You are on page 1of 14

INTRODUCTION

The atmosphere surrounding the earth is made up of nitrogen (78%), oxygen (21%) and the remainder, 1%, is made up of trace gases (called so because they are present in very small quantities) that include the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide, methane, ozone, water vapor, and nitrous oxide. These greenhouse gases act as a blanket and protect it from the harmful ultra violet rays of the sun. They can also be regarded as natural controllers of the earth's temperature system.

The earth receives energy from the sun, which warms the earth’s surface. As this energy passes through the atmosphere, a certain percentage (about 30) gets scattered. Some part of this energy is reflected back into the atmosphere from the land and ocean surface. The rest (70%) actually remains behind to heat the earth. In order to establish a balance, therefore, the earth must radiate some energy back into the atmosphere. As the earth is much cooler than the sun, it does not emit energy as visible light. It emits through infrared or thermal radiation. However, certain gases in the atmosphere form a sort of blanket around the earth and absorb some of this energy emitted back into the atmosphere. Without this blanket effect, the earth would be around 30 ° C colder than it normally is. These gases like carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, along with water vapour, comprise less than one per cent of the atmosphere. They are called 'greenhouse gases' as the working principle is same as that which occurs in a greenhouse. Just as the glass of the greenhouse prevents the radiation of excess energy, this ‘gas blanket’ absorbs some of the energy emitted by the earth and keeps temperature levels intact. This effect was first recognized by a French scientist, Jean-Baptiste Fourier, who pointed out the similarity in what happens in the atmosphere and in a greenhouse. Hence, the term ‘greenhouse effect’. This gas blanket has been in place ever since the creation of the earth. Since the industrial revolution human activities have been releasing more and more of these greenhouse gases into

Activities that generate greenhouse gases are called ‘sources’ and those that remove them are known as ‘sinks’. and sheep. buffaloes. nitrous oxide. This leads to the blanket becoming thicker and upsets the ‘natural greenhouse effect’. land clearing. The resulting enhanced greenhouse effect is more commonly referred to as global warming or climate change. coal mining and also from leaking gas pipelines (due to accidents and poor maintenance of sites). Increasing agricultural activities. carbon dioxide is emitted. which are also GHGs. The emissions of these gases have increased at different rates. Humankind upsets this balance when new sources that interfere with the natural sinks are introduced. When soil is covered with water it becomes anaerobic or lacking in oxygen. A balance between ‘sources’ and ‘sinks’ maintains the levels of these greenhouse gases. These are carbon dioxide. have declined significantly since the 1990s. goats. pigs. the carbon stored in the trees escapes as carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The largest growth in global GHG emissions between 1970 and 2004 has come from the energy supply sector. hydrofluorocarbon. horses. About ¼ of all methane emissions are said to come from domesticated animals such as dairy cows. Industrial processes also release artificial and new greenhouse gases like CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons). methane-producing bacteria and other organisms decompose organic matter in the soil to form methane. Methane is also emitted during the process of oil drilling. Of all the GHGs.Carbon dioxide is undoubtedly. changes in land-use patterns. the concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are at the highest levels. the most important greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. China and India. And. Greenhouse gas emission trends The concentrations of several greenhouse gases have increased over time. as rice is the staple food there. methane. camels. perflurocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride Human activity increases the greenhouse effect primarily through release of carbon dioxide. and natural gas. A large amount of nitrous oxide emission has been . Carbon dioxide is released when we burn such fuels as coal. Methane is another important greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Methane is also emitted from landfills and other waste dumps. Under such conditions. The emissions of ozone depleting substances (ODS) controlled under the Montreal Protocol. while automobile exhaust fumes lead to ozone generation. Changes in land use pattern. and other activities have all led to a rise in the emission of carbon dioxide. If the waste is put into an incinerator or burnt in the open. deforestation. oil. have 80-90% of the world's rice-growing areas. Nearly 90% of the paddy-growing area in the world is found in Asia. between them. CO2 emissions have grown between 1970 and 2004 by about 80% (28% between 1990 and 2004) and represented 77% of total anthropogenic GHG emissions in 2004. Methane is also released from rice or paddy fields that are flooded during the sowing and maturing periods. and other sources lead to rising levels of methane and nitrous oxide. By 2004 the emissions of these gases were about 20% of their 1990 level Green house gases and their sources.the atmosphere. These animals produce methane during the cud-chewing process. agriculture. but human influences on other greenhouse gases can also be important. when we destroy forests.

4.To study the scientific evidences on climate change. which show a slight decrease.7-4. Climate change is likely to impact all the natural ecosystems as well as socio-economic systems as per the National Communications Report of India to the UNFCCC The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. OBJECTIVE: . news paper etc. books. forest dwellers. fisher folk and nomadic shepherds is very low. known as PRECIS developed by Hadley Center and applied for India using IPCC scenarios A2 and B2 depicts the following:  An annual mean surface temperature rise by the end of this century. predicts that global temperatures will rise by 2. grasslands) for their subsistence and livelihoods. (IPCC-2004) Extreme rise in maximum and minimum temperatures is also expected and similarly extreme precipitation is also projected. with a 2. biodiversity.(IPCC-2004) A 2 percent rise in all India summer monsoon rainfall and a further rise in rainfall is projected over all states except Punjab. such as beans and pulses that add nitrogen to the soil. Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu. in its 2007 report. Contributions are also made by leguminous plants.attributed to fertilizer application. with the warming more pronounced in the northern parts of India.30C increase over India by the 2080s.Collection of secondary data from internet. ranging from 3°C to 5°C (under A2 scenario) and 2. the adaptive capacity of dry land farmers. based on Regional Climate Modeling (RCM) system.      . forests and fisheries) and natural resources (such as water. Further. The panel also predicted an increase in rainfall over the Indian sub-continent by 6-8 per cent and that the sea level would rise by 88 centimeters by 2100.(TERI-2004) Indian 7500-km long densely populated and low-lying coastline would be worst hit due to rise in sea level . coastal zones. mangroves.5°C to 4°C (under B2 scenario). LITERATURE REVIEW India is a large developing country with nearly 700 million rural population directly depended on climate sensitive sectors (agriculture.500C by the end of this century. The latest high resolution climate change scenarios and projections for India. how and when it is used and the methods of tilling that are followed. This in turn depends on the type of fertilizer that is used. 70% plants may not be able to adapt to new conditions.(IPCC-2004) 25% of country’s population would be exposed to increased cyclone. magazine. particularly over the West Coast of India and West Central India. METHODOLOGY: .

but in some respects underestimated. the change in global climate. global mean surface temperature and sea level with the projections in the IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR) shows that previous projections have not exaggerated. [GISS. According to the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS).33 °C.3 mm/yr.( IPCC-2004) Science of climate change Scientific understanding of past and future climate change has made substantial progress since finalization of the IPCC WG1 AR4.A new analysis of satellite observations suggests that precipitation and total atmospheric water have increased at about the . New knowledge includes improved analysis of prehistoric climate shifts. and new projections of future changes in extreme weather events. many risks are now assessed to be larger than in the AR4. better attribution of the causes of observed climate change to anthropogenic and natural factors. in particular the risk of large sea-level rise already in the current century and the risks from increases in extreme weather events Observed climate change The IPCC AR4 published in 2007 stated that 11 out of the 12 warmest years on record (i.. Sea level data from tide gauges and satellite data show a linear trend of 3.e. The eight warmest years have all occurred since 1998. 2008] Comparison of the most recent observed climate trends for carbon dioxide concentration. since 1850) had occurred during the last 12 years. improved understanding of carbon cycle feedbacks. Adverse impact on agricultural yield. The observed increase in global mean surface temperature since 1990 is 0. this is in the upper part of the range set by the IPCC. As a result. updated observations of recent climate change. which is faster than the best-estimate projections in the TAR of 2 mm/yr. 2007 was another exceptionally warm year that tied with 1998 for Earth's second warmest year on record.

The results do not alter estimates of the century-long trend in global. These scientists reanalyzed the weak cooling trend observed in global surface temperatures between 1940 and 1970. climate change will result in substantially more rain than currently predicted by climate models.mean temperatures. glaciers and sea levels. They explain an abrupt temperature drop of 0. A team of British and US scientists was able solve one of the remaining gaps in understanding 20th century climate change. If this observed trend continues. drying in the Northern Hemisphere subtropics and tropics. Scientists from the UK Met Office found that anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have led to a rapidly increasing risk of extremely hot summers in the Northern hemisphere. A recent study finds that anthropogenic forcing contributed significantly to observed increases in precipitation in the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes. . A new analysis of radiosonde data for the first time shows a warming trend in the upper troposphere. the largest climate shift in the 20th century that climate models were unable to explain is actually a mirage. New analyses combining climate model simulations with satellite data and surface measurements have also shown that the atmospheric moisture content over land and over oceans has increased substantially in recent decades. Another study was able to detect and separate the effect of greenhouse gases from that of sulfate aerosols on the observed warming trend since 1950 in nine world regions.3 degrees C in summer 1945 as the apparent result of uncorrected instrumental biases in the sea surface temperature record. and that the increase is primarily due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. These findings add to the already extensive evidence of the anthropogenic signal on all aspects of current climate. globally averaged warming is likely to underestimate the magnitude of climate change in the North and Baltic Sea and the resulting impacts. Sea surface temperatures in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea show an unprecedented warming trend since the mid-1980s in all seasons. Changes in ice sheets. The human influence on climate has for the first time been detected in precipitation at global and regional scales. Hot summers which were infrequent 20-40 years ago are now much more common and the current sharp rise in incidence of hot summers is likely to continue. such as those experienced in large parts of Europe in 2003 and 2006 .same rate over the past two decades. while climate models suggest that precipitation would increase much more slowly. Therefore. Detection and attribution of recent climate change Improved data and analyses techniques have improved understanding of observed climate change. Temperatures in summer since 1985 have increased at nearly triple the global warming rate and summer temperatures have risen two to five times faster than those in other seasons. Therefore. UNEP and the World Glacier Monitoring Service have compiled a database on glacier fluctuations from 1803 glaciers as far back as the 19th century. large ice sheets and sea level in order to improve projections of future sea-level rise. and moistening in the Southern Hemisphere subtropics and deep tropics.Many new studies have investigated prehistorical and recent changes in glaciers. which agrees well with predictions from global climate models. The consistency between model simulations and inferred data increases confidence in model-based climate projections. These changes cannot be explained by internal climate variability or natural forcing.

and the mass loss increased by 75% in 10 years.000 years ago. around 120. SRES A1FI.3 m per century. The current and future contribution to sea level rise from Antarctica has been subject to large uncertainties. which simulates sea-level rise for the period 1880-2001 much better than current GCMs. Other studies have also found that changes in the Greenland and the West Antarctic ice sheets are accelerating. This model calculates a best estimate of sea-level rise of 55 to 125 cm by 2100 for the TAR climate scenarios and of 54 to 89 cm for the AR4 climate scenarios (which exclude the highest emission scenario.All these figures are substantially higher than the model-based estimates in the IPCC AR4. The Antarctic ice sheet as a whole was found to be losing mass. respectively) in these periods were comparable to those projected for the 21st century under business-as-usual emission scenarios. Thus.They find that 2006 established a new record annual mass loss of the reference glaciers under long-term observation.6 m per century. Source: [Mote. The two groups suggest that climatic conditions (in terms of the increase in summer surface air temperatures and global mean temperature. The average annual melting rate of mountain glaciers has doubled after 2000. respectively. in comparison with the already accelerated melting rates observed in the two decades before. a scientist from PIK has developed a semiempirical model of sea-level rise. which was 60% above the previous high in 1998. A recent study used extensive satellite observations to estimate the total Antarctic ice flux into the ocean from 1992 to 2006. was about 1. mostly in West Antarctica.8 m. Independently. A team of US scientists has combined climate modelling and paleoclimatic data to assess the potential for large increases in sea level by the end of the 21st century. which did not include ice-sheet dynamics. The most recent 11 summers have all experienced melting greater than the average of the available time series (1973 to 2007).6 m of sea level rise at about 1.According to data from the United States National Snow and Ice Data . the risk of large sea-level rise in the 21st century is now estimated to be much greater than in the AR4. [UNEP/WGMS. Other scientists have found that the average rate of sea-level rise during the last interglacial period. Their maximum and best estimates of total sea-level rise by 2100 are 2 m and 0. 2008] Figure: Change in melting area of the Greenland ice sheet. A team of US and Canadian scientists found that between 9000 and 8500 years ago. 2007] Melting of the Greenland ice sheet in summer 2007 established a new record. Changes in sea ice. melting of the Laurentide ice sheet on Greenland contributed around 6.

than would be predicted in the absence of this feedback. Hence. . anthropogenic emissions result in higher final greenhouse gas concentrations. future methane releases from decaying Arctic permafrost may create a new significant positive climate feedback that has not been considered by climate modelers. The observed sea ice decline is about three times faster than the model mean.Center. The decline in ice cover has accelerated substantially. where it would cause rapid degradation of permafrost. New measurements of methane emissions from Siberian thaw lakes revealed that these emissions are already five times greater than previous estimates. from 3% per decade in 1979-1996 to -11% per decade in the last 10 years. which is 27% lower than the previous record low reached in 2005. One study finds that the warming signal from a rapid loss of Arctic sea ice would penetrate up to 1500 km inland. Arctic sea ice area reached a new all-time minimum on 14 September 2007 at 3. which suggests that melting of Arctic sea ice is likely to happen much faster than projected by current climate models. These findings imply that emissions need to be lower than previously estimated to reach a given target for temperature stabilization. Recent research has provided new knowledge on carbon cycle feedbacks and their implications for future climate change. Carbon cycle feedbacks. consideration of carbon-cycle feedbacks increased the probability of exceeding 2°C warming by 2100 from 10 to 23% and the probability of exceeding 2°C warming by 2200 from 23 to 41%. Thus. and therefore more warming.6 Mio km2. Inclusion of geological and ecosystem feedbacks in warming projections could increase global warming over the next century due to human emissions of greenhouse gases by an additional 15-78%.Most climate simulations in the IPCC AR4 did not include physical or biological carbon-cycle feedbacks. For a given emissions scenario that would stabilize CO2 concentrations at 550 ppm in the absence of carbon-cycle feedbacks. which in turn may lead to additional methane emissions.

Global warming sceptics frequently seize on disagreement amongst geologists over whether high atmospheric CO2 concentrations were always associated with global warming in the distant geological past.5°C above preindustrial levels. Recent research has identified that the two most sensitive tipping elements are Arctic summer ice. options disappear at a rate of 9 ppm year. This value is much larger than the recent annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentrations of around 2 ppm per year because it considers the inertia in the energy and climate system.5-2. Tipping of these elements can no longer be prevented with certainty. As a result. with an estimated threshold temperature of 12. A recent review study involving all leading global climate models finds that 20-60% of the CO2 from fossil fuel emissions remains in the atmosphere for more than thousand years. Most studies suggest that strong cyclones will further increase in the future. due in part to the coarse spatial resolution of these models. Other studies have investigated the longterm effects of current emission. These results suggest that delaying mitigation further impedes reaching a given stabilization level much faster than generally assumed.Human activities have the potential to push the Earth’s system beyond critical thresholds (tipping points) so that it will no longer function in the way we have come to know and expect. the Atlantic thermohaline circulation. Global warming of 3.5°C above preindustrial.e. the Amazon rainforest. Paleoclimate. In addition. current emissions have a substantial impact on the earth's climate for many millennia to come. the West African monsoon.Current global climate models are rather poor in simulating tropical cyclones (i. These findings provide support to the concept of tipping points. but stringent mitigation can substantially reduce the risk of large-scale changes.Changes in tropical cyclones. there is still debate on the quality of observational cyclone datasets for the 20th century. but they might be used as a universal early warning signal for upcoming catastrophic change. Long-term effects of current emissions. including the West Antarctic ice sheet. the El Nino– Southern Oscillation. When mitigation is postponed. much longer than generally expected. with an estimated threshold temperature of 1. . Several recent studies find that the frequency of strong tropical cyclones has increased in recent decades in all world regions. hurricanes and typhoons). The results are consistent with the view that increased CO2 concentrations drive or amplify increased global temperatures. Changes in extreme events Abrupt climate change and tipping elements.A group of US scientists have applied a coupled carbon cycle-climate model to investigate the impacts of delaying emissions reductions on the ability to reach different targets for stabilizing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. and the boreal forest. and the Greenland ice sheet. Such slowing down can be mathematically shown to be a hallmark of tipping points. A new study supports the view that atmospheric CO2 concentrations and Earth surface temperatures have always been closely coupled. beginning emissions reductions today would achieve stabilization at about 475 ppm. Assuming that global emissions can decline at 1% per year.5°C above preindustrial could trigger additional tipping elements. Eight ancient abrupt climate shifts were all preceded by a characteristic slowing down of the fluctuations starting well before the actual shift. This observed increase is attributed primarily to increases in sea-surface temperature caused by anthropogenic warming.

. Leading scientists from the outgoing IPCC Bureau have compiled information from the IPCC AR4 on climate impacts for different mitigation levels. Many recent studies conclude that the consideration of current climate variability and its potential changes in climate impact assessments increases the estimated adverse impacts of climate change on agriculture. Another study finds that atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration in exceedance of 500 ppm and a global temperature rise of more than 2°C significantly exceeds conditions of at least the past 420. These results confirm that both adaptation and mitigation are essential.Coral reefs are among the most important biodiversity hotspots. which is independent of climatic changes. Out of 442 coral species assessed in a recent study. The study finds carbon cycle changes in general and ocean chemistry in particular as the primary causes of the five known mass extinction events. Synthesis of climate impacts. Simulations with agricultural crop models have suggested that increased temperature and decreased soil moisture will act to reduce global crop yields by 2050. Thus. and they provide important services to society. even when a coral colony is transplanted to different environments or subjected to increased temperatures. This finding casts serious doubt on projections that rising CO2 will fully offset global crop yield losses due to climate change.Climate change impacts for different emissions scenarios were not displayed explicitly in the IPCC AR4 SPMs due to a lack of consensus in the IPCC plenary.000 years during which most extant marine organisms evolved.Impacts of climate change and adaptation. They show major global impacts even for a 50% reduction of global emissions by 2050 compared to 1990. the latter because the longer we delay mitigation.Projections of climate impacts and understanding of adaptation have improved significantly since finalization of the IPCC WG2 AR4 in 2007. natural ecosystems. The negative impact was most pronounced for wheat. evidence increases that ocean acidification presents a very substantial risk from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions for marine ecosystems. and human health. The hypothesis that corals may survive climate change by exchanging algal types has been shown to be potentially applicable only to a minority of corals. each of which has left the Earth without living reefs for at least four million years.Negative impacts on crops associated with recent warming between 1980 and 2002 have very likely offset some of the yield gains associated with rising CO2 and technological advances. without stringent mitigation measures coral reefs will undergo a substantial reduction in biodiversity during the 21st century because most coral species are unable to adapt. Many corals rely on their symbiotic algae for survival. coastal regions. the more likely it is that global change will exceed our capacity to adapt. but that the direct fertilization effect of rising CO2 concentration will offset these losses. Furthermore. This finding suggests that some caution should be used in accepting model assessments showing global crop benefits for warming up to about 2°C. maize and barley. the vast majority (77%) do not change their symbiontic algae over time. A recent review study shows the crucial role of ocean acidification in the destruction of coral reefs during previous mass extinction events. Climate impacts on ecosystems. Climate impacts on food production. including for coastal protection and coastal tourism. A new study based on results of recent experiments with free-air concentration enrichment technology shows that elevated CO2 enhanced yield of major grain crops by 50% less than in earlier studies based on enclosure experiments.

and information transfer between different government departments and between them and non-governmental adaptation actors is inadequate. with entire villages being built to accommodate farmers in hills overlooking the floodplain. Potential effects on health due to sea level rise include:       death and injury due to flooding reduced availability of fresh water due to saltwater intrusion contamination of water supply through pollutants from submerged waste dumps change in the distribution of disease-spreading insects effect on the nutrition due to a loss in agriculture land and changes in fish catch Health impacts associated with population displacement. Just a few months later. The results imply that adaptation to climate change might be more difficult than currently assumed. It could also lead to an increase in the number of people suffering from eye diseases such as cataract. While the specific numbers represent the particular circumstances of the study area. Adaptation to climate change Climate change is a multi-dimensional issue and in terms of adaptation numerous state and nonstate actors are involved from global to national and local scales. Climate impacts on human health. A project to provide more information about climate change to farmers did not change their beliefs. Several recent studies have highlighted failures of past adaptation actions and obstacles for future adaptation. It is also thought to cause suppression of the immune system. but institutional networks appear weak.Sea-level rise is expected to effect coastal properties in two-ways: inundation of low-lying property and episodic flooding of properties at an elevation. . A recent detailed study estimated the cost from episodic storm events to be much greater (up to 250 times) than the costs from inundation alone. Diseases: -The GHGs have been responsible for the depletion of stratospheric ozone. the results strongly suggest the total cost of sea-level rise could be underestimated if the costs of episodic flooding are not accounted for. Depletion of stratospheric ozone results in higher exposure to ultra violet rays of the sun. leading to an increase in the incidents of skin cancer in light skinned people. a resettlement programme was implemented. adaptation to climate change will be particularly difficult in countries where institutional networks between governments departments and relevant non-governmental adaptation actors are weak. which protects the earth from the harmful direct rays of the sun. One reason for the failure of this resettlement programme was disagreement between farmers and policy makers about the seriousness of climate risks.Climate change is a major problem caused by the increase of human activities leading to several direct and indirect impacts on health. One study has investigated the reasons for a largely unsuccessful adaptive effort which was intended to reduce flood risk in Mozambique Among other measures. Thus. farmers returned to the floodplain and re-built homes there.Climate impacts on coastal regions. and the potential negative consequences of proposed adaptive measures. Climate change is recognised to be a cross-cutting issue to which all government departments must sign up. even if risks are clearly identified and economic resources are available.

Coastal areas are at increasing risk from sea-level rise and storm surge-Sea-level rise and storm surge place many U. diseases. and increased water loss from plants. 3. water stress. pests. related to reduced precipitation.S. and diseases transmitted by insects and rodents. Energy and transportation infrastructure and other property in coastal areas are very likely to be adversely affected. is an important issue in many regions. increased evaporation. These include increases in heavy downpours. poor air quality.Global warming is unequivocal and primarily human-induced.Water is an issue in every region. 2. urbanization. especially in the West. ecosystems. economic. especially along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts. waterborne diseases. and environmental stresses to create larger impacts than from any of these factors alone. and other social. and health. Pacific Islands. lengthening growing seasons. Drought. population growth and overuse of resources. rapidly retreating glaciers. rising temperature and sea level. transportation. and alterations in river flows. 6. However. 7. . Crop and livestock production will be increasingly challenged-Agriculture is considered one of the sectors most adaptable to changes in climate. thawing permafrost.Global temperature has increased over the past 50 years. and weather extremes will pose adaptation challenges for crop and livestock production. Robust public health infrastructure can reduce the potential for negative impacts. Floods and water quality problems are likely to be amplified by climate change in most regions. These changes are projected to grow. Climate changes are underway in the United States and are projected to grow. but the nature of the potential impacts varies. increased heat.Climaterelated changes are already observed in the United States and its coastal waters. These impacts are different from region to region and will grow under projected climate change. Widespread climate-related impacts are occurring now and are expected to increaseClimate changes are already affecting water. Threats to human health will increase-Health impacts of climate change are related to heat stress. Climate change will interact with many social and environmental stresses-Climate change will combine with pollution. This observed increase is due primarily to human-induced emissions of heat-trapping gases. lengthening ice-free seasons in the ocean and on lakes and rivers. 8. energy. Climate change will stress water resources. agriculture. extreme weather events. Declines in mountain snowpack are important in the West and Alaska where snowpack provides vital natural water storage. earlier snowmelt. 4. 5. and parts of Alaska. coastal areas at increasing risk of erosion and flooding.FINDINGS: 1.

This can be said that climate change has badly hit all sections of the society whether it be poor or rich. This has resulted in decrease in economic status of the people where poor people are going more and more poor. This has lead to agriculture failure on which the community heavily depends on. mortgaging their assets in need of money. rural people or urban people. rich people are getting poorer. shifting their livelihood profile. moving away from more water consuming crops to less water consuming crops. people moving steps in taking loans from different sources. Thresholds will be crossed. and adapting to the changes that are unavoidable. These thresholds determine. shifting the agriculture pattern i. with implications for society. Therefore this can be said as climate change is a serious threat to development and poverty eradication. losing faith on each other. Everyone is struggling to come in terms with the effect of this impact which has of late grown more and more deep. from fish to insect pests. selling off their assets. moving out in search of jobs or work as labors. for example. . 10. the crossing of additional thresholds is expected. lower caste or upper caste.e. Responses involve reducing emissions to limit future warming. and the survival of species. CONCLUSION Evidences in climate have put a lot of effect on the society in the day to day life and activity. the presence of sea ice and permafrost. With further climate change.9. leading to large changes in climate and ecosystems-There are a variety of thresholds in the climate system and ecosystems. Future climate change and its impacts depend on choices made today-The amount and rate of future climate change depend primarily on current and future human-caused emissions of heat-trapping gases and airborne particles.

UNMESH PATNAIK Date.10th November 2011 Submitted By: AKRAMUL HOHUE (10201002) OMKAR GUPTA (10201033) RANJAN PRASAD (10201040) .Scientific Study on Climate change Submitted To: .Prof.

Table of content Introduction Objective Methodology Literature Review Scientific Study on Climate change Impact of Climate change Findings Conclusion References .

08 3 .3-08.4/.90.3089...438:23.4907 %8./.07907.90.79.34.943 0./.3/0.:9:701...:9:70 5.9.3083.438:23.3/54..9 50898  9 25.70:3..08 17421894380.3/2470/005 %070147098 .5045047:7-..841.70 .7-47305./94.4889028  %080 97084/8 /0907230  147 0.3/5072.9.04180. 41 4-8 47 47 .8074:8970. 1742 2470 .2.-0   &$   .30  90 .3 .:7043.907 .90 .9438 147 84.90411:9:70.7.3/ .0.74883 41 .3/ 0.08 803411907.80.5939490./9.30. 97084/88050.17489 .2.80.2..9 97.4./9.-478  8193 90 .7.994/0.2.3/908:7.90.88098 2479.381742/1107039 84:7...3-08..700993544707 5045024.89047:5507.709 41 97084/8 3 90 .4203 907289900110./..70.422:390.250 90570803.74880/ 0..24:39.3 ..08 2.//943.70.9  %8.553..90. 407.9.8708:90/3/0.7.9.99073  0  24.2.0909079-0544747 7. %0...:77039.3/9825.0452039.9 4390 84./0503/843  %8.3/1:9:70:2.50450. .90..90/   :9:70.90 88902 .3028843894291:9:70 .34:9380.98/0503/43.30.2.3907.08 #085438083.808.8..044/57410 4831.943            .745894088../094/..09  9 1:7907 .2..890 7:7.41850.9438419084.907.7458 8193907.3/24705447 7.90 .8-.0 5:9 .9419825../394.38905839...074308897:394.:80/028843841 0. %7084/8-0.. 94 /.30/0503/572. 4941 0110.743.8 .4.3/.4889028 %070.09 3 90 /.4342.3/. 10 .9:8419050450070544750450.350450 .907432470.70432470 .723 .90.3/ 7.2.880983300/412430 24.8030.89./03..308.070/:.

02-07  $:-2990/  #& &      #&!%      #!#$      .90.$9:/432.$..90  94.30   $:-2990/%4 !741 &$!% .0391.

943 -0.0 $.0391.$9:/432.9412.9..0 094/44 907.-041.30 25.90.9:70#0.:843 #010703.08       ..%.90..30 3/38 43.439039 3974/:.