This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Age of Secrecy and Covert Control We are living in a new type of society. What we remember life to have been like only thirty to fifty years ago, and the ideals and beliefs that we once commonly held about our society and ourselves, no longer apply. We used to fully accept and even cherish the idea that each person had the freedom to live, think, and act in whatever manner that they might choose, as long as it didn’t negatively affect anyone else. A man’s home was his castle, and what went on there was nobody’s business but his own. We didn’t judge others too strongly for their differences, and often found them to be novel and interesting for their very uniqueness and originality. However, over the years, those rights and freedoms we once enjoyed and which were meant to preserve our individuality (and by extension the natural creative progression of our evolution) have been stripped away bit by bit, and at an ever increasing rate, until our entire global society has been turned into something far less desirable than it once was. The advances in technology, more than anything else in our entire human history, has caused incredible and sudden changes to our world. Not only does it affect the way that we do things, but also how we think and what we believe. The ever-increasing rate that these changes take place have kept us moving along at a rapid pace that leaves us unable to stop long enough to seriously consider what effect they’re having on us. These constant and rapid changes caused by technological advancements are leading us into a future that we have no control of as ordinary citizens, and at a cost to our individual freedom and security. Technology has always been praised and promoted as a huge benefit and advancement, promising to eliminate problems while providing greater freedoms. Although they might easily do so, few people seem to realize or are unwilling to admit that no problems have ever been eliminated by our use of technology without creating a multitude of new ones, nor that we haven’t really gained any more freedoms at all but have instead become more enslaved. This isn’t by accident. The people who make the decisions that affect our lives claim that it’s all in our best interests, and that nothing – not even Mother Nature – should stand in the way of progress. The problems that are created by past changes become the excuse to advance further changes, and this is all defined as progress. The fact that no real progress is actually being made (at least not for the majority of us) and is even avoided through the use of a standard bait-and-switch maneuver, like a stage magician who distracts the audience with one hand while the other hand does something unseen, creating an illusion with a series of carefully planned moves that draw attention away from the truth. We’re all so mystified and in awe of how technology is being used (and the implications of that) that we don’t ever consider how it could be being used.
But the problem I’m presenting here goes much deeper into the very structure of society than what technology has wrought, and encompasses virtually every aspect of it, from the highest levels of governmental power, throughout the business and social sectors, creeping into every profession, belief system, and lifestyle. It encroaches on every possible endeavor that might be undertaken, so that no power will ever fall into the hands on those without it, and whatever power might be there to take is siphoned off by those who do. Technology might be considered neutral and even good, on its own, but when it’s controlled and directed as we see being done in our society today, it offers an incredible power to enslave and manipulate both individuals and whole populations. Power is the game, and we’re all just playing pieces. In order to properly understand the true state of affairs within our society and how it could even be possible, we need to first consider a number of things that have proven to be crucial elements in fostering such a state without us being aware of it. These things were established first, so that technology could be kept under the control of those who decided on how it would be developed and promoted. Secrecy It’s a common misconception that governments can’t keep secrets. There is some truth to this, but for the most part, it’s a false assumption. Governments can certainly keep secrets when they want to, and very effectively, for that matter. In fact, the government keeps a lot of secrets about things. Some of these secrets eventually reach public awareness, but many others don’t. Still other secrets are already out there in plain view, yet still remain in the realm of urban myth as far as most people are concerned. For the years that it was in operation, the now famous Manhattan Project was kept absolutely secret from everyone but a very small number of people who were directly involved. It was only when the first atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki that anyone else learned anything at all about this secret project. The knowledge that this project took place is now public, but the deeper knowledge that was used to develop the actual bomb remains in the realm of secrecy. Secrets CAN be kept. The methods used to contain this secret program were very effective and have become standardized and expanded to the point that now, secrets can very often be right out in the open while still remaining secret. To understand this, we need to ask ourselves a very important question: What constitutes a secret, and when does it become public knowledge? The way we accept something as true or not true is what determines whether we believe it. There are two types of information that we rely on for obtaining the information we use to determine our belief whether something is true or not true. The
first is through direct and personal experience. The second is through those secondhand sources of information that we trust as reliable. Unless we receive our information in one of these two ways, it’s usually not easily accepted by us as completely reliable. At the very least, verification from a more trusted source will usually be wanted. On the other hand, we put great weight in information coming from personal experience or trusted sources – and in the latter case, maybe too much. Let’s look at a typical example of how this can work to keep secrets. If the average person were to claim that they had seen a flying saucer and its alien occupants, we would normally write it off as a lie, or at best a gross misinterpretation of their perceptions. However, if the president of the United States were to go on national television and announce to the world that a flying saucer had landed at the White House and its otherworldly occupants had formally presented themselves to him with a galactic greeting, we would be far more likely to believe it, even though we hadn’t actually experienced anything more than someone we trust telling us this information. We’re more likely to automatically accept it as true because of our trust in the source of the information. The only thing that keeps people from believing certain things is the fact that they have never experienced it personally, or haven’t been told it by a trustable enough source. The fact that many people continue to report seeing UFOs and their occupants makes little difference. If such sightings aren’t experienced personally or officially confirmed to be real extraterrestrial phenomena, they aren’t believed to be what is claimed, and something more plausible is assumed. A secret doesn’t have to be completely hidden from public awareness to remain a secret. It’s truth only has to be obscured by the lack of its admission by those trusted authorities who might know, and be outside of most people’s direct personal experience. Beyond that, something can be discussed and investigated and promoted as true, and unless a person is exposed to tangible evidence firsthand, they will very likely still continue to doubt it. But more than just this is required for secrecy, obviously. In order to assure that something remains a secret, it’s important to control the knowledge of it. That means being in control of both who knows about it and what they know about it. Compartmentalization To assure that certain information is kept secret, it is compartmentalized so that only those who absolutely need to know any part of it are only exposed to that part that’s necessary, and only as far as they are required to understand it in relation to their designated task. For instance, an engineer working on a top secret military project will only have access to information that pertains to his particular area of involvement, while anything about the overall project or the full purpose of his work remains completely unknown to him.
In addition to this, the number of people who are privy to any of the more sensitive information is very limited, and cover stories are given to them to mask exposure to anything that they are not privy to. Each person in a project must sign a nondisclosure agreement that carries heavy penalties for any breaches of security, so that they aren’t allowed to discuss anything that directly or indirectly relates to their work. They are also kept as isolated as possible from one another, so that information isn’t shared between them. Disinformation In order to counter any leaks of information into the public domain, which might effectively expose a secret, certain procedures are used to confuse and distort the facts so that what is true and what is false are difficult or impossible to differentiate. Cover stories will be used within the compartmentalized groups who are privy to certain information, but as far as the public goes, any evidence of the truth will be obscured by an overlay of false information. The mass media is used extensively for this purpose. If a vital information leak occurs, it’s followed up immediately with further information that will support the leaked information, but will add further elements that will confuse, mislead, or otherwise discredit it. The UFO enigma is an exemplary case in point. It has developed into such a mess of questionable information that blends possibilities with improbabilities that any truth buried in the mess is impossible to extract. The only real clue that there is anything relevant buried there is the fact that the government purposely adds to that confusion. This only tells us that there is a definite cover-up of secrets going on, but it doesn’t reveal anything about what those secrets might be. It effectively turns people away in exasperation. Conditioning Beliefs and Perceptions Further to all this, measures are constantly being taken to manipulate and direct the attitudes and beliefs of the general public – most prominently through the mainstream media. These measures are usually long term and follow a carefully planned procedure to mold the desired mindset among the general population so that certain beliefs and understandings become well established and widely accepted as true, with the result that these beliefs will influence the thoughts and actions of the majority of people in certain directions, and not in others. Just paying attention to trends in consumerism influenced by advertising campaigns will prove this. The sudden proliferation in computer technology in the 1990s is a case in point. Today it is wireless communications technologies – a further step towards enslavement that builds on the last step that conditioned us to be ready for it. Skepticism Skepticism is used heavily to cover up secrets, and it’s one of the elements of mass conditioning that have been created in the popular mindset to dissuade people from believing something. When knowledge that’s meant to be kept secret is publicly
promoted, skeptical attitudes towards it are generated using carefully chosen experts and authorities who provide slanted opinions expressed as fact in order to create a sense of questionability and doubt about a particular subject or piece of information. Since we must usually rely on such expert and authoritative opinions to base our beliefs, most of us are prone to believing these sources when they come forward to confirm or deny that something is true. Skepticism has a certain psychological effect that makes it useful as a form of intimidation. Many people are afraid to state their belief in something if there is a high enough level of skepticism surrounding the subject. We see this with regards to the belief in extraterrestrial visitation, psychic phenomena, and conspiracy theories. These are areas of investigation that are avoided by professionals who have a career to maintain, and any attempt to raise any of them as a serious topic for consideration is met with enough skeptical opposition from more influential sources to destroy any chance of success. This opposition doesn’t even have to offer any sort of evidence for its claims, but only needs to raise enough public doubt through the weight of its authority. Ridicule Along with skepticism as a tool for maintaining secrets is the factor of ridicule, which is used as a threat to further dissuade people from wanting to believe certain things. Ridicule is applied in a manner that is intended to destroy the credibility of a person who makes claims that could expose certain truths that are being kept secret. Ridicule focuses on destroying a person’s credibility by attempting to mold other people’s perceptions of the person’s intelligence, but without offering any greater intelligence in its place and avoiding having to do so. Ridicule is intended to circumvent the possibility of any objective analysis of the facts, which might otherwise reveal the weakness of any claims that are being used to hide secrets and bring those secrets out into the open. Conspiracy Theories Many secrets are able to be protected by the continual conditioning that society receives towards any subjects that revolve around unproven conspiracies. Ridicule and skepticism go hand in hand with the very term ‘conspiracy theory’, leading many to automatically doubt anything that might be labeled as such, or fear of even entertaining such ideas. Such is the power of conditioning. The popularly promoted attitude that conspiracies don’t happen is absurd, given the fact that a conspiracy is simply a secret agreement between two or more parties pertaining to the commission of an act that is illegal or harmful to others, and yet people go along with the notion that a particular version of the facts is false simply because it’s been labeled as a conspiracy theory by certain authoritative sources. Politicians regularly engage in conspiracies against both their opponents and members of the general population, as do corporate entities, and we see this clearly whenever we look at the latest news stories, but we’ve been conditioned to not see them in the same terms.
Of course, there is a purposefully created but subtly ignored distinction between what we might deem as an actual conspiracy and a conspiracy theory. Since the word ‘theory’ suggests that something is still open to question and not yet verified as absolute fact, it is purposely applied in certain instances so as to highlight this fact, while in certain other cases it is completely overlooked. If we take the 9/11 disaster as a case in point, we can only say that the official version of this event is itself nothing more than an unproven conspiracy theory, being based almost exclusively on circumstantial evidence and guesswork that has never even been properly verified, yet it isn’t considered a conspiracy theory because it comes from a supposedly reliable source that we’re expected to trust. Any alternative theory is defined as a ‘conspiracy theory’ and ridiculed on that ground, rather than to ever consider it fairly and honestly. Mental Illness As we’ve just seen, the definition of certain words and phrases have become distorted to the point that their use automatically creates false understandings. This applies to the phrase ‘conspiracy theory’ to the point that it’s taken only in one particular context while the broader and more accurate definition is overlooked. The term ‘mental illness’ has become equally distorted, so that we normally think of this as something that leaves a person incapable of thinking clearly and is therefore not able to reason and think logically. It brings up the idea of someone with a psychotic personality or a retarded intelligence. The fact is, anyone suffering a prolonged emotional state that interferes with their inner peace and normal mental functioning can be defined as mentally ill. This includes such states as sadness, anger, loneliness, frustration, boredom, grief, or any other negative physiological or psychological experiences that we naturally suffer from time to time as human beings. They can be defined as ‘ill’ just as easily as a person with a common cold is considered ‘ill’. The term ‘mental illness’ is used in certain situations to purposely distort the validity of someone, due to how we’ve been conditioned to respond to this term. You wouldn’t normally define someone as mentally ill just because they’re upset about something, yet they can still be loosely regarded as mentally ‘ill’ by the fact they are emotionally upset. This is taken advantage of to destroy the credibility of people who speak out about certain things that they know or suspect to be true, but which can’t be easily proven. Since it can’t be proven, they’re labeled as delusional. Once a person has been labeled as mentally ill, anything they say is thereafter able to be immediately discredited. Fear The underlying element in all of this is fear. Fear is a very deep-seated emotion that leads us into acting on the level of our most primitive survival instincts, which are responses that are triggered automatically and before we’re ever fully conscious of making them, prior to any higher level brain functions being able to intervene. Fear is
a natural reaction to the unfamiliar. What is unfamiliar poses a potential threat to our peace and security, so we are suspicious of it. This can be taken advantage so that we will accept certain beliefs and support certain attitudes. It can be used to make us act in ways that we normally wouldn’t. Fear lies behind the power of skepticism and ridicule, which by extension have a negative effect on phrases like ‘conspiracy theory’ and ‘mental illness’. Through the mass media, fear can be used to control and manipulate whole populations into acting without reason, supporting or engaging in activities before they ever give what they are doing any proper consideration. The New Secret Police, Better Known as ‘Gang-Stalkers’ With the rapid changes taking place in our society and the increasing proliferation and dependence on communications technology, we’ve barely even noticed that domestic spying and covert surveillance is constantly taking place, and more rampant and widespread than ever before in human history. The public fear that has been created by the heavily promoted threats of terrorism and the conditioning effects they have had on the public has led to many of these changes we’re going through. The question of whether these changes are resulting in anything that might be called progress must be left to the reader to decide. One change that has taken place is how we’ve come to perceive each other. Through the effect of such major media events as the Waco massacre, the Oklahoma City bombing, the Columbine shootings, and the 9/11 disaster, the public has been conditioned to distrust their neighbors and fear the average stranger on the street. They are even made to feel suspicious of their friends and family members. The greater separation from others and the further isolation of the individual from onceintimate and personal circles of trusted others is being facilitated by fear tactics, at the same time that communications technology is filling the gap with a new style of interacting with others that keeps most people satisfied enough to feel that nothing has really been lost. Relationships with others over long distance, very often with faceless people who are here today and gone tomorrow, have become the norm. Relationships become far less meaningful in such a situation, and the loss of one friendship is easily replaced with another. However, none of these relationships usually have any lasting or worthwhile value. With population levels so high, people become less appreciated. Another change that has taken place in our society is the way that we’re being policed. Many crimes are no longer investigated in the traditional way, and more time and effort is being put towards intelligence gathering and information analysis, focused more on protecting the upper classes and their interests than on the general public. The proliferation of communications technology has provided an excellent platform for intelligence gathering and wide-scale covert surveillance and monitoring of virtually anyone and everyone within the population. There is only one basic fallback: The technology isn’t capable of monitoring a person’s activities that don’t
involve their use. They’re good for spying on communications and looking around on your computer, but they can’t watch what you do otherwise. The use of informants has always been a standard practice in the military and law enforcement, but in recent years this has increased dramatically, and members of the public from all walks of life are routinely being recruited into a secret network of spies and agent provocateurs who have come to represent a secret police force. They might have joined completely voluntarily, or they might just as easily have been tricked, bribed, bullied, or blackmailed into joining. Whatever the case, once they have joined, they become part of an invisible and growing army that has become the omnipresent eyes and ears of the government. This army is used not only to passively watch and gather information on selected members of the public, but also to police them and even punish them. It’s done in a manner that is hardly ever noticed by anyone other than the targets themselves. Not even the members of this secret army who engage in these ‘extrajudicial’ acts will ever really know the actual level of monitoring, policing, and punishing that takes place against any particular target, or how widespread it is. The system is designed to spread these activities so thinly across a multitude of accomplices that it becomes virtually imperceptible and appears as nothing more than minor isolated problems or unlucky coincidences to anyone else but the target. This is done by way of the methods of secrecy outlined earlier. Those who take part in this new policing system are not usually initially aware that it is what it is, and never consider that it’s intended to become a permanent replacement for the legal system that we have had in place and which is designed to assure that people are given fair and ethical treatment as far as the law goes. This secret network usurps the legal process completely and allows those who have created this new system to target anyone that they decide to, for whatever reason they choose, and completely hidden by a very efficient and well-established method of keeping information and activities secret. It removes the sense of responsibility from all parties involved. This secret network of spies is growing exponentially. It started out with small and isolated groups and individuals scattered throughout society, such as neighborhood watch groups, church groups, and business owners, as well as police informants, criminal organizations, people with personal vendettas, etc. These have all been linked together into a single entity, controlled and coordinated by a central command unit, and highly coordinated and even automated with advanced computer technology. A Look Inside the Network The following looks at how this network might conceivably operate. It is only a speculative outline that I’ve put together, since I have no way of knowing how it’s actually set up beyond what I’ve been able to observe in my experiences as a target. Nonetheless, I feel that it’s probably more accurate than not. The purpose of this section is merely to provide readers with an idea of how such an operation can be so
large, operate so invisibly, and get away with the activities that it engages in. How are people able to be drawn into this secret network and involve themselves in the activities that they do while keeping the bigger picture invisible to them and the rest of society? The following might help to give the reader a better perspective. New recruits come from all walks of life. Because people are different in their lifestyles, beliefs, and levels of morality, different approaches are taken in selecting, recruiting, and using members of this secret spy network. Good Citizens – The majority of the new recruits to this secret network are wellmeaning people who seriously want to help make society a better place to live. They are brought in through Neighborhood Watch groups, church groups, volunteer groups, etc. They are people with good morals who will usually trust in authority without question. They are the easiest to recruit voluntarily. These people will be told that by joining, they are helping the community at large and fighting crime. They are told that by being a member, they will be able to be immediately alerted by a computerized tracking system whenever people who are deemed to be dangerous citizens are nearby, which will offer them a sense of added personal security. They will also be told that they will be one of thousands of other participants who together represent a large force of extra eyes and ears that work together to protect each other. This all sounds like a benefit that could only help make their lives and the lives of others more secure, so they are willing to sign up. Average Citizens – Other recruits aren’t approached in such an innocent manner. Some are forced to join, rather than tricked. They might be bullied, bribed, or blackmailed instead, through whatever means necessary. They are heavily recruited at immigration centers and places of employment, but anybody might be approached. Something as simple as a parking ticket might lead to an offer to overlook it if the person receiving it volunteers to take part in a special program to help their community. This sounds like an acceptable deal, so the person agrees. Next thing they know, they’re regularly involved in this network and its activities. Bad Citizens – Another type of recruit is the criminal who is up against charges that could result in a lengthy prison term. In this case, the police can use much greater force in gaining their cooperation, and keep them under their control by always having the threat of prison to coerce them to do their bidding. All of these different types of recruits are told that they will be assigned targets to watch and given occasional tasks to perform. They are expected to be available on call, giving their time when requested or volunteering whenever they’re able to. Once they’ve signed up but before they’re told anything further, they’re made to sign a non-disclosure agreement, legally binding them to a code of silence. The first rule of spy club is to never discuss spy club. These newly signed up members are assigned a code number and told that they must never reveal it to anybody and only ever identify themselves by it, and that all communications are to be done by phone and only through text messages using
certain codes. This is a security measure that serves to compartmentalize members and what they know as much as it is to protect their identities or expose their activities. They will receive some basic training, and it will be explained that their initial tasks will usually only involve basic surveillance and monitoring of specified targets in their neighborhood or workplace. They will be shown how to call into the system with their code number in order to flag themselves as ‘on-call’ whenever they are available. It will be explained how they will then be continuously tracked on a central computer through GPS, how they’ll be alerted when they’re needed for an operation, how to signal when their ‘active’ in an operation, and how to communicate with the command center and other members of their team during an operation. Training will usually include observing a number of real or simulated operations to get an idea of how they are conducted. New members might be assigned to working with other more experienced members, but it’s just as likely that they won’t know who any of the other members are that they work with. They don’t necessarily have to ever meet face to face, or know that it’s someone they know and see every day. Initial tasks will involve basic surveillance and monitoring specified targets, and reporting on their activities. The member’s level of dedication and their proficiency at assigned tasks will be praised and occasionally rewarded in small ways. Promotions will be offered with the promise that they will lead to more interesting assignments. In order to compartmentalize information, members will be restricted to only having access to information that they need to know to fulfill their tasks. This means that what information they receive through notifications will only include the minimum data on their assigned target or targets. This means that details about why the target is being targeted is not going to be disclosed, or only the most general reasons might be given. This might be as simple as stating that they are known to be violent, mentally unstable, or involved in criminal activity. Of course, this leaves a great deal to the imagination, and very often, because of the element of fear created by prior conditioning, only the worst will be imagined. Targets are routinely generated through the use of ‘watch lists’. These are lists of people who are deemed to be a threat to the public and supposedly need to be watched. A person might end up on this list no matter if it was due to a harmless emotional outburst at work or in public, or due to the fact that they’re a convicted serial killer out on parole. There is a very broad range of possibilities for being put on a list. People can be placed on these lists by the police, doctors, lawyers, employers, etc., for very loosely defined reasons, and the person on the list is never informed of the fact, therefore being denied the ability to formally question the reasons or defend themselves against false allegations. Watch lists are regularly distributed to members of this secret network. Each member is required to have a cell phone, which is used to receive notifications of local targets, as well as recent photographs and information and updates about the target. Surveillance operations requiring more than one person are conducted via cell phone
communications using text rather than voice, with a central operations center coordinating active members and designating their tasks. A member who has flagged themselves as on-call is notified if they are needed in an operation. When they go on call, the central coordinating center begins to continually track them with GPS through their cell phone, and if they come into the vicinity of a target, they receive an alert message along with a photo of the target, giving the target’s reported location and the member’s designated task. Members might just be assigned to follow the target and report on their activities, or they might take part in more offensive types of activities against a target, filling some small role within a larger operation that involves a number of other members who fill other roles. Nobody necessarily has to know each other, what the other member’s tasks are, or the goal of the operation. A typical operation might involve signaling every ‘active’ member within the vicinity of a target as they carry on their normal daily routines. As the target walks through a neighborhood, members of this secret army who are on call will receive an alert. A target who has figured out what’s going on will be aware of who these members are because they will all be pulling out their cell phones and looking at the screen and then gazing around to locate the target they were just alerted about. The alert is generated by other community spies who have been monitoring the target in an adjacent neighborhood and who report the target’s movements to the command center. In many cases, a target is never physically followed in the traditional way, since there are often enough of these community spies active in a given area to keep the target under surveillance no matter where they go. The computer at the command center keeps track of the location of every active member through GPS, and also tracks the target, either through GPS if possible (the target must be carrying a cell phone or have been ‘tagged’ with an RF transmitter), or else through continual updates by members. The computer might even be programmed to automatically analyze situations, decide on tactics, coordinate members, and issue well-timed commands. A member who is actively engaged in an operation and is located ahead of a target who is walking down the street might be given a command to do something to block the target’s path on the sidewalk, while at the same time other nearby members are being directed into position so that the target becomes blocked on every side. Nobody knows anybody else. These things just seem to occur as if by coincidence and it all looks very innocent. Participating members will probably find it amusing, while targets will only find it frustrating. As long as no crimes are committed, most members will be willing to engage in these sorts of activities against a target. It certainly wouldn’t hurt to inject an element of fun into this covert spy system, in order to keep members interested and to make it more exciting for them. They might be given an outlet for discussing their activities and experiences, since their code of silence might otherwise leave them with the compulsion to say something to the wrong person accidentally. This outlet might be a private online forum that they can access and interact with other members at any time, whether they are currently on
assignment or not. They will be known to each other only by their code numbers or perhaps nicknames, and the forums will undoubtedly have certain strict rules about what can be said and what can’t, with both live moderators and special software programs sitting in the background and watching everything that takes place. This will allow further intelligence gathering, focused more specifically on the relationships and discussions between members, and their individual activities. Although members might think that they’re not being as heavily monitored as the people they target, they are. By keeping members constantly engaged in these covert activities, as well as knowing their thoughts about them, etc., they can be more easily monitored and controlled. Members are also watching each other, of course, and are expected to report on any other member who shows signs of disloyalty or breaches the rules. Private discussion forums for members might be used to plan operations, discuss tactics, or reminisce over recent adventures. It’s not hard to imagine members passing messages to each other during an operation, making jokes and degrading their targets, exhibiting the same contempt that’s seen to be reflected on their faces by their targets. Any sort of negative talk about a target, including the spreading of rumors among the public, will probably be condoned, since it will condition members to be willing to take part in the more offensive activities that involve harassment and worse. Private online forums would also offer those who have created this secret surveillance network the ability to determine who can be trusted with more sensitive information, who will be willing to do what others might not, who has the best skills for what tasks, who shows weaknesses that might compromise the system, who is not getting along with who, which members are getting too friendly, etc. Police Complicity and ‘Black Ops’ Units Since it’s a known fact that the police can legally use informants to conduct criminal activity to assist them in the investigation of a crime, such as to break into someone’s home to plant surveillance devices or look for incriminating evidence, then it’s only logical that they would use this legal loophole to its greatest advantage. And indeed, it offers a huge advantage. We always think that if the police are investigating something, then there must obviously be something there to investigate. However, the police often start investigations where there is no evidence that a crime has even been committed, and they only hope to find something to substantiate their suspicions, as though the end justifies the means. Other times, they’ll start an investigation on the word of a person who makes a false or very weak claim that a crime was or is being committed. Again, there is no real evidence. More often than not, these sorts of investigations never result in any charges being laid, and so they go largely unnoticed. If nothing comes from the investigation, it’s closed and nobody knows that it even took place. The only people that ever know about it are the police officers involved and their informant accomplices – and perhaps the innocent victim who was targeted.
Increasing police powers that allow them to use what they call ‘police agents’ – criminals who can legally perform illegal acts – were being instituted at the same time that many other changes were taking place in society. Covert surveillance and monitoring of the population was stepped up dramatically in the wake of the 9/11 scare. No great fanfare was made of it in the mainstream media, and the few who heard about it ever gave it enough thought to realize what it signified. These ‘police agents’, common (and often dangerous) criminals who are willing to do whatever illegal acts that the police might ask or order them to do, are like a special unit within a larger secret army. They are the ‘Black Ops’ of gang-stalking. Members of this secret network include people from all walks of life, and many of them, if they knew who some of these other members were that they were involved with, or what sort of activities they engaged in, would have a hard time accepting it and might begin to question what they are doing. For this reason, compartmentalization of different types of members is necessary. A ‘Black Op’ member will be assigned to such tasks as breaking into a target’s home and planting surveillance devices, engaging in harassment operations, and infiltrating a target’s circle of friends and associates to acquire information on a target, to destroy the target’s friendships with others, and try to set them up for entrapment. Other members of this network never know that these sorts of criminal activities take place, nor that the information used to profile a target or given to help them in their own activities might have been gained illegally. They never have to know that someone they are targeting is also having their privacy violated twenty-four hours a day through video and audio surveillance, both inside and outside their home, unrelentingly. The method of maintaining secrecy assures this. The police know that without the sense that crime and chaos are rampant in society, their services aren’t needed, so it has always been important for them that a certain level of crime and chaos is always present in society. This makes the ‘Black Ops’ members of this secret network a valuable commodity. They can be used to stage criminal activity so that it appears that there is more crime than there would be otherwise, leading these other members to feel that what they do is necessary and useful. These ‘Black Ops’ might be organized to start riots at public demonstrations, giving the police the excuse to go in and silence the protesters in order to defeat their public campaign. They can also be used to influence the perceptions of other members, the ‘good citizens’ and average citizens’, by staging criminal activity to create false scenarios that influences the person’s perceptions and beliefs. The members are not privy to all of the facts surrounding any particular target or regarding the operations they involve themselves in. This is strictly monitored and controlled, and the facts are often purposely distorted. This allows for an incredible degree of manipulation of each member’s perceptions and beliefs, which means that they’re at the complete mercy of those they do this for. A member can never be certain why a target has become a target, or what the full purpose of a task or operation might be. They will only be able to make assumptions about what they
don’t know. We use assumptions to fill in where we don’t have the complete facts, in order to make logical sense of something, but assumptions are only best guesses, and are often quite wrong. The main problem with an assumption is that after a while, if nothing comes up to throw it into question, most people begin to regard it as fact. The enormity of the problem that this secret spy network is creating needs to be fully grasped in order to understand its drastic implications. If it gives those who control it the power to control people’s experiences through staged events, then they are only left to rely on the ‘facts’ as they are told them by the trusted authorities who have built this monster. This is largely a self-propagating system in increasing its membership, and it is highly automatable, providing a very unique method for conditioning and controlling a society, both individually and collectively. It plays its members against each other through the orchestration of their individual actions and the given explanation for what is going on and why they are doing what they are doing as part of the system. ‘Black Ops’ teams are a crucial component in all of this, and it is the least expected component from the point of view of anyone who trusts those who created and manage this secret network. A Conspiracy of Silence Why do the police just snicker and change the discussion when the subject of gangstalking is raised? Why do government officials refuse to respond to letters from people who raise the subject of gang-stalking? Why do doctors routinely label someone as ‘mentally ill’ if they raise this subject? Why do lawyers avoid taking on clients who claim to be targets of gang-stalking? Why do these professionals and authorities, of all people, continually act as though they’ve never heard of gang-stalking and that what people are claiming isn’t a serious issue? The answer only becomes obvious when you understand how effective the government actually is at keeping secrets, and realize that secrecy laws and nondisclosure agreements are being heavily taken advantage of to keep silent anybody in the know, from the highest levels of power down to the most insignificant member of this sinister network, barring the chance of this problem ever becoming officially acknowledged, and thereby affecting the perceptions and beliefs of a large segment of the public who rely blindly on authority. If you don’t understand exactly how such a covert system can be so pervasive and involved in the activities that it is and never come to public awareness, then you’ll never believe those people who claim to be targets of gang-stalking. You’ll very possibly even respond with the conditioned attitude of ridicule when such an idea is raised. At the very least, fear will compel you to deny that it could ever be as real as what is described by targets. Fear of being ridiculed for entertaining the idea. Fear of facing the truth. Fear of what might happen to you if you question the powers that be.
Apparently, the only people who can even legally talk about this secret network and its activities are those people who aren’t actually taking part in it. Everyone else is sworn to secrecy. As soon as conversations turn to anything that might relate to this covert spy system, those people who are involved will either go silent, try to change the conversation to something else, or ridicule the idea. Those who are involved in managing and operating this network and who therefore know all about it will be under the strictest secrecy oaths and will clearly understand the consequences of breaking them, so they’ll be that much more careful to avoid any discussions relating to the subject, whereas recruited members of this secret network don’t really know that much about it beyond what they’ve been exposed to through their participation, so they’ll only avoid discussing what they know not to discuss. This is exactly the situation that is found when the subject is investigated. Formal enquiries to government officials go unanswered, The police continually pretend ignorance, and the majority of the public avoids serious consideration. You would think that if it weren’t true, that those who are in the best positions to know, and who are the most heavily implicated as being knowingly aware of and involved, would be concerned about clearing their names and preserving their reputations by acknowledging the issue and discussing it and taking steps to assure the public that no such system exists that could or would be used in such a way on society. The reason this doesn’t happen is because these people have no way to assure us, at least not without it biting them in the ass. Whether or not they know that such a system exists and it’s being used for illegal and undemocratic purposes, they’ve been forced to maintain absolute silence and feign ignorance about such matters. Most likely, they don’t even know enough about the issue to make any sort of informed response, and must instead rely on those sources of information that they’ve invested their trust in when evaluating the given ‘facts’ against their beliefs. This leaves all knowledge regarding the full reality of the situation tightly contained within a small group. All others know only what they have been told, and the little that they experience personally. Everybody in life gravitates to a level of understanding and awareness of the world that they are most comfortable and able to work with, some middle ground between the known and the unknown where what they accept as true is supported by the common consensus or known ‘facts’ and what they don’t know remains in the dark and is never explored as long as it doesn’t threaten to affect their current level of contentment. When something does threaten that level of contentment, our natural reaction is to try to deny it, to rebury it, to continue to try to explain it in terms of what we believe, until it becomes impossible to deny it any more and we must finally give up and admit that our level of contentment has been permanently shattered by a deeper truth that we weren’t ready for. This is why it’s very hard for people to believe that gang-stalking, and the fascist elements in government that it has grown out of, is not as real as targets describe it. This is why people don’t want to believe that they and everyone around them are being turned into slaves of the state. After hearing stories about gang-stalking, it’s far
too easy for people to quickly regain the illusory feeling that such things are just somebody else’s imagination when they turn on the television or pick up the newspaper and find no explicit support for such ideas anywhere in the real-life events that are depicted there. The constant conditioning that’s ingrained into our perceptions and beliefs is far too familiar to be easily washed away by an instance of doubt and uncertainty, and our natural fear of the unknown keeps us from venturing to look any further into the shadows that cover dark hidden truths. And if we were even brave enough to venture to look, where might we start? Finding out the truth of such things is blocked at every angle of approach. All signs that such a macabre system of control exists have been painted over with the illusion of innocent scenes offering a more palatable presentation of reality to the public’s perceptions. Knowledge of something requires information, either through first-hand experience or second-hand sources. When there’s little information available except through less trusted sources, it’s hard to accept anything as real. Life is But an Illusion What do you equate with happiness? To spend leisure hours with good company and entertaining activities? To have a little more than you currently do? To be free of the worries and discomforts which might threaten your current state? What do you perceive as your greatest hope or achievement for yourself in this lifetime? To succeed in your profession? To raise healthy children and provide them with what they will need to succeed on their own? To be loved and remembered as a good person? However you might answer these questions, it will be within the parameters of what you have been conditioned to believe is possible and what you value. Outside of your values and beliefs, nothing else really matters. For most of us, something as uncertain and unverifiable as gang-stalking must be set aside when evaluating what is important to our own happiness and what we can expect from ourselves. We just don’t have the ability to determine the facts about something like gang-stalking, and it seems to be so far removed from our own lives (excepting targets) that it doesn’t pose any threat to us, so we don’t concern ourselves about it. We continue to perceive the world through commonly established beliefs based on commonly established values that have been taught to us since birth. Broadcast media have played a huge role in molding our values and beliefs. They have become a major source of information for both facts and ideas, through both news and entertainment. However, fact and fiction are more and more often being blended together and so subtly and imperceptibly that distinguishing truth from falsehood is often next to impossible. The historical account of Orson Wells’ radio performance of War of the Worlds in the 1930s and the resulting mass hysteria that ensued was an early example of this, and it turns out that this may have been more of a planned experiment than just a coincidental event. The imperceptibility between
fact and fiction has since been enhanced further with Hollywood special-effects techniques using state-of-the-art computerized sound and image technology to the point that what we see and hear on the screen is easily manipulated to make things appear other than they really are. The internet is an information source that takes this blending further still, mixing factual information with false information, bogging down anyone seeking to learn anything with an overload of distractions and diversions, contradictions, inconsistencies, and alternate opinions. All of this leaves the average person with no other course but to rely on the word of someone they trust and believe would know better than themselves about such things, and who can provide the most accurate information that might be hoped for. Beyond that, nothing more can be done, and there’s no sense in questioning things that don’t seem to affect us personally, and which would demand a complete reconsideration of our sense of reality if it proved to be true. We would rather live in an illusion than to face up to the truth. Many people who might learn about this growing secret army or even involve themselves in it will think of it as a necessary thing, the response to a real threat of terrorism that has developed as a natural consequence of our modern society. They will think that it’s being carefully controlled and only used in a passive sense that’s harmless, even if it is a little invasive. They’ll think that it could never become anything so sinister and Orwellian as what is described by targets, because those descriptions can’t help but raise images in the listener’s mind that relate more to the storyline of a movie or television show than to what they believe exists in the real world. At some point, the blend between fact and fiction that they have been conditioned to expect will interfere with their judgment, and the more outrageous the information is, the more likely they will place it in the category of fiction. The deeper you go in investigating this whole issue (or anything else that relates to our secret history), the more outrageous it becomes. There are many claims that advanced mind-control technology is being used on some targets, and this leads into another area where the element of ridicule stops most people from taking any of it seriously. There are claims that this is a part of the New World Order, and that a secret government is in control of our leaders. This is met with equal ridicule, and leads into all sorts of speculative opinions and unproven facts that have been promoted over the years, muddying the waters. To accept even a part of the truth requires that you take the whole pie, which is more than most people will be able to stomach without getting sick. That our government would create this sort of secret network is not so hard to believe, but that it would be used to engage in illegal activities or to control and manipulate people goes against what we’ve been continually conditioned to believe about our government. They wouldn’t do it. They couldn’t do it. It’s unconstitutional. It goes against the very foundation of the democratic process that this country was built on and is supposed to value so highly. The fact is, it can be done, it is being done, and it’s threatening to overtake society completely. It’s not the fact that we’re being spied on by our friends and neighbors
that should worry you, or even that some people’s lives are being destroyed, but rather the much deeper implications that arise when you consider how such a system might be applied more heavily on the population, creating illusions and burying truths. As far as most people will be concerned, everything will continue to seem as normal as ever. But what seems normal might easily be an illusion. How a person comes to perceive their world will be able to be conditioned, staged, and directed by an unseen hand, where none of the actors will be aware of the parts they are really playing, and each of their perceptions of what they are doing and what is taking place can be quite different. They all think that they’re involved with other like-minded people who know what they know and are driven by the same reasons. When gang-staking activity takes place around them, they’re oblivious to it. When they’re involved in it, they’re following orders and understand the situation only as far as it’s been explained to them. Other participants on an operational team don’t have to understand it the same way, and because they don’t otherwise know each other, there’s little chance of them ever realizing any discrepancies in the facts that they were given to coerce them to act. Such a system might even be used as a ‘reality TV’ form of entertainment for those people who manage the system (some targets suspect that this is what’s taking place in their situation). They might even make a game out of the usual activities of the members, where scenarios are created where a target is put into situations that the members bet on the response. With the prevalence of surveillance devices being planted in target’s homes, an underground market could be created that exploits their more private moments through an exclusive internet video website set up for members who follow certain lifestyles. But the most dangerous aspect of this system and the way it’s able to create false scenarios that none of those involved can be certain is all that it appears to be, is that reality is no longer certain. Any aspect of our day-to-fay lives might be staged. Not just for the targets, but for the members of this network as well.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.