Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

478 views

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Anova
- Chapter 5
- Final
- A Novas
- 94211972 Proforma Mte 3105 Statistics
- EDET J780 Group Project Graphing Calculators and High Stakes Testing
- 44520574-MB0034
- ANDERSON. 2001. a New Method for Non-parametric Multivariate Analysis of Variance
- Anova Analisis
- Non Verbal Pain Scale Revised
- MEFE_16_12
- Question for Spss
- Course Pro Forma
- Analysis
- Predictability of Stock Indices
- 5 Ssgb Amity Bsi Anova
- Human Errors Reduction
- Buy back -18022014
- Chapter 11.pdf
- anova note for students

You are on page 1of 7

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is the technique when an F test is used to test a hypothesis concerning the means of three or more populations. The assumptions for the F test for comparing three or more means are as below :

The populations from which the samples were obtained muat be normally or approximately normally distributed. The samples must be independent of each other. The variances of the populations must be equal.

Although we are going to compared the means in the F test, but variances are used in the test instead of the means. Thats means two different estimates of the population variance are made. There are two types of analysis which is between-group variance and within-group variance. But, we will discuss the example of between group means which involves computing the variance by using the means of the group or between the groups. So, let see the example for One-way ANOVA between group.

Question:

A teacher would like to know the best teaching method that can be use to teach topic Trigonometry. The students are randomly divided into three different groups based on different teaching method. After finished the topic, a test were given to the students and their marks are shown below. At = 0.05, test the claim that there is a significant difference among the means.

Method 1 43 34 41 37 36 49 39 42 40 51

Method 2 53 49 61 57 42 45 54 51 52 49

Method 3 41 44 42 47 51 50 43 39 37 52

iii) Find :

SS B ni xi xGM

i 1

2 2

528.2

i 1

MS B

(k 1)

ss

MS w

(n k )

ss

528.2 3 1

264.1

780.12 30 3

28.89

Source

Sum of squares

Degree of freedom

Between

528.2

264.1

9.142

780.12

27

28.89

1308.32

29

The result show in the table is the same with result shown in SPSS. Is just that in SPSS, it tell us the significant value for this test which is equal to 0.001.

In traditional method, we compare F ratio with critical value that we find in Table F. If F ratio is greater than critical value, we reject the null hypothesis. The result are as below :

Since 9.142 > 3.35 , the decision is reject the null hypothesis.

But, when we use SPSS, we just have to look at the significant value for this test. As we say before, the table show that the significant value is equal to 0.001. If the value is less than alpha which is equal to 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis. Since significant value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.( F(2,27) = 9.141, p < .05).

There is enough evidence to support the claim that there is a difference among the means.

Tukey Test.

When

is rejected, the researcher may want to know where the difference among the means is.

So, we will use another test to find where the difference exist. Since the sample size are equal for each group and we are confident that our populations variances are similar, then we will use Tuket Test. This is because the test is powerful enough to control over the Type I error rate. So, we will continue to make three comparisons which are between Method 1 and Method 2, between Method 1 and Method 3, and the last one is between Method 2 and Method 3. These are the steps for Traditional Method on how to find the difference among these three comparisons.

H0 : H1:

H0 : H1:

H0 : H1:

Since k = 2, v = 27, and a = 0.05 So, from table N, critical value is 3.77

MSW n xi and x j the means of sample being compared. n sample size for groups. MSW mean square within sample.

xi x j

In traditional method, we compare F ratio with critical value that we find in Table N. If F ratio is greater than critical value, we reject the null hypothesis. The result are as below :

i. ii. iii.

Since 8.913 > 3.77, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis. Since 3.001 < 3.77 , the decision is do not reject the null hypothesis. Since 5.913 > 3.77, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

But, when we use SPSS, we just have to look at the significant value for this test. If the significant value is less than alpha which is equal to 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis. For the first comparison which is between method 1 and method 2, the mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level (p < .05). For the second comparison, which is between method 1 and Method 3, the mean difference is not significant at the 0.05 level (p < .05). For last comparison which is between Method 2 and Method 3, the mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level (p < .05) .

There is a significant difference between Method 1 and Method 2 and also between Method 2 and Method 3 (Sig. is less than .05). There is a non-significant difference between Method 1 and Method 3 (Sig. is less than .05).

- AnovaUploaded byNguyen Be
- Chapter 5Uploaded byFanny Sylvia C.
- FinalUploaded bySunny Singhania
- A NovasUploaded bymobota
- 94211972 Proforma Mte 3105 StatisticsUploaded byMohd Zamri Jaafar
- EDET J780 Group Project Graphing Calculators and High Stakes TestingUploaded byhodgess5
- 44520574-MB0034Uploaded byrathis87
- ANDERSON. 2001. a New Method for Non-parametric Multivariate Analysis of VarianceUploaded byIchtus Soluções Ambientais
- Anova AnalisisUploaded byJordon Alvarado
- Non Verbal Pain Scale RevisedUploaded byApriliana Ratnaningrum
- MEFE_16_12Uploaded byRudy Lee
- Question for SpssUploaded bySayali Thakur
- Course Pro FormaUploaded byArchu Dareece
- AnalysisUploaded byMillecai Macaranas
- Predictability of Stock IndicesUploaded byrishabhtam
- 5 Ssgb Amity Bsi AnovaUploaded byanujhanda29
- Human Errors ReductionUploaded byNeenaRawat
- Buy back -18022014Uploaded byashish_p7
- Chapter 11.pdfUploaded byLevi Pogi
- anova note for studentsUploaded byMohd Ellif Sarian
- Labmanual for MbaUploaded byrhariharancse
- DdsUploaded bymechmgr bal
- Marketing ResearchUploaded byObby Purba
- [Elearnica] -636449925311704374-Formulaic Sequences and EAP Writing Development Lexical Bundles in the TOEUploaded byshahin baradaran
- Basic Statistical Tools in Research and Data AnalysisUploaded byAira Villarin
- 04 beyond the basic prductivity tools lesson idea templateUploaded byapi-414582734
- High Stock Returns before holidays: existence and evidence on possible causesUploaded byAngus Sadpet
- Measurement of the Penetration Depth in Biological Tissue for Different Optical PowersUploaded byRed Knight
- Unit6Uploaded byUsman
- jurnal BING Gunasti Hudiwinarsih Pengaruh pengalaman audit, kompetensi dan indenpendensi terhadap sikap profesionalisme.pdfUploaded byNita Paifum

- Two Sample t Test for MeanUploaded byAre Meer
- Histogram & Box PlotUploaded byAre Meer
- Reliability Analysis pdfUploaded byAre Meer
- One Sample Kolmogorov Non ParaUploaded byAre Meer
- Mannwhitney non paraUploaded byAre Meer
- Run Test Non ParaUploaded byAre Meer
- Two Way AnovaUploaded byAre Meer
- PearsonUploaded byAre Meer
- One Sample T TestUploaded byAre Meer
- Test of Normality SmirnovUploaded byAre Meer
- Paired Sample T-TestUploaded byAre Meer
- Independent Sample t TestUploaded byAre Meer
- Assignment1 EDAUploaded byAre Meer

- TestUploaded bydadok999
- CSTE - Prev YrUploaded byapi-3828205
- Research Methodology Final Project PPTUploaded byNour Akkoumeh
- Aux Lecture NotesUploaded byJuanQuintero
- SURVEY RESEARCHUploaded byG-man Zahariman
- chapter 3Uploaded byJONATHAN F. BERNABE
- 49324_unisdrmeframeworkver1.0Uploaded byJoeban R. Paza
- 8Uploaded byArsdy Novalentio
- Lecture 7 (Data Collection Methods)Uploaded byAdnan Aziz
- SPSS ANOVAUploaded byNavilla Irawan
- ch09Uploaded byROHAN CHOPDE
- APTET 2014 Maths & Science Question Paper II with KeyUploaded bygayathri
- Statistik Exercise Chapter2Uploaded bythornyroses
- t.y. b.sc(Stats) Book ListUploaded byArnab Nirendra Ghosh
- Chi Square TestUploaded byfrancisco-perez-1980
- QuantiQuali FORMATUploaded byGraceYapDequina
- Service Quality GapsUploaded byPhilip Annor-Antwi
- fcs-apparel-8 semester-sequencing 1Uploaded byapi-395633987
- Free SAT & ACT Test Prep Resources 2010Uploaded byMarcus Skookumchuck Vannini
- test prep courses fcpsUploaded byapi-198178222
- Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation MethodsUploaded bysanamaqbool
- StateUploaded byABatist@
- Stat 200 Week 6 HomeworkUploaded byldlewis
- Raven's Progressive MatricesUploaded byAnonymous ImPC4e
- A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review 8-6-12Uploaded byRelcyAmador
- jurnalUploaded bynajwa badjuber
- In 070082331 07 Statistics AnswerKeyUploaded byEvelyn Yoon
- Employee Job FitUploaded byNIKHIL SINGH
- PSYUploaded bySaqib Akram
- BUS 346 Final Chapter 10 Flashcards | QuizletUploaded bylaaliauto

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.