1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Samuel Salmon Roxy Salmon 917C Philpott Rd. Colville, WA 99114 Telephone: 509-684-8841 Email: srslunop@gmail.com STATE OF WASHINGTON STEVENS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

SAMUEL SALMON, and ROXY SALMON PLAINTIFF, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP DEFENDANT

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO. : 2011-2-00426-9 QUIET TITLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGED PARTY BANK OF AMERICA N.A.’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff is filing this action as a Pro se litigant and respectfully requests that this complaint will be decided on its content, meaning, and merit, and not on its form. I. CONCESSION The Plaintiffs Roxy Salmon and Samuel Salmon declare as follows: The plaintiffs would concede title rights to the real “beneficiary” of the plaintiffs’ promissory note, and agree to work out a payment agreement with a servicer that has a legal contract to collect on the
Samuel Salmon 917C Philpott Rd. Colville, WA 99114 Telephone: 509-684-8841

QUIET TITLE- RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOT. TO DISMISS

Page 1 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

plaintiff’s promissory note, by producing for the record, the original note with its allonge, and all original documents showing all of its owners, holders, and servicing contracts from the time of its creation until the present. II. BACKGROUND The Salmons have now and always have been since June of 2006 the only registered owners of the real property in this quiet title action and hereby claim superior title of said real property because of the following: 1. The Plaintiffs have discovered the claims of the alleged beneficiary of the promissory note to be untrue therefore fraudulent. 2. The plaintiffs have never been provided with any real documentation regarding the loan, only hearsay. 3. Plaintiffs have good reason to believe their note has been securitized and converted to a stock, or RMBS thereby separating it from its security instrument, or deed of trust. 4. Plaintiffs believe all claims through this deed of trust to be fraudulent because the “beneficiary” listed on the deed of trust and its assignments are not the notes holder. 5. The note the deed of trust represents is unaccounted for. 6. The trustee is fiducially responsible to the alleged beneficiary, therefore cannot represent their claimant. 7. The Plaintiffs have invested over $200,000.00 in this property and improvements thereon.
QUIET TITLE- RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOT. TO DISMISS Page 2 of 6
Samuel Salmon 917C Philpott Rd. Colville, WA 99114 Telephone: 509-684-8841

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

III.MERGERS DO NOT QUALIFY THE ALLEGED PARTY BANA AS THE DEED OF TRUST ASSIGNEE OR THE NOTES BENEFICIARY The attorney for the alleged party Bank of America N.A. (“BANA”) has been allowed to enter a motion as the successor assignee “beneficiary” by merger of defendant BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP in this case when in fact BANA has not been assigned such rights through a deed of trust assignment at the Stevens County Recorder’s Office wherein the property in question is located. Therefore BANA is not a party in interest by assignment, neither does the merger qualify BANA as the note’s owner, or “beneficiary” in this action. Therefore for these reasons the alleged party “BANA” is hereby requested to be removed from this case. IV. ONLY THE NOTE OWNER, HOLDER, OR “BENEFICIARY” HAS RIGHTS TO A TITLE CLAIM According to the Washington State constitution as stated in RCW 61.24.005 (2) "Beneficiary" means the holder of the instrument or document evidencing the obligations secured by the deed of trust,. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.’s (“BAC”)is only a “grantor” on the deed of trust, and it’s claim of “beneficiary” in the corporation assignment of the deed of trust as recorded in the Stevens County Auditor’s Office under file No. 20100007023, is deceptive, as the deed of trust is the note’s only security. Beneficiary of the notes security, or deed of trust does not qualify one as a claimant on a real property title as our state constitution clearly outlines in RCW 61.24.030.7(a) “trustee shall have proof that the beneficiary is the owner of any promissory note. Therefore all defendant’s
QUIET TITLE- RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOT. TO DISMISS Page 3 of 6
Samuel Salmon 917C Philpott Rd. Colville, WA 99114 Telephone: 509-684-8841

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

claims on plaintiff’s property title are illegal unless the trustee is representing the note’s true “beneficiary”. Therefore the claims on the plaintiff’s title by BAC, or BANA are in fact criminal by their own admission shown in plaintiffs Exhibit A the letter in which alleges the notes holder, or “beneficiary” is Fannie Mae. The term “beneficiary” as used in the deed of trust and it’s assignment is deceptive and illegal at best, as the deed of trust “assignee” is referred to in our Washington State Constitution as only the “grantor”. Therefore the term of “beneficiary” used for claims of title in the deed of trust is without substance, and is void as it does not conform to the true definition of “beneficiary” according to Washington State code as shown in RCW 61.24.005. Plaintiff believes and thereupon alleges that the defendant’s claim as “beneficiary” is hereby shown to be without foundation, and is also without any factual proof whatsoever, and criminal in its intent. V. TRUSTEE IS ALSO UNQUALIFIED The trustee Recontrust Co. N.A. is also unqualified as a trustee in the deed of trust and its assignment as they shall not have any fiduciary responsibility to the interested parties pursuant RCW 61.24.010(3,4). The trustee indeed is fiducially responsible to the alleged “beneficiary”, or assignee through its parent company BANA. Our Washington State Attorney General has been forced to take out a suit against the trustee Recontrust Co. for it’s noncompliance to our State Constitution regarding this matter. Plaintiff has elected to file a LIS PENDENS pending this case, although our State ATG is not representing individuals in the State of Washington the subject matter of this action is of subject matter in this
QUIET TITLE- RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOT. TO DISMISS Page 4 of 6
Samuel Salmon 917C Philpott Rd. Colville, WA 99114 Telephone: 509-684-8841

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

case and pertinent in all title claims instituted by the trustee, Recontrust Co. N.A., or any trustee fiducially responsible to parties in interest. VI. ANY TITLE CLAIMS AS BENEFICIARY MUST NOW PRODUCE THE ACTUAL ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE Because of the deceptiveness of the defendants claim as “beneficiary” and because of the fiduciary responsibilities of their trustee Recontrust Co. N.A., plaintiff is demanding the rights granted them by the Washington State laws RCW61.24.030.7(a,b), and produce the note. VII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF If the defendant fails to produce the plaintiffs original note with its allonge, plaintiff Samuel Salmon, and Roxy Salmon pray for judgment against defendant as follows: 1. For an order compelling said defendant, to acknowledge legal title and possession of the subject property to Plaintiff herein; 2. For a declaration and determination that Plaintiff holds a superior title to the property and that the defendant herein be declared to have no estate, right, title or interest in said property; 3. For a judgment forever enjoining said defendant, it’s successors and assignees from claiming any estate, right, title or interest in the subject property; 4. For costs of suit herein incurred and damages as judge discerns fair.

QUIET TITLE- RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOT. TO DISMISS

Page 5 of 6

Samuel Salmon 917C Philpott Rd. Colville, WA 99114 Telephone: 509-684-8841

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

AFFIDAVIT AND DECLARATION
I, Samuel Salmon hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the State of Washington that on Monday, December 12, 2011, all undersigned statements to be true and correct, and I, Samuel Salmon am competent to state the matters set forth herein, that the contents are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, and reasonable and just in accordance with Affiant’s best firsthand knowledge and understanding.

Dated this Monday, December 12, 2011 Samuel Salmon 917C Philpott Rd. Colville, WA 99114

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on Monday, December 12, 2011, I filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court. I certify that a true and correct copy of said document was sent to all case participants in the following manner; first class mail to the defendant as listed: Bishop White, Marshall & Weibel, P.S. 720 Olive Way, Ste. 1201 Seattle, WA 98101-1801 BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. c/o C T Corporation System 1801 West Bay Dr Nw Ste 206 Olympia, WA 89502 Monday, December 12, 2011

Samuel Salmon 917C Philpott Rd. Colville, WA 99114

QUIET TITLE- RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOT. TO DISMISS

Page 6 of 6

Samuel Salmon 917C Philpott Rd. Colville, WA 99114 Telephone: 509-684-8841

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful