Mediocre Achievers for God and Country?

Editor’s Note
Most of you should be wondering now. Why did the artist in our cover page hang her artworks on the wall without finalizing them? Disrupted figures, pale frames, unfinished touches. Assuming the artist has a superb image in the industry, art collectors and critics will still have the tendency to grade her unfinished masterpieces with an excellent rating. The same logic is roughly applicable to universities like De La Salle. A school’s image is the sum total of the actions and merited reactions it has established through the years. But the dictum of our generation is the other way around: We merely depend on DLSU’s image without grasping its real manifestations – the quality of academic and non-academic services it offers. Our anniversary addendum is a mixture of topics about the many facets of the University’s image. There is the overwhelming mediocre behavior of students in academics and student leadership. Is DLSU producing mediocre achievers for God and country? Why are some students already contented with a 1.0 grade? Another essential matter is DLSU’s identity as a “business” school. The corporate image has been tailorfitting the academic curriculum through the years. Our Sports correspondents discuss the good and ugly image of DLSU’s sports programs. A rundown of the UAAP first half reveals the past achievements of basketball and volleyball teams. Four athletes and Coach Franz Pumaren were also featured on how they notched glory in their respective careers, despite severe pressures in and out of the court. Touching on the ineligibility issue, the Sports writers gave particular attention in review of the performances of Benitez and Gatchalian for the Green Archers. But the bigger picture is how the Administration treats the controversy ranging from media confession to investigation. Quoting Antoine de Saint Exupery in his book The Little Prince, “What is essential is invisible to the eyes.” Indeed, there are essential matters that influence our lives in the campus, yet they are not bared into deeper scrutiny. May this special issue assist you to critically probe issues that have been part of the Lasallian way of life. Godspeed.



Passing the Chalk

Image Driven
Politics places the utmost importance on images. Politicians depend on it for their survival in office. Apart from their contributions to society, it is the image they portray to the public – by the way they talk when interviewed, by the stands they take regarding certain issues and more – that determines whether or not they will succeed in politics. Such pivotal role that image plays is also very much relevant among schools. Normally seen as the school for the economically fortunate but intellectually inferior, De La Salle University’s institutional image is much more complex than this simple label. After almost a century of hard work, the University has gained a formidable foothold in the local academic scene, as evidenced by PAASCU Level IV accreditation status and membership in the ASEAN University Network. Such a simplistic label then does not do the University justice. However, seeing DLSU as plainly an academic mover is still not enough. Going back to the politician analogy, image is not built by performance alone. How DLSU handles issues both internal and external weigh in heavily on how other people view the institution. They affect popular perceptions of the school, Lasallians in the former and the national community in the latter. Outward image Clearest evidences of the latter are the Brothers’ stand on the Gloriagate scandal and the issue on ineligible Green Archers. What is clear in the two situations is that both were calculated risks. If either turns out negatively, the consequences will undermine the very foundations of DLSU. The Brothers’ stand on the “Hello Garci?” tapes was a courageous act, a prominent first among all universities. While many people admired the courage of the Brothers, some parties were disdained by the political activity undertaken by DLSU. The University inexorably projected an image of high moral integrity, since it is calling for a “supreme sacrifice” on the grounds that President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo had lost moral ascendancy to rule. Political retribution on the University may prove to be a fatal aftereffect. Whether or not this high moral image will backfire on DLSU will be tested in the Benitez-Gatchalian ineligibility debacle. The possible effects springing from media sensationalizing are disconcerting. Suspension in the UAAP and the branding of DLSU as granting special admission to athletes may mar its image for a long time. Consequently, there may be fewer freshman applicants and an inherent doubt in high school seniors regarding the validity of DLSU’s application process. Evidently, image is drawn from leadership. The Brothers had prerogative to release their political stand although it is not the consensus of all. Similarly, the Administration was compelled to release its statement regarding ineligible athletes after hearing that the PEPTCR papers of the two athletes were possibly faked. For now, the drama unfolds. Embedded culture Prior to the eruption of the two aforementioned controversies, DLSU has maintained a rather serene image for some years. During that time and relevant up to present, the pride Lasallians possess draws strength from this image. The assurance that DLSU is if not second the best in the country may be the reason for the prevalent culture of mediocrity and apathy in the university. This mediocrity is everywhere. In academics, many students have already contented themselves with the 1.0 mark. The so-so in the best institution would still be excellent out in society anyway. In the context of career opportunities upon graduation, it is a popular belief that a DLSU diploma will carry the name of the student well into employment. In student governance, mediocrity turns into apathy, where some do not even exercise their right to vote. Issues arise but students merely shrug them off, believing that dilemmas will be solved even without their participation. From every batch of Lasallians arises the few politically and academically mindful. Often earning key leadership posts in student organizations, they position themselves for a lucrative career. One would expect them to be at the forefront of political reform upon graduation. However, a significant number of these outstanding students land in huge corporations. Political initiative and standing up for students is neatly converted to maximizing profit for the company. Direct contribution to society gives way to indirect contribution – working for the company to enhance the lives of the Filipino consumer. The companies they used to ask solicitations from become the companies that they work for. In this manner, questions will arise. Crafting of an image These unrelated occurrences all interplay in the crafting of image of DLSU. In turn, people are influenced by the stereotype the image establishes. But, there is no default destiny or career path for Lasallians. There is no “default Lasallian” anyone entering 2401 Taft should become. Anyone studying in DLSU needs only to maximize his/her stay in the University and in the process, eliminate mediocrity, apathy, and misconceptions. A Lasallian must not be swayed by typical labels of greatness and constructs of excellence so heavily marketed in DLSU. “The future begins here. ™” DLSU’s omnipresent tagline implicitly denotes by virtue of the singular noun, like a compass pointing in only one direction, a singular future for all Lasallians. That is arguably the corporate future. “The future begins here. ™” could be better termed “Futures begin here.”

The 1.0 Supremacy

Professors come in all colors of the physical and educational spectra. There are dedicated and lazy ones, the buddy-types and... A new challenge always begins with a person expecting the best, not only with the situation, but...

Student Representation
Electing student-leaders is like celebrating one’s birthday: it happens annually...

page7 page8 page10 page12

Corporate Academics Creeping Mediocrity
Icons & Gatchalian: Benitez

Freedom of inquiry, freedom of discussion, and freedom of teaching - without these a university cannot exist...

In an attempt to fully understand the university’s current state, one must ask how DLSU is faring...

Where they Worth It?

page15 page16 page18 page20

Four Shades Faith Dimakiling, and of Green Joseph Yeo, Kristine Prado,

DLSU formally recognized that both Mark Lester Benitez and Timoteo Gatchalian III “may have some personal...”

The Pumaren Connection
Players win the games. The coach loses it. This cliché goes to show the burden of a coach has on his...

Desiree Hernandez - what do these athletes have in common...

Through The Years
Paul Darwynn Yanquiling Garilao Editor in chief

Evey year, De La Salle aspires to bag the general championship title. Despite continuos efforts, DLSU still lags behind perennial leader UST...

Handling Controversy


Image clearly matters especially for an institution holding a revered position in Philippine education such as De La Salle University...

November 2005 The LaSallian 3


Passing the Chalk


1910s: Band of Brothers De La Salle College was born in 1911. Back then, it had only elementary and high school levels and 125 students. The first nine teachers were Lasallian brothers, most of them born in Europe and educated in the United States. Lasallian professors brought with them values and lessons from their homeland. They were conservative both in dress and manner. They were authoritarians and used corporeal punishment. Rote learning was the preferred teaching method. Proper behavior was observed stringently during this time. Since most students boarded at school, the discipline of the teachers extended beyond class hours. Being Lasallian Brothers, the professors also emphasized their faith. The operative slogan was that religion is the basis of education. 1920s – 1930s: All-in-One La Salle in the 1920s was a flurry of activity. Moving to Taft Avenue from its previous home in Paco, the school expanded not only in size, but also in the services it offered. Throughout it all, the student population increased, and more Brothers and professors were brought in to teach. The number of lay teachers increased, but most were still Brothers. The professors during this period maintained discipline and order in their classes. But they also provided openings for students to contribute to class discussions. He required the class to conform to the rules of behavior and school policies. Because of the many demands of the school on its staff, professors had to be flexible. It was common for a professor during this period to also be a sports coach, a supervisor for boarders, or a club moderator. Even though some of the Brothers were already directors or sub-directors, they still handled the same teaching load as other professors. Because of all the extra work professors handled, they were required to interact more with their students. While the professor was still strict, the increased relations narrowed the gap between the two. This contrasted with the early years of DLSC when the foreign Brothers and their native students were culturally separated. The extra activities also made professors better-rounded. Even though the Brothers made up two-thirds of the teaching staff, emphasis wasn’t limited to one area anymore. Professors during this period stressed the virtue of versatility. As the 1920s gave way to the 1930s, professors became admired by their students. Professors not only taught well; they were also very skilled in their fields. Many professors became inspirations as students could see their abilities being put to actual application. Lasallian professors were also noted for their impartiality. Being one of the most prestigious colleges in the Philippines, DLSC drew students from well-known families. Despite this, the professors treated all their students the same way. 1940s – 1950s: Authority Strikes Back During the early days of World War Two, La Salle was turned into a shelter. The school was allowed to reopen under Japanese occupation. Professors were in frequent danger from their Japanese overlords. Misunderstandings often happened, and professors could be killed if they weren’t careful. The occupation period stunted the growth of DLSC. Classes were monitored so professors reverted back to being authoritarian figures.

The nearing end of the war brought many tragedies to the Lasallian brothers. Many brothers were killed and massacred when Japanese soldiers were looted the city. This was a great loss for the school and the Lasallian order. Transition of Power During the fifties, there was a transition from brothers to lay staff. Because of the murders of many Brothers, there were not enough of them to teach an ever-increasing number of students. Even though the number of Brothers declined, their disciplinarian stance remained. During these times, questioning authority was tantamount to blasphemy. However, professors also made few allowances. This authoritarian policy remained mainly because of the times, with the war having just ended. But because of this, the gap between teachers and students was widened. Instead of having mutual relationships, professors once again wielded a rod of iron. 1960s – 1970: Maximum Tolerance By the rock ‘n’ rolling sixties, lay professors were very common and were mostly male. They normally dressed formally, donning a polo-barong, barong or long-sleeved shirt with a tie. Some even came in the coat-and-tie get-up despite the climate. As teachers, they were more of the chalk-and-blackboard type. They did most of the talking without getting their students to air out their thoughts. To present the lesson in an open style was considered revolutionary. This was a period when the global social atmosphere transformed everything in the tradition of the chaos theory. For instance, the Vietnam War disillusioned many about the notion of an infallible authority that had nothing but pure intentions. As distant as that was to DLSC, professors became viewed with suspicion and could never be completely trusted; they were “agents of the establishment.” The professors, including senior faculty members like Professor Waldo Perfecto, had to mellow down their authoritative selves. Although they did not relinquish the prerogative their position gave them, they became more tolerant of rule-breaking. They saw that the more they pushed a student, the more rebellious he became. The theme of the times was “live and let live.” Professors viewed student delinquency as a form of self-expression. So, they hardly squealed on the students. December 6, 1968 was what Brother Benedict, FSC described as the day that “shit hits (the) fan.” It is considered by many alumni as the birth of student power, the day students rose up against the


rofessors come in all colors of the physical and educational spectra. There are dedicated and lazy ones, the buddytypes and you-may-touchme sorts. Regardless of the model they come in, they all have one goal: to educate us. How they’ve been doing that over the years is what’s been evolving. Every decade brings with it something special that marks it as unique. Now, while the stories here are characteristic of the times they hail from, it is important to remember the Bell curve: there are always exceptions.

4 The LaSallianNovember 2005

November 2005 The LaSallian 5

DLSC administration. It was shortly followed by the First Quarter Storm, proving that students did not have to submit to any authority. They got the President himself to entertain them in Malacañang, albeit forcibly. Why should they listen to any professor? As one decade closed and another began, the dichotomy between professors and student became clearer. Soon, professors were just that: professors, media that transmitted information. What is worse is that many professors became afraid of confronting their students. The Tides of Change The seventies meant change: DLSC became DLSU, Martial Law was declared and brought with it yet another pendulum swing: from tolerance back to being more authoritarian. This gave the professor back his sense of command but it made him seem even more suspicious. Some of the younger professors attempted to bridge the gap by hanging out with their boys at night as drinking buddies. Even this was taken with a grain of salt. On the upside, professors carried this tide of change into their classroom. Finally introduced at this time was the open discussion in the classroom. Professors started to employ the let’s-sit-in-a-circle technique, and started to allow the free flow of ideas. Also, since they were also affected by the social events (professors are people too, after all), some also took action against the government, sometimes even alongside their students. syllabus, and had to impress them with their knowledge. Beyond that, professors realized that they had to win the students’ hearts by listening to them. Students asked the teachers for advice and they learned to answer. 2000 - today Paano ba ‘to? Today, the teacher-student relationship has become much more comfortable. And with computers and the Internet, students now sometimes play teacher. When it comes to things about technology, more often than not, students know more. The good thing is that teachers accept this. In some classes, teachers request their students to help them out: setting up the projector or creating an e-group. Students know that their teachers know more than them but now the teachers realize that they too can learn a lot from their students.






Early 1980s: Shut Up! Ironically, teachers heard this phrase a lot of times too and not just students. The eighties meant that they could not express their opinions and beliefs mainly because of the political situation. The teachers could not speak, and just like they sometimes tell their students, they had to keep their mouths shut. Late 1980s: “Look I’m a rebel too!” With EDSA, President Marcos left the country and the country earned its freedom. Finally, people could express themselves in any manner possible. Students remember some of their teachers who did not seem follow any dress code. Teachers wore mini skirts and blouses with plunging necklines, clothes that would otherwise get students of today directly sent to the Discipline Office.
UP at DLSU Just like students, teachers did have their personal conflicts with their co-workers. The faculty was made up of people with different beliefs and ideologies. In the eighties, Brother Andrew Gonzales got some of the UP teachers to come and teach at DLSU for higher pay and more benefits. One can’t deny the fact that people from UP and DLSU are different. The faculty had some sort of a clash of classes and there existed a rivalry of sorts. Teachers wanted to show that their alma mater was better than the other however this his eventually died down during the nineties.

Ano’ng racket mo? As the economy is getting worse, and the University is doing all the cost-cutting it can do, teachers are having a hard time keeping up. Teachers sometimes admit that they are just working for DLSU because of the money, which for some teachers is no longer enough. They then have no choice but to look for other sources of income. To keep up with the times, professors have to find part-time jobs or start small businesses. They don’t involve in scams or anything, but just to lighten the financial difficulties they deal with, they find themselves asking each other, “So, anong racket mo?” If there’s anything this tells us, professors are people too. What makes them different from students is that when they step out of campus, they are no longer teachers. They become parents, children, siblings and professionals. Like the people around us, they are affected by everything that happens in our world. Professors of the future will be no different. Just like those who have gone and those who grace our halls today, professors will ultimately be reflections of the here and now.


new challenge always begins with a person expecting the best, not only with the situation, but also with one’s performance. Remembering your first days in college, you yourself might have thought along the lines with that person. Grades would have become the essential measure for everything. As months roll by, you manage to learn the ropes of university life, and more importantly, the worth of a passing grade. Well, not just its worth—you soon discover that you can actually get by with grades ranging from 1.0-2.0. The goal now shifts from getting the highest grade possible, to attaining a so-so mark that is not indicative of failure.
The easy-pass way of thinking cannot hope to be fully prevented in any educational system, much less with De La Salle University. With the fast pace of everything around, the learning objective of the students becomes more or less concentrated on one thing - survival. The idealistic hopes of true learning are pushed down the drain, and instead are replaced with temporary memorization, barely enough to sustain a borderline grade. The case worsens when passion for the subject is nigh inexistent, and the realization of being in the wrong course hits the shore hard. The adrenaline that pushes you to do well in school is replaced by an empty feeling of loss, regret, and even helplessness, thus forcing one lower into the pits of the 1.0 syndrome. This time, the students study because, hell, they just want to get it all over with. The question left to give all of this some sense is, why? Lost How many times has the choice of course been left to pure whim, ignorance, or “parental guidance”? A common occurrence during the filling of application forms is that adolescents usually pick the most popular programs like management and engineering without much thought for “practical” reasons. The fact is most people who enter college rarely have any idea of what they want to become, Lasallians included. It is actually at this point in their lives that students try to contemplate their purpose and future. The result? These people spend most of their college years floating around the subjects, struggling to find their inner peace. This is one reason that can become one of the major factors for the 1.0 culture to cultivate. While waiting for inspiration to strike, subjects taken, most especially minors, become mere stepping stones, with the students’ mentalities concentrated on remaining on

1990s: “Sorry, class. I’m studying too” It was at about this time that the University decided to work on making the school more world class. Teachers were asked to do more research. The teachers themselves were now using the trimestral system excuse that students always seem to use. They had a hard time balancing teaching their students at such a fast pace and doing their research.
Mommy Teacher Teachers took on the role of second parents since a lot of students had both their parents working to keep up with rising costs. The teachers realized that they couldn’t just teach what was in the

6 The LaSallianNovember 2005


November 2005 The LaSallian 7




middle ground and being “just enough.” The primal need to excel is lacking, as the ardor for the topics is. According to Professor Jose Luis Liongson of the Marketing Department, “Students who under-perform lack the passion, or they just don’t know what they want.” Professors’ Secret Formula Oftentimes, the blame for mediocre grades manages to find its way to the instructors. The usual reasons students utter regarding low scores obtained include such platitudes as “The teacher wasn’t fair” or, worse, “He/She doesn’t know how to teach!” Admittedly, the teacher always possesses a certain amount of accountability to perform well. It is upon the mentor’s shoulders that the perpetuation of the students’ interests to the course ultimately rests upon. Students, on the other hand, cannot be helped to feel some amount of disinterest to any course, and when that happens, the responsibility of the professor is greater. Not only are they supposed to teach the required lecture from the syllabus, but they are also expected to create an atmosphere where growth is the primary concern. Being able to read every person’s potential becomes the challenge, and sometimes the weakness, of some faculty members in this University. Knowing which buttons to push may become the starting point of a meaningful and purposeful life for a student, and the possibility of an end to a life of “substandard.” Multiple Intelligences A student in De La Salle University takes everything from algebra to physical education to accounting to general psychology. The intention of the school is to develop the best of well-rounded individuals. However, that doesn’t always happen. Not all students do well in every single subject. In Physics, they might get a 4.0 with ease but find getting a 1.0 in Literature a challenge. In these moments of struggle, students can’t help but find themselves faced with a pile of course card marked with mediocre grades. While this might seem disappointing for a student who strives to achieve in everything, it’s not something to be ashamed of, if one subscribes to Howard Gardner’s theory. To explain why students tend to settle for the average, Dr. Roberto Mendoza, Professor Flordeliza Bolante, and Dr. Alexa Abrenica of the Psychology Department cited the theory of multiple intelligences. It states that man has many forms of intelligence, ranging from linguistic to athletic, musical to arithmetic. People are said to possess all these potentials. The slide down to mediocrity in

certain areas might be a manifestation that the field simply isn’t one’s specialty. This can be seen in the case of an athlete who can perform amazing feats in his event and yet cannot grasp concepts in economics, or that of a talented singer whose voice is flawless but is lousy at computer programming. These are just two examples of the multiple intelligences we possess and the dynamics of how they work. What Drives You? At the beginning of each course, every teacher distributes a syllabus, and it should be crystal clear to every Lasallian what he or she has to do to make the grade. This means that with some effort, you can do better by getting a 3.0, a 3.5, yes, even a 4.0. Following the syllabus and keeping up with it shouldn’t be that hard. Sounds so simple doesn’t it? The reality is, as Prof. Liongson observed, was that some students settled for mediocre grades simply because the course they were taking wasn’t important to them. They could exert a little more effort to get the above average grade but there isn’t any drive to them. Simply, there is no passion to do it. As disturbing as this might seem, a possible explanation is that it can’t be helped. You cannot force someone to be passionate about what they are doing if it is not important to them. This can be seen best in the way students can pour countless hours and immeasurable amounts of efforts to their major subjects and thesis to get high grades but put just enough effort to pass in minor subjects. It is quite possible that when the passion to learn and excel in a particular field is absent, mediocrity cannot be helped and a student just can’t love every single course in his course flowchart. Beyond 1.0 Take your pick: multiple intelligences, being lost in your course, absence of passion, or lack of motivation from professors. All these factors affect the way we think and the way we work. Thus, any and every one of these reasons validates the Lasallian psychology of the 1.0. But what is important to remember that a single decision can have a profound impact on a mindset. Deciding whether to settle with a mediocre grade despite extensive efforts shows what a true Lasallian is really made out of. We do not simply sit still while the referee makes a bad call on our team; in fact, we protest against it. Same thing goes for our academics. Mediocrity is not merely a fact accepted by students of world-class universities. It’s a dare.


lecting student-leaders is like celebrating one’s birthday: it happens annually. There is fanfare, there is celebration, and there are the occasional entertainers. But after the balloons have popped, the feigned smiles have faded, and the enthralling rhetoric disappears in thin air, what comes next? Supposedly, student officers get elected for the purposes of leading, serving, and most importantly, representing their fellow students. But how well do Student Council (SC) officers represent their constituents? Are they really the student body’s voice? These lingering questions need to be answered by the student-lawmakers of DLSU – the Legislative Assembly (LA) representatives.
is still an enigma. Representative Democracy According to Wikipedia, representative democracy is “a form of democracy… wherein voters choose (in free, secret, multi-party elections) representatives to act in their interests, but not as their proxies-for example, not necessarily according to their voters’ wishes, but with enough authority to exercise initiative in the face of changing circumstances.” This may justify the actions of student leaders because as the authoritative body on campus, they should be decisive in coming out with stands on issues that require immediate response from them. But that does not mean that they could arbitrarily make a stand on issues, especially the sensitive ones, without being mindful of the pulse of the student body. Evidently, campus politics can be less dirty than national politics. Admittedly, student leaders may have tendencies to promote their own personal interests or agendas rather than the students’. However, this should not be applied to all the Student Council officers, especially when their terms have not expired yet. But when their tenure is over, their performance could be subjected to intense scrutiny and their output will reveal their true colors. Former LA representative Mico Geronimo prescribes a medicine: more effective student representation in the lower SC levels. He explained that batch officers should effectively represent their constituents among all of the officers, as they are the most effective persons to reach out and interact with the students. In the idea of the LA and batch reps effectively representing their own respective batches, it is best said that it is a case-to-case basis. These batch officers are given so much power and authority to do this task, but it’s really up to these people how well they do it. If this will be realized, there would be a more robust representative democracy. The medicine does not seem like a mere placebo. However, the more pressing question remains: when will the student leaders


Standing up for whose beliefs? Rashly releasing a stand regarding current issues may prove to be counter-productive for student leaders because the position they have taken may not reflect the true sentiments of their constituencies. The SC’s stand regarding the GMA controversy is a case in point. It may be recalled that when the famed Gloriagate tape scandal erupted, the Christian Brothers immediately called for the Supreme Sacrifice—GMA’s resignation. Before the Brothers came up with their stand, deliberations were held in order to consider the interests of all concerned sectors in the University. Nevertheless, this decision did not receive a hero’s welcome in the Lasallian community. To add insult to injury, the Lasallian brothers, the Alumni Association, and the SC made their own separate stands on the issue. Some students even expressly opposed the move made by their own representatives, which goes to show the lack of effective communication and consultation among them. LA Representative Chris Ngo, meanwhile, tries to present the rhyme and reason behind their questionable action. As he put it, “it is hard to be the voice of 13,000 individuals. It certainly isn’t possible to please everyone, and some things just can’t be compromised. Therefore, the SC acted in ways that they deemed was appropriate.” There are 42 LA representatives in all. Another LA Representative, Madel Balane, acknowledges that due to “the time-constraints, only quick, informal consultations were conducted with some students.” Thus, the SC’s stand does not necessarily mirror the sentiments of all the students of DLSU. But whatever happens, LA representatives ensure that whenever they make a stand on an issue, the votes that they make are well studied and weighed despite the limitation of incomplete consultation. LA Representative Mandee Comia expressed, “We make sure that at all times, we represent the voice of the students.” Whether or not that voice belongs to the majority of the students

swallow it? Rather, how will it be done? This solution might be plausible only in words. Student representation The line splitting those who believe they are well represented and those who think otherwise is clearly defined. On one side are students who recognize the things that the SC has been able to accomplish for them and think that they are indeed well represented. On the other hand, there are those who disagree with the SC’s actions, for reasons that may range from being hypercritical to apathetic. The former pertains to the cynical side of the student body that never seems to be satisfied. The latter, on the other hand, reflects those who don’t even bother to vote. However, putting the blame solely on students is unfair. There are some things that the SC can certainly do to improve their relationship with their constituents, especially the apathetic ones. They must find better means to consult with the student body and they must truly be the voice of the students. While it may be time for the SC to find more innovative ways in order to get the students’ attention and support, students should also do their share. Being proactive is the key to a productive relationship between leaders and constituents. In other words, active participation is needed. In the end, it’s not just a matter of how well the Student Council represents their constituents; it’s also a question of how and how much we, the students, want to be represented.

8 The LaSallianNovember 2005

November 2005 The LaSallian 9



Corporate cademics

“The dangers of a corporate-thinking University without a formidably solid teaching and research infrastructure are not readily visible, but are nevertheless clear.”
the introduction of corporate management methods, and the opening of entrepreneurial opportunities. Most importantly, by augmenting universities’ meager financial capabilities, businesses gave many universities a new lease on life – even allowing them to flourish. On the other side of the industry-academe story is corporatization – “the intrusion of industry interests into the core mission of the university,” according to Deborah Woo from the University of California - Santa Cruz. In the United States and Canada where industryacademe relationships are most advanced, many universities have come under fire for allegedly subordinating academics to corporate agenda. Perhaps the most striking example of how detrimental corporate ties can become is the case of University of Toronto clinical researcher Nancy Oliveri. She was sued by pharmaceutical company and University benefactor Apotex for publishing results that revealed how one of Apotex’s drugs was actually detrimental to children’s health. More recently, the September 10 edition of The Economist detailed that scientists “are turning against free and open inquiry” for commercial reasons, as corporate sponsors are “attaching strings to donations in order to prevent competitors from free-riding on their research.” DLSU is, recognizably, no stranger to these things. The institution, for one, is still popularly perceived as a business school due mainly to its alumni. Within the walls of DLSU, campus maintenance services are currently outsourced to private enterprises. Partnerships with industry are commonly on a per-college basis with collaborative projects and donation clauses. The University itself is being benchmarked against originally corporate standards- criterion ranging from resource growth to efficiency targets. In the same way, curricular offerings across all colleges, as mentioned, have been significantly reworked with industry demands in mind. Forgotten responsibilities Whenever corporatization is discussed, there is the largely neglected but important trade-off between social responsibilities and corporate priorities among students. Volunteer Formation head Ed Rico of the Center for Social Concern and Action (COSCA), noting most students’ preference for corporate work after graduation, that integration of service components in the curriculum is underway for Lasallians to be “sensitive to the needs of our less fortunate brothers and sisters whether they go to the corporate world or to [nongovernmental organizations].” The office revealed that since 1996, no one from DLSU-Manila has joined the Lasallian Volunteer Program, a “career option for new graduates to work in a La Salle mission school in the province, a La Salle partner NGO or La Salle partner community or parish/church.” DLSU Inc.? The dangers of a corporate-thinking University without a formidably solid teaching and research infrastructure are not readily visible, but are nevertheless clear. DLSU may soon find itself fending off valuable corporate funding sources it intends to appeal to. And what better way to entice external funds than to foster an analytical culture that gave rise to capitalism in the first place? It is unlikely for DLSU to be overtaken by private interests soon because of a primitive industry-academe relationship. However, as shown by the career paths chosen by top Lasallians reinforced by the observation of COSCA, there is a dire need to foster alternative, civic-oriented sensibilities among Lasallians – if the University is to truly become a community committed to “easing the plight of the vulnerable and marginalized of Philippine society” (Principles of Lasallian Education in the Philippines). In the final analysis, it is worth reflecting on the words of economist Thomas Sowell: “Capitalism knows only one color: that color is green; all else is necessarily subservient to it, hence, race, gender and ethnicity cannot be considered within it”. Whether DLSU adopts a darker shade of green or not, only time will tell.

“Freedom of inquiry, freedom of discussion, and freedom of teaching - without these a university cannot exist,” once said educational philosopher Robert Maynard Hutchins when asked of the principles central to the existence of the university. Indeed, it often goes without saying that to underscore the importance of academic freedom in universities is to state the obvious: universities, more than other social institutions, require definite autonomy so as to render themselves fully capable of freely advancing knowledge. Unfortunately, the vision of an immaculate, ivy-tower university sheltered from external pressures is far from reality. Amid unprecedented advances in higher education, De La Salle University (DLSU) and other universities over the world are being forced to deal more closely with a largely unrecognized partner: the business corporation. What are the origins, strengths and weaknesses, and prospects of industry-academe relationships in the University? To put it bluntly, how corporate have we become as an educational institution? Then and Now While there were very few doubts as to the merits of a Lasallian university education in the Philippine setting, its true pedagogical mission had constantly been a matter of contention. A commentary by DLSU Professor Salvador Roxas-Gonzales in the 1970s published in The LaSallian attests to this. Roxas-Gonzales lamented the seemingly dictatorial manpower surveys that were proliferating during his era – surveys that sought to show the relevance of offered degree programs to industry needs, hiring trends, and company demand. He pointed out, likewise, that “when the now advanced universities were just building up, there were no such surveys and projections.” Fast forward to DLSU circa 2000. Chances are, those thinking along the lines of Prof. Roxas-Gonzales could very well be surprised at the prevalence of business culture on campus. Partly due to the 24-year old trimestral system, the University has been able to tailor-fit and introduce entirely new courses aimed at the market. What was once the College of Commerce is now the College of Business and Economics, offering eight specializations. There is also the perennially attractive Liberal Arts-Commerce double degree with the College of Liberal Arts The College of Computer Studies allows students to pursue Information and Communications Technology Management (ICTM) as well as Computer Science with specialization in Software Technology (CS-ST) in just three years and one term. CS-ST majors can then acquire a Masters’ degree by merely extending their studies for a year. This former scenario also holds for the College of Science (COS), whose Mathematics and Physics programs are now increasingly being oriented to business applications. For instance,

beginning next school year, COS will open Physics programs with minors in either Economics or Finance. More recently, the College of Engineering introduced Information Technology (IME-IT) and Service Management (IME-SM) specializations for Industrial Engineering due to “the growing demands of the IT industry.” Orient Insights Putting these developments aside, it is the corporate job-focused ORIENT2 (previously dubbed ORIENT3) that has drawn criticism from some members of the Lasallian community – prompting it to incorporate more introspective elements. The program largely retains its corporate focus though; with very little emphasis placed on ideals such as justice, social responsibility, national development, and even the Lasallian Five C’s (Competence, Confidence, Commitment, Compassion and Christ-like). A relevant and insightful observation regarding corporate culture in DLSU was penned by former The LaSallian Editor-in-Chief Meryll Yan. In her July 2004 column entitled “De La Salle, Inc.”, Yan worriedly pointed to the then-ORIENT3 as a “symptom of a corporatized culture,” apart from existing University policies on identification cards and payscale rankings for professors. Still, the most perturbing and noticeable sign of a seemingly institutionalized corporate slant in the University is that “our best and brightest are flocking en-masse to multinationals,” said Yan. “Yesteryear’s student politicians eventually ended up as national leaders, while today’s student politicians end up as management trainees,” then quoted Yan from Economics professor Gerardo Largoza. It may be interesting to note that former Student Council (SC) Presidents Jillian Sze and Saint Anthony Tiu are now working in consumer goods giant Procter & Gamble. Another former SC President in Jolina Mallari is in competitor Unilever. Many more Lasallian luminaries, from the SC noticeably and other organizations are currently employed in huge multinational corporations. However, to the industry’s merit, it may be observed that these companies are exercising their corporate social responsibilities in efforts like Gawad Kalinga and other socio-civic activities. Ivy and Industry In the book Ivy and Industry: Business and the Making of the American University, Christopher Newfield came to the conclusion that businesses and universities were closer collaborators than actually perceived. Universities, Newfield claims, established many facets of the market economy - corporate capitalism, commercial technology, and organizational management. Businesses, in turn, revitalized research and teaching via commercialization,

DLSU Research: Counterflow
Notwithstanding the predominantly corporate mindset on campus, the opposite is true for DLSU research, output which largely remains not commercially viable. “Our inventions haven’t really been that fantastic yet,” explained Dr. Luis Razon of the University Research Coordination Office (URCO). Structures like an Ethics Committee and Intellectual Property guidelines, however, are beginning to be put in place to safeguard the interest of the University in joint industryacademe research. “Hopefully when the time comes that our policies are tested, we will respond properly with the right motivation and right thoughts in mind,” said Dr. Razon. Interestingly enough, Dr. Razon even reported that some donors have not made contact with the University after giving their contributions. Even as degree programs are continually being overhauled to meet the needs of the commercial workplace, it is apparent that the University has a long way to go in realizing the more substantial fruits of industry-academe partnerships, especially in the area of research.

10 The LaSallianNovember 2005

November 2005 The LaSallian11



In an attempt to fully understand the university’s current state, one must ask how DLSU is faring – in terms of educating its students, developing their awareness, addressing social problems, and coping with the times. A closer encounter with the people housing the institution – professors and students alike, revealed different views on their beloved school.
Joseph de Guzman could be described as hot off the press. He had just graduated from DLSU, and was feeling very special and privileged. After all, he came from a very distinguished school. Although his diploma wasn’t accompanied with medals or honorable mentions, he felt that his alma mater’s reputable name was enough to give him an edge over the thousands of graduates applying for a higher-than-minimum-pay job. But two weeks after his march, he was surprised to be faced with the iron fist of the real world at so soon a time. Job-hunting was not in his lexicon back in college, nor did he ever think of the possibility that he would become unemployed. Pages and pages of submitted resumes, unreturned calls, and failed interviews floated in Joseph’s mind. Now, he hoped that he did have a medal or an honorable mention. “It would have made a difference,” his interviewer had put it bluntly. Nothing and everything has changed with the world; in our dog-eat-dog economy, the rich and the lucky remain on top, while the poor and the less fortunate, well, remain at the bottom. But graduates today are facing a lot more disconcerting problems than a six-digit salary ambition or family planning. They are faced with the hoarding of their better counterparts. Companies today only want the best of the best. And at this stage, too late perhaps, they realize the real meaning in their once complacent and mediocre behavior in college – a behavior that would cost Joseph a lot more than the tuition fees his parents paid for his education at DLSU.
Middle Ground Are we of only ordinary or moderate quality--in short, mediocre? Although ordinariness is indeed very normal among many students in DLSU, this once inconspicuous characteristic has begun to evolve and spread in varying degrees within the campus. An astonishing 62 percent of students surveyed within the six colleges admit that the mentality of being “average” has infected them and their friends. This revelation brings a flurry of questions to the community. One is whether time has eroded discipline, and has ceded to today’s culture that emphasizes freedom, enjoyment, and immediate gratification. Another is whether DLSU itself has permitted this behavior to bypass its guidance. Many students are positive that DLSU is one of the best universities, nonetheless. 76 percent still believe that it is one of the most prestigious schools in the country. According to Milette Zamora of the Marketing Department, “Each generation has a totally different standard for excellence and a totally different standard for mediocrity.” Times have indeed changed; whether it was driven to an overhaul by the youth of today or the other way around, professors are constantly evolving to

meet the mercurial minds of students. One of the ways by which teachers try to meet the demands of their students is by attending a teaching workshop like ROLES. Teachers who are having problems communicating their ideas to their students attend this seminar in order to know how to adapt to Lasallian environment and to improve their teaching skills. On their own opinions however, 77 percent of those surveyed believe that student organizations are instrumental in quelling their complacency possibly because of the holistic nature of these activities. Student organizations’ direct positive effect on academics is hard to ascertain though. Another interesting case to note is that students surveyed cited the main reason for their mediocre-tendencies is “a lack in Administration’s motivation for students.” However, Zamora said, “It’s up to you to motivate and to pressure your peers to do better because we can only do so much and we have to meet halfway. It’s up to you, the students, to make sure to choose your teachers properly.” Ironically, majority of students also admitted that their own lack of involvement contribute to their ineffectuality. Others comment that the trimestral system is not able to fully cover the essence of the courses they are taking. In the frenzy to finish the contents of the syllabus to cope with the system, these students submit to their own level of mediocrity. What is most disturbing from these findings is the fact that mediocrity breeds a more negative social predicament – apathetic behavior. Uninterested, That’s All “We may have found a cure for most evils; but it has found no remedy for the worst of them all – the apathy of human beings.” Helen Keller truly hit the nail on its head. Apathy, according to 72 percent of respondents, exists in the community. It is not farfetched to doubt that for the majority of the student population, this apathetic behavior towards lectures, homework, society, and culture contribute greatly to their mediocrity. Zamora, however shares a different outlook on students’ “indifference,” “All students have a great sense of apathy . . . As long as you know what you’re doing and the consequences of whatever it is that you’re about to do, don’t cry, deal with it. Move on. That’s what we teach our students here – life. And in the classroom, I try to teach as much of it as I can,” she shared. Conversely, Simoun Ferrer, Student Council (SC) Vice President for Activities, believes that Lasallians are not truly apathetic, “I don’t think that they [students] are really apathetic. They just have different interests and it is up to the student leaders to address the needs that they have.” Students’ apathy appeared to have a connection with their sentiments towards DLSU – 71 percent of students surveyed said that DLSU is overrated. Dean Barbara “Barbie” Wong of the College of Education (CED), however, believes that DLSU deserves the esteemed academic standing that it currently enjoys. “Actually, the labels that have been given to [De] La Salle are not given by society. They have been given by PAASCU or CHED. They already have set standards and we applied. We have met all of them [standards]. So, I can say, since we have met those standards, our standard for teaching is good. We showed them proofs – grades, physical facilities, our program,” the CED Dean revealed. Apathy of students inside DLSU is just a microcosm of what is happening in the national scene. In a Philippine Daily Inquirer article entitled Catholic schools vow to seek truth about Arroyo, Monsignor Gerardo Santos, director of the Manila Archdiocesan Parochial Schools Association, quipped, “The number of students apathetic to the situation is growing; I think we need to once again go back to our sense of history which our youth needs to cultivate a sense of nationalism.”

Creeping Mediocrity

“The Lasallian community must remember not to sugarcoat our very own education.”

12 The LaSallianNovember 2005

November 2005 The LaSallian13

The survey is taken out of a population of 377 students from the six colleges in De La Salle University. 62% admit that they have settled for mediocrity in their academic performance. This can be related to apathy prevalent in the campus, as attested by 72% of the respondents. However, support for student organizations remains at a high rate – 77%. Although 63% admit that they have failed to protect the university’s image, 71% claim that DLSU is overrated. But a towering rate of 80% among those surveyed are still proud to be called Lasallians.

Benitez and Gatchalian:


DLSU formally recognized that both Mark Lester Benitez and Timoteo Gatchalian III “may have some personal responsibility over these (ineligibility) incidents” and that De La Salle “understands their vulnerability given their age and sincere desire to be part of the University’s men’s basketball team.” This and other issues surrounding the two Green Archers were revealed in a press conference held last Oct. 26 at the Hyatt Regency in Roxas Boulevard. Both Benitez and Gatchalian were key players of Jose Rizal University (JRU) NCAA Junior’s Basketball team. Looking back at the two players’ performances in the UAAP seasons, it is no question that they have not performed to the level of stars like Joseph Yeo and Mark Cardona. The inescapable questions that comes up in the mind of every Lasallian is then: Was sneaking their entries into DLSU “worth” it? Were their contributions to the Green Archers significant that their having falsified documents merited the media hype and the possible heavy punishment on the school? Let the numbers talk Though highly recruited by other schools in his high school years, Mark Benitez spent his collegiate career as a role player for the Green Archers. In his first University Athletics Association of the Philippines (UAAP) season, Benitez contributed fairly to the team averaging 4.1 points and 3.4 rebounds in 17.2 minutes of play. Donning jersey number 15, he produced quality minutes coming off as a substitute for De La Salle’s frontcourt and had a season-high 11 point, seven-rebound performance against the NU Bulldogs on Aug. 2, 2003. In the following season, Benitez was one of the key role players in the Green Archers 2004 championship run. He averaged 4.6 points and grabbed 3.7 rebounds per game in that season, in which he had a career-high 12 points and added six rebounds in a big win against UST on July 29 of that year. The recent UAAP season showed a slowing down in Benitez’ career as he could only muster a 2.5 point per game scoring clip in limited minutes on the hardcourt. Also a recruit from JRU High School, Tim Gatchalian joined the Green Archers as a third string point guard for the team, competing for minutes with TY Tang and JV Casio. In the Archer’s 2003 rookie-laden line-up, Gatchalian played in only 11 games and scored a total of 17 points that season. He saw less time on the floor during the 2004 campaign as he played in 10 games and did not appear in any Final Four game. Gatchalian was later cut from the team due to academic concerns. DLSU averaged 81.7 points and 46.2 rebounds in the 2005 seaason, from Both players also played for the ICTSI-La Salle team in the PBL in 2004. Yet the performance of a player can not be gauged fully on numbers alone. Hustle in every play contributes to more effective defense. Effective implementation of the coach’s system makes scoring easier for the team and lessens the pressure put on the team’s go-to guys. Running up and down the court, screens set, loose balls gathered, even moral support – these valuable facets of basketball are invisible in the statistics, yet no team could reach the championship without these.

With their admission of fielding in ineligible players in their men’s basketball team, De La Salle faces the possibility of being suspended from UAAP. The University reiterated its earlier statement that they will abide by the decision of the UAAP Board in relation to the matter. “Like we said, we will accept the decision of the UAAP Board. We trust the UAAP to make a good decision regarding the matter,” Dr. Quebengco added. However Br. Armin Luistro, FSC, President of the De La Salle System pointed out that the University was transparent in this case. “Personally, if the UAAP suspends us for other reasons, I’ll take that,” said Luistro. “But if we get suspended because the school was negligent, or deliberately covered its tracks or hid something, I will fight this [the suspension] up to the Supreme Court,” added Luistro, showing the same valor seen in him during political rallies these past few months. Such statement has gained applause among alumni who were present during the “Hyatt 2” press conference. Br. Armin also made clear about speculations on the possible changes to take place. “We are also careful of what we are to change. We don’t want to be in the extreme of being reactionary to this whole incident. With the issue being gone the proportions beyond the school, I think we have to allow the heat to die down.” When asked about the effect of these findings to DLSU, Br. Armin responded, “A major overhaul is certain. This is a wake up call for us for the whole sports development program.” Bro. Armin also clarified that “Part of what we are most concerned here is the values formation of our athletes. I think that will have to be a part of our whole program.”

One click Technology surely plays an integral role in the learning process of Lasallians today. Nevertheless, it resembles a double-edged sword that could either help in the development of students or feed their penchant for mediocrity. Dr. Barbie Wong believes that collating information today is definitely easier than before because of technology. Students could easily acquire pertinent data that would help in their studies by just surfing the internet. “During our time, it was really more difficult to find the materials. A lot of time was spent on doing those things. Now, you cannot compare in terms of amount of time. Nowadays, the things we were doing in 10 hours could be done in 10 minutes because of technology,” Dr. Wong reveals. As Zamora shared, “Technology has changed the way you study . . . In our time, we have to find the page. Now, the computer finds it for you. Unfortunately, the computer chooses the wrong page. The problem there is, you don’t find other pages because the search engine just struts out one to you. So, that’s what you get, that’s what you print, that’s what you submit.” As a result of blind reliance on what the computer provides, and without critically analyzing the data that the computer presents, students tend to submit mediocre outputs to their teachers and in turn, teachers give them average grades. Undeniably, finding school materials is easier for students today. With just a click of the mouse, they will have everything they need. Today, what is to be done with technology and the materials that one acquires from it spell the difference between excellence and mediocrity. We, the Student Leaders Indeed, a good mixture of academics and involvement is needed to make a student holistic. In the past, DLSU has positioned itself actively on both University and national issues when it comes to student involvement. Even the students were active and played a great role in tackling political issues. Apparently, there has been a shift from that kind of perspective today. “What happens is that, in joining political parties, students really don’t become politically mature; rather they become election driven,” Student Council Secretary, Kate Lim shares. On issues, students should also be able to draw out their concerns through political parties. An organization is bonded by its virtues and ideologies, and not by the good market it produces. Simoun Ferrer supports, “Political parties have the

highest membership [among organizations]. Unfortunately, they are not able to mobilize their members or if they do so, [they are] only waiting for the coming student elections.” It’s not all about publicizing students’ rights because the real challenge is educating the students as regards the roles they should portray and making them realize why they should serve their purposes. Through good dialogue and experience for the students, the face of apathy can be erased. Backfire What’s keeping Lasallians busy? Are we striving for excellence and setting priorities? Or has the image of DLSU become a mere glorification of what it has established? The Lasallian community must remember not to sugarcoat our very own education. There is a need to cure the existing cancers of our institution before it metastize. For in DLSU’s strive for excellence, we must overrule obscurity— leniency, apathy, and mediocrity. 80 percent of the respondents are still proud to be called Lasallians. The question is: do you deserve to be called one? As Denis Gutierrez of the Marketing Department challenged, “That’s for your generation to answer.”

14 The LaSallianNovember 2005



Pay the price Though their contributions were not astonishing, the price that both Benitez and Gatchalian have to pay is of great consequence. Unfortunately for the two, Dr. Carmelita Quebengco, DLSU-Manila Executive Vice President said that their ineligibility has negated not only their athletic careers but their academic stays in De La Salle. Being ineligible to enter the University, all of their academic units were nullified. “The moment we got the confirmation from the Department of Education (Dep-Ed), they became ineligible immediately. We told them, you will not get any credits taken. That in itself was the sanction to the players,” stated Dr. Quebengco. However, she assured that the University will be supportive of the future of the players especially in their academics. “I have told the players that if they want to finish college, we will help them get into a high school first to finish their high school. And if they want to enter college, we will also help them,” closed Dr. Quebengco.

November 2005 The LaSallian15

Four shades of Green


Des Hernandez definitely knows what the saying “No pain, no gain” means. After all, this has been the adage that has led her to success. After nailing a spot in the UAAP line-up in her rookie year, it seemed like her season was full of promises. Just as when her volleyball career was starting to flourish, ACL caught hold of her in one of her trainings. For five months, Hernandez wasn’t allowed to play, forcing her to sit out the rest of her freshman year. The injury never broke her spirit; instead, it made her a stronger athlete as she made a powerful comeback in 2002. Though the Lady Spikers finished the season as runners-up, it was just the start of Hernandez’ breakout performances. During her third playing year, Hernandez was one of the key players for the Lady Spikers’ championship run against the FEU Tamaraws. It was also her most memorable year as they had to beat the UST Tigresses twice in the semifinals before reaching the finals round. In addition, Hernandez was also hailed as that season’s MVP. Last year, Hernandez together with Maureen Penetrante, led the Lady Spikers once again to its second title. This season, the 20 year old volleybelle, who is well-known for her fast plays and running spikes, delivered once again for the Lady Spikers as the Taft-based squad brought home a rare three-peat championship. However, a third championship wasn’t the only thing in store for Hernandez because she also won her second MVP honors. At present, Hernandez has finally fulfilled her childhood dream. She now trains with the Philippine National Volleyball team. With her sheer talent and winning personality, this volleybelle will certainly go a long way.




oseph Yeo, Khristine Prado, Faith Dimakiling, and Desiree Hernandez- what do these athletes have in common? Besides being members of championship teams, they all have made names in their respective sports. But one thing stands out among the rest- their love for De La Salle and the game. The LaSallian takes a deeper look at how these stars have evolved through the years.

With superstars dominating the Green Archers’ roster during his freshman year, Joseph Yeo wasn’t able to create some noise. However, he managed to redeem himself in the years to come and even ended his collegiate career with a bang. Hailing from Xavier School, Yeo didn’t have things easily going for him. First, he had to adjust to Franz Pumaren’s system, take a backseat from his usual scoring role in high school basketball, and play second fiddle to sensationalized rookie, Mark Cardona. In 2001, he scored an average of 3.4 points for every nine and a half minutes per game. Not bad for a rookie but the performance was still lacking. Nevertheless, the Green Archers, led by Mike Cortez and Ren Ren Ritualo, went on to win the championship against the Ateneo Blue Eagles. As his playing time doubled on his sophomore year, Yeo started to showcase his skills. His points started to increase, while also chipping out in the defensive aspect as well. Despite the fact that the Archers failed to defend their crown, it was not a complete loss for Yeo as he was touted to be one of the top gunners alongside Cardona to lead DLSU in the following year. 2003 was a rebuilding year for the Green Archers as half of the team was made up of eight rookies. However, it was a different scenario for Yeo who was then slowly breaking out from his usual performances. Together with Cardona, the duo tried to lead the young De La Salle team but still fell short of getting into the finals. In the following year, the Green Archers were destined for success. Despite a slow start, Coach Pumaren’s troops managed to peak at the right time as they won nine straight games, and eventually went on to bring home the crown. Yeo also had his own share of success, amazing the crowd with his flashy moves and nerve-wracking shots. With Cardona leaving for professional basketball, Yeo was assigned to be the main man for the Green Archers this season. He had to lead his team on the court while scoring precious points in the other end. Though the Green Archers were considered to be the underdogs prior the season, Yeo proved them wrong as he and the rest of the Green Archers finished the year at second place. Individually, Yeo shot and defended more than what was expected of him, thereby earning him a slot in the coveted Mythical Five lineup. Yeo has already dominated high school and college basketball. Will he also do the same in the PBA?


Knights. Bishops. Rooks. Sounds unusual? Not for Faith Dimakiling as her chess career was launched at an early age through the influence of brother Oliver Dimakiling, a three-time UAAP MVP. For the past five years, Dimakiling has shaped up to be one of the strongest forces in the UAAP chess circuit. She started off on the right track after bagging the Rookie of the Year honors. In addition, she also won a gold medal in Board three during her freshman year. That was just the beginning for Dimakiling. On her second year of play, she skipped Board 2 and immediately moved up to Board 1. The decision turned out to be one good move as the Lady Woodpushers clinched its first ever UAAP title. For the next two seasons, her team ended up in third place positions; nevertheless, that didn’t stop this well-rounded player from yearning for more. Though the Lady Woodpushers fell a spot short from winning the title, Dimakiling is still proud of her team’s run this year. Individually, she brought home a bronze medal after playing Board 1 for the last time. As Dimakiling prepares herself for the real world, she will never forget how chess has become a huge chunk of her everyday life. She will definitely miss the tight bonding with her teammates, rigorous training, and support of the DLSU community. Given the chance to play again for De La Salle, she would be willing to go through it all over again, this time around, she will try to balance her time better and focus more on training by joining less affiliations. Dimakiling has not only proved herself to be an intelligent player but she has also been a queen in her own way, displaying excellent leadership to finish her chess career on a high note.

Who says girls and basketball don’t mix? Well, not in the case of Khristine Prado as basketball had blended really well in her life. In fact, she even turned out to be one of the best players in the women’s division after bagging the MVP award this year. Prado played high school basketball with the School of St. Anthony cagebelles. However, pressure was not yet felt during those times. As she pursued a higher level of playing which was collegiate basketball, Prado started to feel that she was faced with something more than what she had really bargained for. In 2001, Prado stood out from a bunch of basketball hopefuls but that didn’t guarantee her a slot in Coach Juno Sauler’s starting five. Besides the fact that the Lady Archers were full of basketball hotshots, Prado was still young and had a whole lot to learn. On her rookie and sophomore year, Prado slowly adjusted to the competitiveness of collegiate ball. In addition, she had to focus in developing a stronger presence inside the paint by practicing her post-up moves. As she gradually improved her defense, the Lady Archers continued their dominance in the UAAP as they bagged the championships in 2001 and 2002. As the Lady Archers lost center Princess Mariano due to graduation, Prado was assigned to be the starting center for the team. Undaunted by the task, Prado lived up to the job and even helped out with the Lady Archers’ offense. However, all good things had to come to an end as the Lady Archers fell short of their fifth championship run. In season 67, Prado turned out to be the person in charge as she averaged 13.2 points and 9.9 rebounds, securing her a spot in the Mythical Five roster. She continued her dominance in her final year, scoring 20.1 markers per game while grabbing an average of 11.1 rebounds as well. Though the Lady Archers weren’t able to make it to the Final Four, Prado’s efforts weren’t left unnoticed. In fact, she was a shoo-in for the Mythical Five and even went all the way to bring home the MVP honors. Now that her basketball career has come to an end, Prado will never forget how basketball has influenced her life. It is through this sport that she has gained friendship, development of her skills, and maturity as a person. Next year, Prado won’t be around the hardcourt anymore; nevertheless, she still believes that with hardwork, self-confidence, and dedication, the Lady Archers would be back on championship ground once again.


16 The LaSallianNovember 2005

November 2005 The LaSallian17




momentum. Pumaren’s system does not carry any peculiarity on how it sets the starters. What gives his system the edge is how the whole aspect of player rotation is being devised and utilized. Games on the early part of the season would see an experimenting De La Salle basketball system; the rotation is not yet consistent, the starting five is always open to modifications, and the delegation of duties is usually fluctuating. But as the season approaches its middle part, Pumaren would show a more consistent approach on player rotations. The starting five from this point is usually what would be utilized throughout the remaining part of the season. The hierarchy of relievers (bench players) would also become steadier. Players are expected to have already instilled in their minds what their respective roles are the moment they step on the court. Except for some minor tweaks, De La Salle is good to go from that point on. Stars are shining brightly Freedom is achieved when one is free from restraints. It enables an individual to act how they want to act, do what they like to do, and in basketball terminologies – play and showcase, in an unadulterated manner, their skills. Mike Cortez blossomed when he was given the freedom to run the team and take matters to his own hands. Mark Cardona and Joseph Yeo had breakout performances during their final years because they were also emancipated from the clutches of a rigid and authoritative coaching system. The go-to guys in Pumaren’s tenure as coach are composed mostly of guards. Except for Don Allado, Ren-Ren Ritualo, Dino Aldeguer, Cortez, Cardona, and recently Yeo are guards that have been in the forefront of the Archers’ offense. The guards of Pumaren have consistently had different arsenals. Cortez, Yeo, and Cardona are more known for their slashing moves to the baskets. On the other hand, Ritualo, JV Casio, Aldeguer, and BJ Manalo were considered to be the outside specialists of the team. It’s about recognizing the skills and potential of players. Franz Pumaren has this extraordinary keen eye on spotting, beneath his roster, a star that could top all stars. And once he sees it, he would always fling it to the galaxy of stardom and let it shine there – freely and brightly. Frontline Mark Telan, Jun Limpot, and Noli Locsin – these were the past forwards of De La Salle that were responsible for putting the points on the scoreboard for the Archers. Not in the Pumaren system. The forwards and centers under the Pumaren system were more of bruisers, enforcer types of players. Adonis Sta. Maria, Willie Wilson, Carlo Sharma, and Jerwin Gaco gave added presence in the middle as they clogged the lanes, grabbed rebounds, blocked shots, and defended the other team’s low post threat. De La Salle’s frontlines don’t need to score since the guards do the damage. The Pumaren system relies on screens, ball movement, and moving without the ball. The big guys have a role to play as they provide intimidating screens for their guards, who off the screens have an open sight at a long distance shot or a good lane to the basket for an easy score. This is the centerpiece of almost all of its plays in the halfcourt offense. Posting up is almost a last resort. Versatility is the key Ryan Araña. Willie Wilson. Mark Cardona. Three players from different De La Salle eras. What do they have in common? Aside from helping DLSU’s cause for basketball crowns, they are the guys that embody what every La Sallian aspires to become – to be versatile and become masters of their domain. In the world where multitasking is ever important, Pumaren’s system employs guys who could do it on both ends of the floor. It is not enough that one can score; he must also have the skills and the heart to run for loose balls, play defense honestly and consistently, and shift from one position to another when the situation calls for it. Yes, it’s good to be a pure point guard or small forward but wouldn’t it be sweeter when one can shift comfortably from being a point to playing the two spot or from being a small forward to playing the point? It would certainly bring up some mismatches that the team could exploit to rout their adversaries. That feared full-court press Defense wins championships? Tell that to the Green Archers. Of course, the Pumaren system will not be complete without the dreaded full-court pressure defense. Coaches of the opposition have spent most of their precious scouting and practice time on how to even contain this dilemma of a defense. The peskiness of the guards has become a household name in Pumaren’s press. He may go with a one-guard press who is pesky enough to pressure the point guard. Or he can go to a press involving all the wingmen to bother the ball handler and the intended receivers. It creates problems in the opposition’s offensive patterns. It makes bringing down the ball to the frontcourt a challenge to the point guards of the league, who, if not composed enough, will make poor offensive decisions on their part. And even if the point guard crosses the halfcourt stripe, valuable time has already been shaven off for them to set up a decent play. More often than not, the pressure defense has led to numerous fastbreak opportunities for easy baskets at the other end, another hot commodity of the Archers. A barrage of turnover points energizes the Animo crowd which rubs on to the players – something that is very much an intangible factor for the Green Archers. Conditioned Archers Employing a full-court press all game long, in addition to the halfcourt game of screening, ball movement, and moving without the ball, needs players who are up to it, well-trained, and well-conditioned to do the task. This is where the training program of De La Salle basketball comes into play. The conditioning of the players has been, bar-none, the most underrated, and even unnoticed to some, facet of the Pumaren system. For without this trait, operating the system of Pumaren will not even be possible. The Archers have a conditioning coach in its fold in the name of Dan Rose, maybe the only kind in the UAAP, responsible for the conditioning of the players. This season and in the past seasons, it was evident that it worked for the Archers. Whether it is in the cool Araneta Coliseum or the oven-hot Blue Eagle Gym, the players’ conditioning seems to have responded in any conditions, a far cry from their opponents in Season 68. Cramps, sprains, or even ACL injuries are a rarity in Pumaren’s players. Except for Manalo, the Archers never had a player who had a major injury in the tenure of Pumaren. Pumaren’s system has obviously worked wonders for the Green Archers. His coaching brilliance has given the University 100-plus victories during his term, eight Final Four appearances in as many chances, seven Finals stints, and more importantly, five championships in eight years, an achievement that has put him among the coaching greats in Philippine college basketball. The Green Archers did it with different players, different opponents, but only ONE coach on its fold. Now who says players win the games?


umaren Connection

layers win the games. The coach loses it. This cliché goes to show the burden a coach has on his back in every game; however, this line doesn’t seem to be applicable to Franz Pumaren. Since he started coaching the De La Salle Green Archers, the team has finished respectably; if not, it has went on to win it all. And in the world of collegiate basketball where players come and go and criticisms continue to rise, his accomplishments had made Pumaren even more outstanding. Coaches, collegiate or professional, have their systems as their personalities. This is what separates Pumaren from the other coaches. His system has not just earned him his name in the UAAP but it has also been responsible for the overall success of the Green Archers. Pulling out from the grass roots The importance of having blue chip players coming in every year is not to be denied. These athletes ensure the continuity of the basketball tradition DLSU is all accustomed to. When veteran star players have already exhausted their eligibility years, the need to

find young talents becomes more essential than ever. The transition from one batch to another would become more seamless if the talent is already present. The team would be more adept in coping with the loss of a key player because a young gun is already waiting on the wings, ready to shine. De La Salle’s continuous success is about finding individual talents and polishing them together to become a deadlier and more cohesive team. Pumaren, together with his entire coaching staff, should be given credit on how they spot talents from all over the country and their excellence in developing them. But De La Salle’s image as the premier basketball destination for all aspiring collegiate players also assists the team in acquiring these soughtafter young guns. The tale of the Fab 5 The starting five for any basketball game is indispensable because they usually set the approach on how the game would be played. When a team started off the wrong foot, it is usually very difficult to get back on track because the opposing team might have already built a large lead and gained the natural force of

18 The LaSallianNovember 2005

November 2005 The LaSallian19

Through the Years
Evolution of De La Salle’s basketball and volleyball teams


Reason for dominance
According to former OSD Director Danny Jose, one factor why some De La Salle sports have grown to be dominant is the establishment of the Enrique Razon Sports Complex. With the complex, the athletes had the facilities at their disposal. They now have a place where they can really train. In addition, the support for all the De La Salle sports has slowly increased through the years. The University supports all the players, coaching staff, and team managers. The players in return, dedicate their lives to their respective sports and try their best to bring glory to De La Salle. This year is an exception. A lot of the first half sports weren’t able to regain their dominance. In fact, some of them weren’t even able to make it to the Final Four. The reason? “ We weren’t able to get the recruits we really wanted, ” Jose stated.


very year, De La Salle aspires to bag the general championship title. Despite continuous efforts, DLSU still lags behind perennial leader UST; nevertheless, the school still prides itself for being one of the contenders when it comes to basketball and volleyball. From 2000 to 2004, De La Salle had been dominant in these sports. However, this year has been an exception as the Lady Spikers were the sole team to bring home the glory. Has DLSU lost its spark? Or have other schools just gotten better? Maybe yet, this is simply not DLSU’s year in the UAAP.

2000 Green Archers
With Mon Jose, Ren-Ren Ritualo, and ROY Mike Cortez handling the reins for the Green Archers, nothing went wrong for this squad. As a team, they dominated the hardcourt, bagging their thirdpeat championship.

Ritualo was once again the court general. Mark Cardona was the sensational rookie. With these two taking care of the Green Archers’ offense and the rest of the Green Archers chipping in as well, the green and white squad ended up as victors once again.

Despite the departure of Ritualo, the Green Archers still managed to have a good start as they swept the first round of eliminations. However, as the season progressed, the Green Archers lost their momentum and surrendered their crown to their archrivals, the Ateneo Blue Eagles. Overall, this season turned out to be a learning experience for the four-time champions.

With the unavailability of veterans, the Green Archers winded up in fourth place, a far cry from their former finishes. Entering the second round with a 5-2 scorecard, the young Archers squad, which was composed of eight rookies, suffered a string of uncharacteristic losses, thus resulting to their early elimination.

The team of destiny. Prior to the season, the Green Archers were tagged as the underdogs. Nonetheless, the team led by Cardona had a huge turnaround in the second round, winning nine straight games. The Green Archers became stronger individuals and with JV Casio’s threepointer in the remaining seconds of Game 3, the trophy was back on De La Salle’s side once again.

It was another come-from-behind entry to the UAAP finals for the Archers this season. After falling to a 6-4 standing and encountering several controversies along the way, the Archers proved their detractors wrong once more as they managed to squeeze their way in to meeting the FEU Tamaraws again in the finals. Déjà vu, you say? Not quite, as the squad didn’t have any saving three-point shot this time to pave the way for another championship. They sure had their chances but failing to convert at the remaining seconds of the game became a detrimental factor to their loss. Nevertheless, it was a good finish for the squad as they gave a good fight despite having the clear disadvantage in height and experience.

Lady Archers

Roussel Ocampo. Jill San Diego. Debbie Santos. Manalo twins. The Lady Archers simply had an all-star cast. The team was not centered on just one hero so without a doubt, the Lady Archers went all the way to bring home their second title.

The Lady Archers were unstoppable. With Roussel Ocampo playing her final year and Ginny Velarde breaking out from her usual performances, the Lady Archers finished the season with a clean 12-0 record and another championship in hand.

Losing head coach Juno Sauler and star player Ocampo didn’t take its toll on the Lady Archers as they clinched their fourthvv straight crown. The Lady Archers displayed poise, experience, and a lot of heart throughout the entire season but in the end, it was Velarde’s four pressure-packed free throws in the finals that sealed the win for the Taft-based squad.

The arrival of new coaches Mon Jose, Dominic Uy, and Regina Jose, as well as the addition of eight new rookies, meant an adjustment season for the defending champs. The team had a shaky start due to some injuries but it managed to come back together and end the season with five straight victories. However, the wins weren’t enough as the Lady Archers fell to the third spot after years of being queens of the hardcourt.

Despite gallant efforts and vigorous preparations, the Lady Archers weren’t able to finish the season with flying colors as they were defeated by the Ateneo Lady Eagles in the semifinals round, thus resulting to another third place finish. Nevertheless, Coach Jose’s troops managed to step up as they learned to play more together and matured into the players they ought to be.

The season ended earlier than usual for the Lady Archers as they fell one game short of reaching the semifinals. Though there were last minute attempts from the squad to improve their standing by pulling upsets on powerhouses Adamson and Ateneo in the second round, this was still not enough for them to grab a slot in the Final Four. Despite having a potent line up at hand, the coaching staff strived to come up with the right combination on the floor. In addition, the girls also encountered several bad breaks in the middle of the season and struggled to stage a winning streak.

Green Spikers

This was not the year for the Green Spikers as there weren’t enough players to lead the young team. Lacking in experience, the team had no choice but to settle for fourth place.

Another year older, another year better. True enough, the Green Spikers improved from their former fourth place finish and even brought home its first ever volleyball championship. Team captain Janley Patrona delivered the cudgels for the Green Spikers while rookie AJ Mallari manned the defensive zone. Patrona also won the MVP, Best Spiker, and Best Server honors to prove his dominance on the court.

After losing Patrona due to academic reasons and other veteran players, the Green Spikers were back on the starting line once again. Errors during endgames and fatigue turned out to be costly as the Green Spikers failed to defend its crown when it lost to the UST Tigers in the finals round.

The Green Spikers are back in the game once more. With returning superstar Janley Patrona leading the team together with AJ Mallari and Pio de Castro, the Green Spikers had no problems in setting up their plays. Their thirst for the championship and consistency with their offense were the keys as the Green Spikers were back on championship ground for the second time.

After having the time of their lives last season, the Green Spikers failed to make a repeat as they succumbed to powerhouses FEU and UP, thus resulting to a fourth place finish. Though Hansel Go and AJ Mallari exhausted their playing years, it still wasn’t enough to make them last till the finals round.

While their female counterparts seemed to be having all the blessings in the world, the Green Spikers continue to experience a decline in their finishes as they finished the season at fifth place. The departure of several veterans from last year’s roster proved to be too heavy to handle as the team took an early vacation after a loss against Adamson finally pushed them out of contention.

Lady Spikers

Second best. With powerhouse FEU dominating the volleyball scene, De La Salle continued to settle as the runner-ups. Rookie Maureen Penetrante and the improvement of services were the bright spots for the Lady Spikers but a championship title needs more than that.

It was the same old story for the Lady Spikers. FEU went home with the championship again while the Lady Spikers ponder why they continue to lost to the FEU Lady Tamaraws and remain as runner-ups.

FEU is just too good to be true. They swept the eliminations round to clinch their third straight title. On the other hand, the Lady Spikers took second place by virtue of a better quotient against the UST Tigresses as both teams ended the eliminations with identical 11-3 scorecards.

Maureen Penetrante’s blocks, Desiree Hernandez’s spikes and Chie Saet’s precision setting- the keys to winning a championship. With hunger for the crown and revenge in their mind, the Lady Spikers had to defeat UST twice in the semifinals in order to arrange a finals match against the Lady Tamaraws. From that point on, the Lady Spikers proved that they were the better team as they trounced the Lady Tams in the finals.

Lady Spikers-epitome of dominance. The Lady Spikers went all the way, sweeping the eliminations and winning their second straight crown. Penetrante was also dominant in her own way as she bagged the MVP, Best Blocker, and Best Spiker honors.

It certainly is an excellent year for the Lady Spikers. After their dominance over the Shakey’s V league, they went on to lead the pack in UAAP women’s volleyball and win their third consecutive crown. The team might have not been as invincible and dominating as before after losing key player Maureen Penetrante but this year’s line-up remained potent and relatively intact. There were several surprising performances by other squads that created a little challenge in the eliminations but that didn’t stop them from making their way to the finals. They outclassed Adamson University in a best-of-three match-up, accordingly giving DLSU its only championship title for the UAAP first half.

20 The LaSallianNovember 2005

November 2005 The LaSallian21





Image clearly matters, especially for an institution holding a revered position in Philippine education such as De La Salle University but it is not everything. Images can be nothing but illusions woven by the very best spin doctors around yet it can also be an inextricable combination of substance and style. Within an institution such as De La Salle, the threat of controversy that can impact its reputation is often imminent. Certainly, the University has had its share of controversies from the alleged siphoning of money from the AUDPRAC fund in the Accountancy Department to the recent Green Archer ineligibility controversy. How the latter is being handled by the University provides a relative extremum upon which to observe DLSU’s “controversy-handling” skill. Disclosure It is clear in every Lasallian’s mind: what began as a concern among college registrars quickly spiraled into a heated issue receiving the national media’s scrutiny and shaking the school’s credibility. Recapitulating, the University disclosed that it had unwittingly fielded two academically ineligible athletes in its men’s basketball team over the last three seasons and offered to relinquish last year’s championship and this year’s runner-up status. This move reflected honesty and repentance – signs of transparency – virtues that DLSU highly regards as an institution. In the aftermath of the press disclosure, Coach Franz Pumaren was quoted in Philippine Star article Was Benitez a victim or culprit? as saying, “In my eight years as (De) La Salle coach, I’ve recruited more than 10 marquee players who were turned down because they were academically ineligible… So if a player not academically eligible was accepted, there had to be something wrong in the admissions process.” DLSU EVP Dr. Carmelita Quebengco had said it is not the University’s job to authenticate all documents as it is not a government requirement. “The assumption is that – people are honest and they will submit only authentic documents.” Moreover, checking all documents would lengthen the process and may be detrimental to applicants. However, she has clarified that there is now an agreement that enrollment for students with hand-carried admission documents will become official only after authentication. When the news spilled out to national media, many feared that the repercussion would damage the school’s reputation, Dr. Quebengco shared. “A lot of people say ‘how are you going to resurrect the image of De La Salle?’” But she believes that the University has not lost anything. “It was an honest mistake and the mistake there was that we trusted.” Neither does she consider being truthful and transparent a fault. For her, what would be shameful to know is that the school was fielding an ineligible player and engaging in a cover-up. Regarding the possibility that the UAAP may want to conduct its own investigation spanning the last 10 years, Quebengco expressed that she would be amenable to the prospect provided that all the other schools in the UAAP will be subjected to the same and DLSU is not singled out.

“As long as you are telling the truth, you have nothing to worry about... The uppermost in my mind is to ensure that trust is not broken.” -Dr. Quebengco
Limpot, et al Conundrum

More questions than answers As promised, a press conference was held at the Hyatt Regency on Oct. 26 to share the preliminary findings of the four-man committee. Information from the Administration regarding the issue was limited during the investigation and was mostly coming from the Office of the Executive Vice President. The probe conducted by DLSU tagged statistician Raul Lacson as the hander of the falsified documents to the two Archers. It also implicated assistant manager Manny Salgado as having knowledge of the falsification. A sentiment after the press conference was that it raised more questions than the answers it gave. As put in The Philippine Star article DLSU head to contest UAAP ban, “There was no explosive revelation as to who are responsible for the mess...” Servillano dela Cruz, a La Salle High School Batch 56 alumnus, stole the limelight when he accused Br. Armin of being the biggest hypocrite La Salle has produced and asked,” How could they (Benitez and Gatchalian) fail the government exam and pass the (De) La Salle exam?” Allegations that Lacson and Salgado have been used as scapegoats have also been floated. It was also reported in the Oct. 28 issue of the Philippine Star that a relative of one of the players implicated claimed whitewash. Furthermore, according to Manila Times article Franz believes La Salle probe findings ‘factual’, the UAAP board was not satisfied with the results of the probe and “will now conduct its own inquiry and may seek the help of the National Bureau of Investigation.” On its part, DLSU has clarified that the investigation is still ongoing and that the information presented were those that were verifiable. It was also stressed that the University was not involved in an intentional attempt to withhold information and had to follow certain procedures. Dr. Quebengco said, “As long as you are telling the truth, you have nothing to worry about... The uppermost in my mind is that to ensure that trust is not broken.” Adding to this, DLSU President

Br. Armin Luistro revealed, “There will be a reassessment of the Sports Development program (in DLSU). There will be a major overhaul of the process.” He encouraged people to “allow the heat to die down,” and noted that “every sports controversy is a source of division and a lot of finger pointing. We should speak publicly about it without sweeping things under the rug.” The image game Every organization, for profit or not, has its own strengths, flaws and vulnerabilities. It is but normal for most organizations to play up their assets and conceal their troubles from those on the outside as each interaction often involves a certain level of confidence and trust. De La Salle has one entity doing just that – the Marketing Communication Office (MCO), which executes the school’s overall marketing and imaging efforts to enhance public perception and position DLSU as a world-class institution. in fact, the MCO organized the Hyatt presscon, which included a set design and a promotional documentary of DLSU. The question that now arises is: Where do the lines of image and confidentiality, openness, and transparency merge and separate? This question is crucial for educational institutions as they do not merely provide the usual goods and services. They are after all in the business of shaping minds, inculcating values, and preparing students for life outside its borders. Furthermore, there is a need to immediately address concerns that can affect students and the community, whether it is mostly an internal matter or an issue thrusting the University to the public sphere with the clear potential to wreak havoc on its external image. Nonetheless, transparency does not entail a juicy tell-all or a slew of accounts from unequally reliable sources. It is best to have a degree of coherence and the opportunity to retain propriety. Over the last few months in battling for governmental change, DLSU has emerged as a strong educational unit. However, it seems to have considerable cracks within its own system. If the university demands transparency from the government, it must start with itself. Not only must De La Salle contend with issues concerning the national government’s integrity, it is urgent for it to uphold its own integrity while assigning proper accountability and maintaining grace under this volley of fire.

Long before the “cheap shot” incident involving Arwind Santos and Manny Salgado and the ineligibility issue came into the fray, there was the De La Salle University (DLSU)-College of St. Benilde (CSB) conundrum, which involved now PBA stalwart, Jun Limpot, Mark Benitez’s fellow Jose Rizal University (JRU) High School standout, Johnedel Cardel, and Jonas Mariano. This controversy centered on the eligibility of the latter three cagers to play for the Green Archers during the early 1990s, given the allegations that they were enrolled in CSB; thus, as a separate entity from DLSU, player-sharing should not be permitted. However, then Green Archers’ coach Derek Pumaren belied the accusations saying that, “none of my boys were ever enrolled in St. Benilde that’s why nothing has come out of the gossip.” Contrary to his coach’s statement, Jonas Mariano said that, “Starting this semester, we were all enrolled at La Salle Main. None of us are from St. Benilde anymore.” The controversy truly took the UAAP basketball world by storm. The blurring of the lines between DLSU and CSB exacerbated the problem. Sports enthusiasts and students alike were confused as to what the real relationship of CSB and DLSU is. To settle the score, DLSU’s registrar office was consulted and it was then confirmed that the three players were enrolled in DLSU. They transferred the moment the controversy erupted.

22 The LaSallianNovember 2005

November 2005 The LaSallian23

Source: A Question of Identity (Annex-Y Supreme Court GR No. 109002)


Paul Darwynn Garilao Donelle Gan Luis Emmanuel De Vera Royce Robert Zuñiga Juan Carlos Chavez Earlene Clarissa Ching Jan Michael Jaudian Eric Siy Alejandro Almendras IV Kristel Kaye Chua

CORRESPONDENTS Joyce Anne Alfonso, Ross Vergel Delantar, Paulo Jose Mutuc, Francesca Sta. Ana, Dianne Margareth Tang, Nicole Tangco, Jose Francisco Unson, Reuben Ezra Terrado, Don Eric Sta. Rosa, Rey Christian Sikat, Isabelle Regina Yujuico, Jewellyn Gay Zareno, Michelle Andrews, Julius Fabreag, Jed Gonzales, Celine Hernandez, Jensen Ching, Roshan Nandwani ARTISTS Carvin Choa, Ian Roman, Richard Rustum Guttierez, BC Uy, Gerard Philip So Chan PHOTOGRAPHERS Lexie Yu, Josef Lim, Tianel Espiritu, Chynna Chan, Shana Baniel LAYOUT CREDITS Luis Emmanuel De Vera, Jan Michael Jaudian COVER CREDITS Eric Siy ADVISER Noelle Leslie Dela Cruz The LaSallian has its editorial office at 502 Bro. Gabriel Connon Hall, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft Avenue, Manila 1004. TLS can be contacted through the telephone number 5244611 loc. 701, or through its e-mail address, All contributions are subject to editing for clarity or space. None of the contents of this publication may be reprinted without the express written permission of the Editorial Board.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful