Carleton University Department of Political Science PSCI 6601W Theory and Research in International Politics II Thursday 11:35 – 14:25 Please confirm

location on Carleton Central Instructor: Hans-Martin Jaeger Office: C678 Loeb Office Hours: Monday 12:00 noon – 14:00; Thursday 15:00 – 17:00 or by appointment Phone: (613) 520-2600 ext. 2286 Email: Course Description and Objectives

Winter 2011

This class is the continuation of the Ph.D. core course in International Relations (IR). Together, PSCI 6600 and PSCI 6601 provide a survey of IR theory and research with a view to preparing students for the Ph.D. comprehensive examination. Building on the material studied in the first half of the course, this second half focuses on critical and reflectivist (or post-positivist) approaches, which have emerged in the field since the 1980s. It aims to familiarize students with some of the key works, central ideas and debates, and recent scholarship in this vein of theorizing. By the end of the course, students should be able to critically analyze the epistemological orientations, ontological assumptions, and political and ethical implications of different approaches and research traditions in IR. As a seminar, the course is centered on class discussion, which will be introduced by student presentations. Requirements and Evaluation Requirement Percentage of final grade 25% Due date weekly (sign up for a date in the first class)

Class participation (including attendance) Class presentation 15% Two review essays

60% (30% each) the day the approach under review is discussed

Class participation: Students are expected to attend all classes, read the assigned texts prior to class meetings, and participate actively and regularly in class discussions. Class participation will be evaluated based on the quality and quantity of contributions to class discussions with greater weight given to quality. Quality contributions to class discussions include questions and

comments which demonstrate that you can analytically reflect on and critically engage with the central ideas of the readings under discussion, and that you can make connections between these ideas and other themes or readings in the course. Class presentation: Each student has to give an in-class presentations of about 25 minutes introducing and responding to the required readings (and optionally, recommended readings) for a particular class. You will sign up for the date of your presentation in the first class. The class presentation should (a) summarily outline the central ideas (overall argument and main points) of the readings; (b) discuss how the readings relate to each other (and/or to other approaches and themes discussed in the course) by identifying points of agreement and disagreement; (c) present analytical and/or critical reflections on individual readings or the general approach under discussion, and evaluate the overall contribution of the approach to the field; and possibly (d) raise questions about the readings and the approach for class discussion. It is essential that your presentation is not a mere summary of the readings. The summary outline of central ideas of the readings should only take up about half of your presentation (or less). The class presentation should be supported by a two-page handout that highlights the main points under discussion. Two review essays: Each student has to write two review essays (2400-3000 words plus bibliography, 12 point font, double-spaced). The review essay must provide a critical analysis and assessment of a particular approach to IR theory, as (re)presented by the assigned readings. (For classes with two required readings, the review essay must cover at least one additional recommended reading. For classes with three or more required readings, the review essay must cover all the required readings and may additionally cover recommended readings.) It is essential that your review essay develops a clear argument about the chosen topic in response to the readings. The approaches chosen for your review essays may not be the same as the one chosen for your class presentation. The review essays are due as hard copies at the beginning of class on the days the chosen approaches will be discussed. Readings In case you do not have a basic familiarity with the major approaches in IR theory or you need to refresh your knowledge, a good resource is Dunne, Tim, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith (eds.) (2010) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, second edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. To build your personal IR library (and depending on your own interests), you may consider buying some or all of the following books at your preferred retail outlet (but this is not mandatory):


B. Michael and Antonio Negri (2000) Empire. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. New York: Routledge. Hardt.html . Nuno P.) Recommended Keohane. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. and Bohman.” International Theory 1(1): 15-48. Yosef (1989) “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a PostPositivist Era.carleton. (Read the contributions by Kurki.” Review of International Studies 24(5):” International Studies Quarterly 32(4): 379-396. Monteiro.) (1986) Neorealism and its Critics. Chernoff. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Geeta and Sheila Nair (eds.library. New York: Routledge. Ruby (2009) “IR and the False Promise of Philosophical Foundations. R. anyway?” (2009) International Theory 1(3): 439-512. Mercado. Robert O. Jackson. (1988) “International Institutions: Two Approaches. 13 Required Lapid. Class Schedule and Reading Assignments Jan. Walker. Gender and Class. Wendt. Chowdhry. Symposium: “Who Needs Philosophy of Science. Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race. 6 Jan.J.” International Studies Quarterly 33(3): 235-254. New York: Columbia University Press. These books as well as the books containing other required and recommended readings have also been placed on reserve at the library. Hansen. Alexander (1998) “On Constitution and Causation in International Relations. 3 Introduction IR Theory and Metatheory . Wendt. Lene (2006) Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.) (2002) Power. The assigned articles are available through the library‟s online journals at http://www.Brown. Chris (1992) International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. and Kevin G. Alexander (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Robert O. Keohane.

Agathangelou.B. Lapid.” Review of International Studies 27(4): 611-625. Suganami.” Millennium 21(2): 183-206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jörg and Friedrich Kratochwil (2009) “On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology. (See also other contributions to this volume. Legitimacy. Ann (2005) “What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions.” International Studies Review 6(4): 21-49. Kratochwil. Ling (2004) “The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. J. R. 4 . Duncan (2002) “Language. (1989) “History and Structure in the Theory of International Relations. Martin and Steve Smith (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations.) Forum: “Pragmatism and International Relations” (2009) International Studies Review 11(4): 638-662.” International Studies Quarterly 49(1): 1-21. Ole (1996) “The Rise and Fall of the Inter-paradigm Debate. Yosef (2003) “Through Dialogue to Engaged Pluralism: The Unfinished Business of the Third Debate. Lawson. 7.” Millennium 18(2): 163-183. and Wight in the same issue.” International Studies Quarterly 44(2): 213-237. Heikki and Colin Wight (2000) “After Post-positivism: the Promise of Critical Realism. Friedrich (2007) “Of False Promises and Good Bets: A Plea for a Pragmatic Approach to Theory Building (the Tartu Lecture). Gender and International Relations.” International Organization 63(4): 701-731. Shaw. and L. Waever. Karena (2004) “Knowledge. Peterson. and the Project of Critique.” in Steve Smith.” Alternatives 27(3): 327-350. Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski (eds.) Navon. Politics. Friedrichs.” International Studies Review 6(4): 720. Patomäki. Foundations. Anna M.H. Spike (1992) “Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge. Emmanuel (2001) “The „Third Debate‟ Revisited. George (2008) “For a Public International Relations. V.” International Political Sociology 2(1): 17-37. ch.Walker. Bell.” International Studies Review 5(1): 128-131. Oxford: Clarendon Press.J.” Journal of International Relations and Development 10(1): 1-15. Hollis. Tickner.M.) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. (See also the commentaries by Lebow.

David (1998) Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present. Fiona (1999) Globalizing Care: Ethics. Chris. ch. Beitz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brian C. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.B. Cochran. Walker. Martin (1960) “Why Is There No International Theory?” International Relations 2(1): 35-48. R.J. Boucher. Chris (1992) International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. Brown. Michael (1977) Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. Beate (ed. 62.” Modern Intellectual History 1(1): 97-109.) (2002) International Relations in Political Thought: Texts from the Ancient Greeks to the First World War. Feminist Theory and International Relations. Rawls. Boulder: Westview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 5 . 3 and 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.” International Theory 1(1): 1-14. Recommended Hutchings. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 20 Required International Political Theory and Ethics Wight. Armitage. New York: Basic Books. Walzer. 2. Schmidt. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (2002) “Together Again: Reuniting Political Theory and International Relations Theory. Kimberly (1999) International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. David (2004) “The Fifty Years‟ Rift: Intellectual History and International Relations. Charles (1999) Political Theory and International Relations. Brown. Robinson. London: Sage. second revised edition.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4(1): 115-140.) (2006) Classical Theory in International Relations. Snidal. chs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Molly (1999) Normative Theory in International Relations: a Pragmatic Approach. 1. Jahn. Terry Nardin and Nick Rengger (eds. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. John (1999) The Law of Peoples. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Jan. Duncan and Alexander Wendt (2009) “Why There Is International Theory Now.

) Finnemore. and Campbell. Onuf.Seckinelgin. 27 Required Wendt. and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Jan. (1989) Rules. James and Christopher Holmes (2010) “International Political Economy and the Question of Ethics. Norms. Wendt. Friedrich V. Brassett. Democracy.) (2001) Ethics and International Relations. Friedrich and John Gerard Ruggie (1986) “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. Alexander (1987) “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. Kratochwil. Alexander (1995) “Constructing International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.) Cohen. 1. New York: Palgrave.” International Organization 40(4): 753-775.” American Political Science Review 103(4): 691-704. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. Fraser. James and Matthias-Lutz-Bachmann (eds. Wendt.) (1997) Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal. (2008) “Rethinking Human Rights. Recommended Kratochwil. Martha and Kathryn Sikkink (1998) “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. Cambridge: The MIT Press. (See especially the chapters by Hutchings.” International Organization 52(4): 887-917. Seyla (2009) “Claiming Rights Across Borders: International Human Rights and Democratic Sovereignty. Nancy (2009) Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. Constructivism I: Foundations 6 .” International Organization 41(3): 335-370. Nicholas Greenwood (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations.” Political Theory 36(4): 578-606. Alexander (1992) “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. Hakan and Hideaki Shinoda (eds. Alexander (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. (Read as much as you can. skim passages as you see fit.” International Organization 46(2): 391-425. and Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization. Wendt. (See especially the chapter by Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.” International Security 20(1): 7181. Jean L. chs. 3-6. New York: Columbia University Press.) Bohman. Robinson. Benhabib.” Review of International Political Economy 17(3): 425-453.

Maja (2002) Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. European Journal of International Relations 10(3): 395-435.” Journal of International Relations and Development 4(4): 316-338. Jeffrey T. (1998) “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 147-182. John Gerard (1998) “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” World Politics 50(2): 324-348. Finnemore. Finnemore. Guzzini. Müller.” European Journal of International Relations 3(3): 319-363. Ruggie. Hopf. Zehfuss. Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations. Guzzini. Thomas (2000) “‟Let‟s Argue!‟: Communicative Action in World Politics. Culture. Stefano and Anna Leander (eds. Guzzini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Martha and Kathryn Sikkink (2001) “Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Price.Forum on Social Theory of International Politics (2000) Review of International Studies 26(1): 123-180. Process. Pouliot.) (2006) Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and his Critics. Stefano (2001) “A Social Theory for International Relations: An Appraisal of Alexander Wendt‟s Theoretical and Disciplinary Synthesis. Ted (1998) “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. New York: Routledge.” European Journal of International Relations 5(3): 291-332. Vincent (2008) “The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities. and World Politics: Insights from Sociology‟s Institutionalism. Adler. Emanuel (1997) “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. Checkel. Harald (2004) Arguing. and the Study of World Politics.” International Organization 62(2): 257-288. Risse.” Annual Review of Political Science 4(1): 391-416. Martha (1996) “Norms. Patrick Thaddeus and Daniel H. Stefano (2000) “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. Richard and Christian Reus-Smit (1998) “Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism. Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action.” International Security 23(1): 171-200.” International Organization 50(2): 325-347. Jackson.” European Journal of International Relations 4(3): 259-294. Nexon (1999) “Relations Before States: Substance.” International Organization 54(1): 1-39.” International Organization 52(4): 855-885. 7 .

Michael and Martha Finnemore (1999) “The Politics.” International Organization 52(3): 613-644. Eckersley.” European Journal of International Relations 2(3): 275-318. Finnemore. John and George M. Princeton: Princeton University Press.” American Political Science Review 99(3): 401-417. 8. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Mlada (2002) Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture. Recommended Weldes. Power. Cambridge. Social Identity. Thomas (eds. Jutta (1996) “Constructing National Interests. Margaret E. Mitzen. ch. Barnett. Reus-Smit.” in John Barry and Robyn Eckersley (eds. Christian (1999) The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture. Michael and Martha Finnemore (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Isn‟t All It‟s Cracked Up to Be. and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. (2009) “Is Constructivist Ethics an Oxymoron?” International Studies Review 11(2): 231-252. New York: Columbia University Press. Bukovansky. Boli. Peter (ed. Christian (1997) “The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions. Keck. 3 Required Reus-Smit.) (1996) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press. MA: MIT Press. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Barnett.” International Organization 53(4): 699-732. Richard (1998) “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. Hypocrisy. and Pathologies of International Organizations. and Kathryn Sikkink (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics.Hoffmann. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.” World Politics 61(1): 58-85. Katzenstein. Robyn (2005) “Greening the Nation-State: From Exclusive to Inclusive Sovereignty. Martha (2009) “Legitimacy. Finnemore. Price. Martha (1996) National Interests in International Society.) The State and the Global Ecological Crisis. Feb.” International Organization 51(4): 555-589. Matthew J. 8 Constructivism II: Applications . Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Jennifer (2005) “Reading Habermas in Anarchy: Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Public Spheres.) (1999) Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875.

) Hobden.) Bringing the State Back In.” Review of International Studies 25(2): 257-271. Historical Materialism . Michael C. Halperin. Lawson.) (2002) Historical Sociology of International Relations. Tilly. 9 Historical Sociology and/vs.Krebs. pp. Feb. Benno (2002) “Theorizing the Westphalian System of States: From Absolutism to Capitalism. pp. Recommended Debate: “The „Second Wave‟ of Weberian Historical Sociology” (1998) Review of International Political Economy 5(2): 321-361. Justin (2006) “Why is There No International Historical Sociology?” European Journal of International Relations 12(3): 307-340. Hobson (eds. and the Social Construction of Security Communities. (2001) “The Discipline of the Democratic Peace: Kant. Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol (eds. Charles (1985) “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime. George (2006) “The Promise of Historical Sociology in International Relations. Boston: Beacon Press. Williams.” in Tilly (ed. Hobden.” European Journal of International Relations 1(4): 491-517.) The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Risse-Kappen. Ronald R. (1998) “The Historical Sociology of the State and the State of Historical Sociology in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 35-66.” Review of International Political Economy 5(2): 284-320. Karl (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. John M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stephen (1999) “Theorising the International System: Perspectives from Historical Sociology. Stephen and John M. Evans. and Patrick Thaddeus Jackson (2007) “Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric.” European Journal of International Relations 7(4): 525-553. 169-191. Polanyi. Teschke. (Responses to Hobson by Shaw. Rosenberg. 383.” European Journal of International Relations 8(1): 5-48. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Spruyt and a reply by Hobson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Thomas (1995) “Democratic Peace – Warlike Democracies? A Social Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Argument. Tilly. Liberalism.” in Peter B. 10 Required Hobson.” International Studies Review 8(3): 397-423. Charles (1975) “Reflections on the History of European State-Making.

” American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 1075-1090.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 16(4): 387415. Overbeek. the Modern States System and International Relations. Volumes I and II. London: Verso. Anthony (1987) The Nation-State and Violence: Volume Two of A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Gamble. Charles (1990) Coercion. Morton.Tilly. Lacher.” Review of International Studies 31(3): 495-517. Andrew (1999) “Marxism After Communism: Beyond Realism and Historicism. New York: Routledge. Immanuel (1974) “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Bhambra. Gurminder (2010) “Historical Sociology. 11.” Theory. Bastiaan (2004) “Theorizing the Transnational: A Historical Materialist Approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press. New York: Routledge. Giddens. Theda (1977) “Wallerstein‟s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique. AD 990-1990.) Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories. and European States. Brenner. Capital. Spruyt.” Review of International Political Economy 12(1): 26-52.” Journal of International Relations and Development 7(2): 142-176. Adam David (2005) “The Age of Absolutism: Capitalism. Justin (1994) The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Henk (2000) “Transnational Historical Materialism: Theories of Transnational Class Formation and World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Robert (1977) “The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism.” in Ronen Palan (ed.” Review of International Studies 25(5): 127-144.) (2002) Historical Materialism and Globalization. Rupert. Hannes (2005) “International Transformation and the Persistence of Territoriality: Toward a new Political Geography of Capitalism. Immanuel (1990) “Culture as the Ideological Battleground of the Modern WorldSystem. Wallerstein. Wallerstein. International Relations and Connected Histories. Michael (1986/1993) The Sources of Social Power. Van Apeldoorn.” New Left Review 104: 25-92. ch. Berkeley: University of California Press. Mark and Hazel Smith (eds.” Cambridge Journal of International Affairs 23(1): 127-143. Culture & Society 7(1): 31-55. Mann. 10 . Skocpol. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell. Rosenberg. Hendrik (1994) The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change.

Feb. States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.) Neorealism and Its Critics. (1986 [1981]) “Social Forces. Gill.” Capital and Class 28(1): 85-113. pp. the Frankfurt School. Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism. Robert W. Historical Materialism and International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 33(4): 475-499. Cox. World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations. Andrew (1996) “Citizenship and Sovereignty in the Post-Westphalian State. 204-254 [originally published in Millennium 10(2): 126-155]. 17 Varieties of Critical Theory: Neo-Gramscianism.” Millennium 12(2): 162-175. Beate (1998) “One Step Forward.” Third World Quarterly 31(2): 169-184.) Linklater.” in Ernst-Otto Czempiel and James N. 37-50. and beyond Required Cox. Gill. 11 .Gills.” Review of International Studies 25(1): 3-28. Civilisational Crisis. Toronto: Lexington Books.” European Journal of International Relations 2(1): 77-103.) Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics in the 1990s. (2010) “Going South: Capitalist Crisis. Systemic Crisis. and the „Social Turn‟ in IR. Robert (1983) “Gramsci. (See also the other contributions in the forum on Habermas and IR in the same issue.” Review of International Studies 31(1): 195-209. Andreas and Adam David Morton (2004) “A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony. and Democratic Surveillance. Weber. New York: Columbia University Press. Gill. and David Law (1989) “Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. Jahn. Robert W. Barry K. Cox. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Economic Life. Robert (1999) “Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order. Keohane (ed. Recommended Neo-Gramscianism in IR Bieler.” in Robert O. pp. Stephen R.” Alternatives 20(1): 1-49.” Millennium 27(3): 613-641. Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method. (1989) “Production. Martin (2005) “The Critical Social Theory of the Frankfurt School. the State. Stephen (ed.) (1993) Gramsci. Cox. Stephen (1995) “The Global Panopticon? The Neoliberal State. Rosenau (eds. and Change in World Order.

” Constellations 10(4): 453-468. C.” Review of International Studies 24(3): 427-434.” Millennium 21(1): 77-98. (1995) The Restructuring of International Relations Theory. Haacke.” International Politics 45(6): 633-649. Nicholas and Ben Thirkell-White (2007). Linklater. Worth. Andrew (1998) The Transformation of Political Community.) (2001) Critical Theory and World Politics. 12 .A.” Review of International Studies 24(1): 3-21. Linklater. Richard Wyn (ed. Neufeld. Jürgen (1996) “Theory and Praxis in International Relations: Habermas. Linklater. and Humanity.” Cooperation and Conflict 33(3): 298-333. Present and Future of Critical Theory in International Relations. Jones. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Forum on the Transformation of Political Community (1999) Review of International Studies 25(1): 139-156. Mark (2003) “Globalising Common Sense: A Marxian-Gramscian (Re-)Vision of the Politics of Governance/Resistance. Ulrich (2003) “Toward a New Critical Theory with a Cosmopolitan Intent. Self-Reflection. Relational Argumentation. Rupert.S. Owen (2008) “The Poverty and Potential of Gramscian Thought in International Relations. “Still Critical After All Those Years? The Past. Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mark (1987) “Critical Theory and the Inter-paradigm Debate.” Review of International Studies 33(S1): 3-24.” Review of International Studies 29(S1): 181-198. (See also the other contributions to this special issue on Critical Theory in IR.Germain. Andrew (1992) “The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View. Mark A. Frankfurt School in IR Hoffmann. Collective (2006) “Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto. Krause.” Millennium 16(2): 231-249.” Millennium 25(2): 255-289.E. New York: Routledge. Randall and Michael Kenny (1998) “Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. Rengger.” Security Dialogue 37(4): 443-487. Mark (1998) “(Re-)Engaging Gramsci: A Response to Germain and Kenny. Keith (1998) “Critical Theory and Security Studies: The Research Programme of „Critical Security Studies‟.) … and beyond Beck. Andrew (2007) Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship. Rupert.

Ann (1997) “You Just Don‟t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists.” in Enloe. Keohane. Enloe. 13 . 3 Required Winter Break Feminism and Gender Peterson. J.” International Studies Quarterly 41(4): 611-632.” International Studies Quarterly 49(2): 295-334.” Millennium 37(1): 97-105. Charli (2005) “‟Women. Keohane. Cohn.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 10(2): 35-46. and the Development of Feminist Security Theory. Kimberley (2008) “1988 and 1998: Contrast and Continuity in Feminist International Relations. and Bottom Rungs: How to Overcome the Underestimation of Power in the Study of International Relations. Ann (1992) Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. Strategic Frames and the Protection of Civilians as a Transnational Issue. Eric M. (1998) “Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations between International Relations and Feminist Theory. J. and War. Jean Bethke (2009) “Woman. Elshtain. Cynthia (2004) “Margins. and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Cynthia (1990) Bananas. New York: Columbia University Press. Tickner.” Signs 12(4): 687-718. Beaches.” Millennium 18(2): 245-253. and Beyond IR.Feb. (1989) “International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint. 24 Mar.” Millennium 12(3): 429-440.” Signs 28(4): 1289-1312. Invisible To. Robert O. Recommended Tickner. Berkeley: University of California Press.” International Relations 23(2): 289303. Carol (1987) “Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals. Ann (1988) “Hans Morgenthau‟s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Hutchings. Blanchard. Spike (2004) “Feminist Theories Within. Tickner. Berkeley: University of California Press. Enloe. and Other Vulnerable Groups‟: Gender. Carpenter. V. (2003) “Gender. J. Children. R. Silences. ch. International Relations. Robert O. 2. the State. The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire.” International Studies Quarterly 42(1): 193-197.

Ann (1996) “Identity in International Relations Theory: Feminist Perspectives. San Diego: Harcourt. J. 147-162. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory. pp. Marysia (1993) “Feminist Theory and International Relations.” Millennium 23(2): 315-334. Jennifer (2004) “Mind the Gap: Bridging Feminist and Political Geography through Geopolitics.” International Studies Review 8(3): 383-395.” Signs 28(2): 499-535.” in Yosef Lapid and Friedrich Kratochwil (eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ackerly. Spike Peterson (1991) “The Radical Future of Realism: Feminist Subversions of IR Theory. Kantola. Zalewski. Laura (2006) “Gendered Realities and the Immunity Principle: Why Gender Analysis Needs Feminism.” International Studies Review 10(4): 693-707.” Feminist Review 30: 61-88.” Political Geography 23(3): 307-322. Woolf. Anne Sisson and V. Lene (2000) “The Little Mermaid‟s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School. 10 Required 14 Poststructuralism .” in Mike Bowker and Robin Brown (eds.” Millennium 29(2): 285-306. Johanna (2007) “The Gendered Reproduction of the State in International Relations. Mohanty. 115-144. Locher. pp. Mar. Hyndman. Virginia (1966 [1938]) Three Guineas. J. Ann (2006) “On the Frontlines or Sidelines of Knowledge and Power? Feminist Practices of Responsible Scholarship. Chandra Talpade (1988 [1986]) “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Christine (1994) “Empathetic Cooperation: A Feminist Method for IR. Sylvester.Tickner. Sjoberg.” International Studies Quarterly 50(4): 889-910.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9(2): 270-283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Runyon. Hansen. Christine (1994) Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Birgit and Elisabeth Prügl (2001) “Feminism and Constructivism: World Apart or Sharing the Middle Ground?” International Studies Quarterly 45(1): 111-129. Brooke and Jacqui True (2008) “Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations.” Alternatives 16(1): 67-106. Tickner. Chandra Talpade (2003) “”Under Western Eyes‟ Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles. Sylvester.) From Cold War to Collapse: Theory and World Politics in the 1980s. Mohanty.

Ashley. Richard (1987) “The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics. and Speed. Roxanne Lynn (1996) Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. New York: Routledge. Jenny (1999) Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines.” in Robert O.S.) Campbell.J. especially Ashley and Walker. 15 . ch. Doty. Doty. Shapiro. James (1990) “The (S)pace of International Relations : Simulation. and Connolly). 1-4 (and skim at least one of the chapters in part II). chs. Ashley. Bleiker.” International Studies Quarterly 51(1): 139-163. Ashley. David (1990) “Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States.) Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.” Millennium 17(2): 227-262.” International Studies Quarterly 34(3): 295-310.Edkins. Jens (1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty. and George and Campbell. pp. Surveillance. R. Roxanne Lynn (1993) Foreign Policy as a Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U. David (1998 [1992]) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Richard K. Bartelson. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. revised edition. 1. Der Derian. Richard (1988) “Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique. Hansen.” Alternatives 15 (3): 263-286.” European Journal of International Relations 5(2): 225-254.” Alternatives 12(4): 403-434. (See especially the chapters by Der Derian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.) (1989) International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. James and Michael J.” International Studies Quarterly 37(3): 297-320. New York: Lexington Books. (See also the other contributions to this special issue on “dissidence” in IR. Walker. Milliken. Lene (2006) Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Roland and Amy Kay (2007) “Representing HIV/AIDS in Africa: Pluralist Photography and Local Empowerment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Campbell. Recommended Ashley. Shapiro (eds. Jennifer (1999) “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. 255-300 [originally published in International Organization 38(2): 225-261] Der Derian. Keohane (ed. (1986 [1984]) “The Poverty of Neorealism. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.B.

Tarak and Mark Laffey (1999) “The Imperial Peace: Democracy. Ilan (2002) “Capitalism.” Alternatives 19(3): 371-397. (2003) “Sovereign Excesses? Portraying Postcolonial Sovereigntyscapes. Mar. Muppidi.J. ch. Inayatullah. Alexander and Raymond Duvall (2008) “Sovereignty and the UFO. Sankaran (1993) “The Importance of Being Ironic: A Postcolonial View on Critical International Relations Theory. 273-293. Cynthia (1995) Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention.” European Journal of International Relations 5(4): 403-434. Neumann. New York: Routledge.” in Chowdhry and Nair (eds. Gender.” Third World Quarterly 23 (4): 647-664. the State and Symbolic Exchange. Gender and Class. Force and Globalization. 17 Required Darby. Agency: Dependency versus Postcolonial Theory. Culture. Blaney (2004) International Relations and the Problem of Difference. pp. Lene (1997) “A Case for Seduction? Evaluating the Poststructuralist Conception of Security. Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race.” in Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall (eds. Naeem and David L. Tarak and Mark Laffey (2006) “The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies. (1996) “Self and Other in International Relations.” Cultural Values 6(1): 137-150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Barkawi.” Political Geography 22(2): 157-178. and Class in International Relations. Helliwell. Wendt. Phillip and A. Christine and Barry Hindess (2002) “The „Empire of Uniformity‟ and the Government of Subject Peoples. Kapoor. 16 Postcolonialism . Recommended Krishna.” Political Theory 36(4): 607-633. Paolini (1994) “Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism.Weber. New York: Routledge. Hansen.” Cooperation and Conflict 32(4): 369-397.” Review of International Studies 32(2): 329-352. J.) Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chowdhry. 1. Geeta and Sheila Nair (2002) “Introduction: Power in a Postcolonial World: Race. Himadeep (2005) “Colonial and Postcolonial Global Governance.” Alternatives 18(3): 385-417.) Power. Iver B.” European Journal of International Relations 2(2): 139-174. Sidaway. Barkawi.D.

second edition (with new preface).” International Peacekeeping 16(5): 699-716. Mill.E. (1920) “The Souls of White Folk. (2010) “Resistance and the Post-liberal Peace. Phillip (2009) “Rolling Back the Frontiers of Empire: Practicing the Postcolonial.” in Darkwater: Voices from within the Veil (Harcourt. Khalsa Panth.” Millennium 38(3): 665-692. Jahn. Martin and John M. 29-52. Said. Special Section: “The Imperial Voice in Western Political Thought” (2003). New York: Vintage Books. John M. Laffey. Schueller. Oliver P. Kayaoglu. Agamben. 24 Required International Political Sociology 17 .” International Studies Review 12(2): 193-217. Shani. Welch). DuBois.B.” Interventions 11(2): 235-254. Edward W. Forum on International Political Sociology beyond European and North American Traditions of Social and Political Thought (2009). Fanon.” International Studies Review 10(4): 722-734. Brace and Howe). Turan (2010) “Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory. (2007) “Is Critical Theory Always for the White West and for Western Imperialism? Beyond Westphilian Towards a Post-Racist Critical IR. Hobson (2010) “Liberal International Theory: Eurocentric but not always Imperialist?” International Theory 2(2): 210-245. Forum: “Edward Said and International Relations” (2007) Millennium 36(1): 77-145. Malini Johar (2009) “Decolonizing Global Theories Today: Hardt and Negri. Political Theory 31(2): 171-264 (with contribution by Anthony Pagden.Hobson. New York: Grove Press.” International Organization 59(1): 177-207.” Review of International Studies 33(1): 91-116. Beate (2005) “Kant. Butler. International Political Sociology 3(3): 327-350. Jennifer Pitts.” International Studies Quarterly 52(3): 555-577. W. (1994 [1978]) Orientalism. Giorgio (2008) “Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma. International Studies Perspectives 10(1): 77107. Mar. Hall. Forum on Race and International Relations (2009). and Cheryl B. and Illiberal Legacies in International Affairs. Richmond. Mark and Jutta Weldes (2008) “Decolonizing the Cuban Missile Crisis. and Critical International Relations Theory. Darby. Frantz (1963) The Wretched of the Earth.

Walker (2007) “International. Jacqueline (2007) “Why the Economy is Often the Exception to Politics as Usual.Lawson.” in Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society.” International Political Sociology 1(2): 149-164. the International. Jabri.” International Political Sociology 1(1): 1-5. Vivienne (2007) “Michel Foucault‟s Analytics of War: The Social. Mitchell (2010) “International Government. London: Routledge. Robert (2010) “Towards the Global Social: Sociological Reflections on Governance and Risk in the Context of the Current Financial Crisis. Neumann. Wendy and William Walters (2002) “The Political Rationality of „New Regionalism‟: Toward a Genealogy of the Region. Wendy and William Walters (eds. Dillon. and Power. 18 . Larner. Iver B. second edition.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23(1): 107-125. States. Rationality. Dean. New York: Routledge. Lippert. ch. Charlotte (2007) “Guilty Bodies. and Ole Jacob Sending (2010) Governing the Global Polity: Practice.” Millennium 35(1): 181-196.” Theory and Society 31(3): 391-432. Political. Michael (2006) “Foucault and World Politics: Promises and Challenges of Extending Governmentality Theory to the European and Beyond. Mentality. William and Jens Henrik Haahr (2005) Governing Europe: Discourse. Jonathan (2010) “The Limits of Governmentality: Social Theory and the International. George and Robbie Shilliam (2010) “Sociology and International Relations: Legacies and Prospects. Walters. AnnArbor: Michigan University Press. 10. Productive Bodies. Security and War. Ole Jacob and Iver B.J. Recommended Bigo. Merlingen.” International Political Sociology 1(1): 67-81. Larner.” Alternatives 24(3): 295-328. Didier and R. Randy (1999) “Governing Refugees: The Relevance of Governmentality to Understanding the International Refugee Regime.” European Journal of International Relations 16(2): 223-246. Joseph. Sociology. Governmentality and European Integration. London: Sage.B. Culture & Society 24(4): 87-109.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23(1): 69-86. Epstein.) (2004) Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces.” Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 50(3): 651-672. Best. and the Racial. Deuchars. Destructive Bodies: Crossing the Biometric Borders. Sending. Neumann (2006) “Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs. Michael and Julian Reid (2001) “Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics.” Millennium 30(1): 41-65.

Jef (2008) “The Jargon of Exception – On Schmitt. Doerthe (2009) “Decentering Global Power: The Merits of a Foucauldian Approach to International Relations. Doucet (2008) Sovereign Power and the Biopolitics of Human Security. Agamben and the Absence of Political Society. Selby.” International Relations 21(3): 324-345. Williams (2009) “Security Beyond the State: Global Security Assemblages in International Politics.” Security Dialogue 39(5): 517-537. G.” and Civilian Border Patrols.” Global Society 23(4): 497-517. 31 Required 19 New (and not so new) “Master” Concepts and Narratives . Ulmen.Jaeger. trans. Chandler.” International Political Sociology 4(1): 33-49. New York: Picador.S. Jan (2007) “Engaging Foucault: Liberal Governance and the Limits of Foucauldian IR. Miguel and Marc G. De Larrinaga. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Abrahamsen.) Forum: “Assessing the Impact of Foucault on International Relations” (2010) International Political Sociology 4(2): 196-215. Michel (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-1979. (See also the other contributions to this special issue on Foucault and IR. Doty. Roxanne Lynn (2007) “States of Exception on the Mexico-U. and Global Governmentality.L. Michel (2007) Security. David (2009) “Critiquing Liberal Cosmopolitanism? The Limits of the Biopolitical Approach.” International Political Sociology 3(1): 53-70. Rosenow. Foucault. Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977-1978. Hans-Martin (2010) “UN Reform.” International Political Sociology 2(2): 165-183. Schmitt. Biopolitics. Mar. Sonja and Jens Wissel (2010) “State Project Europe: The Transformation of the European Border Regime and the Production of Bare Life.” International Theory 2(1): 50-86. Giorgio (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Buckel. Rita and Michael C.” International Political Sociology 1(2): 113-137.” International Political Sociology 3(1): 1-17. “Decisions. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Agamben. Border: Security. Foucault. Territory. Foucault. Michel (2003) “Society Must be Defended:” Lectures at the Collège de France 197576. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Carl (2003 [1950]) The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Huysmans. New York: Telos Press.

(1997) “World Society and the Nation-State. Peter J.” Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 11-25. Ulrich (1996) “World Risk Society as Cosmopolitan Society? Ecological Questions in a Framework of Manufactured Uncertainties. Raffaele (2009) “Mapping Alternative Models of Global Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Amoore. xi-41.” European Journal of International Relations 16(3): 315-337. Jens (2009) Visions of World Community.” Millennium 29(3): 675-704. Kaldor. Mathias (1998) “Observing World Politics: Luhmann‟s Systems Theory of Society and International Relations. Beck.” Millennium 28(2): 239-265.” International Affairs 79 (3): 583-593. Buzan. Anne-Marie (2004) A New World Order. Louise and Paul Langley (2004) “Ambiguities of Global Civil Society. (2010) “‟Walls‟ Between „Those People‟? Contrasting Perspectives on World Politics.” International Studies Review 11(1): 133-156. Forum on Global Society (2009). Barry and Mathias Albert (2010) “Differentiation: A Sociological Approach to International Relations Theory. Niklas (1997) “Globalization or World Society? How to Conceive of Modern Society.” American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 144-181.” Millennium 21(3): 389-420. Recommended Marchetti. 20 . Princeton: Princeton University Press. Meyer. Samuel (1993) “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs 72(3): 22-49. Cambridge: Polity Press.” Theory. Dingwerth. International Political Sociology 3(1): 109-136.” Millennium 30(1): 19-39. Culture & Society 13(1): 1-32. Mary (2003) “The Idea of Global Civil Society. Katzenstein. Ronnie D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kubálková. Buzan.Hardt. Beck. Barry and Richard Little (2001) “Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it. Albert. Klaus and Philipp Pattberg (2006) “Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics. World (Civil/Risk) Society/System/Community Lipschutz. Ulrich (1999) World Risk Society. Vendulka (2000) “Towards an International Political Theology. (1992) “Reconstructing World Politics: The Emergence of Global Civil Society. Michael and Antonio Negri (2000) Empire. Huntington.” Global Governance 12(2): 185-203. Bartelson.” Review of International Studies 30(1): 89-110.” International Review of Sociology 7(1): 67-79. Luhmann. John et al. Slaughter.

David Held and Martin Köhler (eds. and Thomas Wright (2007) “What‟s at Stake in the American Empire Debate. Sergei (2009) “Generic Universalism in World Politics: Beyond International Anarchy and the World State. Daniel H. Cabrera. Reid. Alexander (2003) “Why a World State is Inevitable. New York: The Penguin Press. Cox. Cosmopolitan Democracy/Cosmopolitanism Held.” American Political Science Review 101(2): 253-271. Domination.” European Journal of International Relations 16(3): 511-530.” Millennium 32(1): 1-27.” Leiden Journal of International Law 23(2): 449-471. America‟s Imperial Temptation – Again. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Culture: The Continued Relevance of Critical Geopolitics.” European Journal of International Relations 9(4): 491-542.” Geopolitics 13(3): 413-436.) (1995) Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order. Prozorov.” Ethics and International Affairs 18(3): 1-24. 21 . Michael and Antonio Negri (2004) Multitude: War and Diplomacy in the Age of Empire. Daniele and David Held (eds. David (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Persistent Challenges. Archibugi.Empire Hardt.” International Theory 1(2): 215-247. Akbar (2010) “Writing About Empire: Remarks on the Logic of a Discourse. Rasulov. Julian (2005) “The Biopolitics of the War on Terror: A Critique of the „Return to Imperialism‟ Thesis in International Relations. World State/Government/Community Wendt. George (2003) “The State of Emergency and the Revival of American Imperialism: Toward an Authoritarian Post-Fordism. Thomas (2009) “What Happened to the Idea of World Government. Nexon. Michael (2003) “The Empire‟s Back in Town: Or. Stanford: Stanford University Press.” International Studies Quarterly 53(2): 253-271. Cambridge: Polity Press. Archibugi. Daniele.” Third World Quarterly 26(2): 237-252. Steinmetz. Jean L. Cohen. (2004) “Whose Sovereignty? Empire versus International Law. Simon (2008) “Imperialism. Weiss.) (1998) Re-imagining Political Community: Studies in Cosmopolitan Democracy. Luis (2010) “World Government: Renewed Debate.” Public Culture 15 (2): 323-345. Dalby.

Accommodation is to be worked out directly and on an individual basis between the student and the instructor(s) involved. by someone else. Global Democracy: A Symposium on a New Political Hope (2010) New Political Science 32(1): 83-121. but no later than two weeks before the compulsory academic event.) (2000) Global Democracy: Key Debates.” This can include: reproducing or paraphrasing portions of someone else’s published or unpublished material. If you require accommodation for your formally scheduled exam(s) in this course. Registered PMC students are required to contact the centre (613-520-6608) every term to ensure that the instructor receives your request for accommodation.Holden. For Pregnancy: Pregnant students requiring academic accommodations are encouraged to contact an Equity Advisor in Equity Services to complete a letter of accommodation. Instructors will make accommodations in a way that avoids academic disadvantage to the student. Then. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. submitting a take-home examination. Such requests should be made during the first two weeks of class. Plagiarism: The University Senate defines plagiarism as “presenting. please submit your request for accommodation to PMC by November 15 2010 for December examinations and March 11 2011 for April examinations. make an appointment to discuss your needs with the instructor at least two weeks prior to the first academic event in which it is anticipated the accommodation will be required. whether intentional or not. expression of ideas or work of others as one’s failing to acknowledge sources through the use of proper citations when using another’s works and/or failing to use quotation marks. For Religious Observance: Students requesting accommodation for religious observances should apply in writing to their instructor for alternate dates and/or means of satisfying academic requirements.” International Political Science Review 27(2): 101-119. using another’s data or research findings.) (1998) Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation. 22 . and presenting these as one’s own without proper citation or reference to the original source. verbatim quotations. concepts. regardless of the source. in whole or in part. or as soon as possible after the need for accommodation is known to exist. make an appointment to meet with the instructor in order to discuss your needs at least two weeks before the first assignment is due or the first in-class test/midterm requiring accommodations. Academic Accommodations For students with Disabilities: Students with disabilities requiring academic accommodations in this course must register with the Paul Menton Centre for Students with Disabilities (500 University Centre) for a formal evaluation of disability-related needs. (2006) “Transnational Democracy in an Insecure World. Instructors and students may contact an Equity Services Advisor for assistance (www. Barry (ed.carleton. laboratory report or other assignment written. New York: Routledge. Dryzek. or paraphrased material. the ideas. John S. Cheah. essay. After registering with the PMC. using ideas or direct. or ideas without appropriate acknowledgment in any academic assignment. Pheng and Bruce Robbins (eds.

This means that grades submitted by an instructor may be subject to revision. Deferred final exams are available ONLY if the student is in good standing in the course. In such cases. or come to our office in Loeb D688. Penalties are not trivial. instructors may use this notation on the Final Grade Report to indicate that a student has already failed the course due to inadequate term work and should not be permitted access to a deferral of the examination. students may be required to pass a brief oral examination on research papers and essays. The Associate Deans of the Faculty conduct a rigorous investigation. Course Requirements: Failure to write the final exam will result in a grade of ABS. To find out more. when an instructor suspects a piece of work has been plagiarized. debates. No grades are final until they have been approved by the Dean.m. stamped with that day's date. and panel discussions. Official Course Outline: The course outline posted to the Political Science website is the official course outline.. 23 . Assignments will be retrieved every business day at 4 p. Late assignments may be submitted to the drop box in the corridor outside B640 Loeb. including an interview with the student. Approval of final grades: Standing in a course is determined by the course instructor subject to the approval of the Faculty Dean. Important course and University information is also distributed via the Connect email system. It is the student’s responsibility to monitor their Connect account. and then distributed to the instructor. Plagiarism is a serious offence which cannot be resolved directly with the course’s instructor. Oral Examination: At the discretion of the instructor.handing in "substantially the same piece of work for academic credit more than once without prior written permission of the course instructor in which the submission occurs. Members can benefit through numerous opportunities which will complement both academic and social life at Carleton University. Final exams are intended solely for the purpose of evaluation and will not be returned. Submission and Return of Term Work: Papers must be handed directly to the instructor and will not be datestamped in the departmental office. visit our website at poliscisociety. For essays not returned in class please attach a stamped. Please note that assignments sent via fax or email will not be accepted. They include a mark of zero for the plagiarized work or a final grade of "F" for the course. Connect Email Accounts: All email communication to students from the Department of Political Science will be via Connect. Holding social events. CPSS aims to involve all political science students in the after-hours academic life at Carleton University. Our mandate is to arrange social and academic activities in order to instill a sense of belonging within the Department and the larger University community. self-addressed envelope if you wish to have your assignment returned by mail. please email carletonpss@gmail. FND (Failure No Deferred) is assigned when a student's performance is so poor during the term that they cannot pass the course even with 100% on the final examination. Carleton Political Science Society: The Carleton Political Science Society (CPSS) has made its mission to provide a social environment for politically inclined students and