This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Welcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out more

*

The whole of quantum mechanics can be expressed in terms of a small set of postulates. This chapter introduces the postulates and illustrates how they are used.

**Postulates of Quantum Mechanics
**

Now we turn to an application of the preceding material, and move into the foundations of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is based on a series of postulates which lead to a very good description of the microphysical realm. Quantum mechanics is a very powerful theory which has led to an accurate description of the micro-physical mechanisms. It is founded on a set of postulates from which the main processes pertaining to its application domain are derived. A challenging issue in physics is therefore to exhibit the underlying principles from which these postulates might emerge. The set of statements we find in the literature as ‘postulates’ or ‘principles’ can be split into three subsets: the main postulates which cannot be derived from more fundamental ones, the secondary postulates which are often presented as ‘postulates’ but can actually be derived from the main ones, and then statements often called ‘principles’ which are well known to be as mere consequences of the postulates.

Main postulates

(1) State or Wavefunction. Each physical system is described by a state function which determines all can be known about the system. The coordinate realization of this state function, the wavefunction (uppercase psi) plays a central role in quantum mechanics. Two wavefunctions represent the same state if they differ only by a phase factor. The wavefunction has to be finite and single valued throughout position space, and furthermore, it must also be a continuous and continuously differentiable function. We shall see that the wavefunction of a system will be specified by a set of labels called quantum numbers, and may then be written ca,b, . . . , where a, b, . . . are the quantum numbers. The values of these quantum numbers specify the wavefunction and thus allow the values of various physical observables to be calculated. (2) Equation for the wave function (Schrödinger equation). The time evolution of the wavefunction of a non-relativistic physical system is given by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation

where the Hamiltonian is a linear Hermitian operator, whose expression is constructed from the correspondence principle. The time independent form of the equation can be written as: We shall have a great deal to say about the Schrödinger equation and its solutions in the rest of the text. (3) Correspondence principle. To every dynamical variable of classical mechanics there corresponds in quantum mechanics a linear, Hermitian operator. When the operators act upon

the wavefunction associated with a definite value of that observable yields this value times the wavefunction. Mathematically we can write: Where O is operator, o is eigenvalue of the operator O and is eigenfunction. The equation is named eigenvalue equation. The requirement that the operators are hermitian ensures that the observables have real values. Selection of the operators for all observables depends on the position and momentum operator. The more common operators occurring in quantum mechanics for a single particle are listed below and are constructed using the position and momentum operators. Operator Abreviation 1D Position Momentum Kinetic Energy K, T, KE K, T, KE x 3D r Math representation 1D x 3D r

Hamiltonian (time dependent) Hamiltonian (time independent)

E, H E,H

E, H E,H

Angular momentum

(4) Measurements (Von Neumann’s postulate). If a measurement of the observable A yields some value , the wavefunction of the system just after the measurement is the corresponding eigenstate . The expectation value will simply be the eigenvalue . (5) Born’s postulate: probabilistic interpretation of the wavefunction. The squared norm of the wavefunction is interpreted as the probability of the finding of the particle in volume . More specifically, if is the wavefunction of a single particle, is the probability that the particle lies in the volume element located at at time t. Because of this interpretation and since the probability of finding a single particle somewhere is 1, the wavefunction of this particle must fulfil the normalization condition

Secondary postulates

One can find in the some books other statements which are often presented as ‘postulates’ but

which are mere consequences of the above five ‘main’ postulates. We examine below some of them and show how we can derive them from these ‘main’ postulates. (1) Superposition principle. Quantum superposition is the application of the superposition principle to quantum mechanics. It states that a linear combination of state functions of a given physical system is a state function of this system. This principle follows from the linearity of the H operator in the Schrödinger equation, which is therefore a linear second order differential equation to which this principle applies. (2) Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. Any measurement of an observable A will give as a result one of the eigenvalues a of the associated operator A, which satisfy the equation Aψ = aψ. This is the consequences of corresponding principle. (3) Expectation value. For a system described by a normalized wavefunction ψ, the expectation value of an observable A is given by

This statement follows from the probabilistic interpretation attached to ψ, i.e., from Born’s Postulate. (4) Expansion in eigenfunctions. The set of eigenfunctions of an operator A forms a complete set of linearly independent functions. Therefore, an arbitrary state ψ can be expanded in the complete set of eigenfunctions of A ( ), i.e., as

where the sum may go to infinity. For the case where the eigenvalue spectrum is discrete and non-degenerate and where the system is in the normalized state ψ, the probability of obtaining as a result of a measurement of A the eigenvalue is . This statement can be straightforwardly generalized to the degenerate and continuous spectrum cases. The statements

Hermitian operators are known to exhibit the two following properties: (i) two eigenvectors of a Hermitian operator corresponding to two different eigenvalues are orthogonal, (ii) in an Hilbert space with finite dimension N, a Hermitian operator always possesses N eigenvectors that are linearly independent. This implies that, in such a finite dimensional space, it is always possible to construct a base with the eigenvectors of a Hermitian operator and to expand any wavefunction in this base. (5) Probability conservation. The probability conservation is a consequence of the Hermitian property of ˆH. This property first implies that the norm of the state function is time independent and it also implies a local probability conservation which can be written

Where

.

(6) Reduction of the wave packet or projection hypothesis. This statement does not need to be postulated since it can be deduced from other postulates. It is actually implicitly contained in von Neumann’s postulate. In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse (also called

collapse of the state vector or reduction of the wave packet) is the process by which a wave function—initially in a superposition of different eigenstates—appears to reduce to a single one of the states after interaction with an observer. In simplified terms, it is the condensation of physical possibilities into a single occurrence, as seen by an observer.

Derived principles.

(1) Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. If p and x are two conjugate observables such that They are not commute, it is easy to show that they satisfy the relation

In general

where the root mean square deviation of A is defined as

Finally, it is appropriate at this point to make a few remarks about the so-called energy–time uncertainty relation. Although the energy operator is well defined (it is the hamiltonian for the system), there is no operator for time in quantum mechanics. Time is a parameter, not an observable. Therefore, strictly speaking, there is no uncertainty relation between energy and time. The true significance of the energy–time ‘uncertainty principle’ is that it is a relation between the uncertainty in the energy of a system that has a finite lifetime (tau), and is of the form (2) The spin-statistic theorem. The spin-statistics theorem states that integer spin particles are bosons, while half-integer spin particles are fermions. The theorem states that: The wave function of a system of identical integer-spin particles has the same value when the positions of any two particles are swapped. Particles with wavefunctions symmetric under exchange are called bosons; The wave function of a system of identical half-integer spin particles changes sign when two particles are swapped. Particles with wavefunctions anti-symmetric under exchange are called fermions. (3) The Pauli exclusion principle. Two identical fermions cannot be in the same quantum state. This is a mere consequence of the spin-statistic theorem. Example 1. Show that any linear combination of the complex functions eigenfunction of the operator , where . is an

Solution. Then we operate on a linear combination of the functions.

The linear combination satisfies the eigenvalue equation and has the same eigenvalue (-4) as do the two complex functions. Self-test 1. Show that any linear combination of the functions eigenfunction of the operator . is an

Example 2. An operator A has eigenfunctions with corresponding eigenvalues . The state of a system is described by a normalized wavefunction given by

What will be the outcome of measuring the observable A? Method. First, we need to determine if c is an eigenfunction of the operator A. If it is, then we shall obtain the same eigenvalue of A in every measurement. If it is not, we shall obtain different values in a series of different measurements. In the latter case, if we have an expression for c in terms of the eigenfunctions of A, then we can determine what different values are possible, the probabilities of obtaining them, and the average value from a large series of measurements. Solution. To test whether is an eigenfunction of the operator A we proceed as follows:

Therefore,

is not an eigenfunction of A. However, because is a linear combination of we will obtain, in different measurements, the values (the eigenvalues of the eigenfunctions of A that contribute to ). The probabilities of obtaining are, respectively, . The average value, given by

Self-test 2. Repeat the problem using

References Laurent Nottale and Marie-No¨elle Celerier, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 (2007) 14471–14498 Atkins & Friedman: Molecular Quantum Mechanics

- exp 2013 10.docx
- exp 2013 10 kapak.docx
- EP228 Cosmic Rays and Dark Matter
- Nukleer Fizik Ders Notlari Nedir
- 3.5 Problems
- 3.4 Application
- 3.3 operatorsandcommutators
- 3.2 quantumwell
- 2.5 Problems
- 2.1 Schrödinger Equation
- 1.5 Problemsandquestions1
- 1.4 Uncertainty
- 1.3 bohrmodel
- 1.2 waveparticle
- 1.1 blackbody
- Midterm 2 Solved Problems
- Midterm 2 Solutions
- Midterm 1 Solved Problems
- Midterm 1 Solutions
- Problems Mixed Final
- 6 Problems
- 5 Problems
- 4 Problems
- 3 Problems

- Implementation of the Behavior of a Particle in a Double-Well Potential Using the Fourth-Order Runge-Kutta Method
- A Course in General Relativity
- GR_course
- Driven Nonlinear Oscillators
- Pert
- Homework 3
- tranformasi Kanonik
- Muxin Han- Quantum Dynamics of Loop Quantum Gravity
- elementary particles
- Introduction to Pi Space Theory
- Lecture 26
- Gauss's Law Worksheet
- azzam
- Yang-Mills Paper 2.1
- tmp568
- Advanced Math Revision
- A. L. Pokrovsky and A. E. Kaplan- Relativistic reversal of the ponderomotive force in a standing laser wave
- 4261 Advanced EM Theory 1 of 11 new lecture notes
- Physics From Symmetry - Jakob Schwichtenberg
- A Temperature Below Absolute Zero
- Hyperfast Interstellar Travel in General Relativity
- S. V. Krasnikov- Hyperfast travel in general relativity
- Pedro F. Gonzalez-Dıaz- Quantum time machine
- Thermo history
- 4 - Kinetics of Particles - Impulse & Momentum
- Physics I Problems (77).pdf
- 2.5 Problems
- 3.5 Problems
- 1.4 Uncertainty

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

We've moved you to where you read on your other device.

Get the full title to continue

Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.

scribd