Conservation Minded? Think Twice about Smart Meters.

As stewards of the environment, we often find ourselves in conflict with man-made technologies that outpace safety standards. “Smart” electric meters, the devices that Central Maine Power (CMP) is currently installing are one such technology. Every citizen in Maine, and particularly MOFGA members, who are known conservationists should be concerned with CMP’s smart meter program and seriously consider opting out regardless of Maine’s Public Utility Commission (PUC) decision allowing CMP to extort a fee from us to protect our own health, safety and privacy. The problem is that CMP’s meters communicate by wireless radio-frequency non-ionizing radiation (man-made RF radiation). Many organisms such as birds, fish, marine mammals, bees, ants and butterflies use naturally occurring electromagnetic fields (EMF) to guide their migrations, give them a sense of direction or find food. But these fields can and are being disrupted. Recent studies on the effects of man-made radiation on plants and animals have been alarming. (Kumar, Girish, Prof. Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, 2010) The unusual signaling characteristics and higher power intensities of radio-frequency (RF) radiation are very different than naturally occurring radiation. It’s well documented, for example, that RF radiation from cell phone towers can adversely affect wildlife. Studies show animals abandon areas where cell phone towers are installed. Cows have increased cancers and lower milk production, and birds have increased birth defects and failed nests. (Manville, Albert, M. Senior Wildlife Biologist, USFWS, 2007 ) Alarmingly, data increasingly show RF radiation from our beloved cell phones cause all sorts of adverse health effects in humans, including cancer. . (www.emrpolicy.org ) and (Cell Phone Reportwww.ewg.org). As recent as November 2010, the Karolinska Institute, the organization that yearly selects the Nobel peace prize in medicine, issued a warning against wireless technologies. They urged governments to halt wireless deployments pending further study. In May 2011, The World Health Organization (WHO) classified RF radiation as a “possible carcinogen”, placing it in the same category as DDT and gasoline exhaust. This is the same radiation CMP says is “safe” and will use to transfer your personal data all over Maine. Haven’t we all experienced in our lifetimes, the assurances of industry telling us everything is fine, only to find out later they weren’t telling us the truth (tobacco, mercury, asbestos, etc.)? I’ve been pondering why so many well intentioned conservationists have fallen in love with the huge tragedy known as the Smart Grid. I suppose that many of them hope a smart grid, with

Very little data support consumers using less energy as a result of this billion dollar taxpayer funded program. when we cook. CMP (and their third party vendors) will know when we use our dryers. Lutzenhiser. Unless utilities are able to turn our appliances on and off. al Behavioral Economics. they will not conserve energy except in miles driven by meter readers. and our own 15-25 appliances. et.gov/ Peters. Only if consumer behavior is changed. whether we have a hot tub. enabled or not. one needed probable cause and a search warrant. 2009) Even if consumer behavior can be encouraged to change. but smart meters installed by CMP don’t provide for energy generated by home customers to feed the grid.ct. and certainly not smart. But if you didn’t know already. it’s the wireless industry and utilities benefiting. this is REALLY about connecting all of our appliances to the grid by wireless RF chips. Consumers can only get their real time energy usage if they buy all new grid-enabled appliances. not the environment or consumers. conservationists should ask where will we put all of our “dumb” appliances. Most worrisome to me are the radiofrequency radiation effects.state. or the meter.dpuc. not “the grid”. and how much will that cost? Smart appliances will connect wirelessly to smart meters so even “off”. Ironically. While smart grids may sound green. enabling wind and solar is touted as another grid benefit. it is you. Enabled appliances are already being manufactured by companies such as GE to recognize signals from the utility.components such as smart meters will (in and of themselves) conserve energy and reduce greenhouse gases. which is a major privacy concern. In the old days. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkley National Laboratory. But that is not how the grid will function. Ie. This will allow appliances to cycle on and off according to loads. So it’s really you who needs to be smart. they will be “on”. So. and when we leave the house. our homes will become loaded with RF radiation from our neighbor’s meters. Connecticut’s Attorney General rallied against the costs of his state’s smart grid after a pilot project showed no energy savings at all. Apparently Bangor-Hydro is able to get the data they need without relying on dangerous RF radiation from wireless meters. Many people reasonably question whether more energy consumed as a result of these “vampire” (always on) appliances. S. The component of the grid that is supposed to regulate energy usage is not the infrastructure. will “the grid” save energy and reduce our CO2 output. Allowing the utility to control your appliances. (www. This is not good news for conservation or privacy. Over 2000 smart meter health complaints have been registered at . doesn’t it make more sense to use a wired system that is less vulnerable to cyber hackers with much less health concerns? A few years ago Bangor-Hydro installed a completely hard wired system.lbl. One thing is certain.us/) Similar results have been reported all over the country [www.drrc. turn on the TV or shower.

In fact. Foley-Ferguson. and now you have a [false] choice to keep your own meter. Visit Maine’s Smart Meter Safety Coalition website at www. Smart meters CMP and many utilities all over the country are deploying are a part of a new wireless technology known as an RF “mesh”. This despite the fact scientific studies regarding this “possible carcinogen” have shown adverse effects for nearly three decades. This despite months of testimony to the PUC by Complainants and over 8000 people requesting opt outs. Friends. FCC regulations are extremely outdated. but as many as 15. and into homes all over Maine 24/7 [spiking every few seconds at orders of magnitude higher than your phone]. That’s your real choice. The mesh uses RF radiation to send data to and from people’s homes by using antennae in the smart meters. Unfortunately the Commission is also requiring you to pay CMP [via the “Opt Out”] “protection money”.electromagnetichealth.org) Dr. You can be quiet. The harmful effects on animals and wildlife are currently being tested in court (www.stopsmartmeters. tinnitus. the Naval Medical Research Institute compiled over 2000 studies dating back to the 1930’s showing adverse biological effects from low-level non-ionizing radiation. (www.com for more information.org).emrpolicy. owner of Beal’s Ice Cream in Portland is . similar to cell phones. to avoid possible health risks and to ensure your constitutional right to privacy. CMP and our own PUC could have selected a non-wireless shielded fiber optic system for Maine’s “smart grid” but it would have affected their bottom line.org) Our electricity provider has now joined an industry denying mounting evidence that RF radiation damages DNA strands. the PUC has ordered CMP to communicate the “benefits” [no drawbacks] of smart meters. As early as 1970. For those whose analog meters have not already been replaced. or you can assert your rights. which is like a web.000 other people’s data every day via the “best route” in the web. These stress responses occur at all levels in our bodies. if you don’t want a smart meter. and any wireless device that uses RF radiation has the potential to create negative biological responses (www. covering solely the “thermal” effects of microwave radiation on large males. we just don’t want to know the truth. Suzanne A. nausea and exhaustion. Martin Blank. a professor at Columbia that studies bioelectromagnetics is not surprised. from. Even the EPA has said FCC radiation limits do not protect the public from long term non-thermal radiation exposure and do not take into account vulnerable citizens with electrosensitivities or children whose developing brains are at risk. will be constantly transmitted to. They had a choice. not only your electrical data. One should know cumulative effects of non-ionizing radiation are not regulated.smartmetersafety. heart palpitations. When exposed to RF radiation. cells respond as if they are stressed. People are complaining about headaches. The meters receive and transmit. insomnia. Thus RF radiation. he says.California’s PUC in the past two years.

one of five complainants before the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC) on the issue of smart meters. . She has worked on environmental issues for over 25 years including a 3-year stint at the Cape Elizabeth Land Trust and founding the Friends of Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge. She served as a Scarborough Town Councilor for six years and currently chairs the Parks and Conservation Land Board in Scarborough.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful