Projective test

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An inkblot from the Rorschach inkblot test, the most well-known and widely used of the projective tests

In psychology, a projective test is a personality test designed to let a person respond to ambiguous stimuli, presumably revealing hidden emotions and internal conflicts. This is different from an "objective test" in which responses are analyzed according to a universal standard (for example, a multiple choice exam). The responses to projective tests are content analyzed for meaning rather than being based on presuppositions about meaning, as is the case with objective tests. Projective tests in general rely heavily on clinical judgement, lack reliability andvalidity and many have no standardized criteria to which results may be compared. These tests are still used frequently, however, despite the lack of scientific evidenceto support them and their continued popularity has been referred to as the "projective paradox".[1] Projective tests have their origins in psychoanalytic psychology, which argues that humans have conscious and unconscious attitudes and motivations that are beyond or hidden from conscious awareness. The terms "objective test" and "projective test" have recently come under criticism in the Journal of Personality Assessment. The more descriptive "rating scale or self-report measures" and "free response measures" are suggested, rather than the terms "objective tests" and "projective tests," respectively.[2]
Contents
[hide]

• • o o

1 Theory 2 Common variants 2.1 Rorschach 2.2 Thematic apperception test

o o • • • •

2.3 Draw-A-Person test 2.4 Sentence completion test 3 Uses in marketing 4 See also 5 References 6 Footnotes

[edit]Theory The general theoretical position behind projective tests is that whenever a specific question is asked, the response will be consciously-formulated and socially determined. These responses do not reflect the respondent's unconscious or implicit attitudes or motivations. The respondent's deep-seated motivations may not be consciously recognized by the respondent or the respondent may not be able to verbally express them in the form demanded by the questioner. Advocates of projective tests stress that the ambiguity of the stimuli presented within the tests allow subjects to express thoughts that originate on a deeper level than tapped by explicit questions. Projective tests lost some of their popularity during the 1980s and 1990s in part because of the overall loss of popularity of the psychoanalytic method and theories. Despite this, they are still used quite frequently. [edit]Common

variants

[edit]Rorschach Main article: Rorschach inkblot test The best known and most frequently used projective test is the Rorschach inkblot test, in which a subject is shown a series of ten irregular but symmetrical inkblots, and asked to explain what they see.[1] The subject's responses are then analyzed in various ways, noting not only what was said, but the time taken to respond, which aspect of the drawing was focused on, and how single responses compared to other responses for the same drawing. For example, if someone consistently sees the images as threatening and frightening, the tester might infer that the subject may suffer from paranoia.

Rorschach test
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Rorschach inkblot test)

"Rorschach Test" redirects here. For the band, see Rorschach Test (band).

The first of the ten cards in the Rorschach test, with the occurrence of the most statistically frequent details indicated.[1][2] The images themselves are only one component of the test, whose focus is the analysis of the perception of the images.

29%

18%

6%

The Rorschach test (German pronunciation: [ˈʁoɐʃax]; also known as the Rorschach inkblot test or simply the Inkblot test) is a psychological test in which subjects' perceptions of inkblots are recorded and then analyzed using psychological interpretation, complex scientifically derived algorithms, or both. Some psychologists use this test to examine a person's personality characteristics and emotional functioning. It has been employed to detect an underlying thought disorder, especially in cases where patients are reluctant to describe their thinking processes openly.[3] The test takes its name from that of its creator, Swiss psychologist Hermann Rorschach. In a national survey in the U.S., the Rorschach was ranked eighth among psychological tests used in outpatient mental health facilities.[4] It is the second most widely used test by members of the Society for Personality Assessment, and it is requested by psychiatrists in 25% of forensic assessmentcases,[4] usually in a battery of tests that often include the MMPI-2 and the MCMI-III.
[5]

In surveys, the use of Rorschach ranges from a low of 20% by correctional psychologists[6] to a

high of 80% by clinical psychologists engaged in assessment services, and 80% of psychology graduate programs surveyed teach it.[7] Although the Exner Scoring System (developed since the 1960s) claims to have addressed and often refuted many criticisms of the original testing system with an extensive body of research,
[8]

some researchers have raised questions about the objectivity of psychologists administrating

the test; inter-rater reliability; the verifiability and general validity of the test; bias of the test's pathology scales towards greater numbers of responses; the limited number of psychological conditions which it accurately diagnoses; the inability to replicate the test's norms; its use in court-ordered evaluations; and the proliferation of the ten inkblot images, potentially invalidating the test for those who have been exposed to them.[9]
Contents
[hide]

• • o

1 History 2 Method 2.1 Features or categories

   o o o • • o • o o o o o o o • • • •

2.1.1 Content 2.1.2 Location 2.1.3 Determinants 2.2 Exner scoring system 2.3 Cultural differences 2.4 Neurology

3 The ten inkblots 4 Prevalence 4.1 United States 5 Controversy 5.1 Test materials 5.2 Tester projection 5.3 Validity 5.4 Reliability 5.5 Population norms 5.6 Applications 5.7 Protection of test items and ethics 6 See also 7 Notes 8 References 9 External links

History

he selected a set of ten for their diagnostic value). the newly-founded Hans Huber publishing house purchased Rorschach's book Psychodiagnostikfrom the inventory of Ernst Bircher. after the turn of the century.[13] After studying 300 mental patients and 100 control subjects. however.[16] Huber has remained the publisher of the test and related book. was the first systematic approach of this kind.[14] but he died the following year. had published a popular book of poems. Bruno Klopfer and others. Rorschach's. Although he had served as Vice President of the Swiss Psychoanalytic Society. in 1921 Rorschach wrote his bookPsychodiagnostik. psychological experiments where inkblots were utilized multiplied.[18] After Rorschach's death. the original test scoring system was improved by Samuel Beck. Hogrefe AG. in 1857.[17] The work has been described as "a densely written piece couched in dry. with aims such as studying imagination and consciousness.[11] French psychologist Alfred Binet had also experimented with inkblots as a creativity test. Rorschach had difficulty in publishing the book and it attracted little attention when it first appeared. scientific terminology". Using interpretation of "ambiguous designs" to assess an individual's personality is an idea that goes back to Leonardo da Vinci and Botticelli.Hermann Rorschach created the Rorschach inkblot test in 1921. which was to form the basis of the inkblot test (after experimenting with several hundred inkblots.[19] John E.[12] and.[15] In 1927. Exnersummarized some of these later developments in . with Rorschach a registered trademark of Swiss publisher Verlag Hans Huber. Interpretation of inkblots was central to a game from the late 19th century. each of which was inspired by an accidental inkblot. [10] It has been suggested that Rorschach's use of inkblots may have been inspired by German doctorJustinus Kerner who.

The underlying assumption is that an individual will class external stimuli based on person-specific perceptual sets.the comprehensive system. no matter how trivial.[29] The most widely used method in the United States is based on the work of Exner. and personal/interpersonal perceptions.[27] As the subject is examining the inkblots. approximately 18x24 cm in size. Whether the cards are rotated. Administration of the test to a group of subjects.[22] Test administration is not to be confused with test interpretation: "The interpretation of a Rorschach record is a complex process. if required. which is closer to the original Rorschach system and rooted more deeply in the original psychoanalysis principles. has also occasionally been performed. affectivity. and including needs. each printed on a separate white card.[24][25][26] After the test subject has seen and responded to all of the inkblots (free association phase). Analysis of responses is recorded by the test administrator using a tabulation and scoring sheet and. while in Europe other methods sometimes dominate. on a white background. and other related factors such as whether permission to rotate them is asked. two are of black and red ink and three are multicolored. at the same time trying to make the scoring more statistically rigorous.[22] The general goal of the test is to provide data about cognition and personality variables such as motivations. the psychologist writes down everything the subject says or does. The subject is usually asked to hold the cards and may rotate them. The Exner system remains very popular in the United States.[28] Methods of interpretation differ. the tester then presents them again one at a time in a set sequence for the subject to study: the subject is asked to note where he sees what he originally saw and what makes it look like that (inquiry phase).[22] This is to facilitate a "relaxed but controlled atmosphere". It requires a wealth of knowledge concerning personality dynamics generally as well as considerable experience with the Rorschach method . but mainly for research rather than diagnostic purposes.[20][21] such as that described in the textbook by Evald Bohm. and that this clustering process is representative of the process used in real-life situations. by means of projected images. conflicts. may expose personality traits and normally contributes to the assessment. base motives. with the tester slightly behind the subject. There are ten official inkblots. Five inkblots are of black ink.[citation needed] Method The tester and subject typically sit next to each other at a table.[23] Each of the blots has near perfect bilateral symmetry. cognitive operations. a separate location chart. Rorschach scoring systems have been described as a system of pegs on which to hang one's knowledge of personality. Some systems are based on the psychoanalytic concept of object relations. response tendencies.

although there is contrasting evidence. information is provided by the time taken before providing a response for a card can be significant (taking a long time can indicate "shock" on the card). which makes it difficult to use content alone to draw any conclusions about the subject's personality. or the negative spacearound or within the inkblot.[35] Content This section requires expansion. "abstract".[37] Location This section requires expansion. originality). even those who are able and qualified to become Rorschach interpreters usually remain in a "learning stage" for a number of years. such as form and color) and location(which details of the inkblots triggered the response) is often considered more important than content. and some information can at times be obtained by analyzing thematic trends in the whole set of content responses (which is only feasible when several responses are available). and may be elicited by very disparate factors..[31] In particular. "nature". but in general content cannot be analyzed outside of the context of the entire test record. etc. i.[32][33] "Popularity" and "originality" of responses [34] can also be considered as basic dimensions in the analysis. information about determinants (the aspects of the inkblots that triggered the response. the contents of the response are only a comparatively small portion of a broader cluster of variables that are used to interpret the Rorschach data: for instance.[30] as well as by any comments the subject may make in addition to providing a direct response.. what the individual sees in the inkblot (the content). "animal". content response can be controlled consciously by the subject. content responses may potentially be interpreted directly.e. Proficiency as a Rorschach administrator can be gained within a few months.[23] .[36] More than any other feature in the test. with certain individuals. In fact. a detail (either a commonly or an uncommonly selected one). However.specifically. conversely. Content is classified in terms of "human". as well as for statistical popularity (or."[22] Features or categories The interpretation of the Rorschach test is not based primarily on the contents of the response. The basis for the response is usually the whole inkblot.

Rorschach's original work used only form. color and movement. but ultimately different methods were in common use at the time. He later published a study in multiple volumes called The Rorschach: A Comprehensive system. and is related to intellectual processes. and subsequently recognized as significant by Rorschach himself. "form-color" implies a more refined control of impulse than "color-form"). a concise description of what would be later called "the Exner system". while others have widened the scope of this determinant. reliable coding and a representative normative . and they can represent certain basic experiential-perceptual attitudes.[43] Exner scoring system The Exner scoring system. from the relation and balance among determinants that personality can be most readily inferred.[43] More than one determinant can contribute to the formation of the subject's percept. also known as the Rorschach Comprehensive System (RCS). the most accepted full description of his system. taking it to mean that the subject sees something "going on". basing instead their judgment on subjective assessment. indeed. as a more rigorous system of analysis.[8][45] In 1969. Exner published The Rorschach Systems.[46] The key components of the Exner system are the clusterization of Rorschach variables and a sequential search strategy to determine the order in which to analyze them. showing aspects of the way a subject perceives the world. objective.[47] framed in the context of standardized administration. being a result of the print process). another major determinant considered is shading. John E. It was developed in the 1960s by Dr. It has been extensively validated and shows high inter-rater reliability. It is. Shading and movement have been considered more ambiguously.[42] and he considered movement as only actual experiencing of motion. currently. or arbitrarily mixing characteristics of the various standardized systems.Determinants Systems for Rorschach scoring generally include a concept of "determinants": these are the factors that contribute to establish the similarity between the inkblot and the subject's content response about it. Exner. Creation of the new system was prompted by the realization that at least five related.[39][40][41] Form is the most common determinant. color responses often provide direct insight into emotional life. while also assessing which of the two constituted the primary contributor (e.g. both in definition and interpretation: Rorschach originally disregarded shading (which was originally not even present on the cards. and fusion of two determinants is taken into account. [38] which was inadvertently introduced by poor printing of the inkblots (which originally featured uniform saturation). with a sizeable minority of examiners not employing any recognized method at all.[44] is the standard method for interpreting the Rorschach test.

[49] In the system.database. related to how the subject processes input data. As pertains to response form. the area of each blot which is distinguished by the client is noted and coded – typically as "commonly selected" or "uncommonly selected". especially in Europe.[29] Using the scores for these categories. reducing it to a measure of the subject's distance to the population average. badge and coat of arms. and ideation. the Exner system solely defines "good form" as a matter of word occurrence frequency. The results of the structural summary are interpreted using existing research data on personality characteristics that have been demonstrated to be associated with different kinds of responses. what makes the inkblot look like what it is said to resemble). incongruous. a concept of "form quality" was present from the earliest of Rorschach's works. cognitive mediation. Exner settled upon the area coding system promoted by S. This system was in turn based upon Klopfer's (1942) work.[52] and there are fewer "good form" responses. which of a variety of determinants is used to produce the response (i. European would seem to express it only when it reaches the level of a craving for closeness). the contents of the response (what the respondent actually sees in the blot). texture response is typically zero in European subjects (if interpreted as a need for closeness. the examiner then performs a series of calculations producing a structural summary of the test data.[53] Form is . in contrast. the form quality of the response (to what extent a response is faithful to how the actual inkblot looks). as a subjective judgment of how well the form of the subject's response matched the inkblots (Rorschach would give a higher form score to more "original" yet good form responses). With the Rorschach plates (the ten inkblots).e.. while others (such as the average number of responses) coincide. in accordance with the system. the degree of mental organizing activity that is involved in producing the response. some of which impact important variables. and this concept was followed by other methods.[48] The system places a lot of emphasis on a cognitive triad of information processing. referring to the way information is transformed and identified. responses are scored with reference to their level of vagueness or synthesis of multiple images in the blot.[50] Cultural differences Comparing North American Exner normative data with data from European and South American subjects showed marked differences in some features. to the point where schizophrenia may be suspected if data were correlated to the North American norms. There were many different methods for coding the areas of the blots. J.[51] For instance. the location of the response. or incoherent aspects of responses. Beck (1944 and 1961). and any illogical. It has been reported that popular responses on the first card include bat.

a bow tie is a frequent response for the center detail of card III. color-form responses are comparatively frequent in opposition to formcolor responses. as opposed to other animals like cats and dogs.[56] Many of Exner's "popular" responses (those given by at least one third of the North American sample used) seem to be universally popular. this difference could stem from a higher value attributed to spontaneous expression of emotions.[54] while color is less frequent than in American subjects. Test responses should also not be translated into another language prior to analysis except possibly by a clinician mastering both languages. which is normally classed as an "unusual" response.[52] The differences in form quality are attributable to purely cultural aspects: different cultures will exhibit different "common" objects (French subjects often identify a chameleon in card VIII."[60] The ten inkblots . this positive correlation suggests that amygdalar enlargement in the normal population might be related to creative mental activity. and "musical instrument" on card VI is popular for Japanese people). and thus immediately subject to cultural influences. For example. since the latter tend to be interpreted as indicators of a defensive attitude in processing affect. while specifically card IX's "human" response. "Since previous reports have indicated that unique responses were observed at higher frequency in the artistic population than in the nonartistic normal population. and. therefore. Japan and South America. the crab or spider in card X and one of either the butterfly or the bat in card I appear to be characteristic of North America.also often the only determinant expressed by European subjects. the examiner should master the language used in the test.[56][57] Form quality. in Scandinavia. an examiner not appreciating this language nuance may code the response differently from what is expected. "Christmas elves" (nisser) is a popular response for card II. conversely.[59] Neurology Research using figure 03 have found that ‘‘unique responses’’ are produced in people with larger amygdalas. cultural-dependent interpretation of test data may not necessarily need to extend beyond these components. popular content responses and locations are the only coded variables in the Exner systems that are based on frequency of occurrence. as shown by samples in Europe. The researchers note. but since the equivalent term in French translates to "butterfly tie".[55] and different languages will exhibit semantic differences in naming the same object (the figure of card IV is often called a troll by Scandinavians and an ogre by French people).[58] The cited language differences mean that it's imperative for the test to be administered in the subject's native language or a very well mastered second language.

according to Swiss copyright law.[66] Card Popular responses[67][68][69] Beck: bat. Responses to them can provide indications about how a subject is likely to manage feelings of anger or physical harm. and are the most distinctive features. turning it) are not very significant. butterfly(29%) Dana (France): butterfly (39%) Comments[70][71] When seeing card I. They have been in the public domain in Hermann Rorschach's native Switzerland since at least 1992 (70 years after the author's death. It is not. This card can Beck: two humans Piotrowski: four-legged animal(34%. moth Piotrowski: bat (53%).g. having readily available popular responses.Below are the ten inkblots of the Rorschach test printed in Rorschach's Rorschach Test – Psychodiagnostic Plates. a card that is usually difficult for the subject to handle. however. or 50 years after the cut-off date of 1942). subjects often inquire on how they should proceed. it can provide clues about how subjects tackle a new and stressful task. Being the first card. gray) . gray parts) Dana (France): animal: dog.[61] together with the most frequent responses for either the whole image or the most prominent details according to various authors. bear (50%.[62] [63] They are also in the public domain under United States copyright law:[64][65] all works published before 1923 are considered to be in the public domain. and questions on what they are allowed to do with the card (e. butterfly. elephant. The red details of card II are often seen as blood.

this serves to elicit a sense of authority. compounded with the common impression of the subject being in an inferior position ("looking up") to it. and is generally perceived as a big and sometimes threatening figure. rug Piotrowski: animal skin. skin rug(41%) Dana (France): animal skin (46%) induce a variety of sexual responses. and the qualities expressed by the subject may indicate attitudes toward men and . skin. Card III is typically perceived to contain two humans involved in some interaction. gray) Beck: animal hide. The human or animal content seen in the card is almost invariably classified as male rather than female. Card IV is notable for its dark color and its shading (posing difficulties for depressed subjects). and may provide information about how the subject relates with other people (specifically.Beck: two humans (gray) Piotrowski: human figures (72%. response latency may reveal struggling social interactions). gray) Dana (France): human (76%.

it is specifically a "sex card". which often elicits association related to interpersonal closeness. after the previous more challenging cards. Containing few features that generate concerns or complicate the elaboration. top) Dana (France): human head (46%. top) authority. bat(40%) Dana (France): butterfly (48%). even though other cards have a greater variety of commonly seen sexual contents. skin rug(41%) Dana (France): animal skin (46%) Beck: human heads or faces(top) Piotrowski: heads of women or children (27%. and typically instigates a "change of pace" in the test. rug Piotrowski: animal skin. bat(46%) Beck: animal hide. moth Piotrowski: butterfly (48%).Beck: bat. Card V is an easily elaborated card that is not usually perceived as threatening. butterfly. it is the easiest blot to generate a good quality response about. its likely sexual percepts being reported more frequently than in any other card. Texture is the dominant characteristic of card VI. skin. Card VII can be associated with femininity (the human figures commonly seeing in it being described as women or .

however. and function as a "mother card". people who find processing complex situations or emotional stimuli distressing or difficult may be uncomfortable with this card. which make this card also relate to feminine sexuality in particular. pink) Dana (France): four-legged animal(93%. being complex and the first multi-colored card in the set. the card introduces new elaboration difficulties. Therefore. People often express relief about card VIII. which lets them relax and respond effectively. pink) children). it represents a "change of pace". where difficulties in responding may be related to concerns with the female figures in the subject's life. The center detail is relatively often (though not popularly) identified as a vagina. .Beck: animal: not cat or dog(pink) Piotrowski: four-legged animal(94%. Similar to card V.

caterpillars. it may provide an opportunity for the subject to "sign out" by indicating what they feel their situation is like. Prevalence . deep green) Dana (France): none Characteristic of card IX is indistinct form and diffuse. but aside from this there are few particular "pulls" typical of this card. and it is the least frequent of all cards. snakes (28%. Being the last card. or what they desire to know. but its uncertainty and complexity are reminiscent of card IX: people who find it difficult to deal with many concurrent stimuli may not particularly like this otherwise pleasant card. There is only one popular response. lobster.Beck: human (orange) Piotrowski: none Dana (France): none Beck: crab. Having difficulty with processing this card may indicate trouble dealing with unstructured data. spider (37%. worms. muted chromatic features. light green). creating a general vagueness. Piotrowski: rabbit head (31%. spider(blue) crab. blue). Card X is structurally similar to card VIII.

and. United States The Rorschach test is used almost exclusively by psychologists.[9][75] as several studies suggested that conclusions reached by test administrators since the 1950s were akin to cold reading. McCall writes (p."[78] A moratorium on its use was called for in 1999."[80] Test materials The basic premise of the test is that objective meaning can be extracted from responses to blots of ink which are supposedly meaningless.[7] Another study found that its use by clinical psychologists was only 43%.] "Its value as a measure of thought disorder in schizophrenia research is well accepted.. 154): "Though tens of thousands of Rorschach tests have been administered by hundreds of trained professionals since that time (of a previous review). nevertheless possess “validity greater than chance” (p. less often. Lee Cronbach (former President of the Psychometric Society and American Psychological Association)[77] is quoted in a review: "The test has repeatedly failed as a prediction of practical criteria.[72] In custody cases.[73] Another survey found that 124 out of 161 (77%) of clinical psychologists engaging in assessment services utilize the Rorschach. Please improve this article and discuss the issue on the talk page. despite the appearance of more than 2. In a survey done in the year 2000.000 publications about the test. and while many relationships to personality dynamics and behavior have been hypothesized. though falling woefully short of the claims made by proponents. Furthermore.The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject.[76] In the 1959 edition of Mental Measurement Yearbook. Supporters of the Rorschach inkblot test believe that . the vast majority of these relationships have never been validated empirically [sic]. Cronbach’s (1970) final verdict: that some Rorschach scores." In addition.[74] and 80% of psychology graduate programs teach its use. 20% of correctional psychologists used the Rorschach while 80% used the MMPI.[79] A 2003 report by Wood and colleagues had more mixed views: "More than 50 years of research have confirmed Lee J.. major reviewer Raymond J. 23% of psychologists use the Rorschach to examine a child. while it was used less than 24% of the time by school psychologists. [. It is also used regularly in research on dependency. [72] Controversy Some skeptics consider the Rorschach inkblot test pseudoscience. substantial evidence justifies the use of the Rorschach as a clinical measure of intelligence and thought disorder. [6] Forensic psychologists use the Rorschach 36% of the time. in studies on hostility and anxiety. 636). There is nothing in the literature to encourage reliance on Rorschach interpretations.

for "Form Quality": in essence. An intense dialogue about the wallpaper or the rug would do as well provided that both parties believe. but the Rorschach's inter-rater reliability has been questioned. the vehicle for the interaction .) of the inkblot leads to each of the tested person's comments.[8] Third parties could be used to avoid this problem. It makes heavy use of what factor (shading. in some studies the scores obtained by two independent scorers do not match with great consistency.. and that a patient typically responds to meaningful as well as ambiguous aspects of the blots. and has all but displaced many earlier (and less consistent) scoring systems." between client and therapist.. whether the subject's response fits with how the blot actually looks.the subject's response to an ambiguous and meaningless stimulus can provide insight into their thought processes."[81] Tester projection Some critics argue that the testing psychologist must also project onto the patterns. latitude remained in the actual interpretation. but it is not clear how this occurs. and the clinician's write-up of the test record is still partly subjective. there is essentially no evidence whatsoever that the test has even a shred of validity. Interestingly. concluding: ".[82] In Exner's system. the total . outline. The Exner system of scoring (also known as the "Comprehensive System") is meant to address this. however. Several scores correlate well with generalintelligence. color. empathy and insightfulness of the tester totally independently of the Rorschach itself.[8] Reber (1985) describes the blots as merely ". results are thus poorly verifiable. etc. Superficially this might be considered a subjective judgment."[81] Nevertheless. Also. much of the subjectivity is eliminated or reduced by use of frequency tables that indicate how often a particular response is given by the population in general.[85] Reber (1985) comments ". That is.. there is substantial research indicating the utility of the measure for a few scores. the usefulness of the Rorschach will depend upon the sensitivity. Disagreements about test validity remain: while the Exner proposed a rigorous scoring system.[8] Another example is that the response "bra" was considered a "sex" response by male psychologists. depending on how the examiner has internalized the categories involved.[84] Validity When interpreted as a projective test.[83] This conclusion was challenged in studies using large samples reported in 2002. A possible example sometimes attributed to the psychologist's subjective judgement is that responses are coded (among many other things). one such scale is R. But with the Exner system of scoring. such a response is always coded as "clothing" unless there is a clear sexual reference in the response. recent research shows that the blots are not entirely meaningless. but a "clothing" response by females..

disordered thinking. and personality disorders (includingborderline personality disorder). In particular. but Wood et al. who are critical of the Rorschach. since many scales do not correct for high R: if a subject gives twice as many responses overall. the Comprehensive System doesn't appear to bear a consistent relationship to psychological disorders or symptoms. Exner's system was thought to possess normative scores for various populations.[86] The same source reports that validity has also been shown for detecting such conditions as schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Complexity. Similarly. But. such as where the tester and subject are seated. verbal and nonverbal responses to subjects' questions or comments. discrepancies seemed to focus on indices measuring narcissism. US Courts have challenged Rorschach as well." [91] Population norms Another area of controversy are the test's statistical norms. and interpretation thus is often controversial".[92] Although Rorschach proponents. and Human Figure responses. it is more likely that some of these will seem "pathological". Jones v Apfel (1997) stated (quoting from Attorney's Textbook of Medicine) that Rorschash "results do not meet the requirements of standardization. and discomfort in close relationships.H.[89] In State ex rel H. and how responses are recorded. personality characteristics. reliability. Bogacki stated under oath "many psychologists do not believe much in the validity or effectiveness of the Rorschach test"[90] and US v Battle (2001) ruled that the Rorschash "does not have an objective scoring system. such as Hibbard. Form Quality. any introductory words. thought disorders. the procedures for coding responses are fairly well specified but extremely time-consuming to inexperienced examiners. There is some evidence that the Deviant Verbalizations scale relates to bipolar disorder. The authors conclude that "Otherwise.number of responses.[93] suggest that high rates of pathology detected by the Rorshach accurately reflect . Also correlated with intelligence are the scales for Organizational Activity. [92] Lillenfeld and colleagues. Exner has published detailed instructions. or such health problems as cancer". have stated that this proves that the Rorschach tends to "overpathologise normals". (1999) where under cross examination Dr.[87] (Cancer is mentioned because a small minority of Rorschach enthusiasts have claimed the test can predict cancer. beginning in the mid-1990s others began to try to replicate or update these norms and failed.[82] cites many court cases where these had not been followed.)[88] Reliability It is also thought that the test's reliability can depend substantially on details of the testing procedure. this reveals the questionable side-effect that more intelligent people tend to be elevated on many pathology scales. who may cut corners as a result. or validity of clinical diagnostic tests. potential for violence.

Sometimes such information about personality characteristics is helpful in arriving at a differential diagnosis.[7]One study has found that use of the test in courts has increased by three times in the decade between 1996 and 2005. with no additional data. and it provides information concerning aspects of personality structure and dynamics that make people the kind of people they are.increasing psychopathology in society. particularly those with a copyright termof up to 70 years post mortem auctoris. They presented an international collaborative study of 4704 Rorschach protocols. in making official diagnoses from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). and it requires that psychologists "make reasonable efforts to maintain the .[98] Protection of test items and ethics Outlines of the ten official inkblots were first made publicly available by William Poundstone in his 1983 book Big Secrets. anyway.[97] In the vast majority of cases.[96] Irving B. the Rorschach also identifies half of all test-takers as possessing "distorted thinking". obtained in 21 different samples.[94] a false positive rate unexplained by current research. with only 2 % showing significant elevations on the index of perceptual and thinking disorder.[99] It claims that its goals include "the welfare and protection of the individuals and groups with whom psychologists work". out of 8. and the testimony was ruled inadmissible in only one of those cases.000 cases in which forensic psychologists used Rorschach-based testimony.[5] and despite the criticism of usage of the Rorschach in the courts. The accusation of "over-pathologising" has also been considered by Meyer et al. compared to the previous fifty years. The American Psychological Association (APA) has a code of ethics that supports "freedom of inquiry and expression" and helping "the public in developing informed judgments". the Rorschach test wasn't singled out but used as one of several in a battery of tests. 12 % elevated on indices of depression and hypervigilance and 13% elevated on persistent stress overload—all in line with expected frequencies among nonpatient populations. across 17 different countries.[citation needed] This controversy stems. Weiner (co-developer with John Exner of the Comprehensive system) has stated that the Rorschach "is a measure of personality functioning. from the limitations of the Rorschach. if the alternative diagnoses being considered have been well conceptualized with respect to specific or defining personality characteristics". which also described the method of administering the test. in part. (2007).[95] Applications The test is also controversial because of its common use in court-ordered evaluations.[5] Others however have found that its usage by forensic psychologists has decreased. The blots are in the public domain in most countries. the appropriateness of the instrument was challenged only six times.

publication of the inkblots is described as a "particularly painful development".[107] Further complaints were sent to two other websites that contained information similar to the Rorschach test in May 2009 by legal firm Schluep and Degen of Switzerland.[108][109] Psychologists have sometimes refused to disclose tests and test data to courts when asked to do so by the parties citing ethical reasons.[111] Hogrefe & Huber Publishing. Hogrefe attempted to claim copyright over the Rorschach ink blots during fillings of a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization against Ney Limonge of Brazil. a Canadian emergency room physician involved in the debate. 2008.. James Heilman. it is argued that such refusals may hinder full understanding of the process by the attorneys. even though "cheating" the test is held to be practically impossible. over many .[111] Dr. such as the Italian Association of Strategic Psychotherapy.[110] Controversy ensued in the psychological community in 2009 when the original Rorschach plates and research results on interpretations were published in the "Rorschach test" article on Wikipedia. called the publication "unbelievably reckless and even cynical of Wikipedia" and said it was investigating the possibility of legal action.23(b) states that the psychologist has a responsibility to document processes in detail and of adequate quality to allow reasonable scrutiny by the court.[100] For example.[101][102][103] A public statement by the British Psychological Society expresses similar concerns about psychological tests (without mentioning any test by name) and considers the "release of [test] materials to unqualified individuals" to be misuse if it is against the wishes of the test publisher. APA ethical standard 1. given the tens of thousands of research papers which have.integrity and security of test materials".[106] On September 9. and listing common responses represents a serious unethical act" for psychologists and is indicative of "questionable professional judgment". [111] For those opposed to exposure.[104] In his book Ethics in psychology. and impede cross-examination of the experts. compared it to the publication of the eye test chart: though people are likewise free to memorize the eye chart before an eye test.[105] Other professional associations. a German company that sells editions of the plates.. its general usefulness as a diagnostic tool for eyesight has not diminished. Koocher (1998) notes that some believe "reprinting copies of the Rorschach plates . The APA has also raised concerns that the dissemination of test materials might impose "very concrete harm to the general public". recommend that even information about the purpose of the test or any detail of its administration should be kept from the public. the Rorschach test is capable of detectingsuicidality. These complaints were denied. It has not taken a position on publication of the Rorschach plates but noted "there are a limited number of standardized psychological tests considered appropriate for a given purpose".

the free encyclopedia Psychology portal The Thematic Apperception Test. or TAT. which is why these are referred to as "projective tests. the emotions of the characters. motivations and attitudes of the respondent. is a projective psychological test. researched. and taught of such tests. Contents [hide] • 1 Procedure . the subject may be asked to describe what led up to this scene. Benjamin Radford. such as The Guardianand The Globe And Mail. and is asked to describe various aspects of the scene. stated that the Rorschach "has remained in use more out of tradition than good evidence. the respondent "projects" their unconscious attitudes and motivations into the picture." Thematic Apperception Test From Wikipedia. for example. and problemsolving abilities."[111]Controversy over Wikipedia's publication of the inkblots has resulted in the blots being published in other locations. "tried to link a patient’s responses to certain psychological conditions. attempting to discover the conflicts. The examiner then evaluates these descriptions. power and intimacy. In the answers.years. it has been among the most widely used. editor ofSkeptical Inquirer magazine.[113] [edit]Thematic apperception test Main article: Thematic Apperception Test Another popular projective test is the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) in which an individual views ambiguous scenes of people.[112] Publication of the Rorschach images is also welcomed by critics who consider the test to be pseudoscience. and what might happen afterwards. Its adherents claim that it taps a subject's unconscious to reveal repressed aspects of personality." and was hopeful that publication of the test may finally hasten its demise. Historically. motives and needs for achievement.

Some of the cards show male figures. and patterns of reaction. Most practitioners choose a set of approximately ten cards. particularly for children or individuals of low cognitive abilities. some of ambiguous gender. either using cards that they feel are generally useful. One is completely blank. some both male and female figures. Although the cards were originally designed to be matched to the subject in terms of age and gender. including:     what has led up to the event shown what is happening at the moment what the characters are feeling and thinking.• • • • • • • • 2 Scoring Systems 3 History 4 Criticisms 5 Contemporary applications of TAT 6 TAT in popular culture 7 See also 8 References 9 External links [edit]Procedure The TAE is popularly known as the picture interpretation technique because it uses a standard series of provocative yet ambiguous picturesabout which the subject must tell a story. and some show no human figures at all. attitudes. its assessment of the subject is based on what he or she projects onto the ambiguous images. There are 31 picture cards in the standard form of the TAT. some children. If these elements are omitted. to complete the assessment each story created by a subject must be carefully analyzed to uncover underlying needs. the evaluator may ask the subject about them directly. The subject is asked to tell as dramatic a story as they can for each picture presented. any card may be used with any subject. some adults. or that they believe will encourage the subject's expression of emotional conflicts relevant to their specific history and situation. like the Rorschach test. Although most clinical practitioners do not . and what the outcome of the story was. some female. [1] [edit]Scoring Systems The TAT is a projective test in that. Therefore.

 Social Cognition and Object Relations SCOR[3] scale. [edit]Criticisms Declining adherence to the Freudian principle of repression on which the test is based has caused the TAT to be criticised as false or outdated by many professional psychologists[citation needed] . therapeutic purpose. Affect-Tone of Relationship Paradigms. [edit]History TAT was developed by the American psychologists Henry A. the TAT “came into being when Dr. such as internal conflicts.’ creating a ‘cultural or psychosocial distance’ between the patients and these stimuli that makes identifying with them less likely [4]. the Human Potential Movement encouraged psychologists to use the TAT to help their clients understand themselves better and stimulate personal growth. Capacity for Emotional Investment in Relationships and Moral Standards. Two common methods that are currently used in research are the:  Defense Mechanisms Manual DMM[2]. in researching the responses of subjects given photographs versus the TAT. Morgan at Harvard during the 1930s to explore the underlying dynamics of personality. the TAT was adopted more broadly by psychoanalysts and clinicians to evaluate emotionally disturbed patients. psychologist and Melvillist . due to the challenge of standardising interpretations of the stories produced by subjects). According to Melville scholar Howard P Vincent. Later. in the 1970s. several formal scoring systems have been developed for analyzing TAT stories systematically and consistently. or reliable (that it gives consistent results over time. and motives. Their criticisms are that the TAT is unscientific because it cannot be proved to be valid (that it actually measures what it claims to measure). Also. Henry A. even ‘old-fashioned. This assesses four different dimensions of object relations: Complexity of Representations of People. andidentification (most mature). Murray and Christiana D. A person's thoughts/feelings are projected in stories involved. Murray. and Understanding of Social Causality. adapted the implicit lesson of Melville’s [Moby Dick] “Doubloon” chapter to a new and larger creative. interests. This assesses three defense mechanisms: denial (least mature). researchers found that the TAT cards evoked more .use formal scoring systems.” After World War II. Some critics of the TAT cards have observed that the characters and environments are dated. dominant drives. projection (intermediate).

‘deviant’ stories (i.  In the MTV cartoon Daria. "That's a different test. All right." The psychologist explains. TAT is widely used in France and Argentina using a psychodynamic approach. or to screen candidates for high-stress occupations. then." The psychologist tells her the picture is of two people. "last time I took one of these tests they told me they were clouds..[citation needed] It is also used by the Services Selection Board of India. The Israeli army uses the test for evaluating potential officers. thought disorders. dear. Psy. in forensic examinations to evaluate crime suspects. It is also commonly used in routine psychological evaluations. In a 2005 dissertation. Quinn makes up a story about the two people having a discussion about popularity and dating.  Michael Crichton included the TAT in the battery of tests given to the disturbed patient and main character Harry Benson in his novel. It's a guy and a girl and they're . not ponies. I see. Sometimes it is used in a psychiatric or psychological context to assess personality disorders. Daria states that she sees "a herd of beautiful wild ponies running free across the plains. "Oh. They said they could be whatever I wanted.D. mate selectionand what motivates people to choose their occupation. Hannibal Lecter mocks a previous attempt to administer the test to him. Daria and Quinn are shown a picture of two people. more negative) than photographs." To which Daria characteristically replies. the TAT remains widely used as a tool for research into areas of psychology such as dreams. typically without a formal scoring system. In this test. fantasies. [edit]Contemporary applications of TAT Despite criticisms. as a way to explore emotional conflicts and object relations [7].[citation needed] [edit]TAT  in popular culture Thomas Harris' novel Red Dragon includes a scene where the imprisoned psychiatrist and serial killer Dr. The Terminal Man. Daria states. Daria and her sister Quinn are given a test that appears to be the TAT by the school psychologist on their first day at their new school. attempted to address these issues by reproducing a Leopold Bellak [6] 10 card set photographically and performing an outcome study..[5] Matthew Narron. leading them to conclude that the difference was due to the differences in the characteristics of the images used as stimuli[citation needed] . they're people and you tell me what they're discussing. The results concluded that the old TAT elicited answers that included many more specific time references than the new TAT..e.

You got to pass it or you get bad marks [sic]" [edit]Draw-A-Person test Main article: Draw-A-Person Test The Draw-A-Person test requires the subject to draw a person. the free encyclopedia Smiling person (combined head and body) age 4½. the main character of A Clockwork Orange. "I dont know the frist 2 werds but I know what test means..[1] A similar class of techniques is kinetic family drawing. Draw-A-Person Test From Wikipedia. clothing and background of the figure. notes in his progress report 4 on March 6th that he was given a "Thematic Appreciation Test. shape and complexity of the facial features." As he says. The results are based on a psychodynamic interpretation of the details of the drawing. the approach has very little demonstrated validity and there is evidence that therapists may attribute pathology to individuals who are merely poor artists. . and he replies that he "pretends" a tablecloth with an ink pen "leeking" all over it. they ask him to pretend that it is something else. As with other projective tests. Charlie Gordon."[8] (Cf. Niemur and Strauss ask him what he "sees" on a card.. such as the size. he replies that he sees an inkblot. the protagonist in Daniel Keyes' Flowers for Algernon. the Rorschach test administered to Charly Gordon in Flowers for Algernon. a herd of beautiful wild ponies running free across the plains.)  The TAT is administered to Alex. during which Drs.discussing.

head to feet.g. Psychologist Julian Jaynes. in a classic study of illusory correlation. when they do." with "blurred and unconnected lines.. or Goodenough-Harris Draw-A-Person Test) is a psychological projective personality or cognitive test used to evaluate children and adolescents for a variety of purposes. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind wrote that the test is "routinely administered as an indicator of schizophrenia. [edit]Nature of the test Test administration involves the administrator requesting children to complete three individual drawings on separate pieces of paper. could be generated from the naive beliefs of undergraduates. this test was first known as the Goodenough Draw-A-Man test. Harris's book (1963) provides scoring scales which are used to examine and . Chapman and Chapman (1969). however. No further instructions are given and the child is free to make the drawing in whichever way he/she would like. The revision and extension is detailed in his book Children's Drawings as Measures of Intellectual Maturity(1963)." and that while not all schizophrenic patients have trouble drawing a person. in the 1976 book. The test has no time limit. Dale B.The Draw-A-Person Test (DAP. Children are asked to draw a man. and themselves.i. Dr. There is no right or wrong type of drawing. not just the face. Contents [hide] • • • • 1 History 2 Nature of the test 3 See also 4 Notes and References [edit]History Developed originally by Florence Goodenough in 1926." ambiguous sexuality and general distortion. And that such signs might be a patient's neglect to include "obvious anatomical parts like hands and eyes. Harris later revised and extended the test and it is now known as theGoodenough-Harris Drawing Test. It is detailed in her book titled Measurement of Intelligence by Drawings. although the child must make a drawing of a whole person each time . it is very clear evidence of a disorder. showed that the scoring manual.[1] There has been no validation of this test as indicative of schizophrenia.e. large eyes as indicative of paranoia. DAP test. e. a woman. children rarely take longer than about 10 or 15 minutes to complete all three drawings.

and beliefs. communication disabilities. The responses are believed to provide indications of attitudes. There is debate over whether or not sentence completion tests elicit responses from . To evaluate intelligence. beliefs.personality characteristics. including presence or absence. or other mental states. In all. This system is composed of two types of criteria.score the child's drawings. The use of a nonverbal. there are 64 scoring items for each drawing. motivations. for various criteria. and proportion. Sentence completion tests typically provide respondents with beginnings of sentences. A separate standard score is recorded for each drawing. and a total score for all three. nonthreatening task to evaluate intelligence is intended to eliminate possible sources of bias by reducing variables like primary language. a factor that may account for the tendency of middle-class children to score higher on this test than lower-class children. the test administrator uses the Draw-a-Person: QSS (Quantitative Scoring System). who often have fewer opportunities to draw. motivations. The test is completely non-invasive and non-threatening to children which is part of its appeal. the administrator uses the Draw-a-Person: SPED (Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance) to score the drawings. However. 47 different items are considered for each drawing. referred to as “stems. For the first type. and sensitivity to working under pressure. test results can be influenced by previous drawing experience. [edit]See also completion test [edit]Sentence Main article: Sentence completion tests Sentence completion tests require the subject complete sentence "stems" with their own words. The purpose of the test is to assist professionals in inferring children's cognitive developmental levels with little or no influence of other factors such as language barriers or special needs. The subject's response is considered to be a projection of their conscious and/or unconscious attitudes. Sentence completion tests From Wikipedia. For the second type. To assess the test-taker for emotional problems. verbal skills.” and respondents then complete the sentences in ways that are meaningful to them. eight dimensions of each drawing are evaluated against norms for the child's age group. detail. Any other uses of the test are merely projective and are not endorsed by the first creator. This system analyzes fourteen different aspects of the drawings. such as specific body parts and clothing. the free encyclopedia Sentence completion tests are a class of semi-structured projective techniques.

sentence completion tests have increased in usage. in part because they are easy to develop and easy to administer.[4] Some sentence completion tests were developed as a way to overcome the problems associated with thematic apperception measures of the same constructs. As of the 1980s. A long sentence completion test is the Forer Sentence Completion Test.[3] Another reason for the increased usage of sentence completion tests is because of their superiority to other measures in uncovering conflicted attitudes. Contents [hide] • • • • • 1 History 2 Uses 3 Examples of sentence completion tests 4 Data analysis. In recent decades. or much longer. The structures of sentence completion tests vary according to the length and relative generality and wording of the sentence stems.[2] Carl Jung’s word association test may also have been a precursor to modern sentence completion tests. A sentence completion test form may be relatively short. which has 100 stems.[1] Ebbinghaus’s sentence completion test was used as part of an intelligence test. validity and reliability 5 References [edit]History Herman Von Ebbinghaus is generally credited with developing the first sentence completion test in 1897. sentence completion tests were the seventh most widely used personality assessment instruments. less structured tests provide shorter stems. Structured tests have longer stems that lead respondents to more specific types of responses. which produce a wider variety of responses. such as those used to assess responses to advertisements. This debate would affect whether sentence completion tests can be strictly categorized as projective tests. such as those used to assess personality.conscious thought rather than unconscious states.[5] . The tests are usually administered in booklet form where respondents complete the stems by writing words on paper.

Washington University Sentence Completion Test (measures ego development). The validity of each sentence completion test must be determined independently and this depends on the instructions laid out in the scoring manual. Sentence completion measures have also been incorporated into non-projective applications. This is to be expected.   Miner Sentence Completion Test (measures managerial motivations). attitude assessment. [edit]Data analysis.. clinical applications. achievement motivation. [edit]References [edit]Uses in marketing . education. validity and reliability The data collected from sentence completion tests can usually be analyzed either quantitatively or qualitatively. including psychology. and measurement of other constructs. and language and cognitive development tests. and marketing. perhaps the most widely used of all sentence completion tests).[edit]Uses The uses of sentence completion tests include personality analysis. because in many cases the sentence stems name or refer to specific objects and the respondent is provides responses specifically focused on such objects. such as intelligence tests. the extent to which measurement items accurately reflect the concept being measured). They are used in several disciplines.[6] [edit]Examples of sentence completion tests There are many sentence completion tests available for use by researchers.[7] Sentence completion tests usually include some formal coding procedure or manual.e. Compared to positivist instruments. such as Likert-type scales. management. language comprehension. Some of the most widely used sentence completion tests include:  Rotter Incomplete Sentence Blank (assesses personality traits. sentence completion tests tend to have high face validity (i.

[citation needed] The technique is featured as part of a travelling exhibition entitled "Psychology: Understanding Ourselves. The application of responses is different in these disciplines than in psychology. Scoring takes a very long time if the test is not administered by computer. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. balance. Scoring is based on twenty-two items: reaction time. In advertising. integration. anxiety. The Holtzman Inkblot Test has been used in both experimental and clinical applications. anatomy. form definiteness. The Holtzman Inkblot Test is used primarily with students. It is housed permanently at theSmithsonian Institution. head trauma or depression. rather than interpreting the meaning of the responses given by a single subject. hostility. shading. space. or abstract). barrier. projective tests are used to evaluate responses to advertisements. are used in qualitative marketing research. in sociology to assess the adoption of innovations. animal. The tests have also been used in management to assess achievement motivation and other drives. originally drawn from a pool of several thousand. conceived by Wayne Holtzman. is a projective personality test similar to the Rorschach test. children. if not all. because the responses of multiple respondents are grouped together for analysis by the organisation commissioning the research. The test consists of two alternate forms of forty-five inkblots. content (human. movement. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. and in anthropology to study cultural meaning. pathognomonicverbalization. sexual. rejection. Understanding Each Other" and sponsored by the American Psychological Association in partnership with the Ontario Science Centre. The Holtzman Inkblot Test was invented to correct many. of the controversial issues aroused by the Rorschach Inkblot Test.[1] Objective tests (Rating scale or self-report measure) . penetration. and with patients suffering from schizophrenia. form appropriateness. for example to help identify potential associations betweenbrand images and the emotions they may provoke. oltzman Inkblot Test From Wikipedia.Projective techniques. the free encyclopedia This article needs additional citations for verification. color. location.(July 2009) The Holtzman Inkblot Test. and popularity. including TATs.

Contents [hide] • o o o o • o o o o • • o 1 History and development 1.g.4 PSY-5 scales 3 Scoring and interpretation 4 Criticism and controversy 4.2 MMPI-2 1.4 MMPI-2 RF 2 Current scale composition 2.[5] Objective personality tests can be designed for use in business for potential employees. The test is used by trained professionals to assist in identifying personality structure and psychopathology.Children (FFPI-C. such as the NEO-PI. has gained acceptance since the early 1990s when some influential meta-analyses (e. the free encyclopedia The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is one of the most frequently used personality tests in mental health. Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III. The Big Five.[6] Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory From Wikipedia.1 Clinical scales 2.3 MMPI-A 1. or Five Factor Model of normal personality. such as allowing for true or false answers or rating using an ordinal scale..).1 MMPI 1. Prominent examples of objective personality tests include the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Barrick & Mount 1991) found consistent relationships between the Big Five personality factors and important criterion variables.[3] Child Behavior Checklist. the 16PF.1 RC and Clinical Scales .3 Content scales 2.[4] and the Beck Depression Inventory.2 Validity scales 2. and the OPQ (Occupational Personality Questionnaire). all of which are based on the Big Fivetaxonomy. Another personality test based upon the Five Factor Model is the Five Factor Personality Inventory .Objective tests have a restricted response format.

2 Lees-Haley "Fake Bad" Scale 6 See also 7 External links [edit]History and development The original authors of the MMPI were Starke R. MD. [edit]MMPI The original MMPI was developed in 1939 (Groth Marnat. [edit]MMPI-2 . The clinician using the MMPI has to pay for materials and for scoring and report services. The tests are mentioned in Thomas Harris' 1988 novel The Silence of the Lambs. the MMPI-2. as well as a charge to install the computerized program.[2][3][4][5][6] The difference between this approach and other test development strategies used around that time was that it was atheoretical (not based on any particular theory) and thus the initial test was not aligned with the prevailing psychodynamic theories of that time. and other subscales of potential interest to clinicians. However. which includes data on the newest and most psychometrically advanced scales—the Restructured Clinical Scales (RC scales).[1] The extended score report also provides scores on the more traditionally used Clinical Scales as well as Content. The computer scoring programs offer a range of scoring profile choices including the extended score report. The atheoretical approach to MMPI development ostensibly enabled the test to capture aspects of human psychopathology that were recognizable and meaningful despite changes in clinical theories.o • • • 5 Notes 4. Computer scoring programs for the current standardized version. and J. The standardized answer sheets can be hand scored with templates that fit over the answer sheets. but most tests are computer scored. by character Clarice Starling. as ones she is familiar with. PhD. Handbook of Psychological Assessment. because the MMPI scales were created based on a group with known psychopathologies. the scales themselves are not atheoretical by way of using the participants' clinical diagnoses to determine the scales' contents. 2009) using an empirical keying approach. are licensed by the University of Minnesota Press to Pearson Assessments and other companies located in different countries. Use of the MMPI is tightly controlled for ethical and financial reasons. McKinley. Hathaway. Supplementary. which means that the clinical scales were derived by selecting items that were endorsed by patients known to have been diagnosed with certain pathologies. C. The MMPI is copyrighted by the University of Minnesota.

The MMPI-2-RF produces scores on a theoretically grounded. hierarchically structured set of scales. and address the use of the scales in a wide range of settings..[9] The MMPI-A has 478 items. which was standardized on a new national sample of adults in the United States and released in 1989. which had been found to contain a general factor that made interpretation of scores on the clinical scales difficult. with a short form of 350 items. The current MMPI-2 has 567 items.g. Publications on the MMPI-2-RC Scales include book chapters. the MMPI-A. illness or time pressure). [edit]MMPI-2 RF A new and psychometrically improved version of the MMPI-2 has recently been developed employing rigorous statistical methods that were used to develop the RC Scales in 2003. but the scores available on the shorter version are not as extensive as those available in the 567-item version.. Scale 3 (formerly known as the Hysteria Scale) : Measures the emotionality of a person. The MMPI-2-RF builds on the foundation of the RC Scales. all trueor-false format. There is an infrequently used abbreviated form of the test that consists of the MMPI-2's first 370 items[8]. The modern methods used to develop the MMPI-2-RF were not available at the time the MMPI was originally developed. Subsequent revisions of certain test elements have been published. The shorter version has been mainly used in circumstances that have not allowed the full version to be completed (e..The first major revision of the MMPI was the MMPI-2. [edit]MMPI-A A version of the test designed for adolescents. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] [edit]Current [edit]Clinical scale composition scales Scale 1 (formerly known as the Hypochondriasis Scale) : Measures a person's perception of their health or actual injuries or health issues. and usually takes between 1 and 2 hours to complete depending on reading level. was released in 1992.[7] It is appropriate for use with adults 18 and over.[10] The new MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) has now been released by Pearson Assessments. multiple published articles in peer-reviewed journals. including the RC Scales.. Scale 5 (formerly known as the Femininity/Masculinity Scale) : Measures a stereotype of a person and how they .[11][12][13][14][15] [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The MMPI-2-RF scales rest on an assumption that psychopathology is a homogenous condition that is additive. Scale 2 (formerly known as the Depression Scale) : Measures a person's discouragement level.. and a wide variety of subscales was also introduced over many years to help clinicians interpret the results of the original clinical scales. Scale 4 (formerly known as the Psychopathic Deviate Scale) : Measures a person's need for control or their rebellion against control. which have been extensively researched since their publication in 2003.

. For men it would be the Marlboro man. Scale 9 (formerly known as the Mania Scale) : Measures a person's psychic energy. tension. scale 0 (formerly known as the Social Introversion Scale) : Measures whether people like to be around other people..compare. obsessiveness 48 8 Sc Schizophrenia Odd thinking and social alienation 78 . respect for society's 50 rules 5 MF Masculinity/Femininity Stereotypical masculine or feminine interests/behaviors 56 6 Pa Paranoia Level of trust. No. sensitivity 40 7 Pt Psychasthenia Worry. Scale 7 (formerly known as the Psychestenia Scale) : Measures whether someone made it into adulthood with or without unresolved issues. doubts. Anxiety.. struggle.. suspiciousness. Scale 8 (formerly known as the Schizophrenia Scale) : Measures a person's ability to have original or unique thoughts and whether they can think outside the box. of Items Number Abbreviation Description What is Measured 1 Hs Hypochondriasis Concern with bodily symptoms 32 2 D Depression Depressive Symptoms 57 3 Hy Hysteria Awareness of problems and vulnerabilities 60 4 Pd Psychopathic Deviate Conflict. anger. While the descriptions of each type were originally used in assessment. The original clinical scales were designed to measure common diagnoses of the era.. for women it would be June Cleaver or Donna Reed. the current practice is to use the numbers only. Scale 6 (formerly known as the Paranoia Scale) : Measures a person's ability to trust.

Fp. [edit]Validity scales The validity scales in the MMPI-2 RF are minor revisions of those contained in the MMPI-2. TRIN). K)).8. Codetypes and interaction of clinical scales can be quite complex and require specialized training to properly interpret. Fb. 48). VRIN. those designed to detect when clients are over reporting or exaggerating the prevalence or severity of psychological symptoms (F. A new addition to the validity scales for the MMPI-2 RF includes an over reporting scale of somatic symptoms scale (Fs).9 Ma Hypomania Level of excitability 46 0 Si Social Introversion People orientation 69 Codetypes are a combination of the one or two highest-scoring clinical scales (ex. . and those designed to detect when test-takers are underreporting or downplaying psychological symptoms (L. which includes three basic types of validity measures: those that were designed to detect nonresponding or inconsistent responding (CNS. FBS). New in version Abbreviation Description Assesses ? 1 "Cannot Say" Questions not answered L 1 Lie Client "faking good" F 1 Infrequency Client "faking bad" (in first half of test) K 1 Defensiveness Denial/Evasiveness Fb 2 Back F Client "faking bad" (in last half of test) VRIN 2 Variable Response Inconsistency answering similar/opposite question pairs inconsistently TRIN 2 True Response Inconsistency answering questions all true/all false .

AAS). developed by Welsh after conducting a factor analysis of the original MMPI item pool.F-K 2 F minus K honesty of test responses/not faking good or bad S 2 Superlative Self-Presentation improving upon K scale. the following are some samples: Abbreviation Description Es Ego Strength Scale OH Over-Controlled Hostility Scale MAC MacAndrews Alcoholism Scale MAC-R MacAndrews Alcoholism Scale Revised Do Dominance Scale . designed to assess the extent to which a client admits to or is prone to abusing substances. Dozens of content scales currently exist. APS. and the A (anxiety) and R (repression) scales. with the more frequently used being the substance abuse scales (MAC-R. "appearing excessively good" Fp 2 F-Psychopathology Frequency of presentation in clinical setting Fs 2 RF Infrequent Somatic Response Overreporting of somatic symptoms [edit]Content scales To supplement these multidimensional scales and to assist in interpreting the frequently seen diffuse elevations due to the general factor (removed in the RC scales)[31][32] were also developed.

Rather.APS Addictions Potential Scale AAS Addictions Acknowledgement Scale SOD Social Discomfort Scale A Anxiety Scale R Repression Scale TPA Type A Scale MDS Marital Distress Scale [edit]PSY-5 scales Unlike the Content and Supplementary scales. scores on the various scales of the MMPI-2 and the MMPI-2-RF are not representative of either percentile rank or how "well" or "poorly" someone has done on the test. Psychoticism (PSYC). Test manufacturers and publishers ask test purchasers to prove they are qualified to purchase the MMPI/MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF and other tests[citation needed]. Disconstraint (DISC) and Aggressiveness (AGGR). making interpretation easier for clinicians. Raw scores on the scales are transformed into a standardized metric known as T-scores (Mean or Average equals 50. The five components were labeled Negative Emotionality (NEGE). the PSY-5 scales were not developed as a reaction to some actual or perceived shortcoming in the MMPI-2 itself.Standard Deviation equals 10). and the PSY-5 scales differ from the 5 factors identified in non-pathological populations in that they were meant to determine the extent to which personality disorders might manifest and be recognizable in clinical populations. [edit]Scoring and interpretation Like many standardized tests.[33] The five factor model of human personality has gained great acceptance in non-pathological populations. but rather as an attempt to connect the instrument with more general trend in personality psychology. . analysis looks at relative elevation of factors compared to the various norm groups studied. Introversion (INTR).

the RC scales have lower interscale correlations and. the RC scales are not saturated with the primary factor (demoralization. unlike the original clinical scales. further. 2) common variance spread across the older clinical scales due to a general factor common to psychopathology is parsed out and contained in a separate scale measuring demoralization (RCdem).[34][35] This claim is not supported by results of research. more pure versions of the original clinical scales because 1) the interscale correlations are greatly reduced and no items are contained in more than one RC scale and.[38] A more basic criticism is that the MMPI-2 RF scales rest on an assumption that psychopathology is a .[edit]Criticism [edit]RC and controversy and Clinical Scales Some questions have been raised about the RC Scales and the forthcoming release of the MMPI-2-RF. which has found the RC scales to be cleaner.[36][37] Critics of the new scales argue that the removal of this common variance makes the RC scales less ecologically valid (less like real life) because real patients tend to present complex patterns of symptoms. Proponents of the RC scales assert that research has adequately addressed those issues with results indicating that the RC scales predict pathology in their designated areas better than their concordant original clinical scales while using significantly fewer items and maintaining equal to higher internal consistency reliability and validity. and are not weaker at identifying the core elements of the original clinical scales. which eliminates the older clinical scales entirely in favor of the more psychometrically appealing RC scales. Critics of the RC scales assert they have deviated too far from the original clinical scales. The replacement of the original Clinical Scales with the RC scales has not been met with universal approval. Individuals in favor of retaining the older Clinical scales have argued that the new RC scales are measuring pathology which is markedly different than that measured by the original clinical scales. Issue 2. finally. are also more transparent and much easier to interpret. October 2006) to provide each side with a forum to voice their opinions regarding the old and new measures. the implication being that previous research done on the clinical scales will no longer be relevant to the interpretation of the RC scales and the burden of proof should be on the RC scales to demonstrate they are clearly superior to the original clinical scales. this issue is addressed by being able to view elevations on other RC scales that are less saturated with the general factor and. therefore. However. contain no interscale item overlap. in contrast to the original clinical scales. and has warranted enough discussion to prompt a special issue of the academic Journal of Personality Assessment (Vol 87. now captured in RCdem) which frequently produced diffuse elevations and made interpretation of results difficult.

The article reports that in 1991 Lees-Haley paid to have an article supportive of his scale published in Psychological Reports. and which have not been subject to the same kind of controversy as the Lees-Haley "fake bad" scale. ” However. which the Wall Street Journal described as "a small Montana-based medical journal. The article quotes Butcher concluding: “ This is great for insurance companies." The scale was introduced in MMPI after a review of the literature.homogenous condition that is additive. Butcher's own study has been criticized on methodological and conceptual grounds. while 21 other studies critical of the test were excluded from the review. These include the F-K scale [39]. In March 2008 a front page article in the Wall Street Journal[42] exposed what it claimed to be the lack of scientific validity of the Lees-Haley "fake bad" scale. most psychodiagnostic conditions such as hysteria. there are several other "fake bad" scales (aside from the standard F and Fb scales. DID are composed of defenses. According to the article. which according to the Lees-Haley "fake bad" scale meant they were malingering. who works mainly for defendants (insurance companies etc. This review was considered flawed by its critics because at least 10 of 19 studies reviewed were done by Lees-Haley or other insurance defense psychologists. two Florida judges barred use of the scale after special hearings on its scientific validity. including the likelihood that his subject pool included many malingerers. Butcher contends that it is unlikely that so many psychiatric patients misled doctors. the Gough Dissimilation index (Ds-r) [40]. contradictory states. and seemingly unrelated signs and symptoms that can not be measured by scales that were made to have high internal consistency. PTSD. which are the original "fake bad" scales) that have been in existence since 1950. that he ignored .) in personal injury cases. and the Wiener-Harmon Subtle and Obvious Scales (S-O) [41]. [edit]Lees-Haley "Fake Bad" Scale The following discussion concerns the Lees-Haley "fake bad" scale. One of the critics of the Lees-Haley "fake bad" scale is retired psychologist James Butcher. who found that more than 45 percent of psychiatric patients he studied had Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale scores of 20 or more. Although symptoms are mainly homogenous. The article reports that this particular "fake bad" scale was developed by psychologist Paul LeesHaley. which is used in courts as argument for malingering in injury litigation. but not great for people.

recommended gender-related cut-offs. [45] The Lees-Haley "fake bad" scale is now regarded by some authors as a 'gold standard' in such populations. an independent professional panel recommended that the Lees-Haley FBS be included in the standard Pearson scoring system. and so psychologists will often administer the test to members of the general population. including specific disorders outlined in the DSM-IV. The MCMI was developed and standardised specifically on clinical populations (i. patients in psychiatric hospitals or people with existing mental health problems). It is composed of 175 true-false questions that reportedly takes 25-30 minutes to complete. [44] Several studies by independent Neuropsychologists have since been published in respected peer-reviewed journals supporting the Lees-Haley FBS scale as highly sensitive and specific (when proper cut-offs are used) in identifying individuals who are exaggerating somatic symptoms (as opposed to psychiatric. and the authors are very specific that it should not be used with the general population. etc.). Roger Davis.' [43] Despite the reservations of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-R authors (including James Butcher) who have a degree of proprietary control over the test. and used a less sensitive or specific MMPI-2 scale as his 'gold-standard. [46] Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory From Wikipedia. and Seth Grossman. as it was designed to do. Carrie Millon. mood. It was created by Theodore Millon. pain clinics. However. The test is modeled on four scales    14 Personality Disorder Scales 10 Clinical Syndrome Scales 5 Correction Scales: 3 Modifying Indices (which determine the patient's response style and can detect random responding). 2 Random Response Indicatiors .e. the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III) The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) is a psychological assessment tool intended to provide information onpsychopathology. It is intended for adults (18 and over) with at least an 8th grade reading level. there is a strong evidence base that shows that it still retains validity on non-clinical populations. or neurological symptoms) in settings where the base-rate of malingering is typically high (litigation.

Conversion to a Base Rate score is relatively complex. They are used to determine a patient's response style. with 60 being the median score. elevated scores on the Disclosure and Desirability scales suggest a "cry for help" response style. The Modifying indices are scored using a complex system in which the patient's responses in the other scales are compared and the raw and BR scores are taken from this. and there are certain corrections that are administered based on each patient's response style. It also is used to measure whether the patient was open in the assessment. [edit]Interpretation The modifying indices consist of 4 scales . such as whether they were keen to present themselves in a positive light (indicated by an elevation on the Desirability scale) or exaggerate the negative aspects of themselves (indicated by the Debasement scale). the Disclosure Scale (X). .the Validity scale (V). 42 Grossman Personality Facet Scales (based on Seth Grossman's theories of personality and psychopathology)[1] The test was normed on a sample of 998 male and female adults with a wide variety of clinical disorders. Contents [hide] • • • • • 1 Scoring system 2 Interpretation 3 See also 4 References 5 External links [edit]Scoring system Patients' raw scores are converted to Base Rate (BR) scores to allow comparison between the personality indices. These are compared against each other to gain an understanding of the patient's response style. For instance. or if they were unwilling to disclose details about themselves (the Disclosure Scale). It is not converted to a BR score. the Desirability Scale (Y) and the Debasement Scale (Z). It consists of three questions. The Base Rate scores are essentially where each score fits on a scale of 1115. and so is scored between 0 and 3. The Validity index is an exception to this.

" While only consisting of 3 questions. The school-age version (CBCL/6-18) is for children aged 6 to 18 years.[1][2] It is a component in the Achenbach System of Emperically Based Assessment. e. For the Personality and Clinical Syndrome scales. and their scores are summed to produce a score for that syndrome. such as "I was on the front cover of several magazines last year. 2 = Very True or Often True. or (for the Clinical Syndromes scales) the presence of a clinical syndrome. or clinical behavior. Acts too young for his/her age. tables are given that determine whether the score represents normal.g. The preschool checklist (CBCL/1½-5) is intended for use with children aged 18 months to 5 years. [edit]See also Child Behavior Checklist From Wikipedia. A total score from all questions is also derived. For each syndrome. Some syndromes are further summed to provide scores for Internalizing and Externalizing problem scales. A raw score above 178 or below 34 is considered to not be an accurate representation of the patient's personality style as they either over. e. usually a parent or teacher. These categorizations are based on quantiles from a normative sample.[citation needed] . the scale is very sensitive to random responding. There are two versions of the checklist. Problems are identified by a respondent who knows the child well. borderline. The Validity Index consists of just three questions in which a response of "True" is extremely unlikely. Similar questions are grouped into a number of syndromes.g. Aggressive behavior. A score of 2 or 3 on this scale would render the test invalid. Scores of 85 or above indicate the persistence of a personality trait or a clinical syndrome. the free encyclopedia The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a widely-used method of identifying problem behavior in children. scores of 75-84 are taken to indicate personality trait. 1 = Somewhat or Sometimes True. problem scale and the total score. Responses are recorded on a Likert scale: 0 = Not True.The Disclosure scale is the only scale in the MCMI-III in which the raw scores are interpreted and in which a particularly low score is clinically relevant. The checklists consists of a number of statements about the child's behavior. The preschool checklist contains 100 questions and the school-age checklist contains 120 questions.or under-disclosed.

Beck Depression Inventory From Wikipedia. the free encyclopedia Psychology History of psychology Branches of psychology Basic science Abnormal · Behavioral neuroscience Cognitive · Developmental Experimental · Evolutionary Mathematical · Neuropsychology Personality · Positive Psychophysics · Social Transpersonal Applied science Clinical · Educational Forensic · Health Industrial and organizational Occupational health School · Sport · Military Lists Outline · Publications Topics · Therapies Portal v•d•e .

Its development marked a shift among health care professionals. In its current version the questionnaire is designed for individuals aged 13 and over.[1] There are three versions of the BDI—the original BDI. Aaron T. weight loss.1 Two-factor approach to depression 4 Impact 5 Limitations 6 See also 7 Notes 8 Further reading 9 External links [edit]Development and history Historically. cognitions such as guilt or feelings of being punished. instead of it being rooted in the patient's own thoughts. by collating patients' verbatim descriptions of their symptoms and using these to structure a scale which could reflect the intensity or severity of a given symptom. Beck. and the BDI-II. created by Dr.[1] . The BDI is widely used as an assessment tool by health care professionals and researchers in a variety of settings. and lack of interest in sex. BDI-II). published in 1996. the BDI was developed in a novel way for its time.[2] By contrast.1 BDI-IA 3 BDI-II 3. as well as physical symptoms such as fatigue. one of the most widely used instruments for measuring the severity ofdepression.The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI. who had until then viewed depression from a psychodynamic perspective. and is composed of items relating to symptoms of depression such as hopelessness and irritability. first published in 1961 and later revised in 1978 as the BDI-1A. Contents [hide] • • o • o • • • • • • 1 Development and history 2 BDI 2. is a 21question multiple-choice self-report inventory. depression was described in psychodynamic terms as "inverted hostility against the self".

because he thinks he may not pass the class.[4] The development of the BDI reflects that in its structure. (1) I feel sad. it was the case that these cognitions caused depression. so he may come to believe he does not enjoy the class. (2) I am sad all the time and I can't snap out of it.  The student has negative thoughts about his future. Each question has a set of at least four possible answer choices. 19–29 indicates moderate-severe depression and 30–63 indicates severe depression. The view of depression as sustained by intrusive negative cognitions has had particular application in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). and the self. "I feel discouraged about the future" to reflect the future. (3) I am so sad or unhappy that I can't stand it. rather than being generated by depression. An example of the triad in action taken from Brown (1995) is the case of a student obtaining poor exam results:  The student has negative thoughts about the world. and "I blame myself for everything bad that happens" to reflect the self. which aims to challenge and neutralize them through techniques such as cognitive restructuring. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. 10–18 indicates mild-moderate depression.[3] In his view. and often intrusive negative thoughts about the self. inaccurate. as he may feel he does not deserve to be in college. with items such as "I have lost all of my interest in other people" to reflect the world. which play a major role in depression. Beck drew attention to the importance of "negative cognitions": sustained. ranging in intensity.Throughout his work. . For example:     (0) I do not feel sad. The standard cut-offs are as follows: 0–9 indicates that a person is not depressed. [edit]BDI The original BDI. a value of 0 to 3 is assigned for each answer and then the total score is compared to a key to determine the depression's severity. consisted of twenty-one questions about how the subject has been feeling in the last week. Beck developed a triad of negative cognitions about the world.  The student has negative thoughts about his self. first published in 1961[5]. When the test is scored. the future.

[8] However. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. thoughts about suicide. the "a and b statements" described above were removed. only the items dealing with feelings of being punished. For instance.71. participants were asked to rate how they have been feeling for the past two weeks.[6][7] The internal consistency for the BDI-IA was good. The test was also shown to have a high one-week test–retest reliability (Pearson r =0.[7] developed in response to the American Psychiatric Association's publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. hypochondria. the BDI-II also contains 21 questions. there are two responses under the Mood heading that score a 2: (2a) I am blue or sad all the time and I can't snap out of it and (2b) I am so sad or unhappy that it is very painful. In this respect.[1] [edit]BDI-IA The BDI-IA was a revision of the original instrument. The cutoffs used differ from the original: 0–13: minimal depression. and respondents were instructed to endorse how they had been feeling during the preceding two weeks. suggesting that it was not overly sensitive to daily variations in mood. Also. 14–19: mild depression. 20–28: moderate depression. developed by Beck during the 1970s and copyrighted in 1978. All but three of the items were reworded. and 29–63: severe depression. with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of around 0. sleep loss and appetite loss items were revised to assess both increases and decreases in sleep and appetite. Items involving changes in body image.85. [edit]BDI-II The BDI-II was a 1996 revision of the BDI. this version retained some flaws.91). and interest in sex remained the same. which changed many of the diagnostic criteria for Major Depressive Disorder. Like the BDI. Finally. each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. showing good agreement. Fourth Edition. the BDI-II is positively correlated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale with aPearson r of 0. and difficulty working were replaced. This and other criticisms were addressed in the BDI-II. One measure of an instrument's usefulness is to see how closely it agrees with another similar instrument that has been validated against clinical interview by a trained clinician.Some items on the BDI have more than one statement marked with the same score. [9] The test also has high internal consistency (α=.93). meaning that the items on the inventory are highly correlated with each other. the BDI-IA only addressed six out of the nine DSMIII criteria for depression. To improve ease of use.[7] [edit]Two-factor approach to depression . as opposed to the past week as in the original BDI.

suicidal thoughts or wishes.g. crying. social expectations might elicit a different response compared to administration via a postal survey. loss of pleasure. self-criticalness. self-dislike. mood) and the physical or "somatic" component (e.[10][11] [edit]Impact The development of the BDI was an important event in psychiatry and psychology. The BDI was originally developed to provide a quantative assessment of the intensity of depression.g. punishment feelings. to one guided by the patient's own thoughts or "cognitions". guilty feelings. in that scores can be easily exaggerated or minimized by the person completing them. change in sleep patterns. rather than of depression.57. irritability. and loss of interest in sex. it can monitor changes over time and provide an objective measure for judging improvement and the effectiveness or otherwise of treatment methods.[15] [edit]Limitations The BDI suffers from the same problems as other self-report inventories. The BDI-II reflects this and can be separated into two subscales. Chinese. loss of appetite).[14] and Xhosa. psychodynamic perspective. in 1998. Like all questionnaires.[12] The instrument remains widely used in research. [17] In an effort to deal with this concern Beck and his colleagues developed the "Beck Depression . it had been used in over 2000 empirical studies. and worthlessness. the way the instrument is administered can have an effect on the final score. suggesting that the physical and psychological aspects of depression are closely related rather than totally distinct. past failures. it represented a shift in health care professionals' view of depression from a Freudian. self-report questionnaires when analysed using techniques such as factor analysis can suggest theoretical constructs. The two subscales were moderately correlated at 0. Because it is designed to reflect the depth of depression. The affective subscale contains eight items: pessimism. for instance. Persian. tiredness and/or fatigue. loss of interest. Japanese.Depression can be thought of as having two components: the affective component (e.[2] It also established the principle that instead of attempting to develop a psychometric tool based on a possibly invalid theory. The somatic subscale consists of the other thirteen items: sadness. If a patient is asked to fill out the form in front of other people in a clinical environment. agitation. loss of energy. indecisiveness. The purpose of the subscales is to help determine the primary cause of a patient's depression.[13] It has been translated into multiple European languages as well as Arabic.[16] In participants with concomitant physical illness the BDI's reliance on physical symptoms such as fatigue may artificially inflate scores due to symptoms of the illness. change in appetite. concentration difficulties.

team building. succession planning and organisational change. The series included the first commercially-available Big Five instrument. OPQ or OPQ32. Lisa Cramp and Bill Mabey. The authors were Saville et al.. The OPQ32 is used in selection. including Roger Holdsworth. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved. development. Gill Nyfield. Unlike the standard BDI. (July 2009) The Occupational Personality Questionnaires. It is now available in more than 30 languages and uses innovative Item Response theory to shorten the questionnaire down to under 30 minutes. in 1984.[1]. the BDI-PC produces only a binary outcome of "not depressed" or "depressed" for patients above a cutoff score of 4. to help employers gauge how a candidate will fit into certain work environments. are widely-used occupational personality questionnaires. and they were launched by Saville and Holdsworth Ltd.An independent review can be found below (4): . how they will work with other people and how they will cope with different job requirements. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. a short screening scale consisting of seven items from the BDI-II considered to be independent of physical function.[18] Although designed as a screening device rather than a diagnostic tool. OPQ32 provides an indication of an individual’s preferred behavioural style at work.Inventory for Primary Care" (BDI-PC). the BDI is sometimes used by health care providers to reach a quick diagnosis. the free encyclopedia This article does not cite any references or sources.[19] OPQ From Wikipedia.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful

Master Your Semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer: Get 4 months of Scribd and The New York Times for just $1.87 per week!

Master Your Semester with a Special Offer from Scribd & The New York Times