You are on page 1of 62

Report Tables

Paper number
1
2
3

Paper title

A comparison of re-offending by adults between 2005 and 2008 who had received different types of sentences, including imme
A comparison of re-offending by adults between 2005 and 2008 who had received different types of sentences, other than imm
Hazards of different types of re-offending

entences, including immediate custodial sentences


entences, other than immediate custodial sentences

Table 1: Proven re-offending rates of matched pairs of offenders where one sentencing type is an immediate
England and Wales
Males
2005

2006

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (less than 12 months)
Community orders
Difference (percentage points)

2,391
50.2%
44.2%
6.0

3,618
54.5%
48.6%
5.9

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (less than 12 months)
Suspended sentence orders
Difference (percentage points)

343
34.7%
31.5%
3.2

1,595
42.1%
37.7%
4.5

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (1 year or more but less than 2 years)
Immediate custody (less than 12 months)
Difference (percentage points)

491
30.5%
40.7%
-10.2

425
32.7%
35.5%
-2.8

359

378

32.6%

31.5%

35.4%
-2.8

36.5%
-5.0

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (2 years or more but less than 4 years)
Immediate custody (1 year or more but less than 2 years)
Difference (percentage points)
1

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.
Includes offenders with no recorded gender.
Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.
*
Data based on 10 or fewer offenders are removed as they make the data unreliable for interpretation.
2

Table 2: Frequency of proven re-offending rates of matched pairs of offenders where one sentencing type is a
England and Wales
Males
2005

2006

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (less than 12 months)
Community orders
Difference in re-offences per 100 matched offenders

2,391
226.3
165.5
60.9

3,618
247.2
171.1
76.1

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (less than 12 months)
Suspended sentence orders
Difference in re-offences per 100 matched offenders

343
130.0
100.9
29.2

1,595
170.8
112.3
58.5

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (1 year or more but less than 2 years)
Immediate custody (less than 12 months)
Difference in re-offences per 100 matched offenders

491
92.3
136.7
-44.4

425
100.2
120.7
-20.5

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (2 years or more but less than 4 years)
Immediate custody (1 year or more but less than 2 years)

359
95.0
88.6

378
92.3
108.5

Difference in re-offences per 100 matched offenders

6.4

-16.1

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.

Includes offenders with no recorded gender.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.
*

Data based on 10 or fewer offenders are removed as they make the data unreliable for interpretation.

Table 3: Proven re-offending custody rates of matched pairs of offenders where one sentencing type is an im
England and Wales
Males
2005

2006

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (less than 12 months)
Community orders
Difference (percentage points)

2,391
31.0%
20.3%
10.7

3,618
35.6%
23.3%
12.3

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (less than 12 months)
Suspended sentence orders
Difference (percentage points)

343
17.8%
20.4%
-2.6

1,595
23.9%
23.1%
0.8

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (1 year or more but less than 2 years)
Immediate custody (less than 12 months)
Difference (percentage points)

491
13.6%
18.7%
-5.1

425
14.4%
18.1%
-3.8

Matched pairs
Immediate custody (2 years or more but less than 4 years)
Immediate custody (1 year or more but less than 2 years)
Difference (percentage points)

359
16.7%
15.3%
1.4

378
17.5%
18.3%
-0.8

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.

Includes offenders with no recorded gender.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.
*

Data based on 10 or fewer offenders are removed as they make the data unreliable for interpretation.

Table A1: Number of offenders in original datasets and number of matched pairs, 2005 1 to 2008
England and Wales

Males
Females
2
All offenders

2005
2006
Offenders receiving immediate custody (less than 12 m
11,718
12,154
1,271
1,383
12,989
13,537

Males
Females
2
All offenders

Offenders receiving immediate custody (less than 12 m


11,718
12,154
1,271
1,383
12,989
13,537

Males
Females
2
All offenders

Immediate custody (1 year or more but less than 2 ye


3,585
3,448
297
253
3,882
3,701

Males
Females
2
All offenders

Immediate custody (2 years or more but less than 4 y


3,407
3,281
300
260
3,707
3,541

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.

Includes offenders with no recorded gender.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.

Table A2: Re-offending comparisons of matched pairs of offenders who have received an immediate custodia
England and Wales
One-year re-offending rate
Immediate custody
Number of matched
(less than 12
pairs of offenders
months)
All offenders2
Males
Females

16,302
15,259
1,043

56.3%
55.9%
61.4%

Age
18 - 20
21 - 24
25 - 29
30 - 34
35 - 39
40 - 49
50 and over

3,381
3,489
3,470
2,491
1,721
1,501
249

54.0%
54.0%
62.2%
63.9%
56.9%
44.4%
26.5%

Most common offences


Shoplifting
Assault
Actual bodily harm
Burglary3
Affray
Drink driving

5,353
3,096
1,745
1,081
852
571

84.3%
43.4%
27.4%
68.0%
28.2%
11.6%

Number of previous convictions or cautions


0
1-2
3-6
7 - 10
11 - 14
15 or more

1,144
1,423
2,205
1,766
1,527
8,237

10.9%
18.7%
34.2%
46.1%
55.1%
77.3%

1
2
3

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.
Includes offenders with no recorded gender.
Refers to burglary both in a dwelling and not in a dwelling.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.
*

Data based on 10 or fewer offenders are removed as they make the data unreliable for interpretation.

Table A3: Re-offending comparisons of matched pairs of offenders who have received an immediate custodia
England and Wales
One-year re-offending rate

Number of matched
pairs of offenders
2

Immediate custody
(less than 12
months)

All offenders
Males
Females

6,822
6,489
333

44.9%
45.0%
42.0%

Age
18 - 20
21 - 24
25 - 29
30 - 34
35 - 39
40 - 49
50 and over

1,768
1,705
1,278
859
583
531
98

46.0%
43.5%
50.8%
49.6%
44.6%
29.2%
16.3%

Most common offences


Assault
Actual bodily harm
Shoplifting
Affray
Burglary3
Drink driving

1,431
1,424
1,094
603
512
284

43.3%
28.8%
87.0%
29.2%
65.8%
10.6%

Number of previous convictions or cautions


0
1-2
3-6
7 - 10
11 - 14
15 or more

801
893
1,229
878
623
2,398

9.6%
17.5%
31.4%
40.7%
49.4%
74.1%

1
2
3

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.
Includes offenders with no recorded gender.
Refers to burglary both in a dwelling and not in a dwelling.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.
*

Data based on 10 or fewer offenders are removed as they make the data unreliable for interpretation.

Table A4: Re-offending comparisons of matched pairs of offenders who have received an immediate custodia
England and Wales
One-year re-offending rate
Immediate custody
Number of matched
(more than 1 year
pairs of offenders
but less than 2)
1

All offenders
Males
Females
Age
18 - 20
21 - 24
25 - 29
30 - 34
35 - 39

2,028
1,996
32

35.0%
35.3%
*

761
633
328
138
110

41.8%
30.8%
32.3%
33.3%
32.7%

40 - 49
50 and over

53
5

*
*

Most common offences


Actual bodily harm
2
Burglary
3
Grievous bodily harm
Affray
Robbery
Violent disorder

640
376
284
274
113
60

26.4%
60.9%
19.4%
32.1%
41.6%
18.3%

Number of previous convictions or cautions


0
1-2
3-6
7 - 10
11 - 14
15 or more

295
287
420
228
172
626

8.5%
16.4%
26.4%
32.9%
43.6%
60.2%

Includes offenders with no recorded gender.

Refers to burglary both in a dwelling and not in a dwelling.

Refers to wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm and wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.
*

Data based on 10 or fewer offenders are removed as they make the data unreliable for interpretation.

Table A5: Re-offending comparisons of matched pairs of offenders who have received an immediate custodia
England and Wales
One-year re-offending rate
Immediate custody
Number of matched
(2 years or more but
pairs of offenders
less than 4 years)
All offenders1
Males
Females

1,518
1,495
23

32.9%
33.3%
*

Age
18 - 20
21 - 24
25 - 29
30 - 34
35 - 39
40 - 49
50 and over

552
488
235
133
61
38
11

33.7%
32.0%
33.2%
35.3%
37.7%
*
*

Most common offences


Robbery
Grievous bodily harm2
Burglary3
Actual bodily harm
Violent disorder
Death by dangerous driving

527
393
383
90
29
24

34.3%
21.9%
53.3%
16.7%
*
*

Number of previous convictions or cautions


0

171

6.4%

1-2
3-6
7 - 10
11 - 14
15 or more

211
267
174
137
558

15.2%
25.1%
28.7%
33.6%
52.5%

Includes offenders with no recorded gender.

Refers to wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm and wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm.

Refers to burglary both in a dwelling and not in a dwelling.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.
*

Data based on 10 or fewer offenders are removed as they make the data unreliable for interpretation.

Table B1: Logistic regression model output showing the statistically significant offender and offence character
Immediate custody <12M (1) compared with
community orders (0)
Offender characteristics
Male
Age
Age (Squared)
Age of First Offence
Age of First Offence (Squared)
Number of previous offences
Number of previous offences (Squared)
Number of previous convictions
Number of previous convictions (Squared)
Number of previous custodial sentences
Number of previous custodial sentences (squared)
Copas rate
Offence Category
Violence
Robbery
Public order or riot
Sexual
Sexual (child)
Domestic burglary
Other burglary
Theft
Handling
Fraud and forgery
Absconding or bail offences
Taking and driving away and related offences
Theft from vehicles
Other motoring offences
Drink driving offences
Criminal or malicious damage
Drugs import/export/ production/supply
Drugs possession/small scale supply
Other
Ethnicity
Unknown
White North European
White Sourth European
Black
Asian
Chinese, Japanese or SE Asian

Coefficient
0.316
0.142
0.024
0.059
-0.030
0.368
-0.057
-0.853
0.066
0.510
-0.038
1.066

SE
0.021
0.013
0.006
0.016
0.005
0.027
0.005
0.034
0.004
0.017
0.003
0.019

1.271
-0.278
0.529
1.293
0.024
-0.169
-0.311
-0.442
0.533
0.271
-0.068
-0.326
0.217
-0.470
-0.892
-0.552
-1.004
0.573

reference category
0.111
0.030
0.065
0.081
0.045
0.035
0.019
0.048
0.036
0.035
0.042
0.052
0.025
0.031
0.038
0.070
0.036
0.037

-0.080
0.592
0.386
0.310
1.746

reference category
0.056
0.072
0.059
0.062
0.104

Middle Eastern
Constant

0.925
-1.244

0.093
0.060

e one sentencing type is an immediate custodial sentence in England and Wales by gender, 2005 1 to 2008
Males

Females
2007

2008

2005

2006

2007

3,986
56.6%
49.8%
6.8

5,264
58.9%
50.6%
8.3

166
53.6%
41.6%
12.0

218
55.0%
49.1%
6.0

287
65.2%
51.9%
13.2

2,002
45.8%
38.9%
6.8

2,549
47.6%
38.8%
8.8

22
*
*
*

85
50.6%
44.7%
5.9

108
36.1%
34.3%
1.9

463
35.4%
42.1%
-6.7

617
40.7%
45.1%
-4.4

6
*
*
*

8
*
*
*

3
*
*
*

330

428

10

33.0%

35.7%

36.7%
-3.6

43.0%
-7.2

*
*

*
*

*
*

nd came into force from April 2005.

ffenders where one sentencing type is an immediate custodial sentence in England and Wales by gender, 2005 1 to 2008

Number of matched pa
Males
2007

2008

2005

Females
2006
218
283.5
169.3
114.2

2007

3,986
262.1
187.4
74.8

5,264
272.0
190.8
81.2

166
225.3
136.7
88.6

2,002
182.2
122.0
60.2

2,549
187.9
122.8
65.1

22
90.9
*
*

85
230.6
144.7
85.9

108
198.1
129.6
68.5

463
101.7
147.5
-45.8

617
109.1
153.8
-44.7

330
82.4
100.0

428
107.7
135.0

10

*
*
*

*
*
*
9

*
*

287
340.1
227.5
112.5

*
*
*
3

*
*

*
*

-17.6

-27.3

nd came into force from April 2005.

ers where one sentencing type is an immediate custodial sentence in England and Wales by gender, 2005 1 to 2008
Males
2007

2008

2005

3,986
36.3%
23.8%
12.5

5,264
37.4%
23.1%
14.3

166
29.5%
15.1%
14.5

2,002
26.3%
24.8%
1.5

2,549
25.2%
24.9%
0.3

22
*
*
*

463
15.1%
20.5%
-5.4

617
19.3%
21.9%
-2.6

330
15.5%
18.5%
-3.0

428
23.8%
21.3%
2.6

10

Females
2006
218
30.7%
20.6%
10.1

287
46.3%
23.3%
23.0

85
28.2%
24.7%
3.5

108
20.4%
23.1%
-2.8

*
*
*

*
*
*
9

*
*
*

2007

*
*
*
3

*
*
*

*
*
*

nd came into force from April 2005.

tched pairs, 2005 1 to 2008

2007
2008
receiving immediate custody (less than 12 months)
13,165
17,274
1,533
1,972
14,698
19,248

receiving immediate custody (less than 12 months)


13,165
1,533
14,698

te custody (1 year or more but less than 2 years)


3,645
240
3,885

2005

2006
2007
Offenders receiving community orders
19,664
44,304
48,447
3,384
7,756
8,705
23,067
52,118
57,220

17,274
1,972
19,248

Offenders receiving suspended sentence orders


1,525
10,175
14,392
260
1,584
2,283
1,786
11,767
16,695

4,333
354
4,690

Offenders receiving immediate custody (less than 12 months)


11,718
12,154
13,165
1,271
1,383
1,533
12,989
13,537
14,698

e custody (2 years or more but less than 4 years)


3,235
211
3,446

3,720
238
3,959

Immediate custody (1 year or more but less than 2 years)


3,585
3,448
3,645
297
253
240
3,882
3,701
3,885

nd came into force from April 2005.

ho have received an immediate custodial sentence of 12 months or less or a community order, 2005 1 to 2008
One-year re-offending rate
Community orders

Difference
(percentage points)

Frequency of re-offending
Immediate custody
(less than 12
Community orders
months)

Difference

49.1%
48.9%
51.6%

7.2
7.0
9.8

259.2
256.4
299.6

182.9
181.3
206.5

76.3
75.1
93.1

50.4%
48.8%
56.3%
54.4%
46.7%
30.6%
11.2%

3.5
5.2
5.9
9.5
10.3
13.9
15.3

215.1
241.7
315.2
315.6
267.8
193.7
92.8

172.7
178.2
229.2
212.2
166.0
105.3
34.1

42.4
63.5
86.1
103.3
101.8
88.5
58.6

75.2%
33.9%
24.0%
57.0%
27.7%
13.3%

9.2
9.6
3.4
11.0
0.5
-1.8

486.3
134.7
70.9
277.6
72.8
29.1

343.1
85.9
54.7
193.0
62.3
24.0

143.2
48.8
16.2
84.6
10.4
5.1

9.4%
18.7%
30.3%
39.0%
48.9%
67.1%

1.5
0.0
3.9
7.1
6.2
10.2

21.0
45.7
97.0
153.5
202.4
405.7

17.0
38.6
68.6
112.7
150.2
282.6

4.0
7.2
28.3
40.7
52.2
123.2

nd came into force from April 2005.

ho have received an immediate custodial sentence of 12 months or less or a suspended sentence order, 2005 1 to 2008
One-year re-offending rate

Frequency of re-offending

Suspended
sentence orders

Difference
(percentage points)

Immediate custody
(less than 12
months)

Suspended
sentence orders

Difference

38.1%
38.2%
36.0%

6.8
6.8
6.0

180.3
178.9
208.4

119.2
118.8
126.7

61.1
60.1
81.7

40.6%
37.0%
44.0%
42.4%
33.6%
22.8%
*

5.4
6.5
6.8
7.2
11.0
6.4
*

154.4
169.3
232.7
222.2
178.9
125.8
92.9

112.4
110.0
155.6
148.9
117.3
55.7
20.4

41.9
59.3
77.2
73.3
61.6
70.1
72.4

33.6%
23.9%
77.2%
26.7%
56.1%
8.5%

9.7
4.9
9.8
2.5
9.8
2.1

129.0
73.5
512.9
66.0
272.7
24.6

77.9
48.1
344.4
60.4
181.6
14.8

51.1
25.4
168.5
5.6
91.0
9.9

7.2%
16.2%
25.1%
34.2%
40.8%
63.9%

2.4
1.2
6.3
6.5
8.7
10.2

18.7
32.8
74.8
108.4
147.5
378.1

11.9
25.1
50.4
78.5
99.4
245.3

6.9
7.7
24.3
30.0
48.2
132.8

nd came into force from April 2005.

ho have received an immediate custodial sentence of 12 months or an immediate custodial sentence of more than one year but
One-year re-offending rate
Immediate custody
(less than 12
months)

Frequency of re-offending

Difference
(percentage points)

Immediate custody
(more than 1 year
but less than 2)

Immediate custody
(less than 12
months)

Difference

41.0%
41.3%
*

-6.0
-6.0
*

100.8
101.4
65.6

140.2
141.1
87.5

-39.4
-39.7
-21.9

44.8%
37.8%
43.0%
38.4%
38.2%

-3.0
-7.0
-10.7
-5.1
-5.5

111.0
86.1
103.4
102.9
135.5

139.8
124.8
160.4
140.6
190.0

-28.8
-38.7
-57.0
-37.7
-54.5

24.5%
*

*
*

43.4
*

92.5
*

-49.1
*

35.8%
71.3%
19.0%
34.7%
43.4%
21.7%

-9.4
-10.4
0.4
-2.6
-1.8
-3.3

60.2
197.3
34.9
71.5
145.1
35.0

93.8
304.5
39.1
90.5
134.5
41.7

-33.6
-107.2
-4.2
-19.0
10.6
-6.7

7.5%
19.9%
31.7%
39.9%
50.6%
70.4%

1.0
-3.5
-5.2
-7.0
-7.0
-10.2

14.6
24.7
57.4
68.4
136.6
207.3

16.3
38.0
72.1
99.6
137.8
306.7

-1.7
-13.2
-14.8
-31.1
-1.2
-99.4

ho have received an immediate custodial sentence of more than one year but less than two years or an immediate custodial sen
One-year re-offending rate
Immediate custody
(more than 1 year
but less than 2)

Frequency of re-offending

Difference
(percentage points)

Immediate custody Immediate custody


(2 years or more but (more than 1 year
less than 4 years)
but less than 2)

Difference

37.5%
38.1%
*

-4.7
-4.8
*

94.0
95.2
*

107.8
109.4
*

-13.8
-14.2
*

38.0%
36.7%
35.7%
44.4%
39.3%
31.6%
*

-4.3
-4.7
-2.6
-9.0
-1.6
*
*

84.4
94.9
107.7
112.0
121.3
55.3
*

100.9
96.3
122.6
144.4
144.3
92.1
*

-16.5
-1.4
-14.9
-32.3
-23.0
-36.8
*

39.3%
20.9%
61.9%
21.1%
*
*

-4.9
1.0
-8.6
-4.4
*
*

86.1
61.3
172.8
34.4
*
*

105.1
42.7
211.7
51.1
51.7
*

-19.0
18.6
-38.9
-16.7
*
*

9.4%

-2.9

18.7

14.6

4.1

14.2%
27.0%
28.2%
47.4%
60.6%

0.9
-1.9
0.6
-13.9
-8.1

30.8
53.6
90.2
92.0
162.0

24.2
53.2
63.2
129.9
202.5

6.6
0.4
27.0
-38.0
-40.5

gnificant offender and offence characteristics that affect offenders receiving a custodial sentencing outcome, 2008

ustody <12M (1) compared with


ommunity orders (0)

Suspended orders (1) compared with immediate


custody <12M (0)

P-Value
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

Coefficient
-0.324
-0.089
-0.016
-0.048
0.022
-0.146
0.047
0.625
-0.063
-0.423
0.032
-0.807

SE

< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.588
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.107
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

0.338
0.034
-0.728
-0.791
0.404
-0.186
-0.472
0.043
-0.422
-1.230
-0.309
-0.322
-0.242
0.029
-0.315
0.846
0.310
-0.583

reference category
0.091
0.034
0.079
0.087
0.046
0.043
0.024
0.057
0.040
0.053
0.053
0.069
0.028
0.037
0.052
0.072
0.042
0.042

< 0.001
0.322
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.452
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.436
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

0.154
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

0.021
-0.578
-0.349
-0.185
-1.717

reference category
0.064
0.085
0.067
0.071
0.132

0.737
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.009
< 0.001

0.025
0.015
0.007
0.018
0.006
0.034
0.006
0.044
0.007
0.022
0.004
0.022

P-Value
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.026
0.008
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

< 0.001
< 0.001

-0.864
0.436

0.112
0.068

< 0.001
< 0.001

Number of matched pairs of offenders a


2

All offenders
2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

372
65.6%
57.3%
8.3

2,557
50.4%
44.0%
6.4

3,836
54.5%
48.6%
5.9

4,273
57.2%
50.0%
7.2

5,636
59.4%
51.1%
8.3

118
43.2%
34.7%
8.5

365
34.5%
30.7%
3.8

1,680
42.6%
38.0%
4.5

2,110
45.3%
38.7%
6.6

2,667
47.4%
38.6%
8.8

15
*
*
*

497
30.2%
40.4%
-10.3

433
32.8%
35.3%
-2.5

466
35.4%
42.1%
-6.7

632
40.0%
44.5%
-4.4

369

387

333

429

31.7%

31.0%

32.7%

35.7%

*
*

34.4%
-2.7

35.7%
-4.7

36.3%
-3.6

42.9%
-7.2

les by gender, 2005 1 to 2008


Number of matched pairs of offenders and number of offences per 100 matched offenders
2
All offenders
2008
2005
2006
2007
2008
372
2,557
3,836
4,273
5,636
311.0
226.2
249.3
267.4
274.6
243.3
163.6
171.0
190.1
194.3
67.7
62.7
78.3
77.3
80.3
118
223.7
127.1
96.6
15
*
86.7
*
1
*
*

365
127.7
97.3
30.4

1,680
173.8
113.9
59.9

2,110
183.0
122.4
60.6

2,667
189.5
122.9
66.5

497
91.1
135.2
-44.1

433
100.7
119.6
-18.9

466
101.7
148.5
-46.8

632
107.8
152.2
-44.5

369
92.4
86.2

387
91.2
105.9

333
81.7
99.1

429
107.5
134.7

6.2

-14.7

-17.4

-27.3

y gender, 2005 1 to 2008

2008
372
43.0%
25.8%
17.2

Number of matched pairs of offenders and re-offending custody rates (%)


All offenders2
2005
2006
2007
2008
2,557
3,836
4,273
5,636
30.9%
35.3%
37.0%
37.8%
20.0%
23.1%
23.8%
23.3%
11.0
12.2
13.2
14.5

118
23.7%
20.3%
3.4

365
17.5%
19.7%
-2.2

1,680
24.2%
23.2%
1.0

2,110
26.0%
24.7%
1.3

2,667
25.1%
24.7%
0.4

15
*
*
*

497
13.5%
18.5%
-5.0

433
14.1%
17.8%
-3.7

466
15.0%
20.6%
-5.6

632
19.0%
21.5%
-2.5

*
*
*

369
16.3%
14.9%
1.4

387
17.3%
17.8%
-0.5

333
15.3%
18.3%
-3.0

429
23.8%
21.2%
2.6

52,020
9,588
61,669

Number of offenders and number of matched pairs


2005
2006
2007
2008
Immediate custody (less than 12 months) matched with community
2,391
3,618
3,986
5,264
166
218
287
372
2,557
3,836
4,273
5,636

15,664
2,541
18,222

Immediate custody (less than 12 months) matched with suspended


343
1,595
2,002
2,549
22
85
108
118
365
1,680
2,110
2,667

tody (less than 12 months)


17,274
1,972
19,248

Immediate custody (1 year or more but less than 2 years) matched


491
425
463
617
6
8
3
15
497
433
466
632

2008

mmunity orders

ded sentence orders

re but less than 2 years)


4,333
354
4,690

Immediate custody (2 years or more but less than 4 years) matched


359
378
330
428
10
9
3
1
369
387
333
429

Number of matched pairs of offenders and different measures of re-offending


Re-offending custody rates
Immediate custody
Difference
(less than 12
Community orders
(percentage points)
months)
35.9%
35.7%
39.2%

22.9%
22.9%
22.3%

13.1
12.8
16.9

30.9%
32.2%
42.2%
44.6%
37.1%
29.0%
16.5%

22.1%
21.9%
28.9%
26.5%
21.3%
12.2%
*

8.8
10.3
13.3
18.1
15.8
16.9
*

64.2%
22.5%
8.9%
42.0%
7.9%
3.3%

42.4%
11.1%
6.0%
27.5%
6.2%
*

21.8
11.5
2.9
14.5
1.6
*

3.1%
5.2%
13.3%
23.0%
31.4%
55.5%

1.1%
3.6%
7.4%
12.7%
17.7%
36.5%

1.9
1.6
5.9
10.2
13.7
19.0

ntence order, 2005 1 to 2008


Number of matched pairs of offenders and different measures of re-offending
Re-offending custody rates

Immediate custody
(less than 12
months)

Suspended
sentence orders

Difference
(percentage points)

24.7%
24.8%
23.1%

24.1%
24.2%
21.6%

0.7
0.6
1.5

21.9%
22.2%
31.3%
30.3%
28.3%
16.4%
*

22.5%
21.1%
30.6%
31.7%
23.8%
14.1%
*

-0.6
1.1
0.7
-1.4
4.5
2.3
*

21.1%
10.5%
65.0%
7.6%
39.3%
*

20.4%
10.5%
63.2%
10.9%
35.7%
*

0.7
0.0
1.8
-3.3
3.5
*

1.7%
2.9%
10.8%
16.9%
25.4%
50.4%

1.7%
5.2%
10.1%
18.3%
24.1%
47.8%

0.0
-2.2
0.7
-1.5
1.3
2.6

sentence of more than one year but less than two years, 2005 to 2008
Number of matched pairs of offenders and different measures of re-offending
Re-offending custody rates
Immediate custody
(more than 1 year
but less than 2)

Immediate custody
(less than 12
months)

Difference
(percentage points)

15.7%
15.9%
*

19.8%
20.0%
*

-4.1
-4.1
*

15.2%
14.8%
19.5%
15.2%
16.4%

21.8%
16.4%
20.7%
18.8%
23.6%

-6.6
-1.6
-1.2
-3.6
-7.3

*
*

*
*

*
*

10.2%
34.6%
4.9%
8.8%
19.5%
*

12.2%
47.3%
*
11.3%
18.6%
*

-2.0
-12.8
*
-2.6
0.9
*

*
*
8.3%
9.2%
18.6%
35.6%

*
*
7.6%
13.6%
25.6%
44.4%

*
*
0.7
-4.4
-7.0
-8.8

years or an immediate custodial sentence of more than two years but less than 4 years, 2005 to 2008
Number of matched pairs of offenders and different measures of re-offending
Re-offending custody rates
Immediate custody Immediate custody
(2 years or more but (more than 1 year
less than 4 years)
but less than 2)

Difference
(percentage points)

18.4%
18.7%
*

18.2%
18.5%
*

0.3
0.2
*

17.4%
17.2%
19.6%
24.1%
26.2%
*
*

18.5%
16.2%
18.3%
25.6%
21.3%
*
*

-1.1
1.0
1.3
-1.5
4.9
*
*

16.7%
11.2%
35.2%
*
*
*

17.6%
6.9%
37.9%
*
*
*

-0.9
4.3
-2.6
*
*
*

6.2%
11.2%
16.1%
19.7%
31.5%

*
7.1%
10.3%
21.9%
35.5%

*
4.1
5.7
-2.2
-3.9

encing outcome, 2008


Immediate custody >=12 & <24M (1) compared with
immediate custody <12M (0)
Coefficient
0.179
-0.030
-0.015
-0.325
0.057
0.185
-0.018
-0.149
0.008
0.198
-0.010
-0.589

SE
0.048
0.022
0.010
0.027
0.007
0.048
0.009
0.054
0.006
0.037
0.007
0.028

P-Value
< 0.001
0.171
0.159
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.058
0.006
0.158
< 0.001
0.136
< 0.001

2.582
0.218
0.265
1.145
1.838
0.054
-1.313
0.169
-0.214
-3.506
-0.094
-1.151
-0.790
-3.070
-0.383
1.649
0.711
-0.598

reference category
0.083
0.050
0.092
0.088
0.048
0.058
0.049
0.081
0.063
0.269
0.076
0.141
0.052
0.216
0.085
0.083
0.055
0.072

< 0.001
< 0.001
0.004
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.353
< 0.001
0.037
0.001
< 0.001
0.217
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

-0.065
-0.517
-0.325
-0.108
-1.500

reference category
0.098
0.138
0.104
0.110
0.215

0.510
< 0.001
0.002
0.325
< 0.001

-1.552
-1.424

0.236
0.110

< 0.001
< 0.001

Number of matched pairs of offenders and re-offending rates (%)


PSM analysis all offenders 2008 only

37,983
57.7%
52.1%
5.6

Additional
randomly
generated factor
37,960
57.5%
53.1%
4.4

27,663
52.4%
43.8%
8.6

27,500
50.8%
44.8%
6.0

915
43.0%
41.6%
1.3

9,285
39.4%
50.0%
-10.6

9,276
39.7%
47.1%
-7.4

32
*
*
*

.
.

.
.

.
.

Full dataset PSM


analysis

matched offenders

High/low
probability courts
1,431
46.8%
43.7%
3.1

g custody rates (%)

er of matched pairs

offending

offending

offending

an 4 years, 2005 to 2008

offending

Table 1: Proven re-offending rates of matched pairs of offenders for sentences other than custodial in En
England and Wales
Males
2005

2006

Matched pairs
Fines
Conditional discharges
Difference (percentage points)

18,587
37.9%
36.0%
1.9

17,059
39.2%
35.6%
3.6

Matched pairs
Community orders
Conditional discharges
Difference (percentage points)

6,638
37.2%
33.8%
3.5

10,915
37.6%
32.4%
5.2

Matched pairs
Community orders
Fines
Difference (percentage points)

9,395
30.2%
29.0%
1.3

15,115
31.0%
29.9%
1.1

Matched pairs
Suspended sentence orders
Community orders
Difference (percentage points)

568
25.9%
27.8%
-1.9

4,418
28.5%
30.7%
-2.2

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.

Includes offenders with no recorded gender.


*
Data based on 10 or fewer offenders are removed as they make the data unreliable for interpretation.

Table 2: Frequency of proven re-offending rates of matched pairs of offenders for sentences other than c
England and Wales
Males
2005

2006

Matched pairs
Fines
Conditional discharges
Difference in re-offences per 100 matched offenders

18,587
131.6
118.0
13.6

17,059
133.0
113.4
19.7

Matched pairs
Community orders
Conditional discharges
Difference in re-offences per 100 matched offenders

6,638
123.6
111.2
12.4

10,915
119.3
102.7
16.6

Matched pairs
Community orders
Fines
Difference in re-offences per 100 matched offenders

9,395
98.9
97.1
1.8

15,115
93.8
95.8
-2.0

568

4,418

Matched pairs

Suspended sentence orders


Community orders
Difference in re-offences per 100 matched offenders

80.3
71.3
9.0

81.0
89.9
-8.9

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.

Includes offenders with no recorded gender.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.

Table 3: Proven re-offending custody rates of matched pairs of offenders for sentences other than custod
England and Wales
Males
2005

2006

Matched pairs
Fines
Conditional discharges
Difference (percentage points)

18,587
11.5%
10.5%
1.0

17,059
12.2%
10.6%
1.6

Matched pairs
Community orders
Conditional discharges
Difference (percentage points)

6,638
14.4%
10.7%
3.7

10,915
14.2%
10.6%
3.6

Matched pairs
Community orders
Fines
Difference (percentage points)

9,395
11.1%
8.9%
2.2

15,115
10.7%
9.1%
1.7

Matched pairs
Suspended sentence orders
Community orders
Difference (percentage points)

568
16.0%
7.9%
8.1

4,418
16.0%
11.3%
4.7

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.

Includes offenders with no recorded gender.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.
*

Data based on 10 or fewer offenders are removed as they make the data unreliable for interpretation.

Table C1: Number of offenders in original datasets and number of matched pairs, 2005 1 to 2008
England and Wales
2005
Males
Females
All offenders2

108,067
15,920
124,387

2006
Offenders receiving fines
104,553
15,283
120,222

Males
Females
All offenders2

19,664
3,384
23,067

Offenders receiving community orders


44,304
7,756
52,118

Males
Females
All offenders2

Males
Females
All offenders2

19,664
3,384
23,067

Offenders receiving community orders


44,304
7,756
52,118

Offenders receiving suspended sentence orders


1,525
10,175
260
1,584
1,786
11,767

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.

Includes offenders with no recorded gender.

Table C2: Re-offending comparisons of matched pairs of offenders who have received a fine or condition
England and Wales
One-year re-offending rate
Number of matched
pairs of offenders

Fines

All offenders1
Males
Females

80,431
70,583
9,762

38.7%
39.8%
30.9%

Age
18 - 20
21 - 24
25 - 29
30 - 34
35 - 39
40 - 49
50 and over

20,352
17,556
13,290
9,617
8,475
8,795
2,346

44.1%
37.9%
39.3%
39.9%
36.4%
32.4%
21.1%

Most common offences


Shoplifting
Criminal damage, 5,000 or less
Causing harassment, alarm or distress
Common assault
Drunk and disorderly
Cannabis possession

15,813
11,406
10,129
10,077
6,310
4,384

60.3%
38.4%
41.5%
18.1%
50.7%
38.8%

Number of previous convictions or cautions


0
1-2
3-6
7 - 10
11 - 14
15 or more

12,152
16,656
17,905
8,785
5,467
19,466

10.9%
26.4%
35.8%
43.7%
50.0%
63.7%

1 Includes offenders with no recorded gender.

Table C3: Re-offending comparisons of matched pairs of offenders who have received a community orde
England and Wales
One-year re-offending rate
Number of matched
pairs of offenders

Community orders

All offenders2
Males
Females

48,192
40,647
7,524

37.6%
38.9%
31.0%

Age
18 - 20
21 - 24
25 - 29
30 - 34
35 - 39
40 - 49
50 and over

11,634
9,591
8,189
6,070
5,499
5,778
1,431

43.7%
38.9%
41.9%
40.1%
34.1%
23.8%
14.0%

Most common offences


Common assault
Shoplifting
Criminal damage, 5,000 or less
Fear or provocation of violence
Other theft
Actual bodily harm

15,091
11,044
4,067
3,086
1,838
1,255

21.6%
66.8%
46.9%
27.1%
41.5%
12.5%

Number of previous convictions or cautions


0
1-2
3-6
7 - 10
11 - 14
15 or more

7,736
9,198
10,321
5,423
3,362
12,152

9.5%
21.6%
33.5%
44.0%
49.4%
65.1%

1
2

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.
Includes offenders with no recorded gender.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.

Table C4: Re-offending comparisons of matched pairs of offenders who have received a community orde
England and Wales
One-year re-offending rate
Number of matched
pairs of offenders
All offenders2
Males

65,930
57,554

Community orders

30.8%
32.1%

Females

8,353

22.5%

Age
18 - 20
21 - 24
25 - 29
30 - 34
35 - 39
40 - 49
50 and over

12,353
12,476
11,185
8,420
7,754
9,858
3,884

43.3%
35.6%
33.9%
31.4%
26.6%
17.6%
8.3%

Most common offences


Drink driving
Common assault
Shoplifting
Fear or provocation of violence.
Criminal damage, 5,000 or less
Other theft

19,961
10,868
10,229
4,020
3,811
1,721

10.9%
22.9%
67.5%
29.9%
46.9%
41.6%

Number of previous convictions or cautions


0
1-2
3-6
7 - 10
11 - 14
15 or more

14,512
13,615
13,774
7,107
4,193
12,729

7.8%
17.3%
29.6%
39.8%
47.2%
62.5%

1
2

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.
Includes offenders with no recorded gender.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.

Table C5: Re-offending comparisons of matched pairs of offenders who have received a suspended sent
England and Wales
One-year re-offending rate
Number of matched
pairs of offenders
All offenders2
Males
Females
Age
18 - 20
21 - 24
25 - 29
30 - 34
35 - 39
40 - 49
50 and over

Suspended
sentence orders

19,140
17,342
1,794

28.5%
29.4%
19.4%

4,528
4,283
3,245
2,148
1,961
2,363
612

34.9%
29.6%
32.6%
29.8%
23.9%
16.5%
7.4%

Most common offences


Assault
Actual bodily harm
Drink driving
Affray
Shoplifting
Burglary3

4,159
3,951
2,101
1,608
1,534
1,184

28.3%
19.5%
9.2%
21.8%
74.1%
47.8%

Number of previous convictions or cautions


0
1-2
3-6
7 - 10
11 - 14
15 or more

3,448
3,820
4,074
2,307
1,400
4,091

7.0%
14.5%
23.2%
33.2%
42.5%
57.4%

1
2
3

Community orders and suspended sentence orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005.
Includes offenders with no recorded gender.
Refers to burglary both in a dwelling and not in a dwelling.

Italics means less than or equal to 50 offenders - treat the data with caution.

Table D1: Logistic regression model output showing the statistically significant offender and offence char
Conditional discharges (1) compared with fines (0)
Offender characteristics
Male
Age
Age (Squared)
Age of First Offence
Age of First Offence (Squared)
Number of previous offences
Number of previous offences (Squared)
Number of previous convictions
Number of previous convictions (Squared)
Number of previous custodial sentences
Number of previous custodial sentences (squared)
Copas rate
Offence Category
Violence
Robbery
Public order or riot
Sexual
Sexual (child)
Domestic burglary
Other burglary
Theft
Handling
Fraud and forgery
Absconding or bail offences
Taking and driving away and related offences
Theft from vehicles

Coefficient
-0.647
0.057
0.020
.
.
0.165
-0.008
0.040
-0.003
-0.046
.
-0.190

0.083
-0.677
-0.328
0.938
0.765
0.376
0.190
0.111
-0.141
-1.768
-0.665
0.355

SE
0.015
0.008
0.005
.
.
0.022
0.003
0.025
0.002
0.010
.
0.013
reference category
0.637
0.018
0.085
0.350
0.159
0.069
0.019
0.056
0.034
0.034
0.073
0.073

Other motoring offences


Drink driving offences
Criminal or malicious damage
Drugs import/export/ production/supply
Drugs possession/small scale supply
Other
Ethnicity
Unknown
White North European
White Sourth European
Black
Asian
Chinese, Japanese or SE Asian
Middle Eastern
Constant

-2.827
-4.965
0.371
-0.780
-0.865
-0.794

0.247
0.137
0.124
0.043
0.252
0.236
0.351

0.035
0.050
0.022
0.077
0.021
0.026
reference category
0.033
0.053
0.038
0.042
0.096
0.077
0.037

ntences other than custodial in England and Wales by gender, 2005 1 to 2008
Males

Females
2007

2008

2005

2006

2007

17,187
40.6%
36.3%
4.4

17,750
41.6%
37.8%
3.7

2,592
30.4%
28.0%
2.3

2,271
30.7%
24.7%
6.0

2,392
30.0%
26.2%
3.8

11,629
38.9%
33.9%
5.0

11,465
41.0%
35.4%
5.7

1,044
35.5%
30.7%
4.9

1,918
28.8%
25.5%
3.3

2,265
28.6%
23.8%
4.8

16,084
32.1%
31.1%
1.0

16,960
34.0%
32.2%
1.8

1,309
25.8%
22.8%
3.0

2,120
20.3%
19.6%
0.8

2,371
21.9%
20.5%
1.4

5,949
29.3%
31.2%
-1.9

6,407
30.5%
33.3%
-2.7

54
*
*
*

429
21.9%
20.3%
1.6

632
18.2%
22.3%
-4.1

d came into force from April 2005.

fenders for sentences other than custodial in England and Wales by gender, 2005 1 to 2008
Males

Females
2007

2008

2005

2006

2007

17,187
139.6
115.8
23.8

17,750
146.3
121.8
24.5

2,592
102.0
91.1
10.9

2,271
97.3
75.3
22.0

2,392
102.4
77.4
25.0

11,629
123.8
110.7
13.1

11,465
139.0
112.6
26.5

1,044
113.0
99.1
13.9

1,918
83.2
79.5
3.8

2,265
97.7
70.9
26.8

16,084
99.7
103.8
-4.0

16,960
109.0
106.2
2.8

1,309
76.3
79.6
-3.3

2,120
57.6
63.1
-5.4

2,371
68.3
65.9
2.4

5,949

6,407

54

429

632

80.1
90.0
-9.9

83.9
95.7
-11.8

61.1
55.6
5.6

59.4
56.9
2.6

59.3
78.6
-19.3

d came into force from April 2005.

ers for sentences other than custodial in England and Wales by gender, 2005 1 to 2008
Males

Females
2007

2008

2005

2006

2007

17,187
12.7%
10.7%
2.0

17,750
13.2%
11.4%
1.8

2,592
6.6%
5.2%
1.4

2,271
6.4%
4.4%
1.9

2,392
5.7%
4.7%
1.0

11,629
14.9%
11.2%
3.7

11,465
15.6%
11.4%
4.3

1,044
9.6%
6.4%
3.2

1,918
7.6%
5.9%
1.7

2,265
7.9%
4.7%
3.3

16,084
11.2%
9.8%
1.5

16,960
12.2%
10.2%
2.0

1,309
5.9%
5.2%
0.7

2,120
4.8%
4.7%
0.1

2,371
5.3%
4.0%
1.3

5,949
16.3%
11.1%
5.2

6,407
17.4%
11.5%
5.9

54
*
*
*

429
11.0%
6.5%
4.4

632
10.8%
5.9%
4.9

d came into force from April 2005.

ched pairs, 2005 1 to 2008

2007
Offenders receiving fines
104,695
16,171
121,238

ers receiving community orders


48,447
8,705
57,220

2008

2005

105,898
16,471
122,822

2006
2007
Offenders receiving conditional discharges
41,905
40,031
41,218
11,711
10,913
11,377
53,848
51,151
52,790

52,020
9,588
61,669

Offenders receiving conditional discharges


41,905
40,031
41,218
11,711
10,913
11,377
53,848
51,151
52,790

ers receiving community orders


48,447
8,705
57,220

ceiving suspended sentence orders


14,392
2,283
16,695

52,020
9,588
61,669

108,067
15,920
124,387

Offenders receiving fines


104,553
104,695
15,283
16,171
120,222
121,238

15,664
2,541
18,222

19,664
3,384
23,067

Offenders receiving community orders


44,304
48,447
7,756
8,705
52,118
57,220

d came into force from April 2005.

o have received a fine or conditional discharge, 2005 to 2008


One-year re-offending rate
Conditional
discharges

Frequency of re-offending

Difference
(percentage points)

Conditional
discharges

Fines

Difference

35.2%
36.4%
26.7%

3.5
3.4
4.2

133.0
137.6
101.0

112.8
117.3
81.4

20.2
20.3
19.5

40.4%
35.2%
35.7%
37.5%
32.0%
27.8%
17.6%

3.7
2.7
3.6
2.4
4.4
4.6
3.5

136.4
117.6
144.3
151.4
132.0
131.1
89.9

121.1
108.9
120.3
127.4
105.0
96.0
60.4

15.3
8.7
24.1
24.0
27.0
35.2
29.5

54.1%
34.9%
36.7%
17.3%
47.4%
36.4%

6.2
3.5
4.8
0.9
3.2
2.5

266.5
104.1
143.4
36.9
201.5
102.3

212.5
93.3
112.8
34.9
180.2
94.7

53.9
10.8
30.6
2.1
21.3
7.6

9.7%
24.2%
32.8%
40.0%
44.2%
58.0%

1.1
2.1
3.0
3.8
5.8
5.7

23.1
62.3
95.8
130.7
163.8
288.7

20.1
56.5
85.6
115.1
139.2
235.5

2.9
5.8
10.2
15.6
24.6
53.2

o have received a community order or conditional discharge, 2005 to 2008


One-year re-offending rate
Conditional
discharges

Frequency of re-offending

Difference
(percentage points)

Community orders

Conditional
discharges

Difference

32.7%
33.9%
26.4%

4.9
5.0
4.7

122.8
126.9
101.5

104.7
109.2
81.1

18.1
17.7
20.4

38.4%
34.5%
36.8%
34.9%
28.1%
20.0%
11.2%

5.3
4.4
5.1
5.2
6.1
3.9
2.8

137.4
125.9
148.6
140.9
107.9
69.9
31.2

115.3
111.1
132.8
116.9
87.3
56.6
25.5

22.1
14.7
15.8
24.0
20.7
13.3
5.7

18.4%
58.6%
41.1%
23.6%
37.6%
12.7%

3.2
8.2
5.9
3.5
3.9
-0.2

46.3
280.8
140.9
62.0
125.0
24.5

39.2
238.8
119.4
56.2
115.8
23.2

7.1
42.1
21.6
5.8
9.2
1.4

6.9%
18.9%
29.8%
37.1%
42.2%
57.6%

2.7
2.7
3.7
6.9
7.2
7.6

17.9
46.4
87.0
128.5
156.0
266.3

12.9
38.8
77.1
105.3
127.9
229.9

5.0
7.6
10.0
23.2
28.1
36.4

d came into force from April 2005.

o have received a community order or fine, 2005 to 2008


One-year re-offending rate

Frequency of re-offending

Difference
(percentage points)

Fines

29.6%
30.8%

1.3
1.3

Community orders

96.6
100.8

Fines

Difference

97.2
101.3

-0.5
-0.5

21.4%

1.1

68.2

68.9

-0.7

42.1%
33.9%
32.2%
30.8%
25.1%
16.9%
6.7%

1.2
1.6
1.7
0.6
1.5
0.8
1.6

134.2
108.8
112.7
105.0
81.7
50.5
20.2

130.1
107.1
113.0
113.4
82.0
55.1
16.6

4.1
1.7
-0.3
-8.4
-0.3
-4.5
3.7

11.0%
20.3%
65.5%
29.0%
45.6%
44.0%

-0.1
2.6
2.0
0.8
1.4
-2.4

23.1
49.2
282.5
68.2
139.8
124.4

24.6
42.9
298.1
66.8
131.7
133.6

-1.5
6.3
-15.5
1.4
8.1
-9.2

6.6%
16.9%
28.4%
38.1%
43.6%
61.2%

1.2
0.4
1.2
1.7
3.6
1.3

15.4
36.5
74.2
113.5
145.0
252.5

13.1
36.4
72.6
109.8
134.4
265.3

2.3
0.1
1.6
3.7
10.6
-12.8

d came into force from April 2005.

o have received a suspended sentence order or community order, 2005 1 to 2008


One-year re-offending rate
Community orders

Frequency of re-offending

Difference
(percentage points)

Suspended
sentence orders

Community orders

Difference

30.7%
31.7%
21.3%

-2.3
-2.3
-2.0

79.9
81.7
61.9

89.6
91.5
71.7

-9.7
-9.7
-9.8

38.6%
33.4%
34.6%
31.1%
24.5%
16.5%
6.9%

-3.7
-3.8
-2.0
-1.3
-0.7
0.0
0.5

93.2
79.4
99.4
92.1
68.0
43.4
17.5

107.7
93.8
111.0
96.1
74.5
43.7
15.5

-14.4
-14.5
-11.6
-4.1
-6.5
-0.3
2.0

29.6%
21.5%
12.8%
22.9%
74.1%
51.2%

-1.3
-2.0
-3.5
-1.1
-0.1
-3.4

63.8
38.1
19.8
45.1
322.6
136.8

72.8
45.5
26.7
49.9
337.7
166.8

-9.0
-7.4
-6.9
-4.8
-15.2
-30.0

8.5%
16.9%
26.8%
36.5%
42.4%
59.0%

-1.5
-2.5
-3.6
-3.3
0.1
-1.6

11.5
26.3
49.4
80.0
111.0
207.2

14.2
31.6
60.1
96.4
120.1
222.3

-2.7
-5.4
-10.7
-16.5
-9.1
-15.1

d came into force from April 2005.

nificant offender and offence characteristics that affect offenders receiving a sentencing outcome other than custody

(1) compared with fines (0)

Conditional discharges (1) compared with community


orders (0)

P-Value
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
.
.
< 0.001
0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
.
< 0.001

Coefficient
-0.389
0.095
0.057
.
.
0.094
-0.007
0.100
0.005
0.013
-0.004
-0.316

0.897
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.007
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.046
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

-2.439
1.599
-0.343
-2.245
-1.524
-0.503
0.840
0.226
0.220
0.413
-0.969
0.264

SE
0.014
0.008
0.005
.
.
0.026
0.004
0.029
0.003
0.014
0.002
0.014
reference category
0.453
0.019
0.075
0.181
0.095
0.049
0.017
0.045
0.030
0.036
0.063
0.057

P-Value
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
.
.
< 0.001
0.054
< 0.001
0.157
0.350
0.009
< 0.001

< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

-0.889
-2.376
1.643
-0.571
1.116
0.990

< 0.001
0.010
0.001
0.304
0.008
0.002
< 0.001

-0.154
-0.024
-0.159
-0.314
0.148
0.026
-0.641

0.036
0.051
0.021
0.069
0.022
0.029
reference category
0.037
0.057
0.041
0.046
0.105
0.082
0.040

< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

< 0.001
0.672
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.158
0.748
< 0.001

Number of matc
All offenders
2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

2,507
32.5%
27.7%
4.8

21,197
37.0%
35.0%
2.0

19,356
38.2%
34.3%
3.9

19,603
39.3%
35.0%
4.3

20,275
40.4%
36.5%
3.9

2,297
33.3%
27.7%
5.5

7,685
37.0%
33.3%
3.7

12,838
36.2%
31.3%
4.9

13,904
37.2%
32.3%
4.9

13,765
39.7%
34.1%
5.6

2,553
23.2%
23.0%
0.2

10,709
29.7%
28.2%
1.5

17,241
29.7%
28.6%
1.1

18,463
30.8%
29.7%
1.1

19,517
32.6%
31.0%
1.6

679
19.1%
21.4%
-2.2

622
25.1%
27.0%
-1.9

4,848
27.9%
29.8%
-1.9

6,583
28.2%
30.3%
-2.1

7,087
29.4%
32.1%
-2.7

Number of matched pairs of offenders and number of offences per 100 matched offenders
All offenders2
2008
2005
2006
2007
2008
2,507
21,197
19,356
19,603
20,275
101.8
127.9
128.7
134.8
140.7
80.9
114.6
108.8
110.9
116.7
20.9
13.3
19.9
23.9
24.0
2,297
115.2
84.4
30.8

7,685
122.2
109.5
12.6

12,838
113.9
99.2
14.7

13,904
119.4
104.1
15.3

13,765
135.0
107.8
27.2

2,553
72.8
71.1
1.7

10,709
96.1
94.9
1.2

17,241
89.4
91.8
-2.4

18,463
95.7
98.9
-3.2

19,517
104.2
101.6
2.7

679

622

4,848

6,583

7,087

66.0
75.8
-9.9

2008
2,507
6.6%
5.0%
1.6

78.6
69.9
8.7

79.1
86.9
-7.8

78.1
88.9
-10.8

82.2
93.8
-11.6

Number of matched pairs of offenders and re-offending custody rates (%)


All offenders2
2005
2006
2007
2008
21,197
19,356
19,603
20,275
10.9%
11.5%
11.9%
12.4%
9.9%
9.9%
10.0%
10.6%
1.0
1.6
1.9
1.8

2,297
9.2%
5.6%
3.6

7,685
13.7%
10.1%
3.6

12,838
13.2%
9.9%
3.3

13,904
13.7%
10.1%
3.6

13,765
14.6%
10.4%
4.2

2,553
5.4%
4.7%
0.7

10,709
10.4%
8.4%
2.0

17,241
10.0%
8.5%
1.5

18,463
10.5%
9.0%
1.5

19,517
11.3%
9.5%
1.8

679
9.6%
7.1%
2.5

622
15.8%
7.7%
8.0

4,848
15.6%
10.9%
4.7

6,583
15.8%
10.6%
5.2

7,087
16.6%
11.1%
5.5

2008

2005

al discharges
39,584
10,991
50,747

al discharges
39,584
10,991
50,747

Number of offenders and number of matched pairs


2006
2007
2008
Fines matched with conditional discharges
18,587
17,059
17,187
17,750
2,592
2,271
2,392
2,507
21,197
19,356
19,603
20,275

Community orders matched with conditional discharges


6,638
10,915
11,629
1,044
1,918
2,265
7,685
12,838
13,904

11,465
2,297
13,765

ines

Community orders matched with fines


15,115
16,084
2,120
2,371
17,241
18,463

16,960
2,553
19,517

Suspended sentence orders matched with community orders


568
4,418
5,949
54
429
632
622
4,848
6,583

6,407
679
7,087

105,898
16,471
122,822

nity orders
52,020
9,588
61,669

9,395
1,309
10,709

Number of matched pairs of offenders and different measures of re-offending


Re-offending custody rates
Conditional
discharges

Fines

Difference
(percentage points)

11.7%
12.4%
6.3%

10.1%
10.8%
4.8%

1.6
1.6
1.5

11.4%
10.6%
14.2%
14.2%
11.4%
9.5%
5.3%

11.0%
10.2%
11.1%
12.1%
8.9%
7.0%
3.2%

0.5
0.4
3.2
2.1
2.5
2.5
2.2

26.2%
9.5%
12.1%
2.5%
13.4%
9.1%

20.6%
9.0%
10.1%
2.4%
11.9%
8.7%

5.6
0.5
2.0
0.0
1.5
0.4

1.1%
3.5%
6.5%
10.4%
15.7%
29.5%

1.1%
3.1%
5.7%
9.3%
13.0%
25.2%

0.0
0.3
0.7
1.1
2.7
4.3

Number of matched pairs of offenders and different measures of re-offending


Re-offending custody rates
Community orders

Conditional
discharges

Difference
(percentage points)

13.8%
14.8%
8.5%

10.1%
11.0%
5.5%

3.7
3.9
2.9

15.2%
14.1%
17.6%
16.3%
12.3%
6.8%
3.3%

11.1%
10.9%
13.1%
12.0%
8.1%
4.6%
1.9%

4.1
3.2
4.5
4.3
4.2
2.2
1.4

4.8%
32.8%
16.7%
5.0%
13.9%
2.2%

3.0%
24.1%
12.3%
4.5%
11.6%
1.8%

1.7
8.7
4.4
0.5
2.2
0.5

1.1%
3.8%
8.3%
13.3%
18.1%
33.3%

0.8%
2.3%
5.4%
8.8%
12.4%
26.0%

0.3
1.5
2.9
4.5
5.8
7.3

Number of matched pairs of offenders and different measures of re-offending


Re-offending custody rates
Community orders

10.6%
11.3%

Difference
(percentage points)

Fines

8.9%
9.6%

1.7
1.8

5.3%

4.6%

0.8

14.9%
12.1%
13.0%
11.5%
9.1%
4.4%
1.4%

12.1%
9.7%
11.0%
11.3%
7.4%
4.1%
0.7%

2.8
2.4
2.1
0.2
1.7
0.3
0.7

1.7%
5.2%
32.8%
6.3%
17.2%
13.4%

1.1%
3.1%
30.6%
5.3%
13.2%
12.4%

0.6
2.1
2.2
1.0
4.0
1.0

0.8%
2.8%
7.0%
12.0%
17.0%
31.1%

0.5%
1.9%
4.8%
9.3%
13.9%
28.7%

0.3
0.9
2.2
2.6
3.1
2.4

Number of matched pairs of offenders and different measures of re-offending


Re-offending custody rates
Suspended
sentence orders

Community orders

Difference
(percentage points)

16.0%
16.6%
10.4%

10.8%
11.2%
6.5%

5.3
5.4
4.0

17.8%
15.8%
20.1%
18.9%
14.5%
9.0%
4.9%

12.9%
11.2%
14.2%
11.0%
9.2%
4.4%
1.8%

4.9
4.6
5.9
7.9
5.3
4.7
3.1

15.8%
7.6%
4.2%
7.6%
59.1%
28.6%

8.7%
4.3%
1.9%
4.5%
43.0%
24.5%

7.1
3.3
2.4
3.2
16.0
4.1

1.6%
4.9%
10.0%
17.6%
25.1%
40.6%

0.8%
2.5%
6.2%
11.2%
14.0%
30.0%

0.8
2.4
3.8
6.4
11.1
10.6

tcome other than custody, 2008


Community orders (1) compared with fines (0)
Coefficient
-0.222
0.137
-0.058
-0.071
-0.017
0.059
0.004
-0.319
.
-0.067
0.006
0.417

2.624
-2.345
-0.053
3.259
2.274
0.845
-0.724
-0.133
-0.337
-2.249
0.372
0.040

SE
0.013
0.008
0.005
0.011
0.005
0.017
0.002
0.017
.
0.011
0.001
0.011
reference category
0.454
0.018
0.066
0.305
0.132
0.055
0.017
0.047
0.030
0.026
0.047
0.062

P-Value
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.001
< 0.001
0.006
< 0.001
.
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

< 0.001
< 0.001
0.420
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.004
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.519

-1.775
-2.501
-1.342
-0.286
-2.069
-1.859

0.407
0.146
0.240
0.314
0.007
0.195
0.937

0.018
0.016
0.022
0.052
0.019
0.026
reference category
0.030
0.046
0.033
0.035
0.083
0.067
0.033

< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

< 0.001
0.002
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.929
0.004
< 0.001

Number of matched pairs of offenders and re-offending rates (%)


PSM analysis all offenders 2008 only
Additional
Full dataset PSM
High/low
randomly
analysis
probability courts
generated factor
54,487
54,313
3,033
39.7%
38.8%
34.0%
36.1%
36.4%
32.0%
3.6
2.3
1.9

offenders

53,305
39.6%
36.7%
2.9

53,303
39.4%
37.0%
2.4

3,020
35.8%
30.8%
5.0

68,911
35.4%
36.3%
-0.9

68,907
35.5%
36.3%
-0.9

4,065
26.3%
23.7%
2.5

39,209
36.0%
39.2%
-3.2

39,215
36.0%
37.7%
-1.8

1,242
31.4%
32.9%
-1.4

y rates (%)

ched pairs

Suspended orders (1) compared with community


orders (0)
Coefficient
0.035
0.024
0.011
0.043
-0.011
0.233
-0.023
-0.098
.
0.084
-0.004
0.109

1.563
-0.168
-0.155
0.465
0.442
-0.406
-0.681
-0.354
0.219
-0.901
-0.525
-0.704

SE
0.018
0.011
0.006
0.014
0.005
0.026
0.004
0.021
.
0.017
0.002
0.014
reference category
0.092
0.026
0.067
0.070
0.038
0.038
0.020
0.046
0.030
0.049
0.045
0.063

P-Value
0.047
0.029
0.079
0.002
0.038
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
.
< 0.001
0.103
< 0.001

< 0.001
< 0.001
0.021
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001

-0.064
-0.628
-1.165
0.504
-0.441
0.039

-0.044
0.029
0.076
0.140
0.085
0.067
-0.756

0.024
0.026
0.040
0.044
0.029
0.036
reference category
0.044
0.066
0.048
0.050
0.122
0.093
0.047

0.008
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.286

0.309
0.655
0.111
0.006
0.485
0.472
< 0.001

Table 1: Bands for OASys Violence Predictor (OVP) and OASys General re-offending Predictor (OGP) sc

Band

OVP 2-year
predicted
re-offending rate

OGP 2-year predicted


re-offending rate
0% 33%
34% 66%
67% 84%
85% - 99%

Low
Medium
High
Very High

0% 29%
30% 59%
60% 79%
80% 99%

Table 2: Offender groups based on criminal history and OGP and OVP scores
Group label

Percentage of
sample

Description

Sexual
offenders

Those with any previous


cautions/convictions for sexual
offending

Low risk

Those with low OGP and OVP scores

Non-violent
specialists1
Violent
specialists

Those with medium/high/very high


OGP and low OVP scores
Those with low OGP and medium
OVP scores
Those with medium/high/very high
OGP and medium OVP scores
Those with high/very high OVP
scores

Versatile
High-risk
versatile

6%
30%
20%
6%
30%
8%2

The term specialists is used here to refer to specialisation in the very broad offence classes covered by OGP and OVP. It is likely that some offenders will

Of which two-thirds had high/very high OGP scores.

Figure 1: Hazards of selected categories of re-offending


Months
1 to 3
4 to 6
7 to 9
10 to 12
13 to 15
16 to 18
19 to 21
22 to 24
25 to 27
28 to 30
31 to 33
34 to 36
37 to 39
40 to 42
43 to 45

Violent (OVP definition)

Sexual
6.7%
5.4%
4.5%
3.9%
3.7%
3.3%
3.1%
2.7%
2.6%
2.4%
2.1%
1.9%
1.9%
1.8%
1.6%

Burglary
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

1.5%
1.1%
0.9%
0.7%
0.7%
0.6%
0.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%

Theft & handling


6.5%
3.9%
2.8%
2.2%
1.9%
1.6%
1.5%
1.3%
1.2%
1.0%
0.9%
0.8%
0.8%
0.6%
0.7%

46 to 48

1.5%

0.0%

0.2%

0.6%

Figure 2: Hazards for six offender groups: violent & sexual re-offending

Months

Sex offenders
(sexual/complian
ce)

Sex offenders (violent)

1 to 3
4 to 6
7 to 9
10 to 12
13 to 15
16 to 18
19 to 21
22 to 24
25 to 27
28 to 30
31 to 33
34 to 36
37 to 39
40 to 42
43 to 45
46 to 48

5.1%
3.8%
3.1%
2.7%
2.8%
2.0%
2.0%
1.6%
1.6%
1.6%
1.1%
0.8%
0.7%
0.9%
1.1%
0.7%

2.0%
1.2%
1.1%
0.9%
1.1%
0.9%
0.8%
0.6%
0.8%
0.8%
0.4%
0.7%
0.7%
0.3%
0.4%
0.3%

Low risk
2.1%
2.0%
1.7%
1.6%
1.6%
1.5%
1.4%
1.3%
1.2%
1.3%
1.1%
1.0%
1.1%
1.0%
0.9%
1.0%

Nonviolent
specialists
4.2%
4.1%
3.2%
3.0%
2.9%
3.0%
2.8%
2.6%
2.6%
2.2%
2.3%
2.1%
2.4%
1.9%
1.7%
1.7%

Figure 3: Hazards for six offender groups: non-violent re-offending

Months
1 to 3
4 to 6
7 to 9
10 to 12
13 to 15
16 to 18
19 to 21
22 to 24
25 to 27
28 to 30
31 to 33
34 to 36
37 to 39
40 to 42
43 to 45
46 to 48

Sex offenders

Low risk
8.1%
4.7%
3.9%
3.1%
3.0%
2.4%
2.0%
1.8%
1.4%
1.6%
1.2%
1.0%
0.7%
1.1%
0.5%
0.8%

2.8%
2.5%
2.2%
1.9%
1.8%
1.6%
1.6%
1.5%
1.4%
1.3%
1.2%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.0%
1.1%

Nonviolent
specialists
19.3%
13.3%
10.3%
9.3%
7.7%
6.8%
6.3%
5.4%
5.1%
4.4%
4.5%
4.3%
3.7%
3.5%
3.5%
2.6%

Violent
specialists
3.2%
3.1%
2.9%
2.6%
2.6%
2.2%
2.2%
1.7%
1.9%
2.1%
1.4%
1.3%
1.5%
1.5%
2.2%
0.8%

ng Predictor (OGP) scores based on their two-year predicted re-offending probabilities

s likely that some offenders will specialise further within those classes, tending to commit particular crimes such as acquisitive offences, drink driving or criminal damage offe

Drugs
1.8%
1.6%
1.5%
1.3%
1.3%
1.2%
1.2%
1.0%
1.0%
0.9%
0.8%
0.8%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%

0.7%

Violent
specialists
6.5%
5.5%
4.6%
4.4%
4.1%
3.5%
3.5%
3.3%
3.2%
2.6%
2.2%
3.3%
2.3%
3.0%
2.8%
1.8%

Versatile
18.1%
12.7%
10.2%
8.3%
7.4%
6.8%
6.4%
5.9%
5.3%
4.6%
4.1%
4.1%
3.7%
3.3%
2.7%
3.2%

Versatile
10.0%
8.4%
7.7%
6.6%
6.4%
5.9%
5.8%
5.0%
5.0%
4.5%
3.9%
3.5%
3.9%
3.8%
3.0%
3.0%

High-risk
versatile
22.9%
14.7%
12.1%
10.0%
8.9%
8.1%
7.3%
5.9%
6.4%
5.8%
5.5%
3.7%
3.2%
3.2%
4.2%
4.3%

High-risk
versatile
20.3%
15.4%
13.2%
11.6%
10.8%
9.5%
9.4%
8.5%
8.7%
7.5%
7.4%
7.5%
3.9%
4.5%
3.8%
4.1%

nk driving or criminal damage offences.

You might also like