Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 366 #:8413

Filed 09/07/11 Page 1 of 5 Page ID

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Michael J. Niborski (State Bar No. 192111) e-mail: mniborski@pryorcashman.com PRYOR CASHMAN LLP 1801 Century Park East, 24th Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-2302 Tel: (310) 556-9608 Fax: (310) 556-9670 Tom J. Ferber e-mail: tferber@pryorcashman.com PRYOR CASHMAN LLP 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036-6569 Tel: (212) 326-0194 Fax: (212) 798-6388 Attorneys for Defendant Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION LISA LIBERI, et al. Plaintiffs, vs. ORLY TAITZ, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 11-00485 AG (AJW) Hon. Andrew Guilford Courtroom 10D STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT and DECLARATION OF MICHAEL J. NIBORSKI IN SUPPORT THEREOF [PROPOSED] ORDER LODGED CONCURRENTLY Complaint Served: June 29, 2011 Current Response Date: Sept. 16, 2011 New Response Date: Oct. 7, 2011

1

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 366 #:8414

Filed 09/07/11 Page 2 of 5 Page ID

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc. (“Defendant”) as follows: The First Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) in this action was

1.

served on June 29, 2010;

2.

Plaintiffs and prior counsel for Defendant previously agreed to one

statutory extension of time pursuant to Local Rule 8-3, as well as one non-statutory extension of time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint. The current response date is September 16, 2011;

3.

The undersigned counsel for Defendant has recently been retained and has

only recently been able to gather and review the voluminous pleadings and other matters in this case in order to prepare a response to the Complaint; The Court has scheduled a hearing on co-defendant Oracle Corporation’s

4.

motion to dismiss for September 12, 2011 which may result in a second amended complaint being filed. In order to achieve judicial efficiency and alleviate unnecessary litigation, this Stipulation would permit this hearing to occur and any pleading changes be filed in advance of Defendant filing any answer or motion pursuant to FRCP 12; The Parties submit that this Stipulation comports with the Court’s stated policy of limiting unnecessary litigation in this action.

THEREFORE, UPON APPROVAL BY THE COURT, it is hereby stipulated by and between the Parties, through their counsel of record, that Defendant may have up to and including October 7, 2011 to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action.

2

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 366 #:8415

Filed 09/07/11 Page 3 of 5 Page ID

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PRYOR CASHMAN LLP Dated: September 7, 2011 By: /s/ Michael J. Niborski Michael J. Niborski 1801 Century Park East, 24th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-2302 Tel: 310/556-9608 Fax: 310/556-9670 mniborski@pryorcashman.com Attorneys for Defendant Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc.

LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG Dated: September 7, 2011 By: /s/ Philip J. Berg Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Tel: 610/825-3134 Fax: 610/834-7659 philjberg@gmail.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs

3

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 366 #:8416

Filed 09/07/11 Page 4 of 5 Page ID

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DECLARATION OF MICHAEL J. NIBORSKI I, Michael J. Niborski, hereby declare as follows: 1. I am of counsel to the law firm Pryor Cashman LLP, counsel of record in this action for Defendant Daylight Chemical Information Systems (“Defendant”). I submit this declaration in support of the Parties’ Stipulation To Extend the Deadline for Defendants to Respond to the First Amended Complaint. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration, except for those matters stated to be based upon my information and belief, and if called upon to do so I could and would competently testify thereto. 2. The First Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) in this action was

served on June 29, 2010. 3. Plaintiffs and prior counsel for Defendant, the law firm of Silverstein &

Huston, previously agreed to one extension of time pursuant to Local Rule 8-3 for Defendant to respond to the Complaint. 4. Our firm was recently retained in this matter and has just now gathered

and been able to review the voluminous pleadings and other matters in this case in order to prepare a response to the Complaint. 5. Immediately following our retention, Plaintiffs’ counsel Mr. Berg and I

agreed and submitted a stipulation to extend our deadline to respond to the Complaint until September 16, 2011. The Court granted this Stipulation. 6. From my review of the docket in this matter, there is a hearing on defendant Oracle Corporation’s motion to dismiss scheduled for September 12, 2011 which may result in a second amended complaint being filed. This motion was previously set for August 29, 2011. 7. In order to achieve judicial efficiency and alleviate unnecessary litigation,

this Stipulation would permit this pleadings challenge to be resolved in advance of Defendant filing any answer or motion pursuant to FRCP 12. I believe this would comport with the Court’s stated policy of limiting unnecessary litigation in this action. 4

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 366 #:8417

Filed 09/07/11 Page 5 of 5 Page ID

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. This declaration is executed on September 7, 2011, at Los Angeles, California.

/s/ Michael J. Niborski MICHAEL J. NIBORSKI

5

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful