2231 S Court, Palo Alto, CA 94301 Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.

net Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

Human Rights Alert

11-12-08 US Accuses Russia of Election Fraud - Look Who is Talking...

Los Angeles, December 8 - in view of the recent accusatory exchange between the United States and Russia, regarding integrity of the Russian election process, one should be reminded that the 2012 US presidential elections are likely to be the first conducted: 1. Under fraud by the US Supreme Court, which published online that "Judgment" in Citizens United v Federal Election Commission was "issued", but no "Judgment" record was ever discovered, ever served, or ever entered, and 2. With a Democrat incumbent, who published a digital fraud instead of an authentic long-form birth certificate. Therefore, the 2012 US presidential election is likely to become the next logical step after the:
• 2000 Election, where the outcome was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in Bush v

Gore;
• 2004 Election, where Diebold electronic voting machine fraud has been repeatedly alleged; • 2008 Election, where Obama was a candidate of dubious eligibility.

________ 1) Federal Election Commission (FEC) is asked to disregard Citizens United v Federal Election Commission as Simulated Litigation The FEC has never been served with a valid, signed, authenticated record of the US Supreme Court Judgment, and such record has never been discovered yet. The records of US District Court in Washington DC, in which the case originated, start with an invalid Summons, end with a Judgment that was not recorded in the Judgment Index of the Court, with an ‘off the record’ proceeding in between.

Page 2/4 Cynthia L. Bauerly FEC Chair

December 8, 2011

Los Angeles, May 24 – in a letter to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chair Cynthia Bauerly, the Commissioners, the Acting General Counsel, Acting Staff Director, and the Inspector General, the FEC was asked: Why would the FEC not disregard the cases of Citizens United v FEC in the US District Court, DC, (1-07-cv-2240) and in the US Supreme Court, (08-805), as matters that have never been litigated and decided pursuant to the law of the United States? [[i]] Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) (08-205) was reported as one of the landmark decisions of the US Supreme Court. “[D]ecision holding that corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts of money in election campaigns… a stunning example of judicial activism…” [[ii]] However, based on review of US Supreme Court, US District Court, Washington DC, and FEC and US Solicitor General FOIA-response records, the request opined that Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (08-805) in the US Supreme Court and Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (1-07-cv-2240) in the US District Court, DC, were cases of Simulated Litigation. [[iii]]

No valid summons was ever issued or served on the FEC in the case in the US District Court, DC No Judgment is listed as entered in the Judgment Index of the case in the US District Court, DC No valid, duly signed and authenticated record of the Judgment of the US Supreme Court has been discovered so far. There is no record to show that the Judgment of the US Supreme Court has ever been served by the Clerk of the US Supreme Court on the FEC.

The requester, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has gained substantial experience in examination of computerized records in large corporate and government systems. His opinions in such matters have been supported by highly reputed fraud and computer science experts. Papers he has authored on the subject were peer-reviewed and published in a computerscience journal and presented in international computer-science and criminology conferences. [[iv]] Report, authored by him, and based in part on analysis of computerized court records, was incorporated into the official 2010 Staff Report of the United Nations Human Rights Council, as part of the Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States, with a reference note stating: Corruption of the courts and the legal profession... [[v]] The request was copied to Senator Dianne Feinstein. LINKS
[i] 11-05-24 RE Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) - Request for Policy Statement by FEC s

Page 3/4

December 8, 2011

http://www.scribd.com/doc/56145482/ [ii] 0-01-21 Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 130 S.Ct. 876 (2010) at the Supreme Court of the United States - opinion of Prof Chemerinsky and Wikipedia overview http://www.scribd.com/doc/41364083/ [iii] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows: Texas Penal Code; §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. (a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to: (1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or (2) cause another to: (A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document. (b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered. [iv] 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/ [v] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession". http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

________
2) The ongoing Sheriff Joe/Birth Certificate saga - and legitimacy of the 2012 US presidential election
The Birthers, like the Occupy movement, will not be brushed off through a media blackout and obfuscation in the US Courts... And if media focus on the issue of the Birth Certificate and the multiple Social Security numbers early, rather than later in the campaign, the US may be saved yet another historic constitutional disgrace...

a),

or b)

Birth Certificates from Hawaii, 1961: a) Obama's digitally-generated birth certificate, released by the White House, and b) Authentic microfilm copies of contemporary birth certificates.

Regardless of one's opinion of the maverick Sheriff Joe, one must notice with concern his observations (below) regarding the dubious nature of the Obama's long form Birth Certificate, and conduct of the media in this regard. Obama's dubious Birth Certificate and multiple Social Security numbers, if not adequately addressed in a timely manner, are likely to undermine even the appearance of legitimacy of the 2012 presidential election in the United States. Therefore, the 2012 election could become the next logical step:

2000 election, where the outcome was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in Bush v Gore; [i]

Page 4/4 •

December 8, 2011

2004 election, where Diebold electronic voting machine fraud has been repeatedly alleged; [ii] 2008 election, where Obama was a candidate of dubious eligibility; 2012 election, where the eligibility of the incumbent president, running for reelection, will have been opined by law enforcement deficient, or even fraud.

• •

The Birthers, like the Occupy movement, will not be brushed off through a media blackout and obfuscation in the US Courts... And if media focus on the issue of the Birth Certificate and the multiple Social Security numbers early, rather than later in the campaign, the US may be saved yet another historic constitutional disgrace... LINKS:
[i] Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore [ii] The 2004 US Elections: The Mother of all Vote Frauds http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/2004votefraud.html 10-08-28 Common Cause Voting Machines Report Malfunction and Malfeasance http://www.scribd.com/doc/36565560/ 10-04-19 Brennan Center for Justice Notice in Re: Unprecleared Voting Machines - violation of the voting act http://www.scribd.com/doc/36565891/ 05-00-00 Validating Voting Machine Software http://www.scribd.com/doc/36630297/ 05-05-19 MIT-Caltech: Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting http://www.scribd.com/doc/36629558/ 10-10-06 US Electronic Voting Machines - Made to Defraud - Wired Magazine http://www.scribd.com/doc/47833408/

______
CERTIFIGATE Posted: November 09, 2011 8:29 pm Eastern … WND has previously reported Arpaio has demanded to see the original microfilm records of Obama's birth certificate held in the vault of the Hawaii Department of Health. WND has also reported that on April 27, the White House released three versions of Obama's long-form birth certificate, each one of which appears fundamentally different from the other two: 1. An electronic PDF computer file that contained a green background clearly showing the green hash marks of Hawaii Department of Health security paper; 2. A photo taken by the Associated Press and attributed to J. Scott Appleworth shows a blue background, with no hash marks and no green security paper background; and 3. Two photographs the White House staff allowed NBC photographer Savannah Guthrie take on April 27 that show a gray background on which grey hash marks are clearly visible on the security paper background. Arpaio has also suggested the White House should authorize the Hawaii Department of Health to release for independent court-authorized forensic examination any 1961 paper-and-ink original Obama birth records the department has on file. Read more: Sheriff Joe threatened for probing eligibility http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=366125#ixzz1dQEeusDE

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful