibrium y. Then every solution of Eq(9.3.9. 1.3.11) with initial conditions in the invariant interval q pr − q . (b) Assume that pr > q + qr .3.7.5 Assume r ≥ 1 and pr ≤ q.

17) are the nonnegative solutions of the equation y= (p + 1)y .17) γ yn . . The equilibrium points of Eq(9.1 and Theorem 1.11).1. q+1 (9. C and r = A . r + qyn + yn−1 β .158 2 Chapter 9.17) also possesses the unique positive equilibrium y= p+1−r . r r r (1 + yn + ryn−1 ) 2 9. . r + (1 + q)y Hence zero is always an equilibrium point and when p + 1 > r.3) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= pyn + yn−1 .18) The following theorem is a consequence of Theorem 1. Proof.3. Here we make some simple observations about linearized stability. C n = 0. (9. The proof follows from the relation yn+1 − q q qr2 = ( − yn ) 3 . .1. 3)-Type Equations Theorem 9. (2. . Eq(9. and the convergence of solutions in certain regions of initial conditions.4 The Case α = 0 : xn+1 = βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 This is the (2. 1.6 Suppose that pr = q + qr and let {yn }∞ n=−1 be a nontrivial solution of Eq(9. γ q= B .3. γ This equation has not been investigated yet. 3)-type Eq(9. the solution oscillates about the equilibrium y with semicycles of length one. Then after the ﬁrst semicycle. invariant intervals.

4. Theorem 9.17) is globally asymptotically stable.17) about its positive equilibrium y is zn+1 − p − q + qr q−p+r zn − zn−1 = 0. Then the positive equilibrium of Eq(9. q−1 . .4.17) is locally asymptotically stable when q + r < 3p + 1 + qr + pq. The following result is a consequence of Theorem 1. and unstable (a saddle point) when q + r > 3p + 1 + qr + pq. . ψ. φ. . . The linearized equation associated with Eq(9. .17) is unstable.20) holds. .3 Eq(9.20) (9.4. it follows from Section 2.1. Theorem 9. .19) Concerning prime period-two solutions for Eq(9. Furthermore when (9. 1. (p + 1)(q + 1) (p + 1)(q + 1) n = 0.5 that the following result is true. . .18) holds.2 Assume that (9.1 βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 159 (a) Assume that p + 1 ≤ r. Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(9. Then the zero equilibrium of Eq(9. (9. (b) Assume that p + 1 > r.20) holds there is a unique period-two solution and the values of φ and ψ are the positive roots of the quadratic equation t2 − (1 − p − r)t + p(1 − p − r) = 0.1. Furthermore the zero equilibrium is a saddle point when 1−p<r <1+p and a repeller when r < 1 − p. φ.9.17).4. if and only if (9. The Case α = 0 : xn+1 = Theorem 9.17) has a prime period-two solution . ψ.

Lemma 9. (b) 0.1 Invariant Intervals The following result. 3)-Type Equations 9. qr p − q2 when q 2 < p ≤ q 2 + r and p + q > r. K2 −p [0. K] when q 2 < p ≤ q 2 + r and p + q ≤ r. p+q−r q+1 when p = q 2 and q 2 + q > r where K > 0 is an arbitrary number and qr . K] when q 2 − qr ≤ p < q 2 and p + q ≤ r.160 Chapter 9. K1 p − q2 K1 = (c) 0. and [0. q2 pr −p (q − r)(p − q 2 ) − qr + [0. which can be established by direct calculation. where K > 0 is an arbitrary number and pr . K] when p = q 2 where K > 0 is an arbitrary number. . (2. and q 2 + q ≤ r. q2 where K2 = when q 2 > p + qr.1 Eq(9.4.4. when q 2 − qr ≤ p < q 2 and p + q > r. gives a list of invariant intervals for Eq(9. ((q − r)(q 2 − p))2 + 4p3 qr2 2pqr (q − r)(q 2 − p) + . when p > q 2 + r where ((r − q)(p − q 2 ) + qr)2 + 4q 3 r(p − q 2 ) 2q(p − q 2 ) .17) possesses the following invariant intervals: (a) 0.17).

q+1 (b) It is clear that the function f (x. 2 pr pr . First assume that q 2 < p ≤ q 2 + r . yk−1 ) ≤ f (K.4. yk−1 ) ≤ f (K1 . 2 p−q p − q2 pr . y) = r + qx + y is increasing in both arguments. ) ≤ K1 . −p Then one can see that for yk−1 . Therefore for any K > 0. q2pr we obtain −p yk+1 = f (yk . 1 ≤ K. p−q2 we obtain qr . K) = (p + q)K with K = pr . q 2 −p First assume that q 2 − qr ≤ p < q 2 . it is satisﬁed under the condition r + q 2 > p. K1 p−q 2 we can see that qr qr . yk−1 ) ≤ f (K. The last inequality is always satisﬁed when p + q ≤ r and when p + q > r. while when q 2 + q > r the inequality is true when p+q−r K≥ . y) is increasing in both arguments for y < and it is increasing in y and decreasing in x for y ≥ q2pr . K) ≤ K is equivalent to q 2 +q−r ≤ (q+1)K. K). p−q 2 0 ≤ f (x. Then for yk−1 . r + (q + 1)K qr where we set K = p−q2 . The Case α = 0 : xn+1 = Proof. Then for yk−1 . yk ∈ 0. qr Hence for yk−1 . K2 q 2 −p Second assume that p < q 2 − qr. y) is increasing in both arguments for x < qr and it is increasing in x and decreasing in y for x ≥ p−q2 . 1 ≤ K.9. 2 q2 − p q −p . q 2 −p (c) It is clear that the function f (x. yk ∈ f qr . this inequality is satisﬁed for any K > 0. Now observe that the inequality f (K. K2 ≤ yk+1 = f (yk . When q 2 + q ≤ r. K1 ≤ yk+1 = f (yk . yk ∈ f one can see that ≤ K2 . yk−1 ) ≤ f K2 . yk ∈ 0. y) ≤ f (K. βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 161 (a) It is easy to see that when p = q 2 the function px + qy f (x. yk+1 = f (yk . r + (q + 1)K pr . K) = (p + q)K Second assume that p > q 2 + r.

Assume that q 2 − qr ≤ p < q 2 and p + q ≤ r. 2 q2 pr −p qr p − q2 q2 + q − r q+1 . K]. For example. Then every solution of Eq(9.1.4. converges to the equilibrium y.4. Then every solution of Eq(9.2 Convergence of Solutions px + qy r + qx + y By using the monotonic character of the function f (x.17) with initial conditions in the interval [0.5-1.1 and Theorem 1. for any K > 0. converges to the equilibrium y. y) = in each of the intervals in Lemma 9.4. converges to the equilibrium y. K]. for any K > 0.4. for any K > 0.17): Theorem 9. The proof is an immediate consequence of Lemma 9. (2.8. 3)-Type Equations 9. Assume that q 2 + r ≥ p > q 2 and p + q ≤ r. Then every solution of Eq(9. Then every solution of Eq(9.17) with initial conditions in the invariant interval 0.17) with initial conditions in the interval [0. converges to the equilibrium y.4 (a) Assume that p = q 2 and q 2 + q > r.4. (b) Assume that q 2 + r ≥ p > q 2 and p + q > r. converges to the equilibrium y. converges to the equilibrium y.4.162 Chapter 9.17) with initial conditions in the invariant interval 0.17) with initial conditions in the invariant interval 0. (c) Assume that q 2 − qr ≥ p < q 2 and p + q > r. together with the appropriate convergence theorem (from among Theorems 1.8). Proof. we can obtain some convergence results for the solutions with initial conditions in the invariant intervals. Then every solution of Eq(9. Then every solution of Eq(9. Assume that p = q 2 and q 2 + q ≤ r. K]. the following results are true for Eq(9.17) with initial conditions in the interval [0.4.

20) is not satisﬁed.3 Assume β.5. B. γ. Conjecture 9.4. ∞).1 and Theorem 1. Conjecture 9. C ∈ (0. C ∈ (0. Proof.6. (iii) q < 1 qr . A. Show that every positive solution of Eq(9.5. 2 9. The proof is a consequence of Lemma 9.4.4.1) has a ﬁnite limit. B. 2 Theorem 9.2) is bounded.11) with initial conditions in the invariant interval converges to the equilibrium y.5 Open Problems and Conjectures α. A. A.4. β. p−q 2 Proof. K1 p−q 2 3q 2 +q−qr+r . . Conjecture 9.6 Assume that q 2 > p + qr and that Condition (9.5. K2 converges to the equilibrium y.11) with initial conditions in the invariant interval qr .4. 1−q 163 and p ≤ Then every solution of Eq(9.4. Then every solution of Eq(9. (ii) q ≥ 1. B. ∞).5.5 Assume that p > q2 + r and that one of the following conditions is also satisﬁed: (i) p ≤ q + r. C ∈ (0. ∞).5.1 Assume Show that every positive solution of Eq(9. The proof is an immediate consequence of Lemma 9.9. γ. Show that every positive solution of Eq(9.2 Assume α. Open Problems and Conjectures Theorem 9.3) is bounded.1 and Theorem 1.

3)-Type Equations α.2) is globally asymptotically stable.5.3) is globally asymptotically stable.3 Determine the set G of all initial points (x−1 . ∞) with x−1 + x0 > 0 and that β. n=−1 .5.2) has no prime period-two solutions. ∞). n=−1 Open Problem 9.3) has no prime period-two solutions. Extend and generalize.5.164 Conjecture 9. (2.1 Determine the set G of all initial points (x−1 . Conjecture 9. n=−1 Open Problem 9. Extend and generalize. γ. and for these initial points investigate the long-term behavior of the solutions {xn }∞ . B.4 Assume Chapter 9. C ∈ (0. Suppose that Eq(9.5 Assume that x−1 . Open Problem 9. ∞) and suppose that Eq(9. γ. Show that the positive equilibrium of Eq(9. C ∈ (0. A.5. x0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation xn + xn−1 xn+1 = 1 + xn + xn−1 is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. and for these initial points investigate the long-term behavior of the solutions {xn }∞ .5.2 Determine the set G of all initial points (x−1 . Show that the positive equilibrium of Eq(9. x0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation 1 + xn−1 xn+1 = 1 + xn + xn−1 is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. A. and for these initial points investigate the long-term behavior of the solutions {xn }∞ . B. x0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation 1 + xn xn+1 = 1 + xn + xn−1 is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0. Extend and generalize. x0 ∈ [0.

. . . . Investigate the basin of attraction of the two cycle . of Eq(9. ψ.17). . ψ. .5. n = 0. ψ. of Eq(9. . . .5. .23) pn yn + yn−1 . .5. {qn }∞ . φ. Investigate the basin of attraction of the two cycle . . Extend and generalize. 1 + yn + rn yn−1 n = 0.21) (9. . . . φ. . . Conjecture 9. .17) is locally asymptotically stable. . . 1. φ.4 Assume that {pn }∞ .12) holds. ψ.23). Open Problem 9. lim and r = n→∞ rn . n = 0. 1.6 Assume that (9.11).5. {qn }n=0 . and {rn }∞ are convergent sen=0 n=0 n=0 quences of nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits. . Open Problems and Conjectures 165 Open Problem 9. ψ.21)-(9.9. Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of Eqs(9.5 Assume that {pn }∞ . n→∞ q = n→∞ qn . and {rn }∞ are period-two sen=0 n=0 quences of nonnegative real numbers. ψ. Show that the period-two solution . 1 + yn + rn yn−1 pn + qn yn−1 . (9.6 Assume that (9. .5. . . Open Problem 9. of Eq(9. lim Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of each of the following three diﬀerence equations: yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = pn + qn yn . rn + qn yn + yn−1 ∞ Open Problem 9. . φ. . .7 Assume that (9.22) (9. p = lim pn . φ.20) holds. . . 1.20) holds.5. φ.

r + qyn + yn−k n = 0. n = 0. ∞) and Chapter 9. . . 1.166 Open Problem 9. q. r ∈ [0. 1 + yn + ryn−k pyn + yn−k . . 1 + yn + ryn−k yn+1 = yn+1 = p + qyn−k . 1. n = 0. .25) (9. . . (9. 3. .26) . 1.24) yn+1 = . (2. . . . . 3)-Type Equations k ∈ {2.}.5. Investigate the global behavior of all positive solutions of each of the following diﬀerence equations: p + qyn (9. .8 Assume that p. .

. . A + Bxn α + βxn + γxn−1 . . (10. . . the initial conditions are nonnegative.4) and r = 167 . (10. 1 + yn αB .1 Introduction α + βxn + γxn−1 . A n = 0. n = 0.3) Bxn + Cxn−1 Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all parameters that appear in these equations are positive. 1. 1. 2)-type: xn+1 = xn+1 = and α + βxn + γxn−1 . xn+1 = n = 0. .2) 10. A (10. .1) (10. γ . A2 q= β .1) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= p + qyn + ryn−1 . A + Cxn−1 Eq(1) contains the following three equations of the (3. . 1. . n = 0. . 2)-Type Equations 10. 2)-type Eq(10. 1.Chapter 10 (3.2 The Case C = 0 : xn+1 = A yn B α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn This is the (3. and the denominators are always positive. . . .

2 below.168 Chapter 10. The proof of part (a) of Theorem 10.4) converges to a period-two solution.2.1 we see that y is locally asymptotically stable when r <1+q and is an unstable (saddle point) equilibrium when r > 1 + q. See Sections 2. 1.1 was given.4) exhibit the following trichotomy character. The main result in this section is that the solutions of Eq(10. 2 (1 + y) 1+y n = 0.1 and 10.7. By applying the linearized stability Theorem 1. for a more general equation. Then the equilibrium of Eq(10. Then every solution of Eq(10. 2)-Type Equations (Eq(10.7. (b) Assume that r < q + 1.4) possesses prime period-two solutions.2.4) is globally asymptotically stable.2. When r =q+1 Eq(10.1 are given in Sections 10.7) (10. . .1. . .6) (10.4) possesses unbounded solutions.2.4) about its unique equilibrium y= is zn+1 − q+r−1+ (q + r − 1)2 + 4p 2 q − p − ry r zn − zn−1 = 0. (c) Assume that r > q + 1. (10.5 and 2. in Section 2.1 (a) Assume that r = q + 1.5) .2. The proofs of parts (b) and (c) of Theorem 10. (3. Then Eq(10. Theorem 10.) The linearized equation of Eq(10.4) was investigated in [29].

.2.10. .10) reduces to yn+1 − q = Also in this case 0<r =1− r (yn − q) for n ≥ 0.5 and therefore the proof is complete when (10. (1 + q) + zn n = 1.8) holds.12) (10.9) for n ≥ 1. We know already that when Eq(10. . 1 + yn and so when p≥q we have yn ≥ q Therefore the change of variables yn = q + zn transforms Eq(10.8) which is of the form of the (2. 2)-type Eq(6.1 Proof of Part (b) of Theorem 10.23) which was investigated in Section 6.4) satisfy the following identity yn+1 − q = Note that when q= that is when p + qr − q = 0 the Identity (10.1 Here we assume that Eq(10.4) is attracted to the equilibrium.2.10) . (10.4) to the diﬀerence equation zn+1 = (p + rq − q) + rzn−1 . So in the remaining part of the proof we assume that p < q. (10.4) is globally asymptotically stable. .6) holds and we prove that the equilibrium of Eq(10. . Observe that (p − q) + ryn−1 yn+1 = q + . n = 0. (10. 1 + yn p <1 q (10. .2. The Case C = 0 : xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn 169 10.6) holds the equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable so it remains to be shown that every solution of Eq(10.11) q−p r yn−1 − 1 + yn r q−p r for n ≥ 0. Now observe that the solutions of Eq(10. 1.

Then we can see from (10.14) First assume that (10.16) holds.13) holds. Still to be considered are cases where p + qr − q > 0 and p + qr − q < 0.16) (10. We will assume that (10. If (10.15) is not eventually true then either y2n < or y2n−1 < This is because when yN −1 > then it follows from (10.18) q−p q−p r y2n − > r y2n − 1 + yn+1 r r .17) holds is similar and will be omitted. To this end. note that now q−p <q r and employ (10. 2)-Type Equations |yn+1 − q| < r|yn+1 − q| and so n→∞ lim yn = q which completes the proof when (10.4) is equal to q.170 and the equilibrium of Eq(10. (3. The case where (10. q−p r q−p r for n ≥ 0 for n ≥ 0.10). To complete the proof in this case it is suﬃcient to show that eventually (10.10) that yN +1+2K > q for all K ≥ 0.17) q−p r for some N ≥ 0. (10. It follows from (10. (10. (10.12) that Chapter 10.10) that y2n+2 − q = and so y2n+2 > ry2n + p for n ≥ 0.15) yn ≥ q and then use the known result for Eq(10.11) holds.9).13) (10.

.10. when r < 1.4) lies eventually in the interval 0. Next assume that (10. The Case C = 0 : xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn 171 This is impossible when r ≥ 1.1. q−p .2. because by (10. The case where (10.20) holds is similar and will be omitted. q−p r q−p < r y2n − y2n − 1 + y2n+1 r r . the proof that the r equilibrium is a global attractor of all solutions would be a consequence of Theorem 1.2. r 1−r This contradicts (10.14) holds. + rp + p r which implies that p q−p ≤ .16) and (10. Then from (10.19) holds. Now we claim that every solution of Eq(10. . + rp + p r and so p q−p ≥ r 1−r which contradicts (10. r that either q−p y2n > for n ≥ 0 (10. y2n−1 > (10.10) and r the fact that now q−p q< . Once we establish this result.10) we see that y2n+2 − q = and so y2n+2 < ry2n + p for n ≥ 0. Note that in this case r < 1 and so q−p < y2n+2 < rn+1 y0 + rn p + . q−p .13) holds. .19) r or q−p for n ≥ 0.20) r We will assume that (10.18) that q−p > y2n+2 > rn+1 y0 + rn p + .8 and the fact that in this case the function f (x. . Then one can see from (10. y) = p + qx + ry 1+x is increasing in both arguments.13) and completes the proof when (10.16) the solution is bounded. it follows from (10.14) and completes the proof of part (b) of Theorem 10. On the other hand.4. To this end assume for the sake of contradiction that the solution is not eventually in the interval 0.

A (10. y0 ∈ [q. More speciﬁcally the solutions of Eq(10.5 for appropriate initial conditions y−1 and y0 .1 Here we assume that (10.2. 1.4) with initial conditions such that q ≤ y−1 < r − 1 and y0 > r−1 + p + q(r − 1) r−1−q for n ≥ 0.7) holds.4) possesses bounded solutions which in fact converge to the equilibrium of Eq(10.7) holds and show that Eq(10.2) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= p + qyn + ryn−1 . That is when y−1 . . .4) possesses unbounded solutions. then yn ≥ q Now the change of variables yn = q + zn transforms Eq(10.3 The Case B = 0 : xn+1 = A yn C α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Cxn−1 This is the (3.4) is a saddle point and so by the stable manifold theorem.7) holds the interval [q.2. A2 and r = . To this end observe that yn+1 = q + q p + r(yn−1 − r ) 1 + yn for n ≥ 0 and so when (10. 1 + yn−1 q= β .21) αC . 10.9) and the conclusion of part (c) follows from Section 6. It should be mentioned that when (10.4). ∞). ∞) is invariant.2 Proof of Part (c) of Theorem 10. 2)-Type Equations 10. in addition to unbounded solutions. . A n = 0.172 Chapter 10.4) to Eq(10. Eq(10. 2)-type Eq(10. (3. γ . have the property that the subsequences of even terms converge to ∞ while the subsequences of odd terms converge to q. the equilibrium of Eq(10.

21) when p ≥ r. . invariant intervals. Observe that (p − r) + qyn . 1. yN . . . The Case B = 0 : xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Cxn−1 173 This equation has not been investigated yet. for some integer N ≥ 0.3. 10. By applying Theorem 1. yN +1 ∈ I then yn ∈ I for n ≥ N. .1 Eq(10.3. r−p q when q < 1 and p ≥ r(1 − q). .1 we see that y is locally asymptotically stable for all values of the parameters p. .21) about its positive equilibrium y= is zn+1 − q+r−1+ (q + r − 1)2 + 4p 2 q p − r + qy zn = 0.3. Here we make some simple observations about linearized stability. Lemma 10. which can be established by direct calculation. if whenever. n = 0. Recall that I is an invariant interval. q.21) possesses the following invariant intervals: (a) 0. and r. 1. zn + 1+y (1 + y)2 n = 0. p 1−q when q < 1 and p ≥ r. . 10. yn+1 = r + 1 + yn−1 and so when p≥r Global Stability When p ≥ r . and convergence of solutions in certain regions of initial conditions. The linearized equation of Eq(10.10.1.21). gives a list of invariant intervals for Eq(10.1 Invariant Intervals The following result. (b) 0.3.2 Here we discuss the behavior of the solutions of Eq(10.

2)-Type Equations for n ≥ 1.3 Convergence of Solutions Here we discuss the behavior of the solutions of Eq(10. which is of the form of the (2.3. Then the following statements are true.174 yn ≥ r Therefore the change of variables yn = r + zn transforms Eq(10. 2)-type Eq(6. (b) The positive equilibrium of Eq(10.2 (a) Assume that q < 1 and r ≥ p . 1−q Then every solution of Eq(10.21) with initial conditions in the invariant interval 0.21) is bounded.21) when p < r. .2) which was investigated in Section 6.21) to the diﬀerence equation zn+1 = p + qr − r + qzn . r−p q . (1 + r) + zn−1 Chapter 10. 2. 10. n = 1.3. .21) is globally asymptotically stable if one of the following conditions holds: (i) q < 1.1 Assume p ≥ r. The following result is now a consequence of the above observations and the results in Section 6. Theorem 10. converges to the equilibrium y. (ii) q≥1 and either p + qr − r ≤ q or q < p + qr − r ≤ 2(q + 1).3. Theorem 10.3.3. . (a) Every positive solution of Eq(10. (3.

C n = 0. γ and r = . r−p q q for all n ≥ 0.4. r−p .1 we see that when y−1 . y) increases in x and decreases in y.22) β . It is easy to check that y ∈ 0.K q and that in the interval .K q converges to the equilibrium y.3. 2)-type Eq(10.10. r−p .3.K q r−p .K q pq + r2 − pr .3) which by the change of variables xn = reduces to the diﬀerence equation yn+1 = where p= r + pyn + yn−1 .4 The Case A = 0 : xn+1 = γ yn C α+βxn +γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 This is the (3. K= q + r − p − q2 (b) In view of Lemma 10. .4.8.K q the function f (x. 1−q and p < r < Then every solution of Eq(10. then yn ∈ r−p . 2 10. qyn + yn−1 q= B . γ2 (10. It is easy to check that y ∈ r−p . (a) In view of Lemma 10. αC .4. y) increases in both x and y. The result is now a consequence of Theorem 1. . r−p q q the function f (x. then yn ∈ 0. .21) with initial conditions in the invariant interval r−p . Proof. y0 ∈ for all n ≥ 0. 1.5. r−p and that in the interval 0. y0 ∈ 0.1 we see that when y−1 . The Case A = 0 : xn+1 = (b) Suppose that either or Set α+βxn +γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 175 0≤q−1<r q<1 and p < r p . The result is now a consequence of Theorem 1.

22) about its positive equilibrium y= is zn+1 − (p − q)y − qr (p − q)y + r zn + zn−1 = 0. it follows from Section 2. φ. as in Section 6. . and the convergence of solutions in certain regions of initial conditions.23) It is interesting to note that the above condition for the local asymptotic stability of y requires the assumption that r > 0. . (q + 1)(r + (p + 1)y) (q + 1)(r + (p + 1)y) n = 0.9. The linearized equation of Eq(10.23) is strict and Condition (10. q−1 . Here we make some simple observations about linearized stability. . . . 2)-Type Equations This equation has not been investigated yet.5 that a period-two solution exists if and only if p < 1. .1 we see that y is locally asymptotically stable when either q ≤ pq + 1 + 3p or q > pq + 1 + 3p and F where F (u) = (q + 1)u2 − (p + 1)u − r. Concerning prime period-two solution. . ψ. (3.24) 2r q − pq − 1 − 3p >0 (10. φ. (10. ψ. (1 + p) + (1 + p)2 + 4r(1 + q) 2(1 + q) By applying Theorem 1. q > 1 and 4r < (1 − p)(q − pq − 3p − 1). . the inequality in (10.24) is void. 1. The second condition reduces to q > pq + 1 + 3p. is unique and the values φ and ψ are the positive roots of the quadratic equation t2 − (1 − p)t + r + p(1 − p) = 0.176 Chapter 10. .25) Furthermore in this case the prime period-two solution . When r = 0. . (10.1. invariant intervals.

. b] when p = q a and b are positive numbers such that r + (p + 1)a ≤ (q + 1)ab ≤ r + (p + 1)b. p−q q (c) 1. (b) p qr .21).10.1 q−p Proof.1 Eq(10. p > q. y) is decreasing in both arguments when y < qr is increasing in x and decreasing in y for y ≥ p−q . y) ≤ f (a. b) ≤ f (x. a) = ≤ b. First assume that p > q and p2 −pq q2 and it < r.26) when p > q and p2 − pq < r. Lemma 10. q2 when p > q and when p < q < p + r. when q > p + r. q2 p2 − pq > r. p−q and (10. Hence a≤ r + (p + 1)b r + (p + 1)a = f (b. and p < q. We consider the cases where p = q. (a) It is easy to see that when p = q the function f (x.4.4. The Case A = 0 : xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 177 10. y) = is decreasing in both arguments.4. r q−p r .1 Invariant Intervals Here we present some results about invariant intervals for Eq(10.21) possesses the following invariant intervals: (a) [a. q p−q qr p . (q + 1)b (q + 1)a qr . r + px + y qx + y (b) Clearly the function f (x.

q−p q−p 1< ≤ f (x. we obtain qr p . . y) ≤ f p p . q p−q Chapter 10. r . First. q−p (c) It is clear that the function f (x.178 Then for x. y) ≤ f p qr . Using the decreasing character of f in x and the increasing character of f in y. Using the decreasing character of f . p2 −pq q2 > r. we obtain r (p + r)(q − p) + r = f 1. p−q p−q The inequalities qr + p(p + 1) qr ≤ p(q + 1) p−q are equivalent to the inequality Next assume that p > q and For x. 1) = r+p+1 r ≤ . assume that p < q < p + r. p(q + 1) p−q qr qr . y ∈ qr p . p−q q ≤ f (x. y ∈ p =f q p qr . y) is decreasing in both arguments for x < r and it is increasing in y and decreasing in x for x ≥ q−p . p−q q p2 −pq q2 and p qr < q p−q < r. 2)-Type Equations we obtain ≤ f (x. q p−q p = . q (qr + p)(p − q) + pq 2 r =f q 3 r + p(p − q) The inequalities (qr + p)(p − q) + pq 2 r qr ≥ 3 r + p(p − q) q p−q follow from the inequality p2 −pq q2 and qr p > q p−q > r. q(q − p) + r q−p ≤ f (x. p−q . we obtain 1=f The inequalities r r . y) ≤ f (1. q+1 q−p r+p+1 r r < and q−p q+1 q−p are equivalent to the inequality q < p + r. (3. Next assume that q > p + r. y) ≤ f r . q q = qr qr + p(p + 1) ≤ . 1 = 1.

4. The Case A = 0 : xn+1 = The inequalities α+βxn +γxn−1 Bxn +Cxn−1 179 (p + r)(q − p) + r r ≥ q(q − p) + r q−p follow from the inequality q > p + r.25) is not satisﬁed.2 Convergence of Solutions Here we obtain some convergence results for Eq(10.22). Then every solution of Eq(10. q2 Then every solution of Eq(10. r < p2 −pq .22) with initial p qr . q−p converges to the equilibrium y. (b) Assume that p > q and r > p2 −pq .22) with initial conditions in the invariant interval r .1 and Theorem 1.4. b]. q2 and that either p≤1 or p > 1 and (q − 1)[(p − 1)2 (q − 1) − 4q(1 − p − qr)] ≤ 0.4.22) with initial conditions r in the invariant interval 1.6. Proof. q−p Proof. 2 Theorem 10. 1 converges to the equilibrium y. and r <1 q−p 2 10.1 and Theorem 1. qr p .26) converges to the equilibrium y.1 and Theorem 1. 2 .22) with initial conditions in the invariant interval converges to the equilibrium y.2 Assume that p > q. p + r < q. 2 Theorem 10. Then every solution of Eq(10.4. Then every solution of Eq(10.3 Assume that p < q.4. p−q q Proof. q p−q conditions in the invariant interval converges to the equilibrium y.7.22) with initial conditions in the invariant interval [a.4.4. (c) Assume that p < q < p+r.4. and that Condition (10. Then every solution of Eq(10.10. Theorem 10.1 (a) Assume that p = q. where 0 < a < b satisfy (10.5.4.4. The proof is an immediate consequence of Lemma 10.4. The proof is an immediate consequence of Lemma 10. The proof is an immediate consequence of Lemma 10.

. . (10. 2)-Type Equations 10.4) are bounded. .180 Chapter 10.5 Open Problems and Conjectures ∞ Open Problem 10.3 For each of the equations listed below.27).1 Every positive solution of Eq(10. (a) Determine the set of initial conditions y−1 and y0 for which φ = ψ.21) converges to the positive equilibrium of the equation. φ. Determine the set of initial conditions y−1 and y0 for which {yn }∞ n=−1 converges to (10. . and for these initial points investigate the long-term behavior of the corresponding solution: 1 + xn + xn−1 xn+1 = (10.27) (b) Assume (10.5. ψ.29) 1 + xn−1 1 + xn + xn−1 . . y0 ) ∈ B. ψ.5. (3. Conjecture 10. (a) Find the set B of all initial conditions (y−1 . if and only if r = 1 + q. x0 ) ∈ R × R through which the equation is well deﬁned for all n ≥ 0.2 Assume r > q + 1. Open Problem 10.30) xn+1 = xn + xn−1 Extend and generalize.4). φ.1 We know that every solution {yn }n=−1 of Eq(10. ∞) × (0. Open Problem 10.27) is a prime period-two solution of Eq(10. Investigate the asymptotic behavior of {yn }n=−1 .4) converges to a not necessarily prime period-two solution . . determine the set G of all initial conditions (x−1 . ∞ (b) Let (y−1 .5. y0 ) ∈ (0. (10. ∞) such that the ∞ solutions {yn }n=−1 of Eq(10. .28) 1 + xn 1 + xn + xn−1 xn+1 = (10.5.

. 1 + yn pn + qn yn + rn yn−1 . (10. Open Problems and Conjectures Conjecture 10. (c) When Eq(10. and {rn }n=0 are convergent sen=0 n=0 quences of nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits.5. . 1 + yn−1 rn + pn yn + yn−1 . 1.10. and {rn }∞ are period-two sen=0 n=0 n=0 quences of nonnegative real numbers. . 1. Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of each of the following three diﬀerence equations: yn+1 = pn + qn yn + rn yn−1 . Extend and generalize. {qn }∞ . when it exists.22) possesses a period-two solution.32) (10. 1. is locally asymptotically stable. . p = lim pn . q.33) Open Problem 10. . .33).2 Assume that p. {qn }∞ . lim lim and r = n→∞ rn .22).22) has no prime period-two solutions the equilibrium y is globally asymptotically stable.31) yn+1 = yn+1 = n = 0. .31)-(10. .4 Assume that {pn }∞ . n→∞ q = n→∞ qn . . the equilibrium y is a saddle point.5. n = 0.5.5. ∞). (d) The period-two solution of Eq(10. .22) (a) Local stability of the positive equilibrium implies global stability. r ∈ (0. Investigate the global character of all positive solutions of Eqs(10. 181 (b) When Eq(10. (10. qn yn + yn−1 n = 0. Then the following statements are true for Eq(10. ∞ Open Problem 10.5 Assume that {pn }∞ . but not globally. .

q. . 1 + yn−k p + qyn + ryn−1 . . qyn + yn−k n = 0. . . n = 0. 2)-Type Equations p. .6 Assume that Chapter 10. 1.5. (3.35) (10. r ∈ [0.182 Open Problem 10.34) (10.}. . .36) . ∞) and k ∈ {2. 1. n = 0. . 3. . 1 + yn p + qyn + ryn−k . (10. . . . 1. . Investigate the global behavior of all positive solutions of each of the following diﬀerence equations: yn+1 = yn+1 = yn+1 = p + qyn + ryn−k .

(11. .1) Please recall our classiﬁcation convention in which all coeﬃcients of this equation are now assumed to be positive and the initial conditions nonnegative. invariant intervals.2) . Here we make some simple observations about linearized stability.1 Linearized Stability Analysis (B + C)x2 − (β + γ − A)x − α = 0. and the convergence of solutions in certain regions of initial conditions. 3)-type equation xn+1 = α + βxn + γxn−1 . . 11. − z 2 + α(B + C) + (B + C)(A + β + γ)x n−1 A A2 183 n = 0. The linearized equation about x is (see Section 2.Chapter 11 The (3. . (11. . . This equation has not been investigated yet. 1.1) has a unique equilibrium which is the positive solution of the quadratic equation That is. . A + Bxn + Cxn−1 n = 0. 1. . Eq(11.3) zn+1 − (βA − Bα) + (βC − Bγ)x zn + α(B + C) + (B + C)(A + β + γ)x (γA − Cα) − (βC − γB)x = 0. 3)-Type Equation α+βx xn+1 = A+Bxn+γxn−1 n+Cx n−1 In this chapter we discuss the (3. x= β+γ−A+ (A − β − γ)2 + 4α(B + C) 2(B + C) . .

yN . is discussed in Section 2. γ > β+A.15) are satisﬁed.1) has a prime period-two solution . .1). that is. . .14). These intervals are derived by analyzing the intervals where the function f (x.3).2 Invariant Intervals Here we obtain several invariant intervals for Eq(11. 3)-Type Equation xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 The equilibrium x is locally asymptotically stable if Conditions (2.5. .31) and (2. Conditions (2. The (3.1) by testing whether the hypotheses of one of the four Theorems 1. (2. φ. y) = is increasing or decreasing in x and y.1) if whenever. Eq(11.4. yn ∈ I . ψ. .3) 4C 2 Furthermore.1) then we may be able to obtain a convergence result for the solutions of Eq(11. . φ. and α < (γ − β − A)[B(γ − β − A) − C(γ + 3β − A)] . . for n ≥ N. then clearly fx = M = βC − γB.13). ψ. ψ. . holds the values of φ and ψ are the positive roots of the quadratic equation t2 + γ−β−A αC + β(γ − β − A) t+ = 0. 2 (A + Bx + Cy) (A + Bx + Cy)2 Recall that an interval I is an invariant interval for Eq(11. . . If we set L = βA − αB. when (11. Once we have an invariant interval for Eq(11. φ. and N = γA − αC α + βx + γy A + Bx + Cy L + My N − My and fy = . φ. C C(B − C) .6. yN +1 ∈ I then for some integer N ≥ 0. and (2.4. if.5-1.8 are satisﬁed. (11. B > C. ψ.32) are satisﬁed. see Section 2.184 Chapter 11. (11. .4) The local asymptotic stability of the two cycle 11. .

1) and in this interval the function f (x.1) and in this interval the function f (x. (vii) Assume that α β γ = > . y) is decreasing in both variables. B is an invariant interval for Eq(11. < < < B C A βC − γB α Then 0.11. B+C is an invariant interval for Eq(11. B+C βC − γB α β+γ Then A . A B C α Then 0. A is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the function f (x. C B A β α Then B .1) and in this interval the function f (x. βC−γB is an invariant interval for Eq(11. (ii) Assume that β γ α > > B C A and γ N ≤ . (v) Assume that α β γ γA − αC > .1 (i) Assume that β α γ = > . y) is decreasing in both variables.2. A is an invariant interval for Eq(11. y) is increasing in both variables. . y) is increasing in both variables.1) and in this interval the function f (x. ≥ > βC − γB A B C γA−αC Then 0. y) is increasing in both variables.1) and in this interval the function f (x. (iv) Assume that β α γ = < . (vi) Assume that β γ α γA − αC . (iii) Assume that β α γ > > C B A and β+γ αB − βA ≤ . C M α γ Then A . C B A 185 α β Then A . y) is increasing in x and decreasing in y. C is an invariant interval for Eq(11. A is an invariant interval for Eq(11. y) is decreasing in both variables.2.1) and in this interval the function f (x. Invariant Intervals Lemma 11.

in this case the function f is increasing in x. for every x. B is an invariant interval for Eq(11.1) and in this interval the function f (x. A M M C for all x.1) and in this interval the function f (x. L > 0.1) and in this interval the function f (x. y) ≤ f ( . y ∈ α γ . and N > 0. y) ≤ f ( . B A C β Then 0. which in turn imply that N > 0. Proof. Thus. Thus. y) is increasing in x and decreasing in y. = f (0. ) ≤ A B B B+C B Here we used the fact that under the condition γ β α = > C B A the function f (u. B+C B γ β α (ii) The condition B > C > A is equivalent to M > 0. (x) Assume that β α γ < ≤ . (ix) Assume that α β γ = < . Thus. C is an invariant interval for Eq(11. B A C γ Then 0. this function γ N N is increasing in y for x < M . A C .186 (viii) Assume that Chapter 11. 0) ≤ f (x. 3)-Type Equation xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 β α γ > ≥ . 0) ≤ f (x. y) is increasing in y and decreasing in x. γ β α (i) The condition C = B > A is equivalent to M = 0 and L > 0. The (3. in this case the function f is increasing in both variables for all values of x and y and α β+γ β β β = . A B C γ Then 0. C is an invariant interval for Eq(11. . y) is increasing in y and decreasing in x. u) is increasing and consequently f (u. u) ≤ β β+γ = . assuming C ≤ M we obtain N N γ α = f (0. ) = . In addition.

Thus assuming A ≤ M . y) ≤ f (0. we obtain. α L ≤− . for every y. y ∈ 0. Thus. A M γ β α (vi) The condition A > C > B is equivalent to M < 0. ≤ f (x. Invariant Intervals 187 γ β α (iii) The condition C > B > A is equivalent to M < 0 and L > 0. we obtain 0 ≤ f (x. 0) = L for all x. for every y. and N < 0. in this case the function f is increasing in y. 0) = . in this case the function f is decreasing in x. B+C . Thus assuming B+C ≤ − M . this function is increasing in x for y < − M . In addition. y) ≤ f (0. in this case the function f is decreasing in y. 0) ≤ f (x.11. y ∈ α β+γ . y) ≤ f A for all x. In addition. y) ≤ f (0. Thus assuming A ≤ − M . γ β α (iv) The condition C = B < A is equivalent to M = 0 and L < 0. Thus. B A A A Here we used the fact that under the condition β α γ = < C B A the function f (u. α = f (0. α L L this function is decreasing in x for y < − M . u) is decreasing and consequently f (u. In β+γ L L addition. A . y ∈ 0. α . 0) = α for all x. which imply that N < 0. L < 0. − M . for every x. in this case the function f is decreasing in both variables for all values of x and y and α α β α ≤f . B+C B+C ≤ β+γ . this function α N N is decreasing in y for x < M . Thus. A B+C β+γ β+γ . A . which in turn imply that N < 0. Thus. B+C B β γ α (v) The condition A > B > C is equivalent to M > 0 and L < 0. which in turn imply that N > 0. u) ≥ β+γ β = . we obtain 0 ≤ f (x.2.

which in turn imply that N < 0. y ∈ 0. A . L < 0. C . which in turn imply that N > 0. Here we use the fact that the function f (0. Using this we obtain. 3)-Type Equation xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 β γ α (vii) The condition A = B > C is equivalent to M > 0 and L = 0. γ C ≤ γ . Using this we obtain. v). 0 ≤ f (x. and N < 0. L > 0. and N ≥ 0. y) < f 0. A A β γ α (viii) The condition B > A > C is equivalent to M > 0. C . Thus. v) ≤ = lim f (0. y ∈ 0. Thus. 0 ≤ f (x. B B β γ α (ix) The condition A = B < C is equivalent to M < 0 and L = 0. in this case the function f is decreasing in x and increasing in y for all values of x and y.0 = . β β . C v→∞ for all v. Using this we obtain.0 = .188 Chapter 11. γ C = γ . α α . γ for all x. The (3. v) is increasing in v when N > 0 and so γ f (0. in this case the function f is increasing in x and decreasing in y for all values of x and y. y ∈ 0. y) ≤ f 0. C γ for all x. 0 ≤ f (x. Using this we obtain. 0 ≤ f (x. . y) ≤ f α for all x. C γ β α (x) The condition B < A ≤ C is equivalent to M < 0. Thus. in this case the function f is increasing in x and decreasing in y for all values of x and y. in this case the function f is increasing in x and decreasing in y for all values of x and y. Thus. B . y) < f β for all x. 2 The next table summarizes more complicated invariant intervals with the signs of the partial derivatives fx and fy . y ∈ 0.

− M ] if AM −(B+C)L < − M βM K+αM L L [− M .11. K3 ] if AM −BL+CMK > − M K α [0. fy < 0 if x > N M (β−A)2 +4Bα ] 2B (β+γ−A)2 +4α(B+C) ] 2(B+C) αM −(β+γ)L L L [0. − M ] if AM −L(B+C) < − M αM −βL+γM L L [− M . Then in each of the following cases lim xn = x. if √ αM +(β+γ)N AM +(B+C)N > N M fx > 0 fy > 0 if x < fx > 0 fy < 0 fx > 0 fy > 0 N M . fx < 0 if y > − M fy > 0 fx > 0 fy < 0 fx < 0 fy > 0 L L fx > 0 if y > − M . . Convergence Results 189 Case 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Invariant intervals αM +(β+γ)N N [0. .3 Convergence Results The following result is a consequence of Lemma 11.8. M ] if AM +(B+C)N < N [ M . Theorem 11. M ] if AM +(B+C)N < αM +βK+γN N N [ M . n→∞ .1 Let {xn } be a solution of Eq(11. fx < 0 if y < − M fy < 0 fx < 0 fy < 0 fx < 0 N N fy > 0 if x > M . A ] √ L L fx > 0 if y < − M .2.1 and Theorems 1. fy < 0 if x < M αM +(β+γ)N αM +(β+γ)N N [ AM +(B+C)N . ((γ − A)M − BN )2 + 4BM (αM + βN ) 11.1).3.4. .3. K1 ] β−A+ Signs of derivatives N M [0. K4 ] if AM +BK+CNM > M M N M where K1 = K2 = K3 = K4 = (β − A)M − CN + (A − γ)M − BL + (β − A)M + LC + (γ − A)M − BN + ((β − A)M − N C)2 + 4BM (αM + γN ) 2BM ((A − γ)M − BL)2 + 4CM (αM − βL) ((β − A)M + LC)2 + 4BM (αM − γL) 2BM 2CM −2CM .5-1. [0.4. K2 ] if BM K+AM −γL > − M −CL β+γ−A+ β [0. B ] γ [0. C ] αM −L(β+γ) αM −L(β+γ) L L [ AM −L(B+C) .

A B C β (viii) At least one of the following three conditions is not satisﬁed and x−1 . x0 ∈ β α . B A C . x0 ∈ 0. B : β > γ + A. B < C. . . B C A (iii) γ β α > > . γA − αC . 3)-Type Equation xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 γ β α = > C B A (ii) β γ α > > . A B+C γ γA − αC ≤ . β α γ > ≥ . B+C βC − γB and x−1 . A C α β+γ . βC − γB α . C βC − γB and x−1 . and or (C − B)[(C − B)(β − γ − A)2 − 4B(αB + γ(β − γ − A))] > 0. A β γ α γA − αC < < < B C A βC − γB and x−1 . B < C. x0 ∈ 0. B A and x−1 . α (vii) At least one of the following three conditions is not satisﬁed and x−1 . β γ α = > . A : β > γ + A. . x0 ∈ α β γ γA − αC ≥ > > βC − γB A B C (vi) and x−1 . x0 ∈ α β . . C B A (iv) γ β α = < C B A (v) and x−1 . A B α γ . and or (C − B)[(C − B)(β − γ − A)2 − 4B(αB + γ(β − γ − A))] > 0. The (3. x0 ∈ αB − βA β+γ ≤ . x0 ∈ 0. x0 ∈ 0.190 (i) Chapter 11.

4.3. γ .1) is globally asymptotically stable.4.1) we obtain the following global asymptotic result. x0 ∈ 0. m= α + βm + γM .3) is not satisﬁed.6.11. β γ α = < A B C (x) Condition (11.4. .2. and by observing that Eq(11.1 Global Stability Theorem 1. The proofs of statements (iv-vi) follow by applying Lemma 11. Convergence Results (ix) Condition (11.3. x0 ∈ 0. and by observing that the only solution of the system of equations m = f (m. A + Bm + CM M= α + βM + γm A + BM + Cm is m = M . C B A Then the equilibrium x of Eq(11.8. The proofs of statements (i-iii) follow by applying Lemma 11.1) does not possess a prime period-two solution. γ .2 and linearized stability imply the following global stability result: Theorem 11.3) is not satisﬁed. C 191 Proof.2. . m). By applying Theorem 1. Theorem 1. C and x−1 .3.1 (vii) and (viii) respectively.4. that is. 2 11.2. The proofs of statements (vii) and (viii) follow by applying Lemma 11.2. M ).4. α γ β < ≤ B A C and x−1 . M = f (M.1 (i-iii) and Theorem 1.1 (iv-vi) and Theorem 1.2 Assume that γ β α < min . The proofs of statements (ix) and (x) follow by applying Lemma 11.7.1 (ix) and (x) respectively.5. Theorem 1.4.3 to Eq(11.

1) is globally asymptotically stable.1) is bounded.1) is a saddle point and the period-two solution is locally asymptotically stable. β. βA ≥ αB. Conjecture 11.192 Chapter 11. Then the equilibrium x of Eq(11.1) has no positive prime period-two solution. γ.1) is globally asymptotically stable.1 Assume Show that every positive solution of Eq(11. and 3γB ≥ βC ≥ γB. γA ≥ αC.4. A. C ∈ (0. β. . C ∈ (0. Conjecture 11.4. B. ∞). Then the equilibrium x of Eq(11.3. αB > βA. Then the equilibrium x of Eq(11. (b) Assume that αB ≥ βA. A.3. 3)-Type Equation xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 Theorem 11. The following global stability result is a consequence of linearized stability and the Trichotomy Theorem 1. γ.4. and γA > αC. 11.4 Open Problems and Conjectures α.1) is globally asymptotically stable. Show that every positive solution of Eq(11. B. and 3βC ≥ γB ≥ βC. A. Theorem 11.1) converges to the positive equilibrium.4. C ∈ (0.1) has a positive prime period-two solution. γ.2 Assume α.4. Conjecture 11. γB > βC. The (3. Show that the positive equilibrium of Eq(11.3 Assume α.4 (a) Assume that αC ≥ γA. β.3 Assume that B ≤ C. ∞) and that Eq(11. B. ∞) and that Eq(11.

In particular.5 Assume that (11. xn+1 = (11. Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions so that every positive solution of Eq(11. a + a0 xn + .2 Assume that the parameters in Eq(11. n = 0. {βn }∞ . . Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions so that every positive solution of Eq(11. ai .7) converges to a period-two solution.4 Assume that (11. . Open Problem 11.11. Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of the diﬀerence equation αn + βn xn + γn xn−1 .4. {γn }∞ . B. n = 0. Show that Eq(11. A. .4. . Ai ∈ [0. ∞) for i = 0.4. {Bn }∞ . 1.4.4. + Ak xn−k (11. + ak xn−k . γ. (11. .6) holds.4.5) are period-two sequences of positive real numbers. investigate the cases where 2 ≤ k ≤ 8.6) Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions so that every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = has a ﬁnite limit.5) An + Bn xn + Cn xn−1 Open Problem 11.5).1 Assume {αn }n=0 .7) is periodic with period-k. . Open Problem 11.7) Open Problem 11. .1) cannot have a prime period-k solution for any k ≥ 3. k. {An }n=0 . {Cn }∞ n=0 n=0 n=0 n=0 are convergent sequences of nonnegative real numbers with ﬁnite limits. . . .3 Assume that a. . A. ∞). . A + A0 xn + . . Investigate the asymptotic behavior and the periodic nature of all positive solutions of Eq(11. Open Problems and Conjectures Conjecture 11. 1. .4. . . 1.6) holds. β. C ∈ (0. . k ≥ 2. 193 ∞ ∞ Open Problem 11.4 Assume α.

4. ∞) for i. 1. ∞).8) converges to a period-two solution. j ∈ {1.5 Let k ≥ 2 be a positive integer. .) αxn + βxn−1 xn−2 . . the periodic nature. and [60]. 3}. . . + xn−k−2 converges to 1. .194 Chapter 11. Extend and generalize.4. . . β. + xn−k + xn−k−1 xn−k−2 .7 Assume that p. (See [8]. ∞) with γ + δ > 0. (11.6 Let α. γxn xn−1 + δxn−2 Conjecture 11. and the asymptotic behavior of all positive solutions of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = (See [8] and [61]. The (3. γ. Show that every positive solution of the system xn+1 = yn+1 = zn+1 = a11 xn a21 xn a31 xn + + + a12 yn a22 yn a32 yn + + + a13 zn a23 zn a33 zn . 2. (See [32] for the two dimensional case. n = 0. . .4. 1. Show that every positive solution of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = xn + . . .4. δ ∈ [0. q ∈ [0. xn xn−1 + xn−2 + . . Investigate the boundedness character. [47]. . . n = 0. 1. .) Conjecture 11.) Conjecture 11. n = 0.6 Let aij ∈ (0. 3)-Type Equation xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 Open Problem 11. Extend to equations with real parameters.

. q ∈ [0. xn−1 + pxn−2 n = 0. 1. . (a) Show that every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = xn−1 . . Open Problems and Conjectures (a) Show that every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = pxn−1 + xn−2 . . . ∞). . (See [62].4. 195 converges to a period-two solution if and only if p = 1 + q. Conjecture 11.4. (c) Show that when p>1+q the equation possesses positive unbounded solutions.) Conjecture 11.9 Assume that p. converges to a period-two solution if p ≥ 1. . (b) Show that when p<1+q every positive solution has a ﬁnite limit. ∞).8 Assume that p ∈ (0. (b) Show that when p<1 the positive equilibrium x = 1 1+p is globally asymptotically stable.11. q + xn−2 n = 0. 1.4.

.4. (c) Show that when q<1 the equation possesses positive unbounded solutions. (iii) When p < 1 there exist positive unbounded solutions. . 1.) . xn n = 0. 1. (See [62]. The (3. .) Conjecture 11. converges to a period-two solution if and only if q = 1. (ii) When p = 1 every positive solution converges to a period-ﬁve solution.196 Chapter 11. has the following trichotomy character: (i) When p > 1 every positive solution converges to the positive equilibrium. converges to a period-four solution. . 1. . .10 Show that every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = xn + xn−2 . xn−1 n = 0. . (See [62]. (b) Show that when q>1 the positive equilibrium of the equation is globally asymptotically stable.11 Show that the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = p + xn−2 . 3)-Type Equation xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 (a) Show that every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = xn−1 + p .) Conjecture 11. . (See [62].4. xn−2 + q n = 0. .

4. where φ. .10) (a) In addition to (11. xn−1 + xn−2 n = 0. What other conditions are needed so that Eq(11. . .12 Show that every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = 1 + xn . . . .11. 1. what other conditions are needed so that every positive solution of Eq(11.4.9) converges to a period-two solution? (b) Assume γ < β + δ + A.. φ φ ψ ψ Open Problem 11. ∞). ψ. A + Bxn + Dxn−2 (11. φ. .9) has prime period-two solutions if and only if γ = β + δ + A. . 1.9) possesses unbounded solutions? (See [6].4.9) converges to the positive equilibrium? (c) Assume γ > β + δ + A. Open Problems and Conjectures Conjecture 11.) ψ 1 1 φ .. . .9) with nonnegative parameters and nonnegative initial conditions such that B + D > 0 and A + Bxn + Dxn−2 > 0 for n ≥ 0. .) . (11. Then one can show that Eq(11.7 Consider the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = α + βxn + γxn−1 + δxn−2 . ψ ∈ (0. .10). (See [62]. 197 converges to a period-six solution of the form . What other conditions are needed so that every positive solution of Eq(11.. n = 0.

(See [6].) Conjecture 11. .15 Show that every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = xn−2 . xn−2 n = 0. ∞). . . converges to a period-three solution. (a) Show that when q=r every positive solution converges to a period-four solution.4. Conjecture 11. . . (See [6]. 3)-Type Equation xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 Conjecture 11. The (3. 1.13 Show that every positive solution of each of the two equations xn+1 = and xn+1 = 1 + xn−1 + xn−2 . p + qxn + rxn−2 . xn−1 n = 0.14 Show that every positive solution of the equation xn+1 = 1 + xn−1 . r ∈ (0. .4. . ∞) and q.198 Chapter 11. 1. . .) Conjecture 11. .4. (b) Show that when q>r every positive solution converges to the positive equilibrium. 1. . n = 0.4. 1. xn−1 + xn−2 + xn−3 n = 0. 1. converges to a period-two solution. . .16 Consider the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = where p ∈ [0. . . . converges to a period-two solution. 1 + xn + xn−2 n = 0. xn 1 + xn−1 + xn−2 .

. . . B1 . Open Problem 11. . . . .4.) 199 Open Problem 11. 1. xn−2 + xn−3 . .4. . .9 Assume that k is a positive integer and that k A. ∞) with i=0 Bi > 0.11. . . xn−2 n = 0.) . xn−1 . + Bk xn−k n = 0. . A + B0 xn + . . . B1 .4. 1 + xn−3 . . 1. . . 1. . 1. Bk so that every positive solution of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = xn−k . (See [62]. xn n = 0. Bk ∈ [0. . Obtain necessary and suﬃcient conditions on the parameters A and B0 . Open Problems and Conjectures (c) Show that when q<r the equation possesses positive unbounded solutions. (See [6]. 1 + xn + xn−3 n = 0.8 Determine whether every positive solution of each of the following equations converges to a periodic solution of the corresponding equation: (a) xn+1 = (b) xn+1 = (c) xn+1 = (d) xn+1 = 1 + xn + xn−3 . . converges to a period-(k + 1) solution of this equation. . . B0 . . 1. xn + xn−2 + xn−3 n = 0.

(11. Then we can easily see that every nonnegative solution of the equation xn+1 = xn−k .11) converges to a period-(k + 1) solution of the form . . 1.4. . . . + xn−k+1 n = 0. 3)-Type Equation xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 A+Bxn +Cxn−1 Open Problem 11. .17 Let k be a positive integer. ..200 Chapter 11. (c) Determine the set of all nonnegative initial conditions x−k . x0 .4. (a) Does Eq(11.12) with a given φ ≥ 0 ? (See [6].12) with φ ≥ 0. Show that every positive solution of xn+1 = 1 + xn + xn−k . .12) which corresponds to the nonnegative solution {xn }∞ n=−k of Eq(11. . . . . . . 0. k−terms (11.) Conjecture 11. .11). xn−k+1 n = 0. .11) possess a positive solution which converges to zero? (b) Determine. .. x0 for which the ∞ corresponding solution {xn }n=−k of Eq(11. . .10 Assume that k is a positive integer.11) converges to a period-(k+1) solution of the form (11. . the value of φ in (11. .. 1. . 0. . The (3. φ. 1 + xn + . 0. . in terms of the nonnegative initial conditions x−k . converges to a periodic solution of period 2k. .

1.1) ∞ has a unique solution {xn }n=−2 . x. Let I be some interval of real numbers and let f :I ×I ×I →I be a continuously diﬀerentiable function. 201 . very often a good strategy for obtaining global attractivity results for Eq(A. .1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a.1 Let [a. y. b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a. or non decreasing in all three. We state the results for third order equations from which higher order extensions will become clear. In this regard there are eight possible scenarios depending on whether f (x.1) converges to x. n = 0.8. (A. . the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = f (xn . b]. Then Eq(A.1) is to work in the regions where the function f (x. has a unique solution in the interval [a. x−2 ∈ I. x−1 . z) is non decreasing in all three arguments. xn−1 . x) = x. z) is non-decreasing in each of its arguments. b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x. or non increasing in two arguments and non decreasing in the third. z) is monotonic in its arguments. or non increasing in one and non decreasing in the other two. As we have seen in previous chapters. b]3 → [a. y. Then for every set of initial conditions x0 . b] and every solution of Eq(A. (b) The equation f (x. xn−2 ). y.Appendix A Global Attractivity for Higher Order Equations In this appendix we present some global attractivity results for higher order diﬀerence equations which are analogous to Theorems 1. Theorem A.4.0. .5-1.4.

b]. set Mi = f (Mi−1 . Mi−1 ) and mi = f (mi−1 . and is nonincreasing in z ∈ [a. m) then m = M. . m = M = x. Then Eq(A.202 Proof. z) is non-decreasing in x and y ∈ [a.1) converges to x. (A. (b) If (m. .2 Let [a. b] for each x and y ∈ [a. M ) and M = f (M. b] is a solution of the system m = f (m. and mi ≤ xk ≤ Mi Set m = lim mi i→∞ Appendix for k ≥ 3i + 1. m. . M. . b] × [a. M. . b] and every solution of Eq(A. . m.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a. . b] for each z ∈ [a. b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a.0. M ). Mi−1 . b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x. 2 Theorem A. mi−1 ). m0 ≤ m1 ≤ . m = f (m. . Now observe that for each i ≥ 0. ≤ Mi ≤ . mi−1 . ≤ mi ≤ . m) and M = f (M. ≤ M1 ≤ M0 . from which the result follows. M ) ∈ [a. 2. Set m0 = a and M0 = b and for i = 1. b]3 → [a. . y. b]. .2) Then M ≥ lim sup xi ≥ lim inf xi ≥ m i→∞ i→∞ and by the continuity of f . In view of (b). i→∞ and M = lim Mi .

mi−1 ) and mi = f (mi−1 . 2. Then (A. Therefore in view of (b) m=M from which the result follows.Appendix Proof. set Mi = f (Mi−1 . b] × [a. b] is a solution of the system M = f (M. y. Set m0 = a and M0 = b and for each i = 1. M ) and M = f (M. and is nonincreasing in y ∈ [a. . . z) is non-decreasing in x and z in [a. ≤ mi ≤ . Mi ≤ . b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x. M ) ∈ [a.2) holds and by the continuity of f . . m = f (m.0. M ) and m = f (m.1) converges to x. . and mi ≤ xk ≤ Mi Set m = lim mi i→∞ 203 for k ≥ 3i + 1. Now observe that for each i ≥ 0 a = m0 ≤ m1 ≤ . mi−1 . . m. Mi−1 ). m. Mi−1 . b]. b] and every solution of Eq(A. . m). b] for each x and z in [a. 2 Theorem A. m) then m = M. M1 ≤ M0 = b. . . b]. . b]3 → [a. (b) If (m. b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a. i→∞ and M = lim Mi . b] for each z ∈ [a. .1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a. Then Eq(A. M.3 Let [a. M.

204 Proof. M ) ∈ [a. . ≤ mi ≤ . mi−1 ) . (b) If (m.4 Let [a. y. M ) and m = f (M. set Mi = f (Mi−1 . b] and every solution of Eq(A. b] is a solution of the system M = f (m.1) converges to x. Then (A. . z) is non-increasing in x for each y and z ∈ [a. b]3 → [a. b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x. i→∞ and M = lim Mi . Mi−1 ) and mi = f (mi−1 . m) . . m = f (m. y ∈ [a. Mi−1 . 2. . b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a. m) then m = M. Theorem A. M. mi−1 . M ) Therefore in view of (b) m=M from which the results follows. m. b] × [a. Then Eq(A. b]. M1 ≤ M0 = b. . . Now observe that for each i ≥ 0 a = m0 ≤ m1 ≤ .0. Set m0 = a and M0 = b and for each i = 1. .2) holds and by the continuity of f . M. m.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a. . . b] and is non-decreasing in y and z for each x. . Mi ≤ . and mi ≤ xk ≤ Mi Set m = lim mi i→∞ Appendix for k ≥ 3i + 1. 2 and M = f (M.

5 Let [a. b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a. Set m0 = a and M0 = b and for each i = 1. . b] and is non-increasing in y and z for each x ∈ [a. Therefore in view of (b) m=M from which the results follows. b] is a solution of the system M = f (M. M ) and m = f (M. M. . Mi ≤ . M1 ≤ M0 = b and mi ≤ xk ≤ Mi Set m = lim mi i→∞ 205 for k ≥ 3i + 1.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a. Then (A. mi−1 . . b]. Mi−1 . . (b) If (m. . M ) ∈ [a. b] × [a. ≤ mi ≤ . mi−1 ). m). b]3 → [a. Then Eq(A. set Mi = f (mi−1 . m) and m = f (m. . . 2 Theorem A. Now observe that for each i ≥ 0 m0 ≤ m1 ≤ . .2) holds and by the continuity of f .0. M.1) converges to x. m. M ) then m = M. i→∞ and M = lim Mi . z) is non-decreasing in x for each y and z ∈ [a. b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x.Appendix Proof. M = f (m. m. y. . Mi−1 ) and mi = f (Mi−1 . 2. . b] and every solution of Eq(A.

b] and every solution of Eq(A. Mi ≤ . b] and is non-increasing in x and z for each y ∈ [a. . mi−1 . M ). i→∞ and M = lim Mi . Therefore in view of (b) m=M from which the results follows. m. Now observe that for each i ≥ 0 m0 ≤ m1 ≤ . Then (A. . M. b] × [a. m. b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a.1) converges to x. M1 ≤ M0 = b and mi ≤ xk ≤ Mi Set m = lim mi i→∞ Appendix for k ≥ 3i + 1. . y. Then Eq(A. . b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x. .206 Proof. m) and m = f (m.6 Let [a. m) and m = f (M. b]. Mi−1 . (b) If (m. M ) ∈ [a. 2. M ) then m = M. set Mi = f (Mi−1 . . . M. 2 Theorem A. . .1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a. b] is a solution of the system M = f (m. M = f (M. ≤ mi ≤ . Mi−1 ).2) holds and by the continuity of f . . b]3 → [a. mi−1 ) and mi = f (mi−1 .0. z) is non-decreasing in y for each x and z ∈ [a. Set m0 = a and M0 = b and for each i = 1.

. b] and is non-increasing in x and y for each z ∈ [a. b]3 → [a. M = f (m. (b) If (m. mi−1 . Set m0 = a and M0 = b and for each i = 1. b] and every solution of Eq(A. . Now observe that for each i ≥ 0 m0 ≤ m1 ≤ . b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x.0. y. Then Eq(A. m) and m = f (M. Mi−1 ). .2) holds and by the continuity of f . b] × [a. b]. M. i→∞ and M = lim Mi . set Mi = f (mi−1 . mi−1 ) and mi = f (Mi−1 . m. m. Therefore in view of (b) m=M from which the results follows. ≤ mi ≤ . .1) converges to x. M1 ≤ M0 = b and mi ≤ xk ≤ Mi Set m = lim mi i→∞ 207 for k ≥ 3i + 1. . m) then m = M. . Mi−1 . b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a. 2 Theorem A. M ). Then (A. M. Mi ≤ . . . b] is a solution of the system M = f (m. M ) and m = f (M. z) is non-decreasing in z for each x and y in [a. M ) ∈ [a. . 2.Appendix Proof. .7 Let [a.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a.

b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a. Then Eq(A. y. Now observe that for each i ≥ 0 m0 ≤ m1 ≤ . .2) holds and by the continuity of f . b] is a solution of the system M = f (m. M. ≤ mi ≤ . Mi−1 . b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (x. b]3 → [a. z) is non-increasing in all three variables x.208 Proof. z in [a. . 2 Theorem A. .0. M ) ∈ [a. M1 ≤ M0 = b and mi ≤ xk ≤ Mi Set m = lim mi i→∞ Appendix for k ≥ 3i + 1. Then (A. Therefore in view of (b) m=M from which the results follows. m.1) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a. 2. mi−1 ). mi−1 . . i→∞ and M = lim Mi . m.1) converges to x. m).8 Let [a. . b] and every solution of Eq(A. M = f (m. m) and m = f (M. y. . . Mi ≤ . . (b) If (m. Set m0 = a and M0 = b and for each i = 1. Mi−1 ) and mi = f (Mi−1 . M. . . M ) then m = M. set Mi = f (mi−1 . b]. M ) and m = f (M. b] × [a.

m. . 1. . up ) is non decreasing in the second and the third variables u2 and u3 and is non increasing in all other variables.2) holds and by the continuity of f . b] is a continuous function satisfying the following properties: (a) f (u1 . where is a continuous function. In this case. Theorem A. . 2.0. . set Mi = f (mi−1 . . . p xn+1 = f (xn . . Therefore in view of (b) m=M from which the results follows. . xn−p+1 ).0. . . M = f (m. Mi−1 . M ). .8. Let us formulate one of these results. u2 .3) 2 The above theorems can be easily extended to the general diﬀerence equation of order . f : Ip → I n = 0. Mi ≤ . (A. mi−1 ) and mi = f (Mi−1 . .0. . Now observe that for each i ≥ 0 m0 ≤ m1 ≤ . b] be an interval of real numbers and assume that f : [a. M1 ≤ M0 = b and m i ≤ x k ≤ Mi Set m = lim mi i→∞ 209 for k ≥ 3i + 1. . .9 Let [a. . Set m0 = a and M0 = b and for each i = 1. ≤ mi ≤ . . xn−1 . . . m) and m = f (M. M. mi−1 .1-A. Mi−1 ). there are 2p possibilities for the function f to be non decreasing in some arguments and non increasing in the remaining arguments. Then (A. This gives 2p results of the type found in Theorems A.Appendix Proof. b]p → [a. . i→∞ and M = lim Mi .

3) converges to x. . . M ) ∈ [a. . b] × [a. b] is a solution of the system M = f (m. m. b] and every solution of Eq(A. . m) and m = f (M. M. . . M. . M ) then m = M. m. M. m. Appendix Then Eq(A. .3) has a unique equilibrium x ∈ [a. .210 (b) If (m.

[10] R. 1-5. Yorke . Math. Gelbard. New York. 369-382. 211 . 1997. J. Appl. Grove. [11] E. 106(1999). Comput. 5(1)(1999). Diﬀer. Diﬀer. Hannigan. (to appear). T. 1977. A. and G. Amleh. 5(6)(1999). Some dynamically trivial mappings with applications to the improvement of simple iteration. and J. S. Math. Diﬀer. B. [8] A. Equations Appl. N. J. Taiwan.Bibliography [1] R.T. M. S. On a class of diﬀerence equations with strong negative feedback. Georgiou. Diﬀer. A. Methods and Applications. Periodicities of solutions of the generalized Lyness recursion. 1(3)(1995). Diﬀerence Equations and Inequalities. K. M. Strauss. [3] L. Sauer and J. Equations Appl. Abu-Saris. 1992. Equations Appl. 7(2001). Taipei. and M. E. M. Lipe. Amleh. J. 291-306. Heidelberg. Beckermann and J. Mathematical analysis of a model for a plant-herbivore system. [5] American Mathemathical Monthly. M.A. Ladas. D. Agarwal. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Diﬀerence Equations and Applications. [2] L. 847-864. 497-515. Marcel Dekker Inc. Wimp. J. Problem 10670. Tokyo. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. [6] A. On the periodicity of the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = α|xn | + βxn−1 . Amleh and G.. J. Appl. N. Springer-Verlag. G. Allen. 57-69. J. and G. and S. Equations Appl. Alligood. 967-968. J. 24(1998). Barbeau. [12] B. On the recursive sequence n−1 xn+1 = α + xxn . A Preliminary mathematical model of the Apple Twig Borer (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Grapes on the Texas High Plains Ecological Modelling 58 (1991). New York. J. [7] A. Anal. Kruse. and W. Ladas. Strauss. Tanny. M. Convergence to periodic solutions. T. [4] K. Theory. Hoag. Ladas. Amleh. 1999. Berlin. 790-798. September 1-5. Thorvilson. Allen. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 55 (1993). 233(1999). M. [9] A. CHAOS An Introduction to Dynamical Systems. M. Ladas. Boundedness of solutions of a plantherbivore system. 89-97.

Ladas. and M. (to appear). Boca Raton. W. Janowski. and S. 73-93. On the recursive sequence xn+1 = −1 + xn−1 . E. 1992. L. Equations Appl. J. Diﬀer. Schultz. An Introduction to Diﬀerence Equations. (to appear). J. Equations Appl. editor. Math. MA. Galminas. [16] R. Devaney. [25] H. Cunningham. Ladas. Stability or chaos in discrete epidemic models. J. Lyness-type equations in the third quadrant. 1183-1189. 30(1997). Ladas.. W. S. DeVault. 245 (2000). A. [27] J. Catania. Levins. D. Calef. and E. Cooke. Physica D 10(1984). Hoag. 3257-3261. Devaney. Equations Appl. xn [14] K. 161-170. 1977. Academic Press. V. V. El-Metwally. D. Janowski and G. 126 (1998). Level. Camouzis. Diﬀer. On the recursive c α+βxn Sequence xn+1 = Bxn +Cxn−1 . Global attractivity and convergence to a two-cycle in a diﬀerence equation. A Piecewise linear model for the zones of instability of an areapreserving map. Springer-Verlag. Catania. A. Equations Appl. Discrete Chaos. On the Recursive Sequence xn+1 = A 1 + xn−2 . On the diﬀerence equation xn+1 = α + βxn−1 e−xn . FL. DeVault. [22] S. E. xn−3 xn−4 A + xn xn−1 [21] S. Math. Ladas. J. Schultz. Reading. Nonlinear Systems and Applications. xn [20] R. J. Valicenti. E. and S. Proceedings of WCNA2000. Italy. J. T. Grove. New York. G. On the global attractivity and the periodic character of some diﬀerence equations. DeVault. 6(1)(2000). CRC Press. 2000. TMA. L. New York. J. 2000. 481-483. A. G. Diﬀer. [23] H. G. 121-125. J. 387-393. Elaydi. Soc. Grove. M. E. Ladas. and G. Addison-Wesley. 1999. Kulenovi´. [17] R. and G. Anal. and S. E. Voulov. A global convergence result with applications to periodic solutions. 203-209. 6(4)(2000). Ladas. G. Appl. Feuer. Italy. . 7(2001). and G. G. Ladas. On the recursive sequence A B xn+1 = xn + xn−1 . [15] K. E. July 19-26. Ladas. Franke. Ladas. and G. (to appear). El-Metwally. [18] R. A First Course in Chaotic Dynamical Systems: Theory and Experiment. Elaydi. 2nd ed. R.212 BIBLIOGRAPHY [13] E. 2000. Ladas. Nonlinear Anal. R. Radin. Diﬀer. DeVault. Proceedings of WCNA2000. Nonlin. 7(2001). [26] J. 5(2)(1999). On the recursive sequence xn+1 = 1 . Equations Appl. July 19-26.. F. Anal.(to appear). [24] H. Lakshmikantham. J. R. [19] R. El-Metwally. and H. Diﬀer. Grove. Proc. Amer.

289-294. Ladas. [34] J. Berlin. [38] G.BIBLIOGRAPHY 213 [28] C. Sﬁcas. 17(1991). 1995. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Diﬀerence Equations and Applications. Kulenovi´. [39] G. T. Jaroma . Dynamics and Bifurcations. 1-25. 4(2)(2000). Poland. Nonlinear Oscillations. M. L. G. Springer-Verlag. Grove. (1989). Ladas. May 25-28. Hot-Line. Existence and behavior of solutions of a rational system. [29] C. A+xn [30] E. 2000. Tokyo. Appl. Hautus and T. 865-866. Convergence of a diﬀerence equation via the full limiting sequences method. Gibbons.C. August 27-31. Karakostas. [32] E. [31] E. Heidelberg. 329-335. Heidelberg. 8(2001). R. G. On the trichotomy c character of xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 . L. 1991. H. 1983. 6(3)(2000). Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. G. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. Karakostas. C. Equations Appl. Berlin. Kent. Levins. and Y. Ladas. Solution to Problem E2721. Texas. Asymptotic 2-periodic diﬀerence equations with diagonally selfinvertible responses. Diﬀer. Sci. 66-74. Ladas. Society. 86(1979). On the rational recursive sequence xn+1 = (αxn +β)/((γxn +C)xn−1 ). Amer. M. H. 1-11. New York. [40] G. and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. On the global asymptotic stability of xn+1 = A+xn−1 . M. Comm. 1994. Res. Greek Math. Guckenheimer and P. C. and H. E. McGrath. Monthly. S. Dynamical Systems. Equations Appl. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Diﬀerence Equations and Applications. R. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. Springer-Verlag. Poznan. A. 1(1994). R. Bolis. Nonlinear Anal. G. D. Global stability in some population models . San Antonio. Janowski. E. Nonlinear Anal. a+bxn [36] J. J. Ch. Gibbons. 61-72.S. Karakostas. A discrete semi-ﬂow in the space of sequences and study of convergence of sequences deﬁned by diﬀerence equations. Voulov. 7(2001) (to appear). On the recursive sequence c α+βxn−1 xn+1 = γ+xn . and C. [37] G. and G. H. Math. Comm. 281-294. 149-176. A. Diﬀer. S. Diﬀerential Equations Dynam. G. Kocak. Teixeira. J. 1998. J. and G. Philos. Ladas. and S. Holmes. M. Hale and H. Tokyo. [33] J. Grove. . Kulenovi´. J. Systems 1(1993). M. Kent. Karakostas. 1069-1084. Valicenti. The dynamics of some discrete population models. Math. A. Grove. New York. [35] M.

G. and relative stability for positive nonlinear diﬀerence equations of higher order. Math. L.5. S. Martins. Appl. F. Kulenovi´. R. J. T. 1993. Kulenovi´. 127-157. Math. M. Appl. 571-586. [42] V. Krause. 245-254. [44] V. path stability. [46] U. Math. G. On a rational diﬀerence equation. Ladas. 173 (1993). Ladas. 31-37. Ladas. 6(5) (2000). Dordrecht. M. 563-576. and N. On the rational recursive sequences. R. Global asymptotic stability for discrete dynamical systems. R. Kuang and J. G. Teixeira. [43] V. J. Holland. G. Anal. On the recursive c p+yn−1 sequence yn+1 = qyn +yn−1 . 2(1)(1996). Ladas. Discrete and Impulsive Systems 1(1995). 251(2000). Diﬀer. Kocic and G. S. Diﬀer. and I. 323-346. [47] N. 671-678. Equations Appl.. and I. Academic Press. γxn +Cxn−1 . On the recursive sequence xn+1 = c αxn +βxn−1 . [49] M. Thomas. C. R. J. Math. Rodrigues. Diﬀer. and W. Ladas. R. J. Equations Appl. W. Anal. Anal. R.214 BIBLIOGRAPHY [41] W. Prokup. S. On the dynamics c α+βxn of xn+1 = A+Bxn +Cxn−1 facts and conjectures. Kulenovi´. Peterson. Res. J. Kulenovi´ and G. Tzanetopoulos. Ladas. On the stability of Lyness’ equation. Kocic. S. 1991. Kulenovi´. Equations Appl. L. Ladas. Dynamics of Continuous. G. 151-158. K. 235 (1999). and C. Kosmala. Kocic. [54] M. Ladas. Appl. Equations Appl. J. S. 641-646. 1-8. Hot-Line 2(1998). 41(2001). G. G. Stability trichotomy. Comput. R. W. S. Prokup. J. Cushing. Diﬀer. [48] Y. Invariants and related Liapunov functions for diﬀerence equac tions. Nesemann. [45] W. G. Global stability in a nonlinear diﬀerence-delay equation model of ﬂour beetle population growth. n +Cxn−1 [51] M. Kluwer Academic Publishers. New York. and E. L. A. c Comput. Math. Global Behavior of Nonlinear Diﬀerence Equations of Higher Order with Applications. R. 1+xn [53] M. Appl. On the recursive sequence xn+1 = c αxn +βxn−1 . Math. L. Kruse and T. Appl. no. Ladas. Kulenovi´. S. 1(4) (1995). Lett. 13 (7)(2000). G. (to appear). 6(5) (2000). [52] M. Sizer. S. Appl. [50] M. Diﬀerence Equations. 1-16. Kulenovi´. Sci. R. Open problems and conjectures: On period two c α+βx solutions of xn+1 = A+Bxn +γxn−1 . Math. Rodrigues. and N. Kelley and A.

Existence of solutions of certain singular diﬀerence equations. Ladas. Ladas. C. Problem 1572. [67] E. 249-258. Symbolic Dynamics. FL. Geometric stability conditions for higher order diﬀerence equations. 6(5)(2000). John Wiley & Sons. I. 160-161. Open problems and conjectures. k Ai i=0 xn−2i . 255-272. [69] H. Pielou. New York. [60] G. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Philos. Sedaghat. Invariants for generalized Lyness equations. Appl. Population and Community Ecology. Introduction to Discrete Dynamical Systems and Chaos. Sﬁcas. Gordon and Breach. Math. Comput. . [56] G. [58] G. Ladas. C. New York. 4(5)(1998). J. 62(1994). (to appear). Anal. Equations Appl. Open problems and conjectures. Equations Appl. 317-321. [68] C. Global attractivity in a nonlinear diﬀerence equation. K. CRC Press. Equations Appl. Ladas. J. [62] G. Quart. Pielou. and Chaos. J. J. Open problems and conjectures. John Wiley & Sons. Boca Raton. Diﬀer. 1999. 497-499. Diﬀer. Ladas. [65] Ch. 1995. J. 1974. Equations Appl. [66] E. New York. Ladas. 95-97.BIBLIOGRAPHY 215 [55] S. Diﬀer. Diﬀer. G. 1(3)(1995). [61] G. 1(4)(1995). Diﬀer. 1(2)(1995). J. Ladas. [59] G. 1965. Equations Appl. 73(2000). [64] Mathemathics Magazine. [57] G. Sedaghat. 50 (1992). Diﬀer. G. Oscillation and global attractivity in a discrete delay logistic model. Appl. On the recursive sequence xn+1 = 4(3)(1998). [63] M. Open Problems and Conjectures. Martelli. Stability. [70] H. Equations Appl. Diﬀer. Equations Appl. 311-313. Appl. and Y. J. Equations Appl. Kuruklis and G. Math. Open problems and conjectures. Purnaras. J. 535-561. Robinson. 1(1)(1995). Math. Ladas. Differ. 227-233. J. 413-419. 209-214. 224(1998). 7(2001).

edu/ecz/gu. Zheng. Temuco. α+xn . Geometric unfolding of a diﬀerence equation.math. Zheng.utsa. Systems 6(1998). [75] Y. http://www. S. 209(1997). Diﬀerential Equations Dynam. 51-58. A+Bxn +Cxn−1 . Anal. On periodic cycles of the Lyness equation. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Diﬀerence Equations and Applications. Math.html [73] Y. January 3-7. 94-102. C. Chile. 319-324. 2001. Zeeman. 2000. Some periodic solutions of the Lyness equation . xn−1 [74] Y. Sizer. Appl. Periodic solutions with the same period of the recursion xn+1 = α+βxn +γxn−1 . Diﬀerential Equations Dynam. (to appear). Existence of nonperiodic solutions of the Lyness equation xn+1 = J. Systems 5(1997).216 BIBLIOGRAPHY [71] W. [72] E. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. Zheng.

5 Flour Beetle Model. 2. 184–189 limiting solution. 29 existence of prime period-two solution. 9 negative semicycle. 25 periodic solution. 71 invariant interval. 2 ﬁxed point. 49–51. 7 . 183 linearized stability theorem. 38 Discrete Epidemic Models. 5. 192–200 oscillate about x. 1. 30 217 locally asymptotically stable. 6 globally asymptotically stable. 64–68. 35 existence of solutions. 17.Index basin of attraction of a two cycle. 78 Riccati number. 17 full limiting sequence. 134– 136. 24 prime period p solution. 138–139. 3 convergence to period-two solutions. 123–130. 128 population model. 7 repeller. 7 semicycle analysis. 43–46. 24–28 signum invariant. 2. 6 invariant. 72–75. 180–182. 41–42. 66 Pielou’s equation. 31 global attractivity of the positive equilibrium. 25 nonoscillatory. 57 Plant-herbivore system. 129 positive equilibrium. 6 locally stable. 128 equilibrium point. 7 Riccati diﬀerence equation. 9–14 global attractor. 9 positive semicycle. 15 full limiting solution. 32 local stability of the zero equilibrium. 2. 5. 38 sink. 9. 25 open problems and conjectures. 163–166. 18 saddle point. 33 Pielou’s discrete delay logistic model. 16 gingerbreadman map. 15 linearized stability analysis. 75 negative feedback condition. 70 May’s host parasitoid model. 66. 6 local asymptotic stability of a two cycle. 6. 7 periodic solutions with the same period. 75 global asymptotic stability of the zero equilibrium. 38 classiﬁcation of equation types. 129 forbidden set. 25 oscillate about zero. 36 local stability of the positive equilibrium . 6 Lyness’ equation.

2)-type. 168 type of equation (1. 1)-type. 53–54 (1. 77–78 (2. 3)-type.218 source. 3)-type. 2)-type. 183 unstable equilibrium. 6 stability of equilibrium. 47–48 (1. 167 (3. 42. 5 stability trichotomy. 137 (3. 189 trichotomy character. 7 strictly oscillatory. 1)-type. 6 unstable manifold. 141 (3. 1)-type. 131 (2. 3)-type. 25 table of invariant intervals. 10 stable manifold. 2)-type. 69–70 (2. 8 stable manifold theorem in the plane. 8 INDEX .

- Chap01
- Amath 351 Final
- Transient Stability Analysis of Multi Machine System For Different Contingent Cases
- Saharon Shelah- Finite Canonization
- ufabccapitulo1
- ds4_2012
- Time Base Circuit
- SIS Standard
- Sequence Textbook Sequences and Series
- Asymptotic Properties and Stability Criteria of Zeros of Sampled-Data Models for Decouplable MIMO
- Nonlinear Motor Dc
- Monograph
- Warming, R.F.; Beam, R.M.; Hyett, B.J. - Diagonalization and Simultaneous Symmetrization of the Gas-Dynamic Matrices.pdf
- Binder 1
- ST97
- Speed Sensorless and Sensor-Fault Tolerant Optimal PI Regulator for Networked DC Motor System With Unknown Time-Delay and Packet Dropout
- Carmo, Meneghini Sherwin - 2010 - Secondary Instabilities in the Flow Around Two Circular Cylinders in Tandem
- 1
- 08.06080603.Zhou
- 2157317
- Pattern Formation on Sphere Turing Instabilities
- Algebra and Geometry
- debreu1964
- US Federal Reserve
- 2nd to 1st Order
- 0195096703 Chemical Dynamics
- 04587006
- Modern Control Theory
- TPN 3
- physics137A-sp2004-mt2-Hardtke-soln.pdf

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Dynamics of Second Order Rational Diff[1] will be available on

Loading