This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Assume that you are the lawyer for either one of the parties. Using the information given, choose one side and write a memorandum of arguments that the court may consider before deciding the case. 1. Testimony of the Plaintiff COURT STAFF: (After swearing in the witness) State your name and personal circumstances. WITNESS: I am Anna Geronimo, 35 years old, married and an accountant. ATTY. RICHARD VALDEZ: With the Court’s permission. Ms. Geronimo, do you know the defendant in this case, Mr. Peter Pascual? A: Yes. Q: How do you know him? A: My husband, Raul Geronimo, and I have been friends with him since our college days. Q: Could you please tell us why you filed this suit for annulment of contract with damages against him? A: My husband sold our one-bedroom condominium unit to Mr. Pascual without my consent. Q: Could you please tell us how you learned about the sale? A: I knew about the sale because I was the one who offered the property to Mr. Pascual. Q: Could you please elaborate on that? A: Since we got married in 2006, my husband and I have been living in a onebedroom condominium unit. When I learned that I was having a baby sometime in 2008, we decided to buy a house to make room for the nanny and all the baby stuff we need. Q: When did you acquire this condo unit? A: My husband bought it in 2001 when he was still single. Q: But you have been living there since you got married? A: Yes. Q: So, how did Mr. Pascual learn about your plan to buy a house? A: Like I said, we were close friends. He usually came to our condo unit for weekend dinners. Sometime in January 2009, I mentioned our plan to him. He said that he would love to buy our condo unit should we finally decide to sell it. He mentioned something about it being a good investment. Q: When did the actual negotiations for the sale of the condo unit start? A: In April 2009, I called Mr. Pascual and informed him that we finally found a house. I told him that we were now selling our condo unit. Since he was still interested in buying it, I offered it to him at P2 million. He said that he will call back once the deed of sale and manager’s check were ready. Q: Did he call back? A: I left for the United States in May 2009 to give birth. He called my husband while I was away. Q: If you were the one who negotiated the sale, why are you saying now that your husband sold the condo unit without your consent? A: While I was in the United States, I decided not to sell the condo unit anymore. I thought it would be better to keep it in the meantime as an investment. Q: Did you tell your husband about this? Essay Part 1: Trial Memorandum Page 1 of 6
Q: When did you return? A: In September 2009. she informed me that they were giving it for P2 million. When I told her I was. She asked if I was still interested in buying their condo unit. Thus. Ms. Raul Geronimo. 36 years old. Q: Did you accept the offer? A: Yes. Pascual. I said that I’ll call back once the deed of sale and manager’s check were ready. He called me in June 2009. do you know the plaintiff in this case. Q: Could you please tell us how you learned that the condo unit was for sale? A: Sometime in January 2009. Q: What did she say? A: She promised to call me once they have found a house. Mr. your honor. I have seen how they took care of their condo unit. single and a sales manager. RICHARD VALDEZ: That is all for the witness. WITNESS: I am Peter Pascual. They were expecting a baby soon and they would need a nursery room and storage area for their baby stuff. Q: What did you tell her when you heard that? A: Since I have been living in an apartment for several years. Essay Part 1: Trial Memorandum Page 2 of 6 . he said that we will just talk about it when I get back. she told me that they finally found a house. Q: How do you know her? A: I have been friends with her and her husband. ATTY. I told Ms. Q: Do you know why she filed this suit for annulment of contract with damages against you? A: She claims that her husband sold their one-bedroom condominium unit to me without her consent. Q: What happened then? A: I called Mr. Since the spouses Geronimo have been my friends for a long time.A: Yes. Q: Did he agree? A: No. I thought it might be a good idea to invest and buy my own condo unit. 2. Geronimo told me that they were planning to buy a house. Statement of the Defendant COURT STAFF: (After swearing in the witness) State your name and personal circumstances. Q: When? A: In April 2009. Ms. I visited their condo unit. Q: What did you do? A: I consulted a lawyer and decided to file a suit for annulment of contract with damages. JUDD LAUREL: With the Court’s permission. He said that he already signed the deed of sale and that he already has the manager’s check. Q: Did she call? A: Yes. ATTY. Anna Geronimo? A: Yes. Pascual and explained that we were no longer selling the condo unit. When I told him that I already changed my mind. I even offered to return his money in cash. Geronimo that I will buy it should they finally decide to sell it. He insisted that the sale had been consummated and refused to accept the money. since college.
Geronimo about that? A: Yes. In case of disagreement. the transaction shall be construed as a continuing offer on the part of the consenting spouse and the third person. subject to recourse to the court by the wife for proper remedy. Since there was no valid consent from her end. In the event that one spouse is incapacitated or otherwise unable to participate in the administration of the common properties. The sale had been consummated. Laws and jurisprudence that may apply 1. She’s already married and we have been really good friends.Q: A: When did the deed and payment become ready? I immediately asked a lawyer-friend to prepare the necessary deed of sale. Q: Would you know of any reason why she suddenly changed her mind? A: Actually during that phone call. Geronimo? Did she sign the deed of sale? A: No. I met up with Mr. But that’s absurd. ATTY. Q: What did she say? A: She said that the condo unit was their property. Geronimo. I think she might be jealous because I always thought her to be extremely nice and sweet to me. Q: When did you learn that Ms. Q: Did you tell Ms. Geronimo called me. Sometime in June 2009. She said they won’t be selling the condo unit anymore. she will have the deed of sale annulled. and may be perfected as a binding contract upon the acceptance Essay Part 1: Trial Memorandum Page 3 of 6 . Q: Why not? A: She was in the United States to give birth. the disposition or encumbrance shall be void. the other spouse may assume sole powers of administration. Geronimo? A: Yes. However. JUDD LAUREL: That is all for the witness. In the absence of such authority or consent. Q: To whom was it named? A: It was under the name of Mr. Article 96 of the Family Code The administration and enjoyment of the community property shall belong to both spouses jointly. Geronimo. your honor. she told me that she wasn’t happy that I was getting married and was going to use the condo unit as our conjugal home. Q: How about Ms. which must be availed of within five years from the date of the contract implementing such decision. I told him that the sale could not have come at a better time since I was getting married and will use the condo unit as our conjugal home. After I handed him the manager’s check. he signed the deed of sale. Q: Were you able to get the certificate of title from Mr. the husband's decision shall prevail. I also prepared a manager’s check for P2 million. Q: What did you tell her? A: I told her that they can’t back out now. Geronimo did not want to sell the condo unit anymore? A: When she returned in September 2009. Ms. These powers do not include disposition or encumbrance without authority of the court or the written consent of the other spouse. Q: Were you able to have it transferred in your name? A: Yes.
Article 124 of the Family Code The administration and enjoyment of the conjugal partnership shall belong to both spouses jointly. Article 1330 of the Civil Code A contract where consent is given through mistake. These powers do not include disposition or encumbrance without authority of the court or the written consent of the other spouse. Article 1390 of the Civil Code The following contracts are voidable or annullable. 5. (2) Those where the consent is vitiated by mistake. Essay Part 1: Trial Memorandum Page 4 of 6 3. . undue influence. intimidation. 7. These contracts are binding. In the event that one spouse is incapacitated or otherwise unable to participate in the administration of the conjugal properties. the other spouse may assume sole powers of administration.by the other spouse or authorization by the court before the offer is withdrawn by either or both offerors. However. The offer must be certain and the acceptance absolute. subject to recourse to the court by the wife for proper remedy. (2) Object certain which is the subject matter of the contract. unless they are annulled by a proper action in court. Article 1318 of the Civil Code There is no contract unless the following requisites concur: (1) Consent of the contracting parties. or fraud is voidable. violence. (3) Cause of the obligation which is established. The contract. is presumed to have been entered into in the place where the offer was made. They are susceptible of ratification. intimidation. in such a case. the husband's decision shall prevail. violence. and may be perfected as a binding contract upon the acceptance by the other spouse or authorization by the court before the offer is withdrawn by either or both offerors. In the absence of such authority or consent. 2. the disposition or encumbrance shall be void. which must be availed of within five years from the date of the contract implementing such decision. 6. even though there may have been no damage to the contracting parties: (1) Those where one of the parties is incapable of giving consent to a contract. undue influence or fraud. and cannot be denied or disproved as against the person relying thereon. A qualified acceptance constitutes a counter-offer. Article 1431 of the Civil Code Through estoppel an admission or representation is rendered conclusive upon the person making it. In case of disagreement. Article 1319 of the Civil Code Consent is manifested by the meeting of the offer and the acceptance upon the thing and the cause which are to constitute the contract. the transaction shall be construed as a continuing offer on the part of the consenting spouse and the third person. 4. Acceptance made by letter or telegram does not bind the offerer except from the time it came to his knowledge.
Respondent Norma Camaisa admittedly did not give her written consent to the sale. her written consent to the sale is required by law for its validity.. otherwise. Respondent Norma may have been aware of the negotiations for the sale of their conjugal properties. petitioner herself admits that Norma refused to sign the contracts to sell. 513 SCRA 570 [A] person is considered in estoppel if by his conduct. as a consequence of which he would be prejudiced if the former is permitted to deny the existence of such facts. G. January 31.8. 11. 2004. Camaisa. No.R. 2005. the Court ruled that the husband may sell property belonging to the conjugal partnership even without the consent of the wife if the sale is necessary to answer for a big conjugal liability which might endanger the family’s economic standing. Co Chien v. Jader-Manalo v. 439 SCRA 649 Being essentially consensual. Therefore. which she denied. 155043. September 30. 165420. No.. 10. impliedly. Ainza v. "causes another to believe certain facts to exist and such other rightfully relies and acts on such belief. the consent of both husband and wife must concur. Abalos v. whether intentionally or through culpable negligence. The properties subject of the contracts in this case were conjugal. the disposition is void. G.R. No. 2002. 462 SCRA 614 The consent of both Eugenia and Antonio is necessary for the sale of the conjugal property to be valid. Macatangay." 9. Sr. Lucia Realty and Development. ownership of the thing sold shall not be transferred to the vendee until actual or constructive delivery of the property. Inc. [T]he husband may dispose of conjugal property without the wife’s consent if such sale is necessary to answer for conjugal liabilities mentioned in Articles 161 and 162 of the Civil Code. January 23. no judicial intervention is necessary. Significantly. In Tinitigan v. Even granting that respondent Norma actively participated in negotiating for the sale of the subject properties. Sta. in the absence of Antonio’s consent.R. a contract of sale is perfected at the moment there is a meeting of the minds upon the thing which is the object of the contract and upon the price. Except for the self-serving testimony of petitioner Natividad. for the contracts to sell to be effective. This is one instance where the wife’s consent is not required and. the disposition made by Eugenia is voidable. Jr. Essay Part 1: Trial Memorandum Page 5 of 6 .R. hence.. Eugenia alone is incapable of giving consent to the contract. G. However. there is no evidence that Antonio participated or consented to the sale of the conjugal property. No. June 30. Antonio’s consent cannot be presumed. Tinitigan. G. 374 SCRA 498 The law requires that the disposition of a conjugal property by the husband as administrator in appropriate cases requires the written consent of the wife. representations or admissions or silence when he ought to speak out. Padua. However. 2007. 162090. being merely aware of a transaction is not consent. 147978.
2003. such as by Articles 166 and 173 of the Civil Code or Article 124 of the Family Code. he must show that he inquired into the latter's capacity to sell in order to establish himself as a buyer for value in good faith. 502 SCRA 334 To establish his status as a buyer for value in good faith. Bautista v. 604 SCRA 120 In the present case.R. G. 2009. The contract is not perfected if the offeror revokes or withdraws its offer and the revocation or withdrawal of the offeror is the first to reach the offeree. An acceptance which is not made in the manner prescribed by the offeror is not effective but constitutes a counter-offer which the offeror may accept or reject. 2006. Silva. September 19. 160708. The termination of the contract when the negotiations of the parties terminate and the offer and acceptance concur. If an offeror prescribes the exclusive manner in which acceptance of his offer shall be indicated by the offeree. Unless the offeror knows of the acceptance. 157434. 13.R. an acceptance of the offer in the manner prescribed will bind the offeror. is largely a question of fact to be determined by the trial court. October 16. G. Ravina v. An offer made inter praesentes must be accepted immediately. No. Even assuming that petitioners believed in good faith that the subject property is the exclusive property of Pedro. no real concurrence of offer and acceptance. a person dealing with land registered in the name of and occupied by the seller need only show that he relied on the face of the seller's certificate of title. 125761. The contract is perfected only from the time an acceptance of an offer is made known to the offeror. However. 402 SCRA 168 The acceptance of an offer must be made known to the offeror. G. Mary Ann. an attempt on the part of the offeree to accept the offer in a different manner does not bind the offeror as the absence of the meeting of the minds on the altered type of acceptance. there is no meeting of the minds of the parties. April 30. the contract will be perfected only upon knowledge by the offeror of the express acceptance by the offeree of the offer.12. But for a person dealing with land registered in the name of and occupied by the seller whose capacity to sell is restricted. On the other hand. 14. Court of Appeals. The acceptance by the offeree of the offer after knowledge of the revocation or withdrawal of the offer is inefficacious. No. No. Petitioners cannot deny knowledge that during the time of the sale in 1991. Malbarosa v. If the parties intended that there should be an express acceptance. Mary Ann’s conformity did not appear in the deed. Villa Abrille. the property is registered in the name of Pedro and his wife. they were apprised by Mary Ann’s lawyer of her objection to the sale and yet they still proceeded to purchase the property without Mary Ann’s written consent. Essay Part 1: Trial Memorandum Page 6 of 6 .R. Pedro was married to Mary Ann. The offeror may withdraw its offer and revoke the same before acceptance thereof by the offeree.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.