MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

CONTRACTOR: CH. ABDULLATIF & CO. CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS:

SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE II MULTAN Sieve Analysis of Embankment & Sub Grade Material
Grain Size Analysis AASHTO-T-27
PROJECT: Sampling Date Testing Date Field Sample No. Lab. Sample No. Analyst.

Kind of Material LOCATION Original Sourse

Weight of Original Sample Weight of Oven Dry Weight of Washed Oven Dry Sieve Size
mm 75
63 50.0 37.5 25.0 19.0 12.5 9.5 4.75 2.36 2.00 1.18 0.60 0.425 0.3 0.18 0.15 0.075

Gms Gms Gms
Cum. Wt.Retained Cum. Retained
Grms %

1042.9
Date (‫)التاريخ‬ Cum. Passing
%

Wt. Retained
Grms

Specification
%

Remarks

(alt.) 3''
2 1/2" 2" 1 1/2'' 1" 3/4 " 1/2 " 3/8 " No. 4 No. 8 No. 10 No. 16 No. 30 No. 40 No. 50 No. 80 No. 100 No. 200

0.0 10.4

0.0 10.4

0.0 1.0

100.0 99.0

66.7

77.2

7.4

92.6

135.6 Oven Dry wt. -4 # Sieve ( Gms) Sieve Size Passing %

212.8 No.10

20.4 No.40

79.6 No.200

Calculations
CONTRACTOR:

Cumulative Percent Retained = Cumulative mass Retained / Dry Mass Before Wash Percent Passing = 100 - Cumulative Percent Retained

CONSULTANT:

CONSULTANT:

LAB TECHNICIAN

MATERIAL INSPECTOR

MATERIAL ENGINEER

MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CONTRACTOR: CH.ABDUL LATIF & CO. CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS

SOUTHERN BYE PASS PHASE II MULTAN

Soils Classification /Atterburg Limits
MRD Test Method 208 -209 - 210 (Adaptation of AASHTO T 89 - 90 - 80) Project Kind of Material Location Quantity Represented
Sampling Date Testing Date Lab. Sample No.

Material Used:

Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size
Individual Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. Retained
Cumulative Percent Retained

Percent Passing

3/4 in (19 mm) No.4 (4.75 mm) No.10 (2.00 mm) No. 40 (0.425 mm) No.200 (0.075 mm) Pan Wash Total

0 0 0.9 5.7 179.8

0 0 0.9 6.6 186.4

0 0 0 1 20

100 100 99.9 99.3 80.3

186.4 Original Wt. Gram

Dry Wt. Gram 946.3
LIQUID LIMIT TEST 32 25 32 24 A-2 A-3 27.70 18.50 53.43 46.15 48.72 40.70 4.71 5.45 21.02 22.20 22.41 24.56

Wash Dry Wt. Gram

Atterburg Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit )
Type of Test Number of Blows Trial No. Container Number Wt. of Container Wt. Wet Soil + Container Wt. Dry Soil + Container Wt. of Water Wt. of Dry Soil Water Content % 40 1 A-1 17.70 45.54 40.85 4.69 23.15 20.26 18 18 A-4 19.50 44.63 39.36 5.27 19.86 26.54 PLASTIC LIMIT TEST 1 A-5 22.20 34.96 32.85 2.11 10.65 19.85 2 A-6 20.20 33.66 31.45 2.21 11.25 19.65 3 A-7 24.00 35.93 33.99 1.94 9.99 19.40

g g g g g

Avg.
30.00 29.00 28.00 27.00 26.00 25.00 24.00 23.00 22.00 21.00 20.00 19.00 18.00 17.00

23.44

19.63

Water Content %

10

20

25

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

No. of Blows
Liquid Limit (L.L) Plasticity Index (P.I)
CONTRACTOR LL =

24.40 4.77

P.I = L.L - P.L

Plastic Limit (P.L) Classification Group
CONSULTANT

P.L =

19.63

A-4
CONSULTANT

LAB TECHNICIAN

MATERIALS INSPECTOR

MATERIAL ENGINEER

635 5. Soaked C.8 655. A-B Mass Can.34 116.908 3 10 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 30 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 65 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 Penetration Per Min.64 1.62 0.B.21 116.08 6. Analyst: Rate of penetration mm/Minute 1.43 0.35 7. Blows Per Lift 1 Test No.27 2/1/2010 Molding Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216) 2 A9 727.8 3.2 5.5 2 3 4 6 70.43 0.81 5.6 70.54 3.836 12. 2 cm g g g g/cm 3 % 3 g/cm 3 1 2128.9 12. Mass Of Water.42 116.7 12.0 4.08 7.1 1.6 6.3 9.908 15. Mold Volume Mass.9 g/cm3 % Blows Per Lift No.4 14. Unit Wet Mass.5 1 1. Initial Height .145 12. Can No.18 g/cm3 Unit Load (Stress) kg / cm2 20 15 10 Percent Swell % PROCTOR MODIFIED MAX DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 5 % 65 1.000 0.40 Density Determination 3 B4 621.1 2.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: NAZIR & COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM CONSULTANT FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 VEHARI ROAD MULTAN California Bearing Ratio MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 .789 3 2124.4 25 12.8 8.4 558 63.7 15.3 0 0 1.6 5.7 4.000 0.3 12. Wet Soil + Can.R At 95% of Max Dry Density 3 10 1.AASHOT 193) Page 1 Of 2 Road Name Description: Location Materials Surcharge Weight Used(kg) Test No. % 95 % of Max.6 7.804 3 3 0.1 6. 0 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 CBR % CBR % CBR % mm 0 0.2 2.90 2.4 30 1.9 3.4 1.29 1.R. Mass Mold .9 12.9 Swell Reading Date Moldend Test No.4 47.7 4.2 2.21 0.3 7.1 510. Mold No.2 72.27 1. A B C D E F Mass.0 10997 7090 3907 1.011 12.1 8. Date Of Sampling Date Tested Quant.43 0.5 11.1 3.2 16. mm mm mm mm 1 1 0. Dry Density g/cm .9 1.5 9. Sample + Mold .81 5. Percent Moisture Unit Dry Mass. Final Height .0 11496 6940 4556 2.0 4.9 65.7 2. Mass Sample .1 7.3 1.54 3.0 5.4 9.635 2 2109.30 Field Sample No.35 105.3 3.8 20.B.7 1.6 581.9 3.7 10. Mass Dry Soil .3 1.30 1.000 0.6 6.27 2. Difference .3 5.1 585.34 0. B-D Moisture Content C/E X 100 Standard Load (Stresses) Kg / Cm2 FATIMA JINNAH TOWN SUB GRADE MATERIAL B-BLOCK SUB GRADE MATERIAL 4.89 Penetration mm 12.36 2 2 0.0 11191 6950 4241 2.3 16.789 12.9 5.40 Test No. Dry Density C.1 12.8 Contractor: Consultant: Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer .40 1.899 12.62 8.2 15.53 0.2 2. Mass Dry Soil + Can.54 1 g g g g g % A5 647.7 48 533.3 5. Rep.9 12. Sample Length .42 0.

950 2.B. DRY DENSITY AS MOLDED g/cm 3 SOAKED C.819 11.R At 95% of Max Dry Density CONTRACTOR: 10 1.B. % 95 % of Max. Dry Density C.B.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: NAZIR & COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM CONSULTANTS: FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 VEHARI ROAD MULTAN California Bearing Ratio MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 .635 5 1.AASHOT 193) Page 2 Of 2 Description: SUB GRADE MATERIAL LOCATION: B-BLOCK 18 16 14 12 Soaked CBR % 10 8 6 4 2 0 1.700 1.R.800 1.900 1.600 1.915 11.9 30 1.850 1.000 Dry Density g/cc MAX DRY DENSITY 1.877 12 65 1.R At 93.750 1.980 16 g/cm 3 g/cm ³ PROCTOR MODIFIED OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % BLOWS PER LAYER No.8 CONSULTANT: % % Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer .0% of Max Dry Density C.2 12.650 1.

.

1557 .887 4 9237 4724 2118 4513 2. Formula Wt.2 290.3 286.AASHO T 99 .053 A-3 34.727 A-1 36.8 6.6 8.0 249.3 1.990 1. Dry Soil + Container (gm) Wt of Water (gm) I-J Wt. Wet Soil + Container (gm) Wt.0 313.8 1. Sample No.930 Dry Density gm/cm3 1.9 33.917 Moisture-Density Relationship 1. Wt. Mold (gm) Volume of Mold (Cm 3 ) Wt.3 285.628 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Moisture Content % 10 11 12 13 14 15 Remraks : CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER .818 6 B-C Wet Density (gm/Cm ) E/D Container No.6 14.131 A-4 34.3 17.5 302.8 1.903 A-2 35. of Dry Soil (gm) J-H Water Content % ( K / L )*100 Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) OPIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % 3 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm 11.071 A-4 36.7 13.1 274.5 302.689 1.6 256. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Mold No. Lab.9 322. of Container Wt.916 5 9110 4724 2118 4386 2.5 275.6 22.5 27. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) Wt.749 1.2 308.ROVEMENT&WIDENING OF NATIONAL HIGHWAY N-5 BAHAWAL POUR CHOWK (929+ CONTRACTOR: CH:ABDUL LATIF &CO CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS SOUTHREN BYPASS PHASE II VEHARI ROAD TO BAHAWALPUR CHOWK MULTAN Moisture-Density Relationship of Soils MRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 .T 180) Project Description Of Sample LOCATION: LAYER: Analyst. 1 8382 4724 2118 3658 1.2 238.870 1.809 1.9 1.0 1.0 241 11.645 2 8755 4724 2118 4031 1.6 5. Compacted Wet soil (gm) 3 Sampling Date Testing Date Field Sample No.0 336.782 3 9072 4724 2118 4348 2.2 1.

7 11.912 2 2128.0 11.8 3.2 5.9 51. Sample Length .24 g/cm3 Unit Load (Stress) kg / cm2 20 15 10 Percent Swell % PROCTOR MODIFIED MAX DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 5 % 65 1. Final Height . Dry Density g/cm .7 1.80 1.1 8.7 2.5 5.35 7.4 3.36 0.7 5. 0 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 CBR % CBR % CBR % mm 0 0.912 5.3 8.0 25 12.8 1.1 1.90 2. Blows Per Lift 1 Test No.2 5.3 631. Can No.4 3.7 4.1 610.80 1 g g g g g % A5 740.R At 95% of Max Dry Density 3 10 1.3 7.64 1. Mass Mold .81 5.6 8. % 95 % of Max. Analyst: Molding Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216) Test No.9 2. A B C D E F Mass. B-D Moisture Content C/E X 100 Standard Load (Stresses) Kg / Cm2 Density Determination 3 B4 686.31 1.8 70.000 0.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CH:ABDUL LATIF &CO CONSULTANT: ABM CONSULTANT SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE II MULTAN California Bearing Ratio MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 .35 105.8 1. Unit Wet Mass.4 19.4 10.5 g/cm3 % Blows Per Lift No.1 2.AASHOT 193) Page 1 Of 2 Road Name Description: Location Materials Field Sample No.45 0.54 3.0 7.2 2.1 6.9 15.898 15. Difference .5 Swell Reading Date Moldend Test No.3 1. Mold No.3 6.2 13.6 4.7 2.000 0.1 65 521.806 11.5 1 1. Dry Density C.2 680.909 9.8 30 1. Mold Volume Mass.0 586.814 3 3 0. Mass Of Water.0 6.2 Contractor: Consultant: Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer .62 0.43 0.2 68 563.4 59.53 1.08 7.39 2 2 0. 2 cm g g g g/cm 3 % 3 g/cm 3 1 2124.0 4.2 3. Soaked C.1 55.54 3.08 6.89 Penetration mm 12.9 9.27 2.80 Test No.80 2 A9 638.000 0.28 116.81 5.5 16.1 9.1 0 0 1.27 1.0 9. Mass Sample . Mass Dry Soil + Can.983 9.806 3 2109.4 5.62 8.5 2 3 4 6 70.45 116.9 5.0 11310 7090 4220 1. Mass Dry Soil .0 10969 6510 4459 2.099 9.8 3.28 0. Rep. mm mm mm mm 1 1 0.7 2.4 15. Percent Moisture Unit Dry Mass.0 11.B.084 9.43 0.36 116. Sample + Mold .3 9.8 15. Initial Height .43 0.7 12.B.898 3 10 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 30 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 65 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 Penetration Per Min. A-B Mass Can.R.80 1.0 1. Date Of Sampling Date Tested Quant.3 6. Wet Soil + Can.0 11344 6950 4394 2.6 9.

AASHOT 193) Page 2 Of 2 Description: Embankment 4th Layer LOCATION: 3+175 TO 3+500 Full Width 35.814 9.912 5.0 1.900 1.1 1.700 1.5 g/cm 3 g/cm ³ PROCTOR MODIFIED OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % BLOWS PER LAYER No.B.850 1.0 30.898 15.R At 93.B.806 11.0% of Max Dry Density C.R.6 12.0 25.2 CONSULTANT: % % Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer . CONSTRUCTON COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM CONSULTANTS: SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN California Bearing Ratio MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 .MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CH.R At 95% of Max Dry Density CONTRACTOR: 10 1.0 10. % 95 % of Max. DRY DENSITY AS MOLDED g/cm 3 SOAKED C.650 1.0 0.8 30 1.909 9.0 15.750 1.0 5. Dry Density C.950 MAX DRY DENSITY 1.B.0 Soaked CBR % 20.7 65 1.800 Dry Density g/cc 1.

.

7 1.2 298.3 321.1 29. of Container Wt.8 1.5 372.4 304. Mold No.0 446. Lab. of Dry Soil (gm) J-H Water Content % ( K / L )*100 Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm 3 9.071 A-4 35.1 19. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) Wt.AASHO T 99 .1 381.950 1.800 1.795 3 9695 5376 2135 4319 2.0 362.T 180) Project Description Of Sample LOCATION: LAYER: Analyst. Formula Wt.765 A-1 36.2 314.2 7.2 37.9 1.1 9. Wt.650 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Moisture Content % Remraks : CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER . Dry Soil + Container (gm) Wt of Water (gm) I-J Wt.023 A-3 35.4 394.2 353.750 1. Mold (gm) Volume of Mold (Cm 3 ) Wt.702 2 9438 5376 2135 4062 1.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CHOUDHARY CONSTRUCTION CO.0 1.5 357.9 268.8 1.1 318.700 1.6 1. CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTAN Moisture-Density Relationship of Soils MRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 . A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Sothern ByePass Multan Embankment 4th Layer 3+175 to 3+500 Full Width 4th Layer Sampling Date Testing Date Field Sample No. Wet Soil + Container (gm) Wt.909 Moisture-Density Relationship 1. Compacted Wet soil (gm) B-C 1 9144 5376 2135 3768 1.856 6 Wet Density (gm/Cm 3 ) E/D Container No.3 416.5 9.8 11.096 A-4 35.903 A-2 34.875 4 9851 5376 2135 4475 2.900 Dry Density gm/cm3 1.6 6. Sample No.1557 .3 3.850 1.3 333.909 5 9798 5376 2135 4422 2.2 30.

L .L) Plasticity Index (P. Sample No. Dry Soil + Container Wt.59 4.80 20.10 (2.50 47.32 38.06 56. 40 (0.90 27.41 A-4 CONSULTANT LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER .4 Original Wt.210 (Adaptation of AASHTO T 89 .53 45.00 20.8 0 0 0. of Blows Liquid Limit (L.00 30.21 23.94 23.74 7.00 20.00 23.27 11.70 42.P. Gram Atterburg Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit ) Type of Test Number of Blows Trial No.73 33.79 6.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CH. of Dry Soil Water Content % 40 1 A-1 22.00 26.L = 20.00 25. of Water Wt.425 mm) No.80 2. of Container Wt.87 28.00 21. Retained Cumulative Percent Retained Percent Passing 3/4 in (19 mm) No.79 P.29 27.00 24.91 4. Material Used: Embankment Sieve Analysis Sieve Size Individual Wt.4 (4.00 10 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 No.51 25.41 Water Content % 28.00 22.200 (0. Container Number Wt.00 27.29 16 4 A-4 19.90 .41 20.16 29.26 20.9 5.20 35.3 LIQUID LIMIT TEST 32 24 2 3 A-2 A-3 17.00 mm) No.25 3 A-7 17.45 PLASTIC LIMIT TEST 1 A-5 22.I = L.75 mm) No.36 Wash Dry Wt.3 186.00 24.6 186.80 64.L) Classification Group CONSULTANT P. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS SOUTHERN BYE PASS MULTAN Soils Classification /Atterburg Limits MRD Test Method 208 -209 .20 3.46 2.83 26.3 80.00 29.7 179.80) Project Kind of Material Location Quantity Represented SOUTHERN BYE PASS MULTAN Embankment 4th Layer 3+175 to 3+500 Full Width Sampling Date Testing Date Lab. Retained Cumulative Wt.48 2.I) CONTRACTOR LL = 24.L Plastic Limit (P.81 g g g g g Avg.12 22.80 28. Gram 946.19 21.16 2 A-6 16.03 10. Gram Dry Wt.39 11. 30.00 19.48 20.4 0 0 0 1 20 100 100 99.075 mm) Pan Wash Total 0 0 0.91 41.9 99.9 6.40 50. Wet Soil + Container Wt.

50 No.7 No.0 99. 80 No. 8 No.0 12. Analyst.8 34.15 0.4 99.0 86.8 Oven Dry wt.60 0.5 25. Retained Grms Specification % Remarks (alt.10 18. Sample No.0 0.7 No. Retained Grms % 971.7 3.18 0.5 9.18 0.3 No.40 81.425 0.9 3. 100 No.3 100.7 0.4 100.6 Date (‫)التاريخ‬ Cum. 200 0 0 0 0 131 0 0 76 0.5 4.6 52. Passing % Wt.075 Gms Gms Gms Cum.0 7.Retained Cum.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CH.5 100.9 0.5 0.0 37. Wt. 10 No.Cumulative Percent Retained CONSULTANT: CONSULTANT: LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIAL INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER .3 96.0 40. 16 No.0 7. Weight of Original Sample Weight of Oven Dry Weight of Washed Oven Dry Sieve Size mm 75 63 50.3 0. 40 No. -4 # Sieve ( Gms) Sieve Size Passing % 181.8 0 0 0 0 131 0 0 36 0.2 -3. Lab.8 65.200 Calculations CONTRACTOR: Cumulative Percent Retained = Cumulative mass Retained / Dry Mass Before Wash Percent Passing = 100 . 4 No.0 99.) 3'' 2 1/2" 2" 1 1/2'' 1" 3/4 " 1/2 " 3/8 " No.0 0.36 2.6 177.0 13. 30 No.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS: SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN Sieve Analysis of Embankment Material Grain Size Analysis AASHTO-T-27 PROJECT: Kind of Material LOCATION Original Sourse Southern ByePass EMBANKMENT 4 TH LAYER 3+175 TO 3+500 Full Width Embankmant Sampling Date Testing Date Field Sample No.4 48 60 0.00 1.0 19.75 2.

734 6.7 6. Unit Wet Mass.9 5. Mass Dry Soil + Can.3 571. Mass Dry Soil .7 1.8 4.B.35 7.27 1.0 7.5 16.834 3 3 0.2 6.08 6.6 9. Mold Volume Mass. Difference .CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM CONSULTANT SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTAN California Bearing Ratio MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 .00 116. Mass Mold . % 95 % of Max.00 0.10 1.1 30 1.0 11198 6950 4248 2.90 2.4 9. Dry Density g/cm .2 584 54.4 10.4 14.734 2 2109.8 18.89 Penetration mm 14. Mass Of Water.0 2. Soaked C. Sample Length .0 1.00 g/cm3 Unit Load (Stress) kg / cm2 20 15 10 Percent Swell % PROCTOR MODIFIED MAX DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 5 % 65 1. 2 cm g g g g/cm 3 % 3 g/cm 3 1 2128.4 3. Mold No.1 536.9 3.000 0.00 116.5 1 1.10 Density Determination 3 B4 683.35 105.3 48 523. Date Of Sampling Date Tested Quant.4 5. mm mm mm mm 1 1 0.6 7.8 11.0 53.0 0 0 1.1 8.0 11457 6940 4517 2.5 2 3 4 6 70.10 Test No.5 4. Dry Density C.4 12.6 19. Rep.2 Contractor: Consultant: Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer .43 0. Analyst: Rate of penetration mm/Minute 1. B-D Moisture Content C/E X 100 Standard Load (Stresses) Kg / Cm2 SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN SUB GRADE MATERIAL 1+550 to 2+600 L/S Sub Grade 1st Layer 4.6 g/cm3 % Blows Per Lift No.7 10.829 3 2124.43 0.0 10.932 18.62 0.931 10.2 47.64 1.0 11155 7090 4065 1.6 Swell Reading Date Moldend Test No.6 24.000 0.3 7.014 10.AASHOT 193) Page 1 Of 2 Road Name Description: Location Materials Surcharge Weight Used(kg) Test No. Blows Per Lift 1 Test No.4 4.4 56.00 2 2 0. Wet Soil + Can.62 8.27 Molding Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216) 2 A9 638.1 626.B. Initial Height .7 3.0 5.0 14.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CH.000 0 116.54 1 g g g g g % A5 624.08 7.910 10.7 4. Percent Moisture Unit Dry Mass.R At 95% of Max Dry Density 3 10 1.81 5.2 12.0 1.6 10. Sample + Mold .5 6.8 2.81 5.9 7. Can No.5 4.7 18.6 17.00 0.932 3 10 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 30 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 65 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 Penetration Per Min. Mass Sample .9 10.54 3. A B C D E F Mass.127 10.27 2.00 0.6 14.54 3.6 2.0 3.1 3.R.20 Field Sample No.20 1.53 1.7 65 561. A-B Mass Can.5 5.1 1.5 25 13.7 7. 0 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 CBR % CBR % CBR % mm 0 0.00 1. Final Height .0 2.0 2.43 0.829 14.

800 Dry Density g/cc 1.829 14.850 1. DRY DENSITY AS MOLDED g/cm 3 SOAKED C.0 4.750 1.0 8. % 95 % of Max.700 1.R At 93.1 30 1.0 10.834 11.734 6.R.0% of Max Dry Density C.R At 95% of Max Dry Density CONTRACTOR: 10 1.6 g/cm 3 g/cm ³ PROCTOR MODIFIED OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % BLOWS PER LAYER No.B.B.650 1.0 14.931 10.0 6.AASHOT 193) Page 2 Of 2 Description: Sub Grade 1st Layer LOCATION: 1+550 TO 2+600 L/S 20.2 CONSULTANT: % % Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer . CONSTRUCTON COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM CONSULTANTS: SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN California Bearing Ratio MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 .0 1.B.0 65 1.0 0.950 MAX DRY DENSITY 1.0 2.900 1.0 1. Dry Density C.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CH.932 18.0 Soaked CBR % 12.6 14.0 18.0 16.

.

701 2 9463 5376 2135 4087 1. Lab. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Sothern ByePass Multan SUB GRADE MATERIAL 1+550 to 2+600 L/S Sub Grade 1st Layer Sampling Date Testing Date Field Sample No.AASHO T 99 .0 1.900 Dry Density gm/cm3 1.950 1.9 1.871 6 Wet Density (gm/Cm 3 ) E/D Container No.800 1.2 8.0 412.088 A-4 41.1 397.1 360.914 A-2 35.801 3 9722 5376 2135 4346 2.2 378.700 1.9 12.126 A-4 36.850 1.3 6.036 A-3 35.750 1.T 180) Project Description Of Sample LOCATION: LAYER: Analyst.1 346.1557 .5 3. of Container Wt. Formula Wt.2 27.9 361.1 384.0 319 11.650 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Moisture Content % Remraks : CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER . Mold (gm) Volume of Mold (Cm 3 ) Wt.885 4 9915 5376 2135 4539 2.931 Moisture-Density Relationship 1.6 326.3 353. Sample No.3 20.4 310.4 318.3 1.1 37. of Dry Soil (gm) J-H Water Content % ( K / L )*100 Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm 3 10.9 349. Mold No. Wet Soil + Container (gm) Wt.1 1. CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTAN Moisture-Density Relationship of Soils MRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 .6 1. Dry Soil + Container (gm) Wt of Water (gm) I-J Wt.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CHOUDHARY CONSTRUCTION CO.0 381. Wt. Compacted Wet soil (gm) B-C 1 9149 5376 2135 3773 1.767 A-1 35. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) Wt.7 31.5 10.931 5 9834 5376 2135 4458 2.4 366.1 1.

22 25.00 16. Container Number Wt. 30.34 48.L) Classification Group CONSULTANT P.16 PLASTIC LIMIT TEST 1 A-5 19.90 A-4 CONSULTANT LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER .38 2.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: NAZIR & COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 VEHARI ROAD MULTAN Soils Classification /Atterburg Limits MRD Test Method 208 -209 .00 19.8 0 0 0.P.4 Original Wt.3 186. Retained Cumulative Wt. Dry Soil + Container Wt.64 28.9 5.00 10 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 No.26 24.19 22. Wet Soil + Container Wt.L .34 31.I = L.200 (0.40 34.48 32.L Plastic Limit (P.00 29.00 24.36 11. Sample No.00 20.90 Water Content % 28.10 (2. Gram Dry Wt.06 45.06 6.28 45.80 20.7 179.4 0 0 0 1 20 100 100 99.I) CONTRACTOR LL = 26.35 17 4 A-4 20. 40 (0. Gram Atterburg Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit ) Type of Test Number of Blows Trial No.3 80.29 Wash Dry Wt. of Container Wt.90 31.78 29.00 5.210 (Adaptation of AASHTO T 89 .90 .00 22.19 56.85 26.20 53.74 53.81 3 A-7 17.00 26.48 20.L = 20.84 7.70 59.80) Project Kind of Material Location Quantity Represented FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 SUB GRADE MATERIAL B-BLOCK Sampling Date Testing Date Lab.75 mm) No.3 LIQUID LIMIT TEST 33 25 2 3 A-2 A-3 17.93 g g g g g Avg.9 6.22 28.00 21. of Dry Soil Water Content % 41 1 A-1 27.9 99.00 mm) No.00 24.80 52.95 2 A-6 22.12 30.6 186.00 20.075 mm) Pan Wash Total 0 0 0.08 10.76 2.10 P.40 11. of Blows Liquid Limit (L.00 27.26 20.L) Plasticity Index (P. of Water Wt.16 26.00 25.89 5. Retained Cumulative Percent Retained Percent Passing 3/4 in (19 mm) No.85 8.425 mm) No.50 33.40 2. 1/1/2010 Material Used: SUB GRADE Sieve Analysis Sieve Size Individual Wt.4 (4.00 23. Gram 946.

Lab.0 Oven Dry wt.7 No.5 100.5 9. 16 No.0 19.5 25.) 3'' 2 1/2" 2" 1 1/2'' 1" 3/4 " 1/2 " 3/8 " No.0 37.7 0.0 9.18 0. 8 No.4 37.0 0.18 0.8 65.2 81. Wt. 30 No.425 0.3 100.200 Calculations CONTRACTOR: Cumulative Percent Retained = Cumulative mass Retained / Dry Mass Before Wash Percent Passing = 100 . 80 No.5 0 0 0 0 161 0 0 0 0.0 13.36 2.40 89.6 Date (‫)التاريخ‬ Cum.3 No. 10 No.7 No.0 99.7 7. Retained Grms Specification % Remarks (alt.00 1.0 12. Passing % Wt.5 0. 100 No.2 90. 200 0 0 0 0 161 0 0 7.4 48 60 0. Retained Grms % 1193.0 0. Weight of Original Sample Weight of Oven Dry Weight of Washed Oven Dry Sieve Size mm 75 63 50.0 99.4 100. -4 # Sieve ( Gms) Sieve Size Passing % 127.5 4.0 86. Analyst.75 2.60 0.15 0.Retained Cum. Sample No.0 0. 50 No.0 100.3 0.0 40.2 9. 4 No.6 52.Cumulative Percent Retained CONSULTANT: CONSULTANT: LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIAL INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER .5 34.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: NAZIR & COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS: FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 VEHARI ROAD MULTAN Sieve Analysis of Sub Grade Material Grain Size Analysis AASHTO-T-27 PROJECT: Kind of Material LOCATION Original Sourse FATIMA JINNAH TOWN SUB GRADE MAERIAL B-BLOCK SUB GRADE MATERIAL Sampling Date Testing Date 01/01/2010 Field Sample No.6 92.10 10.075 Gms Gms Gms Cum. 40 No.

931 5 9834 5376 2135 4458 2. Dry Soil + Container (gm) Wt of Water (gm) I-J Wt.850 1.701 2 9463 5376 2135 4087 1. Wt.3 20.5 10.9 349.9 1. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) Wt.2 27.0 1.900 Dry Density gm/cm3 1.1 1.767 A-1 35.5 3.T 180) Project Description Of Sample LOCATION: LAYER: Analyst.0 319 11. Mold No.650 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Moisture Content % Remraks : CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER .0 381.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CHOUDHARY CONSTRUCTION CO. CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTAN Moisture-Density Relationship of Soils MRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 . Sample No.1 37.1 384.1 397.2 8.750 1.AASHO T 99 .885 4 9915 5376 2135 4539 2.3 6.801 3 9722 5376 2135 4346 2.4 310.931 Moisture-Density Relationship 1.950 1.036 A-3 35. Wet Soil + Container (gm) Wt.6 326. Compacted Wet soil (gm) B-C 1 9149 5376 2135 3773 1.914 A-2 35. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Sothern ByePass Multan SUB BASE MATERIAL 1+550 to 2+600 L/S Sub Grade 1st Layer Sampling Date Testing Date Field Sample No.700 1. Formula Wt.9 361.1 360.1 1.871 6 Wet Density (gm/Cm 3 ) E/D Container No.2 378.1 346.6 1.0 412. Lab. of Container Wt.4 318.3 1.4 366.088 A-4 41.1557 . Mold (gm) Volume of Mold (Cm 3 ) Wt.9 12.126 A-4 36. of Dry Soil (gm) J-H Water Content % ( K / L )*100 Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm 3 10.7 31.3 353.800 1.

Lab.250 Dry Density gm/cm3 2. of Dry Soil (gm) J-H Water Content % ( K / L )*100 Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm 3 6.7 38.3 29.056 A-1 48.203 A-2 65.248 Moisture-Density Relationship 2.1 607.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CH.5 580.2 2.147 6 Wet Density (gm/Cm 3 ) E/D Container No. 1 9190 4836 2118 4354 2.996 2 9502 4836 2118 4666 2. Formula Wt.200 2.000 1.298 A-3 47.050 2.3 510.300 2.2 2.AASHO T 99 .0 613.6 610.7 35.184 4 9904 4836 2118 5068 2.393 A-4 62. Mold (gm) Volume of Mold (Cm 3 ) Wt.5 2.0 573.100 2.2 5.1557 .950 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture Content % Remraks : CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: LAB TECNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER .T 180) Project Description Of Sample Analyst.1 526. CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS SOUTHERN BYEPASS PART:II MULTAN Moisture-Density Relationship of Soils MRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 .150 2.0 1.6 2.ABDUL LATIF & CO.8 510.4 545.6 15.6 7. Wet Soil + Container (gm) Wt.3 6. Compacted Wet soil (gm) B-C Sampling Date Testing Date Field Sample No.3 22. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Mold No. of Container Wt. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) Wt.1 619.3 4.3 563.6 2. Dry Soil + Container (gm) Wt of Water (gm) I-J Wt.114 3 9702 4836 2118 4866 2.6 3.4 591. Sample No.310 A-1 70.247 5 9729 4836 2118 4893 2.9 558.4 643. Wt.1 639.

9 12.89 Blows Per Lift No.5 563. Mold Volume Mass.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM CONSULTANT SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTAN California Bearing Ratio MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 .18 g/cm3 Unit Load (Stress) kg / cm2 8000 6000 4000 Percent Swell % PROCTOR MODIFIED 2000 MAX DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % 65 2.5 2 3 4 6 70.81 5. Difference .9 76 563.236 6.0 7.32 116.R. % 98 % of Max.3 10. Date Of Sampling Date Tested Quant.90 2.40 116.1 51.81 5. Mold No. Unit Wet Mass. Soaked C.21 0. Can No.383 6.7 g/cm3 % 0 0 1.27 1.8 2.20 2.6 6. Mass Dry Soil .6 35.20 Field Sample No.2 23.6 30.62 8. Wet Soil + Can.6 67. Blows Per Lift 1 Test No.0 17. B-D Moisture Content C/E X 100 Standard Load (Stresses) Kg / Cm2 SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN SUB BASE MATERIAL 0+175 to 1+250 L/S Sub Base 1st Layer 4.54 1 g g g g g % A5 674.9 38.0 12162 7090 5072 2.246 3 10 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 30 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 65 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 Penetration Per Min. Initial Height .000 0.43 0. Mass Dry Soil + Can.8 31.6 34.000 0.R At 98% of Max Dry Density 10 2.6 42. Percent Moisture Unit Dry Mass.0 11466 6950 4516 2.7 46.54 3.7 10.0 -2000 Penetration mm #REF! Contractor: Consultant: Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer .53 4. Mass Sample .7 26.5 16. 2 cm g g g g/cm 3 % 3 g/cm 3 1 2109. Final Height .2 55.B.9 24.188 3 3 0.8 29.08 7.34 2 2 0.2 2.1 6960.4 7.2 22.62 0.27 2.3 35.4 36.6 6. 0 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm 2 0 Tested Corrected Load Kg / Cm 2 CBR % CBR % CBR % mm 0 0.0 3.016 12.9 65 498.54 3. Mass Of Water.64 1.5 1 1.3 32.7 Swell Reading Date Moldend Test No.43 0.3 15.32 0.35 7.0 11690 6940 4750 2.8 37.08 6.3 9. Dry Density g/cm 3 .MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CH.0 12.6 18.4 0.3 12217.000 0.016 2 2124. Analyst: Rate of penetration mm/Minute 1.2 37.27 Molding Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216) 2 A9 594. A-B Mass Can.6 15.0 12.106 3 2128.8 14. Dry Density C.0 11.233 6.0 8594.141 6.1 576. Sample + Mold .10 Test No.3 27.0 30 2.8 47.20 Density Determination 3 B4 608.9 16.B. mm mm mm mm 1 1 0.106 27.1 31. Rep.35 105.10 2.8 6.5 639.5 10000 28.3 28.9 24.7 12.27 2. A B C D E F Mass.21 116.43 0. Sample Length .3 64 512.1 5.AASHOT 193) Page 1 Of 2 Road Name Description: Location Materials Surcharge Weight Used(kg) Test No.9 19. Mass Mold .246 36.1 21.

I) LL = 31.00 33.62 28.00 12.00 15.25 2.PH#II DHA Islamabad.Nasir.3 Type of Test Number of Blows Trial No.74 2.00 32. of Water Wt.50 20.55 31.13 30.23 14.00 Water Content % 34.60 21.65 PLASTIC LIMIT TEST Avg.I = L.AN ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL &SOIL TESTING LABORATORY ATTERBURG'S LIMITS PROJECT: Sub-soil Investigation of Plot of Capt.80 13.L) Plasticity Index (P.43 6.73 3 A3 6.L .35 7.62 1.07 23.00 29.99 22. BH # Sample Depth : Sampling Date: 1 03 ft 05/10/2011 08/10/2011 LOCATION: Plot #61. 31.00 31.20 23.61 5.88 2.L = 23.50 11.00 28.07 1.55 P.65 CL-ML TESTED BY:--------------------------- CHECKED BY:--------------------------- .81 1 A4 5.85 18.L) Classification Group P.00 31.13 17 3 6 12.00 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 100 No.11 6. of Blows Liquid Limit (L. Dry Soil + Container Wt.32 9.81 7.65 Testing Date : Atterburg Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit ) LIQUID LIMIT TEST 26 2 5 13.70 23. Container Number Wt. 946. Wet Soil + Container Wt.P.38 24.00 16. of Dry Soil Water Content % g g g g g 35 1 4 9. of Container Wt.ST# Jinnah Blved.20 14.24 33.Sector#A.20 7.L Plastic Limit (P.99 1.50 17. Arshad M.65 35.56 2 A2 5.

.

0 19.4 48 60 0.5 25. 200 0 0 0 0 161 0 0 7. Passing % Wt.0 0. Weight of Original Sample Weight of Oven Dry Weight of Washed Oven Dry Sieve Size mm 75 63 50.0 13.40 89.08 Gms Gms Gms Cum.0 Oven Dry wt.0 40.10 10.6 Date (‫)خخخخخخخ‬ Cum.4 100.7 0. 50 No. 16 No.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: NAZIR & COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS: FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 VEHARI ROAD MULTAN Sieve Analysis of Sub Grade Material Grain Size Analysis AASHTO-T-27 PROJECT: Kind of Material LOCATION Original Sourse FATIMA JINNAH TOWN SUB GRADE MAERIAL B-BLOCK SUB GRADE MATERIAL Sampling Date Testing Date 01/01/2010 Field Sample No. 8 No.0 0. 10 No.6 52.0 86.5 0 0 0 0 161 0 0 0 0. Retained Grms Specification % Remarks (alt.43 0.8 65. -4 # Sieve ( Gms) Sieve Size Passing % 127.0 99.7 No.0 12. Wt.0 99.7 7.2 81.2 90.15 0. 100 No.18 0.5 9.Retained Cum.5 0.2 9. Lab.5 100.00 1.36 2.3 0. 30 No.0 37.) 3'' 2 1/2" 2" 1 1/2'' 1" 3/4 " 1/2 " 3/8 " No.5 4. Analyst. 4 No.6 92.0 100.4 37. 80 No.5 34.60 0.7 No.0 9.18 0.200 Calculations CONTRACTOR: Cumulative Percent Retained = Cumulative mass Retained / Dry Mass Before Wash Percent Passing = 100 .3 100.3 No.75 2.0 0. Retained Grms % 1193. Sample No. 40 No.Cumulative Percent Retained CONSULTANT: CONSULTANT: LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIAL INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER .

.

2 8.550 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Moisture Content % Remraks : CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER . Sample No.9 349.800 1.0 381.1 37.700 1.650 1.3 20.885 4 9915 5376 2135 4539 2.2 378.767 A-1 35.6 326.4 366.088 A-4 41. Wt.750 1.5 10.9 361.600 1.0 319 11.1 384. Formula 1 9149 5376 2135 3773 1.1557 .7 31.0 1.036 A-3 35.4 318.3 6.1 346.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CHOUDHARY CONSTRUCTION CO.1 1.4 310.5 3.914 A-2 35.T 180) Project Description Of Sample LOCATION: LAYER: Analyst. Compacted Wet soil (gm) 3 Sothern ByePass Multan SUB BASE MATERIAL 1+550 to 2+600 L/S Sub Grade 1st Layer Sampling Date Testing Date Field Sample No.850 1.9 12.3 353. Mold (gm) Volume of Mold (Cm3) Wt.6 1.871 6 B-C Wet Density (gm/Cm ) E/D Container No.2 27.AASHO T 99 .000 1. CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTAN Moisture-Density Relationship of Soils MRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 . Wt.9 1.900 Dry Density gm/cm3 1.950 1. of Dry Soil (gm) J-H Water Content % ( K / L )*100 Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm3 10.701 2 9463 5376 2135 4087 1. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Mold No.126 A-4 36.931 Moisture-Density Relationship 2.931 5 9834 5376 2135 4458 2. Dry Soil + Container (gm) Wt of Water (gm) I-J Wt.3 1.0 412.1 1.1 360. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) Wt. Lab.1 397. Wet Soil + Container (gm) Wt.801 3 9722 5376 2135 4346 2. of Container Wt.

4 591.6 7.1557 .3 6. Sample No.203 A-2 65.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CH.0 573. Wt. of Container Wt.114 3 9702 4836 2118 4866 2.ABDUL LATIF & CO. Dry Soil + Container (gm) Wt of Water (gm) I-J Wt.0 1.5 580. Formula Wt.247 5 9729 4836 2118 4893 2.5 2.250 2.300 2.3 29.147 6 Wet Density (gm/Cm3) E/D Container No.056 A-1 48.000 1.393 A-4 62.996 2 9502 4836 2118 4666 2.6 2.3 4.6 2.3 22.150 2.6 610.050 2.850 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture Content % Remraks : CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: LAB TECNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER .298 A-3 47. Lab. Compacted Wet soil (gm) B-C Sampling Date Testing Date Field Sample No.3 510.2 2. Wet Soil + Container (gm) Wt.7 38.0 613.8 510.200 Dry Density gm/cm3 2.7 35.T 180) Project Description Of Sample Analyst.1 526.3 563. 1 9190 4836 2118 4354 2. of Dry Soil (gm) J-H Water Content % ( K / L )*100 Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm3 6. Mold (gm) Volume of Mold (Cm3) Wt.100 2.950 1.900 1. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) Wt. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Mold No.AASHO T 99 .6 3.2 2.9 558.4 545.1 619.4 643. CONSULTANT: ABM ENGINEERS SOUTHERN BYEPASS PART:II MULTAN Moisture-Density Relationship of Soils MRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 .310 A-1 70.6 15.248 Moisture-Density Relationship 2.184 4 9904 4836 2118 5068 2.2 5.1 607.1 639.

20 Density Determination 3 B4 608. Final Height .B.141 6.7 26.1 31.6 42.08 6.7 Swell Reading Date Moldend Test No.236 6.000 0.9 12.89 Percent Swell % PROCTOR MODIFIED MAX DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % 65 2.1 576.4 36.3 32.9 76 563.4 0. Mass Sample .62 8.5 1 1.3 10.43 0. Can No. Mass Dry Soil .5 639.43 0.9 38. Mold Volume Mass.383 6.0 3.1 5.0 11690 6940 4750 2.64 1. Percent Moisture Unit Dry Mass.0 11.54 3. Mass Dry Soil + Can.8 31.21 0.32 0.246 36.6 18.8 37.7 g/cm % 3 Blows Per Lift No.5 2 3 4 6 70.54 3.2 23.8 2.43 0.3 9.3 28.5 563.0 7.35 7.27 2.90 2.R.0 12162 7090 5072 2. A B C D E F Mass.6 6.08 7. Analyst: Rate of penetration mm/Minute 1.7 12.016 12.35 105.3 35.5 16.27 Molding Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216) 2 A9 594.106 27.233 6.53 4. Mass Mold .20 Field Sample No. Dry Density C. Sample Length .1 6960.3 27.1 21.7 46.2 55.27 2.246 Tested Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm2 0 30 Tested Load Kg / Cm2 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm2 0 65 Load 3 Tested Corrected Kg / Cm2 CBR % Corrected CBR % Corrected Kg / Cm2 CBR % mm 0 0.0 8594.0 11466 6950 4516 2.MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR: CH.6 6.0 12.9 24. Blows Per Lift Penetration Per Min.B.6 35. Mass Of Water. 0 Molded Total Load Kg Unit Load Kg / Cm2 0 10 Load 1 Test No.5 10000 9000 28.54 1 g g g g g % A5 674.1 51.106 3 2128.27 1. mm mm mm mm 1 1 0.8 14.6 34. A-B Mass Can.6 30.016 2 2124.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONSULTANT: ABM CONSULTANT SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTAN California Bearing Ratio MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 .0 17.18 g/cm3 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 1.2 37.3 64 512. Rep. Difference .20 2.2 22.0 30 2. B-D Moisture Content C/E X 100 Standard Load (Stresses) Kg / Cm2 SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN SUB BASE MATERIAL 0+175 to 1+250 L/S Sub Base 1st Layer 4.8 29.9 16.6 67.2 2.8 47.34 2 2 0.21 116.000 0.AASHOT 193) Page 1 Of 2 Road Name Description: Location Materials Surcharge Weight Used(kg) Test No. Wet Soil + Can. Initial Height .40 116.7 10.9 24. Date Of Sampling Date Tested Quant. % 98 % of Max.9 65 498. Soaked C. Dry Density g/cm3.3 15.9 19.0 12. Sample + Mold .32 116.188 3 Unit Load (Stress) kg / cm2 3 0.R At 98% of Max Dry Density 10 2.10 2. Mold No.8 6.62 0.3 12217. 2 1 cm3 g g g g/cm3 % g/cm3 2109.000 0. Unit Wet Mass.6 15.4 7.0 #REF! Penetration mm Consultant: Contractor: Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer .10 Test No.81 5.81 5.

23 14.25 2. Dry Soil + Container Wt.65 Avg.07 1.50 11.07 23.99 1.20 7.65 35.80 13.00 10 100 No. BH # Sample Depth : Sampling Date: 1 03 ft 05/10/2011 08/10/2011 LOCATION: Plot #61.50 17.43 6.65 LIQUID LIMIT TEST 26 2 5 13.55 P. 40.81 Testing Date : Atterburg Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit ) PLASTIC LIMIT TEST 1 A4 5.Nasir.20 14.32 9.3 Type of Test Number of Blows Trial No.00 31.38 24.56 2 A2 5.00 31. Container Number Wt.74 2.60 21.L) Classification Group P.85 18. Arshad M.I = L.62 28.65 CL-ML TESTED BY:--------------------------- CHECKED BY:--------------------------- .13 Water Content % 25.PH#II DHA Islamabad.00 15.62 1.55 31.99 22.88 2.00 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0. of Container Wt.50 20.00 12.L) Plasticity Index (P.13 17 3 6 12.ST# Jinnah Blved. Wet Soil + Container Wt.73 3 A3 6. of Dry Soil Water Content % g g g g g 35 1 4 9.00 5.Sector#A.00 16.61 5.L . 946.AN ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL &SOIL TESTING LABORATORY ATTERBURG'S LIMITS PROJECT: Sub-soil Investigation of Plot of Capt.00 20.35 7.P.L Plastic Limit (P.20 23.70 23.00 30. of Water Wt.00 10.L = 23.81 7.I) LL = 31.11 6.00 15.24 33. of Blows Liquid Limit (L.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful