You are on page 1of 2

was this a"one giant lie for mankind"

Armstrong made his descent to the Moon's surface and spoke his
famous line "That's one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for
people lie; the evidence doesn't.

The Apollo 11 mission was the first manned mission to land on the Moon. It was the fifth
human spaceflight of the Apollo program and the third human voyage to the moon.
Launched on July 16, 1969, it carried Commander Neil Alden Armstrong, Command
Module Pilot Michael Collins and Lunar Module Pilot Edwin Eugene 'Buzz' Aldrin, Jr.
On July 20, Armstrong and Aldrin became the first humans to land on the Moon, while
Collins orbited above.

The mission fulfilled President John F. Kennedy's goal of reaching the moon by the end
of the 1960s. In a 1961 speech he had proposed - "I believe that this nation should
commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the
Moon and returning him safely to the Earth".

i can give you dozens of scientific reasons to prove that man never landed on the moon. i
can lay out at great length what radiation and extreme temperatures would have done to
any astronaut. i could explain how the laws of physics, gravity, and photography could
not have produced any of the "proof" that NASA has released, but i am not an expert in
radiation or physics. what i am an expert in is conspiracies, and the moon landing
has "FAKE!" written all over it
in the 1960's automobiles and airplanes were still in their infancy. every attempt at
manned spaceflight had been a colossal failure. and yet, they want us to believe that
NASA was able to make a great stride forward and fly to the moon with not
one but three perfect flights - a feat that forty years later we have
yet to duplicate. no nation had the technology necessary to land on the moon. the
landing crafts and spacesuits were not yet designed to withstand the radiation and
extreme temperatures. America didn't even have the technology for
direct communication with a space ship, and yet despite these seemingly
insurmountable hurdles, NASA safely and successfully landed three crews on the lunar
surface and broadcast the feedback to televisions in every living room

People all over the world found it hard to believe that NASA could land a man on
the moon, so NASA produced evidence, and that evidence will be their undoing. Millions
of people watched the first moonwalk on TV. They sat in awe as the American flag
fluttered gently in the breeze, although there is no air in the vacuum, atmosphere-less
surface of the moon. None of the still pictures match up with the film footage. The
reason that the video quality was so bad was that news crews were only allowed to film
the footage projected onto a large screen inside of NASA.

the video feed may have been poor, but the pictures were perfect, too perfect in
fact. a professional photographer working under normal conditions will get one or two
really good pictures off of a roll of film. the astronauts, not photographers at all, produced
thousands of perfect pictures. each picture was perfectly focused and exposed even
though they were supposedly working under extreme lighting conditions
normal film would melt in the temperatures found at the moon, so a special film was
developed just for this expedition. the astronauts had cameras mounted on their chests,
and working with unfamiliar film through thick gloves without the ability to focus, meter,
or properly compose their shots came back with perfect pictures every time

every part of the picture is perfectly lit even though the only possible light source
was from the sun. the shuttle and flag have shadows to the right even though there must
be a light source behind the camera man in order to illuminate the picture. look closer,
where is the astronaut's shadow? other photos show shadows going in separate directions
and reflections of light sources in the visors that could not be the sun.

whether these pictures were created in an elaborate studio or if they were pieced together,
the result in the same. the pictures are nicely done fakes. if the only evidence of america's
flight to the moon is false, and the possibility that NASA could have conducted a lunar
landing is slim, they add up to only one thing. man has yet to set foot on the moon

The sounds
The major point which has helped convince that the moon landing was faked was the fact that
when the control room asked a question to the Astronauts the replies were instant with no delays.
This seems strange as even with technology in the 1990's there is a delay from satellite links from
the UK to the US. There is about a 0.7 second delay from London to California so how is it
possible for instant replies from the Moon ?
There is also evidence that when people go into space that there voice goes tense although the
Astronauts voices have been analyzed and found to be normal, and 7/10 people said it sounded
like someone reading from a script.
When Houston are talking to the module you should not be able to hear the responses at least
when the module is landing and the infamous "eagle has landed" quote, this is due to the noise
that should have been created by the rocket motor which generates several hundred thousand
pounds of thrust 20 ft below the astronauts. The noise would have completely drowned
the vocals out.
The Radiation
An American author has researched and found out that he believes the Apollo Spacecraft would
have needed to be two meters thick to prevent cosmic radiation from cooking the Astronauts
Also in addition to the radiation protection for the astronauts similar protection would be required
for the films + cameras, NASA's official explanation of how the films were protected was that the
cameras were painted with a coat of aluminum paint,
yeah right.