## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

**T. Koshizuka , T. Shinkai , K. Udagawa , H. Kawano
**

Abstract--This paper shows the simulation of SLF interrupting

performance for SF6 gas circuit breaker. From the measurements on 300kV-SF6 gas model circuit breaker, it was shown that the extinction peak voltages were varying with arcing times. But, the current values at the extinction peak were the identical. To simulate the SLF interrupting performance for the circuit breaker, serially connected 3 arc models with different arc parameters were used. There was good agreement between the measurements and simulations. Keywords: Circuit Breaker, Cassie model, Mayr model, EMTP, MODELS.

I. INTRODUCTION he Short-line-fault (SLF) interruption performance of a circuit breaker is evaluated by calculation in which serially connected multiple arc models are combined within a circuit [1] [2] [3]. When using arc models for calculation, it is important to set the arc parameters such as the arc time constant and arc power loss. A method of extracting arc parameters from measurement data has been proposed [4], but it necessitates complicated data processing such as differentiation of arc resistance or arc conductance and linear approximation. This paper describes an evaluation method in which the parameters of the arc models are estimated from the waveform of the arc voltage with respect to the current, and the results are used to calculate the SLF interruption performance of an SF6 gas circuit breaker. The arc model for calculating the interruption performance was constructed by serially connecting one Cassie model and two Mayr models. The Cassie model simulates the large current region. The two Mayr models have different arc parameters. One of them was used as a model for simulating the vicinity of the arc voltage extinction peak (defined as Mayr model 1) and the other was used as a

T. Koshizuka is with Power & Industrial Systems Research & Development Center, Toshiba Co., Kawasaki, JAPAN (e-mail of corresponding author: tadashi.koshiduka@toshiba.co.jp). T. Shinkai is with Power & Industrial Systems Research & Development Center, Toshiba Co. Kawasaki, JAPAN K. Udagawa is with Power & Industrial Systems Research & Development Center, Toshiba Co., Kawasaki, JAPAN H. Kawano is with Power & Industrial Systems Research & Development Center, Toshiba Co., Kawasaki, JAPAN Paper submitted to the International Conference on Power Systems Transients (IPST2009) in Kyoto, Japan June 3-6, 2009

T

model for simulating the vicinity of the current zero (defined as Mayr model 2). Interruption tests were carried out using a 300 kV SF6 gas model circuit breaker (hereafter called “model circuit breaker”) under 63 kA – 50 Hz – 90% SLF interruption conditions, and the success or failure of interruption and the arc voltage were measured. It was confirmed that the voltage in the large current region remained roughly constant regardless of the arcing time, and also that the value of the arc voltage at the extinction peak varied according to the arcing time, but the value of the current at the extinction peak remained constant regardless of the arcing time. The arc voltage waveform in the large current region can be simulated by making the parameters of the Cassie model constant, and the value of the extinction peak voltage can be simulated by adjusting the arc power loss of Mayr model 1. The fact that the value of the current at the extinction peak is constant could be simulated by making the identical value of the Mayr model 1 arc time constant. The arc voltage waveform from the extinction peak to the current zero could be simulated by Mayr model 2. In addition, good agreement between measurement and calculation of the success or failure of interruption was obtained by setting the arc time constant of Mayr model 2 to 10% of that of model 1, and the arc power loss to 2% of that of model 1. In the EMTP simulations, these arc models were defined using MODELS, and combined with the SLF synthetic test circuit [1]. II. MEASUREMENT OF SLF INTERRUPTION PERFORMANCE OF THE MODEL CIRCUIT BREAKER Figure 1 shows the results of a 63 kA – 50 Hz – 90% SLF interruption test performed on the model circuit breaker. In the interruption tests, the interrupting current was maintained constant, and the arcing time was varied. Figure 1 shows the value of the extinction peak of the arc voltage, and also the success or failure of interruption, versus the arcing time. Interruption fails when the arcing time is approximately 13 ms, and is successful when the arcing time is approximately 14 ms. The value of the extinction peak is low when the arcing time is short, and progressively increases to a maximum when the arcing time becomes approximately 18 ms. At D where the arcing time becomes increasingly long, the value of the extinction peak becomes low once again. Figure 2 shows the arc voltage versus the arc current. It indicates the period from a point approximately 4 ms prior to the current zero. The horizontal axis is a logarithmic scale.

The symbols A to D in Fig. Measured results of 300kV model circuit breaker for 63kA-50Hz90% SLF interruption 5 5 Arc voltage extinction peak (kV) 消弧ピーク(kV) C 44 A rc voltage (kV ) D 3 3 B 22 A 11 00 1·10-1 4000 Total arc voltage Arc voltage (V) 3000 Arc voltage of Mayr model 2 2000 Arc voltage of Cassie model 0. Under the conditions of A and B where the arcing time is short.2. P: Mayr model arc power loss 5 4 C D B A 3 2 1 0 10 15 20 25 アーク時間(ms) Arcing time (ms) o : Success. it can be said that the time from the point at the extinction peak of the arc voltage to the current zero remains constant regardless of the arcing time. the arc voltage differs slightly with the arcing time. so the arc voltage is slightly low.2.6 µs. as shown in Fig. from Fig. the value of the arc voltage at the extinction peak varies depending upon the arcing time. In Fig. III. Current (A) Fig. the arc voltage in the large current region is represented using the Cassie model. one Cassie model and two Mayr models were serially connected. but is more or less constant at approximately 1500 V. and the extinction peak is reached when the current is approximately 100 A. v0: Cassie model arc voltage. regardless of the arcing time.The current and arc voltage were measured using a Rogowski coil and a voltage divider installed near the model circuit breaker. It reproduces the arc voltage of C shown in Fig.16 µs. P2 = 13. All of the arc voltages start to increase at a current of approximately 10000A or below. In addition. i: Current.1 1·100 1 10 1·101 100 1·102 1000 1·103 10000 1·104 100000 1·105 1000 Current (A) Fig. In other words.3 is the sum of the three arc voltages. v0 = 1500 V Mayr model 1:θ m1 = 1. v: Arc voltage. 1. PI = 680 kW Mayr model 2:θ m2 = 0. the arc voltage falls as the current zero is approached. in the region of large current exceeding 10 kA. However.5 µs. CALCULATION OF INTERRUPTION PERFORMANCE USING THE THREE SERIALLY CONNECTED ARC MODELS A. Measured arc voltages of 300kV model circuit breaker 0 0. The extinction peak occurs at a current . In other words. Computed arc voltage waveform by 3 arc models The total arc voltage shown in Fig. Because the interruption current is maintained constant. Figure 3 shows the waveform obtained as a result of calculating the arc voltage using the three serially connected models. 2. P2 = P1 × 2%) 5000 Fig.1.2.2. and is approximately 1500 V. The vicinity of the extinction peak is represented bv Mayr mode 1. Subsequently. and each value was converted into a digital signal by sampling at 40 MHz and a resolution of 12 bits [2]. In order to use these arc models to indicate the arc voltage in Fig. 1 dg 1 v 2 (1) = 2 − 1 g dt θ c v0 1 dg 1 = g dt θ m vi (2) − 1 P Where.2.1 1 10 100 Arc voltage of Mayr model 1 1000 10000 100000 As shown in Fig. The aspects of the arc voltages closely match those of C in Fig.6 kW (θ m2 = θ m1 × 10%. The arc parameters used in the calculation are as follows. Cassie model: θ c = 2.1 correspond to those in Fig. 3. the value of the current corresponding to the extinction peak is constant at roughly 100 A. it is said that the Cassie model can simulate an arc in the large current region. Calculation of Arc Voltage Equations (1) and (2) are the equations for the Cassie model and the Mayr model. in the large current region the arc voltage of the Cassie model is dominant.2. the region where the current is 10 A or below is represented by Mayr model 2. θc: Cassie model arc time constant. g: Arc conductance. θm: Mayr model arc time constant. × : Failure Generally. in the large current region the contacts are not sufficiently open. and the Mayr model can simulate an arc in the vicinity of the current zero.2.

the arc voltage. and 1/g(dg/dt) along the vertical axis. The measured success or failure of interruption could be reproduced by calculation.0 Arc time constant (us) A B C D 1.3. and the data corresponding to the period between 5 µs and 2 µs before the current zero is linearly approximated by means of the least squares method.1 as well.E+06 1/g(dg/dt) 2. ARC PARAMETERS A. B. Calculation of Interruption Performance An attempt was made to reproduce the SLF interruption test results using the three serially connected arc models described in the previous paragraph. Time Constant of Mayr Model 1 near the Extinction peak The method of obtaining the arc parameters of the Mayr model 1 by linearly approximating the relationship i2/g(=vi) – 1/g(dg/dt) is known [4].0 0. using the current and arc voltage during the period from the vicinity of the extinction peak to the current zero in the results for C in Fig.6.5. the aspect of the attenuation of the arc voltage agrees closely with Fig. The arc power loss of Mayr model 1 was adjusted so that the extinction peak of the arc voltage agreed with the measured value. as a result of the use of Mayr model 2.3 and Fig.5 0.E+05 4. In Fig.E+06 C D B A 4. Example of measured arc time constant of the Mayr model 1 2. In the calculation of each of A to D. In 1 and 2.4. Figure 4 shows a comparison of the measured results and the calculated results.E+00 0. the period from the current zero to the extinction peak value does not change. 6. in Fig.5 dg/dt is indicated as an absolute value. 5. Figure 7 shows the change in the arc voltage extinction peak when each of the arc time constant and the arc power loss is changed in the Mayr model alone. because the arc time constant remains unchanged. and the arc time constant of the Mayr model agreed with the calculated values shown in Fig. Measurement results of Mayr model 1 arc time constant in the vicinity of the extinction peak of the arc voltage .E+05 Fig. The parameters of the arc model are explained in Section 4. + : Failure( Simulation) θ:1. In the other results of Fig. The conductance decreases as the current zero is approached.5 1.E+05 6. the results of calculating the arc time constant are likewise shown in Fig. the arc time constant of the Cassie model.5μs 1.6 µs on average.7 µs. In addition. and are expressed in terms of the relationship between the arcing time and the value of the extinction peak.E+06 3 2 1 0 10 15 20 25 アーク時間(ms) Arcing time (ms) o : Success. Figure 5 shows these parameters expressed using i2/g (=vi) along the horizontal axis. × : Failure( Measurement ) : Success. a straight line is shown. so dg/dt is a negative value. because the arc power loss is changed. However.E+06 i2/g 2. Comparison between measurement and simulation IV. both the extinction peak value and the period from the current zero to the extinction peak have changed.E+00 -1. and was 1.E+06 3.of approximately 100 A. and the arc time constant is changed. and only the arc power loss is changed. In 1 and 3. 5. the extinction peak also changes. 1 and 2 correspond to the case where the arc time constant remains unchanged at 2. It agreed with the value calculated using the method shown in Fig.5. the arc time constant was 1. However. This is because the arc voltage is assumed to be in the vicinity of the point in time corresponding to the extinction peak. The arc time constant was more or less constant regardless of the arcing time.E+05 8. The measured results are the same as those of Fig. 1 and 3 correspond to the case where the arc power loss remains unchanged.E+06 0.1. The inverse of the value at the point of Fig. 4. In Fig. Arc voltage extinction peak (kV) 消弧ピーク(kV) 5 4 intersection between this straight line and the vertical axis is the arc time constant.0 10 15 20 Arcing Time (ms) 25 Fig.5 µs.1.2.

so it is expected that there will be an error in the arc time constant calculated by an approximation. the aspect of the arc voltage extinction peak of Fig.5. and agreed with the arc time constant used for Mayr model 2 in Section 3.7us Arc power loss 950kW Current Zero 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Total Arc Voltage Time (5us/div) Arc voltage of Mayr model Arc voltage of Cassie model 0. When the arc time constant of the Cassie model is reduced. particularly when the current is approximately 10 A or less.2 µs. However.7us Arc power loss 1500kW 3 Arc time constant 1. the calculation of Fig.1.6us Arc power loss 950kW 6000 5000 Arc Voltage (V) 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 -1000 performing linear approximation in the same way as Fig.E+04 1. Computed arc voltage waveforms with different Mayr model 1 arc parameters B. However.E+06 3. In Fig. 2 Arc time constant 2. (3) is derived from (1) [5].E+05 Fig.E+06 i2/g 5. there is no significant difference from Fig. Example of measured arc time constant of Mayr model 2 between 50ns to 500ns before current zero C.E+00 -1. Mayr Model 2 Arc Time Constant near the Current zero Figure 8 shows an example of the waveform resulting from calculation of the arc voltage when the Cassie model is connected to Mayr model 1 alone. Also.3 and the Cassie model arc . The foregoing agrees with the fact that it is said that in this model the interruption success or failure is determined by the Mayr model 2. and the SLF interruption performance of an SF6 gas circuit breaker is determined by several µs in the vicinity of the current zero.8 indicated an interruption failure.6 and Fig.E+00 0.E+06 θ:0. the attenuation occurs quickly in the case of Fig. the interruption success or failure did not agree with the result of measurement. 7. even in this case. the arc time constant was 0. the circuit breaker cannot be simulated using one Cassie model and one Mayr model connected serially. Consequently.8. 5000 Arc Voltage (V) 1 Arc time constant 2. in Section 3. dv V0 = dt θ C (3) Figure 10 is an enlarged view of the vicinity of the current zero of the total arc voltage of Fig. It shows the results of calculating the arc time constant of Mayr model 2 by Current (A) Fig. Figure 9 is an enlarged view of Fig. Mayr model 2 was added in order to simulate the vicinity of the current zero.E+06 1. As a result. In other words. and the aspect of the attenuation of the total arc voltage from the extinction peak to the current zero agrees with Fig. the aspect of the attenuation of the arc voltage from the extinction peak to the vicinity of the current zero differs greatly from Fig.The following can be said from the results of Fig. However.8.3 from the large current region to the vicinity of the extinction peak. the attenuation of the arc voltage of the Cassie model slows down. 5.2 can be simulated.3. 1) The result in which the current at the extinction peak of Fig.3. the value was approximately 10% of the value in the vicinity of the extinction peak shown in Fig. During this period.5 using the data between 50 ns and 500 ns prior to the current zero.E+06 0. but the arc power loss of the Mayr model 1 was adjusted so that the extinction peak value agreed with C in Fig. Cassie Model Arc Time Constant At the current zero. the amount of data is small.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Fig. This indicates that during the period from the extinction peak to the current zero.2 is constant can be simulated by making the identical value of the Mayr model 1 arc time constant.7. The Cassie model arc parameters and the arc time constant of Mayr model 1 were the same as the values used for Fig. 8. 2) By changing only the arc power loss of the Mayr model 1. Computed arc voltage waveform by 2 arc models 5.1.E+06 1/g(dg/dt) 2. 9.2μs 4.

and the arc power loss was varied.10. the measured and calculated results of the success or failure of interruption agreed with each other. et al. the Cassie model arc time constant is changed and calculations are repeated until that the total arc conductance agrees with the measured value [3]. of the Mayr model 1 values. The extinction peak value of the arc voltage varies according to the arc time..5us Time (1us/div) Total arc voltage c) d) e) The arc parameters of the Cassie model and the arc time constant of the Mayr model 1 which represents the vicinity of the extinction peak were made constant.. 10. a large number of repetitions may be necessary depending upon the setting of the initial value. In this case. Power Delivery. good agreement between the measured and calculated values of the current corresponding to the extinction peak and the arc voltage corresponding to the extinction peak could be obtained. the arc time constant and the arc power loss were made 10% and 2%. “ Practical modeling of the Circuit breaker Arc as a Short Line Fault Interrupter” IEEE PES Summer Meeting F77 625-5 . the period between this point of intersection and the current zero is the arc time constant. thus enabling the aspect of the arc voltage waveform during the period from the extinction peak to the zero point to be reproduced by calculation. et al. respectively.. thus obviating the need for complicated arc parameter calculations. 2003 G. when the Cassie model and Mayr model 2 are serially connected. “ Evaluation Method of Interruption Performance using Two Series Mathematical Arc Models(No. It can be seen that the point of intersection of dv/dt and V0 (1500 V) at the current zero of the Cassie model arc voltage corresponds roughly to the point in time at which the extinction peak of the total arc voltage occurs. “Circuit Breaker Model for Digital Simulation based on Mayr’s and Cassie’s Differential Arc Equations” IEEE Trans. REFERENCES V0=1500V dv/dt =V0/θ Current Zero [1] [2] Fig. et al.Sawada. ”EMTP Simulation of SLF Interrupting Performance for Serially Connected Two Arcs with Different Arc Parameters” IEE-J Trans. a Mayr model 1 for simulating the vicinity of the arc voltage extinction peak. VI. it is considered that the defining of the period from the extinction peak to the current zero as the Cassie model arc time constant is one method of calculation. CONCLUSIONS An arc model for evaluating the 63 kA – 50 Hz – 90% SLF interruption performance of a 300 kV-SF6 gas model circuit breaker using calculations was studied. The question of whether or not this applies to circuit breakers that have other voltage ratings is an issue for the future. b) In order to simulate the arc voltage waveform during the period from the vicinity of the peak value of the current to the zero point. [4] [5] T. July 1995 T. In other words.Browne. Arc time constant of Cassie model [3] V. In addition. As a result. As shown in Fig. Vol. namely a Cassie model for simulating the large current region. However.7、July、2001、pp845852 (in Japanese) Smeets. 5000 4000 Arc Voltage (V) 3000 2000 1000 0 Cassie model arc voltage 2. only the arc voltage in the large current region and the arc voltage at the extinction peak are necessary. No.voltage. a) An interruption test was performed by leaving the interruption current constant and changing the arc time.1) IEEJ Power and Energy Conference 2003 (in Japanese) T. These values can be easily obtained from measurement of the arc voltage. The only known method of calculating the arc time constant of the Cassie model is one in which. and also a Mayr model 2 for simulating the vicinity of the current zero. “ Short-Line Fault Interruption Assessment of HighVoltage Circuit Breakers by means of Current Zero Analysis” CIGRE A3 Colloquium.. an arc model was constructed by serially connecting three models. and the arc voltage was measured.Bizjak. the value of the current corresponding to the extinction peak did not depend upon the arc time. B，Vol. and remained roughly 100 A.121-B、No.Koshizuka.10.E.3. Jr. In Mayr model 2 which indicates the region in the vicinity of the current zero subsequent to the extinction peak. et al. When using this arc model..

- CB - Routine Tests
- SEN Plus new generation metal clad plug
- ieee14cdf
- Oil Circuit Breakers
- RED IEEE 14 NODOS
- PC Magazine USA 2015-03
- Arc Resistance
- Circuit Breaker3
- Challenges While Testing Magnetically-Actuated Vacuum CBs
- Rating of the Circuit Breakers
- 1329239_634643550493815000
- 45CBTHER.pdf
- PC.magazine.usa April.2015 XBOOKS
- Transient Analysis of Shunt Reactor Switching
- Switchgear and Protection
- checklist PM
- Seismic Response of Circuit Breakers
- NETA Acceptance 7 6 1 2(CB)
- Elmark_2012
- Thaisonnam_1
- 3AH5 Vacuum Circuit Breaker Technical Slides 7078
- Vacuum Circuit Breaker Catalogue
- 3 Cycle vs 5 Cycle
- driv
- DISTANCE PROTECTION RELAY
- lehf1835-07-fiche-specification-insonorisee-serie-gepx-gb.pdf
- Suzol Electrical Charactrestics
- U01A
- DET-456
- GIS Summer Training Report

Skip carousel

- A review on Parametric Optimization of Submerged arc welding process
- Experiments with Alternate Currents of High Potential and High Frequency by Tesla, Nikola, 1856-1943
- As 60974.6-2006 Arc Welding Equipment Limited Duty Portable Arc Welding and Allied Process Power Sources (IEC
- As 3853.2-2006 Health and Safety in Welding and Allied Processes - Sampling of Airborne Particles and Gases i
- Tacoma-Public-Utilities-Power-Factor-Provisions
- Deposition Rate and Weld Bead in Submerged Arc Welding
- Arc & Gas Welder Associates, Inc., a Maryland Corporation v. Green Fuel Economizer Co., Inc., a New York Corporation, and National Surety Corporation, a New York Corporation, 285 F.2d 863, 4th Cir. (1960)
- As NZS ISO 14343-2006 Welding Consumables - Wire Electrodes Wires and Rods for Arc Welding of Stainless and h
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. Co, 179 F.2d 293, 3rd Cir. (1950)
- As 60974.1-2006 Arc Welding Equipment Welding Power Sources (IEC 60974-1-2000 MOD)
- Analysis of Electric Potential Distribution on Ceramic Disc Insulators under dry conditions using ANSYS
- Optimization of Process Parameters of Submerged Arc Welding on AISI 1018
- Military Searchlights (1912)
- As 60974.11-2005 Arc Welding Equipment Electrode Holders
- Baltimore Gas and Electric Company and Bankers Trust Company v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Maryland Corporation, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, a Connecticut Corporation, and Royal Insurance Company, Limited, a Body Corporate of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and North Ireland, 269 F.2d 138, 4th Cir. (1959)
- A Review on Study of Heat Transfer Rate on Multipass Submerged Arc Welding

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading