Philippines – Australia Human Resource Development Facility Re-entry Action Plan Progress Report Background This survey seeks

to monitor the progress of the REAP that you developed as a result of your participation in one of the PAHRDF activities. We are interested in gathering information about the status of your REAP and your experiences in implementing it. Please try to answer as candidly and as specific as possible. Rest assured that your answers will be treated confidentially, and you will not be identified in any report produced from this survey. Thank you. A. Basic Information Name of Noel Bringas Constantino Participant : Contact Info: Mobile number: 09215298329 Email address:constantino1568@yahoo.com Name of Provincial Gov’t. of Misamis Occidental Institution : Title of STT or LTT (for LTT, indicate Master of Arts in Theology degree earned): REAP Title : Drug Testing REAP Objective : Drug Testing Program to increase income. Start Date : March 2009 Expected Outputs Increase income of Drug Rehabilitation center : Target Customer or User of Secondary/ College Students Outputs : Targeted Institution Capacity : Planning and policy Project development Administrative service procedures and systems ICT Management Revenue Generation Leadership and teamwork  Human resource management/ Human resource development X Service delivery procedures and systems X Partnership-building     X 

Date of this July 31,2011 Progress Report : Has your REAP  Yes been revised X No since it was first approved? If yes, Reason/s for revision: Please specify reason for revision.

1

3. What competencies did you acquire from the PAHRDF intervention? What are you now able to do better or differently? 2 . Include unintended/ unplanned outcomes or results. and REAP output is approved  REAP is completed. ongoing. and REAP output has been fully implemented in at least 1 unit  REAP is completed.B. 76-99% completed 51-75% completed 26-50% completed 1-25% completed  REAP has not been implemented/ discontinued (please answer #5 below) 2. if any. and Outcomes are considered a benchmark practice  REAP is still  REAP is still  REAP is still  REAP is still ongoing. Pls see emailed documents and pictures. ongoing. and REAP output has been replicated in other work units  REAP is completed. ongoing. Action Plan Status 1. What is the current status of your Re-entry Action Plan ? Period : As of July 2011 Status :  REAP is completed. and Outcomes are evident – systems and processes have been improved X REAP is completed. Please describe what has been achieved so far (if REAP is ongoing) or final results (if REAP is completed) vis-à-vis the objectives of the REAP.

not easily discourage and a fighter in whatever circumstances that comes on my way… 3 .It enhanced my confidence. courageous.

reinforcement of changes or improvements) X Executive sponsorship (presence of a champion. absorptive capacity for the change. Ocampos is very supportive and the newly elected Governor in the person of Hon.  Organization’s readiness for change (awareness. 4 . Ramero continues the programs with her Thrust GOHERMIE Programs. Loreto Leo S. partnership agreement. Hermenia M. support of supervisor) X Intervention’s/ REAP’s alignment with organization’s change agenda/ strategic directions (intervention and REAPs contribute to organization’s/ unit’s objectives.  Intervention design (approaches. community support. people.4. desire and knowledge of people about the change. components. time)  Competencies to implement the change (intervention adequately equipped STT/LTT participants to implement the change) X External support (other donors. HRD Adviser support)  Others (please specify) Please explain: The former Governor Hon. What helped you carry out your Re-entry Action Plan? Check all categories that apply and provide explanation below. topics that were helpful)  Quality of engagement with PAHRDF (follow-up mechanisms. REAP included in unit/ organization workplan) X Resources provided (adequacy of budget. etc.

What difficulties. support of supervisor)  Intervention’s/ REAP’s alignment with organization’s change agenda/ strategic directions (intervention and REAPs contribute to organization’s/ unit’s objectives. reinforcement of changes or improvements)  Executive sponsorship (presence of a champion. components.5. time)  Competencies to implement the change (intervention adequately equipped STT/LTT participants to implement the change)  External support (other donors. if any. have you encountered in implementing your Re-entry Action Plan? Check all categories that apply and provide explanation below. people. partnership agreement. etc. desire and knowledge of people about the change. What actions have you taken to address the difficulties encountered?  Organization’s readiness for change (awareness.)  Intervention design (approaches. REAP included in unit/ organization workplan)  Resources provided (adequacy of budget. absorptive capacity for the change. HRD Adviser support)  Others (please specify) ___________________________________________________________ Please explain: Difficulties encountered How they were addressed 5 . topics that were helpful)  Quality of engagement with PAHRDF (follow-up mechanisms. community support.

6 .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful