Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marketplace
www.dentistry.co.uk
Figure 1: The small, medium and large 360-degree cervical matrix forms
Ideal requirements for composite restorations
Many factors will influence the outcome of a successful composite restoration. Not only is it essential that the restoration should be aesthetically acceptable through careful shade determination, shape and contour, but it must also restore the tooth to its required function, and should also permit correct oral hygiene procedures to be carried out. In placing both composite and glass ionomer resin materials, clinicians are advised to make full use of a matrix that will suit a specific class or type of cavity. However, in trying to address the requirements of an ideal matrix system, some products can fall short of the ideal, and resultant restorations can be somewhat deficient in contour and function and may also result in the patient experiencing routine oral hygiene problems such as interproximal food packing. Clinicians can also experience difficulty in placement of the composite materials when trying to restore hard-to-reach areas in the mouth for Class 5 cervical restorations or for abfraction lesions.
recently introduced its new 360 cervical matrix, which can help clinicians to overcome these problems. The 360 system offers three sizes of preformed anatomically shaped matrices (small, medium and large) that are supplied with a small handle affixed to them. This enables them to be rotated by using the Triodent Pin Tweezers to help achieve correct positioning on the teeth. Their shaped curvature helps to create good tooth contour and, as they are made from a clear and slightly flexible coated synthetic material, this produces a smooth mirror-like finish to the composite resin. Their conformity of shape can be beneficial in helping prevent the formation of voids and the air inhibited layer. They are also see-through, allowing visibility and complete light curing. The Pin Tweezers can permit easy placement, and a secure positive grip can be gained by squeezing the Tweezer tips, and can be useful when positioning matrices on the distal aspects of an upper second molar. In using the 360 matrices, it is recommended that the clinician makes full use of the Pin Tweezers, as they have three angles of attachment. The selected matrix is loaded onto the Tweezers, and the correct angle of insertion should then Figure 3: Illustration showing distal be determined by rotating the matrix to placement of matrix on lower second gain easy access to the prepared cavity. molar