2231 S Court, Palo Alto, CA 94301 Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.

net Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

Human Rights Alert

12-01-08 What happens when an attorney realizes that he is victim of fraud by the US court
The attorney in question was trying to protect his lawful rights against abuse by the state courts. The US District court in question patronizes the corruption of the state courts through the conduct of simulated litigation, to deprive the attorney of his lawful rights. By now, such conduct by the US courts is documented as a routine from coast to coast.

1) JZ wrote:
Please get me the NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing). I am mostly a record fraud analyst. JZ

2) X Wrote:
I'm a little confused. Are you referring specifically to [REDACTED] Order of [REDACTED] ?

3) JZ wrote:
Yes

4) X Wrote:
This? ----- Forwarded Message ----From: "ecfmail@.uscourts.gov" [REDACTED]

5) JZ wrote:
Yes. Please email me all other NEFs from this case and any other cases that you may have in the USDC. You are victim of fraud by the US District Court, through the conduct of simulated litigation. [1] JZ LINKS: [1] "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service" here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows: Texas Penal Code 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. (a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to: (1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or (2) cause another to: (A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the

Page 2/5

January 9, 2012

document, or on the basis of the document. (b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered. _____ The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.

6) X Wrote:
First, you say I am "subject" to fraud by ..... Does that mean that you have determined that this particular document I sent you IS IN FACT a simulated document? Or may be? or what? If yes it is, how do you know? I also need to know what you plan on doing with any documents I send you. I have a very specific strategy for my case and I need to be advised of any actions taken BEFORE they are taken. Please understand, I respect you immensely but I don't have enough information. Look forward to your clarification.

7) JZ wrote:
You were and are subject of fraud in the US court. I typically write a report, and then file a request for impeachments of the judges and clerk involved (several were already filed...). See for example a case that was written as an academic paper, presented in the 16th World Criminology Congress (Kobe,Japan). [1] I am not an attorney, and I do not discuss the legal subject matter, beyond minimum explanation of the underlying issues. In your case, I assume that it is continuation of the patronizing by the US courts of corruption of a states justice systems. For example, my report on the California justice system was reviewed by the UN in 2010, and was later incorporated into an official UN report, referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California". A separate issue, is the conduct of the attorneys who appear on behalf of defendants in your case, which are likely to be part of the fraud. I have a large collection of such cases by now, from the US courts from coast to coast, and I plan on filing in 2014 a report on the US justice system to the UN, documenting widespread corruption of the US courts. The only records I need your help with are the NEFs, the rest I can download from PACER. In general, as best documented in the case of Richard Fine, nothing that you would do would make any difference at this point. A case that starts as simulated litigation in the US District Court, typically continues as a simulated case in the US Court of Appeals, and the US Supreme Court. However, I always support efforts of the victims to continue and document the corruption, as long as you realize what you are dealing with. JZ LINKS: [1] 11-08-01 Zernik, J: Design and Operation of Information Systems of the US Courts are Linked to Conduct of a Simulated Banking Regulation Litigation http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/ [2] 11-02-05 Request No 2 for Impeachment of Judge JED RAKOFF Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in Re Conduct of Lindner v Amex (1:10-cv-02228) s http://www.scribd.com/doc/48244479/ [3] 10-12-07 Request for Investigation and if Appropriate - Impeachment Proceedings - against TERRY NAFISI - Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Central District of California s http://www.scribd.com/doc/44818903/ [4] 11-02-09 Press Release: Dont Ask, Dont Tell the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists on Conducting a Simulated Appeal from a Simulated Judgment of the US District Court http://www.scribd.com/doc/49070315/

Page 3/5

January 9, 2012

8) JZ wrote:
11-12-31 What to Do When One is Subjected to Fraud and Corruption in the US Courts? http://www.scribd.com/doc/76855582/

9) X Wrote:
Are you saying my case isn't REAL? I'm so confused by your statement: "A case that starts as simulated litigation in the US District Court, typically continues as a simulated case in the US Court of Appeals, and the US Supreme Court." What does "simulated litigation" mean? HOW CAN YOU TELL? What is it about the NEFs that let you know they're simulated?

10) JZ wrote:
"Not real" is correct. "simulated litigation" is the term I use, following the definition in the Texas Criminal Code. [1] I provided you more than enough links, where I explain the issues in detail. I assume that there was a reason you were referred to me. Someone thought that you would like to know the truth. Anyway, I do not believe that there is any damage to you by providing the NEFs. They are public records by law. Furthermore, it may be better for you that an uninvolved third party expose the fraud that is perpetrated on you. JZ NOTES: [1] "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service" here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows: Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. (a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to: (1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or (2) cause another to: (A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document. (b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.

11) JZ wrote:
My opinions on these matters are supported by opinion letters of top US fraud experts, by top international computer experts, and by peer-review at the 16th World Criminology Congress (2011, Kobe Japan), where I presented three lectures on the subject. You can test my opinion regarding the fraud in your case, by choosing any significant order that was purported to have been issued, and request in writing a certified copy of that order from the Clerk of the Court, or even by a formal motion, filed under your case caption. The US Court would not provide you a certified copy of such order, or of your PACER docket, for that matter. They are all honorable people, and would not like to damage their reputations by such blatant fraud. That was, for example, the key issue in Log Cabin Republicans case, if you read the links, previously provided. The US District Court refused to certify the purported judgment, but the US Court of Appeal, 9th Circuit, conducted a simulated appeal from the same uncertified judgment.

Page 4/5

January 9, 2012

Both in the US District Court. the US Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court, the principle is to keep you busy as long as possible with such simulated litigation, exhaust you financially, mentally, but at the end the outcome is zilch. You could be a legal genius, it really does not matter. JZ

12) X Wrote:
Dr. Zernik: I rely on my gut to make most of my decisions and to me that is God. I cannot nor will not believe that what you are saying applies to my case. [REDACTED] I have respect for what you are doing if you have helped people in the past but I can't operate from a place of darkness, evil, and hopelessness. I can only operate from a place of light, goodness and unending hope. Otherwise life has no purpose and that is far from true. I look to God for my intuitive thought and guidance. [REDACTED] Best regards,

13) JZ wrote:
Dear [ ]. The duty of the common person in these dark times, is to document the scope of the corruption! [REDACTED] Richard Fine was in a similar place, or worse. He was held in solitary confinement in Men's Central Jail, filing his habeas corpus petitions in the US District Court, US Court of Appeals, and SCOTUS. As a former US Prosecutor, he could not believe my analysis of his cases. Moreover, he had no access to computers in jail. I filed in his cases "Motions to Intervene", the goal was to serve on him in jail various records, which he had no access to. You would find the most comprehensive analysis of the fraud in the US courts from top to bottom in my Motion to Intervene in SCOTUS in his case. You should particularly check out the part of my filing in Richard Fine's case, which deals with appearances of attorneys who are not authorized, "with no communications with clients clause". [REDACTED] Finally, Richard Fine and his assistant conceded that I was correct all along, and when he was released, he called for popular revolt against the corrupt US justice system. The worst mistake that I made, that Richard Fine made, and that you may make, is to assume that anything in the United States today, is what it was 10 or 20 years ago. However, like you, I like to believe that if enough people of good will and good faith rise against the tyranny, we may prevail, with some help from above... JZ LINKS: [1] April 20, 2010 Motion to Intervene and related papers in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) in the US Supreme Court http://www.scribd.com/doc/30304657/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/

Page 5/5 http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161692/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/30185575/

January 9, 2012

______

Boycott the vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 11-12-10 Where Should #Occupy Go Next? Civil Disobedience in the Footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!

http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/ Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable... 12-01-01 Secession - A Smart Business Move! http://www.scribd.com/doc/76877453/