You are on page 1of 5

# PENYERAHAN DAN PENILAIAN TUGASAN ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION AND ASSESSMENT ________________________________________________________________________ KOD KURSUS /COURSE CODE : HBMT4403 TAJUK

SOALAN TUGASAN /ASSIGNMENT QUESTION SOALAN / QUESTION Some studies have found that students who do well in mathematics would likely do well in other subjects such as science. You want to find out whether there is any relationship between their mathematics achievement and the achievement of a science subject for the class. From the previous semester examination results for your class obtain a set of mathematics test scores and a set of science scores. Determine the relationship between the mathematics scores and the science test scores. To aid your task, refer to books, journals and internet materials. Describe in detail two different methods of determining the relationship between the two scores. Use these two methods that you have chosen with a group of students. Analyse whether there is any relationship between the mathematics scores with the science test scores. Check their results by using any suitable tools for analysis such as EXCEL. Include in your report a write up and summary of the findings. Reflect upon the strengths and weaknesses of the experimental activity you have carried out. Give suggestions for improvement. [Total: 30 marks]

LAMPIRAN / ATTACHMENT RUBRIK TUGASAN / ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS KOD KURSUS / COURSE CODE : SEMESTER / SEMESTER :
Criteria Marks/ (Weightage) (2)

## HBMT 4403 SEPTEMBER 2011

Weak 1 Description of method unclear; inaccurate identification of the relevant steps. Partially Meets Standards 2 Description of method lacking in detail. Steps identified lacks sequence and logic. Meets Standard 3 Sufficient detail given; every step in executing the procedure is explained quite clearly. Exceeds Standard Total Score 4 More than sufficient detail given in logical manner; every step in executing the procedure is clearly explained using simple terms and references.

Procedure involved in determining the relationship between the test scores using method 1 Procedure involved in determining the relationship between the test scores using method 2 Description of tryout and summary of findings

(2)

## Description of method unclear; inaccurate identification of the relevant steps.

Description of method lacking in detail. Steps identified lacks sequence and logic.

Sufficient detail given; very step in executing the procedure is explained quite clearly.

More than sufficient detail given in logical manner; every step in executing the procedure is clearly explained using simple terms and references.

(2)

Description of activity unclear; summary includes vague or no conclusions based on the methods used.

Description of activity lacking in detail, summary includes some, but not all conclusions based on the methods used.

Sufficient detail given; summary includes the right conclusions based on the methods used.

More than sufficient detail given in logical manner; summary includes the right conclusions based on the methods used.

## Reflection on the procedure and steps

(0.5)

Reflection written does not show evidence of thorough thinking and has not provided any evidences. Show little new learning.

Reflection written has not covered adequately all issues and are not based on evidences. Reflection indicates some new learning taking place.

The reflection provided is clear and well taught through and few evidences are provided. Reflection indicates new learning.

A clear and well taught through reflection is provided which rely on evidences. Reflection very clearly shows new learning.

## Strengths and weaknesses

(0.5)

Strengths and weaknesses discussed vaguely. Some suggestions for improvement, although not practical.

Strengths and weaknesses discussed, though lack detail. Some suggestions for improvement and some are practical. Total

Strengths and weaknesses clearly discussed. Appropriate, practical suggestions for improvement

(0.5)

## Accurate and practical suggestions for improvement.

30

PENILAIAN / EVALUATION Tugasan ini akan menyumbangkan 30% markah kepada kursus tersebut dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik. / This assignment accounts for 30% of the marks for the course mentioned and shall be assessed based on the Rubrics. Anda akan dimaklumkan tentang markah tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan Akhir Semester bermula / You would be informed of the assignment mark before the Final Semester Examination commences. PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan secara automatik akan disemak untuk persamaan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong seperti berikut: / Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. If plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows: Tugasan dengan kandungan 10 - 30% yang sama dengan lain: 20% potongan daripada jumlah markah yang diperolehi. Tugasan melebihi kandungan 30% yang sama dengan lain: Markah sifar akan diberikan. Assignments with 10 - 30% overlap with others: 20% deduction from the total marks scored. Assignments with more than 30% overlap with others : Zero mark would be given