This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

5 -

BH1 0 l ev el 11. 500 12. 600 13. 300 14. 200 15. 000 16. 300 17. 100 18. 000 19. 500

BH2 MP a uc s 1. 02 1. 96 7. 34 4. 21 5. 19 2. 42 1. 21 1. 08 1. 69 GL dept h 11. 3 12 13 14. 5 15. 3 16. 6 17. 5 18. 2 19. 6 0 l ev el - 11. 300 - 12. 000 - 13. 000 - 14. 500 - 15. 300 - 16. 600 - 17. 500 - 18. 200 - 19. 600 MP a uc s 2. 16 1. 99 4. 2 5. 61 1. 08 1. 86 0. 75 8. 31 1. 31 GL dept h 11. 7 12. 9 13. 8 14. 5 15. 9 16. 8 17. 3 18 19. 5 -

BH3 0 l ev el 11. 700 12. 900 13. 800 14. 500 15. 900 16. 800 17. 300 18. 000 19. 500

MP a uc s 0. 98 2. 61 4. 61 1. 35 1. 41 6. 31 1. 73 2. 16 4. 18

Ro c k l e v e l 11 - 11. 000 W t er l ev el a 1. 7 - 1. 700 1020

Ro c k l e v e l 11 W t er l ev el a 1. 8

- 11. 000 - 1. 800 1990

Ro c k l e v e l 11 - 11. 000 W t er l ev el a 1. 65 - 1. 650 980

UC S

S haft m in T o e m in

980 1 .9 6

( f or ( f or

t oe l ev el t oe l ev el

- 1 2 m) - 1 2 m)

0 GENERAL 2.Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p.1 MAXIMUM ALLAWABLE COMPRESSION LOAD 3.0 STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF THE PILE 3.2 TOTAL PILE CAPACITY 4.3 CALCULATION OF SETTLEMENT OF PILE 4.3.0 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF THE PILE 4.p.4 STRESS IN CONCRETE 3.3.1 SETTLEMENT OF PILE SHAFT 4.f.2.3.0 PROPOSED PILE DETAILS 100 TONS (C) & 0 TONS (T) 3.2.O.1 RESUME OF SOIL DATA 4.8 CHECK FOR SPACING OF STIRRUPS 4. 2009 DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF 500 MM DIA PILES. Box: 40287 . CONTENTS: 1.PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P.com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 PFP/040/09/04/A012 April 22.3 SETTLEMENT OF PILE CAUSED BY THE LOAD SUBMITTED ALONG THE PILE SHAFT 4.7 CHECK FOR STEEL IN TENSION 3.3.2 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OF REINFORCEMENT 3.5 CHECK FOR CLEAR SPACING 3.emirates@gmail.2 SHAFT FRICTIONAL RESISTANCE OF PILE IN SOIL ABOVE ROCK LAYER 4.1 CAPACITY OF PILE IN ROCK LAYER 4.4 TOTAL PILE SETTLEMENT 1 .6 CHECK FOR BOND LENGTH 3.3 BENDING MOMENT CALCULATIONS IN PILE DUE TO H-FORCE & CONSTRUCTIONAL ALLOWANCES 3.2 SETTLEMENT OF PILE CAUSED BY THE LOAD AT END BEARING 4.

Braja M Das Pile Design and construction practice .Lvl 2.0 PROPOSED PILE DETAILS Pile Type Pile Diameter Design Capacity Number of Piles Pile Toe Level Pile length Cub Concrete Strength Reinforcement Main Bars Links Cover Tests Nbr of Working test Nbr of Integrity test : : : : : : : 2 63 Piles (1.p.PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P.6 m 8. D H Shields Ground Level ± 0.O.O. Third edition Elements of Soil Mechanics for Civil and Mining Engineers . BS Code of practice for Foundations Charts for design of circular columns to BS 8110 Principles of Foundation Engineering .00 N/mm 2 -7.0 GENERAL Project Location Owner PILING Contractor Consultants References : : : Villas .M J Tomlinson.5%) Piles (100.0m Steel Bars 6 No: 16 mm & fy = 8 mm @ 150mm & fy = 75 mm 460 N/mm2 250 N/mm2 Rock Lvl -8.0%) : : : : : : : Bored Piles Using CFA Method 500 mm (Nominal) 100 Tons (C) & 0 Tons (T) 750 mm max 1 m C.com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 1. Structural use of Concrete BS 8004 : 1986 .Compression.60 m 8.By G N Smith Pressure Meter and Foundation Engineering . J F Jezequel. Box: 40287 .MBZ City ABU DHABI السيد محمد سالم سعيد محمد الحجري : : : بلى برنث للمقاوالت العامة مكتب التصميم العالمي لالستشارات الهندسية BS 8110 : 1997 .Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p. T .6 m Toe Lvl Note: All Dimensions are in mm unless otherwise noted C.emirates@gmail.Shear. S.By F Baguelin.Lvl below platform 63 Piles -8.f.000 m G. 98 – Sector Z 22 .Tension 2 .60 m 40.63 CFA PILES Plot No.

Ac = 2 195143. Refer pages 219 to 223 of " Pile Design And Construction Practice by M J Tomlinson Third Edition.O.m 3.4 fcu A c + 0.33 kN Elastic Analysis: Reese and Matlock have established a series of curves for normally consolidated and cohesionless soils for which the elastic modulus of the soil Es is assumed to increase from zero at the pile head in direct proportion to the depth assuming that the pile behaves as an elastic beam on a soil which also behaves elastically.Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p.4 Safe N = 252.emirates@gmail. Table 7.0 STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF THE PILE 3.PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P.58) MF Fm T E I nh T Zmax L Zmax = MF = FmHT = Bending Moment = Bending Moment Coefficient from figure 6.2 Design Requirements of Reinforcement : BS 8004:1986 Art 7. Hence the moment on the pile occurs mainly due to horizontal force at the pile head.p.75 TONS Hence the pile is structurally safe to carry the load 2 40 N/mm 2 460 N/mm . N = 3538488.5.M produced by eccentricity : 75 1:75 50.1693 mm 2 1206.3 Bending Moment calculations in Pile due to H-force and constructional allowances: Since the piles are restrained by the pilecaps and Tie Beams the pile head shall be considered to be restrained from rotational moment.62 MN/m3 (Refer figure 6. Box: 40287 .20) 7 3 .85 TONS 100 3.75 As fy (Eq 38 of BS 8110:1997) fcu = fy = As = .1 Maximum allawble compression load: Allowing for eccentricity of loading due to deviations during construction.9 N Or Load Factor : 1.2.00 kN.33 kN 75.4.39b = Stiffness Factor 5 = EI/nh = Reference: BS 8110:1997 Part 2. Total horizontal force on the pile head (Ultimate) H= 83.3 L/T Pile length 6.com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 3.003067962 m = Coefficient of subgrade modulus variation = = = = = 24 1.2 = 28000 MN/m² or N/mm² 4 = 0. the ultimate axial load should not exceed the value of N given by: N = 0. 1987 Using the fixed Pile head equation (6.4 refers OUT OF POSITION ALLOWED : OUT OF PLUMB ALLOWED : The reinforcement shall be designed for this Article requirement H-force on the Pile (5.00 kN 13.f.0% of the Vertical Load) : Horizontal load from plumb on the pile : (Including construction allowances) B.371579 mm (Net Area) 353.

3.00 5.3.42 0.17 0.93 -0.75 0.Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p.30 1.08 18.00 2.emirates@gmail.9 5.4.25 0.30 1.61% Therefore safe Nos.5 T (m) 1. mm 3.O.00 MF =FmHT (kN.42 f 2 kN.00 Fm -0.4 for working load: 1.75 kN.30 Z=x/T 0.75 -5.05 0.42 5.m For the Ultimate State Design apply a load factor of 1.00 4.4.25 x fcu < = 10 5.2 m = Ac I = = 5. Dia: 16 0.2 M = Nc M ± x s at 5.00 Therefore maximum bending moment on pile = Mmax = hs = 75 318 mm 318 Then hs /h = 500 + = 100.p.092958179 N/mm² N/mm2 Therefore safe As an example of the foregoing calculations stresses.1 the working stress in compression should not exceed 25% of the characteristic concrete strength at 28 days.41 3 h h² From Chart 13 for design of circular columns to BS 8110 .4 Stress in Concrete: According to BS 8004:1986.30 1.00 3.4 N M = 5.30 1.25 fcu or 10 N/mm² From the above results it can be inferred that stressses in the concrete are acceptable 4 .65 3 5.60 . Box: 40287 .com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 Depth x (m) 0 1. 6 Area = Links 8 = 0. Section 7.3. = 1.3 2.6 3. for this condition: Area of Steel required Areq = (Asmin = 0.2 6.f.1: these stresses are < 0. As per BS 8004 Article 7.00 1.30 1.64 = 175. Working stress = 100 x p/4 x < 10000 500 ² 0. the Moment at 5.40%) 0.m) -100.PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P.3.m ± x 10 x 5.42 3067961576 x Which give sm = 6 500 2 5.05 0.40% Area of Steel provided As Proposed reinforcement: Main Bars.42 27.K.09 N/mm².61% of concrete mm @ 150 mm Therefore O.53 1000 p/4 OR x x 10 250000 4.

53 mm² mm² Therefore safe.33 p/4 x x 10 500 ² 3 = v = Hw p/4 xf ² (Ultimate) = 0.50 3. No Shear reinforcement is not required.4 Allowable Tensile Force = 37. however we provide nominal 8 mm links @ 150 mm For this condition use the following equation: Minimum Shear reinforcement required = Asv 0.38 N = 52.650 100.c spacing = Therefore clear spacing is 150. Dia Ultimate Tensile Force = 1206.79 x (100 x As/(b x d))1/3 x (400/ds)1/4/gm = = vc = 2 0.37 Shear Stress = vc 0.4 of BS 8110 (Part 1) : 1997 max clear spacing is 300 mm Thus 6 bars provided are adequate.4 bv sv / 0.Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p.40 x 0.575 N/mm for concrete grade 25 1/3 = 0.424 N/mm² As v < vc the permissible shear stress is more than the actual shear stress .95 x 500 460 x 150 = < 68. Box: 40287 . for fcu = ds = 400.95 fyv Asv = 0.PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P.25 mm2 Area of Reinforcement Provided = 1206.2.com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 3.6 Check for Bond Length: Table 3.50 mm Art 3.8 BS 8110 (Part 1:1997) . 5 .37 x 437 = 527184. 166.27 of BS 8110:1997 shows the following values of anchorages for various grades of concrete: Grade 30 35 40 For fcu Type 2 Deformed Bars 40 f 38 f 35 f = 40 = == 750 N/mm² x 560 mm mm into the pile cap 35 16 Anchorage length We propose 3.O.12.00 mm 40 N/mm² gm = 1.3716 mm² for 6 Bars.673 N/mm2 for concrete grade 40 Working Shear Stress in pile v = 83.emirates@gmail. c.11.p.7 Check for steel in tension: As = 1206.718 Load Factor = 1.575 [40/25] 0.66 Tons > 16 mm (460 X 0.8 Check for Spacing of Stirrups: From Table 3.95 = 437) Tons 0 Tons Therefore safe 3.f.5 Check for Clear Spacing: For 6 bars of 16 mm dia.

(see annex .46 N/mm² (see annex .46) = 0.96965511 kN/m .500 (Pile Design and construction practice .5 mm² C = Cohesion at base = ½ quc of UCS of Rock (but less than 0.PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P.page 3 to take an idea) = 1570796. 4.emirates@gmail. tand = qb = tanf 25467 = 0.Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p.2.3rd ed page 123) Nc = 40 Nq = 20 f = Angle of friction at the base pile level = 30 s'v0 = Effective overburden pressure at base pile level = g' = Average Effective unit weight of shaft pile in rock = D = Diameter of Piles = 500 mm As = Area of Socket friction in rock Ng = 20 (see annex .00 kN/m² .60 m Rock Level Toe Level Length of Piles: It should be emphasized that the length of pile assumed in these calculations is based on Lower cut-off levels. 1st assumption: Reference: Braja M Das (Principles of Foundation Engineering .M J Tomlinson.3 C Nc + Nq s'v0 + 0.60 m UCS of rock at Toe of Pile : -8.O.3 g' D Ng) + 1/2 Ks s'v0 tand As Ab = Pile base area = 196349.000 m Platform Level Platform Level Cut-off Level : max 1 m : below platform Cut-Off Level Min UCS of shaft : 1770 kN/m² : Min UCS at Toe 2175 kN/m² Zone of interest of reading for UCS Values at the Toe Level for End Bearing Capacity [25% from shaft (0. Loadings and results of tests run on a few boreholes carried out by a third party.577 & Third edition: Cast-in-place.5D)] : Toe Level -8. 3 9. At any rate such information contained in the Boreholes results affecting the design may not be exactly representative of the whole area and particularly that the hard strata reported may differ from pile location to the other.5D) & 75% from Toe (1.504) .com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 4.1 RESUME OF SOIL DATA: : GULF LABORATORY Soil Report by : ± 0.p. Box: 40287 . d = Pile/Soil friction angle Ks = K0 = (1-sinf) = 0.page 6 for Mudstone .00 kN/m .327 mm² Ks = Coefficient of the horizontal soil stress. Rock Level : -7. The length of pile(s) shall be determined on site while boring by our supervisor on site as he is the best judge of the soil conditions because he watching every bore all the time.page 4) (see annex .to be at the safe side since the soil report give a higher value.2 Total Pile Capacity : 4.f.Pages 487 .60 m 2175 kN/m² UCS in Rock Socket : 1770 kN/m² Length of Rock Socket : 1 m Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Pile Qu _ a. we adopt 0. concrete/sand) qs = 2 10. Ng & Nq = Dimensionless Bearing Capacity Factors depneding of f (Tomlinson.46 N/mm 2) Nc .1 Pile Capacity in Rock Layer : Taking the worst case.Of course the attention of the Engineer's Representative shall be drawn to each case as it arises and a decision taken regarding where to found the pile in each case.0 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF THE PILE: 4.Estimation of shaft & end bearing according to TERZAGHI which can be calculated as follows: Qu = Qb + Qs = Ab qb +As qs = Ab (1.pages 6 & 7 to take an idea) 76.

01096966 = Qu = 5000433.467 = 0.emirates@gmail.757 N 17231.54 x 1570796.com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 Qb = Qs = 196349.Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p.p.09396 N 5017664.3 x 25.f.PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P.66% 0.851 N = 99.34% 501. Box: 40287 .O.77 Tons 6 .

Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p. = = 13050.84 Tons 4.com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 b.38 0.0113807 x Where 0.00 kN/m² .p.79864068 Tons = : d = Pile/Soil friction angle 10367255.0 6. concrete/sand) Therefore.3287 N 3068377.b= qs = ab quc .32 Qu = = = 2562361.76 mm² 36.M J Tomlinson. Where see annex .770 = 0. Third edition: Cast-in-place.00 x 2175 2175 kN/m² .64 Tons 7 11. Box: 40287 .49% 306.727 kN/m² 10367255.page 1) m 76.PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P.51% 16.136 Unit end bearing according to Tomlinson can be calculated as follows: qb = 2 Nf quc (4. As = Area of Socket friction qs = 1/2 Ks s'v0 tand As .508 N 506016.05 N/mm² Shaft Frictional Resistance of Pile in Rock according to Tomlinson (After Williams & Pells): qs = ab quc Where.322 N/mm² Shaft Frictional Resistance of Pile in Rock according to according to Tomlinson (After Rosenberg & Journeaux) : . a = Rock Socket Reduction factor = 0. a = 0.4068 N = 318.05 0.54 Qs = 1570796.00 .00 .2 Shaft Frictional Resistance of Pile in Soil above Rock Layer: Friction angle of shaft in the Soil Layer : Length of Pile shaft in Soil Layer .6 . b = Rock Socket correction factor = 0. qs = 0.412 0.84 Tons From the above comparative calculations it can be inferred that the minimum value for bearing in rock is: Qu = 306.05 N/mm² 0.26) Where Nf = tan² (45 + f/2) For UCS of f = Nf = 3.f.32 N/mm² Therefore Qb = 196349.8 = 117986.28 x 0.650 x 1.2.2 x 1 x 1770 = 0.65 .1m for Cap Pile : Qs (S) = As qs = 1/2 Ks s'v0 tand As s'v0 = Effective overburden pressure at the base of soil level = Ks = Coefficient of the horizontal soil stress. Ks = K0 = (Pile Design and construction practice . (Dependent on Mass factor/RQD) Average RQD < 50% quc = 1.770 N/mm² (Average UCS Value) qs = 0.20 1.00 kN/m² 13.35 N/mm² From the above comparative calculations it can be inferred that the minimum values are: qb = qs = .3 x x 13. the total capacity of the pile is : Qu = . 2nd assumption: (Reference: Tomlinson's "Pile Design and Construction" Pages 131 . (1-sinf) = tand = tanf = qs Qs (S) = = 11. qb = 2 x 3. 30 °. 13.837 N = 83.O.28 .emirates@gmail.

3.Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p.emirates@gmail.5 for uniform & parabolic . 9 & 10) = Iwp = influence factor S2 = Settlement of pile caused by the load at end bearing = 4.pages 7.80 mm 1. Qallow = > Tons = 106.21 Tons 100 Tons .67 for triangular Settlement of pile shaft = S1 4.88 2. Nomenclature: S = Total pile settlement = S1 + S2 + S3 S1 = Settlement of pile shaft S2 = Settlement of pile caused by the load at end bearing S3 = Settlement of pile caused by the load transmitted along the pile shaft 4.4 Total pile settlement : Total settlement anticipated = S = S1 + S2 + S3 = 4.54 mm² 7600. 1977) = 376 kN 624 kN 196349.page 11) 0. 1977) = S3 = = = 1570.2 Settlement of pile caused by the load at end bearing : S2 = qwp D Es D = diameter of pile qwp = point load per unit area at pile point Es µs = Poisson's ratio of soil = = = = 500.S = 3 In Tension : Qu = Qs F.96 Tons 4.95 kN/m² 350000 kN/m² 0.3 Calculation of Settlement of Pile : Reference: "Principles of Foundation Engineering".p. Box: 40287 . 51 Qallow .88 mm .PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P.00 m 3.5 .3 Settlement of pile caused by the load transmitted along the pile shaft : S3 = Qws pLe p Le x D Es x (1.S = .3.19 mm x (1 .5 0.3.36 mm 1. Therefore safe = 2.74 mm Iws = influence factor 4.O.0 mm 1914. The weight of pile is not considered 24. x = 0.952 mm = Young's modulus of rock at pile tip (see annex .com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 In compression : F.ms² ) Iwp = = = = (Vesic.3.µS ) Iws 2 = perimeter of the pile = embedded length of pile = 2 + 0.1 Settlement of Pile shaft : Settlement of pile shaft = S1 = (Qwp + x Qws )L Ap Ep Qwp = load carried by end bearing under working load condition = Qws = load carried by shaft friction under working load condition = Ap = area of pile cross section L = Length of the pile from cut-off level Ep = Young's modulus of the pile material Skin Friction resistance Distribution factor " x " x = 0.35 Le / D (Vessic.30 (see annex .f. second edition by Braja M Das.00 mm 28 kN/mm² 0.

com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 The above figures.f. it must be appreciated.emirates@gmail. Box: 40287 . We cannot predict residual settlements as these should better be left to the actual testing of piles.O.p.Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p.PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P. 8 . are calculated using data available from the soil report and the actual conditions may vary taking into consideration the practical aspects and limitations of the piling operation.

Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p.MBZ City ABU DHABI السيد محمد سالم سعيد محمد الحجري مكتب التصميم العالمي لالستشارات الهندسية بلى برنث للمقاوالت العامة . 98 – Sector Z 22 .p.f.PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P.O.com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 PILE DESIGN JOB NUMBER: PROJECT: LOCATION: OWNER: CONSULTANT: CONTRACTOR: PFP/040/09/04/A012 Villas . Box: 40287 .emirates@gmail.63 CFA PILES Plot No.

Box: 40287 .emirates@gmail.f.p.com Mob: + 971 50 96 76 136 ANNEXES Construction & Trading Licenses Soil Report & References Sheets Drawings .Abu Dhabi Fax: +971 2 5825184 E-mail: p.PHEONIX FOUNDATION PILING LLC Tel: + 971 2 582508 Phoenix Foundation Piling LLC P.O.

- Rock Socket EC 7 Template- Rev 00
- pile capacity
- Pile Capacity Calculation (12!12!2011)
- GeoTechnical Design of Pile
- Pile Design
- Pile Design C Phi Soil
- Pile Design
- PileCal BH 1 6 7 8
- Rock Socketed Shafts for Highway Structure Foundations
- Pile Design Sheet
- Understanding Load Transfer Behaviour and Rock Socketed Bored Piles DrGary Chapman
- Piled Raft Case Study in Malaysia
- Pile Capacity
- Pile Design Using SPT
- Pile Capacity Calculation
- Bore Pile Design d=1500-41m-Hk8
- Tension Design-Reaction Pile Tower B
- Pile Head Stress Calculations
- Pile Design
- Design of Pile Foundation
- Pile Design
- Maccaferri Soft Soil Stabilization Design Spreadsheet
- Design of Pile and Pile Cap Final
- Issues in Evaluating Capacity of Rock Socket Foundations
- Pile Foundation Sheet 123
- Design and Construction Driven Pile Foundation Vol 2
- NEW_ABUT
- pile foundation basic
- Pile Geotech Design[Engineersdaily.com]
- Kentledge Design Spreadsheet

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

We've moved you to where you read on your other device.

Get the full title to continue

Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

scribd