131 views

Uploaded by mostafa

- Newton's Law of Cooling & its applications
- General Relativity Lectures
- The Very Nature of the Strong Nuclear Force
- Hestenes' Book
- Special Relativity
- Theory of the Strong Force and the Nuclear Energy
- General Relativity
- Introduction to Dark Matter Experiments
- Special Relativity
- Special Relativity
- doppler
- The Extraterrestrial Casimir Effect
- Special Relativity
- General Relativity in a mathematical nutshell
- Simple Pendulum with a simple derivation of formula
- Doppler Effect
- Theory of the Nuclear Strong Force (presentation)
- Physics Formulary - J. Wevers
- Falsifiability in Particle Physics
- Newtonian Physics - Benjamin Crowell.pdf

You are on page 1of 35

Dr. H. Osborn1

Michælmas 1997

1 A

LT

EXed by Paul Metcalfe – comments and corrections to pdm23@cam.ac.uk.

Revision: 2.5

Date: 1999-06-06 14:10:19+01

Contents

Introduction v

1 Basics 1

1.1 Review of earlier work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1.2 The Dirac Formalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1.2.1 Continuum basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

1.2.2 Action of operators on wavefunctions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

1.2.3 Momentum space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

1.2.4 Commuting operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

1.2.5 Unitary Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

1.2.6 Time dependence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

2.1 Relation to wavefunctions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

2.2 More comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

3 Multiparticle Systems 13

3.1 Combination of physical systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

3.2 Multiparticle Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

3.2.1 Identical particles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

3.2.2 Spinless bosons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

3.2.3 Spin 12 fermions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

3.3 Two particle states and centre of mass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

3.4 Observation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

4 Perturbation Expansions 19

4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

4.2 Non-degenerate perturbation theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

4.3 Degeneracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

5.1.1 Spin 12 particles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

5.1.2 Spin 1 particles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

5.1.3 Electrons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

5.2 Addition of angular momentum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

5.3 The meaning of quantum mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

iii

iv CONTENTS

Introduction

These notes are based on the course “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics” given by

Dr. H. Osborn in Cambridge in the Michælmas Term 1997. Recommended books are

discussed in the bibliography at the back.

Other sets of notes are available for different courses. At the time of typing these

courses were:

Probability Discrete Mathematics

Analysis Further Analysis

Methods Quantum Mechanics

Fluid Dynamics 1 Quadratic Mathematics

Geometry Dynamics of D.E.’s

Foundations of QM Electrodynamics

Methods of Math. Phys Fluid Dynamics 2

Waves (etc.) Statistical Physics

General Relativity Dynamical Systems

Physiological Fluid Dynamics Bifurcations in Nonlinear Convection

Slow Viscous Flows Turbulence and Self-Similarity

Acoustics Non-Newtonian Fluids

Seismic Waves

http://www.istari.ucam.org/maths/ or

http://www.cam.ac.uk/CambUniv/Societies/archim/notes.htm

or you can email soc-archim-notes@lists.cam.ac.uk to get a copy of the

sets you require.

v

Copyright (c) The Archimedeans, Cambridge University.

All rights reserved.

Redistribution and use of these notes in electronic or printed form, with or without

modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:

1. Redistributions of the electronic files must retain the above copyright notice, this

list of conditions and the following disclaimer.

2. Redistributions in printed form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this

list of conditions and the following disclaimer.

3. All materials derived from these notes must display the following acknowledge-

ment:

University and their contributors.

4. Neither the name of The Archimedeans nor the names of their contributors may

be used to endorse or promote products derived from these notes.

5. Neither these notes nor any derived products may be sold on a for-profit basis,

although a fee may be required for the physical act of copying.

6. You must cause any edited versions to carry prominent notices stating that you

edited them and the date of any change.

UTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING,

BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABIL-

ITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO

EVENT SHALL THE ARCHIMEDEANS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR

ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSE-

QUENTIAL DAMAGES HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LI-

ABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUD-

ING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE

OF THESE NOTES, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAM-

AGE.

Chapter 1

Mechanics

physics. Its point of view is completely different from classical physics. Its predictions

are often probabilistic.

We will develop the mathematical formalism and some applications. We will em-

phasize vector spaces (to which wavefunctions belong). These vector spaces are some-

times finite-dimensional, but more often infinite dimensional. The pure mathematical

basis for these is in Hilbert Spaces but (fortunately!) no knowledge of this area is

required for this course.

This is a brief review of the salient points of the 1B Quantum Mechanics course. If

you anything here is unfamiliar it is as well to read up on the 1B Quantum Mechanics

course. This section can be omitted by the brave.

A wavefunction ψ(x) : R3 → C is associated with a single particle in three di-

mensions. ψ represents the state of a physical system for a single particle. If ψ is

normalised, that is

2 2

ψ ≡ d3 x |ψ| = 1

2

then we say that d3 x |ψ| is the probability of finding the particle in the infinitesimal

region d3 x (at x).

Superposition Principle

linear combination a1 ψ1 + a2 ψ2 (a1 , a2 ∈ C). This is obviously the statement that

wavefunctions live in a vector space. If ψ = aψ (with a = 0) then ψ and ψ represent

the same physical state. If ψ and ψ are both normalised then a = eıα . We write

ψ ∼ eıα ψ to show that they represent the same physical state.

1

2 CHAPTER 1. BASICS

(φ, ψ) ≡ d3 x φ∗ ψ ∈ C.

This has various properties which you can investigate at your leisure.

Interpretative Postulate

Given a particle in a state represented by a wavefunction ψ (henceforth “in a state

2

ψ”) then the probability of finding the particle in state φ is P = |(φ, ψ)| and if the

wavefunctions are normalised then 0 ≤ P ≤ 1. P = 1 if ψ ∼ φ.

We wish to define (linear) operators on our vector space — do the obvious thing.

In finite dimensions we can choose a basis and replace an operator with a matrix.

For a complex vector space we can define the Hermitian conjugate of the operator A

to be the operator A† satisfying (φ, Aψ) = (A† φ, ψ). If A = A† then A is Hermitian.

Note that if A is linear then so is A† .

In quantum mechanics dynamical variables (such as energy, momentum or angular

momentum) are represented by (linear) Hermitian operators, the values of the dynam-

ical variables being given by the eigenvalues. For wavefunctions ψ(x), A is usually

a differential operator. For a single particle moving in a potential V (x) we get the

2

Hamiltonian H = − 2m ∇2 + V (x). Operators may have either a continuous or dis-

crete spectrum.

If A is Hermitian then the eigenfunctions corresponding to different eigenvalues

are orthogonal. We assume completeness — that any wavefunction can be expanded

as a linear combination of eigenfunctions.

The expectation value for A in a state with wavefunction ψ is
Aψ , defined to be

2 2

i λi |ai | = (ψ, Aψ). We define the square deviation ∆A to be
(A −
Aψ ) ψ

2

Time dependence

This is governed by the Schrödinger equation

∂ψ

ı = Hψ,

∂t

where H is the Hamiltonian. H must be Hermitian for the consistency of quantum

mechanics:

∂

ı (ψ, ψ) = (ψ, Hψ) − (Hψ, ψ) = 0

∂t

if H is Hermitian. Thus we can impose the condition (ψ, ψ) = 1 for all time (if ψ is

normalisable).

If we consider eigenfunctions ψi of H with eigenvalues Ei we can expand a general

wavefunction as

ıEi

ψ(x, t) = ai e− t ψi (x).

If ψ is normalised then the probability of finding the system with energy Ei is |ai |2 .

1.2. THE DIRAC FORMALISM 3

This is where we take off into the wild blue yonder, or at least a more abstract form of

quantum mechanics than that previously discussed. The essential structure of quantum

mechanics is based on operators acting on vectors in some vector space. A wavefunc-

tion ψ corresponds to some abstract vector |ψ, a ket vector. |ψ represents the state of

some physical system described by the vector space.

If |ψ1 and |ψ2 are ket vectors then |ψ = a1 |ψ1 + a2 |ψ2 is a possible ket vector

describing a state — this is the superposition principle again.

We define a dual space of bra vectors φ| and a scalar product φ|ψ, a complex

number.1 For any |ψ there corresponds a unique ψ| and we require φ|ψ = ψ|φ∗ .

We require the scalar product to be linear such that |ψ = a1 |ψ1 + a2 |ψ2 implies

φ|ψ = a1 φ|ψ1 + a2 φ|ψ2 . We see that ψ|φ = a∗1 ψ1 |φ + a∗2 ψ2 |φ and so

ψ| = a∗1 ψ1 | + a∗2 ψ2 |.

We introduce linear operators Â|ψ = |ψ and we define operators acting on bra

vectors to the left φ|Â = φ | by requiring φ |ψ = φ|Â|ψ for all ψ. In general, in

φ|Â|ψ, Â can act either to the right or the left. We define the adjoint Â† of Â such

that if Â|ψ = |ψ then ψ|Â† = ψ |. Â is said to be Hermitian if Â = Â† .

If Â = a1 Â1 + a2 Â2 then Â† = a∗1 Â†1 + a∗2 Â†2 , which can be seen by appealing to

the definitions. We also find the adjoint of B̂ Â as follows:

Let B̂ Â|ψ = B̂|ψ = |ψ . Then ψ | = ψ |B̂ † = ψ|Â† B̂ † and the result

follows. Also, if ψ|Â = φ | then |φ = Â† |φ.

We have eigenvectors Â|ψ = λ|ψ and it can be seen in the usual manner that the

eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator are real and the eigenvectors corresponding to two

different eigenvalues are orthogonal.

We assume completeness — that is any |φ can be expanded in terms of the basis ket

vectors, |φ = ai |ψi where Â|ψi = λi |ψi and ai = ψi |φ. If |ψ is normalised

— ψ|ψ = 1 — then the expected value of Â is Âψ = ψ|Â|ψ, which is real if Â

is Hermitian.

The completeness relation for eigenvectors of Â can be written as 1̂ = i |ψi ψi |,

which gives (as before)

|ψ = 1̂|ψ = |ψi ψi |ψ.

i

We can also rewrite Â = i |ψi λi
ψi | and if λj = 0 ∀j then we can define

−1

−1

Â = i |ψi λi
ψi |.

We now choose an orthonormal basis {|n} with
n|m = δnm and the complete-

ness relation 1̂ = n |n
n|. We can thus expand |ψ = n an |n with an =
n|ψ.

We now consider a linear operator Â, and then Â|ψ = n an Â|n = m am |m,

with am =
m|Â|ψ = n an
m|Â|n. Further, putting Amn =
m|Â|n we get

am = n Amn an and therefore solving Â|ψ = λ|ψ is equivalent to solving the

equation Aa = λa. Amnis called the matrix representation of Â. We also have

matrix

ψ| = n a∗n
n|, with an ∗ = m a∗m A†mn , where A†mn = A∗nm gives the Hermitian

conjugate matrix. This is the matrix representation of Â† .

4 CHAPTER 1. BASICS

In the above we have assumed discrete eigenvalues λi and normalisable eigenvectors

|ψi . However, in general, in quantum mechanics operators often have continuous

spectrum — for instance the position operator x̂ in 3 dimensions. x̂ must have eigen-

values x for any point x ∈ R3 . There exist eigenvectors |x such that x̂|x = x|x for

any x ∈ R3 .

As x̂ must be Hermitian we have x|x̂ = x x|. We define the vector space required

in the Dirac formalism as that spanned by |x.

For any state |ψ we can define a wavefunction ψ(x) = x|ψ.

We also need to find some normalisation criterion, which uses the 3 dimensional

Dirac delta function to get x|x = δ 3 (x − x ). Completeness gives

d3 x|x x| = 1.

|ψ = 1̂|ψ = d3 x|xψ(x).

cation by x.

Something else reassuring is

ψ|ψ = ψ|1̂|ψ = d3 x ψ|x x|ψ

2

= d3 x |ψ(x)| .

can similarly define states |p which satisfy p̂|p = p|p. We can relate x̂ and p̂ using

the commutator, which for two operators Â and B̂ is defined by

Â, B̂ = ÂB̂ − B̂ Â.

The relationship between x̂ and p̂ is [x̂i , p̂j ] = ıδij . In one dimension [x̂, p̂] = ı.

We have a useful rule for calculating commutators, that is:

Â, B̂ Ĉ = Â, B̂ Ĉ + B̂ Â, Ĉ .

proved simply by expanding the right hand side out. We can use

this to calculate x̂, p̂2 .

x̂, p̂2 = [x̂, p̂] p̂ + p̂ [x̂, p̂]

= 2ıp̂.

We can define an exponential by

∞ n

ıap̂ 1 ıap̂

e− = − .

n=0

n!

1.2. THE DIRAC FORMALISM 5

ıap̂

We can evaluate x̂, e− by

∞

ıap̂

1 ıap̂ n

x̂, e− = x̂, −

n=0

n!

∞ n

1 ıap̂

= x̂, −

n=0

n!

1 ıa n

∞

= − [x̂, p̂n ]

n=0

n!

∞

1 ıa n

= − ıp̂n−1

n=1

(n − 1)!

∞

ıa n−1 n−1

=a − p̂

n=1

ıap̂

= ae−

ıap̂ ıap̂

x̂e− = e− (x̂ + a)

ıap̂

and it follows that e− |x is an eigenvalue of x̂ with eigenvalue x + a. Thus we

ıap̂

see e− |x = |x + a. We can do the same to the bra vectors with the Hermi-

ıap̂ ıap̂

tian conjugate e to get x + a| = x|e . Then we also have the normalisation

x + a|x + a = x |x.

ıap̂ ıap

We now wish to consider x + a|p = x|e |p = e x|p. Setting x = 0 gives

ıap

a|p = e N , where N = 0|p is independent of x. We can determine N from the

normalisation of |p.

δ(p − p) =
p |p = da
p |a
a|p

ıa(p−p )

2

= |N | da e

= |N | 2π δ(p − p)

2

12

So, because we are free to choose the phase of N , we can set N = 1

2π and

1 12 ıxp

thus
x|p = 2π e . We could define |p by

12

1 ıxp

|p = dx |x
x|p = dx |xe ,

2π

We recall the definition of the wavefunction ψ as ψ(x) = x|ψ. We wish to see what

operators (the position and momentum operators discussed) do to wavefunctions.

6 CHAPTER 1. BASICS

by multiplication. As for the momentum operator,

x|p̂|ψ = dp
x|p̂|p
p|ψ

= dp p
x|p
p|ψ

12

1 ıxp

= dp pe
p|ψ

2π

d

= −ı dp
x|p
p|ψ

dx

d d

= −ı
x|ψ = −ı ψ(x).

dx dx

The commutation relation [x̂, p̂] = ı corresponds to x, −ı dx

d

= ı (acting on

ψ(x)).

|x → ψ(x) = x|ψ defines a particular representation of the vector space. It is

sometimes useful to use a momentum representation, ψ̃(p) = p|ψ. We observe that

ψ̃(p) = dx p|x x|ψ

12

1 ıxp

= dx e− ψ(x).

2π

see that p|p̂|ψ = pψ̃(p) and p|x̂|ψ = ı dp

d

ψ̃(p).

We convert the Schrödinger equation into momentum space. We have the operator

p̂2

equation Ĥ = 2m + V (x̂) and we just need to calculate how the potential operates on

the wavefunction.

p|V (x̂)|ψ = dx
p|V (x̂)|x
x|ψ

12

1 ıxp

= dx e− V (x)
x|ψ

2π

1 ıx(p −p)

= dx dp V (x)ψ̃(p )e

2π

= dp Ṽ (p − p )ψ̃(p ),

ıxp

where Ṽ (p) = 1

2π dx e− V (x). Thus in momentum space,

p2

Hp ψ̃(p) = ψ̃(p) + dp Ṽ (p − p )ψ̃(p ).

2m

1.2. THE DIRAC FORMALISM 7

Suppose Â and B̂ are Hermitian and Â, B̂ = 0. Then Â and B̂ have simultaneous

eigenvectors.

Proof. Suppose Â|ψ = λ|ψ and the vector subspace Vλ is the span of the eigenvec-

tors of Â with eigenvalue λ. (If dim Vλ > 1 then λ is said to be degenerate.)

As Â and B̂ commute we know that λB̂|ψ = ÂB̂|ψ and so B̂|ψ ∈ Vλ . If λ is

non-degenerate then B̂|ψ = µ|ψ for some µ. Otherwise we have that B̂ : Vλ → Vλ

and we can therefore find eigenvectors of B̂ which lie entirely inside Vλ . We can label

these as |λ, µ, and we know that

Â|λ, µ = λ|λ, µ

B̂|λ, µ = µ|λ, µ.

These may still be degenerate. However we can in principle remove this degener-

acy by adding more commuting operators until each state is uniquely labeled by the

eigenvalues of each common eigenvector. This set of operators is called a complete

commuting set.

This isn’t so odd: for a single particle in 3 dimensions we have the operators x̂1 , x̂2

and x̂3 . These all commute, so for a single particle with no other degrees of freedom

we can label states uniquely by |x. We also note from this example that a complete

commuting set is not unique, we might just as easily have taken the momentum opera-

tors and labeled states by |p. To ram the point in more, we could also have taken some

weird combination like x̂1 , x̂2 and p̂3 .

For our single particle in 3 dimensions, a natural set of commuting operators in-

volves the angular momentum operator, L̂ = x̂ ∧ p̂, or L̂i = ijk x̂j p̂k .

We can find commutation relations between L̂i and the other operators we know.

These are summarised here, proof is straightforward.

• L̂i , x̂l = ıilj x̂j

• L̂i , x̂2 = 0

• L̂i , p̂m = ıimk p̂k

• L̂i , p̂2 = 0

• L̂i , L̂j = ıijk L̂k

• L̂i , L̂2 = 0

p̂2

If we have a Hamiltonian Ĥ = 2m + V (|x̂|) then we can also see that L̂, Ĥ = 0.

We choose as a commuting set Ĥ, L̂2 and L̂3 and label states |E, l, m, where the

eigenvalue of L̂2 is l(l + 1) and the eigenvalue of L̂3 is m.

8 CHAPTER 1. BASICS

An operator Û is said to be unitary if Û † Û = 1̂, or equivalently Û −1 = Û † .

Suppose Û is unitary and Û |ψ = |ψ , Û |φ = |φ . Then φ | = φ|Û † and

φ |ψ = φ|ψ. Thus the scalar product, which is the probability amplitude of finding

the state |φ given the state |ψ, is invariant under unitary transformations of states.

For any operator Â we can define Â = Û ÂÛ † . Then φ |Â |ψ = φ|Â|ψ and

matrix elements are unchanged under unitary transformations. We also note that if

Ĉ = ÂB̂ then Ĉ = Â B̂ .

The quantum mechanics for the |ψ, |φ, Â, B̂ etc. is the same as for |ψ , |φ , Â ,

B̂ and so on. A unitary transform in quantum mechanics is analogous to a canonical

transformation in dynamics.

†

Note that if Ô is Hermitian then Û = eıÔ is unitary, as Û † = e−ıÔ = e−ıÔ .

This is governed by the Schrödinger equation,

∂

ı |ψ(t) = Ĥ|ψ(t).

∂t

solution of this if Ĥ does not depend explicitly on t. We set |ψ(t) = Û(t)|ψ(0),

ıĤt

where Û (t) = e− . As Û (t) is unitary, φ(t)|ψ(t) = φ(0)|ψ(0).

If we measure the expectation of Â at time t we get ψ(t)|Â|ψ(t) = a(t). This

description is called the Schrödinger picture. Alternatively we can absorb the time de-

pendence into the operator Â to get the Heisenberg picture, a(t) = ψ|Û † (t)ÂÛ(t)|ψ.

We write ÂH (t) = Û † (t)ÂÛ(t). In this description the operators are time dependent

(as opposed to the states). ÂH (t) is the Heisenberg picture time dependent operator.

Its evolution is governed by

∂

ı ÂH (t) = ÂH (t), Ĥ ,

∂t

which is easily proven.

For a Hamiltonian Ĥ = 2m p̂(t)

1 2

+ V (x̂(t)) we can get the Heisenberg equations

for the operators x̂H and p̂H

d 1

x̂H (t) = p̂H (t)

dt m

d

p̂H (t) = −V (x̂H (t)).

dt

These ought to remind you of something.

Chapter 2

In quantum mechanics there are two basic solvable systems, the harmonic oscillator

and the hydrogen atom. We will examine the quantum harmonic oscillator using al-

gebraic methods. In quantum mechanics the harmonic oscillator is governed by the

Hamiltonian

1 2 1

Ĥ = p̂ + 2 mω 2 x̂2 ,

2m

with the condition that [x̂, p̂] = ı. We wish to solve Ĥ|ψ = E|ψ to find the energy

eigenvalues.

We define a new operator â.

mω 12 ıp̂

â = x̂ +

2 mω

mω 12 ıp̂

â† = x̂ − .

2 mω

and creation operators. We can

easily obtain the commutation relation â, â† = 1̂. It is easy to show that, in terms

†

of the annihilation and creation operators, the Hamiltonian

Ĥ = 12 ω

ââ + â† â ,

which reduces to ω â† â + 12 . Let N̂ = â† â. Then â, N̂ = â and â† , N̂ = −â† .

Therefore N̂ â = â N̂ − 1 and N̂ â† = â† N̂ + 1 .

Suppose |ψ is an eigenvector of N̂ with eigenvalue λ. Then the commutation rela-

tions give that N̂ â|ψ = (λ − 1) â|ψ and therefore unless â|ψ = 0 it is an eigenvalue

of N̂ with eigenvalue λ − 1. Similarly N̂ â† |ψ = (λ + 1) â† |ψ.

But for any |ψ, ψ|N̂ |ψ ≥ 0 and equals 0 iff â|ψ = 0. Now suppose we have an

eigenvalue of Ĥ, λ ∈ / {0, 1, 2, . . . }. Then ∃n such that ân |ψ is an eigenvector of N̂

with eigenvalue λ − n < 0 and so we must haveλ ∈ {0, 1, 2, . . . }. Returning to the

Hamiltonian we get energy eigenvalues En = ω n + 12 , the same result as using the

Schrödinger equation for wavefunctions, but with much less effort.

We define |n = Cn â†n |0, where Cn is such as to make n|n = 1. We can take

Cn ∈ R, and evaluate 0|ân â†n |0 to find Cn .

9

10 CHAPTER 2. THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR

1 =
n|n

= Cn2
0|ân â†n |0

= Cn2
0|ân−1 ââ† â†n−1 |0

Cn2

=
n − 1|ââ† |n − 1

Cn−1

2

Cn2

=
n − 1|N̂ + 1|n − 1

Cn−1

2

Cn2

= (n − 1 + 1)
n − 1|n − 1

Cn−1

2

Cn2

=n .

Cn−1

2

Cn−1 − 12

We thus require Cn = √

n

and as C0 = 1 we get Cn = (n!) and so we have

the normalised eigenstate (of N̂ ) |n = √1n! â†n |0 (with eigenvalue n). |n is also an

eigenvector of Ĥ with eigenvalue ω n + 12 . The space of states for the harmonic

oscillator is spanned by {|n}.

We also need to ask if there exists a non-zero state |ψ such that â† |ψ = 0. Then

We evaluate

mω 12 d

0 = x|â|0 = x+ x|0

2 mω dx

d mω

+ x ψ0 (x) = 0.

dx

1 mω 2

This (obviously) has solution ψ0 (x) = N e− 2 x for some normalisation con-

stant N . This is the ground state wavefunction which has energy 12 ω.

For ψ1 (x) = x|1 = x|â† |0 we find

mω 12

ı

ψ1 (x) = x|x̂ − mω p̂|0

2

mω 12 d

= x− ψ0 (x)

2 mω dx

1

2mω 2

= xψ0 (x).

2.2. MORE COMMENTS 11

Many harmonic oscillator problems are simplified using the creation and annihilation

operators.1 It is useful to summarise the action of the annihilation and creation opera-

tors on the basis states:

√ √

â† |n = n + 1|n + 1 and â|n = n|n − 1.

For example

12

m|x̂|n =
m|â + â† |n

2mω

12

√ √

= n
m|n − 1 + n + 1
m|n + 1

2mω

12

√ √

= n δm,n−1 + n + 1 δm,n+1 .

2mω

This is non-zero only if m = n ± 1. We note that x̂r contains terms âs â†r−s , where

0 ≤ s ≤ r and so
m|x̂r |n can be non-zero only if n − r ≤ m ≤ n + r.

Ĥt Ĥt

It is easy to see that in the Heisenberg picture âH (t) = eı âe−ı = e−ıωt â.

Then using the equations for x̂H (t) and p̂H (t), we see that

1

Also, Ĥâ†H (t) = â†H (t)(Ĥ + ω), so if |ψ is an energy eigenstate with eigenvalue

E then â†H (t)|ψ is an energy eigenstate with eigenvalue E + ω.

1 And such problems always occur in Tripos papers. You have been warned.

12 CHAPTER 2. THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR

Chapter 3

Multiparticle Systems

In quantum mechanics each physical system has its own vector space of physical states

and operators, which if Hermitian represent observed quantities.

If we consider two vector spaces V1 and V2 with bases {|r1 } and {|s2 } with

r = 1 . . . dim V1 and s = 1 . . . dim V2 . We define the tensor product V1 ⊗ V2 as the

vector space spanned by pairs of vectors

We see that dim(V1 ⊗ V2 ) = dim V1 dim V2 . We also write the basis vectors of

V1 ⊗V2 as |r, s. We can define a scalar product on V1 ⊗V2 in terms of the basis vectors:

r , s |r, s =
r |r1
s |s2 . We can see that if {|r1 } and {|s2 } are orthonormal

bases for their respective vector spaces then {|r, s} is an orthonormal basis for V1 ⊗V2 .

Suppose Â1 is an operator on V1 and B̂2 is an operator on V2 we can define an

operator Â1 × B̂2 on V1 ⊗ V2 by its operation on the basis vectors:

Â1 × B̂2 |r1 |s2 = Â1 |r1 B̂2 |s2 .

We illustrate these comments by example. Suppose

p̂2i

Ĥi = + 1 mω x̂2i i = 1, 2.

2m 2

We have two independent vector spaces Vi with bases |ni where n = 0, 1, . . . and

âi and â†i are creation and annihilation operators on Vi , and

Ĥi |ni = ω n + 12 |ni .

we form the tensor product V1 ⊗ V2 with basis |n1 , n2

and Hamiltonian Ĥ = i Ĥi , so Ĥ|n1 , n2 = ω (n1 + n2 + 1) |n1 , n2 . There are

N + 1 ket vectors in the N th excited state.

13

14 CHAPTER 3. MULTIPARTICLE SYSTEMS

The three dimensional harmonic oscillator follows similarly. In general if Ĥ1 and

Ĥ2 are two independent Hamiltonians which act on V1 and V2 respectively then the

Hamiltonian for the combined system is Ĥ = Ĥ1 + Ĥ2 acting on V1 ⊗ V2 . If {|ψr }

and {|ψs } are eigenbases for V1 and V2 with energy eigenvalues {Er1 } and {Es2 }

respectively then the basis vectors {|Ψr,s } for V1 ⊗ V2 have energies Er,s = Er1 + Es2 .

We have considered single particle systems with states |ψ and wavefunctions ψ(x) =

x|ψ. The states belong to a space H.

Consider an N particle system. We say the states belong to Hn = H1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ HN

and define a basis of states |ψr1 1 |ψr2 2 . . . |ψrN N where {|ψri i } is a basis for Hi .

A general state |Ψ is a linear combination of basis vectors and we can define the

N particle wavefunction as Ψ(x1 , x2 , . . . , xN ) = x1 , x2 , . . . , xN |Ψ.

The normalisation condition is

2

Ψ|Ψ = d3 x1 . . . d3 xN |Ψ(x1 , x2 , . . . , xN )| = 1 if normalised.

2

We can interpret d3 x1 . . . d3 xN |Ψ(x1 , x2 , . . . , xN )| as the probability density

that particle i is in the volume element d3 xi at xi . We can obtain the probability

density for one particle by integrating out all the other xj ’s.

∂

For time evolution we get the equation ı ∂t |Ψ = Ĥ|Ψ, where Ĥ is an operator

N

on H .

If the particles do not interact then

N

Ĥ = Ĥi

i=1

where Ĥi acts on Hi but leaves Hj alone for j = i. We have energy eigenstates in each

Hi such that Ĥi |ψr i = Er |ψr i and so |Ψ = |ψr1 1 |ψr2 2 . . . |ψrN N is an energy

eigenstate with energy Er1 + · · · + ErN .

There are many such cases, for instance multielectron atoms. We will concentrate on

two identical particles.

“Identical” means that physical quantities are be invariant under interchange of

particles. For instance if we have Ĥ = H(x̂1 , p̂1 , x̂2 , p̂2 ) then this must equal the

permuted Hamiltonian H(x̂2 , p̂2 , x̂1 , p̂1 ) if we have identical particles. We introduce

Û such that

Û p̂1 Û −1 = p̂2 Û p̂2 Û −1 = p̂1 .

particle 1 then Û Â1 Û −1 is the corresponding operator on particle 2 (and vice versa).

3.2. MULTIPARTICLE SYSTEMS 15

require Û to be unitary, which implies that Û is Hermitian.

In quantum mechanics we require |Ψ and Û |Ψ to be the same states (for identical

particles). This implies that Û |Ψ = λ|Ψ and the requirement Û 2 = 1̂ gives that

λ = ±1. In terms of wavefunctions this means that Ψ(x̂1 , x̂2 ) = ±Ψ(x̂2 , x̂1 ). If we

have a plus sign then the particles are bosons (which have integral spin) and if a minus

sign then the particles are fermions (which have spin 12 , 32 , . . . ).1

The generalisation to N identical particles is reasonably obvious. Let Ûij inter-

change particles i and j. Then Ûij Ĥ Ûij−1 = Ĥ for all pairs (i, j).

The same physical requirement as before gives us that Ûij |Ψ = ±|Ψ for all pairs

(i, j).

If we have bosons (plus sign) then in terms of wavefunctions we must have

permutation.

Remark for pure mathematicians. 1 and {±1} are the two possible representations

of the permutation group in one dimension.

(Which means that the only variables for a single particle are x̂ and p̂.) Suppose

we have two identical non-interacting bosons. Then Ĥ = Ĥi + Ĥ2 and we have

Ĥ1 |ψr i = Er |ψr i . The general space with two particles is H1 ⊗ H2 which has

a basis {|ψr 1 |ψs 2 }, but as the particles are identical the two particle state space is

(H1 ⊗ H2 )S where we restrict to symmetric combinations of the basis vectors. That

is, a basis for this in terms of the bases of H1 and H2 is

|ψr 1 |ψr 2 ; √12 (|ψr 1 |ψs 2 + |ψs 1 |ψr 2 ) , r = s .

2

(ψr (x1 )ψs (x2 ) + ψs (x1 )ψr (x2 ))

1

and the corresponding eigenvalues are 2Er and Er +Es . The factor of 2− 2 just ensures

normalisation and

2

For N spinless bosons with Ĥ = Ĥi we get

√1

N!

(|ψr1 1 . . . |ψrN N + permutations thereof) if ri = rj

1 Spin will be studied later in the course.

16 CHAPTER 3. MULTIPARTICLE SYSTEMS

1

3.2.3 Spin 2

fermions

In this case (which covers electrons, for example) a single particle state (or wavefunc-

tion) depends on an additional discrete variable s. The wavefunctions are ψ(x, s) or

ψs (x). The space of states for a single electron H = L2 (R3 ) ⊗ C2 has a basis of the

form |x|s ≡ |x, s and the wavefunctions can be written ψs (x) =
x, s|ψ. A basis

of wavefunctions is {ψrλ (x, s) = ψr (x)χλ (s)}, where r and λ are labels for the basis.

λ takes two values and it will later be seen to be natural

to take λ = ± 21 .

χλ (1)

We can also think of the vector χλ = , in which case two possible basis

χλ (2)

1 0

vectors are and . Note that χ†λ χλ = δλλ .

0 1

The scalar product is defined in the obvious way:
φr λ |φrλ =
ψr |ψr
χλ |χλ ,

which equals δrr δλλ if the initial basis states are orthonormal.

The two electron wavefunction is Ψ(x1 , s1 ; x2 , s2 ) and under the particle exchange

operator Û we must have Ψ(x1 , s1 ; x2 , s2 ) → −Ψ(x2 , s2 ; x1 , s1 ). The two particle

states belong to the antisymmetric combination (H1 ⊗ H2 )A .

For N electrons the obvious thing can be done.

There is only one antisymmetric basis state

1

χA (s1 , s2 ) = √ χ 1 (s1 )χ− 1 (s2 ) − χ− 1 (s1 )χ 1 (s2 ). ,

2 2 2 2 2

χ 1 (s )χ 1 (s )

2 1 2 2

χS (s1 , s2 ) = √12 χ 1 (s1 )χ− 1 (s2 ) + χ− 1 (s1 )χ 1 (s2 ). s1 = s2

2 2 2 2

χ (s )χ (s ).

− 12 1 − 12 2

We can now examine two non-interacting electrons, with Ĥ = Ĥ1 + Ĥ2 and take

Hi independent of spin. The single particle states are |ψi |χs .

The two electron states live in (H1 ⊗ H2 )A , which has a basis

1

√ (|ψr 1 |ψs 2 + |ψs 1 |ψr 2 ) |χA ; r = s

2

1

√ (|ψr 1 |ψs 2 − |ψs 1 |ψr 2 ) |χS ; r = s,

2

with energy levels 2Er (one spin state) and Er + Es (one antisymmetric spin state

and three symmetric spin states).

We thus obtain the Pauli exclusion principle: no two electrons can occupy the same

state (taking account of spin).

As an example we can take the helium atom with Hamiltonian

Ĥ = + 2 − − + .

2m 2m 4π0 |x̂1 | 4π0 |x̂2 | 4π0 |x̂1 − x̂2 |

3.3. TWO PARTICLE STATES AND CENTRE OF MASS 17

If we neglect the interaction term we can analyse this as two hydrogen atoms and

glue the results back together as above. The hydrogen atom (with a nuclear charge 2e)

−2e2

has En = 8π 0n

2 , so we get a ground state for the helium atom with energy 2E1 with

no degeneracy and a first excited state with energy E1 + E2 with a degeneracy of four.

Hopefully these bear some relation to the results obtained by taking the interaction into

account.

p̂2 p̂2

Suppose we have a Hamiltonian Ĥ = 2m1 + 2m2 + V (x̂1 − x̂2 ) defined on H2 . We can

separate out the centre of mass motion by letting

1

P̂ = p̂1 + p̂2 p̂ = (p̂1 − p̂2 )

2

1

X̂ = (x̂1 + x̂2 ) x̂ = x̂1 − x̂2 .

2

Then X̂i , P̂j = ıδij , [x̂i , p̂j ] = ıδij and X̂, P̂ and x̂, p̂ commute respectively.

2 2

We can rewrite the Hamiltonian as Ĥ = 2M P̂

+ ĥ, ĥ = p̂m + V (x̂), where M = 2m and

we can decompose H2 into HCM ⊗ Hint . HCM is acted on by X̂ and P̂ and has wave-

functions φ(X). Hint is acted on by x̂, p̂ and any spin operators. It has wavefunctions

ψ(x, s1 , s2 ). We take wavefunctions Ψ(x1 , s1 ; x2 , s2 ) = Φ(X)ψ(x, s1 , s2 ) in H2 .

ıP.X

This simplifies the Schrödinger equation, we can just have φ(X) = e and then

P2

E = 2M + Eint . We thus need only to solve the one particle equation ĥψ = Eint ψ.

Under the particle exchange operator Û we have

with a plus sign for bosons and a minus sign for fermions. In the spinless case then

ψ(x) = ψ(−x).

If we have a potential V (|x̂|) then we may separate variables to get

x

ψ(x, s1 , s2 ) = Yl R(|x|)χ(s1 , s2 )

|x|

x x

with Yl − |x| = (−1)l Yl |x| . For spinless bosons we therefore require l to be even.

3.4 Observation

Consider the tensor product of two systems H1 and H2 . A general state |Ψ in H1 ⊗H2

can be written as

|Ψ = aij |ψi 1 |φj 2

i,j

with |ψi 1 ∈ H1 and |φj 2 ∈ H2 assumed orthonormal bases for their respective vector

spaces.

18 CHAPTER 3. MULTIPARTICLE SYSTEMS

Suppose we make a measurement on the first system leaving the second system

unchanged, and find the first system in a state |ψi 1 . Then 1
ψi |Ψ = j aij |φj 2 ,

which we write as Ai |φ2 , where |φ2 is a normalised state of the second system. We

2

interpret |Ai | as the probability of finding system 1 in state |ψi 1 . After measurement

system 2 is in a state |φ2 .

If aij = λi δij (no summation) then Ai = λi and measurement of system 1 as |ψi 1

determines system 2 to be in state |φi 2 .

Chapter 4

Perturbation Expansions

4.1 Introduction

Most problems in quantum mechanics are not exactly solvable and it it necessary to

find approximate answers to them. The simplest method is a perturbation expansion.

We write Ĥ = Ĥ0 + Ĥ where Ĥ0 describes a solvable system with known eigenvalues

and eigenvectors, and Ĥ is in some sense small.

We write Ĥ(λ) = Ĥ0 + λĤ and expand the eigenvalues and eigenvectors in

powers of λ. Finally we set λ = 1 to get the result. Note that we do not necessarily

have to introduce λ; the problem may have some small parameter which we can use.

This theory can be applied to the time dependent problem but here we will only discuss

the time independent Schrödinger equation.

Suppose that Ĥ0 |n = n |n for n = 0, 1, . . . . We thus assume discrete energy levels

and we assume further that the energy levels are non-degenerate. We also require Ĥ

to be sufficiently non-singular to make a power series expansion possible.

We have the equation Ĥ(λ)|ψn (λ) = En (λ)|ψn (λ). We suppose that En (λ)

tends to n as λ → 0 and |ψn (λ) → |n as λ → 0. We pose the power series

expansions

|ψn (λ) = N |n + λ|ψn(1) + . . . ,

substitute into the Schrödinger equation and require it to be satisfied at each power

of λ. The normalisation constant N is easily seen to be 1 + O(λ2 ). The O(1) equation

is automatically satisfied and the O(λ) equation is

(1) (1)

Note that we can always replace |ψn with |ψn + α|n and leave this equation

(1)

unchanged. We can therefore impose the condition
n|ψn = 0. If we apply
n| to

19

20 CHAPTER 4. PERTURBATION EXPANSIONS

this equation we get En =
n|Ĥ |n — the first order perturbation in energy. If we

(1)

r|Ĥ |n

r|ψn(1) = −

r − n

and therefore

|r
r|Ĥ |n

|ψn(1) = − .

r − n

r=n

Note that we are justified in these divisions as we have assumed that the eigenvalues

are non-degenerate. On doing the same thing to the O(λ2 ) equation we see that

2

r|Ĥ |n

=− .

r − n

r=n

0.

Using these results we can see that dλd

En (λ) = ψn (λ)|Ĥ |ψn (λ) and

∂ 1

|ψn (λ) = − |ψr (λ)
ψr (λ)|Ĥ |ψn (λ).

∂λ Er (λ) − En (λ)

r=n

∂ Ĥ

Also ∂λ = Ĥ and so

∂2 ∂

En (λ) = 2
ψn (λ)|Ĥ |ψn (λ).

∂λ2 ∂λ

2

p̂

Consider Ĥ = 2m + 12 mω 2 x̂2 + λmω 2 x̂2 , which can be viewed as Ĥ0 + Ĥ , where

Ĥ0 is the plain vanilla quantum harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian.

Calculating the matrix elements r|x̂2 |n required is an extended exercise in ma-

nipulations of the annihilation and creation operators and is omitted. The results are

En(1) = ω n + 12

1 1

En(2) = − ω n + .

2 2

2

En = ω n + 12 1 + λ − λ2 + O(λ3 ) .

√

This system can also be solved exactly to give En = ω n + 12 1 + 2λ which

agrees with the perturbation expansion.

4.3. DEGENERACY 21

4.3 Degeneracy

The method given here breaks down if r = n for r = n. Perturbation theory can be

extended to the degenerate case, but we will consider only the first order shift in r .

We suppose that the states |n, s, s = 1 . . . Nn have the same energy n . Nn is the

degeneracy of this energy level.

As before we pose a Hamiltonian Ĥ = Ĥ0 + λĤ such that Ĥ0 |n, s = n |n, s

and look for states |ψ(λ) with energy E(λ) → n as λ → 0.

The difference with the previous method is that we expand |ψ(λ) as a power series

in λ in the basis of eigenvectors of Ĥ0 . That is

|ψ(λ) = |n, sas + λ|ψ (1) .

s

As the as are arbitrary we can impose the conditions
n, s|ψ (1) = 0 for each s and

n. We thus have to solve Ĥ|ψ(λ) = E(λ)|ψ(λ) with E(λ) = n + λE (1) . If we take

the O(λ) equation and apply
n, r| to it we get

as
n, r|Ĥ |n, s = ar En(1)

s

which is a matrix eigenvalue problem. Thus the first order perturbations in n are

the eigenvalues of the matrix
n, r|Ĥ |n, s. If all the eigenvalues are distinct then

the perturbation “lifts the degeneracy”. It is convenient for the purpose of calculation

to choose a basis for the space spanned by the degenerate eigenvectors in which this

matrix is “as diagonal as possible”.1

1 Don’t ask...

22 CHAPTER 4. PERTURBATION EXPANSIONS

Chapter 5

momentum

For a particle with position and momentum operators x̂ and p̂ with the commutation

relations [x̂i , pˆj ] =

ıδij we define L̂ = x̂ ∧ p̂. It can be seen that L̂ is Hermitian and

it is easy to show L̂i , L̂j = ıijk L̂k .

5.1 Introduction

We want to find out if there are other Hermitian operators J which satisfy this com-

mutation relation.1 We ask on what space of states can this algebra of operators be

realised, or alternatively, what are the representations?

We want

[Ji , Jj ] = ıijk Jk .

We will choose one component of J whose eigenvalues

label the states. In accor-

dance with convention we choose J3 . Note that J2 , J3 = 0, so we can simultaneously

diagonalise J2 and J3 . Denote the normalised eigenbasis by |λ µ, so that

We know that λ ≥ 0 since J2 is the sum of the squares of Hermitian operators.

†

Now define J± = J1 ± ıJ2 . These are not Hermitian, but J+ = J− .

It will be useful to note that

[J± , J3 ] = ±J±

[J+ , J− ] = 2J3

J2 = 1

2 (J+ J− + J− J+ ) + J32

= J+ J− − J3 + J32

= J− J+ + J3 + J32 .

1 The ~ is taken outside - you can put it back in if you want, it is inessential but may or may not appear in

exam questions. Since we are now grown up we will omit the hats if they do not add to clarity.

23

24 CHAPTER 5. GENERAL THEORY OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM

Using the [J± , J3 ] relation we have J3 J± = J± J3 ± J3 , so that

J3 J± |λ µ = (µ ± 1) J± |λ µ

can see that J± |λ µ is an eigenstate of J2 with eigenvalue λ.

Now evaluate the norm of J± |λ µ, which is

λ µ|J∓ J± |λ µ = λ − µ2 ∓ µ ≥ 0.

We can now define states |λ (µ ± n) for n = 0, 1, 2, . . . . We can pin them down

more by noting that λ − µ2 ∓ 2µ ≥ 0 for positive norms. However the formulae we

have are, given λ, negative for sufficiently large |µ| and so to avoid this we must have

µmax = j such that J+ |j = 0: hence λ − j 2 − j = 0 and so λ = j(j + 1).

We can perform a similar trick with J− ; there must exist µmin = −j such that

J− | − j = 0: thus λ = j (j + 1). So j = j and as −j = −j = j − n for some

n ∈ {0, 1, 2, . . . } we have j = 0, 12 , 1, 32 , . . . .

In summary the states can be labelled by |j m such that

J2 |j m = j(j + 1)|j m

J3 |j m = m|j m

1

J± |j m = ((j ∓ m) (j ± m + 1)) 2 |j m ± 1

states with different m for the same j. |j m is the standard basis of the angular

momentum states.

We have obtained a representation of the algebra labelled by j. If J = L = x̂ ∧ p̂

we must have j an integer.

Â we can define a matrix Aλ λ by Â|λ = λ |λ Aλ λ .

Recall that if we have

Note that (BA)λ λ =

µ Bλ µ Aµλ . Given j, we have (J3 )m m = m δm m and

(J± )m m = (j ∓ m) (j ± m + 1) δm ,m±1 , giving us (2j + 1) × (2j + 1) matrices

satisfying the three commutation relations [J3 , J± ] = ±J± and [J+ , J− ] = 2J3 .

If J are angular momentum operators which act on a vector space V and we have

|ψ ∈ V such that J3 |ψ = k|ψ and J+ |ψ = 0 then ψ is a state with angular

n

momentum j = k. The other states are given by J− |ψ, 1 ≤ n ≤ 2k. The conditions

also give J |ψ = k (k + 1) |ψ

2

1

5.1.1 Spin 2

particles

This is the simplest non-trivial case. We have j = 12 and a two dimensional state space

with a basis | 12 12 and | 12 − 12 . We have the relations J3 | 12 ± 12 = ± 21 | 12 ± 12 and

J+ | 12 2

1

=0 J− | 12 2

1

= | 12 − 12

J+ | 12 − 2

1

= | 12 2

1

J− | 12 − 2

1

= 0.

5.1. INTRODUCTION 25

J| 12 m = | 12 m 12 (σ)m m .

m

The matrices σ are 2 × 2 matrices (called the Pauli spin matrices). Explicitly, they

are

0 2 0 0 1 0

σ+ = σ− = σ3 =

0 0 2 0 0 −1

1 0 1 −ı 0 −ı

σ1 = (σ+ + σ− ) = σ2 = (σ+ − σ− ) = .

2 1 0 2 ı 0

Note that σ12 = σ22 = σ32 = 1 and σ † = σ. These satisfy the commutation relations

[σi , σj ] = 2ıijk σk (a slightly modified angular momentum commutation relation)

and we also have σ2 σ3 = ıσ1 (and the relations obtained by cyclic permutation), so

σi σj + σj σi = 2δij 1. Thus if n̂ is a unit vector we have (σ.n̂)2 = 1 and we see that

σ.n̂ has eigenvalues ±1.

matrices s= 2 σ and so s = 4 1.

1 2 3 2

We define the angular momentum

1 0

The basis states are χ 12 = and χ− 12 = .

0 1

We apply the theory as above to get

√

0 2 √0 1 0 0

S+ = 0 0 2 S3 = 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 −1

†

and S− = S+ .

5.1.3 Electrons

Electrons are particles with intrinsic spin 12 . The angular momentum J = x̂ ∧ p̂ + s, s

are the spin operators for spin 12 .

The basic operators for an electron are x̂, p̂ and s. We can represent these operators

by their action on two component wavefunctions:

ψ(x) = ψλ (x)χλ .

λ=± 12

in terms of these, for instance we may have a Hamiltonian

p̂2

H= + V (x) + U (x)σ.L

2m

where L = x̂ ∧ p̂.

If V and U depend only on |x| then [J, H] = 0.

26 CHAPTER 5. GENERAL THEORY OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM

Consider two independent angular momentum operators J(1) and J(2) with J(r) acting

on some space V (r) and V (r) having spin jr for r = 1, 2.

We now define an angular momentum J acting on V (1) ⊗ V (2) by J = J(1) + J(2) .

Using the commutation relations for J(r) we can get [Ji , Jj ] = ıijk Jk .

We want to construct states |J M forming a standard angular momentum basis,

that is such that:

J3 |J M = M |J M

±

J± |J M = NJ,M |J M ± 1

±

with NJ,M = (J ∓ M ) (J ± M + 1). We look for states in V which satisfy

J+ |J J = 0 and J3 |J J = J|J J. The maximum value of J we can get is j1 + j2 ;

and |j1 + j2 j1 + j2 = |j1 j1 1 |j2 j2 2 . Then J+ |j1 + j2 j1 + j2 = 0. Similarly this

is an eigenvector of J3 with eigenvalue (j1 + j2 ). We can now apply J− repeatedly to

form all the |J M states. Applying J− we get

−

The coefficents α and β can be determined from the coefficents Na,b , and we must

have α + β = 1. If we choose |ψ a state orthogonal to this;

2 2

J3 |ψ can be computed and it shows that |ψ is an eigenvector of J3 with eigenvalue

(j1 + j2 − 1). Now

and so ψ|J− |φ = 0 for all states |φ in V . Thus J+ |ψ = 0 and

For each J such that |j1 − j2 | ≤ J ≤ j1 + j2 we can construct a state |J J. We

define the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients j1 m1 j2 m2 |J M , and so

|J M = j1 m1 j2 m2 |J M |j1 m1 |j2 m2 .

m1 ,m2

We can check the number of states;

j

1 +j2 j

1 +j2

(2J + 1) = (J + 1)2 − J 2 = (2j1 + 1) (2j2 + 1) .

J=|j1 −j2 | J=|j1 −j2 |

5.3. THE MEANING OF QUANTUM MECHANICS 27

Electrons

Electrons have spin 12 and we can represent their spin states with χ± 12 (s). Using this

notation we see that two electrons can form a symmetric spin 1 triplet

χ 2 (s

)χ 1 (s )

1

1 2 2

χm (s1 , s2 ) = √2 χ 12 (s1 )χ− 12 (s2 ) + χ− 12 (s1 )χ 12 (s2 )

1

χ 1 (s )χ 1 (s )

−2 1 −2 2

1

χ0 (s1 , s2 ) = √ χ 12 (s1 )χ− 12 (s2 ) − χ− 12 (s1 )χ 12 (s2 ) .

2

Quantum mechanics deals in probabilities, whereas classical mechanics is determin-

istic if we have complete information. If we have incomplete information classical

mechanics is also probabilistic.

Inspired by this we ask if there can be “hidden variables” in quantum mechanics

such that the theory is deterministic. Assuming that local effects have local causes, this

is not possible.

We will take a spin example to show this. Consider a spin 12 particle, with two

spin states |↑ and |↓ which are eigenvectors of S3 = 2 σ3 . If we choose to use two

component vectors we have

1 0

χ↑ = χ↓ = .

0 1

Suppose n = (sin θ, 0, cos θ) (a unit vector) and let us find the eigenvectors of

cos θ sin θ

σ.n = .

sin θ − cos θ

2

As (σ.n) = 1 we must have eigenvalues ±1 and an inspired guess gives χ↑,n and

χ↓,n as

Thus (reverting to ket vector notation) if an electron is in a state |↑ then the prob-

ability of finding it in a state |↑, n is cos2 θ2 and the probability of finding it in a state

|↓, n is sin2 θ2 .

Now, suppose we have two electrons in a spin 0 singlet state;

1

|Φ = √ {|↑1 |↓2 − |↓1 |↑2 } .

2

Then the probability of finding electron 1 with spin up is 12 , and after making this

measurement electron 2 must be spin down. Similarly, if we find electron 1 with spin

down (probability 12 again) then electron 2 must have spin up. More generally, suppose

we measure electron 1’s spin along direction n. Then we see that the probability for

28 CHAPTER 5. GENERAL THEORY OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM

the state |↓, n2 .

If we have two electrons (say electron 1 and electron 2) in a spin 0 state we may

physically separate them and consider independent experiments on them.

We will consider three directions as sketched. For electron 1 there are three vari-

(1) (1)

ables which we may measure (in separate experiments); Sz = ±1, Sn = ±1 and

(1)

Sm = ±1. We can also do this for electron 2.

(1) (2)

We see that if we find electron 1 has Sz = 1 then electron 2 has Sz = −1 (etc.).

If there exists an underlying deterministic theory then we could expect some prob-

ability distribution p for this set of experiments;

0 ≤ p Sz(1) , Sn(1) , Sm

(1)

, Sz(2) , Sn(2) , Sm

(2)

≤1

(1) (2)

which is nonzero only if Sdirn = −Sdirn and

p({s}) = 1.

{s}

Bell inequality

Suppose we have a probability

partial probabilities pbc = a p(a, b, c) and similarly for pac and pab . Then

≤ p(1, 1, −1) + p(1, 1, 1) + p(−1, 1, −1) + p(−1, −1, −1)

≤ pab (1, 1) + pac (−1, −1).

P Sn(1) = 1, Sm

(2)

= 1 ≤ P Sz(1) = 1, Sn(2) = −1 + P Sz(1) = −1, Sm

(2)

=1 .

θ

P Sz(1) = 1, Sn(2) = −1 = P Sz(1) = 1, Sn(1) = 1 = cos2 2

P Sz(1) = −1, Sm (2)

= 1 = cos2 θ+φ2 and

P Sn(1) = 1, Sm (2)

= 1 = sin2 θ2 .

φ θ θ+φ

The Bell inequality gives sin2 2 ≤ cos2 2 + cos2 2 which is not in general true.

References

◦ P.A.M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Fourth ed., OUP, 1958.

I enjoyed this book as a good read but it is also an eminently suitable textbook.

Wesley, 1964.

Excellent reading but not a very appropriate textbook for this course. I read it as a

companion to the course and enjoyed every chapter.

This is a recommended textbook for this course (according to the Schedules). I wasn’t

particularly impressed but you may like it.

There must be a good, modern textbook for this course. If you know of one please

send me a brief review and I will include it if I think it is suitable. In any case, with

these marvellous notes you don’t need a textbook, do you?

Related courses

There are courses on Statistical Physics and Applications of Quantum Mechanics in

Part 2B and courses on Quantum Physics and Symmetries and Groups in Quantum

Physics in Part 2A.

29

- Newton's Law of Cooling & its applicationsUploaded byDr Srinivasan Nenmeli -K
- General Relativity LecturesUploaded byrebeccachalker
- The Very Nature of the Strong Nuclear ForceUploaded byBernard SCHAEFFER
- Hestenes' BookUploaded byJames Chappell
- Special RelativityUploaded byAndrew Florit
- Theory of the Strong Force and the Nuclear EnergyUploaded byBernard SCHAEFFER
- General RelativityUploaded bypero_k
- Introduction to Dark Matter ExperimentsUploaded byahsbon
- Special RelativityUploaded byDravid Arya
- Special RelativityUploaded byBernard SCHAEFFER
- dopplerUploaded bymicromax25
- The Extraterrestrial Casimir EffectUploaded bydgE
- Special RelativityUploaded byAndrew Florit
- General Relativity in a mathematical nutshellUploaded byBernard SCHAEFFER
- Simple Pendulum with a simple derivation of formulaUploaded byDr Srinivasan Nenmeli -K
- Doppler EffectUploaded bykrawczyb
- Theory of the Nuclear Strong Force (presentation)Uploaded byBernard SCHAEFFER
- Physics Formulary - J. WeversUploaded bybraindammage
- Falsifiability in Particle PhysicsUploaded byJohn McGowan
- Newtonian Physics - Benjamin Crowell.pdfUploaded byhascribd
- Types of EnergyUploaded byphydotsi
- SPIE 2011Uploaded bydgE
- dopplerUploaded bybocko976
- Doppler EffectUploaded byIndranil Roy
- Special RelativityUploaded byIshu
- Fundamental Problems in Quantum PhysicsUploaded byGenio012
- Special RelativityUploaded byjpl244
- FreeFallJCUploaded byapi-3755159
- General RelativityUploaded byJunHyoung Kim
- string theoryUploaded byrebeccachalker

- adaptive filters-3 - PPT.pptxUploaded bydeepa
- Nicolaus Copernicus BiographyUploaded byBien Morfe
- logCD0Uploaded byFulga Alex
- gfgfgfUploaded byMuhammad Farid Ab Rahim
- A Selection of HafizUploaded bydwellintheheart
- datasheet_MX-20-20DUploaded byAlex Pavloff
- Design of Crane Structure & Testig of Crane as Per is-M.tech-Sem.iiUploaded byVatsal Desai
- Examining the justification of Residential RecyclingUploaded byliasides
- Value Stream MappingUploaded byJavisalas
- Isotc213wg17n0040rev4 Global TpsUploaded bySrujana Kandagatla
- ABO & Rh-BloodUploaded bynts07
- System ArchetypesUploaded byMirjana Pejic Bach
- 20060501_I Will if you WillUploaded byThe Sustainable Development Commission (UK, 2000-2011)
- Chimie Douce Approaches to the Synthesis of Metastable Oxide Materials.pdfUploaded byFernando Silva Betim
- GPA 2145 - Table of Physical Constants for Hydrocarbons and Other Compounds of Interest to the Natural Gas IndustrUploaded byclementer
- Project_of_Manufacture_of_Embroidery_Saree.pdfUploaded byangelohero6643
- PraveenUploaded bykumar_goud
- Infosys case analysisUploaded byUmesh Sonawane
- Journal of Natural Products Volume 73 Issue 2 2010 [Doi 10.1021%2Fnp900530n] Tian_ Li-Wen_ Zhang_ Ying-Jun_ Qu_ Chang_ Wang_ Yi-Fei_ Yang_ Ch -- Phloroglucinol Glycosides From the Fresh Fruits of Eucalyptus MaideniUploaded byWireni Ec
- Interview With Hava Eva Jonai (NonViolent Communication trainer)Uploaded byEMK
- Disciples Path the Journey Vol1 SampleUploaded byZORAN10
- Rejection List IB 01 121115Uploaded bySudheer Kumar
- Bio Control LectureUploaded bydars23
- SOF Sample Paper Class 11Uploaded byMurtaza Lokhandwala
- 2. Handling Form DataUploaded bymahesh19nov
- Dynalock 2012 PricebookUploaded bySecurity Lock Distributors
- 1John a. Zacharias 313 West 7th Street Marysville, Ohio 43040Uploaded byJohn Zacharias
- PMI Scheduling Conference AgendaUploaded bythereflu
- Dianabol (D.20131018.221414Uploaded bypuran1234567890
- Father AljabarUploaded byabinailah