You are on page 1of 3

NIVEA: SOFTENING AND STANDARDIZING GLOBAL MARKETS

Just as healthy skin requires the proper pH balance to flourish, a strong global brand must find the right
balance between marketing efforts that build consistency in overall worldwide positioning and the need to
appeal to specific geographic and cultural markets. Beiersdorf (BDF), the German manufacturer of Nivea
skin care products, seems to have mastered that balancing act with all the skill of an Olympic gymnast.
Introduced in 1912, Nivea Creme was a unique water-in-oil emulsion, a formulation that set it apart from the
fat-only creams available at the time. The brand’s positioning also made it distinct from other products on the
market: It was a multipurpose cream sold at a price that made it available to the masses, rather than to only
the upper-class women who were the competition’s target market. Over the years, Nivea’s positioning
strategy has remained as simple and steadfast as the now-familiar blue-and-white package. Despite all the
technological developments the company has introduced in skin care products, and all the markets it has sold
in, Nivea’s marketing always focuses on key brand benefits—high quality, reasonable price, straightforward
approach, and mild skin care. This commitment to the mainstream market and focus on multipurpose
applications means that every product introduced under the Nivea name has to conform to guidelines which
ensure that everyone working on the brand around the world knows what it stands for. Nivea’s marketing
strategy is well stated by Rolf Kunish, chairman of the Beiersdorf Group: “The strategy of concentration on
exploiting market potentials and regional growth opportunities is to be continued. The same applies to moves
into new market segments and to increased investment in research and development.”

Exploiting market potentials means constantly introducing new products that meet current market needs and
the needs of newly targeted market segments. One example from the past is Nivea’s emphasis on health and
active lifestyles as more women went to work in the 1920s. Others include the introduction of sunscreen,
skin protection, and tanning products to match the more active, outdoor lifestyles in vogue from the 1960s to
today; plus products for every skin type and need. To meet the needs of new market segments, Nivea
expanded its product lines to include children and men. All these new products were guided by the Nivea
standards: each product must meet a basic need, be simple and uncomplicated, not offer to solve only one
specific problem, be a quality leader, and be priced such that consumers perceive a balanced cost-benefit
relationship. BDF’s new product strategy was honed in the 1970s when competitive challenges prompted the
company to take steps to revitalize the brand. It used a two-pronged approach. First, to counteract
perceptions that Nivea had an older, less dynamic image, the company for the first time described specific
product benefits in its advertising. Before this, advertising had focused on the variety of settings in which
each product could be used. Second, BDF introduced additional products that would leverage the recognition
and reputation of the Nivea name in growing segments of the market. These are sub-brands, such as Nivea
Shower and Bath, Nivea for Men, Nivea Sun, Nivea Hair Care, Nivea Body, Nivea Visage, and the recently
introduced Nivea Baby.

During the 1980s, new products were supported by separate ad campaigns that helped build individual
personalities and associations for each sub-brand, while linking them to each other and to Nivea Creme
through the use of the word “care” in all headlines. The sub-brands helped establish Nivea as a broad skin
and personal care brand, but their success was both pleasing and a problem for BDF. The company worried
that the proliferation of products bearing the Nivea name might leave consumers confused about what the
brand represented, and that the image of Nivea Creme, the heart of the brand, might be weakened or diluted.
After conducting studies, the company embarked on a marketing strategy that would deliver on the concept
of the “universality” of Nivea products while reinforcing the image of the brand as a skin care specialist. All
ads for the core brand, Nivea Creme, had to incorporate its underlying values of timelessness and agelessness,
motherhood and a happy family, honesty and trustworthiness, and the product benefits of mildness and
quality. Ads for the sub-brands had to reflect elements of these values as well as those that were uniquely
their own.

In 1990 BDF internationalized its brands by creating a worldwide name for each product category and
implementing common packaging on a global basis. Moreover, all ads, regardless of the country in which
they ran, had to evoke a common emotion, use the same typeface, incorporate the same kinds of people, and
use a uniform Nivea logo. The result is a highly standardized approach to global marketing. Rather than
focusing on the individual differences among peoples around the globe, the firm focuses on the similarities.
After all, as one company official notes, all people have skin and many people have the same needs and
ideas. This leads to a direct approach and a high degree of consistency. When a firm operates in as many
markets as BDF, consistency, simplicity, and focus on the same benefits not only create a universal brand
image, they also reduce headaches. Many fewer marketing decisions have to be made. Standardized
advertising campaigns need be adapted only slightly by translation into the local language. Because the costs
can be spread around the globe, it’s much less expensive to run a single global campaign rather than many
separate regional ones. And marketing control is much simpler and easier with a standardized program.
Packaging costs are reduced and product recognition is very high when people encounter the product in other
countries and cultural situations.

The second element of the BDF strategy is exploiting regional growth opportunities. Doing so, however,
may necessitate some adjustments to the standardized approach. Because Nivea Creme is a European
product, its appeal and marketing approach can be very similar in many parts of the globe. The United
States, Canada, Latin America, and South America were all populated by European settlers. This produces
some commonality in cultural background and light skin type, with the result that many products developed
for the German market can be sold in these markets with little or no product or marketing adaptation. A focus
on healthy, glowing skin will sell cosmetics in nearly all these markets. Of course, the company might use
darker-haired models with more olive complexions in the Latin and South American markets. And it might
develop tailored sub-brands and programs for important sub-segments of all these markets. However, as
Nivea moves further away from this common European cultural base, its products may be less well suited to
the market. This is particularly true in African nations, where a majority of people have much darker skin
and may require different sorts of moisturizers and sunscreen products. In between the European and African
markets are the Asian markets, which are characterized by yellow and frequently more pale complexions.
Although Nivea sells well in some Asian markets, such as Indonesia and Thailand, it sells less well in Japan.
The difference in sales is attributable to both market and cultural conditions.

In the past, Japanese markets were strongly protected and there was relatively little competition from non-
domestic manufacturers. Unfortunately for Japanese merchants, the resulting high prices provided a strong
lure to foreign producers. When BDF first entered the Japanese market, it was highly successful. But as
Japanese markets have opened up, competition has increased, price maintenance has been abolished, and
prices have fallen. As a result, BDF has reduced the number of products sold there, and focused on the more
profitable ones. There are cultural differences between markets such as Germany, the United States, and
Japan. Germany and the United States are classified as “low-context countries,” which means that ads should
state explicitly what the product will do. Japan, in contrast, is a “high-context” country in which product
claims do not need to be stated explicitly. Rather, because Japanese consumers want to form relationships
with companies, the company itself should be prominently featured in advertising. If the company is worthy
of consideration, then the quality of its products is assumed to be high. Thus, an advertising campaign
prepared for Germany requires more than just a little tweaking in order to promote products successfully in
Japan. All these differences argue for more adaptation of Nivea products and marketing to match cultural
and market differences outside Germany and the European market. However, as economies develop, they
tend to acquire many of the same tastes as developed economies. An example is Russia, where men—
especially younger men—are beginning to spend more on cosmetics. They are buying many of the same
brands as their Western European counterparts—Gillette, Nivea for Men, Old Spice, and a few designer
brands such as Christian Dior, Armani, Boss Lancome, Aramis, Guy Laroche, Gucci, and Paco Rabanne.
Price is not the crucial variable in the purchase decision—men are buying based on product characteristics
such as fragrance and brand awareness. For companies such as Nivea and Gillette, which are willing to
spend on advertising, the market seems quite responsive. The bottom line is the increasing homogenization
that argues against customization of products for specific markets.
Speaking of bottom lines, Beiersdorf has done very well with its own. Total sales for Beiersdorf’s cosmetics
business grew at 5.7 percent in 1996, despite decreased sales of the company’s higher priced Labella and
Atrix lines and lower sales in Japan. The Nivea line grew by 13.3 percent, far outpacing the more expensive
cosmetics and skin care products. However, growth around the world has been uneven. Although BDF’s
brands experienced double-digit growth in Eastern Europe, Scandinavia, Southern Europe, and South
America, sales growth within Germany and some Northern European countries has been much lower due to
the difficult economic situation. Nivea held its own in the United States, but grew by 36.3 percent in Mexico.
Despite strong growth in Thailand and Indonesia, sales in Asia and Australia fell by 10.4 percent, affected by
the downward trend in Japan and China. Compounding the Japanese losses are unfavorable exchange rates
between the yen and the mark, which reduced earnings even further. Even so, although the overall global
picture for Beiersdorf is quite good, it’s still just a little fuzzy in some parts of the world.

Questions for Discussion


1. How do economic, legal, and cultural factors affect the worldwide marketing of Nivea products?
2. Describe Beiersdorf’s product and promotion strategies for Nivea. Is BDF engaging in product
adaptation, dual adaptation, or something else? What are the arguments for and against this strategy?
3. Would you say that Beiersdorf engages in global rather than international marketing? Explain your
answer.
4. Find a Nivea ad and try to adapt it for the Japanese market.
5. From a marketing viewpoint, is the homogenization of global markets good or bad? From a national
viewpoint, is this homogenization good or bad?
6. Should Beiersdorf continue with its fairly rigid standardized marketing strategy?

Sources: “Men’s Lines Grow in Russia,” Cosmetics International, March 25, 1997, p. 2; “Beiersdorf Beauty Sales Get a
Boost from Nivea,” Womens’ Wear Daily, March 1, 1996, p. 11; “Sales Indicate Global Direction of Beiersdorf,”
Cosmetics International, July 10, 1997, p. 12; “Beiersdorf Increases Profits as Nivea Sees Continued Success,”
Cosmetics International, June 25, 1996, pp. 12-14; Melissa Drier, “Beiersdorf’s Growth Bolstered by Nivea,” Women’’
Wear Daily, February 28, 1997, pp. 11; and information from the Nivea Web site (nivea.com).