CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

McCoy Elementary
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2010-2011

Dawn Rink, Principal

McCoy Elementary School, in partnership with our families and community, will develop students who meet the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) at the proficient or commended level and graduate college ready without remediation.
October 1, 2010

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

CIC MEMBERS
Name Midge Hunley Sarah Eaton Katie Lyons Amber Rader Monica Johns Jeff Sughrue Jennifer Sharp Debbie Fowler Tony Romo Sylvia Mazuera Ellen McLoughlin Dawn Rink Position Kindergarten Teacher 1st Grade Teacher/DIC Rep 2nd Grade Teacher 3rd Grade Teacher 4th Grade Teacher/ESL 5th Grade Teacher Specials Special Education PTA Vice-President PTA President/Parent/Community Assistant Principal Principal Years Served 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 1 0 2 2 4 Signature

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment
The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus, business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educational plans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides this work. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievement indicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance, graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics (e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered. The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253): 1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system. 2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs populations, including students in special education. 3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student. 4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan. 5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan. 6. Timelines for reaching goals. 7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives. 8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus. 9. Program for encouraging parental involvement. 10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data, student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged that ensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity. Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campus goals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment to excellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1 funds will be spent.

Title I --Targeted Assisted ( TA )

Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standards TA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planning TA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based research TA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programs TA 5. Highly qualified teachers TA 6. Professional Development TA 7. Increase Parental Involvement TA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessment TS 2. School-wide reform strategies TS 3. Highly qualified teachers TS 4. Professional development TS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schools TS 6. Parental involvement TS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs TS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basis TS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievement A. TEA Recognized/Exemplary District B. Recognized/Exemplary Schools C. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) D. Achievement Gap E. Special Populations F. TAKS Commended Scores (all students) G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores) H. SAT I. PSAT/NMSQT J. Advanced Placement K. Graduation Data Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff A. Out of School Suspensions B. DAEP Placements C. Attendance Rate Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness A. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST) B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instruction C. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 payments D. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usage E. Overtime hours F. Highly Qualified Teachers G. Teacher Classroom Attendance Rate H. All Staff Attendance Rate I. Teacher Turnover Rate J. Availability of Critical Technology Systems Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system A. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality Together B. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed) C. Staff Survey (to be developed)

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

RESULTS GOAL
Should identify what is desired in terms of performance after, or as a result of, putting new processes in place or improving existing processes.

SMART GOAL
Goal should be Strategic and specific, Measurable, Attainable, Resultsbased, and Time-bound.

INDICATOR
Standards and objectives (weak areas for students)

MEASURES
Tools well use to determine where students are now and whether they are improving.

TARGETS
The attainable performance level we would like to see.

Reading Obj. 1 Basic Understanding Obj. 4 analysis using critical thinking skills

Benchmark

All students will score 95% or higher on Benchmark assessments.

TAKS Data Benchmark TAKS Data

To improve student performance on Reading, Math, Writing and Science TAKS tests.

Increase number of commend ed student by 5% in each sub population

All students will score 90% or higher on TAKS All students will score 95% or higher on Benchmark assessments. All students will score 90% or higher on TAKS All students will score 90% or higher on TAKS

Math
Obj. 3 Geometry/Spatial reasoning Obj. 6 Mathematical processes and tools

Science
Obj. 3 Physical Science Obj. 4 Earth/Space Science

TAKS Data

Writing
Obj. 4 Sentence structure Obj. 6 Punct., Cap. spelling

TAKS Data

All students will score 90% or higher on TAKS

Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be a goal worthy of commitment. - Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline (1990)

SMART GOALS (Example) 90% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Reading Obj. 1 Basic Understanding 85% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Math Obj. 1 Numbers, Operations, and Quantitative Reasoning Obj. 6 Mathematical Processes and Tools 6

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

McCoy Elementary
Campus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA 2011 GOALS

All Students INDICATOR 2010 Data Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies All Tests Graduation 2009 Graduation 2010 Goal Participation: Reading/Language Arts Participation: Math Attendance 99 100 97.4 100 100 97 97 100 97.5 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100

African American 2010 Data 84 90 100 85.7 2011 Goal 90 93 100 90

Hispanic 2010 Data 97 96 100 97 2011 Goal 100 99 100 100 2010 Data 100 100 100 100

White 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100

Special Ed 2010 Data 85 81 100 90 100 2011 Goal 90

Economically Disadvantaged 2010 Data 94 94 100 97 2011 Goal 97 97 100 100 2010 Data 94 93 100

LEP 2011 Goal 97 96 100

100 100 97.5

100 100

99 100 97.4

100 100

99 100 97.2

100 100

100 100 96.9

100 100

97 100 97.5

100 100

94 100 97.8

100 100

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

McCoy Elementary Campus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students 2011 Goals
All Students INDICATOR Campus Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 59 71.6 52.7 70 State 35 40 32 46
Diff. from state

African American 2011 Goal 61 75 56 73 Campus 55.6 55 28.6 71.4 State 24 26 22 27

Diff. from state

Hispanic 2011 Goal 58 57 31 73 Campus 34.9 59.6 28.6 54.5 State 27 35 26 33

Diff. from state

White 2011 Goal 37 62 31 57 Campus 71.6 82.9 68 77.8 State 48 51 40 58

Diff. from state

2011 Goal 74 85 70 80

+24 +31.6 +20.7 +24

+31.6 +29 +6.6 +45.4

+7.9 +24.6 +2.6 +21.5

+23.6 +31.9 +28 +19.8

Special Ed. INDICATOR Campus Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 11.8 38.1 State 16 20 12 26
Diff. from state

Economically Disadvantaged 2011 Goal 16 40 Campus 40.2 61.6 32.4 55.9 State 25 31 24 31
Diff. from state

LEP Campus 22.2 35.5 State 22 30 20 18

Diff. from state

2011 Goal 42 63 34 58

2011 Goal 24 38

-4.2 +18.1

+15.2 +30.6 +8.4 +24.9

+.2 +5.5

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

McCoy Elementary 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement
Campus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance Measure
A,B F Increase student achievement Earn a rating of EXEMPLARY from the Texas Education Agency. in Math, Reading, Science and Increase commended in all sub populations by 2% Writing.

District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff
Campus Focus #2
Improve discipline

Criteria for Success

Reduce office referrals by 15%

Performance Measure
A,B

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

McCoy Elementary 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness
Campus Focus #3
Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Criteria for Success

All teachers are highly qualified

Performance Measure
F

District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system
Campus Focus #4 Criteria for Success Performance Measure
PTA attendance Sign in sheets Sign in sheets Sign in sheets Survey results Improve parental involvement 30% of families will attend PTA events 30% of families will attend curriculum nights for math, reading and science 100% parent involvement in parent conferences in November, 2010 100 % parent attendance at training meetings for low performing students Increase parent-community survey effectiveness rating by at least .5

10

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

McCoy Elementary 2010-11 Campus Focus

Campus Focus #5
Safe and Orderly Environment

Criteria for Success

Monthly Crisis Drill Improve mobile communication with staff Educate students and staff on Bullying

Performance Measure
Monthly Report Purchase of talk around radio Bully Program Taught

11

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2010-2011

Campus Focus
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Title Target Area

ACTION STRATEGY
Target specific SEs for intensive instructional focus by examining release TAKS test items that match the SEs to be taught. Utilize Eduphoria to evaluate student strengths and weaknesses to differentiate instruction Use i-Pods for Reading with K-2 students and Video i-Pods with 5th graders for Science Include TAKS formatted questions on Unit tests.

FORMATIVE MEASURE
Agenda of Department meetings; Principal attendance at one planning meeting per grade. Unit tests, Benchmarks, student participation Utilization of iPods by K-2 and 5th grade students weekly. Student performance. 40% of TAKS Formatted items on unit tests. Assessments submitted to Principal Student performance, Instructional changes made due to results Training complete Notation unit plans Classroom observation

ASSESSMENT TIMELINE
Ongoing

RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S)
Principal, Dawn Rink, Instructional Facilitators

COST/RESOURCES
Eduphoria, TEA, Longitudinal data provided by CFB Title 1 $29,000

X X

TS 1,2,3 ,5,9 TS1, 4,5,9 TS 1,2 TS1

X X

Sept- 2010 Ongoing

Amy Bramhall, ITS K-2 teachers and Sue Hutchinson Principal, Instructional Facilitators Couselor, Angel Reiter, Principal, Instructional Facilitators Principal, Dawn Rink Assistant Principal, Ellen McLoughlin

i-Pods

X X

Each teacher submits test at the end of each nine weeks. Ongoing

X X

Implement and evaluate MAP testing for 5th grade

X X

TS 4,5
X X X

All teachers note Content Literacy Strategies in lesson plans. Discuss CLS use in Faculty Meetings. Reinforce CLS through Observation Protocol & Focused Walkthroughs. Provide Bully Awareness and Child Abuse training to the staff Appoint and train an Ambassador for the Hispanic Parents; Invite parents to meet at school; Provide interpreters for conferences and meetings. Offer Lock Ins for 3-5 students and tutorials after school and Fridays for At Risk students. Provide small group instruction during day for at risk students. Utilize resources different from regular classroom. Continue Reading and Math Coaching Model

Ongoing

Attendance at meeting Student Performance Attendance at meetings; Increased number of Hispanic parents involved in school activities. 2009-10TAKS Tests Fountas & Pinnell Teacher Unit Tests Benchmarks Observations Teacher Lesson Plans Observations Focused Walkthroughs Debriefing sessions with IF & Principal Boy & Girl Scouts, Carnival, Sock Hop,

September, 2010

X X

TS 1,2,3 ,5,8, 9 TS 1,2,8 , 9 TS 2,4,5

Three meetings yearly; Parent Education Mtgs.-Monthly September, 2010 Ongoing

Principal, Dawn Rink Counselor, Angel Reiter Sylvia Mazuera, Cultural Ambassador

Title I Funds $388 Stimulus $63

Principal, Dawn Rink, Instructional Facilitators

Title 1 funds $6,003 Stimulus $6,267

X X

Ongoing

Instructional Facilitators, Principal, Dawn Rink

X X

TS 1, 2,

Provide opportunities for parents and students to learn and/or participate

Ongoing

PTA Programs VP CFB Parent Ed staff

Title 1 Funds $356

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10
X X X

TS 2,3, 4,5

together at school. Including opportunities for parents to gain knowledge to improve student organizational skills, utilize technology and help their child/children . All teachers will have GT and ESL certification by year end

McCoy Picnic, curriculum nights, Parent education

Principal, Dawn Rink

Number of teachers with ESL and GT certifications

Ongoing

Principal, Dawn Rink

District

X X
Provide and encourage attendance for TS campus and district sponsored core 3,4,5 academic subject area professional development for all core academic teachers At least one teacher from each grade attend district training to improve content knowledge (Math Monday, Science training, Reading Renaissance) Sign-in sheets and hours earned for CPE credit Ongoing Principal, Dawn Rink Instructional Facilitators, District C&I Staff District

X X X X X X X

TS 2, 8 TS 10 TS 1, 2, 8, 9 TS 9, 10
TS 2, 6 X X

Fully implement the Instructional Improvement Process IIP for Math and Science Incorporate Fitnessgram in daily CATCH activities in classroom and PE Strategic planning and review of student work with district math and reading specialists Monitor student progress through SNAP and benchmarks Convert to Schoolwires Conduct monthly crisis drills and hold debrief Purchase talk around radio to improve mobile communication Campus wide progress monitoring for reading, math and science after each unit test

Team meeting minutes documenting use of IIP CATCH documentation and Fitnessgram tests Lesson plans, analysis of student work Ongoing

Ongoing

Principal, Dawn RinkInstructional Facilitators J. Sharp District staff and Instructional Facilitators Instructional Facilitators, Principal Kathy Draves Principal, Dawn Rink Principal, Dawn Rink Instructional Facilitators CATCH activities box, Fitnessgram guidelines and health books

ongoing Benchmark assessment results and TAKS results. 9 week SNAP meetings, PLC meetings Fall 2010 Monthly October 2010 Ongoing

X X X

All web pages created by staff Drills held and debriefed Radio purchased Creation of charts and analysis of data

TS 1, 9

13

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

14