BEMM160 Group members Sarah Naylor Sen Zhai Ka Ki Tsang Phatiphat Tanasuwanthan 580005089 610009431 610044810 590070608

1

Critical analysis of the Ukraine market for further investment by Deutsche Brauerei company

Introduction

This report aims to analyse the attractiveness of the Ukraine’s market for

further long-term capital investment in a brewing capacity by Deutsche

Brauerei (DB). DB first invested in the Ukraine in 1998 with Ukraine

consumers ‘accounting for most of the unit growth in Deutsche’s sales over

the past three years’ (Deutsche Brauerei 2007) and thus this suggests

potential for future investment. A detailed analysis of the weaknesses and

2

strengths, and also risks and opportunities is needed in order to decide on

any structural changes and cultural changes needed if implementation is to go

ahead.

PESTEL

Political:

Since 1991, the Ukraine has declared itself independent from the Soviet

Union and preceded a constant political and legal reform for the past 20 years

and has now achieved a better stable political status since Viktor Yanukovych

won the presidential election in 2010. In order to support its economic growth

3

and to receive compensation if the business or property is nationalized by the government (DATAMONITOR. Furthermore. informal economies and corrupt practices are widespread in the Ukrainian workplace (Rogers. the parliament has passed legislation that endows foreign investors the right to purchase property and businesses. 2010). These factors are all attractive to potential investors however. Its corporate income tax rate in the Ukraine is a flat 25% which is lower than in Germany or other Europe countries.by foreign investment. 4 . to repatriate profits and revenues. the Ukraine entered into World Trade Organization in 2008 and intends to join the European Union by 2015.

Economic Before 2008. 5 . (DATAMONITOR 2010). However in 2009 there was a substantial decrease and a decreasing tend is expected to continue to approximately 8% by 2013. karatnycky. the decreasing trend of inflation will be attractive to potential investors. Consequently. 2007). the inflation rate increased steadily but saw a dramatic increase in 2008 which was detrimental to the Ukraine economy. despite the current high inflation.Williams 2008) with the ‘Orange Revolution’ anti-corruption campaign in 2005 having minimal impact (Neutze.

Figure 1 showing the consumer price index and CPI-based inflation in Ukraine from 2002 to 2013 6 .

Figure 2 showing the GDP and GDP growth rate from 2003 to 2013 7 .

Figure 3 showing percentage of population living below $1 a day (absolute) from 2000-15 From 2003-2008 there was a reasonably steady economic growth which then suddenly dropped in 2009 (Figure 2) and the unemployment rate increased dramatically. These changes were caused by the global recession in 2009 but 8 .

The resulting decrease of the percentage of the population living below $1 a day (DATAMONITOR 2010) indicates that the residents income would increase from 2010-15. The government’s response to this negative economic impact was to raise the wages of certain public-sector workers and draft a 2010-11 budget proposing a minimum hourly Ukraine wage. Social 9 .the worst is potentially over with an expected increase in GDP rate until 2013 (Figure 2).

the amount spent on alcoholic drinks has increased by 1% from 2001 to 2011 and the consumption of alcoholic beverages increased substantially in 2007 and has continued to increase steadily since 2001 (Barnes Report 2011) 10 . Moreover. However.06 males to every female which is favorable as statistically males consume more alcohol than females with men accounting for 64% of alcoholic drinks consumption in comparison to 36% for women and men accounting for 71% of beer consumption (Humphries 2010). the sex ratio shows 1.The population of the Ukraine has seen a steady decrease since 2001 which would be seen as disadvantageous to companies wishing to invest further.

Figure 4 showing the total mid-year population (Absolute) in Ukraine from 200015 11 .

Figure 5 showing the fertility rate (Absolute) in Ukraine from 2000-15 12 .

Figure 6 showing the death rate (Absolute) in Ukraine from 2000-15 13 .

Figure 7 showing the spending pattern of citizens in the Ukraine in 2001 14 .

Figure 8 showing the spending pattern of citizens in the Ukraine in 2011 15 .

Volume(Absolute) 16 .Alcoholic Beverages.Country Statistics . Total Retail Sales.

Figure 9 showing Alcoholic beverages, Total Retail Sailes, and Absolute Volume in the Ukraine

17

Technology

Since the fall of the socialist regime in 1991 the country’s telecommunications

has developed rapidly. For instance the mobile growth rate had reached more

than 180% in 2006. The Ukraine has weak internet penetration when

analyzed by European standards however, the dramatic increase of internet

access of residents since early 2000 indicates that internet advertising is more

convenient and useful in the 21st century Ukraine. (Market Research report

2011)

Environmental

18

According to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), recent climate change

together with new crop varieties and better technology could increase crop

yields in Ukraine significantly (Impacts of Climate Change in Ukraine, 2010).

Furthermore, the development of biotechnology in the Ukraine allows

enhanced efficiency of barley production and thus a stable production supply.

(DATAMONITOR 2011)

Legal

The Ukraine is set to integrate into the European Union in the near future,

having already undertaking an obligation to gradually harmonize its legislation

19

E. (The New Legal Frame work). It endows foreigners with the rights to invest in the Ukraine to the same extent as Ukrainian legal entities and individuals. publishing and broadcasting (Deloitte. which provides equal business conditions for national and foreign investors.with European Union laws pursuant to Article 51 of the Treaty on Partnership and Co-operation between Ukraine and the European Community and their Member States of 14 June 1994. it should be noted that there are still some restrictions in place in certain areas. The main legal framework of foreign investment in Ukraine is the Law on the Foreign Investment Regime. However. 2009) 20 .g.

Swot analysis DB prides itself on quality and thus a key strength of it is that is has the benefit of their brewer’s expertise which makes it possible for them to gain a competitive advantage over rival companies. However. Table 1 21 . DB has only five distributorships. despite its apparent popularity. Furthermore. Enhanced technology for the production of barley may lower Ukraine production costs in the long-term compared to Germany. This weakness might result in a lack product availability within the Ukraine especially if production was to increase in the case of further investment.

below shows that German beer companies are considered the best beer producers from a consumer viewpoint which suggests that consumers would respond well to the marketing of new beer products by DB. 22 .

Furthermore. the fact that it enforces corrupt practices may lead to increased overhead costs from bribery. If prices rise at a faster rate in Ukraine than in Germany then that will affect the exchange rate and transaction costs as the purchasing power of each currency has changed. they are more inclined to buy famous brand products. Increased investment interest in the Ukraine market increases both the level of competition and the overall marketing costs which is consequently detrimental to all beer companies in the market.Ukraine has an informal economy with an inflation rate higher than 10 %. Since Ukraine customers are brand conscious. If DB cannot operate efficiently and reduce 23 .

manufacture costs then the selling price will be high and will not be able to compete on the same level as those famous brands. (Swift 2010) Five porters’ analysis Buyers: Buyer power is weakened by the fact that the Ukrainian consumer is brand conscious. Ukrainian consumers consider Country-of-origin to be less important than quality. these may all be threats to the company in terms of establishing itself successfully within the Ukraine market. Consequently. brand and availability and thus loyalty to local 24 . taste.

The Ukraine beer market is vast though so consumers are able to switch to brands best suited to their preferences at different economic times (Khmel’nyts’ka. malted 25 .e. Swift 2010) Suppliers: The Ukraine. Ukrainian consumers will appeal to a lower-priced market. and the previous years’ recession. has many suppliers of the input goods and resources required for beer production i. due to the Ukraine having a lower average standard of life.beers is feigning whilst demand for foreign beers increases. compared to other European countries. as a nation of substantial beer consumption. Moreover.

with the specific aim of maintaining unique quality and taste.grain. hops and apples. but competitive. some companies. This makes it an attractive. New entrants: The Ukraine has a relatively large population (some 48 million) and a large and increasing demand for beer with beer import increasing by 63% over 2010. Thus there is a low switching cost for companies wishing to change suppliers within the Ukraine. have their own raw material manufactory which consequently reduces suppliers’ bargain power. market for the major 26 . At the same time.

international brewers. we can see that non-alcoholic beverage sale volume has been increasing for the past several years. (Pivnoe-delo 2011) Substitutes: There are a number of beverage substitutes to beer. From the chart below. such as wine or soft drinks. the Ukraine implements policies to integrate European and domestic regulations creating a similar economic situation to that of other European countries and consequently making it easier for European countries to invest in the Ukraine. Moreover. Children prefer to 27 .

Total Value (Absolute) (Datamonitor 2011) 28 .Beverage and adults are more like wine and beer. Figure 10 Country Statistics .Non-Alcoholic Beverages.. Retail Sales. There are no switching costs and many different beer brands for consumers to choose from.

Quality is no longer the key characteristic of the product. and whose output and sales far exceed the industry’s average. This makes them strong competitors for any new brewers entering into the Ukraine marketplace.Rivalry: 80% of the marketplace is controlled by the “Big Eight” brewers whose brands are well positioned on the market. 29 . (Foodmarket 2011). but rather company image and brand popularity thus companies should be innovative and create new brands to meet customers’ demands.

Part b) Corporate culture: The Ukraine market has a different organization and corporate culture than that of Germany. unity and commitment. The specific advantages of family business. Germany operates a family oriented business compared to the Ukraine’s market-oriented subsidiary business which is ultimately inflexible enforcing bootstrap operations. ensure a competitive advantage to achieve market expansion in the Ukraine as long as the balance between family interests and business development is 30 .

maintained. (Gallo and Cappuyns. For instance since family members are different from employees. they may have different assessments and goals within the company which may cause uncertainty as to the company’s actual goals which would be detrimental to business development and productivity and upset the balance. They should continue to take advantage of the ensured commitment to the businesses success when run by family members but the negative effects such as reluctance to punish employees for wrong-doings because of the 31 . 2004). Thus previous generations’ knowledge and cultural information should continue to be acknowledged in order to maintain and improve the business reputation long-term (Academy of Entrepreneurship 2004).

family tie and the disinclination of older generations to trust younger generations. For instance. means consideration of what is a suitable dividend percentage for satisfying both shareholders and company development is important. the fact that business is controlled by family shareholders with more than half retired and relying on dividends for the rest of their life. This could be a big issue as it may result in conflict between the businesses two vested interests: management and its 32 . The balance of the shareholders and business interests is important to control when moving into the Ukraine.

DB should establish strong distribution networks to guarantee vast product availability. thus enhancing their reputation. As Ukraine distributors are small businesses with little room for capital increase individually. (Worldpress 2011). The gearing ratio for the Ukraine is extremely high which suggests narrow profit 33 . as there is opportunity for longer credit repayments in the Ukraine compared to Germany. DB can increase the time allowed for credit repayment. (Rise 2007) High gearing is dangerous for the volatile revenues in the Ukraine. Moreover.shareholders. which would help to build strong relationships with numerous distributors.

There will be reduced risk because they then become a national. Thus they won’t be targeted by Governments in the long term as there are trends towards nationalistic government in the Ukraine i. Setting up the Ukraine subsidiary independently but having DB buy minority stakes in the company may resolve this issue.e. DB would have a shareholding of less than 50 per cent of the Ukraine company’s equity capital and thus it would have to deduct earnings (or losses) attributable to minority.margins in the future. company. (Smartcompany 02/12/11) 34 . rather than international. with parties like ‘our Ukraine’ and ‘Pro Ukraine’ potentially putting foreign companies at a disadvantage.

production etc. So DB would be at the top of the hierarchy and on the next level it would be split geographically into Germany and the Ukraine. so the German and Ukraine divisions are distinctly separate. These divisions are created as self-contained units.Organizational structure: The best organizational structure would then be divisional which divides employees and resources along divisional lines. The advantages of this are that each unit will be small and tuned into its environment and thus will be responsive to change and flexible in an unstable 35 . each with their own separate functional departments for distribution.

However there is potential for duplication of resources across divisions. resulting in lost efficiency and economies of sale. Furthermore it fosters concern for customer needs and ensures excellent communication across functional departments. Vershinina 2010) 36 .environment. the drawbacks can be overcome through strict controlling of resources etc and so this still remains the most efficient organizational structure for DB in the Ukraine..e. and coordination across divisions is often poor i. However. software not matching up. Kendrick. (Daft.

Figure 11 showing the functional division organizational structure (Bscdesigner 2011) Oleg Pinchuk is currently acting as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in charge of the DB operation in the Ukraine and all of the functional 37 .

changing and refreezing.departments. the further investment and expansion of the business may require the implementation of separate functional department managers to ensure continued efficiency as there will greater demands on each department. This may be cost detrimental to begin with but will be cost beneficial long-term if expansion is successful (Deutsche Brauerei 2007) 38 . He should continue to be the top manager for this division due to his successful implementation of the company into the Ukraine market via the three distinct stages for achieving behavioral and attitude change: freezing. However.

g. The reward and incentive structure will most likely be action oriented as it is a family company so there will not always be a direct link between performance and rewards as an action oriented structure adheres to family unity and 39 . the Ukraine division CEO can allocate budget to functional divisions at his discretion but his total financial budget for the year will come from the DB board.Control measures: A machine control (result oriented) control archetype will be most applicable to the DB structure as it is decentralized as it has outsourced to the Ukraine and has clearly defined areas of responsibility and accountability e.

When evaluating and monitoring performance and in terms of standardization. an explanatory control archetype will be relevant as it will refer to emerging standards of the Ukraine and German markets separately. To conclude. the Ukrainian beer market provides much opportunity for investment.commitment. Its contrasting culture to that of Germany suggests that a divisional organization structure would be most suitable in order to allow 40 . but there are risks to consider including increasingly intensive competition. . Being a family business a ‘do your best’ approach would be undertaken with no ex ante standards and targets. (Spekle 2001).

References Swift... S. Beer in the Ukraine: consumer choice criteria. May 2011. Reference Code: 0199-2015 41 . Datamonitor.adaptation to each country’s environment easily to ensure efficiency and the best competitive advantage. The CEO will remain at the head of the Ukraine subsidiary but now with separate functional managers to aid him. 2010 Global Brewers. Control measures should ensure a safe and successful further investment without losing the unique family values of the company. J. et al.

5 No. Swift. Vol.678 42 . p.pivnoe-delo. Jonathan S. (2010). (2008) "Workplace crime and the informal economy in Ukraine: Employee and employer perspectives". 78-101 Peter Rodgers. International Journal of Emerging Markets. Williams. pp. 1. International Journal of Social Economics.http://eng. 35 Iss: 9. Vol.info/2011/06/03/ukraine-the-beer-market-analysis/ Ol’ga Khmel’nyts’ka.666 . John Round. Colin C.

Country analysis report Ukraine in-depth PEST insights. [Online] Available at: http://360.php? year=2011&number=1&article=2) Breweries & Beer-Making Industry-Industry & Market Report.foodmarket.http://www. Barnes Reports October 5.ru/eng/archive.spb.com/Product?pid=CBB0FBEC-9E52-48458DCB-0AE74E1E519A [Accessed 24 November 2011] 43 . 2011 Datamonitor. 2010.datamonitor.

Ukraine.emeraldinsight.. 2008. [Online] Available at: http://www.htm?issn=0306-8293 [Accessed 24 November 2011] Deloitte.W. Workplace crime and the informal economy in Ukraine: Employee and employer perspectives.deloitte. International Journal of Social Economics.pdf [Accessed 25 November 2011] 44 . 2009. 35(9) Available at: http://www.Peter R. International Tax and Business Guide connecting you to worldwide information.. [Online].com/journals. & John R.com/assets/Dcom-Global/Local %20Assets/Documents/Tax/Intl%20Tax%20and%20Business %20Guides/dtt_tax_guide_ukraine_2009. Colin C.

agmrc. Vertical Coordination in the Malting Barley Industry: A ‘Silver Bullet’ For Coors? MRC Agricultural resource centre Available at: http://www. 2009. 2004. World Tax Rates 2010/2011 [Online] (Updated 2011) Available at: http://unrealestates.org/media/cms/coors_6C217F1EDB6E5.pdf [Accessed 25 November 2011] Micheal Boland. 2005) 45 . Gary Brester.Tax Rate Guide and Tax Help. Ukraine: Agriculture Overview [Online] (Updated October 21.bg/PEST%20Analysis%20of%20Ukraine.pdf [Accessed 29 November 2011] United States Department of Agriculture.

uk/resources/uk/pdf/pdf1/Climate- change-report-Ukraine-eng [Accessed 25 November 2011] Jorge Zukoski. American Chamber of Commerce in Ukraine 46 . Impacts of Climate Change: Ukraine [Online] Available at: http://ukinukraine.usda.Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed 26 November 2011] Met Office.gov.gov/pecad/highlights/2004/12/ukraine%20ag %20overview/index. 2010. Ukrainian Investment perspectives: Credibility and Stability Are Key.fco.fas.

The Atlantic Council of the United States: Corruption.wordpress. 2007. Immediate Online Access http://zaid85. Family business characteristics and management practices: an analysis of covariance study.com/2011/07/13/family-businesses-and-behaviors/ [Accessed 24 November 2011] 47 . Karatnycky.J.Neutze. 01-JAN-04 Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal.. Democracy and Investment in Ukraine. A.

Journal of Management 18. Effective marketing and innovation strategies by gender. age. IESE Business School Gavin Humphries. Charateristics of successful family business. Consumer Targeting in Alcoholic Drinks. Business Insights. price and occasion.(Miguel A.2 (1992)@ 267-294 48 . Gallo and Kristin Cappuyns.Alan Randolph. February 2004. Aug 2010 Robert C. No. ‘Cross-functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project Management’. Ford and W.

K. Ukraine News. Natalia Vershinina. Jonathan S. 2007. 78-101 http://www.com/what_we_do/matrix_organisation_structures. (2010). International Journal of Emerging Markets. p. 1.globalintegration.com/downloads/extra7-11_09. 2010 Rise. 2011) 49 .html Richard L. Martyn Kendrick. Swift.Ol’ga Khmel’nyts’ka. 5 No. Ukrainian corporate culture. Daft. Vol.pdf accessed date 1st December (Assessed on 3rdDecember. Management. avaiavleat: http://mafcon. 9th Ed.

au/finance/minority-stakes-the-pros-andcons. F. Organizations and Society 26(4-5): 419-441 Bibliography 50 .http://www.com/setting-up-balanced-scorecard-concept-forbusiness-hierarchy.com. Explaining management control structure variety: A transaction cost economics perspective. Accounting. R.smartcompany. 2001.bscdesigner.htm Spekle.html http://www.

S. Third Edition.pivnoe-delo. Datamonitor.info/2011/06/03/ukraine-the-beer-market-analysis/) 51 .. May 2011. 2007 Swift.. Published in Association with American Chamber of Commerce in Ukraine. Reference Code: 0199-2015 (http://eng. 2010 Global Brewers.“Doing Business with Ukraine: A Guide to Investment Opportunities and Business Practice”. J. et al. Beer in the Ukraine: consumer choice criteria.

1. Vol. 78-101) http://www. [Online] Available at: http://360. 2010. (2010).php? year=2011&number=1&article=2) Datamonitor. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 5 No.datamonitor.((Ol’ga Khmel’nyts’ka. Country analysis report Ukraine in-depth PEST insights.com/Product?pid=CBB0FBEC-9E52-48458DCB-0AE74E1E519A [Accessed 24 November 2011] 52 .foodmarket.ru/eng/archive. Swift. p. Jonathan S.spb.

2008.Peter R.emeraldinsight.agmrc. International Journal of Social Economics. Vertical Coordination in the Malting Barley Industry: A ‘Silver Bullet’ For Coors? MRC Agricultural resource centre Available at: http://www. 35(9) Available at: http://www..W..com/journals.org/media/cms/coors_6C217F1EDB6E5.htm?issn=0306-8293 [Accessed 24 November 2011] Micheal Boland. Workplace crime and the informal economy in Ukraine: Employee and employer perspectives. Colin C. & John R.pdf [Accessed 29 November 2011] 53 . [Online]. Gary Brester.

Ukraine. World Tax Rates 2010/2011 [Online] (Updated 2011) Available at: http://unrealestates.pdf [Accessed 25 November 2011] 54 .Deloitte. [Online] Available at: http://www.pdf [Accessed 25 November 2011] Tax Rate Guide and Tax Help. 2009. 2009. International Tax and Business Guide connecting you to worldwide information.deloitte.bg/PEST%20Analysis%20of%20Ukraine.com/assets/Dcom-Global/Local %20Assets/Documents/Tax/Intl%20Tax%20and%20Business %20Guides/dtt_tax_guide_ukraine_2009.

Ukraine: Agriculture Overview [Online] (Updated October 21.uk/resources/uk/pdf/pdf1/Climate- change-report-Ukraine-eng [Accessed 25 November 2011] 55 .htm [Accessed 26 November 2011] Met Office. 2005) Available at: http://www.usda.fco.gov.gov/pecad/highlights/2004/12/ukraine%20ag %20overview/index. 2004.United States Department of Agriculture. Impacts of Climate Change: Ukraine [Online] Available at: http://ukinukraine.fas. 2010.

pdf [Accessed 23 November 2011] at: Bulgarian Investment Consulting Agency. Inside Ukraine.bg/PEST%20Analysis%20of%20Ukraine. 2008. American Chamber of Commerce in Ukraine 56 .pdf [Accessed 23 November 2011] Jorge Zukoski. [Online] Available at: http://unrealestates. Ukrainian Investment perspectives: Credibility and Stability Are Key.com.International Centre for Policy Studies. [Online] Available http://www.ua/files/articles/60/42/Inside_Ukraine_ENG_11. 2009. PEST Analysis of Ukraine.icps.

wordpress. Jonathan S. International Journal of Emerging Markets. (2010). Swift. Vol.Family business characteristics and management practices: an analysis of covariance study.com/2011/07/13/family-businesses-and-behaviors/ Ol’ga Khmel’nyts’ka. 01-JAN-04 Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal. 78-101 57 . Immediate Online Access http://zaid85. p. 1. 5 No.

Daft. IESE Business School http://www.html Richard L.com. Charateristics of successful family business.au/finance/minority-stakes-the-pros-andcons.html 58 . 9th Ed.globalintegration. February 2004.com/what_we_do/matrix_organisation_structures.smartcompany. 2010 http://www. Management. Martyn Kendrick.(Miguel A. Natalia Vershinina. Gallo and Kristin Cappuyns.

2001.html http://www.smartcompany.datamonitor. F. Organizations and Society 26(4-5): 419-441 59 .bscdesigner. R.com/ Spekle. Explaining management control structure variety: A transaction cost economics perspective.com/setting-up-balanced-scorecard-concept-forbusiness-hierarchy.htm http://www. Accounting.com.au/finance/minority-stakes-the-pros-andcons.http://www.

International Journal of Social Economics.com/research/4cacf5/ukraine_beer_marke) [Accessed Dec 02 2011] 60 . Market research report 2011 Available at: (http://www.678 Ukraine Beer market insights. Vol. Williams. 35 Iss: 9.Peter Rodgers. pp. Colin C. (2008) "Workplace crime and the informal economy in Ukraine: Employee and employer perspectives". John Round.researchandmarkets.666 .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful